Slashdot Mirror


Vegetative State Man 'Talks' By Brain Scan

c0lo writes "'Severely brain-injured Scott Routley hasn't spoken in 12 years. None of his physical assessments since then have shown any sign of awareness, or ability to communicate, thus being diagnosed as vegetative (vegetative patients emerge from a coma into a condition where they have periods awake, with their eyes open, but have no perception of themselves or the outside world).' Scott Routley was asked questions while having his brain activity scanned in an fMRI machine. British neuroscientist Prof Adrian Owen said Mr Routley was clearly not vegetative. 'Scott has been able to show he has a conscious, thinking mind. We have scanned him several times and his pattern of brain activity shows he is clearly choosing to answer our questions. We believe he knows who and where he is.' As a consequence, medical textbooks would need to be updated to include Prof Owen's techniques, because only observational assessments (as opposed to using mind-readers) of Mr. Routley have continued to suggest he is vegetative. Functional MRI machines are expensive (up to $2 million), but it's quite possible that a portable high-end EEG machine, costing about $75,000, can be used at a patient's bedside. Phillip K. Dick's world is one step closer."

202 comments

  1. Must be boring. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Must be pretty boring to be conscious but unable to do anything at all.

    1. Re:Must be boring. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure that I read a book about that, and the title was "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"...

    2. Re:Must be boring. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      That was a computer, though, wasn't it? Harlan Ellison? Maybe I'm thinking of something else.

      The story depressed the hell out of me, I and feel really bad for the guy. I'd be trying to wire him up to the TV remote or a web browser next just so he can get some entertainment.

    3. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And this puts us one step closer to provide new means to be able to do stuff again.

    4. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set me up with a keyboard, mouse, and computer with an internet connection. That's all I need right there.

    5. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubik is the book.

    6. Re:Must be boring. by todrules · · Score: 3

      Also a song - "One," by Metallica.

    7. Re:Must be boring. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      .... you're forgetting the method to control said computer, since these people have no control over any part of their body. Not sure what you'd do with a keyboard and mouse, look longingly at them provided they're placed in your field of vision, if you can still see and your eyes are open?

    8. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not original, it's just a version of Johnny Got His Gun. They even use footage from the film adaptation in the video.

    9. Re:Must be boring. by mikael · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't one of those Emotiv EEG (http://emotiv.com/) headsets do the job? It would be insane to not let him communicate in some way now that they know he is conscious.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Must be boring. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Yes they were inspired by the Movie.
      But unlike a dickless AC it is original.
      Them movie does not have the lyrics nor the music in it.
      Not even close.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    11. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember anything
      Can't tell if this is true or dream
      Deep down inside I feel to scream
      This terrible silence stops me

      Now that the war is through with me
      I'm waking up, I cannot see
      That there is not much left of me
      Nothing is real but pain now

      Hold my breath as I wish for death
      Oh please God, wake me

      Back in the womb it's much too real
      In pumps life that I must feel
      But can't look forward to reveal
      Look to the time when I'll live

      Fed through the tube that sticks in me
      Just like a wartime novelty
      Tied to machines that make me be
      Cut this life off from me

      Hold my breath as I wish for death
      Oh please God, wake me

      Now the world is gone, I'm just one
      Oh God help me
      Hold my breath as I wish for death
      Oh please God, help me

      Darkness imprisoning me
      All that I see
      Absolute horror
      I cannot live
      I cannot die
      Trapped in myself
      Body my holding cell

      Landmine has taken my sight
      Taken my speech
      Taken my hearing
      Taken my arms
      Taken my legs
      Taken my soul
      Left me with life in hell

    12. Re:Must be boring. by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://pub.psi.cc/ihnmaims.txt

      Maybe if you're considering Mr. Routely, the man in the article, to be similar to the AM computer from the story. The human protagonist has that thought ("I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream") at the end of the story, but I think what makes that story great was that it really describes the computer. It becomes intelligent, butit's just a world-spanning computer. It has consciousness, but no real purpose, drive or desires, and that's what drives it mad. I find that whole concept really intriguing, because we see a lot of "machines taking over the world" stories in which humans are eliminated because they're considered "inefficient" or simply because the cold, calculating machine sees no value in human life as the machines have no emotions (skynet), but in IHNMAIMS, the computer very much has emotions, it's just that it's hateful. So, instead of humans being eliminated by a machine of cold, cruel logic, they're eliminated and/or tortured by a sadistic machine driven by hatred. Really interesting.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    13. Re:Must be boring. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah they might need a bit more precision and low latency control for certain games.

      But don't underestimate what can be done with a few "buttons" as long as the latency is low enough:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx24B6RwekQ
      Broly (guying playing with his face) is playing Chun-Li vs Daigo (one of the top SF players in the world).

      Seems he's not the only person: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrfwSinBUkY

      --
    14. Re:Must be boring. by redneckmother · · Score: 2

      Must be pretty boring to be conscious but unable to do anything at all.

      Shades of _Johnny Got His Gun_, by Dalton Trumbo.

    15. Re:Must be boring. by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I'm sure if the guy could communicate more than yes/no he would be saying "Kill me" over and over and over.

      this to me is the truly scary part of technology, how they can make someone a "head in a box" for all intents and purposes and leave you going for years trapped in some grey nothing (that is what one girl who awakened from a coma described it as, a grey room with nothing, no sounds, no doors, just a grey room...trapped forever with no concept of time) with no way to escape...fuck that, put a bullet in my brain, smother me with a pillow, OD me on morphine, don't leave me trapped in some grey hell for eternity.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    16. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a computer that transformed the man into a blob-like creature so that he could not kill himself. He had just managed to kill all of his human companions before the computer could stop him. This caused the computer to hate the main character all the more, since know it only had one person to torture. It was angry because it had sentience but was supposedly physically limited in some way that resulted in extreme frustration.

    17. Re:Must be boring. by ZombieThoughts · · Score: 1

      Ran out of mod points a few hours ago. Definitely agree with this.

    18. Re:Must be boring. by dyingtolive · · Score: 0

      Fucking liberal morons. You all think we could sing kumbaya with muslims who want us dead, think it's a great idea to kill unborn children, make past times out of making fun of anyone or any news source that is not liberal with complete intolerance, and support any cause that goes against Israel or its existence. You have no mind of your own and just spew out all the brainwashing you got in school and TV like good little mental midgets.

      21 Ways to be a good Democrat

      Fantastic. I'm a conservative who's been unable to vote Republican for my entire life as I've been unable to distinguish between the red team and the blue team for as long as I've been able to realize that they exist. Lets do this.

      1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.

      Actually, I like both. I think Capital Punishment should be more prevalent, if anything. Even if it were not, an unborn embryo that has a mother that doesn't want to save it isn't worth keeping. The child is better off in nonexistence. Really. Further, if you don't allow abortion in the case of medical risk to the mother, well, then you've dropped to the level of Northern Ireland, also known as being mere micrometers above the piece of utter shit that is the middle east as far as female human rights go.

      2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.

      Why can't I believe both create oppression?

      3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Iran or Chinese and North Korean communists.

      I"m not altogether sure I believe that strawman at all. I rather enjoy going to the shooting range, myself, and I rather dislike the notion of anyone having readily available nuclear arms, simply because I don't have them available myself.

      4. You have to believe that there was no art before federal funding.

      Where did this even come from?

      5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical documented changes in the earth's climate and more affected by soccer moms driving SUV's.

      I'm not convinced, but Have you seen a soccer mom drive an SUV? We could do with a few less doing so.

      6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial but being homosexual is natural.

      As a Republican? I think you've forgotten who you're trolling mid-troll.

      7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.

      Magic Johnson is the most immune person to HIV. Money is clearly a factor in limiting the spread of the virus. Clearly.

      8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

      Some of the dumbest people I've encountered are the most prolific breeders. I'm not happy about this, but clearly, they know something you don't.

      9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but loony activists who have never been outside of San Francisco do.

      Interestingly, my republican coworker lamented the fact that he grazed a deer this last weekend, and that he had to chase it down to put it out of its misery. He seemed to actually feel bad about it. My liberal fag professor friend went fishing and talked about hooking fish without a second thought like they weren't living creatures.

      10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.

      From the deepest pits of my copy of Fountainhead, and my own heart, I suggest you go fuck yourself.

      11. You have to believe that the

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    19. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking liberal morons. You all think we could sing kumbaya with muslims who want us dead, think it's a great idea to kill unborn children, make past times out of making fun of anyone or any news source that is not liberal with complete intolerance, and support any cause that goes against Israel or its existence. You have no mind of your own and just spew out all the brainwashing you got in school and TV like good little mental midgets.

      21 Ways to be a good Democrat

      1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.

      Well, more accurately you have to believe that the government should not have the power to take lives except when necessary for protection of its citizens from immediate danger, and that government has no business interfering with individual reproductive choice.

      2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.

      I don't know any liberals that believe government necessarily creates prosperity. Proper government does create the kind of environment where prosperity can arise. Businesses, properly regulated, do not create oppression; businesses, poorly regulated, certainly can.

      3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Iran or Chinese and North Korean communists.

      No, you don't. You are just spouting rubbish and random nonsense.

      I could go on with a point-by-point refutation, but you get the idea: Your list is complete bullshit.

    20. Re:Must be boring. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Wire him up to the inputs too.

      We don't even really need to know how to wire him up so he can immediately do something. There is a REALLY good chance the brain will remap itself on its own given enough time and access to stimulus

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    21. Re:Must be boring. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I don't see how anyone could see "the grey room" as anything but a living hell. No sound, no windows, no books, no nothing but a square grey box, and the worst part is the no concept of time, you would be spending centuries for all you know because there is no clocks and no light/night cycle to give you any clue.

      Fuck that, sometimes the most merciful thing you can do is kill them, don't leave them trapped like that, hell we wouldn't do that to a dog, why would you to a person?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    22. Re:Must be boring. by migloo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "And I'm sure if the guy could communicate more than yes/no he would be saying "Kill me""

      Well, he could answer "yes" to the question "do you want us to kill you?",
      and "no" to the question "do you want to live a little longer?".

      Locked-in syndrome is to me the most terrifying end I can conceive.

    23. Re:Must be boring. by Krneki · · Score: 2

      Obligatory South Park joke

      Doctor: Hi Bob, I have a question for you, do you want us to terminate your life? One blip for yes, two blips for no.
      Bob: Blip blip
      Doctor: Double yes. Thanks Bob, see ya tomorrow.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    24. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm sure if the guy could communicate more than yes/no he would be saying "Kill me" over and over and over.

      Maybe I will change my mind in the future, but I have allways thought that I would prefer not to be killed. Even if in crey room with no stimuli or with pain and no hope for recovery.
      I know this is selfish and my organs or resources used for my body could probably used for somebody else.

      But on the other hand if by allowing euthanasia on me on such case would significally improve medical treatment on me on other cases... I'm wililing to trade. You cant have it all.

    25. Re:Must be boring. by jythie · · Score: 1

      Can you recall any details about who gave the account? I would be curious to read more of this person's description.

    26. Re:Must be boring. by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that I read a book about that, and the title was "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"...

      There is another book although he isn't vegetative just trapped in his body, called 'Johnny Got His Gun'.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Got_His_Gun

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    27. Re:Must be boring. by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

      Both my parents made it very clear to my brother and I that if either or both of them are brain dead/non-recoverable coma, to pull the plug on them. Both of us have asked them the same.

    28. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be trying to wire him up to the TV remote or a web browser next just so he can get some entertainment.

      Uh... well... I'd hope all that "wiring up" would be non-invasive, and non-surgical. Inductive "wiring" by using the FMRI detectors to effectively cause interactions with electonic devices would be fine, I'm sure...

      But if I was vegetative, although conscious, awake and aware, it would just freak me right the fuck out to wake up to the reality that strange doctors had cut into me and rigged up wires, turning me into some kind of weird mutant cyborg. I mean really. Let's think about this.

    29. Re:Must be boring. by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      Could it be that there is a difference between the brain and the mind/soul? That person's brain is like a computer, where all output circuits have burned out. The CPU and memory is still working. The keyboard is still active and any keystrokes are recognized by the CPU. Apparently this man's hearing is still working, otherwise he could not respond in any way that could be detected by an fMRI scan. I have heard that the sense of hearing is the last to shut down before death.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    30. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1)

      Time: count! it's not like your entire notion of memory disappears - so you can reasonably say 'oh I counted to 1000'
      and it would take me about 10 minutes to do that. And also - it's not like you don't have an inate sense of how long an
      hour is, etc. E.g.: I usually crap or sleep every N hours, and I haven't crapped in probably 1-2h, so it must be N oclock
      make up a time system if you want. that will occupy some time

      2) Nothing to do: again - you have memory. Make up stories. Meditate on how lucky you are to even be alive in a 'grey box', etc.

      But of course, such a lack of creativity is not surpsising in todays 'contstant external stimulation' environment

    31. Re:Must be boring. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      If they could do something like that House episode where a "locked in" guy could communicate a binary response thanks to sensors, a special browser could could provide a list of links and he could navigate up and down. C'mon, this is a whole new world of handicapped accessibility to explore.

    32. Re:Must be boring. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I suppose he'd only need 34 yes/no responses to navigate a binary tree of the ~9 billion pages on the internet.

    33. Re:Must be boring. by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      What scares me is how the liberals at slashdot want to kill these injured people the first chance they get when they are still very much alive!

    34. Re:Must be boring. by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      How does anyone know what recoverable is?

    35. Re:Must be boring. by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      Pascal said the worst punishment for a lot of people would be just that.

      And he concluded this shows just how superficial most people are.

    36. Re:Must be boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" is nothing like this.

    37. Re:Must be boring. by kmoser · · Score: 1

      [Insert obvious joke about Microsoft kernel programmers here.]

  2. I'm loath to ask: by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will they ask him if he wants to die?

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    1. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Antipater · · Score: 5, Funny

      *beep beep* "Yes, yes? I knew it. Euthanize him, boys!"

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it's a fair question & something he deserves. I read in my local news paper (mX...) they plan to ask him what time he prefers food or to be bathed in the future but what about asking him about his over all quality of life?

    3. Re:I'm loath to ask: by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being kept alive in that condition (where you are conscious but are essentially trapped in your own body) is unimaginably cruel. I for one would rather die.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    4. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It may take a while to get it out but, "I want a hand job, please. And no 'man hands' as I cannot verify ownership, txbie."

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:I'm loath to ask: by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I for one would rather die.

      How lucky you are; if you are laid low as Scott has been you won't have to wait a decade to tell anyone.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    6. Re:I'm loath to ask: by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I've heard the researcher interviewed, and while they've considered this question they're not ready to ask it.

      Even assuming you can ensure the answer is reliable, and the patient is competent (he's still brain damaged), euthanasia is a very delicate subject.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:I'm loath to ask: by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not me. Keep me going. I would rather be bored then dead. They might be able to cure me someday.

      In the mean time please leave the TV on. maybe get an EKG machine that lets me interface with a computer.

      You sir, are a quitter.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. If I end up in a vegetative state, use me for parts and move on with your lives.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    9. Re:I'm loath to ask: by steviesteveo12 · · Score: 2

      I'm uncomfortably reminded of the Facilitated Communication scam, except replacing holding their hand with an fMRI scanner. I'd hope no one dies based on cutting edge research into interpreting brain scans.

    10. Re:I'm loath to ask: by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're assuming quite a bit. What if the parts of your brain that process visual/audio data are damaged and don't work anymore? Just how useful would TV be in that situation? Think about it... you would be trapped in a dark abyss entirely inside your head, unable to see or hear any stimulus. Even if people come to visit you, you would never know because you couldn't see or hear them. Yes, death would be preferable.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    11. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's odd, because the first thought that leapt to my mind was Captain Pike.

    12. Re:I'm loath to ask: by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I'm uncomfortably reminded of the Facilitated Communication scam, except replacing holding their hand with an fMRI scanner. I'd hope no one dies based on cutting edge research into interpreting brain scans.

      I'm more worried about someone being unnecessarily kept alive and hogging all those delicious organs...

    13. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are things in this world far worse than death.

    14. Re:I'm loath to ask: by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree now, and as a default, I want that assumed. However, If possible, I would like the opportunity to be asked, especially if there was a chance to be a part of research into people in my condition to potentially make communication easier or even computer interface possible, which could totally change the equation.... even if just for a little while.

      Though, in some ways the only place you ever are is in your mind, I could see it being a totally different experience for some people. I can't imagine being ok with it for long without some serious advancements along that line to say the least.

      Maybe one day, I could even be reborn with a robot interface.... though we all know where that leads...

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    15. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this sort of research is great--it's disturbing to me that conclusions about being in a vegetative state have not been more sophisticated before.

      However, I have serious, serious concerns about the author of this study grossly oversimplifying what's happening in terms of the cognition of the patients.

      They are able to answer *some* basic questions correctly most of the time, but does this mean they are reasoning? Is it an "automatic" response? What, exactly, is their level of reasoning ability?

      The question "Do you want to die" isn't significant only because it raises ethical questions about euthanasia, but because it begs the question of what, exactly, *is* the cognitive state of the individuals being assessed.

      Neurosurgeons are notorious for an attitude of "well, they can walk and talk, so their cognitive state is fine." I worry that this will now extend to an attitude of "well, they can correctly identify their father's name, and their own name, and where they live, so that means they are sentient and capable of abstract reasoning and ethical decision-making."

      We really don't understand how the brain works, and to me this has all of the appearance of a sophisticated neurological party trick.

    16. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care should be taken with the TV channel - can you imagine being stuck in front of Oprah all day. You may actually end up bored then dead.

    17. Re:I'm loath to ask: by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Are you in need of some fava beans? Perhaps a nice Chianti?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    18. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Being kept alive in that condition (where you are conscious but are essentially trapped in your own body) is unimaginably cruel. I for one would rather die.

      I totally agree with you there. I've actually said the thing multiple times to all my relatives and acquaintances; I do not ever wish to be confined to my own body, without ever being able to so much as move my arm. I'd much rather die and donate my organs to someone else who actually wishes to live.

    19. Re:I'm loath to ask: by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

      We have put MTV on for you. Are you happy now or would you rather die?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:I'm loath to ask: by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      In the mean time please leave the TV on.

      Depending on what channel it's set to, that could be a fate far worse than death.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    21. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, let's see how fucking brave you are when you're stuck in a black abyss for the rest of your artificial life. Decades on end of nothing. If they do find a way to reconnect your senses, you'll be long dead.

    22. Re:I'm loath to ask: by adolf · · Score: 2

      Yes, death would be preferable.

      Perhaps. But would you be able to tell the difference?

    23. Re:I'm loath to ask: by evilviper · · Score: 2

      What if the parts of your brain that process visual/audio data are damaged and don't work anymore?

      That isn't the case for this man. He is apparently acquiring information from after his accident (unless this experiment is biased and the conclusions are all crap, but that's a different discussion).

      you would be trapped in a dark abyss entirely inside your head, unable to see or hear any stimulus

      Purgatory? Solitary confinement? Depending on your philosophy, a few years of that may be preferable to death. And if there is any HOPE of a cure, a few years of complete isolation may not be horrendous. If you've had a decently long life, you may have lots to think about...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:I'm loath to ask: by mariox19 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean like being a patient such as Mr. Routley and having your organs harvested? Generally, donors are not given pain medication, only tranquilizers to keep their bodies from flinching, since it's assumed that people in such a state are "gone." I brought this up to my brother, the anesthesiologist, when this story was in the news a few months back, and he insisted that there was no need for anesthesia. That's the consensus of the medical community.

      That puts us a step ahead of vivisection—but only barely.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    25. Re:I'm loath to ask: by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Someone save this post. His family might need it later.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    26. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, now you can ask him directly, rather than basing the answer on what you'd prefer to do.

    27. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i was seriously wondering the same thing. imagine being gagged and restrained from like age 35 until you die at like age 75. now imagine that whoever restrained you locked you in a secret room that only they knew about, a room with a combination lock that only they knew. now imagine that you know this person has died and no one will ever find you and free you.

      when i really start to imagine what it must be like to be completely paralyzed, i begin to have an anxiety attack. for a claustrophobic like myself, it is the ultimate hell...trapped in ones own body. i have told all of my friends and family that if i ever fall into such a condition that they better honor my request and euthanize me or i will freakin haunt the fsck out of their arses when i finally do die.

    28. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't think it would be boring. i think it would like having an itch but you can't scratch it...for the rest of your life. i think it would be hell and i don't think hell will be boring. of course, if i have some way of communicating with people, i might try to hold out for a cure or something...because i know that if i change my mind, i can let someone know. however, i wouldn't want my friends or family or fellow tax-payers paying a 5k per month bill just so i can answer yes or no questions. not a quitter. i'm self-sacrificing.

    29. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Ikkyu · · Score: 1

      You want to control a computer with your heart? Surely you mean an EEG.

    30. Re:I'm loath to ask: by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      In the book it was a big Amarone, not a nice Chianti, btw.

      I'm curious to what extent they have statistically analyzed his responses to questions repeated or asked in different forms, to see how alert he really is...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    31. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think about it... you would be trapped in a dark abyss entirely inside your head

      Happened to me once. So I separated the darkness from the light. And the darkness I called night and the light I called day. After that I made up all kinds of stuff. Useless but entertaining.

    32. Re:I'm loath to ask: by ZombieThoughts · · Score: 1

      Is that a Red Dwarf reference? Kryten I think?

    33. Re:I'm loath to ask: by hene · · Score: 2

      I spend lots of time in meditation. When my busy mind gets still it's not terrible at all, actually quite enjoyable state. So it is pretty much depends how you want to experience it. If you freak out it might be terrible, but if you are able to accept it.. it might not be so cruel at all.

    34. Re:I'm loath to ask: by hene · · Score: 2

      So you rather die then spend time with yourself and with your imagination? I don't know what level of brain activity works here, but I would like to twist this view point to the angle where this state is much more close the living then most people do in their life time. Everybody now days runs away from experiencing life itself doing anything but have to spend time with their own mind.

    35. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the part of you that wouldn't like that is gone?

    36. Re:I'm loath to ask: by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The reality of it is, if you ACTUALLY had to face those conditions, the anxiety would pass fairly quickly and you'd get over that particular bit of the problem in very short order.

      Not saying life in that situation long term would be fun, but the things you fear are trivial and go away quickly.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    37. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP states the man "is clearly choosing to answer our questions."

      It seems to me to be a simple indication he can hear. As for others in a vegetative state, it would seem a simple matter to diagnose their hearing the same way, then allow them to make conscious decisions using the device.

    38. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best comment ever!

    39. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      So you rather die then spend time with yourself and with your imagination?

      I already spend time with my imagination, but I don't want to be confined inside my own imagination. A huge difference.

    40. Re:I'm loath to ask: by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      However, this implies that you wouldn't be able to receive _any_ stimuli.

      I don't think it's too far-fetched to assume that, if we're soon to be able to reliably "read" brain signals from people who're so totally trapped, we'll also soon see true direct machine-to-mind communication. I.e. being able to inject stimuli directly into the parts of the mind that process basic awareness -- the holy grail of virtual reality.

      That, of course, means that, as Scott Adams said, "the holodeck will be humanity's last invention".

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    41. Re:I'm loath to ask: by jythie · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. Time in a dark abyss is a lot of time to one's self, and to some that might be more heaven then hell.

    42. Re:I'm loath to ask: by AnonyMouseCowWard · · Score: 1

      Scott Routley was asked questions while having his brain activity scanned in an fMRI machine. [...] We have scanned him several times and his pattern of brain activity shows he is clearly choosing to answer our questions.

      He can at least hear. He's not trapped in an abyss or a grey room with no stimuli, he's _able to understand others and communicate via brainwaves_. He would know that his family is with him, or whatever. Might still not be worth living, but it's not at all the case you describe. The whole article was about how he's _not_ really vegetative, that behavioural exams suggest it but that in reality he is conscious and thinking.

    43. Re:I'm loath to ask: by i · · Score: 2

      A donor would be brain-dead (AFAIK) which means irreversible loss of activity in the brain. And that means there is no receiver of any pain signals. (Comparable to a head amputation.)

      --
      Mundus Vult Decipi
    44. Re:I'm loath to ask: by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Thus the Matrix is born.

    45. Re:I'm loath to ask: by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      Thank you for putting some humor in this thread. This topic terrifies me.

    46. Re:I'm loath to ask: by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      At what cost to society? Or do you have enough personal savings to hire an engineer create that device, have a dedicated EKG machine, a hospital room, and a staff to maintain your body?

      (P.S. I'm not really sure if you were serious or not, but either way it makes for good discussion)

    47. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you would exist in only one of those options, no.

    48. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if there is any HOPE of a cure, a few years of complete isolation may not be horrendous.

      It will be horrendous no matter what. That hope might keep you from wanting to end it once and for all, but it WILL be a hellish experience.

    49. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not me. Keep me going. I would rather be bored then dead.

      Wouldn't you rather be bored than dead? Those pesky little words make such a difference in the meaning of a sentence.

    50. Re:I'm loath to ask: by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      That's the most superficial thing I have ever read.

    51. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the scariest thought. What if that's exactly what death is like?

  3. Sounds like a match. by olsmeister · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sounds like a great use for something like this. But, have fun getting insurance to cover it...

  4. EEG == $75k? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does one charge $75,000 bucks for something that can be found in the land of open source?

    http://openeeg.sourceforge.net/buildeeg/

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:EEG == $75k? by suutar · · Score: 2

      Because one can get that much from hospitals that can't use the open source one because it's not certified?

    2. Re:EEG == $75k? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      75K seems a good amount for taking something that could be done in Open Source and making it safe, reliable, and repeatably measurable for use in a hospital.

      Sure, we can get these things to cost $5000 like a good hearing aid. But I'm not sure that version is going to be used to make the final assessment of whether there is a living person in a locked-in patient or not.

    3. Re:EEG == $75k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EEG is not the same as fMRI. NIR would be a possibility and much cheaper. Interpretation of fMRI results are tricky. I'm looking forward to reading the original paper

    4. Re:EEG == $75k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Because one can get that much from hospitals that can't use the open source one because it's not certified?

      Did you use a random word generator, or was that supposed to be a sentence?

    5. Re:EEG == $75k? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I assume that there is a slice of the 'sold as a medical device' premium; but that you start looking at a considerable premium if you make greater demands on the sensitivity and precision of the device. If you are hunting signals down into microvolt amplitudes, and don't want to get out your good bone saw, I suspect that a $2 op-amp doesn't always cut it.

      How can Agilent sell $15k oscilloscopes when you can download Arduino firmware with oscilloscope functions for free? Sensitivity, sample rate, features, probably some name-brand markup.

    6. Re:EEG == $75k? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Once again,. someon on /. has no clue baout how the world actually wqorks.

      They need to pay people.
      It needs to get certified.
      Maintained
      Tested regularly,
      be durable.
      make a profit.

      So, yeah shit cost money and time.
      Now, if I had someone I knew in that state and I couldn't get one through the hospital, I would build on to bring with me. It wouldn't be a medical device.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:EEG == $75k? by icebike · · Score: 1

      75K seems a good amount for taking something that could be done in Open Source and making it safe, reliable, and repeatably measurable for use in a hospital.

      Sure, we can get these things to cost $5000 like a good hearing aid. But I'm not sure that version is going to be used to make the final assessment of whether there is a living person in a locked-in patient or not.

      Developmental costs of 75,000 seem unlikely to suffice. Factor of 10, maybe, but most likely to get such a device
      certified you are talking 7.5 million.

      After that, per unit cost depends solely on the parts involved, and these are pretty cheap. Knocking them
      out for 5grand seems entirely possible.

      You can buy a Defibrillator on Amazon.com for a thousand bucks, with no license, training, or certification for use. And it is designed to generate potentially life ending voltages.

      There is nothing unsafe about EEG electrodes, some of which can be totally passive, that could not be solved with an optical signal linkage (air gap). Even Active electrodes can be battery powered.
      Such would preclude even the most dunderhead-ed wiring job from turning an inert pickup into a shock inducing short circuit.
      Five volts and tiny amperage's are routinely popped into our ears every time we put in ear buds, without a thought.

      I'm not sure why such a cheap device couldn't be used to make such an assessment, at least as a preliminary diagnostic tool.
      We make life and death assessments with Sub $100 stethoscopes every day.

      Until that time when it is trusted enough to justify pulling the plug on a warn body, it can be used bedside to communicate at some level
      with the patient on an ongoing basis. 5K is not all that expensive compared to what is already wheeled into hospital rooms
      every day in any modern country.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:EEG == $75k? by mikael · · Score: 1

      fMRI is in real time - they can ask him questions and watch the oxygen levels of the different brain regions light up. They already have a a general model of what does where. So by getting him to think different things, they can see different areas light up.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:EEG == $75k? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      EEGs are just sensitive amplifiers. They aren't hard to make, lots of engineering classes have made them in one form or another.

      Data collection and interpretation are other matters entirely.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:EEG == $75k? by icebike · · Score: 1

      EEGs are just sensitive amplifiers. They aren't hard to make, lots of engineering classes have made them in one form or another.

      Data collection and interpretation are other matters entirely.

      That information is implicit in this thread.

      But you are not going to bring home brew medical devices into a hospital in anything but the most backward of third world countries.
      Certifying such a device for hospital use will take years and money. Just ask the people who already supply these things to hospitals.

      This subthread is about making a life-support decision based on such a tool.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:EEG == $75k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your insurance, alone, is going to be a lot more than the parts, for additional copies. The liability involved is severe, and not severable.

    12. Re:EEG == $75k? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      Yes, I meant 75K per sold device not for the entire development cost.

      Unfortunately, right now you might have to allocate tens of Millions to such a company just to operate the patent defense. Never mind that this was a vacuum tube device. There are current patents on computer implementations.

    13. Re:EEG == $75k? by sjames · · Score: 1

      $15K is one thing, $75 is quite another.

    14. Re:EEG == $75k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stethoscopes don't really have any moving parts, and I would be extremely surprised to hear of life or death decisions based solely on a Stethoscope.

      The money in medical software/hardware isn't building it, it's certifying it.

    15. Re:EEG == $75k? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Stethoscopes don't really have any moving parts, and I would be extremely surprised to hear of life or death decisions based solely on a Stethoscope.

      The money in medical software/hardware isn't building it, it's certifying it.

      Neither does an EEG.
      And life and death decisions based solely on a Stethoscope have been the standard for 100 years.
      As for certifying it, see my first sentence.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:EEG == $75k? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      They've also had salmon respond to fMRI scans hours after death. Not really impressive or useful if interpreted wrong.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  5. Hope for treating "Locked-in" Syndrome by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If even a small percentage of people suffering with "Locked-in" Syndrome are reachable it will be a major win. Think "Johnny Got His Gun" or "The Diving Bell And The Butterfly" for cinematic examples of "Locked-in" Syndrome.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    1. Re:Hope for treating "Locked-in" Syndrome by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Johnny could at least nod out Morse code if I recall.

      There was an episode of House like this. A "ocked in" guy was hooked up to sensors, and he had to teach himself to think certain ways to move a pointer on a computer screen so he could at least give yes and no responses.

    2. Re:Hope for treating "Locked-in" Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Johnny could at least nod out Morse code if I recall.

      There was an episode of House like this. A "ocked in" guy was hooked up to sensors, and he had to teach himself to think certain ways to move a pointer on a computer screen so he could at least give yes and no responses.

      If he can think enough to move a pointer, then give him a goddamn visual keyboard and he can just type what he wants. Setup some macros, and he can talk as well as Hawking. Refine the controls, and he can play WoW. Ya bitch, I just pwned you. Move out of my mom's basement and get a job you say? Well that's hard to do as I can literally not control my body at all.
      MOOOOOOM!!! BATHROOOM!!!!

  6. Morse Code by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While watching "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly", it occurred to me that knowing morse code would give you the best chance of communicating from this frightening state.

  7. London, Ontario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big win for the London, Ontario area, not to mention UWO, who also has recently announced good news on the HIV vaccine testing.

  8. London, Ontario by Rohobian · · Score: 2

    Big win for the London, Ontario area, not to mention UWO, who also recently announced good news on HIV vaccine tests.

  9. Not vegetative? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1, Insightful
    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Not vegetative? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Oh dear!

      If only they had thought to use EEG and neuroimaging techniques during her attempted rehabilitation and the subsequent EOL battle...

      Oh, wait, they did, and didn't find anything.

    2. Re:Not vegetative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Try reading your own reference. Start here.

      The damage was, in the words of Thogmartin, "irreversible, and no amount of therapy or treatment would have regenerated the massive loss of neurons."

      Her melon was empty.

    3. Re:Not vegetative? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1
      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Not vegetative? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You could say the same about your average FOX news viewer...

      Just kidding

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Not vegetative? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That man shows activity when hooked to an EKG machine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Not vegetative? by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      He does not count as a functioning human being. He was after all a government worker,
      Proof that you in fact do not need a brain to work for the government.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    7. Re:Not vegetative? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I'm not really sure on these things, but I think every living person shows EKG activity when hooked to the machine, vegetative or not :-)

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:Not vegetative? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, none of the brain structures observed in TFA still existed in her head.

    9. Re:Not vegetative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, that is still considered a citeable source after what happened eleven days ago?

    10. Re:Not vegetative? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If only they had thought to use EEG and neuroimaging techniques during her attempted rehabilitation and the subsequent EOL battle...

      Oh, wait, they did, and didn't find anything.

      TFS says this is a new fMRI technique and that EEG techniques could be developed (but obviously haven't yet).

      fMRI was denied for Schaivo:

      On February 23, 2005, the Schindlers filed a motion for relief from judgment pending medical evaluations.[48] The Schindlers wanted Schiavo to be tested with an fMRI and given a swallowing therapy called VitalStim. The motion was accompanied by thirty-three affidavits from doctors in several specialties, speech-language pathologists and therapists, and a few neuropsychologists, all urging that new tests be undertaken.[49][50] Patricia Fields Anderson, the Schindler family attorney, still held out hope "that Terri might be able to take nourishment orally, despite past findings that she is incapable."[51] Judge Greer formally denied the motion and ordered the "removal of nutrition and hydration from the ward" and set the time and date for the removal of the feeding tube as, "1:00 p.m. on Friday, March 18, 2005."[52]

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  10. They don't need to by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Most of the time they just kill them without asking.

    1. Re:They don't need to by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Usually just by pulling the plug on whatever machine is keeping them alive, right? Makes me wonder how much hunger (either of air or food) he and others like him are capable of feeling...

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    2. Re:They don't need to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the point of keeping him alive - all he can do is lie there and shit himself.

      As a democrat I say he's useless as a slave and we can use his dead meat to smother newborn babies.

  11. Just kill them all for the love of god by lexman098 · · Score: 0

    I'm not even sure why they let vegetative people live if they've been in that condition for so long. If they're truly unconscious then they're already gone, and if they're not you definitely want to kill them. It makes me sick that we even *potentially* leave people in such a state for so long.

    1. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Xacid · · Score: 2

      But is it to release you from the burden or them? Seems like a question that can be asked of them now.

    2. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, that's basically what the enlightened such as the Dali Lama think of the rest of us. That smile is not what it seems

    3. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Fuck you.

      Never, ever turn me off.
      How about we find away to communicate instead of just killing them?
      hmm?
      You are a small minded, mean SOB.

      Gosh, someone provokes god in the same sentence as killing people. I'm shocked I tell you. Yes I am aware I might be committing the genetic fallacy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not even sure why they let vegetative people live if they've been in that condition for so long. If they're truly unconscious then they're already gone, and if they're not you definitely want to kill them. It makes me sick that we even *potentially* leave people in such a state for so long.

      You cannot say that someone else should die, without asking them, simply because **you** imagine you would want to in that situation. That would violate just about every single code of ethics imaginable. The situation changes a bit if they have previously expressed a desire not to be kept alive in such a situation (which is often followed, although mind you even in that case, it's hard to know if they really meant it, since they had no prior experience with which to make an educated judgment), but to presume that another should die because of what you think or want is one of the grossest violations of human rights possible.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    5. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      So consider some other form of torture. Maybe a person is impaled every hour for years. Would you find it just as unethical then to assume they'd want to be put out of their misery if there was little hope of alleviating their pain (assuming you couldn't communicate)? My point here is that there is a line. Maybe you don't agree with my line, but throwing out "gross violations of human rights" is a little far fetched. I expect most people would not want to be locked in their own mind for years.

    6. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that not choosing isn't an option. And, if a patient cannot communicate or is too young/brain-damaged/mentally ill/etc. to communicate their preference, you can't usefully ask(this particular case, apparently, now may be able to communicate, solving the ethical problem).

      This puts you in the position of being forced to act on somebody else, without having access to their opinion. What, then, do you base your actions on? Do you do unto them as you would do unto you? Do you do some polling and do unto them as a statistically representative sample of demographically similar people would do unto themselves? Do you flip a coin?

      The problem is that there isn't a 'default' position. Either way, you make the choice for them and impose it on them.

    7. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, give it a break.

      If you can't make contact with me, kill me just to be sure. For all you know, I might be in terrible pain. In any event, my existence would not be a blessing to me or my loved ones.

      Don't turn life into a fetish.

    8. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the mean one. They're in a state that's probably the most hellish thing imaginable. Sensory deprivation makes people go insane after a while, imagine it for years.

    9. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two problems that make this issue more complicated than what you're presenting. First, what is being dead? If you define it as the last cell in your body ceasing metabolic activity, that's going to be a week or so after you've been beheaded. Being permanently unconscious is de facto dead, as would be the loss of human-level intelligence and personality.

      Second, death is not the worst thing that can happen to you. Sensory deprivation is torture. Not being able to think properly is hellish (e.g. crippling dementia). It's also entirely possible they have thalamic pain syndrome (half of stroke victims have some degree of it). In the more severe forms, the pain is so intense and unrelenting that many patients commit suicide within a couple years. In other words, they could be experiencing the worst pain known to man, without anything to distract them from it, and being unable to think through and cope with it.

      If you are so certain of your beliefs, I suggest doing some volunteer work in a large hospital and dropping by the ICU. I've never met someone who was familiar with the issue and completely against involuntary passive euthanasia, unless they were hardcore religious (rare). Patient families, OTOH, often want everything done, which is tantamount to torture in many cases. For example, some doctors and nurses use a "slow code" to go through the motions for the family but not seriously attempt to resuscitate the patient. This happens when they ethically refuse to further traumatize the patient despite the family's request (this usually happens around the fifth or sixth time a patient starts to die, resuscitation at that stage is futile and quite violent/painful).

    10. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If you don't know, it doesn't matter. Why is it 'sick'?

      If you do know, there is hope.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well . . . the medical community does have a default position. See Hypocratic Oath.

    12. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that only because you've not been in solitary confinement for a decade. Anyone and everyone considers that inhuman and cruel. All this means is you are either very ignorant and/or very sadistic. Its very, very likely, he's rather insane at this point.

    13. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by firewrought · · Score: 2

      You cannot say that someone else should die, without asking them, simply because **you** imagine you would want to in that situation. That would violate just about every single code of ethics imaginable.

      Actually, one could argue it's supported by the moral codes of most religions, as they all tend to feature some form of reciprocity. Of course, this would be a simplistic argument since any one religion you look at will have other principals, philosophies, and fads affecting how this gets interpreted and applied.

      Personally, while I think the Golden Rule has significant weaknesses as a moral guideline, I think it can be helpful in situations like this where you don't have the ability to communicate with the other person. Even if you feel uncomfortable answering the death question (as we all should), someone who is exercising power-of-attorney is going to have to use their own reactions to a judge/make guesses about the other person's thoughts and desires in how to deal with a specific situation.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    14. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it aint broke, don't fix it.

      the 'life' is working.. perhaps not ideally, but ..

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. fMRI has problems by capedgirardeau · · Score: 5, Interesting

    fMRI has problems and is very subject to interpretation, misuse and manipulation.

    For example the now classic dead fish fMRI tests:
    http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/fmrisalmon/

    I am very skeptical of this until it has been repeated, tested and evaluated in other settings by different researchers.

    For some reason when reading the story, it really reminded me of "facilitated communication" which is a terrible, cruel scam non-communicative and vegetative or near vegetative state people are subject to. I realize this is different, but really not very different.

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
    1. Re:fMRI has problems by Chuckstar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You also have to be careful when thinking about this due to the different conditions that could all be lumped into "vegetative states".

      Someone with localized damage could appear vegetative, but really just be "locked in". In other words, they could have a largely intact brain, except for key regions blocking movement/communication. They would appear vegetative, but actually be able to react in ways that would show up in fMRI. This research could prove to be valid in such cases.

      Someone like Teri Shiavo, though, is a whole different story. Her brain was so damaged that most of it was simply gone (damaged material is cleared out by the immune system). She mostly had a big empty cavity in her head filled with fluid. It's unlikely that fMRI would show any response in such a case. And even if it did, with that much damage it would be impossible to make any guess as to what that activity might mean.

    2. Re:fMRI has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get how the fact that dead fish have functioning brains has to do with anything.

    3. Re:fMRI has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right to be sceptical, but this guy's been giving lectures in legit conferences and publishing papers on this project at least as far back as 2010 (when I saw him in Barcelona).

    4. Re:fMRI has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stroke or brain injury usually takes out something like your motor-control system (speaking, arm/leg movement) or senses like vision/hearing (you might lose the ability to recognise sounds/shapes, but know that they are there. One woman just saw clouds of coloured points rather than anything recognisable, but knew something was there). If it took out your brain-stem, that would mess up your breathing and blood supply for the whole brain, so you die.

      So, a person can be breathing, be conscious, but yet paralyzed completely down to eye movement. It could be that the "sleep mode" which disables motor-control hasn't been switched off. There was some temporary success with a particular drug for some people, but eventually its effects would stop working.

      fMRI would pick up activity in a dozen or so regions associated with particular types of thought. That's how these tests work. If a dozen or so regions out of a hundred all light up when a particular question is asked (and these are all consistent over a large sample of the population), then it's probable that the person is conscious.

      With a salmon brain, that's just the equivalent of one brain region (though Salmon don't really sleep, they just swim against the current). But who knows, brains usually slow down in response to a shortage of nutrients.

  14. Kill me, please by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a legal document that tells my family to pull the plug in such a case. I don't care who thinks I'm a "quitter".

    1. Re:Kill me, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had trauma surgeons tell me that advance directives/living wills are very frequently overridden by family.

      It makes sense, in a degenerate way: the docs and the hospital have better things to do than sue families to get them to follow their invalid family member's advance directive document. It would be a PR disaster, and it's just easier to leave a patient as a full code on a vent rather than fighting a family willing to attempt to get an injunction from a court.

      Basically, what I was told was that these help to absolve your power of attorney of any guilty feelings they might have about terminating care and letting you die. So, it's important that your PoA is on board with your wishes, otherwise they won't be happening while you're incapacitated (and if you're *not* incapacitated then you don't need a living will in order to execute your wishes). Don't get me wrong—I have a notarized living will for which I and my PoA carry a digital copy on our USB keychain drives. I'm just saying that the documents aren't a panacea.

      Also, it's tough to be a doctor. If a patient is resuscitated after their DNR is on file then performing CPR, etc, is legally considered assault (or battery). I've seen a department in damage control mode after a resident failed to let a patient die (ie. the resident successfully resuscitated a DNR patient and wasn't aware of the DNR order). Can end up charged with malpractice or worse...

  15. Non-verbal Autism by macraig · · Score: 1

    This work might also have implications for non-verbal autistic people, who historically were presumed to be severely retarded.

  16. Terri Schiavo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any similarities with her case? Did they pull the plug too early?

  17. False positive? by xlsior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just because they got results, doesn't mean that there's any conscious thought going on.

    Case in point: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/fmrisalmon/
    "So, as the fish sat in the scanner, they showed it “a series of photographs depicting human individuals in social situations.” To maintain the rigor of the protocol (and perhaps because it was hilarious), the salmon, just like a human test subject, “was asked to determine what emotion the individual in the photo must have been experiencing.”

    The salmon, as Bennett’s poster on the test dryly notes, “was not alive at the time of scanning.”

    If that were all that had occurred, the salmon scanning would simply live on in Dartmouth lore as a “crowning achievement in terms of ridiculous objects to scan.” But the fish had a surprise in store. When they got around to analyzing the voxel (think: 3-D or “volumetric” pixel) data, the voxels representing the area where the salmon’s tiny brain sat showed evidence of activity. In the fMRI scan, it looked like the dead salmon was actually thinking about the pictures it had been shown."

    1. Re:False positive? by Atticka · · Score: 1

      I listened to an interview with the doctor that was performing the tests, this is how it works....

      The patient was asked to think about playing tennis since these types of thoughts are known to create noticeable and distinct brain activity that can be observed. The patient was then asked to think about walking around his house creating a distinctly different brain pattern.

      The patient was then asked a series of questions and advised to think of "playing tennis" for a yes and "walking around the house" for a no. A series of test questions (like a polygraph) were asked, is the sky blue, is your name Scott, etc... lines of communication were opened.

      The test went further to ask if the patient was in pain, and he indicated that he was not.

      --
      No sig here...
    2. Re:False positive? by perceptual.cyclotron · · Score: 1

      The Bennett study was deliberately using poor statistical methods to demonstrate a point, and to encourage the field to adopt better minimum standards. While it's undeniable that there are problems in fMRI – anyone halfway competent is aware of these problems (especially the dead salmon problem – which essentially says that without correcting for multiple comparisons, if you do thousands of tests you will get false positives). It's important to be mindful of the possibility of trouble in the statistical methods, but unless you can provide even the barest hint that such problems are actually at play in a given case, your lack of confidence is the most useless form of skepticism possible. Indeed, it can be applied to any situation or claim whatsoever simply by stating "I don't believe this result, because at various times in the past some people have made mistakes."

  18. Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both the BBC and the Star articles claims this is a first. But it's not.

    1. Re:Not the first time by nbauman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the BBC gave a link to the NEJM article. What have they done with those 5 patients since then?

      http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0905370
      Willful Modulation of Brain Activity in Disorders of Consciousness
      Martin M. Monti, Ph.D., Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, M.Sc., Martin R. Coleman, Ph.D., Melanie Boly, M.D., John D. Pickard, F.R.C.S., F.Med.Sci., Luaba Tshibanda, M.D., Adrian M. Owen, Ph.D., and Steven Laureys, M.D., Ph.D.
      N Engl J Med 2010; 362:579-589
      February 18, 2010
      DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905370

      Results

      Of the 54 patients enrolled in the study, 5 were able to willfully modulate their brain activity. In three of these patients, additional bedside testing revealed some sign of awareness, but in the other two patients, no voluntary behavior could be detected by means of clinical assessment. One patient was able to use our technique to answer yes or no to questions during functional MRI; however, it remained impossible to establish any form of communication at the bedside.

      Conclusions

      These results show that a small proportion of patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state have brain activation reflecting some awareness and cognition. Careful clinical examination will result in reclassification of the state of consciousness in some of these patients. This technique may be useful in establishing basic communication with patients who appear to be unresponsive.

    2. Re:Not the first time by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

      What have they done with those 5 patients since then?

      however, it remained impossible to establish any form of communication at the bedside.

      Sounds like all they've done is frustrate the hell out of them, but I hope I'm wrong.

  19. Not the first time by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

    Both the BBC and the Star articles claims this is a first. But it's not.

  20. Bow and locks by Peter+(Professor)+Fo · · Score: 0

    Feedback in necessary to tailor efforts into communication. Suppose you woke up in the jungle surrounded by monkeys (or whatever intelligent creature rocks your boat.) If they don't react to Ug? BOO! Gosh-pilliwinks! or anything else you have no way to evolve a language. 'Doctors' could do better with a dice or oueja board.

  21. My dad's brain damage and amazing recovery by phantomlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in 1998, my dad had a brain aneurysm (his second, the first was a ruptured brain aneurysm when he was a teenager that he survived without any impairment othe than an aneurysm clip on his left carotid arterty) that required a coil embolization (a new technique at the time, he was the 7th patient they had done at this hospital). After placing the coils, a clot broke free resulting in a stroke. He was recovering well and was almost fully functional, when two weeks later when he developed hydrocephalus, so they placed a ventriculostomy to relieve the pressure. Two days after that while doing a CT to check the placement of the catheter, they found an infection in his brain stem (later to also note that he had developed a left ear infection), which required a craniotomy. That resulted in him being in a coma and on a ventilator.

    The only directive he had ever given me was that he didn't want to live on a machine... That ventilator weighed heavily on me. The doctors told me that he had three days to come out of his coma or he probably never would. In an effort to try to get any type of response out of him, they would twist his nipples so hard that they bled. My sister's 14th birthday was on day 5 of the affair and I decided that there was a difference between living on a machine and recovering from a serious incident for a few days. If he didn't come out of the coma, I would pull him off the ventilator on day 7 - just in case he hung on, I didn't want him to die on my sister's birthday.
    He woke up on day 3 and ended up on the ventilator for about a week. It was that incident that finalized his brain damage, Essentially, he was a 41 year old that lost the entire top half of the right side of his brain. He wasn't moving his left side at all, he wasn't able to talk well, his short term memory was totally gone, he couldn't even sit up without falling over and could barely swallow a pureed and thickened diet. After 2.5 months of trying to get him stable enough to leave, he went to rehab where he stayed for another 2.5 months.

    After rehab, he came home to live with me... and he regained almost all of his mental faculties. He could walk with assistance, having regained most of the major muscle control in his left leg, but his primary long term deficits were the loss of his left arm and the neglect of the left side of his field of vision. The kicker? He remembers every word that was said to him while he was in a coma. The doctors can't believe that the person they see corresponds to the brain imaging that they're looking at... while they expect that amount of plasticity in a younger individual, it's extremely rare in an adult. Needless to say, he was pretty happy with his life, though he faced the usual depression and whatnot that comes with such a significant change in his lifestyle.

    Fast forward to this year... he had mastoiditis in the same ear as that infection back in 1998 and took two courses of antibiotics to get rid of it. Five months later, he went blind and started exhibiting stroke symptoms. I took him to the hospital and he was diagnosed with an abscess in his occiptal lobe (visual cortex) that penetrated the ventricles, causing ventriculits. To do imaging and a lumbar puncture, they ended up needing to sedate him and he ended up on a ventilator. Broad spectrum antibiotics (flagyl, vancomycin, and ceftriaxone) were started that night. A week in, he was, once again, no longer responding to pain.

    Once again, I was stuck with confronting my father being on a ventilator and essentially in a coma. Once again, the doctors came through telling me that the odds of survival weren't very good and that, given the previous brain damage to the other side of his brain, now that both sides were involved and with little reserve brain left, he almost certainly wouldn't recover.... but there was still a chance that, if I stopped treatment, he could survive, though it wasn't likely. I decided that my dad would want the only option that gave him any chance of an outcome worse than death, so I co

    --
    Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
    1. Re:My dad's brain damage and amazing recovery by AEC216 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing! I hope your dad recovers.

      --
      May I please have my frontal lobotomy if I bring back the ashtrays?
    2. Re:My dad's brain damage and amazing recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life is cruel sometimes.. I hope you father turns out OK. Thanks for sharing.

    3. Re:My dad's brain damage and amazing recovery by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing your story and good luck your father, you and your family.

      My father suffered a severe stroke in 1994 (He was 46) which caused his heart to stop numerous times. He was comatose for 2 weeks and doctors told my mother there was too much brain damage from the lack of oxygen due to the multiple heart failures. My mother and grandparents could not bear the thought of pulling the plug. He came out with severe brain damage and was said not to be in a vegetative state but in an altered state. He was breathing on his own but of course needed a feeding tube. He moved around a bit, his eyes were open when he was "awake". Unfortunately he could not respond but we always maintained hope that he could recover. His mother was at his bed side nearly every day talking to him, reading to him, playing music, putting the TV on, playing home movies etc. We tried everything, asking him to try to move his eyes, squeeze his hand, anything really. Nothing got a response.

      He passed away of natural causes in 2003, he was only 55 then. To this day I sometimes feel guilty that I didn't try harder to see if he was somehow trapped inside his own body. How horrible would it have been for him if that were true. But what was done was done and there really was nothing I nor anyone else could do for him, I accepted that a long time ago but there is always this lingering feeling of guilt. I used to have a lot of dreams that he was alive and well, living a secret life and the person wasting away in the nursing home was an impostor.

      Its a shit position to be, having a loved one suffer like that. He was such a good man, intelligent, kind loving. For him to go at such a young age is about as sad as it gets.

    4. Re:My dad's brain damage and amazing recovery by patchouly · · Score: 1

      Incredible story. Thanks for sharing it. Hope your Dad continues to beat the odds and recovers enough that he can be happy and you don't have to worry about him as much.

    5. Re:My dad's brain damage and amazing recovery by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Statistically, there is always room for hope...

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  22. Perception. by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

    Didn't they do something likethis in an episode of Perception, where they told a vegative guy to think of two different things to represent YES and NO, and then went through the alphabet until they got a name?

  23. Judging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helen Keller, blind and deaf, was thought to be no better than some "wild animal", unable to learn or behave human. It was only because no one was listening to her and therefore no one cared.The "experts" knew that she could never become the woman she grew up to be.

    Here is a man who "experts" decided was nothing but a mindless vegetable when it turns out that people were simply not listening to until now.

  24. Re:Happy Hump-day from The Golden Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BURMA SHAVE!

  25. Dialog, damaged by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    In the book it was a big Amarone, not a nice Chianti, btw.

    You think that's bad, go read "Make Room, Make Room" by Harry Harrison, and then go subject yourself to "Soylent Green."

    That is the bloody poster child for Hollywood fapping not only all over the book's story, but also the meaning of the story, the order of the story, the characters in the story... worst SF movie ever made, hands down, because it didn't just suck, it was the magical transformation from a book that most definitely did not suck, to a movie with absolutely no redeeming value whatsoever that was *also* an insult to its inspiration. Horrific.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  26. The hell is that there is no leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've also had salmon respond to fMRI scans hours after death. Not really impressive or useful if interpreted wrong.

    What if it means exactly what it implies? What if the conscience lingers in brains inside dead bodies almost until neural tissue is completely decomposed ... or cremated. Until recently none could tell for sure and it was just a theoretical speculation, although signs of conscience on severed heads are very well documented in history. All those guys who plead "If that happens to me, then just kill me" may find out that such bold step doesn't solve their problem. They may try "If that or any other kind of permanent loss of interaction, such as death, happens to me, remove my brain into a blender and turn the machine on".

    1. Re:The hell is that there is no leaving by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You mean consciousness not conscience. It's the difference between Jiminy Cricket and the sound of crickets.

      On the other hand, if you want to see a film interpretation of the above idea, see the Torchwood mini-series Miracle Day. It fills your head with all sorts of scary questions.

  27. Awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how many aware patients have they pulled the plug on so far, because they weren't able to communicate?

  28. And the movie is from a book by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    Book -> Movie -> Song

    Oh and the concept is hardly original because the book was inspired by reading of the Prince of Wales visiting a real life soldier who had been similarly wounded.

    Reality->Book -> Movie -> Song

    Gosh, it is almost as if people get inspiration from other people. THIEFS!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  29. Then how can he read the question? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Of course, you can always make things worse theorizing but in this case, they guy can read and now also answer.

    In a civilized country, he would just get an MRI machine since that is what he needs and we can affords it with our means. Oh wait, that is communism right. Yeah, the Romney thing is to let him suffer because euthanasia also isn't allowed.

    It is not like providing a 2 million dollar/euro machine for every vegetative person is going to break any countries economy.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Then how can he read the question? by jythie · · Score: 1

      They seem to have scraped up the cash for useless multi-million dollar machines to scan people at airports... yeah.. I suspect most 1st world nations could afford a bunch of fMRIs for coma patients.

    2. Re:Then how can he read the question? by readin · · Score: 1

      Of course, you can always make things worse theorizing but in this case, they guy can read and now also answer.

      In a civilized country, he would just get an MRI machine since that is what he needs and we can affords it with our means. Oh wait, that is communism right. Yeah, the Romney thing is to let him suffer because euthanasia also isn't allowed.

      It is not like providing a 2 million dollar/euro machine for every vegetative person is going to break any countries economy.

      Can we afford it? An MRI machine costing thousands (tens of thousands?) of dollars for every patient in a vegetative state, plus staff to maintain it and to interpret the results. I suppose we have the resources to do it if we made that our top priority, but at what cost? Is the MRI machine for one person more valuable than buying an ambulance for a small town (might save a few lives with that ambulance)? Is the MRI machine for one person more valuable than a school lunch program for an inner city elementary school? Is the MRI machine for one person more valuable than a college education for another (looking at just the individuals - having a life at all does seem better than having the better life of a college-educated person - but also consider the benefits to society of having more college educated people around).

      There are quite a lot of things we can afford, but we can't afford all of them. One of the reasons our government is in so much debt is a failure to set priorities. Anything that is good or beneficial is deemed worthy of spending money on, yet clearly we can't afford everything - choices need to be made.

      If we paid enough taxes to eliminate the deficit the economy would tank immediately (it will tank eventually anyway from the debt). If we paid enough taxes to eliminate the deficit while simultaneously increasing spending to cover the cost of everything that is good and beneficial then we would indeed be in socialism with all of your money going to the government. Unfortunately, it is human nature to just stop working when that occurs. What if you look at it from a world-wide perspective?

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  30. I except = weasel words by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't need to say "expect" unless you knew you were a weasel trying to project YOUR opinion on "most" people (most is another weasel word).

    It is simply not up to you and thank goodness for that. Their are no simple answers on this and most certainly not ones based on one persons opinion who isn't in that situation.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  31. The diving bell and the butterfly by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diving_Bell_and_the_Butterfly

    probably based on this, book written by author in this state.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  32. Quality of live is relative by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    People say easily "I would want to die if I was like that" but when you are like that... quality of life is not hard set. When you get older, you know you are going downhill one way or another. Ask a youngster who says he rather be dead then in a wheelchair how he feels about a walker. To most young people, old age is a horror but when you get there, you find that there is more to live then perfect health. Would you want to see your grandchild even if both of you were in diapers? That is real life.

    I can respect people who say "enough" and wish to die but until you are there, you cannot tell and you cannot speak for someone else. I had to sit by twice as someone died knowing that resuscitation was pointless and unwanted and I could see it was but I wanted them with me longer and people don't die easily even if they want it to end.

    Until you are there, you just can't talk about it. And you can't make others understand because nobody wants to truly consider death. And I can't blame them.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  33. Reruns of Barney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on what channel it's set to, that could be a fate far worse than death.

    I love you You love me
    We're a happy family
    With a great big hug and a kiss from me to you.
    Won't you say you love me too
    I love you You love me
    We're best friends like friends should be
    With a great big hug and a kiss from me to you.
    Won't you say you love me too
    I love you You love me
    We're a happy family
    With a great big hug and a kiss from me to you.
    Won't you say you love me too
    I love you You love me
    We're best friends like friends should be
    With a great big hug and a kiss from me to you.
    Won't you say you love me too

  34. Not moving is very painful by Marrow · · Score: 1

    He must be in severe pain. Unless his injuries have left him with no ability to feel his body, he would likely be in agony.

    1. Re:Not moving is very painful by Atticka · · Score: 1

      Once the lines of communication were opened (simple yes\no answers) the patient was asked if he was in pain and he indicated he was not.

      --
      No sig here...
  35. My Mother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mother had a stroke around 1990 and was confined to a wheelchair. In 1997 she had another stroke that resulted in a coma and was hospitalized for a while with no sign of regaining consciousness. She was moved to a long term care facility for eight months where she exhibited no signs of coming out of it. During this time she was fed through a gastric tube that was inserted into the stomach.

    A decision was made to terminate feeding. Plenty of morphine and nothing else. It took about a week if I remember correctly until she died.

    Something I have always wondered about was what level of activity there was in her brain during the months in the long term care facility. How did the termination of feeding affect her?

    Clearly the way we have of dealing with the nearly-dead is pretty awful and "discoveries" like this should make it even more awful to contemplate.

  36. Why not ask him if he wants drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you want to die: no. We legalized it last week. Do you want some: HELL YES!

  37. Prototype device from Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work on this sounds like the prototype for Capt Pike's chair....

  38. First message decoded: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Please kill me!"

  39. Johnny Got Hist Gun by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    (*in Morse code*) "Kill me....Kill me...Kill me...."

    Johnny Got His Gun

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Got_His_Gun_(film)

  40. I don't know which is worse... by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

    the fact that so many people are kept alive like this and live for years unable to do anything; or the fact that many of the people like this that were allowed to die may have wanted to go on and wait for a breakthrough, that they may have been aware that they were dying...

  41. Inconceivable suffering by gregdeocampo · · Score: 1

    Treat this man with the respect you'd treat a dog, I say, and euthanize him. This is unbelievably arrogant and cold medicine.