Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Inexpensive SOHO Crime Deterrence and Monitoring?

First time accepted submitter trellz writes "My sister and brother-in-law are self employed, and run a small business with a storefront. It was broken into about a year ago, and since then they have reinforced physical security; bars on the doors and windows, better locks, etc. Unfortunately, their store was broken into and vandalized again last week, in spite of the added security measures. Being technically savvy, I'm trying to come up with inexpensive ways to add deterrence, monitoring, and alerting to their business. They run an extremely lean lifestyle and profit margin, so the solution needs to be almost free. They do have an internet connection at the store, so motion detection, web cameras, Arduino devices, and the like are certainly an option. Ideally I would like a rock-solid alerting method. Something like an email or text to a laptop at home, or a dedicated prepaid phone, but without the pitfalls of such a solution (i.e. random wrong numbers, solicitors, email spam, etc). I'd also prefer not to poke holes in their firewall at the shop if at all possible. I was considering an email with some sort of long code or hash in the body, and then could white list that on the receiving end to key off of. The goal is to never have a false alarm based on the transmission/reception method." What advice, beyond ZoneMinder?

272 comments

  1. How was it broken into again? by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bars on the doors and windows suggests someone was pretty aggressive about getting in there - or your physical security upgrades are just insufficient. If people can still get in, and if what they take is relatively lightweight, a sophisticated alarm isn't really going to help you all that much compared to just something which makes a lot of noise.

    1. Re:How was it broken into again? by trdtaylor · · Score: 1

      Right, could be insider threat.

    2. Re:How was it broken into again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, a good bar system should take longer to get through than anyone would be willing to commit. My first question was, "what do they have in there? Guns or drugs?" and the second is "what are the bars made of, rubber?"

      My vote is for a cheap $50 (or less) motion detector tied to a loud speaker. Nobody wants to rob a place so loud it hurts. You could set it up to send an email when triggered or such, but that's not going to make a huge difference in the robber's response. Unless the plan is to get a $200 cheap PVR/camera security combo so that they can catch people, rather than scare them off after they've done $1000 damage to windows and bars before running off.

    3. Re:How was it broken into again? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate a meth addict. Some have been known to tie winch wire to the frame of their car/truck/suv with the other end secured to a door or window bar. You may have seen a scene in a movie where this was done to break someone out of a jail. Well, that shit works (IRL for buildings, not jails)!!!. They drive up, wrap it secure, yank it off. In, out, long gone before police show up. Loud alarms and alerts are just after the fact.

      If you're doing business in a bad part of town. My advice is to leave!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:How was it broken into again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Or my favorite, stealing a car and driving it into a building to open the door. Though I've seen someone try the drive through the door trick when the concrete-filled metal poles were in front, they didn't make it in. Or when someone tried to pull a door down that was well secured and pulled the axle off the car - movie style. Gotta love the youtube age.

    5. Re:How was it broken into again? by Barsteward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And also set up a camera on the building opposite so it records everything as teh camera on the violated property will probably get trashed if seen

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    6. Re:How was it broken into again? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Right, could be insider threat.

      Good point. There's so much here that isn't made clear. Some questions to answer before deciding what to do:

      • is this one shop in a big area that gets picked on?
      • what are other surrounding shops doing different?
      • does this look like a personal vendetta or just two random coincidental crimes? Is there anything to link the two incidents?
      • are there surrounding shops that might work together?
      • did the guys get something of value?
      • did they likely come in masks?
      • if you alert the police are they likely to react quickly?
      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    7. Re:How was it broken into again? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2

      And also set up a camera on the building opposite so it records everything as teh camera on the violated property will probably get trashed if seen

      I'd assume that all the cameras should send out to an off-premises server. In this case they should be recorded before they trash them.

      The idea to get cameras opposite is good though. At that point getting together with all the shops in the area and setting up a system together might help. Scary and anti-freedom though this is, nobody will care or try to stop you. This will be much cheaper than paying for everything yourself.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    8. Re:How was it broken into again? by Bazman · · Score: 2

      Myth... busted!

      Mythbusters tried to yank the axle of a car using a fixed cable but every time either their cable failed or their anchor failed. They busted the rear axle up pretty bad, but never yanked it off as seen in American Graffiti.

    9. Re:How was it broken into again? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      Myth... busted!

      Mythbusters tried to yank the axle of a car using a fixed cable but every time either their cable failed or their anchor failed. They busted the rear axle up pretty bad, but never yanked it off as seen in American Graffiti.

      that depends on the car.... rusted up lada and think again what happens.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've seen it at the race track, and from people doing dumb things, it is possible to totally rip out your rear-end. It depends on the condition and type of rear suspension. This was all found from a single search.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB4EdVql8dE
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UUUSyysTAs
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7WzWDk0jes
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wnM51jsOMA

    11. Re:How was it broken into again? by TheLink · · Score: 2

      If a loud alarm isn't enough add some smoke (as long as it doesn't trigger sprinklers or similar ;) ).
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOgKti335tQ
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFWe-sAsAIA

      --
    12. Re:How was it broken into again? by mekkab · · Score: 1

      You mean a Lada fresh off the factory floor in Tolyatti? ; )

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    13. Re:How was it broken into again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Myth... busted!

      Say it with me, Mythbusters is not science. You're busted. Stop citing mythbusters, especially when hilariously trying to prove a negative.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:How was it broken into again? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a good bar system should take longer to get through than anyone would be willing to commit.

      And also be so ugly that customers might decide to go to the mall instead.

      --
      No sig today...
    15. Re:How was it broken into again? by SimonInOz · · Score: 2

      Obvious solution - get a dog.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    16. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with off site servers, is that the thieves will trace the wires back to your home address!!!

    17. Re:How was it broken into again? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      I've seen a number of "barred windows" in my time. I didn't exactly count them, but roughly 35 or 40% of them can be bypassed with nothing more than a screwdriver and/or small pry bar. Taking some wrought iron, and screwing it into the storefront's facade does NOT constitute "barred windows", IMHO. Maybe for legal purposes, such a setup helps to demonstrate intent and determination, but most of us live in the physical world, subject to the laws of physics. A teenage girl with a bad case of PMS could rip down some of those bars - without any tools!

      Good, solid bars that are incorporated sturdily into the building's structure are both time consuming and expensive to install. Unless, of course, the bars were part of the architect's plans. Building a new building with really good security is always easier and cheaper than trying to retrofit.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    18. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In what way? Mythbusters use the scientific method to test claims. They measure, experiment, collect data on a variety of scenarios - controlling and testing different variables on each pass - and report on their findings.

      Some of their findings have been challenged by members of the public, and repeat experiments have been conducted - some confirming the initial assessment and some forcing a revision. Their experiments and their results are available to anyone and are testable, repeatable, and refutable all the same, with further experiments refining the hypotheses under test.

      That's called "science".

      I'm afraid you've been poorly educated on the subject if you don't think so.

    19. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because random youtube clips are a more reliable source.... Right?

    20. Re:How was it broken into again? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I'd have to see the mythbuster's attempt to pull the axle out. I've seen the axle of a 3/4 ton Ford pickup pulled halfway out from under the truck. The truck was still operable, barely. It was driven to a close-by garage for repairs. Pulling the axle free of the frame isn't easy, but it isn't impossible either.l

      If it were my goal to recklessly pull the axle out from under a vehicle, I'd start with an old, high mileage vehicle, preferably with a lot of rust. If some young, dumb kids have altered the suspension with lift kits, etc, you'll probably find that the axle comes loose a lot easier. Kids often fail to understand how all the parts work together, so they leave out a pin, or fail to align everything properly.

      Send mythbusters down south here, to hand their car over to some farm kid. Just tell him that you want him to pull tree stumps out of a field. Kids are geniuses at wrecking stuff!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    21. Re:How was it broken into again? by flyneye · · Score: 2

      My suggestion would be a modified version of this sentry system http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uetmdJJkpdQ
      Mod it with a .410 shotgun for use with anything from rock salt to birdshot to deer slugs, dependent on the damage you want to inflict.
      Stun gun? Flame thrower? I'd fool around with marking them up w/paintball, but these guys sound aggressive enough that putting them down would be best for all.
      Just a judgement call, but you know your situation better than me.

                Heres a bit about the open source software used to run it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECa4lUD-WFs
      Open Vision Control.

      It's better to PWN than be PWND.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    22. Re:How was it broken into again? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dogs work well. But, housing and caring for dogs in a downtown business district can create a lot of headaches, too. Not to mention, that well trained security dogs are expensive, and poorly trained dogs are a liability. Be prepared to spend not less than twelve hours per week with a pair of dogs - time that many businessmen don't have.

      In short, I wouldn't recommend dogs to anyone who didn't
      A: think of it themselves
      B: actually likes dogs (preferably loves dogs)
      C: have a close by exercise yard
      D: have plenty of time to work with the dogs

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    23. Re:How was it broken into again? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      These dogs are not pets, you expect them to work all night and be vicious. Be prepared to keep an animal mean and unsociable. Dogs that aren't dedicated to protection tend to just bark a lot, nip and get shot by intruders. Be prepared to have animal rights people up your butt about it as well.
      Not a bad idea for a rural farm area, not so good for urban areas.Impractical.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    24. Re:How was it broken into again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Because random youtube clips are a more reliable source.... Right?

      If all it takes is some youtube clips to prove them wrong, then they're clearly full of shit. And indeed, that is the case.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:How was it broken into again? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Informative

      My friend, you just suggested a shotgun trap, which is illegal. Like premeditated-homicide illegal. Sure, the criminals were breaking into the store, but the difference between a trap pulling the trigger and a human is all it takes for the store owner to go to jail.

    26. Re:How was it broken into again? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      >The problem with off site servers, is that the thieves will trace the wires back to your home address!!!

      I can't tell if this is a troll, but even the cheapest of Chinese CCTV DVRs today have a backup to network, backup to hard drive, and backup to offsite option.

      Also be sure to look for "pentaplex", meaning you can do 5 things all at once (view, record, ?, ?, and ?).

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    27. Re:How was it broken into again? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Like I said, it's a judgement call.
      He knows his circumstances.He's capable of evaluating the level of security he wants.
      Put whatever deterrent you like in the mix.

      This leaves many options open. Paint balling him for easy identification seemed funny, if you trust cops to actually catch them.
      Shooting electrodes for a stun gun might be effective for keeping them still long enough for the cops to drive over from Winchells and find their asses w/both hands if you are urban. Potato gun? Glue? R-15? Animal Tranquilizers?
      It's a targeting system, you fill in the blanks.
      If we needed a lawyer or ethics management, it would've come up. Quit whining. This is information for someones needs not some Jiminy-cricket morality play.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    28. Re:How was it broken into again? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It is due to those determined people that you don't want to be alerted instantly -- because you may just do something stupid like go there and get beaten up or shot.

      To me it seems possible that it's a protection racket and they're not telling you that they've been asked for money. Maybe they just didn't get the hint.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    29. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because I run 6 mile long cables to my house...

      You are retarded

    30. Re:How was it broken into again? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Yes, the experiment is the ultimate validation of any theory, but it needs to be done in such a way that sufficiently controls for things. Here, demonstrably, when you control for the solidity of the car and choose a solid car, you're not ripping anything out. I'm not surprised junk cars that the likely burglars drive would be, um, more prone to getting the rear end separated.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:How was it broken into again? by tibit · · Score: 3, Informative

      A camera? Now stop being silly. Go to a location that has presumedly similar layout to the one in question. Take a pic with your digital camera. Scale it down to NTSC resolution. That's the best case image you're going to get -- stuff from usual cameras used for monitoring looks much worse. Most security cameras are completely useless. You can barely tell between a human and a gorilla on most of the feeds that catch large areas. A small storefront may leave you with a bit better image than most, but it's still way too large area of an to cover if you want to see any faces. Other than recognizing faces, what's the point? I mean, you know there was a break-in, there's no reason to look at a video recording to confirm what's obvious. Either you get faces that are recognizable, or it's mostly useless.

      You've basically fallen for the security monitoring scam: people love it until they actually need to see the images and realize they are useless.

      To get good monitoring you need HD cameras, and plenty of them. For a small storefront monitoring, you may need coverage from two 1080p webcams. They are not exactly the most inexpensive of things. Alternatively, if you believe in a bit of luck, a digital photo camera taking timelapse pictures every second may also be likely to catch the faces. I'd go for one of the Canons where you can replace stock firmware with CHDK. You can then make it delete old pictures and keep new ones in round-robin fashion.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    32. Re:How was it broken into again? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Obvious solution - get a dog.

      Not sure if it was true or not, but I heard a story about a jewelry store that used to let tarantulas loose in the display cases when the store was closed.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    33. Re:How was it broken into again? by phoebusQ · · Score: 2

      What you don't seem to understand is that these sorts of traps are specifically illegal in most jurisdictions. It's not a question, you WILL be charged with murder if you kill someone with one, or attempted murder/assault if you don't quite do the job. It's not the same as actually being there in a self-defense situation.

    34. Re:How was it broken into again? by yog · · Score: 1

      What if they're wearing ski masks or stockings over their faces? So much for high def cameras.

      The question in my mind is, what is motivating these crooks to break into this office? If it's such a lean, barebones kind of operation, I wonder what it is that makes thieves think, this room must have valuable stuff that is worth the risk?

      Maybe they should move their office to a safer neighborhood. Or, remove all the bars and obvious theft-deterrence stuff (keep the hidden cams and alarms, if they're already in place) and take the hard disks home at night. Lock down the gear such as monitors and CPUs with cables strong enough to satisfy the insurance company, don't keep a box of petty cash, empty the filing cabinet and make the company files virtual, and leave it at that.

      Or maybe let your friend's Rottweiler sleep in the office every night for a few months. The gang that's working that neighborhood will get the message and stay away.

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    35. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone says "that can't happen", then yes, that's all it takes is examples of it happening.

    36. Re:How was it broken into again? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2

      >Maybe they should move their office to a safer neighborhood.
      > They run an extremely lean lifestyle and profit margin

      Maybe you don't understand something here. Rent. In the neighborhood you want them to move to rents can be double and triple the cost of the ghetto. If they are not making huge profits as it is, they simply can't afford to.

      Locking up all the items is fine, but the problem stated was vandalism. That is a different problem then theft. A vandal may not take anything, but instead just smash stuff up. Some people are assholes.

      The dogs not a bad idea, most of the gang member type i've seen seem to have a healthy fear of dogs.

       

    37. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general, I consider that anything Mythbusters considers busted to simply mean that they were too incompetent (or likely, time/money constrained) to property evaluate the 'myth'.

      The simple fact that you will see dragracers pop off their rear axles with fairly regular occurrence suggests that the mythbusters simply didn't account for the wide variety of car conditions that exist.

      (lol... Captcha: recall)

    38. Re:How was it broken into again? by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Dogs work well. But, housing and caring for dogs in a downtown business district can create a lot of headaches, too. Not to mention, that well trained security dogs are expensive, and poorly trained dogs are a liability. Be prepared to spend not less than twelve hours per week with a pair of dogs - time that many businessmen don't have.

      In short, I wouldn't recommend dogs to anyone who didn't A: think of it themselves B: actually likes dogs (preferably loves dogs) C: have a close by exercise yard D: have plenty of time to work with the dogs

      Does the same apply to night watchmen? [giggle] I ask because a night watchmen might be about the same annualized cost as keeping a dog. And, I also like the questions in posts above about why this place being hit so much and is it an inside (or ex-employee) job. Too many questions about why and how these crimes keep happening to really provide a good answer to the security question, but low tech is where you should start; including introspection and asking yourself why this is happening!

    39. Re:How was it broken into again? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      And Jello. No burglar wants to get near smoke and fire and Jello.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    40. Re:How was it broken into again? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Well, obviously, you don't have to exercise a night watchman. Now, stop giggling, and go get the watchman some more donuts, please. He's due for a coronary, and we've got to help him! ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    41. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we needed a lawyer or ethics management, it would've come up. Quit whining. This is information for someones needs not some Jiminy-cricket morality play.

      I'm sure the DA will take that into account when charging you with accessory to murder when some idiot follows your internet instructions. NOT!

    42. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, depending on the politics of where you are and if anyone cares or misses the villain, be careful about disposal.
      Just to cover your bases, make it look like a cop did it , for best results, they are disposable villains in most cases anyway.
      Thank you for drawing that to my attention, the original poster wasn't very thorough or thoughtful.

    43. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without training, a dog is just a dog. Unless it's a particularly aggressive dog, in which case you wouldn't want it as a pet in the first place, and it certainly wouldn't be friendly to customers.

      http://realestate.aol.com/blog/2012/11/15/guard-dogs-burglars-home-security/2

      There's another article out there which mentions Chihuahuas as guard dogs. While they don't cause damage, they certainly raise a hell of a racket. If all I want is a racket, I'd rather get a stand-alone alarm which doesn't shit all over the place and require vet visits.

    44. Re:How was it broken into again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem with Mythbusters is that every experiment has to be boiled down to 7 minutes of TV (two per show, ~22 minute show with about 1/3 wasted). They rarely go into enough detail to really fully test an idea, at least not since the first few series.

      It gives you a good starting point and sometimes proves that something is possible, but very rarely conclusively disproves anything.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    45. Re:How was it broken into again? by honestmonkey · · Score: 1

      Not sure about burglars, but it does work on chicken hearts.

      --
      Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
    46. Re:How was it broken into again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked in a movie theater and we got robbed. It was less than two weeks after we had new cameras installed. Turns out they were all aimed to catch employee theft, and there was no camera that got a decent view of someone robbing the place. But there was a great view of my hands taking the money from the till and handing it over. Or of me on the phone with 911. I could tell it was me.

      The police and manager were in the office reviewing the tapes, and they had to call me in to point out the robery, as from the tapes, they couldn't find the one wide-angle that caught it all (put in to see how long the ticket lines were).

    47. Re:How was it broken into again? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The Columbus Ohio area had a string of people crashing the cars through the side of the buildings to gain entry. The alarms never went off, the security video recorded everything and they played it back on the news. They crooks took mostly smokes and liquor.

    48. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a loud alarm isn't enough add some smoke (as long as it doesn't trigger sprinklers or similar ;) ). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOgKti335tQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFWe-sAsAIA

      I've thought about doing something similar as a car theft deterrent. A recorded voice saying "deploying deadly neurotoxin in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, and then have harmless fog fill the cabin. Bonus to add something smelly to it too. Even if the thief is brave enough to risk the toxic cloud, he's not going to be seeing much to actually finish the job. And while bystanders are used to ignoring car alarms, how many people are going to ignore a car that's spewing smoke from all openings? Even if they just stand and watch, you've got something out of the ordinary that won't easily be ignored.

    49. Re:How was it broken into again? by trellz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll try and answer some of the general questions I've seen here. It is a tattoo studio, they used bolt cutters to open the locked rear gate to the courtyard, bolt cutters on the back security door, and then battered the metal door down. They stole thousands in tattoo equipment and inks, and even his portfolio, but left the computer. This is a similar MO to last time, and it does seem personal(though I have no idea as to why). It's in a small town, so that area is just vacant during the nights, and the back courtyard is hidden completely. Other measures to secure things will be taken, like a safe, etc. This is family, so I'm just trying to do whatever I can to help. They've been in business for 15+ years and enjoy being self employed. The alerting them at home would be the last preferred method. In my opinion it's best to deter (through visible security means), prevent (through physical security and restricted access), to alarm (loud audible), and then finally alert (through some means), so that at the very least they could hop in their car and drive past.

    50. Re:How was it broken into again? by vux984 · · Score: 2

      In what way? Mythbusters use the scientific method to test claims. They measure, experiment, collect data on a variety of scenarios - controlling and testing different variables on each pass - and report on their findings.

      The main issue is that failing to replicate something is not evidence that something did not happen.

      When they confirm a myth there is usually no issue. But busting a myth by failing to confirm it is not really valid science.

      They make assumptions about the environment the claim takes place in. Usually the assumptions are quite reasonable, but the real world is not a reasonable place. Improbable things happen, and it can be argued that anything one calls a "myth" is out of the ordinary enough that if it occurred that it probably took place under extenuating circumstances.

    51. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they could always load it with rock-salt.

      However, they might still be charged with.....

    52. Re:How was it broken into again? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2

      Parrot to burglar: "God is watching you".
      Burglar, bemused: "Who would teach a parrot to say that?"
      Parrot to burglar: "The same person who would name a Rottweiler "God".

      Seriously, raise a good dog and let him sleep in the shop. If he lets his territory be violated by a burglar, then it's someone the dog already knows.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    53. Re:How was it broken into again? by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      > Mythbusters use the scientific method to test claims.

      It's true, and if you forget what the methods are, stick around until after the commercials when they'll spend five minutes reminding you.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    54. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dogs are fine just rent them from a security company that also handles the liabilities. Someone comes by to lock them up and unlock them while feeding. They also take them for exercise and retraining. Also the local here pays 50% for them because it helps reduce crime.

    55. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely culprits are the local motorbike clubs. Probably their best customers too.

    56. Re:How was it broken into again? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      I think the original was clear, they don't care about recorded views. Seams they want quick notification; my guess would be to catch them red handed. No police notification was mentioned, my interpretation was they can handle enforcement, perhaps live 5 minutes away, have 10 minutes of physical security, have fire power; only thing missing is notification.

    57. Re:How was it broken into again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      I've seen some flimsy looking ones do a really good job. 4"+ wood screws screwed into the framing (building frame, not window frame) will pretty much require pulling down the wall to take off without unscrewing them.

      Good, solid bars that are incorporated sturdily into the building's structure are both time consuming and expensive to install. Unless, of course, the bars were part of the architect's plans. Building a new building with really good security is always easier and cheaper than trying to retrofit.

      My favorite was the Pentagon. An airplane crashed into it, and, from what I saw from the pictures, not a single window was broken. They spec'd the windows to be the strongest part of the building. The expectation was that a sniper would try to shoot through a window. If you had a spotter off to the side, a .50 sniper bullet would happily penetrate the wall with legal force (if you managed to hit the target), but the strongest sniper rifle existing or conceived of would not be able to score a kill through a window.

      Or a friend of mine that lived in Helsinki near where many of the ambassadors live, and he had bulletproof glass put in because he wanted to fit in with the other houses so he wouldn't be a target for stupid robbers.

    58. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me, you know how they are getting in, and what they are doing. Get ONE hi-res cam, and train it on the metal door (the inside) - set it up to be motion detected, and get it to send images via email. That's it. When the shop is hit again by these b@stards you *should* have some fairly identifiable images that you can a) go to the police with, or b) put on display in the shop as a name-and-shame exercise.

      -Jaruzel

      (Posted as A/C as modding other posts in this thread)

    59. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bet is that someone in the small town doesn't like a tattoo shop being there and/or the clientele that it draws. Seems obvious to me that by what is taken, they are intent on damaging the ability to do business. My first response when I read "tatoo studio" was..... Oh. A tattoo shop... nice commerce base for a small town.

    60. Re:How was it broken into again? by Shagg · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Mythbusters is an entertainment show. Their findings are meaningless.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    61. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just sleep there with a shotgun in your lap. That's "almost" free surveillance...

    62. Re:How was it broken into again? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Too much security is an invitation to break-ins. Thieves will ask "What is so precious that they need such heavy protection? Lets see what we can resell at a good profit!"

      Locally, a security package with several cameras and the recording equipment are available in the $300 range. Some systems record to flash memory. There is no continuous recording, but only recording when there is an image change. When the image has not changed for several minutes, monitoring continues, but recording stops.
      Do your search and yee shall find.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    63. Re:How was it broken into again? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Sounds dubious, insurance companies generally require the goods to be stuck in a safe when the store is closed (or they aren't covered).

    64. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Mexico everything has huge bars, typically wrought iron so it looks good. But there is always a weak spot.
      We were burglarized by the guys simply knocking off the hasp with a huge hammer, no need to break the lock.
      A the bars are useless when there is one single point of weakness. You need multiple locks, chains, candle, etc.
      along with very loud alarms and lights. The idea is to deter their entry rather than to use some sophisticated comm gear
      to see what happened after the fact.. Why do you want an email that says "Hey dude, you've been robbed.".
      How about real physical security?

    65. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, is that you?

    66. Re:How was it broken into again? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      In what way? Mythbusters use the scientific method to test claims. They measure, experiment, collect data on a variety of scenarios - controlling and testing different variables on each pass - and report on their findings.

      Some of their findings have been challenged by members of the public, and repeat experiments have been conducted - some confirming the initial assessment and some forcing a revision. Their experiments and their results are available to anyone and are testable, repeatable, and refutable all the same, with further experiments refining the hypotheses under test.

      That's called "science".

      I'm afraid you've been poorly educated on the subject if you don't think so.

      That's all well, but it boils down to the ability to prove a negative. The claims that they test and can reproduce, sure, it's proven. We just saw it done. Then there are the other claims that they test and cannot reproduce. All that test shows is that they were not able to do it, that one time.

      If I claim "No one can eat this whole pizza", and then you sit down and eat it, I've just been proven wrong. If you can't eat it, all that shows is that you can't eat it, but proves nothing about my original claim.

    67. Re:How was it broken into again? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      my guess would be to catch them red handed.

      Then they're either dead by gunshot in their office, or dead by gunshot as soon as the perp's friends get out of jail.

      Using force will only worsen the situation.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Simplicity... by kelarius · · Score: 0

    How about a specific subject line in the email, and if the email doesn't have it, it gets filtered into the trash?

    --
    Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    1. Re:Simplicity... by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      No, that's far too simple. He's after a high-tech solution.

      I still want to know how sending an email will prevent the burglars. Is he going to put up a sign: "Warning! This shop protected by email!" ?

      I'm not sure I'd hire him as a security consultant. I might do something crazy like ask a local cop what to do. Somebody who knows the area and knows what sort of people break into shops. That's just me though...YMMV.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Simplicity... by crutchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i bought a really nice bike years ago when i started university and it was stolen (locked up in an open public place within the university grounds)... talking to campus security revealed that it was commonplace and that the solution was to use a cheap shitty looking bike because they aren't targeted

      in other words... make your store appear less of a target; if you have massive steel bars on the windows and security cameras everywhere, crims will think you are protecting something of value. i dunno what the store sells, but you may want to look at what measures are used by other similar stores in the area.

      there are a bunch of possible reasons why your store could have been targeted:
      - what sort of neighborhood is it in? (maybe shift to somewhere with lower crime)
      - do you have any enemies? (think outside the box here a bit, such as does your wife have nasty spats on facebook? women can be as vindictive as men)
      - how do you get on with your competitors? (you're not competing with the mafia are you?)
      - are the police offering any advice? if so, maybe consider following it

      at the end of the day, you need to analyze how it is affecting your business overall. i'm guessing you're not in the security business so having bars on the windows and alarms and cameras probably is costing a lot and not contributing to increased sales. the decisions you make should be sound business decisions, as well as consideration of your personal or family situation if you think there is any risk (what happens if someone comes in while you are in the store?). for the business, add it to your threats column and see how it all stacks up. if you are spending more on security to the point where you're not making enough to pay your bills then the viability of your business in on the line. continuing an unviable business out of spite for the criminals is stupid obviously (that's how government's think, not small busininesses).

      trying to shape the problem to suit a solution that an IT specialist can help with is putting the cart before the horse; more security may not be the right solution.

      there isn't really enough info provided to give much more of a story but its a fairly common problem with shop fronts so there should be a lot of folks out there with ideas.

    3. Re:Simplicity... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2

      put up a sign: "Warning! This shop protected by email!" ?

      Warning! This shop protected by attack email.

      That way they would-be perps know that they'll have to deal with malicious payloads, instead of just phishing and 419 like you get from the usual sleepy bone-chewing guard emails.

    4. Re:Simplicity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank very much!!!
      http://ucsivietnam.com

  3. Insurance Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly enough, as in IT security, I'd wager that compliance with industry best practices is more important (from the underwriter's perspective) than actual efficacy -- that is, while it would cost more up-front, a contract with a security provider may result in easier access to (potentially mandatory) insurance.

  4. Dog by MobyDobie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about getting a dog? It's both a deterrent and an alarm.

    1. Re:Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if properly trained and broken into frequently feed cost and police involvement can be minimal

    2. Re:Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a liability.

      (AC for posting from work no password)

    3. Re:Dog by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is a property in my home town whose walls are painted (outside the concertina-lined fence) with the message "DANGER: GUARD DOG WILL KILL". And several skull-and-crossbones for the illiterate. Game over, man, game over.

    4. Re:Dog by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 0

      lol!

    5. Re:Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no puck ass teenager is going to mess with a shop with a rottie on the other side of the glass!

    6. Re:Dog by u38cg · · Score: 2

      A dog is pretty defenceless against a piece of meat with some horse tranquilliser in it. And to be really honest, they're not much against a steady nerve and a hefty crowbar either. And we're talking about a storefront here, not a private residence.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:Dog by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      And to be really honest, they're not much against a steady nerve and a hefty crowbar either.

      Dogs or headcrabs?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:Dog by mikael · · Score: 1

      Or even just a recording of one or more ...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:Dog by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I like the sign that says: "Beware! The dog has an attitude problem, and a .357."

    10. Re:Dog by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      How does the gun help if the staff has gone home overnight?

    11. Re:Dog by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      >A dog is pretty defenceless against a piece of meat with some horse tranquilliser in it

      Fucking cokeheads doing this kind of stuff would have already shoved the tranq up there ass in a drug induced stooper. In the end all the security measures do is filter out the less determined. The dog may filter out a few young punks looking to steal a box of candy bard, but not the gang looking to steal your pseudo.

  5. Already Solved by Johnny+Doughnuts · · Score: 2

    The software is available for surveillance already. You can setup a threshold of changed pixels in a time window (outside of business hours) and if it is exceeded it sends an e-mail, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_(surveillance_software)

  6. Live there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a good firearm. Kill them. It works very well.

    1. Re:Live there by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Messy though. Not an elegant solution.

    2. Re:Live there by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Messiness aside, you have to live there for this to be an effective solution. If it's in the bad part of town, you don't want to live there... I love my guns and I keep one in the car almost all the time, but I don't want to live in the kind of neighborhood where you have to have your gun on you all the time.

    3. Re:Live there by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Have a good firearm. Kill them. It works very well.

      I won't respond to the obvious pro-anti gun control flamebait (only an idiot would do that*). We have no idea where this shop is based so you might be right; In some areas of Mexico where the police will never come this would probably be the right solution. Moreso if you live somewhere where you have no social security and are likely to starve to death if you lose your shop.

      However, it doesn't fit the specification. "the solution needs to be almost free".

      First of all, you want better and more effective weaponry than the people who are going to come to your shop. Heavy machine guns do not come cheap, and even if you will do with a pair of assault rifles they won't come free.

      Secondly, as even the NRA will tell you; especially the NRA; you need to train with your weapon especially if you are planning to use it in a serious situation. An initial period of several months of intense training in marksmanship and urban combat followed up with weekly practice and regular refresher training will be needed. Even with a local club willing to help this is going to end up expensive.

      Thirdly, most of the time people's firearms are used against them more than they get to use them. You will want to work in a pair (or more), with one person on guard duty, and one person serving the customers at all time. You will want to buy secure firearm storage for the occasions when you have to put the gun down.

      Fourthly a firearm alone isn't going to cut it. If they get inside before you start firing you are going to end up in considerable danger anyway. Let's imagine that this is a stand alone store set back from a road in the Columbian countryside. You will want to have motion detectors and cameras wired to alarms and screens in your safe room together with a loudspeaker system outside. When the invaders come at night you need to give them warning (in case they are lost tourists or local paramilitary police dropping by to check on your health) before you open fire.

      Finally, if you do end up killing them and are unlucky, you may want to be ready for the escalation from their drugs gang buddies. At least budget to buy a few RPGs and heavier machine guns; armoured reinforcement and ex-SAS security guards are probably advised.

      Overall, whilst this may be excellent on paper, you will find such security does not always come cheap.

      * (or troll)

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    4. Re:Live there by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

      Elegant? What do you want? Lightsabers?

      --
    5. Re:Live there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a good firearm. Kill them. It works very well.

      Until Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton show up.

    6. Re:Live there by crutchy · · Score: 1

      just put a sign on the door "this business is owned by the mob"

    7. Re:Live there by crutchy · · Score: 1

      nukes... adopt the tried and true MAD principle :)

    8. Re:Live there by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Ineffective against the mob, and may make it difficult dealing with insurance & police.

    9. Re:Live there by flyneye · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "An initial period of several months of intense training in marksmanship and urban combat followed up with weekly practice and regular refresher training will be needed."

      What a load of shit. A good gun safety course takes a few afternoons on the weekend. The urge to return to the range and practice is natural.
      Most gunplay with handguns occurs at less than 50 feet and the majority of that at less than 25 feet. Train intensely if you are shooting for the Olympics, train realistically if you want to hit a human size target effectively. Choose an adequate weapon for the task at hand. A .45 cal is just about perfect for personal protection.
        a .40 will go through walls, cars easily, a .38 couldn't bring down an aged Pope with a whole clip, a 9mm is just a Euro .38. .357,.44 and .50 are fine for disabling freight trains and semi-trucks .22 and .32 will protect you from rabbits.

      Mostly, get gun advise from someone involved with weapons and training. Getting a bunch of anti-gun-nut propaganda from some pacifist hippie on the internet is useless as the one giving it.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    10. Re:Live there by slpalmer · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this up. My mod points *just* expired!

    11. Re:Live there by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Your heart is in the right place and noted.
      May your seed be fertile in the belly of your woman... or whatever good wishes are appropriate.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    12. Re:Live there by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      What a load of shit. A good gun safety course takes a few afternoons on the weekend

      You seem to be deeply hard of reading. I will try to translate the proposal

      get a firearm (note singular - for one person only) and sleep there (note - by basic principles of security you should assume that the opponents know you are sleeping there) alone then, when the assailants (unknown number) come in armed (with unknown set of weapons) do not attempt to frighten them off (they might get away); instead kill them all.

      Remember that, whilst you might be lucky and get a bunch of punks who have no clue what they are doing, it's actually quite likely that, given that they are willing to attack an occupied building, you will meet heavily armed people ready to fight. Your average gun safety course will considerably reduce the chance of killing yourself accidentally with a weapon. In a random street encounter with lightly armed random assailants who are ready to run away it will give you a reasonable chance of even behaving in an effective way. It definitely does not prepare you to take on multiple heavily armed and prepared assailants and ensure that you kill them all.

      So summarised

      • Buy at least a semi-automatic weapon; actually you almost certainly want multiple weapons
      • ensure that you have practiced in realistic indoor/ confusing situations; not just some "gun safety" firing range
      • make sure that you can shoot accurately and rapidly enough to expect to kill three or more "bad guys" yourself personally

      Even with all of this; it's a thing you should only do in a situation of desperation. Doing it without that level of preparation comes under basic "don't bring a knife to a gun fight" rules. Planning to fight against multiple forewarned armed assailants with a single pistol, .45 or not, is stupidity of the highest order. Doing it at a time of their choosing in a situation where they know where you are and not the other way round is plain suicide.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    13. Re:Live there by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Step 1 Have a good firearm. Kill them. It works very well.

      Step 2 Until Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton show up.

      Step 3 Repeat step 1.

    14. Re:Live there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly, get gun advise from someone involved with weapons and training. Getting a bunch of anti-gun-nut propaganda from some pacifist hippie on the internet is useless as the one giving it.

      Hey! I'm a pacifist hippie, but I do know how to shoot. Just because I'm a pacifist doesn't mean I'm an idiot, you insensitive clod!

    15. Re:Live there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the only way to be sure.

    16. Re:Live there by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

      Actually, handguns are a personal defense compromise favoring convenience and portability.

      If you know you'll be in a fight, get a nice 12-gauge shotgun.

      Everyone on the planet, from individuals to the US Coast Guard to the US and Chinese militaries, uses the Remington 870. It is cheap, reliable, and highly effective. And, when the situation is resolved, you can buy a long barrel suitable for hunting; where the 870 is equally appreciated. Just make sure your local laws won't make you the criminal if you do this.

    17. Re:Live there by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Yeah, whatever G.I.Joe,
              We have a new rash of justifiable homicides here locally from home and shop break ins in addition to armed robberies. Everything is doing just fine.My favorite old story is from last year when a man lived over his machine shop and was previously shot by burglars. He had a .45 this time, killed one and injured another both armed with either a gun or crowbar. My favorite new story is the Mid-easterner Convenience store owner a few blocks from my work who held a couple crackheads armed with a shotgun with his .40 while cops came. In between are people in an industrial city who are taking advantage of open carry, arming themselves,taking courses and protecting their own without being hassled for it. I'm not getting any stories about overwhelmed home and business owners. I guess until, the bad guys start getting training on COBRA island, then the world just doesn't need the services of G.I.Joe.
                over and out soldier.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    18. Re:Live there by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree, but find swinging a long barrel around an indoor area cumbersome.
      I think this assault weapons ban will put conveniently sized shotguns out of reach.
      I never got around to getting an 870.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    19. Re:Live there by crutchy · · Score: 1

      just don't let the queen criminal on your space ship

      better make sure you have robot lifting machines available just in case, along with a handy repertoire of comebacks should the queen criminal stow aboard ...erm...hang on a minute

    20. Re:Live there by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as the mafia, and we'll rub out anyone who says there is.

  7. Synology Surveillance Station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Never used the feature myself, but I do own an old DS-207 nas box which is rock solid.
    It will send out an email if the attached cameras detect motion.
    Interface with the nas software is pretty user friendly.

    I am sure there are other nas boxes from other companies that have similar features.

    Just figured I'd throw this out there.

  8. "Lifestyle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We know you said,

    They run an extremely lean lifestyle and profit margin, so the solution needs to be almost free.

    but it's pretty clear that you meant,

    They sell wearable handicrafts made from soft-drink tins and yarn, and spend all the money on weed, so don't bother offering any solution that isn't basically free.

    We're all grown-ups here, no need to soft-pedal for Grandma or whatever.

  9. Chinese no-names to the rescue by trdtaylor · · Score: 1

    1. Something like this

    http://www.chinavasion.com/china/wholesale/Surveillance_Security/Security_Gadgets/Motion_Detection_Camera-GSM_Mini_Camera

    2. With another something like this

    http://www.chinavasion.com/china/wholesale/IP_Cameras/Outdoor_IP_Cameras/IP_Security_Camera_720P_HD_Dual_IR_Array/

    It will give you MMS, recording in 720p, and ability to yell at them in korean to get out of your store.

    1. Re:Chinese no-names to the rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with either of these what are you going to record to?

      the ip camera's are the easy part, the recording of say 2MP RTSP streams is the tricky part. Products like zonealarm are fairly arse to be honest and I'm yet to find a cheap DVR that can record RTSP from any random camera for a decent price.

    2. Re:Chinese no-names to the rescue by crutchy · · Score: 1

      at night after you close up shop, roll down a fake shop front that makes the joint look like a dive that nobody would bother taking a second look at let alone going to the trouble of breaking into

    3. Re:Chinese no-names to the rescue by Above · · Score: 2

      I've evaluated a ton of IP cameras, from low end $49 units to high end $2000 PTZ night vision units. In my experience, cameras like the ones you linked to are 100% useless, and a waste of time and money. Why? Imagine quality.

      Security cameras serve three purposes. The deterrence is just the crook being able to see them. A working camera isn't even required for that purpose, and fakes are sold for as cheap as $10. The second purpose is to identify the criminal. For that you need a VERY clear picture. Getting one is tricky during daytime, and requires careful camera placement and relatively unsophisticated criminals. Getting one at night requires a high quality camera, and a high quality IR illuminator. I have yet to see a sub $250 camera that's worth even considering, and really good imagines start in the $500 range. The lowest end line I would recommend are Y-Cam (www.y-cam.com), their Bullet line is acceptable in many outdoor situations, and their Knight line can be ok indoors, at short range. Axis makes plenty of great options, but probably starting in the $800 and up range. The thing to remember though, is even if you get a perfect image of the criminal the police have to be willing to take it, find the person, and prosecute; and 9 times out of 10 you will get nothing back as they have destroyed the merchandise and have no money to pay restitution.

      The third reason? Insurance. Several people have already said on here business insurance is the best option, and do what they recommend. That's true, however they may question your claims, wondering if an intruder really did the damage. Here a camera showing an overview of the shop and the damage the intruder causes inside can be quite valuable in getting insurance to pay out more of the claim. Image quality is not quite as critical, but night vision still is. 1-3 Y-Cam bullets inside should get the job done.

      On the Y-Cam products, here's why I like them. They are solidly made, and have decent sensors and IR illuminators. They all take a MicroSD card and can record locally, meaning no-DVR is required for a basic setup. For an advanced setup, software like SecuritySpy can be used for a central DVR, which combined with the onboard MicroSD means two copies of everything. Destroy the DVR, get images from the camera. Destroy the camera, get images from the DVR. Y-cam and SecuritySpy are both also very DIY friendly companies, designed for SOHO use.

      But, don't rely on cameras. Make the business look like less of a target. Basic low-key security. Have good insurance. Make sure cash and untraceable valuable are in a safe or off premises every night. Cameras don't prevent crime, they just make catching the criminal and getting an insurance payout more likely.

  10. REVO DVR by vinn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I put in a small Revo DVR unit with webcams last year for a small business. It was $800 and I think it was a lot of bang for the buck. It had alarm inputs, whick are simple enough that if you're on a budget you could set up on entryways. The cameras were motion detecters, IR, etc. I definitely recommend it.

    --
    ----- obSig
  11. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they going to run to the shop, guns in hand to fend off the intruders? What is police response time to the area? How long did it take the criminals to clean the place out?

    For deterrent, how about a group of concealed speakers that are triggered by movement inside the store (i.e., broken IR beam across doors and windows, etc.). The speakers play a warning tone at 135dB, a very brief message that it's about to get much louder, and then let it just get louder and louder. Even with hearing protection, I don't think a thief is going to be able to burgle your store while a variety of discordant tones plays at 150dB, increasing to 180dB, then maybe on up to about 220dB. I think at around "louder than a rocket launchpad" even a deaf thief will notice.

    You might end up with a noise complaint though, and if you're in California, you may have to worry about the thief (or thieves) suing you for damaging their hearing.

    1. Re:Why? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If the business is in a high crime area, the police will not respond with any type of expediency.

      In Chicago, they might not even respond at all.

      I suspect that they want to get pictures of the crooks to turn over to the police or to release to the news.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:Why? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      With police like that I doubt pictures of the crooks will help. Especially if they are masked or wearing helmets.

      I wonder how much those anti-theft fog/smoke things cost and cost per release:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK083niNAmY
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOgKti335tQ
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOqECorcOno
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SZeCbARjKM
      There's even a disco light edition ;) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAPw_xbTJzk

      These seem more likely to reduce the amount of stuff stolen than some cameras and alarms. So maybe the insurance company would reduce your premiums if you had such a system installed.

      --
    3. Re:Why? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "I don't think a thief is going to be able to burgle your store while a variety of discordant tones plays at 150dB, increasing to 180dB, then maybe on up to about 220dB. I think at around "louder than a rocket launchpad" even a deaf thief will notice."

      The neighbors will come and kill them. And the speakers. And you.

      But anyway, all these solutions are very fine but not cheap. Also if the perps get in, the damage is done, you'd need new doors, new bars, new locks, new cameras, new loudspeakers etc, a cheap solution looks different.

      You need to find out the reason for the robberies, is it revenge, competitors, racket etc. you won't be able to scare those away.

      If that's not the case, perhaps a cheap sign would do:

      'No cash, no drugs, no jewelry, no electronics, no radio, no TV, nothing to steal here besides a prize doberman, but he won't come cheap, he eats 3 pounds of meat each morning, and right about now he's really hungry and pissed.

      PS. He doesn't take food from strangers, so you have been warned."

    4. Re:Why? by flyneye · · Score: 0

      Lol , the upside to that is; once you have disabled the intruder, he is your little puppy to pwn.
      Dig out his wallet and get his personal info, tie him up and do a little recon. Come back with pictures of his family and residence.
      Go ahead and dig out a set of rose pruners at this point. Take off one knuckle of a pinky and start asking for addresses, phone numbers and names of his friends.
      Take off a few digits to amuse yourself. At this point, he is just a babbling mess and pretty useless. Beat him retarded with a piece of rebar, tattoo thief across his forehead and dump him either back on the sidewalk of his "hood" as a warning or in the E.R. parking lot , dependent on your level of interest in his well being.
      Pat yourself on the back for ruining a criminal career, saving tax dollars and educating yourself on "special interrogation" methods.
      No need to disturb the donut testers.They're busy collecting fines to buy more toys with and have no interest in your special feelings or needs.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:Why? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea.
      I've done high profile contract work for Audio Defense Systems.
      The average person can alternate white and pink noise at those volumes cheaply enough. Use of a timer is a good idea and shut it off after 10 min or so.
      People of means and governments can afford to pump an effective 9 - 11 c.p.s. at 180 dB which has inhumane features to contribute to the nervous system along with hearing damage.
      Do not use around puppy dogs.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Take off one knuckle of a pinky and start asking for addresses, phone numbers and names of his friends.
      Take off a few digits to amuse yourself. At this point, he is just a babbling mess and pretty useless. Beat him retarded with a piece of rebar, tattoo thief across his forehead and dump him either back on the sidewalk of his "hood" as a warning or in the E.R. parking lot , dependent on your level of interest in his well being."

      Nah, a meat hook & catfish pliers are more effective. Remove an inch or two of skin every fifteen minutes. Rent a backhoe to take care of the carcass.

    7. Re:Why? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I think I saw Tim Allen demo that once...

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  12. Almost free? by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They run an extremely lean lifestyle and profit margin, so the solution needs to be almost free.

    Doing nothing has a cost too... possibly more break-ins = more lost profit. There is a potentially high risk cost of doing nothing; depending on what it is, they might be able to budget a lot of money, and the net cost could be zero: assuming the break ins are actually causing damage and hurting their business revenue.

    The idea that you run a business, and you are not willing to spend any money on security is absolutely ridiculous. You should be willing to spend an appropriate amount of money to manage the risk.

    The most important mitigation is probably to have insurance, but again... the premium may increase, the more breakins.

    This may be a matter that a security consulting firm should be hired to look at.

    Hidden cameras with a DVR may be useful to help catch the perps.... however, there is a problem: this is only useful, if responders become aware of the breakin and get there, before the thief can locate the DVR associated with the cameras and destroy it.

    Visible cameras, may be used as a deterrent; however, they are subject to vandalism.

    One of the best deterrents which should not be overlooked is a professionally Monitored security alarm system with External sounders, Internal motion detectors, Door sensors, Glass break detectors, perimeter coverage, and an alarm loop and cellular backup to a central monitoring station, that will dispatch authorities in the event of an alarm.

    1. Re:Almost free? by davester666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Um, this is 100% a waste of money. A monitored security alarm gets rid of nobody but the dumbest B&E'ers. Even if the alarm company is listening, and verifies that a person is physically inside the premises, and phones the cops, the response time is still ridiculous [in downtown Vancouver BC, it was like 20-30 minutes]. And the thieves know it.

      $5 for stickers saying you have a monitored alarm works just as good.

      DVR's need to be fairly good to be able to positively identify somebody, nevermind at night in the dark. And that assumes the police put much effort into looking at it [it usually amounts to the detective on the case looks at the video, and either recognizes the guy or doesn't...end of video]. And does catching the guy make a difference to your business [as in, how fast does the guy have to be caught for him to still have the stuff so you get it back, as once he has passed it along, the likelyhood of ever seeing it again goes WAY down].

      And your insurance rates go up the same amount whether or not the guy gets caught [unless of course, you recover enough stuff to not bother making a claim, which is very rare].

      In general, your best bang for your buck is loss prevention. As in, preventing the stuff from exiting the store prematurely.

      For ground-level shops, try roll-shutters over the windows and doors. As a bonus, they also prevent vandalism like window-smashing.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Almost free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There should always be a light on in the store. It doesn't need to be large. Emergency lighting (required, at least in NJ) will let the cameras record just fine.

    3. Re:Almost free? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      The idea is to make the thief think that breaking in would be a bad idea. If he doesn't make that decision then no amount of fancy sensors will make any difference, he'll just walk in, grab some stuff then walk out admiring all your expensive flashing lights and sirens. He knows the cops won't turn up for half an hour (if at all).

      You'll still have a broken window, broken doors, etc. to clean up next morning.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Almost free? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Get a proper one. [...] The cost is miniscule.

      Moreover, it's a cost which absolutely should have been planned for up front. If you can't afford security, you can't afford to be in business.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Almost free? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      From experience: You put one of the monitors on top of an old VCR with a tape in it in public view. Of course, the VCR is a ruse but they think they got the recording mechanism if they do break in and steal it. The VCR doesn't even have to work.

      Fake cameras with built in motion sensors that pan the camera are also good. They run on 9V batteries and cost about 8 dollars each. Of course, this is in ADDITION to a real security system. It just allows you to have the look of extreme coverage.

      Most crimes are of convenience. If you look like a very difficult target, they will move on to something that looks easier. Usually. Nothing is 100%, nothing is free, but choosing nothing is dumb.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:Almost free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that 140db sirens that go off when the alarm trips. It's going to be pretty hard for a burglar to carry anything out of the business with their hands over their ears.

    7. Re:Almost free? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Um, this is 100% a waste of money. A monitored security alarm gets rid of nobody but the dumbest B&E'ers. Even if the alarm company is listening, and verifies that a person is physically inside the premises

      Same argument that a Firewall or an Antivirus program is a waste of money, because only the dumbest attacks are stopped by it.

      That may be all you need. Remember, the objective isn't to make it impenetrable -- it's to make it less attractive than other potential targets; thus reducing the incentive to break-in: increase the risk to break in, increase the cost and energy to break in (stronger physical barriers), make the intrusion require more time (more physical barriers that all have to be defeated; parking lot bollards; fences; gates locked up at night; window bars, high-security shutters, window and door coverings), increase the risk of detection (security lighting; cameras both visible and hidden -- both inside and outside -- both color and night-vision, be sure to get pictures of front and rear of any vehicle coming in or out, alarms, sirens, strobes, proximity sensors).

      A 30 minute police response, plus some video evidence; showing pictures of the potential offender will likely give them some pause.

      And if the issue is occuring frequently, you can contract a private guard, or private police responder; to monitor the alarm, and seek to provide a more timely response.

      It would be even better to be friends with some of the local police officers patrolling that area, and also ask them for some suggestions...

  13. Don't bother. by FireballX301 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy business insurance, do what the insurance adjuster wants you to do, and don't do anything more.

    If you don't have or can't afford business insurance, then you should question whether your business is viable or not, especially if a poorly timed robbery can put you under.

    1. Re:Don't bother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy business insurance, do what the insurance adjuster wants you to do, and don't do anything more.

      This. Hacking together some "security system" won't do shit for you. Even if you manage to get some clear video, even if you manage to get the police to look at it, even if you avoid having some half-asleep public defender obliterate you in court because you can't actually prove the timestamp on the video is accurate, even if you manage to get a conviction...how the fuck does help your friends? They still need to take that conviction and use it as leverage in a civil case against the perp, and even if they get a judgement....there is no cash register at the court house! Your friends aren't going to see a dime from some broke-ass criminal deadbeat.

      This is what insurance is for...to insure assets against risk and let you move on with life.

  14. Sunology Surveillance Station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A free downloadable software package for Synology NAS units. I believe that if you use more than one camera there is a license for each additional one. Does support motion sensing, email/text/Skype alerts. http://www.synology.com/dsm/dsm_app.php?lang=us

    1. Re:Sunology Surveillance Station by crutchy · · Score: 1

      a simple sign on the door at night will do the trick: "WARNING: ANTI-PERSONNEL MINE TESTING FACILITY"

  15. Chloroform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get some chloroform or other substance that can knock someone out, and tie it into your motion detection system. If anyone breaks in they'll be knocked unconscious and you can get the police in to arrest them. Or, since it's unlikely the burglars let anyone know what they were doing, nobody will miss them...

    1. Re:Chloroform by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember: Anesthesiology pays relatively well because knocking people out is easy; but knocking them out such that you can wake them back up is hard.

      Also, murder charges are a real hassle, and even jurisdictions that allow you to shot people for little more than trespassing tend to frown on lethal traps...

    2. Re:Chloroform by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      As one business owner in my hometown did, paint the phrase "GUARD DOG WILL KILL" on the walls. I don't even know if he had a dog, but it worked...

    3. Re:Chloroform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Murder charges? No. "Vandals broke into shop, smashed bottles containing chloroform/chlorine/poison gas. Got what they deserved..."

      Your homebuilt alarm should seem to merely trigger a loud klaxxon. But it also makes the chloroform bottle fall to the floor - in a non-obvious way. The shop has been vandalized before, of course the perps were smashing up stuff.

      Setting a trap might be illegal, but the law usually don't demand that the shop be "safe" when closed. So you can have shelves designed to fall over and crush, you can have a cellar trap door that is not secured at night, you can have all sorts of dangerous chemicals that might spill. There could be an electrical fault - touch the metal shelf and you're dead. (Turn off/secure "traps" when the shop is open - obviously)

      Other kinds of traps could be in the stuff they might steal - a poisoned bottle of booze, something that looks like dope but kills, and so on.

  16. email is not a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    email can get hung up for a variety of reasons and take hours or days.

  17. webcamd on UNIX by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi, what you need is webcamd for a low powered machine with a cheap USB webcam (best to check the chipset compatibility before buying, just in case).

    There'll be a bit of manual page reading, setting the motion detection thresholds and areas, configuring it to start on boot, archive/FTP images taken, add timestamps to the images, etc, and writing the scripts that will get run when motion is detected, but it'll be cheap, customizable and it'll work.

    I've used this setup in a local maritime simulator where there was a breakin attempt (lots of projectors and electronics naturally), and they wanted a bit of extra security on the cheap.

    HTH,

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    1. Re:webcamd on UNIX by houghi · · Score: 1

      As we can see from various videos online, having a webcam is not a good enough solution to stop these people.
      First I would go for a high quality image that does not show grainy images. The reason for grainy images often is lightening,
      Second I would go for a low eye-level camera, so it looks people in the face. With the prices of HDs, I would not go for motion detectors. Just let the thing run 24/7.
      Also go for multiple camera's. One at the checkout, one at the entrance and one at the exit on eye level. One that shows an overview of the whole store if 1 camera can see everything.

      Think about archiving. Do you really want to keep the images of last month if nothing has happened? Also think about privacy. There might or might not be laws, but even then it would be good to think about privacy. e.g. inform staff if there is any. Perhaps not needed by law where you are, but still nice to tell them what exists and why it exists. Do NOT use it to spy on your staff, unless you are an asshole.

      In some countries it is forbidden to have camera's pointed at certain parts of a business if it means that you invade too much of their privacy. So no camera in the lunchroom or directly pointed at a desk.

      See that if they use passwords that the keyboard is not visible.
      In any case, look if there are any laws concerning this. It is stupid to let people who were arrested go free because you did something that was in the law and they found that loophole.

      Do understand that camera's will no stop people braking and entering. Use the motion detectors to start making a LOT of sound and light. The extra light is good to get good images.

      yet be sure to have good camera's that have good night video as well.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  18. Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by wonkavader · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This does nothing. But it completely stops break-ins and it's cheap.

    https://spygear4u.com/ds_proddetail.asp?prod=GS-LS-131

    Watch the videos you can find of it around. It's very scary. Does nothing, of course, but it's VERY scary. And that will keep your family's store safe.

    1. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, that should scare off the unsophisticated average thief. Smooth.

    2. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Bruce Schneier has pointed out another similar device: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/08/200_for_a_fake.html

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    3. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's all fun and games until your cat dies of exhaustion.

    4. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This needs a frikkin' shark on its head.

      Lazers with frikkin' sharks on their head. Awesome, simply awesome.

    5. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce Schneier has pointed out [...]

      Isn't this security through obscurity?

    6. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well plagiarized.

    7. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the more well known it becomes the less effective it will be. The same thing happened with fake car alarms that were nothing more than a flashing red LED.

      It would probably work better if the questioner made his own, so that it didn't follow the well known pattern that the commercial version produces. Shouldn't be too hard to expensive if he knows how to use an Arduino. It's just a laser pointer and a couple of spinning mirrors, and in fact could probably be adapted from one of those cheap "laser show" things crap DJs use.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  19. Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't say where you are, in some jurisdictions you must be certified to install security solutions for commercial premises/purposes and it must be to code.

    1. Re:Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've seen in Texas, you only need a permit if you're installing an alarm that calls the police. If it doesn't call the cops, you can do whatever you want (apart from booby traps).

  20. IP camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our shop is low margin also. I installed an IP camera with a battery backup that feeds a netbook that records the camera feed and save it for ten days. The cost is cheap and it will help cops catch the purp. A couple of dummy camera along with one real one will scare off just about any crook.

    1. Re:IP camera by mveloso · · Score: 1

      Get a Foscom Wireless IP Camera. It'll email you a picture if something triggers motion detection. Pretty handy.

      Might want to get something that turns on the lights, too, so the camera can get a good look at whomever.

  21. That is seriously good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that device is an absolute cack
    which will most likely work simply due to the unknown risk factor
    back it up with some visible security cameras to cover key areas and back those up with hidden cameras, make sure you've got a UPS and internet backup on the files and you should be all good

  22. Monitored Alarm System by rhook · · Score: 2

    If they cannot afford the less than $100/month for this service they're not going to be in business long since they obviously aren't turning a profit.

  23. Go with a professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a monitored alarm put in.

    Even if you managed to cobble something together and if gave you beautiful pictures of the perp it would still be too late. Chances are you wouldn't be able to alert the cops fast enough to get them to stop the guy and the damage to the property and the stolen goods are not likely to be recovered. In contrast a professional system would be up there and visible (bell boxes on walls, stickers in windows etc) AND there is a chance that ADT calling the cops might get a patrol car there fast enough to catch the guy.

    Putting someone in jail doesn't fix busted doors and windows. A deterrent that makes someone look for easier pickings might prevent property damage.

  24. Here's A Solution by idealego · · Score: 1

    Here's what they need:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnH95uzQPOo
    It's both cheap and effective (apparently).

  25. My alarm system by slashmydots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At my repair shop, I have a $1 contact-break alarm system on my back door. As soon as it goes off, 100 dB alarm in your face and it's rather difficult to disable without knowing how it works. Not many people would say "well, that alarm is blasting but let's keep robbing it." They just run.

    I can't believe modern people are still stupider than medieval people. This is pure castle theory. You don't build tons and tons and tons of defense like walls and locks and moats and then just leave it. Persistent threats will find a way in. What did rich people and kings do? Set traps. Make it look somewhat secure but then oops, you stepped on the wrong rock. Now there's spikes in your face. Or you pick a lock on the treasure chest and it released poison gas because the treasure chest is actually backwards and the real lock is on the back.

    Bars on the windows are nothing. They'll just bring a crow bar. The "low hanging fruit" theory about which stores get robbed do not apply here. But add traps aka window break alarms and make sure the "Protected by alarms" and red blinking lights are showing and a thief would have no idea what trap they're about to fall into and would stay away.

    1. Re:My alarm system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandmother has a home-made alarm a friend built for her attached to her back gate. Open the gate and it make a lot of noise. Close the gate and the noise turns off. There is a switch inside the house to disable it (so you can use the gate).

      One of the neighbours reported a suspicious person stalking around (she had a wooded area next door) and when the cop opened the gate to see if he was hiding in her back yard it scared HIM so bad he left the gate open and quickly left. The trusted neighbours (who know how the alarm works and watch the house for her when she's gone) got a good laugh out of it :)

    2. Re:My alarm system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A friend had a remote shop (sop easy to break in without detection and difficult to respond to quickly) which he wired with a simple intrusion alarm system, but also included a fog machine like the kind you buy at Halloween. When the alam is tripped the sirens beging and the lights are switched off and the fog macine starts and the thief assumes he started a fire and leaves. It's worked twice so far with no loss of property, just replacing the busted door.

    3. Re:My alarm system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bars on the windows are nothing. They'll just bring a crow bar.

      And as they bend the bars apart, they're on fire because the bars carry 3000 volts at night . . .

      You may actaully want to have thin, weak-looking bars encouraging this type of break-in.

    4. Re:My alarm system by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      What did rich people and kings do? Set traps.

      In rare and unusual cases, yes. The vast majority of the time they relied and locks and guards just like we did today. Back in medieval times, most of their wealth generally wasn't in coins or other easily portable means anyhow... You should get less of your history from TV or the DM's guide.

    5. Re:My alarm system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most modern people live under a system of laws that provide serious consequences for setting booby traps. Good luck with yours.

    6. Re:My alarm system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not many people would say "well, that alarm is blasting but let's keep robbing it." They just run.

      You would be surprised. They know they have approx 15 minutes until the cops arrive. That gives them 10 minutes to smash and grab and get the hell out. You may have reduced your exposure, but don't delude yourself into thinking you eliminated it.

    7. Re:My alarm system by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      At my repair shop, I have a $1 contact-break alarm system on my back door. As soon as it goes off, 100 dB alarm in your face and it's rather difficult to disable without knowing how it works. Not many people would say "well, that alarm is blasting but let's keep robbing it." They just run. I can't believe modern people are still stupider than medieval people. This is pure castle theory. You don't build tons and tons and tons of defense like walls and locks and moats and then just leave it. Persistent threats will find a way in. What did rich people and kings do? Set traps. Make it look somewhat secure but then oops, you stepped on the wrong rock. Now there's spikes in your face. Or you pick a lock on the treasure chest and it released poison gas because the treasure chest is actually backwards and the real lock is on the back. Bars on the windows are nothing. They'll just bring a crow bar. The "low hanging fruit" theory about which stores get robbed do not apply here. But add traps aka window break alarms and make sure the "Protected by alarms" and red blinking lights are showing and a thief would have no idea what trap they're about to fall into and would stay away.

      All that is cool and James Bond-y, but if it's an inside job and they know police response times, your "traps", etc. it's all for naught. Determine the cause/source of the crimes and THEN apply your silly castle theory. Also, local laws might prevent you from making "traps", so checking with a police officer first would be a good idea. Don't want your security theatre turning into a lawsuit against you because you maimed a burglar.

    8. Re:My alarm system by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      For excellent advice on security contact an insurer, and get them to insure against theft at the same time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:My alarm system by PPH · · Score: 1

      False alarm charges? In my town, one needs a permit for an alarm system. And there is a charge for police responses to false alarms over some threshold.

      Thief pops the lock on your back door and runs when the siren goes off. Neighbors call the cops. After this happens a few times and you start paying for the calls, you disable the alarm. Next time the thief breaks in, no alarm. Profit!

      A monitor system will allow you to see the source of the 'alarm'. You can then select one or more options: 1) Call the cops. 2) Trigger the siren from your cell phone or other mobile device. 3) Have a record of the intruder's identity and possibly handle the situation yourself*.

      *Some years ago, I scared off a guy hiding in my hedge who had his pants down around his ankles and was using the cover to watch my neighbors teenage daughters. When I called the cops the officer that arrived started asking leading questions about the perp's identity as if he already knew who he was (correcting a few inaccuracies in my description). Once he determined that I did not have a good enough look at the guy to make a positive ID, he was relieved. Like he was covering for a buddy. Now I have a few cameras up and the next time, I'll just post the videos to YouTube and ask for a crowd-sourced identification. I may live withing spitting distance of Bill Gates, but they could cast Deliverance in this town.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  26. Stop being stupid by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
    Know your limits. You don't know anything about security so leave it to experts. All your ideas will not prevent any thefts. Get insurance, maybe hidef cameras to record intruders and leave the rest to police. If they're doing illegal things, well, then go to hell.

    Seriously, how is anybody supposed to know how their system is deficient or how to prevent further break.ins without knowing the merchandise which is attracting robbers and how their system was compromised?

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    1. Re:Stop being stupid by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Little hint about cameras. Keep the ceiling ones for large coverage, but keep a few about 4 feet off the ground facing the entrance to catch good face shots of people coming in. Should be fairly easy to hide inside a display or counter. I remember hearing about a bunch of thugs that destroyed the window display of a camera shop. Turned out the owner always left 2 or 3 of the display cameras recording (wired to a remote recorder) at night and got REALLY good shots of their faces!

  27. Here's the solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get this: http://www.axis.com/products/m10_series/video/index.htm

  28. If you're not going to do it right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... then just completely halfass it. Don't bother putting any real equipment in.

    Just head over to ebay and buy some ADT window decals and someone's old busted keypad to hang on the wall. Get one that just has LEDs, not a screen, and wire up some batteries to light the Power and Ready lights.

    That will be more of a deterrent than some half-baked cobbled-up do it yourself system.

    That said, if it's really something they're concerned about, they should just get a real security system installed and monitored. It's not that expensive - getting the hardware put in can add up, but if all you need is a couple of doors and a glass break detector, it's not too bad - and the monitoring for a small business won't be that much. And having a real, properly installed, permit on file alarm system will generally get you a discount on insurance.

    Alarm systems won't keep a place from being broken into, and they won't get the police there fast enough to catch someone when it is, in general. But I do strongly recommend having one because you can get a monitored smoke detector and THAT can be a big help getting the fire department there fast enough to do something.

  29. Seriously, get a safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Breaking crews are highly specialized, know how to enter almost any place and ransack it for valuables in impressively short time.

    Get a safe, preferably something hard-installed or bulky and impossible to carry - this will protect what's in the safe reliably (think: irreplaceables), as it cannot be opened in the timeframe of a typical robbery or carried off.

    Other than that, back up all your business data twice in the evening, one onto an encrypted hard drive that goes into the safe, one that goes home with you.

    For anything replaceable: Get insured.

    Oh, and if you have really valuable inventory and are running on low margin, get out of the business you are in.

  30. The Source has a convincing camera dome by kawabago · · Score: 1

    It has a battery and a blinking LED so it looks like a camera is operating. I installed it in the alley and it stopped strangers driving down the alley. I have to change the battery every six months.

  31. Try the Open Source Ninja Block for security by schappim · · Score: 1

    Given you put Arduino like options on the table you should checkout the Open Source Ninja Block ( http://ninjablocks.com/products/ninja-blocks-kit ). The Ninja Block (with it's free cloud service) lets you create rules that use it's sensors to send you alerts (via SMS/Email/Social Network etc). For example "if motion is detected, send an SMS". Included in the kit is a Motion Sensor and door/window contact sensor. You can get more sensors off the Ninja Blocks website. The Ninja Blocks community seems to also be growing strong: http://forums.ninjablocks.com/ If you want to tinker more, inside the Ninja Block is an Arduino compatible uC and an embedded Linux computer running Ubuntu.

    1. Re:Try the Open Source Ninja Block for security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just get a ninja?

  32. Get a dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A large mean-looking guard dog would be the best and most cost-effective measure. Especially if they could train it to dial 911.

  33. Security should be "in depth" by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm seeing a lot of partial solutions here. Both in what has been done, and in what is being proposed. The first thing you should be doing though has been mentioned, and that's talk with your insurance adjuster. At the very least you can find out what your liabilities are for various security measures, and possibly what measures will reduce your insurance rates.

    Start by looking at what a thief is going to see as they look at how to enter the property. You may find the TV series from a few years back "it takes a thief" (or something like that) helpful in looking at the entire place for security problems. The doors and windows may be barred, but is it possible to gain access through the floor, or ceiling? Even a good barred door may be a problem if it's sheltered in such a way that you can't see if someone is working on the lock.

    Part of that should also be looking at what you can do to improve deterrence. Signs, visible (if non-functional) alarm panels, even a steadily blinking light next to a sign labeled 'Alarm System' can be a deterrent.

    And finally look for ways to monitor the approaches to the property both front and back, and if the building is stand alone, all around the building. You may want to use PIR along with IR Lighting to capture movement around the building.

    If you are presuming that someone will break in after you've identified (and hopefully fixed) the issues from outside, then you're to the detect and defend internal options. High resolution cameras, covering the access points. Motion detection, door and window open sensors, glass break detectors, etc. These are intended to generate alerts and set up a means to capture what information you can about the thief. Tip, mark the door frame on either side of likely entrances with contrasting tape to form a crude (half foot or 20 cm increment) tape measure to give you a quick estimate of how tall someone passing by the entrance is.

    Obviously you will need to decide for yourself how critical it is to secure different parts of your store. High value gem dealers usually place their entire stock in a vault of some sort overnight. If you know what the reason is behind the break-ins in the area (paying for drugs being common) you may be able to protect high value items by making it easier to steel a few low value items that you are less concerned about loosing.

    Understand what the thief is working with. Unless you've been cased for a professional theft, in which case you're insurance carrier may have other suggestions for you, Most thefts are a snatch and grab variety, the thief is looking to get in, get something and get out. Be gone before the cops show up. If you know the cops will be there within 20 min, (talk with other businesses in the area that have experienced break-ins to find out if that estimate is even in the balpark) then you know how hard you have to make it for a thief to get at the valuables.

    Also set policies (and follow them) for how to deal with elements of the store that are critical for operating. Assume that a thief can get the cash register, all cash within the store, and possibly your computers in the store. Does someone have a spare cash register, and operating cash for the day that they can bring in at the start of the day if you need to get going while making repairs? Is there sufficient spare stock in an off-site storage to get up and running the next business day, or are you going to be waiting a week for your suppliers to restock? Is the customer information on your systems at work in a secure system? Do you have off site backups of your inventory and books? Have you a policy of depositing all cash over and above what you absolutely have to have for daily operations on a nightly basis? Do you have multiple known locations where you can make those deposits so that if construction makes your usual after hours depository unavailable you can still make your deposit. Have you tested your off site backup solution to confirm that if your systems up and left, or a vandal cam in and drove a pick-ax

    --
    You never know...
  34. A perspective: if you get an alert, it is too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The alert is after-the-fact, of course. And did the local police tell you what their (hopefully, substantiated) response time is???

    Is it two minutes, twenty minutes or do they decline to say?

    I have tripped alarms while working late and sat there waiting for the authorities while a loud horn blasted the neighborhood. No one came. The police later confirmed that they cannot cover everything. I guess so.

    I have purchased fake or dummy surveillance cameras. The flashing light gets their attention. They are on line and cheap. They use a battery, so no wiring is needed. Just one more deterrent, something to make them think twice, hopefully.

  35. Use a fire suppression system like this by Meski · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaseous_fire_suppression And trigger it with the burglar alarm entry system. :)

    1. Re:Use a fire suppression system like this by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Wire the burglar alarm to the fire alarm - the fire crews respond much faster than the cops...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Use a fire suppression system like this by Meski · · Score: 1

      And sadly, after the recent incident in NY, they are likely to turn up armed. (I'm not saying that like its a bad thing, but sad that it's necessary)

  36. Low-tech solution: Hobo with a shotgun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No really, it works!

  37. Never mind the dog... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    A simple sign with "Nevermind the dog, beware of the rattle snakes" should do it.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  38. I have the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A non working Iphone attached to a pound of black powder and a pound of 16 penny nails.
    When they pick up the phone boom no more problem.

  39. Is your time free? by houghi · · Score: 2

    Are you working for free? That means that you are paying for their security. Great if you are willing to do that, but it also means that if you are out of town on a holiday with no cell reception and there is an issue, who are they going to call?

    And although this might be a fun project to work on, this is their livelihood you are experimenting with. And it is experimenting. Otherwise you would not ask the questions.

    tell them this before that you will do a best effort, but that there are no guarantees that things either break down or that things do not go as you imagined they would happen. People are not recognizable because the camera was too high and not enough light in the place where the thief was. Too much light. Too low, so the staff filed a complaint about privacy invasion.

    What happens if the internet connection is out? What if the power is out? What if the phone dies? What if the phone company kills the number, because they forgot to pay for the next installment in 5 years time?

    The first thing you need to figure out why they broke into that store and not the one next door. Then you can start looking for ways to not want them to break in. Security camera's don't do anything and neither do motion detectors, unless they contact a security company.

    The cheapest way to help them is to tell them to contact an expert who knows not only the technical stuff, but the rest as well. Where to put the camera's. Then propose them that you are there to ask all the technical questions to see if he knows what he is talking about and if you find any loopholes.

    That way they can contact another small business owner and help the community as well as defend themselves. That person will be able what the advantages and disadvantages are, because of his experience.

    Sure, not free, but cheaper then having not thought of one thing and closing the business because of it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Is your time free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good post. I wanted to add something along similar lines.

      If you are doing the security work and something messes up, doesn't quite work, or your friends feel that your solution actually did nothing to solve the problem, you could be held partially liable for damages.

      It doesn't matter if you're an amateur just helping out a friend and you've explicitly told them you're not a pro. It doesn't matter if you think there is any implicit understanding between you and them, nor does it matter if they only spend $50 and you did all you could with that amount. If your friends rely on you and your advice to their detriment, you will have a case to answer if they decide to pursue it.

      Leave it to the pros, or at the very least, the people who have liability insurance to cover such a lawsuit. Offering advice in this situation is exposing you to liability which you have no reason to incur since you aren't being compensated for the risk you are taking.

      In the same spirit, this is opinion only and is not legal advice. You should consult a lawyer if you're unsure as to your liability under these circumstances. :)

  40. Deterrence, but not monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://laughingsquid.com/laserscan-a-fake-laser-security-system-for-fooling-thieves/

    Link says it all. Sometimes all it takes is to make people think you've got a better security system, and an LED laser, a few rotating mirrors, and a keypad will dissuade a would-be thief from breaking in. Of course, it works better with a real monitored alarm, but getting people to not break in to begin with saves you money.

  41. What about insurance? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Often your insurance will demand certain CERTIFIED minimum requirements with your insurance premium going down the more you meet their requirements.

    And those requirements don't have to make sense or be best practice but they are the difference between your insurance company paying out and not paying out.

    If requirements made sense, we would LONG since have had HD camera's recording to HD's rather then very very very poor camera's recording to low quality tape. But your own 4k mug shot and tricorder scan of the perps DNA and entire social history will see your insurance claim thrown out with a scornful laugh while a certified wobbly 320x200 etcha sketch will get you fully re-imbursed.

    So: First check with your insurance company.

    Next: Crime prevention is about denying criminals what they want:

    1 Fast

    2 Easy

    3 Cheap

    4 Low risk

    5 Money

    So do stop criminals make their crime be

    1 Slow

    2 Hard

    3 Expensive

    4 High risk

    5 Non paying.

    Your shop needs a door and to be inviting it needs to be airy and this is done by making it out of glass. But a glass door is easily shattered. A wooden door with two large glass panes separated by a wood bar in the middle is ALMOST as inviting but now the burglar either needs to remove the door, open it or climb in through ONE of the smashed panels. This is slower. He will still get in but be able to steal less in the same amount of time. This makes it less profitable.

    Shutter I mean one of those rollup "fences" that drop out ofthe celing, no idea what their english name is.

    One thing you could do for instance is leave your display window open but install a shutter inside the store itself as an additional barrier to overcome. Barely visible during the day, at night an extra barrier. Many people place them infront of doors but this just requires you to lift the shutter, then bust in the doors that tend to open inwards.

    Place an electrically lowered shutter BEHIND inwards opening doors, how do you open that one without a key? You can't push the doors in because the shutter is blocking that and you can't lift the shutter because the doors are in the way. Remember, theft prevention is like preventing being eaten by a lion, you don't need to be able to outrun the lion, you just need to outrun your neighbor.

    Hard is similar to slow of course in that you make the burglars work just that little bit harder. Just one more lock, just one more barrier to overcome. One thing we as consumers hate is those plastic wraps around products but they have a simple reason. They are very large meaning it is hard to conceal for shop lifters or at least conceal as many. And they are hard to open to make it hard to open them and take their contents. We know this works because well, we all bitch about how hard they are to open. Most of the large plastic containers are pure theft prevention and contain a fully serviciable selling/display package inside for shops that don't need to fear shoplifters.

    Do you NEED to store all your most valuable products in handy to carry containers right near the entrance to the warehouse? Or could you place your most expensive products on the highest shelf in the furthest corners? And lock up the ladder? And add some barbed wire to the shelves for those trying to climb it?

    Think of shoe stores, if they are smart, they one have either the left or right shoe on display. Putting both the right and left shoe in the same size outside is asking for it but how many shoe thieves are interested in only left side shoes? I don't know if this was purely accidental but I did once notice that all the shoe shops in one area all had only the left shoes on display.

    Expensive might be a little less clear but while you might think that a prepared thief can cut through any chain in any case you might as well get the cheapest available, the simple fact is that not all locks/chains etc are the same. And the better ones require mo

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:What about insurance? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      inwards opening doors

      Around here, doors on commercial buildings open outward. Something about making it easier to escape a burning building.

    2. Re:What about insurance? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Doors indeed should open in the escape direction - people have lost their lives for not being able to open the door due to pressure from the crowd behind them.

      Yet in malls many shop doors open to the inside of the shop units: then at least you don't have the doors sticking out in the hallways, but nicely out of the way in the shop. And those doors are usually open all the time when the shop is opened. Also usually not that many people in an individual small shop at one time.

  42. Zoneminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this place still slashdot of late? Its loosing its mojo. Zoneminder for chrissakes. With the pictures being uploaded to a remote server at intervals to stop them trashing the setup. This is 101

    1. Re:Zoneminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Slashdot hasn't changed. It's still too much to ask to read the story.

  43. Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much damage was there? How often is the alarm system expected to prevent such damage? What's the allowed upkeep? What impact does an alarm system have on insurance? How soon is the alarm system supposed to pay for itself?

    Once you've answered all those questions... Define "inexpensive".

  44. Just watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  45. Pay for a Central Station by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

    Don't have the alarm call or text you. That's a waste of valuable time. You're just going to call the cops anyway. And what happens if you're asleep, in a movie, flying, etc? More time wasted. Your job is not to wait for the call or text from your security system letting you know that an alarm has been triggered. Given that you've had break-ins before, I'd say you would drive yourself crazy making sure you're accessible 100% of the time in case a message came in.

    Monthly central station service is the price of a couple pizzas.

    Small price to pay for the peace of mind you get having someone ready to get the police there on a moment's notice anytime of the day or night.

    1. Re:Pay for a Central Station by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Small price to pay for the peace of mind you get having someone ready to get the police there on a moment's notice anytime of the day or night.

      Small mind if you think the police will be there on a moment's notice any time, day or night. It can take them an hour to respond to a theft call and thirty minutes is not unusual. You need a monitoring company with its own responders.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  46. Frikken Lasers! by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

    Point some laser pointers at mirrors attached to a servo motor and make it look like there's a crazy cool scanning laser security system!!

    --
    Unexpect the expected!
    1. Re:Frikken Lasers! by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

      Just have some of this audio hooked up to a proximity sensor: Lion Sound Effects

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    2. Re:Frikken Lasers! by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

      Ooh ooh and a smoke machine, with a recording of sexy female voice that says "Releasing sleeping gas now, please remain calm and await police response"

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
  47. Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want a serious crime *deterrent* that's all but free and you want it to work well enough to make people stop stealing from you out of the goodness of their heart or because they're physically unable to.

    Simple and straight truth: what are you smoking?

    If you want results from something you have to spend the money on it.

  48. Uuh, hello? IP cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't any of you heard of IP cameras?
    Why are idiots on here suggesting using a "webcam with a low powered PC"? Duh.

    IP CAMERAS, on the outside of the building too, high up enough to be unnoticeable by potential thieves, (say 8 feet off the ground), and also inside near to the entrance, at head height, set up to auto e-mail you photos of the perps when any motion is detected.

    Plus sturdier bars - I'd like to see the second set of 'security' they broke through. Why not set up a vibration detector on the bars/metal security (whatever it is), so that as soon as somebody starts trying to attack it, it will set off an alarm?

  49. dog guard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a nice big dog

  50. simple by crutchy · · Score: 1

    call homeland security and tell them that terrorists broke in

    they will be all over it like flies on shit

    just don't expect to do much business... everyone that walks into the store will have to be anally probed and interrogated, and there is a good chance every 3rd one will be sent to guantanamo bay on suspicion without charge... especially kids cos they are a real security risk (just ask the TSA)

  51. Brute Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cold bitter truth is that you can't outsmart a stupid criminal. It doesn't matter how many alarms you have if they ignore them, or if they're on video after the damage is done. Video monitoring helps convict a criminal after the fact, in the off chance they're caught, and alarms might scare off a less determined criminal, but if they got past bars on windows, then I can only say that the defenses just waren't strong enough. Bars need to be bolted in more deeply, door need to be solidly mounted and reinforced, door frames and molding need to be reinforced and bolted firmly to the building's structural supports (or better yet replace wooden door frames with metal reinforced security doors), and given criminals will go as far as to ram a car through a display window, you'd better make it impossible to reach the storefront with a vehicle. Even a monitored system is only going to have police arrive in time to do the paperwork.

    Given that with unlimited time a burglar can compromise any system, your best bet is to harden defenses enough to slow down a thief. A smash and grab means that thieves will usually ignore the more difficult targets. Any safes need to be firmly bolted down to the building's structural supports, and if there is no safe there needs to be one. If you do set up a DVR security system the DVR box needs to be hidden (i'd suggest in attic or basement space if possible, or otherwise also in a separate bolted down safe. Noise making alarms may attract help or at least cause the burglars to get in a hurry and reduce the time they have.

    your options aren't free, they aren't even close to free, but you can trade off labor for money in installation and setup at least. If you truly want to stop a robbery cold though, an armed guard is about the only thing that's going to do it.

  52. How can Chinese no-names yell in Korean?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Please excuse me for being dense ...

    How can Chinese no-name gadgets yell in Korean ?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  53. Notification only? no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notification is secondary. Really...it's like a rape victim having a play-by-play announcer during the act if all you get to do is watch a real time video of the robbery.

    Dog is good.
    Smoke bombs are good, choke them out.
    If smoke is too damaging to smell, an intense aerosol mist of peppermint or cinnamon extracts might make someone evacuate, yet leave a pleasant aroma in the morning.
    Blaring alarm is good, best if it's well beyond the pain threshold.
    Make it a horrible place to be.

    A cute story, paraphrased from the annals of the skunk works: the most secure documents were kept in a "janitor's closet", with a hardware store padlock. A bunch of unimportant drivel was locked in a conspicuous and expensive nearby safe.

    So...keep a cheap portable safe by the register. Put a lojac type device on it. Surprise, you just strained your back stealing a tracking device!

    1. Re:Notification only? no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er...should be obvious, but the safe is empty.

  54. Re:Bruce Schneier has pointed out another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's actually the same device.

  55. No, no. Fill it with sand! by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Or rocks. Or bricks.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  56. Inhuman solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a motion-activated vandalism-proof boom box set to loop Justin Bieber 'music'.

  57. Alert delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having an e-mail or text/SMS as the way to alert might not be as good as you think, as you are relying on others to actually sent it, with no confirmation that it have reached the recipient in time.
    Mail can bounce, and you will not know about it until a couple of days later...
    Texts/SMS is'n bulletproof either - shure they mostley are delivered in a timley matter, but some get lost and others delayed.

    So here is my suggestion:
    Have a dialup connected to the alarm so it can leave a voice message, if the first number is busy, it can try a whole list of them... if no one responds, instant confirmation and it can move on to the next one.
    Whether you want to buy a dialup or build it yourself, maybe from an old computer and asterisk or such - i leave that to you ;-)

  58. Private security? by ergean · · Score: 1

    I don't know how is in US, but in Romania there are security companies that provide 24/7 monitoring for as little as 40$ a month with a contract that guaranties a 7 minutes response, if you want lower you pay more. They include motion sensors & means to connect directly to their teams to alert the closest one. I own a small business and had no problems until now. But they usually call me if they see an unusual pattern - like opening at night or if I forget to set the motion sensors on after a certain hour. They even provide you with a panic button.

    Is there anything like that for small business in US?

  59. Re:No, no. Fill it with sand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a large pull-activated firecracker, set to go off when the safe is opened.

  60. Green Laser Dazzler by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Not exactly cheap, but one step up from the fake laser light show devices. http://www.freaklasers.com/laser-dazzlers-300mw-600mw.html

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  61. Re:Go ballistic on them by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    A cow fence could be a good idea, but it is easily defeated by anyone slightly more intelligent than a cow. A green laser dazzler and a sound bomb might be better. Anyhow, a combination of a cow fence, dazzler, sound bomb, smoke and bear spray, may be a useful deterrent...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  62. Forget cameras by masonc · · Score: 1

    I install cameras for customers, and I would advise you to forget CCTV as a way to stop break-ins. I get a lot of prospective customers who want cameras to deter intruders and advise them the same way. Good camera systems, which pretty much leaves out video, is useful to catch shoplifters, light fingered employees, improper use of resources, and reduce liability in the event of an accident and law suit. If you want to stop intrusion, secure the property (if they got through bars, you need better bars), and have a professional company install an alarm with central monitoring and security staff.
    Getting a picture of an intruder is useless. Getting a picture of an intruder wearing sunglasses is even more useless.

    An Alarm with glass break, lights, loud siren and guards on the way ought to stop them. If it doesn't, move.

    --
    CM www.cometenergysystems.com Blog: http://caribbeanrenewable.blogspot.com/
  63. get the ED-209 by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

    the ED-209 is still on ebay! you only need to animate it, rig it to the security system and have it use quotes from the movies... and you got a great deterrent! if it doesn't work, get a targeting system and a couple pistols rigged in ^_^

  64. Re:Go ballistic on them by solidraven · · Score: 1

    Well yeah, what I made was a bit more powerful than what you'd use for a cow fence..

  65. Dawg: Lo-tec is sometimes best by RedLeg · · Score: 1
    Get the store a dawg. It needs to be a medium to large but friendly breed with a loud bark.

    The key is, the store is his home. His people (the owners) come to visit him and spend time with him there every day. He gets lots of visitors who he can greet (customers).

    End of the business day, his people leave him a small amount of food, plenty of fresh water, and a nice place to sleep, as well as run of the store.

    Post signs. Dawgs protect their territory, which is why it needs to be HIS store (his home), not a bring to work dawg.

    Caveat Emptor: check with the liability insurance carrier up front.

    Red

  66. Relatively simple by wganz · · Score: 1

    It is called a 'shotgun sleepover'. Call your redneck friends over. Promise a case of beer per burglar.

  67. Re:Go ballistic on them by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    Be happy that you're still around posting the results here, instead of sitting in jail for murder.

  68. Re:Go ballistic on them by solidraven · · Score: 1

    Nah it wasn't powerful enough to kill somebody, made sure of that. Never sufficient charge in the circuit for a fatal current combined with very high frequency discharge. Just hurts very badly. Additionally thieves aren't human, they're sub-human scum that deserves to die anyway. Why is it so hard to leave other people's things alone for certain people?

  69. .357 Magnum by skitchen8 · · Score: 1

    Once you shoot the first one word spreads quickly, problem solved. Given a choice a criminal will always take the path of least resistance and a bullet always travels faster than police.

  70. Watch again - Mythbusters yanked axles by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Watch the Mythbusters episode again. What they considered "busted" was the part in the movie where the car rose up over the rear wheels and kept going. Instead, the rear axle broke loose of the suspension, but the wheel wells kept it from being left behind. AFTER trashing the suspension and the underside of trunk, the cable broke. Mythbusters said "this car will not be driving any further". The Mythbusters test can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRHMNc5WyB4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

    1. Re:Watch again - Mythbusters yanked axles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MythBusters is hogwash!!!! They also tried 'busting' the ice bullet...using a mold! Just !@#$%#^ make a block and carve it down!

      MythBusters is FAR from science.

    2. Re:Watch again - Mythbusters yanked axles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, they should have use the high pressure blue glacier ice. It is much stronger, more massive and generally better.

  71. Re:Go ballistic on them by wvmarle · · Score: 2

    It is powerful enough for this:

    The skin of his hands was white and black due to the burns.

    But:

    Nah it wasn't powerful enough to kill somebody, made sure of that.

    That is totally contradictory.

    A quick look at some web sites gives me answers of 15 mA across the heart to be the minimum lethal current, while burns can be expected at currents of 200 mA and above. That are huge currents to run through one's body, and if any vital organs are in the way (e.g. hand to foot - drawer to ground) it's simply lethal.

    Cattle fences give nasty shocks, yet work at far lower voltages than 170 kV (2-10 kV usually), and give pulses of just microseconds in length instead of being constant on like you do.

    Lightning strikes produce burns while victims often actually survive, thanks to this being a very short pulse and the current is usually running mostly along the skin, and not through the body. Of course we all know lightning can very well be lethal. High voltages are just not something to fool around with.

  72. Re:Go ballistic on them by solidraven · · Score: 1

    You gave the solution yourself, high frequency. Additionally the burns are due to arcing when you pull your hand away. And what did he learn from that? Never steal things that belong to my deceased girlfriend.

  73. Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No amount of monitoring will stop someone. That only helps for the cleanup. It also serves to show you aren't around much to watch it yourself.

    Get a dog. a BIG dog.

  74. Ask Slashdot? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    Timothy,
    Please learn how to post "Ask Slashdot" stories in the actual Ask Slashdot category so that the exclusions filters actually work.
    Fnord666

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    1. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Haha, next you'll be asking him to actually screen for questions that provide actual information and from people who read and respond, so people have something they can actually respond to.

      I'm starting to think these stupid ask slashdot questions are just made up crap to try and get more participation because even a blind person can tell slashdot participation has plummeted.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  75. How About Turrets? by ios+and+web+coder · · Score: 1

    They are quite effective (I've heard).

    However, they do tend to be a bit top-heavy, and easily tipped.

    They are quite polite.

    --

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

    -H. L. Mencken

  76. If you're getting paid you need a license by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Separately from the permit for the alarm itself, you also need to be licensed if you're being paid to install a system. In Texas, it's a third degree FELONY, I think, to install systems for pay without a license. Other US states are mostly similar. * The same agency that regulates security professionals regulates PIs. Unlicensed PI work is a felony. Unlicensed security work may be a class A misdemeanor, in which caae max penalty would be 1 year jail.

  77. arduino, GoPro and programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking of a solution where you could hsvr multiple gopro cameras (1080p) that automatically starts recording when the arduino sensors are triggered..The cool thing about this is they already have an internet connection which allows you to connect to the devices and watch the break-ins as it's happening. The difficult part would be to program the arduino device for different sensor functions and send an email, and start recording at the same time. This email would alert you to the break in and when the video starts recording you can connect directly to the recording stream (realtime) and verify that its truly a breakin. The only concerns would be that the cameras use wireless and a thief that sniffs network traffic (doing their homework) could find the stream unless you get a wireless router that will limit the area of broadcast. Most BE's are looking to get in and out so you can bet that they do their homework. I think something along this route would help you if they are looking for a cheap solution...

  78. Proper Alarm + Monitoring by corychristison · · Score: 1

    You can buy a wired DSC kit for about $120. Additional motion detectors (I recommend DSC Bravo's) for about $35/each on amazon.

    Google "alarm monitoring diy" and choose a monitoring service. I've seen them as low as $8/month if you pay a year in advance. Most of these services can provide you with a certificate to take to your insurance company. Monitoring usually pays for itself in this sense by reducing your insurance costs.

  79. Motion for Linux by jasauders · · Score: 1

    Find an old computer, something that isn't exactly an Intel Atom but has some sort of horsepower to it. A Core 2 Duo would be perfect. Install a Linux distro on it (I use Ubuntu) and install "Motion" from the repos via sudo apt-get install motion. Motion is a motion detection service that runs as a daemon, so it starts once the system fires up. It works based on MJPG streams, so you won't get epic 3000 FPS HD 1080 quality shots, but if you run the cameras at say 5 FPS, you're still getting 5 JPG snapshots per second, which is often more than enough to ID somebody. Cameras could be a wide range, but the cameras will dictate the quality of image you get, so do your homework beforehand. Wired is always preferred to wireless, but I've used wireless cameras that were "okay". I wouldn't consider them for a situation like this, though. Also, consider routing your feeds to a secondary box on the premises, or perhaps to an off-site box all together. Tons of options there. Maybe you could run an rsync job via cron every 60 seconds and sync the data over SSH to another box, whether it be on the same LAN or at another property. lsyncd looks interesting too, which seems to be (based on 10 seconds of reading) a "live" rsync between two servers. Worth considering. Keep in mind if anybody breaks in and steals the box, you got nothing. Having a 2nd up-to-date box running would be the ultimate combo. Linux is free. Motion is free. The computer would be cheap (Craigslist or repurpose one you already have). The biggest cost here would be the cameras... and believe me, you get what you pay for. Food for thought. For what it's worth, I've used ZoneMinder heavily, but it had random crashes and populated my error logs with thousands of errors I couldn't ever come to terms with. Motion has yet to let me down. Sure, it has no GUI and runs entirely as a daemon, but it's rock solid in terms of reliability and has given me zero reason to consider anything else. Here's a Motion tutorial I set up earlier this year. Note that there is a Part 2 on YouTube as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwDLkMPLTw0

  80. Lasers... No seriously cheap laser are the answer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Security through absurdity "I really think the company should be using that phrase"
    LaserScan, A Fake Laser Security System for Fooling Thieves

  81. Re:REVO DVR or another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you said lean lifestyle, but if they have a smartphone there are tons of several hundred dollar DVRs with an Ipad or Android App that will stream you real time video upon motion. Not to endorse a particluar store, but
    http://www.homedepot.com/Electrical-Home-Security-Video-Surveillance-Video-Surveillance-Systems-Surveillance-Kits/h_d1/N-5yc1vZc1xv/R-203217686/h_d2/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&storeId=10051

  82. Don't avoid commercial solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are two interesting links to commercial products that may solve the problem for you, unless you think you are being targeted by professional burglars. I do not in any way benefit from the sale of these products.

    A fake system which may be effective because of the intimidation factor. Bruce Schnieir commented about it on his security blog. Pretty cheap ($200) if it works. Read the blog then watch the video it links to.
    http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/08/200_for_a_fake.html

    A commercially available system. I know nothing about it except that an acquaintance installed it in his business and says it helped him eliminate problems. It doesn't stop everything but allows him to identify the culprits. There are probably similar systems available in your area. Here is the link to the testimonials page.
    http://www.ezwatch.com/testimonials

  83. XProtect Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Milestone makes a pretty awesome commercial package, not cheap, but they do have a free(requires registration?) version that supports 8 cameras, 1 user and 5 day retention. In their higher end product, their big selling point is ease of research when you are looking for specific activity. I haven't tried the free version, so not sure how feature stripped it is. They support a ton of IP cameras.

  84. dog by fazey · · Score: 1

    If there isn't anything the dog can mess up... Leave a rottweiler in the store at night. When they see it pacing the window...they will think twice.
    Also, add cameras that stream to a different location. Put sensors on the doors and impact sensors on the windows.
    Then call it done.

  85. StickDeath Security Systems by jargonburn · · Score: 1

    Because your business is worth more than their lives! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO7s9y9Vjtg Apply this principal to your shop security. What could possibly go wrong?!

  86. Hydra control freak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not well known it it rocks for this purpose.

  87. cocoontech forums - dedicated to this topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    very active with excellent info:

    http://cocoontech.com/forums/

  88. Simple solution to the e-mail alert spam issue by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

    Something like an email or text to a laptop at home, or a dedicated prepaid phone, but without the pitfalls of such a solution (i.e. random wrong numbers, solicitors, email spam, etc).

    Just set up a new e-mail account for the alerts to go to, and don't publish the address or use the account to send any outgoing e-mails. In order for you to receive spam at an address, first that address needs to be out there to be harvested.

  89. Move out of New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just suggest you move out of Manhattan to an area that is known to have less crime if you're that worried.

  90. Camera encourages arson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing which worries me about a camera is that the thief sees it, and thinks "Oh shit" and panics, and thinks, "How do I get rid of the evidence?" and decides its a good idea to set fire to the place.

    1. Re:Camera encourages arson? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I can't imaging a thief thinking any store in this day and age won't have a camera on somewhere.

  91. Dropcam by PGillingwater · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned Dropcam yet. Cloud based HD video security monitoring using Wi-Fi enabled cameras, which include audio and motion alerts that send directly to email or Android/iPhone devices.

    The video quality is just fine if you include a motion activated light, and it's cheap enough to add three or four of them to cover all entrances (including windows.)

    For a basic subscription, it will keep 7 days of video monitoring online, as well as sending you alerts.

    As a bonus, it lets you talk back to the camera....

    --
    Paul Gillingwater
    MBA, CISSP, CISM
  92. Best car alarm ever by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine but this into his car but the idea may work with buildings as well. His ideas was that potential thieves always try the doors first because they might be unlocked so he put microswitches into the door handles and had them immediately set off the alarm.

    But my thought is for the door handle to alert the owners by SMS so that they can go there immediately. You want to know about the first thing which happens to give you more time.

    1. Re:Best car alarm ever by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
      Or install the capacitive type auto alarm into the door frame. All they have to do is go for the door handle and it changes the oscillator circuit frequency to trip the circuit and thus whatever is attached to the alarm.

      You could then hook the alarm trigger to the lights inside/outside the shop and have everything light up like a Christmas tree as soon as the door or window is touched. Using metallic coated glass or the break resistant wire mesh in the glass would help detect slackers. Nothing would spook a burglar quite as much as having the building "know" they are there, and show that the building itself is quite ready to take them on.

      Also, Once they are in the building, any video system on the premises is history. If you have to resort to video cameras as a solution, then use those that can be set up with motion detection and have them trigger the lights, not just sit back and observe the break in. An active defence is always better.

  93. Play with their heads! by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    It sounds like fun if you use psychology instead of projectiles -- have a highly visible camera on a gimbal targeting the intruder, with a tiny red laser - accompanied by a playing a recording of a massive capacitor charging up. Text-to-speech voice saying "Target Acquired". Play subsonics with a good subwhoofer, say 10-18Hz sine wave to give them that good old fashioned sense of unease.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  94. change your business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay open 24/7 ---

  95. Inductive Reasoning by Guppy · · Score: 1

    In what way? Mythbusters use the scientific method to test claims. They measure, experiment, collect data on a variety of scenarios - controlling and testing different variables on each pass - and report on their findings.

    Very enjoyable when they use their approach to prove a myth is possible. But when a Myth is proclaimed to be "busted"? Often, they ignore the particular assumptions and constraints of their particular implementation of the tested Myth, for the purpose of making broad sweeping claims of impossibility -- just so they can wrap up the show with a nice sound bite.

    If they were a little more humble about their own limitations, I would accept it as an example of the difficulty in proving a negative. Instead, they turn it into an unintentional parody of Bad Inductive Reasoning.

    "When an elderly and distinguished scientist tells you that something is possible, he is very probably right. When he tells you that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong" - Arthur C. Clarke.

  96. Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Twine and here
    2. Sensors (Motion detection, window and door sensors etc..) that alert via SMS to your phone so you can call police and/or catch them in the act. Perhaps a silent-alarm (no audible alarm). You could obviously add video and images too. Just a linux PC or rasberry pi even that's connected to the net could do it.

  97. Tear gas or colored smoke dispensers. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Look into tear gas or colored (so as not to be mistaken for fire) smoke dispensers. You could build your own using orange smoke grenades etc, but ensure your enclosure is fire-safe.

    Physical security can SLOW attackers, but doesn't DENY them the premises.

    Example, I've not used these:

    http://burglarbomb.com/

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  98. Stop trying to fake it... by DoctorStarks · · Score: 1

    ... and buy insurance. Contract for immediate armed response to the alarm if you really want somebody to get hurt.

  99. simple, leave a radio on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voices, and light are a deterrent. Leave a radio on so you can hear it from outside the door. Particularly a talk show. Perhaps sleep there every once and a while in case someone is keeping an eye on it.
    Try it for yourself, leave your radio on before you go out. Be gone long enough to forget about it, when you get back you wonder who is inside.

  100. Geese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For rural areas, at least, they are *really* efficient.

  101. What ever happened to these old-fashioned methods? by geercom · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to doing it the old-fashioned way? 1. Attack dogs inside the premises 2. Boards with spikes pointing upward on the floor in front of all doors and windows And please do not tell me that it is inhumane. You are talking about people stealing from you.

    --
    Best Regards, David Geer
  102. Anti Burglar etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SPEND THE NITE WITH .12 GAUGE SHOTGUN & DOUBLE OUGHT BUCKSHOT... works well in Houston Texas!

  103. Panasonic Web Cam by BMIComp · · Score: 1

    I had two breaking attempts last year. After the first attempt, I had my landlord install better locks, and I also made my own security solution. Being in an apartment, I can't get a major brand alarm system (that comes with a three year contract)

    So, I bought a Panasonic BL-C230A web camera. I made custom mobile page on a website, which I use to arm and disarm my "alarm". I've also setup the panasonic camera to visit a URL every time it detects motion. If the alarm is armed and it receives a visit on this URL, it will send me a text message and an email letting me know that it has detected motion. I also have it uploaded an image to an offsite FTP server whenever it records motion (which is somewhat bandwidth intensive). However, I can pull up a website and see every recent event that happened in my apartment.

    I also contemplated using Tropo as an alerting system for phone and SMS. Doing so would even let me setup a call tree and all that. I never got around to implementing it but it seems like it would have worked well for this.

    Also, I tried a D-Link model before the Panasonic webcam. The Panasonic ended up being the best camera for this solution though. The huge feature is the infrared motion sensor. Most webcams seem to detect motion by a determining a change in the image. However, if anything causes the change shift quickly, these give off a false positive. Which is not a great thing for an alarm to do several times a day. A few other nice features are the FTP capability, visiting a webpage when motion is detected, PTZ, and external inputs and outputs (for example, you could use these for a door open/close sensor or a siren).

    1. Re:Panasonic Web Cam by BMIComp · · Score: 1

      *break in