Slashdot Mirror


Four Cups of Coffee A Day Cuts Risk of Oral Cancer

An anonymous reader writes "Coffee may help lower the risk of developing oral and pharyngeal cancer and of dying from the disease. The study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, was conducted using the Cancer Prevention Study II. The large cohort study began in 1982 by the American Cancer Society. Researchers were able to examine 968,432 men and women, none of whom had cancer at the time of their enrollment in the study." Four or more cups a day lowered the risk of getting oral cancers by a whopping 49%.

151 comments

  1. Chaw tabaccy... drink coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chaw tabaccy, cuppajoe. Chaw tabaccy, cuppajoe. Repeat all day long. What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Chaw tabaccy... drink coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I was thinking. Maybe I can give up smoking after all.

    2. Re:Chaw tabaccy... drink coffee by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      HPV.

      Your biggest risk for mouth cancer isn't chewing _tobacco_.

      Chew, coffee, chew, coffee, chew, coffee.

      No I can't imagine a way of combining actions. Coffee would have to be too cold.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  2. Yeah, but ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... my dental hygienist will kill me if she has to scrape any more Starbucks stains off my teeth.

    At least cancer may give me a few more years to live.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Yeah, but ... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... my dental hygienist will kill me if she has to scrape any more Starbucks stains off my teeth.

      No worries, the article clearly said "coffee."

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Yeah, but ... by mandginguero · · Score: 1

      ... my dental hygienist will kill me if she has to scrape any more Starbucks stains off my teeth.

      forget the stains, acidic drinks pull calcium off of your teeth

      --
      i don't know karate, but i know ca-razy
    3. Re:Yeah, but ... by somersault · · Score: 2

      Maybe calcium protects against oral cancer? :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Yeah, but ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You know if you actually brush those teeth that is not a problem.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Yeah, but ... by danormsby · · Score: 1

      Not quite as clear cut as that. Depends on your teeth which depends on your genes and environment. I love coffee but can't stomach more than one cup a day as the caffeine does me in. This puts me in a different pool of people than frequent coffee drinkers which is apparently at a higher risk of cancer. This isn't the same as saying drink more coffee and have less cancer.

      --
      Omnis amans amens
    6. Re:Yeah, but ... by Guignol · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's the wrong "Yeah, but"
      The real "Yeah, but" is this one:
      Yeah, but my gf thinks it tastes bad when I drink too much coffee, therefore
      Four Cups of Coffee A Day Cuts Risk of Oral Sex
      I'm so sorry but the balance is just not there

    7. Re:Yeah, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if she wants you suckin on her naughty bits down there then she's going to have to get used to coffee. Apparently oral on women (with virus infection(s)) is known to cause throat cancer in men (and women). Maybe the coffee will dampen that risk. They should study that next. Don't care? You will years down the road when your dealing with throat cancer.

    8. Re:Yeah, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And oral sex increases your risk.

      So it's up to you to decide how to start the day.

    9. Re:Yeah, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't care? You will years down the road when your dealing with throat cancer.

      Doesn't matter, had sex!

    10. Re:Yeah, but ... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      And oral sex increases your risk.

      So it's up to you to decide how to start the day.

      Between oral sex and coffee? I'll take my chances with the BJ 8 days a week!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    11. Re:Yeah, but ... by highphilosopher · · Score: 1

      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."

      Telling people "If you don't understand please don't mod me down" in a somewhat snarky way

      Just so you know, I modded you down because you whine about mods in your sig.

      Didn't understand the comment, and decided to mod down anyway.

      Post 1 was moded down and Post 2 explains that the reason is (basically) he didn't understand that Poster 1 doesn't like to be moded down for people not understanding!!!

      IT'S AN IRONIC ENDLESS LOOP!!!!

    12. Re:Yeah, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite as clear cut as that. Depends on your teeth which depends on your genes and environment.

      I love coffee but can't stomach more than one cup a day as the caffeine does me in. This puts me in a different pool of people than frequent coffee drinkers which is apparently at a higher risk of cancer. This isn't the same as saying drink more coffee and have less cancer.

      Sorry, but you're wrong. None of the people enrolled in the study had cancer and there was no attempt made to quantify their risk of developing cancer prior to the trial. The study simply shows that the population of people who drank coffee had fewer cases of oral cancer, and the subpopulations who drank even more coffee showed an even greater reduction in the incidence of oral cancer.

  3. Possible FRAUD ALERT. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Four or more cups a day lowered the risk of getting oral cancers by 49%."

    Is that public relations from coffee producers?

    Did the percentage of oral cancers go down because people died from diabetes?

    I'm VERY skeptical.

    1. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by masternerdguy · · Score: 2

      I'm skeptical because, yet again, coffee has flip flopped from harmful stimulant that can increase hypertension and cause heart disease to wonderfood that cures everything wrong with you.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by WWJohnBrowningDo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because coffee drinks are on average slightly richer and rich people has a slightly less chance of getting cancer?

      If cash can cure AIDS, why not cancer too?

    3. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did the percentage of oral cancers go down because people died from diabetes?

      What in the nine hells does diabetes have to do with coffee?

      Hell, prior junk research has shown coffee drinkers have less of a risk for diabetes.

      Oh, wait, you're confusing sludge and a pound of sugar (eg, Starbucks) with actual coffee. My bad.

    4. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Well the starbucks drip coffee is actually pretty good but to expensive so I only drink it when someone gives me a giftcard. Not all of their coffee is drowned in sugar.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    5. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      When referring to food and drink, "rich" does not mean "expensive," it means "sumptuous". Rich food is not necessarily expensive, and expensive food is not necessarily rich.

      Coffee is indeed sumptuous, but it isn't expensive unless you're stupid enough to buy it at Starbucks or even McDonald's. A ten dollar can of coffee will give you a fresh pot every morning for all month long. Ten dollars will buy you a dozen beers, or four two litre bottles of soda, or two gallons of milk. Coffee is one of the least expensive drinks there are (unless, as I said, you're a rich retard who's too lazy to brew your own).

      I think you could use a cup or two right now...

    6. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm VERY skeptical.

      Seriously? Did you not RTFS? "The study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, was conducted using the Cancer Prevention Study II. The large cohort study began in 1982 by the American Cancer Society. Researchers were able to examine 968,432 men and women, none of whom had cancer at the time of their enrollment in the study."

      What is someone who doesn't trust science fucking doing at slashdot, anyway? Go back to Sports Illustrated and leave us nerds alone, dumbass.

    7. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by Shempster · · Score: 1

      "Four or more cups a day lowered the risk of getting oral cancers by 49%." Is that public relations from coffee producers? Did the percentage of oral cancers go down because people died from diabetes? I'm VERY skeptical.

      Why'd you flag his post as a troll for? It's a legit assumption, whether its completely ignorant of the study or not. Most of the general public are increasingly unaware of more and more reality outside their individual tiny inner circles of immediate friends and family, and their social media apps. Corporate media is a dubious source of information controlled by the biggest advertisers and trust funds from big oil and other polluters. These types of funders, clearly driven by self-interest, drive the storyline the public chats about, injecting half-truths and lies that promote their own selfish interests into the public conscience, everyone and everything else be damned. So yeah, warm n fuzzy "studies" like this should be initially met with skepticism.

    8. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Duh. Obviously it's a wonder-food that is being slandered by Mormons, same as beer.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You need to get out more. It's pretty bad. Colombian; available in 5lb bags at wally world is much, much better.

      Sure compared to can coffee charbucks is pretty good. But dish water is pretty good compared to can coffee.

      Hint: Many idiots think they can improve coffee by burning it, they should get better beans. Don't spend crazy money. Most of the super snooty coffee is faked for the label conscious hipster anyhow. There is more fake JBM and Kona then real, by far. You can be sold/served fake in Jamaica and Hawaii, what do you think your odds on the internet are? If you like that kind of thing, buy the Costa Rician for a fair price and label it JBM/Kona yourself. I've been serving my idiot friends the same pound for the better part of a decade.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. Proving once and for all, that Cancer has better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    taste than most human beings.

  5. That's great... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but what does it increase the chances of? Well, besides drug (caffeine) addiction?

    Come on, there's always a catch...

    1. Re:That's great... by kenj0418 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on, there's always a catch...

      don't be so negative there is no catch drinking coffee coffee doesn't have a catch I drink lots of coffee and I don't have any side-effects I think you are being paranoid ha ha I'm not going to have oral cancer and you are just mad about it why don't you chill out and have a cup of coffee like everyone else I think I need another cup of coffee what the hell is this slashdot says I have to wait 30 seconds to post aaahhhh *click* *click* *click* ahhh still 28 more seconds

    2. Re:That's great... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Be careful, Cornholio! You're gonna kill yourself bouncing off all those walls!

    3. Re:That's great... by ygslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...but what does it increase the chances of? Well, besides drug (caffeine) addiction?

      I'll bet the rate of cancer morbidity among heroin users is extremely low.

    4. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the main correlation here is that people who drink four or more cups of coffee per day just don't engage in oral sex.

    5. Re:That's great... by prasadsurve · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of Le Cafe

    6. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drink a good strong cup of coffee and check your heart on an EKG. You will be surprised how erratic your heart rate becomes. Caffeine does create erratic heart rate, but how serious it is I have not idea. I know when the doctor looked at my EKG readout he just said, "That is caffeine." and dismissed it.

    7. Re:That's great... by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Awesome... reminds me I need to get another cup : )

    8. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you threatening me?

    9. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Dave Grohl.

    10. Re:That's great... by epSos-de · · Score: 2

      Correct. We should use our common sense in here.
      Hot coffee can actually increase the chances of cancer, if you burn your tissue way too often.

      The coffee producers funded a study that said that hot tea can create cancer. Now they funded a study that promotes coffee, but actually the tea is far more superior than coffee against cancer, because it can be blended and have multiple effects, instead of one. Most of the medicine was extracted from herbs. And most of tea is made from herbs too.

      The most healthiest coffee is probably the non-roasted, green coffee that is blended with mate and honey.

    11. Re:That's great... by Creepy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The catch is this is American style drip brewed coffee. I'd be curious to see if this same finding is true for French Press or Espresso, which previously have been found to contain oils that are cancer causing, but these are removed in filtered coffee. Perhaps they counteract each other. Also I'd be curious if they used teabags or a tea ball in their research (that didn't find results in favor or against), which would be similar to filtered vs unfiltered coffee.

    12. Re:That's great... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Green coffee??? Why the hell drink something if it tastes like crap? May as well just chew the beans, at least then you're getting a little bit of nutrition with the foul taste.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    13. Re:That's great... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      One possible 'catch' is that caffeine can be a trigger for migraine apparently. I am currently trialling an exclusion diet for migraine management and one of the restrictions is no more than one serve of caffeine or chocolate per day - and a 'serve' is smaller than you'd think.

      Ironically, one of the medications my husband used to be prescribed for migraine was a product called Cafergot, to be taken at the onset of a migraine, it used caffeine to carry ergot directly to the brain for faster uptake in order to cut migraines off before they really settled. It was only useful if you took it within the first 30 minutes of offset. You couldn't take more than 2 per week or 3 per month because the ergot is nasty toxic stuff.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    14. Re:That's great... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Based on the residue left on the cup, I would assume that espresso retains the oils, you can usually see any oily residue floating on the top of a short black.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  6. What about smokers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smokers will normally drink coffee whilst having a cig. Whilst the coffee opens up the taste buds, it increases the risk of smokers having mouth / tongue cancer....

  7. COFFEE? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like coffee. I REALLY LIKE COFFEE. I drink a lot of coffee. SURE I PEE A LOT, and YES well MAYBE but not REALLY, Iâ(TM)m NOT HIGH STRUNG. I just tell MY FRIENDS to MELLOW THE FUCK OUT. Itâ(TM)s not me, itâ(TM)s you. YOU MOTHER FUCKER. Not me, you. I love coffee. HOW FAST ARE WE GOING? I have things to do. Good bye⦠SERIOUSLY, GOOD FUCKING BYE. Good bye. I love coffee. Or is it cocaine, Iâ(TM)m not sure. Or maybe Iâ(TM)m a crack head? HELLO! HELLO! Yellow mellow. Coffee? Did someone say coffee? I love coffee. Mostly triple espressos, no water no ice. LOVE the drip. I LOVE THE FUCKING DRIP. Coffee that is.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:COFFEE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stan the Java Man?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tjarMM4gUc

    2. Re:COFFEE? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1
      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    3. Re:COFFEE? by needsomemoola · · Score: 2

      Maybe you confused your cocaine for your creamer mix or sugar. I keep mine next to each other bye the coffee machine too. Easy mistake.

      --
      "That'll never compile."
  8. statistics by alienzed · · Score: 0

    Anyone good with statistics? Sounds to me like 49% is actually bad, I mean, 51% of the people in this study got cancer.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    1. Re:statistics by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2

      22% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    2. Re:statistics by narcc · · Score: 2

      Google "Relative risk"

    3. Re:statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anyone good with statistics? Sounds to me like 49% is actually bad, I mean, 51% of the people in this study got cancer.

      I *hope* you're being facetious....

      If a human's risk of developing oral cancer at some point in his lifetime is 2 in 100,000, then drinking 4+ cups of coffee per day reduces that risk to essentially 1 per 100,000.

      You're welcome.

    4. Re:statistics by fatphil · · Score: 1

      It has been shown that 4 cups of strychnine a day reduces your relative risk of cancer by *100%*.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    5. Re:statistics by JustOK · · Score: 1

      74% of people get that statistic wrong 100% of the time.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:statistics by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Informative

      If 100 out of 10000 non-coffee-drinkers got cancer (1%) and 51 out of 10000 coffee drinkers got cancer (0.51%) that's a 49% decrease.

    7. Re:statistics by narcc · · Score: 1

      As a rule of thumb, just ignore anything with an RR<2 (200%).

    8. Re:statistics by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Always remember to add a decimal point or two to your made up statics. It makes them 82.4582645389319% more believable.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  9. 4 cups of coffee a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lightweights! I assume they consider cup to be 8 fluid ounces. In which case I drink two cups just to wake up.

  10. Not Fraud! by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 1

    4 cups a day lowered the risk of getting oral cancers.

    Because at 4 cups a day, you're not eating, so your cells split more slowly (about 20% slower)... And that reduces the risk of cancer, since there are fewer opportunities for cancer to develop.

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    1. Re:Not Fraud! by lxs · · Score: 1

      Because at 4 cups a day, you're not eating...

      Not in my experience. Are you sure you were drinking coffee?

    2. Re:Not Fraud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because at 4 cups a day, you're not eating...

      Not in my experience. Are you sure you were drinking coffee?

      that's because he pulled that out of his ass aka speclating.

  11. Fouror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fouror more cups a day lowered the risk of getting oral cancers by 49%.

    MEIN FOUROR! I can TALK!!!

  12. You Sure? by okmijnuhb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You sure it doesn't mean that those with the physical constitution to withstand 4 cups of coffee are resistant to oral cancers?
    These studies are meaningless.

  13. just say no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coffee seems harmless, so EVERYONE uses it, EXPECTS you to use it.
    And the 'best coffee' in the world comes out of a cats ass. That's true horror when it comes to drugs.

    Just say no to coffee. Down that path is madness.

    1. Re:just say no by blippo · · Score: 1

      I follow this simple rule: Just say no to drugs that's been transported in another animals lower intestine, and you're safe.

      Luckily the cat's ass variant is optional...

      Actually, I'm rather addicted to caffeine, and that's slightly annoying as I get sick if I don't get coffee for a day or two.
      Other than that, it's a rather harmless drug. (In concentrations that won't kill you immediately.) and i really enjoy my coffee.

    2. Re:just say no by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      If you don't fancy the civet coffee, maybe give this a try.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  14. Relative versus absolute risk by gringer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find that changing relative risk to absolute risk makes the wow factor of these studies go down considerably. The absolute risk is of getting oral cancers and dying from them can be derived from the abstract:

    Among 968,432 men and women who were cancer free at enrollment, 868 deaths due to oral/pharyngeal cancer occurred during 26 years of follow-up.

    So the 26-year absolute risk of death due to oral/pharyngeal cancer in this study was about 1 in 1,000 (one thousand). Assuming an even spread across the years, that's also about 1 in 30,000 for any given year.

    Drinking greater than 4 cups of coffee a day has a relative risk of about 0.5, so that's about 1 in 2,000 over 26 years (a difference of 0.045%), or about 1 in 60,000 in any given year (a difference of 0.0017%).

    Note that this risk reduction is associated with death due specifically to oral/pharyngeal cancer, not the cancer alone -- it does not follow from these results that drinking coffee reduces your risk of getting cancer. If you get oral/pharyngeal cancer, but die from being impaled by an angry unicorn, it doesn't count for the purposes of this result / association.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you get oral/pharyngeal cancer, but die from being impaled by an angry unicorn"

      Stop right there. Now -that- would be a cool way to die.

    2. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classic Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal strip:

      http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=653

    3. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Note that this risk reduction is associated with death due specifically to oral/pharyngeal cancer, not the cancer alone -- it does not follow from these results that drinking coffee reduces your risk of getting cancer. If you get oral/pharyngeal cancer, but die from being impaled by an angry unicorn, it doesn't count for the purposes of this result / association.

      Thank you! A beacon of logic in an attic of doubt and uncertainty.

      In order to assess the risk, we need to compare the total risk of drinking coffee with the total risk of not drinking coffee. Just examining and comparing one aspect is not enough - we need to take everything into account.

      I've been considering starting to drink coffee now that I'm getting older (>50 yrs), and have been doing a bunch of research on it. I've found a number of benefits in the literature to drinking coffee; for example, it lowers the risk of kidney stones (surprising, in my view).

      I have not found any long-term health disadvantages to drinking coffee (setting aside obvious short-term effects), and the number of benefits is surprising. I'm not ready to consider coffee as "safe" quite yet, but so far as I can tell it's a good bet.

      We need a study of the total risk associated with drinking coffee, in the manner that we have total risks associated with smoking and drinking.

    4. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by fropenn · · Score: 1

      Excellent points. It could also be the case the people who drink more coffee have more money, and are therefore more able to afford cancer treatment (thus reducing the "risk").
      I would recommend this article in The Atlantic: Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science. It points out many of the fallacies of this kind of medical research.

    5. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in short, in order to reduce the risk of getting a very rare form of cancer, we have got to drink four cups of coffee, a substance that can really mess you up. At one cup a day it already causes neurological problems, like for example that nasty morning feeling before you've had that first cup. People who don't drink coffee are just as alert/focussed but don't have to torture themselves out of bed. More cups a day carry a heightened risk of long-term heart disease.
      Furthermore coffee is extremely addictive and people tend to lose count and always crave for one more cup. Turns out that as you drink coffee for longer periods the cups get less and less satisfying as habituation kicks in. But the body, especially your heart, does not habituate, and at six cups you increase the risk of short-term acute heart issues like arrhythmia, and worse. It's so bad that in the local hospital in my city, the emergency wards regularly have to deal with caffeine overdosed civil servants.
      Coffee is best regarded as a toxic substance. Yes, if you're only a social drinker and stick to one or two cups a week you may not run any risk. Sure. But if you're drinking coffee habitually you're wrecking your body and playing Russian roulette with your health.
      Sorry if this is a bit long-winded, but every time a study on a substance that's really bad for you finds a mild positive effect, the papers report it as: breaking news! X is good for health! And I'm sick of it.

    6. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the biggest benefit of drinking coffee, it tastes good!

    7. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by JimFive · · Score: 1

      One thing to note is that you can probably get all of the coffee benefit with decaf which would take away most of the detriment, (headaches and heart issues).

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  15. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On face value this look robust with 968,432 men and women.

    Have to get the paper and search for the devil in the detail as always.

    Cheers

  16. surely, there were other results... by Goldsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A 26 year study, following 968,432 people and these guys draw a conclusion revolving around coffee and a cancer involving 0.09% of the people in the study?

    That's some serious barrel scraping on that data set.

    That said, it's one more argument to use when my wife complains that I drink too much coffee. Go science!

    1. Re:surely, there were other results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A sample size of 872 isn't bad. But how many in that sample drink 4 or more cups of coffee a day? And what is the confidence interval?

    2. Re:surely, there were other results... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      oral/pharyngeal cancer doesn't get much attention, it's actually nice to see a prominent study on it.
      the HPV vaccine (i think it's a scare tactic by big pharma, given the numbers) is BIIIIIIIIIIIIG money for them if they can convince parents it's necessary.
      Talked to a prominent fellow in the field about it... big money for something if you can pump up the scare factor is what he told me too.

      but yeah, nice to see some more hard numbers showing that this cancer is not a very big risk

      --
      -
  17. Lurking variables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neglects to mention that people who work in an occupation where they have an opportunity to get four cups of coffee a day are usually office or transport jobs.... not dangerous ones. Any thoughts?

    1. Re:Lurking variables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, and you can't smoke in an office...

    2. Re:Lurking variables... by hrvatska · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Neglects to mention that people who work in an occupation where they have an opportunity to get four cups of coffee a day are usually office or transport jobs.... not dangerous ones. Any thoughts?

      I grew up in town where most people worked some sort of blue collar job, and I recall plenty of big coffee drinkers. I spent a summer working in a steel mill and it wasn't unusual to see guys arriving with large thermoses of coffee. Those that didn't bring it to work could purchase it from vending machines in the break rooms. A couple of cups before work, a couple during breaks or lunch, and by the end of the day they had had at least four cups of coffee.

    3. Re:Lurking variables... by denmarkw00t · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up! Same goes for construction workers (at least when I was growing up). I'd go to the sites with my dad and most of the guys working had thermoses in-hand, hopefully with coffee inside...

    4. Re:Lurking variables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got relatives who are miners, and they all drink coffee before leaving for work and take big thermoses of coffee with them. Have you considered that people who work in dangerous occupations like mining and lumber have a greater need for staying alert than people who sit at desks? A little bit of inattentiveness in those environments can cost you an arm, a leg, or your life.

  18. Yeah, but at those side-effects, it's not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Four cups a day That's the addict limit.

    I think everyone knows that in the long run, this does more harm than good. *Much more harm*.

  19. Subsequent research will show ... by kawabago · · Score: 3, Funny

    Subsequent research will no doubt show that the coffee isn't directly responsible. People drinking 4 or more cups of coffee a day are far too wired to engage in oral sex, so the result of fewer infections of oral STD's leads to fewer oral cancers.

    1. Re:Subsequent research will show ... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Now that's what I call science...

    2. Re:Subsequent research will show ... by Zibodiz · · Score: 2

      Actually, my hypothesis is that oral cancer is caused by drinking soda; so the people who drink 4+ cups of coffee/day don't get it, because they never have any soda.
      Now, somebody, please come out with a study that refutes my hypothesis so I can get back to drinking Mountain Dew by next sumer!

  20. Re:You Sure? by c0lo · · Score: 1

    You sure it doesn't mean that those with the physical constitution to withstand 4 cups of coffee are resistant to oral cancers?

    These studies are meaningless.

    You will discover the meaning only if you drink coffee. No, I mean lots of coffee... you should strive to get over the 4 cups.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  21. Not quite as impressive... by dalias · · Score: 2

    Not quite as impressive as the 100% reduction in the rate of Alzheimer's, but 49% is still pretty damn good. Not sure what's up with all the anti-coffee trolls calling this propaganda from "the coffee industry".

  22. mmmm by jameshofo · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sure because the people who drank more than 4 cups a day died of other "natural" causes like a tac a cardia, its a blip but it could have been caused by a few other behavioral coincidences. It feels a little more like someone trying to get value out of 26 years of possibly unfruitful research. there's another study that show's no determinable link! http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/49/4/1049.short

    but certainly you can't disprove something by showing no determinable results on it.

    --
    Good leaders run toward problems, bad leaders hide from them.
  23. Not worth it by aepervius · · Score: 1

    868 people out of 968K comes out at roughly ~0.09% got the cancer. If the heavy coffee drinker had a 50% lower risk then naively we got 289 heavy coffee drinker and 579 non coffee drinker. Or a risk of 0.058% for non coffee drinker and 0.029% for heavy coffee drinker. Put in perspective you have 1 chance of out 1700 to get the cancer, and you lower it to 1 chance out of 3400. Not worth being forced to drink the filthy filthy thing.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  24. Sooooooo... by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

    ....coffee is good for us again? Or maybe at least until next week, when the media sensationalizes some stupid study that shows drinking ten or more cups of coffee a day increases our 1 in 10^8 chance of developing some condition by 10%.

  25. I think the question is... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

    ... How many Norwegians have oral cancer.

    Or all the other people on this list of heavy coffee consumers.

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    1. Re:I think the question is... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1
      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  26. Correlation does not equal causation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been proven that many throat cancers are also from the HPV, like cervical cancer.

    It's quite possible that drinking 4 cups of a coffee a day isn't what protecting it, maybe it's the demographic who drink that amount of coffee not having sex?

    haha: captcha = colons

  27. Re:You Sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This. There is a reason 2/3s~ of the human race don't get cancer. Hint, it isn't because they were lucky.

    Most people develop and destroy minor cancers throughout their entire life, a little known fact that seems to be forgotten by the majority.
    These people, even exposed to high numbers of carcinogens still don't develop full-on cancers.
    That is a genetic reason and one we still don't fully understand yet, that is different even from diet. (but diet does increase your defences too)
    No, Petri-dish tests aren't a human body. So don't say you can infect anyone with cancer straight-up. Biology doesn't work like that.

    Research on cancer lines isn't exactly helpful, either, since those came from people who developed full-on cancers!

  28. To /. devs: 4 cups COFFEE, pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) All internal links broken.

    2) Error 503 Service Unavailable

    Service Unavailable
    Guru Meditation:

    XID: 523568083

    Varnish cache server

  29. Hurray! by docilespelunker · · Score: 2

    Now for the study proving that pizza and beer are good also. I feel I may be a valid entry to the data set there...

  30. coffee alergie by ruir · · Score: 1

    Sure, I drink coffee. At least, 1 mug at breakfast, often a couple more expressos during the day. Often I have to go running to the toilets, in a couple of minutes. I suspect I am allergic to it, or to some substance added when they are processing it. Furthermore, I would like to know who paid for this study. There is a huge industry around coffee abuse.

    1. Re:coffee alergie by Malc · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd do better if stuck to espresso during the day.

    2. Re:coffee alergie by Malc · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd do better if you stuck to espresso during the day.

    3. Re:coffee alergie by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, I would like to know who paid for this study.

      Maybe you should get another cup... or maybe you had too much and the jitters kept you from reading and digesting the summary, which stated right up front that it's the American Cancer Society?

      There is a huge industry around coffee abuse.

      How could one abuse coffee? Inject it intraveniously?

    4. Re:coffee alergie by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      How could one abuse coffee? Inject it intraveniously?

      Intravenous coffee seems like a damn good idea to me most mornings.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    5. Re:coffee alergie by ruir · · Score: 1

      Nope, but at an estimated 900% profit margins for the coffees shops, and god only knows how much to the distributor, I guess there is an incentive for this "studies".

  31. Sunrise by EmagGeek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Every day, about 310,000,000 Americans do not get cancer of any kind.

    The Sun also rises every day.

    Therefore, we can conclude with 95% confidence that Sunrise prevents cancer.

    1. Re:Sunrise by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

      Of those who did get cancer, all of them were diagnosed with cancer (though ~5% during an autopsy). Thus we can see with 100% certainty that a medical diagnosis causes cancer. Protect your loved ones, don't let them get diagnosed or tested!

  32. Correlation does not imply causation by markdavis · · Score: 0

    Repeat: Correlation does not imply causation

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation

    1. Re:Correlation does not imply causation by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      But it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing "look over there!"

  33. It's the antioxidants by Andrio · · Score: 3

    It's not the coffee. It's the antioxidants in the coffee. For a lot of Americans, coffee is probably the only steady source of antioxidants in their diets.

    It's the same thing as with wine. Drinking some wine everyday isn't good for your heart because the wine is good for you. It's because of the antioxidants that were in the grapes.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:It's the antioxidants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yeah, totally. Antioxidants are awesome.

      http://www.quackwatch.com/03HealthPromotion/antioxidants.html

      From a marketing perspective, I mean.

    2. Re:It's the antioxidants by Andrio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Back in the 1800s, scientists discovered the three macronutrients: carbs, protein, and fat. They said to themselves "We now understand food. If people get enough of all these three, they will be healthy."

      Of course, that didn't work. People still got things like scurvy.

      Then scientists discovered Vitamins. And they said "We now understand food. If people get enough of all of these, they'll be healthy."

      Of course, that doesn't seem to be really working either. Even processed and refined food is often loaded with vitamins (100% Vitamin C!) because it's marketable.

      Now recently scientists started to pay attention to these things called Polyphenols. There's thousands of different ones, found in food (well, natural foods); they're what "antioxidants" can be classified as. Not all that much is known about them so far (It doesn't pay much to do research in non-patentable stuff, like natural food). But I suspect they will eventually they'll become as common in dietery speak as the macro and micro nutrients are.

      In short, food, and foods effects on the body are a very complex thing, and only fools believe we know all there is to be know about it.

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    3. Re:It's the antioxidants by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It's the same thing as with wine. Drinking some wine everyday isn't good for your heart because the wine is good for you. It's because of the antioxidants that were in the grapes.

      That's not what the Mayo Clinic says. It does say that antioxidants are good for the heart, but it says grape juice is possibly as good.

      Does grape juice offer the same heart benefits as red wine?
      Answer
      from Martha Grogan, M.D.
      Possibly.

      Not scientifically proven, in other words.

    4. Re:It's the antioxidants by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Back in the 1800s, scientists discovered the three macronutrients: carbs, protein, and fat. They said to themselves "We now understand food. If people get enough of all these three, they will be healthy."

      Of course, that didn't work. People still got things like scurvy.

      Then scientists discovered Vitamins. And they said "We now understand food. If people get enough of all of these, they'll be healthy."

      Of course, that doesn't seem to be really working either. Even processed and refined food is often loaded with vitamins (100% Vitamin C!) because it's marketable.

      Now recently scientists started to pay attention to these things called Polyphenols. There's thousands of different ones, found in food (well, natural foods); they're what "antioxidants" can be classified as. Not all that much is known about them so far (It doesn't pay much to do research in non-patentable stuff, like natural food). But I suspect they will eventually they'll become as common in dietery speak as the macro and micro nutrients are.

      In short, food, and foods effects on the body are a very complex thing, and only fools believe we know all there is to be know about it.

      Eh. You paint a bleak picture when you claim, "of course, that didn't work."

      People are healthier today than they used to be, on average (if you discount the obesity problem that is, which has nothing to do with not understanding food: It has to do with eating too much of it and not getting enough exercise).

      Let me put it this way. Athletes keep breaking records year after year. You'd figure we'd have plateaued by now. There are several reasons why we haven't, and a big part of it is that we understand nutrition well enough to control their nutrition to maximize the benefits they get from training. And yes, there's the doping, but honestly, clean athletes are still out there breaking records.

    5. Re:It's the antioxidants by BlueRaja · · Score: 1

      "the risk for oral and pharyngeal cancer held steady for the participants who consumed tea on a regular basis."

      Tea has more antioxidants than coffee, so it seems your theory is incorrect.

  34. Traditional coffee "cup" = 6 floz by jabberw0k · · Score: 2

    The traditional measure of a "cup" of coffee, at least in the United States, is 6 fluid ounces, 177 ml. So "four cups" would be about 700ml.

    1. Re:Traditional coffee "cup" = 6 floz by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, coffee cups come in all sizes, from your dinky little four ounce cups to a huge full pint cup. A cup is exactly half a pint, a little less than 1/4 of a litre.

    2. Re:Traditional coffee "cup" = 6 floz by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      A metric cup is 250ml, which is exactly 1/4 of a litre (1000ml).

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    3. Re:Traditional coffee "cup" = 6 floz by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      He said American cup, America has cups and pints and quarts, not litres and millilitres. I imagine 250ml would be pretty much a standard cup anywhere else.

  35. Go Go Statistics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Drinking cyanide daily would also lower oral cancer death rates...

  36. The acid in coffee will make those teeth disappear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soft drinks too.

  37. Probably just affects the flora in the mouth. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many diseases are mediated by the microflora living on and in the human body; e.g. we now know that ulcers mostly result from bacterial infections in the stomach. A lot of oral cancer comes from the STD HPV. I'd bet that a lot of coffee changes the balance of bateria and fungus and viruses living in the mouth, leading indirectly to a lower incidence of cancer.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Probably just affects the flora in the mouth. by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Bacteria and fungi have a balance, I believe that's true. They compete for resources. But bacteria and viruses? Viruses don't compete for resources, they just splice in host cells dna.

    2. Re:Probably just affects the flora in the mouth. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      There are viruses that attack bacteria and fungi, not just animal cells. You can get predator/prey cycles with them, too.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  38. AARP had this first... by Zibodiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, not to be a wet blanket, but my Dad told me about this a week ago, after reading about it in his subscription of AARP's [print] magazine. Shouldn't us young[er], technologically-savvy, electronically-delivered folks be getting science news a little bit faster than the old people get it in their mainstream print magazines?

  39. Bless the Maker and his coffee. by sexybomber · · Score: 2

    It is by coffee alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of the arabica bean that the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking. The shaking becomes a warning. It is by coffee alone I set my mind in motion.

  40. Oh, is that so?! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... Time to drink tea :p

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  41. Good grief. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what, the third article on slashdot as of late trying to convince us that coffee has some magical positive effect?
    Stop trying to pass off your bad habits as good ones, next you'll tell me smoking is great for your body too.

  42. Pioneering a New Study by CMYKjunkie · · Score: 1

    Since drinking coffee is proving to be so good for oral cancer, I am pioneering a new study: taking coffee rectally to improve rates of colon cancer.

    1. Re:Pioneering a New Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's known as a coffee enema. Not sure if Starbucks has plans to roll these out, tho'.

  43. Re:You Sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK for 4 cups, but where's the research on those of us who drink 1 gal. / day? And intravenously?

  44. Bad site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a horrible site medicaldaily is. I hate a site that plays 2 ads at the same time without my permission. Ban it.

  45. FRAUD? I don't know how it was accomplished. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I don't know how it was accomplished, but I'm guessing there was fraud.

    Slashdot has a LONG history of running articles that are in fact advertisements, many people have said. (They call them Slashvertisements.)

    Now we are seeing stories from Medical Daily.com, a publication that seems to me to be EXTREMELY unreliable public relations.

    Consider this: How did Slashdot become a medical web site?

    1. Re:FRAUD? I don't know how it was accomplished. by PT_1 · · Score: 1

      Consider this: How did Slashdot become a medical web site?

      Slashdot has always been a science and technology website; science includes medicine. Search Google including the term site:slashdot.org. You'll find plenty of medical stories on the site from 10 years ago and earlier.

  46. Ok ok ok... I'll uh I'lll, pour... uh ... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...pour ... get me uh, you know... uh... another cup ... of uh java... uh coffee...

  47. More FRAUD? Tomatoes stop mental problems? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    More likely it is just fraud, in my opinion. Here's another one of today's articles in Medical Daily: A Tomato a Day Keeps the Shrink Away: How Eating Tomatoes Can Cut the Risk of Depression by Half

  48. Re:You Sure? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    You sure it doesn't mean that those with the physical constitution to withstand 4 cups of coffee are resistant to oral cancers?

    Withstand four cups of coffee?? That doesn't make sense at all, most coffee drinkers I know drink at least that much, and most non-coffee drinkers I know don't drink it because they just don't like the taste. The only people I know who hold it down to two cups are older folks; caffiene makes them shake.

    And yes, correlation doesn't prove causation, but the fact that it's cancers of body parts that the coffee physically touches sure indicates a causation. I mean, look -- dropping a rock on your foot correlates with a painful foot. But correlation does not prove causation, so maybe it's just coincidence that it always hurts when you drop a rock on your foot?

  49. Re:Yeah, but at those side-effects, it's not worth by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Four cups a day That's the addict limit.

    Daily use of any amount of an addictive substance will cause addiction.

    I think everyone knows that in the long run, this does more harm than good.

    I can cite studies that show all sorts of beneficial effects of coffee, but I have yet to run across a single one that shows deleterious effects. You got a citation, coward?

  50. Re:You Sure? by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    This. There is a reason 2/3s~ of the human race don't get cancer. Hint, it isn't because they were lucky.

    That should be simple to test, by checking if four cups of coffee only lowers oral cancer or other types of cancer too. If it only lowers oral cancer but mysteriously no others, then this lowering effect has nothing to do with your "physical constitution".

    Cancer rates are not entirely genetic, that much is already extremely well-established ... there are other major risk factors like smoking and obesity. Given the obesity link, and the fact that coffee also appears to lower your risk of diabetes, I suspect the effect may be coming from elsewhere in the coffee.

  51. Correlationn is not causation by davidannis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One study found that you are less likely to die young if you drink wine instead of beer. It's not because beer causes death or because wine wards death off. It is because at the time the study was done the ratio of wine to beer consumption was strongly correlated with income. Having a higher income was positively correlated with adequate nutrition and health care. Just because drinking coffee correlates with something doesn't mean that it causes it.

  52. So it reduces a 0.0125% chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chance of developing oral cancer: 0.0125%. Cut that in half, and it's still pretty much zero. Better solution is to stop shoving carcinogens in there.

  53. Also... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    is it the acid? the scorching of the inside of one's mouth? the caffeine?

    I feel like they should have added a "tea" group in there too or something.

    Also, good god, 4 CUPS OF COFFEE A DAY FOR 26 YEARS!? sweet jesus, that doesn't seem healthy.

    I'm curious what other health effects there were vs a control group. I think THAT would have gotten them a ton more mileage out of the data (IMO)

    --
    -
    1. Re:Also... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Seems like a modest amount to me. A cup is 8oz, so that's really just 2 16oz coffees. One in the morning and one at lunch, just right to get you through the day.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  54. Re:You Sure? by Bengie · · Score: 1

    Most people develop and destroy minor cancers throughout their entire life, a little known fact that seems to be forgotten by the majority.

    Yep. Say hello to cancer caused by AIDS because your white cells can't fight off the cancer as it normally does.

  55. Cunnilingus is Better by Misterfixit · · Score: 0

    I much prefer munching the ole Carpet as a cure for what ails me.

    --
    nar
  56. Me too by WebManWalking · · Score: 1

    Did you wonder, as I did, whether 8 or more cups resulted in a whopping 74% reduction? And how much whopping do we have to do?

  57. Re:You Sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel I need to explain to non-coffee drinkers that when they say "4 cups a day" they really mean 4 standard coffee cups which are not the ones you see the IT guys walking back to their desk with. The coffee mug we all use is actually 2+ cups of coffee each. When your cell, uh cube mate, goes to get his 4th cup of coffee he is actually getting his 8-10th cup for the day. Do not confuse these measurements. I generally measure my coffee consumption in pots which makes it sound better to non-believers when I say only have 5/6ths a day now.

    Four cups is not a large amount of coffee. You can relax a little, which will likely help your stomach more than avoiding coffee.

  58. Re:Yeah, but at those side-effects, it's not worth by JimFive · · Score: 1

    There's nothing here that says it has to be caffeinated coffee.

    --
    Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  59. I take mine carbonated by Macklyn · · Score: 1

    any news on the joys of 4 Diet Cokes a day?

  60. Re:Yeah, but at those side-effects, it's not worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Four cups a day That's the addict limit.

    I think everyone knows that in the long run, this does more harm than good. *Much more harm*.

    You drink alcohol, right? Well, if I drink one beer I'm going to get kind of drunk. Two beers will give me a pretty severe hangover. But I'm not going to go around trying to call you an addict if you drink four beers and I'm not going to claim you're suffering the same side effects I do.

    When I drink four cups of coffee it's hardly even noticeable.

    It's called tolerance and it's something your body does naturally.

  61. Findings by billd10 · · Score: 0

    Interesting that what used to be bad is now good. Wine, other booze in moderation, coffee, chocolate. To much of these findings were based on personal opinions, not proper data gathering