Slashdot Mirror


Man Fired For His Online Customer Service Game

First time accepted submitter DiscountBorg(TM) writes "An employee of the Canada Revenue Agency lost his job after releasing a humorous game in which the player answers customer service calls for the Agency, usually leading to his termination. In an email National Revenue Minister Gail Shea said: 'The Minister considers this type of conduct offensive and completely unacceptable. The Minister has asked the Commissioner (of Revenue, Andrew Treusch) to investigate and take any and all necessary corrective action. The Minister has asked the CRA to investigate urgently to ensure no confidential taxpayer information was compromised.'"

210 comments

  1. Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't have our employees making light of our oppressive workplace policies, they might actually improve morale!

    1. Re:Butthurt by GiantMolecularCloud · · Score: 5, Funny

      "You think this is a GAME!?!"

    2. Re:Butthurt by Jetra · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The truth?...You can't handle the TRUTH!"

    3. Re:Butthurt by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best thing about writing a customer-service simulator: if your code freezes, people don't care, they think it's part of the simulation.

    4. Re:Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There needs to be another thread for playing that smooth lounge music, though.

    5. Re:Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't have our employees making light of our oppressive workplace policies, they might actually improve morale!

      The beatings will continue until the moral improves.

    6. Re:Butthurt by AtomicTomatoOfDoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In all honesty, though, their workplace policies aren't all that bad. I've worked as an IT analyst for the CRA for a few years. I regularly had to interact with employees that manned the phones and made friends out of a few of them, all of whom eventually quit. Essentially, the workplace environment isn't all that bad (I'd even go as far as to say that it's relatively nice). However, those who quit explained to me that they felt like they were slowly dying from the inside. See, their job is to call people owing the government money and essentially threatening them of legal action until they would pay up. Calling that one guy who owns a yacht and hasn't paid his taxes in 4 years feels okay, satisfying even. It's when they have to call a grandmother living alone in a small apartment, who breaks down in tears when they tell her the amount she owes that their job gets rather excruciating.

    7. Re:Butthurt by logjon · · Score: 0

      That's how my parents did it. Didn't do much for my morale, but my morals have kept me out of prison!

      --
      The stories and info posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
      Only fools would take it as fact.
    8. Re:Butthurt by rishistar · · Score: 2
      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    9. Re:Butthurt by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 1
      --
      So.. it has come to this
    10. Re:Butthurt by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      "The beatings will continue until morale improves!"

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    11. Re:Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      After all, what more could one ask for?

    12. Re:Butthurt by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      After all, what more could one ask for?

      Hey, if parent's keep their son out of prison, and their daughter off the pole....then, they've done at least a reasonable job on the basics of raising children.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smooth music is so last decade. Now it is bad AM quality music, interrupted frequently by recorded voices saying things like, "Hello... did you know how amazing our services are? We felt like reminding you while you are actually still on hold" or, "How may we help you? ... Let us know on our website." It makes it a lot harder to work on something else with a speaker phone on in the background, when they interrupt music with a voice, sometimes starting with a greeting that makes it sound like you are off hold.

    14. Re:Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about son on the pole and daughter in prison -- do I still get parent of the year for that?

    15. Re:Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I just stepped out of DeLorean.. God, I'm old!

    16. Re:Butthurt by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2

      I suppose your son could be a utility lineman... And your daughter a prison guard.

    17. Re:Butthurt by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      "This. Is. SPARTA!"

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    18. Re:Butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the son could be a closet daughter and the daughter could be a whore.

    19. Re:Butthurt by shugah · · Score: 1

      My mother-in-law works for CRA (Canada Revenue Agency). Can you imagine working there for 35 years? My father-in-law recently retired from another equally humourless federal agency. Can you imagine dinner at the in-laws?

      --
      If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
    20. Re:Butthurt by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Is that the rancid stench of morale I smell?

      ...Or is that just the butthurt of the powers that be?

    21. Re:Butthurt by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Dilbert has taken an all to real meaning in my current job. I have become a drone. Yeah I don't think your supposed to think. or complain.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
  2. Correction please. by will_die · · Score: 4, Informative

    As of the stories the guy had not been fired or another done to him. The guy is playing up that he could be fired and is using that as a reason people should purchase the game.

    1. Re:Correction please. by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Man not fired from job he doesn't like, for making game about how much he hates his job, to fund aspirations of leaving job" doesn't exactly invoke outrage.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Correction please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Man not fired from job he doesn't like, for making game about how much he hates his job, to fund aspirations of leaving job" doesn't exactly invoke outrage.

      True ... but it's certainly a well crafted sentence, which is more than I can say for the headline or the OP.

    3. Re:Correction please. by benjymous · · Score: 5, Informative

      From his twitter, he said he was fired after that article was posted (which is why it doesn't mention it explicitly) but isn't able to talk more. Do you have information showing that this was false and he's still in the job (or quit rather than being fired?)

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    4. Re:Correction please. by ice_nine6 · · Score: 5, Informative
    5. Re:Correction please. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      As of the stories the guy had not been fired or another done to him.

      Yes he has.

    6. Re:Correction please. by mdm42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      From his twitter, he said he was fired ... but isn't able to talk more.

      140 characters. Didn't stand a chance.

      --
      New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
    7. Re:Correction please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe he isn't allowed to talk more because he has a decent lawyer who told him to STFU and not say anything to diminish his payoff for illegal termination.

    8. Re:Correction please. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Game over Dude!!

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    9. Re: Correction please. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Seeing as I only found out about that now...

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    10. Re:Correction please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds familiar. He should try to work something out with Odd Todd.

    11. Re:Correction please. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Sounds familiar. He should try to work something out with Odd Todd.

      Whoever writes that Odd Todd blog has something wrong with him. Reading that is like staying late without overtime at a job you hate to finish a task you hate for a boss you hate so you can look forward to more jobs you hate the next day.

      Sitting around all holiday watching lost - What a loser.

    12. Re:Correction please. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      That's what my lawyer's told me. "Even if they say something completely wrong and it hurts, they're just trying to hurt your case. You want to say something, say it through me, and I'm not talking."

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    13. Re:Correction please. by Scoth · · Score: 1

      If you haven't seen any of his videos, especially the original unemployed ones, it won't make much sense. He has a certain... style of talking/writing.

    14. Re:Correction please. by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      Whoever writes that Odd Todd blog has something wrong with him.

      Yeah, they should call him "Strange Todd", or something like that.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    15. Re:Correction please. by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      It is a funny sentence.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    16. Re:Correction please. by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Even if you publish a well crafted anything, ask your lawyer to apply the black pen to it first. Your sentence comes back a little shorter.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
  3. Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Welcome to fashist Canada, where satire is a crime.

    1. Re:Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by radiumsoup · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always thought the French had the fashion industry to themselves, not the Canadians. Learn something new every day on /.

    2. Re:Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satire and parody are now covered under canadian copyright exemptions under fair dealing. Try again.

    3. Re:Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Nobody said this was a copyright issue. Try again.

    4. Re:Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh!

    5. Re:Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No said what he did was a crime either... it is a matter of HR practices at a government office

      If someone gets fired from their government job spend their time yelling insults at coworkers, is that same as saying it is now a crime to insult people?

    6. Re:Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor is it a criminal issue, but OP claimed satire is a crime. The post you responded to was a valid response to OP, whether relevant to the story or not.

    7. Re:Over Reaction from the Goverment ! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I got the "joke", but it was stupid in my opinion because satire and parody can still get you in trouble for reasons other than copyright.

  4. American sweatshop by alphatel · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have to smile while you're on the phone (uhm really?), follow the cubicle dress code (but I just answer the phone), not allowed to hang up on abusive customers no matter what they do. The week's vacation you earned and got approved 3 months in advance was just re-allocated as forced time off due to the business being slow. World's worst health insurance if you get any at all.

    Fluorescent lighting from hell, vending machines for lunch, 19" square monitors from the 1980's, computers running Windows XP, no service pack.

    We live this job every day.

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:American sweatshop by Smauler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And then complain when it's outsourced for someone else to cope with.

      One point to note is that _we_ are the abusive customers. I personally always try to be nice (I'm not talking "have a nice day" nice, I mean sincerely - I don't have to do it all day, every day), especially to people I call up for a service (even if they do have to try and sell me the little add on warranty whatever it is at the end).

    2. Re:American sweatshop by acidfast7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not me! I left the US behind almost 6 years ago. In the meantime, I've had a full year of paid holiday (6 years x 35 days/year holiday + 10 days/year of federal days off.)

      My gross salary is even higher, but the net salary lower with the 50% deductions.

      No desire to go back. The lack of unlocked phones and reasonable prepaid plans it just one recent example of you guys taking it in pooper.

    3. Re:American sweatshop by Grimbleton · · Score: 4, Funny

      You got Windows XP? I had a fucking amber text WYSE TERMINAL in 2007. That they're probably still using.

    4. Re:American sweatshop by prefec2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would recommend two things in this situation:
      a) Found a union, based on continental European approaches. The UK and US approaches are not that good.
      b) If a) does not work, because your colleagues and fellow US citizen like to be mistreated, leave the country. In Europe we have standard health care above the MediCare stuff you have. You get 4 weeks holiday a year, protection from too many over hours, payed sick leave (in Germany) etc. according to apologists of neo-liberalism that will cause high unemployment rates. However, we do not have such thing in Germany.

      On a side note: You really should get organized in the US. The information we get from the US looks more and more like stories normally associated with developing countries not a first world country.

    5. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      19" monitors in the 1980's? Were you even around in 1980, let alone working in a job that involved computers then? I think not.

    6. Re:American sweatshop by lexa1979 · · Score: 1

      no high unemployment rates in Germany ? Could you tell me what the Belgian and French medias mean when they say "Germany has no unemployment, instead they have several thousand 1€/hour workers in the car industry". What's the trick ?

    7. Re:American sweatshop by DaMattster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      America has always been about sweatshop workplaces. We need more unions, not less but styled after a European one. Heaven forfend should we offer an real perks to our employees. Why, perish the thought, we might be seen as socialists! Hopefully you've concluded that my statement is dripping with sarcasm. No wonder America ranks lower than its industrial counterparts in lifespan, health, and education.

    8. Re:American sweatshop by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Not me! I left the US behind almost 6 years ago. In the meantime, I've had a full year of paid holiday (6 years x 35 days/year holiday + 10 days/year of federal days off.)

      My gross salary is even higher, but the net salary lower with the 50% deductions.

      No desire to go back. The lack of unlocked phones and reasonable prepaid plans it just one recent example of you guys taking it in pooper.

      I would be very curious to know what country.

    9. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would recommend two things in this situation:
      a) Found a union, based on continental European approaches. The UK and US approaches are not that good.
      b) If a) does not work, because your colleagues and fellow US citizen like to be mistreated, leave the country. In Europe we have standard health care above the MediCare stuff you have. You get 4 weeks holiday a year, protection from too many over hours, payed sick leave (in Germany) etc. according to apologists of neo-liberalism that will cause high unemployment rates. However, we do not have such thing in Germany.

      On a side note: You really should get organized in the US. The information we get from the US looks more and more like stories normally associated with developing countries not a first world country.

      A few comments:

      Unions are not the panacea to these conditions. It sounds like you're from Germany, where management-union relations are more cooperative, but we (in the UK and US) do not want to have the same situation in France, where unions strike over anything and they can even sit down and block the motorways and railways, bringing the economy to a halt and inconveniencing everyone else. Unions say they're for more equality but in reality they are for a different kind of class system - those who have heavily protected jobs for life, and those who do not. Look at Spain for an example.

      >>b) If a) does not work, because your colleagues and fellow US citizen like to be mistreated, leave the country.
      Great idea! Umm, what's this, I need an employer sponsored work permit? How about a free trade and free movement agreement between the EU and US/Canada? What, increasing immigration is politically controversial on both regions? How dare they!

      If you're stuck in a dead end job you hate, take it into your own hands and up-skill, go back to school or train yourself and get a better one. I was there (at a call center) at one point in my life. Blaming others only goes so far...

      Signed,
      An American who has moved to Britain (no plans to go back, btw)

    10. Re:American sweatshop by radiumsoup · · Score: 1

      cue obligatory self-congratulatory "any other country is better" in 3...2...1...

    11. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention Amtelco and their crap-tastic software.

    12. Re:American sweatshop by radiumsoup · · Score: 1, Insightful

      instead of a lame attempt at comedy by improper use of "dripping sarcasm", perhaps you should try critical thinking.

      America has always been about self determination. If you are at a job where you don't like the situation, you have many choices. Here are a few of them, listed in increasing risk/reward order: You can join or form a union (even in non-union states, most of the time you can unionize even if it's a right-to-work state.) You can speak up and try to change the culture of your workplace. You can find a different job with the same skillset. You can move to another city with better economic prospects. You can increase your skillset through training and education and then find another job. Or you can start your own company and run it however you want.

      And before you think you can get away with linking job satisfaction with education, remember that government-run schools are the ones you're complaining about. In the aggregate, private, parochial, and home-schooled kids rank far better on standardized tests than the schools you're excoriating. Think about that. The parents that follow the path of self-determination for their kids are exceeding the average, just like the people who start their own businesses do. As for lifespan and health, that's partly genetic, partly cultural (fast food, etc.), but has almost nothing to do with workplace satisfaction. Look at Japan, where they have arguably some of the worst job hours and stress in the world, but their average lifespan is higher than the US. If we were to conclude that job satisfaction correlates with lifespan and health, Japan should be doing much worse overall than the US, which isn't true.

    13. Re:American sweatshop by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      Sweden first, Germany now, Denmark soon.

    14. Re:American sweatshop by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      You have to smile while you're on the phone (uhm really?), follow the cubicle dress code (but I just answer the phone), not allowed to hang up on abusive customers no matter what they do. The week's vacation you earned and got approved 3 months in advance was just re-allocated as forced time off due to the business being slow. World's worst health insurance if you get any at all. Fluorescent lighting from hell, vending machines for lunch, 19" square monitors from the 1980's, computers running Windows XP, no service pack.

      It is just as galling when the company's communist propaganda machine (aka HR) calls these benefits, "excellent and competitive." We live this job every day.

    15. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of the things you list, I agree with. But some of those things, you clearly don't understand.

      You have to smile while you're on the phone (uhm really?),

      Smiling when you're on the phone changes your tone of voice. The idea, which works in reality, is that you sound friendlier and so customers are happier to work with you. Doesn't apply 100% of the time, but it is a successful tactic to improving a company's image - and diffusing some of the ire from the other end of the line.

      follow the cubicle dress code (but I just answer the phone),

      You may not be visible to the customer, but you are visible to your coworkers, and they deserve your respect. Agreed, some dress codes just don't make sense, but people have been known to show up to work in the same clothes that they've been wearing all week with no shower or or clothes-washing.

    16. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "federal days" suggest Germany. But this could be the OP posting a translation for the 'merucans from "public holidays".

    17. Re:American sweatshop by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " The information we get from the US"

      and is mostly false. It's mostly good here except for the noisy people with political agendas to push.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    18. Re:American sweatshop by MatrixCubed · · Score: 0

      Any country IS. What's your point?

    19. Re:American sweatshop by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      cue obligatory self-congratulatory "any other country is better" in 3...2...1...

      No, many are worse. Also many are better.

      It depends on what you want out of life to decide on how you measure better.

    20. Re:American sweatshop by prefec2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I never heard of any factory worker, who works for 1€ per hour. This 1€ program is for people who are unemployed for a long time, who require help to get back in normal jobs. Therefore the state provides them with a basic income, called ALG II. which is considered the existential minimum (I personally think it should be higher, but that is not the point here. They get money to live and the state pays their rent and health insurance, definitely more than the average unemployed person in the US has). On top of that income they can earn extra money in such so call 1€ jobs. By law these job grants are not allowed to be used by employers to replace staff on normal income.

      I personally think, that the German system is too harsh, but compared to the US, it is still better.

    21. Re:American sweatshop by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      And as a phone monkey you can't actually solve real problems. Solving problems will drive your call stats down too much, and low call stats will lead to your termination. The best possible outcome for you is that for whatever reason the customer should give up almost immediately and go away. Perhaps because they can sense the ineptitude oozing down the line at them. Those guys aren't rated on customer satisfaction or problems successfully resolved, They're rated on how many people they can convince to go away in an hour. If you hear that hopeful spark when that phone monkey asks you if you tried rebooting it (You will, if you listen for it,) that's why. If you do get someone who knows what he's doing, I guarantee you that person will not be there long. That sort of person doesn't last long in phone support.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    22. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the aggregate, private, parochial, and home-schooled kids rank far better on standardized tests than the schools you're excoriating.

      I agree that the schools are garbage, but I don't think that ranking higher on standardized tests is much of an accomplishment. Our standardized tests are all about rote memorize, not understanding.

    23. Re:American sweatshop by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      You may not be visible to the customer, but you are visible to your coworkers, and they deserve your respect.

      But it's subjective. The fact that you don't like someone's clothes doesn't mean that the clothes are objectively bad or ugly. I never really understood this silly, superficial fixation on clothing, but I guess many people are petty, so it's not too surprising.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    24. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "19" square monitors from the 1980's"
      Back in the 80's, I would have killed for a 19" monitor.
      Pretty sure this was either a 7" or 9" monitor: http://www.highdisplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/1980s-computer-monitor3.jpg

    25. Re:American sweatshop by lexa1979 · · Score: 1

      thanks for the explanation !

    26. Re:American sweatshop by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      not allowed to hang up on abusive customers no matter what they do.

      A friend used to work for a different government agency, Passport Canada. He would give verbally abusive customers one, maybe two warnings, and then yes he'd hang up on them if they persisted. One time, someone called back and demanded to speak to his manager, the call was transferred, after talking for a few moments the manager asked the caller if he had been verbally abusive before my friend hung up on him. When the caller answered yes and started trying to justify it, the manager told him "good" and hung up on him.

      (Being professional doesn't mean you put up with abuse, of any kind).

    27. Re:American sweatshop by radiumsoup · · Score: 1

      when comparing between countries, standardized tests are used to gain statistical relevance... it's not about accomplishing anything per se, it's about comparison, which is what the GP was spouting off about.

    28. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And then complain when it's outsourced for someone else to cope with.

      Comments like these that earn +5 Interesting must be getting mods from foreigners. I say this as a citizen of the USA: we like to complain, sure, but we also like to do hard work.

      The problem with shill posts like yours is that they ignore the "hard work ethic" most Americans actually do have.

      So fucking-A right we complain when the JOBS WE GO TO WORK AND DO EVERY DAY DESPITE HATING THEM GET OUTSOURCED.

    29. Re:American sweatshop by radiumsoup · · Score: 1

      This. So much of this.

      I worked at AOL for about 3 years in their tech support queue (this was straight out of high school) and the metrics for support staff were something along the lines of maintaining a 7.5 minute call time and 90% satisfaction rating from callers.

      My average was about 9 minutes, but I routinely got 100% satisfaction ratings quarter after quarter. My boss told me to stop being so nice so I could take one more call per hour. I ended up moving to the DSL queue which had no time limit, and that's just about the only reason I was able to stay for so long. The average turnover was 300% for regular support. You read that right, they turned over their entire support staff 3 times per year, on average. There were some days that I was helping train someone new and they would leave for lunch on day 1 and never come back - and this happened several times.

      But I gotta tell you, when I moved to the "no call time limit" queue, it was an instantaneous leap forward in my overall job satisfaction. No more pressure to dump calls, I could actually take the necessary time to solve the problem, which made me very happy. Then the AOL-Time Warner merger happened, I saw the handwriting on the wall, and I sold all my stock options almost exactly at the peak of $165 and never looked back. I honestly miss that job sometimes.

    30. Re:American sweatshop by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't have to go that far... Canada has on average one statutory holiday (federally mandated day off) per month, and many employers give people fresh off the street at least 2 weeks' paid vacation, with the trend being towards more vacation: many larger companies will give you 3 or even 4 weeks at the start, and will give you the option to buy an extra week as part of your benefits package. Some provinces have provincial statutory holidays in addition to the federal ones. They're slowly coming to the realization that a well rested and happy worker is more productive, and allowing this much vacation actually costs less than not allowing it.

      35 days is a bit much for most companies yet, but I've been able to book 5 full weeks of vacation this year (1 week of carryover from last year), and because I picked weeks where the statutory holidays come, I've managed to parlay that into an extra week of vacation in the form of days-in-lieu for statutory holidays. That's 30 working days of vacation, or 42 calendar days this year, and I still have 2 floater days and 2 personal emergency days, in addition to paid sick leave.

      And most of Europe has even more vacation as standard than we do.

    31. Re:American sweatshop by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      His point would be that you're mind numbingly ignorant of how absolutely awesome it is to be even homeless in the US.

      Spend a day in a country that actually sucks ass, then speak.

      Go spend a day in Somalia, Lybia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Palestine, most of Africa, large sections of rural Asia.

      You have absolutely no clue what 'bad' is.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    32. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GP is talking about pretty much all of western/northern Europe.

      So, Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Great Britain (England, or ... you know what i mean), Ireland, Norway, Iceland, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Denmark.
      Probably more

      I got 20 days of paid holiday, + 3 because our workweek is half an hour longer than the industry standard (38 hours/week) + all national holidays (9 or so I think). If a national holiday falls in the weekend, it must be reassigned to some other working day or chosen freely by employees.
      Oh and paid sick leave and family emergencies (e.g. family member dies) do not count as vacation days.

      That's the point where I can start negotiating with a prospective employer for more. Europe is a nice place to work in.

    33. Re:American sweatshop by acidfast7 · · Score: 2

      Spend a day homeless in Europe and get back to us. In addition, in the US, employment = insurance (recent changes, not withstanding.)

    34. Re:American sweatshop by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Yea, unions are awesome. Not like they cause more employement problems or anything. Not like there aren't any recent examples of unions ruining the lives of their members or anything, causing companies to go out of business ... preventing non-unionized employees from getting jobs.

      If you think unions or the solution you're ignorant. If you don't like your working environment, CHANGE IT. There is absolutely no excuse in America for not having a job. The only reason ANY American is unemployed for an extended period of time is because they don't WANT to work. You may not be able to get the job you want, but you can certainly get a job that will keep you from starving or living under a bridge. It may not pay for you to live in some lifestyle you think you're entitled too, but you won't 'die'.

      Get over yourself, you aren't entitled to anything.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    35. Re:American sweatshop by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      If you're doing what you need to do to have the same retirement plan, you'll be about the same in both locations, net salary wise (401K deductions, etc) I ran the numbers across several years to compare with my colleagues, the numbers were surprisingly similar, except their health plan was better, although our health services can be better, it depends upon where you wind up going. On average, I'd say insured health care in the US is better, average health care in northern Europe is far better.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    36. Re:American sweatshop by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yes, because fresh out of high school you understood the point of the business and what they were trying to accomplish.

      Sadly, you seem to be somewhere post-after-high school and you still don't understand that your goals may not actually be the goal of the company as a whole and that they may have a strategy that fits them better.

      They may not, but fresh out of high school you certainly didn't have the cluepon needed to understand that.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    37. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ended up leaving a job at Orange over dress code. Some jumped-up tinpot hitler decided he wanted dress trousers and ties for all staff in his department. For workers on phones, who never saw customers.

      Anyway, I jumped ship and immediately got a £10K/year wage hike doing something a bit closer to my skillset. My recommendation - do not negotiate with fools and their arbitrary demands. Fuck em off and move on.

    38. Re:American sweatshop by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I used to stare wistfully at the Textronics brochures. Dreaming of the day I could afford that kind of display.

      For some reason that gives me the energy to get up and go to work.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    39. Re:American sweatshop by Livius · · Score: 1

      "They're rated on how many people they can convince to go away in an hour."

      Single most perceptive thing I've read in years.

    40. Re:American sweatshop by ildon · · Score: 1

      LOL, leaving the country over a fucking call center job? Do you realize how insane that sounds? It's like leaving the country because of poor conditions working at McDonalds. It'd be easier to learn to be a carpenter or a plumber, or some other skilled trade job that needs bodies (there are a lot of those here in the U.S.).

    41. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most modern corporate dress codes are aimed at making sure you don't decide to show up in your underwear, in a T-shirt that says "rape is fun", or in something else similarly inappropriate.

      They usually specify more constraints than that but the main goal is to cut down on "hostile workplace" complaints and random undesirable nudity.

    42. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vending machines for lunch

      Bring your own. What do you want, a cafeteria?

      19" square monitors from the 1980's

      What's wrong with that? Do you want to watch a BluRay or something?

    43. Re:American sweatshop by dfeifer · · Score: 1

      "Fluorescent lighting from hell, vending machines for lunch, 19" square monitors from the 1980's, computers running Windows XP, no service pack. " Sounds like a majority of corporate America. :) This describes 75% of the systems in my company.

    44. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that sounds like my old job. Then the company was bought out and things got worse. Then the department was downsized. (Thankfully I was out before then)

    45. Re:American sweatshop by suutar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think I disagree. We don't especially like to do hard work, but we do like to accomplish significant tasks, which generally involve hard work. (If it wasn't hard it wouldn't be significant :) Hard work for its own sake sucks.

    46. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And American's innovating the medical breakthroughs they pool their money to socialize. We maintain a military second to none, and as a result, European nations get the luxury of not having to spend much money maintaining a capable military. America is fine if you're not a lazy shitsack. If you want the government to be a replacement for mommy and daddy after you move out, Europe is great.

    47. Re:American sweatshop by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      innovation ... lol.

    48. Re:American sweatshop by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Don't have to go that far... Canada has on average one statutory holiday (federally mandated day off) per month, and many employers give people fresh off the street at least 2 weeks' paid vacation, with the trend being towards more vacation: many larger companies will give you 3 or even 4 weeks at the start, and will give you the option to buy an extra week as part of your benefits package. Some provinces have provincial statutory holidays in addition to the federal ones. They're slowly coming to the realization that a well rested and happy worker is more productive, and allowing this much vacation actually costs less than not allowing it.

      Actually, ... no.

      The federal Employment Standards Act (which applies to around 4% of employees - it's for federally regulated businesses and government) has around 10 days stat.

      Provinces (which cover most employers within the province) average anywhere from 9-12 days stat.

      Like In BC, we used to have 9 stat holidays - New Years Day, Easter Friday, Victoria Day, Canada Day, BC Day (aka Civic Holiday), Labour Day, Thanksgiving, Remembrance Day, Christmas. This year the government tossed in one to break up the long stretch between New Years and Easter called Family Day, making the total stats to 10.

      The Federal^WHarper Government (yes, Harper changed the name of the federal government to the Harper Government) adds Easter Monday and Boxing Day to the mix. Ironically, the feds don't honor Family Day in any province, so federal employees have to work it as a regular day. Many companies can choose to recognize Boxing Day as well, voluntarily (since the provincial or federal acts (whichever one applies - it's either-or) only give a minimum).

      Also in the BC act, employers MUST give an employee 2 weeks paid holiday every year minimum. Many employers though can choose to give extra - 3 or 4 weeks, and many also give sick/personal leave days (act says you don't HAVE to)).

      The federal employees one leads to an interesting consequence - because all federal services have to be open on family day, if you're employed directly by the government, no problem. If you're not (i.e., subcontracted), you actually are mandated by law to open, and you have to pay your employees for the stat holiday (either overtime or in lieu), like say a post office in a store.

    49. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ad Wyse Terminals? All we had were teletypes...

    50. Re:American sweatshop by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      I say this as a citizen of the USA: we like to complain, sure, but we also like to do hard work.

      Well, long work at least. Maybe hard (though that's less evident), and definitely not efficient. Which is why for a long time the US, while its had the highest per-employed-worker productivity in the developed world, has also been near the bottom in per-worker-hour productivity.

      So fucking-A right we complain when the JOBS WE GO TO WORK AND DO EVERY DAY DESPITE HATING THEM GET OUTSOURCED.

      I'm confused, are you claiming that US workers "like to do hard work" (your first sentence) or view jobs which involve hard work as something they "go to work and do every day despite hating them" (your last sentence). Because those claims are directly opposed to each other.

    51. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      His point would be that you're mind numbingly ignorant of how absolutely awesome it is to be even homeless in the US.

      Spend a day in a country that actually sucks ass, then speak.

      Go spend a day in Somalia, Lybia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Palestine, most of Africa, large sections of rural Asia.

      You have absolutely no clue what 'bad' is.

      And you have absolutely no idea how 'good' good is, particularly in Europe (despite the economic downturn and rediculous armageddon-peddling of the US media vis-a-vis Greece and the other PIIGS).

      I've lived abroad for many years, and am back in the US. In both instances, opportunities took me abroad and brought me back (and may take me abroad again, who knows)? The US has its good qualities, but it does suck ass in a whole lot of ways that other countries, particularly in Western and Northern Europe, do not. Gun nuttery and associated criminal mayhem (~50,000 murders/year vs less than a few hundred in a similarly populated country?), universal healthcare that is comprable and often better in quality than what you get in the states with a cadillac health plan here, better consumer and citizen rights across the board, a lack of political insanity in one of the several governing parties, and the list goes on (though on the last point, YMMV by country).

      Oh, and faster internet (by far), better and cheaper unlocked cell phone plans, are just another bonus lost in the white noise of not living in a place where the government is so overtly of, by, and for the corporations.

      So yeah, there are worse places (Somalia, Libya, etc.), but the false dichotomy you hide behind doesn't change the fact that in many, many respects the US is a third world country that sucks-ass in many ways, particularly when compared to Wester Europe, New Zealand, Australia, and a whole host of other developed nations.

    52. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i live in the US and i get 33.5 paid vacation days per year, without carrying over a week from the previous year. plus sickleave

      granted this probably isn't the norm.

    53. Re:American sweatshop by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      nor is it legally mandated (US = 0 days, here's it's usually 29+/year)

    54. Re:American sweatshop by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      The information we get from the US looks more and more like stories normally associated with developing countries not a first world country.
       
      Then the information Europeans get from the US is ridiculously inaccurate. The living standard in the US is significantly higher than in Germany according to the United Nations HDI rankings. Health care quality in the USA is miles ahead of Germany or any place in Europe for the 86% of the population who have it (though I'll admit that the other 14% have a problem). A typical neighborhood in the USA is not a bombed out ghetto with bullets flying daily (as you might think from news or Hollywood movies, although such areas exist) but a safe and well maintained rows of large (huge by European standards) houses with soccer mums rushing between Starbucks and their kids 26 weekly activities in ridiculously large, tank-like SUVs. It has its problems but they are definitely first-world problems. It is a shame that you have to settle for inferior salaries, inferior housing, inferior personal liberty, inferior healthcare when you, due to geography and demographics, should have it a lot better than we do.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    55. Re:American sweatshop by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you haven't noticed we're talking about Canada. You don't have to smile (though people can tell), dress code can be non-existent depending on the province, you can hang up on abusive customers. You get awesome health insurance and they really can't change any time off requests after they've been approved. Modern lcd's, Vista or 7 on up-to-date computers. Plenty of really nice restaurants near, or in the building of most of the call centers (never ever saw a vending machine) and the fluorescent lighting is modern and upgraded (or should be as it's covered under federal health and safety laws).

      So, no, you live some hell job, this guy doesn't. As Canadians though our lives are pretty damn sweet so complaining becomes relative.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    56. Re:American sweatshop by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Oh, and faster internet (by far)

      What good is that internet, if it is being blocked and censored by the govt.? Didn't I read here recently about Australia and/or UK forcing ISPs to censor from there with blacklists, etc...that are not made public?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    57. Re:American sweatshop by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      You have to smile while you're on the phone (uhm really?),

      For the more observant among us, it *is* possible to sometimes determine when a person on the other end of the phone is smiling by the way their words sound.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    58. Re:American sweatshop by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      35 days is a bit much for most companies yet, but I've been able to book 5 full weeks of vacation this year (1 week of carryover from last year), and because I picked weeks where the statutory holidays come, I've managed to parlay that into an extra week of vacation in the form of days-in-lieu for statutory holidays. That's 30 working days of vacation, or 42 calendar days this year, and I still have 2 floater days and 2 personal emergency days, in addition to paid sick leave.

      And most of Europe has even more vacation as standard than we do.

      Don't get me wrong, I believe vacation time is important and good for a person.

      But seriously, with THAT much time off, how do you get anything done.?!?!?

      Do you not have deadlines every few months to get something done and out the door working? If so, how do you do it, with potentially everyone off at different times and only a skeleton few there at any given time throughout the year?

      I'm honestly curious. I mean, it is tough when one or two people here are gone, and usually that is less than a full week at times, but to have people off here and there for weeks at a time would really make it difficult to meet our deadlines?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    59. Re:American sweatshop by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      "Visit The US! Now With 30% More 'Not as bad as Somalia!"

      I really, really hope you get fired from your job at the Board of Tourism...

    60. Re:American sweatshop by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Thank you, you answered pretty much what I was going to say.

      Aside from the high unemployment the past 5 years....life in the USA is pretty darned good!!

      In most cases, if you aren't buying crack in the projects or in a gang, you're not likely to get shot or see a bullet fly across your life in any shape, form or fashion.

      Yes, the typical US neighborhood is as you describe.

      I dunno where the folks in EU get the idea that we live in squalor, with only a few rich mansions here and there. Life it pretty good for most, even with the low employment problems we're having the past 5 years.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    61. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the same conditions or better at every place I've worked at in the US. Such holidays and vacation are not federally mandated (although some states and local laws do mandate such things... which tends to get ignored in such discussions). So while a lot of people don't have it so nice, many do. It can make some claims looks a lot more silly or stupid, when they are along the lines of, "We have it so nice here, we have X, Y, and Z, while it sucks to be you," when those are things many people being addressed do have.

    62. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster you replied to said nothing about what he thought of the business's goals or that they should be changed to make his job better or make him happier.

    63. Re:American sweatshop by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I would not call a difference of 0.005 "significant". The difference between USA and Australia according to the HDI rankings are way larger (or, in fact, between Germany and Denmark, even if there is no real difference there).

      The "better healthcare" is also not really the case. Maybe on average - but it is similar to the average body temperature in a hospital, counting the morgue and the quarantine lab. If you average like that, I can do the same and say that with the American average murder rate, a typical neighbourhood in the USA is very much a bombed out ghetto with bullets flying daily in comparison to Central Europe.

      For most cases, we really do better than you do. The exceptions are smaller cars (although that SUV fashion, unfortunately, crossed over the pond) and smaller houses (but the quality of building materials is often much better). Personal liberty is neither better nor worse, just differently accentuated.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    64. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it isn't carpenter or plumber. Almost the entire construction business is down right now with lots of people sitting around looking for jobs in other fields.

    65. Re: American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sit down, shut up and listen:

      You hire enough people so that everyone gets vacation and doesn't have to turn up to work with the plague.

      /

    66. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gun nuttery and associated criminal mayhem (~50,000 murders/year vs less than a few hundred in a similarly populated country?)...

      Wikepedia: 14,748 for the most recent year. Not broken down by weapon, IIRC, a little less than 10K were by firearms.

    67. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely correct; the US does vary a lot. One place I worked at started at 3 weeks / year vacation, max of 5 weeks after 10 years, plus 9 holidays. Another is 2 weeks, 3 after 5 years, and 7 holidays. So those in Canada and Europe don't necessarily have it much better than an employee in the US, depending upon the employee. It would be interesting to see the average amount of vacation each person in the US gets, to compare that with the average in other countries.

    68. Re:American sweatshop by EdZ · · Score: 2

      Yes, the US is a bastion of never ever seizing domains (from domain holders outside the US even) for frivolous reasons and with no evidence.

    69. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and faster internet (by far)

      What good is that internet, if it is being blocked and censored by the govt.? Didn't I read here recently about Australia and/or UK forcing ISPs to censor from there with blacklists, etc...that are not made public?

      No blacklists passed in Australia.

    70. Re:American sweatshop by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      You have to smile while you're on the phone (uhm really?), follow the cubicle dress code (but I just answer the phone), not allowed to hang up on abusive customers no matter what they do.

      Though there is a malicious call warning button (i.e. someone's made a death threat) that they won't tell you about until you press the unlabeled button accidentally and send people into a panic.

      Also dress code is a good thing. I worked in a place that had "casual Friday", which was odd since most of us didn't get weekends off. For casual Friday one day a guy came in shirtless. Completely shirtless. Someone had to explain the difference between "casual" and "manboobs flopping around".

    71. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you have a pretty skewed image of typical America.

    72. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1980s had 12 to 14 inch monitors. 17" monitors were $2000.

    73. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False dichotomy.
      Many countries are better in respects of homelessness... yet some, as you say, are much definitely worse. But it's a spectrum, so don't pretend that it's either "homeless in U.S. == awesome vs. homeless anywhere else == LIVING HELL".

    74. Re:American sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't complain, those were just awesome for nethack. Modern displays just don't cut it.

    75. Re:American sweatshop by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      That's your selling point? "Come to the US, it's better than Somalia, Lybia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Palestine, most of Africa and large sections of rural Asia!"

      Um, yay?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    76. Re:American sweatshop by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      And American's innovating the medical breakthroughs they pool their money to socialize. We maintain a military second to none, and as a result, European nations get the luxury of not having to spend much money maintaining a capable military. America is fine if you're not a lazy shitsack. If you want the government to be a replacement for mommy and daddy after you move out, Europe is great.

      According to the pharma industry's top spokesperson in a BBC World News interview a few weeks back, 80% of the R&D money that goes into medicine is supplied by the government. It took the host maybe 2 full minutes of repeating the same question before the PR guy would give up the actual number. So that American medical innovation to which you refer is almost entirely based on socialized medicine, not private funding.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    77. Re:American sweatshop by MatrixCubed · · Score: 1

      My work here is done.

  5. We're with the government... by VendettaMF · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're with the government. We don't have a sense of humor.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    1. Re:We're with the government... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      that we're aware of.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  6. Did he do it at work or at home? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he did it at home then firing him is a flagrant abuse of the departments power. If he did it at work then its a flagrant abuse of his position and he deserved to be fired. Anyone know which?

    1. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by ciderbrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Years ago when I had a phone job - I got pulled in to the office for drawing at my desk. I said everyone here doodles. Apparently there is a skill level limit to the doodle. Bored managers amusing themselves by being awful never helps a bad job.
      Good job this guy didn't work there http://www.biro-art.com/

    2. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      It's incredible just how often 'phone jobs' make their staff fucking miserable. If you're doodling / drawing you must be either not busy enough or not engaged in the conversations well enough to do your work properly.

      Now I don't entirely agree with that, as someone who passes work out to the other staff, I can understand a small aspect of wanting the staff to look busy but I'd rather they were happy than miserable, often happy employees are more productive or at least easier to manage.

      Any phone jobs I've had have been IT based, so my web browsing was traditionally, incredibly excessive but I've mostly got away with it throughout my career. None the less I can sympathise for sure. (There was a time when older women were welcome to do knitting during phone jobs, those days seem gone too as well)

    3. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's conduct unbecoming of a public servant. A lot of civil servants have something like that in their contracts.

    4. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Phrogman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did a few years of tech support for a Real Estate software company. They claimed they had 700,000 US Real Estate agents as customers.
      * The software was written in Visual Basic 5, and used an Access Database.
      * We suggested that customers limit their list of potential customers to 20,000 so that the database would not have issues as often (it was Access based so it was guaranteed to have at least some issues some of the time). One of the people I talked to wanted to load 1 million names into his database, and tried to do so before calling. He had no forethought to back things up first. It did not go well.
      * Real Estate agents as a whole do not understand computers, and seem generally to have little patience for any problem - whether or not they caused it. The conversations got rather heated - a lot. I remember one guy who worked in Beverly Hills, screaming at the top of his lungs that he was losing 100k a hour while he was on the phone with us. My coworker in the cubicle took the call but I could hear it clear as day over top of the call I was taking at the time.
      * We had over 60 tech support people crammed into their cubicles. I must say the quality of the Staff and the Tech Support leaders was actually quite high.
      * We had a script we were required to follow and which was almost never relevant. This was a major problem since usually we could identify the problem quite quickly, but had to trudge through the routine first until that failed to solve the problem and we could carry on with actually solving the problem.
      * A lot of the problem was of course the Sales staff who would lie through their teeth to get a Sale, knowing that Tech Support or Development would have to solve the problem, not them. In general, I hate Sales people as a result of those at this company.
      * Our in house tools were written by the company too, and since what they knew was Visual Basic, thats what they wrote them in. Since the database they knew was Access, thats what we used. Every day at noon, for 1 hour, we had to revert to pen and paper because the Access Database for *our* customer base had to be repaired. Then we would madly enter call details in, in between other calls until we got caught up.

      It was an "educational" experience, but not one I care to repeat if I can avoid it :P

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    5. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Yes he was.

    6. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      I was in a similar situation. Then I noticed there were women that would knit while on the phone and they didn't seem to have a problem with that. So, always up for a challenge, I learned to knit. I made a 22foot, stitch for stitch replica of the original Dr Who Scarf.

    7. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Sique · · Score: 1

      He was.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      A lot of the problem was of course the Sales staff who would lie through their teeth to get a Sale, knowing that Tech Support or Development would have to solve the problem, not them. In general, I hate Sales people as a result of those at this company.

      Don't feel bad, like you're biased or something. In general, the sales "people" at any company behave precisely the same way. Whether you're talking about a delivery tracking software company with a dozen employees or IBM itself, this is how the sales department always behaves. No one should ever talk to the salesmen, because they will sell features that don't exist that they thought they heard someone say was in the product but might only be theoretically possible, or indeed, theoretically impossible. Treat the salesmen the same way you treat HR, like lepers who might get some on you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Yebyen · · Score: 2

      At our phone job, we actually encourage the call-center employees to doodle, because it's a) not on your screen, where the work/customer record is supposed to be (at all times excepting breaks), which makes it much better than either youtube or reading the news and b) it's something that's easy to stop if the customer picks up the phone, since it's an outcall position with no auto-dialers, a lot of time is spent repeating three dead simple steps of clicking onto the next record, pressing the dial button, until you have someone on the phone and just waiting for an opportunity to read the script and introduce one's self, only to be told that you've woken up the wrong person and you should call back/never call again.

      (I feel sorry describing it that way, pretty sure it's not as bad as it sounds, but I don't run the phones so I honestly can't say how much it sucks.)

      I have seen the more impressive doodles going onto the refrigerator and whiteboard, we keep plenty of whiteboard magnets mostly for this purpose.

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    10. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      Back when I was a phone grunt, I first started out by doing homework. Then they said no, no home work allowed. No reading any more either. So I switched to doodling. I, too, got hit with the "skill limit" warning because my doodles were too good. Then they forbade drawing entirely for anyone. I switched to origami for a long time - just something to keep my hands busy - and when they told me to stop with the origami, I finally quit. I have no regrets.

      These days, many call centers are actually distributed, so unless your supervisor is monitoring you with a web cam, they really can't tell what you're doing in your home office. I think that might finally be the end of that particularly vile variation of micro-management.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    11. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      This is almost exactly the situation, minus the angry sales people, I experienced when I was doing tech support for a major outsourcer. All software tools were made by agents who were effectively silently promoted by their immediate supervisors because upper management wouldn't pay for any software development whatsoever. So as far as upper management was concerned, the agents doing the most helpful tool building were just taking calls. Of course, they had no access to any infrastructure (that costs money!) so everything was built in Javascript, and when they were lucky, PHP / MySQL on a homegrown server.

      So glad I'm doing real software development now.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    12. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. The sales people generally have a motto of "Anything is possible. Never say no." and set unreasonable expectations.

      Coming from that type of environment, though, I've found that generally anything IS possible, as long as you throw enough resources at it and get creative with how you implement it. The first round may not be pretty, but it'll probably get the job done.

      Its the salesperson's job to then go back to the customer and explain why what they want costs an arm and a leg and will take a year and a day, but if implemented correctly and to the satisfaction of the customer, they're usually willing to pay for it.

    13. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I've had sales people promise we'd report data we didn't have.

      What they needed was an accounting procedure (Import our existing report subtotals into their general ledger) and a report out of their GL.

      Of course once the VP of sales had made a promise, we were fucked.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      There is no single original Dr Who Scarf.

      They used a different one for each episode. They are coveted collectors items for Dr Who fans.

      Fake up a certificate and sell yours. Dr Who fans are morons. Remember to claim a particular episode on the certificate.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Did he do it at work or at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very difficult to fire a federal public servant in Canada. One of two things is true in this case. Either a) there's much much much more to this story than we know so far, or b) he will have his job back in a month.

  7. RTFA by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  8. Re:What happened to Canada? by Dunbal · · Score: 0

    Heh some people are slow to wake up. I left Canada 20 years ago...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  9. What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's a whole other Slashdot story...
    I LOVE my 19" square monitor, can't stand widescreen. I am not alone.

    1. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen a square monitor.

    2. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I hate those friggin widescreen monitors as well. They're only good for watching video. For actually doing work and reading I have to continuously scroll every few lines.

    3. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some workstations in the 80s and early 1990s had square CRT monitors. It never really caught on in the mainstream.

      Or perhaps he was being hyperbolic and referring to early 5:4 "square" LCD monitors from the middle of last decade.

    4. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by deroby · · Score: 2

      That's not quite true.

      My wide-screen allows me to have 2 pages next to each other which can be utmost convenient at times. Off course you need to have decent resolution for that, but I have my current wide-screen 1920x1080 over your 1280x960 any time. Sadly there's a lot of 1366x768 screens out there which is like going back to the middle ages.

      I'll admit that I hate everything has shifted from 16:10 to 16:9 though, 1920x1200 was bliss.

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    5. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      They're shifting to 1920x1080 instead of x1200 because of cost - the industry is pumping out a LOT of 1920x1080 displays for TV sets, so that exact resolution is cheap.

      Square, high-resolution displays do exist.... generally used in radar applications.

    6. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by mjr167 · · Score: 2

      Try two 22 inch wide screens with one oriented vertically. You never have to scroll again :P

    7. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by deroby · · Score: 1

      I understand the why, more or less.

      But honestly, how many laptop-screen-size-like TV's have you ever seen ? There isn't all that much overlap IMHO ! The resolution of a 32" TV (or bigger) may be identical to my Dell laptop here, it still requires a different production line to make this 15.6 inch screen. They could have stuck to 1920x1200 and pump out just as many, it wouldn't have affected the TV-production-lines in any significant way IMHO.

      (I guess they can re-use the driver/electronics parts somehow but I doubt it would add that much to the cost. Damned bean-counters.)

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    8. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen 20"x20" screens attached to alpha workstations at a military radar control installation in the late nineties.

    9. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by tippe · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should change careers and get into ASIC or FPGA design/verification. Widescreen monitors are great for viewing waveforms. The wider the better as far as I'm concerned...

    10. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I find it hard to believe there is that much demand for 1080p TVs under 32".

    11. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I think it's more that consumers for some reason demand 16:9 in their desktop and even laptop screens because when they do watch 16:9 video, they don't like seeing black bars on the screen.

      Look at the flack Apple got for not making iPads 16:9, and that's a *ten* inch screen.

    12. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by robbyb20 · · Score: 0

      I recently was in the market for a new screen when I upgraded to a laptop and lost the ability to use my 3 19in(square haha) monitors. I ended up going with a 16:10 1920x1200 dell IPS monitor. They are available, just need to pay a little more for them.

    13. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      WTF? How does having more space on the side mean you have to scroll more?

      Are you trading vertical space for horizontal space? If so thats pretty much your fault.

      You don't buy a monitor thats 17" tall square and then get a 15" wide screen and pretend you got the same thing. Well, okay, an intelligent person wouldn't. You seem to be doing just that.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    14. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen a square monitor.

      Today's your lucky day!

      NCD 16, a 16" monochrome X terminal capable of 1024x1024 resolution, ca. 1989.

      As the other AC pointed out, it never really caught on. The CRTs weren't made in any appreciable volume, and as computing got faster, the cost of the CRT, not the motherboard beneath it, became the largest part of the price of any terminal.

      (They can have my 21" 1600x1200 LCD when they replace it with a 1920x1200. I'm not going back to resolutions less than what I had on a 19" CRT without a fight.)

    15. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I think that's where I'm going. Use the vertical as a page monitor and the horizontal one for everything else.

    16. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I've got a 23" monitor. It's very wide, 1920X1080 and it's much better than the silly ass 766 vertical display on my laptop but still I like to display a full page on the monitor. I guess I just got used to my old Sony 22" standard CRT monitor. I miss it so much I'm tempted to get it out of the garage and take it to be repaired.

    17. Re:What's wrong with 19" square monitors! by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      That's because you're stuck thinking in consumer terms. The general public doesn't buy small 1080p screens but industry buys them in piles. Try outfitting a fleet of buses or planes, or doing displays for ad kiosks and suddenly you'll notice how many small hi-def screens get made and sold every year.

      Virg

  10. all you want to know about this game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. "no confidential taxpayer information" by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    He was investigated for disclosing "confidential taxpayer information". Right. He used real customer names and numbers? At least they could be honest and say his crime was making a joke about his job -- and since it's a government job, at the tax department, (though he didn't actually say that in his game) it's not like they have to worry about losing customers.

    1. Re:"no confidential taxpayer information" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. My beef is less about snippy managers firing (or considering firing) an underling because he had the gall to publicly humiliate said management, and more that they are trying to feign some sort of legitimacy by raising the specter of PII leakage. That's bad mojo any way you slice it.

    2. Re:"no confidential taxpayer information" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather they just got "eh" and assume that none was released?

    3. Re:"no confidential taxpayer information" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's generally the SOP unless you are given reason to suspect -- otherwise, everyone's actions would eternally be under investigation. What about this scenario gives them reason to suspect that PII has been released?

      Be reasonable: management is using a fabricated investigation to justify the firing of this employee. The really bad part is that they probably don't need to justify their actions, but feel a need to... which is pretty telling in its own right.

  12. Re:What happened to Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I second this: 18 months was enough for me, it's a shit of a place to live.

  13. Real problem with phone jobs by prefec2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are a lot of people out there calling help or support lines. Some of them are frustrated, some of them are angry, depressed or helpless. Depending on their mood and way dealing with it, they use the support stuff as a verbal punching ball. However, for some problems there is a solution.

    a) A person calls and does not have ready all the stuff required to have a successful help line talk. For example, the do not have their customer number or other details available. And they start searching for them while on line.
    Solutions:
    A) Tell the person on the other end which information they have to collect, and that they can call back when the have it. These request should include all required and optional information you want to have as a help line person. Then wish him or her goodbye.

    In cases where people are waiting for hours to get through, this is often not an option. Also some company policies could require you to keep the line open. In that case use B

    B) Tell the person on the other end which information they have to collect, and that you are waiting for her/him until she/he can bring all the information. To survive this situation you have to switch from a goal centric state of mind, to a service state of mind. Even if you are doing nothing beside breathing and other vegetative stuff, you are there for the caller, your pure presence is the job. This might look like nothing, but it means a lot mentally for the caller, which has now someone who is there for him or her. For Europeans and people with a similar cultural determination have often a problem with that. That's why (beside the money) India is so popular for helplines. For help on that issue ask someone who meditates or a Buddhist.

    In cases where the person is angry or otherwise aggressive, it helps to think that it is not you the person is angry with. It is like parenting. If you little baby cries, it is not angry with you it is just angry. It is not personal. Therefore, do not act like you are the source of the anger. You just have to comfort the baby. For older children, the approach is a little different. However, do not try to persuade it, as it is not open to any reasonable argument. Working at a help line is very similar. And you should act similar to that. Also you might have a supervision talk with your colleagues on a regular basis. If your company is great, they pay for it. If not, do yourself a favor and organize something privately.

    1. Re:Real problem with phone jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) The business process should allow for that customer to direct-dial back to a specific rep and be served by that specific agent. The current call in progress should be queued to the front of the line after the rep explains to the situation to the customer. (not sure the hardware has this capability, but it should) All calls should have all in-progress data stored as a business object that is delivered to the next rep with the call. This is already done sometimes and known as a "screen pop" by PHBs. Implement it and you'll get a glass trophy on your desk, maybe even a promotion.

      B) wastes time

    2. Re:Real problem with phone jobs by TheSpoom · · Score: 2

      A is impossible because the caller can't direct dial an agent. I have never seen an IVR that allowed direct dialing through to a call center unless it was a special line to get a third level agent, and that line isn't given out publicly.

      B is nearly always impossible, because the major metric the call center is judging you on is your Average Handle Time, or AHT, which mean how quickly you get the caller off the phone without hanging up on them.

      The reason call center work is the most frustrating is because as the agent, your employer's profit depends on pushing you to your breaking point.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:Real problem with phone jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should a caller be able to direct dial an agent? We're taking about a business where all phone people are interchangeable cogs.
      It's not like the agent's going to remember the caller or anything. And why would they expect the same person to be available when they call back?

    4. Re:Real problem with phone jobs by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Except we're talking about CRA where you can direct dial an agent and the government doesn't care too much of yourAHT.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    5. Re:Real problem with phone jobs by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      To be fair, a national tax agency is in kind of a unique position with respect to call centers.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  14. Plea to someone with the means... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    ....please give this gentleman a real, non-soul sucking, non-phone job.

    The kid that was kicked out of school for finding the security issue was given an internship and a scholarship to help get him back on track when he was the victim of administrative idiocy. I hope someone with some power to help can do the same here.

    1. Re:Plea to someone with the means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only non-soul sucking job is to be running your own business

      Having done so I can tell you that running a business takes soul-sucking to a whole different level. Not only are you bartering with your own as usual, you're now bartering with the souls of your employees. On the plus side, if you redeem enough souls, Satan's got some bitchin' prizes.

      No, the only non-soul sucking job is to occupy space on an island in the Pacific; a theoretical island that suffers no storm and has a magical beer fountain that never runs dry.

  15. He got one thing right by Megane · · Score: 2

    usually leading to his termination

    Yep, just like what happened to him in real life.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  16. A good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad to know that some tax collector has been fired.

  17. No Canukistan Free Speach? by hduff · · Score: 1

    He pissed off the wrong people, the ones with the tight asses and dour faces.

    How may I obtain this game?

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:No Canukistan Free Speach? by Prokur · · Score: 1

      Game available for free in many places like here.
      In order to download, use firebug or any other plugin suitable to save SWF files.

    2. Re:No Canukistan Free Speach? by hduff · · Score: 1

      Ok, I got a copy. I had trouble running it using Linux, but the author was helpful via email and it now runs just fine. Essentially it all extracts into one folder and everyhing needed to run it is in that folder. WINE handles it OK.

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    3. Re:No Canukistan Free Speach? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm....
      I am having some trouble getting it to run under WINE.
      I think I will call the CRA and ask for Tech Support.

  18. Re:What happened to Canada? by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    the Conservative government.

  19. His game criticises his employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and involves employees getting fired.

    Surely this result was not a surprise. He should be thrilled that he got what he wanted AND gets to whine in public about it.

  20. I wonder why this game is not free by Prokur · · Score: 1

    Looks like a plan to earn money, because in order to download this indie game you have to pay 2 bucks. And all those news is part of good promotion and advertising program.

    1. Re:I wonder why this game is not free by Prokur · · Score: 3, Informative

      nevertheless, game is available for free here

  21. One wants to believe... by Jawnn · · Score: 1
    Truly and deeply wants to believe that

    The Minister has asked the Commissioner (of Revenue, Andrew Treusch) to investigate and take any and all necessary corrective action.

    ...means that the Minister is referring to sad state of customer "service" in the agency and not to someone who's poking fun at it. But that's a sucker bet, for sure.

    1. Re:One wants to believe... by hduff · · Score: 1

      I hope the Minister can answer all of the security questions.

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    2. Re:One wants to believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call CRA on a fairly regular basis and have always found them helpful and professional. I'm usually calling the business line, but the times I called the personal line were no different.

      I don't call them unless I've already looked for an answer myself, and always have my stuff together (account numbers, past statements, etc) during the call, and I avoid getting upset at phone jockeys for rules they didn't make up.

  22. Check out his podcast! First Level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He does a podcast on the Bonus Level Radio Network where they take a look at the first level of video games. You should totally check it out.

    http://www.bonus-level.com/podcasts/first-level-2/

  23. One tricky pony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to hand it to slashdotters to take a post that is (a) misrepresented in a headline (the guy wasn't fired) and (b) about civil service in Canada and turn the discussion into an argument trashing both the United States and Microsoft.

    Do I see a trend here? It's almost as if people come to slashdot with an agenda to push or something ...

    1. Re:One tricky pony by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you seem to be one of those misrepresenting the truth. He did get fired. It has been reported by numerous sources as such including the man himself. If you're too stupid to read, that's hardly our problem.

  24. Not too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually came to the article expecting to read that he made a game where players answered real calls for the agency and earned points doing it.

  25. Reputation by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

    Think about it this way. It is not good for your company if your customers believe that customer support staff are sitting on the other end of the phone rolling their eyes, or worse.

    That is the image that this portrays.

  26. Excruciating by phorm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or when they ruin somebody's life because he wouldn't pay a crooked taxman's bribes, conveniently losing all his documentation, and then refuse to pay back damages.

  27. Effem if they can't take a joke by yesurbius4822 · · Score: 2

    I worked at a notorious Canadian call center in 2004 providing Comcast internet support. It was part of the call center culture to share the annoying and stupid calls with our coworkers. I don't think for a minute that the same culture doesn't exist inside the CRA call center. Lets face it - some of the people that we are forced to deal with in customer service positions are .. well, stupid. Some of the other calls are downright hillarious - like the one-armed man that kept dropping his phone while his windows 98 ocean theme kept making toilet-like bubbling noises in the background. You can't make this shit up.

  28. I love watching the Streisand Effect in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...even if it is sweeping up some of my overly self-important, pompous, posturing country-mates!

  29. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whenever discussions about customer support come up, I remember my experience working for a regional ISP before and during the bubble burst.
      I had been with the company for several years, working my way up from dialup customer support (Internet helpdesk, Please hold) to manager of the web hosting services.
        Manager was a broad term, just as web hosting services was. In fact I had my hands in every part of the internet divisions operation.
        So when the bubble popped, I found myself working for a company in receivership. However there was value in the internet division so it was kept going by the receiver until a buyer could be found.

      Finally a buyer was found. At that point myself and several other top techs were just about to jump ship. The new owner took us all out for a fancy dinner, the intention being to keep us from leaving.

    I have noticed that you can tell a lot about a person, especially a manager, by how they treat wait staff. People that treat wait staff poorly tend to treat anyone that they perceive as being of lower status then them poorly as well. They are not the type of person that you want as a manager.
    This purchasing company's source of wealth was long distance, pre-paid phone cards. One of their big selling points was that they had support staff that could speak many languages, so people that used their phone cards to call India, Pakistan, etc, could talk to someone in their native language if they had problems.

    So the new owner at this supper was wooing us with wonderful promises. Yet we couldn't help but notice how poorly he treated the wait staff.

    Then, during the course of the evening, he made a statement that he liked to employ new immigrants to the country as his customer service representatives. This made sense. He wanted people with the ability to speak to callers in their native language as his customer support reps.
    But then he stated that he also liked to employee new immigrants since they don’t know what they should be getting paid, so he could pay them the minimum wage. Then if they found out what they should be getting paid, and asked for any sort of a raise, he would just fire them and get some other new arrival.

    We were all horrified and all left the company within a few weeks.

  30. ... And British Sweatshops by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    Relatively recently the British have created a "Get Britain Working" program that includes both "working for volunteer/charity organizations" and "working in the private sector". As you said, "by law" they aren't to be used to replace staff on normal income. But it's the private sector, there's little supervision, and it gets a lot of abuse. See also this recent court decision.

    Note that to retain "jobseeker benefits", even people who had held down a regular job for a significant time might be required to work unpaid for 4 or 6 weeks (depending on which article you read). Asking someone who held a job for 10 years to work "to develop working skills" is asinine.

  31. Re:What happened to Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which came into existence because the Liberal government was worse.

    Shall we continue with this game, or do you want to realize they're all terrible, because they're all government?

  32. You're bragging about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, in most of Europe, 4 weeks is the legal minimum! Most people in office jobs get 6!

  33. Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have a thought a government tax agency would have no sense of humor?

  34. What the heck are you talking about by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    productivity is through the roof in America. We're working our asses off. Take most Americans out of the job and they have no idea what to do with themselves. We might not work as hard as a Chinese man who is literally fighting for his life when he goes to work, but then again if you own a restaurant you do. And most of my coworkers are doing tons of side work. They rent properties (and maintain them themselves), do support work on the side, etc etc. My neighbors all have second jobs or are in school (albeit diploma mills, but what can you do?). Americans work like demons. You're just being mean-spirited.... :(

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/