Slashdot Mirror


Is Anonymous Going Mainstream Following Website Funding?

DavidGilbert99 writes "For a completely online movement, the lack of an official Anonymous website is certainly strange. The reason, according to Anonymous itself is down to the lack of a hierarchical structure. However, one Anonymous-linked group could be about to change all that, having succeeded in securing $55,000 in funding for a website. Is this the beginning of Anonymous going mainstream? From the article: 'The @YourAnonNews (YAN) Twitter account has over one million followers and has leveraged its popularity to successfully raise over $55,000 (£34,000) through a crowd-funding campaign on the Indiegogo website. The funding drive was established to allow those behind the YAN account to set up a website of its own which will allow it "to collect breaking reports and blog postings from the best independent reporters online."'"

101 comments

  1. Unwitting Accomplices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would people who donated to their cause be unwitting accomplices when Anonymous continues to violate many laws in many countries? I'm sure that governments will use this as a tact to pry into people's lives.

    1. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Troll

      Actually, calling themselves "Anonymous" and gathering funding now gives governments around the world - from Russia to Australia, from the US to Indonesia - the pretext to prosecute anybody posting anonymously online, as a conspirator and an accessory to... Well, darn near anything.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you really think that posting anonymously online reaches the standard of 'probable cause,' or even 'reasonable suspicion'? Because that's what they're going to need if they're going to prosecute them (in the US, Australia might have different standards).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how is that annoymous hasn't been able to squat to China is it because they scared shitless of what Chinese government can do?

    4. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Rather people pretending to associate with the organization and provide a public face for them. Surely this group of anonymous has nothing to do with the anonymous hackers. This little dilemma goes back to the definition of the word "anonymous".

    5. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't need "probable cause" or even evidence, in "terrorism" cases, apparently.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Do you really think that posting anonymously online reaches the standard of 'probable cause,' or even 'reasonable suspicion'?

      Yes.. What makes you think that it doesn't? We now have, and probably always did have, a 'public safety exception' to all constitutional law. Our facade of 'freedom' is really quite flimsy and crumbling fast.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by umeboshi · · Score: 1, Troll

      Perhaps your "freedom" is crumbling fast because you decided to treat it as a facade and leave it exposed to the elements that weathered it into it's crumbling status. I, however, chose to take my "freedom" and protect in a fortress that I like to call "the law". I have found this to be the best way to actually "preserve" my "freedom". If our freedom didn't need such protection, we would not have any need for the law in the first place.

    8. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's this for evidence?

    9. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes you do.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes you do.

      You need it, but law enforcement agencies often do not bother getting it.

    11. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You need it, but law enforcement agencies often do not bother getting it.

      What case are you even talking about? It's pointless to arrest someone without getting it because the case will get thrown out of court.

      The bar for 'reasonable suspicion' is really low, but even then it's above 'commented anonymously online.' You need to get your conspiracy theory hat off.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Are you really the person behind the "host file" spam?

      Spam Example

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    13. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What case are you even talking about? It's pointless to arrest someone without getting it because the case will get thrown out of court.

      People in gitmo would like you to specify what court and when ... they'd like to have their cases thrown out of court, since no charges have ever been filed for many of them, despite months and years of detention.

    14. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Of course not.

      I "elevated" one, once, under my UID with copy and paste. Why?

      It was modded below visibility - and a CLEAR, HYSTERICAL PARODY that included about 5-7 running slashdot jokes.

      Now. Let's get back to the topic: The end of liberty, freedom, due process and rule of law in the USA:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l07cvZAn0L8

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    15. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    16. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      We now have, and probably always did have, a 'public safety exception' to all constitutional law.

      Tell me that when his testimony is allowed as evidence in court.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    17. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Even the filmer sounded tired in that movie.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:Unwitting Accomplices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole, liar, and troll tells more lies. Film at 11.

  2. Re:No... apk by waddgodd · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ever think you're getting modded down because you're an asshole?

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
  3. Way to miss the point YAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea of an official Anonymous anything is absurd.

    And for an unofficial Anonymous site, there's 4chan.

  4. Cheese is the real victim here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone has to claim the money, somehow, making it a sure way for authorities to nab the silly buggers. To be sure, though, it's not Anonymous but someone cashing in on their fame.

    1. Re:Cheese is the real victim here by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I wish I'd thought of this way to make money too.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Cheese is the real victim here by Dins · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I wish I'd thought of this way to make money too.

      Yeah, it's great until some three letter agency breaks down your door at 3:00 am, shoots your dog, and has some questions for you...

    3. Re:Cheese is the real victim here by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's great until some three letter agency breaks down your door at 3:00 am, shoots your dog, and has some questions for you...

      Doesn't this normally happen to the people who live a house or two away from the house they are trying to target?

    4. Re:Cheese is the real victim here by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Someone on 4chan said it best: "Anyone claiming to represent anon is not anon."

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    5. Re:Cheese is the real victim here by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      I believe you just posted the first comment ever which was ever voted to +5 insightful, whose only contribution to the discussion is a quote from "someone on 4chan".

      You win the Internet for today.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  5. Is it just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does this seem like the dumbest idea ever, about as smart as an Al Qaeda cell setting up a plainly signed recruitment office next door to MI5's headquarters?

    1. Re:Is it just me by Xest · · Score: 1

      You know Al Qaeda does actually have a media wing and publishes a regular magazine called "Inspire" right?

  6. They already own a website... by mw13068 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... it just happens to have other people's content on it sometimes.

    1. Re:They already own a website... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the CP belongs to other people, of course it does...

      posting as AC to avoid retribution.

      CAPTCHA: rotten, how apt.

  7. FBI is first subscriber! by danbuter · · Score: 5, Funny

    The cybercrime division of the FBI is the very first subscriber, remarkably enough.

    1. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2

      As well as a large number of the members.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    2. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As well as a large number of the members.

      He said the first, you cant have a large number of individuals be first now can you?

    3. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the FBI is a large amount of what is reported on ... maybe they should just call it "The FBI Post"

    4. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Fox, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS are the next five.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by schlachter · · Score: 1

      hey, it would be nice as a misinformation site...or better yet...a honey pot for law enforcement online accounts/personas

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    6. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      The cybercrime division of the FBI presumably has more than one member, so of course you can.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    7. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because they are a FBI funded group that is a rouse for things like CISPA. I know you were joking but it is scary the amount of truth that is behind it.

    8. Re:FBI is first subscriber! by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Subscriber? For all we know, it's the anonymous FBI who set up that web site and the FBI who anonymously donated most of the money to itself. It certainly wouldn't be that difficult for them to pressure an existing anonymous member to do their bidding, or to set up their own anonymous identity among other anonymous members just for a couple of months before volunteering to set the web site up.

  8. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is probably the most stupid thing I've ever seen in my life. And I used to go to church...

    1. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed so hard I spit out my Coke. If I could fan you I would!

    2. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Churches don''t teach the truth. The Bible does't say what churches say.

  9. Re:No... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must've gotten the better of him + seriously "gotten his goat" in doing so in a technical debate & his "geek angst" @ losing to me has him doing the:

    Says the one spamming Slashdot comments despite repeatedly being told nobody cares about your geek angst.

    Yes, yes, I know, everyone, don't feed the troll and don't bother replying. Point taken, but still, I can't help but be amused by how the entire multi-page whine specifically designed to cheat Slashdot's comment length cutoff is confirmed hypocrisy in the first few lines.

  10. YAN is NOT anonymous by MaxDollarCash · · Score: 0

    How long before some other "anons" decide to go against the YAN. This cannot and won't go mainstream as long as others use the same name. I wait for their twitter or website to be owned soon enough. the real anon's are /b/tards and do whatever they please. You cannot control or organize such a group. They are called /b/tards for a reason.

    1. Re:YAN is NOT anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How long before some other "anons" decide to go against the YAN. This cannot and won't go mainstream as long as others use the same name. I wait for their twitter or website to be owned soon enough. the real anon's are /b/tards and do whatever they please. You cannot control or organize such a group. They are called /b/tards for a reason.

      It seems as if someone organizes you into a relatively homogeneous group...

  11. absurd! by drwho · · Score: 2

    An Anonymous website...the whole point is there can be no single website. This project is a bunch of posers, and it will be DoSed as soon as it goes up. In any case, 4chan is about as close to an Anonymous web site as is wanted, needed, or possible.

    1. Re:absurd! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This project is a bunch of posers

      More likely a honeypot or part of a campaign to discredit anon.

    2. Re:absurd! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      No! I am Spartacus!

  12. Re:No... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does he bypass the comment length cutoff?

  13. Anonymous is mainstream already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, I'm posting as anonymous!

    Listen, the whole point of calling themselves anonymous is because they are. There's no way to be "officially" anonymous, because attaching a name and website to it defeats the entire purpose.

  14. Re:No... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashcode is all just fucked to hell.

  15. Re:No... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember someone mentioning it has to do with html tags

  16. Now that anonymous is passe, can I suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    using 'Anonymous Coward' as the name for the replacement anti-organization? :)

    1. Re:Now that anonymous is passe, can I suggest... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Well, if it had started here instead of 4chan, that's exactly what it would be called.

      But yeah, I can totally see protestors in Natalie Portman masks, doin' it for the hot grits.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  17. This isn't just late, this is slowpoke meme status by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anonymous went mainstream circa 2007. Anyone thinking anything different has no understanding of what is actually going on.

    --
    RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
  18. Lawyers cracking knuckles by concealment · · Score: 1

    "That's excellent! Now that they're a legitimate public entity, they can be sued! That gets them out of criminal court, and into profit court err I mean civil court."

    I can hear the excited clicking of Mont Blanc pens now...

    1. Re:Lawyers cracking knuckles by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      "That's excellent! Now that they're a legitimate public entity, they can be sued! That gets them out of criminal court, and into profit court err I mean civil court."

      I can hear the excited clicking of Mont Blanc pens now...

      I tire of this game. There are many heads. This one you may sever from the hydra, and carry back to your town as a trophy. The trumpets will welcome you as a returning hero, but anyone with half a mind will know the truth of this day.

  19. This may not end well by Peer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In a similar case somebody ran of with the server and donations:
    https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Why_We_Protest_Forums#11.2F29.2F08_The_Day_Enturb_Stood_Still

  20. It's not just you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I headdesked when I read it up to "official Anonymous website".

    That guy claimed MY money, check my username - I'd go and sue him for that but I don't have enough guts for this :(

    1. Re:It's not just you. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Coward.

  21. Re:DISPROVE MY POINTS TROLL...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hi. I am a 28 year old male that frequently reads these forums over the past several years. I generally use them to gauge popular perception on certain topics, and to find competing viewpoints to popular problems (nerds love to make each other look stupid/disprove each other/demonstrate topical intellectual superiority). I have come across your post a few times, and it is very disconcerting to see the sort of writing style you introduce as it is a very harsh contrast to the "normal" -- which goes even for non-native English speakers. I spent at least five minutes reading links and supporting evidence for "127.0.0.1" not being as efficient as "0". The amount of fervor you utilize to make this point comes off to me (and perhaps an explanation for you, many others that you refer to as trolls) as insanity. You seem to imply there is an unexplained, even conspiratorial effort at Microsoft for sabotaging your preferred host file entry method. You also seem to think you have a reputation which is at stake, and I assure you, aside from your raving posts, I have never heard of you before. The time-cube APK imposter you mention appears to be (at least to me) an adequate parody of your abrasive writing and argument style. The fact that you seem to take such excessive offense to this parody further strengthens the lehman's perception of your insanity. I suspect I am representative of a much larger sample in this regard, but you may consider me to be one additional data point.

  22. Misdirection by sstamps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who thinks that this represents or is backed by the core activists who are part of the collective is, well.. a fool parted with their money.

    It would paint a massive bulls-eye target on anyone associated with it, pretty much saying "here I am, come get me!".

    --
    -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    1. Re:Misdirection by spekode · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks that anonymous needs "core activists" doesn't understand anonymous. That is the idea, isn't it? Decentralization? These anon are as legit as those anon. Wait, are you anon? This is misinformation and I swallowed it hook, line 'n sinker!! AHHH!

    2. Re:Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be clear, and let's state outright what other posters are only implying: This is likely a sting operation by the FBI or some other authority.

      The FBI likes to infiltrate groups when they can, and when they do they assume positions of power so that later on they can topple the entire organization by pulling just a few strings. You do not have to be a subversive org to be p0wned by the FBI. They have infiltrated anti-violence protestors and quilting circles. Other authorities do the same thing with more or less skill at it.

      In the case of Anonymous, there is no central hierarchy for the authorities to supplant. So of course they're going to try to make one. Everyone who signs up for this website (probably everyone who visits it) will wind up on a list, and that list will be targeted for even more scrutiny. This is a trawling operation. A clumsy one, but it's a hammer that the authorities already have, so they might as well try to find a nail with it.

    3. Re:Misdirection by sstamps · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wasn't so much defining a membership group as delineating the ones who do from the ones who talk.

      --
      -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
  23. like slashdot by schlachter · · Score: 1

    so many of the posts will be signed with anonymous coward

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  24. What this article should say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bunch of spooks, astroturfing cover for break-in operations, secures public funding to increase profile of non-existent group.

  25. geez, is Anon going to open coffeeshops next? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    the wi-fi is free, but your disk gets examined on the Tors.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:geez, is Anon going to open coffeeshops next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>the wi-fi is free, but your disk gets examined on the Tors.

      Umm, you misspelled "Thors"

      -Eric Schmidt

  26. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i thought they already had one called 4chan...

    1. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We kicked those children off the site in 2008 after they decided in 2007 that they need to Do Good in the world.

      That resulted in the formation of various websites all around the web for their activities, popularly referred to as the /i/ age of anonymous, AKA /i/nsurgency.
      After that I stopped caring about the children.
      Most of them were skiddie drones, only a few of the people with actual capability were of any worth, and those people pretty much used the skiddies as ammo and distractions.
      And we all know what happened to the ones of worth, they turned in to sub-groups like Lulzsec and, uh I forgot the other awful one, they were attention-whoreish as well.
      Very few white-hat groups emerged from the Anonymous Collective. Most are grey or straight-up blackhole-hat. Dark indeed. I hear they regularly summon gods from the underverse.

      Hell, even the collective in general never really formed on 4chan, it was another one I forgot the name of, 711 I think.
      Before that, Anonymous was just a joke on the random board.
      I hate when subtle jokes get taken up by people that don't understand it, especially in small communities, they end up thinking it is serious.
      That single thing destroys so many communities all over the web.
      As the saying goes, if a group acts like idiots, eventually actual idiots will find a home with them. History of 4chan right there.

    2. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You actually made a huge rant that amounted to nothing more than "newfags"

  27. Re:DISPROVE MY POINTS TROLL...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    +1

    He certainly does read as either a complex spambot who's doing an awful lot of linkfarming, a very peculiar troll, or a total nutjob, i tend to believe the latter least.

  28. Re:No... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ever think you're getting modded down because you're an asshole?

    I've started clicking the flag button to report that guy's ass on every post, hoping that Slashdot admins eventually ban this guy's ass for repeated spamming, but that doesn't seem to work. I bet if everyone who sees that spam post reports it that eventually they will do something about it.

  29. $55,000 for a website? by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

    I can set them up with a wordpress site for free!
    (I would think they know how to 'secure it', hardy har har)

  30. I will DDoS It Like It's Hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DDoS It Like It's Hot
    DDoS It Like It's Hot

    1. Re:I will DDoS It Like It's Hot by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      DDoS It Like It's Hot

      Interesting isn't it? How ineffectual the DDoS is, incapable of actually stopping anything from happening for any length of time. It only raises awareness. The hive needs information outlets (many of them, because: why not?), and all are just as "official" as the others, yet it will freely fling its own "weapons" at itself, knowing it can not truly harm the body -- like an anemone immune to its own poison. It's merely communicating with itself.

      The DDoS has become only a way to make a proportion of disapproval known through exerting sheer evidence of the existence of differing ideas. Like an arched cat walking sideways, or a Lion's thundering roar, it serves only to intimidate, provide proof of their presence, and in the hive's case, perhaps spark discussion. Since it takes energy to continue in a strong enough capacity to affect any real change this discord will fade into the mass of other chaotic signals as the dissenters grow bored, the protested cease action, the DDoSed get more support in the form of more traffic and bigger pipes, or the conflict of wills is resolved.

      As one who studies and applies a wide range of systems from genetic algorithms to neural networks in accordance with information theory and a host of other sciences it's interesting to me how self organizing forms emerge and evolve. Humans are a hive-mind themselves: Their complex genetic programs dispatch chemical signals from the nucleus of each cell causing the cells to perform a multitude of actions, some more specialized for a task than others, from livers to bones to white blood cells, to neurons, or egg and sperm; These collectives have reached a sufficient level of complexity in interaction between the cells to give rise to minds where thoughts themselves dwell as echoes of electro-chemical currents, and the humans have themselves began interacting in such complex ways with thoughts that they can form meta structures too. This generation of humans being more capable of connecting and communicating ideas directly than any other in history rushes faster still toward the next phase of macro organization and awareness: They themselves are becoming merely cells forming the loose structure of yet a larger organisms made of like-minded thoughts...

      Corporations and governments are similar meta structures in some ways, but these are the product of intelligent design. What we have here is the natural emergence of a species of organizational amoeba -- A slime-mold-like entity capable of dispersing and regrouping instantly, one that needs no constant influx of energy to survive because it thrives by being completely abandoned husk of dormant ideas that surges to life in sections at a time when the larger cultural system senses the need or opportunity to put forth the pressure of those ideals to the other meta structural entities.

      If you study life as a system of information, what's going on here is clear. I will stop now, however, because if I continue it may also become clear to others how to end such an organisms' life before it truly has a chance to begin. Have no fear though, if the design or configuration is unfit death is optimal. Look at yourself though -- Little amoebas running around in your blood, born from within the relatively static bone structure -- And these are your best defense against invaders who would hijack your very cells and turn them against you. The configuration of Anonymous may or may not survive, but the useful structures will be preserved in future generations. Humans can serve as host cells for more than one intangible thought system.

      "All of this has happened before, and it will all happen again."
      -- J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan

      "All this has happened before, and all this will happen again."
      -- Six, Battlestar Galactica

    2. Re:I will DDoS It Like It's Hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So say we all.

      More seriously, that what you describe has a name. Its called an egregore.

  31. They already have a website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called 4chan

  32. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I and many Anons stand against it, because it is not the way Anonymous works. Those individuals do not speak for the rest, and they may be taken out of business by Anonymous.

    It happened once before with "The Plan", where those that came up with it came up with a web site, which required people to login and it provided all kinds of personal information. They came under attack, and finally gave in and dropped out of sight.

    A majority of the Anonymous community saw them as a front for government spooks, and the same will happen in this new case. In fact, I would not be surprised if it is the same people.

  33. in fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if 75% of all anonymous' activities arent the fbi they are other 3 letter orgs of the usa govt.

  34. Slashdot is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently not if Slashdot has anything to say about it! Anonymous makes the call for websites to go dark to protest CISPA and Slashdot ignores it as if it wasn't happening. Tsk. If this were 1998, i'm betting it would, but now your corporate masters won't let it.

    For shame, Slashdot, for shame (and you just lost a reader.)

  35. Re:DISPROVE MY POINTS TROLL...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody cares. Nobody ever cared. Kill yourself.

  36. Re:Anyone know why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just me, but surely this is one of the few stories where it could be considered on-topic.

  37. Anonymous collects $55k to pay for bandwidth by Memroid · · Score: 1

    of LOIC attacks from anonymous.

  38. YAN.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy, http://mirror.hardchats.org/doxbin/doxviewer.php?dox=Jackal he is a Federal Criminal Informant Just like Sabu.

  39. Slaying the hydra by concealment · · Score: 1

    A good lawyer doesn't slay it; she keeps it alive and milks it for hourly payments.

  40. Popularity via Anonymity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as the name suggests, the reason why Anonymous has gained such popularity is because actually being a member is "Anonymous". Thus, it is easy to say "Well, I'm in Anonymous and we're gonna hack you!" However, since there is no official membership, participation, or having to answer for being in the group (assuming you weren't one of the few people who actually did the hacking and were tracked... it happens...), you can just deny participation when it's convenient. Also, since they don't have specific leaders, there is no "big boss" who you could piss off if you do something wrong in his/her eyes.

    It's actually a lot like posting on /. Yes, there are many who have accounts (not that it's difficult to make a free account that isn't linked to you)... but it's really easy to post only when you feel like it as "Anonymous Coward". When you actually have to join something, you think about reputation and backlash for things you do wrong... but since it's not linked to you (and you had to invest 0 time to prepare for doing it), #&@! what other people say and just move on whenever you want.

    Thinking about posting a stupid comeback? Don't care, after I post this I won't be checking this article again... and you'll never know who I am since I'm "Anonymous".

  41. Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're embarassing yourself Jeremiah Cornelius http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3581857&cid=43276741 since you posted that using your registered username by mistake (instead of your usual anonymous coward submissions by the 100's the past 2-3 months now on slashdot) giving away it's you spamming this forums almost constantly, just as you have in the post I just replied to.

    1. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Paul.

      p.s. What do you make of this?

    2. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forty Two Tenfold has Jeremiah Cornelius = "friend" in his account on /. = obvious he's a sockpuppet account you, Jeremiah Cornelius, use. Yes we know it's you Jeremiah Cornelius that I am replying to now, you off topic troll. Jeremiah Cornelius, you blew it with your 100's of anonymous coward trollings by accidentally submitting one of them by your registered username here Jeremiah Cornelius http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3581857&cid=43276741 and you, Jeremiah Cornelius failed badly giving yourself away troll. Doing sock puppets along with that? No big trick to the likes of you, clearly caught in the act in that link above..

    3. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul, you fail it. Your skill is not enough.