Slashdot Mirror


Plans Unveiled For Full Scale Replica of the Titanic

Hugh Pickens writes "USA Today reports that Australian billionaire Clive Palmer has unveiled plans for construction of Titanic II, a cruise ship designed as a 'full-scale re-creation' of the Titanic, adding that the ship will be built in China and begin carrying passengers in 2016. The Titanic II will be built 883 feet long – 3 inches longer than the original Titanic – and weigh 55,800 gross tons, according to Palmer, who stopped short of calling the vessel unsinkable. It will carry a maximum of 2,435 passengers and 900 crew members, and include a gymnasium, Turkish baths, a squash court, a swimming pool, a theater and a casino. Like the original ship, there will no TVs aboard and probably no Internet service, Palmer says. Passengers will be able to dress in 1912-style clothing, giving them an opportunity to step back in time, or pretend they are Leo DiCaprio or Kate Winslet, who starred in James Cameron's 1997 blockbuster movie. But industry insiders are skeptical about the commercial viability of the ship. 'Titanic II is a curiosity and may have a draw as a floating hotel, but the idea of spending close to a week at sea on a vessel built around such a thin premise is seen as a stretch, at least by many within the industry,' says Michael Driscoll, editor of industry newsletter Cruise Week. Driscoll adds that he is skeptical about the future of Titanic II in the aftermath of the Carnival Triumph fire and last year's shipwreck of the Costa Concordia off the coast of Tuscany. Paul Kurzman, whose great-grandparents, Isidor and Ida Straus, died on the Titanic, says he has 'no problem' with the construction of Titanic II. 'I don't think they would have had any problem whatsoever, as long as the Titanic II steers clear of icebergs.'"

7 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. Seperation of classes by matthewlw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would have to wonder if they will effectively separate classes on a ship as they did in that time, this hardly seems like it would be a popular concept in modern day, however it is hardly an accurate recreation if they ignore this aspect.

  2. Please tell me it wont be an accurate replica... by jonwil · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are some parts of the old ship that most definitely should NOT be replicated on the new one.
    Like the lifeboats.
    And the engines.
    And the bridge (and its navigation equipment and iceburg detection systems)
    And the kitchens

  3. Well spent monay, not. by u64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's next, Hindenburg replica?

    1. Re:Well spent monay, not. by heypete · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's next, Hindenburg replica?

      Why not? Traveling by airship would be a unique experience for many people.

      With proper precautions, hydrogen as a lifting gas is not considerably more hazardous than jet aircraft loaded with gobs of jet fuel /covering the fabric of the airship with highly flammable chemicals seems like a bad idea

  4. Looney by hairyfish · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those outside Australia, Clive Palmer is well known looney tunes. He has a habit of making outlandish claims (such as the CIA is funding the Green (hippie) party purely to destabilise our coal industry), I'd be surprised if this ever sees the light of day.

  5. Re:Please tell me it wont be an accurate replica.. by leathered · · Score: 5, Funny

    They had British chefs.

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
  6. Re:Please tell me it wont be an accurate replica.. by MitchDev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, load the the ship with the "top 1%" and sink the bitch fast, no lifeboats.