Slashdot Mirror


Papa John's Sued For Unwanted Pizza-Related Texts

jfruh writes "Nationwide pizza chain Papa John's is finding itself on the receiving end of a $250 million text spam lawsuit. From the article: 'Seattle law firm Heyrich Kalish McGuigan, representing three Papa John's customers, alleged that the pizza delivery service has sent 500,000 unwanted text messages to customers. If the court finds that Papa John's violated the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the pizza maker could have to pay damages of $500 per text message, or US$250 million, one of the largest damage awards under the 1991 law, the law firm said. "Many customers complained to Papa John's that they wanted the text messages to stop, and yet thousands of spam text messages were sent week after week," Donald Heyrich, attorney for the plaintiffs said in a statement. "This should be a wake-up call to advertisers. Consumers do not want spam on their cell phones."'

32 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. it would have been more cost effective by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

    to just have pirated 3 movies and be done with it.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  2. This is wrong. by RudyValencia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Companies should honor requests for people to be able to opt out of their text messaging programs. I used to work in a call center supporting a major cellular carrier and their devices. The most common problem people called about was text messages they did not want and needed help in stopping. All we could do was educate the customer on how to opt out of the text messaging spam. This was one year ago. I left and never looked back.

    1. Re:This is wrong. by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Companies should honor requests for people to be able to opt out

      No, they should all be "op-in"...

      (...otherwise they just set up a new company every week and we have to "opt-out" all over again)

      --
      No sig today...
  3. Law Firm: $50 mil - You: $1 off next pizza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Enjoy your justice - American sytle.

    1. Re:Law Firm: $50 mil - You: $1 off next pizza by c0lo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (hmmm.... can't stop thinking... a dozen more suits like this and the US economy would be growing... right?)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:Law Firm: $50 mil - You: $1 off next pizza by Sulphur · · Score: 5, Funny

      (hmmm.... can't stop thinking... a dozen more suits like this and the US economy would be growing... right?)

      A gross domestic product.

  4. The law says... by iYk6 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The law says that you aren't allowed to spam cell phones with commercial advertisements. No opt out necessary.

    1. Re:The law says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But of course there's a loop hole... one used by a company during this past election.

      You don't spam the phone by sending text messages... you spam the phone by sending "emails" to
      @

      Such as 8145553345@vtext.com or whatever Verizon's service is. The company in Virginia that was doing this hasn't gone to trial yet but many see it as "breaking the spirit of the law but not actually the law its self".

    2. Re:The law says... by kbdd · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't spam the phone by sending text messages... you spam the phone by sending "emails" to @

      I would like to hear what they tell the judge when he asks where did they think the messages would end up if not on a cell phone as a text message?

    3. Re:The law says... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So how do you know if the customer is in another country?

      They don't know and they don't care. Why is it the Belgian government's problem that US carriers have stupid "receiver pays" billing policies? Belgium can't fix an American problem.

  5. Papa John by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just as info for those who don't know these morons.

    "Before the election Papa John’s CEO John Schnatter, a big Romney supporter, was one of the highest profile CEOs threatening layoffs and pizza price hikes (god forbid!) if Obama won. He doubled down after the election, like the Vegas man saying he’d start making layoffs and reducing hours at Papa John’s locations rather than having to provide healthcare for people working more than 30 hours per week."

    http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/190955/idiots-line-up-to-thank-papa-johns-for-screwing-them-out-of-healthcare/

    1. Re:Papa John by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because it's a job creator taking a brave stand against Comrade Obama. A job creator, cutting jobs and pay of already poorly paid employees, is an admirable stand against the communism that is causing the EU and Canada to descend in to governmental Orwellian surveillance, economic ruination, soccer, no freedoms and a whole bunch of stupid national anthems and incomprehensible languages.

      I salute Papa John's financially successful and well educated Facebook fans. Fight for the job creators, not the White House Politburo!

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    2. Re:Papa John by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      did not know that and now that I do, they are on my do-not-buy list.

      You realize, of course, that by doing that, you're hosing the employees even further, because not only will hours be cut, but so will the number of employees.

      Perhaps they can go to work for a more ethical pizzeria when Papa John's cuts back locations due to reduced business. I suppose you'd prefer that nothing ever get better at all because some people will suffer if it does.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Papa John by ehynes · · Score: 4, Informative

      How can it be payback? The lawsuit is being brought by a private law firm and it was certified as a class-action case by a Reagan appointee.

    4. Re:Papa John by clonehappy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't bother. People on here don't understand basic economics. They think that somehow these pizza joints (franchises mostly that have nothing much to do with John Schnatter anyway...barely keep their heads above water) are raking in cash hand over fist and greedily sticking it into their vaults to swim in occasionally. This is patently false.

      If it costs them an extra $50,000 a year to run a restaurant, many will be forced to lay people off, simply because they can't afford to pay them anymore. Some restaurants may even close. But somehow, in the new Amerika, this is progress?

      It boggles the mind. Fix the problem within the healthcare system, then worry about forcing the poorest individuals to pay a tax if they don't have healthcare. But since it was packaged up and shoved in the sickly-sweet loving liberal exterior, it has to be good...and anyone who understands the real ramifications of the healthcare act is a very very bad person and/or a racist.

    5. Re:Papa John by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Informative

      Papa John's is reacting to the new economic reality they face under the Obama regime. It's that simple. Obamacare will force them to cut hours and let people go. They know that. We know that. This has never changed since the concept was first floated. It's reality.

      Some people knew it - but many people lived under a reality distortion field that lead them to believe that there would be no consequences of any kind under the new law. Those of us who pointed out the flaws in the plan and pointed out that you couldn't alter the trajectory of billions of dollars without consequences were and are being called haters, and liars, and ignorant... and worse.
       
      The worst part is that Obamacare doesn't actually do anything to reform health care or control costs. It's a shell game to hide the mounting costs.
       
      Still, the effects of this farce are only beginning to be felt. The shell game they've been playing about funding is going to end, with a shell lifted to reveal... nothing. Expect a wave of insurance companies going under over the next decade, if they aren't bailed out to the tune of billions or trillions (which the government doesn't have). Since many underwriters and insurance companies also provide other forms of insurance, the ripple effects through the economy will be staggering.
       
      And those ignorant people under the reality distortion field won't understand that these consequences were as predictable as the sun rising. They simply cannot comprehend TANSTAAFL.

    6. Re:Papa John by jackbird · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the clusterfuck that ended up being the ACA was an attempt to get republicans on board. The actual sickly-sweet loving liberal version is single payer, like, you know, the rest of the developed world. And small business owners should be first in line to ask for it (perhaps only after large corporations with large retiree healthcare expenses), but somehow they've all been convinced it's anathema.

    7. Re:Papa John by PraiseBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or maybe he will be force to lower his franchising fees, since clearly the parent corporation is making a ton of money.
      They have options:
      A) Everything stays the same, go out of business (so the CEO claims)
      B) Cut back employee hours to save money, and stay in business
      C) Cut back franchise fees to a billionaire who has a private golf course and moat, and stay in business
      D) Raise prices by the 11 cents per pizza and pass along the cost to the customer

      They've chosen options B and D. Raising the prices by 50 cents to cover health care costs, while simultaneously cutting worker hours so they don't have to give them health care either way, and hiring more "part-timers". Essentially the plan is to screw over both the customers and the employees, rather than cutting his own obscenely large paycheck.

      People on here don't understand basic economics
      I think people on here don't like assholes.

  6. Re:Who doesn't want Pizza? by bfandreas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not to be nitpicky but proper Mozzarella is made from (European) buffalo milk. Not that cheap cow stuff.
    Not every lactation of any bovine will do for proper Mozzarella.

    But anything is better than that horrid cheese analogue they stir together from second rate fat, rotting skunks and paint.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  7. Sounds like a Marketing-led clusterfuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I imagine happened is this: A marketing firm contacts Papa John's marketing about spamming sms, convinces them its a great idea.

    Marketing arm of Papa Johns goes ahead on its own, resulting in this case.

    At no point was any technical, legal or compliance arm of Papa Johns consulted, where they would have found people who know about this stuff due to existing business relationships with above-board SMS platform providers who would have informed them of the legal requirements for operating a sms service (opt-ins, requirement for STOP handling, etc).

    Anonymous because the stuff in bold is true.

    This won't go to trial, it will be settled beforehand. The case is that unwinnable for Papa Johns.

  8. Re:Spam tastes great by 6031769 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rectangular squares? I suppose you need to differentiate them from all those elliptical squares we see nowadays.

    --
    Burns: We're building a casino!
    McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
  9. Well... by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Couldn't happen to a "nicer" guy. He was so angry about the $0.14 per pizza he would have to spend to give his employees healthcare coverage that he will now be paying out the equivalent on healthcare costs for an entire state and with nothing to show for it.

    Oops.

    Stupid is as stupid does.

  10. Re:If I get spam from a pizza company, by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm going to order so many pizzas to be sent to random addresses with the name "sam spam" etc they're likely to get the message pretty quickly.

    Be sure to order a spam, spam, spam, spam, cheese, tomato and spam topping.

    --
    No sig today...
  11. That would buy a lot of health care by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    he pizza maker could have to pay damages of $500 per text message, or US$250 million, one of the largest damage awards under the 1991 law...

    That would have bought some health care for their employees.

    According to Forbes magazine, it would cost Papa Johns 5 cents per pizza to provide health care to their employees.

    http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2012/11/14/Forbes-Papa-Johns-ACA-cost-5-cents/UPI-54101352940627/

    It never was about the nickle and it never was. Most species of apes, specifically the males, assert their sexual dominance by keeping more of the good stuff - whatever that might be- for themselves than they can possibly use. This is so they can broadcast the fact of their dominance to females .

    I think it's safe to say that the owner of Papa Johns is a physically unprepossessing specimen, basically he looks like some guy on your neighborhood watch.

    http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/08/papa-johns-obamacare-will-raise-pizza-prices-131331.html

    Without a mindset that causes him to spend his life seeking, acquiring hording and displaying his wealth, he'd never get laid, or at least, he would not get as laid as he feels he should be.

    In making a show of denying those under him healthcare, and especially by talking about how little it would cost him to provide those benefits as per the article above his primordial mind is attempting to broadcast the fact of his sexual dominance / desirability to available females. That's what's going on here.

    When shit as demented as "No nickle for healthcare !!!! " becomes that public and is even paraded around by the perps themselves, you have to go to waaaaay back in evolutionary time to find the part of their brain that's being activated.

    It's amusing that the conservatives who deny evolution is real seem also to be the people whose motivations are most clearly amenable to forces governing basic evolutionary processes.

    1. Re:That would buy a lot of health care by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure there is an element of this, but it's not just about the nickel ; it's about the dollars he'd have to spend on wages for employees that were no longer terrified of losing their jobs.

      People who aren't worried about their healthcare costs are less scared of losing their job. The American healthcare system is a nightmare because a single accident can bankrupt you, wipe you out, make you choose between keeping a finger and sending your kids to college.

      People like this ass perceive their employees as convenient victims, not partners in their pizza enterprise. Making them happier and more content is not on their agenda, because happy contented people are less likely to want to work for minimum wage and clock out when the restaurant is empty.

  12. Re:Who doesn't want Pizza? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    I fail to see what Papa John's has to do with pizza.

  13. Re:If I get spam from a pizza company, by tangelogee · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't want spam, I want pepperoni!

    Well, you could order the spam, spam, pepperoni and cheese, that hasn't got much spam on it.

  14. Re:If I get spam from a pizza company, by Y2KDragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, the drivers lose in the cost of gas to go out. They lose tips for non-existent deliveries. They lose income from people being angry and petty. Remember, the people working in the stores aren't the ones who sent the spam, but they will be the ones to bear the worst of the punishment for such actions. Best response is to just not buy from them anymore. I've stopped ordering a long time ago when I found out he was a heavy political backer of the "nut-job right" (not to be confused with actual Conservatives).

  15. Re:Spam tastes great by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    However if Papa John ignored their own "stop" requests they shouldn't be surprised if they get fined (mind you $500 per text is a bit excessive).

    Why is $500 excessive for an act of harassment? I think you should also get a restraining order against them in the bargain, and if they send you one more text, the CEO gets jailed for 30 days.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. The FCC is soliciting comments on this topic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the FCC has a currently open comment period on how to address automated system for sending spam texts to cell phones. See http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022037251

    With this Public Notice, we seek comment on the petition for an expedited clarification and
    declaratory ruling filed by Revolution Messaging, LLC.1 Revolution Messaging asks the Commission to
    clarify that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)2 and the Commission’s related rules3 apply
    to users of Internet-to-phone text messaging technology and similar technologies involving the storage
    and automatic dialing of wireless telephone numbers.4 Revolution Messaging states that such a ruling
    would make clear that Internet-to-phone text messaging technology is a type of “automatic telephone
    dialing system” under the Commission’s rules and is therefore subject to the prohibitions in the TCPA
    and the Commission’s related rules.

    Anyone can file comments urging the FCC to make clear that such systems should be considered a type of “automatic telephone dialing system” under the Commission’s rules.

    Read the full petition here: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022037252

    File comments on the FCC ECFS system, the docket number to use is "02-278". http://http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/

    And although the deadline is close, the FCC is generally fairly liberal in allowing and considering late-filed comments.

  17. Re:Who doesn't want Pizza? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    I personally can not stand there food.

    Why are you calling the GP "food"? And why can't you stand there?

  18. Re:Who doesn't want Pizza? by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

    Papa Johns is one of the better nationwide chains of pizza

    That's like saying "Having electrodes pasted onto your nuts is one of the more tolerable forms of torture."