Slashdot Mirror


Symbian Sells Millions, Despite Nokia Pushing Windows Phone

Nerval's Lobster writes "During the fourth quarter of 2012, Nokia sold 4.4 million Lumia smartphones—a significant rise from the previous quarter, which featured sales of 2.9 million Lumia devices. The Lumia line runs Microsoft's Windows Phone operating system, which largely replaced Symbian as Nokia's smartphone software of choice. Despite that shift and Nokia's emphasis on Windows Phone, however, the company still sold 2.2 million Symbian smartphones during the quarter. The question remains whether Nokia should have gone with Windows Phone in the first place, or embraced an alternate platform such as Android; an anti-Elop camp has emerged in recent months, arguing that Symbian was still a viable platform before Elop consigned it to the dustbin of tech history. For now at least, both sides seem to be right: Symbian still sells despite Nokia's attempts to take it increasingly offline, and Lumia phones are selling well. It'll take more time—perhaps a lot more time—before the ramifications of Elop's bet become clear."

218 comments

  1. Good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good bye Elop, good bye Windows Phone and GOOD BYE MICROSOFT!!!

    1. Re:Good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Didn't you say something similar about 10 or 15 years ago?

    2. Re:Good bye by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was a different Anonymous Coward :)

    3. Re:Good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean goodbye Apple?

    4. Re:Good bye by Nossie · · Score: 1

      your average joe didn't think a tablet would be 'good' enough 10 - 15 years ago...

      shame all those tablets don't run Windows

      THAT is the difference.

    5. Re:Good bye by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      You actually want Symbian?

      Eww.

      BTW, MeeGo had already flown the coop. You do know that, right?

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    6. Re:Good bye by Luckyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still have a symbian phone. It works fine.

      Of course I'm a bit old school, I prefer my phone to be functional rather then stylish.

    7. Re:Good bye by Therad · · Score: 0

      There are more than one??? I thought it was just one very disturbed person, which often argues with him/herself with conflicting views.

    8. Re:Good bye by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Same here, still using my 5630. I don't want these huge phones nowadays, with a battery life of a day or two.

    9. Re:Good bye by clonmult · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've got the last Symbian phone; Nokia 808 - works perfectly. And of course the camera on it is truly excellent, truly decent optics, and image quality thats resulted in my DSLR being used quite a lot less.

    10. Re:Good bye by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 0
      I have tablet that is at least 5 years old and runs some evil form of Windows, and it is definitely not good enough. There were older ones, and they were definitely worse.

      Consider your wish granded, and appoint me your firey godmother!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    11. Re:Good bye by Nossie · · Score: 0

      Wait, sorry I'm trying work out the relevance of your comment.

      You have a tablet from over 5 years ago that runs Windows. Microsoft have been trying to shoehorn their own OS onto a tablet since 2000 and failed spectacularly.
      Your tablet is definitely not good enough, that's right - which is why it took 10 years for them to take off and not with Windows on them!

      What was my wish?

      Enter the ipad and smart phones in general. Your average shmoe can view porn, get pics from their kiddies and surf the interwebs easily without the need for a laptop or desktop with Windows on it.

      Are you being humorous? sarcastic? ... I am actually puzzled.

      thanks.

    12. Re:Good bye by saihung · · Score: 2

      Have you actually used a Symbian device recently, or is this just a knee-jerk reaction? I have an E6-00 with the latest release of Belle on it, and I like it a lot. It's stable, the battery life is great, and it has a physical keyboard. It does everything I need a smartphone to do, which is why I thought we bought the things to begin with.

    13. Re:Good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that there is more than one of us. That asshole up there is giving me a bad name.

    14. Re:Good bye by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about you, but I don't have a phone. I have a 700 +MFlops computer on my pocket, which I use way more for other things than calling, something I do less and less.

      I consider the battery tradeoff acceptable.

    15. Re:Good bye by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      May I ask you what you are doing with your pocket computer? I am always wondering if people do somethying with their smartphones that I can't do. The only thing I have seen so far is watching videos, this does not really work on my old one. Checking emails and listening music are working fine. The webbrowser is not comfortable on that small screen, but it works for all important pages. This model does not have GPS yet, which can be useful sometimes, just Ovi Maps (free offline world map).
      My battery life is still 3-4 days if I don't do internet surfing or listening music for a long time. I think it was not much more when it was new, 5 years ago.

    16. Re:Good bye by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      For one, it's an ARM processor. Those things are more and more prevalent, and there are already servers using them. As we are heading towards exascale supercomputers during the next years, power consumption is playing a bigger and bigger role, especially on this very high-end scope (which is my area of work). I expect ARM supercomputers to appear on the Top500 on the next few years, and making the news as soon as universities start to assemble clusters of Raspberry Pi and the like, or that Parallella machine.

      That being said, arm has its own quirks as any other platform has. To have one in my pocket is an asset: I can do quick tests on it anywhere.

    17. Re:Good bye by clonmult · · Score: 1

      So having an ARM based device on you at all times is a benefit for what purpose?

      Do you regularly write ARM code directly on the device, and then later target it at a small scale computational problem? Or do you browse the web, take pictures, listen to music and tweet a bit?

    18. Re:Good bye by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      Both.

    19. Re:Good bye by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      I used a Nokia 5800 until about 10 months ago. I kept with it for about 2 years. It was my 5th Nokia phone. So no, it's not a knee-jerk reaction. I know what's up.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    20. Re:Good bye by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      My 5230 plays videos just fine and offers a resolution that is exactly half of the 720p, which means no resizing artefacts. It also has Nokia Maps (they rebranded ovi maps back to nokia maps some time ago).

    21. Re:Good bye by vgerdj · · Score: 1

      WAIT, there's more than one Anonymous Coward?

    22. Re:Good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I ask you what you are doing with your pocket computer?

      Permission granted. I watch homosexual pornography on my pocket computer. Doesn't require a long battery life since I can't stand watching it for too long. Disgusting.

    23. Re:Good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer my phone to be functional rather then stylish.

      Sup Lucky, still trollin' bro?

    24. Re:Good bye by nobodie · · Score: 1

      ditto, ditto aaaand ditto
      bought it in 2007, still a great PHONE

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    25. Re:Good bye by saihung · · Score: 1

      Dude, the 5800 is a FOUR YEAR OLD phone. What are you talking about?

    26. Re:Good bye by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Alright, if that's not a good enough example: I bought someone in my family a Nokia 500 with Belle on it last year.

      It's an excellent phone (which is its primary purpose), but I wouldn't call it a good smartphone.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  2. Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lumia phones are NOT SELLING WELL. Don't repeat astroturfing media BS.

    1. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      4M isn't bad for a new phone/os - you can shout and wave your little fist but there it is...

    2. Re:Astroturfing by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 2

      They're not selling well when compared to iPhones or many Android phones.

      However the product is actually quite good (try it, prove me wrong) but the problem is that people aren't willing to give it a shot.
      Hopefully the new Nokia Lumia 620 helps crack the mid/low end markets - I doubt quality-wise it will have many competitors in the price bracket. If they went with Android they'd probably be king of the hill right now.

      I'm thinking that Nokia will die if they don't downsize, but if they do downsize they have a chance of rebuilding.

    3. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they sold 4.4 million in a quarter where they didn't release till the second half of it. It may not be selling iphone or s3 levels of well but those are actually damn good numbers.

    4. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia did not sell 4M phones with a new OS (WP7/8). It sold 4.4M smartphones which include Symbian OS.
      Only 2.9M were Windows phone. The fact you've not gotten this shows you didn't really read the article. So I guess the other guy can wave his little fist cuz there it ain't.

    5. Re:Astroturfing by networkzombie · · Score: 1

      I'm on Verizon. I've been waiting for the Lumina 920 and will buy one as soon as it is available. Where is it?

    6. Re:Astroturfing by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nokia did not sell 4M phones with a new OS (WP7/8). It sold 4.4M smartphones which include Symbian OS. Only 2.9M were Windows phone.

      You are incorrect, and have misunderstood the sentence that discussed the figures. They sold 4.4 million Windows Phone devices this quarter, compared to 2.9 million sold in the last quarter. It is a 50% improvement. From the article:

      During the quarter, Nokia sold 4.4 million Lumia smartphones - a significant rise from the previous quarter, which featured sales of 2.9 million Lumia devices

    7. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Call me (on your Windows 8 phone, maybe) when tech journalists learn the difference between sell-in and sell-through.

      Channel stuffing... it's not just for Thanksgiving anymore!

    8. Re:Astroturfing by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      Lumia phones are NOT SELLING WELL. Don't repeat astroturfing media BS.

      Compare this to previous quarterly sales figures for the iPhone and it is not a disastrous as you want to believe. It is certainly not bad enough to make any claim of Lumia sales to have only come from Astroturfers.

    9. Re:Astroturfing by monzie · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have a Nokia Lumia 800 ( It's basically the N9 with WP7.8 , minus the front facing camera )

      It is a very good phone and I like it.

    10. Re:Astroturfing by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, we assume that there are two million astroturfers out there who each bought two phones. You call it a stretch, I call it a possibility. ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is not a good comparison. The smartphone market exploded. Nokia sold 30 million Symbian smartphones in the quarter before the platform was declared dead. The declared plan was to replace the Symbian smartphones with Windows Phone smartphones in two years. The two years are almost over, the smartphone market doubled (or so), and Nokia sells only 4.4 million Lumia phones. This is a complete failure.

    12. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is disastrous. Android sells 4.4 million phones in three days.

      Yes, three days.

    13. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elop should have thought of that? If someething is not popular, and actually ANTIpopular, than, it should also be considered with OS choice?

      Microsoft was doing asshole shit to others over course of decades, it finally comes back and bytes them in the ass. Elop didn't see it coming?
      Wao, good job. I knew Nokia was finished, once I heard that QT support was dropped and they went full ahead to windows future. Or should I say, windows doom.
      I had a few Nokias in my life. Last one i have is a dissapoitment.(cheap shit, that simply doesnt work 90% of time,, its not windows based, but it's irrelevant to me. It still is Nokia)

      So they can suck my balls with Lumia all they want, I ain't buing this shit.

    14. Re:Astroturfing by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The key numbers you have to know are that

      1. Nokia used to sell 4million smartphones every two weeks, not every three months.
      2. The current major competitors typically sell more than that on launch day
      3. RIM, which is just before it's new OS launch, and is clearly in trouble sold 6.9 Million phones; almost without any marketing.
      4. Nokia and Microsoft are putting down billions of Euros in subsidies for these phones and more in terms of marketing

      150% of nothing is still nothing. A "significant rise" would behave been an increase of 15 to 30 million. That would still not put Nokia near the big league, but would suggest that they have a real chance of getting back.

      If you take into account the fact that a huge proportion of these phones were bought by Nokia and Microsoft employees and partners for testing, what you come up with is an App market which has no prospect of expanding to become something close to an "eco system" within the next two to five years.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    15. Re:Astroturfing by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Except that windows phone is no longer new. It's been around for a while and it's in its third major iteration (7.0, 7.5, 8.0).

    16. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia still can turn things around, but they will need some new ideas, and perhaps some changing in paths.

      First, there is nothing wrong with Windows phones. They work. They are decently secure in the real world (I've not heard of any malware issues with them.) Their biggest two downsides are the relative lack of apps, and the locked-down architecture. Other companies sell more than one OS; it might not hurt Nokia to do similar.

      Second, Nokia has the UI for the low end feature-phones down pat. Of course, smartphones are important, but there are times when one just needs a bare-bones device that can do voice and texts and not much more. Of course, there isn't any real money to be made in this sector compared to smartphones, but it is a strong point of the company, and shouldn't just be tossed.

      Third, Nokia phones are well engineered. I'd say radio-wise, they come in second to Motorola for call quality. They have a decent feel, and even the inexpensive phones you find at a corner store don't feel "cheap".

      Maybe Nokia should consider having more than one line of phone. Adding an Android line shouldn't be too difficult. If worried about physical security, have a bootloader unlock mechanism similar to HTC's where one signs up for a developer account, gets a decryption key, then uses that.

      Of course, maybe Nokia should enter the Android market with some cool features. For example, ARM's TrustZone. Perhaps Nokia should use the "worlds" functionality to allow a phone to work in a BYOD mode. There is always the Open Virtualization project that could keep the hypervisor in the secure "world", and keep the "home" and "work" VMs separate. Of course, separate users does this functionality, but it is easier to sell separate VMs to the PHBs than try to explain the concept that this UID does not see this other UID's files no matter what.

      Nokia might do well bringing enterprise elements which are somewhat lacking due to RIM being pushed out of that arena. Maybe Nokia might be able to eke out a market niche by designing an Android device from the ground up for business. Having multiple VMs would be useful for separation, but there is always adding other features, perhaps a MicroSDXC card [1] (so one could use something like Titanium Backup to copy apps in use to a safe spot.)

      [1]: Newer phones either have a MicroSD card, or more space than 32 gigs of disk; I don't know of any that have both, although it would be extremely useful for backups or swapping out ROMs.

    17. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A new phone/os?!? What are you talking about? 4.4M is the total sale of all the Lumia phones, I.e. from WP7 to WP8, from Lumia 510 to Lumia 920! Compare this with the 18M sold by the Galaxy S III, a single phone!

    18. Re:Astroturfing by madprof · · Score: 1

      The Lumia 920 is a brick of a phone. Don't get one. Get another Windows device if you must but not a 920.

    19. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not. It's missing almost all the good parts on the N9 - the software and the UX. It has all of the the bad parts - the stupid usb charger door that snaps off and causes the sim card to fall out, the non-expandable storage and the non-changable battery.

      At least you don't need to reboot the phone when the sim card falls out on Meego.

      It's only saving grace is the Nokia design (screen and overall look) which are pretty good.

    20. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their biggest two downsides are the relative lack of apps, and the locked-down architecture.

      No. The two biggest downsides are the words "Microsoft" and "Windows". MS has spent 20 years building a reputation as the worst technology company in the world, both in terms of incompetence and and willingness to rip off the customer. Nobody is going to buy a phone made by them, not even if it shits rainbows and kittens.

    21. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, there is nothing wrong with Windows phones. They work. They are decently secure in the real world (I've not heard of any malware issues with them.)

      Why would malware writers bother writing exploits for a platform nobody uses?

    22. Re:Astroturfing by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      http://my-symbian.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44034

      Seriously? You've never seen this list before? Let's say 10% of the list are misunderstandings and another 30% has been fixed in the latest version of WP, that's still pretty damning.

    23. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually it's pretty awful.

      The original iPhone sold only 6 million and that was frankly a flop despite what revisionist Apple fans say. Nokia's competing offering at the time the N95 sold around 12million units for example and that wasn't exactly thought of as a particularly standout success, but pretty much par for the course for a Nokia smartphone.

      Since then the smartphone market has absolutely exploded, it's size has grown massively, so 1/3rd the sales of a run of the mill performance flagship smartphone from 6 years ago when the market has expanded massively?

      No that really is an absolutely awful sales figure. A success would mean at least doubling the sales from back (so at least 24million) then given the at least doubling of the size of the market (it's likely much more than a doubling, a 5 to 10 fold increase is probably more realistic given the Android/iOS handset sales nowadays).

    24. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Nokia it is. And they sold 14 million in the first year and if they would've had a steady supply of all the necessary parts, the figure would be closer to 16-17 million. This is with limited markets, as the WP8 devices haven't been sold in China or India yet. And you guys are telling everyone here that it doesn't sell and nobody is buying that?

      Btw, they sold over 86 million phones this quarter.

    25. Re:Astroturfing by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 1

      Man, I loved my N95 and it cost me the silly amount of 350€ with an 18 months contract. It was a good phone, no software obsolescence, well designed, great camera (it had video, something the iPhone didn't have until the 3GS three years later!), you could install third party apps (the iPhone didn't allow this until much later) and great battery life with 3G on (3 - 4 days). All the apps I needed were there.

      The main issue with Symbian was that it sucked to develop on it because the tools weren't the best and the OS itself was too embedded on the device (no OS updates), no real app store where devs to sell their apps and the browser was stuck on 1999. The same thing can be said about J2ME.

      It's a shame Nokia, really a shame. Maybe they'll embrace FirefoxOS for their new line of cheap smartphones.

    26. Re:Astroturfing by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      I've seen it before. Excluding the 10% or so that aren't on any smartphone (browser Silverlight plugin? Ha!), the 15% or so that were there when the list was first made and the people who made it were just being idiots, the 30%-ish that have been fixed in Mango or later versions of WP7 (seriously, that list is old; Mango came out a year and half ago, and I'm not counting WP8 changes in that 30% list), the additional 10% or so that were fixed by third-party apps, and the 25% or so that are fixed by homebrew apps, and you have the remaining 10 or so of features that some subset of the population wants but WP7 can't provide. Big whoop-de-doo, no smartphone OS is a strict superset of the others.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    27. Re:Astroturfing by madprof · · Score: 1

      The screen is nice but nothing special compared to other high end devices. Wireless charging...hardly worth buying a phone for. It is a massive lump though. It is not my choice for a Windows phone, let alone a smartphone.
      They all have flaws (I think most phones like the SGS3 are too big) and this one has its overall bulk.
      In my opinion.

    28. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you sound like a person who can find me a stuffed channel with an available yellow Lumia 920 in it?

    29. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, from Q3 WP sales are up. However, the Q3 2.9 million was huge drop from Q2, when they sold 4 million WP devices. (The drop was probably because of of announcing WP8 and obsoleting WP7 devices.)

      So if you take out Q3 as outlier, then over the second half of the year they added measly 0.4 million devices. This means they even aren't keeping up with overall growth of market and are actually losing market share. So indeed, this is pretty bad and they certainly can't continue like that.

    30. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also: 20% simple lies, 10% actual problems, 30% same design decisions as in iOS. Or something like that. And no, I don't own a WP phone.

    31. Re:Astroturfing by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Stuffed peppers are a lot tastier, and more fun!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    32. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia != Windows Phone

    33. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you got two problems there. It's not called Lumina, and the Verizon variant is not 920, it's 922. So maybe ask for Lumia 922 and it might ring a bell at the Verizon store. :-)

    34. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, pretty terrible that they only sold 14 million Lumias in the first year.

    35. Re:Astroturfing by ilguido · · Score: 2

      Naaa, those figures are from the Symbian era, WP is a much more laughable competitor: iPhone in the third quarter of 2012 sold 26.9 million, 27.04 in the fourth quarter. Android sold more. I might concede that it is not as disastrous as it seems: it is inconceivably worse.

    36. Re:Astroturfing by samkass · · Score: 1

      During the quarter, Nokia sold 4.4 million Lumia smartphones - a significant rise from the previous quarter, which featured sales of 2.9 million Lumia devices

      So they got a 50% improvement going from a non-Holiday quarter to a Holiday quarter, and have sold 14 million total since the Lumia line was released. While Symbian year-over-year sales figures went from 28.3M/quarter two years ago to 19M/quarter last year to 2.2M this past quarter.

      Regardless about whether you consider a minor bump for the biggest shopping season of the year "significant" or "selling well", it's clear that Lumia is not carrying the volume it needs to to make up for the death of Symbian.

      It's possible Nokia could pull out of a sales dive like this, although no phone company to date ever has.

      http://www.asymco.com/2013/01/10/getting-to-know-the-meaning-of-sisu/

      --
      E pluribus unum
    37. Re:Astroturfing by MajroMax · · Score: 1

      Those numbers are a bit out of date. The current Wikipedia page has an updated bar graph; in the most recent quarter listed (Jul-Sept 2012), the iPhone sold 26.9 million units.

      If we're to assume that Nokia's goal is to sell a dominant phone platform, rather than a very niche product, these reported sales figures are underwhelming.

      --
      "Evil company X is threatening to restrict our rights! Let's all get together to stop--OOOH! SHINEY!!!" -- AC
    38. Re:Astroturfing by luther349 · · Score: 1

      my buddy has one frigging loves it not a joke he has a stack of andorid phones he no longer uses after buying a windows phone. but everybody at work it either apple or android. so i don't call 1 in 20 guys selling well.

    39. Re:Astroturfing by luther349 · · Score: 1

      i don't call giving them away for free sales. of course they will say they where. that's also part that's hurting any sort of wide adaption of these phones android have become un contracted and some models very cheap phones to buy where is the cheap prepaid windows phone.

    40. Re:Astroturfing by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Compared to what they gave up to sell windows phones, this is equivalent of "nobody buying that".

    41. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Phone 8 compatibility won't last 5 years. Microsoft lost (never had?) platform guys & can't maintain reliable platforms since they're a solutions company. They kill off their mobile ecosystems regularly & I see no reason that #8 should vary from WinMo (9 versions) + WP 7/7.5.

    42. Re:Astroturfing by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > but the problem is that people aren't willing to give it a shot

      In all seriousness, can you blame them?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    43. Re:Astroturfing by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Nokia is betting everything on Windows Phone. That's the point. Windows Phone is selling pathetically bad.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    44. Re:Astroturfing by daniel_l_mills · · Score: 1

      Gadget_guy is absolutley correct.

    45. Re:Astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slight modification.

      Stephen Elop, a stooge of Microsoft, has hijacked Nokia and is betting everything on Windows Phone.

  3. I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by bogaboga · · Score: 2

    Yes, I believe most of those that bought Nokia's Windows Phones didn't know they were buying into Microsoft's phone OS.

    Most of them must have bought Nokia phones because the word "NOKIA" featured prominently on the phones. Not because they featured Windows Phone 8.

    All this reminds me of those early Net-book days running Linux, remember?

    1. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      You are radically over estimating consumer awareness of anything that is not an iPhone. Most of the people who bought Nokia's Windows Phone did so because they walked into the store and a salesperson recommended it.

    2. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by morcego · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, in Brazil the Nokia brand carries a lot of weight. People will buy a phone because it says Nokia here. True or not, around here people believe they need to buy Nokia if they want a phone they don't need to charge every days (sometimes, twice a day).

      I have no reason to doubt it is the same in at least some other countries. And regardless, Brazilian cellphone market is huge.

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You are radically under estimating the brand value of nokia. It's on par if not more known and liked then apple in most of the Latin America and Asia.

      It took a shitload of hits lately, but it's still extremely high up. They bought themselves a lot of clout with projects like bringing natal care to mothers in rural third world, and they ran dozens of these (and still do to an extent).

    4. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

      True. In Germany, back before smartphones there were essentially Nokia and a few other companies no one cared about. Nokias were tanks that fit in your pocket, almost indestructible and with long battery life. In 2010, Nokia still had the reputation of being a solid choice (if somewhat old-fashioned as Meego was only starting to pick up steam and people were still associating Nokia with Symbian). I can't say much beyond that as I can only tell about the techie population but most techies I know avoid the company's products since Elop happened. As far as I can tell, Samsung and Apple have become the new Nokia: If you use Macs then Apple is the first manufacturer you consider when planning to buy a smartphone while Samsung is if you're a Windows or Linux user.

      Nokia is only considered if you have already decided to buy a WinMo phone - and even that may be shaky due to Microsoft invalidating the entire current Lumia line shortly after release by making WinMo 8 incompatible with existing devices (apparently without telling Nokia how to make compatible ones before launching the OS) and making WinMo 8 apps incompatible with WinMo 7, making Nokia's smartphone unit stuck with nothing but futureless legacy phones for the second time in two years. I can imagine that even people who consciously bought a Lumia in 2010/11 would be wary about WinMo and/or Nokia after that.

      I think that relatively soon even average people will realize that Nokia is no longer the mobile phone giant it was. Hell, marketing alone could take care of that; it's been months since I've seen a Nokia ad but Apple, Samsung and HTC ads are all over the place.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      It used to be the same here in the UK. Until the Motorola Razr (the original), I don't think there was a single other phone brand which people would seek out by name- Nokia was THE phone brand.

      Right up until the iPhone, Nokia was still an extremely popular brand. Post-iPhone there was a lot of criticism of Symbian "looking tired", although it was still popular enough. Post-Elop, I think the brand is more or less dead to people now.

    6. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are radically over estimating your awareness of anywhere that is not the USA.

    7. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      Ditto in India. Used to be that one identified a mobile phone store by the Nokia logo on top of the store. Even now, for feature phones (or dumb phones) people will choose Nokia without a second glance. But everywhere I look, Samsung seems king in smartphones in India.

    8. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Nokia is only considered if you have already decided to buy a WinMo phone - and even that may be shaky due to Microsoft invalidating the entire current Lumia line shortly after release by making WinMo 8 incompatible with existing devices (apparently without telling Nokia how to make compatible ones before launching the OS) and making WinMo 8 apps incompatible with WinMo 7, making Nokia's smartphone unit stuck with nothing but futureless legacy phones for the second time in two years. I can imagine that even people who consciously bought a Lumia in 2010/11 would be wary about WinMo and/or Nokia after that.

      It sounds like MS is actively trying to destroy Nokia. Their only significant partner when it comes to Windows Mobile devices. Now of course MS is not known to play nice with other companies in general, this sound like downright stupidity from MS's side. They need Nokia as much as Nokia needs them, provided they want to give Windows Mobile at least a fighting chance against juggernaut Android.

    9. Re:I guess most didn't know what they were buying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it does not.

      People here buy iPhone, Motorola, Samsung and LG. Nokia has lost the same amount of customers as everywhere else in the world.

      Plus, we have A LOT of second class Chinese cellphones because they support dual or triple sim cards.

  4. Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
    1. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that and I don't get it. What exactly caused Nokia's death? How exactly did Nokia's CEO fuck up so badly?

    2. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by danomatika · · Score: 1

      TL;DR

      Looking at the last graph, how much of the drop in Nokia is due to Windows Phone adoption versus the overall increase in people buying smartphones? The graph make it seem pretty clear, but dosen't part of Nokias loss/growth of rivals circa 2010 show more that smart phones are becoming cheaper, more accessible, and more people are buying them over Nokias bread and butter smart phones? If that's the case, it can be argued choosing an Android/iOS smartphone OS analog like Windows Phone was the only way to stem the loss of dumb phone sales.

    3. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but elop killed the in house smartphone OS, bought windows 7 to nokia, hook line &sinker, and after nokia paid good money getting that OS on their phones, micro$oft wrecked that nokia product line by announcing windows 8 quarters befor the OS was available, and that fraction of cudtomers that buy the latest wizz bang toy, shut their wallets and waited, or bought the iphone 5.

    4. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I read it correctly, this data is all about smartphones, not dumb phones. Nokia's name is still very respected but now, it looks like two companies. One is practically a division of Mircrosoft, the other is the proud Finnish company we all love.

    5. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by mirix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He killed the existing OSes, and bet it all on windows phone. Which was a losing proposition, apparently. He was of microsoft stock, which leads people to believe it was malice causing this decision.

      Prior to that there were two 'smart' platforms:

      Maemo - Linux based, still fairly infantile but showed a lot of promise.

      S60 (symbian) - kind of long in the tooth, long lineage. Designed ground up for phones.. great battery life.
      Nokia had recently opened most of it up, and was moving to to support Qt applications, which was going to make things easier.
      The most recent release was supposed to be quite decent, from what I've heard.

      Anyway, then elop announced they're both dead, and no one develops for dead platforms...

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    6. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh here we go, Tomi Ahonen, Nice balanced viewpoint once again from the disgruntled ex-Nokia employee

    7. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      Elop declared Symbian dead. He basically told everybody: "do not, I repeat DO NOT but our Symbian smartphones, we're closing the Ovi appstore, we're abandoning all development, and the platform has no future. We're going with Windows Phone. Yes, we're also junking Qt."

      He also declared Maemo/Meego dead, even more emphatically.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    8. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "analyst" is a tool.

    9. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, then elop announced they're both dead, and no one develops for dead platforms...

      As a mobile game developer: That’s also why we don’t program for Windows Phone.
      Apart from it being total shit, and Microsoft being a multiple-time convicted criminal, who continued doing the same crimes, the moment their probation officer went away, of course. (Seriously. Elop and you not being able to use any browser apart from IE on Nokia phones happened exactly when their probation officer went away.)

      I proudly will never support Windows Phone. Period. And so do many of my not-so-spineless colleagues.

    10. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by jfanning · · Score: 2

      Nice trick those graphs.

      Symbian was already tanking in Q2 2010, nearly a full year before the famous memo and Android had already passed Symbian in market share by the time of the memo. They were screwed no matter what.
      http://dominiescommunicate.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/android_bypasses_symbian.png

    11. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maemo's not dead. It lives on right at the moment in another company. The core itself is being re-born by Samsung as an alternate plan to Android in partnership with Intel.

      But, as you observed, no one develops for dead platforms...funny...seems that Nokia does after discarding workable ones that're still in their infancy. Maemo was "more infantile" because Nokia couldn't make up it's mind on what to do with it. It's a very usable system, albeit slow at times, if you get to see an N800. Thing is, it was slow, not because of the OS, but because of the suboptimal hardware. Put even OS2008 onto a modern phone like the hardware in a Galaxy Nexus, and it'll dance circles around most everything else. Put Harmattan on it...heh... It's what Microsoft was aiming for and didn't quite get with WinMo8.

    12. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't matter. The type of clueless eurotard who was buying Symbian phones does not read Nokia's press releases or technology blogs.

      Symbian sales dropped because Samsung/Android kicked it's ass, not because Nokia's CEO issued a memo.

    13. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Zos23 · · Score: 1

      It's all a matter of perspective. While I like Tomi and generally agree with some of his points and I certainly dislike Elop and would agree that he is a terrible CEO, those graphs are just plain wrong. It all boils down to what you call a smartphone and it has been discussed over and over. If you count any phone that can do email and web and whatnot a smartphone then yes in 2010 Nokia did ship more smartphones than Samsung and Apple, but everyone and I really mean everyone knew that Nokias offerings weren't in the same league as the ones with iOS/Android. The consumers didn't perceive them as being in the same class and that's what matters.

    14. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never write a company off. If you remember correctly, one time Apple was is such a bad situation that Microsoft had to come in and buy shares to help keep the company from going under. Apple turned their fortunes around, when they were pretty low. Has happened before, can happen again.

    15. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by hobarrera · · Score: 2

      Meego (maemo6) wasn't so immature actually. Some apps are still missing, but I find it to be as feature-complete as any other mayor player, with great responsiveness, and very intuitive UI.
      Maemo5 (N900) was cool, but too geek-oriented. Meego is perfect for average-joe.

    16. Re:Oner must be pretty high to be in doubt by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > He was of microsoft stock, which leads people
      > to believe it was malice causing this decision.

      I'm not sure I buy that. Microsoft guys (especially near the top) tend to believe pretty strongly in their products. If he came from Microsoft, he probably actually thought Windows Phone would be great, both as a user experience and as a selling brand.

      Okay, so he was wrong -- very objectively wrong by the latter criterion. Being wrong is not the same thing as being malicious.

      Also, Symbian *was* already losing market share (as a percentage, because the other smartphone makers were experiencing significantly faster growth as a percentage), so it's not true that there wasn't any problem for the CEO to solve. His attempt at solving it was poorly conceived and went horribly awry, exacerbating the situation quite severely and putting the company in a much worse situation than they were already, but that's failure (severe failure, arguably), which again is not the same thing as malice.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  5. Do consumers care about the OS? by El+Micko · · Score: 2

    Aside from technically literate consumers who might actually care whether their phone is powered by IOS, Symbian, Windows, or Android, would most consumers be able to meaningfully discriminate between these phone operating systems?

    Wouldn't most consumers merely want a phone that works and some working apps for Facebook, Twitter, YouTube etc?

    1. Re:Do consumers care about the OS? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Aside from technically literate consumers who might actually care whether their phone is powered by IOS, Symbian, Windows, or Android, would most consumers be able to meaningfully discriminate between these phone operating systems?

      I think the best way of answering this is to look at the Android graphical interface and compare it to the iPhone GUI and while not identical there is significant similarly for customers to move from one to the other with very little extra learning so basically the human interfaces are functionally similar with nicely designed and separated icons which are labelled underneath with a comfortably readable font. When you look at the Microsoft interface which is "tile based" you see different sized tile icons with very little space (effectively a black line a few pixels wide) between them and the labelling is internal to each tile.

      When a customer looks at purchasing a smart-phone I would be fairly comfortable in saying that they are going to prefer the iPhone and Android interfaces over the Microsoft interface however the saying Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder" is valid and some would prefer the Microsoft tile interface over the externally labelled icons of the other smart phones.

      From a personal perspective I think an icon that is well separated and has the labelling underneath is much more human readable in that it can be recognisable at a glance compared to a variable sized tile which needs to have its meaning read within the tile so much greater care has to be made in designing the tile so as not to obscure the tile labelling. Of course there will be people who disagree with me but externally labelled well separated icons on GUI's have been around for well over 30 years (years before Microsoft Windows) now and I have never heard of anyone complaining about them although I have heard of people complaining about too many icons on their desktop especially when talking about Microsoft Windows.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    2. Re:Do consumers care about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't, but people, who they ask for help, they do...

    3. Re:Do consumers care about the OS? by Patch86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People don't care about "the OS" per se, but they care about several things which are related to the OS:

      - They care about the GUI. iOS devices have a certain GUI. Android devices all have GUIs with highly shared characteristics. Windows Phone devices have that tile-based GUI. If you don't like the tiles, you could describe that as "not liking Windows Phone".
      - They care about the apps and hardware accessories. iOS is the king of both- hugely well populated App Store, colossal range of accessories. Android phones have a great range of apps, and a smaller but varied accessory range. Windows Phones currently have few apps, and almost no dedicated hardware accessories.
      - They care about branding. iPhones are extremely fashionable. Android Phones have built up a great reputation as almost the "standard smartphone"; plus the Google and green android branding is well loved. Microsoft Windows still makes most people think of offices, spreadsheets and beige boxes. For better or worse, those annoying "I'm a PC/I'm a Mac" Apple adverts did hit the nail on the head.

      People don't care about NT kernels and Unix-like file systems and Java Machines, no. But the OS doesn't stop with those bits.

    4. Re:Do consumers care about the OS? by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Most definately! Android and iOS are like "app-buckets", whereas Symbian features all kinds of functionality that these app-buckets simply do not have, which have to be complemented with apps, but kind of suck.

      I'll give a few examples of why I choose a Nokia E7-00 (a $600 phone at that time) after Android, even though I'm a fan of Linux on the desktop and free software in general:
      -Offline maps, with walking directions;
      -Build in VoIP straight from the dialer app;
      -Build in streaming internet radio (simply paste an URL and go);
      -Support for most audio formats;
      -Dolby Digital built in;
      -USB host, so I can use a USB stick to bypass the laptop boot everytime I need to print a document;
      -Official, full range MSOffice suite and HDMI out, which in combination with USB host for a mouse can make presentations that much easyer;
      -No credit card needed for app purchases (just on top of the monthly phone bill);
      -Slide to unlock holding turns of LED flash light, with a brightness you can lit an entire room with;
      -Full multiple Exchange support;
      -FileSystem support;
      -BlueTooth music streaming, that compared to iOS, actualy doesn't skip every now and then;
      -Other exclusive apps (like for example a YouTube downloader which pulls even DRM Vevo horror just fine, so I don't have to consume my entire data plan, every time I want some new music on the go).

      And next to obviously better hardware than any other phone (except killer CPU which you don't even need with Symbian):
      -Battery kicks ass;
      -Connectivity kicks ass;
      -ClearBlack display kicks ass if, you know, you want to use your phone outside?;
      -Nice keyboard.

      And then tons of usability things. I'll keep this phone until it breaks or HTMLv5 starts to realy take off on a sane mobile platform that doesn't suck balls in ways like it's 1999 all over again.

      --
      Here be signatures
    5. Re:Do consumers care about the OS? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      well Samsung took android and ran with it and are pretty much second to apple now so much so well apple tries to kill them all the time. i think its like 75% of the android market is a Samsung device wile the others guys fight over the rest. Nokia had the ball in there court they could have been the Samsung of android but nope they decided to drink the Microsoft spiked koolaid. i mean relly they have had 2 things ever not fail there desktop os and there console any other projects have always been epic fail or stillborn. look at windows 8 for gods sake someone tell them to stop trying to change whats not and never will be broken.

    6. Re:Do consumers care about the OS? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      well Samsung took android and ran with it and are pretty much second to apple now so much so well apple tries to kill them all the time..

      Samsung are ahead of Apple in terms of market share, I believe. Not that that'll upset Apple too much; they're still raking in the profit with margins Samsung can only fantasise about. Samsung will be hoping to change that by persuading more people to go for their premium offerings rather than their mid/lower range devices, but that's a different story.

    7. Re:Do consumers care about the OS? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      well that's the point Samsung covers both markets. they have both low/mid devices and high end. apple has learned this lesson recently with there cheaper mini ipad.

  6. is symbian still viable? by metalmaster · · Score: 1

    Nokia has given up, but is there still a dev community for it? Are consumers sticking to Symbian for some app that doesnt exist on other platforms?

    1. Re:is symbian still viable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More likely, they're consumers that just want a phone that can do calls and send and receive texts. Dumbphones are still pretty popular, and they've got to run on something.

    2. Re:is symbian still viable? by monzie · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. There are many folks who can live without Instagram [1] or Angry Birds.
      A good/decent camera with "social stuff" like Facebook and Twitter and solid battery life is all that many people require.

      Here in India Symbian still sells, sells well and people still like it, Here are some reasons that I can think of

      1. Symbian phones have better battery life than most other smartphones. In a country where people travel a lot and power outages are common, a long batter life is a important. And when you ask and Indian what "good battery life" is , you'll get the answer: "2-3 days".

      2. It does the job. SMS, WhatsApp, Skype, Twitter , Facebook are all the apps that people use. Using iFart apps has not really caught on. The downside is people don't use Yelp or Foursquare or GroupOn all that much in India. People just call up friends and ask. Sometimes that's easier and better :)

      3. Indians hate paying for apps. Period.

      Of course mine is a country of a BILLION people so generalizations are impossible But having stayed in this country all my life and having owned muliple iOS/Android devices ( currently evaluating WP 8).

      Footnotes:
      [1] = More people can live without Instagram, especially thanks to its new TOS

    3. Re:is symbian still viable? by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 1

      The same can be said about almost every African country where the only mobile coverage only allows for SMS's, and that's a big market to grow on.

    4. Re:is symbian still viable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. There are many folks who can live without Instagram [1] or Angry Birds.

      Angry Birds runs just fine on Symbian and my Nokia E6.

  7. Lumias don't sell well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The anti-Elop camp emerged the moment he has announced the Windows strategy in Feb 2011 and a lot of people predicted Nokia's downfall at that time. And in no way do the Lumia phones sell well. Not by any standard. 4.4 million Lumia phone is just pathetic. The Nokia N8 (Symbian) alone sold almost 4 million in its first quarter (Q4 2010) and the smartphone market was much smaller at that time. It is also a lie that Nokia was failing before the strategy was switched to Windows Phone. The smartphone unit had increasing sales, sold more phones than any competitor, and was profitable.

    1. Re:Lumias don't sell well by clonmult · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whilst I do really like both my N8 and the 808 (and kinda despise my iPhone), anyone who thinks that Nokia were in a great position prior to Q4 2010 are smoking something dubious. It has taken Nokia 2 years to get Symbian into something like a decent state (as seen on the latest 808 firmwares) - Android and Apple were improving and growing at a much greater pace. Of course Nokias problem is down to stupendous levels of incompetence at the top end, management who don't know their posterior from their elbow, that were happily allowing teams to compete with each other, politics that would have made MS management happy beyond their wildest dreams. On that count, Nokia and MS are a match made in heaven/hell (delete as appropriate)

    2. Re:Lumias don't sell well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not saying that everything was perfect. But their smartphone unit was profitable and had increasing sales and was much larger than the compitation. They also had a plan for the future: Meego (transititioning their developer base to QT on Symbian and then Meego). Yes, Meego was much too late and delayed due to management stupidity. But still the N9 was still released before the first Lumia phones and was much better in every respect. So they were almost there.

    3. Re:Lumias don't sell well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Android and Apple were improving and growing at a much greater pace.

      No this is not true. In absolute numbers, Nokia grew faster than Apple and Android in 2010.

  8. Which bar was RIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article was one big, broad-brushed logical fallacy after another. With cherry picked facts.

    Some of the facts like "2010 best quarter ever, nothing wrong with Nokia" could be said of Research in Motion/Blackberry.

    I have no opinion on any of this and no position, but that article was just a tunnel-vision rant using a broad-brushed bar graph as the sole factual piece of evidence and a bar graph can show anything.

  9. Windows phones are junk by default by jonfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Windows phones are not user friendly. There user screen cannot be properly configured (as with other mobile phones today). They have no options of setting a background image. They are hard to configure, missing features that have existed for years on Symbian, Android and Apple. It is battery unfriendly by nature (a lot of power usage).

    For this reason I am never going to buy a Windows phone. I rather move to Android. But I would prefer to continue to use Symbian. But that is not a option I am afraid of. Since Nokia has almost been destroyed by the Microsoft zetaloid that was hired by Nokia board few years ago. But he did work for Microsoft, so he going for Windows Mobile is no surprise at all.

    Nokia is going to be missed if it goes bankrupt. The lesson here is however is that never go into a deal with Microsoft. It is going to ruin our company in a record amount of time. It is a fact and a rule. I did see a list of companies that Microsoft made bankrupt with there bad deals. Too bad I can't find at the moment.

    1. Re:Windows phones are junk by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're definition of easy is highly suspect, for actually getting to your information wp blows android and iPhone away.

      Posted ac as I can't be stuffed logging in.

    2. Re:Windows phones are junk by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this poorly written, rambling, lacking-in-citations-and-often-just-wrong ("user screen cannot be properly configured"?!) post moded anywhere but down?

    3. Re:Windows phones are junk by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am modded down and often labelled troll for arguing in favor of Microsoft, though I almost always provide references. I've even seen my posts deleted (like when I wrote about MS patents that allowed modular hardware advances, i.e. the CPU / GPU / RAM / IO Ports / Screen / Keyboard theoretically can all be upgraded virtually independently without upgrading the entire phone, at least by patent claim. Kind of like how you might upgrade your desktop. I posted that because it was just a fact MS specifically patented such a modular approach to mobile handset, ... and it was deleted in about four hours.) This site is ridiculous when one can state facts and be modded to zero or minus something, and anyone who simply states "Microsoft teh suck" is modded 5 Insightful or 3 Intelligent.

    4. Re:Windows phones are junk by default by jonfr · · Score: 1

      Tell me. Where can you change the background image on the newest Windows phone? Let me know when you find it. For others. Just search Google.

  10. This is relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who posts this shit? Of course they're still using Symbian on entry level phones for Africa and poor ass countries

    1. Re:This is relevant by ToThoseOfUs · · Score: 1
      but they aren't using symbian on entry level phones. That is where their series40 operating system dominates. i think the last symbian phone made was the 808 which came out at the beginning of last year as basically a tech demo for their new camera sensor.

      Any new nokia phone out there is either windows, or series 40.

      There are still older phones out there running symbian, and they are most certainly smart phones. In some ways android and iOS are only just catching up.

      That betng said, my next phone will be Android, after Elop killed the symbian ecosystem.

    2. Re:This is relevant by clonmult · · Score: 1

      Their intention several years ago was for Symbian to become entry level, and to a certain extent that was happening with devices like the 5230/5530. The 808 is a truly excellent device, with a camera that I doubt anyone will get close to for a few years (as the N8 has yet to be bettered by anything other than the 808).

  11. What about Nokia's other OS? by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They say numbers about Windows 8 and Symbian, but what about Meego/N9? If a platform that they declared dead and buried basically at the moment of launching it, in just one phone, performed in a not so different way than Win8 phones, that would be a big message. There were some numbers around N9 sales for Q4 2011 and Q1 2012 that could point that it was selling better than Lumias, but not sure how it evolved. What is possible is that if Sailfish or Ubuntu gets ported to it (have a good shape for the swipe gestures used in those incoming mobile OSs) it could be even start selling back.

    Anyway, speaking about dead and buried OSs, Microsoft killed and buried the Window OS bundled in most Lumia Phones when announced Windows Phone 8, saying that present and close enough in time Lumias won't be able to run it, and that apps for Windows 7.x won't be compatible with it neither. Is not so amazing that it sells badly, even for being a Windows phones. You had to wait till Lumia 920 to have a Windows 8.

    1. Re:What about Nokia's other OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The N9 was not allowed to be sold in western europe, only in a few eastern european countries. It still did very well because of grey export.
      I would say 2M units sold in just three very poor countries vs. 5M units sold all around the world is a clear indication of N9s success if it would be sold everywhere.

  12. I have had both. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are a waste of money. iOS and Android are better options.

  13. no way by terec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Symbian was popular, but it was a disaster in terms of technology: hard to program with one of the worst mobile user interfaces ever conceived. Nokia needed to change to something else. Windows 8 is actually not that bad in principle, but it was too little too late, and Microsoft has failed to establish it as a viable and popular platform for app developers.

    Nokia should have gone with a dual Android (cash cow) and Meego (risky bet, high payoff) strategy. Nokia could have made fantastic Android phones. By now, they have lost their sales channels and their brand name, and lots of other companies have figured out how to make good hardware, so they are basically toast.

    1. Re:no way by tuppe666 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Symbian was popular, but it was a disaster in terms of technology: hard to program with one of the worst mobile user interfaces ever conceived. Nokia needed to change to something else.

      ...but had a solution in place going forward with a unifying toolkit "QT" and two replacement in-house OS's Meego and Meltemi.

    2. Re:no way by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Elop hurried the windows phone announcement and "symbian is dead" announcement to happen just about at the same time that the qt libs for symbian became usable enough for shipping apps with it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Symbian was popular, but it was a disaster in terms of technology: hard to program with one of the worst mobile user interfaces ever conceived.

      Used to be hard to program with old C++ API but the Qt/QML-toolchain is completely different story. I work for a mobile software company and have recently written or co-written version of same application for basically all the active smartphone platforms out there (minus Blackberry) and I have to say that Qt-based Symbian/Meego version was hands down easiest to do. Just the sheer number of lines of code you physically need to type in order to make the same thing happen with, say iOS/objective-C, makes the process much slower. Luckily Qt lives on and is coming to Android and iOS as well so maybe one day I'll have only one repository. Can't blame a dev for dreaming.

    4. Re:no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think also that Nokias offices were full of Linux experts. Coding Android after Meego would have been a breeze for them. All that was thrown away. For some odd reason Nokia leadership lost their nerve jumped into sea when they smelled smoke.

    5. Re:no way by ecki · · Score: 2

      ... of which none did deliver or were stillborn. The cross platformness of Qt was compromised from the start with two competing UI frameworks libdui for Harmattan and Orbit for Symbian. This is a good article about that mess. And from what we know about Meltemi, it would have been a third, incompatible framework.

      Nokia did achieve only the minimum target for Symbian, and that is to retrofit Qt 4.8 to Symbian 9.2/^3.

      Before anybody blames Elop for this, 90% of it happened before his time.

    6. Re:no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, Meego was delayed. But the N9 was finished and sold before the first Windows Phone from Nokia. It was less buggy (the Lumias had all serious problems at launch), even had a decent set of app, was produced by Nokia (not outsourced), and while the situation with Qt was a bit of a mess, there was at least some transition path for developers. For Windows Phone there was no such thing. And then: Don't forget that this was Windows Phone 7. Declared dead shortly after. So what is your point? The situation was not perfect, but they made it much much worse by switching to Windows Phone.

  14. Re:Silly Slashdot post by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    I think everyone loves to hate some company or other. Since this is Slashdot (and not Backslashdot) it's perfectly normal.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  15. Look, Elop can't have non-WP7 success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Having betted the company on Windows Phone 7, he cannot have a success with anything but Windows Phone 7. That means that any success N9 had, Elop would have taken steps to kill it. Likewise the Symbian continued sales are a bit of an embarrassment to him, given, as he did, talk the phone down, both in a public presentation and in private burning platform emails to employees.

    It's very easy for a CEO to make failure, one swipe of a pen is all it takes. So it's very easy for him to make Symbian and N9 fail enough to make Windows Phones 4 million units seem good.

    So, never mind he's basically killed the company with a non selling phone, he will ensure that no other phone succeeds from the company and then point to the failure of those [a failure he created] to say, well at least we did better than symbian.

    Welcome to management 101, it's not about the company success, it's about the boss ego.

    1. Re:Look, Elop can't have non-WP7 success by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not boss ego, it's downright fraud: he did it for Microsoft's benefit, not Nokia's.

    2. Re:Look, Elop can't have non-WP7 success by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Stop with this dumb crap, if he was really doing that, he could and would've been fired in an instant. MS pays Nokia 1B/year in much needed money to aid in the transition.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_directors

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorma_Ollila

      --
      This space for rent.
    3. Re:Look, Elop can't have non-WP7 success by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Calm down, dear. When - not if - Nokia go under, we'll know. I expect Elop to bungie straight back into a senior role at MS, with a corner office constructed entirely of hookers and beer.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Look, Elop can't have non-WP7 success by Patch86 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      The world's biggest smartphone maker (and biggest dumb phone AND feature phone maker, while we're at it) inexplicably abandoning two popular platforms, which combined were outselling all rivals literally doubly so, and which the company owned all rights and licenses to internally, to pick Microsoft's platform instead. If that doesn't sound like something that is being done for Microsoft's benefit, I don't know what is.

      Admittedly, I'm more a fan of the stupidity argument rather than the malice one. But it's hardly outlandish to say that Microsoft is getting a better deal out of Elop's custodianship of Nokia than Nokia is.

    5. Re:Look, Elop can't have non-WP7 success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of Nokia's smartphones were "smart" in name only. They were sold through the channel as dumb phones, but if you wanted to punch yourself in the testicles you could try to use their super shitty web browser or crappy mail client.

      So, no, Nokia never was a big name in smart phones. Even though Windows Phone has been a total fail, Nokia is probably selling more actual high-range data plan devices now than they were a few years ago.

    6. Re:Look, Elop can't have non-WP7 success by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      You're looking at the term "smartphone" through a modern lens. The term originally (and still does, I guess) apply to Blackberrys. Nokia's Symbian offerings were more or less the same as, if not better than, the Blackberrys of the time; certainly when it came to web browsing, media playing, etc.

      When iPhone came out, followed by Android, the same fate befell both BB and Nokia- their phones looked crappy by comparison. Nokia's solution was a new platform (Maemo/MeeGo). But to say that Symbian wasn't a smartphone OS is to misrepresent the history of it.

  16. Re:Silly Slashdot post by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

    So wait a second here. The submitter is pointing out an anomaly or fluke in the statistics, and you assume he's a Microsoft hater? Submitter says he'll wait awhile to see what happens before passing judgement. And, he's a hater?

    Sounds more like you're a fanboi, and anything that doesn't praise Microsoft is "hate" in your book.

    Stop sniveling - there are many ways to do things, without relying on Microsoft. It's not OUR FAULT that your junior high school only has Microsoft products. Maybe when you get to high school, they'll have something different for your to play with, giving you the opportunity to learn something new and different.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  17. 6.6 M units sold on Q4 XMAS quarter? Disaster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To sell 6.6 million smartphones on Q4 XMAS quarter is a disaster.

  18. Nokia disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is terrible, and Nokia is on its way to bankruptcy.

    Mobile analyst Tomi Ahonen: "Nokia preliminary market share for Q4 is 2.8% (on my target market total unit sales number Q4 of 240 million smartphones). This is down from 3.6% in Q3 and 12.4% one year ago."

    http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2013/01/nokia-surprises-us-by-releasing-q4-smartphone-results-early-so-3-for-q4-and-5-for-full-year-2012-and.html

  19. What? by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

    1/10th the sales of iPhone, and 1/30th the sales of Android phone is now considered "GOOD"? MS has lowered its standards, it would seem. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57549482-94/smartphone-sales-up-47-percent-as-android-increases-its-lead/

  20. Sybian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh. Symbian, not Sybian. You had me going there for a second.

  21. 1.5 Million Android Daily, 25 Million Apples in1/4 by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    To sell 6.6 million smartphones on Q4 XMAS quarter is a disaster.

    Even if you add two OS's together Windows/Symbian competitively it looks like Elops strategy of choosing a Windows Phone OS *only* over *any* other strategy looks stupid. In real terms it has taken the smartphone unit from being 2x as large as Apple and 4x as large as Symbian, and relegated Nokia to 10th largest smartphone manufacturer.

  22. Linus Torvolds is Ass Kicking by tuppe666 · · Score: 0

    hero Linus Torvolds

    asshole "linux genious's"(sic) consider Linus Torvols a hero(sic) because he got there through meritocracy. Ironically in the context of this article by creating a kernel that powers 75% of the opposition, and by releasing a new revision of it ever 3 1/2 months like clockwork [and in reference to your comments he does so by keeping a tight ship].

    Ironically your heros whether they be Bill of Steve were both considered bastards, but even their achievements get acknowledged here.

    The sad fact is whether Linus *kicks cats* (he doesn't) is nothing compared to his achievements. In reality they shouldn't matter anyway, he can wear his underwear on his head, stick pencils up his nose and say "wibble". Its the kernel that matters.

  23. Windows phones are junk by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    wp blows android and iPhone away.

    Posted ac as I can't be stuffed logging in.

    Its not true. If it was you would have been able to make a logged in post.

  24. 2013 the year of Windows Phone by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    Didn't you say something similar about 10 or 15 years ago?

    ...I doubt it. Ironically in the context of this article Android the Os that Nokia did not choose is set to overtake Windows in Market share this year to become the dominant OS...and Sells 1.5million daily. Windows Phone sold 4.4Million...and is already expecting to sell less next quarter in its own release..

  25. Golden Handcuffs by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    MS pays Nokia 1B/year in much needed money to aid in the transition.

    ...and I suspect that is personally why everyone is currently going along with this madness,if they break the agreement with Microsoft now...Microsoft will want there money back. In real terms however the last figures I saw of costs of transition to Windows Phone was 10Billion...the cost in terms of staff, output, brand obviously make this figure a lot higher.

  26. Re:Silly Slashdot post by ralphbecket · · Score: 0

    I think I missed the anomaly you saw.

    Nokia sold 50% more lumias than the preceding quarter and a 100% more lumias than Symbian phones in the same quarter.

    I've owned a Windows 7.5 phone (a Samsung) for over a year now and I'm delighted with it. I've owned an iPhone and I have Android 4 on my Kindle Fire and neither of them match up in terms of usability. I really don't understand the juvenile frothing at the mouth here whenever it is pointed out that MS has made a good product.

  27. Aldi by SilenceBE · · Score: 1

    They are selling that well in the benelux countries that Nokia is dumping Lumia phones on aldi, a discount supermarket chain. A model that sold for 499 euro six month ago for 199 euro. I still wouldn't want it for that price to be honest.

  28. Re:Silly Slashdot post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One small problem: GP never mentioned any such thing, and never performed any "frothing at the mouth". The anomaly is that Symbian was (according to Elop) supposed to be dead by now, yet it sees increasing sales.

    It's people like you that necessitate a "-1 Miserable Astroturfing Shill" mod so, so badly.

    WP 8 and "usability in the same sentence? Honkey please...

  29. Re:Silly Slashdot post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is really why does Slashdot allows retarded .NET "programmers" post on Slashdot.

  30. OS does not matter by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    The OS doesnt matter. it is the UI that matters.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:OS does not matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may laugh at watching Steve Ballmer chanting "Developers! Developers! Developers!" in that old video but he isn't wrong. A smartphone OS with no developers making applications for it is doomed. This is why the OS matters. What good is your OS with a stellar user experience if nobody develops apps for it? Smartphones these days are general-purpose computers in their own right and all such platforms have always and ever lived and died by the availability of applications for them.

    2. Re:OS does not matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. And the UI of Windows phones suck. It is ugly, as if designed by a pre-school girl. If those 'Metro' live tiles were so attractive, people would be dumping their iPhones and Android phones en masse to #switch.

      Good luck Microsoft! 5% of global marketshare... I think even BB10 will beat that.

  31. Re:Silly Slashdot post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Aww, that's so sweet. The Microsoft shill said "Android 4" on his Kindle Fire.

  32. Any good apps on it? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    I wonder, what apps did you download for it, what do you use it for, apart from calling people and taking some casual snapshots? What does it make it worth more than a feature phone for you?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  33. The question doesn't remain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The question remains whether Nokia should have gone with Windows Phone in the first place"

    Nokia should not have gone with Windows phone in first place period.

  34. Re:If you didn't understand the sales figures. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I they ever tried this crap on me in real life, it would end badly for them.
    and they know it.

    If your cowardly ass ever said that to Linus's face it would end very badly for you. Even Linus kicks the shit out of retards.

  35. Re:Silly Slashdot post by madprof · · Score: 0

    MS have not made a good product. It absolutely not as good as iOS. No way.
    I will repeat that again - Windows phones are not as good as iPhones.
    One person I know got given a Lumia by MS at a conference. He used it, declared it not ready for prime time, and bought an iPhone 5. He would rather spend money on a decent device
    I have seen this with a number of Windows phone users. All anecdotal but having used it a bit too, I am inclined to agree. And I think Apple are a bunch of control-freaks and would not buy an iPhone for that reason
    But Windows phones are simply not "there" yet. Maybe next year?

  36. Nokia is Microsoft. Jolla is the actual Nokia now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real developers of Meego and everything around it, left Nokia the very day, the Elop trojan horse infected Nokia, to form Jolla.

    Sailfish is everbody you should look for now. Hell, they even provide Sailfish support for the N9!

    The only thing I hope, is that they make a powerful smartphone with an actual keyboard, that isn't just available in China. Because then they will swim in our money!

  37. Re:Silly Slashdot post by iserlohn · · Score: 0

    "Android 4 on my Kindle Fire"

    You kinda gave yourself away there. Keep on shilling.....

  38. Recently by drolli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recently my samsung galaxy note had some accident, so until it was repaired i was forced back to use my old nokia e63. Funny story: for email and podcasts (which is what matters to me on a mobile) i found that actually more productive, even after 2 years of using android phones/tablets, especially taking into account the battery life. I then checked in a store for the current symbian phone models, and i can honestly say: There is nothing in the smartphone world which matches the price/performance ratio of these.
    They are cheap, well designed, have an os where the bugs have been fixed. The UI is sensible, i can take one in my hand and still use it without thinking.

    I would rather buy a new symbian phone as a second cheap reliabe outdoor phone for sports etc. than a nokia lumia (even if these are no bad either).

    If nokia would not have bragged so much about changing the platforms, the best thing they could have done would have been to put a decent kernel below and keep the API stable.

    1. Re:Recently by horza · · Score: 1

      I have a Nokia E71 as backup. To be honest it's much better than all the android smart phones out there for productivity. It would probably be smarter of me to get a cheap tablet for playing games and watching movies in bed and use a symbian phone for daily use. The two killer features of Symbian for me are (a) battery life which can be nearly a week and (b) voicemail app that records directly to the handset which means I can just listen to my latest message without going through the previous 20 to get to it. The fact there is no Android app that does (b) simply boggles my mind.

      However I do like my Note 2 just for the cool factor.

      Phillip.

    2. Re:Recently by drolli · · Score: 1

      There are a number of features which i love the note 2 for. Funnily the ultimate killer feature in the daily use of the note 2 is the idea that it vibrates shortly if you pick it up and there is a new message. This is so fucking brilliant and practical - you just can miss a new message with this. I also like the "flip over to turn silent" idea.

    3. Re:Recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Android and an iPhone, but I use Nokia 701 as a Phone. Had a Lumia, but wasn't impressed.

  39. Sure, plenty. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    Different phone, same OS...

    Downloaded non-game Marketplace apps that I use at least semi-regularly, from the top:
    Adobe Reader (sadly, the best PDF solution for WP7 right now).
    Amazon Kindle (constantly).
    Amazon Mobile (somewhat infrequently, but it has the cool features like barcode scanning to look up pricing).
    AuthenticatorG (Google Authenticator implementation).
    EveMon7 (EVE Online character tracking tool).
    Flashlight (uses the extremely bright camera flash LEDs).
    Forward Contact (not built in, sadly).
    GeekByte (feed reader for various tech sites, including /.).
    Headshot (cool app that uses facial recognition and spoken instructions to help you take self-portraits using the back camera).
    HTC YouTube (better than the default one, though these days I mostly use HTML5 in the browser).
    ICanHasCheezburger (my daily dose of silly cat pictures).
    IM+ (multi-network IM client).
    LinkedIn (the phone has some integration, but the app is much more complete).
    Look n Type (text messaging app that uses the camera to show what you're about to run into).
    Mango Transit (get bus routing, sadly the built-in maps app only supports car and foot navigation).
    MTG : Helper (Magic: The Gathering life tracker / card lookup / etc.).
    OneBusAway (shows real-time ETAs of buses).
    oPenGP (OpenPGP implementation, since we use encrypted mail at work).
    RemoteDesktop (Windows terminal services client, not built-in but the this third-party implementation is excellent).
    Shazam (music recognizer, works slightly better than the built-in feature).
    SkyDrive (the built-in one only supports document formats).
    Skype (sadly not integrated in WP7, unlike WP8).
    SnowMinder (ski conditions, snow day tracker, etc.).
    Speed Tester (Internet speed test).
    The SSH Client (exactly what is says on the tin, and works well).
    TouchDevelop (scripting IDE and runtime for the phone).
    Trailhead (hiking trail info, maps, etc.).
    User Agent Switcher (for sites that don't like the IE user agent).
    Vimeo (Internet video site, if you were somehow unaware of it).
    WarDice (polyhedral dice rolling app).
    Weather (The Weather Channel app).
    Xbox SmartGlass (access and control an Xbox 360 from the phone).
    XDA-Developers (read and respond to PMs and forum posts).
    Yelp.
    Ztitch (build panoramic photos).

    Games:
    7cave (good old fly-through-a-cave game).
    Chromatic Pro (bullet-storm game, shoot falling enemies with various weapons before they reach the bottom).
    Civilization Revolution (soooo much civ...).
    Fruit Ninja.
    geoDefense (great tower defense game)
    Hearts.
    Mars Runner (obstacle course racing, basically).
    Minehacker (free Minesweeper clone).
    Picross 7 (WP7 picross game).
    Plants vs. Zombies.
    Puzzle Quest 2.
    Rise of Glory (biplane combat flight sim).
    Sudoku.
    Wizard's Choice (fantasty-themed choose-your-own-adventure style of game).
    Wordament (incredibly addicting free word search game where everybody around the world plays on the same board at once).
    ZOMBIES (on the ph0ne) (twin-stick top-down shooter with fun flavor).

    Note that I'm excluding a lot of apps that other people probably have, like Angry Birds, Facebook, Netflix, and such, as well as excluding apps that I don't use much (OpenTable, iHeartRadio since the phone has built-in radio and music streaming, etc.) but have installed anyhow. Most significantly for my phone in particular, I'm also not including sideloaded homebrew apps, like Advanced Config (customize all the device sounds, etc.), Bazaar (think Cydia), BlueManager (full Bluetooth file transfer), lockWidgets (dynamic lockscreen info), Marketplace Config (bypass marketplace regional or device restrictions), Metro Theme (advanced custom theming), Orientation Lock (not built in, sadly), phonemander (Midnight Commander-like file browser), SMSBackup (also not built in...), TouchXperience (alternate shell + connection to a PC app for remote administration), USBModeSwitch (wired tethering; wifi is bui

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    1. Re:Sure, plenty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice list. But.. but .. but ... there is no instagram! :)))
      I think that a few slashdotters already had a heart attack.

  40. Re:Silly Slashdot post by ralphbecket · · Score: 2

    Sure, I installed Jelly Bean on the 'Fire. If that's beyond you, perhaps you're reading the wrong site.

    Now, what makes me a shill for saying I enjoy using my Windows Phone?

  41. Re:Silly Slashdot post by ralphbecket · · Score: 0

    "Hater", "fanboy", "snivelling", "when you get to high school". You're right, these are the kinds of phrase that you expect in polite, open discussion and not frothing invective. I stand corrected.

  42. Re:Silly Slashdot post by ralphbecket · · Score: 2

    Android 4. It's Jelly Bean. You may have heard of it? Now, pray tell, what makes you think I'm "shilling"?

  43. Re:Silly Slashdot post by ralphbecket · · Score: 2

    Well, I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I honestly don't think the overwrought expressions of WinPhone's inferiority common on this thread come from anyone who has seriously (or even actually) used the product. The press reviews are almost unanimously very positive and that matches my experience.

  44. Nokia smartphones were screwed even before Elop by Lasse.Vartiainen · · Score: 1

    There has been quite a few ex-engineer discussions here in Finland, especially now that some employee NDA are expiring

    Long before Elop Nokia board realised they are screwed in Smartphone market. They hired him with full understanding of his MS history.

    For background:

    • Although regular phones were the main product for Nokia, they felt they need good presence at smartphones to maintain brand
    • Nokia was caught somewhat off-guard with sudden popularity of ecosystem based smartphones (read : iPhone)

    All their options were pretty bad:

    • Symbian was dying as ecosystem, pretty much partner everyone had left it
    • Co-operation with Intel (Moblin/MeeGo/Maemo) wasn't producing expected results (Intel sucked at battery life, QT issues, CDMA etc), ecosystem would have been still small
    • Google wouldn't give them any special Android package -> they would be competing against emerging asian brands on HW alone
    • Windows phone was pretty much only sensible option, especially since MS desperately needed credible partners

    Not sure if Elop's burning platform mail was a clear blunder, or actually required to get Nokia research & development focused (it was technically just internal memo).

    You can read more from techiical arcticle based on interviewing Nokia (ex)engineers : http://taskumuro.com/artikkelit/the-story-of-nokia-meego

    -Lasse

    --
    lav : Not for ourselves but for the world we have been born into.
    1. Re:Nokia smartphones were screwed even before Elop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have gone the Android route. Nokia always could compete on hardware and past renown. They could also have created their own apps (maps, etc), giving users something no other manufacturer did.

    2. Re:Nokia smartphones were screwed even before Elop by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Google wouldn't give them any special Android package -> they would be competing against emerging asian brands on HW alone

      Microsoft didn't give any special package to Nokia either. Microsoft proudly announced this when other hardware manufacturers claimed discrimination.

        Ever heard of someone preferring Toyota over Honda because Honda cars have tyres?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  45. Re:Silly Slashdot post by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I think everyone loves to hate some company...

    Curse and damn Betty Crocker...

  46. Re:what is a symbian phone? by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    What's a BlackBerry?

    I'm in EU...

  47. Re:Silly Slashdot post by iserlohn · · Score: 1

    Amazon isn't even in the Open Handset Alliance. They take the source from AOSP, and then customize the interface beyond recognition. So, yes your post is a bit misleading and disingenuous and reeks of shilling.

    So, let's see how many mod points you've got on your 10 other accounts yeah?

  48. Anyone else read that as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else read that as Sybian instead of Symbian the first time, and have to do a retake.

  49. Huh. by Westwood0720 · · Score: 1

    And here I thought this was going to be an article about the vibrating thing that chicks sit on to get off. .

  50. Re:Silly Slashdot post by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2

    It is about the old saying: "fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on you".

    Slashdot has a very specific audience, and one that has had to live with all shit microsoft spat on our faces for the last 3 decades. There was hardly a moment where their product was better, more stable or faster than the competition. I will not even mention how many companies microsoft destroyed just because they wanted to, either by releasing half-baked software, or by just announcing vaporware. The would-be competitor would come out of market without microsoft ever releasing anything.

    The combination of, for the most part, low-quality software, competition strangling, FUD, plain lies, and press bribing made the software market stall as a whole pretty much the same way church made europe stall in feudalism during the middle ages or the patent system is starting to do to american economy today. It was a drag, and a lot of people are happy to see them lose importance.

  51. I don't understand the abstract. by uacheesehead · · Score: 1

    Despite the shift from 2.9 to 4.4 million Lumia phones, and despite the fact that those phones sold twice as many Symbian phones, the choice of Windows over Symbian is in question? Symbian has a global reach and isn't going away overnight...

  52. Nokia software historically sucked by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I still have a symbian phone. It works fine..

    My last Nokia phone (a Nokia E series phone) could technically do everything an iPhone or Android phone could do but it was a huge pain-in-the-a$$ to actually use. The interface sucked and was never updated. The software to communicate with my PC was horrible to the point of uselessness. We surfing was so bad it was pointless to try and email wasn't much better. Technically it had all the same features as the iPhone of the same period but it simply wasn't worth the trouble. It worked acceptably as a phone but with a smartphone what I really want is an easy to use computer that happens to be able to make calls. Nokia never really seemed to grasp this concept.

    Of course I'm a bit old school, I prefer my phone to be functional rather then stylish.

    The reason I don't use a Nokia phone anymore is precisely because it wasn't functional. As far as function vs style goes, there is no reason you cannot have both. Saying it is one or the other is a false dilemma. Furthermore having used Nokia phones for about 10 years, their software functionality pretty much sucked. I have no confidence that this will change so Nokia has probably lost my business for good.

    1. Re:Nokia software historically sucked by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      My 5230, which is ancient my modern standards (it's from symbian generation that came around the same time as first iphone) received its last update 19.11.2011 according to phone management that I just checked.

      It went through over five major iterations and upgrades of UI during its lifetime (each 10 version up was a major OS overhaul).

      Perhaps you just forgot to update your phone?

    2. Re:Nokia software historically sucked by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you just forgot to update your phone?

      Few updates were ever produced for it and none were what I would describe as major improvements. It was a E70 which was a S60 phone. Nokia basically abandoned the phone. My experience with Nokia is that they spend all their time fussing with the hardware (which is usually decent) while they do nothing but checklist feature implementations that technically can do the job but are horrible software to actually have to use.

      Earlier Nokia phones I owned required sending the phone to Nokia for a firmware update.

  53. Smartphone vs just a phone by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Same here, still using my 5630. I don't want these huge phones nowadays, with a battery life of a day or two.

    Your mistake is that you are thinking of them as phones. Really they are pocket sized computers that happen to be able to make calls. If all you want is to be able to make calls then I agree smartphones are pointless. Obviously many people want something more than just a telephone, myself included.

    1. Re:Smartphone vs just a phone by nobodie · · Score: 1

      so along with my PHONE, when I am going our for a period when I might have the time to do something with a device with extra abilities, I take my WeTab in my backpack. That way I don't carry around (or pay for a dataplan that sucks cash without providing real value) My dataplan lets me pay per MB prepaid. Cheap, does everything I really need and I am covered. Case closed.

      The big plus is that my phone time and my dataplan time cost me about $30.00 a month in a busy month, like December. The WeTab, in case you don't know, is MeeGo based, has both Wifi and 3G and so is extremely easy on the 3G MB costs. It is a little heavy (an 11" screen and an atom processor with an aluminum frame) but I can manage, really I can.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    2. Re:Smartphone vs just a phone by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      But the 5630 is a smartphone.
      Actually it is just the phone that I want: a tiny smartphone with real keys. I can't find something like that now.

    3. Re:Smartphone vs just a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly don't understand what exactly makes S60 devices not "computers that fit in your pocket". They've been like that for a long, long time, before the iPhone came about. The only distinction is the touchscreen and the app store which centralizes 3rd party appliction access -- and Nokia even had that.

  54. Android destroys OEMs faster than any OS by elabs · · Score: 1

    The only OEM that does well with Android is Samsung. HTC, Sony and every other OEM to try to use it have met with disaster.

    1. Re:Android destroys OEMs faster than any OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android on Nokia hardware would've been an obvious choice for most customers over android on samsung hardware.
      Symbian still sells because people prefer the design language and hardware quality of a Nokia phone. The Lumia line was designed in America, for America and it looks/works nothing like a real nokia. Thats why it doesn't sell well in Nokia's primary markets like India and China

  55. Re:what is a symbian phone? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's really popular with about half the phone using population.

    But seriously, a lot of phones in the US use symbian (the OS, not the sex toy). A lot of "feature phones" run symbian. It doesn't get a lot of marketing here.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  56. Re:Silly Slashdot post by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

    Curse and damn Betty Crocker...

    Yeah, her phones are really really tasty, but get moldy so fast ...

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  57. Re:Silly Slashdot post by ralphbecket · · Score: 1

    Allow me to illuminate you.

    (1) My point, which I assume was obvious to other people, regarding having a modern version of Android on my 'Fire was precisely that I have it to compare against Windows Phone 7.5 as a small-device OS. You do realise you can replace the OS on a 'Fire?

    (2) This is my only account which I've held pretty much since Slashdot started.

    (3) Are you aware that your posts are nothing more than ad hominem attacks? Do you accuse everyone who disagrees with you of "shilling"?

    (4) If you spoke to people face to face the way you speak on Slashdot you'd get a few good slaps. Which would probably do you a world of good.

    All the best.

  58. Google Sync for Symbian terminated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Google kills the sync for Symbian devices in Mar 13, there goes the market for Symbian smartphones.

  59. Symbian Simian by pfg23 · · Score: 1

    I have a Nokia N8. It is a brilliant smartphone: perfect form factor, great camera, the best GPS/Map/routing software by far, plenty of apps, and a built-in FM radio to boot. Stylish too! The downside? It looks like the most recent version of Symbian ^3, Belle, drains the battery in less than a day, even with less than average use (say one call a day, minimal data usage). Very sadly, it has become unusable. At first I thought the battery was just old, so I bought a replacement. It drains the new one too. I don't think it's a specific app, because I reset the phone, removed the old apps, yada, yada. Going back to an old OS version seems unfeasible. I haven't been able to get or find a solution to this yet, from either Nokia support or scouring the web. Too bad, because the N8 is truly marvelous.

    1. Re:Symbian Simian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My N8 lasts at least 5 days with such usage, still running Anna on it though.

  60. Re:1.5 Million Android Daily, 25 Million Apples in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't call Stephen Elop stupid. That Microsoft stooge from Canada knew exactly what he was doing.