Slashdot Mirror


Bee Venom Has "Botox-Like Effect," Is Worth 7 Times As Much As Gold

dryriver writes "The BBC reports that cosmetic products using bee venom as an ingredient are a new 'hot seller' in the cosmetics market. Bee venom is said to have an effect on female skin similar to Botox injections, tightening the skin and making wrinkles and other signs of aging appear less pronounced than before. Unlike Botox, however, bee venom does not need to be injected, and can be absorbed through the skin naturally as an ingredient of cosmetic skin creme. Now comes the kicker: A special electrified device that causes bees to sting a synthetic membrane and release their venom can harvest about one gram of bee venom from 20 bee hives. That one gram of bee venom is worth a whopping 350 dollars. This makes bee venom almost seven times more valuable than gold, which, in comparison, is worth only about 53 dollars per gram."

63 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Botox by kimvette · · Score: 5, Informative

    FTFS:

    Unlike Botox, however, bee venom does not need to be injected, and can be absorbed through the skin naturally as an ingredient of cosmetic skin creme.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  2. 7 times the price of gold? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we've finally found the real reason why honey bees are disappearing.

    1. Re:7 times the price of gold? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bees die when they sting humans at least - their sting is barbed and they can't get it out, so the injuries they receive when they rip part of their butt off are fatal. It only applies to animals with a thick skin/

      If this membrane is tough enough, they won't be able to penetrate it, and their stinger will stay on. It would also work if it's weak enough to pull the stinger loose.

  3. Re:Can't we just 3D print it? by QuesarVII · · Score: 2

    I mean just look at what nanotechnology has brought us so far! Um, oh wait...

    You mean something like a handheld computer that can make phone calls, surf the internet, play games, and all weighs less than a pound? Oh, and is so ubiquitous that even your grandma might have one?

    If only that had happened we could say nanotechnology was a success :(

  4. Not for long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of producing it from bees for $350/g, you could put the appropriate genes into some E. coli and have them produce it for 20% of that price or less. But of course then you wouldn't be able to sell it for $350/g.

    1. Re:Not for long by Sulphur · · Score: 3, Funny

      Instead of producing it from bees for $350/g, you could put the appropriate genes into some E. coli and have them produce it for 20% of that price or less. But of course then you wouldn't be able to sell it for $350/g.

      I thought getting shitfaced meant something else.

  5. Re:Botox by calzones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why female skin is a more apt question.

    Does it not work for guys or is it an assumption that guys aren't interested in looking younger?

    --
    Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
  6. Re:Botox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is Slashdot. We have a proud tradition of not reading the articles, summaries, or even headlines, and then spouting inaccurate, misinformed idiocy and feeling smug about what "experts" we are.

  7. Correct me if I'm wrong by theIsovist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bee's die after stinging, which means that you're losing twenty hives of bees for only $350. That sounds like a huge loss to any bee keeper. That also seems like a hell of a lose of bees that are already suffering from sudden colony collapse... Am I wrong here?

    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe they only die if their stinger breaks off. One would assume that the membrane is designed to leave the stinger intact.

    2. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong by Zomalaja · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.abeeco.co.nz/shop/Bee+Venom+Products.html
      "To extract the Bee Venom a pane of glass is placed along side the hive and a small electrical current is run through it, which encourages the bees to sting the surface. The bees are not harmed in the process."

    3. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong by Cochonou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems that preying mantis cannibalism during sex happens much less frequently in the wild than in captivity.

    4. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong by drkim · · Score: 2

      I wonder how evolutionists would explain why honey bees never evolved out of this self-destructive behaviour.

      The worker bees are the ones with the stingers, but they have no part in fertilizing the queens. So, their sacrifice is more like an animal chewing off it's leg to escape a trap (in an evolutionary sense.) They support the hive - but don't contribute to the hive genetics.

      It is the drones, not the workers, who do the fertilization of the queens, and therefore play a primary role in evolutionary progress.

    5. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong by loufoque · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's the Big Brother effect.
      Women go crazy when on camera.

    6. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2

      Due to my moderation threshold missing the comment you were replying to, I had assumed that you were one of those fundie-athiests bringing up religion out of nowhere just to let everyone know how stupid you thought religion was.

      But then I read the comment you were replying to and then yours made total sense.

      Carry on.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  8. Re:Does it kill the bees??? by IonOtter · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, the bees just get really pissed off by the current, and it encourages them to sting the glass.

    Per the video, you can "harvest" every two weeks.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  9. i apologize in advance by alienzed · · Score: 3, Funny

    leave them bee!

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  10. This has been tried before by Fyzzler · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    I have one question. If the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture is not in charge of Gundam, then who is?
  11. price comparison by swell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This makes Bee Venom almost seven times more valuable than Gold, which, in comparison, is worth only about 53 Dollars per 1 gram."

    So it costs the same as ink for my printer, data for my cellphone, gas for my car (soon), and clean drinking water (later).

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:price comparison by Eyeball97 · · Score: 2

      Simple, you measure the cost of your data bundle in libraries of congress, then divide by the weight of a library of congress...

    2. Re:price comparison by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      Interestingly enough, you can. Information can be converted to energy, at a rate of kTln2 per bit. Energy can of course be converted to mass. Of course, boltzmann's constant is small.

      So, one bit at room temperature works out to about 4 × 10-21 joules. That works out to be about 4 x 10-28 kg per bit.

  12. Re:Can't we just 3D print it? by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    your celphone is not nanotech

  13. And still cheaper than ink for my printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, I wonder how much and what animal venom they use in my ink jet printer cartridges...

  14. And more importantly by Andy+Prough · · Score: 2

    does it work on neckbeards??

    1. Re:And more importantly by taxman_10m · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. The beard gets in the way of the neck.

  15. Re:Botox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering the price of the active ingredient i think it's fair to assume that the quantities in any anti-ageing product will be about as effective as any current venomless skin cream, maybe they feel that, since women are already very used to convincing themselves of the efficacy of some made up or at least utterly useless new wonder molecule they're also most likely to feel the effects of any bee venom branded moisturisers.

  16. Re:Botox by Cryacin · · Score: 2

    So buy up big on Beetox (tm) futures now, and reap the rewards.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  17. What does gold have to do with this? by Demonantis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are a ton of products more valuable than gold. I don't understand why that is a big deal. Hopefully this makes honey cheaper with the extra source of income.

  18. Re:Can't we just 3D print it? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    And you thought bee venom was expensive? Just wait until you see the prices of HP 3D Printer Bee Venom Cartridges.

  19. The HORROR... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, this will certainly aggravate the Vegans, who believe that honey is not "vegan" because we are enslaving the bee.

    http://www.vegetus.org/honey/honey.htm

    Though I'm sure they happily eat fruits and vegetables that are pollinated with domesticated bees that farmers have "enslaved"...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  20. Inkjet Printer Ink by jomegat · · Score: 2

    That must be what they use to make inkjet printer ink.

    --

    In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

  21. Lolwut by Psicopatico · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bee's venom can kill by inducing shock in allergic subjects.
    It looks like it has a very nasty property of being a potential allergenic (I hope I got the correct term. If not, sorry) meaning: once you get stinged, you may become allergic to venom even if before you weren't. This in sufficently predisposed subjects.

    And now it is going to be the golden ingredient for some cosmetic? I hope it is going to be subjected to some form of medical control, to say the least.

    But I'm no chemist nor biologist so I may be completely wrong.

    --
    Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
  22. Re:Price comparison chart by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 3, Funny

    I need clarification on your proposed measurement #3.

    By 'Members of the Senate", do you mean:

    a) The value of their lives (What the rest of us would be losing if they were to magically disappear in a Harry Potter-esque manner),
    b) Their value to the rest of us (What we gain from them per capita versus what they take from us),
    -or-
    c) What it costs to buy one (What needs explaining?!)

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  23. Gender-specific venom action ? by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to have an effect on female skin

    Male skin is not affected, thusly.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  24. Re:funny story by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    some guys basically stinging their penis with bee's to make it swell up.

    I've discovered that beavers can have the same effect.

  25. Pssst...... by rts008 · · Score: 3, Funny

    *whispers*: Platypus venom.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  26. A small correction by jandersen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Botox injections, tightening the skin and making wrinkles and other signs of aging appear less pronounced...

    Botulinum toxin does not tighten the skin - it paralyses muscles, and since many wrinkles are aggravated by muscles in the skin, paralysing them can make the wrinkles less pronounced. This paralysis is very evident on the faces of many aging celebrities - they simply struggle with producing facial expressions.

    It's a strange thing, isn't it? Instead of accepting their age, people mistreat themselves so they look 'younger', at least when you're not too close. I think it is deeply sad; and it only makes you look less attractive.

  27. Re:Botox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    With the right marketing guys could be a far bigger market:

    "My balls are as smooth as pearls, and you know how much women love pearls"

  28. Re:Does it kill the bees??? by bwcbwc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmmm, I was going to say that bees die when they sting. But that's because normally the stinger gets hooked in the victim and the bee's abdomen ruptures when the stinger is pulled off. If they're stinging glass, I suppose it's possible they could survive the experience because the stinger wouldn't get stuck.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  29. Would that be considered cruel ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't say I know how the bees feel when electricity is applied to them so that they can produce the venom, but I can tell you that it wouldn't be pleasant.

    In China and in Vietnam people "harvest" bear gall bladder juice by tying up live bears and inserting a tube into the bears - and that practice is deemed "cruelty to animal".

    Should electrocuting bees be considered as cruel, as well?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by ComaVN · · Score: 2

      bees are not cute and cuddly, so no.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    2. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by samoanbiscuit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only this, but being arthropods with considerably more primitive nervous systems than mammals, it's yet to be determined if they (insects) even feel pain the same way we do. The reason why mammals such as bears and dolphins seem "cuddly" is because our close evolutionary heritage show characteristics in common between species that elicit a protective and nurturing instinct even between species. Naturalists have filled pages and pages full of anecdotes of mammalian predators who have spared and even gone on to raise young mammals of their prey species; the nurturing instinct is strong and not very discriminating.

    3. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does it matter? It's wrong anyway, and especially so since it's not even necessary. Doing this kind of thing should be illegal if it's for cosmetic purposes and/or to make people look/feel better.

    4. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by wgoodman · · Score: 2

      Why post a valid (unpopular) opinion as AC? Put your purse down.

    5. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by kimvette · · Score: 2

      Do insects even feel pain as we understand it? The brains are very primitive - little more than ganglia.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      I can. They do not feel a thing. Insects lack a central nervous system, which is needed to have ability to feel what is happening to remote parts of your body.

    7. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Informative

      They do not feel a thing. Insects lack a central nervous system, which is needed to have ability to feel what is happening to remote parts of your body.

      Not so fast. You might want to reconsider that thought, especially when the dance of bees were studied and how it relates to their central nervous system.

      Then there is the anatomy of a bee which shows its nervous system.

      Obviously bees feel pain. The question is to what extent compared to mammals.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    8. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by OneAhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to think like you when I was a kid. Then I discovered reality is more nuanced and the science on this is surprisingly soft.

      Nervous system morphology: yes, arthropods' nervous systems surely looks different from ours, with one large ganglion in the head and multiple somewhat smaller ganglia controlling motoric and digestive functions. But to conclude from this that they can't possibly feel pain is a huge leap of logic. An insect brain is organized much like a crustacean's brain, and a crustacean's brain is capable of complex behaviour. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=clever-crustaceans

      Nervous system organization: suppose you want to argue that our nervous system not only look different, but is organized differently, with everything centralized, as opposed to different ganglia taking care of different functions. Well, the differences are not that huge. Have you ever seen a freshly beheaded chicken? I can tell you, some of them run like hell - a sight so spooky that you won't easily forget it. This is because the act of running originates from the spinal cord, which is still there when you cut off the head. Similarly, it is speculated that the human spinal cord plays an important role in coordinating monotomous tasks such as walking. And the number of neurons associated with coordinating our digestive tract is larger then the number of neurons in a rat, and comes surprisingly close to the number of neurons in the cerebral cortex of a dog.
      http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=gut-second-brain
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_by_number_of_neurons#Cerebral_cortex

      That bring us to Nervous system size. The above shows that a large structure of neurons is no guarantee for intelligence. On the other hand, there are many studies showing that corvids like crows and magpies show surprisingly intelligent behaviour on a smaller budget of neurons than our digestive system or a dog...

      My point of all this is that neither brain size nor morphology or organization necessarily equates to complexity of function.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain_in_invertebrates#Central_nervous_system
      What does, then? We do not know! And we know even less whether bees can feel pain; nobody ever became a bee and wrote a book about it. The thought of not knowing this might feel threatening to your ethical preconceptions, but it's the hard truth! To make matters worse, the more we learn, the more it looks like some if not most invertebrates are able to experience pain at some level. Funny that we were just talking about administering electric shocks to honeybees: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain_in_invertebrates#Conditioned_suppression

      Now the interesting question is: how to build a system of ethics on this (lack of) knowledge. This I cannot answer for you, but the solution I use for myself is attributing gradual weights to the torture of different animals, with molluscs falling into the lowest tier, small insects a bit higher, large crustaceans a bit higher, birds and small mammals a bit higher and "intelligent" mammals even higher. The most important element of my system of ethics is that even the lowest tiers have a nonzero weight and torturing them for no good reason should be avoided.

      Regardless of all the above soft ethics, there's a hard reason why "bee-tox" is a horrible idea. There already is a shortage of honeybees to the extent that fruit farmers start worrying about pollination:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co

    9. Re:Would that be considered cruel ? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      Perhaps he just prefers to post anonymously. Perhaps he has or may have future employers that might take objections to this statement. Perhaps he didn't feel it was worth logging in for. Perhaps he just likes pissing off people who don't like people posting as AC.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  30. Re:Botox by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

    "My balls are as smooth as pearls, and you know how much women love pearls"

    Not to mention their love for the necklace you can make with them.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  31. Re:Botox by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

    "My balls are as smooth as pearls, and you know how much women love pearls"

    Not to mention their love for the necklace you can make with them.

    And they'll want rather more than two of them to make a decent necklace...

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  32. Re:Can't we just 3D print it? by neokushan · · Score: 2

    It's made of components that are assembled at the nanotech level, so why isn't it? (asking the question genuinely as I suspect there's some definition for nanotechnology that we obviously don't know).

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  33. Most men arn't so vain and insecure... by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    ... that they'd have a potent toxin injected in them just to make them look a few years younger. Female vanity apparently has no bounds. Or at least we haven't found them yet.

    1. Re:Most men arn't so vain and insecure... by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, men are vain and insecure in completely different ways, because they have spent their lives being judged for things other than their beauty.

  34. Re:funny story by samson13 · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of an urban legend (or maybe I just watched it on Fox) about some guys basically stinging their penis with bee's to make it swell up.

    I don't think it works this way.

    The story starts with a backyard apiarist doing a quick check of my hives in the middle of January. It was stinking hot. Since I was not planning on taking any real time or doing any real work I was wearing lite shoes that didn't tuck into my suit very well. Combine this with the bad choice of boxer shorts, a little bee leakage led to at least one bee in a very dangerous place.

    Lifting the second box back on I lent against it leading to the worst sting I've ever experienced. I couldn't scrape the sting out in a hurry so it had lots of time to inject lots of venom (don't take your pants off while standing next to an open hive).

    There was not much swelling other than a small blister. Lots of pain for days (I was reasonably immune so normally would expect no symptoms after a couple of hours at the most). It was sort of itchy but not in a way that could be scratched and any contact was uncomfortable. I've still got a scars from the sting (If chicks dig scars then try and explaining that one).

  35. Praise be by Swampash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Colony collapse disorder? Failure of crop pollenation worldwide? The possible end of agriculture and mass starvations and food riots worldwide? None of that was important enough to save the bees.

    But now, shit, the bees might be able to keep aging Baby Boomers looking young! Nothing can compete with that, the bees are SAVED!

  36. Re:Botox by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm trying really hard to figure out if you got whooshed...

  37. Not quite as simple by DrYak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First you have to know which compound of the venom are the active ingredient (a venom is not a single molecule, it's a big mix of lots of substances).

    Maybe the important part are just small peptide (works also for small nucleic acid strands). In this case, yes: just slap the gene inside a bacteria or yeast and just harvest the thing in a huge brewery tank. This will cost a tiny fraction of the current method. (as in "a few bucks for a dozen of kilograms"). Washing industry thrives on this kind of process and has already made it fucking incredibly cheap (do you really think that the digestive enzyme in your washing powder where harvested from actual animals ?)

    But maybe not. Maybe it can be a complex protein that requires some post processing (chaperone helping to fold it into an unusual shape, enzyme modifying some parts) - (but very unlikely. If the venom can cross the skin without injection, it needs to be something small). Or maybe it can be a small chemical molecule that is produced by a long and complex chain of chemical reaction necessitating a big collection of enzymes (very likely, given that it can easily cross the skin).
    In this case you need to identify the candidate, understand the process that produce it (not impossible but it takes time), and then either put the whole machinery inside yeast (bacteria post-process a lot less their proteins) and go for the brewery-tank method, or replicate the synthesis in another way (produce the protein in bacteria and then do the modification in a lab. Or find a way to synthetise the small chemical compound by using a sequence of chemical reactions in a lab) and scale it up to industrial scale.
    This *WILL* end up being incredibly cheap in the long term, but requires much more research and development.

    There's a whole branch of science to study that, called "Venomics".

    Until then, you're stuck at putting bee on a micro electric chair until they are so pissed of that they start stinging the glass.

    (And I'm betting that perhaps, all the benefit come from the few traces of adrenalin-like substance that the bee end-up secreting after going through such predicament and of which a small part might end up in the venom itself).

    But the fact that they extract only a gram from a whole hive, means that they are probably concentrating/extracting the product already, so they know already a few tips in which direction to look to find the interresting part.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  38. Re:Can't we just 3D print it? by eggstasy · · Score: 2

    Nanotechnology, as I understand it, is about building entire machines out of atoms, on a nanoscale. This would allow us to interact with the world in a completely different way, for instance, physically ripping bacteria apart instead of trying to kill them with chemicals. So a cell phone doesn't fit the description: even though transistors can be measured in nanometers, the whole CPU, let alone the cell phone, is far beyond the nanoscale.

    I'm not an expert. You could just read about it on wikipedia.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotechnology

  39. Ingrained by mkdx · · Score: 2

    Younger looking females are in more advantageous position in the mating process. On the other hand, older males are seen as more stable and more likely to have the means to support.

  40. Re:Botox by kimvette · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's far too expensive for mass consumption, not easy to mass produce, and to get this to bring in big money you'd have to be able to synthesize it somehow with process that can be used to mass production.

    I disagree. People spend money on gold facial masks:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Tmycixsh8

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLrurC4dtUY

    and some idiots pay for silver facials and gels, which will actually result in argyria (turn your skin blue - literally) if you do it too many times:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhQgFc_bec4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDW799FhVJ0

    Examples of argyria:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyria

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahihGKZC5Kk

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnXdk3Kmq9s

    Now granted those are some extreme examples, but ever notice many women's earlobes have a small greyish spec at the bottom of the piercing? This is from silver compounds being absorbed into the skin. Same thing.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50