Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Doubles Linux Driver Performance, Slips Steam Release Date

leppi writes "Nvidia has announced a huge increase in Linux gaming performance for their GeForce R310 drivers after almost a year of development alongside Valve and other game developer partners. Nvidia's announcement also indicated the Steam beta for Linux should be out today. Quoting: 'Available for download at www.geforce.com, the new R310 drivers were also thoroughly tested with Steam for Linux, the extension of Valve's phenomenally popular Steam gaming platform that officially opened to gamers starting today. ... Comparing 304.51 driver performance of 142.7 fps versus 310.14 driver performance of 301.4 fps in beta build of Left for Dead 2. All tests run on the same system using Intel Core i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz with 8 GB memory, GeForce GTX 680 and Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit.'" Update: 11/06 21:00 GMT by S : Valve has gone ahead and announced the Steam for Linux Beta. They've sent invites to a number of people who filled out the application, and they'll be inviting more as the test goes along. The beta test is available for installation on Ubuntu 12.04, with support for other distros to come: "We intend to support additional popular distros in the future; we’ll prioritize development for these based on user feedback."

363 comments

  1. Yet another YOTLD estimate by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hardcore video games have traditionally been one of the sticking points against getting PC users to adopt GNU/Linux. But with big companies (Valve and NVIDIA) committed to bringing hardcore video games to the GNU/Linux platform, what else is in the way of making 2013 the year of the Linux desktop?

    1. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nothing just like the last decade.

      For many people the YOTLD was a long time ago.

      I just hope I got selected for this beta.

    2. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ease of use.

    3. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by kirillart · · Score: 1

      dmabuf api

    4. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... the windows 8 interface of course

    5. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ninlilizi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      what else is in the way of making 2013 the year of the Linux desktop?

      The Open source zealots themselves. Ferrociously brandishing huge sticks of self-flagulation against the very thought of their pure and holy shrine being poluted by this closed source sourcery

    6. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nethack is a hardcore video game - all those valve graphics are just fluff

    7. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Clearly you're not scaring the Windows users away.

      So that sort of thing shouldn't be a problem for Linux either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is a pretty good imagination you have.

      Every linux user I know is pretty happy about this.

    9. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny

      ALSA.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    10. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      You could not be more wrong.

      Ubuntu will do it all with shiny pictures for you.

    11. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by cruff · · Score: 2

      nethack is a hardcore video game

      I still enjoy playing nethack every so often. One day my brother had me show my niece and nephew a nethack game. At first they couldn't believe games were so crude in the old days, but then they started getting into the game play after a bit.

    12. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walks like a troll, sounds like a troll, stinks like a troll. Yup, you're a troll.

      Desktop is for preinstalled OSes, most people don't care about what they're running and they never meet the people you are FUDing about. The reality is, Linux owns the biggest machines down to the embedded. It is by far the world's #1 OS.

    13. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Apple. Or even modern versions of Windows, I guess.

      For me at least, the clear advantages of a Linux desktop withered away about 4-5 years ago. Even the price of commercial OS's are almost inconsequential these days.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    14. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extreme buggyness.

    15. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by wzinc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's funny. MS is always touting you need Windows for "real" work, but the only reason I even keep a Windows box is games. I believe there are a lot of /. people out there who are the same way.

    16. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      You could not be more wrong.

      Ubuntu will do it all with shiny pictures for you.

      While I can't speak for the AC, his experience mirrors mine, ubuntu 12.10 with a nvidia 5950 ultra.

    17. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Reality.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    18. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may have meant flagellation. I guess your Windows has a broken spell checker.

    19. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      12.10 with a GTX460.
      Checked the box for the updated versions of the driver and that was it.

    20. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by dimko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean it's too easy to use Linux? I mean... With ubuntu you just pop into it's centralised software database, and graphically install most needed programs from there, while in windows you have to find application in search engine, and actually navigate and download it, and it's not always as easy as it seems.

    21. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      In fact I most recently bought & installed windows 8 just to eke out a bit more gaming performance.

      Its honestly a fantastic OS(for windows) once you get rid of the thing where they try to force you to use a tablet interface with a mouse & keyboard.

      I also keep most of the PC's in my house on Windows because nothing except my router plays nice with linux for some reason.

    22. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By default Ubuntu will use the open source video driver called Nouveau for your NVIDIA graphics card.

      Usually you will see a notification and/or an icon in the top panel, reminding you that restricted drivers are available.

      https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/Nvidia

    23. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Valve can choke twice, once on me and once on steam. I'd rather get an old game I meaingfully own for four bucks than a new game that I don't for the same four bucks.

      On the other hand, I'm quite glad to see nVidia improving driver performance, and I hope that I'll see some improvement myself, with my much older card. I don't need to see performance double to be happy, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just hope I got selected for this beta.

      I wish they had more detailed questions. Or at least announced a larger beta pool. I feel like they'll easily glance over me if I didn't select the right hardware.

    25. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by kimvette · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what else is in the way of making 2013 the year of the Linux desktop?

      • The ongoing trend of saying "RTFM" to every question when TFM is either nonexistent, is written in geek terms a non-sysadmin will never comprehend, or the documentation simply sucks balls.
      • Regligious fanboyism of distro-vs-distro
      • RPM Hell (. . . and RPM is one of the better package managers!!)
      • Lack of a cohesive marketing effort; different projects and distros spend too much time competing and distinguishing themselves from one another rather than cooperating and distinguishing ALL of Linux from Windows as a legitimate alternative
      • F/OSS vs. binary blob holy war: why does it have to be so difficult (from a user's perspective) to get an NVIDIA card working properly? (or to get an ATI/AMD card to work at all ;))
      • lack of working management tools for SAMBA (editing config files and managing samba users via CLI is still the best way) not to mention crappy SAMBA documentation and howtos that are just plain wrong

      --

      --
      Lack of support from third-party vendors and hardware makers (or inferior support where support does exist). I am back tor running Windows almost exclusively on my primary PC (my laptop) for:

          - RAW support for my DSLR (DCRAW is horrible compared to Lightroom or even Canon's DPP raw processing)
          - Adobe CS and photoshop plugins
          - my embroidery machine and embroidery software
          - My iPhone (like it or not, it's a great product but it's tied to iTunes)
          - Games (less work to configure than futzing around with WINE or Crossover or Cedega**)
          - CD/DVD publisher (Bravo SE) at the office
          - Brother label printer
          - SilverLight (Ick. see: Netflix)

        ** now discontinued(?) - which brings up another point: products/projects being abandoned/discontinued seemingly at random

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    26. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      [...]what else is in the way of making 2013 the year of the Linux desktop?

      Gnome

      --
      This is blinging
    27. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you misspelled "Pulse."

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    28. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I buy the games on disk and just enter the codes in steam. If they ever screw with me I can download a cracked executable.

    29. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      I'm happy it worked for you. It doesn't work for everyone... The gui installer didn't even work for me, failed at step 1.

    30. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      RPM is not one of the better package managers. Yum uses RPM, but even that sucks.

      Drivers are easy, its a checkbox in Ubuntu.

      You are blaming an OS for a company shutting down? Is it Microsofts fault when a windows software company dies?

    31. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      By default Ubuntu will use the open source video driver called Nouveau for your NVIDIA graphics card.

      Usually you will see a notification and/or an icon in the top panel, reminding you that restricted drivers are available.

      https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/Nvidia

      Going to be hard to spot that notification icon when the installer doesn't even work...

    32. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not entirely right...

      I only use Windows for gaming AND running Ableton Live.
      Unfortunately wine (even when using wineASIO) is not capable running Live 8 smoothly enough.

      At the other hand, the rest of the music is created on Linux using Ardour, Rosegarden, Muse and Reaper (the last one by using wine) etc.
      Also a lot of plugins work great under Linux.

      As soon as Bitwig becomes available for Linux I have enough power to drop Live and Windows is only used for gaming.

      As soon as enough games have been ported, or otherwise made usable under Linux (a lot of them are already running great using wine) by using the Steam client, it will probably be the end of my last remaining Windows version.

    33. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Steam has so far been a blight upon every system I've installed it on, but maybe they will get serious about software quality and QA on Linux. Heh heh heh.

      My ISP makes downloading warez a PITA. For example they ban bittorrent entirely, and they spy heavily. I have downloaded some cracks, though. I did pay for Half-Life 2 and Garry's Mod before I decided how much I hated Steam...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      $100 buys you a small SSD, 16GB of RAM, or and OEM version of Windows. Two of these will make your computer very pleasant to use.

    35. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      You may think of my comments as a "works for me". Nothing more.

      Why you would want the non-linux users opinion on linux I don't know. I would think someone who actually uses it probably knows more about the topic.

    36. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Steam seems to work fine via wine. That is how I currently use it.

      I don't pirate software so I do not know what my ISP does in that regard.

    37. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If you are going to violate the license why not just pirate windows?

      OEM versions are for you to build a PC that you sell, not one for your own use.

    38. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      I've got about a dozen friends and cow-orkers using Linux now, and all have stated that they find it more usable than Windows). They've chosen a variety of desktops, mainly Gnome2 plus Docky, Gnome shell, or Xfce. Updates are automatic and centrailized, software repositories are built in, and you can generally tweak it to act as you wish, although less so in the last few releases of Ubuntu using Gnome-shell or Unity. A little love from the hardware manufacturers would be nice though. You still run into the occasional rough sport with some hardware, but it happens with Windows as well. I still think Google should put out a nicely packaged version of Debian for people to use.

    39. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      I only keep a Windows box for games. For awhile there, I also kept a Windows partition for high-performance audio using NI's Traktor software.

      Due to the inconvenience of dual boot, I bought a second-hand Macbook and ditched my Windows Traktor setup. The Macbook works good enough, but if I had the chance to do it all over again, I would have stuck with Windows.

      Ever since Vista (of all releases!) I found Windows audio performance to be rock solid at incredibly low latency / buffer settings. I definitely prefer Windows for "real" audio work over Mac, although I may be the only one.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    40. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Bengie · · Score: 2

      Steam has worked flawlessly for everyone that I know.

    41. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by tepples · · Score: 1

      For many people the YOTLD was a long time ago.

      I'm glad that GNU/Linux works for you. It also works for me on my 10" laptop. But I'm sort of referring to manufacturers of desktop and laptop PCs sold in U.S. brick-and-mortar chains, which pretty much always come with Windows unless they're made by Apple.

    42. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      * RTFM: still happens, but not as much as it used to.
      * Distro-vs-Distro: yes, this is still annoying as hell
      * RPM Hell: yea, what? Seriously, when was the last time you got this when you wern't doing stupid things like trying to use SuSE RPMs in Fedora? Likewise with the debian family.
      * I can say nothing about marketing, beyond the claim that all involved in it should die in fires (along with lawyers)
      * Binary Blob holy war: Blame US copyright law. Not an issue for end users, usually.
      * SAMBA doesn't matter if Windows is removed from the picture.
      * RAW image support: we are talking about desktop use, not photo lab use... that said, I agree this should be supported. But it's not holding us back from desktop use.
      * Adobe CS and photoshop? You need to take that up with Adobe. It's not our fault they don't build for our platform.
      * Likewise for your embroidery software.
      * Also likewise for iTunes and your iPhone. You should be able to load music on it, but you won't get the iTunes integration.
      * And yet again likewise for games.
      * AND your label printer!
      * oh, also silverlight!

      Gee, half your complaints are nothing Linux can do anything about. Third parties have to get off their asses (or remove their heads from their asses) and port their own products. The rest is minor shit that isn't holding back anything except you, it seems.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    43. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Karzz1 · · Score: 2

      I just hope I got selected for this beta.

      I could not agree more, however I answered (truthfully) that my distro of choice is Gentoo which I suspect will put me at the very bottom of the list :(

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    44. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by tepples · · Score: 1

      Is it Microsofts fault when a windows software company dies?

      If Microsoft refuses to approve the company's application to run on Windows RT, Windows Phone 7/8, or Xbox 360, then yes, it's Microsoft's fault.

    45. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got a cold sweat and I haven't touched Linux since college

    46. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by dpidcoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The centralized software database is great... until you need a program that's not in it.

      Also, finding and downloading something with a search engine is done every day by pretty much anyone who uses a PC (regardless of OS), so it's not really accurate to include that when measuring complexity of installing software. Having to type a bunch of things into a command line (and then finding out TFM was out of date and everything you types was wrong) is definitely not something that non-linux PC users are familiar with.

      oh, and have fun trying to actually find where the program is with the unity interface (though to be fair, that could just be because I'm not that familiar with it yet)

    47. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by davydagger · · Score: 0

      I'd say don't feed the trolls, but I'd point out your argument makes no sense

      People don't use windows because they want to use windows, they use windows because they either don't know there is an alternative, or don't know how to access that alternative. Even more get tripped up on Microsoft FUD and lies.

      Few, if any make any make an informed decision about operating system choice.

    48. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by davydagger · · Score: 1

      This will certainly help but I think the gnome 3 debacle really snuffed the "year of the linux desktop for 2013"

      in gnome 2 we had a pretty united face of what linux looks like on the desktop. Not that other desktops are without merrit, but it was gnome 2 that was the default install on many distros, and became the "face" of linux. Not only that, it was good at it did.

      Gnome 3 shattered that, with distros starting to make distro specific User eXperiances, albeit with the same libraries, such as UNITY and Cinamon. Then we have a few stubborn gnome shell enthusiasts, as well as a resurgent XFCE with 4.10, and KDE.

      What is the face of linux on the desktop to the casual user?

    49. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trying to find software in a search engine is also extremely risky if you are not technically competent, and results in large numbers of such users being tricked into installing malware. Installing software by hand should be strongly discouraged, and left to people who know what they're doing.

      And you don't type anything into a command line from a website, you cut+paste it which is far less error prone than following gui based instructions...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    50. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Parent is Insightful, not Funny. Pulse's atrocious latency will always make AAA gaming on Linux "feel broken".

      Why people think that having Steam ported helps Linux gaming in any way baffles me though. The problem isn't "we don't have Steam", it's "we don't have any AAA games, period". Steam isn't going to magically turn all those win32+D3D titles into posix+OGL ones, and the market isn't even remotely close to large enough for typical companies to spend ANY time at all porting their product.

    51. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe.

      http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/is-it-ok-to-use-oem-windows-on-your-own-pc-dont-ask-microsoft/1561

    52. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why not use WINE if not Linux native ported games?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    53. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu rarely has bleeding-edge versions of software in its repositories. If you want bleeding-edge anything, or even something not considered mainstream, you still have to go out searching for it and add it and its GPG keys to your sources. That said, screw you Microsoft!

    54. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      The year of the Linux desktop was pundit proclamations and not from those who used, developed, or supported the platform. And ease of use issues are a lame attempt at bashing.

      Linux is very easy to use. Linux is moving along nicely and is headed for the lead position. If you have difficulty using Linux it is perhaps because you have difficulty learning. That is probably derived from the fact that you put so much into learning one OS that you don't want to exercise your brain again to learn something new to you.

      So basically there never was a true declaration of the year of the desktop except from those that loved to mock, and ease of use is relative as Windows and the Mac OSes were difficult to use for their respective user-base when these people first began. We can safely state that any opinion of difficulty is attributable to those who do no want to learn.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    55. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Steam client itself generally works ok with Wine. It's annoying, though, that dragging the main window doesn't work properly - it often doesn't register mouse-up events and follows your cursor around the screen until you can convince it to stop. The games themselves, though, often have conflicting dependencies which means you wind up with several Steam Wine bottles each with their own winetricks recipes to cater for specific games.

    56. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except a lot of the software that is not in the software database is still available as a package from the creator's website (or occasionally linked to from the creator's website). That just puts you back to the "search web, download installer" routine you would be using on other OSes. I don't remember the last time I had to install something with command line tools, that wasn't developer related software that you would need command line skills to use on any OS anyways.

    57. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by dimko · · Score: 1

      No, not really, If I know applications i am goingt to need, i just serach them in GUI tool, and click to install, no browser messing... Most common programs are there in database. Thinderbird/firefox/gimp/vlc/etc. I was talking about GUI only solution, for most programs you don't CLI. And than, apt-get install packagename - even i remember it, and I DONT USE ubuntu. Nothing stops you from using other interface. Gnome/KDE/XFCE. Install them once, use forever. You can even use xubuntu or kubuntu. I agree, Unity sucks.

    58. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by dkf · · Score: 1

      The ongoing trend of saying "RTFM" to every question when TFM is either nonexistent, is written in geek terms a non-sysadmin will never comprehend, or the documentation simply sucks balls.

      Be fair. An awful lot of commercial documentation is just as bad, but with bonus pictures of smiling multiracial actors. Too many damn systems and too much damn software has docs that just do not actually give the information you need. Sometimes, if you're really lucky you'll find a blog posting that describes a half-assed workaround that is now obsolete but which indicates the road to what the workaround is and actually lets you become able to find out how to make things work for a few weeks. Until some moronic dev breaks it again.

      Sorry for bitching. Too much time dealing with badly-documented REST services and frameworks...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    59. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      If you are Joe Blow and dont know how to search and install with apt-get, then you sure as hell dont want bleeding edge anything.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    60. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with your premise that it is nothing Linux can do, and that it is solely the responsibility of the third parties. "Linux has no market share in the desktop soccer mom consumer device space, so those "niche" markets should come over to Linux". Why should they spend their limited resources on such a small market when they have a much larger captive audience in Windows/Apple users? Why can't developers try going into those niche markets and offering their services? Because it's not a sexy product? That's too bad.

    61. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ongoing trend of saying "RTFM" to every question when TFM is either nonexistent, is written in geek terms a non-sysadmin will never comprehend, or the documentation simply sucks balls.

      For the last couple years, I've noticed more the opposite problem: there are too many answers to easy, non-sysadmin questions instead of harder questions. Too often I will search for an error message or other problem, and come across pages of people helping someone for simple problems that generate similar symptoms. I'm not trying to blame such people for making it harder (except for when someone insists you have the simple/dumb problem, when you've already eliminated such cases), but the landscape looks far different from the RTFM trends of yore.

    62. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What specifically is hard to use?

      Now from that list of bullshit you just came up with, which items are actually required to do the end user who using a modern distribution targeted for the desktop user (such as Ubuntu)?

    63. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      Why you would want the non-linux users opinion on linux I don't know.

      For the very same reason that if you wanted to know about Audi's allwheel-drive technology, you'd ask someone who owns a Cavalier (preferably one with a large spoiler and a coffeecan-sized exhaust tip). ;)

    64. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Even RTFM is better than using the Microsoft diagnostics - after 20 minutes clicking various pointless things "MS Diagnostics has no idea what your problem is - you are totally stuffed!" is not really what you want to hear, even if it is said politely.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    65. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Thavilden · · Score: 1

      Performance, primarily. I've heard of people playing WoW through WINE, but this may be a breach of EULA with Blizzard's third party software clause. Last time I tried Left 4 Dead through WINE I got maybe 1/4 the FPS and two or three ticks down in resolution.

    66. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how the "open source zealots" are only effective at scaring people away from Linux in the desktop sector where there's a long standing monopoly in place.

      RMS YOU FOOL!!!! WHAT ARE YOU THINKING!!!! Scare them away from phones too!!!!

    67. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, finding and downloading something with a search engine is done every day by pretty much anyone who uses a PC

      Way off. The number of internet users who regularly install software is consistently measured between 5-10%.

    68. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by antdude · · Score: 1

      Wow, I thought WINE improved in performance. I guess not. I remember trying Codeweaver or something during my early Linux days with Diablo 2. Speed and enhancement losses. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    69. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      This box has an integrated Nvidia chip in it at 6150SE.... when I installed Fedora on it, it used the Nouveau open source driver which is good enough for 2D on the 6150Se but not 3D....but I knew that so I installed the RPMfusion repos with a website click. and then did the following:

      Restart, make sure Nouveau is blacklisted and you're good to go. Unlike with Nvidia's "run" driver, I don't have to worry about Kernel updates either, akmod takes care of that automagically.

    70. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by NotBorg · · Score: 2

      Gee I must be doing it wrong. I installed Linux via a graphical installer and installed the NVIDIA driver without ever touching a command line.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    71. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Zalbik · · Score: 2

      If you are going to violate the license why not just pirate windows?

      OEM versions are for you to build a PC that you sell, not one for your own use.

      That depends. For Windows 8, OEM versions can be used for personal use.

      From: Microsoft

      Q. I am not a system builder, but I am building my own PC for personal use. Can I purchase OEM System Builder software?

      A. Yes. Anyone who is building a PC for personal use with Windows 8 or Windows 8 Pro software can use the Personal Use License.

    72. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      installing NVidia driver on Linux stills requires a shitload of configuration

      To install on Ubuntu 12.04/Mint 13 or older:

      sudo apt-add-repository ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates
      sudo apt-get update
      sudo apt-get install nvidia-current nvidia-settings

      Bingo.

    73. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ask Nokia.

    74. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And i have a box with an nvidia card which when running windows boots into generic VESA, and if you install the nvidia drivers the machine fails to boot at all with a black screen, and you have to boot into safe mode and manually remove the drivers (which requires manual registry hacking)...
      I have no idea how to make the drivers actually work on this box, i eventually gave up on it.

      The fact is there is simply too much varied hardware to support everything smoothly... Windows just comes preinstalled with whatever hacks are required already applied, and most users will never reinstall it themselves.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    75. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm glad that GNU/Linux works for you. It also works for me on my 10" laptop. But I'm sort of referring to manufacturers of desktop and laptop PCs sold in U.S. brick-and-mortar chains, which pretty much always come with Windows unless they're made by Apple.

      I picked up a very current Ivy Bridge PC from Fry's a few weeks ago and after a couple of weeks experiencing and being horrified with what Windows users have to put up with on a daily basis (countless virus nags, disk drive constantly churning, crazy menues, endless reboots etc etc) I booted Ubuntu live off a usb key, it worked perfectly, did the full install and that worked perfectly too. Then apt-get install kubuntu-desktop to put the icing on the cake. Now my OS isn't in my face, it just works. And plus, I've got the thousands of trustworthy, free packages a minute's install away. Blessed relief.

      It's just amazing how far Windows has fallen behind Linux.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    76. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "The Open source zealots themselves. Ferrociously brandishing huge sticks of self-flagulation against the very thought of their pure and holy shrine being poluted by this closed source sourcery"

      If we had more zealots we would not be moving in the direction of computer feudalism where you never own the games and software you buy. While people like yourself may not like them, I hate all the mouth-breathing kids and adults that feed corporations because of their addiction to their software and then justify the removal of our rights to own and modify our own stuff. Think of all the old software that is abandonware that you can't repair, update or modify because of closed source. Tonnes of gaming is lost because of the bullshit copyright laws and software licensing crap of never owning shit you pay for.

      The market simply doesn't work period, since people are too stupid to make good decisions. So you end up with the modern DRM/corporate nanny (getting permission to use software you paid for?) clusterfuck.

    77. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I forgot the most important one:

      User reports a bug or makes a feature request - in regard to a really glaring, obvious issue or shortcoming.

      Developer response: WIll not fix. It's more boring than developing new features. (or) it's open source, fix it yourself!

      Yeah, brilliant marketing there. Way to win friends (for Microsoft and Apple) and influence people (to go back to proprietary OSes)

      In comparison to what?
      MS simply don't respond at all to most user bug reports or feature requests, unless you are a very large customer that's threatening to move to linux.

      Linux developers not only give you a response (albeit not the one you want), but also give you the option of fixing it yourself (or hiring someone else to do so) if it's that important to you.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    78. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Trying to find software in a search engine is also extremely risky if you are not technically competent, and results in large numbers of such users being tricked into installing malware. Installing software by hand should be strongly discouraged, and left to people who know what they're doing

      Excellent advice. And there are also plenty of binaries out there that do come from trusted sources, Opera for example, which does an excellent job of installing smoothly and painlessly on pretty much every known x86 Linux distro.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    79. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would never have been a sticking point if devs stuck to a standard that was usable by everyone and not stick themselves into a proprietary Microsoft only api. Direct X killed pc gaming for anything but windows systems pretty much.

      Now that mobile platforms like tablets and smartphones are taking off like a rocket, devs are finally starting to look at OpenGL again... which has the same or more features as DX and has the advantage that it works on everything pretty much. CPU arch aside, you make a game with opengl and it will work on pc, mac, linux, windows, tablets, phones..... can't say that about DX.

      Looking at that hideous looking win8 and that thing they call a tablet, I don't think they will be on top for gaming much longer. And the thing people don't seem to realize is that gaming on any platform is what drives development, performance improvements and better hardware. If we only used word and maybe spreadsheets, we'd still be on single core cpus with low speeds and probably no video gpus besides onboard. Gaming is why we have 4+core cpus with high clock speeds, better memory and storage, extremely fast GPU's and many other things. Best thing about this? with the gaming populations eye slowly coming to focus on linux, even if just for a moment will mean VAST improvements in various linux systems - kernel and distro that will help games and gaming tremendously.

      And once that happens Linux distros will no longer be the os of the fringe computer power user or system admins in some data center.. it will bring linux into the mainstream. Especially when you can go to buy the newest game release and it has native linux support. I think this is just fantastic and I hope it continues. 99% of all people that I know that I try and get to use linux, ends up always coming down to not being able to play the new games (yes WINE works for alot of stuff but new games are usually not among them.)

    80. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      As a rule of thumb, one can safely ignore any post after the word "zealot".

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    81. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by tepples · · Score: 2

      That was true in the Windows 7 era. PCs that come with Windows 8, on the other hand, ship with UEFI secure boot turned on, and users may need to figure out how to disable secure boot first.

    82. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      The Portuguese Open Source Business Association (ESOP) published a white paper (PDF) which explains the problems laptop manufacturers are facing when trying to introduce systems preloaded with Linux to the market.

      The report analyses the current laptop market with the help of game theory and concludes that it is "bound to a configuration which is not efficient" and does not benefit consumers.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    83. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Your mileage may vary. If you are running a game that uses DirectX (or whatever it is called nowadays) wine will do its best to transform these calls into OpenGL calls. It will emulate the ones that cannot be easily transformed. If you are lucky, performances will be roughly the same but you never know when you will be confronted with the glass reflection effect that suddenly divides your framerate by 4.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    84. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Or because Windows works fine for us and the alternatives lack significant features (like a 20 year library of AAA games) that are important.

    85. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by lattyware · · Score: 2

      Really? How many people have an iPhone where they can only install software from the app store? How is it any different (besides the fact that you actually can install what you want besides, it's just not simple). People get package managers now, because most people use them all the time. Either they'll be happy with what's on offer, or they'll be a power user who can at least google how to deal with it.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    86. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      I think Kickstarter is far more valuable to Linux than Steam in the short-term, in the long-term though Steam will proably be more important

    87. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The difference in drive access is amazing. In windows it's constant, where on a Linux machine running the same software it never even flickers. I'd swear the drive manufacturers pay them to reduce their life expectancy.

    88. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Haha, you're really funny. Try reporting a bug or making a feature request to Microsoft.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    89. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Archenoth · · Score: 1

      That is a pretty good imagination you have.

      Every linux user I know is pretty happy about this.

      I can't say I am... I use Linux not because of the ideology behind GNU, but rather because I have so much more control over my system and I find myself much more productive in it.

      I have no problems with Steam or Valve, so long I can both use the OS I rather and be able to play good games on it.

      It's not like the FSF ideal is going to go away when Steam hits Linux, there will always be the option to ignore it if it doesn't suit you. All people do when they try to push back is limit the choice of other people who may not share the same opinion.

      --
      The arch foe.
    90. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 2

      If you want a specific example of what he was gettting at how about this;

      KDE 4 has no way to set mouse sensitivity graphically.

      You can set acceleration, threshold (amount of movement before mouse responds), double click speed and all that graphically. But you can't set mouse sensitivity graphically. The only way to set sensitivity right now, in the year 2012 is to edit xorg.conf manually.

    91. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Gnome was never going to turn into a desktop that your mom would want to use, in spite of all the political pressure from Red Hat. To Gnome 3 is actually a blessing because it makes it very obvious that Gnome is a dead end. Use KDE, it's fine.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    92. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That was true in the Windows 7 era. PCs that come with Windows 8, on the other hand, ship with UEFI secure boot turned on, and users may need to figure out how to disable secure boot first.

      Microsoft will no doubt get dragged into court over that. Count on the EU if no one else. In the mean time if I have to boot to the bios to switch it off I will, and Linux vendors have various workarounds. Another alternative is to buy Linux pre-installed. Endpcnoise has some fine machines with Ubuntu preinstalled. Their discount for choosing LInux instead of Windows is quite attractive. I call this dying gasp time for Microsoft. They haven't hit the really steep part of the cliff yet, but they will and they know it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    93. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by deek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hear ya. I responded with Debian to the distro question, which I was hopeful was close enough to Ubuntu that they'd sneak me in.

      The funny thing is, according to the beta announcement, "An overwhelming majority of beta applicants have reported they’re running the Ubuntu distro of Linux". I have to wonder how many of those people are actually running other distributions and said Ubuntu, and how many didn't even bother signing up, because it was widely known that Valve were targeting Ubuntu for the beta.

    94. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference in drive access is amazing. In windows it's constant, where on a Linux machine running the same software it never even flickers. I'd swear the drive manufacturers pay them to reduce their life expectancy.

      that's most likely related to indexing for full-text search - KDE users with Strigi/Nepomuk are in my experience no better off than Windows Vista/7/8 users in that regard.

      but you can always turn the indexing service off if you want to.

    95. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Traditional desktops and laptops sold in US brick-and-mortar chains don't make the manufacturer hardly anything. The Windows OEM operating margin into retail is below 5%. The retailers for the most part make about 2%, hoping to sell accessories and software - and marketing incentives from OEMs for shelf space who don't have the margin to improve these incentives. Its actually hard to not make more return on investment than this. Since this year Microsoft is taking away their brick-and-mortar retail software business with their Windows 8 App Store, they're left with accessories - which is not enough money to make the whole thing worthwhile. With good 30%+ margins on software they could keep that boat afloat but no more. There is no profit for the OEM or the retailer, or in the entire manufacturing chain, in a $300 Windows laptop - especially for the department store retailer who could put an earner product in that spot with lower product returns, like basketballs or pillows. The bulk of the profit dollars for that device go to UPS for delivering it when ordered online, or the shipping company who moved the parts around. There are just not enough folk left dumb enough to pay $50 for a 2m HDMI cable (and $20 more for the extended warranty!) to make this work financially for a retailer who must pay rent or mortgage, staff payroll and electric, and tax, to maintain the debt burden taken to get where they are now.

      Since these stores are also suffering from the migration away from physical media based distribution of games and movies, look for more of them to fail or simply close the PC department. Frankly it's long overdue. PC focused stores have been closing for a long time: ex, Future Shop. I remember once long ago standing in front of a CompUSA one cold Thanksgiving morning. As I stared in wonder at its lifeless beauty another customer wandered up and joined me. We were there for a little while admiring the rich storefront with the lights out and I said to him in an awestruck voice: "They close." His reply: "Wow." They have other problems too - the unpleasant customer experience of staff trained to optimize the corporate bottom line to the detriment of the consumer who pays for it all is one.

      The death of the desktop will come quickly now not because Linux or Apple killed it but because Microsoft sucked all of the oxygen, all of the profit, out of its environment. Microsoft is killing their golden goose. Even without this in an era of instant streaming delivery of bits, or next-day delivery of almost anything physical every brick and mortar was going to have trouble.

      This is not the YOTLD. It is the YOTLPT - the Year Of The Linux Palm Top. We have gone mobile and 1.5 million people a day choose to put Linux-based Android in their pocket and compute at their convenience, wherever they happen to be, because they're humans and where they want to be is more important again than the needs of their IT gear now that some IT gear can do its bit wherever the humans happen to be. Half a billion people so far and growing at a half-billion a year, doubling every year - take their Linux-based Android palmtop computer with them everywhere they go - to work, on vacation, to bed, to school...

      I'll make a technology prediction: cubicle farms are dead. As humans take back ownership of their content consumption and creation environments enabled by these fully mobile devices there is going to be a vast tranformation in office space throughout the world. You want to short whatever company it is that makes those cloth-covered office space divider units and buy calls in anybody who makes couches and coffee tables.

      But back to the topic: Steam games was the last thing keeping my oldest son from dual-booting Linux. Now that Valve has gone there he's going to join me on the Linux side in a trial. If it works out he'll use the Windows side less and less until eventually I wean him off the crippled system his mother insisted we get for him. Our younger kids like Linux and And

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    96. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what else is in the way of making 2013 the year of the Linux desktop?

      • The ongoing trend of saying "RTFM" to every question when TFM is either nonexistent, is written in geek terms a non-sysadmin will never comprehend, or the documentation simply sucks balls.

      Another one that bugs me is, "Works fine here." Not very helpful.

    97. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      -1 plain wrong.

      Mouse -> Advanced -> Pointer Acceleration.

    98. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is shown by the failure of people to use iTunes and Google play on iPhone and Android respectively. No way a centralised software database will become popular.

      Phillip.

    99. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amuse me.
      How is "Pointer Acceleration" not equivalent to what is widely thought of as "sensitivity"?

    100. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The ongoing trend of saying "RTFM" to every question when TFM is either nonexistent, is written in geek terms a non-sysadmin will never comprehend, or the documentation simply sucks balls.

      Then pay for support. The forums are incredibly helpful but if you want to ask brain-dead questions where ten seconds of Google could give you the answer then pay for the privilege.

      > Regligious fanboyism of distro-vs-distro

      Uh?

      > RPM Hell (. . . and RPM is one of the better package managers!!)

      Have you used Linux since 1990?

      > Lack of a cohesive marketing effort; different projects and distros spend too much time competing and distinguishing themselves from one another rather than cooperating and distinguishing ALL of Linux from Windows as a legitimate alternative

      Why would they do any marketing at all? People pick and OS and use it because it's good for them.

      > F/OSS vs. binary blob holy war: why does it have to be so difficult (from a user's perspective) to get an NVIDIA card working properly? (or to get an ATI/AMD card to work at all ;))

      NVidia blob works perfectly. The war is about principle.

      > lack of working management tools for SAMBA (editing config files and managing samba users via CLI is still the best way) not to mention crappy SAMBA documentation and howtos that are just plain wrong

      Er never noticed any problems but if you say so.

      > Lack of support from third-party vendors and hardware makers (or inferior support where support does exist). I am back tor running Windows almost exclusively on my primary PC (my laptop) for:
              - RAW support for my DSLR (DCRAW is horrible compared to Lightroom or even Canon's DPP raw processing)
              - Adobe CS and photoshop plugins
              - my embroidery machine and embroidery software
              - My iPhone (like it or not, it's a great product but it's tied to iTunes)
              - Games (less work to configure than futzing around with WINE or Crossover or Cedega**)
              - CD/DVD publisher (Bravo SE) at the office
              - Brother label printer
              - SilverLight (Ick. see: Netflix)

      Digikam, Darktable, Luminance, RawTherapee, etc. There are plenty of RAW photo processing apps. iPhone is a poor product but if you are an Apple fanboi then buy a Mac. For games use Windows, there is no alternative.

      Phillip.

    101. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      -1 plain wrong.

      Mouse -> Advanced -> Pointer Acceleration.

      Read the fucking parent.

      You can set acceleration, threshold (amount of movement before mouse responds), double click speed and all that graphically. But you can't set mouse sensitivity graphically.

      Yes you can set acceleration but ACCELERATION IS NOT SENSITIVITY! Not even remotely the same thing. Acceleration increases the speed the mouse moves as you move the mouse. I like my acceleration at 0. Sensitivity is the speed the mouse moves given the amount of real world mouse movement.

    102. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ikaruga · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Office.
      Not even Apple's OSX could survive without that. If we could just all agreed and adopt the open document format standards then that wouldn't be a problem. But as long as academic papers, banking, government and trade documents use microsoft formats nothing is going to change.
      At least, based on my experience, Word and Excel up to 2007 work great under Wine. Although that is far too much trouble for a freaking word editor.

    103. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      Acceleration increases the amount of cursor movement per unit of real world mouse distance travelled based on the velocity of the mouse. Move your mouse a small distance really quickly and your cursor flies across the screen.

      Sensitivity is purely the amount of cursor movement per distance travelled. It's quite common to have acceleration at 0 and sensitivity reasonably high for gaming. It allows a clear correspondence between the location of the mouse on the mouse mat and the position of the cursor on the screen.

    104. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a history of mental retardation in your family, or are you the first?

    105. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Uhyve · · Score: 2

      With pointer acceleration enabled, move your mouse a set distance across your desk slowly, then try moving it the same distance but fast, and your cursor will move further. Whereas sensitivity just multiplies movement by the amount you choose. I like acceleration turned on (though not in games), but it's not a replacement for proper mouse sensitivity settings, it's barely even related.

    106. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna guess that's it's the RAM and the Windows, since a small SSD would never run any non-hippy OSes.

      Did I win??

    107. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? A release that's only coming out initially on Ubuntu is not "Steam for Linux." It's "Steam for Ubuntu," and if you haven't seen how much utter contempt there's been for Ubuntu and Canonical recently you must have had your eyes closed for the last two or three years. If Steam is only going to be supported officially under Ubuntu then I'll be playing my games in Windows like I always do and booting up Fedora when I really need to get something done. I imagine a lot of people will do the same, particularly now that Canonical is including Amazon's adware built in.

    108. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Rutulian · · Score: 1

      I can only surmise from your comment that you must be using a distro like Suse or Fedora, which is the source of your problems. Suse I've used on and off over the years, and never have been happy with them. Just questionable decisions with regard to configuration, setup utilities, and buggy interfaces. Fedora is definitely not a desktop distro. Every time I give it a try, I run into some kind of ridiculous problem (crashy, graphics artifacts, broken packages) within the first couple of weeks. So if you really want a desktop distro, what you need is Ubuntu. It's the only distro, out of hundreds, that is really focused on desktop usability, and that is why people like me stick with it despite things like unity-lens-shopping. There just isn't a good alternative, or at least I haven't found one. With Ubuntu, most of your list goes away:
      1) No RTFM on the ubuntuforums. I have never seen it.
      2) No dependency hell. Ever. And the PPA respoitories are nice when you are looking for custom packages.
      3) No binary blob or proprietary codec war. In older versions of Ubuntu these were opt-in, but now they are installed by default. So everything works pretty well out of the box.
      4) For SAMBA, what is it you are trying to do? File sharing is pretty easy to setup in Ubuntu. If you are looking to join a domain, then SADMS is what you are looking for.

      As for your other list:
      1) What kind of RAW support do you need. Darktable supports pretty much everything.
      2) Adobe yes, well, you can say the same thing about MS Office or any other proprietary software. Adobe isn't going to sink the development cost into supporting linux when the market just isn't there. So you'll just have to dual-boot for this if you really need it. Ditto for games.
      3) Your embroidery software has a reasonably good chance of working with Wine. I've managed to get a number of simple Windows applications to work this way.
      4) iPhone agreed. This is due to Apple suckiness mostly, though. The protocol has to be reverse-engineered to get it to work on linux. It's being worked on, but progress is slow.
      5) Bravo SE, seems like they have some kind of linux support, but again, without the market they don't have the pressure to make it work. The upside is they do seem to have an SDK, so an interested linux developer could take it up as a project.
      6) Which printer? A number of Brother printers are supported.
      7) Silverlight? Don't expect MS to cooperate on this. They could and it would work with minimal effort, but they won't.

    109. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (same AC)

      I'm afraid I'm unable to move the mouse in small enough motions to not activate this "acceleration."
      Even then, your argument is a strawman at best.

      Firstly, what you're describing here is the mouse's DPI value, this is intrinsic to the mouse itself and the Operating system has no means of controlling or manipulating this, what it can do instead is manipulate the reported coordinates via this "Pointer Acceleration."
      Secondly, even this is irrelevant as Games use RAW INPUT which completely discards any manipulation the system will do to the mouse motions before passing it to the program.

    110. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've actually just started trying out KDE and have indexing running. It's slightly more active than Gnome, but *way* less than Windows. I have indexing turned off on my work Windows machine and it's still far more active than KDE as well.

    111. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      (same AC)

      I'm afraid I'm unable to move the mouse in small enough motions to not activate this "acceleration."

      There's a minimum threshold for acceleration to take effect. Look in your xord.conf file to see this threshold. Small movements essentially have no acceleration. Turn acceleration up full and it'll be the same and acceleration at 0. This is due to the minimum threshold. What you will notice with acceleration turned up to maximum is a massive amount of movement if you move the mouse quickly. Even if you only move it quickly over a short distance.
       

      Even then, your argument is a strawman at best.

      Firstly, what you're describing here is the mouse's DPI value, this is intrinsic to the mouse itself and the Operating system has no means of controlling or manipulating this

      No, the OS most certainly has control over it. You just need to add Option "Sensitivity" "float" to the xorg.conf file. NOTE HOW THIS IS DIFFERENT TO THE ACCELERATION OPTION! What KDE4 doesn't have is a way to change this commonly used property graphically.

      (same AC)

      Secondly, even this is irrelevant as Games use RAW INPUT which completely discards any manipulation the system will do to the mouse motions before passing it to the program.

      Not all games use RAW INPUT. In fact it's quite disconcerting for a game to have a different cursor movement to the OS, especially for RTS games.

    112. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by higuita · · Score: 1

      - Brother label printer

      actually i just configured a brother label printer a few days ago and worked fine with the brother drivers

      but its all the same story.. ask the hardware/software vendors for linux support... If there is no support, dont buy from then any more. just like you dont buy apple only hardware/software to "connect to"/"use in" a windows, dont buy window only hardware/software if you plan to use linux.

      If you dont like all this, if you require all that windows lock-in ... then stay in windows... some people still also use DOS and Macintosh System [7-9]

      --
      Higuita
    113. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Infact the people running other OSes should get a second survey & become 'primary' testers.

      Were the ones who will find (and should accept the fact fixes wont be immediate) the bugs and issues.

      With my Gentoo box I could batch test the application through at least 12 library versions for whatever libraries they are using, in a couple of hours in a chroot prefix just so valve dont have to worry that the next version will break things when its added from upstream into Ubuntu... because it probably was (or could be) in a Gentoo prefix within a few hours of the upstream devs marking that branch stable.

      The biggest reason I keep using Gentoo for development boxes and VMs, is just how easy it is to test library variations... well except for heavily used libraries that lots of other things depend on, but your being naive if your not sufficiently isolate your testing to avoid breaking your entire system when you start trying to play with a new version of things like glibc.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    114. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by smash · · Score: 0

      But back to the topic: Steam games was the last thing keeping my oldest son from dual-booting Linux.

      As any steam using Mac owner will tell you - steam on linux won't bring the entire game library.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    115. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shit. Jumped the gun. My bad. -1 plain stupid for me.

    116. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to myself, but the above comment still stands even if they distribute a binary. I only need to know its dependencies and where it expects files to be (hopefully in standard places unlike some proprietary binaries I've used over the years.) and based on the Mac version, they will compartmentalize the application quite well with per user settings in appropriate folders and such. Valve do seem to respect platform conventions. I just hope they dont ignore the convention of 'openness' that is at the heart of linux...

      Otherwise I wont be able to test it on FreeBSD using Linux Binary Compatibility ;-)

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    117. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by smash · · Score: 0

      Until there's a version of vSphere's virtual infrastructure manager for Linux (or OS X), there's no way I can give up Windows for work.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    118. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The difference in drive access is amazing. In windows it's constant, where on a Linux machine running the same software it never even flickers. I'd swear the drive manufacturers pay them to reduce their life expectancy.

      that's most likely related to indexing for full-text search ...

      Definitely not. This was continuous over the two weeks before I put Windows out of its misery. I'll put it down to incomprehensibly bad design.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    119. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Mint to death (unity interface killed ubuntu for me) But I still can't stand to have to sudo Gedit the bloody Fstab to mount a Nas or a Vbox shared drive because it never seems to work for me.

      That and I'm still trying to understand the logic behind where linux programs install what when you Get a package. Every article on the matter says go to a repository, or blurts out a terminal command, but None explain the logic of what happens when you do. At least on Windows, I know that if I need to find something I installed, the Program files directory is usually the place to look.

      That being said.... Everything else works great and I can't wait to drop windows as soon as humanly possible.

    120. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Well since I'm a Linux geek who never, ever ran Windows on his desktop this is no loss.

      To me receiving an Office document is akin to sucking a sip out of a sewer.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    121. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by smash · · Score: 0

      See this is the problem: As an end user I don't care WHY software isn't available for a particular platform. It doesn't matter. If it isn't available, and I need to use it (or rather, amount of pain to not have it exceeds the pain involved in paying for the other OS platform) then I don't switch platforms.

      For most people the OS platform is not a religious issue. The OS is a platform to run the apps we want to run. If the apps aren't available - for whatever reason - the platform is of little use.

      And a lot more people need/desire raw image support than photo labs. Any noob with a DSLR camera is going to want RAW image support.

      Telling people "oh it's not linux's fault" doesn't make the problem go away.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    122. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See Windows 8

    123. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by quantumphaze · · Score: 1

      Not to argue with your point on KDE missing the option, but for readers who want to know how to do it without editing xorg.conf can use the xinput utility:
      xinput list
      Find your device, (eg: Logitech USB Laser Mouse) and then run:
      xinput list-props "Logitech USB Laser Mouse"
      Alternatively you can use the id, but that doesn't persist through boots/replugging. Change a value with:
      xinput set-prop "Logitech USB Laser Mouse" "Device Accel Constant Deceleration" 1.3
      This makes my high-res mouse slower.
      Mess around with the options until you find what you're looking for.

      Advantage: This can be done on a per mouse basis. Laptops with a touchpad and nipple mouse can customise both and a USB mouse separately. I don't know if you can do that on Windows.

      Problem: This has to be run after you connect the mouse. Laptop users will want to edit xorg.conf. If anyone knows how to have xinput run when a user connects a particular mouse please tell.

    124. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *tears flow* Someone please stabilize Linux audio!

    125. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

      everything you types was wrong

      I see what you did there.

      --
      Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
    126. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Now imagine if you'd bought a PC with Ubuntu preinstalled... do you really think there'd be less crapware on it?

      Try a clean install of Windows 7. Very little nagging to be found. :)

    127. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by eennaarbrak · · Score: 1

      The rest is minor shit that isn't holding back anything except you, it seems.

      ... as the end-user adoption rate of Linux clearly proves.

    128. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      WINE is fine for the most popular AAA games (and software), as long as you're willing to tweak it and cherrypick versions. For my back-catalogue of games, not so much. The number of times I've picked a game off the shelf and looked it up on WineDB, to find that the best it has is a bronze rating for a version 3 patches ago, without one of the expansion packs, and with a version of WINE from 5 years ago...

      Sometimes it's just simpler to keep a native OS installed in a dual-boot or VM somewhere.

    129. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be why most windows systems are infested with malware.

    130. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by XcepticZP · · Score: 0

      We Windows users don't put up with the crap you mention. Must just be your build or your installation. Please try again, troll.

    131. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      oh, and have fun trying to actually find where the program is with the unity interface (though to be fair, that could just be because I'm not that familiar with it yet)

      I don't use the menus anymore, neither in Win7 nor in Linux. A tip: Hit the Windows key, and a live search feature will pop up. Entering the three first letters of whatever you want to launch will usually move it to the first hit.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    132. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You state that installing software based on information from the new (search engine) should only be left to technically competent people, but you consider mindless copy-pasting of commands from the same source to be OK?

      ahem:

      Try this and tell me whether your sound has started working:

      sudo curl http://my.blackhat.website/fixsound.sh | sh

    133. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I use Linux not because of the ideology behind GNU, but rather because I have so much more control over my system

      So, in other words, you use Linux not because of the ideology behing GNU, but because of the ideology behind GNU.

      You know that's the whole point of Free Software: it's freedom for the user (i.e. you). Noone can prevent you doing what you want with it. Noone can take that freedom away. That is the point of the GNU project. IOW you are in control of it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    134. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. On a more serious note.. Pulse is pure garbage.

    135. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by fatphil · · Score: 1

      "DCRAW is horrible"

      I'm curious what I'm missing, as I use dcraw rather than anything else, as Wine isn't available on my powerpc workstation. I looked at the source, and it's totally shit code - I've made it about twice as fast just by removing some of the idiocy - but what else is horrible about it?

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    136. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Google use Ubuntu internally (with a few packages added, a few packages taken away).

    137. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      And in 12.10 :

      * Open the "Software Sources" applet
      * Go to the "Additional Drivers" tab
      * Find NVIDIA card in the list
      * Choose the driver package of your choice (currently I have four options, including the newest main line 304 version and the option to revert back to the OSS nouveau driver)

    138. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      If Valve are involved, then you can be sure that audio will start to receive some love - games need audio (and love) too.

    139. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny. MS is always touting you need Windows for "real" work, but the only reason I even keep a Windows box is games. I believe there are a lot of /. people out there who are the same way.

      Yes, and I also only read porn for the articles.

      Selling expensive toys that look like work-stuff is not that uncommon. Just look at the /. articles about energy effecient cars. There is always a bunch of people that "absolutely need" a large pickup with space for 5 or more adults to be able to.. well.. pretend that they do things around the home that they couldn't do otherwise.

      Some people just can't stand up and say "Hey, I'm an adult gamer, deal with it."

    140. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by RaceProUK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The difference in drive access is amazing. In windows it's constant, where on a Linux machine running the same software it never even flickers. I'd swear the drive manufacturers pay them to reduce their life expectancy.

      that's most likely related to indexing for full-text search

      More likely the continuous defrag (when idling) that started in Vista.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    141. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by antdude · · Score: 1

      VM? I thought VM can't play most of these games? Which VM program?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    142. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The centralized software database is great... until you need a program that's not in it.

      Which is why Ubuntu introduced PPA's. The user clicks on the URL, Software Center pops up and asks the user if they want to add the new PPA (which is a package repository) and off you go.

    143. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The amazon packages are easy to remove and if you are not able to convince steam that your fedora box is an ubuntu machine that is pretty sad.

    144. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That's the fault of the third-party items. The items Linux can solve are not the problem here.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    145. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until companies don't need to customise their applications for every distro... it will never be the year of linux on the desktop.

    146. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Good question; I've never tried, I dual boot. I might be talking nonsense on that front.

    147. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by Archenoth · · Score: 1

      I don't mean the ideal, but rather, the functionality that comes from it. Closed source can be functional as well...

      I don't mind if the software I use is open source or not, provided I can do what I like with it.

      Open is nice, but avoiding "closed but functional" is not really something I can see myself doing.

      --
      The arch foe.
    148. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by davydagger · · Score: 1

      many old games got open sourced, and then got linux ports. DOOM engine is open source and works great natively.

      There is also DOSBox, which runs a FreeDOS in ontop of linux, and plays ALL Dos games just as well as they were meant to be played.

      Many many windows games work in wine, and steam, and the engines associated with it are getting a linux port.

      Linux also has far better native driver support than windows, and the nVidia drivers just got a performance doubling overhaul.

      what features does windows have that modern linux lacks?

      I'll tell you a few windows lacks

      1. a filesystem that doesn't suck. Mabey win8 changed things, but NTFS was old slow, and fail. ext4 beats it in benchmarks hands down. Thats only until btrfs comes out and does things like online partition resizing. Can you even resize an NTFS partition at ALL in windows? No but you can do it in linux. Linux has native read-write support for windows NTFS, FAT, OSX HFS+, IBM XFS, JFS, and quite a few other high end proffesional grade file systems.

      2. a good system for dealing with libraries. Why in hell would windows ever ship without the microsoft c/c++ runtime libraries. you install a program in linux, whatever libraries needed get pulled. They also get updated with system updates. In fact there are not a bazillion diffrent slightly incompatible versions of linux libraries. When libraries introduce incompatibilities they rename the file, so forked versions can run concurrent, and programs link to the one they need to run. Despite the hype, libraries are more standard on linux between distros than they are on windows, between install files.

      3. that gets us to updates. windows uses browswer based active x controls which have proved almost trivial to hack by faking broken as fuck SSL cert system, and all modern browsers are limited to broken TLS 1.0. This is the only means of authenticating packages.

      most major distros going back a long time have used gpg signed packages to authenticate and error check packages that are downloaded.

      Oh yeah, and install third party software usually involves verifying keys and importing the developers repository, so you get the most updated versions, everytime you update, gpg signed, so the work you need to do to keep your system bug free with the latest patches is far far far far less.

      On newb systems like linux mint and ubuntu, there are really great graphical tools that run automaticly that update automaticly, to make sure newbs get their shit updated.

      4. Call me paranoid, but MS has a long standing history of putting backdoors in its software.

      5. Better hardware support. Unless you have some really oddball hardware modern(3.0+) kernels will most likely support all your hardware out of the box. The exception is video cards, of which the three major manufactures of video cards give you some pretty nice options. Intel maintains its own open source drivers for linux on video cards and ALL of their hardware. They are rock solid. nVidia has feature complete official binaries they release, that work on every distro, and open source KMS modules that recompile with almost every kernel, seemlessly with scripts nVidia wrote. nvidia just released a new high performance binary release to co-incide with steam for linux to make it a success.(doubles frame rates). Then there is nouveau, feature complete 2d/3d acceleration rock solid, community maintained open source drives that just hit a 1.0 ABI stable release.

      AMD again has feature complete drivers, and official contributes to the open source project for their drivers. They are slightly buggy on all operating systems, but work.

      Installing drivers on newb distros like linux is easy as an automaticly running jockey-gtk will prompt if you want to install propreitary drivers

      do a clean install of windows. What do you get?

      6. cutting edge graphics and displays. Windows will copy *NIX desktop design elements mabey 5-10 years later. Or 2 in the case of win8 and gnome-shell.

    149. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by smash · · Score: 1

      My point is this: STEAM on any platform is not an instant massive games library. Some people seem to believe it is.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    150. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by smash · · Score: 1

      Mod down? Lol. It is a simple FACT that if you run vSphere, Windows is the only supported platform for the virtual infrastructure client.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    151. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ninlilizi · · Score: 0

      I had that problem for the longest time. But gave it another go yesterday. Ubuntu 12.10, Gnome3, What ever version of wine is pulled in my PlayOnLinux. And it now seems to work flawlessly. Window dragging and resizing included.

    152. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ninlilizi · · Score: 0

      I completely agree with you. That was the point I was trying in earnest to make.

    153. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by ninlilizi · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. How is my choice of word a problem. It's not offensive. And clearly defines somebody who believes strongly in there mission.

    154. Re:Yet another YOTLD estimate by symbolset · · Score: 1

      My point is this: STEAM on any platform is not an instant massive games library. Some people seem to believe it is.

      Fine. I don't crave a massive games library. But when they bring Steam to me, I gained some cool games I didn't have for my platform. Kind of like when Windows Phone users were glad to finally get Angry Birds and Words With Friends long after they were passe.

      Like those Windows Phone users I wasn't ever going to shift my platform to go to the developer so it is nice he is coming to me. It's doubtful I will actually play many of these games for very long anyway. No time for games.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  2. Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it measured in Valve Time?

    1. Re:Today by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      As long as it is not the third anything we will be ok. Since we all know valve can't count to three.

    2. Re:Today by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      At this point, there's a part of me that's expecting to see the third installment of everything from Valve all come out on the same day. Would explain why HalfLife 2 Ep 3 took so long if they had to wait to also have Team Fortress 3, Portal 3, Left4Dead 3 and DOTA 3 in the pipe and ready to go.

      That said, it's not a big piece of me that's actually expecting that though. About 1/3.

    3. Re:Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup, and they'll release them as one package, The Orange Box 2.

    4. Re:Today by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      TAKE MY MONEY PLEASE!!!!

      Valve please be reading this.

    5. Re:Today by Juanvaldes · · Score: 2

      Well this is the third platform Steam has come out for. First Windows, then Mac OS, now Linux.

    6. Re:Today by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shut up, shut up, shut up.

      You might end this right here and now if Gabe sees that post.

    7. Re:Today by tibman · · Score: 1
      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    8. Re:Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually it's the 4th, don't forget the PS3 port that debuted with Portal 2.

    9. Re:Today by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      Hmm, actually first they would need to release second installments in all their other series as The Orange Box 2, then they can put part 3 of every-damn-thing in The Orange Box 3.

      And it'll be released on 3/3/33

      The weird part is that Valve actually do turn out a lot of games - about 1 a year pretty consistently for the last decade. They don't seem to have a problem with making and shipping things in general, just that one game in particular. Maybe they're caught in the trap of trying to beat expectations against a background of continually rising expectations.

  3. Some perspective needed (pun optional) by rs1n · · Score: 2

    I'm sure everyone is also interested in seeing how the performance compares to drivers on other operating systems (Windows, Mac OS X). Is there a link to such a comparison? It helps to put things into perspective. (I'm too lazy to google it =)

    1. Re:Some perspective needed (pun optional) by kav2k · · Score: 3, Informative

      No need to go far.

    2. Re:Some perspective needed (pun optional) by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      However that comparison is based on the old version of the drivers, it would be interesting to see how it performs now with updated drivers.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  4. Steam Programs by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 2

    Since Steam now provides programs, including one that updates your drivers, why not release the major drivers on the platform directly? Take advantage of the Steam (torrent hybrid) distribution method and get auto updates. - HEX

    1. Re:Steam Programs by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How exactly does that work assuming you aren't silly enough to run Steam as root?

    2. Re:Steam Programs by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Same way it does on Windows, asks to install the updated driver and get elevated for that task. Personally I wasn't thinking of Linux, as I game (and mostly work) on Windows. - HEX

    3. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, Steam runs as root on Windows. That's why they have the entire service running "in the background" to launch stuff that is used for updates.

      Frankly, I'd run Steam on linux but only in a chroot. And away from video drivers.

    4. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you want on top of the driver updater? I don't understand your request. Windows Steam already updates AMD drivers when you ask it to.

    5. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under windows, steam downloaded the latest Catalyst, and launched its installer in a separate process, which then prompted me for elevated permissions.

      I don't see what's wrong with windows update, or AMDs own "check for updates" routine, but I guess it's more NIH syndrome.

    6. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. DRM required just to install a fucking driver. Sounds lovely.

    7. Re:Steam Programs by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      At least in its Windows incarnation, Steam doesn't run with admin privileges. It simply, when necessary, starts whatever the installer is with a request for elevation. You get the pop-up and/or username and password prompt(depending on your system settings) and the privileged process does whatever install needs doing while steam continues to chug along at its usual level. Presumably a linux implementation of the idea would work in roughly the same way: Steam downloads the installer package and, depending on whether it is a binary installer or a .deb/.rpm package, kicks up a sudo prompt to allow you to run the installer or your package manager as root.

      That said, the main incentive to have Steam offer GPU driver updates is that the ones provided through Windows update are always ages behind the curve, and having a vendor-specific update-nagging tray object is annoying. On a system with a package manager, there really isn't much point.

    8. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ubuntu already updates the nvidia driver through default repositories.

    9. Re:Steam Programs by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      Steam service runs as Local System which does have some restrictions, while the client itself runs under my user account and would be subject to UAC if I had it turned on. I run my home systems for my convenience, so easy driver updates or all in one programs like http://www.ninite.com/ appeal to me. The places I contract to I never see Steam installed and haven't ever had to worry about it, except to want a better distribution network for my packages. ;) - HEX

    10. Re:Steam Programs by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      not required you could go dig it up on your own if you wanted to they would just be a convenience.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    11. Re:Steam Programs by centuren · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea, actually, so long as it's only an option for those who want it (and not a requirement for either the drivers or steam).

      I think I'd rather have driver updates integrated with my software repositories than with any particular application, however gaming specific it is (which I'd also like to have integrated with my software repositories). Steam coming to Linux, and any effort around it, is a big deal, absolutely. Big because Steam has a serious user base (many of whom think of it as synonymous to PC gaming enough to suggest it distribute drivers), but also because of the source engine.

      I am a Steam user, and have bought tons of games through it. Still, it's primarily just a distribution point. The important thing are the game engines (unreal, crytek, etc). These are what's important, because what the popular game engines support heavily determine what the games can support. A game studio might want to release for Linux, but that often ends up meaning a decision between using a top-of-the-line engine and one that supports OpenGL. Chris Roberts brought this up regarding a possible Star Citizen Linux release, saying:

      We would be happy to support it and the CryEngine srever can run on Linux. The problem is the client side as that relies on DirectX (which obviously doesn't work on Unix). If Crytek can add OpenGL support then I would say, we will do it.

      I look forward to Steam's debut on Linux, and recognise it's significance. I just wish there were more Valve/Source games I liked. Aside from the Portals, nothing comes to mind.

    12. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Steam runs as root on Windows

      No. No it does not. It runs as a service, but not with full permissions.

    13. Re:Steam Programs by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Steam does not require DRM to be enabled. It is just a centralized distribution and management platform that supports DRM.

    14. Re:Steam Programs by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      That Linux comment makes no sense at all.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    15. Re:Steam Programs by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      Steam has asked nVidia and Canonical to provide updates to new drivers more frequently. There is also a program called nvidia-current to bring down current drivers and to install those. Those come from a repo. Maybe with Steam prompting AMD will come out with better driver releases faster too.

      Windows has had video driver checks in software going back over 15 years. Many games would look at your video driver and recommend updates be installed before proceeding.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    16. Re:Steam Programs by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      I believe he was talking about the fact that you were prompted to elevate access control for drivers and installing updates to programs. I don't think he was talking about DRM per se.

      Steam does have copy protection. It always has. It is there to discourage casual copying. What the Steam rep said was that they don't dictate DRM to developers. They can have none or use any amount they want on their own independent of Steam.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    17. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, Steam IS DRM.

    18. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But games distributed through Steam don't have to use Steam DRM. I have a number of Steam games which are DRM-free.

    19. Re:Steam Programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you play them without having Steam running in the background?

    20. Re:Steam Programs by Elbart · · Score: 1

      Oh no, stop it with your facts.

  5. What a Slip! by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nvidia's announcement also indicated the Steam beta for Linux should be out today

    I think Valve's announcement kinda indicated that too.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    1. Re:What a Slip! by stonedonkey · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, Nvidia's press release went out at 6 AM EST. Valve didn't provide this corroboration until 2:30 PM.

    2. Re:What a Slip! by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      That's moot now.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  6. Today Microsoft Officially Died by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This event marks a new dawn of popularity for Linux. This is awesome. So sorry to see you go M$. You have been resigned to the bone-yard of has-been techology companies. Say Hi to IBM for me.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
    1. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by gtirloni · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed. All those dozens of hardcore gamers holding Linux back. Now they have no excuse!

      --
      none
    2. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by bws111 · · Score: 2

      IBM is a has-been of technology companies? Do tell.

    3. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me - how many games does this Steam on Linux thingy have? Can I play Civilization on it? Skyrim? Any other major game releases from this or last year?

    4. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by HermMunster · · Score: 2

      They promise that every single game will be available. It took a while to build up the offering for Windows and Mac. It'll take time to do the same for Linux.

      They also promise that future development will include native versions for Linux.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    5. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      For their games maybe. They can't promise any such thing for everyone else.

    6. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact taht the vast majority of games won't be on Linux for years if ever. In the next couple years I think we'll see a fairly large number of games going full cross platform, but no one but Valve going to go back and make their old games work for Linux.

    7. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Every single game? That's a ridiculous promise, and I doubt they'd be foolish enough to make it. There's two ways that keeping that promise could be possible:

      1. Drop every game that doesn't support Linux. Goodbye to the vast majority of games.
      2. Provide a perfect Windows emulation layer. Although this would make keeping the promise possible, it is, in practice, impossible in itself.

      All Valve games? Sure, I could see them saying that. But all games? No, I'm going to have to call [citation needed] on that one. I'll be very surprised if you can come up with one.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    8. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      IBM is a has-been of technology companies? Do tell.

      IBM rescued itself with Linux. I don't think Microsoft is that way inclined.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by mattso · · Score: 1

      Valve has made no promises about any future games. Or even announcements about future games. Just a handful of announcements about the beta Steam and beta TF2. That's it. And no one at Valve can promise ANYTHING about future development (even Gabe). Every Valve employee is their own boss. Unless people sign up to do the work, the ports won't get done.

    10. Re:Today Microsoft Officially Died by smash · · Score: 1

      The mac offerings are still extremely limited. 1+ years on - and they're also available elsewhere for the most part. Steam being available does not automatically port the game library as some people seem to believe.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  7. OMG could this be by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    the year of Linux on desktop?

    Will the evil Microsoftians interfere?
    Will the diablolical Appleites unleash the dooms day Software and Plastic part patents?
    ????
    Stay tuned!

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  8. Hear that, Microsoft? by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Funny
    That's the sound a one big motherfucking railroad spike being driven into your soft, worm-eaten coffin.

    Music to my ears, baby! :)

    1. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      98% of all desktops run on Windows. Guess how many of that cares about Steam games?

    2. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This time for real! ...

    3. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by collet · · Score: 1

      Probably a fair bit care about games in general.

    4. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      As much as I love Linux and (having to work with it at work, have come to) despise Windows...

      You're utterly delusional.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      98% of all desktops run on Windows. Guess how many of that cares about Steam games?

      All of them?

      Why else would anyone run Windows?

    6. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Wishful-thinking. Delusion is being convince that that's how things'll play out, which (unfortunately) I am not. :p

    7. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      It used to be 98%. It is not that now.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    8. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      Valve strikes Microsoft in the lower body with it's right hand and the severed part sails off in an arc!

    9. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come up with an actual counter-argument or shut up.

    10. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My boss doesnt. My mom doesnt. My grandma doesnt. My aunt doesnt. The cashier at the coffee shop doesn't. The HR bitch doesn't. My coworker doesn't.

    11. Re:Hear that, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. 304.10 won't build against the 3.7 kernel source.. by ktmdms · · Score: 2

    How nice except that 304.10 won't compile against the 3.7 kernel source and nVidia says it will try to get that working by the next release...

  10. Nouveau, Please by ilikenwf · · Score: 2

    I wish nVidia would stop being so protective about it's API's and just work with nouveau. If there's a few bits here or there that must remain proprietary, they could release those with a nonfree license and make the rest open...I refuse to use something with no support for a framebuffer console.

    1. Re:Nouveau, Please by armanox · · Score: 1

      And dare I ask what is so important about the framebuffer console? I hate the high res text console (vga=791 was plenty fine), and not having KMS or whatever setting the console is fine with me.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  11. Re:32 bit ?! by Zan+Lynx · · Score: 2

    I've been running 64-bit Windows and Linux since 2007. Where is this suck you speak of?

    I suppose you could have been one of the sad few who used a Pentium 4 instead of the much better Athlon 64 chip.

  12. CUDA programs by nherm · · Score: 1

    Will programs using the CUDA libraries have increased performance as well?

    1. Re:CUDA programs by godrik · · Score: 1

      most likely not. the implementation of the cuda protocol is most likely not kernel dependant.

  13. Re:304.10 won't build against the 3.7 kernel sourc by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Nvidia needs to get their shit together and at least put some of the driver in the mainline kernel.

    At least all the Source games should run fine on the intel driver.

  14. FPS measurements are useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really - 150 FPS versus 300? No one could ever tell the difference - not even your monitor! I don't get this whole obsession with FPS, especially when monitors can't even do it this fast.

    1. Re:FPS measurements are useless. by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      Really - 150 FPS versus 300? No one could ever tell the difference - not even your monitor! I don't get this whole obsession with FPS, especially when monitors can't even do it this fast.

      Higher frames per second translate in to more frames for physics engines to run, which brings much finer simulation detail.

    2. Re:FPS measurements are useless. by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      But I bet most people can tell the difference between 15 FPS and 30 FPS. Up the complexity, and the rendering slows down.

    3. Re:FPS measurements are useless. by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Add a few more monitors and the difference might be noticable.

    4. Re:FPS measurements are useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you run all of your games single-threaded or something?

  15. Versions on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the linux crowd we are talking about here...

    Ubuntu 12 is such an arbitrary term for a "typical" linux user.

    How about, naming compatibility with kernels and hardware? Anyone could make their 10.10 (with gnome) install appear to be 12.whatever

    1. Re:Versions on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You feel free to support that. No commercial game vendor will do that.

    2. Re:Versions on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it works with other systems, it's just a package targeted for Ubuntu 12.04

    3. Re:Versions on Linux by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Ubuntu is or until recently was the most popular Linux desktop they the number two now one Mint is based on Ubuntu; thus ubuntu is the most obvious Linux flavor to start with. Requiring the current LTS or later is entirely reasonable, especially for beta software. Besides Valve has said if all goes well the will add support for more distros. no need to whine because it wasn't you favorite varient they chose if you don't like it you can always duel boot, try extracting the (probably .deb) package and install it yourself. or you could run it in a VM or any of a dozen other possible ways putting it on your favorite distro.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    4. Re:Versions on Linux by loufoque · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting setting up a VM so that you can install video games that need to talk directly to the graphics card?

      What a funny guy.

    5. Re:Versions on Linux by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      if i recall correctly Linux on Linux virtualization with vmware and virtualbox have hardware openGL acceleration. And windows on windows has dirextX acceleration so it is possible if you have enough ram

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    6. Re:Versions on Linux by loufoque · · Score: 1

      You have a proxy driver that remaps OpenGL calls. Assuming it works (doesn't work so well in practice), this is nowhere as efficient as direct access to the graphics card.

  16. Re:304.10 won't build against the 3.7 kernel sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    3.7 is not out of RC yet, Im pretty sure the nvidia driver has never worked for me without hand fixing build issues on RC kernels. distro's wont adopt 3.7 until a few months later too. Bleeding edge usually involves some pain and tinkering now and again

  17. Re:32 bit ?! by twnth · · Score: 1

    the Nvidia driver is available as 64 bit (listed under legacy and beta drivers)
    Steam has previously said they're starting with 32 bit, and will get 64 bit out later. Hey, its beta. Nothing should be considered final.

  18. trolling much? but I'll bite... by Chirs · · Score: 2

    1) high frame rates in a basic game imply better frame rates in a more complicated game, or at higher resolution
    2) high max frame rates imply a higher minimum frame rate, which is actually noticeable if it drops too low

  19. Re:32 bit ?! by afidel · · Score: 1

    Considering Prescott introduced X86-64 to the P4 in September of 2005 and Cedar Mills made it universal in 1H 2006 I fail to see how your bragging about an Athlon 64 is 2007 has any relevance.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  20. Re:32 bit ?! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    Assuming you install the 32bit libs, seems like it should not be any issue to run 32bit steam on a 64bit OS.

  21. 32 bit OS? by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 2
    Why was this test done on a 32 bit OS with 8 GB of RAM?

    This means that it was running that crappy PAE kernel.

    Far better to test on a 64 bit OS instead.

    1. Re:32 bit OS? by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      ...that crappy PAE kernel.

      Care to elaborate?

  22. 10 % better than Windows by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    10 % better than Windows if the numbers at

    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/geforce-gtx-670_4.html

    can be used straight away (which they possibly can to some extent as Left for Dead 2 probably isn't CPU bound) for GTX 680

    Windows - 276 fps

    Linux - 301.4 fps

    Quite an improvement anyhow!

    Congratulations to all involved!!!

    1. Re:10 % better than Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's classic. That means every hardcore gamer out there that would sell their grandmother for another 10% increase in frame rate will be forced to move to Linux.
      This should be interesting.

    2. Re:10 % better than Windows by amorsen · · Score: 1

      It is not exactly the first time that Linux has beat Windows at frame rate. So far the influx of hardcore gamers has failed to materialize.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:10 % better than Windows by smash · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen because even though STEAM is ported, the library of games isn't.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    4. Re:10 % better than Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? I would sell their grandmother too for a 10 % increase.

    5. Re:10 % better than Windows by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      It's the first time one of the premier game distribution services has been ported to Linux with a 10% performance increase on their most popular games.

      Even if performance has been better on Linux before, there's never been the AAA games collection to pull in the numbers before now.

    6. Re:10 % better than Windows by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      The improvements they made to the engine for Linux also improved the Windows version a little - but still not as fast as the Linux version. I think the edge is about 4% for Linux.

    7. Re:10 % better than Windows by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      10 % better than Windows if the numbers at

      Windows - 276 fps

      Linux - 301.4 fps

      Quite an improvement anyhow!

      Congratulations to all involved!!!

      Can you actually explain what the advantages are of having that extra 10% ? Once you go above 60 FPS you don't get the "stutter" and are actually rendering duplicate frames. So what is the Net gain of additional frames especially if your monitor (60 hz, or 120 hz) can't display them ?

    8. Re:10 % better than Windows by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      "Can you actually explain what the advantages are of having that extra 10% ? Once you go above 60 FPS you don't get the "stutter" and are actually rendering duplicate frames. So what is the Net gain of additional frames especially if your monitor (60 hz, or 120 hz) can't display them ?"

      First, 60 FPS is an average...

      Second, read the following article, http://techreport.com/review/22890/nvidia-geforce-gtx-690-graphics-card/3

  23. Ubuntu 32-bit? by Milharis · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "All tests run on the same system using Intel Core i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz with 8 GB memory, GeForce GTX 680 and Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit."
    8 GB of RAM, and they're using the 32 bit version of Ubuntu ?
    I know it's what Ubuntu is recommending by default, but come on, with the rig they have, why go for 32 bit?

    1. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      32-bit Linux can access up to 64 GB of RAM using the x86-32 "Physical Address Extension" (PAE). The maximum size of a single page is still 4GB, but few processes require allocating that much, anyway.

    2. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Would be even more amusing comparing it against 32bit windows running on that hardware, since it would need to fit everything (including the video ram) into the artificially limited 4gb address space.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The x86 Physical Address Extension feature, which Linux supports, allows for a 32-bit OS to use more than 4 GB across several processes. 32-bit Linux supports up to 64 GB RAM using PAE. Each individual process is still limited to 4 GB, of course.

    4. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by jejones · · Score: 1

      Actually that's not true (about what Ubuntu recommends). From https://help.ubuntu.com/community/32bit_and_64bit: "Unless you have specific reasons to choose 32-bit, we recommend 64-bit to utilise the full capacity of your hardware."

    5. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because with PAE its probably moot

    6. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Beamboom · · Score: 1

      ... But on their download page they recommend the 32 bit: http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop See, "choose your flavour", 32 bit is default selected, with a "recommended" in parenthesis.

    7. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because it's faster? 32 bit memory addresses take less space than 64 bit ones...

      I would never run a 32 bit OS because I need the memory for my work - but a pure gamer might actually be better served with a 32 bit OS. (I'm guessing most games don't take much advantages of >4GB of memory?)

    8. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point and/or are an idiot : (almost) Nobody has this kind of hardware but nobody needs 300 FPS either (especially when the refresh rate of your monitor is probably 60Hz or 120 Hz if you're really rich, and the latency 4ms (~250fps).

        The point is that the proprietary Nvidia Linux Drivers are now On par or better performance-wise with their windows counter parts EVEN FOR THE LATEST AND MOST ADVANCED hardware.

        If the driver can take 100% out of the GTX 680 then it can take 100% of all the 600 series.

    9. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      But games (especially 3D games) are probably amongst those few processes that could benefit from it, being the only thing apart from some very niche apps that consume more than 1.5GB of RAM on my desktop.

    10. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      32-bit pointers may consume less space (unless you start using 64-bit pointers with pointer compression like newer JVMs do), but in general this is offset by the ability to use 64-bit CPU instructions which can manipulate more raw data per clock.

      Most benchmarks show that 64-bit is faster than 32-bit.

    11. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      The wiki page is community managed. The community is more progressive than the corporate side of Canonical who control that download page.

      It may just be an oversight, as well. That page has been around a long time, and it's probably designed for maximum adoption, rather than maximum performance. If you recommended a 64-bit as a suitable replacement for Windows on older hardware which was likely to be 32-bit, the users first experience of Linux would be "I can't run on this hardware....". The 32-bit distro has the advantage of running on nearly everything, including netbooks (of which there are plenty of 32-bit models).

    12. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by loufoque · · Score: 1

      x86-64 has twice the amount of GPR registers and SSE registers.
      It necessarily has SSE2 and other extensions.
      It has a much better ABI, yielding better performance, in particular for everything tied to SSE. It will also allow better PIC, as used by shared libraries.

      32-bit x86 distributions are built for i386, i486 or i586. All of which do not have all the instructions available in your processor. On a 32-bit distribution, essentially everything is built for ancient processors in the name of compatibility, and it doesn't use your processor effectively.

      So no, sorry, but a 64-bit x86 linux distribution will be MUCH faster than a 32-bit one. Anyone installing a 32-bit one is doing something extremely silly.

    13. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by Motormouz · · Score: 1

      32-bit x86 distributions are built for i386, i486 or i586. All of which do not have all the instructions available in your processor. On a 32-bit distribution, essentially everything is built for ancient processors in the name of compatibility, and it doesn't use your processor effectively.

      That's simply not true. A lot of 32-bit distro are build for minimal i586 or even i686. E.g. Ubuntu is build for i686 starting with release 10.10.

    14. Re:Ubuntu 32-bit? by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that's still ancient.

  24. Driver fixes for mobile platforms as well? by colin_faber · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the mobile chips will see an improvement as well? It sure would be nice to watch HD video without huge amounts of page tearing.

    It's gotten better of the years, but it's still a rather large and annoying issue with these chips. Though it could be worse, I could be stuck with an AMD (ati) chipset.

    1. Re:Driver fixes for mobile platforms as well? by loufoque · · Score: 1

      The component responsible for decoding video with the nvidia GPU is vdpau, and it is unrelated to OpenGL driver performance.
      vdpau kind of sucks anyway. I frequently get both better performance and better quality using the CPU.

  25. Re:32 bit ?! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I think he meant AMD64, which is what x86-64 is more properly called.

    64 bit opertons were available in 2003. Intel back then was still touting Itanic.

  26. How? by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can any driver developers comment on how this was achieved? I know I haven't been programming OpenGL for very long, but all I see it doing is writing the data to the card and running the shaders on that data. Data transfers should already be going at full speed, so I don't see much possible improvement there. I also can't see how shader compiler improvements could result in doubled performance. Typically, compiler changes speed things up by a few percent and I don't believe that nVidia's compiler was that bad before. So what was sped up exactly? And frankly, aside from compiling the shaders and memcpying data to the card, I'm puzzled what the driver is doing anyway?

    1. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      happy to answer that one for you.
      I believe they enabled the optimization flags on the compiler.
      The undergrad that had been maintaining the Linux drivers had been wondering what the commented out -O3 thing was.

    2. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Change:

      Sleep(1000);

      To: //Sleep(1000);

    3. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect there would have been some unnecessary malloc/free calls going on, copying buffers instead of passing them around by reference. You'd be surprised how badly that can kill performance when there are thousands (or millions) of calls per second in play.

    4. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a lot more to the driver than just shader execution. Optimizations to OpenGL and Direct3D come in multiple tiers, the obvious in those APIs themselves, then the driver layer, and then in the hardware. The most crucial part is in the driver where it will be deciding what gets sent to/from the graphics card as well as influences which hardware optimizations will be enabled/disabled.

      http://traxnet.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/understanding-modern-gpus-1/ - an awesome read when your curious what each layer of the rendering system on modern computers does.

    5. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The card is actually running software on it and improving that software should speed things up. It is quite difficult to keep a card running at 100% capacity. What you need is to have every single part of the card busy at the same time which requires just the right balance of operations and full use of the to-GPU and from-GPU bandwidth while also performing operations on that data at the same time. It's not an easy juggle to get perfect and a 100% speedup from a first stab to a careful implementation doesn't seem at all far fetched to me, though I'm not a driver developer.

    6. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it had something to do with the multithreaded optimizations change. From what I hear, the driver tends to just spike one cpu core on linux before 310.

      http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?74441-NVIDIA-310-14-OpenGL-4-3-Threaded-Optimizations

    7. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Linux has some fancy memory management routines for graphics cards which can reduce or eliminate memcpy.

    8. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux kernel gets the hell out of your way, whereas Microsoft's tries to interfere with everything you're doing.

    9. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have a very reduced view of all the work the driver has to perform. There are different kinds of resources that have to be treated separately. There's data that gets uploaded once and reused often, there's data that gets uploaded once per frame because it's updated on the CPU, there's things like shader uniforms which cause lots of calls to GL functions per frame... all within the existing infrastructure of an operating system. So I can see that there is easily room for optimization left.

      However, I fear that the speedups aren't actually achieved through honest optimizations but through the - quite common and liberal - application of driver level hacks. Typical windows drivers for gaming second-guess the applications' intents and replace certain draw calls with something completely different, which is faster, but not what the application thinks it does. For gamers, this is fine. But if you happen to trigger these hacks as a developer, you're out of luck.

    10. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphics cards are enormously parallel environments. The short of it is that in comparison with single-thread environments, we are still relatively inexperienced in working with parallel computation. It is enormously easy to stall out the pipeline in lots of little places and have those stalls eat your performance. Keeping all of those compute units fed is still more of an art than a science. So it is relatively easy to have a reasonable job done by "good" programmers be half the speed of your top-end programmers who really know the environment on that specific card. My guess is some variant of that is what we are seeing here.

  27. Steam Game Console by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Additionally, the Steam for Linux Beta client includes Big Picture, the mode of Steam designed for use with a TV and controller, also currently in beta.

    How many more clues do you guys want? The Steam Game Console is coming!

    1. Re:Steam Game Console by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Duh!

      Except it will not be one steam game console. It will be a whole series of them. Think android phones. Lots of vendors lots of choices all running one distro provided by Ubuntu for Valve.

    2. Re:Steam Game Console by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      It is hard to get into hardware. It is costly to fail. Who said there was profit in consoles? And when does Steam's license fees pay enough to support hardware development, production, and maintenance?

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    3. Re:Steam Game Console by bjwest · · Score: 1

      Except when the hardware is pretty much off the shelf. Motherboards are pretty small if you get one with only one or two PCI slots. Valve can throw together a console for very little hardware development other than a case and (possibly) external power supply if they really want. Of course if they go the way Microsoft did with the 360, they can way overspend on custom hardware, just to lock things down.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    4. Re:Steam Game Console by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Mini-ITX with on-board nVidia GPU, Logitech 2.4GHz gamepads.

      Done.

    5. Re:Steam Game Console by JazzVoid · · Score: 1

      Who said there was profit in consoles?

      Probably the fact that consoles are competing with PCs on a videogame market. For end user, consoles are cheap and easy to maintain, that's why people buy them.

  28. Ban BitTorrent and you ban WoW updates by tepples · · Score: 1

    My ISP makes downloading warez a PITA. For example they ban bittorrent entirely

    What does your ISP's representative say when paying subscribers complain about not being able to update World of Warcraft?

    1. Re:Ban BitTorrent and you ban WoW updates by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What does your ISP's representative say when paying subscribers complain about not being able to update World of Warcraft?

      That's a good question. Maybe they whitelist that traffic. They claim it's a problem for their cellphone-derived hardware, though, too many small packets or something. I thought it sounded stupid but not outside the realm of possibility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Also AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    AMD made their graphics drivers open source. This allowed Valve to put in more debug messages and benchmarks into them for testing purposes. This is just as important as the new drivers from nVidia.

  30. Be more specific plz by tepples · · Score: 2

    You appear to claim that "reality" will continue to keep the GNU/Linux environment from becoming a compelling choice for home use after the games obstacle is removed, especially now that Windows 8 is starting to look more like a tablet environment than like the desktop environment that people are used to. Exactly what aspect of reality are you talking about?

  31. Xfce by tepples · · Score: 1

    Gnome? I won't let a lawn ornament stand in the way of my clean PC. I just did sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop and set it up the way I wanted.

  32. When you tried Linux, why did you abandon it? by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why you would want the non-linux users opinion on linux I don't know.

    Perhaps they think that if they ask "When you tried Linux, why did you abandon it?", they can squeeze some insights out of the answers about how to improve the Linux user experience.

    1. Re:When you tried Linux, why did you abandon it? by Qu4Z · · Score: 2

      But you can bet a large portion of that 99% will answer "What's a linux? Is it like a meerkat?"

    2. Re:When you tried Linux, why did you abandon it? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      And then you say "It's like Android but with a desktop like XP." Just enough link from the familiar to the familiar for them to get over their fear.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  33. Re:32 bit ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first Athlon64 and Opteron series were released in 2003.
    It took intel 2 years to release a cpu with AMD64 support, and those P4s were dog slow in 64 bit mode.
    Why? Because intel was still trying to push Itanium.

  34. Cedega by phorm · · Score: 2

    I believe Cedega died because Wine was beating it out in terms of maturity/compatibility. Near the end, many games worked fine on Wine but still had issues in Cedega, so all it had going was a GUI.
    DRM used to be an issue with Wine but most of the games I have that used to have DRM issues work fine now.

    1. Re:Cedega by triso · · Score: 1

      CEDEGA died because the Co. found something more profitable to do,

  35. Re:304.10 won't build against the 3.7 kernel sourc by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    I totally agree with that sentiment. If the kernel boys aren't going to offer some binary compatibility between versions then Nvidia should just write a wrapper for the kernel that calls into the proprietary driver internals.

    Like ndiswrapper but for graphics.

  36. Xfce by tepples · · Score: 1

    What is the face of linux on the desktop to the casual user?

    For anyone whom I introduce to GNU/Linux nowadays, the face of GNU/Linux is Xubuntu, whose Xfce desktop you called "resurgent".

  37. Bring iMac to Panera to update WoW by tepples · · Score: 1

    cellphone-derived hardware

    You didn't tell me it was a wireless ISP. In that case, I wouldn't be surprised if the answer were "if you want to update WoW, bring your computer to the nearest coffee shop." And in fact, this does happen in Panera and elsewhere.

  38. 142.7 vs. 301.4 fps on a 60 fps monitor? by BBF_BBF · · Score: 0

    It's good that performance has increased by greater than 100%, but it does no good if I can't see the difference on my 60 fps monitors, nor anybody elses the top-of-the-line 120 fps monitors.

    Note how the press release didn't state what resolution the game was running at? Was it running at 640x480? (useless, but quite likely) or 2560x1600? (impressive if it were true, but highly unlikely). What were the quality settings?

    Both AMD and NVIDIA play this "numbers" game... whenever a new "performance" driver comes out, and claims "25%" gains for a certain game, it usually means 25% in one specific instance that nobody uses, but you'll probably get 2-5% if you're lucky. :-(

  39. Re:32 bit ?! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Some of us were running 64bit systems in the 90s...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  40. PPC G4 by N_Piper · · Score: 1

    Hai guys can I play in the ancient processor epenne waving contest?
    You know back in 1999 the IBM PPC 7400 "G4" series had 128 bit command extensions so I figure that beats your 64 bit processors twice over!!!
    :-)

  41. Re:32 bit ?! by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    All my Linux machines have 64bit installed. There's no lack of availability for drivers or applications for 64bit in Linux.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  42. Re:32 bit ?! by HermMunster · · Score: 2

    You can get nvidia 64bit drivers from their site. The web page will automatically know you are using a 64bit Linux and offer that version. You can override it and download any version you wish.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  43. In genres traditionally associated with gamepads by tepples · · Score: 1

    CPU arch aside, you make a game with opengl and it will work on pc, mac, linux, windows, tablets, phones..... can't say that about DX.

    Make a game with DirectX and it'll work on Windows. If your company is big enough and its previous games have sold well,* it'll work on Xbox 360 too. In genres traditionally associated with gamepads, Xbox 360 compatibility is a big plus because as I understand it, not a lot of people are willing to buy gamepads for use with PCs, tablets, or phones.

    * I intended this as an approximation of the criteria to become licensed to develop for consoles.

  44. Optimus? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have they changed their stance on their Optimus feature that they infamously said "would never be supported under linux"? For those unaware of it, laptops now ship with 2 GPUs : a small one, low performance and low conso, usually an Intel one, and a high-end one, that is started when GPU intensive tasks are started. Optimus is the undocumented feature that allows to switch between these two.

    It is not supported in the linux nVidia driver, it was said by nvidia official they would never support it and they didn't even give the OSS developers the little hints they need to make a workaround.

    Unless this silliness (that made Linus call them many names) is solved, I am unlikely to buy any laptop with a nVidia board.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:Optimus? by Jthon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or you can see that they were trying to enable it but they want to use the DMA-BUF API to pass the buffers between the open source and proprietary driver but can't because it's GPLed.

      http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIwNDI

    2. Re:Optimus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They have actually indicated that they are working on supporting it, but they are being blocked by kernel developers who don't want the binary blob to interact with the GPL drivers for the Intel card.

    3. Re:Optimus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google "bumblebee". I am typing this on a laptop with Optimus, using it to run two external monitors + internal monitor: internal monitor and 19" screen on Intel card, 24" screen on Nvidia card.

    4. Re:Optimus? by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Optimus is the undocumented feature

      Optimus is most of the time used as a marketing argument to sell laptops with powerful graphics yet low power consumption, so it is hardly undocumented.

    5. Re:Optimus? by xrobertcmx · · Score: 1

      However, even under Windows it is a pain to get it to use the right graphics card. The HD3000 in mine can barely push HD video.

    6. Re:Optimus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There really is no reason for this programmaticly speaking. And every active dev know that.

      Hooray for politics.

    7. Re:Optimus? by loufoque · · Score: 1

      The choice is supposed to be transparent.
      You can probably force to always use one in the BIOS.

    8. Re:Optimus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly Asus did not include that option. I can sort of do that in the Nvidea Control panel

  45. Steam DISTRO? by Zarian · · Score: 1

    I hope this means Valve is also working on their own distro of Linux. (And hopefully it's 64-bit...) In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if they already have something in Alpha.

  46. Try before buy by tepples · · Score: 1

    Another alternative is to buy Linux pre-installed.

    I would, but I don't know of any dealers with showrooms in Fort Wayne, Indiana, so that I can try out a laptop's keyboard and screen before I buy. Mail ordering is fine for desktop PCs, but it has its drawbacks for laptops, tablets, and smartphones.

    1. Re:Try before buy by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Another alternative is to buy Linux pre-installed.

      I would, but I don't know of any dealers with showrooms in Fort Wayne, Indiana, so that I can try out a laptop's keyboard and screen before I buy. Mail ordering is fine for desktop PCs, but it has its drawbacks for laptops, tablets, and smartphones.

      I buy nearly all my electronics online now. I don't think I'm unusual in that respect. My online experience has in general been much better than my retail store experience lately and you just can't beat the convenience. Usually, you can't beat the online prices either, even with delivery. Factor in the time spent travelling to/from the store, parking, getting new door dents etc, and the deal is sealed.

      If you want to know if the keyboard is ergnonomic, read the reviews. I find it especially helpful to look at the photos. Finally, if you really care about ergonomic, don't get a laptop, there is no such thing as an ergonomic laptop. Laptops are pure carpal tunnel zone.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Try before buy by timbo234 · · Score: 2

      It may not help in your case but people in the EU can send anything ordered online and delivered by post/courier ('distance selling') back without having to give a reason within 7 days (14 in some countries). So there's no reason you can't buy online and if something about the keyboard, screen, Linux driver support or anything else isn't to your liking just box it up and send it back.

      I did this with a 1000 Euro ultrabook in Germany that when it arrived I realised had very poor wireless range, in both Windows and Linux. Something only a few of the reviews mentioned and obviously something I couldn't test until I had the thing in my house. I ran the recovery DVD, boxed it up and sent it back to Amazon. Money was refunded a couple of days later (cash in my account, not gift vouchers or any credit) and I bought a different Ultrabook.

      http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_int/safe_shop/dist_sell/index_en.htm
      "Consumer's right to cancel the contract within a minimum of 7 working days without giving any reason and without penalty, except the cost of returning the goods (right of withdrawal);"

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
  47. Becoming a trusted source by tepples · · Score: 1

    And there are also plenty of binaries out there that do come from trusted sources, Opera for example

    So what should a software publisher do to prove its trustworthiness, especially if the publisher is a startup that hasn't been operating long enough to draw the attention of a major distributor like Valve?

    1. Re:Becoming a trusted source by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      And there are also plenty of binaries out there that do come from trusted sources, Opera for example

      So what should a software publisher do to prove its trustworthiness, especially if the publisher is a startup that hasn't been operating long enough to draw the attention of a major distributor like Valve?

      That's your call. The fact that they're shipping a Linux binary is a good start, it's up to you to satisfy yourself that the company is reputable. The thing is, the vast majority of software you need is already available for free in you distribution. You will just be picking up a few "big" items like CAD software or a VPN client. Not scurrying around the net downloading the mp3 player of the week like Windows users do. What an excellent way to get powned.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Becoming a trusted source by tepples · · Score: 1

      You will just be picking up a few "big" items like CAD software or a VPN client.

      That or some indie games that haven't yet been accepted to Steam.

    3. Re:Becoming a trusted source by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Anyway, I misread your post above. It was what should a publisher do. One suggestion: have a credible forum where real people can review the software, complain about it, love it, whatever. Also, try to encourage third party commentary, and link it. Walk and talk like a company whose most valuable asset is its reputation.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  48. Nintendo's 27-year library by tepples · · Score: 1

    Or because Windows works fine for us and the alternatives lack significant features (like a 20 year library of AAA games) that are important.

    A 20-year library would include DOS games and Windows 3.1 games, and 64-bit Windows can't run those without an emulator. On the other hand, Nintendo's Wii Shop Channel has the Virtual Console categories with officially emulated games dating back to the fourth quarter of 1985 when the NES was released.

    1. Re:Nintendo's 27-year library by theArtificial · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, Nintendo's Wii Shop Channel has the Virtual Console categories with officially emulated games dating back to the fourth quarter of 1985 when the NES was released.

      That's pretty amazing, especially if you aren't aware of emulation. Now, if you include emulators which run on the PC (there are titles that come bundled with dosbox so it's point and click, ready to go, available on Steam or GOG.com like Space Quest) you have pretty much all of the systems covered since gaming began. Use a USB controller adapter to enhance the experience with your actual contollers. Bummer you have to rebuy your titles, it would be very cool if you could easily uniquely identify cartridges and unlock what you've already purchased.

      A 20-year library would include DOS games and Windows 3.1 games, and 64-bit Windows can't run those without an emulator.

      Neither can Nintendo, without an emulator.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  49. Consumption by tepples · · Score: 1

    As humans take back ownership of their content consumption and creation environments enabled by these fully mobile devices

    Creation? Good luck entering large amounts of text or drawing things with pixel precision using only a capacitive multitouch screen. Even what some people call "consumption" (which makes me think of TB) is crippled on a completely flat sheet of glass; it's hard to control a character in a platform game without being able to feel where the on-screen buttons are. I'm working on an essay about the implications of using a touch screen as a device's only input device.

    until eventually I wean him off the crippled system his mother insisted we get for him.

    Until companies start selling devices that are crippled in another way: they use cryptography to block execution of software that the device's manufacturer doesn't approve. This is already the case with phones and tablets by Apple and Microsoft, and if they wanted, they could wipe Android off the map of this country with patent lawsuits.

    1. Re:Consumption by symbolset · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I bought the TF101 on launch day over a year ago. It has HDMI output and can drive the same monitors you and I are looking at. I have acquired three Windows cloud desktops through services like OnLive. Through Citrix and VMWare View I have access to an unlimited number of desktops with this tablet. Because my support crew is first rate they support every version of every Windows OS back to DOS 5.1 - and prior versions I can run or simulate locally. Anything your PC can do, my tablet can do. I use it to administer 100+ servers.

      My phone has LTE and hotspot, so I can do this anywhere I happen to be by tethering this old tablet to my phone's wifi.

      My tablet has the dock, so I can attach Wacom tablets, keyboards, mice, trackballs, and even Microsoft's Kinect if I want to. Bluetooth too. Connecting a peripheral to a device is becoming a network problem and the network software guys make short work of that.

      Microsoft's Surface tablet has encryption to prevent loading of alternate operating systems. That would be protective of their OS franchise if Nexus 10 didn't have more storage, a 300 DPI screen, and cost less. Nobody in their right mind would pay more for a Surface intending to defang the prevention of choice implicit in it when they could just buy a Nexus 10 and do what they want without the uncrippling step instead, and also have resolution beyond the limit of their visual acuity.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until companies start selling devices that are crippled in another way: they use cryptography to block execution of software that the device's manufacturer doesn't approve. This is already the case with phones and tablets by Apple and Microsoft, and if they wanted, they could wipe Android off the map of this country with patent lawsuits.

      This is true, but probably in another way than you think:

      In Stalinist Albania, dictator Enver Hoxha threatened private car owners with lawsuits.
      As you say, this wiped private car ownership, private garage ownership, etc. off the map in Albania, and the country was famous for its horse-and-cart economy.

      The keyword here is : "in Albania", just like in your sentence it is "(...) off the map of this country".

      The point to remember, however, is:
      Things would proceed as normal in every other country that doesn't have that artificial economic millstone around their neck.

  50. Re:304.10 won't build against the 3.7 kernel sourc by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    NVidia does have a wrapper. (They had to, to comply with the GPL.) They still can't make a driver that'll work.

  51. Re:304.10 won't build against the 3.7 kernel sourc by amorsen · · Score: 1

    I totally agree with that sentiment. If the kernel boys aren't going to offer some binary compatibility between versions then Nvidia should just write a wrapper for the kernel that calls into the proprietary driver internals.

    Guess how the Nvidia driver already works. AFAIK it has always worked that way. The shim will never be accepted upstream though.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  52. Hardcore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always amused by this concept of "Hardcore Gaming"! It's just gaming. There isn't anything hard-core about it. All the wannabee soldiers etc that think they are playing "Hardcore" need to man up and join the military and get off the couch!

  53. Level of complexity by tepples · · Score: 1

    By "casual" games, I was referring to games comparable in complexity to the sort of Flash games seen on Kongregate, Newgrounds, and the like. I may have committed a misnomer. What's the appropriate term for that level of complexity?

  54. Zero bars by tepples · · Score: 1

    I have acquired three Windows cloud desktops through services like OnLive. Through Citrix and VMWare View I have access to an unlimited number of desktops with this tablet. [...] My phone has LTE and hotspot

    Can you use these desktops while you have zero bars? I can use my 10" laptop while riding the city bus without needing to spend hundreds of dollars per year on a cellular data plan. How much do you pay the telco per month for a cellular plan that includes "LTE and hotspot", and how much more rent do you pay per month to live in a major city that has LTE compared to a smaller city that lacks it? And what do you do when you run out of LTE data allowance for the month?

    My tablet has the dock, so I can attach Wacom tablets, keyboards, mice, trackballs, and even Microsoft's Kinect if I want to.

    Keyboards, mice, and trackballs I'll grant because those devices use class drivers that I know are in Android. But I wasn't aware that tablets came with drivers for Wacom tablets or Kinect sensors. Even the driver for USB flash drives requires rooting on a Nexus 7, and I was under the impression that things like Netflix would refuse to run on rooted devices.

    Nobody in their right mind would pay more for a Surface intending to defang the prevention of choice implicit in it when they could just buy a Nexus 10

    Unless they don't want to have to buy, carry, keep charged, and buy data plans for both a Surface to run Windows RT-exclusive applications and a Nexus 10 to run Android-exclusive applications.

    1. Re:Zero bars by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I have acquired three Windows cloud desktops through services like OnLive. Through Citrix and VMWare View I have access to an unlimited number of desktops with this tablet. [...] My phone has LTE and hotspot

      Can you use these desktops while you have zero bars? I can use my 10" laptop while riding the city bus without needing to spend hundreds of dollars per year on a cellular data plan. How much do you pay the telco per month for a cellular plan that includes "LTE and hotspot", and how much more rent do you pay per month to live in a major city that has LTE compared to a smaller city that lacks it? And what do you do when you run out of LTE data allowance for the month?

      My tablet has the dock, so I can attach Wacom tablets, keyboards, mice, trackballs, and even Microsoft's Kinect if I want to.

      Keyboards, mice, and trackballs I'll grant because those devices use class drivers that I know are in Android. But I wasn't aware that tablets came with drivers for Wacom tablets or Kinect sensors. Even the driver for USB flash drives requires rooting on a Nexus 7, and I was under the impression that things like Netflix would refuse to run on rooted devices.

      Nobody in their right mind would pay more for a Surface intending to defang the prevention of choice implicit in it when they could just buy a Nexus 10

      Unless they don't want to have to buy, carry, keep charged, and buy data plans for both a Surface to run Windows RT-exclusive applications and a Nexus 10 to run Android-exclusive applications.

      I'm a metro critter I guess. Since I got this SGS3 phone with 3G, 4GE and hotspot capability I haven't ever been in a spot where I needed IP network and didn't have it - not even on the slopes of Mt. St. Helens. Not in an elevator with a CIO or CEO. Not in a conference room with Fortune 500 reps. Not in the regular course of business. Maybe now and then on vacation it might occur, but then the phone is turned off so I wouldn't even know.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Zero bars by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I think my biggest issue with all of this is that I don't need or want most of that junk. I'm either at work, at home, or very occaisonally somewhere else where the primary focus is on not using a technological device.

      It's the same reason I don't own a cell phone, let alone a smart phone. At work I have a computer to do everything I need and the same at home. My PC is modular and so a broken or underperforming part can be replaced. It can operate independantly of the "cloud" and so I can game or create content so long as their is electric power.

      The single real advantage that I can see for a tablet or similiar device is the mobility. And given that my lifestyle provides extremely little opportunity to take advantage of that it merely becomes an over priced under performing toy. What I am tempted to buy is a kindle or similiar e-ink device. And my desire for that is driven by the wife's nagging to free up more shelf space for her use to store knick nacks.

    3. Re:Zero bars by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It is very rare that I connect my tablet to anything but the WiFi at work and home, the hotel, store or restaurant that provides free WiFi. On the go I just use the phone. Sometimes I just whichever is closer to hand like now on my phone, over home WiFi. But I do have the phone, and if I want to share something with somebody else, the 10" tablet is a more considerate format, so it's nice to be able to tether. It's easier on the eyes for tech manuals and such too. WiFi 4g tether is awesome.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  55. Re:32 bit ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With not nearly as much software as you have on it now on Windows 7 64-bit nor as likely well-done versions, considering most software gets better as it matures and with as much time for improvement in that timeframe (where on Windows 7 I can run my 32-bit wares 'seamlessly' ala Os/2 Warp-style from way back when, also/to boot, perfectly).

  56. Re:32 bit ?! by smash · · Score: 1

    Yeah all those 64 bit installs back in 2005 really sucked for performance.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  57. will they release an improved android/linux tegra? by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    Lets hope that they can improve the performance of the Tegra drivers used on Linux/Android.

    There have been big improvements in drivers between android releases despite the same hardware.. my guess is that there is still a fair bit of room for improvement.

  58. Re:trolling much? but I'll bite... by Confusador · · Score: 1

    3) high frame rates on high end hardware (and the listed testbed is bleeding edge) imply that it is possible to get reasonable framerates on lesser equipment..

  59. I stopped gaming ages ago.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I may buy and play a few games to show my support for the Linux desktop - next us a witch hunt against Ubuntu however.

  60. How about Steam for Radeon? by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

    I only have various incarnations of ATI/AMD video cards in my laptops and desktops. I have just installed the Steam beta on one of them, running Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit and the latest fglrx proprietary Radeon driver. It's horrible. The Steam window has a really bad flickering, which makes it unusable. I managed to get some games installed by creative guess-and-click to hit the right buttons, but then none of the games run; they give me some error, but I can't read the box because of the flickering.

    So it looks that so far this is compatible with nvidia only. No luck for Radeon users.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  61. Re:32 bit ?! by loufoque · · Score: 1

    What is surprising is that 64-bit is clearly better than 32-bit for performance, and the whole point of the exercise seems to be to get higher performance.

  62. Button layouts for emulated games by tepples · · Score: 1

    Neither can Nintendo, without an emulator.

    I was under the impression that Nintendo tended to avoid "emulation" in marketing materials for Virtual Console so as to distance Virtual Console from community-made emulators that rely on (usually illegally traded) ROM images.

    Use a USB controller adapter to enhance the experience with your actual contollers.

    Emulators can't tell in general which button is in which position on each brand of controller or adapter. This means the user has to set up the button mappings for each PC game or emulator. I'm told people don't have much patience to set up in every single game or every single emulator, and that's why they use official emulators on consoles. In addition, a console is more likely to have a case designed to fit in well next to a television (as opposed to a typical tower PC case), which is important if a game uses offline multiplayer.

    1. Re:Button layouts for emulated games by theArtificial · · Score: 2

      I was under the impression that Nintendo tended to avoid "emulation" in marketing materials for Virtual Console so as to distance Virtual Console from community-made emulators that rely on (usually illegally traded) ROM images.

      Regardless if they call it one or not it remains a software based emulator. It's unfortunate the duration of copyright otherwise these (arguably classic) games might be in the public domain.

      Emulators can't tell in general which button is in which position on each brand of controller or adapter [pineight.com]. This means the user has to set up the button mappings for each PC game or emulator. I'm told people don't have much patience to set up in every single game or every single emulator, and that's why they use official emulators on consoles.

      Even the official emulators have problems with control schemes for multiple platforms (Virtual Console supports multiple platforms, although, not as many as the PC). You have preconceived notions about how Emulators work but your scenario isn't based in reality. Fortunately one doesn't need to keep remapping things per game, once configured for the emulator the profile works for all games loaded. For newer titles Xinput handles things automagically. Most people turn to Google or Youtube when they need answers, and there are plenty of helpful people out there with easy to follow instructions for those not savvy enough to navigate the emulator options on their own.

      All Virtual Console games have their buttons mapped to the respective buttons on the controllers, however, in certain circumstances users can use X and Y instead of A and B, if the original controller does not have X and Y buttons (for example the NES).[40] In certain titles, such as Nintendo 64 games, there may be specific controls tailored to the Classic Controller or GameCube Controller. Nintendo 64 titles that originally provided force feedback via the Nintendo 64 controller's Rumble Pak peripheral however, are not supported by the built-in "Rumble" feature of the GameCube controller despite its capability of doing so.

      The button mapping has become the cause of problem and concern, however. The button mapping is rigid and is not customizable. Because of this, many games are difficult to play. All Neo Geo fighting games have very awkward control schemes and glitches when changed to GameCube controllers. Nintendo has acknowledged this issue but has not put any efforts towards fixing it. (wiki source)

      Pick your poison, Virtual Console with no setup, known awkward controls, and the joy of (re)buying titles OR some setup, excellent controls (especially if you already have originals, also working rumble!), and no out of pocket for titles. People seem to like "free." At least there are options out there, ultimately nothing compares to the authentic experience.

      In addition, a console is more likely to have a case designed to fit in well next to a television (as opposed to a typical tower PC case), which is important if a game uses offline multiplayer.

      Very true. I'd recommend something like an old modded XBOX which lets you rock nearly every emulator and as a bonus sits right next to your TV. One downside is a console also requires an additional investment.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  63. Endorsement much! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Big endorsement by Steam for Ubuntu distro. This could be the start of the "Year of the Linux Desktop", and it has a name: Ubuntu.

    Seriously, the number 1 problem with Linux was it doesn't support games made for Windows (very well anyway). Ease of use it still a bit of an issue, but it has largely been solved over the years. Linux is easier than ever, and people are more technological savvy (well some more are anyway).

    The fact that so many indie game makers use Steam, makes me wonde if those most agile companies won't try to take this market in a big way. I mean it is one thing if you have to compete with the big boys, but if given a distrabution system into a whole new market, where they big guys basically gave up on? Just the compitition it will bring, will make it interesting.

    Anyway I hope it does launch, and is good, as it can only mean better outcomes for all gamers. Imagine if MS actually had to compete for buisness?!

  64. Re:304.10 won't build against the 3.7 kernel sourc by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    It would be if they at least put all the 2D stuff in the shim. What exactly is so interesting about 2D?

  65. Are you recommending emigration? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Things would proceed as normal in every other country that doesn't have that artificial economic millstone around their neck.

    So how would "every other country that doesn't have that artificial economic millstone around their neck" deal with millions of applicants for a work visa?

  66. If it's a show killer, use another WM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to use KDE. This isn't Windows or Apple. You can use a different WM.

    And SuSE, RH and Mandriva all have a control panel that deals with that themselves. You don't even have to use the KDE supplied tools.

  67. Can he run those games without Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not, then Steam is restricting the game's use. DRM.

  68. Re:trolling much? but I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Implied, but not guaranteed. Show the benchmark with lower end GPUs where it might matter if that's what you're looking for.

    I see this nonsense on all the "enthusiast" review sites as well. "LOLLOLO OMGG!1!! AMD CPU gets only 120FPS while Intel gets 170FPS!!111 AMD is teh suxors 4 games!!!111"

  69. Re:32 bit ?! by Zan+Lynx · · Score: 1

    It is relevant because in 2007 running 64-bit didn't suck. The operating systems and drivers were all in good shape by then.

    Unless of course you were using a Pentium 4 in which case most 64-bit operations were the same speed or slower than 32-bit.

  70. Ubuntu bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubuntu has become too bloated and suffers from regressions and breakages whilst android is now a malware magnet thanks to Google's ineptness at anything other than search products.

    I personally use Debian Sid and it's been immensely stable and reliable. Nothing compares to a free OS that works the way one customizes it.

  71. Multiple emulators; non-360 controllers; law by tepples · · Score: 1

    Fortunately one doesn't need to keep remapping things per game, once configured for the emulator the profile works for all games loaded.

    So one profile per emulator, which as I understand it means one profile per emulated platform unless you consider variants of a single platform (such as Sega Master System and Game Gear or Game Boy and Game Boy Color) or platforms commonly included in a multi-console emulator (such as VisualBoyAdvance, which emulates both the Game Boy Color and the Game Boy Advance) to make up one emulated platform. If you have games for several different emulated platforms, each emulator will need it set up once. In addition, each native PC game supporting gamepads will need it set up once.

    For newer titles Xinput handles things automagically.

    XInput works only with the Xbox 360 Controller on Windows operating systems, not with controllers other than the Xbox 360 Controller (such as original console controllers through adapters), and not on non-Windows operating systems (such as the operating system that is the subject of this Slashdot story). From the page you linked: "By supporting XInput only, your game will not work with legacy DirectInput devices. XInput will not recognize these devices." I own an Xbox 360 Controller and have found its directional pad imprecise compared to Nintendo 64 and PlayStation controllers run through adapters, and I seem to remember other reviewers agreeing with me.

    and no out of pocket for titles. People seem to like "free."

    Did the defendants in Sony v. Tenenbaum and Capitol v. Thomas-Rasset like free?

    I'd recommend something like an old modded XBOX

    I was under the impression that building a business around providing "an old modded XBOX" to customers would get one arrested under anti-circumvention statutes.

    1. Re:Multiple emulators; non-360 controllers; law by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      If you have games for several different emulated platforms, each emulator will need it set up once. In addition, each native PC game supporting gamepads will need it set up once.

      I summed this up in my previous post, you can pick convenience or choice. You seem to be against the choice of using your desired input method, why? If people want convenience they have it (why not simply use an original system, best of both worlds, authentic control and convenience of things just working!) I think options are a good thing and the emulation scene is bigger than ever with more games, more emulators, more people interested.

      I own an Xbox 360 Controller and have found its directional pad imprecise compared to Nintendo 64 and PlayStation controllers run through adapters, and I seem to remember other reviewers agreeing with me.

      It's a valid observation and I've encountered this as well. At least there is an option of using the N64 controller on a PC unlike the Wii.

      Did the defendants in Sony v. Tenenbaum and Capitol v. Thomas-Rasset like free?

      Must be why The Pirate Bay is not a popular site any longer?

      XInput works only with the Xbox 360 Controller on Windows operating systems

      Windows is what 90% of people run, especially if you're a gamer, and the Xbox 360 controller is one of the most popular PC gaming input methods. Your argument is about convenience, Xinput makes things pretty convenient. Here is a nice list of emulators including pictures of getting them to work with Xbox 360 controller.

      I was under the impression that building a business around providing "an old modded XBOX" to customers would get one arrested under anti-circumvention statutes.

      Who said anything about building a business? I thought we were discussing playing games many people may have already purchased (especially if you're 30+) and I'm recommending using things most people already have or can acquire cheaply. Not everyone wants or needs to buy a Wii just to play old games when they've got something around the house which'll do the job.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  72. More profitable by phorm · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't be hard.

    Oftimes, when you have to find a new - more profitable - direction, it's because you're not very competitive/good at what you're currently doing.
    When most people can get what they need from a regular Wine install (or sometimes more than Cedega), why buy the subscription?

  73. More work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a joke. I can't even login. I rebooted to Win7 just be sure the user name and passwd were correct. It worked with Win7 not Fedora 16. They have a long way to go.