Slashdot Mirror


Police Capture Second Marathon Bombing Suspect in Watertown, Mass.

Police have captured believed Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was "pinned down" in a boat stored behind a house in Watertown, Massachusetts. You can listen to the live police feed here.

150 of 773 comments (clear)

  1. Make him run the Marathon by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Over and over again.

    1. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Drop him off in Baghdad, where 27 people were blown up yesterday.

    2. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, maybe, apply the same rules that we've deemed fair for you and me, and not stoop to the level of being torture terrorists ourselves.

    3. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Typical slashdotter.. thinks exercise is punishment.

      Lift that cheeto! LIIIFT! Lock it in!

    4. Re: Make him run the Marathon by Doubting+Sapien · · Score: 5, Informative

      Guess who's presecuting? I'm watching the live stream from ABCnews and who should I see muscle her way in front of the mic but Carmen Ortiz. Yep, the one of Aaron Swartz fame. God! It would be such a travesty if she should escape responsibility for bullying Aaron by riding the political prestige to be had from punishing this nut job bomber.

      --
      ========== "Hello World" in my programming language of choice: ATG - LET THERE BE LIFE - TAG ==========
    5. Re:Make him run the Marathon by jamesh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Iraq wanted us out, so it's their fucking problem now.

      You say "Iraq" like it's one thing with a unified want... I think you might be mistaken about that.

    6. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does a non-anonymous European work better? Here's one.

      The US have a great history of meddling with something, noticing that they bit of more than they could chew, then run away from the problem and leave others to pick up the debris. Actually amazing that you didn't fuck up after WW2, that was pretty much the last time when you decided to stick with it and take responsibility.

      Yes, Saddam sure wasn't a nice guy (ok, he was a buddy back when he attacked Iran that decided to turn from buddy to Teh Evil practically over night and all those shiny F14s you sent there were now in the hands of those Islamists, but when he dared to attack someone other than what you wanted him to, he turned from buddy to Teh Evil over night). But at least the effin' country was STABLE. It was near impossible for some Islamist to establish a base of power there. Now, you managed to make it easy for them.

      Good intentions being the pavement to the road to hell, ever heard that one? Guess it would be adapted as the US foreign policy motto.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ffft. How lo-tec. I built a cheeto lifting machine!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Make him run the Marathon by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got the feeling the Kurds actually liked us.

    9. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Cow+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good intentions being the pavement to the road to hell, ever heard that one? Guess it would be adapted as the US foreign policy motto.

      Come on, that's harsh.

      Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing
      ...after they have exhausted all other possibilities.

      -- Winston Churchill

      CJ

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    10. Re:Make him run the Marathon by deimtee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Americans hold the people of every other country to be responsible for their politicians. Why shouldn't America be held to the same standard?

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    11. Re:Make him run the Marathon by dwpro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Not a nice guy" is what you say about your sister's boyfriend who yells at her and treats her badly. Saddam was a sadistic tyranical purveyor of genocide.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    12. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering my family was stuck in some Soviet-occupied area for quite a while after the war and you didn't lift a finger to change anything about that, well, thank you. Apologies if it doesn't really sound too sincere.

      When comparing Communism and Capitalism, I gotta say, the difference ain't that great, though. Does it matter whether you can't buy anything 'cause it's not available or whether you cannot afford it? Does it matter whether you can't go anywhere because you must not leave or because you cannot afford to leave? Does it matter whether you have no choice of your leader because there is no choice or because there isn't any real difference between them? The main difference was that at least you could speak your mind, but we're working on reverting that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Make him run the Marathon by oldhack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We saved your whiny euro asses and all we get back is your bitching and moaning, and this right after we suffered a lunatic bomb attack.

      Clean up, you say? You know why Africa and Middle East is the mess it still is today? Spectacular achievement of you dumbass Euro clowns. Go clean THAT up, dumbass.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    14. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did I say "you deserve it"? Far from it. Nobody "deserves" being bombed. That includes people outside the US, too, though.

      How long does it take to bury 4 Americans? Longer than it takes to bury 110,000 Iraqi?

      Ok, I guess I shouldn't compare. Every single person dying pointlessly from violence is one too many, but it kinda puzzles me how the death of four Americans causes more global mourning and distress than the death of thousands somewhere else. What makes Americans more "valuable" and their violent deaths more noteworthy than pointlessly killed Iraqis, Somalis or, hell, anyone else?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Cytotoxic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes. Yes it does matter, on all those fronts. You might as well ask "does it matter if you can't leave your apartment because you've got agoraphobia or because you are Jaycee Lee Dugard and some twisted bastard is keeping you in the shed out back." Either way, you can't leave, so what difference does it make?

      And you are much more likely to be in the "can't afford it" category living under communism, so it isn't like that's an either/or situation anyway.

      I do agree with your punchline though... freedoms have to be protected continuously, or you lose them.

    16. Re: Make him run the Marathon by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What happen if this "bomber" were found not guilty?

    17. Re:Make him run the Marathon by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a red blooded American let me say, FUCK YOU.

      You're an ass. What we did in WWII we did for ourselves. Don't you think for a fucking minute that the "Europeans" owe us a god damned thing because the American sacrifice in WWI and WWII barely pays them back for the French support during the revolutionary war. Millions of French starved and the country went bankrupt because they supported our revolution, again for purely self interested reasons, just like our own reasons during WWII.

      Don't get me wrong, the asshole you're replying to is just as big of an ass. Almost every single problem area or hot spot with atrocities going on in the world today is almost directly at the feet of European meddling. From India, Pakistan and Afghanistan having bullshit borders drawn by some British general, to the creation of Israel to the havoc colonialism has wrecked on Africa. Almost every single problem in the "old" world can be traced to bullshit Europeans caused.

      Sure the US has it's problems and Bush's meddling and in particular the Iraq war deserve the ridicule they often receive. But no nation in this world has clean hands with regards world relations. Even those Scandinavian countries that have done the least meddling deserve blame for standing silent while their European neighbors raped half the worlds populace.

      Americans and Europeans have both fucked up at various times. Rather than confrontational bullshit about claiming one is better than the other why don't we focus on what we both agree on instead of letting our minor (and they are very minor) fucking differences dominate the conversation. We can both help each other be better but not if you jackasses keep pretending one of us is better than the other because it ain't fucking true.

    18. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      1. Vietnam might disagree. But I admit, comparing this would be very unfair after all you fled the country. It's a given that you can't clean up as you would in an orderly retreat. I cannot really comment much on Korea, lacking data, but it seems you did fairly well there considering their economy and population are doing quite well (I'm talking about that part of Korea you actually had your hands in), and most likely without your intervention the whole peninsula would now suffer the fate of the northern half. I have to give you that, this was one good move, and I'll have to review my position on this portion of the statement. What remains, though, is that what comes after simply isn't even close to par with it. But then again, I still think Eisenhower was the best prez the country had since WW2. He handled the occupation organization of Germany in a splendid way and most likely was one of the few that could end the Korean war in a favorable way for the US, with him at the helm Vietnam sure would have ended differently... or not started at all, since he initially refused to go there in the first place... but I digress.

      2. Saddam was no saint, not by a longshot. He most certainly was a nightmare for his country, but, and that's after all what US foreign politics are usually about, a boon for the US. He was a fairly stable point in a very unruly area, one which also holds a lot of strategically very important resources. Oil, for example. At first, the Iran (yes, THAT Iran) was "our man in the middle east", and the US supported the Shah. Also not really a saint, if you remember (if you don't, look him up). Not really far away from Saddam, was he? And the US pumped an insane amount of top notch, state-of-the-art military hardware into the country. Quite literally, they were armed to the teeth with, IIRC, the fourth largest army on the planet, equipped with the most advanced military equipment money could buy at that time. They got the SAME tech level military equipment the US had themselves (a mistake the US would not repeat).

      After the coup of 79 the US were kinda shaken. Now there was a country, ready, able (and probably willing) to take over the whole middle east that was decidedly NOT an ally anymore! War against them, aside of not really being very popular just 4 years after the Vietnam debacle, would have been a nightmare. If you fight a technologically equal enemy, expect similar losses on your side that you inflict.

      So Saddam became an ally of the US. He was by no means any better back then, but he was willing and able to wage a war against the Iran and stall them enough to make not only their military hardware a bit more dated but also decimate their stockpile of weapons.

      So, please, not the argument that Saddam was a monster. Yes, he was. No doubt about that. But being a monster and a scourge for the people who are subject to its rule has never ruled out an oppressor as an ally of the US. Pinochet, Noriega, Branco, they were not really the epitome of democracy and liberty either, but all of them were installed or supported by the US as part of its foreign politics. Understandable from an US point of view, who of course do care more about its position in the world rather than the people who have to suffer from it, but please don't tell me overthrowing Saddam was just a "humanitarian act" or similar bullshit.

      He broke the rules, that's all. Same as Noriega, btw.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of my grandfathers died in a Nazi concentration camp. The other one was shot when helping people escape from the Communist prison countries. My dad took over that "family business". I personally was only there to aid people during the 1989 escapes, but that doesn't really count, they didn't really shoot anymore by then.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re: Make him run the Marathon by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Most terrorist trials have been in NY's southern district."

      First you would have to establish that he was a actually a "terrorist".

      I didn't hear about any threats or demands. So it looks so far like he's a mass murderer, but not a terrorist.

    21. Re:Make him run the Marathon by vistapwns · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know you will probably not give a damn what I think, but I think you see things too black and white. I think the US hates all these SOBs, but we can't be against every single asshole on the planet or we'd have no friends and would definitely lose the fight for the soul of the planet. We have to be 'friends' with some of them, which means, we are friends with them so long as they help us against people we judge to be worse, and that worse could be something the Berkley brigade would call greedy like financial help, but without a strong financial position the US and thus freedom parishes. So we have to make shitty calls all the time, I think (or hope) it's for a ultimately greater good, and one day the world will be democratized and all these stupid fucking dictator will be waiting tables and not bothering anyone (or even better, hung at war tribunals), but who knows. Without omniscience we can only make the best shit call we can out of nothing but shit calls. Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth. Oh btw, we didn't flee Vietnam, not the US anyway, after stabilizing the situation, and setting up South Vietnam to defend itself, the democrats in the US congress (which had a super majority that was too much for even a presidential veto) decided to abruptly cancel funding for South Vietnam, causing their military to collapse against the North's war machine. Now you may consider the democrats to be the US, but I assure you I think quite the opposite.

      --
      "...I think the Microsoft hatred is a disease." - Linus Torvalds
    22. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 2

      Slashdot only gives me mod points when I have no interest in using them. Pity, because your post is the first one that actually gives an unvarnished impression of the situation.

      +1, Not an Idiot

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    23. Re:Make him run the Marathon by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Love that.

      Blame the US for removing dictatorship. Blame the US for not removing a dictatorship.

      Here's a clue, fella. Decent people think removing a dictator is a good thing, but don't bitch at people who won't do it for them.

    24. Re:Make him run the Marathon by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      That used to be one of Hitchen's lines - "You really know someone doesn't know what they're talking about when they say 'Yeah, Saddam wasn't a nice guy, but ...."

    25. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Countries don't have friends. Countries have allies. And more often than not, it's just an "enemy of my enemy is an ally" deal. That's no accusation, that's simply foreign politics. I don't question the support for all the Pinochets and Noriegas of the world, they were the US' way of fighting off communism, which was teh evilz of the time. What I do question, though, is arguing as them as the big nasty boogeyman once they have outlived their usefulness and using it as an argument to fight them. That's more than just duplicity. That's simply lying through your teeth, to your voters and to the soldiers who do the fighting for you.

      What I also question is the shortsightedness of some of those deals. Noriega turned into a drug problem. And the support for Afghanistan during the fight against the Soviet Union into a terror problem. I admit it might not be easy to continue support after countries are no longer "useful", but simply cutting off funding when the political climate changes can have even worse results. Your example of Vietnam and suddenly "pulling the plug" without cleaning up properly fits that bill well, too.

      Politicians have no room in military decisions, btw. You don't want to live in a country governed by military, do you? Why should you want politicians to wage wars? I think what made WW2 and Korea a success, and what made pretty much every war afterwards a disaster, was that this prime rule was violated. Politicians may decide for or against war, but once the decision for war is made, GTFO and let the people who know how to do it take over.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Chickenlips · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Iraq never invited us "in". We created the "fucking problem" in the first place. They had excellent reason to want us out. Occupation is never a long term solution.

    27. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No whey!

      Sorry. I couldn't resist.

    28. Re:Make him run the Marathon by techhead79 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What makes Americans more "valuable" and their violent deaths more noteworthy than pointlessly killed Iraqis, Somalis or, hell, anyone else?

      At what point in your TV watching habits did you come to this conclusion? You do understand that news agencies and massive corporate news sites based out of the US will report more about US related news regardless of what version of their website/tv programs you're watching. So I'll take it that whatever country you're in they don't report as much about iraqi deaths? Have you considered that maybe a death related to terrorism in the most powerfull country on this planet might have repercussions accross the globe in terms of that nation's forieng policy? It has nothing to do with what individuals are more important. It has everything to do with what country is preceived as a leading power in the world. All of Iraq could be destroyed and the world will keep moving along. If all of Europe or all of the US was destroyed what do you think would happen to the rest of the world? I hate to rain on your, "the US is evil because we think we're better than everyone else" parade....but there are simple realities in this world. Decisions made by those in power impact everyone. A death in the US impacts the reasons why those in power in the US make decisions more than a death in Iraq would for obvious "der" level reasons.

      So try and not to hate us so much...3 deaths are not more important than any other 3 deaths. The difference is 3 deaths in a powerfull country impact the entire world. If you hate that then I guess we could let some other country make all our decisions for a while...or better yet just do away with our own goverment and let the UN rule us just so you feel better. The only solution to your discomfort is to destroy America and redistribute the power and wealth to the rest of the planet. (HI NSA!). Where guess what, some other country will find a way to get more power and more wealth than the rest and you'll have to hate them next. Welcome to humanity...how the fuck long did it take you to figure this out?

    29. Re:Make him run the Marathon by meglon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Decent people think overthrowing a democratically elected, pro-west government, installing a ruthless dictator and training his hit squads to murder his opponents purely because he's easier to control than a freely elected government is NOT a good thing. Too bad the US did exactly that back in 1953. How were those mental fucking midgets to know that it would turn the country against the US, who they'd then end up kicking the hell out so they could establish a religious theocracy that views westerners as evil, and fund what we in the west consider terrorist groups. I mean hell, that would have taken all of a couple brain cells to have that amount of foresight.

      Then again, if we empower some other ruthless dictator who hates the new religious theocracy that kicked our asses out after we fucked over their country, we can have him fight a proxy war. Too bad if he's a ruthless dictator killing people (just like the first one we empowered), he's our dictator.. again. Oh wait, he decides he doesn't need us anymore. Now you say we have to go kick his ass out, and we do it because we're "good" people.

      Bull fucking shit.

      Here's a clue, Rudy. They don't hate us because of our freedoms, they hate us because we've fucked them over every fucking chance we've gotten, and we're generally big fucking pricks. You want to blame someone.. blame the stupid motherfuckers who put those fucking dictators into power in the first place. Oh yeh, that's us in the US, isn't it.

      ...and now you want a pat on the back for removing the second dictator we empowered. There's not enough derogatory obscenities to adequately qualify what should be the response to that.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    30. Re:Make him run the Marathon by nomadic · · Score: 3, Informative

      how the death of four Americans

      Three Americans. One Chinese. And the media is treating her just like the Americans.

    31. Re:Make him run the Marathon by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      Yeah, we fucked the whole world over by defeating Stalinism. So sorry. Perhaps you'd feel more at home living in Iraq under Saddam. Ooops, we did it again; we took that away too. So sorry, so sorry. But never fear, there's still a bit of Stalinism left in North Korea. Don't let me keep you.

    32. Re:Make him run the Marathon by thrich81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please ... the US had lots of European help in the screw-ups since WWII. Vietnam, for example, happened because the French wanted to take it back as a colony after the war -- that's what turned Ho Chi Minh against the West. The US's problem there was not telling the French in the 50's to get out. The elected government of Iran was overthrown by the US in the 50's at the behest of Britain and their oil company there (not to excuse the US's actions there, but our mistake was not telling the Brits to screw off at the time [or is it, 'bugger off'?]). More recently, it took the US to put an end to the active fighting in Bosnia in the 90's -- as I recall, the Dutch troops there just stood around while the Bosnian Muslims got massacred in Srebrenica before the US got involved. Those are just the major events I can think of right off. Wasn't there documented French cheating on the UN sanctions against Iraq under Saddam? I'm sure a lot more of the US mistakes around the world can be traced to cleaning up messes the Europeans started -- the whole screwed up map of the Middle East in the 20th century can be traced to European meddling there before and after WWII.

    33. Re: Make him run the Marathon by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      I didn't hear about any threats or demands. So it looks so far like he's a mass murderer, but not a terrorist.

      No threats or demands are needed, mass murder does just fine as justification for labeling as a terrorist.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    34. Re: Make him run the Marathon by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      I didn't hear about any threats or demands. So it looks so far like he's a mass murderer, but not a terrorist.

      No threats or demands are needed, mass murder does just fine as justification for labeling as a terrorist.

      Strictly speaking, a terrorist is someone who uses terrifying acts to (they hope) further some goal.

      Maybe these guys were jihadists or maybe they were "freedom fighters", but maybe they're just the latest nihilistic psychos, who happened to think it would be more fun to blow people up than to hose little kids with machineguns.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    35. Re:Make him run the Marathon by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      USA defeated stalinism? Wow. Never knew Khrushchev was an American.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    36. Re:Make him run the Marathon by b4upoo · · Score: 2

      War is not like a baseball game where there is a score and an official ruling at the end. Whether we "won" in Vietnam is not really established. If we intended to occupy and dominate South Vietnam in the long term then we lost that war. But if the intention was to simply delay until old, Stalin style communism moderated into a more moderate political system then the war in Vietnam was quite a success. In the early 1960s old style communism was frantic and world domination was the clear goal. China was in a radical frame of mind. In the 1970s when Vietnam was winding down communism was altering its posture and intentions were no longer involving world domination. The end result is that Vietnam is doing rather well and its people are also doing much better than they were before American intervention in their affairs. North Korea stood as an example that prolonged clinging to old style communism was expensive and undesirable. The moderation of politics inside China and even in south America was moderated by our efforts in Vietnam.
                                    If all we sought was traditional victory in war we could have eliminated all hostilities in Vietnam on day one. If that had been done there would be no Vietnamese left alive. Iraq presents the same problem. Iraq is dangerous and unstable. Ultimately we can play around with the situation and if possible tolerate the instability but one day the elimination of their nation may be the only choice in play just as it is now in Iran and N. Korea. Money and manpower may well decide what we do with nations when diplomacy fails. Total war for 15 minutes is inexpensive for us compared to situations like ones currently costing us money and lives of our troops.

    37. Re: Make him run the Marathon by jopsen · · Score: 2

      I didn't hear about any threats or demands. So it looks so far like he's a mass murderer, but not a terrorist.

      Well, at least the caught him alive, so there's a reasonable chance we get to know why... Assuming of course it was these guys...

      Btw, I noticed that the article said they weren't read their rights, "citing national security exceptions". What I don't understand is that even though these exceptions to human rights exists in the US, why use them unless strictly necessary?
      If this guy just turns out only to be guilty of robbery, accomplish to murder and resisting arrest using a deadly weapon, you might just have to let him go due to process error... Why take that risk? Can you guys just ignore process errors?

      "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause", Padmé Amidala - Star Wars :)

    38. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Get back to us when the total equals those killed by the IRA, who you funded.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    39. Re:Make him run the Marathon by professionalfurryele · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I agree with your sentiment I have a slightly different take. As you suggest there really isn't 'paying each other back' in international relations, but the US is a good ally to have, with capable armed forces and I will acknowledge that it is only because of US support that Western Europe did not end up if not occupied by the Soviets then certainly strongly within the Soviet sphere of influence. For that I am thankful to the US and the citizens who paid to keep us safe.
      That said US foreign policy is generally speaking a disaster, and not just under Bush. Not because it is too interventionist, I don't subscribe to the Berkely school of 'everything the US ever does abroad is always wrong'. It is a disaster because they pretend to be engaged in realpolitik when they really aren't, or at least are doing it very wrong. Realpolitik in the US seems to mean propping us corporate interests and right wing governments at the expense of democracy and social freedoms. Every once in a while this works (South Korea for instance) because reasonable economic conditions result in an expanding middle class who then demand democracy and social freedoms. But usually what you get is some asshole dictator whose corrupt government squanders any and all gains from having economic freedom. At the same time the US gets the reputation of propping up yet another dictator or of trying to overthrow a nominal democracy.
      Venezuela is a good example of the failures of this pollice. Chavez was an idiot and an arsehole. If the US hadn't made him seem under siege he would have been out of office by now. His policies were stupid and Venezuela, while not exactly a paragon of democracy, was democratic enough that it almost certainly would have replaced him. But the US had to strengthen his hand by supporting a coup that was never going to work.
      Now this is not to say your point about Europe basically fucking up the entire world isn't a fair cop. Heck I'm British, the TV new could basically be renamed 'a list of places Britain fucked up in some way' and it wouldn't be misleading. And if it wasn't us it was the Belgians or the French or the Spanish or in a few cases the Germans. But while this is a fair cop the scale at which Europe is fucking up right now is generally speaking smaller, partly because we just don't have the resources to fuck up on a grand scale any more.
      That said it isn't always easy, and sometimes people are going to accuse you of fucking up even when you do the right thing. Take Libya for instance. The US was instrumental in giving Libya a chance for freedom. In my opinion the US did the right thing there. They prevented what would have been termed 'the rape of Bengahzi' for a start. Even if we end up with a Jihadi state or some fascist dictator I still think the US did the right thing because international politics isn't easy. Same with the early stages of Vietnam before it became obvious the government in the South wasn't going to get it's act together and that the North would win.
      When the US fights for economic and social freedom it is a force for good in the world, and it is doing the right thing, even if it doesn't succeed. The problem is that often the US isn't fighting for these things, especially when the CIA is involved. Often the US is fighting not for justice, freedom and democracy, but for corporate interests or out of fear of the latest bogeyman.
      Basically what I'm saying is the US need to have more confidence in its ideals.

    40. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Clsid · · Score: 2

      After World War 2, Western Europe itself made sure it became irrelevant. After being the dominating global world player for centuries with the combined colonial possessions of the UK, France and Spain among others, Europe was nothing else but another front of the Cold War. It wasn't about helping the Europeans, it was about keeping the Soviets and their growing power in check. France and the UK were so screwed up after that war that they were hardly in shape to say anything to anyone anymore. Hell, even the Argentinians were able to hurt the UK as far as 1981 with a very poor military.

      I'm neither European or American, but I do have to say that the worst anti-American attitudes I have found were in some Western Europe countries and Latin America. Hell I think, regular folk in China and Russia like Americans a lot more and people in America do not seem to realize it because their respective governments are at odds.

    41. Re:Make him run the Marathon by Bearhouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...More recently, it took the US to put an end to the active fighting in Bosnia in the 90's...

      Quite true, to our (European) eternal shame and dishonour. This and other incidents, both prior and subsequently, have shown the myth that 'European integration' on difficult foreign policy matters really is.

      -- as I recall, the Dutch troops there just stood around while the Bosnian Muslims got massacred in Srebrenica before the US got involved.

      To be fair to them, it widely was reported at the time that they, and other forces, repeated warned about the upcoming slaughter and were fully ready to intervene, (despite being heavily outnumbered, and thus probably being slaughtered in their turn). The politicos said no.
      It's wrong to brand EU armed forces as 'useless' or 'cowardly'; they have fought well, and bravely, in many places since WW2, including alongside US-forces in Iraq, AfPak...

    42. Re: Make him run the Marathon by quenda · · Score: 2

      This is the United States, where even innocent clients are advised by their lawyers to take a plea bargain.

    43. Re:Make him run the Marathon by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      According to my brother who was there with the 101st Airborne Division, the Kurds were delighted, at least the ones he met. They showered them with gifts of food, tea, etc.

    44. Re:Make him run the Marathon by techhead79 · · Score: 2

      So I state several facts about humanity, the planet, and news corporations...and you decide I'm a prick...ok fine hate the fuck out of me not the entire USA. Is your impression of America and the people residing in it based entirely off of online postings? I can see why you'd hate us.

    45. Re:Make him run the Marathon by F34nor · · Score: 2

      We should have broken up Iraq and made the Turks give their Kurdish area to Kuristan in order to join the EU. Then support a Gulf Economic Union with Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, Oman, and possibly the Suni Syrians.

    46. Re:Make him run the Marathon by techhead79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He was referring to the perception that Americans are viewed as more important than the rest of the world. The above stories are tragedies and you are correct they are very good reasons to hate America. They however were in war torn countries (by lovely us) and were not intentional. That does not absolve us of any wrong doing by any means.

      There is however a very real difference between killing civilians in a war torn area and killing civilians intentionally and targeting them. If you don't know what that difference is then you need to have your head examined. It's horrible, and it all could have been avoided if the government in charge of that country apprehended the terrorists that attacked our nation. Iraq is another very long discussion.

      I don't excuse the things my nation has done, but there are at times logically no other choice. I'm completely against both wars. There may have been other ways to get done what we needed to have done. However those actions would have also been completely illegal in the eyes of most nations. What is so shocking is somehow every nation has turned into an innocent child incapable of any evil wrong doing in the face of the US recent actions. The US is involved in the middle east for a ton of reasons from oil to WWII to the rise and fall of communism. They didn't get through the last century without both Europe's and the US's involvement and it's going to be another 100 years before we stop caring about the middle east. You don't like it? If you want to do something that might improve the area try local government reform (please note that doesn't mean completely destroy your country)...because they are the ones taking bribes from large corporations and they are the ones that allow their civilians to live the way they do under fear of some big bad outside force that somehow is responsible for everything that goes wrong on this planet.

      Don't forget why those people are dying, and accept the fact that when you're not in charge of the entire fucking planet there is a chance you might piss off the wrong people. The funny thing is...the US isn't pissing off the wrong people. If China or the EU or even Russia spoke up and took a real stand we'd have to back down and exit immediately. They do not want terrorists to be able to strike them and hide in other countries just like they don't want anyone else with nukes either. Can you imagine how quickly this entire planet would go up in smoke the second Iran has ICBM and nukes capable of reaching the US? It would drastically alter our foreign policy in the middle east and suddenly one nation out of all of them will become the leading voice....guess what happens to the rest of the nations without nukes without the US, EU, China, and Russia protecting them?

      You don't get to look at one horrible act and get to claim moral superiority. The middle east has been on the brink of destruction for a lot of reasons that have nothing to do with outside forces. The level of internal hate inside each of these nations is unbelievable. Not even the nations are unified under one rule. Countless time the US has been blamed for their instability. Did you ever consider what the area would look like without us? The common conception is some utopian peace free from all hate and mistrust. There are countless examples in the history of this planet on areas like the middle east in which a powerful outside force does not exist. It's not pretty.

  2. RedSox by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    So the Sox can still get the game in, right?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  3. Woot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Awesome! So glad that someone posted the live Boston police scanner stream. The scanner was VERY much ahead of any live news.

    1. Re:Woot! by swalve · · Score: 2

      @opieradio was live tweeting it, and was a good half hour ahead of the news. Even the instant kinds of things (like the cheers) were minutes behind on the "live" news. Makes me wonder just how live they really were...

    2. Re:Woot! by foniksonik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      TV stations made mistakes in the past and people got to watch a guy blow his head off with a shotgun. They don't do "live" anymore. There's always a few minutes delay so they can cut in time.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  4. Not the best escape vehicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A parked boat is probably not the best way to escape Boston and evade the police

    1. Re:Not the best escape vehicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you seen Boston traffic? It would hardly make a difference.

  5. Covered in blood, but alive by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

    I read police were tracking the hijacked car through it's built-in gps, they threw flash-bang grenades into the previously searched boathouse (a woman noticed later the door was open), and the suspect surrendered, covered in blood.

  6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nothing "paranoid Mulsim conspiracy nut" about the father's response he is still in the denial phase that a parent would be when they learn their child has done something really, really bad.

  7. Bravo to catching him alive by hsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "lockdown" of Boston is a bit disturbing. But, rest assured the LAPD would have burned the boat to the ground. Boston PD seems to be a bit more professional and restrained.

    1. Re:Bravo to catching him alive by thestudio_bob · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...But, rest assured the LAPD would have burned the boat to the ground.

      After shooting up the neighborhood, killing some random families dog, busting in on the wrong house and bitch slapping a mother while her child watches, accidentally setting fire to the house and reniggin on the reward.

      --
      The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    2. Re:Bravo to catching him alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      hey - don't diss philly - with MOVE we firebombed an entire neighborhood !!!

    3. Re:Bravo to catching him alive by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Don't forget shooting several people wearing white ball caps.

    4. Re:Bravo to catching him alive by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      The "lockdown", which wasn't the armed-police-at-everybody's-door that Slashdot posters love to think the government does, is pretty common in the these situations, though usually not over such a large area. When there's an armed crazy guy around, standard operating procedure is to tell the civilians to keep out of the line of fire. I remember it happening once when I was a kid, when there was a standoff between the police and a guy that eventually shot himself. Everyone on my block was told either to evacuate to a nearby park or, in my family's case, to go into their basements and stay away from the windows. This isn't the beginning of a totalitarian regime, but the norm for trying to keep people safe.

    5. Re:Bravo to catching him alive by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      That's not how you spell reneging. If you find yourself typing n-i-g-g at any point, you're probably either (a) spelling it wrong or (b) an asshole.

      To remain on topic, however, reneging on the reward would be quite a niggardly thing to do.

    6. Re:Bravo to catching him alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's get this "lockdown" thing straight. I live in Watertown. Today, during the "lockdown", my girlfriend just wanted to get out of here, and go spend the day with family in CT. We proceeded to pack some bags, go downstairs to our car, load up, and drive away. Didn't get stopped once the whole way into CT, and had a relatively pleasant evening out. This was during a time when at least one or two swat teams was on our street doing door to door sweeps (as for when they came into our building, they knocked on the door, asked if our apartment was okay, and otherwise, left it at that).

      Was it uncomfortable to have armed SWAT in the building with rifles drawn? Sure. Do I think they crossed the line in the way this was carried out? No. The news has been enjoying talking about an ORDER to stay inside, and plenty of playing up the SWAT sweeps, but frankly, from my perspective of a directly involved individual in this incident, I saw nothing problematic. When there are IED's potentially in your living situation, perhaps you'll feel differently about armed police coming in to make sure you're clear.

  8. Um... "suspect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's remember, folks, that until we see actual evidence and he's tried, that he's a *suspect.* I'm all for the consequences if he is proven to be the perpetrator, but let's not all jump on the finger-pointing-based-conviction bandwagon.

    1. Re:Um... "suspect" by screwdriver · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing they want him alive so he can be tortu^H^H^H^H^HInterrogated.

    2. Re:Um... "suspect" by Therefore+I+am · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Guilty or not, there is plenty of "threat" in all this for Congress to double the budget of the Department of Homeland Security...

    3. Re:Um... "suspect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      How about this?
      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/19/bomb-victim-whose-legs-were-blown-off-reportedly-helped-fbi-id-suspect/?intcmp=trending

    4. Re:Um... "suspect" by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's remember, folks, that until we see actual evidence and he's tried, that he's a *suspect.*

      There will be all kinds of people claiming that the cops should have shot him, that he doesn't deserve any rights - what about the victim's rights, etc.

      The thing is, a trial by jury isn't really about the rights of the accused - it is about OUR right to live in a society under the rule of law rather than the rule of man. Killing this guy or even railroading him with an unfair trial won't bring back any of the dead or heal any of the wounded. But it will undermine our status as a free and just society.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Um... "suspect" by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't it pretty obvious when him and his brother just happen to have pressure cooker bombs to throw at the cops, right after they are identified as suspects in the bombings? They are either the guys, or the unluckiest home cooking aficionados ever.

      Well the media has never misreported stuff before, ever, so yes lets skip the trial and go straight to the lynching.

    6. Re:Um... "suspect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then you're a psychopath.

    7. Re:Um... "suspect" by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not here in Massachusetts. He will be taken to a world-class hospital and his wounds treated. Once he is well, he will await trial in a comfortable jail, with access to his lawyer so he can prepare his defense. If he can't afford a lawyer we'll hire one for him. In such a high profile case, he may even get a top drawer lawyer working pro-bono to ensure his defense doesn't get steamrollered by public opinion. If he chooses to plead not guilty he will have the fairest trial we can possibly contrive, and the burden of proof will be on the prosecutor. If the prosecutor proves he is guilty, and he escapes the Federal death penalty (we don't have a state death penalty), he will be housed for the rest of his life in a correctional facility that is humanely operated to the maximum extent consistent with ensuring public safety.

      And I'm proud that's we do things. It's civilized. Some people may kill, maim or hurt people because they're feeling angry, but we as a people don't do things like that. That's what makes us better than they are.

      We got the job done, there's no reason to spike the ball. In fact there's plenty reason *not* to. We give the state power to kill people, to inflict pain, to deprive them of their freedom, but those powers ought to be limited to their proper application by strict rules. They should not be used at the whim of an individual government official or group of officials.

      Had Tsarnaev continued resisting arrest and got himself shot, I'd shake the hand of the officer who shot him. But now that he's given up, I'd call for the prosecution of any official who uses excessive force on him.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Um... "suspect" by Seumas · · Score: 2

      I don't think you understand how our justice system is supposed to work. With idiots like you, I have to wonder what we're all riled up to defend. There's nothing worth defending if we're just going to become a nation of angry vigilantes that pick and choose when someone deserves due process and a shot at justice. Fuck you.

    9. Re:Um... "suspect" by Seumas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And our government and government agencies never manufacture, mislead, or cover-up. Nope. No reason to worry about that, either.

      If this guy is guilty, then to hell with him. I'm just not willing to be ignorant of the vileness of our government nor give up the fundamental principals for which we're supposedly fighting so hard to maintain, just for some sort of masturbatory post-crises catharsis.

    10. Re:Um... "suspect" by hey! · · Score: 2

      Be shown the bills, promptly die from shock, and his family forced to declare bankruptcy while Walmart collects the life insurance payout.

      Nope. We have Romneycare, the model for Obamacare nationwide (although to give credit where credit is due it should probably be called BobDoleCare). Massachusetts hasthe lowest rate of uninsured in the country, so he's probably covered.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:Um... "suspect" by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only chance he has of a not guilty verdict is if someone like me is on the jury, someone who truly believes that the burden of proof is on the prosecutor and that the burden should be pretty high and that is pretty damn unlikely.

      Well, I've been on two Massachusetts juries, one of which found "guilty" the other of which found "not guilty". The "not guilty" verdict was in a case that involved a fairly heinous crime. Given the seriousness of the crime it took us a long time to come to the "not guilty" conclusion -- I was the last juror to make up his mind in fact. While I believe all of us thought the preponderance of evidence was that the guy did it, we took the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard seriously. We worked, very, very hard to come up with the right verdict, especially because in this case it ran counter to our feelings about the man.

      That doesn't mean it'll be easy to get a jury like that in this case. I have a niece who is on social media right now calling for this guy to be tortured and left to bleed to death. I don't think she'd get on the jury, and if she did, I'd speak up. I think *I* could give this guy a fair hearing, and I'm not really that unusual in understanding the importance of a juror's duty to be open-minded.

      I happen think there's a very good chance, given the prominence of this case, that some big time lawyers and law professors will take up this guy's defense.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:Um... "suspect" by istartedi · · Score: 3, Informative

      he will be housed for the rest of his life in a correctional facility that is humanely operated to the maximum extent consistent with ensuring public safety.

      If he doesn't get the death penalty, he'll most likely be housed in a Supermax prison which is controversial. Some say it's unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. The wheels of justice haven't ground it down yet though. Note, California's overcrowded state prisons were ruled unconstitutional, with a result of state prisoners being sent to county jails or released, so it is possible to win a suit to improve prison conditions in the US.

      Anyway, if supermax is as bad as they say it is, those who say that the death penalty is too merciful may get their wish.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    13. Re:Um... "suspect" by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually I share your concern with Supermax prisons. I think for some prisoners they're necessary for the protection of the public and the people who guard them, but I get the nagging feeling that some places use detention in Supermax as a kind of unconstitutionally enhanced punishment.

      If Tsarnaev's sent to the kind of facility you're talking about, it'll be the federal facility in Florence Colorado -- which is an antiseptic hell-hole.

      I didn't think Massachusetts had its own facility that meets Supermax security standards, but it turns out I was wrong. There's Souza-Baranowski in Shirley Mass, which some have called the most technologically advanced prison in the world. I kid you not, it runs entirely on renewable energy sources. Go ahead and laugh at liberal Massachusetts, because it *is* funny that our version of Devil's Island is solar powered.

      According to the Mass DOC, Souza-Baranowski "offers a full range of educational, vocational and substance abuse programming," which sets it apart from the kind of Supermax prisons you're talking about, where prisoners rot away in solitary confinement.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:Um... "suspect" by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's a 'suspect' in the Marathon bombing, but AFAIK he's pretty much red-handed involved in the killing of one cop and the shooting of another, as well as lobbing pipebombs at those trying to arrest him.

      So yeah, guilty now. Maybe more guilty later.

      --
      -Styopa
    15. Re:Um... "suspect" by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      I wish I could believe that but with the article (and others that I've read) stating that they are questioning him without Miranda rights being issued to him I have little faith that it will be a show trial. I find it quite disturbing at how easily it is to have these rights taken away from someone. On one hand people are being told that everything is safe because the suspect has been captured but the suspects rights have been taken away because there's a danger to society. It's either one or the other.

    16. Re:Um... "suspect" by Sun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about this, instead?

      Abstract: In the 1996 Olympic games bombing the FBI was quick to release information about a "person of interest", which several reputable news sources were quick to publish. Not only was he not the bomber, he was the one who found the bomb and helped evacuate the building. It took two years to clear his name, and an apology has never been issued. The man carried the punishment of doing a good deed to his last day.

    17. Re:Um... "suspect" by manwargi · · Score: 2

      If America values justice rather than revenge, he will be tried, convicted (or released if he is proven innocent!), and sentenced to an appropriate punishment in a court of law. It is not the place of the police to "get medieval on his ass."

  9. Re:Oh good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah - cause shooting at cops always proves how innocent you are.

  10. Small tidbit by sshir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    CBS reported that few years back Russians warned FBI about older brother being radicalized. So FBI asked him, he said "nope", they said "ok" and let him go. And they totally forgot about it - he wasn't on the list of suspects...

    That's "cooperation" alright...

    1. Re:Small tidbit by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 2

      It's a tough job. There are probably 10,000 pissed off nutjobs mouthing off in pub or mosque for each one that considers doing something, and one in 10,000 of them actually do. No matter how low your false positive rate, you're going to still have 99% chaff in your interview room. It's interesting that in a post-1984 world, that it's become virtually impossible to get away with a high-profile act such as a public bombing. It's also interesting how Boston seems to have a standing army

    2. Re:Small tidbit by jamesh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      CBS reported that few years back Russians warned FBI about older brother being radicalized. So FBI asked him, he said "nope", they said "ok" and let him go. And they totally forgot about it - he wasn't on the list of suspects... That's "cooperation" alright...

      Maybe you would have been happier about 60 years ago in a time when they could lock you away because your neighbor said you might be a communist. The world was a much safer place back then with all those commies being locked away without a trial.

    3. Re:Small tidbit by game+kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think everyone involved did their best. The Russian gov isn't exactly trustworthy either, and without real evidence of prior harm from Tsarnaev it was Russia's word against his. Plus we would've screamed "thoughtcrime arrest!" if we heard the FBI just up and jailed the guy before he actually conspired to do things.

      In any case, the younger's last-stand spot gives "going overboard" a different meaning...

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    4. Re:Small tidbit by jamesh · · Score: 2

      Concern is not that he was let go. Consern is that for whatever reason he was not in a database afterwards. Apparently FBI not sure how that happened.

      Suppose you had mouthed off about your government once upon a time (say, September 12, 2001) and someone reported you to the FBI. The FBI interviews you and discovers nothing other than the regular run-of-the-mill anti government sentiment. But they add you to the database. Then someone lets some bombs off and kills a few people at a marathon. You're in the database, and you just happened to be in the area because your friend/sister/cousin/whatever was runner. The government comes and finds you and starts asking a bunch of questions. They also question your family, and maybe some of your workmates. Nothing comes of it in the end, because you are innocent, but your workmates will always wonder...

      Seems like you've given up some of your freedom to secure a little temporary safety.

  11. Caught because someone noticed ... by perpenso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Caught because someone noticed something strange in the backyard and called it in.

    Like many other problems, ordinary folks pitching in to help in an appropriate way can sure help to fix things.

    1. Re:Caught because someone noticed ... by Philotomy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah. Also interesting that the boat where the suspect was hiding was outside the perimeter of the search zone where the authorities had been conducting their house-to-house searches all day, and that the tip came in within *minutes* of the "shelter in place, all you vulnerable citizens, while we protect you" order being lifted. The homeowner went outside to get some air and check his property. So thank a private business for the initial video of the suspects, and thank an "ordinary" citizen for the observation that led to the second suspect's capture.

    2. Re:Caught because someone noticed ... by Brucelet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So thank a private business for the initial video of the suspects, and thank an "ordinary" citizen for the observation that led to the second suspect's capture.

      Of course, also thank the FBI for identifying the suspects (rather than the misidentification by private citizens and some news organizations), and all the law enforcement officers putting their lives on the line today.

    3. Re:Caught because someone noticed ... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      The NY Post is not a news organization. They are a marketing organization.

  12. Re:Oh good. by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

    Is it safe to go out now?

    I mean, before this case is even brought before a courtroom...

    You're free to hide out until the verdict, and beyond. I'll trust the identification provided by the guy who was carjacked, while you explain why he would lie about the alleged confession/boast.

  13. Re:Oh good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gee I don't know maybe the VIDEOS OF THEM PLANTING THE BOMBS? Or maybe them SHOOTING AND THROWING EXPLOSIVES AT COPS?

  14. Re:Oh good. by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it safe to go out now?

    Of course not. 4chan might decide you're dark skinned and subject you to their full sanction - circling someone who kinda looks like you on a picture. I believe that's called "vigilantism" and we are sorely afraid of it.

  15. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but based on the actual information we have (as given by the news media to date), this "monster" may be involved to the degree of anywhere between "mastermind of terrorist bombing operation, detonated the bombs, shot various innocent people in the process" to "forced by actual terrorist brother to hang around him for the time period in question".

    I'd like a little more detail (that is, any) as to specific charges and evidence before making such a characterization.

  16. Re:Oh good. by hsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exactly. Shooting a cop, running, throwing bombs out windows, more shootouts, are all things that innocent people do.

    Clearly, calling up the BPD and saying "hey we are the guys in the pictures and we didn't do it! lets talk!" would be crazy

  17. Carmen F***ing Oriz to do the press conference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess the DOJ is trying to put lipstick on a pig.

  18. Re:Oh good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps not innocent, that doesn't mean he is the right guy.

    Proper trials are not only there to make sure that innocent people doesn't get punished. If a rapist gets convicted of murder that means that the murderer goes free.
    "Beyond reasonable doubt" isn't only there to protect innocents, it also makes sure that cases doesn't get closed until we know that we've got the right guy.

  19. Re: Oh good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Han Solo of course.

  20. Rights. And stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe I am not current and entirely out of line, but with all the locking-down and searching-of-houses happening: what happened to the constitutional rights re: search and seizure? Suspending them for an entire town and effectively rendering it into a war zone with suspended rights to apprehend one guy how killed two people seems a little... ah... third world?

    1. Re:Rights. And stuff. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Maybe I am not current and entirely out of line, but with all the locking-down and searching-of-houses happening: what happened to the constitutional rights re: search and seizure? Suspending them for an entire town and effectively rendering it into a war zone with suspended rights to apprehend one guy how killed two people seems a little... ah... third world?

      Apparently, the search wasn't all that invasive, nothing is reported seized that wasn't evidence related to the bombers, and it had basically come down to a choice between business as usual versus taking down a 2-man army loaded for bear.

      I have more indignation on the subject of personal rights than most people seem to, but there's a big difference between a manhunt for people who are armed, dangerous, and already known to have killed and an "innocent people have nothing to hide, but you look kind of shifty to me" renunciation of due process. It was a war, with specific Rules of Engagement, and unlike the War on Terror, it had a definite duration and now it's over and the normal legal limitations apply again. At least until our geniuses in Congress use this as an excuse to strip away some more of those limitations.

    2. Re:Rights. And stuff. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative
  21. Re:Good by swalve · · Score: 2

    There was a stupid picture going around facebook today that was kind of right. Only in Boston will they shut down the entire goddamned city to search for someone like this. Don't fuck with Bawfston.

  22. Re:Glad to hear it. by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He'd called his uncle after the bombings and asked for his forgiveness. It's said he idolized his older brother, who family members called the bad one. Yes, now we will be able to know all of the true motives they had for commiting this carnage. We won't like or agree with the answers he gives, but they will be answers, better than guessing at the 'why' of this horrid act.

  23. Re:Good by swalve · · Score: 2

    The more successes they have with good, honest police work, the less likely the past awfulness will be repeated. Bad behavior is more often born of frustration than success.

  24. just checking in by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh, I guess I didn't get the Slashdot memo...so torture and no due process is now okay?

    Just checking: are drone strikes, domestic spying, overzealous prosecution, and all the other things we usually rant about, still bad?

    1. Re:just checking in by RussR42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's like we're forming up a lynch mob! I've had my ass handed to me for suggesting due process for everyone before.... Maybe this time I'll just stand in back with a pitchfork and wait for every one to calm down. By tomorrow every one here will be screaming for it again.

    2. Re:just checking in by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is not. The people advising torture are on a moral level lower than this person who is a SUSPECT at this time. But many here do not have the minimal moral standards required to actually understand what that means.

      A lot of anger and no morals or brains. That put more than one dictator in power.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:just checking in by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Running a marathon is torture? Hmm...that thing in Boston they were doing must have been a group torture event then.

      But you knew that the parent was joking. I'm thinking you just posted here just because you wanted to make sure that everybody knows that you are against torture, and that they should all know how evil the US is. Rest assured, we're all happy for you.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    4. Re:just checking in by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Hey! Where's mine?

      I demand answers!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:just checking in by Spykk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is Slashdot's stance on overreacting to what is obviously a joke?

    6. Re:just checking in by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Slashdot knee-jerk reaction that this criminal (yes, criminal, not suspect) deserved to be apprehended with no use of force is incorrect.

      The criminal shot at and threw pipe bombs at the police as he was being pursued. He has a right to due process for the marathon bombings, but not for the crimes of shooting and bombing cops while being pursued (and the pursuit was justified, due to a preponderance of evidence against him for the marathon bombings). He was a clear and present danger during the pursuit and committed those crimes against the police while they were attempting to arrest him. If he wanted a guarantee of no violence to himself, like so many Slashdotters like you think he deserved, he should have not basically caused himself to be caught red-handed shooting at and bombing cops - he should have surrendered. But he did not do so.

    7. Re:just checking in by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This person is a suspect for the marathon bombings, but was a clear and present danger to the public and to the police during the pursuit, and the police would have been justified in using violence against him. Of course they didn't want to kill him, because they want to question him. But he did not deserve a no-violence arrest because of his actions during the arrest.

    8. Re:just checking in by blackraven14250 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, they were throwing bombs at the police, on top of the gunfire, during the pursuit if the news is right on that count. That's clearly grounds for giving up your rights to a nonviolent arrest - you're actively trying to kill people!

    9. Re:just checking in by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Running a marathon is torture? Hmm...that thing in Boston they were doing must have been a group torture event then.

      Having started ill-prepared and barely finished a half-marathon, I can inform you that thoughts like "Why the hell am I torturing myself like this?" and "I'm even paying for this!" are not unheard of. Then again, people pay to be locked up in S&M dungeons and every Easter there's some religious guys whipping themselves bloodied too... insanity loves company.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  25. Re:Hmm by swalve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And it still took them 4 days to find two guys. Imagine trying to solve the murder of an 18 year old gangbanger whose killer is identified as a dark skinned male from 15-25, 5'10" medium build? And nobody in the neighborhood ain't seen shit. Police work is hard.

  26. Re:Glad to hear it. by swalve · · Score: 2

    I don't care so much about study, but I would like to know what their fucking problem was.

  27. Oh the irony by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Usually rats flee sinking ships. This is the first time a sinking rat fled to a ship.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  28. Re:Fuck Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fuck religion and everything that comes with it: horrific acts world-wide, subjugation of women in everywhere, and persecution of anyone who dares to speak against it.

    Fixed that for you.

  29. Re:Oh good. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately for your argument this darkskin person they sanctioned in fact had several bombs in their vehicle which they threw at police vehicles.

    A lie can run round the world before the truth can get its boots on. Unfortunately, for your argument.

    The "darkskin", as you like to put it - the one whose picture appeared in Rupert Murdoch's newspaper - is the innocent one. People rushed to judgement.

    The guys who were throwing bombs and firing off guns right and left were pasty-pale people.

  30. But why was he shooting? by Pollux · · Score: 2

    For all we know, they were commiting a crime of an unrelated nature.

    My point has not changed from my original post; I am tired of this bloody spectacle. The news has been fixated on this even for the past four days, and it has done nothing but reinforce fear and paranoia within our society. While the odds are high that these men are guilty, we should not let our personal opinions interfere with our judgement or our civility. I thought a little satire in my parent post would make this point, but I guess it didn't.

    1. Re:But why was he shooting? by static0verdrive · · Score: 2

      Not to mention giving attention to the act and criminals, thereby potentially motivating other evil attention-seekers to perform similar acts. The media needs to report it once, maybe the odd update when it matters, and Never, Ever, name those responsible. (Saying whether they were caught is OK, but why make them famous/infamous and go down in history?)

      --
      ========
      77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
    2. Re:But why was he shooting? by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2

      For all we know, they were commiting a crime of an unrelated nature.

      You do know there is a considerable amount of photographic evidence of dudes who look like these turkeys. You do know that the guys the police chased were armed with firearms and bombs, yeah? and these guys resisted arrest (unlike, say, a random citizen who wouldn't fire on police trying to talk to them). You do know that the people apprehended visited Islamic jihadi sites, yeah? you do know that the Australian imam "Sheil" Feiz inspired these dudes yeah? (according to: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/459253/20130419/feiz-mohammad-tamerlan-tsarnaev-boston-marathon.htm).

      Now I agree that the arrested dude could be innocent by some means - but your statements don't make much sense given the evidence available to even us plebs. If you wanted to say "innocent until proven guilty" then I'm with ya. If you wanted to say "I'm bored with the manhunt and capture of Islamic terrorism that killed three people (including a Chinese national and a young boy) and wounding hundreds more, ruining a globally-reknowned celebration of athletic prowess, and traumatising many bystanders" then I'm not with you. In fact, I'd say you were perhaps a bit of a self-centered prat whose writing suggests a lack of empathy with the victims. By all means you can tire of the manhunt coverage, by all means feel free to speak (write) your opinion. Please don't be surprised if we think you are a bit of a git for shifting blame off the perpetrators. Such as implicitly suggesting the police had gone crazy and just grabbed some minor perps; and suggesting that coverage of a jihadi attack on US soil and the associated manhunt was not as newsworthy as say, Kim Kardashian's tribulations.

      It seems to me that many of a Leftist bent still desperately want the terrorism to have been conducted by a right wing nut, so the leftists could feel comfortable with the world view. Instead, reality has just slapped many leftists in the face and completely destroyed the Leftist excuses for jihad (assuming that US and Israel foreign policies or poverty are the causes of jihad rather than than the Truth - that the Qur'an has 109 violent clauses the mainstream Muslims believe is their duty to fulfil). I don't know whether what your politics are, but this event should be a wake up call to every Free Person. The battle between the 7th Century political Islam and the rest of the World (whose outlook is mostly in the 21st Century) has been going on for 1400 years and will not stop without either the Islamists subjugating all non-Muslims (their stated goal, eg. according to Sura 9:29) or the Free World defeats the political system called Islam (just as National and Soviet Socialism were defeated).

  31. Re:Good by rmandevi · · Score: 2

    So they didn't Miranda him. That just means that a court could throw out any statements that he makes. I suspect that there is enough physical evidence and cell camera footage to force a conviction.

    --
    People who live in glass houses shouldn't walk and text.
  32. Venting by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the one hand, we must maintain the due process of law that makes this country great. On the other hand, threads like this help us vent.

    Therefore, I suggest that we throw him in a food processor, and blow him out a vent.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Venting by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh effin' great, typical American solution, not caring a bit about pollution!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Venting by cryptizard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because Europe is so freaking great... in my experience, every western country is more or less the same plus or minus some particular group of assholes. You gain some things and lose some things depending on where you go, but there is no country that is really doing that awesome right now.

    3. Re:Venting by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but in every way that counts, your country has stopped being "great" a long time ago.

      So, would you prefer your change in Dollars, or (non-German) Euros?

      Would you prefer your NATO liberators arrive in F-14s or Yugos?

      Would you prefer your judge US Republican or French (I won't even bother comparing against any Sharia country)?

      Would you prefer your fries supersized, or rationed?

      Would you prefer your burger Angus or Clydesdale?

      Take your pick. The US has its flaws, and I rarely defend it, but the rest of the world looks like it has gone to hell even faster than we have.

    4. Re:Venting by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, but in every way that counts, your country has stopped being "great" a long time ago. It is basically a threat to everybody, including its own citizens. It is just that you do not have any meaningful comparison, or you would see that immediately. I have notices a growing number of US citizens that are trying to stay permanently in Europe after being here for a while. Not a coincidence.

      Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

      I'm no statist so let me respond: Do not confuse the great American People as being purveyors of Government corruption. The People are the ones who sacrificed crockery to make weapons for war when needed. The People are the ones who fight in the wars too. The country is made not only of its government, but primarily it's people. You can change a government and still have the same people. America is HUGE. The political and legal systems are its Government, and they are likewise huge and lumbering. We know the beastly bureaucracy is not always right or even good at times, but if it gets too oppressive then we won't stand for that either. We don't make sacrifices to have the country turn into those very same things we sacrificed for. Potential for it do become so is not the same as it being so. Sure, there is a risk and hints its headed that way, but currently it's really not so bad -- Certainly not bad enough for a revolt. The average Person thinks things could be better here, and so it shall be in due time.

      Better to adapt slowly than take radical action over mere "threats to everyone" and risk death or oppression.
      ^- Note that this is the opposite mentality than that of a terrorist...

      In short, your concern has been noted, but it's not fresh news to us. WTF does it have to do with the pathetic ineffective attempts of a couple of nutters to get our attention? I hope you see that that way is useless. We're not doing the best we can to change things, but really now, who is?

      Truly, you are "sorry" -- "in every way that counts".

    5. Re:Venting by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 2

      An excellent point. Thanks.

      This is Slashdot. We have the technology. We can find a carbon neutral way to torture the hell out of this piece of trash wrapped in a human skin.

      BTW, I agree with grandparent post:

      On the one hand, we must maintain the due process of law that makes this country great. On the other hand, threads like this help us vent.

      --
      Will
    6. Re:Venting by cplusplus · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...but, will he blend?

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    7. Re:Venting by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, would you prefer your change in Dollars, or (non-German) Euros?

      Bitcoin!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:Venting by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, would you prefer your change in Dollars, or (non-German) Euros?

      The Euro has done pretty well against the USD long term, so I'll take Euros.

      Would you prefer your NATO liberators arrive in F-14s or Yugos?

      Eurofighters please.

      Would you prefer your judge US Republican or French (I won't even bother comparing against any Sharia country)?

      I like my European Convention on Human Rights thanks. I disagree with a lot of the decisions the French judge might make, but at least I know my human rights will be protected and I won't get thrown in Guantanamo.

      Would you prefer your fries supersized, or rationed?

      Er... We don't have food rationing here... But normal size is fine thanks. Or "regular" as you say, which to me sounds like they should help with your bowel movements.

      Would you prefer your burger Angus or Clydesdale?

      Horse, natch.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  33. Re:TV using Google Street View of boat ... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

    An image on the TV news of the boat in the backyard looks like a Google Street View image.

    It's Bing. Google's camera shots didn't line up with the driveway.

    Bing has also been used for the aerial views, since their photos are winter and the foliage of Google's summer view obscures part of the property details.

  34. Re:Fuck Islam by Seumas · · Score: 2

    Agreed. Only, substitute this with all of the major religions which encourage and promote this sort of atmosphere and hatred. Christianity, Islam, etc. Don't pretend your shit doesn't stink when you're part of the problem.

  35. Re:String 'em up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've had enough of this ignoring the Constitution lately. Why don't we try using it for a change.

  36. Re:Fuck Islam by gweihir · · Score: 2

    Indeed. The problem is that the "War on Terror" is really a war of Christian fuck-ups against Islamic fuck-ups. Nothing good can ever come from religion if taken seriously.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  37. Re:Oh good. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have seen them? Where could I get a view of them? All I have seen is a few videos of some guys with backpacks running about that were presented to me by the cops, telling me "this is the guys we're looking for". About the shooting and throwing explosives at cops, again, do you have a source? All I have is cops telling me he shot at them and threw explosives.

    Audi alteram partem, anyone?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Re:Oh good. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    You would have to ask the MIT security guy about that.

    Oh shucks. He's dead.

  39. Re:Fuck Islam by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    > Fuck religion, period. Christianity over time has had similar consequences.

    Centuries ago.

    I am agnostic, but let's face reality. Muslim terrorist acts out-number all other terrorist acts about 10,000 to 1.

    20,000 Muslim terrorist acts since 9/11, 250,000 casualties. Modern Christianity does not compare.

  40. Re:Thats it by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

    I'm going to another site. As a european Im used to american-centric viewpoints etc. And ofcourse I could understand the 9/11 post. But there were 3 people killed in one measly attack. I live in a very small country but there are more people killed in traffic each day then by the Boston attack. Every week there are much bigger terrorist attacks going on in the world. Could you please stick to nerdy stuff?

    There are probably more that 3 people killed in Boston alone on a typical day in traffic. There were about 30 killed shortly after the Marathon incident in a single Bagdhad bombing. What makes this particular incident a big deal is the same thing that made 9/11 a big deal.

    America is the "safe" place. For much of its history, it was the Destination of Refuge, where corruption rests lightly, wars are something that happen in Some Other Country, and terror incidents likewise. The original inhabitants might not totally agree, but all in all, in the USA you were supposed to be immune to the troubles of the more unstable parts of the world.

    Incidents like this, therefore, have more effect simply because they're so unthinkable. Not only for those of us who live here, but for anyone who ever thought of the USA as a refuge, albeit a refuge full of overweight arrogant gun-toting cowboy wannabes.

    In the last decade or so, we have sacrificed a lot of our traditional ideals to the God Terror. Today was a day to pay it back. To prove that we don't need to give up more freedom to be what we are supposed to be. We didn't win this fight by bringing in the armies or permanently suspending our legal processes. We did it using our domestic law enforcement resources in co-operation with our citizens.

    This is what the noise is all about. We have proven that we can take injury, even though we're "supposed" to be immune to it, and that we can deal with terrorists as the criminals they are and not some sort of supernatural boogie men. Under the law.

    Tomorrow we'll be back to arguing whether Windows 8 is the Second Coming of Windows Me, whether the latest solar-cell breakthrough is anything that will mean anything before the sun goes cold and even the latest legal developments with Google in Europe. But while the web is international, slashdot isn't, and today is a pretty big day for the USA. So the best advice I can give you is that if you don't want to hear about it, skip to the next topic. Or another site. But finding a place infested by non-US nerds isn't that easy.

  41. Re:Fuck Islam by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 2

    There is literally not a single part of Christianity that is violent.

    Well, what about that Jew nailed to a stick that Christians just love to dwell on? That entire religion is pretty damn morbid... their bible brimming with fucked up shit, just waiting for someone with mental problems to take in such a way that they do something vile. It's a fucking morbid fairy tale meant to control primitive people.

  42. Re:Good by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2

    Yeah, keeping people of the street due to a massive manhunt. Totalitarian! Black Helicopters! Tyranny! Fascists! Walrus! Broccoli! God help us all!!!!

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  43. Re:Fuck Islam by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is literally not a single part of Christianity that is violent.

    Jesus beat the shit out of the moneychangers in the temple.

    But really, you've fallen victim to the "no true scotsman" fallacy. Anyone who commits violence in the name of christianity isn't a christian. In my experience, the people who are willing to apply that standard to christianity aren't willing to apply that standard to any other religions.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  44. Re:Fuck Islam by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 2

    In my experience, the people who are willing to apply that standard to christianity aren't willing to apply that standard to any other religions.

    I totally would, if Muslims would come out and criticize Islamic terrorism, but most Muslims seem to clam up instead. And at times I have overheard them secretly cheering (I used to work with Muslims that made statements like this when they thought nobody was listening). Christians are quick to criticize "Christian" lunatics like WBC.

    You're cherry picking the home team, and generalizing the away team. I know a lot of "Christians" that think abortion clinic bombings are justified because the victims are legal murderers.

    WBC isn't the only lunatic group as viewed from the outside.

    --
    a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
  45. Re:No by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I'm tempted to say "with any luck, she'll drive him to suicide, too", but that's not what I'd really want. What I want is a fair trial. Yes, what he (allegedly, so far we don't have a conviction yet) did was a horrible crime, but I don't just want to see someone hang for it, I want the RIGHT person to hang for it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. Terrorists caught/killed by PPH · · Score: 2

    And all without having troops occupy Massachusetts, send armed UAVs in to take out targets in Boston and engage in a little 9 year occupation of Maine on the side.

    We are concerned about intelligence indicating New Hampshire possesses nuclear technology, in spite of their continued claims tha it is for peaceful uses only.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  47. Re:Fuck Islam by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

    I totally would, if Muslims would come out and criticize Islamic terrorism, but most Muslims seem to clam up instead.

    (a) Now you've moved the goal posts from the religion to individuals who profess to follow the religion.
    You are balls-deep in the no true scotsman fallacy with that.
    (b) Is thousands of prominent muslims good enough for you?

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  48. as another ex-eastern euro by cheekyboy · · Score: 2

    I would have rather USA took over than russia, even if for simple reasons like russian entertainment and fun is utterly crap. Why did they want so much control, god damn nut cases! too much brain damage from vodkas.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  49. 9/11 vs Columbine again by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Psychopaths like the Tsarnaev brothers, the Columbine killers, the 9/11 terrorists, the Koch brothers, etc. are either total predators like Tamerlan or Eric, with a bizarre interest in family hierarchy, a fascination with determining who is and isn't related to you, a desire for stirring religious hatred, and no altruism, empathy, or moral center to be found; they can also have only one allele like Dzhohar ("Johar", whatever), who was maybe an asshole with a superiority complex, but was also quiet about it. He was easygoing enough to form relationships with individuals in both allelic subpopulations, normal and psycho. They'll hang out with you and your other unsuspecting friends, smoke weed with you once a week just like normal Americans, etc. etc., but they'll also carry pressure cookers full of nails into dense crowds of strangers for you if they feel strongly related to you somehow.

    The uncle, Ruslan Tsarni, looks like he's carrying normal alleles at this locus. He announced to a mob of reporters that he thought his older nephew was up to no good. He said that his nephew Jahar was a loser for doing what he did, announced he should turn himself in, and ask for forgiveness from the wider population of Boston. He said the brothers "brought shame on their family and upon the entire Chechen ethnicity." It might run in his family, but I don't think the uncle is as interested in seeing people run into trouble just for not being related to him.

    Hopefully we decide not to waste another decade. This is not the time to go off fuming about how everyone in Chechnya is carrying this psychotic gene. Everybody there would be dead. Comfort with inhibiting the reproduction of people unrelated to you runs in families all around the world. It occurs in legislatures everywhere. It preserves itself by making you cause problems for people who don't have it. But it has to self-regulate in any wider human population, Chechnya or Boston or wherever, or it goes extinct along with the rest of the genome in the region.

    Hopefully we won't see this as an excuse to waste another decade with more political 9/11-style bullshit against one particular religion or another. This was in the end a story of two bungling religious-minded psychotics, with a "mastermind", a "pushover with no conscience", and a shared comfort with mass-murdering a dense unrelated-looking crowd in a city far from home.