Slashdot Mirror
Pot Smokers Might Not Turn Into Dopes After All
ananyo writes "Back in August last year, we discussed a study reportedly showing heavy marijuana use in teenagers had been linked to a decline in IQ in later life. Now, a new analysis suggests that the study may have been flawed. Using the same data, the researchers found that they could explain the IQ drop by properly accounting for socioeconomic factors — such as individuals from poorer backgrounds being more likely to smoke cannabis as well as having reduced access to schooling."
Bam! They do more of it, and it isn't!
Who designed this religion anyway?
I realized this when i met someone who had smoked for about 2 years. He was border line retarded. Then I met someone else who had been smoking since he was 14, and he was an engineer. Different strokes for different folks. Dont blame the drugs.
I forgot what I was going to post !
Randomly getting the first post yo. Thank you THC.
Going on smoking the dope for about 15 years now. If anything, it assisted me with diving in to the world of UNIX with intense enthusiasm and concentration. I've worked in IT business solutions and web development this whole time and things progressively get better as long as you continue to work hard. Just like anything else, all it takes is being responsible. What you do after 5pm is none of my business as long as your work gets done on time and in a professional manner. If you spent all of your waking hours drunk on booze, high on dope, full on fast food, or anything else out of control, then you probably won't succeed very much at anything. Toke responsibly.
And here's a defence of the original paper by one of its authors: apparently when you account for said socioeconomic factors the effect is still there. The take of this anonymous coward, who has only read his own link, is that the original paper should have included this analysis, but it turns out that its results stand nevertheless.
(anons can't use hyperlinks??)
https://theconversation.edu.au/teen-cannabis-use-lowers-iq-despite-claims-to-the-contrary-11568
How about whether high IQ folks are more likely to smoke pot or dumb ones? That would also be an interesting study. Does pot smoking have enough of a stigma attached to it that people who are considered "smarter" are less likely to smoke it. Also, how does it compare with alcohol ? I did not read TFA btw!
Correlation does not equal causation? I'll be darned....
You realized that there wasn't a statistically significant correlation based on a sample size of two?
What have you been smoking?
And most people will focus on the person in the above stories that confirm their bias.
Like pot? Then it'll make you an engineer!
Hate drugs? Then it makes you a retard!
My doctor likes to point out that many of these studies aren't randomized controled trials - RCT - because it's a bitch to do any study on "recreational" drugs in the US because of our Puritanical laws and this whole "War on Drugs" horseshit.
Of course, there aren't any studies of whether smoking pot causes the same instances of emphysema, cancer, and other diseases that can happen from smoking anything.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, there was a study years ago (not RCT either) that showed that there may be a link with smoking pot and slowing tumor growth.
It hasn't been repeated as far as I know so the results haven't been verfied.
Anyway, there are plenty of folks out there in the internet peanut gallery that cling to that one study and came to the conclusion that pot stops cancer.
Oy!
You smoke pot so we're kicking you out of school
You'll lose the opportunity to be educated and socialize normally with a mainstream peer group
We'll use your now sub-standard IQ and abnormal social skills to defend the prohibition on pot
-- Bill Hicks
There is no way most of the mainstream press is going to cover this. The potentially flawed study reinforced too many stereotypes and opinions in step with the "war on drugs" which bankrolls increasingly powerful law enforcement.
....individuals from poorer backgrounds being more likely to smoke cannabis as well as having reduced access to schooling.
There you have your answer about cannabis and drugs in general.
NARK!
"pot use reduces not only IQ but also wealth and access to schooling"
how many pairs of boxer shorts should you own?
The original study was restated to middle class children, which arguably means it was corrected for socioeconomic factors (or that only middle class kids who smoke dope experience IQ loss).
What is implicit in the article is that the first study may not be as strong, or the effect might be more complex than initially indicated.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
"A friend with weed is a friend indeed"
"Dope will get you thru times of no money better then money will get you thru times of no dope."
both I learned from the Fabulous Furry Freak Brother comics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fabulous_Furry_Freak_Brothers
I'm really stoned right now and low or high IQ, this is the best I can do for this conversation.
Be seeing you...
I'll take your anecdote about your friend, and respond with my anecdote about how it has saved my life. Between my intense migraines that I suffered from for 20 years with no pharmacological relief, and my severe depression, I'm positive that I would have killed myself without it. It eases the depression and goes a long way to reduce the occurrence and intensity of my headaches.
Somehow your friend sounds like he had other problems that the weed just compounded. I'm sorry for him, but your anger is misplaced.
First of all, you definitely didn't answer the question posed, sounds like his intelligence might have been unaffected. Secondly, it seems that your friend moved on to a new phase in his life, and your paths diverged. People change, that's part of life, and not all change is bad, or good. It's common for people to grow apart, just as some grow closer.
If I was one of the original paper's authors I'd post as an AC as well. If smoking pot makes you stupid then I was smarter than Einstein and Feynman combined at one time. I'm not posting as an AC since it is 2013, and anyone who judges me for smoking pot is highly likely to do a much, much worse drug known as alcohol, and I don't hide from morons and hypocrites.
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
It's not really a question of "is pot harmful". It's a question of "how harmful is pot in comparison to other legal activities". Other people could provide similar anecdotes about the affects of alcohol, gambling, or online games - yet possession of any of those isn't illegal.
Our society is hypocritical. It needs to decide once and for all, whether citizens have the right to pursue life, liberty and happiness in a manner they choose, or whether the state abrogates to itself the right to decide for its citizens what level of risk they are allowed to take, and the adopt a consistent policy.
They won't, of course, because a consistent policy will either lead to a lessening of authority and money, as the privatised prison system is forced to downsize, and police authority curtailed, or to mass corruption and civil disobedience as briefly glimpsed in prohibition. So they'll remain happily hypocritical, not because it is the right thing to do, or backed by scientific evidence, but because it is the best way to retain the current balances of power - and that, after all, is what politics is all about.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
I don't think alcohol is harmless, yet I drink beer or wine a couple of times a week. With alcohol, some people handle it just fine and others fall off a cliff. From what I've seen, pot is the same way.
[Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
Well that would be easy enough to check. Just take kids from poor neighborhoods and without access to good education who did not smoke pot and see if their IQ declined later in life. If the pot isn't a factor, then the IQ should drop just the same as in the people who smoked pot. Or, if the pot is a factor, then do the same study, but with rich kids who had access to a good education. If the pot is the factor, then their IQ should have dropped, too.
If he is successful and happy with what he does, then who the fuck are you to criticize his character because he doesn't meet your expectations of who he should be. Talk about selfish.
You are viewing it from one perspective and putting too much faith in that one data point. It reminds me of my daughter when she is doing something dangerous and I tell her "You are going to get hurt!"... "But I didn't!"
You are viewing pot, like a drug, as in cocaine-meth-style drug, rather than say, caffiene. A cup or three of coffee can be a godsend, but drinking pots throughout the day will kill you in more ways than one. Don't like that comparison? One vitamin is good. Six are not.
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
One benefit to the recent legalizations in the US is that it should be much easier to find test subjects and actually study the effects of marijuana. It would be nice to actually have some scientific evidence about the risks instead of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
[Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
I mean, he used it (very documented) and enjoyed it, and he doesn't have to worry about being re-elected, so, when will he push for something that I'd guess a majority of his supporters and followers would support?
Mr. Obama, are you listening?
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
For *decades*, we've been seeing Studies That Show The Dangers Of Weed (tm). And within the year, sometimes within the month, they're withdrawn, or debunked, or shown to be massively flawed.
Not *ONE* has ever overturned the conclusions of the LaGuardia study of 1941 (completed? '44) http colon //www.drugtext.org/Table/LaGuardia-Committee-Report/
The truth is that the prohibition was created thanks to Hearst's purchase of four very large wood pulp paper mills, and the last head of Prohibition, Anslinger, who wanted his job back, and it's been a useful tool to squash folks who might not agree with you in the ballot box.
And the moralists. (The definition, by a friend years back, is that moralists are TERRIFIED by the thought that Someone, Out There, might be having... FUN!)
mark
Interesting anecdote. But you fail to make your point that pot was actually harmful, unless you only meant it was harmful to your friendship.
Yes, smoking marijuana can change a personality. Perhaps only while under the effects or perhaps indefinitely, it just depends on the person. I liken it to an "eye-opening" experience for some people, that after smoking they now view and think about the world in a different way that makes it impossible to go back to their prior-to-smoking mindset.
Smoking pot is an experience, and for some, it is profound. Like any profound experience, you may be forever changed. Consider also that some people have been doing and thinking the same things for so long in their life that when finally introduced to new/altered perceptions they simply require a period of time to "tune out", look inward, organize the new and reorganize the old thoughts. This could be a day or this could take years. Or it could simply be an excuse for the person to finally do whatever it is they have always really wanted to do, possibly to the exclusion of those around them. I don't believe any of this is necessarily harmful. I believe much of this is enlightening.
/occasional smoker
-IOVAR Web Dev Platform
You are getting flamed, but this is a pretty common experience among potheads, in my experience. Personality-wise, they become slow-witted "Butthead" types, even though they're functionally very intelligent. Frequently they'll end up as bro-grammers. (and for the record, i'm not anti-weed)
Chevy Chase: A reminder to those of our viewers who missed our story last week on the influx of so-called Killer Dope in urban areas around the country. "Weekend Update" has been analyzing the samples of marijuana sent to us anonymously all week. We are pleased to report that, so far, the only significant finding has been that if you force a baby squirrel to smoke seven-hundred cannabis joints a day, he will become disoriented, seems to take the laws of self-preservation less seriously, tending to play with his nuts rather than store them.
Once again, if you should come into contact with ANY suspicious cannabis, and wish it be analyzed by "Weekend Update"'s team of research analysts, simply send a small sample immediately to: "Chevy Chase, 857 West 81 Street, New York City".
Even though something can be explained by low SES doesn't mean it that low SES is the explanation. In fact low SES is almost never the answer by itself. it is a factor that must be controlled, and if the study in fact did not control for it then the study may in question. Even so SES may indicate that pot use, with other factors such as nutrition, may lead to lower IQ. Or it could mean that the IQ test is flawed. I was watching Firefly with the episode they had cows walking on grates. All I thought of is Josh Whedon probably has a pretty high IQ, but does not know anything about cows. Imagine that. It is hard to pinpoint exact bias in a test, but the assumptions made are the cultural norms of the test writer.
"She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
This hasn't, and it won't.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
Perhaps being poor and uneducated correlates to being unhappy and self medicating with drugs and has nothing to do with the drug the poor are self medicating with?
Smoking pot was the only thing that got me through my senior year of high school, it's quite likely I would have dropped out (or possibly suicided) if I hadn't been able to finally do some introspection and self analysis.
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
I'm not a pothead, I've never smoked pot (or anything else) and never been interested in doing so.
Here's my question: Your college buddy, did he ever hurt anybody? Did he ever punch or shoot someone that he otherwise wouldn't have? Did he have a hard time maintaining relationships with his family? Did he mistreat any significant others he had? Because the only drawback you've stated is that you didn't like him anymore, and that it changed him in some ways. You also said he graduated with a 4.0, which hardly sounds like he destroyed himself.
People change all the time, for all sorts of reasons. Alcohol, tobacco, heroin, cocaine, etc have easily documented harmful effects that far outweigh anything you've described, so if your friends' pot use is as serious a problem as you claim you should also be able to point to some actual impacts.
If we're putting laws in place, we should have a demonstrable harm that we're protecting the public from, and that harm should be greater than the harm of enforcing the law. On that basis, outlawing PCP makes total sense, because people on angel dust pose extreme risks to people around them, but outlawing pot has not been demonstrated to be useful.
I am officially gone from
10 years of medical marijuana hasn't produced any noticeable changes. I was always absent minded. More like focused to the exclusion of everything else. Now I'm stoned and communicating with all life everywhere in the universe at the same time. No extra charge for long distance. Being on disability and having no schedule imposed by work makes appointments the hardest thing to keep. I made it to the dentist this morning on time! That's once in a row, a record! The prescription drugs for disease with serious side effects that create the need for medical marijuana will kill me far sooner than marijuana use will.
"Not really a shining endorsement of pot smoking as a past time"
Doesn't really indicate anything negative about it either. Pot is chemically induced euphoria. Some people add artificial in there but your emotions are nothing more than a chemical state so there is nothing artificial about it. If your life isn't a joyful wonderland pot is a fairly effective and low cost way to make it one for a little while. Being poor sucks and being dumb sucks, why wouldn't you want cheap happiness. If you aren't dumb but merely lazy and making bad choices it seems that would tend be depressing as well so ditto on cheap happiness. If you are highly intelligent and can't help but realize just how fucked we are in this life then again bring on the happiness.
If you are rich, lazy, and dumb on the hand you don't have much to be unhappy about. You get handed degrees from the best schools, society is set up to ensure that the wealthy enjoy the most comfort and have the best of everything, and the opposite sex will throw themselves at you all day long.
Snoop Dogg! (actually he's really smart!)
Snoop Dogg! (really smart dude actually, great business sense)
Harmless? No, not really. Concentration either goes out the window, or becomes hyper-focus (at least for me, YMMV). I know better than to drive or use a table saw stoned, same as if I had been drinking. People who don't know or don't believe that it affects them are a problem, but you can say the same about cell phone users and players of Angry Birds.
keep telling yourself that marijuana's harmless, it hasn't changed you at all.
I'd never assume that, as I know for a fact that using marijuana in a variety of contexts has changed my personality dramatically. In my case, for the better. After a really vile childhood my personality had evolved to the point where no one could stand to be around me. Over a number of years I managed to look within myself to try and see why I did certain things and reacted certain ways, and gradually to change them. Although I'm still a bit of an introvert, today I can function as a more-or-less normal member of society, and have friends and a wonderful wife, which would have been impossible without the introspection that pot enabled.
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
Except that there are no shortage of very productive individuals who drink and smoke pot and aren't poor.
Dear AC: I should really take the time to refute your crudely expressed and scientifically baseless assertions. But I'm just not feeling very motivated, for some reason.
I stopped enjoying being stoned in my early 20s. At some point it started to crank my anxiety up from its usual manageable level to "OMG SOMEONE PLEASE CUT MY HEAD OFF AND THROW IT OUT A WINDOW."
That being said, I think it's great stuff and should be completely unregulated...as in, no laws, no tax, no nothing. The US really stepped in shit when we bought the whole "Devil Weed" myth.
Suddenly my title bar changed over to "Slashdot (15)"
It's the number of stories shown on the page. Not sure why it's there, though, since it always seems to read 15 for me.
To keep on-topic I suppose I ought to mention that I'm typing this with a "herbal cigarette" in the other hand.
If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
You are kidding right? King Obama will do no such thing. See, if you go back and listen to every thing he said, like not using federal power to bring down medical clinics in CA, you will see that every single promise made by our Dear Leader has been broken. The part I like the most is when most people on sites like this then complete the circle by lying to themselves and defending him. LMAO!!! I won't lie. I voted for him the first time. What was that quote? Fool me once, shame on me, won't get fooled again. Something like that...
I'm sure legions of propagandists will jump in here to tell me how pot is harmful.
I can assert that isn't true from personal experience.
In my fraternity days, as a freshman I met and ended up hating this with an asshole with a douch-ie personality. Bright, introverted, he thought he was the fucking world and broke shit like my bong and the keg tap. we got along like shit on a tux for at least 3-4 months. Then he discovered the joy of weed. From the first joint in his life, he quickly progressed to constant indulgence, and his room became a haze of bluish smoke. He mellowed ut and became a reasonable person.
Finally we went on a freshman bus trip and he brought along what I thought was a huge bag - roughly the size of a softball, maybe a little larger - and he smoked that gone in about 3-4 days. Then i taught him if he didnt buy shwag and bought some KB he wouldn't have to carry so much.
He became a different person. Animated caring, into funny shit like Aqua Teen (back when it was good), glassy eyed. Except towrds this one other pill in our frat that he'd been friends with for the first bit. But that fuck didn't realize that one thing about college is discovering who you are and didn't ever change and was the same little douche . I can't say my new pothead friend became smart, he discovered that if you study baked and then take the tests baked, you do just fine (though if you don't do them the same you're fucked). I think he graduated with a 4.0 anyway.
But he was a wholly different, likeable person. I miss my friend.
Who knows, right? Maybe he was an addictive personality that would have similarly destroyed himself in alcohol or other drugs. Good thing he found weed. He could have been an alchy wife beater!
All I can tell is that the dickhead I met and grew to hate was not eventually the kickass guy he became in a very short while. And that was ENTIRELY due to weed. I watched it happen.
But go ahead, keep telling yourself that marijuana's harmful, because it 's the only thing that can change you at all.
Smoking anything is bad for you, and I'll be the first one to agree that weed is not a "one size fits all" solution. When I tell people I meet in social settings that I don't partake because I don't like how it makes me feel, it's annoying when they say something like "Oh, that's because you never had ________ before." No, it's because it doesn't work with my body chemistry....but you've known me for five minutes, please tell me what's good for me and what isn't.
I also think you can overindulge to where you're dumb and lazy, just like any number of things out there (alcohol, turkey, carbon monoxide, etc.). When I said that I didn't think it should be controlled, that didn't imply that I felt that people shouldn't be moderate in their use. It's powerful medicine and shouldn't be abused...but even if it is, the cumulative effects are nowhere near as bad as the legal alternatives.
Becasue there is more to worry about. Creating an issue that pubs hate will create ANOTHER pathetic excuse to be obstructionists.
Pay attentionh to a president first year. They try to probe what thye want and check for repson form congress. If an issue will stop a bigger issue from going through, they set it aside.
One of the big examples from Obama is gitmo. He worked on closing it, but the pubs dug their heals in and made pathetic excuse of why a supermax prison won't hold them. Once that became an issue that the pub would stop all activity over, it was set aside. The the pubs uses it against him..the vary same ones who wouldn't let it close.
Fact of the matter, you could put most of the remaining people at gitmo in a county prison, and it would be perfectly secure.
So, yes he is listening, but pubs would use it as an 'evil liburl' reason not to vote for democrats.
Same thing with Clinton.
What Obama did to was change the priority of who to go after, and frankly, that was a pretty big step and nearly amazing accomplishment he did it so well with this congress.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
It's a question of "how harmful is pot in comparison to other legal activities". Other people could provide similar anecdotes about the affects of alcohol, gambling, or online games - yet possession of any of those isn't illegal.
Gambling? Online games? Try football. Football is directly associated with concussions which are directly associated with brain damage. By comparison, cannabis is far safer. Football should be outlawed.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
It's not really a question of "is pot harmful". It's a question of "how harmful is pot in comparison to other legal activities". Other people could provide similar anecdotes about the affects of alcohol, gambling, or online games - yet possession of any of those isn't illegal.
whether citizens have the right to pursue life, liberty and happiness in a manner they choose,
The problem is that alcoholics, gambling and drug addicts aren't pursuing happiness anymore with their activities. They might have been pursuing life, liberty, and happiness in a manner they choose once upon a time... but now they are just sick, miserable, and trapped.
Society has an obligation to try and help the sick, and even prevent sickness in the first place.
Drugs and alcohol are the worst though because the idea that a person should take 'personal responsibility' is fine; but what if that person chooses to impair their own brain. Should that be a choice one should make in the pursuit of liberty and happiness? Clearly that's not in societies best interest, and its likely not even in the individuals best interest, and past a certain threshold the individual can't even evaluate their own circumstances properly.
There is a clear and reasonable mandate for some sort of societal interference in individuals actions to prevent them ending up addicted, miserable, and trapped.
Our society is hypocritical.
Not exactly.
Society is made of people with different view points of where the the line should be drawn, and it wasn't all drawn by one guy one day. Its a patchwork of laws drawn up over 200 years. Expecting the level of consistency you are asking for is unreasonable.
On top of that its just not possible to manage the nuanced evaluation of someone's activities like that with a blunt tool that only has legal or illegal as options, and the resulting line in the sand is pretty arbitrary and doesn't make a much sense when looking at the boundary.
Their is a big difference between a couple having a glass of wine with dinner and a strung out addict. The former can be easily been seen be exercising their pursuit of liberty life and happiness and the alcohol is enhancing not impeding it. The junkie on the street turning tricks for a fix got lost somewhere along the way. Banning the substance itself clearly isn't the solution, but neither is legalizing it and walking away.
How's this for a correlation and causation? If the kids have a low socio-economic status, it could be because their parents are on drugs too.
Drugs ruin people's lives, not enhance them. Wake up people.
I suspect he simply prefers a (particularly black) society that doesn't own guns or use weed to bring them out of poverty to have the same opportunities as whites, and would rather lock away the embarassments than let them live free. In his mind, he quit using cocaine and weed and didn't own guns and went on to become President as a minority, so that's what needs to happen for everyone else.
10 years of medical marijuana hasn't produced any noticeable changes.
Yes it has, for many people. For example, many chronic pain sufferers have been able to live more normal lives because they haven't been as debilitated or addicted to opioids, some cancer patients have lived longer because their weed helped them tolerate the chemo treatments better, allowing them to complete regimens that many can not, folks who suffer sever anxiety and panic attacks can get out and live their lives without being overwhelmed by fear, people with glaucoma have maintained their sight without risky surgeries, and at least one person with epilepsy (who I personally know) no longer suffers from seizures as long as she "medicates" at least every 2-3 days.
It is very clear that there have been noticeable changes since medical marijuana became available in the U.S., and they have been overwhelmingly positive. Crime rates in medi-pot areas have NOT increased, cases of addiction to illegal drugs have not gotten out of control (busting the guess that weed is a "gateway" drug), there hasn't been a rise in cardio-pulmonary diseases among non-tobacco smokers, and courts in states like Colorado have not been clogged with minor, non-violent marijuana offenders.
Of course I do not advocate driving under the influence, use among minors, or puffing away all day like a stereotypical Rastafarian or flash in the pan, one hit wonder rapper, but informed use in moderation or under a physician's supervision should be possible in every state. I'd like to see it reach a level of acceptance where employers are not permitted to dictate how you live your life or choose to medicate yourself when you are not at work. If they do not specifically suspect that you are high at work, and have no evidence that you are, positive tests for THC should not warrant dismissal or exclusion from employment. But then I believe strongly in the American concepts of privacy and freedom, so I am certainly a bit biased.
And further, wait.... what?
This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
I've smoked POUNDS of pot. I'm talking about over an ounce a week, every week, for nearly 10 years.
That's 1/16 * 10 * 52.
Or 1/8 * 5 * 52
Or 1/4 * 5 * 26
Or 1/2 * 5 * 13
Which is, the same as 65 / 2. Which by my calculations is 32.5.
Look ma, I've smoked over THIRTY POUNDS of weed and I can still calculated how much I've smoked without a calculator.
I can also write efficient algorithms, and prove using economic models that minimum wage increases reduce the buying power of your savings by driving up the price of the many goods that make up the consumer price index WITHOUT causing proportional interest to be paid on your savings (thus causing inflation). Obviously, the non-pot smoking economists that work for your government aren't capable of such feats, since they legislate minimum wage increases without legislating maximum levels of compensation and profit.
Perhaps pot is illegal because it makes you SMARTER (which is dangerous for corrupt governments)! I can understands economics and programming considerably better than I did at 18, before I started smoking. As medical professionals say, correlation is causation, and my rapid increase of intellect correlated with my starting to smoke pot.
THIRTY TWO POUNDS!!!!
That is all.
Most potheads I know have six figure incomes, and coach their kids teams on the weekend. I even know a few active in local government. The wrecks I know all drink way too much....
Mr. Obama, are you listening?
No, he doesn't listen to idiots who refer to him as "the 'blessed' leader."
I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
If you want him to listen then why don't you post a petition??
Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
They wasted all their money buying pot, imagine that. Still the same cause and effect chronologically. I really don't think that social and economic factors affect how quickly and effectively my brain can process information. Constantly messing with my nervous system with drugs, well that just might do it.
there was this one toker who graduated from this ivy league school, but instead of taking on big corporate job like his classmates just went into community organizer work on the bad side of Chicago. then he became a senator then president. beware the weed, kids...
I'm not sure what AC is implying with this, but it is correct and it would make a great /. quote!
FWIW, I think the new study is finally headed in the right direction. It sounds like prior studies hadn't controlled for socioeconomic variables. Tsk tsk
Howdy howdy howdy
This difference between people like me and you is I blame obama, AND bush. you blame bush and give obama a pass.
sure obama WANTED to close gitmo... he seems to ignore the constitution when it comes to everything else so why not on this? Perhaps because he didnt really want to
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
Individual rights > society, 99% of the time
Unless that individual has chosen to impair their brain; at which point they aren't competent to decide how to exercise their rights, which is precisely the case that arises with excesses in drugs (incl. alcohol).
Isn't it always a question of what came first - the low IQ potential or the pot smoking? - Did they start smoking because they were borderline stupid or did they become stupid from smoking?
About a decade ago we had a huge discussion about "painter's syndrome" where professional painters showed symptoms very similar to chronic alcohol abusers. The painters claimed it was the solvent from the paints but studies showed that the painters did consume more alcohol than comparable groups, although not quite as much as alcohol abusers. The painters then claimed that the fumes made them drink, while their employers noted that a lot of painters ignored rules about protection against the fumes, often as a result of being more or less drunk. It was never really resolved as the paints in the meantime became water-based thus reducing the fumes. As far as I know the current generation of painters still drink more than average but their symptoms has all but disappeared.
"For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
Most people will probably know a stoner, someone who isn't all there. Absentminded, procrastinating loser. But I have known a stoner who never did pot. The guy was just an absentminded loser. Nice enough but weird and logic was never his strongest point and he tended to believe whatever he was told.
So it is back to the old debate, what comes first, the chicken or the egg. Do stoners do pot or does pot create stoners?
The research linked in this case is nice and useless as usual. Lesser access to education. So, how do you explain stoners then in countries were education is free and accessible by all?
One simple, but highly unacceptable answer is this: There are only 24 hours in the day, 8 are spend asleep, 4 spend on body necessities like eating, washing, crapping, leaving 12 hours to do something. Anything.
Who is more likely to end up a stoner, the kid who spend his free time studying OR the kid who spend his free time smoking. No, don't give me that crap about drugs expanding your mind, if that worked you could have long since proofed it clinically, going "ooh, my hands" is NOT mind expanding, it is a sign your brain has fallen out. Scoop it up before the cat gets it.
It is the same reason sluts don't do well in school. It is a fact that girls outperform boys in every field, right up to the point girls get intrested in boys and they start falling behind. The girl who studies after school will do better in school, then the girl who is banging the sports team but the girl that does the teacher beats them both.
Think about it: Who is the better coder, the nerd who writes on slashdot in his free time OR the guy who spends his free time coding? (Take the recent Doom 3 code is beautiful article. The world has those who admire code and those who write it. Guess who makes the most money?)
Take this one: Most famous people, barely watch TV. It makes sense, you don't get famous for being a couch potatoe. People who got famous for their achievements, had to first achieve something and you don't achieve anything hanging in front of the idiot tube. (Take programs like QI and HIGNFY, the lead intellectuals on those shows are often barely coherent on popular media often getting no closer in 2013 then being aware that Star Wars movie thingy is getting pretty big. They know the births and deaths of countless dead people but can't name the 4th spice girl... and yes, it does say something about me that my current media events are decades old)
Does the idiot tube make you stupid OR do stupid people have nothing better to do then watch the idiot tube?
When you read of a self-made man like Warren Buffet, you got to realize that he didn't post on slashdot, watch TV, follow his favorite soccer team, spend his first fortune on a PARTY!. He worked, every day, every hour and STILL does it and lives in a rather ordinary house, driving a decent but not super flashy car and basically is not you, the loser.
Now I am not going into a debate about whose life is better spend because ultimately that is all about personal taste BUT I am going to say that how you end up in life is in large part due to yourself and NOT your race/culture/parents but due to your own choices. And that you didn't see a choice... well... that is a large part of it. The stoner who bitches about people hating stoners and not being able to get a job isn't jobless because he does drugs, he is jobless because he is the type of person who instead of making an effort, does drugs instead.
That is why some people ARE successful despite doing the same drugs. That is NOT proof drugs have no harmful effect, it is proofs that being successful is mostly about drive and ambition. Doing weed doesn't make you a winner or a loser, the reason you DID weed makes you a winner or a loser.
And to be honest, the world has more room for losers then winners. Only one pothead can be president. But there is infinite space on the couch.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
Pot doesn't make people stupid, people make people stupid. Is there a pot equivalent of an AK47?
No, he doesn't listen to idiots who refer to him as "the 'blessed' leader."
While that's true, I'm quite sure it has nothing to do with referring to him as the blessed leader, and everything to do with not showing up with a big bag of money.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
This sir is exactly my feeling on the subject. I salute you.
Ron Paul vs Dennis Kucinich is a (for the most part, there's always going to be BS and marketing in politics) genuinely healthy political axis. Obama vs Bush is a Reality TV show.
Sooo when this story first appeared and I pointed out bogus weed studies are a dime a dozen, especially from any nation anywhere near Scandinavia, and everyone scoffed at me, I gotta wonder if anyone is now willing to concede this sorta thing goes on all the time AND is a waste of Slashdot space?
The only significant study on weed I've seen in a looong time is one from the NIH. It's significant because no one the the US has done any inquiry into medical uses of weed since the 60s or so. The study had a small paragraph suggesting that weed can stifle cancer growth in cells. Wish I had a link but it was a couple of years ago.
Talking about things that change people. I used to have a really close friend... and then he got married.