Slashdot Mirror


The Information Age: North Korean Style

An anonymous reader writes "It seems cell phones and the internet have come to the reclusive nation of North Korea — albeit in a manner that you might not expect. North Korea now sports over a million cell phones, although calls are not allowed outside of the country and text messages come daily from North Korean authorities sporting government propaganda. The internet is not the global internet of Twitter and Facebook, but a government-crafted intranet that is restricted to just a tiny percentage of the population. The intranet is restricted to elites in North Korea with good standing. The intranet uses message boards, chat functions, and state sponsored messages; its use has also been encouraged among universities, technical professionals and scientists, and others to exchange info. An even smaller fraction can access the outside internet. All of this seems to be an effort to control the information revolution without losing authority."

156 comments

  1. A Revolution without Losing Authority? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All of this seems to be an effort to control the information revolution without losing authority.

    Let's just stop and think for a minute about that sentence.

    A controlled revolution isn't really a revolution (unless you buy the propaganda of those controlling it). Furthermore the only "revolutions" I can think of that were actually controlled or orchestrated are coups d'état which is a special kind of revolution. Unlike ousting a former government and installing just a new regime, the information revolution is about fundamentally altering our class system from the bottom up. It is directly applied to the masses and by definition is difficult to control (look at China have fun with that). The reason I balk at the idea that anyone could control this is that you can't even show evidence of the information revolution except by way of anecdotes (just examples) and socioeconomic trends in a vast populace (better). How do you control that which is hard to detect?

    So I don't think you can control the information revolution (hence the reason it's called a revolution, it's happening whether those in control want it to or not). You can either let it happen or you fight it. And I feel like North Korea is doing simply the latter. Of course, the sentence from the summary bemuses me beyond most things I read ... but then again I guess that's also the case with anything I find on North Korea.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by del_diablo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its not that simple. The unwashed masses does not become educated just because they got a education. The unwashed masses does not want a revolution either, if by the time they realize they are unwashed, they are not having a hard time living their live. North Korea is changing, perhaps fighting this change, but at the same time welcoming the change.
      Will North Korea become Best Korea? Well, if it does, the Internet have a problem, I mean, who shall replace North Korea as a meme?

    2. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by durrr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      With the ever present wireless tech availible, and a relatively small country like NK next to super-teched SK, it's only a matter of time before enough information spills over to either forcibly induce change or through cooperation with the leadership.

      SK should put a series of 200 meter high towers with ultra strength directional-antenna open wifi beacons along the DMZ. I mean, why?, the SK soldiers along the DMZ should be able to watch starcraft streams on their phones of course! What?, dirty NK pirates stealing their bandwidth! atrocious, lets put a password("1234") to prevent those dirty thieves from stealing their positively overspecced bandwidth.

    3. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Its not that simple. The unwashed masses does not become educated just because they got a education. The unwashed masses does not want a revolution either

      Oh, the hilarious irony! More? "Is you a unwashed mass, del_diablo?"

      (Played for humor only, I suspect English isn't your native language, although you do a lot better than many native speakers at slashdot! Mi Espanol no es muy bueno...)

    4. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by dintech · · Score: 4, Funny

      who shall replace North Korea as a meme?

      Cheer up, we've still got Iran. :)

    5. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      NK would call SK out for doing that, and quite rightly so. There are ways to help, and actively pissing NK is not one of them.

    6. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Informative

      SK should put a series of 200 meter high towers with ultra strength directional-antenna open wifi beacons along the DMZ.

      Hi, could you take a seat over there? I'm here with BUTU's new reality TV show, "to catch a violator of the laws of physics," and the physics police are waiting outside. I just want to ask you a few questions. Do you think it is appropriate for a /. reader like yourself to just violate the conservative of energy like that?

      (OK, jokes aside, the more gain an antenna has, the more directional it needs to be. Thus, if you had a 75dBi antenna [which would be impractically large for 2.4GHz], you would get amazing range but only in a very tiny area, and otherwise you would have no appreciable reception.)

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    7. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      With the ever present wireless tech availible, and a relatively small country like NK next to super-teched SK, it's only a matter of time before enough information spills over to either forcibly induce change or through cooperation with the leadership.

      That might work for broadcast media; but it'd be a nervy(or foolish) North Korean who operates an unauthorized radio transmitter that would allow for any sort of bidirectional networking... Some radio receivers are noisy enough to detect(see the BBC's old-school TV detector vans); but any transmitter running at useful power, unless using some sort of extremely tight directional antenna, is just asking for a knock on the door...

    8. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by NEW22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And quite rightly so? Hell, NK has a fake city set up that actively blared propaganda into SK via loudspeaker for years. Popped off some artillery at a SK island setting fire to buildings a couple years back. Oh, and kidnappings. That's the easy stuff off the top of my head. For SK to retaliate with free Wi-fi would, in comparison, clearly be an appalling violation of NK sovereignty!

    9. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      who shall replace North Korea as a meme?

      Cheer up, we've still got Iran. :)

      China, don't forget China! Even France can fit the bill if necessary. Come to think of it, pretty much any country other than the one you currently live in will work.

    10. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      They probably already have some form of Wifi along their side of the DMZ, though not necessarily 200m high towers with directional antennae. I doubt any but the highest ranking NK officers have anything resembling a mobile phone, and those that do would not connect to an outside Wifi network for fear of being sent to the gulag. The open internet is reserved for those closest to the few in power in Pyongyang, or at least from what I have read. Kim Jong-un needs his entertainment, right?

    11. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      It probably would violate some status quo and the NK would feel compelled to retaliate in some way, shape or form.

    12. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      SK should put a series of 200 meter high towers with ultra strength directional-antenna open wifi beacons along the DMZ.

      Hi, could you take a seat over there? I'm here with BUTU's new reality TV show, "to catch a violator of the laws of physics," and the physics police are waiting outside. I just want to ask you a few questions. Do you think it is appropriate for a /. reader like yourself to just violate the conservative of energy like that? (OK, jokes aside, the more gain an antenna has, the more directional it needs to be. Thus, if you had a 75dBi antenna [which would be impractically large for 2.4GHz], you would get amazing range but only in a very tiny area, and otherwise you would have no appreciable reception.)

      Maybe not, but 25dbi antennas for 12.5cm are widely available. I've seen manufactured antennae for sale that claim to give 50dbi at this wavelength. In a relatively quiet environment you can get several km from even a 15dbi dipole setup; 25 or 50 would do the job. Obviously none of these are omni, but you wouldn't want or need omni for this application anyway.

      Not that I'm saying I think this is a good idea - but if SK had the will to do it, it probably could be done.

    13. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we all know that's only going to be for another six months before shit goes down. Then what?

    14. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 1

      What this guy said. "Dave420" has clearly been drinking the bong water.

    15. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might be over thinking the word "revolution." Things like the industrial revolution, information revolution, etc., are at the most fundamental level just about a radical change that has wide reaching impact on other aspects of our life. There isn't anything about that requires it to be with or without some form of control, and isn't quite the same meaning as a revolution that overthrows or replaces the government. The nature of the information revolution does impact ability of governments and others to control things, but it doesn't preclude a muted but still wide spread change in paradigms that still are subject to the government's authority. It might make it difficult though.

    16. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work anyway. The people who could actually receive devices are the NK equivalent of 1984's Outer Party. They're a minority of bureaucrats whose job it is to maintain the existing status quo. There's not enough of them to start a revolution, and they probably wouldn't know what to do with one if they did.

      Those people already know the real score anyway. Maybe a not full understanding of how fucked they are, but they have some idea.

    17. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Such as what? Begging them permission to send them food they can't manage to get themselves? I seem to recall Dear Leader turning down aid on more than one occasion because it would have been admitting in some small way that North Korea was imperfect.

      Also, "actively pissing NK" off? They're in a constant state of being convinced the genetically inferior rest of the world is attacking them, no matter what we do. Their country is based on paranoia and xenophobia as much as it is based on love/fear of the government. They're still in a war with South Korea. It's a bit like saying "Don't make that rabid, frothing at the mouth dog angry!" Playing nice absolutely does not get you anywhere with NK.

    18. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      Even at 25dBi, you have a very narrow beam -- I have such an antenna, and aiming it properly is quite a bit of work.

      It is also worth noting that when you hear about long-distance wifi setups (say, 4km, the width of the DMZ), you are usually talking about a directional antenna on both ends and careful aiming. Directional-to-omni is substantially harder, especially when the omni end is transmitting at 1W or less (and a typical laptop or tablet will be transmitting at a much lower power than that). Sector antennas might work, but I doubt it -- not across 4km, and all the North Koreans would have to do is plant a bunch of tall trees in the path of the beam to kill that plan (or just shoot anyone who brings a laptop into the small area where there would be any chance of receiving the signal).

      This is not like Voice of America (which, as it turns out, we do transmit into North Korean territory).

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    19. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1234"? That sounds like something someone would put on their luggage!

    20. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by OakDragon · · Score: 2

      North Korea needs little to no provocation to "retaliate". The normal rules don't apply to NK.

    21. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by Ltap · · Score: 1

      It's simpler than that. People just want to use the word "revolution" to refer to something, regardless of its influence on society (which is what actually constitutes a revolution: a radical change in society).

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    22. Re:A Revolution without Losing Authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason the two Korea's are not plunging into bloody conflict is thanks to the South Korea's constant readiness and restraint. It's not a good situation (seeing friends just reaching their physical and mental peak facing 2 years of compulsory military service) but is a lot better in the short term and arguably better in the long term to avoid conflict.

  2. "Information age"? by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Propaganda isn't information.

    1. Re:"Information age"? by JustOK · · Score: 2

      it's a type of information.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      depends on which side of the fence you are

    3. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is and so is your and my post (fyi i'm on the helping side of education)

      propaganda

      propaganda

      [prop-uh-gan-duh]

      noun
      1.
      information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.
      2.
      the deliberate spreading of such information, rumors, etc.

    4. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better to say it's the movement of information.

      The Internet is the greatest tool of propagation the world has known.

    5. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Propaganda isn't information.

      Really? Gasoline isn't a liquid, either. Welcome to the new reality!

    6. Re:"Information age"? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      In the same way that 'antimatter' is 'matter.'

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:"Information age"? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      As long as your are on either side, because sometimes those fences have barbed wire on top.

    8. Re:"Information age"? by JustOK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Propaganda isn't necessarily false.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    9. Re:"Information age"? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Propaganda isn't information.

      Yes, it is.
      propaganda[prop-uh-gan-duh] noun
      1. information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.
      Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/propaganda

    10. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is information. Information doesn't have to be correct or completely align with reality, it can be false or selectively narrow.

    11. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't sweat it, I think he must be employing irony to devaule the meaning of propaganda so that he can be more successful in using it in future.

    12. Re:"Information age"? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      Propaganda isn't information.

      Repeat that often enough and people might believe you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tion != nda

      Fail!

    14. Re:"Information age"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And complicating matters further, propaganda doesn't have to be incorrect or opposed to reality.

  3. They have to by Clsid · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine what would happen to North Koreans if they allowed access to YouTube? Everybody would like to be like Psy.>)

    1. Re:They have to by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Sure.

      A real revolution.

  4. They should open up to certain sites by Iconoc · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should allow access to the obvious North American news sites. The propaganda is already done for them. No worries ...

    1. Re:They should open up to certain sites by na1led · · Score: 1

      Kim Jong-un News - Chabez News - Obama News; I'm sure there is a lot in common.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    2. Re:They should open up to certain sites by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      In that they all seem to generate a lot of conservative butthurt?

      Obama is a rightist, just not a far rightist deal with it.

  5. Controlled Country by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 2

    And this is what remains from the cold war.
    I'm so lucky not to be born there ... (And I'm not the only one)

    1. Re:Controlled Country by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      and Cuba

  6. Expect unification by udachny · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think in the next 5 years time we'll be observing unification of North and South Korea, all signs are pointing in that direction. The North can provide plenty of unskilled cheap labor and the South will provide the capital, tools and management. AFAIC that's the best way to resolve that conflict, of-course there will be a problem of many high government officials accepting the terms, but I am sure they can be offered cushy enough sinecure positions of power until they retire. Somalia solved their communist problem with a bloody civil war. USSR fell apart and parts of it are reconstructed under authoritarian regime. Eastern Germany became a stone on the welfare system of the Western counterpart. Let's see if Koreans find a better way to deal with the unification process (hopefully they allow for a market solution to it rather than a central planning one).

    1. Re:Expect unification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That comment should be pushed down! SOCKPUPPET for 'roman_mir'. Moderate down.

    2. Re:Expect unification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great job on Somalia's problem solving.

      Oh wait, they haven't even begun to solve their problem with communists, namely Communist Chinese fishing ships.

    3. Re:Expect unification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly are those signs?

      I think that the unification will either take decades, or involve at least one completely collapsed country.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_reunification

    4. Re:Expect unification by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      What market solution would that be?

      Why would the market want to improve the lives of north koreans?

      If bringing up the standard of living for North Koreans is the goal then you will have to go the German unification route and it will cost a fortune. There is no other solution.

      If you just want slaves, then letting the market exploit these already impoverished folks some more will work great.

    5. Re:Expect unification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just down mod the posts that are actually really bad, instead of turning it into some sort of personal vendetta. Just modding everything down will make it look like he is going against a troll, probably motivating him to fight back, or otherwise validate and encourage what he is doing when someone so indiscriminately fights back. It is not like it will do much in terms of destroying his account, especially if you respond looking like an idiot to the better comments, and others will ignore you.

      Instead, downmod the more problematic posts, then maybe you can encourage more desirable discussion. Or you still get ignored anyways, but at least didn't waste your time chasing down all of his comments and looking like an idiot trying to get others to follow. If someone's posts are bad enough anyways, you don't need encouragement to get people to downmod.

    6. Re:Expect unification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unification will not happen anytime soon.
      NK is a broken nightmare world who's entire population suffers from deep psychological damage. A place so completely screwed up that is gets along simply because nobody wants to touch it. Read the stories of people that have escaped. Every single one of them needs years of treatment and most do not integrate well even after that. If you escape, they execute your family (Outright, or via prison labor camp) - Think about that for a while.

      Unification, interestingly, is a strong propaganda message the NK puts out. A bizarre, endless narrative that they'll reunite with their southern brethren very soon (And always under the leadership of the north!) There's lots of NK propaganda available on youtube. Watch it. It's mind-bending and deeply disturbing. A glimpse in dark absurdity that even the most devote dadaist could never dream of.

    7. Re:Expect unification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict the unification (if it happens) will create an even stronger collectivist state.

      I predict the South will tax its productive people to subsidize the North, in an attempt to bring about "equality" to all Koreans

      I predict large government infrastructure projects to link the North and South (again paid for by taxing the productive people, and debt).

      Companies like Samsung will get juicy deals from the Korean government (in exchange for goods and services Samsung provides). They'll become more entrenched while the united Korean government grows in power

      I predict the US and nations of the West will accept this growing united Korean government with open arms. Businesses will sell to this government all sorts of things (things which help the government maintain power, like say... Internet surveillance and censorship tools). I predict the few people who are against this in the US will be called leftist/socialist (even though the Korean government is the one that's growing from all the money the US will be printing to throw at it)

    8. Re:Expect unification by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      uhh..

      That's the obvious solution. do you know what's keeping it from happening? the people in North Korea who have the power in NK.
      Why the fuck do you think they would like to go on a trip to Hague?

      Btw a market solution would be a centrally planned solution - because of the shit they've been upto in the commie-dictato-inherited-crimes(concentration camp because you're guilty by association) Korea. There just can't be an orderly transition from that - those who would face jail and courts for the things they did for the old regime would never go for that, not even if it actually meant that they would eat better.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Expect unification by udachny · · Score: 0

      It will start as a 'Strategic Alliance for Economic Cooperation' of some sort and in the beginning there will be no loss of power among the North Korean political elite.

      The deal will be brokered by China and it will provide a way for South Korean and Chinese companies to employ North Korean labor and except for the salary, there will be various special deals and perks included into this, just enough to save the face of the North Korean leadership, to show how 'great' they are for the North Korean people, etc.

      As long as it is framed this way, it will work and within 4-8 years it will create enough momentum to move towards a more open solution. What will it look like in 20 years? I think more or less like China does.

  7. the PRK intranet is just begging to be rickrolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or goetsed etc

  8. Dear Leader approve this 1980's BBS! by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Leader wish to remind all BBS user that upload ratios be strictly enforced for glory of True Korea and Worker Party!

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Dear Leader approve this 1980's BBS! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Didn't the French have a shitty internet going spare? They should put it on eBay, maybe NK could afford it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Dear Leader approve this 1980's BBS! by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're referring to Minitel?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minitel

    3. Re:Dear Leader approve this 1980's BBS! by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Dear Leader is dead, now we have Great Successor.

  9. Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by na1led · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cheap Tablets with limited 3G bandwidth and full access to the Internet. Let the real revolution start!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Using what wireless infrastructure? You do realize that you need to connect to an Internet-connected base-station in order to access the Internet, don't you? Cell phones/tablets don't just connect to the Internet magically over infinite distances.

    2. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by Gerinych · · Score: 0

      They don't have 3G towers in North Korea... I think. If they do, they're probably being controlled by the government, anyway, so the access is still restricted.

    3. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 3G bandwidth will automatically be limited... to zero. This is NORTH KOREA we're talking about here, ffs.

    4. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      This could be done with satphones but it would require a sponsor with huge financial investment since they're kind of the opposite of cheap.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    5. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know NOTHING of the internet. It's part of all of us. It is a God-Given Right. It has always existed and will always exist. All you have to do is believe. We're all number one and we all win.

    6. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Even if, such a revolution would just end up with more blood, for the blood god, regardless of who won.

    7. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're right! After reading your message I felt a weird sensation all over my body and now there's this new "ArcadeMan" SSID available for my tablet!

    8. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe use even cheaper tablets with no wireless access, but with a 64 Gb cache of the Best of the Internet. I'm thinking Wikipedia, the Food Network recipe files (North Koreans are hungry!), and selected high-quality porn.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    9. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by tgd · · Score: 1

      Cheap Tablets with limited 3G bandwidth and full access to the Internet. Let the real revolution start!

      Who is going to revolt when they're bleeding profusely from the head wounds the tablets caused?

    10. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by na1led · · Score: 1

      You could create a mesh network, like they have done with the OLPC "one laptop per child" . Each tablet connects to each other till it gets an Internet connection across the southern DMZ.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    11. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      That would work great if your goal is to have more North Koreans sent to labor camps.

    12. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      the Food Network recipe files (North Koreans are hungry!)

      What are they going to do, print out and eat the recipes? If you're hungry, it's probably not because you have all the basic ingredients and you just don't know how to prepare them. It's because you don't have the basic ingredients. You don't have rice, grains, sufficient potable water...

    13. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Even worse: using what power infrastructure ? Tablets need electricity to run. And it looks like the majority of north korea has no such thing.

    14. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      look man, sending them recipes is just _CRUEL_.

      that's like finns broadcasting cooking tv shows to estonia during the reign of the ussr... oh wait we did that.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    15. Re:Airdrop cheap tablets like leaflets by pgdave · · Score: 1

      ... it would require a sponsor with huge financial investment ...

      The US Government comes to mind. For the price of a single B1 bomber, they could do that.

  10. NK $p4m by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lulz @ cptl$m. KrlMrx 4eva. Ma0 MTSBWY.

  11. Ooopa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oopa North Korean Style.

  12. Opportunity to sow seeds of discontent? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could this be an opportunity for South Korea (or any other western government) to send their own daily propaganda text messages to phones in NK? All it would take is a fake cell site just over the border, on a (very high) flying aircraft/drone, or on a ship outside territorial waters. Having radio-based technology in the hands of the masses in NK can work for _and_ against the current government.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:Opportunity to sow seeds of discontent? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if only south korea wanted to officially do that.

      the people in south korea who are for waging information war against the north are surprisingly small - status quo is just fine for most of them and they will (even violently) prevent others from upsetting the state in the north in that fashion.

      aaanyhow.. those with cellphones in the north are in the top class that knows that everyone can eat pork in China of all places - they're not the best target for the propaganda.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Opportunity to sow seeds of discontent? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Could this be an opportunity for South Korea (or any other western government) to send their own daily propaganda text messages to phones in NK?

      Why bother? If you want to spread propaganda (or other information) to poor people, radio is the ideal medium. Small radios that can receive AM/MW signals are what westerners would consider nearly free, and MW signals can propagate hundreds of miles. In fact for those near the broadcast can put together AM/MW radios from any scraps of wire, dismantling a pair of headphones is ideal (see: Foxhole Radio).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Opportunity to sow seeds of discontent? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      No argument there, I clearly understand the utility of broadcast radio propaganda. Are typical NK citizens allowed to own SW radios that receive 'Despicable Western Decadent Broadcasts (tm)' ? If not, owning one could get you killed. For a radio to be useful to a propagandist, the citizen has to actively tune in to get the message. Sending unsolicited text messages gets the message across whether the recipient wants it or not.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:Opportunity to sow seeds of discontent? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      They already do that with radio and TV (NK versions only have one or two channels). NK just jams the signals near the borders. From what defectors say, most of their information about the rest of the world actually comes across the border with China.

    5. Re:Opportunity to sow seeds of discontent? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Radios are extremely easy to hide. Just ask the French Resistance... These days they can be microscopic.

      And I'd recomend MW over Shortwave. North Koreans don't generally speak English, so the bulk of available shortwave programming will be lost on them. And with the biggest potential international broadcaster right next door, the extra range really isn't necessary.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Opportunity to sow seeds of discontent? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I agree that radio has a place, but I think you've missed the gist of what using SMS gains.

      For someone to hear an outside message with a radio, they must first know about and want to hear the message badly enough to perhaps risk their life hiding a radio.

      For someone to hear an outside message via SMS, they must only have a 'party approved' cell phone. They don't have to know anything else - the message is pushed to them without their knowledge (or consent), and they can plausibly deny that they wanted to receive that message to their government. Nothing to hide from the NK gov't, no repercussions from having a radio.

      Perhaps send an SMS telling them what frequency to tune in to for further 'truth'?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  13. sport sport sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you like the word sport.

  14. So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the URL? I wan't to sell them some cheap viagra.

  15. best korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    text messages on a cellular telephone? Message boards and chat functions? Dear leader truly is a visionary! How long until the plebs in the rest of the world catch up? Oh they never will because next year North Korea will introduce a phone that has a camera in it! North Korea is the freest most technologically advanced nation on the planet!

    1. Re:best korea by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      It better not have rounded corners or else Apple may try to sue.

    2. Re:best korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, Apple will wait until they violate the bounce back patent and then go after them.

  16. At least they have the right approach by Zocalo · · Score: 1

    Say what you want about the censorship itself, but at least the approach taken by likes of China and now North Korea's is more in keeping with the spirit of the Internet that some of the sweeping proposals coming from the more fundamental groups at the moment. Given that some content and topics are, for whatever reason, prohibited in a given area of the world (and some quite rightly so), I'd much rather have the Chinese / North Korean approach of "This is our section of the Internet, and we'll take responsibility for censoring it as we see fit while the rest of you can route around the damage and do want you want on your section." than the approach being proposed by certain other groups to block the whole lot, everywhere - including where it is a perfectly legal and accepted social norm.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:At least they have the right approach by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 1

      It's just because they know blocking everyone else is more difficult. They'd even attempt world domination if they believed they could.

  17. An entire country imprisoned/brainwashed by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine, an *entire country* held captive and being brainwashed by political media. I hear North Korea is pretty bad too.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:An entire country imprisoned/brainwashed by na1led · · Score: 1

      I don't need to imagine it, I'm already living it.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    2. Re:An entire country imprisoned/brainwashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can point it out like that, it's not true. When you post stuff like that AC, we're edging in that direction. When you stop posting anything at all, except what your job might require, then we're there.

    3. Re:An entire country imprisoned/brainwashed by jittles · · Score: 1

      Why can we not keep up with the technological advances of the Great Leader of NK? I mean, this is the future of the internet, is it not? So why are they getting it before us?

    4. Re:An entire country imprisoned/brainwashed by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder what country you are referencing. Because it couldn't possibly be the US. Unless, of course, you live outside the US and, like many foreigners, assume all of us are FoxNews-watching, shotgun-carrying, truck-driving, rednecks, hellbent on destroying every nation on earth that isn't us. But hey, believe whatever you want.

  18. Intranet? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

    An intranet reminds me of the good old days. Maybe NK should install Banyan Vines. Then they could have the B-mail snowball effect:

    To: "*@*@*"
    LUNCH BAG
    Somebody left their lunch bag in the break room 2432.

    To "*@*@*"
    Re: LUNCH BAG
    Don't send messages to *@*@*!

    To "*@*@*"
    Re: Re: LUNCH BAG
    Hey you stupid people, never Reply All to *@*@*!!!

    To "*@*@*"
    Re: LUNCH BAG
    I'm in the Singapore office. Where is this room 2432 you speak of?

    To "*@*@*"
    Re: LUNCH BAG
    Hey you people, knock it off!

    <strained 80286-based servers crash>

  19. I don't have to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine, an *entire country* held captive and being brainwashed by political media.

    We've all seen this exact phenomenon happen in full force earlier this week.

    Fuck the FSA.

  20. Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's no coincidence that all the major media players use exactly the same words to describe events. Case in point? The description of the election was "razor tight" was repeated everywhere. Now if this were a commonly used expression, I wouldn't have noticed. But this is a ridiculous and meaningless expression. what is "tight" about a razor? Nothing. Razors are sharp. Razors are thin. Razors are not "tight." But that the media repeated this across the board says a lot to me.

    It says they are there to repeat what they are told to say and to use that repetition to drive the masses to think and believe in particular ways. And of course it works...

    "Support the troops!" Right? It doesn't mean what I think it should mean. Of course it *does* mean that we don't reject them when they return from tours of destruction and unaccounted for "collateral damage" which may or may not include the killing of children or other innocents. It means we don't blame them for doing what they were told... or even if they were doing more than they were told. (Really, we don't know what they were told to do.) But that it should mean is that wounded fighters should have their lives taken care of for the rest of their lives... you know, like the congressmen, senators and presidents who sent them off into harm's way to do their bidding in persuit of their agenda. We don't do that. Our government has no interest in doing that. No one actually supports the troops in any meaningful way... in fact, on Veteran's day, the one "holiday" where *I* (a veteran of the first Iraq 'thing') should get recognized and the day off and all that, I don't. Who does? Banks, the postal service, some schools... Not me though.

    "Support the troops!" means something else. It actually means "support our agenda unquestioningly" and that is exactly what has been happening.

    1. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the wool is slowly and forcefully being lifted, the question is, will anyone actually notice to a percentage degree that will actually matter?

    2. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Eevee · · Score: 2

      I think it's no coincidence that all the major media players use exactly the same words to describe events. Case in point? The description of the election was "razor tight" was repeated everywhere. Now if this were a commonly used expression, I wouldn't have noticed.

      According to Google, there are about 16,400,000 results for "razor thin" and about 10,300,000 results for "razor tight". So "razor tight" doesn't appear to be all that obscure.

      But this is a ridiculous and meaningless expression. what is "tight" about a razor? Nothing. Razors are sharp. Razors are thin. Razors are not "tight."

      Now, you're right, razors are not "tight". But in this context, tight isn't modifying razor, razor is modifying tight.It's a tight race. How tight? So tight that the margin is a razor-blade's thickness. (Here's a hint: try dropping one of the words and see what happens.)

      But that the media repeated this across the board says a lot to me.

      Now, did it say "people pick up phrases from each other" or did it say "it's time to up my medications again'?

    3. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really bothered me how, when refering to the trails for Guantanamo Bay captives, not a single outlet mentioned that they were using military tribunals instead of real trials. There is something very wrong with our country's media.

    4. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Nah, it means support OUR troops, as it means those troops are OUR people,as in our brothers, sons, boyfriends, and husbands who are over there. It's easy to misconstrue this, especially if you are in the elite class who does not know anyone in the military. Quick question: how many of your high school classmates joined up? Oh, they didn't? Ah, now we begin to see the inconsistency. The politicians decide when and where our soldiers go to war. You don't like the war, then vote the politicians out of office. It can by no means be considered the fault of the warrior, upon whose head you seem to be all to eager to lay all the blame.

      For what it's worth, the "support our troops" movement grew directly out of the Vietnam War experience. The American body politic held the troops directly responsible for everything that happened there. This, even though Robert McNamara (the chief villain behind the war) wrote a book basically saying, "yeah the whole thing was my fault, my bad, I promise not to do it again, I learned my lesson."

      But fuck that, eh? It's much more satisfying to lay the blame on the individual soldiers who were given impossible missions. Blame the doers, not the deciders. After all, the doers are the powerless, and it's fun to shit all over them. The deciders? Heck, if I blame them, then I might not be allowed to join them! Fuck that noise. Meet the returning soldiers at the airport and spit on them. That's the correct way!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Use quotes. For "razor tight" with quotes, I get 18,800 results. Nearly every result on the first page is discussing what a weird term "razor tight" is for the media to have seized upon.

      For comparison, "razor thin", with quotes, has 1,460,000 results.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You don't like the war, then vote the politicians out of office. It can by no means be considered the fault of the warrior, upon whose head you seem to be all to eager to lay all the blame.

      No. The troops made the choice to join the military. They either knew, or should have known that they would be used as nothing but tools to make the world safe for Goldman Sachs. You don't sign up to be an enforcer for the largest criminal organization in the world and not shoulder some of the blame for the crimes you commit.

      Are the troops powerless? Hell no. They have the power to decide not to sign up, and they made the wrong choice. Fuck them all.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Colven · · Score: 1

      puh... I was so busy being bludgeoned with "get-out-the-vote" that I never got to hear "razor-tight!" :(

      --
      expletives welcomed
    8. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow thanks for opening my mind, I was wondering why people often start to wear the same kind of clothes at the same time, now I know, it's the government that tells them what to wear !!!
      I guess that's the same for all the buzzwords like cloud computing, web 2.0 ... The goverment is really everywhere !
      Thanks for relvealing this consparacy mate :)

    9. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by mha · · Score: 1

      You lack something called "insight" and "empathy", OR you are the only person who does not know that for MANY Americans joining the military is their ONLY chance to get a good education and a chance to a reasonable life. Sure, it's THEIR fault that they joined, they could have done what I did and get a great university education (free in my case, Germany - I did live in the US for more than 7 yrs too) to earn lots of money (IT, programming). If they did not do that, it MUST be THEIR FAULT. Yeah, right.

    10. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by JigJag · · Score: 1

      "Support the troops!" means something else. It actually means "support our agenda unquestioningly" and that is exactly what has been happening.

      Glad to see that coming from someone who was in the middle of it.

      Changing (twisting?) the meaning of words is no new feat. Of course most people would think of Orwell's newspeak when discussing this point, but did you know that it was mentioned way earlier by a French revolutionary named Jean-Paul Marat in his book "Chains of Slavery" published in 1774?

      Here's a link to the book in English: http://www.jpmarat.de/english/jpmie.html. It details the process to Tyranny as a warning example.
      Unfortunately, the interesting part is not found in the English version, rather in the French, found at: http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/marat_jean_paul/chaines_esclavage/marat_chaines_esclavage.pdf (PDF)

      In particular, you want to read section 53 of the French version: "Adulterating the nature of words". It's a little oldish French but totally understandable (to the French). Maybe Google translate will do it justice.. Anyways, here's the original extract:

      Peu d'hommes ont des idées saines des choses, la plupart ne s'attachent même
      qu'aux mots. Les Romains n'accordèrent-ils pas à César, sous le (1) titre d'empereur,
      le pouvoir qu'ils lui avaient refusé sous celui de roi.

      Abusé par les mots, les hommes n'ont pas horreur des choses les plus infâmes,
      décorées de beaux noms ; et ils ont horreur des choses les plus louables, décriées par
      des noms odieux. Aussi l'artifice ordinaire des cabinets est il d'égarer les peuples en
      pervertissant le sens des mots ; et souvent des hommes de lettres avilis ont l'infamie
      de se charger de ce coupable emploi.

      En fait de politique, quelques vains sons mènent le stupide vulgaire, j'allais dire le
      monde entier. Jamais aux choses leurs vrais noms. Les princes, leurs ministres, leurs
      agents, leurs flatteurs, leurs valets, appellent art de régner celui d'épuiser les peuples,
      de faire de sottes entreprises, d'afficher un faste scandaleux, et de répandre partout la
      terreur ; politique, l'art honteux de tromper les hommes ; gouvernement, la domina-
      tion lâche et tyrannique ; prérogatives de la couronne, les droits usurpés sur la souve-
      raineté des peuples ; puissance royale, le pouvoir absolu ; magnificence, d'odieuses
      prodigalités ; soumission, la servitude ; loyauté, la prostitution aux ordres arbitraires ;
      rébellion, la fidélité aux lois ; révolte, la résistance à l'oppression ; discours séditieux,
      la réclamation des droits de l'homme ; faction, le corps des citoyens réunis pour
      défendre leurs droits ; crimes de lèse-majesté, les mesures prises pour s'opposer à la
      tyrannie ; charges de l'état, les dilapidations de la cour et du cabinet ; contributions
      publiques, les exactions ; guerre et conquête, le brigandage (2) à la tête d'une armée,
      art de négocier, l'hypocrisie, l'astuce, le manque de foi, la perfidie et les trahisons ;
      coups d'état, les outrages, les meurtres et les empoisonnements ; officiers du prince,
      ses satellites ; observateurs, ses espions ; fidèles sujets, les suppôts du despotisme ;
      mesure de sûreté, les recherches inquisitoriales ; punition des séditieux, le massacre
      des ennemis de la liberté. Voilà comment ils parviennent à détruire l'horreur qu'ins-
      pire l'image nue des forfaits et de la tyrannie.

      (1) La preuve qu'ils ne crurent jamais avoir fait ce qu'ils venaient de faire, c'est que lorsque César
      essaya de se faire poser le diadème sur la t

      --
      "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    11. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Use quotes around the search phrase or your search is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. If you do so, you'll find almost all the links are about the election. One of the links is to "what the hell is 'razor tight'" and another talks about the origin of the phrase as of 3 days ago.

      Try again.

    12. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many joined out of desperation for a job or because of some ideals about helping the country, even if they should have known better. Making the wrong choice for the right reasons is not a fault of intentions, but a fault of awareness. For minor things, it is easy to laugh or let people suffer their mistakes. For major things, that have long term impact in their lives that are not easily reversed or corrected, especially in cases of disproportionate consequences, are deserving of support and sympathy. Especially when nearly large parts of the population are to also blame for what they are being used for.

    13. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Hatta · · Score: 1

      for MANY Americans joining the military is their ONLY chance to get a good education and a chance to a reasonable life.

      That's all the more reason not to spend the best years of their life protecting the plutocracy.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Making the wrong choice for the right reasons is not a fault of intentions, but a fault of awareness.

      That is why I try to make people aware of what a reprehensible choice joining the military is.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the "fuck them all" attitude for those stuck with their decision doesn't help.

    16. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Thank you for proving my point. "Fuck them all", indeed. Be sure to point that out frequently, as it's important. By the way, how many in your family serve? Yeah, that's what I thought.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Fuck them all.

      Fuck Bradley Manning?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    18. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

      I think it's no coincidence that all the major media players use exactly the same words to describe events.

      Absolutely.
      Case in point? Conan O'Brian collects a montage of talking heads all parroting the same line about "pushing the envelope". The interesting bit starts at 1:19, or click here to go right to that point in the video.

      If this isn't evidence that everyone is getting their talking points from the same source, I don't know what is.

    19. Re:Meanwhile, in the US, media all sounds the same by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, "some" of this comes from the associated press news wire. And they do tend to over-utilize it and simply use it wrong. In my view, the AP is essentially an unverified source of news. Each time it is used, the reporting agency should take when is given, verified and restated. One could argue about accuracy of story retelling, but on the other hand, when a wrong story is reported over the AP, then much worse things happen.

  21. It is the only way Communist can win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should not be a surprise. Communist can not win if you know what they are doing.

    Note: Obama never lets us know his plans.

    1. Re:It is the only way Communist can win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not real Communism if there is a government. You're thinking of fascism.

  22. You got it all wrong... by Vexler · · Score: 1
  23. The Mobile Phone And Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm quite amazed to hear that there are over 1 million mobile phone users in North Korea. But, it gets me thinking about something else...

    I travel a quite a bit, and very often in poor countries. Yet, everywhere I go I am continually surprised to see people living in tin shacks and questionable frequency of meals using mobile phones and having satellite TV dishes. It seems that the world over, people that can afford the least spend their money on totally unnecessary items where they would be better off spending that money on food, clothing or shelter.

    Even in the ghettos of the U.S. where people are living in project housing, eating via food stamps, they have mobile phones(not just Obama phones) and satellite/cable TV. It indicates a level of ignorance that annoys me.

    Go ahead and tell me what an ass I am for my views and how poor people should have these things. I just don't see it.

    1. Re:The Mobile Phone And Economics by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      There is a key feature about mobile phones and satellite dishes which makes them highly appealing to people of lower income.

      The phones are mobile, and the dishes provide information flow from a region far beyond the local geographic area.

      People have a need to 'ingest' news and information. And for a lot of these people, they speak a different language, or are culturally segregated from the local populace. A satellite dish allows them to receive information from their region or group regardless of their current location.

      When you rent, or aren't sure just where you will be living in the next 3 months, do you want to go through the process of getting a new landline run to your location? Or activating an old one? Do you then go through the process of telling everyone your new number (number portability is a recent development and may not exist in certain nations)

      Or you can get a cell phone and buy minutes. That way you can be contacted, and you can contact people.

      If you are homeless and trying to get a job. What do you give out for a phone number? The phone number at your homeless shelter? Who wants to reveal to an employer they are homeless. Instead, they can give people a cell number, and then no one has to know they are homeless, and they can be contacted quickly regardless of which shelter they are currently residing at.

      I won't call you an ass. (but I expect someone to come in and move the goalposts from 'cellphone' to 'smartphone')

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:The Mobile Phone And Economics by shoes58 · · Score: 1

      Even in the ghettos of the U.S. where people are living in project housing, eating via food stamps, they have mobile phones(not just Obama phones) and satellite/cable TV. It indicates a level of ignorance that annoys me.

      Go ahead and tell me what an ass I am for my views and how poor people should have these things. I just don't see it.

      OK, you're an ass! There is no such thing as an "Obama-Phone"! This is a pejorative term invented by the tea-baggers to imply the President or his policies provided these free of charge to minorities. In fact, this is a program that has been around since the 60's and is funded ENTIRELY by the telcos. It insured that low income families who couldn't afford phones would be able to summon help in emergencies or be notified of jobs or family emergencies. Think you can get a job with no phone, DUMBASS? And of course, God forbid people can watch ANY type of news programming and be informed on issues of the day! They have proven to be too stupid for that by being poor!

    3. Re:The Mobile Phone And Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u mad bro?

    4. Re:The Mobile Phone And Economics by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if you have a shack, you have shelter - and if you're living in a shithouse you'll need all the tv you can get!

      moreover.. neither of these things actually cost all that much nor are transferable into money. it's only stupid well off americans who pay a hundred bucks a month for owning a mobile phone. turning that shack into a real house might need 100x the money the shack costs - and then you'd need to hire security.

      I'd argue that getting a cablemodem would make more sense than cable tv, though if someone from north korea makes it to a place with food and tv I wouldn't blame him for watching sitcoms and documentaries for 5 years just to get up to speed on what he's been missing(not the shows themselvs... but the world! tv is a wonderful machine for spreading ideas and "propaganda" about all that exists in the world, that's why north koreans aren't in general allowed to have them! ).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  24. This is not a new phenomenon by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

    For years the closed cell network and intranet have been available in NK, long before Kim Jong Un was even known. They've slowly been adapting things from outside of the country for over a decade now, and even have their own versions of "burger joints". Youtube is blocked where I am, otherwise I'd post links to some videos on there showing them off. This is the same way North Korea has dealt with all technology. When radios were still the main source of media, they were given radios they could not turn off, that played propoganda and "party approved" music. When TV became inevitable they started giving televisions to upstanding members of the party, but they were limited to one channel only and it was illegal to tamper with it. I'm still interested to find out if anything will change in regards to available technology... Kim Jong Un spent lots of time outside the country and grew up with video games, dvds, and most likely, the internet.

    The main difference is that it has become widespread to smuggle _real_ phones in to the country from China. They are also getting DVD's from South Korea via China. Many of them are now aware that the rest of the world is not the desolate backwater their government asserted it was.

  25. Sounds like N.Korea finally has BBSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they run at 9600 baud?

  26. Even this is better than nothing by tp1024 · · Score: 1

    When all improvements are merely seen as proof of how bad the situation is, you miss out on the fact that there has been an improvement - however slight.

    Remember what China was like 40 years ago under Mao? Remember the giant steps in which change happened? Right, me neither. Change is slow, incremental, imperceptile, even when it happens at the speed that China has changed. Just because they haven't crossed the finish line doesn't mean it's not a first step.

  27. Moron by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Informative

    Really, you are a moron, what base tower are they going to connect to? Or do you think 3g is some kind of miracle magic internet thingy that just works anywhere?

    Morons like this are on a tech site but know nothing about tech or reality. North Korea might have cell towers but they aren't connected to the rest of the world. All you will do in NK is you turn on a cellphone is give the position of someone who is going to spend sometime in a labor camp. Your cellphone won't connect but its position will be accurately enough determined through triangulation.

    No doubt some equal noob is going to shout something about darknet or whatever cyber crap they heard but never understood. The reason you can hide things on the internet in the west is because nobody is looking. The easiest way to stop people from communicating is NOT to listen to what they are saying but to kill anyone who says anything at all.

    In NK there won't be a crack team trying to break your encrypted mails, if you don't belong to the elite, you send an email, you die. End of story. You belong to the elite and they can't plainly see it as readable, they ask you through a rubber hose.

    In NK there is no TSA to try to catch your out at the airport, they catch you at the airport, you die. End of story.

    In NK there is no drone trying to see if you grow weed, you use electricity, your door is busted open to see what you are using it with.

    This is a dictatorship, they don't ask why you are broadcasting, broadcasting ANYTHING is illegal.

    Below some idiot talks about a mesh network... yeah because creating a netword of transmitters in a place nobody trusts each other is going to last anytime at all.

    REALLY, this is supposed to be a tech site not a site for dweebs who heard a word and run with it.

    THINK for a second what total control means. NK information comes in through the ass and goes out. Film rolls smuggled inside and if you survive the border, ANYONE finds out what you done, you are dead and your family is dead. This is a place where MILLIONS died and NOTHING happened. This is not a nice dictatorship like nazi germany, this is something the world has never seen before, total control.

    Can just everyone on this site accept that ANY transmitter will be detected? This was true as long back as WW2. The only thing possible is to create a transmitter that requires practically no power, can be moved very fast and broadcast near instantly and it tiny. Then you might get out a burst on the go and not be found. And you would have to do that all the time in a country where if someone turns you in, they will eat something besides grass.

    Dropping tablets with 3g? So dumb it really deserves not just mockery but vilification.

    Que mod down by some butthurt noob whose teachers all told him he was special.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Moron by na1led · · Score: 1

      Obviously you know nothing about Korea, and nothing about networking. I've been there, and a cell tower in the southern border of the DMZ could reach a good distance on the north side. You can also create mesh networks like they have done with OLPC in Africa. So please keep your rants brief, I don't need a history lesson about North Korea.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    2. Re:Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also create mesh networks like they have done with OLPC in Africa.

      Still talking about mesh networks? I call bs on

      I don't need a history lesson about North Korea.

    3. Re:Moron by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      From what I have read, you are about 30 years late on your information. At one time, it was like that and on top of it all, most of the population were true believers that were more than happy to turn you in. The only people to cross the border were usually the privledged or military who were in a spot where they feared for their lives. These days, they've done away with much of the blood guilt that would kill your family as well as you for such things and the boarder is much more porous. South Korean soap operas are a big hit in North Korea and smuggled in from China. Likewise, people smuggle themselves out via China (then to Vietnam) to get to South Korea. The South Korean government is currently having troubles because they are getting so many North Koreans who are just average folks whose only experience with anything outside of NK are those South Korean soaps. They undergo six months of acclimation training and still they have issues even functioning in South Korea because the idea of going into a store and being able to make their own choices between brands is so foreign to them. Many eventually go back because they can't handle SK or miss their families. The ones that stay send money back to NK and it is strongly hinted that the NK government encourages this to a degree both to cover their spies and because their economy needs that money.

    4. Re:Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dropping tablets with 3g? So dumb it really deserves not just mockery but vilification.

      Do a test of an asteroid defense system. "Accidentally" drop a small one on North Korea's government buildings?

    5. Re:Moron by aembleton · · Score: 1

      WTF, did you read his reply?

      I'm sure he's aware that a cell tower near the DMZ could reach into North Korea. However, the only village near the DMZ is a propoganda village: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kij%C5%8Fng-dong where nobody lives.

      Also, anything that transmits can be detected and located. You do know what transmit means don't you?

      Yes you can create mesh networks in Africa because in Africa you can transmit without being hunted down and placed in a forced labour camp along with your parents, grand parents and any children you may have. If you want to learn more, read this book: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Aquariums-Pyongyang-Years-North-Korean/dp/1843544997

    6. Re:Moron by aembleton · · Score: 1

      . These days, they've done away with much of the blood guilt that would kill your family

      Have you got any sources to back this up? It doesn't have to be particularly authoritive as NK is so restrictive this would be hard to get.

      Human Rights Watch reported in 2007 it was getting harsher: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,HRW,,PRK,45fff1b92,0.html

      It may well have improved; I'd just like to read about it.

    7. Re:Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If these people will ever have a chance of revolution, they need a way to communicate. You suggest they do nothing, and continue living a nightmare?

  28. Simply solution: by trum4n · · Score: 2

    Lets load up drones with WIFI blasters and Satellite modems! Give them some real internet for a day! Oh, and paint Iranian logos on the drones!

  29. They just described 1984 perfectly by dywolf · · Score: 1

    North Korea is a walking talking Orwell country

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  30. This is the sort of thing that boils my blood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but feel we're failing as humans. Honestly, any reason to invade NK that gives those people freedom and the possibility of a better life is a good enough reason to me.

  31. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wonder where the porn is hidden in that intranet ;]

  32. Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is fantastic. Once users are able to communicate freely and anonymously, and the schools and scientists appreciate the advantages of the medium, it will be just a matter of time until the North Korea intranet connects to the Internet, just as it did in China.

  33. global internet of Twitter and Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is this global internet of Twitter and Facebook that you are talking about? I'm a happy user of internet even if I am not use either one.

  34. The solution to Spam? by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    In other news North Korea Finally invents a Spam solution for e-mail that doesn't fall pray to the standard checklist of reasons spam filters will fail.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  35. The Walled Garden by scruffy · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't North Korea just use some version of Apple's walled garden? It sounds perfect for them.

  36. But not Israel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is permitted to criticize Israel.

  37. Wait 20-25 years for the floodgates to open by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The internet is not the global internet of Twitter and Facebook, but a government-crafted intranet that is restricted to just a tiny percentage of the population.

    This sounds like the American (and worldwide) Internet until 20-25 years ago.

    Remember, folks, Arpanet, NSFNet, and most of the other major pieces of what became the Internet was largely funded by US government dollars with heavy restrictions on what it could be used for. Outside of military- and government-use networks and "next-gen" research networks ("Internet 2," etc.), those restrictions were gradually lifted in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

    I'm predicting North Korea will see its Eternal September and the beginning of the Spam era in about 20-25 years.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  38. History Repeats by wallsg · · Score: 1

    In other words, it's sort of like AOL.