Slashdot Mirror


Direct-to-Vinyl Recording Makes a Comeback (Video)

For many decades, gramophone records (the black vinyl discs in Grandma's attic) were made by cutting grooves directly into an acetate disc, then making a mold from that "master" and "pressing records." Nowadays, of course, we use digital recording software on our computers or even on our mobile phones. Vinyl? Strictly for fogies and maybe a few audiophiles who think analog recordings have a depth and warmth that CDs and MP3s lack. Naturally, SXSW is a haven for these folks, and among them Tim Lord found Wesley Wolfe and two German compatriots from vinylrecording.com, busily demonstrating their vinyl recording system, which is sort of the gramophone record equivalent of print on demand. Lots of background music in the video makes the voices a bit hard to hear; some might prefer the transcription -- although those who do will lose out on watching the vinyl recording machine in action. Either way. Or both. Up to you.

166 comments

  1. Yeah! by meowgoesthecat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I listen to it on my mp3 player?

    --
    Meow
    1. Re:Yeah! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 0

      Can I listen to it on my mp3 player?

      Does anybody know what sort of bandwidth a record can manage? Telephone lines were never good enough, within audible bands(DSL obviously did a bit better, where available) to hit even 64kb/s, which is sort of the low-water-mark for vaguely-listenable mp3s. Do records have enough bandwidth that you could coax 128kb/s, or even more, out of a suitably formatted recording using the various modem techniques?

    2. Re:Yeah! by marcello_dl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can I listen to it on my mp3 player?

      Sure! get a turntable, connect it to the phono input of a mixer, connect the smallish cable to the ground pin near the phono input, connect the output of the mixer to some amplifier or powered speakers.

      Put the vinyl on the turntable, put the mp3 player on the floor, climb on the mp3 player and listen.

      Voila'.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    3. Re:Yeah! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      You can get broadcast-quality audio out of suitably-balanced telephone lines...

    4. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Can I listen to it on my mp3 player?

      Sure! Follow these steps:

      1) Put MP3 player on couch or chair
      2) Sit on MP3 player
      3) Listen to vinyl recording
      4) ???
      5) Profit!

    5. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      CD4 records could do 45 khz, but they only used that to put a 15khz signal onto a 30khz carrier. Commercial discs are limited to 18 khz

    6. Re:Yeah! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does anybody know what sort of bandwidth a record can manage?

      An Ortofon DSS731 cutting head has a usable response from 5Hz to 25kHz, but typical playback systems fall short of this.

      Telephone lines were never good enough

      Telephone lines have a frequency response from 300Hz to 3kHz.

      Do records have enough bandwidth that you could coax 128kb/s, or even more, out of a suitably formatted recording using the various modem techniques?

      The bit rate of compressed audio isn't directly related to frequency response. A 64kb/s MP3 can reproduce a discrete 20kHz tone, provided no lower frequencies deemed more important by the psychoacoustic processing are present (the "swooshing" from hi-hats on low bit rate MP3s is the encoder deciding you don't need to hear those frequencies).

      But to answer the question, a fresh vinyl recording played on a properly balanced tone arm should be indistinguishable from 48kHz uncompressed audio because it's uncompressed audio.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    7. Re:Yeah! by nightfury · · Score: 1

      But more importantly, it responds properly to a well placed and timed pitch-nudge applied via middle and index fingers, or a gentle drag on the platter in transition.

    8. Re:Yeah! by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I remember a magazine in the UK sometimes including Sinclair Spectrum disks that you could play to load a program into the computer through the cassette input. So it could manage at least 1200bps (think that's what the Spectrum cassette interface used).

    9. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a fresh vinyl recording played on a properly balanced tone arm should be indistinguishable from 48kHz uncompressed audio because it's uncompressed audio.

      Indeed. But then every time it is played, it degrades just a little bit. If it ever gets scratched, add even more noise. With digital, you take any hit once, at the time of the recording, and then you make lossless perfect copies forever.

    10. Re:Yeah! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      But then every time it is played, it degrades just a little bit. If it ever gets scratched, add even more noise.

      Yes, Captain Obvious, that's why I specified fresh vinyl.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    11. Re:Yeah! by Reeznarch · · Score: 1

      I tried that once and scratched my record.

    12. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > should be indistinguishable from 48kHz uncompressed audio because it's uncompressed audio.

      Uh, no. The distortion levels and high noise floor of vinyl will be readily audible in any direct comparison.

    14. Re:Yeah! by locofungus · · Score: 1

      But to answer the question, a fresh vinyl recording played on a properly balanced tone arm should be indistinguishable from 48kHz uncompressed audio because it's uncompressed audio.

      RIAA equalization.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    15. Re:Yeah! by dintech · · Score: 1

      Q: What's different about working with vinyl that's different from a CD?
      A: The music is alive? For CD, you know the first Super Mario Brothers, he had a square nose. That's what your audio looks like in 16-bit.

      And here is a fascinating presentation from Monty Montgomery from Redhat and xiph.org, creator of Ogg Vorbis, blowing that misconception regarding 16-bit out out of the water.

      Xiph.Org - Digital Show & Tell

    16. Re:Yeah! by RoboJ1M · · Score: 2

      OK, comparing lossy compression algorithms (especially duffers like mp3) at crappy bit rates to eye wateringly expensive playback mechanisms is obviously biased.

      So. Thought experiment.

      (Assuming near-perfect recording equipment, including the digitizers and supremely competent engineering)
      (Assuming well set up very high quality play back equipment)
      (Assuming you meant 48kHz 16bit PCM)

      Do you think there will be any distinguishable difference between fresh vinyl and 48kHz 16bit audio?
      What about the super high resolutions? (24bit and up to 96kHz, the mastering resolutions)
      What about 320kbps CBR mp3?

      (I'm not trolling, I really am attempting a proper discussion, I know, it's weird, this is slashdot)

      Because at this point the argument that FLAC exists and space is cheap comes into play.
      Why lossy compress anything at all anymore? Except portability?

      I was taught 16bit resolution is above the resolution of the human ear.
      Is this still considered true?
      Many people seem to this it's not and that's why we have 24bit now but I thought 24bit was for mastering, mitigating rounding errors for multi track recoding when you mix it down to the final product.

      Why can't people just say Vinyl Is Fun and be done with it?
      I collect 16mm film but I do it because Projectors R Fun. Not because it looks better than a blu-ray.
      (35mm would be a different story, but I would have to sell too many kidneys to afford it)

      People should just invent 128bit ADC/DACs and be done with it.
      More numbers than atoms in the universe? I think that'll do it! ;)

    17. Re:Yeah! by lastx33 · · Score: 1

      Can I listen to it on my mp3 player?

      Of course! You can listen while sitting on anything you wish.

      --
      "You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead!" - Stan Laurel
    18. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You completely fail to understand RIAA equalization. RIAA equalization allows subsonics without the tonearm jumping out of the groove. Bass is attenuated on the recorded media and boosted on playback, giving you exactly the same waveforms as before equalization. It works sort of, but not exactly, like Dolby, which increases treble on record and attenuates it on playback, driving down the tape hiss. A vinyl record will have the exact waveform as the analog tape it was made from, with (of course) the slight degradation you get when re-recording any analog.

      Quadraphonic records were made by modulating the rear channels with a 44kHz tone, then demodulated on playback. This says that vinyl has far more than twice the frequency response of a CD. The increased frequency response and lack of aliasing is what makes vinyl sound better -- but you need VERY good speakers and a VERY good turntable for it to matter. On a cheap stereo, CDs will sound better, because the turntable will attenuate the bass to reduce rumble, and attenuate the treble so it doesn't sound tinny because of the attenuated bass. Plus, you won't have real woofers and probably not real tweeters. Most modern speaker setups are a squawker (midrange), a cheap tweeter that won't go much past 15kHz, and a single "sub" woofer that may only have a five inch cone.

      CDs have a superior dynamic range, which today's sound "engineers" completely disregard and go for "LOUD!!!". This makes many remastered analog recordings' CDs sound like utter effluent compared to the original vinyl, but it isn't the CD technology's fault, it's idiot "engineers" that couldn't engineer their way out of a paper bag.

    19. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because at this point the argument that FLAC exists and space is cheap comes into play.
      Why lossy compress anything at all anymore? Except portability?

      No reason whatever to compress on a terrabyte drive, but with an MP3 player you need the room and your shit earbuds aren't going to let you hear the difference.

      I was taught 16bit resolution is above the resolution of the human ear.
      Is this still considered true?

      Probably, but consider that a soft passage (not talking hiphop here, most modern music has no soft passages) will have far less than eight bits of resolution. Think of most classical music, where CD's superior dynamic range works, except the soft passages sound aliased.

      Why can't people just say Vinyl Is Fun and be done with it?

      If you don't have an expensive turntable and rediculously expensive speakers, CDs will sound better. But with great speakers and turntable the lack of aliasing in the record and the increased frequency response of vinyl does in fact make a difference. Of course, this is offset by noise, which CDs don't have.

    20. Re:Yeah! by NulDevice · · Score: 1

      Sure, no lossless, compression...

      But...

      No reputable mastering engineer would ever print un-effected audio to a vinyl record. To deal with the vagaries of playback systems (unless, of course, your audience is exclusively those guys who buy $30,000 turntables mounted on granite slabs), there'd always be some dynamic range comrpession/limiting of the upper frequencies (and usually a gentle rolloff above about 12khz), the low frequencies would be mixed into mono (while generally bass and kick are mixed in center channel anyway, occasionally you get low frequency information in stereo, and that makes for a wiiiiide groove) and you generally have to limit your overall dynamic range to something that an average needle can resolve.

      Plus there's the fact that the stuff on the outer edge of the record generally can be louder than the stuff on the inner edge, simply due to the density required.

      So in theory, it'd be better than digital, but in practice it's just...different.
       

      --

      ----
      "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

    21. Re:Yeah! by giuda · · Score: 1

      Telephone lines have a frequency response from 300Hz to 3kHz.

      No. That frequency response is filtered from the cable, to grant a good transmission quality on long distances in analogue mode. In fact, 300Hz - 3 KHz it's the frequency range when the human speech is enough clear to be understandable. ADSL on copper lines works because the signal is using frequencies > 3 KHz, and distance to the DSLAM matters. Nearer you are from it, better your ADSL speeds. In fact, a copper cable can have a frequency response in MHz.

    22. Re:Yeah! by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      So we need VDR as well then? Variable dynamic range?

      And I don't have shit earbuds.... :'(

      It sounds like we need something better than dumb PCM.
      Why hasn't anybody invented storing audio as vectors yet?

    23. Re:Yeah! by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      128 bit ADC/DAC - hee! In reality we don't even have 24 bit ADC/DACs yet except perhaps for exotic supercooled laboratory equipment; no real world converter actually has a full 24 bits of dynamic range, and we're not likely to ever get there because of thermal noise in the circuitry.

      16 bits is not above the resolution of the human ear. But it is above the amount of dynamic range that is likely to be useful for music content; it will take you from the audible threshold in a quiet room to the quick ear damage threshold and that's certainly enough. See the xiph.org post quoted earlier. But you have to optimize the use of those 16 bits carefully and there is little room for error, which is why 24 bit recording is useful in the studio.

      I think the jury is still out on whether there is a (small) benefit to higher sample rates. Even if humans are unable to directly perceive pure tones above 20 KHz it's possible that there are perceptible effects of their presence in a complex sound.

    24. Re:Yeah! by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      All week we've been marvelling at the machine gun advances in practical materials science. All nanotechnology scale stuff, all stuff that sounds too good to be true but they have commercial prototypes available, not just theory and lab experiments. I'm starting now to just expect someone to crack things like room temperature superconductors any day now. Then(apparently) we'll be able to ditch our classic electronics that mostly turn electricity into heat. ;)

      We're actually living in an era which will have BBC documentary seasons made about it in 100 years time.

      Ain't it cool? :-)

  2. Kids these days... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's disgusting how so-called 'audiophiles' can bear to listen to music that has been tainted by electricity. Back in my day, we used Edison Cylinders, recorded entirely by the soundwaves emitted by the performance! (It is actually a neat process to watch, a horn concentrates the incoming sound and a sharp stylus attached to the diaphragm cuts the groove in the cylinder, 100% passive, except for the guy who brushes away the wax shavings)

    1. Re:Kids these days... by Kenja · · Score: 2

      Reminded of this guy...

      Hipster level infinite.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Kids these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my day, all we had to listen to were seashells! I still keep my collection around because sometimes I need a break from the harshness of pressed vinyl.

    3. Re:Kids these days... by jythie · · Score: 1

      You know, it would not surprise me if there was a community into doing so, and that would be kinda awesome ^_^

    4. Re:Kids these days... by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mister fancy pants with your lazy wax. We just listened to people play instruments!
      Who is into Vinyl today.
      Hipsters.
      Now get your plaid pant wear butt and $300 backpack on your fixie bike and get out of here.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Kids these days... by fermion · · Score: 0

      This is funny, but the reality is that much music is tainted by not electricity, but VLSI electronics. When records were first put out, the sweet sound that so many talk about came from vacuum tubes and analog components controlling the recording and reproduction. Much of rock music, the music that drove the sale of records for so long, was based on the simple operational amplified connected by relatively unsophisticated interconnects, again allowing for a certain imperfection as well as the overdriving of the opamp. Now we have a much simpler music played on much more complex devices that allows a more consistent, if not perfect, reproduction.Simply put the recording is digital, the playback is digital, there just is not so much there to compensate and adjust. The process is dead simple. There is no room for atmosphere. Really this is back to the days of a bunch of guys yelling and playing as hard as they could around a wax cylinder.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Kids these days... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know, it would not surprise me if there was a community into doing so, and that would be kinda awesome ^_^

      http://www.edisonia.com/ Recording and playback hardware, along with new blanks manufactured to period spec. (No association with them, though I've seen blanks that I think were produced by them used to record a couple of live performances)

    7. Re:Kids these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i knew it was this sketch before i even clicked it. =]

    8. Re:Kids these days... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      your appeal to atmosphere (whatever that is) is undefined. up to the nyquist frequency the recording is indistinguishable from the analog source. you get the added benefit of much less noise and no degradation of the media.

      if you want that old 'vinyl' sound can listen to period rock with the proper equalization.

    9. Re:Kids these days... by Joska · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, a thousand times yes! As long as the wax is naturally occurring, those cylinders were the last pure, accurate and worthwhile means of storing music. Damn those electrophiles!

    10. Re:Kids these days... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The bigger issue I'm hearing with albums is where the mastering and or remastering isn't done very well. A lot of the really old jazz CDs which were essentially just a transfer with just enough processing to remove the snaps and pops, sound far better than a lot of the new stuff in terms of audio quality.

      I'm personally skeptical about analog really sounding any different, but the mastering process is different, and a lot of the remastered stuff strips away at the CD's advantages.

    11. Re:Kids these days... by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      You are on the right track. Back in the 70's Audio mag did some stories which proposed that the warmth of tube sound comes from how the amp reacts when over-driven. A transistor amp clips hard and produces odd numbered harmonics. A tube amp has a softer transition into clipping and produces even numbered harmonics. (Maybe not odd vs. even as much as which dominates.) Even numbered harmonics blend in better with original frequencies while odd numbered harmonics stand out from the original, so equal amounts do not produce an equal effect. A waveform enriched by second and fourth harmonics will sound richer and fatter, which a waveform enriched by third and fifth harmonics will sound rough and buzzy.

      Generally we are talking about clipping of transients.

      Analog tape also introduces clipping, and a well made pro deck (15ips half track stereo or better) will do so gently. Digital equipment clips extremely hard, so max level must never be exceeded. A digital recording can contain transients at much higher levels relative to the main waveform body, thus pushing the playback amps into clipping. And if these are transistors, the clipping sounds ugly.

      Why do IC op-amps sound worse that discrete transistor amps? Could be that to create the necessary resistors the IC designers use a bunch of transistors, which exacerbate the problem.

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    12. Re:Kids these days... by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 1

      Just be careful with those cylinders, especially if you are nervous and on a TV show. Double if the cylinder is 'one of a kind.'

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnsizkVjGm8

      --
      When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
    13. Re:Kids these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is funny, but the reality is that much music is tainted by not electricity, but VLSI electronics. When records were first put out, the sweet sound that so many talk about came from vacuum tubes and analog components controlling the recording and reproduction. Much of rock music, the music that drove the sale of records for so long, was based on the simple operational amplified connected by relatively unsophisticated interconnects, again allowing for a certain imperfection as well as the overdriving of the opamp.

      You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

      The electronic imperfection at the heart of lots of rock music (distortion effects, etc.) were and still are deliberately created in stage equipment like electric guitars and their amps. If you buy a modern electric guitar setup, there will be a minimum of one knob for messing with the sound. The settings will range from no distortion at all to horrible awful distortion suitable only for experimental noise music. Real musicians have even been known to change up the distortion settings from piece to piece, or to use pedals to vary distortion and other effects during a single song.

      This stupid foundation myth you've invented (in which bad electronics created rock, and we have to return to bad gear to make good rock) makes no sense anyways. The origins of rock were poor, itinerant musicians who had no electronic equipment at all. The pioneers of electric rock who began to use distortion weren't using crude equipment which distorted everything, either. They were deliberately misusing gear to force it to distort. And because that became part of a hugely popular art form, guess what? Controllable circuits for inducing distortion began to be included in the gear, so you didn't even have to mess with anything, you could just turn a knob.

      That has not stopped just because VLSI.

      Now we have a much simpler music played on much more complex devices that allows a more consistent, if not perfect, reproduction.Simply put the recording is digital, the playback is digital, there just is not so much there to compensate and adjust. The process is dead simple. There is no room for atmosphere. Really this is back to the days of a bunch of guys yelling and playing as hard as they could around a wax cylinder.

      What a load of bull. First, guitar distortion is still around today, and it's usually still done in the analog domain. Second, today's digital gear has essentially infinite effects flexibility. Once you've got the signal in the digital domain, and a programmable DSP to apply effects, you can invent any crazy effect you want. And even add it to gear already in the field with a firmware upgrade. That includes nigh-perfect emulation of tube distortion, if that's your thing.

      Effects-heavy bands like the Beatles and 1960s-70s Pink Floyd would have fucking killed to have the digital recording and effects gear available today. You know what destroys "atmosphere" in a recording? Losing details to generation loss because you've gone through too many iterations of tweaking and mixing, even though you're using state-of-the-art analog studio gear. When you do that stuff in the digital domain today, using the right software, the generational loss is essentially zero.

      So fuck off with your snotty 'VLSI has destroyed REAL MUSIC' hipster bullshit. The gear has gotten better, not worse. The state of music today, whether you consider it good or bad, is a function of the musicians creating it and the cultural and political environment they live in.

    14. Re:Kids these days... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Well, bad mastering will affect any playback medium, and is a policy issue rather than a technical one. The people dissing digital media do so because they don't understand it.

      I agree though. The way top 40 is mangled these days makes it nearly unlistenable, even if the content is desirable to the listener.

    15. Re:Kids these days... by burningcpu · · Score: 1

      Ah, no, it reminded me of this poor soul

    16. Re:Kids these days... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I wasn't really disagreeing, one of the wonderful thing about the '70s was that the processes being used are new enough to be rather impressive, but not so new that they've been ruined by overdoing it.

      I tend to dislike the over production that goes on today, where rather than learning to make the music well, they fix it all in the studio, I love that the Eagles sound more or less the same on stage as they do in the studio, I can respect that, even if I dislike their vocals.

    17. Re:Kids these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      up to the nyquist frequency the recording is indistinguishable from the analog source.

      Only if your Nyquist frequency is much higher than a frequency you can hear. At CD sampling rates, there is no difference whatever between a 17kHz sine wave and a 17kHz sawtooth wave; it's aliasing distortion. Get a rediculoualy expensive turntable and a pair of ancient (pre-digital) expensive speakers and you can tell the difference. Making the sample rate so that the Nyquist limit is barely above the limits of human hearing was a math error made by someone who misunderstands the Nyquest theorem. Triple the sampling rate and your digital samples will blow vinyl away, provided you have good enough speakers (say, four way enclosures with 18 inch woofers, a couple of different sized squawkers, a good tweeter, and what doesn't exist any more, a supertweeter that will go into supersonic ranges).

    18. Re:Kids these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if your Nyquist frequency is much higher than a frequency you can hear. At CD sampling rates, there is no difference whatever between a 17kHz sine wave and a 17kHz sawtooth wave; it's aliasing distortion.

      Nonsense. There is no audible difference between a 17kHz sine wave and a 17kHz sawtooth wave, period. Even on analog equipment, if it can reproduce that 34kHz 2nd harmonic, you won't be able to hear it. I'd like to see any evidence to the contrary.

  3. Dub Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever wrote this needs to ask somebody. DJs having been quietly making dub plates for performances for years and years and years

    1. Re:Dub Plates by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Whenever you see Roblimo post a video, its of Tim Lord (timothy) and it illustrates just how incredible ignorant of the subject matter at hand timothy is.

      I can not think of a single slashdot post in its history that timothy has made that was informative, or even had an accurate summary or headline. Its really hard to get it wrong as much as he does.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  4. Not new by dpilot · · Score: 2

    There was another round of direct-to-disk back in the 70's, and who knows how many others, before and after that.

    I bought a Sheffield disk of Prokofiev's "Romeo and Juliet" back in the mid 70's, and there were other disks in their lineup. Here is someone else's on ebay now - http://www.ebay.com/itm/Prokofiev-Romeo-Juliet-Excerpts-LP-Sheffield-Lab-Direct-Disc-Leinsdorf-LAPO-/380457368606

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have several Sheffields and non are for sale.

    2. Re:Not new by foobsr · · Score: 1
      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    3. Re:Not new by jgarry · · Score: 1

      Me too. I listen to them every 5 years or so.

      --
      Oracle and unix guy.
  5. Collectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's the superior medium for collectors. Some of you collect old game cartridges right? Do they feel good in your hand? Sure they do. I can use an emulator for that.

    1. Re:Collectors by jythie · · Score: 1

      Well, there is something to be said for the fun of ritualistic engagement. I kinda laugh at the people who claim that vinyl is superior to digital, but I have no complaints against the crowd that likes working with the old tech because they enjoy it.

      And I have to admit my own vice... vintage camera lenses. Technologically inferior to the nice autofocused image stabilized coated lenses of today.. but they are still fun.

    2. Re:Collectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey everyone has a hobby. I imagine record collecting is a bit like old baseball cards. Just because neither are my thing means there's anything wrong with it.

      And if people want to record to vinyl, that's their business. It's a bit like homebrew games for old consoles. You're trying to make the best of an inferior technology, and I can see how that would be part of the charm of it.

  6. Nice, but by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    But I've seen on the net two other organizations, UK and Italy, that produce one-off vinyls. There was also a home vinyl carving station from vestax (vrx 2000) but I guess vynil mastering needs a LOT more care than cd mastering. Unless you like to see needles jumping.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    1. Re:Nice, but by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      but I guess vynil mastering needs a LOT more care than cd mastering. Unless you like to see needles jumping.

      I suspect that the opposite is true: Vinyl cutting is definitely on the fiddly side of of things you would actually want to do in the field; but it can be done. Cutting CD pits in the field is sufficiently difficult that it just isn't done. Dye/laser based systems are cheap as chips; but to the best of my knowledge no mechanical pit-cutter has ever been used, certainly not in rooms with normal sized dust and crud.

    2. Re:Nice, but by Tapewolf · · Score: 1

      But I've seen on the net two other organizations, UK and Italy, that produce one-off vinyls. There was also a home vinyl carving station from vestax (vrx 2000) but I guess vynil mastering needs a LOT more care than cd mastering. Unless you like to see needles jumping.

      The VRX was very expensive, had a frequency response up to about 12KHz and a maximum of about 15 minutes a side. ('Momentary Lapse of Reason' was about 26 min/side). I was curious about the idea of making one-off LPs of my music, but once I saw the specs I realised why it was discontinued.

  7. Depth and Warmth by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are generally found to be distortion and a roll off of high frequencies when one bothers to take apart the actual music reproduction.

    Some people have become accustomed to these artifacts and so prefer them.

    The only real antidote is to go to live music performances to hear what they really sound like.

    I'd recommend that for people used to modern pop recordings too. I think many would be shocked to hear what they are missing in the horribly compressed and otherwise doctored up recordings that are sold today.

    1. Re:Depth and Warmth by Shinobi · · Score: 2

      Indeed.

      Even though I'm not religious, I try to go to various church concerts here in Stockholm, just for the acoustics, and for the organs....

      There's NO recording equipment that can capture the full majesty of a huge organ in a church or cathedral. Then there's the mixing and if direct-to-online, encoding....

      I fear for when the current Ableton Live generation is in charge of the studios, and not just "musicians" =(

    2. Re:Depth and Warmth by Nimey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your real audiophile keeps a can of Monster Air with precisely-tuned isotope and pollutant counts, and opens it whenever he goes to a concert.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Depth and Warmth by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some people have become accustomed to these artifacts and so prefer them.

      My personal theory is that (most) people's musical tastes, both in terms of medium and in terms of genre, tend to fossilize around the time that they either graduate high school or first get laid. Once fossilized, any vices and inconveniences of the medium are imbued with a warm sentimentality and the preferred genre is enshrined as real music, as compared to the outdated stuff listened to by those who came before them, and the noise listened to by damn kids these days.

    4. Re:Depth and Warmth by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I was fortunate to have been part of a music education program in High School which involved going to the Boston Symphony Saturday afternoons.

      If the fossilization theory is right, I fossilized around something pretty good as Symphony Hall in Boston is generally considered to have the best acoustics in the New World, and in the top 5 world-wide.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_Hall,_Boston

    5. Re:Depth and Warmth by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The only real antidote is to go to live music performances to hear what they really sound like. I'd recommend that for people used to modern pop recordings too. I think many would be shocked to hear what they are missing in the horribly compressed and otherwise doctored up recordings that are sold today.

      Except that at least for some acts lip-synching a la Milli Vanilli is now the rule rather than the exception, so depending on the group the live concert may just be a really loud playback.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:Depth and Warmth by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      There's NO recording equipment that can capture the full majesty of a huge organ in a church or cathedral. Then there's the mixing and if direct-to-online, encoding....

      Exactly. The dubstep kiddies are Doing It Wrong. If you want bass, you need a pipe organ.

    7. Re:Depth and Warmth by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      I've visited Stockholms Konserthus, Berwaldhallen and Operan a number of times, and yes, it's a special feeling to experience music in concert halls. Even some metal can be really enhanced there(Such as Therion for example... Or Apocalyptica)

      I don't subscribe to that fossilization theory though, because my taste in music has changed with time and I'm in my mid-thirties.

    8. Re:Depth and Warmth by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Are generally found to be distortion and a roll off of high frequencies when one bothers to take apart the actual music reproduction.

      Some people have become accustomed to these artifacts and so prefer them.

      The only real antidote is to go to live music performances to hear what they really sound like.

      I'd recommend that for people used to modern pop recordings too. I think many would be shocked to hear what they are missing in the horribly compressed and otherwise doctored up recordings that are sold today.

      While I generally agree with your statement, many of the modern live pop bands do the same thing live that they do on recordings. It's a shame that the live performances are just as doctored as the recordings are.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    9. Re:Depth and Warmth by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend that for people used to modern pop recordings too. I think many would be shocked to hear what they are missing in the horribly compressed and otherwise doctored up recordings that are sold today.

      That's because over compression and doctoring are the norm, really I think it's more of a cause that a person knows that in life there is no crisp clearness, it's everything around you that makes music, or even talking warm and have depth. You remove that and you remove what makes it unique. I suppose someone should come up with an audio version of the uncanny valley, it's really the same thing.

       

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Depth and Warmth by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Oh man, the gut feeling when the organ rumbles....

    11. Re:Depth and Warmth by houghi · · Score: 1

      I recommend you do not mess with what others prefer.

      Why give people an 'antidote'? They prefer it that way.

      When I go and listen to live music, I miss a LOT more in quality then when I listen to a record. I am not sitting or standing in the right position according to how the music boxes are standing. The sound person was off. There are people singing along with the song. I am snogging a girl. I might even order a beer during the highlight of the evening.

      Music is not about the quality of the recording. It is about the emotion that is brings and the memories that it feeds.

      This one time as a kid, I was listening at a live classical concert and they were singing some opera. We were there with some 10 friends. All around the age of 17-19 and it started of very boring. Then we started to listen to the lyrics and he was singing about the butler doing the wife and the maid doing the man of the house. It was one big orgy. Some other hilarious stories were told as well.
      We were a bit immature and we started to laugh. Loud and hysterically. I mean come on, it was funny as hell.

      The adults in the concert hall were all shushing us, because they could not hear the quality of his music. They were pointing to us and urged us to be quiet.

      After the concert the performer came to us and he congratulated us for not only listening but also understanding the music. He specially picked that music, so people would react to it and we were the only ones that did. And this was some big name in the opera industry (no, I do not remember his name.)

      He was happy, as a performer, that we looked beyond the mere quality for which he was famous, but listened, really listened to the music. And he was right. The fact that it was a superior quality sung by some big name was a nice bonus. It was not the main thing. The quality of the music, the quality of the performer, the quality of the music hall. None of that was really important.

      So if you think that music is all about quality, you are now officially an adult. You are incapable of listening to the music and I feel sorry for you.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Depth and Warmth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herp a derp. u am so smart! Can you be my teacher 4 a day? DERP!

    13. Re:Depth and Warmth by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you're not far off. Humans use music as a group bonding tool, and once we form groups (goths, emos, punks, indie...) with close-knit social bonds, the need for the music is no longer as strong and it fades over time.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    14. Re:Depth and Warmth by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Are generally found to be distortion and a roll off of high frequencies when one bothers to take apart the actual music reproduction.

      Correct. Tubes distort "harmonically" when overdriven (which happens easily and often). It's one reason why tubes are generally preferred for audio effects boxes because overdriving them is what you want, and what comes out sounds good and doesn't make your listeners want to rip their ears off.

      Transistors are much better as long as they stay in the linear region of operation. However, once you exceed that region, they distort, and their distortion introduces harsher harmonics, nevermind the even worst ones you get when they're clipping.

      Vinyl's an interesting case - there's something to be said about its distortions, but it's also because of the limits of mastering which resulted in the loudness wars not happening to it. (Note: it's possible to have dynamic-range-compressed masters sent to Vinyl, in which case they sound just as awful as the CD).

    15. Re:Depth and Warmth by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I would phrase this different.

      There IS recording equipment that CAN get the full majestity of a huge organ in a church or cathedral.... its the PLAYBACK equipment and venure that will never be able replicate the sound.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    16. Re:Depth and Warmth by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Every year I subject myself to the Christmas Show at Macy's (formerly Wanamaker's) in Philly just to hear the organ.

      (Yes, I know they do regular recitals...)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    17. Re:Depth and Warmth by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      as a group bonding tool

      That's why I only listen to porno music.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:Depth and Warmth by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Why give people an 'antidote'? They prefer it that way.

      Personally I'm willing to let sleeping dogs lie. But when the dog wakes up and starts spewing pseudo scientific crap about how MY choice is inferior, it's time to start smashing egos.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:Depth and Warmth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know what I'd be really interested to test sometime.

      Take a record of any sort, play it, and record the audio to an mp3. There's various devices that will do this... one on thinkgeek if I recall correctly.

      Now take one of these audiophiles and stuff them in a room that has nothing more than a pair of speakers. Have them be stupid high quality, all the bullshit that audiophiles crave.

      Now, have them listen to the mp3 file, and the record. Obviously, to avoid the sound of the needle hitting the record, you would have to start the record, once its playing, fade the music into the speakers, then fade out before the end of the song. Do the EXACT SAME fading in and out for the mp3.

      See if the audiophile is capable of telling which recording was the record, and which was the mp3.

    20. Re:Depth and Warmth by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      And then you get the bands who decide think that "Loud" is the best way to hear their music - Displaying nothing of the musical dynamics that you may hear on their studio recordings.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    21. Re:Depth and Warmth by NoMaster · · Score: 2

      "Vinyl's an interesting case - there's something to be said about its distortions, but it's also because of the limits of mastering which resulted in the loudness wars not happening to it. (Note: it's possible to have dynamic-range-compressed masters sent to Vinyl, in which case they sound just as awful as the CD)"

      Errr... you do realise that the "loudness wars" began before the Age of the CD, don't you? Over-compression was a common discussion point in the audio engineering trade & audiophile magazines in the 70's, and it was taken to extremes on rock/pop singles & compilations. Not only was it possible, but it was commonplace.

      And that was on top of the necessity for a certain amount of DRC anyway, just to 'fit' the signal onto vinyl's limited dynamic range (55-65dB max for a pristine commercially-pressed album vs 96dB? for a CD). Better than that is theoretically possible - in the case of vinyl, careful cutting and a willingness to ignore the effects of pickup compliance on tracking can get you get up around 80dB (IIRC, the famous Telarc release of the 1812 Overture in the late 70's was up around there, but only the best turntables could track it through the cannon shots), but ultimately you're limited by the noise floor of vinyl at one end and the ability to cut/track the groove at the other.

      So vinyl by definition requires noticeable amounts of compression, and the "loudness wars" of over-compression started well before the advent of CDs. CDs certainly made it worse, though...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    22. Re:Depth and Warmth by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      Hm.

      how does graduation, or fornication, affect perception of sound?

      ever since i constructed the 200 L, 12" full-range speakers, i can hear details i could never hear before. MP3? screw that, i can tell if a cd has been properly recorded. metal? pointless. pop? even more so. it sounds clear and perfect, but it is like artificial food flavoring. Acoustic jazz (no electric guitar, eg)? yes. full orchestra? sweet sweet fulfillment.

      I had sex 10 years ago for the first time and graduated high school 15 years ago, fwiw.

      in relation to this topic, i am thinking of getting a turntable, see if the filters on DACs' outputs have any effect on stereo imaging (and for the first time in my life, excepting binaural audio which in itself is a *revelation*, i understood what it means, because you have to place your head in centimeter-exact position).

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    23. Re:Depth and Warmth by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      To further bring out the point about what I fear in regards to the Ableton Live generation: So-called "epic trailer" music, that is so generic and bland that is all the rage on many esports streams to give a break from the dubshit...

      Two Steps From Hell, Audiomachine and similar crap.... I mean, it's so bland and overboosted that it becomes... yawnworthy...

    24. Re:Depth and Warmth by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Fossilization of that sort has little to do with those milestones, it's just that at those points people tend to correlate to a drop in pressure to be open minded about new experiences.

      For example, once one gets married, their partner will have a pretty substantial say in what activities they can try in the future and won't be likely to expose one to the broad range of ideas that a new girlfriend would.

      And for people who don't move on to college, one isn't likely to be forced to be exposed to all the new music and such after one graduates high school.

      So, there is probably something to it, but ultimately, it's most likely a byproduct of not pushing ones boundaries and comfort zone. I don't personally bother with new music lately, but that's largely a budgetary thing. Finding good indie music is easier than it was when I was in high school, but it's still a lot harder than finding Bieber.

    25. Re:Depth and Warmth by Swarley · · Score: 1

      This has been done. The results are entirely predictable in that almost any fool can tell the difference between a low bitrate MP3 and a CD or vinyl. Very few people can tell the difference between a 350kbps MP3 and CD or vinyl, but some people can (doubtful that all audiophiles fall into this group but some surely do). Most interestingly is that younger people had a much higher chance of preferring the low bitrate mp3 to the CD or vinyl.

    26. Re:Depth and Warmth by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      could you give some examples about what you say in the second paragraph?

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    27. Re:Depth and Warmth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol you had sex 5 years AFTER graduating highschool. Not something I'd admit to on the internet.

    28. Re:Depth and Warmth by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      after the right burritos (or vindaloos, whatever your pref is), you can create all the Monster Air(tm) you want.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    29. Re:Depth and Warmth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're on the right track, but a little early. Men's taste in everything (clothes, hairstyles, music etc) freezes on the day they get married, and never truly recovers

    30. Re:Depth and Warmth by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Are generally found to be distortion and a roll off of high frequencies when one bothers to take apart the actual music reproduction.

      Some people have become accustomed to these artifacts and so prefer them.

      The only real antidote is to go to live music performances to hear what they really sound like.

      I'd recommend that for people used to modern pop recordings too. I think many would be shocked to hear what they are missing in the horribly compressed and otherwise doctored up recordings that are sold today.

      By definition, anything that differs between the original sound recording and the reproduction is distortion of some kind. As you say, some people consider certain kinds of distortion desirable. What the "audiophiles" that prefer vinyl don't seem to understand is that the distortion they desire doesn't have to come from the playback device any more. It would work just as well to run everything through a turntable during mastering and digitize the result for a high quality, dynamic medium like CD. Then, they could get the same "warm" distortion every time they play the recording rather than having it degrade over time.

    31. Re:Depth and Warmth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I"m getting at there is that a wife or husband tends to have relatively fixed interests and one will typically negotiate what activities will be shared, but that has to happen again each time you get a new partner.

    32. Re:Depth and Warmth by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      The pipe organ is the only instrument able to play a warm deep bass where only the harmonics extend up into the audible range. Several organs have had pipes producing clean notes below 10 Hz, including the infamous "brown note" which is supposed to be around 7 Hz. The test Mythbusters performed to bust this myth used only a clean frequency (sinus tone), not a real tone with harmonics. They also did the test outside, not in a closed space with echo and reverberation.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    33. Re:Depth and Warmth by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Music is not about the quality of the recording. It is about the emotion that is brings and the memories that it feeds."

      Thank you.

      When the music transcends the medium, it doesn't matter if it sounds like cats being fed through a wood chipper. If it moves you, that's good enough.

  8. That "warmth" and "depth" are electrical noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old hi-fi systems had superb ESR that rival that of a poorly made PC power supply. Its all a gimmick to sell to the old, rich folks who used to listen to vinyl when they were younger and stoned out of their minds.

  9. Back to bad times by Airon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a professional recording, editing and mixing engineer, all I can say is NO THANK YOU.

    For those who place a premium on scratchy, error-prone, expensive, one-time and short recordings this might be neat. There are lots of reasons we started using tape in the late 40s and early 50s in the music recording industry, and loads of reasons we're recording digitally now.

    Quality, speed, cost. A direct-to-disc recording system ain't it on any of those fronts.

    1. Re:Back to bad times by petsounds · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Digital has nothing to do with this -- this is for listeners who still prefer a physical product to hold.

      As a recording engineer, you should know that tape machines are a PITA in terms of maintenance and upkeep. Not something your average indie band has the money/skills/space to keep around in working order. And good-quality tape is harder to find these days. This vinyl system, if it works as well as they say it does, allows an artist to do a small run of high-quality physical products. 180g vinyl is top quality, assuming the transfer is good. This is a great thing for indie artists. Think of it as craft beer for musicians.

    2. Re:Back to bad times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Quality, speed, cost.

      Pick any two.

      I would be interested to hear if you, as an audio engineer, your opinion on music recording practices today.

  10. Good idea! by EllisDees · · Score: 1

    Totally worth doing! Now if only there were some way of playing that analog record with fidelity anything even remotely approaching a dollar store cd player. Even the most expensive record player has measurable wow and flutter, and driving a needle through vinyl grooves immediately degrades the sound. What's the point of this again?

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    1. Re:Good idea! by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Money.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if only there were some way of playing that analog record with fidelity anything even remotely approaching a dollar store cd player.

      Remind me what kind of quality DAC this dollar store disc player will have? There's a lot a digital device can lose in this area, and by default analogue devices have a definite advantage –at least regarding the lack of a DAC – here.

    3. Re:Good idea! by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Yes of course, and you play this perfect digital sound through 5$ earphones or super inefficient resonant speakers that distort by definition.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  11. Hmmm by Waveguide04 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that we can usher in a new wave of music piracy? Don't need any MP3s, just distribute the content as 3D printer files and drive up the demand for such devices and filament. :)

  12. Re:crap by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Just do what Lisa and I have been doing all the times something like this happens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi3HdVJUAyA

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. Placebo by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

    A while back I was looking at an advertisement for a medication used to treat people with a bladder problem. In the fine print it said that in clinical trials, 79% of the people who took this medication reported an improvement in their bladder problem, compared to 49% who reported an improvement after taking a placebo. Half the people who took a placebo claimed they got better.

    These must be the same people who believe that vinyl LPs " have a depth and warmth that CDs and MP3s lack"

    1. Re:Placebo by Jonner · · Score: 1

      A while back I was looking at an advertisement for a medication used to treat people with a bladder problem. In the fine print it said that in clinical trials, 79% of the people who took this medication reported an improvement in their bladder problem, compared to 49% who reported an improvement after taking a placebo. Half the people who took a placebo claimed they got better.

      These must be the same people who believe that vinyl LPs " have a depth and warmth that CDs and MP3s lack"

      Indeed, the placebo effect is well documented in scientific studies. What's really crazy is that in health and music experience, sometimes perception is reality. Maybe we should just let the "audiophiles" remain blissfully ignorant while we spend much less money listening to CDs and FLACs.

  14. Re:crap by rudy_wayne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Vinyl remains king in the electronic/hiphop/whatever DJ scene.

    Where sound quality is of absolutely no concern.

  15. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, this guy in germany who sold me this metal box with vacuum tubes sticking out said it would help with my music playback and so far, after buying accessory after accessory I am left with no money...

  16. Hear that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the sound of maybe 5,000 people who actually think this is cool, and the maybe 1/3 of them who would actually buy a record and only half of those would actually listen to it.

    This is just some fad being put out in the hopes of playing on nostalgia or perhaps people who would actually think they might be worth money someday and that's it. Its like how some horror movies were put on VHS a couple years and it caused no resurgence, same thing with tapes and a couple releases of sega genesis games put back out. No one cared and they all fizzled before they even launched.

    The people who truly have a passion for records do not care about this. Like my best friends uncle, he doesn't care a bit about this or anything released on record. He prefers original records from when they were widely used and his collection is about 3,000+

  17. Gullible Moron! by t4ng* · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "...the first Super Mario he had a square nose. That’s what your audio looks like in 16-bit format. What vinyl’s actually doing is stretching those square waves and rounding them out..."

    "Well, I have no technical training at all. No mechanical engineering experience."

    Yes, and it shows. I wonder if he thinks black and white kinescope recordings from the 50's have more warmth and depth than digital HDTV.

    1. Re:Gullible Moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, the guy has no fucking clue what he's talking about. He's just parroting back jargon he's heard.

      I wouldn't buy a dish sponge from this idiot.

    2. Re:Gullible Moron! by Saffaya · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the kinescope you refer to is, but France had black and white HD (737i) in 1949 and until 1983 :

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_high-definition_television_system

      My point is, do not belittle accomplishments of the past just because they are from the past.

    3. Re:Gullible Moron! by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the kinescope you refer to is, but France had black and white HD (737i) in 1949 and until 1983 :

      Kinescope is a fancy way of saying 'pointing a film camera at a TV screen'. You can see the picture quality it produces on old black and white Doctor Who shows from the BBC.

    4. Re:Gullible Moron! by MessageApprovalMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's funny how he linked to a Wikipedia article but didn't go one step further and look up kinescope on Wikipedia.

      --
      I'm Message Approval Man, and I approve this message.
    5. Re:Gullible Moron! by Monoman · · Score: 1

      I agree. However, I can't help but to think how digital sampling is the exact opposite problem. Taking a good quality analog source with smooth curves and then making it digital with a jagged curve. Now I understand the theory behind it all that if the sampling is done at or above a certain frequency then it will be just as good as the source. It just found the super mario example silly and humorous.

      Maybe with enough the right square stretching algorithms we won't be able to notice ... or perhaps the sound will improve! ;-)

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    6. Re:Gullible Moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't help but to think how digital sampling is the exact opposite problem. Taking a good quality analog source with smooth curves and then making it digital with a jagged curve.

      Digital waveforms are not "jagged" - this is a common misunderstanding of how sampling works. Usually the waveform is drawn with either a horizontal line between samples ("staircase") or a straight line from sample value to sample value ("zigzag"). Neither is representative of the source waveform; there is actually nothing "between samples." Samples are discrete.

      Here are a couple links to explain why the waveform you get from a DAC is smooth:

      https://wiki.xiph.org/Videos/Digital_Show_and_Tell

      http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=93496

  18. Can we get a "Hipster" category? by Gothmolly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So I can ignore it?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  19. But I thought my $6000 PlayStation was the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at playing audio... dat depth and mid-level tone.

    See, I'm an audiophile, too, since I can put together words like, hi-fi, depth, tone, nuance, g-chord all in one sentence...

  20. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No. Vinyl is no longer king shit of EDM. That would be laptops and CDJs nowadays. Your knowledge is about 10 years out of date. Yes, Hip-Hop and turntablists and the like still like vinyl to some extent, but pretty much ALL mainstream EDM, trance, techno, progressive, dubstep, whatever, uses CDs and laptops.

    Welcome to the 21st century.

  21. Content is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current vinyl comeback is cute and I'm happy it might be helping certain record stores/independant artists as those are generally great people and support great communities. On the other hand vinyl sounds awful with even a reasonable setup. Most annoying to me is a lot of content is released as vinyl only, or even LIMITED vinyl release. Nope I always prefer a digital or cd source as I hate wow and flutter and distortion. The community around the vinyl comeback is a bit mad, let's just focus on good content guys.

  22. Not cool enough by shadowrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm holding out for 3d printed records.

    1. Re:Not cool enough by mars64 · · Score: 2

      Almost there! We can currently print at an end-product resolution of 600dpi, translating to ~6-bit/11kHz fidelity. Compared to the average professionally produced CD of 16-bit/44.1kHz fidelity. http://www.amandaghassaei.com/3D_printed_record.html

    2. Re:Not cool enough by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out for 3d printed records.

      The Star Wars theme song, being played from a 3d printed disc on a vintage kids' Fisher-Price record player.
      Someone's also printing Beastie Boys for Fisher-Price.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:Not cool enough by Tapewolf · · Score: 1

      Almost there! We can currently print at an end-product resolution of 600dpi, translating to ~6-bit/11kHz fidelity. Compared to the average professionally produced CD of 16-bit/44.1kHz fidelity.

      http://www.amandaghassaei.com/3D_printed_record.html

      That is fascinating, and I love the idea. But it's not going to fly unless they can get rid of the wailing sound (apparently caused by the 'voxels' which the record is made up of)

  23. Digital music is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only ever going to be an approximation of the source.

    1. Re:Digital music is.. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      just like your analog recording....only with less noise, wow, flutter, intermod distortion and media degradation.

  24. forget this, real info about vinyl cutting here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.lathetrolls.net/

    the vinylrecorder have a pretty bad reputation, for shall we say "people skills"

  25. Re:crap by xaxa · · Score: 2

    Vinyl remains king in the electronic/hiphop/whatever DJ scene.

    Where sound quality is of absolutely no concern.

    Not quite. It's really obvious if the instruments (synthesisers etc) are cheap, poor quality ones, and quite common for people to consider how good a venue's sound is before seeing a band/DJ play.

    In any case, I've not seen a DJ using a turntable since... ever (~2004)? They use either laptops or CDs. Most electronic bands I see use at least one laptop.

  26. Nyquist-Shannon by attah · · Score: 2

    While I too prefer the sound of a vinyl sometimes, he is full of s*it, comparing it to a 16-bit mario game. Someone should introduce him to Nyquist-Shannon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem

  27. Clean digital, please by steveha · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of my favorite albums was recorded "direct to disk", with a vinyl cutting machine recording the performance live, and the band playing each record side straight through in one set. (The album was James Newton Howard and Friends.)

    But here's the thing: they also ran a digital recorder, and the CD was made from the clean digital recording. Then they mastered the CD properly, and it's a very nice CD. I don't think it would be improved by a less-clean recording process.

    Oh, my. It's been re-issued, with a new master made from the direct to disc vinyl recording! So it looks like Sheffield Labs thinks it is improved by using a less-clean recording process. No thanks, I'll keep my clean digital copy.

    There is exactly one good thing about vinyl recordings: they make it impossible to really over-gain the music to where the wave forms are mangled by hard-clipping. But the alternative is to make a digital copy and just, you know, don't over-gain it.

    As with tube amplifiers, there is distortion associated with vinyl records that some people like. The solution is to make a digital filter that simulates this distortion. I helped write such a filter, and I actually like using it when I listen to music with headphones. But I don't want this sort of distortion impressed forever upon the music at the time of recording!

    We have the technology to just make a clean copy of the artist's performance. Once that is done, the album can be mastered, and remastered. Heck, record it with a clean digital process and then carve it into vinyl if you want to... just keep the clean digital copy around, so that someday you can change your mind and release a version without the analog distortion.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Clean digital, please by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      It isn't about "a less-clean recording process" or improving it by means thereof.

      Your understanding of analogue is seriously flawed; indeed, you can get "clipping" with any analogue signal.

      There's more than "one good thing" about analogue recording - you just don't understand what analogue IS.

      Tube amps do not necessarily distort, and an imitation of analogue distortion is just an imitation.

      Everyone that rated your remarks highly are stunningly stupid. As opposed to ignorant. Ignorant people at least COULD potentially educate themselves. Stupid people CHOOSE to remain ignorant.

  28. He said huge organ by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

    heh-heh. that was cool

  29. Re:crap by xaxa · · Score: 1

    It's really obvious if the instruments (synthesisers etc) are cheap, poor quality ones...

    I should say, it's really obvious to me, and others, but certainly a lot of people don't care.

    I wear high-ish quality earplugs (£20), and don't take any drugs beyond one or two alcoholic drinks.

  30. Meh by Niris · · Score: 2

    This article makes people who listen to vinyl sound pretentious as all get out. I have a decent sized collection of vinyl records that I listen to daily, but that's mainly because I won a pretty sweet turntable and stereo set. MP3 has its place, like in the car and whatnot, but I do enjoy just putting on a record and listening to it from start to finish as well. I also enjoy owning the physical records and going through the case artwork, etc. A couple of my Floyd and Jethro Tull albums have photo books in them. I guess the point is who cares what form your music takes? If you enjoy it, go for it. If not, that's cool too.

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how can I feel like I'm better than you if I have that mindset?

      No, I'd rather take a few arguments made by those ignorant to the benefits of vinyl and use that to show how all people who listen to vinyl are idiots.

    2. Re:Meh by Airon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Playing a vinyl album requires taking it out of its cover, placing it carefully on the turn table, maybe dusting it off with a special long brush and lifting the arm up to the vinyl(or use some automatic system you rich person you). Then you might sit there with the open jacket covers that are almost as large as a 24 inch monitor and liste to it front to back.

      That process does give the experience some gravity, as opposed to flipping a piece of shiny plastic in to an open tray of a CD/DVD/Blueray player, or a drive in a PC for ripping.

      Then there's the unfortunate tendency to limit the dynamic range of what are mixes with much higher fidelity than those thirty years ago to such a degree that the tracks are often so noisy and distorted that people complain about fatigue setting in. Vinyl records have to be mastered to within the limits of the medium, which does not permit such harsh treatment of the material as is possible on CDs.

      The vinyl as a medium is vastly inferior in quite a few ways, but the material does tend to be mastered differently for it, which is often much more pleasant.

      Thankfully we're starting to see some trends in the opposite direction in which digital recordings are mastered without the harsh treatments. HDTracks.com for example sells some of those tracks, like a remaster of Green Day's American Idiot album that has actual drum transients, instead of clipped dog shit.

  31. Fogies and Audiophiles? What about djs? by mars64 · · Score: 1

    Despite the audiophilia-disposition of the video, my personal observation has been that DJs and audiophiles have kept the industry in motion. I personally continue to collect vinyl, because I actively play vinyl. It's a heartache when a venue doesn't have turntables, but I do have Serato to keep me in the game. But I digress. http://blog.dubspot.com/the-resurgence-of-vinyl-continues-in-2012-record-stores-making-a-comeback/ I'd be curious to know what the conversion rate of newbie-djs-with-digital-tools-to-vinyl is. With such ubiquitous technologies for emulating turntables (and jesus poses!), it seems feasible that a wider market share of DJs contributes to vinyl's extended lifespan.

    1. Re:Fogies and Audiophiles? What about djs? by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      Just 'friended' you because it's always nice to see a fellow DJ on Slashdot, and thus, I think I'm baiting myself for an "offtopic" mod since I gather that you will understand me, but many with mod points will not. I started out using Mixmeister (still an excellent product in its own right), but then went to Torq (also an excellent product, just a bit too late to market with a few too many shortcomings in its early releases), and finally got myself an SL-3 a few years ago. There are three broad reasons why I'm unconvinced that DJs are keeping the market alive in the way that you claim:

      1.) The best selling record for the last several years is, unsurprisingly, the Serato control vinyl. Resultantly, a handful of vinyl pressing plants are still up and running, but the medium as a whole isn't really garnering many DJs.

      2.) Panasonic stopped making the Technics 1200s in 2010. I love my Numark TTX decks, and there's been a Stanton turntable that a few jocks have said comes in "close second" to the 1200, but getting into the vinyl game these days requires much more intent, especially since...

      3a.) Controllers are all the rage these days. Everyone from American Audio to Pioneer is making a controller with jog wheels and cue points these days, and I'd wager that most of the bedroom DJs are starting there, simply because it's a much more affordable starting point than a pair of turntables at minimum $800/pair - you can get a Virtual DJ controller, the kitchen sink edition of VDJ, and a whole lot of Beatport tracks for the same money.

      3b.) I'd love to see plenty more top 40 tracks make their way onto vinyl so I could get a better handle at spinning real vinyl vs. control tone (I do mobile stuff, not clubs). The chicken-and-egg problem is that it's incredibly difficult to amass enough records to justify the workflow, and even then you're hard pressed to get Crooklyn Clan style transitions and party breaks pressed to wax. Sure, you'll always find a club guy or two who will keep to vinyl, and yes, I'd love nothing more than to be able to mark up all of my records with cue labels and be able to go out and do a set with them. If you're starting out now, it takes a LOT more dedication to get a pair of turntables and enough vinyl to forego a DVS, and at that, you'll need to make a name for yourself with "I only spin REAL vinyl" being your schtick, and then find someone who cares enough about what you use to make that an actual selling point, AND is willing to pay you what you're asking since you'll inevitably be asking more than the next guy who is using the aforementioned controller and collection of MP3s from Beatport or DJ City.

      Me personally, I was thrilled to find Deborah Cox's "Something Happened on the Way to Heaven" and Tiesto's "Silence" (the "In Search of Sunrise" mix that takes the entire side of a 33) both pressed on vinyl. If I find a recognizable track here or there, I'll pick it up. Every so often I'll go on eBay on a vinyl binge and see if I can find any memorable songs pressed on a record, but it once annually, if that, when I find myself setting Scratch Live into "thru" mode to play an actual record...if for no other reason that I've been spoiled by relative mode where bumping the needle doesn't actually cause a disruption to the music.

    2. Re:Fogies and Audiophiles? What about djs? by akirapill · · Score: 1

      Whenever, the subject of vinyl comes up on Slashdot I am reminded of this: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WhatAreRecords The joke is that old people make jokes about young people not recognizing vinyl.

    3. Re:Fogies and Audiophiles? What about djs? by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      Hi, vinyl DJ here (waves) .... I'm personally sick of people arguing about audio quality. I just like having a physical copy of the music i can fumble with, MP3 vs Vinyl is like porn vs sex. I'm also an electronic noise artist * and would love to do a run of vinyl, but at the moment you have to fork out for about 300 units at a time, when maybe I just want 12.

      Have been getting used to Traktor lately, and now need to get me some timecode vinyl so I can exist in the netherplane inbetween both worlds. Guess in terms of porn vs sex that's a bit like videoing yourselves and playing it on the tv while you're doing it. Or something.

      What was the subject again?

      *If i use the word musician then some old people will complain that if it doesn't have electric guitars in it can't be music, just like the old people before them saying how electric guitars couldn't POSSIBLY be musical instruments

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  32. obligatory - The Secret Society of Lathe Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Secret Society of Lathe Trolls
    A forum devoted to record-cutting deviants, renegades, professionals & experimenters.
    http://www.lathetrolls.net/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k58qrcIJiEE

  33. Tired of the "Warmth and Depth" Strawman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I buy new vinyl, talk to people at the record store every now and then, and worked with a few people to design a tube amp. Not once have I heard anyone use "warmth" or "depth" to describe music on vinyl. Smoother waveforms at high frequencies is the argument generally used in favor of vinyl, even-ordered harmonics is the argument generally used in favor of tubes. You can argue to death over whether or not these things matter or if the benefits outweigh the negatives of both technologies, but stop using the "warmth and depth" strawman argument you read on the internet from a guy who went to a record store with a bunch of PBR guzzling hipsters. I'm sure I could find people who swear 56Kb MP3s sound no different than 192Kb MP3s and make some fine strawman arguments, too.

  34. It's all in your mind by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    Hearing the difference between 128 and 164 kbit/s, between Vinyl and
    CD, between Klipsch speakers and B&W speakers -- it's all in you mind.

    To NOT know is to enjoy unimpeded. So yes, give me vinyl; just don't
    tell me.

  35. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wear high-ish quality earplugs (£20), and don't take any drugs beyond one or two alcoholic drinks.

    I'd argue that LSD and MD*A (ie, hippie/rave drugs) actually increase one's ability to perceive subtle differences in sound. alcohol, without a doubt, reduces it. Pot is debatable.

  36. And why nobody's quoting this... by xded · · Score: 2

    Tim: Usually in 2013, you see people going from vinyl to digital formats, here you are doing the opposite, you’ve got a CD player here that’s feeding music over to a vinyl cutting lathe.

    Believe what you want about vinyl records, but recording on vinyl something coming out of CD player goes against any logic he could try to follow.

  37. Re:crap by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    then why do most of them use cdjs now... with flash drives? sure sometimes they break out the vinyl for fun and show, but it is not the dominant media anymore.

  38. Re:crap by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I'd argue that LSD and MD*A (ie, hippie/rave drugs) actually increase one's ability to perceive subtle differences in sound. alcohol, without a doubt, reduces it. Pot is debatable.

    I'm completely put off by the uncertainty of what I'd be buying, and from watching the people that do take various drugs. I've considered MDMA, but I'm not interested enough to try it. (I don't use caffeine, so a large cola can get me pretty excited...)

    Most people at the clubs I go to do amphetamines or ketamine. It seems to make them boring to talk to (too easily distracted, unable to concentrate enough to finish a sentence).

  39. Re:forget this, real info about vinyl cutting here by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    people skills are overrated.. i dont care someone's attitude as long as their facts and conclusions are correct.

  40. Wrong terms used. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    "Warmth" and "Depth" are actually known as "distortion".

  41. Electric recording is no substitute for acoustic by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Electric recording has a harsh sound that can't compare with the human warmth of direct, acoustically-recorded 78-rpm shellac.

    Although direct acoustical recording has a peaky response, the peaks occur in just the right places to make the sound richer.

    There is no upper frequency cutoff at all. Logically, ultrasonic frequencies must move the recording stylus and make some impression on the disk, an impression that can be heard even if it can't be seen or measured. These homeopathic doeses of ultra-high-frequency sound explain the airy "open" feeling never experienced with vinyl LPs.

    A pair of ticks separated by 1800 milliseconds on an LP distract your attention and spoil the sonic experience, but you can listen "through" a steady continuous series of ticks at 767-millisecond intervals on a scratched 78, because due to the endless repetition you can anticipate and ignore them.

    Finally, and most important, when you drop a 78 on edge and it instantly shatters into three wedges held together at their points by the label, the sharp pang of sudden loss makes you feel how valuable and precious these disks are, giving you an emotional connection you can never have with unbreakable vinyl.

  42. Makes a Comeback.... by dark+grep · · Score: 1

    TEN YEARS AGO!

    This news is about as current as 9/11. Double pressed vinal records have been in my local music store for at least the last 10 years,and I first heard about them at least 15 years ago. Turntables have never stopped being manufactured and there have always been specialist high end audio shops selling them, along with valve amps.

  43. Ah, no thank you. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I think people are forgetting that while a newly-pressed vinyl album may _sound_ great on first playback, you're forgetting that being a mechanical storage medium, vinyl records suffer from the following problems:

    1. The record and the needle will wear out from physical contact.
    2. If the record center hole is not perfectly centered, you get unpleasant "wowing" effect.
    3. The surface of a vinyl record scratches rather easily.
    4. The signal-to-noise ratio of a vinyl record is about 55-60 db, far below the 90+ db of a Compact Disc.
    5. Setting up the tone arm is very finicky, what with correct tonearm placement, proper tracking force and proper anti-skating force.
    6. The preamp's phono inputs require a high-gain low-noise amplifier if you're using a moving-coil cartridge.
    7. Vinyl records can "warp," which can cause serious tracking problems.
    8. You have to deal with turntable rumble, unless the turntable is heavy and driven by a properly-engineered belt-drive system.

    To get everything right, the cost of a quality turntable nowadays can run into the _thousands_ of dollars.

    It's a pity that a the war between DVD Audio and Sony's Super Audio CD killed any chance of a second-generation optical disc based on DVD technology with vastly higher data sampling rates than Compact Discs. I've listened to a DVD Audio disc and the audio quality is _phenomenal_, especially the crystal-clear treble playing back high notes on a piano, a piccolo or cymbals. And unlike vinyl records, DVD Audio or SACD discs don't suffer from the mechanical playback issues that limit vinyl records.

    1. Re:Ah, no thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's a pity that a the war between DVD Audio and Sony's Super Audio CD killed any chance of a second-generation optical disc based on DVD technology with vastly higher data sampling rates than Compact Discs. I've listened to a DVD Audio disc and the audio quality is _phenomenal_, especially the crystal-clear treble playing back high notes on a piano, a piccolo or cymbals. And unlike vinyl records, DVD Audio or SACD discs don't suffer from the mechanical playback issues that limit vinyl records."

      You can have the same quality of music as DVD-A (24/96 audio) on a standard DVD; that's been included in the DVD specifications since the day it was launched. Neil Young released a number of albums in this format (Chrome Dreams, Prairie Wind, etc) when his original plan to do successive DVD-A releases withered due to the decline of DVD-A itself. Most people didn't get what was going on there (an understatement), but those are hi-def recordings rather than video-focused releases.

      Bluray also offers a disc-based hi-definition option, with 24/192. There's been a bit of a lack of interest in better-than-CD quality music (the continued flourishing of MP3 is testament to that), but at the same time, things have diversified, and people may slowly come around to the alternatives to lower-quality digital files. Ideally, the music industry would do more to promote that, but it looks like that's not going to happen. However, if it's disc-based hi-definition audio you want, you can make your own DVDs or Blurays, or indeed DVD-Audio discs. Linn has a download service for exactly that. So does HDTT.

    2. Re:Ah, no thank you. by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      I've listened to a DVD Audio disc and the audio quality is _phenomenal_, especially the crystal-clear treble playing back high notes on a piano, a piccolo or cymbals.

      In your mind only. Or it was differently mastered than the CD. CD quality is perfect for human hearing. Higher bitrates and frequencies achieve nothing as you can't hear it anyway. DVD-A or SACD may be better for dogs though. Or bats.

    3. Re:Ah, no thank you. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the higher bit rates have the advantage that treble frequencies don't sound "harsh" like they do on a Compact Disc. As such, musical instruments with a lot of treble frequency energy like a piccolo or cymbals actually sound like the real thing.

    4. Re:Ah, no thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not saying you're wrong, but do you have any studies to back this up? In my experience, harsh treble has everything to do with EQ during mixing and mastering and nothing to do with sampling rate.

      Can you specify what you believe you are hearing that makes highs harsh or not harsh?

  44. He looks like young Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. His face. He could play Steve Jobs in a new movie. Too bad he's a total douchebag. And the voice doesn't fit.

  45. Re:crap by The+Lyrics+Guy · · Score: 1

    Come out to Cambridge/Boston and visit Elements at Phoenix Landing. Longest running DnB night in the US at 15 years nearly. Preferred format by many DJs is still vinyl on 1200s. You can keep your dubstep and prog house.

  46. The fidelity from vinyl is actually quite good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fidelity from vinyl is actually quite good, the first time you play it. Fidelity only drops by .5% every time you play a vinyl record. 200 plays before its all hiss, pops and clicks. Like a mad farmer ploughing a field, the stylus is dragged through the groves on the disk. It only changes the recording by a small amount each time, unlike a CD which can be played continuously for 20 years with no measurable loss in quality or fidelity (likewise an mp3 stored on a hard disk or flash drive). There is a lot of noise about vinyl sounding 'warmer' but that's a load of bunk. If you want to listen to rumble and hiss, have fun. I like cd's and mp3's. You can play them till you are tired of them.

  47. Re:crap by akirapill · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately even in DNB this is the case. I play strictly vinyl and have a couple hundred DNB plates - however fewer and fewer releases are coming out on wax. I have been purchasing for my new mix and many of the tunes I've been following I have discovered were digital only, or i couldn't find in a main distributor and had to buy through discogs. It varies greatly between labels, and Nu Urban, one of the biggest DnB vinyl distributors just went out of business. The sad fact is that between declining sales and the rising cost of pressing runs, fewer labels are willing to take the risk and put something out on wax - which is too bad because it is definitely the best for spinning - the interface is built right into the medium. If you play dnb please continue to buy vinyl! And Elements is a great night B)

  48. Re:crap by Ghaoth · · Score: 1

    I believe the term "high fidelity" has been removed from the dictionary these days. Listening to MP3 music at high levels through ear buds has probably robbed many ears of any fidelity. Not that MP3 could be deemed to have much fidelity anyway.

    --
    Nos Morituri te salutamus
  49. vinyl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, I knew about vinyl carvers because I've been doing some research, and they will carve a 7" 45 for about $35 per side from your source original. The reason? I'm not some record collector, but I own a wurlitzer silhouette jukebox from the early 80's, that I bought not working originally planning to make it into a fancy looking mp3 jukebox to go with my myth/nfs system, but in a spot of fixy managed to get it working 100%, and now its just so damn nice I cant bring myself to butcher it.
    There IS something different to things on vinyl. While I have a load of mp3's on a share, and probably binned a couple of sacks of cd's from the period, I find myself buying the odd 45 of stuff I like to go in it, unwrapping them, writing the description ticket for the panel and listening to it. In fact its playing now. Maybe the UI is just so easy, just flick a switch and punch a few numbers in on a dedicated and your listening, and the whole watching the carousel loading arm whirling the record round onto the table.
    It's hard to explain I guess. Life is too short to spend out on $50 specialist carved discs though.

  50. RIAA Curve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    back before RIAA was a bad thing, they established a plaback curve that was used to maximize record playback based on how responsive vinyl could be....does this need/use that?

  51. There will always be niche markets by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    for stuff to sell to audiophiles/phools. There is at least one company out there that will record stuff to Edison cylinders for you if you don't mind paying for it.

    Like most junk aimed at audio nut community, its market is limited by the exorbitant prices charged and the small number of afflicted who have the means to indulge their disease. This, like so many other audio trinkets and totems, will disappear quietly without anyone noticing.

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Fogies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Strictly for fogies and maybe a few audiophiles who think analog recordings have a depth and warmth that CDs and MP3s lack."

    What about those of us who realise that there are great recordings from the 40's to 70's that never made it past records? If you restrict your listening to only the latest trend in recording you will miss out on some great music.

  54. Re:crap by NulDevice · · Score: 1

    Traktor has basically taken over electronic DJing, except for old-skool house guys. Everybody else would rather haul a laptop and a controller on the plane than 10 crates of records.

    HipHop still relies on vinyl, but less so for anyone who's not a scratch artist.

    --

    ----
    "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."