Slashdot Mirror


Anonymous Helps Find Evidence In Gang Rape Case

jfruh writes "Evidence of a gang rape committed by members of an Ohio high school football team, including video, was, in the way of digital native teenagers today, put online on various social media sites — and was quickly taken down as students began realizing the magnitude of the situation. The hactivist group Anonymous has been able to find archived and cached versions of the damning content, which may help prosecutors make their case." (The original story from December at the New York Times adds more detail.)

52 of 436 comments (clear)

  1. Anonymous has become Batman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No boundaries, no jurisdictions... just results.

    All of the power of the harnessed internet with the face of the silent auction bidder.

    1. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by kilodelta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know. I love what Anonymous is doing. It's the Justice League of the net.

    2. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by EdZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anonymous.

    3. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, and they would never frame anybody or tamper with evidence or anything, because their motives are always pure and above reproach. And unlike public officers, they're completely accountable!

      Wait, who are these people again?

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    4. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh. They're chaotic-whatthefuck. They do what they want with no regard for impact, just attention.

    5. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by Zephyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its parent groups were killed off while it was watching, what else did you expect?

    6. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, and they would never frame anybody or tamper with evidence or anything, because their motives are always pure and above reproach. And unlike public officers, they're completely accountable!

      Wait, who are these people again?

      I can't tell if you're a smart guy trying to slam Anonymous or an idiot idolizing public officers. Either could be corrupt and/or unaccountable. Anonymous, however, has no vested interest either way in the lives, well-being and reputations of those in Steubenville Ohio - or their football team (which, if you read the NYT article, seems to be the main concern of many in the town)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    7. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      High school football teams.

      They're more like the Legion of Dumb.

    8. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anonymous has no accountability at all. If taken with a grain of salt and backed by good police work, what they provide could very well be useful, but they're essentially no different than the anonymous tip line. Tips do provide leads, but they also provide a significant ratio of noise as well.

      We need police forces that at least have checks on them, even if they are sometimes broken. We definitely cannot rely on, or uncritically applaud the motives of those who choose to take certain actions under the Anonymous umbrella. It's like saying that being a little biased or corrupt is the same thing as being completely uncontrolled to begin with. The "intentions" of an anonymous tipster can be anything from helpful to just trolling or even character assassination, at the worst.

      So, let me say "Good job" to the individuals who ran down this data, but given the fact that there are no entry requirements for the group, Anonymous remains, as always, completely unpredictable in both quality of work, and even intent.

    9. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't tell if you're a smart guy trying to slam Anonymous or an idiot idolizing public officers

      I was trying to say that the only difference between Anonymous and public officers is accountability. Public officers are also prone to frame someone or tamper with evidence -- this happens frequently. But the fact that they're accountable is important, and makes me more inclined to trust lawful authorities than a faceless mob.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    10. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup, because when the authorities frame people and then later get caught, they almost always get punished, and the victims exonerated. Oh wait, no, that's not what happens...

    11. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by MrEdofCourse · · Score: 5, Informative

      IANAL, but I don't think that's true. I believe the prosecution can use illegally obtained evidence if it was obtained by non-government individuals. See:
      Supreme Court Decision BURDEAU v. MCDOWELL, 256 U.S. 465 (1921)

    12. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by in10se · · Score: 5, Informative

      IANAL: Not sure if that's true. If the police obtained the evidence illegally, it could not be used in court. However if someone else obtains it illegally (who has no connection with the police) and provides it to them, then it can be used.

      "Evidence unlawfully obtained from the defendant by a private person is admissible. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect privacy rights, with the Fourth Amendment applying specifically to government officials."
      - Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465

      --
      Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
    13. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's cute that you think public officers are held accountable. See http://www.copblock.org/ for many examples - too many - where you're far from right.

    14. Re:Anonymous has become Batman. by Thomasje · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, and they would never frame anybody or tamper with evidence or anything, because their motives are always pure and above reproach. And unlike public officers, they're completely accountable!

      Wait, who are these people again?

      I can't tell if you're a smart guy trying to slam Anonymous or an idiot idolizing public officers. Either could be corrupt and/or unaccountable. Anonymous, however, has no vested interest either way in the lives, well-being and reputations of those in Steubenville Ohio - or their football team (which, if you read the NYT article, seems to be the main concern of many in the town)

      How would you know Anonymous has no vested interest? You don't even know who they are. It worries me that people refer to Anonymous as an entity, rather than a mask of anonymity that could be worn by anyone or everyone, and that people ascribe lofty motivations to what is just another bunch of ACs.
      Also, lack of vested interest, proven or not, is no guarantee of benign intent. I was falsely accused of several acts of vandalism once, back in school. Once the accusation was made, the entire class believed it and turned against me, and several came forward in following days making additional accusations. I didn't do any of those things but that made no difference to the court of public opinion. Now, you could argue that a bunch of stupid naive kids can't be expected to make sound judgements as to what is true and what is false, but unfortunately most adults are just as credulous, and for anyone to throw accusations about in public can create a dangerous situation. Not something I'd applaud the way I see people doing here. The place to find truth is in a proper court of law, not the court of public opinion.

  2. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anonymous does something truly useful and good!

    Way to go guys!

    1. Re:Finally... by SirAstral · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, if the video can be forensically shown to be un-tampered with then it will be admissible. The nature of the evidence is taken into account as well as the methods of collection. In the case of video, anyone can find it under just about any circumstance because the actions depicted in the video is the evidence itself, which tends to avoid the issues associated with other types of evidence that can be planted which is why they have to follow a strict chain of custody and procedures.

      Its a lot more difficult to plant video evidence of you raping someone as opposed to me walking in and claiming I found this illegal gun with the serial filled off in your home.

    2. Re:Finally... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to some posts made by the suspects: they lured the girl to a party under false pretenses, drugged her, and then had her way with her. At one point, on video, they're caught commenting that they couldn't tell if she was passed out or dead and didn't care either way since they got their rocks off. Then commented/question on whether it's really rape if she never even got the chance to consent or say no.

      Really creepy stuff.

    3. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You really ought to read the article so you can provide informed comments. Your basic premise is way off the mark. If the reports are true, these punks did hatch a plan to kidnap her, drug her, and abuse her for the purpose of retaliation. These sick, twisted little fuckers deserve the utmost that the law can throw at them. Don't even start blaming the victim, in this case.

    4. Re:Finally... by casings · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your conclusions are wrong, you are an idiot, and the world would be a much better place if you killed yourself.

    5. Re:Finally... by HaZardman27 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So even if she knew she was going to a party to drink and intentionally consume drugs, how the fuck does that make it ok for her to be assaulted while essentially unconscious?!

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  3. And still no death penalty for rape by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been half-heartedly following this story once I heard the initial reports and what took place was almost, but not quite, as bad as the Indian student who was attacked, raped and beaten on a bus in India and later died.

    This girl was, apparently, passed out drunk (she was 16) and while passed out, was raped by at least 2 members of the football. Her limp, violated, body was carried by her arms and legs, all while being recorded and while others stood by and did nothing.

    Some people present tweeted what was taking place, some took pictures and one shining example of the human race was recorded for a length of time bragging about how much she was fucked (worse than in the movie Pulp Fiction according to him). No one called the police.

    Further, when asked about how he would feel if his daughter was raped (he apparently at the ripe of a late teenager had a daughter) in 10 years, he pontificated that in ten years his daughter would be raped and dead. What a wonderful guy.

    While the death penalty cannot undo what was done to someone, we as a society can no longer continue to coddle people who refuse to live with the basic bounds of society. There isn't something new in not raping, murdering, shooting, tealing from, beating or otherwise doing something to someone, and people such as this who have no regard for others do not deserve any sympathy or regard from the rest of society.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's next, cutting off a thief's hands? Death penalty is not proportional to the crime. Yes, rape is bad, but it's not murder.

      Obviously, castration would be proportional to this. :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you know how much porn is online from what counts as respectable pornographic film companies doing exactly that? I don't mean staged content; I mean a couple 40 year old guys slip into a college party and fuck a completely drunk, barely awake (if even) college girl.

      You probably believe those Dancing Bear videos where a male stripper shows up to a bachelorette party and ends up fucking the bride-to-be and all the bridesmaids aren't staged either.

      No, those bangbus guys don't just pick up random girls on the street and fuck them in the back of a van for cash, either.

      Repeat after me: all porn is fake. Yes, ALL of it.

      Do you have any idea how much pressure is on porn producers to verify and document the legal age of every single performer in their productions? They will get shut down if records are missing or tampered with. All performers are required to submit to regular health and STD checks. Stringent records and contracts are kept.

      Why take a gigantic risk and have your male talent (which is in severely limited supply) rape some random girl on camera, provided they would even agree to do so and not just hand you over to the cops immediately? They would basically be filming their own confession.

      It's fake. All of it. Yes, even that video you just found that looks really authentic. Fake.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    3. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by epp_b · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, but there are mounds of evidence as to why the death penalty is not a deterrent (ie.: crimes of passion, psychological studies that show humans are *really* bad at thinking ahead and considering consequences ) and as long as there a still a chance of wrongful conviction, I won't stand for mandated state murder. Not to mention killing is morally wrong no matter what the context or circumstances.

      I will happily see my tax dollars spent (and even increased) to incarcerate truly haneous offenders as long as is necessary.

    4. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      people such as this who have no regard for others do not deserve any sympathy or regard from the rest of society.

      I agree, but then why are you regarding them so much? Why are you spending so much of yourself on hating them? Why not just remove them from society and get on with your life? Why would you let them turn you into a killer? Why let them poison who you are?

      It's like torturing terrorists when you don't get actionable intel; even if they genuinely deserve it, that's not the point. It's about what we subject ourselves to. We choose not to torture because torturing harms us, not because the sonofabitch doesn't deserve it.

      We choose not to kill because killing is a nasty business, and is not necessary to achieve the goal of minimizing the rapist's ability to effect our world. Rather, it increases his effect on who we are. He does not deserve that power.

    5. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They do, however, have girls sign consent forms, then genuinely coerce them into doing stuff they didn't want to.

      That is, the girl makes it clear when she takes the job that there's no anal, nothing rough, no bondage - then one by one, her agent, the director, the male co-star, etc. - browbeat her (verbally) into submission. It wouldn't surprise me at all if girls were given alcohol to expedite the process.

      For example, recently a documentary aired on British TV (sorry, can't remember the name) in which exactly this was happening, until the documentary film crew felt they had to intervene, rather than be accessories to rape.

    6. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by misterooga · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd have thought it's the other way around.

      If you are murdered, that's it. After rape, you have to live with not only the physical AND mental trauma, but also the society's finger pointing that says "yeah she is victim but she probably deserved it."

      No one deserves it.

      And what would she do if she got pregnant by the rapists? She will need to go through another nightmare deciding what to do.

      I honestly think death sentence is too lenient in this case. Burning isn't good either; it will end too soon.

    7. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The only reason it's more expensive than life in prison is because assholes like you get your feelings hurt.

      No it isn't. Even if the death penalty is a good idea (I'm not offering an opinion on that here), summary execution is not. You're ending someone's life here, and you can never undo that if it turns out to have been a mistake, so you'd damn well better take the time and effort to make sure you didn't fuck things up when you convicted the guy. That means appeals, it means possible retrials, it means delay after delay over technicalities, it means lots of expense for the taxpayers, and that is how it fucking well ought to be. It should NEVER be easy or cheap for the state to kill a citizen, no matter how big a scumbag he's alleged to be. That's a road that never leads anywhere good.

      There is not, and never can be, a "quick, simple, cheap solution to this problem".

    8. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be careful who you dehumanize, for we may decide next it is you who is not human.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by Uberbah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You obviously have no right to comment on this. Talk to an actual victim of rape sometime, or get raped yourself.

      You're obviously a raging asshole and a demagogue. First, victims of crimes do not set the level of punishment for their victimizers for obvious reasons. Secondly, you're also a raging moron if you think rape is as bad as death - go talk to any parent who's child has been raped AND murdered and see if they'd rather have a rape survivor if you want to play that card.

      Third, talk to the Duke Lacrosse men and the Central Park five about how they should have all been executed. Before they were found to be innocent.

    10. Re:And still no death penalty for rape by oursland · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BTW...there's a big difference between what happened in India which was violent and evil with the intent to harm/kill which went far beyond rape vs the kind of rape that involves having sex with a passed out girl.

      What we have here is a kinder, gentler rape.

  4. The really disturbing part by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The really disturbing part is not just the fact that a 17-year-old was gang-raped, and no charges have been filed. No, the really really disturbing part was that a significant portion of the population of the town have actively opposed doing anything about it.

    I mean, why bother even having laws against rape if you're not going to enforce them?

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:The really disturbing part by alen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but these were jocks, football players

      they are more equal than others

    2. Re:The really disturbing part by Kinthelt · · Score: 4, Informative

      The NYT article clearly states that two football players were arrested 11 days later, and are being held under house arrest until their trial.

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    3. Re:The really disturbing part by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is being able to run fast and throw/catch a ball accurately considered something that elevates these people above everyone else?

      Why can't people be elevated for doing things that actually contribute to society?

      Our priorities as a culture are SERIOUSLY fucked up.

    4. Re:The really disturbing part by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the Duke case, the DA was pandering to constituents who wanted action(it was a serious town/gown thing, and students don't do much voting in local politics). In this case, the relevant authorities are pandering to constituents who want inaction to protect their precious football heroes.

      Different incentives; but both good examples of the fact that criminal investigations can be...modified...by the desires of local stakeholders.

    5. Re:The really disturbing part by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because sex with drunk chicks is a major past time in America. Parties are arranged with alcohol specifically because people want to get drunk and fuck. It is well known that women do not go to bars to get laid; they go to bars to have fun, which is why we have wingmen--distract the girl's friends so she is isolated, because she's not there to get picked up. That's why guys take home so many drunk chicks: they did not come there to get taken home, they're just too drunk to think straight!

      Guys go out to the bar to find drunk bitches to fuck. Guys arrange parties and tell their friends to find chicks to bring so they can get them drunk and fuck them. This is not what college kids do. This is not what teenagers do. Thirties, forties guys do this. It is common, consistent, continuous behavior.

      Most laymen don't register this as 'wrong' until somebody calls it rape. Hell even women don't really take much notice that they've been taken for a romp; they just wake up, ask where the hell they are, and try to find their way home without giving it much thought.

      There is a sickness in the world, though perhaps I am pessimistic. Maybe the only reason we freak out when someone calls it 'rape' is because we've accepted this behavior to such a level that everyone pre-accepts the consequences--women don't go out to get fucked while they're passed out drunk, but when it happens most of them are like, "Oh yeah, that happens lol... man I was druuuuunk..." and don't flinch. Is this really what we are?

    6. Re:The really disturbing part by spidercoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being originally from Small Town, Ohio, I can attest to the fact that people who live there have small minds and neither know nor care about things outside their own little world of shitty beer and Friday Night Lights. Quite simply, they make these dumb fucking children who have never been taught right from wrong into hero-figures because that is all they have. A few of those kids who are lucky/rich/smart enough will make it out, but for the majority of them, HS football is the peak of their lives, and they will spend their years after graduating living in the same town, working a shit job, and clinging to those days of "glory". Then when they have kids, they try to live vicariously through them, pushing them down the same path, and the cycle perpetuates itself. It's ridiculous and pathetic, but it's all these sad sacks of shit have.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    7. Re:The really disturbing part by cusco · · Score: 4, Informative

      They drugged her. Then when she was unconscious they raped her. Not the same thing at all.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  5. Re:Tainted evidence by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Informative

    When this story came out, the prosecutor told the press that they already had collected the video in question. And still hadn't charged anybody.

    In other words, there's an untainted trail of the evidence, and the reason that Anonymous got involved at all is that they're trying to shame the prosecutor's office into doing something.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  6. It would appear... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The better title might be 'Anonymous actually gives a damn about gang rape case, unlike clannish and football crazed natives of some backwater hellhole'.

    The perps in this case were almost unbelievably sloppy in concealing their activities; but the people supposed to be enforcing the law were, by turns, overtly apathetic and far more interested in protecting their hometown heroes and their precious football season than actually seeing justice done.

    1. Re:It would appear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The authorities aren't overtly apathetic, they're seem to be in full-on coverup mode. According to the narrative that Anonymous/Localleaks/Knight Sec are telling, they have a vested interest that goes well beyond preserving hometown pride. One of the players implicated is the son of the county prosecutor attached to the case, and allegedly the girl transported to the prosecutor's residence during that night and raped before being transported to another location.

  7. Video link by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Deadspin has been great about following this story (see the other links(, and this page from a few days ago is more in depth and has the video itself (and some choice quotes if you can't listen to this sort of thing):

    http://deadspin.com/5972527/she-is-so-raped-right-now-former-student-jokes-about-the-steubenville-accuser-the-night-of-the-alleged-rape

    Truly despicable.

    --
    I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
  8. This just in by s0nicfreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anonymous wanted for possession of child porn

  9. Re:Tainted evidence by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The prosecutor, you mean the mother of one of the kids on the football team?

    Hurray small town america.

  10. Re:Tainted evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, it is admissible. IAaL, I am assuming you are not an attorney. Any objection the defense has will go the weight and not the admissibility. All you need is someone to testify to the video, and that the contents are a fair and accurate representation of the events that occurred. It is a matter of course to identify the videographer, people in the video, etc. If the defense wants to attack the authenticity of the video, or if it was edited, that is fine, but it will, as stated above, only serve to limit the weight the jury gives it and not the admissibility for consideration. Additionally, you don't need video evidence of a rape to prove rape. They arrested, convicted and punished people for 1000s of years without video evidence, and in most cases today there is none.

  11. Wrong by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Under Ohio law, the Ohio Attorney General is elected by the voters of the state and does not have the independent jurisdiction or ability to undertake investigations or prosecutions of juvenile crime. In this case, the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney who has such authority delegated her authority to the Attorney General's office to act as special prosecutor in the matter. The special prosecutors are not from the Steubenville area and graduated high school elsewhere."

    Source

  12. Sheriff says he'll arrest the hackers. by Andy+Prough · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The sheriff is going after KnightSec, says none of the "evidence" they provided was actual evidence of a crime: http://www.wtov9.com/news/news/sheriff-anonymous-hacker-im-coming-after-you/nTnNX/.

    From this article:

    "Why put their names out there? Why put their addresses out there? With all the crackpots we have running around this country? With all of the sex offenders were have out there, plenty of them in Jefferson County, why put children’s names out there?” said Abdalla. "Mothers have taken their children out of school in fear of what may happen. This has gone too far. Enough is enough." Abdalla also claimed to know the identity of the person leading the online effort. "I'll deal with that at another time," said Abdalla. "I know where he lives. I know his name, his mother's name, his father's name, his brother's name."

  13. Huh? Not charged? by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    -August 11-12, 2012. The incident that began this case occurred.

    -August 14, 2012. The incident was reported to Steubenville Police.

    -August 16, 2012. Electronic devices of people who potentially had knowledge of the incident were taken, pursuant to search warrants.

    -August 17, 2012. Steubenville Police request technical and investigative support from the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation "BCI" (a state agency supervised by the Ohio Attorney General). At the request of Steubenville Police, BCI expedited the evidence analysis. The analysis involved uncovering and reviewing tens of thousands of emails, texts, and photos from approximately a dozen electronic devices. The vast majority of such data was unrelated to the case. Investigators and forensic examiners never found any video of the alleged crime.

    -August 22, 2012. Based on the investigation of the Steubenville Police, two juvenile males were arrested and charged. Their names are Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond. Suspects remained in juvenile detention until November 1, 2012 when the Visiting Judge (from outside the county) assigned to the case placed the suspects on home arrest.

    -August 28, 2012. County Prosecuting Attorney delegates her authority to special prosecutors from the Ohio Attorney General's Office.

    -August 30, 2012. Steubenville Police meet with the special prosecutors.

    -The Juvenile Court trial in this case is scheduled for February 13, 2013. Circumstances surrounding media and public access to that trial are controlled by the Visiting Judge.

    Source

  14. Re:Tainted evidence by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always shudder when I hear people say they're going to raise their kids in South Treestump because they want them to grow up with "small town values". Of course almost none of these people actually grew up in a small town (and the ones who did were from the upper class), or they'd know better.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  15. Re:What does "gang" mean? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    You heard wrong and obviously have never spoken to a rape victim. Rape is not a sex act, it is an act of hatred and violence. Its only purpose its to hurt, demean, and humiliate the victim. Many rapes are done with broom handles, pool sticks, toilet plungers, etc.

    Rapists don't rape because they're horny, they rape because they hate women.