Slashdot Mirror


Sony Launches Internet Service Offering Twice the Speed of Google Fiber

An anonymous reader writes "Sony Japan has announced that its own Internet service provider So-net Entertainment has launched what is thought to be the world's fastest Internet connection for home use in Japan with download speed of 2 Gbps on average. This speed is twice as fast as competing high-speed fiber connections in Japan. The ultra-fast connection, known as Nuro, will cost an inexpensive 4,980 yen ($51) per month- offering download speeds of 2 Gbps and uploads of up to 1 Gbps."

268 comments

  1. thnx sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    thnx sony 2x the first post power

    1. Re:thnx sony by newcastlejon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Enjoy the first post feature while it lasts, it'll be gone in your next mandatory router update.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:thnx sony by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Fine print: Twice the speed refers to the possibility that you may get UP TO twice the speed, if you happen to be the caretaker that lives at the central hub. Upload speeds may vary, and max out at 1kb/s.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:thnx sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modem*

    4. Re:thnx sony by vidnet · · Score: 1

      To prevent piracy, there is a 25 MB/day cap. A company spokesperson assured us that this does not affect the average person, as it's equivalent to over eight copies of the entire Lord of the Rings series -- much more than any mortal being could possibly plow through in 24 hours.

  2. Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No doubt Sony will figure out a way to ensure that you only use it for Sony approved content.

    They will actually turn the internet into a series of tubes, all controlled by Sony Inc.

    1. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      All the better to deliver rootkits, DRM'd DLC and other Sony owned crap. Let's not forget the special consideration their PS# packets will get to improve their customers' perceived experiences.

      Oh, I almost forgot ... this will help hackers harvest data faster from Sony the next time they leave their back doors wide open.

    2. Re:Sony will figure out a way by man_the_king · · Score: 2, Funny

      All the better to deliver rootkits, DRM'd DLC and other Sony owned crap. Let's not forget the special consideration their PS# packets will get to improve their customers' perceived experiences.

      Oh, I almost forgot ... this will help hackers harvest data faster from Sony the next time they leave their back doors wide open.

      And...cue the Sony-haters: no matter that Sony has been mostly on the right track these last few years. Keep nursing your grudge, haters, while rational people - who are able to recognize that times change, people change, and even corporations can change (esp because they have been brought down to kneeling like Sony has been in recent times) - will take advantage of Sony's offerings.

    3. Re:Sony will figure out a way by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Since this is in Japan, why do they need to bother? They'll pretty much have a monopoly, unless companies like NTT decide to get into the act. Is Google likely to try duplicating its US efforts in Japan? Actually, there, given how compact that nation is, it will be a loss less extensive effort to set it up there than it is to set it up in the US.

    4. Re:Sony will figure out a way by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      Might very well be a valid argument. I'll consider it after six months have gone by without Sony giving their customers a lubeless ass-fucking.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    5. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not a single Sony exec went to prison for their rootkit. We should all hold a grudge until the perpetrators are brought to justice. People like you who just forget about their criminal activities are the problem, not those who would hold them accountable.

    6. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their stance on DRM doesn't seem to have changed, and why would anyone who cared forgive them for removing OtherOS? Sony has shown that it will readily harm its own customers as long as it thinks it has a good excuse (usually 'piracy'), and (in the case of OtherOS) will sometimes try to justify this by saying that its actions only harmed a few people.

    7. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The XCP rootkit alone should have clued you that you're an idiot for buying electronics from them, that was only 10 years ago. Yes, I was a victim and yes, I'm pissed that nobody went to prison for it. Once bitten, twice shy. The OtherOS debacle was only five years ago, the hack only a couple of years ago. Sony has shown absolutely no indication that they're going to change their ways, and the fact that they're going to require an always-on internet connection for single player games shows they have no remorse and have no plans to become any less evil.

      Look, a guy goes to prison for theft, well, you might want to give him a break and hire him when he gets out -- but not the third time he's gone to prison for stealing.

      Anybody who would buy anything electronic from Sony is brain-dead stupid. It isn't like there are no other suppliers. I'll give them twenty years, if they don't get caught fucking over their customers in the next two decades I'll consider them. But the same people who ran Sony through XCP, OtherOS and the hack scandal are still there. You're a fucking idiot to trust them, dumbass.

    8. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not a single Google exec went to prison for their illegal monitoring of personal electronic communications. We should all hold a grudge until the perpetrators are brought to justice. People like you who just forget about their criminal activities are the problem, not those who would hold them accountable.

    9. Re:Sony will figure out a way by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      My first thought. Getting your Internet connection from a pro-DRM media company with a fetish for proprietary tech rivaled only by Apple's, what could possibly go wrong?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did he say anything good about Google? Oh, wait... he didn't! You simply assumed he did.

    11. Re:Sony will figure out a way by englishstudent · · Score: 1

      You might think so, but the amount of red tape you would have to jump through would likely negate that.

      --
      We'll never make it.......oh! we made it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM&list=FL7kKrE4eTs17mQl7eyvJIOg
    12. Re:Sony will figure out a way by man_the_king · · Score: 3, Informative

      The XCP rootkit alone should have clued you that you're an idiot for buying electronics from them, that was only 10 years ago. Yes, I was a victim and yes, I'm pissed that nobody went to prison for it. Once bitten, twice shy.

      The XCP rootkit incident did not affect me - however, I was rational enough to realize that the incident had been perpetrated by BMG Crescendo just before it was acquired by Sony Music or during the acquisition (look up the timeline). And I like the quality of the electronics they make. I also realize that Sony had many different arms which seemed to not even work well together - Sony Music was not governed by the people who make TVs, Blu-ray Players or the PS3. It's only recently that their different divisions seem to have started working towards common goals.

      The OtherOS debacle was only five years ago, the hack only a couple of years ago.

      As for the OtherOS debacle, while I don't really like them taking away a feature (that they did NOT advertize, no matter how much haters like to claim that they did), I can understand the panicked mindset that led them to that rash decision. An idiot called Geohot had just decided to publicize and teach others how to use the OtherOS capability to hack into the PS3 architecture.

      Moreover, Sony's response to the hacks has been much better than ANY other corporation out there - including CitiCorp, Microsoft, etc. They even offered a one-year free identity theft protection. The only reason you are harping on about the hack is because it was Sony.

      ...and the fact that they're going to require an always-on internet connection for single player games shows they have no remorse and have no plans to become any less evil.

      You are thinking of Microsoft and the NextBox. Sony have clearly said they are NOT going to require always-on internet connection for games. So making up lies to support your claim now?

      I'm willing to bet that many of the Sony-haters are XBox fans - who conveniently forget that Microsoft also screwed them over by releasing faulty consoles. Mayhaps you are one of them? Viva la Kinect, right?

      ...you're an idiot ...brain-dead stupid ...You're a fucking idiot ...dumbass.

      Wow, you really have a bee up your bonnet - calling people brain-dead, stupid, idiots and dumb-ass just because they happen to prefer buying well-made products.

      Since you've now insulted me, sworn at me, and called me names multiple times, let me respond in kind: you are a grudge-nursing, bilious, vindictive, jerk.

    13. Re:Sony will figure out a way by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously think that Sony is one monolithic organization? The movies/music people are separate and away from the electronics, which is separate from the playstation. No idea where this group falls under, but most probably not music/movie people.

    14. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously think that Sony is one monolithic organization?

      While you may be technically correct, that's still THEIR problem, not ours. Or at least it should be.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    15. Re:Sony will figure out a way by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Wow, facts instead of spittle. Well done. Curious why so many idiots continue to spout nonsense when facts are so readily available.

    16. Re:Sony will figure out a way by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      More like "facts". The GeoHot hack happened well after the OtherOS removal. And, in typical Sony fanboi fashion, you also demonize him for releasing details that would allow people to, you know, do what they want with the hardware they own.

      And yes, OtherOS *was* advertised. I don't even follow the game industry much and I remember it being listed among the "it only does everything" claims.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    17. Re:Sony will figure out a way by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      lol that funny. It was my first thought too.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    18. Re:Sony will figure out a way by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      How does that old saying go? Screw me once, shame on you. Screw me twice, Shame on me. Or let me put it another way. Look Dad, I know i have wrecked 2 cars already, but I promise I won't wreck this next one.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    19. Re:Sony will figure out a way by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      It's the Slashdot way!

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    20. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since we're all ACs why don't we just talk much shit for no reason. Then whip out our dicks and measure 'em. Then we can see who can piss the furthest! After all, we're all internet tough guys here!

      You're a putz because the other guy pointed out how your argument was horseshit and you decided to try to shout him down rather than accept you were wrong in the first place. Don't make horseshit arguments and people won't have to resist the urge to interject.

    21. Re:Sony will figure out a way by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      And they will remove Linux access for it on the next update

    22. Re:Sony will figure out a way by man_the_king · · Score: 1

      More like "facts". The GeoHot hack happened well after the OtherOS removal. And, in typical Sony fanboi fashion, you also demonize him for releasing details that would allow people to, you know, do what they want with the hardware they own.

      Nope, not "facts" - facts. The original GeoHot hack was released in Jan 2010, and required the OtherOS function of the machine in order to work. That is why SCEA over-reacted and decided to take away OtherOS. If I was SCEA, and my bread and butter depended upon games being sold, and there was a danger that this hack would affect my bread-and-butter, then I might have done the same as well.

      And yes, OtherOS *was* advertised. I don't even follow the game industry much and I remember it being listed among the "it only does everything" claims.

      See this. The original Sony 60 GB model did NOT list OtherOS as a feature.

      Also, see this. There was no mention of OtherOS in the "It only does everything" ad.

      Now please stop lying.

    23. Re:Sony will figure out a way by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      No single banker went to prison for selling phony mortgages.. (though I also put blame on the people who signed UP for the phony mortgages, they should be in debtor's prison.)

    24. Re:Sony will figure out a way by rossz · · Score: 1

      Your memory is faulty. OtherOS was never advertised. It was mentioned (accidently) at a game developers conference in an offhand remark, but it was NEVER EVER NOT ONCE advertised as a feature, especially not as part of the "Does Everything" campaign". I challenge you to find an ad that mentions OtherOS. Since the internet is forever, you should have no problem finding something that might back up your argument. No photoshops, though.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    25. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a putz if you couldn't understand the poster's argument. I guess for you calling something you don't understand horseshit makes everything ok? Dipshit.

    26. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Sony has not promised behave in the future. So, it isn't even as good as the kid who promises not to wreck a third car.

    27. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just have to say, they did advertise the OtherOS feature. It was marked on the back of the PS3 box as a feature. The instruction manual had instructions on how to set up and use the OtherOS. That to me, says they are selling that as a feature.

    28. Re:Sony will figure out a way by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1

      The main contributing factor to fiber being inexpensive is that most lines are run above ground here in Tokyo.

      NTT has a monopoly on Fiber. I haven't researched this, but I would be shocked if Sony wasn't riding on NTT fiber.

      I don't have a motivation to change though. I have a 200/200 capable fiber line (realistically I get 60 to 70 up and down), and bandwidth is never a limiting factor for me.

    29. Re:Sony will figure out a way by Alimony+Pakhdan · · Score: 1

      Silly Coward. So-Net has been around since 1995 and remains just as neutral as any other ISP.

    30. Re:Sony will figure out a way by gullevek · · Score: 1

      I use So-Net and compared to other providers here they are one of the most open ones which do not block anything.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    31. Re:Sony will figure out a way by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out - this was done under BMG. Sony was buying BMG at that moment. In other words, it *wasn't* Sony's fault.

      The blame should be placed correctly.

    32. Re:Sony will figure out a way by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Off on a tangent - I'm pissed that Sony refuses to allow the USA PS3s to play some UK bluerays, the 50Hz ones specifically. I had to go buy a Samsung $50 BR player to play my ordered from UK Planet Earth BlueRays. WTF is up with that!?

    33. Re:Sony will figure out a way by man_the_king · · Score: 1

      Just have to say, they did advertise the OtherOS feature. It was marked on the back of the PS3 box as a feature. The instruction manual had instructions on how to set up and use the OtherOS. That to me, says they are selling that as a feature.

      Not true - check this picture of the box of the original PS3 60 GB - no mention of the OtherOS.

      And providing help and instructions do not constitute advertising for a feature.

      So no, there was NO advertising for the OtherOS feature. As "rossz" said above, please take up the challenge of finding an ad that mentions OtherOS. Otherwise please stop propagating untruths.

  3. And it's in Japan by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Japan already have better connection options than the US? I know that it's fast, but how is this particularly notable?

    1. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      occasionally people who don't live in the US use slashdot.

    2. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Japan has incredibly high population densities relative to the U.S. (same with South Korea), this comparison is pointless. Fiber is expensive over distances, which the U.S. has a lot of.

    3. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Japan already have better connection options than the US? I know that it's fast, but how is this particularly notable?

      It just highlights how bad the US is at internet, just to twist the knife a little.

    4. Re:And it's in Japan by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but what's the point of comparing it with Google's fiber when they aren't even in the same part of the world?

      Unless they're planning to set up their network in a part of the world where Google is also thinking about setting up a network, the comparison is completely meaningless.

    5. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically it's notable because after running us over, Japan has backed up and did it a second time.

    6. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would be a valid point if major US cities had fiber. Except they don't. They have shitty expensive internet just like the rest of the country.

    7. Re:And it's in Japan by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because it goes up to 11.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    8. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but what's the point of comparing it with Google's fiber when they aren't even in the same part of the world?

      Unless they're planning to set up their network in a part of the world where Google is also thinking about setting up a network, the comparison is completely meaningless.

      Because Google is held up as the shining example of what the telcos *could* be providing us... yet in Japan Sony is offering twice the speed for less cost. So maybe Google's offering is not the holy grail of home internet and telcos should be doing better.

    9. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why isn't there something similar (either in raw Mbp/s or Mbp/s/USD) in the high density cities?

    10. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think we all understand the difference in population density and how that affects the cost to provide infrastructure services. That plays a big part in how places in Japan can offer better price and performance than places in the US.

    11. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Japan has incredibly high population densities relative to the U.S. (same with South Korea), this comparison is pointless. Fiber is expensive over distances, which the U.S. has a lot of.

      San Francisco has a higher population density than Tokyo, yet my choices for "high speed" internet are 20mbit Comcast or "up to" 6mbit DSL service from AT&T. U-verse should be "coming soon".

      So it's not just density - the USA has plenty of dense cities without ubiquitous and cheap gigabit internet.

    12. Re:And it's in Japan by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      The numbers are a few years old, but still pretty relevant.

      Seoul is ~16,000 people per square kilometer with > 17.5 million residents
      Tokyo/Yokohama is ~4,700 people per square kilometer with > 33 million residents
      Los Angeles is ~2,750 people per square kilometer with ~12 million residents
      New York City is ~2,050 people per square kilometer with ~18 million residents

      The United States has nowhere near the concentrations or densities of people that Japan and South Korea has. On top of that, the USA has vast distances of relatively nothingness that you need to account for as well... you have to look at the big picture of it all.

      Source: http://www.citymayors.com/statistics/largest-cities-density-125.html

    13. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think we all understand the difference in population density and how that affects the cost to provide infrastructure services. That plays a big part in how places in Japan can offer better price and performance than places in the US.

      So what's the excuse in NY, SF, Chicago, Boston and other high density cities that have a population density greater than Tokyo? If Google can wire up low-density Kansas City and Austin, why can't the telcos figure out how to make money wiring up a neighborhood full of high density apartment buildings?

    14. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exclusivity contracts and peoples willingness to gripe and complain but still pay for it.

    15. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this was true the average connection speed offered in Manhattan would be much faster/cheaper than the average in Stockholm Sweden. It is not.

    16. Re:And it's in Japan by meerling · · Score: 1

      Rubbing salt in the wound
      Displaying the increasing disparity between what our providers call 'high speed broadband' and what they do(Not to mention the pricing differences.)
      Because someone somewhere is getting the dream speeds we drool over
      It's tech oriented and geeky
      That kind of speed in the home is just cool

      Take your pick, all fit the standard Slashdot focus.

    17. Re:And it's in Japan by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Tokyo's population density is significantly higher than New York, LA or any other American city (~4700 per sq km in Tokyo compared to ~2700 per sq km in LA or 2050 in NYC). And then there's the fact that the Tokyo area's total population is almost double NYC's.

    18. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 2

      The numbers are a few years old, but still pretty relevant.

      Seoul is ~16,000 people per square kilometer with > 17.5 million residents
      Tokyo/Yokohama is ~4,700 people per square kilometer with > 33 million residents
      Los Angeles is ~2,750 people per square kilometer with ~12 million residents
      New York City is ~2,050 people per square kilometer with ~18 million residents

      The United States has nowhere near the concentrations or densities of people that Japan and South Korea has. On top of that, the USA has vast distances of relatively nothingness that you need to account for as well... you have to look at the big picture of it all.

      Source: http://www.citymayors.com/statistics/largest-cities-density-125.html

      I think your figures are looking at metro areas, not cities -- Wikipedia says NY population density is 27,550/sq mi (10,640/km2),

      Those vast areas of nothingness don't really matter if you're rolling out fiber to a city, you don't have to roll out fiber to Kansas if you are rolling it out in New York City.

    19. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What choice do we have? The Internet is not really a luxury anymore. It's incredibly hard to do anything without it. Try to buy airplane tickets, for instance.

    20. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 2

      If you look at cities instead of metro areas:

      NY: 27,550/sq mi (10,640/km2)
      Tokyo: 6,000/km2 (16,000/sq mi)

    21. Re:And it's in Japan by unixisc · · Score: 0

      Which is an apples to pineapples comparison. Japan is a compact country with a high population density and that too in a few densely populated metros, so drawing fiber lines to just those major metros is nowhere near as big a challenge as getting vast open cities in the US such as Kansas City or Austin connected. Hedwards is therefore right - comparing a Sony setup in Japan w/ a Google setup in the US is therefore meaningless in terms of demonstrating that 'Google should be doing better'. Also, how are the costs being compared - like what percentage of an average family income in Japan would be spent on this, vs that percentage of an average family income in the US?

      The above story is useful in itself in describing how internet connectivity outside wireless is getting upgraded in Japan. But it's worthless if the idea is to compare it w/ Google projects in the US, or any other company's project in any other country.

    22. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Which is an apples to pineapples comparison. Japan is a compact country with a high population density and that too in a few densely populated metros, so drawing fiber lines to just those major metros is nowhere near as big a challenge as getting vast open cities in the US such as Kansas City or Austin connected. Hedwards is therefore right - comparing a Sony setup in Japan w/ a Google setup in the US is therefore meaningless in terms of demonstrating that 'Google should be doing better'. Also, how are the costs being compared - like what percentage of an average family income in Japan would be spent on this, vs that percentage of an average family income in the US?

      The above story is useful in itself in describing how internet connectivity outside wireless is getting upgraded in Japan. But it's worthless if the idea is to compare it w/ Google projects in the US, or any other company's project in any other country.

      If density were the real issue, NYC, Chicago, Boston, SF, Wash DC would all have cheap residential gigabit fiber.

    23. Re:And it's in Japan by heypete · · Score: 1

      According to the wikipedia, the population density of NYC is 10,640 per square kilometer (26,939 per square kilometer for Manhattan alone). Los Angeles is 3,124 per square kilometer, and Tokyo is 6,810 per square kilometer.

      There's really no excuse for NYC or other US metro areas to not have better internet service even if they do end up having a smaller population in the metro area.

    24. Re:And it's in Japan by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Because Google is held up as the shining example of what the telcos *could* be providing us... yet in Japan Sony is offering twice the speed for less cost.

      Its not twice the speed. 2Gbps up/1Gbps down is not twice as fast as 1Gbps symmetric.

      Plus, Google Fiber has never been billed (even by its fans, much less Google) as "best in the world", but at best "far better than anything that is currently available in the US at its price". People have often cited is as a push toward the US not being as far behind other parts of the developed world in broadband as it currently is.

    25. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many Swedish towns it is possible to get a 1Gbps connection for rougly the same price.
      And our towns have waay lower population density than those mentioned.
      Basically, it is less about population density than about a working market were suppliers compete. I have a 100Mbit/s connection. I have just not found a reason to upgrade as my router has been the slowest part and I haven't had the need.

    26. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus most American cities have much older infrastructure under ground, making wiring more costly, difficult and time consuming.

    27. Re:And it's in Japan by Minwee · · Score: 1

      And don't get me started about "Full Speed" USB.

    28. Re:And it's in Japan by somersault · · Score: 1

      The internet is not really a luxury any more. My evidence: you can't buy (luxury item) without it!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    29. Re:And it's in Japan by Thorizdin · · Score: 1

      I think your figures are looking at metro areas, not cities -- Wikipedia says NY population density is 27,550/sq mi (10,640/km2),

      Those vast areas of nothingness don't really matter if you're rolling out fiber to a city, you don't have to roll out fiber to Kansas if you are rolling it out in New York City.

      Except, the metro areas ARE important, in fact much more important that the city boundaries. Your position that the cities matter is simply incorrect since that's not how telco territories are mapped or operated in large metropolitan areas. Cable franchises are often by the city, but all of the major operators group their franchises together and will only start operations where they can get large chunks of contiguous territory, ie metropolitan areas.

    30. Re:And it's in Japan by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      I think we all understand the difference in population density and how that affects the cost to provide infrastructure services. That plays a big part in how places in Japan can offer better price and performance than places in the US.

      So what's the excuse in NY, SF, Chicago, Boston and other high density cities that have a population density greater than Tokyo? If Google can wire up low-density Kansas City and Austin, why can't the telcos figure out how to make money wiring up a neighborhood full of high density apartment buildings?

      For the Boston area, the issues are:

      1. Old Infrastructure, expensive to run new services as you have to dig up streets, etc., while not affecting existing old infrastructure.
      2. Negotiations must be completed with each town. Some run their own ISP services.
      3. Anti-competitive behavior. Existing ISPs will do anything they can to derail any challenge to their "high-speed" ISP access monopoly. Yes, DSL and satellite are available, but they don't offer the same speeds.

    31. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mbp/s

      A quick fix, that reads "megabits per per second", so you have to drop either the 'p' or '/'.

    32. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your position, "If they can't connect the metro area, don't bother with the more lucrative locations."?

      If they put the infrastructure into the city first, then it becomes cheaper to expand the network to the less dense areas. If there is an issue with territories, then someone really need to step in and shut them up. The FCC should do this, but at this point many are frustrated enough to tell congress to order them to do it. ... Not that I have any aspirations of them doing it correctly if at all in either case.

    33. Re:And it's in Japan by kernelistic · · Score: 1

      The glass itself is cheap - With decently-sized orders, you can get a 1 km run for under $75. The majority of the costs are manpower to string the stuff to poles (or run it through manholes), do splices and OTDR signal levels along the way. Besides higher population density, Japan has an added "advantage" of having lower median income, which is likely to translate into lower labor costs for installation...

    34. Re:And it's in Japan by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Population densities like those of Japan actually costs more because of the cost of installing infrastructure in already packed areas. The good news is once that fiber infrastructure is installed, the upgrade process is relatively cheap and simple.

    35. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Plus most American cities have much older infrastructure under ground, making wiring more costly, difficult and time consuming.

      Many cities in Japan are older than the country of the USA. Tokyo is over 400 years old.

      Ok, to be fair, Tokyo underwent significant rebuilding after the war, but still, that was 60 years ago.

    36. Re:And it's in Japan by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Know what is more expensive than fiber over distance? Copper over distance. Average operational costs of copper is about 20% higher. Even over short distances, fiber is now competitive with copper.

    37. Re:And it's in Japan by Captain+Segfault · · Score: 2

      If you're going to do a comparison like this you really need to count just the 23 special wards (14,485 per square kilometer). Tokyo the prefecture-equivalent "metropolis" includes a lot of areas which are essentially suburban sprawl west of Tokyo -- the Tama area. I don't think anyone would really consider, for example, Hachioji to be part of Tokyo the city, but it is a substantial fraction of Tokyo metropolis -- and if you're coming up with a number as low as 6,810 you're including it.

      This is complicated by the fact there is no longer a government for Tokyo City, which is what used to be the 23 wards. The wards themselves are cities, somewhat comparable to a more independent and smaller form of NYC Boroughs. Conversely, Tokyo metropolis would be something like a separate State of New York City which includes both the Boroughs and Long Island and a couple of small islands in the Caribbean.

      With that said, there's no ward of Tokyo which is as dense as Manhattan. mostly because there aren't a lot of tall buildings. The technology to build earthquake resistant skyscrapers is relatively new compared to a lot of the construction.

    38. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your arguments make no sense, why don't the high density areas have fast low cost access?

      "Also, how are the costs being compared - like what percentage of an average family income in Japan would be spent on this, vs that percentage of an average family income in the US?"

      The price is mentioned, it is really cheap. Both in absolute costs as in relative to a families income.

      BTW you might have noticed Japan is a quite active earthquake zone. Putting infra in the ground might be

    39. Re:And it's in Japan by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      My evidence: In the UK, you can't file your tax return without it.

    40. Re:And it's in Japan by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Well according to TFS, it's twice as fast as competing services in Japan. So apparently 1Gbps connections aren't uncommon over there. Of course, TFS doesn't say what the competing services cost, but I suspect that if this one is only a measly $51 (compared to the outrageous prices we pay here in the USA), the competing services probably are pretty cheap too.

    41. Re:And it's in Japan by unrtst · · Score: 1

      There's really no excuse for NYC or other US metro areas to not have better internet service even if they do end up having a smaller population in the metro area.

      There are plenty of excuses, and even some valid ones. Population density just isn't one of them. IMO, the age of the city and its infrastructure plays the biggest role. Keep in mind, Tokyo was hit very very hard during World War II (1944). So, even though Tokyo has been around for centuries, an awful lot of it is new.

    42. Re:And it's in Japan by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      3. Anti-competitive behavior. Existing ISPs will do anything they can to derail any challenge to their "high-speed" ISP access monopoly. Yes, DSL and satellite are available, but they don't offer the same speeds.

      And this is a governmental problem. Why are existing companies allowed to "derail" anyone who wants to compete with them? Obviously, countries such as Japan and Sweden don't have this problem; if some company wants to set up a new ISP service, they just do so, which is why they aren't stuck with dog-slow speeds and insanely-high prices like we Americans are.

      It all comes down to corruption. The USA is as corrupt as Mexico, where rich corporations use the government to set up effective monopolies and prevent any competition. Then we stupid Americans run around complaining about government "regulation" (which is what you need to ensure competition in the first place).

    43. Re:And it's in Japan by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      Yup. And, seriously, I can't be the only one pissed off that they're getting 2gbps for the same price as most of us are paying for 10mbps. That's absurd. And I get nastygrams from the cable company when I watch too much Netflix (sorry, can't justify paying an extra $70 for a bunch of channels I don't want and a cable box).

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    44. Re:And it's in Japan by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      So what you're really saying is that we need a Tokyo Style Firebombing to get us some decent internet?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    45. Re:And it's in Japan by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Thats because its a series of tubes.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    46. Re:And it's in Japan by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Yea, but you've got Cable Cars, Fog and an enchanting elf sized door

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    47. Re:And it's in Japan by malignant_minded · · Score: 1

      Probably because Japan already has great infrastructure while these US cities are antiquated. I suspect it was easier and less red tape for Google to go into a place with less existing infrastructure so they could start from scratch but still have reasonable population density to get a return on their investment than it would have been to try and build infrastructure in a place that has density but also a lot of old equipment that may need to be replaced if even able to do so.

    48. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what's the excuse in NY, SF, Chicago, Boston and other high density cities that have a population density greater than Tokyo?

      The story in Boston:

      Verizon wanted to lay fiber. Mayor-for-Life Menino told them they couldn't cherry pick neighborhoods and rip up streets in poor areas just to provide service to wealthy areas. If they built infrastructure in an area, they had to serve that area. Verizon walked away from the deal.

      That left only Comcast and a few shitty DSL providers for residential connections. Comcast has been steadily jacking up their rates to the point where the FCC stepped in and limited the hikes to 12%/year and mandated they provide an unbundled 3Mbps connection for $50/mo.

      Doing any sort of wiring in Boston is expensive as hell. To open a manhole or put a bucket truck in the street, you need to hire a Boston Police officer for at least 4 hours, even for a 30 minute job. There's a strong union racket that prevents just using cones and/or flagmen. You must have a cop (who sits in their car and surfs the net the whole time)

    49. Re:And it's in Japan by Ioldanach · · Score: 2

      The potential infrastructure available to deployment in the US vs Japan is vastly different. Japan has a population density of 836 people per square mile. That's over 1 person per acre. The US has a population density of 86 per square mile. The difference is a factor of ten. That dramatically reduces the cost per person to deploy, because every mile of fiber can reach many, many more people. In the US, it only becomes cost effective to deliver high speed services in very limited areas. In Japan you can reach a much greater percentage of the population with high speed services.

    50. Re:And it's in Japan by kqs · · Score: 1

      And this is a governmental problem. Why are existing companies allowed to "derail" anyone who wants to compete with them?

      I agree. When someone mugs me, I don't blame the mugger. I blame the police. Maybe we should put the police in prison?

      While the government could do a lot better, let's point blame correctly. It takes two sides to sign an exclusivity contract; only blaming one side is odd. And since most cities had the option of either giving an exclusive contract or their citizens not getting cable, I sympathize with their dilemma.

      A good solution is a build-out owned (and possibly run) by the city, which other ISPs can link into to sell their services. This rarely happens in the US since lobbyist dollars are common and very persuasive.

    51. Re:And it's in Japan by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Elect politicians who will dismantle the regulations which put in place and keep in place the effective monopolies granted to the service providers.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    52. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Francisco has a higher population density than Tokyo

      Not really. The daytime population of San Francisco is high, but the number of people who actually live there is low. If you don't believe me, try to get a bus after sunset.

    53. Re:And it's in Japan by kwark · · Score: 1

      I'm living in a low density, pre-WW 2 era, low income neighborhood. Choices for internet access:
      -3 wireless providers (not counting MVO), my company phone max out a 6/1 Mbps.
      -2 satelite providers (20/2 max)
      -2 DSL providers (not counting resellers), max: 20/1 or 40/4
      -1 cable provider, max 150/5
      -1 open fibre network, max 500/500

      This list is sorted on Mbps/price (max price is something like 70 EUR/month).

      This hood wasn't bombed, unlike the city centre which contained hightech industry for that time. Strangely enough, the city center has no FttH sofar. Even more strange is the initial FttH projects in the higher density neighborhoods near the center failed.

    54. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The potential infrastructure available to deployment in the US vs Japan is vastly different. Japan has a population density of 836 people per square mile. That's over 1 person per acre. The US has a population density of 86 per square mile. The difference is a factor of ten. That dramatically reduces the cost per person to deploy, because every mile of fiber can reach many, many more people. In the US, it only becomes cost effective to deliver high speed services in very limited areas. In Japan you can reach a much greater percentage of the population with high speed services.

      Then don't provide high speed fiber in unoccupied farmland and forests (to who? Birds? Tractors?) and concentrate on the cities. Rural internet is a completely separate issue from providing it in population centers.

    55. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 1

      San Francisco has a higher population density than Tokyo

      Not really. The daytime population of San Francisco is high, but the number of people who actually live there is low. If you don't believe me, try to get a bus after sunset.

      Have you ever been to SF? There are a lot of commuters for sure, but a lot of people live here too. The resident population is around 800,000 - or around 17,000 per square mile. There are "only" about 400,000 commuters that come into the city each day.

      Muni runs most lines until around midnight. Most lines don't drop from their commute frequencies until after 7 or 8pm. Less frequent bus service at night doesn't mean that not many people live in the city, since even city dwellers commute by Muni too.

    56. Re:And it's in Japan by Ingenium13 · · Score: 1

      I'm usually the last person to speak out in favor of Comcast, but in SF my 30mbit Comcast internet just got bumped up to 50 down, 10 up. Definitely noticed a big difference (and that most servers can't keep up), but still a long way off from Google Fiber level of speed.

    57. Re:And it's in Japan by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      I have a high-speed BiDi parallel port, if that'll help...

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    58. Re:And it's in Japan by hawguy · · Score: 2

      And this is a governmental problem. Why are existing companies allowed to "derail" anyone who wants to compete with them?

      I agree. When someone mugs me, I don't blame the mugger. I blame the police.

      If the mugger mugs you every day while a policeman stands by and purposely looks the other direction, you should probably blame the police more than the mugger. The mugger is looking out for his own best interests, he has a family to feed after all, but you are paying the police to look out for *your* interests.

    59. Re:And it's in Japan by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Because Google is held up as the shining example of what the telcos *could* be providing us... yet in Japan Sony is offering twice the speed for less cost. So maybe Google's offering is not the holy grail of home internet and telcos should be doing better.

      Though no other companies that I know of are providing *free* network access (except WiFi in some areas, and I presume a nearby resident could use a bridge to use it as a home network for other devices)..

      from https://fiber.google.com/about/

      Free internet at today's average speeds
      Future-proof your home with free Internet at today's average speeds.
      You can upgrade to Fiber speeds anytime, with no additional equipment needed.
      Up to 5Mbps download, 1Mbps upload speed â No data caps â Free service guaranteed for at least 7 years â Includes Network Box
      $300 construction fee (one time or 12 monthly payments of $25) + taxes and fees

      That intrigues me even more than the ultra high speed Internet for which I don't really have any use.

    60. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. When someone mugs me, I don't blame the mugger. I blame the police. Maybe we should put the police in prison?

      But when a coyote kills a chicken, I blame the farmer. I don't expect coyotes to self-regulate, because they have never been good at it. Even if you make an example of one, the others don't learn. The only effective defense is barriers and vigilance.

      The same goes with corporations. Expecting them to not engage in anti-competitive behavior is setting yourself up for disappointment. They have never been good at it. There is always one that will go a step too far.

      A good solution is a build-out owned (and possibly run) by the city, which other ISPs can link into to sell their services.

      Or, more generally, separate the natural monopoly (layers 1&2) from the service (layers 3+). Heavily regulate the network as a utility, and let all the providers compete on top of it. Most of the country does this for phone and power. The city doesn't need to actually own the utility for this to work.

      This does require a mature distribution technology, such as POTS or grid AC. It doesn't work well when the government-enforced utility monopoly is expected to replace copper with fiber. The last mile may not be stable enough to do this yet.

    61. Re:And it's in Japan by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      One could still go to a library to file it though, right?

    62. Re:And it's in Japan by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      And this is a governmental problem. Why are existing companies allowed to "derail" anyone who wants to compete with them? Obviously, countries such as Japan and Sweden don't have this problem; if some company wants to set up a new ISP service, they just do so, which is why they aren't stuck with dog-slow speeds and insanely-high prices like we Americans are.

      They are? They can just tear up the streets to install (duplicated) cable, thus disrupting people's lives, to create a competing ISP?

    63. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? It only goes to 3?

    64. Re:And it's in Japan by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I agree. When someone mugs me, I don't blame the mugger. I blame the police. Maybe we should put the police in prison?

      If the mugger mugs you while the policeman stands by him, because the mugger is his good buddy, and the policeman threatens to shoot you dead if you try to defend yourself against the mugger, then yes, the policeman should be put in prison.

      It takes two sides to sign an exclusivity contract; only blaming one side is odd. And since most cities had the option of either giving an exclusive contract or their citizens not getting cable, I sympathize with their dilemma.

      Cities never needed to sign any such contracts. "Not getting cable" was never an option. If the cable companies don't care to compete, and require exclusivity contracts to provide service there, then let them go without. How exactly is a cable company going to make any money if they don't install cable service? Surely the cities could allow the cable companies to install cable without an exclusivity contract. If cable company A refuses to install a system, then maybe cable companies B, C, or D would like to install theirs. If they do, they have a shot at getting paying customers. If they refuse, then they're not going to make any money at all.

    65. Re:And it's in Japan by hurfy · · Score: 1

      I think we all understand the difference in population density and how that affects the cost to provide infrastructure services. That plays a big part in how places in Japan can offer better price and performance than places in the US.

      So what's the excuse in NY, SF, Chicago, Boston and other high density cities that have a population density greater than Tokyo? If Google can wire up low-density Kansas City and Austin, why can't the telcos figure out how to make money wiring up a neighborhood full of high density apartment buildings?

      They can, they did, and they do.

      Why would they spend more to get what is likely the same amount of profit?
      9 times out of 10 your choices are 'fast' cable or slower DSL. If people want fast they are probably already a customer. If they came and changed all the connections to 1,2, or 10 Gbps how much more would they make? Pretty sure the answer is 'not enough.'

      Sadly DSL seems to be stagnent (or worse) so no push from competition, if they even want to BE competition :(

    66. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is going to great lengths to overcome the political obstacles to wiring up the neighborhood, and no one will ever know if they actually profit doing so.

      High-density apartment buildings in NY, SF, Chicago and other such cities typically DO have ultra-high-speed broadband options.
      Its called MDU.

      Inevitably, while the service is far better than that offered by the local telco, someone will complain that they don't have a choice of vendors, as if they didn't bother to read their lease or the terms of the homeowner's association when they closed escrow.

      Telcos can't make money if customers aren't willing to buy the product. Verizon has shown for many years that people don't want to pay for fiber.
      If they only served a few buildings, they're accused of cherry-picking.

      Boston fails to get modern broadband, because it ultra-leftwing city council folk want to dictate terms.

    67. Re:And it's in Japan by antdude · · Score: 1

      Isn't that an United Kingdom (UK)/British thing? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    68. Re:And it's in Japan by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Plus most American cities have much older infrastructure under ground, making wiring more costly, difficult and time consuming.

      Because:

      a) Europe and Asia didn't have cities until America showed them how.
      b) European and Asian cities didn't have underground infrastructure until the Romans brought it back from America where everything was originally invented.
      c) Every single city in Europe and Asia was bombed into oblivion during WWII and had to be completely rebuilt, including the underground infrastructure.

    69. Re:And it's in Japan by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Tokyo was hit very very hard during World War II (1944). So, even though Tokyo has been around for centuries, an awful lot of it is new.

      However, they weren't laying down high-speed Internet in the 50 years post World War II. Government policy is a much more likely cause:

      "[Lennett] argued that broadband policy in recent years has been based on the "really flawed assumption that telephone companies and cable companies are going to compete with each other." Instead, he said, we've gotten a "negotiated truce" in which cable incumbents enjoy a de facto monopoly on high-speed broadband service, while Verizon and AT&T focus primarily on their wireless platforms. "The consumer is going to lose from that," Lennett said.

      Lennett suggested two policies that might rejuvenate the US broadband market. First, he suggested that policymakers should re-evaluate the 2005 decision to abandon line-sharing rules. In many other countries, incumbent firms are required to lease their facilities to competitors at regulated rates."

      The second policy he mentions is having the city pay for rollouts, but that usually ends up blocked by court battles in the US.

    70. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the end of the day technology is measured by many factors and one is speed - not by country. Who cares if they compared it to google fiber...it gives the story a reference point for the readers.

    71. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan has incredibly high population densities relative to the U.S. (same with South Korea), this comparison is pointless. Fiber is expensive over distances, which the U.S. has a lot of.

      San Francisco has a higher population density than Tokyo, yet my choices for "high speed" internet are 20mbit Comcast or "up to" 6mbit DSL service from AT&T. U-verse should be "coming soon".

      So it's not just density - the USA has plenty of dense cities without ubiquitous and cheap gigabit internet.

      ===
      How do you define dense. Do you mean as intellectual capabilities?

    72. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf
      2700 LA?
      what LA is this
      the one you dreamed about?
      please!!!
      are you subtracting for WATER when you say LA is 40% more DENSE THAN NYC or are you just missing the entire point of human per square mile calculations in general....... Per Square Mile or PSKilometer whatever.... wake up moron!
      Manhattan Island has different density than Bergen County New jersey which has different density than New Brunswick New Jersey or Staten Island or Brooklyn or Queens or THE Bronx, but the NORTHEAST CORRIDOR, with its greatest population Density in Manhattan Island, so far exceeds the people per square mile of any comparable area in 2 American Continents that for some moron from LA to say LA is more densely populated is embarrassingly retarded, have you ever looked at a 3d rep of population density for the US? Picture the massive area from southern coast of Maine to Tidewater, VA and Research Triangle Park, NC - now picture San Diego To LA (1/8th of the Northeast Corridor) and San Jose To SF to Oakland To Vallejo/etc... (1/20th of the Northeast Corridor) with that huge gap in between...... (less people than upstate New York and Vermont and New Hampshire, etc....

      are you really that clueless because of Central Valley suburbs?????????

      have you ever seen a real density map of the eastern US?

      the west is an arid desert with some places irrigated fool

    73. Re:And it's in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manhattan was settled by Europeans in 1524 and is the most densely populated part of North and South America at 69,464 residents per square mile. (2008 census = higher today @!#) LA is like 2000/mile who wrote this crap above - and why have so few corrected them?

    74. Re:And it's in Japan by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Scandinavia and the Baltics. That is all.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  4. After the first $million ... by Compaqt · · Score: 2

    Is there really a noticeable difference between 1Gbps and 2?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:After the first $million ... by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Is there really a noticeable difference between 1Gbps and 2?"

      A big one, the data has to wait twice as long for your harddisk.

    2. Re:After the first $million ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now? Probably not.

      But 20 years from now? Maybe.

      There used to be a time where I thought "Wow! 1MB of RAM! Why would I ever need anything more?"

    3. Re:After the first $million ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have 1Gb connection, full duplex, at the moment. I would not say one any private user would experience any difference above 200Mbit even if they have the equipment to handle it. A part of the problem is that you have to spend quite a lot of money to get a router to handle the speed and you will need to get more than wireless (unless you have the not yet standardised 802.11ac) is capable of providing.
      Even if you get full usage at home you will seldom reach top speeds as the other end of the party will not be capable of sending to you in those speeds and the cases where it matters are quite few. Round trip time and stability is much more important once you have breached 100Mbit speeds as far as I am concerened.

      The most demanding people do today is backups, which usually have very small requirements to be very fast, and streaming video.
      The numbers I have heard is that it normally take around 15Mbit to stream HDTV to a single entity so a 100Mbit connection would easily satisfy a normal househould with multiple streams at the same time. I guess 4K television could pump up the needs for bandwidth but I have a hard time to see it needing more than 50Mbit for compressed and streamed to households in the near future.

      So, I see no real need for it except I welcome it as it would pump up the demand for 10Gb ethernet and hopefully lower the cost and power requirements due to higher demand. The only reason I have 1Gb internet at the moment is that my ISP is only offering 100Mbit and 1Gb and the offer was too good for me to say no (399SEK/month for 1Gb). I would say that going above 100Mbit is worthwile but after 200Mbit the benefits diminishes quite fast and I do not see a great demand for personal use in the near future (say, next 5 years). That is assuming this is not directed to bussiness as well or that there is a great need for personal servers running in the area.

    4. Re:After the first $million ... by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the number of torrents you're running.

    5. Re:After the first $million ... by hawguy · · Score: 0

      Is there really a noticeable difference between 1Gbps and 2?

      I'm not a network engineer, but by my calculations, 2 Gigabit fiber is twice as fast as 1 Gigabit. But please double check my numbers:

      2 / 1 = 2

    6. Re:After the first $million ... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Is there really a noticeable difference between 1Gbps and 2?

      There's a big difference.

      Whether you personally have a use for it is a different question.

    7. Re:After the first $million ... by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, however once the speed of the connection from your house to your ISPs PoP gets over a certain speed it stops being a significant factor in the overall user experiance. Other factors including limited bandwidth at the server, bandwidth limitations in the ISPs (both client side and server side) networks, limited speed of your hard drive, human time to select things in the user interface, time for servers to process requests and so-on become the limiting factors on the overall performance.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:After the first $million ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Is there really a noticeable difference between 1Gbps and 2?"

      A big one, the data has to wait twice as long for your harddisk.

      Do you really only have 1 device with 1 hard disk hooked up to your internet connection?

    9. Re:After the first $million ... by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      What I would like to know, is are they going to provide their users with 10 Gigabit hardware (and limit to 2 Gbps), or are they going to run two 1 Gbps fibers and do load sharing, or are they going to give them an OC-48 (2.48 Gbps), because there is no current technology that can do just 2Gbps.

    10. Re:After the first $million ... by kwark · · Score: 1

      "A part of the problem is that you have to spend quite a lot of money to get a router to handle the speed"

      Routing 1Gbps is no problem, a plug computer (like a (guru|dream)plug) would do. NAT would be a problem I'd presume (never tried) it, but wouldn't a fairly recent PC with PCI express or multiple PCI busses do the job?

    11. Re:After the first $million ... by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Sure, however once the speed of the connection from your house to your ISPs PoP gets over a certain speed it stops being a significant factor in the overall user experiance. Other factors including limited bandwidth at the server, bandwidth limitations in the ISPs (both client side and server side) networks, limited speed of your hard drive, human time to select things in the user interface, time for servers to process requests and so-on become the limiting factors on the overall performance.

      Gee, I wonder if Sony can possibly come up with a reason why they think multigigabit fiber to the home would be useful?

    12. Re:After the first $million ... by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      user experience?
      faster is always better.
      10Gbit>1Gbit>100MBit>10Mbit>1Mbit. Always.
      Just because your limited imagination can't understand why doesn't make it so. Plus your making horrible assumptions:
      The user will only connect to a single source at a time - wrong. The more bandwidth you have, the more transfers/apps/whatever you can have running at once. Download a linux iso in 5 seconds while watching a hd movie on netflixs, etc. Share multiple computers in the same household at full speed. Rsync a remote backup at full speed. 1 gbit is ~120meg/sec, 2gbit is 240meg/sec which is still slower than what an ssd can provide.

    13. Re:After the first $million ... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, like laptops can finish faster a faster Internet connection also goes faster back to idle given the same load. My 2 Mbit line was pegged at 100% almost 24x7, my 25 Mbit line some of the time, my 60 Mbit line not that often. I'd not use double the bandwidth if I got double the speed and across all subscribers those peaks would even out. Of course you'll use some more because you can but not in a straight linear fashion. On the other side too, if Steam releases a gigabyte patch they're not served in any way by sharing it out as a trickle, they'll use the same bandwidth anyway as if they just blast it off and make room for the next customer.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:After the first $million ... by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      Gaze upon my beowulf cluster of VIC-20s and tremble mere mortal.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    15. Re:After the first $million ... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Is there really a noticeable difference between 1Gbps and 2?

      Considering I'm paying $70/month for 0.005 Gbps the 2Gbps could provide 0 benefit over 1Gbps and I'd still want it at the price they are charging.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    16. Re:After the first $million ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're oversimplifying the GP's point. A 10Gbit/s connection to your ISP is not worth much if they have a 1Mbit/s connection to the rest of the internet (well, you'll get nice speeds on anything they have cached). That's an extreme case, obviously, but at some point your personal home internet connection is no longer the bottleneck, something else is. I suspect that point is well past 2Gbit/s, though.

    17. Re:After the first $million ... by frozentier · · Score: 1

      Depends on the number of torrents you're running.

      If I could seed at 1Gb/s...

    18. Re:After the first $million ... by frozentier · · Score: 1

      Is there really a noticeable difference between 1Gbps and 2?

      There's a big difference.

      Whether you personally have a use for it is a different question.

      I know I could work a bigger farm in Farmville, that's for sure.

    19. Re:After the first $million ... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the parent, but no, although I do only have a GigE router.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    20. Re:After the first $million ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are twittering no.

      If you, your daughter, your wife, and your son are all on the net at the same time, perhaps watching different HD videos, then YES.

    21. Re:After the first $million ... by ikaruga · · Score: 1

      For browsing Google.com or Slashdot, most likely not. As a matter of fact, as a guy who lives in Japan with a 1Gbps connection(infrastructure is from NTT B-fletz fiber(Y3600(40)/month), provider is Hi-bit(Y800($10)/month)), if I access anything outside Japan (and maybe South Korea),it's not uncommon for me to be bottle-necked by the other end. However, for watching videos(hosted in Japanese servers such as NicoNico) or accessing my workplace network, with anything from ssh to VPN with VNC, it does make the difference. A jump from 1Gbps to 2Gbps would make those non webbrowsing network activities even smoother.

      But, I speculate, the reason for sony to invest in a faster network is the PS4. The PS4 has two confirmed features for which 1Gbps+ internet connection is ideal: 4K video streaming and 1080p Gaikai game streaming. Attempting to create a infrastructure so people can actually use these services without complaining about lag/artifacts/etc makes sense. If someone who has a slower connection starts complaining, they can just blame the connection.

  5. Amazing tentacle detail . . . by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . now in 1080p with 7.1 surround!

    1. Re:Amazing tentacle detail . . . by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

      a more interesting question, would this be enough for widespread adoption of the newest 4k video standard?

    2. Re:Amazing tentacle detail . . . by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      That probably depends more on what people are shooting and editing with on the one end, and what people are decoding and viewing with on the other.

      Thanks to the magic of lossy compression, you can get pretty much any resolution you want at any data rate you want(just ask Youtube about their 1080p...). If memory serves, BD-ROM 'HD' video tops out at just under 50mb/s, and is generally considered endurable, and many broadcast and cable channels squeeze considerably harder than that. If we naively assume that pushing 4 times the pixels takes around 4 times the bandwidth, we are still only talking a 200mb/s stream, with considerable room to move downward if you find the notion of people buying $20k displays to watch stop-motion legovision amusing...

      The bigger problem is likely to be that camera gear, and hardware for transmitting, storing, and editing the uncompressed video are excitingly expensive and not terribly well justified by the market, with the cheaper(but much more distributed) problem of a whole lot of fixed-function decoders that top out on 1080p material.

  6. Youporn and xvideos.com.. by Doalwa · · Score: 1

    prepare for the onslaught!

  7. That's great news! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    For those living in certain parts of Japan. It's also an awesome "competition" with Google Fiber, which isn't in Japan. :)

    1. Re:That's great news! by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      You can 'compete' with someone you're not in direct business competition for. If nothing else, being able to market as "The fast ISP on Earth' (or you could even get away with 'In the known Universe') sounds better than 'The fastest ISP in the country'.

    2. Re:That's great news! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      You can 'compete' with someone you're not in direct business competition for. If nothing else, being able to market as "The fast ISP on Earth' (or you could even get away with 'In the known Universe') sounds better than 'The fastest ISP in the country'.

      The fastest? I thought they've operated at the speed of light since the first fiber inception.

      I'm just messin' with words. ;)

    3. Re:That's great news! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      And of course even if we take "fastest" to mean "highest bandwidth" it's only true if you limit yourself to connections that are sold at consumer/small buiness prices.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:That's great news! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      connections that are sold at consumer/small buiness prices

      *cough*throttling*coughcough* :)

    5. Re:That's great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's really stretching it too far. If you were competing in the Olympics and I asked you about your competitors then you'd tell me about the people you're facing in your event. You wouldn't tell me about someone you think you might be facing in the next Olympics. Likewise, if you asked Google who are the competitors for Google Fiber then they would not list Sony and vice versa.

  8. Even has a SLA! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if for any reason it causes the silentl install of a rootkit or performs some other criminal act within your enterprise, you'll be entitled to a pair of $1 iTunes gift certificates.
    Take THAT, google fiber!

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  9. What's the catch? by drcagn · · Score: 1

    This is Sony, there's something proprietary here surely? You can only use their router? You can only connect to the service using some terribad desktop app?

    --
    Scorta futuere amo!
    1. Re:What's the catch? by RevWaldo · · Score: 3, Funny

      They use 1s and 0s where everyone else uses 0s and 1s.

      .

    2. Re:What's the catch? by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      First, it's not Sony, it's a subsidiary of Sony. Second, it's not Japan. It's in a small section of Japan. Third, It's asymmetrical service. It's only twice the download speed. The upload speed is the same. The fact they they are comparing this to Google Fiber is ludicrous. There's no plan here to expand this to a dominant market share.

    3. Re:What's the catch? by drcagn · · Score: 1

      Do you go on every article talking about the PlayStation and mentioning Sony, yelling "IT'S NOT SONY, IT'S SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, A SUBSIDIARY OF SONY!!!!"?

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    4. Re:What's the catch? by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      If I did, would you go on every post and ask me if I did it? You said "This is Sony" and then based a comment on that fact. I was merely correcting a informational inconsistence to allow you to better consolidate your argument in a more refined and knowledgeable manner. My apologies, I didn't realize you prefer to represent invalid logic in your arguments.

  10. Competition is great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh shit, now we have to get off our asses and actually compete.. with REAL COMPETITION!"

    1. Re:Competition is great. by seven+of+five · · Score: 2

      No, this is just for the Japanese market. American telcos continue to slumber in their golden beds.

  11. sony rootkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/sony_rootkit

    never forget, never forgive

    1. Re:sony rootkit by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/sony_rootkit

      never forget, never forgive

      Thank you AC, though currently modded off-topic, you saved me the trouble of googling for 'rootkit'. Seems very topical to this story. So, Sony inserted drm's into unsuspecting users computers, and disabled the copying of legally owned music and software. Mod up informative from us less geeky neckbeards.

    2. Re:sony rootkit by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And the rootkit opened up security vulnerabilities on the computers in question. All from just "playing" a legally purchased music CD.

    3. Re:sony rootkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome. I for one think that if customers didn't have so very short memory, corporations would act much more responsibly.

      Now it feels like a race to the bottom. Anything goes...

  12. Now they can rootkit the whole house. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At no additional charge!

  13. $51 is expensive? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's arguable that with everything that a Comcast subscription requires that we pay 2-3 times that depending on what you REALLY want and use out of your service.

    I think it's an extremely reasonable price given U.S. conditions.

    1. Re:$51 is expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the standard of living and everything being more expensive in Japan for the most part, I fail to see how $51 is expensive as well.

      I'm also wondering when or why Sony got into the ISP business.

    2. Re:$51 is expensive? by Atlas_Atkinson · · Score: 2

      "INexpensive 4,980 yen ($51)"

      Unless I'm reading your intentions wrong, this service is cheaper then most,
      ex. TechSavy 50Mb/s(35Mb/s actual) Unlimited @ 70$/month.(Canada)

    3. Re:$51 is expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might want to reread the summary. Though, in complete jest, your username is relevant!

    4. Re:$51 is expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I'm too lazy to do it myself I'll leave it to a motivated person to actually look up the source, but on reddit it was said that this service requires an initial setup fee of 400+ USD, and the signing of a 2 year contract. So this may possibly not be as cheap as it seems.

    5. Re:$51 is expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $51 may be cheap as chips for a pipe that (fast? fat? do we know?) but the $539 installation is a little more expensive.

      I'll go halves with you...?

    6. Re:$51 is expensive? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who, 9th Doctor era.

    7. Re:$51 is expensive? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Informative

      ugh.. but you're right.

    8. Re:$51 is expensive? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Over two years, I pay $1320 for Time Warner's 15mbps service ($55/mo)
      Over two, with your setup fee, Sony comes out to $1624 ($67.67/mo)

      Over ten years (assuming prices stay in step with each other), Sony works out to be a hair cheaper than Time Warner for more than 130 times faster Internet. Well worth it imo.

    9. Re:$51 is expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you have Comcast. I live in Seattle, and Comcast is at capacity on my block and has been for over five years, so no cable for me. I'm stuck with DSL at $65 per month at 2 Mbps because of the old wiring in the neighborhood. I'm paying over 25% more for literally 1/1,000th of the connection speed. Per bit per second, Seattle allows the monopoly they created to charge 1,275 times more for Internet access.

    10. Re:$51 is expensive? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      For many current price is accepted as reasonable based on a relatively high disposable income.

      Leaving that relative income bit aside for the moment, if I blue sky, wander back in memory a bit regarding the telcos, what telecommunication is, what a public service is, that bit about common carrier, if I had to make a wild-ass-guess about a fair rate and price, I'd look at something like one down and half up for $20/mo. as fair; $25 would get you 7 down 2 up, and for $30 you'd get the 10 down 5 up. For instance. And if you paid $50/mo. you be in a pool from which every Wednesday at high noon on Main Street the CEO of Time Warner or you favorite local cable/ISP provider would kiss your ass.

      Content and Internet connection should be entirely separate. The former would bid to allowed over the pipes, not the other way round (if that means a voice actor can't get a million per episode or a ball player $20 million a year, so be it); the latter would be regulated similar to electric and other public utilities.

    11. Re:$51 is expensive? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      I think it's an extremely reasonable price given U.S. conditions.

      That's why the summary says it is inexpensive. $51 is almost exactly what I pay for 12Mb Uverse DSL in the midwest USA, which is making me a little bit sick right now.

      ican haz fibre now??? NO.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    12. Re:$51 is expensive? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yep, I pay $54.95 per month for 10/1 for my TWC. I remember during @Home and PowerLink with Adelphia days in 2001, it was $59.99 per month for even worse speeds and horrible uptimes. It wasn't even DOCSIS compliant! :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    13. Re:$51 is expensive? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I'm also wondering when or why Sony got into the ISP business.

      1996.

    14. Re:$51 is expensive? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I don't see where that 400+ USD comes from, as the standard installation fee is listed as 32,340yen, which is currently discounted to 30,450yen with the first two months service free as an opening promotion. Even allowing for recent depreciation of the yen, given that they are translating the monthly fee of 4980yen to $51, it does not seem to add up. Minimum contract term would have to be more than the 30 months (or 29 months with current discount) that it takes to pay off the installation fee at 1050yen per month.

  14. Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately after a few years they wont let you use Linux on it anymore. Also you may get rootkits if you actually try to purchase music.

  15. Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know how Sony treats people in Japan, but for me Sony would be the last company I would trust as my ISP.

    People who install root-kits on computers are going to go to great lengths to look out for their own interests. They also don't have the greatest track record for security.

    I'm probably just a tad bitter and cynical, but there's a lot of ways in which my distrust/dislike of Sony would make me think this isn't something I'd want. They'll probably be doing DPI and everything else shady you can imagine.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realize that sony is a massive company and the division that would run the isp is not the same division as Sony BMG?

      If you didn't know, see divisions don't necessarily know what the others are doing and they definitely don't get a say in their decision making. When you grow up and start working for a company, you'll start to understand this.

      If you did know, well shame on you for circle jerking over "evil sony". Give it a break already, it happened 6 years ago. they apologized, learned their lesson, and they haven't done it since. What more do you want? Kazuo Hirai to personally come to your home and blow you? Get off it.

    2. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google and Sony fight over "last company I would trust" for people who don't realise there isn't really any other option!

      We are Anonymous Corward. Expect us with the popcorn to this match.

    3. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent doesn't even mention goOgle...

      NICE NON-SEQUITUR THERE PAL!

    4. Re:Hmmm ... by Minwee · · Score: 1

      I don't know how Sony treats people in Japan, but for me Sony would be the last company I would trust as my ISP.

      That's only because Electronic Arts doesn't offer that service yet.

      "EA Fibre 2012 servers will be closing down later this month, but you can pre-order EA Fibre 2014 and get a Free(*) copy of Sim City!"

    5. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how Sony treats people in Japan, but for me Sony would be the last company I would trust as my ISP.

      Would you trust them as your life insurance company? Saving and chequing accounts? As your local sports team?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Life
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Bank
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Sendai_F.C.

      You're thinking in Western terms, where one company tends to do one thing. A good portion of Eastern companies are a part of conglomerates where the business units are fairly isolated. Just because some people/companies are asshats doesn't mean that others are.

    6. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol you do realize at almost every multinational at some point has done something idiotic and/or assholish? I'm surprised in your supposed 20 years in "the software industry" (w/e that means) you didn't notice this.

      So unless you pull a RMS and only use certified grade-a pure FOSS you're ALWAYS going to be using a product from one of those EVIL companies.

      get off your high horse and take off your blinders. sony is no worse than google, ms, foxconn, intel, etc etc etc. You just choose to fixate on sony because you like pandering for approval from a bunch of fellow neckbeards.

    7. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea because Google totally respects your privacy.

    8. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that happened years ago. You really don't forgive them for that? Really? Come on...

    9. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Maybe you should either grow the fuck up or shut the fuck up.

      Oh the irony...

    10. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun factoid - Sony also run a bank, in Japan. Would you feel safe keeping your money with them?

    11. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

  16. Speed is not everything by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last time I was in Japan, I had a good connection, but the ISP decided to drop every ssh connection above a given traffic. My tunnels kept being broken until I set a speed limit on my side.

    I tried also to seed some videos (that I created) but did not manage to get peers at more than 1KB/s

    It is good to have a high speed, but it is useless if it is just to watch youtube videos. I won't trade the decent DSL I have here in France through a protocol-tolerant ISP (Free Telecom) to a fiber connection through someone like Sony who is well known for its tight control.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:Speed is not everything by adnonsense · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in Japan, I had a good connection, but the ISP decided to drop every ssh connection above a given traffic. My tunnels kept being broken until I set a speed limit on my side.

      Was that a DSL connection with an ISP-supplied router, or maybe a cable TV ISP? With optical fiber I've never had any problems, SSH sessions stay open for days (and this is without a fixed IP address), and p2p "just works". This is in Tokyo, BTW.

    2. Re:Speed is not everything by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      This was in Tokyo (near Iidabashi). The ssh-cutting thing happened in my weekly mansion, that possibly shared a big connection and could have implemented its own aggressive traffic shaping, but the P2P was through a (small) business connection. It is good to know that fiber won't have that problem.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Speed is not everything by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      From your sig:

      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.

      Truly words of wisdom...

  17. Bottlenecks by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

    Even if servers can dish out content at 2 Gbps (and many of them can't), almost all modern NICs max out at Gigabit Ethernet support. Although a 10 Gbps Ethernet standard has existed for a couple years, the cabling and termination requirements are extremely tight (most existing Cat5 and even Cat6 installations won't qualify) and the network cards cost hundreds of dollars while switches cost thousands.

    I think this service would be most useful to small businesses, which could easily support both their internal networks and good-quality customer-facing WiFi on one connection. (Larger businesses are going to want redundancy and SLAs which this consumer-level product doesn't offer.)

    1. Re:Bottlenecks by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Even if servers can dish out content at 2 Gbps (and many of them can't), almost all modern NICs max out at Gigabit Ethernet support. Although a 10 Gbps Ethernet standard has existed for a couple years, the cabling and termination requirements are extremely tight (most existing Cat5 and even Cat6 installations won't qualify) and the network cards cost hundreds of dollars while switches cost thousands.

      I think this service would be most useful to small businesses, which could easily support both their internal networks and good-quality customer-facing WiFi on one connection. (Larger businesses are going to want redundancy and SLAs which this consumer-level product doesn't offer.)

      Including TV's blu ray players, computers, phones, tablet, etc, I have 10 internet connected devices in my household (add another 5 to include IP security cameras which aren't networked, but not internet connected) - of those, at least 4 are gigabit ethernet capable (not sure about the TV + Bluray players)

      So even if one device by itself can't use 1Gbit of network bandwidth, multiple devices can.

  18. Lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2G down, 1G up is only 1.5x Google Fiber...Upload counts, dammit!

    1. Re:Lies! by hawguy · · Score: 1

      2G down, 1G up is only 1.5x Google Fiber...Upload counts, dammit!

      Not to most residential users. As long as the upstream can keep up with the ACK's, most people care a lot more about downstream bandwidth than upstream. Which is part of what makes residential fiber so attractive to Google - most of their pipes are sending traffic out of Google's network, so they have a lot of "free" unused inbound capacity that they can give to residential users. Youtube's ratio of outbound to inbound traffic must be huge.

  19. What router should I buy? by Krneki · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, I got this super-awesome 2Gbps internet connection. What cheap router (max 50E) should I buy?

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:What router should I buy? by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Get two of them and wire them in series: WAN -> LAN -> WAN -> LAN. That'll double the capacity of your tube processing power, and you're good to go!

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    2. Re:What router should I buy? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Do you want a 500E car to use all of that 100kph speed limit, too? If you want to use it all, you can't set prices arbitrarily based only on your own desires. I've driven on the Autobahn but was only wealthy enough to rent a tiny car capable of about 130kph. Too bad, I guess.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  20. Yeah yeah, so what? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting

    New York is very densely populated. It still doesn't have anywhere near close Asian speeds. Hell, Holland is LESS densely populated AND it has higher speeds. So does Sweden.

    Not all of the US is a desolate wasteland inhabited by rednecks. Some parts are almost civilized, and still the infrastructure sucks donkey balls. Explain that?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by unixisc · · Score: 2

      You didn't read his post. It's not about desolate wasteland or anything else. It's just that there are huge distances to be covered, which raises the costs of laying fiber everywhere. Whereas much of the Japanese interior is mountaineous and so thinly populated that they wouldn't be putting fiber there, but they would be putting it in Tokyo, Yokohoma, Kyoto, Osaka and other major cities.

      Whereas if they put it in San Francisco or New York, they'd have to expand, unless the plan is to just provide it at the Embarcadero or Manhattan. If they started in Manhattan, ultimately, they'd want/have to spread it out to Queens, NJ, Upstate, CT and so on. Or in San Francisco, extend it to the peninsula, Marin county, Oakland, Berkeley and rest of Alameda and ultimately Santa Clara counties. Not something they'd run into much of in Japan - there, each city would be an island of fiber, and not have to be extensively extended. Such an exercise would be similarly feasable in South Korea - service Seoul and Busan and a few other major cities.

      For really huge stretches of territory, such as China, US, Russia, India, Brazil, it makes more sense to have high bandwidth wireless, so that one doesn't have to undergo the headaches of laying down fiber from Moscow to Vladivostok, or Bangalore to Delhi, or Los Angeles to New York.

    2. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      easy. monopolies (or ologopolies, i guess). either way, its very difficult for innovation to happen when all of the major players are willing to keep speeds down and prices up for no reason other than to milk their customers, and have deals with the government that prevent competition from trying to ruin their fun.

    3. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      Not all of the US is a desolate wasteland inhabited by rednecks. Some parts are almost civilized, and still the infrastructure sucks donkey balls. Explain that?

      Best candidate explanation is that Washington, DC is a desolate wasteland inhabited by rednecks.

    4. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Whereas if they put it in San Francisco or New York, they'd have to expand, unless the plan is to just provide it at the Embarcadero or Manhattan. If they started in Manhattan, ultimately, they'd want/have to spread it out to Queens, NJ, Upstate, CT and so on. Or in San Francisco, extend it to the peninsula, Marin county, Oakland, Berkeley and rest of Alameda and ultimately Santa Clara counties. Not something they'd run into much of in Japan - there, each city would be an island of fiber, and not have to be extensively extended. Such an exercise would be similarly feasable in South Korea - service Seoul and Busan and a few other major cities.

      Why would they "have" to expand? Is someone Forcing Google to provide fiber in Austin since Kansas City was such a success?

    5. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expain that?
      Well its a combination of the best of what a 'free market', 'capitalism' and your 'tax dollars in action' can achieve.

    6. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where is this Holland with high speed internet, might be a nice place to move to.

    7. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.) Greed

      2.) Local Monopolies where gov't casts a blind eye towards collusion, which fixes prices high (see 1).

    8. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas if they put it in San Francisco or New York, they'd have to expand

      Why would they "have" to expand?

      If you have shitty internet, and your buddy in New York has good internet, you're going to be pissed and demand better internet.

      If you have shitty internet and your buddy in New York has shitty internet and some guy you never heard of in Tokyo has good internet, then it must be impossible to have good internet in the US. Gosh, I'm sure the telcos just try their very hardest, but it can't be done. I'm sure there's some huge difference between Tokyo and here that makes it impossible. Population density, let's say. Also, the air is probably different? I think Japanese bits are narrower.

    9. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      You didn't read his post. It's not about desolate wasteland or anything else. It's just that there are huge distances to be covered, which raises the costs of laying fiber everywhere.

      So don't lay it everywhere. Start in the East Coast cities where density is on a par with Tokyo. I seriously doubt a farmer in rural Shikoku can get 2Gbps fibre within the next ten years either, so stop acting like the US is somehow special.

    10. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      If you have shitty internet and your buddy in New York has shitty internet and some guy you never heard of in Tokyo has good internet, then it must be impossible to have good internet in the US. Gosh, I'm sure the telcos just try their very hardest, but it can't be done. I'm sure there's some huge difference between Tokyo and here that makes it impossible. Population density, let's say. Also, the air is probably different? I think Japanese bits are narrower.

      As well as metric bits being narrower and easier to shift than US bits, the radioactivity in Japan helps move the bits faster. You don't really want that do you?

    11. Re:Yeah yeah, so what? by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      You didn't read his post. It's not about desolate wasteland or anything else. It's just that there are huge distances to be covered, which raises the costs of laying fiber everywhere.

      Who needs to lay transcontinental fiber? The country is already absolutely blanketed in fiber, much of which is dark. In terms of wiring, the last mile is the missing link, not the backhaul or backbone.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  21. So what by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2

    Why do I care how fast Japanese can access content when it takes 30 seconds to load www.google.com in Canada using one of the top telco's in the country?

    Canada truly is the 3rd world of internet access.

    Aside from that, not sure how or why Sony is getting into the ISP fray. Could be that they are failing in every other division so why not enter a new market.

    Personally, I will wait for Samsung's internet services, Japan itself is failing in innovation all around.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:So what by Reapman · · Score: 1

      As a fellow Canadian I think we're getting off topic here, but I think you mean Eastern Canada. Here in the west it's pretty decent. I'm a pretty cheap guy, so only have the 50 Meg service Shaw offers (I think its like $60, so cheap being relative), but for $10 I can double it to 100 Meg. My cap is like 400 Gigs too. 100 Meg.. no idea what that cap is. If Shaw ever packed up and I had to use the other guys, Telus, I'd probably cry, but so far I'm quite happy with Shaw. Not Google Fiber (or Sony?!?) speeds but still pretty happy.

    2. Re:So what by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Why do I care how fast Japanese can access content when it takes 30 seconds to load www.google.com in Canada using one of the top telco's in the country?

      Canada truly is the 3rd world of internet access.

      New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are now getting FiberOP (similar to FIOS), which goes up to 250MB. My Dad has it.

      I'm jealous because I can't get a similar service in the Mass. town where I live (Verizon stopped their FIOS rollout in MA before getting to us).

    3. Re:So what by misterooga · · Score: 1

      What's the cap for that speed?

    4. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torontonian here. 32ms away from www.google.com, page loads instantly in a browser. Sorry you live somewhere shitty / remote, do not make such generalizing statements though. You'll find remote regions of East Asia are not nearly as fast as Tokyo too. Enjoy fellating Samsung bro.

    5. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For New Brunswick, at least, there's no cap.

      But, it's crazy expensive. $250/month with 12 month term.

    6. Re:So what by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Why do I care how fast Japanese can access content when it takes 30 seconds to load www.google.com in Canada using one of the top telco's in the country?

      If you didn't know what internet service was like in other countries, how would you know if yours was good or bad?

      Besides, as other countries get their own cheap fast internet, enough people will question their providers and government why they are stuck paying $80/month for laggy 6mbit DSL when the rest of the world pays $50 for gigabit fiber.

      Aside from that, not sure how or why Sony is getting into the ISP fray. Could be that they are failing in every other division so why not enter a new market.

      So-net Entertainment has been in the ISP business since the late 1990's, so it's not as though they are just now entering the space.

      Canada truly is the 3rd world of internet access.

      Personally, I will wait for Samsung's internet services, Japan itself is failing in innovation all around.

      So your country has slow internet that takes 30 seconds to load a mostly text web page, but Japan is failing in innovation because they've started deploying fast and affordable 2 gigabit internet? And you're waiting for a Korean company to rescue you from your own country's mediocrity?

    7. Re:So what by adnonsense · · Score: 1

      Sony has been in the ISP fray since 1995.

    8. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I care how fast Japanese can access content when it takes 30 seconds to load www.google.com in Canada using one of the top telco's in the country?

      Canada truly is the 3rd world of internet access.

      Aside from that, not sure how or why Sony is getting into the ISP fray. Could be that they are failing in every other division so why not enter a new market.

      Personally, I will wait for Samsung's internet services, Japan itself is failing in innovation all around.

      It would have to be PlayStation 4 related.... All that streaming blah blah...

      Maybe its a shitty experience using existing ADSL?

  22. Bigger than Sputnik! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WELL what a mighty wake up all this is -- bigger than Sputnik! Now Americans are going to need to watch 2x as many films/cat videos/advertising just to keep up!!

  23. "...or fewer" by tomknight · · Score: 1
    "Targeting individual homes and apartment buildings of two floors or fewer"

    Yes, someone actually uses "or fewer" instead of "or less" when talking about countable objects!

    Yes, I really am that person who hates it when supermarkets have a "ten items or less" queue....

    --
    Oh arse
    1. Re:"...or fewer" by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      News flash for you, pseudo-pedantic boy, one integer can indeed be less than another. Don't make us repeat this one or more times, less than two times should be sufficient.

    2. Re:"...or fewer" by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      "Targeting individual homes and apartment buildings of two floors or fewer"

      Yes, someone actually uses "or fewer" instead of "or less" when talking about countable objects!

      Wait, you can count and use context clues? "fewer" vs "less" -- Less has one less syllable and is easier to say.

      What's odd is that we all know languages are fucking horrible at transmitting thought, but there are some fuckers like you who actually care about the particulars of how shit's wrote. If there were ambiguity I'd understand, but if you get the meaning then the message was transmitted. Stop acting like a fucking 1980's BASIC parser: "SYNTAX ERROR -- UAAAAAGH!" You Have a Brain, stop fucking wasting it.

  24. $51 is what I pay for 12Mb in the US by bioneuralnet · · Score: 1

    But my speed tests show 13Mb down, so GREAT DEAL!

  25. Massive conflict of interest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game/Movie publisher wants to provide you with internet. Like hell that won't be filtered and monitored to hell and back even if you aren't a pirate.

  26. What do households do with 1 gbps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, what does the average person do with all that speed? What makes that speed worth paying for? The major use I can think of is Netflix, and high resolution Youtube videos. I am able to get around on 768 kbps. I just wish it was cheaper.

    1. Re:What do households do with 1 gbps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, what does the average person do with all that speed? What makes that speed worth paying for? The major use I can think of is Netflix, and high resolution Youtube videos. I am able to get around on 768 kbps. I just wish it was cheaper.

      Well I know what I would do with those kinds of speeds.
      Right now I'm paying 50$ for a 12MB dl/1MB ul crappy ADSL 2+ connection.
      Why can't Google fiber come to Europe ? We need super high broadband speed. And fuck the telecom monopolies.

  27. But the cap.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..will of course be 20gb/month with an overage fee of $0.10 per gb on top of that.

  28. Telecommuting by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    One of the barriers to a higher acceptance of telecommuting is IMO the (low) quality of telepresence, which is mainly due to a lack of bandwidth. Imagine what will be possible with Nuro. Of course, it won't make much of a difference on the whole if only a few people in a few areas have access to this kind of bandwidth, but if it ever becomes the norm I think it will make a difference.

  29. Meanwhile, in America by neminem · · Score: 1

    I pay 50 bucks a month (plus taxes) for a whopping 5mbps down on average (supposedly it's 7, but I'd say on average it's about 5; I do see close to 7 occasionally). At least I got free long distance out of verizon as a "we're sorry" present for them having completely fracked up our order and making me take a whole day of vacation to be on the phone with them trying to fix it, even though I told them in advance several times that it looked like my order was messed up, and they promised, several times, that they had fixed it, until the guy came down to turn on our phone and discovered, what a surprise, that no they totally hadn't, and he couldn't do anything about it. Ugh.

    Not that I would trust Sony to be any better, but they could hardly be frelling *worse*. (Yes, I don't think I could really use 2 gbps, but I could definitely use at least in the hundreds of mbps range... but not for hundreds of dollars a month, I couldn't.)

  30. Re:Here's the point... by Nukky+Cisbu · · Score: 1

    This is CAPITALISM?

    No. But feel free to bandy the term about until it becomes meaningless.

    As better explained above, the higher price we pay is not solely due to monopolistic practices.

    I just bought a Yamaha receiver, RX-V673, on Amazon that has 4K upscaling AND 4K pass-through for.... $399. If Yamaha were an American monopoly what would it have cost me? There is NO free Market Capitalism in Amaerica.... never has been... Just BIG monopolies and trusts.

    And yet Yamaha isn't an American monopoly, so your point you were trying to make there falls a little flat.

  31. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone actually used the internet in Japan? It's mostly awful if you're doing anything that is not domestic. As soon as you hit an international line, your "awesome" 100-1000mbps connection starts crawling like a T1. Basically, Japan has a really big MAN.

      In addition to that, all ISP's seem to use significant filtering mechanisms and drop connections if they don't like them.

  32. You young folks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gbps?

    I can remember using 110 baud dial-up. With a 64-column fuzzy CRT terminal. And I spent two weeks wiring up the modem, from scratch. Modem design supposedly could do 300bps but my poor resistor-matching skills made it work poorly, like one wrong character out of every 10.

    So I'm reasonably happy with comcast internet service. 8, maybe 10 mbps on a good day. Much faster than i can read or watch.

    1. Re:You young folks. by Bengie · · Score: 1

      If I can watch my progress bar, it's going too slowly.

    2. Re:You young folks. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      And everyone else is reasonably happy that you are an idiot. It's a win-win as they say.

  33. Re:Here's the point... by ichthus · · Score: 1

    This is CAPITALISM?

    Sony's offering in Japan is... also capitalism.

    There is free market capitalism in the US. The problem is, most of it is in the fast food business. The few ISPs that have the go-ahead from the cities aren't interested in improving their offerings, and the small WISPs that fill in the gaps are either unable to do any better, or only willing to match the status quo.

    --
    sig: sauer
  34. Who really cares? by madwheel · · Score: 1

    Honestly instead of a pissing match and comparing highest speeds for bragging rights why don't we focus more on getting gigabit connections throughout our country. What good is a gigabit connection if it's only in a select few spots of the country. Good for Sony, but as everyone mentioned before, they'll find some way to make things proprietary like they always do.

  35. What interesting things are people doing with it? by NoNeeeed · · Score: 1

    I'm quite interested to hear what, if any, new and interesting things people are doing with their 1 and 2gbps fibre connections, in Google neighbourhoods and in Japan.

    While incremental increases in speed are nice, big jumps like this make whole new uses possible. For example before ADSL and cable we could do most of the things we do today just slower, but usable quality video wasn't really feasible, certainly not on-demand. I have a 120mbps (10mbps up) connection which is great for video on demand, and synching large files with Dropbox etc, but mostly it just lets me do the same old things, but quicker.

    Are there any interesting new ways of using the internet that are coming out of these super high-speed areas with their 1 and 2gbps fiber connections. I'm especially interested in the effect having a symmetric connection of that speed, I can see it making video conferencing much, much nicer.

  36. Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. Given Sony's history in online security all that means is you can be hacked at an awe inspiring speed. Here come multigigabit botnets.

  37. US by VeryBest52 · · Score: 2

    Get back to me when they wire up the US ;)

  38. What they don't tell you by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    Is that they cap your download speed, so you can only use your internet for about a minute a month. :-)

  39. Japan USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan #1 in technology as always. They are the most progressed country in the world, not just technology-wise. Keep up the good work!

  40. Yet.. by GigaBurglar · · Score: 1

    Yet they forget to mention that only a fast SSD, or a RAID 0 configuration, is capable of receiving/writing files that quickly.

    Instead of rolling out ridiculous speeds why don't you roll out better average speeds? 100mb would suffice.
    Not to forget that at 2Gbps there are very few things that you would download and see a great benefit from the speed - I'm sure people wouldn't mind waiting a few extra seconds for large files..

  41. Telecommunications in Canada by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    It is not just internet access, the whole telecommunications industry is a joke. Slightly more so than even the US which is really depressing. We make fun of about the US government being in bed with big business, yet they are getting screwed slightly less somehow by their telcos. When I was overseas on a group vacation, all the other folks from various countries balked in wonderment when the Canadians and Americans told them what they pay for cell plans and service, and that none of us could use them anywhere else but our home country without outrageous fees.

    I get the second fastest retail internet connection available in Ontario. I pay +80$ a month for that privilege. It is 30 MB/s with a 175GB cap (although I recently got a letter saying they were going to up my cap by 100GB which was nice). The fastest that isn't some sort of specialized business connection (which is even more $$$) is 50MB/s and 275GB cap. For perspective that Japanese service is 51$ for 2000MB/s...

    Anyway, something has been wrong with our telecommunications industry in Canada for a very long time. The CRTC who are supposed to be regulating the industry need to be gutted and replaced. The Minister in charge of the file should be placed under intense pressure to answer the key question and propose a solution. Why are telecommunications so expensive in Canada relative to other countries, and how can this be addressed.

    And don't give me the big country, low density BS. 1) Most of our population lives in cities, all within a very narrow strip close to the US. 2) It is not like those rural areas are getting good coverage now anyway. 3) There are plenty of examples of countries with similar population densities that are able to provide much faster and cheaper telecommunications, like Finland for example.

    1. Re:Telecommunications in Canada by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      I'm in Ontario, I pay under $50 for 28Mb, 300GB cap. Stop going to Bell and Rogers.

    2. Re:Telecommunications in Canada by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      While I won't argue there. The independents are not available everywhere, and mostly just the larger cities.

      Believe me, I would use Teksavvy or something were it available (and it is not, I checked).

  42. But can you trust Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah it sounds good but can you trust Sony even in japan? I mean after all the bullshit years ago with the rootkit software distributed on cd's and later on the ultimate screwing up of the PS3 when you used to be able to run Linux on it then eventually it got locked down more and more I just couldn't trust sony much anymore.

  43. you'll need the speed to load the Sony rootkits by swschrad · · Score: 1

    that will stream Sony content at extra optional cost all day long, to the router if not to your PC.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  44. Always-On Internet Connection Required by hduff · · Score: 1

    It's a trap!

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  45. Re:What interesting things are people doing with i by ModelX · · Score: 1

    I've been on a 1 Gbps connection for about 5 years now. The nice things about it are:
    - you don't need to find that DVD, downloading is faster
    - moving around disk and VM images is a one minute job
    - you can do everything over remote desktop including video playback and editing
    - low latency is nice for interactive applications like videoconferencing (no stupid late echoes)
    - a large torrent downloads while you are using the toilet
    - video on demand is a non issue, thats just a few Mbps, you can stream quite a few IP cameras all the time just for fun

  46. Re:What interesting things are people doing with i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can tell you what I'd do! I'd hook it up to my wireless G router and only use 55Mb of it. And I'd be soooo happy.

      ~Craig

  47. Sugoi hakuryoku! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Sorekara watashi wa Nihon ni idÅ shitai.

  48. sony internet eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it come with atrac?

  49. DSL Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when DSL (SDSL AND ADSL) first came out years ago. ISPs were falling over each other to give the fastest service at a decent price. I was with Telocity for about 1 year before their SDSL 768K service went under. It was the best at the time and I paid $50 a month happily for it. They gave me too much for too little and they couldnt support it. T1s were still big then and I was getting half of that consistently for 5% of the cost of a T1. Its great to offer someone the world for cheap, but when everyone jumps on that bandwagon, can you support it? How long is your return on investment? Keep in mind, technology changes faster everyday and by the time you get the bugs worked out of a solution, it might be old news. You need to recover quickly to stay in the game.

    My point is, I think we are way over reacting to this google fiber thing. Hell, do we even know if fiber is the future?? What about wireless? There is a lot of overhead in running wires of any kind. What are you going to do with all that bandwidth? What are you going to do with all that fiber when we move away from that technology? I can watch movies just fine with my 20 MB service. Again, I just dont think its worth all this BS. Are the current ISPs charging more and not innovating enough, sure, to a point. Keep in mind, price is what the market will bare. Dont like that? Dont hate the player, hate the game. The game is capitalism!

    1. Re:DSL Wars by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      You're just jealous.

      -- A Kansas Citian

    2. Re:DSL Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can watch movies just fine with my 20 MB service. Again, I just dont think its worth all this BS. Are the current ISPs charging more and not innovating enough, sure, to a point. Keep in mind, price is what the market will bare."

      20MB for watching movies, 5Mb is more then enough, what are you doing with 31 times more?

      But take a look at the rest of the world (there are enough examples posted here), the rest of the world get high speed symmetric FttH services at a fraction of the price you pay. Over the last 15 years I have been paying about 50 USD/month for internet services. Speeds went from 256kbit/s to 100Mbit/s (256kbps in 98 (cable), 1024kpbs in 2003 (ADSL), 8Mbps in 2005 (ADSL), 2006: 10Mbps (FttH), 2009: 100Mbps and now just waiting to get a bump to 500Mbps for the same price (might take a few years)).

  50. OtherOS support? by IMightB · · Score: 1

    I'm not subscribing unless it supports the "OtherOS" option as well as rootkit installs. If it does, I'll get two.

  51. Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy cr*p, I can't even get gigabit at work! Blah blah the switch, blah blah the ports, whatever. 2 Gbps is powerful strong even if it's asymmetric.

  52. Yes. 1Gb/S for years. by lindseyp · · Score: 1

    I had 1Gb/s fiber to my home in Tokyo for the last 5 years at least. That Sony is providing 2Gb/s now is not particularly noteworthy, except that thanks to Google recently offering 1Gb/s in the US, it's now in the public consciousness, whereas beforehand most of the world hadn't realised just how far ahead Japanese internet service was.

    I wonder what they get in Korea... it wouldn't surprise me if they 1Gb/s was standard there for years already.

    What is noteworthy to anyone with such a fast connection, is that most of the internet as we know it is throttled at speeds way below that anyway. It takes 40 or so connections to max out my download speeds from usenet.

    --
    j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  53. Just to make some things clear by gullevek · · Score: 1

    Those non NTT Fiber services only work if you can directly put the Fiber in your house. So if you live in your one single home, no problem, if you live in a small Appartment block below the 4th floor, then it is sometimes possible. But if you live in a big Appartment block, unless there is a Fibre from Sony going in your block, this won't fly. In most Appartment blocks you have the last Meter (into your place) as normal copper. I do have Fiber, but I do not have a Fiber going into my place, I have my Router hooked up to the normal Telephone jack, and have 100Mbit. In my old place I had Fiber directly into my place, but that didn't change, that I only had 100Mbit there too.

    There are rumors going around of having an update to 200Mbit, but I haven't heard anything in detail about this yet.

    --
    "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  54. Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, Australia is offering National Broadband 5 years later at a whopping 25 Mbit/s.. bloody Japs only have 2, hahaha.. uh wait..

  55. makes no difference by Eivind · · Score: 1

    That's nice, but it's like megaherz, over a certain minimum, it doesn't really matter. Especially not small differences like factors of two.

    I've got a fibre-optical link, and yeah, there's GB available for it, but I, like 90%+ of the subscribers opt to subscribe for only 100Mb/s, because a) it's slightly cheaper, and b) there's few practical differences between 100Mb/s and 1Gb/s.

    Yes sure, in some situations it matters. Are these situations worth an extra $15/month subscription-fee ? Not for me. And not for most people.