Slashdot Mirror


Florida Activates System For Citizens To Call Each Other Terrorists

An anonymous reader writes "Sheriffs in 13 Northeast Florida counties announced an online system Thursday for residents to report suspicious activity they think may be terrorism-related. The site provides examples of red flags to watch for, such as people with an unusual interest in building plans or who are purchasing materials useful in bomb making. Important places to watch include hobby stores and dive shops."

93 of 501 comments (clear)

  1. Really??? by bobthesungeek76036 · · Score: 2

    Can't they just call 9-1-1???

    --
    Karma: Bad
    1. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      911 is for emergencies. They are looking for tips.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Really??? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, you use 9-1-1 for real threats involving actual terrorists.
      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Really??? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the media

    4. Re:Really??? by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same way it happened during the Red Scare?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Really??? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For one, they'll probably report some statistics for "dozens of reports of possible terrorist threats each day".
      Secondly, the mere existence of the reporting tool means people get reminded of terrorism more often.
      Finally, "Where there's smoke, there's fire"; this is the smokescreen (bad pun, sorry).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      1) The fact this program ('report suspected terrorists') exists must mean that there are terrorists out there. I'm afraid.

      2) I need to buy a new pressure cooker for the big meal I'm cooking... what if I get reported as a possible terrorist?? I'm afraid.

    7. Re:Really??? by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      And since it will be the police getting the reports, how do you figure it will increase the level of fear in citizens?

      The first time local law enforcement says, "Reports of terrorism are up 900% this year; we need an increased budget to deal with the increased threat."

    8. Re:Really??? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      911 is for emergencies. They are looking for tips.

      Here is tip, comrade, everyone is a terrorist, but me!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:Really??? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because they will release reports on how many calls come in. Be afraid, citizen, be afraid!

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    10. Re:Really??? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, that should work out well for them; I mean, it's not like Florida is filled with geriatrics who find everyone under the age of 50 to be suspect, right?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    11. Re:Really??? by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And since it will be the police getting the reports, how do you figure it will increase the level of fear in citizens?

      Because once you've got that label they will throw away whatever legal protections you may have. Don't leave the country because then you are a possible drone target - all because your nosy neighbor thought *you* were suspicious. Remember, everyone probably looks suspicious to someone and you've always had the ability to report suspicious activity. But now you get to add that label. Does it scare you now?

    12. Re:Really??? by screwdriver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty soon it will be illegal to have a hobby. Just consume your goods and go to work like a good little citizen. I'd rather be a victim of a terrorist than live in that society.

    13. Re:Really??? by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...so they'll just be repeatedly calling their grandchildren and asking how to do it. THIS IS A TOOL OF THE DEVIL.

    14. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends on your definition of "large numbers". More people die from everyday things than terrorists. An example of the cure being worse than the disease. We've lost more soldiers to suicide than actual war in our current wars.

    15. Re:Really??? by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When terrorists become more of a threat than ladders, maybe then I'll consider thinking about giving the government new powers to stop them. Until them, fuck off you dictator wannabee.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it doesn't because it is irrelevant. The US lost more than 100x the number of people that died at Pearl Harbor in WW2, but it still went to war against Japan, Germany, and Italy. The problem they presented wasn't going to go away by doing nothing. I expect that far more people at the time died of accidents of various sorts than were killed in the attack. Not relevant. The problem of Al Qaida is the same - it won't go away by itself. but will only get worse if ignored. It has to be addressed to turn it around. The point about suicide versus battlefield casualties doesn't negate that and is irrelevant. Although I will take a moment to recognize the considerable improvements in battlefield medicine and personal protection through various means which have resulted in a much lower death rate than previous conflicts - fabulous work.

      On a tangential note, you might want to find out what Al Qaida's goals are. They are ultimately independent of US actions.

      The Future of Terrorism: What al-Qaida Really Wants
      The short version: Restore the Islamic Caliphate dissolved in 1923, take over the work, and convert the world to Islam. It is a long term goal. You may not think that is realistic, but that is what they fight and kill for.

      Including this lot: Bomb plot: Life sentence for Irfan Naseer, ringleader of Birmingham men planning wave of UK suicide attacks
       

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    17. Re:Really??? by triffid_98 · · Score: 2

      If 'doing something about it' means two draft dodgers sending tens of thousands of soldiers to die in the desert on a complete fking lie, then (in future) I'd really rather they not do anything about it.

    18. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My neighbor in the city I used to live in was a gardener. Dude was like 70. Anyway, had a nice greenhouse, would make some cash on the side selling flowers and tomatoes and such every spring/summer. Anyway, one day the feds kicked his door in, tore up his house, wrecked his greenhouse, etc, because someone reported they saw pot there. Feeling they got fucked with, the feds dragged in the person that made a tip to point out the pot. They pointed to a plant with similar leaves that looked nothing like it, that he had openly on sale.

      Whatdya know? Turns out the person that called in the tip was also a gardener that now had a much better chance to sell their wares now that his competition was basically ruined. Neighbor gets out of it with a sprained wrist, bruises, a bunch of broken flower pots, ripped bags, busted lights, etc. Looked like a damn hurricane hit the place.

      We wrecked an old dude's life on an anonymous tip that he was growing pot there, in the open, in front of tons of straight edged old geezers that would freak out if they so much as saw a real pot leaf.

    19. Re:Really??? by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Jimmy, do you still want to be an architect? And you still shoot model rockets? Oh that was your brother, right. Could you help me with a website?"

  2. Quick, everybody report somebody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With enough reporting, they might catch a single person who once thought about some act of terror. But wait, isn't that different from a terrorist attack?

    Oh well, let Florida sort it out, they're good at that.

  3. The Haystack by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

    1. Re: The Haystack by pollarda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is Bruce Schneier quoted as much as XKCD or is XKCD quoted as much as Bruce Schneier?

    2. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's if the goal is actually to find the needle, rather than simply expand the business of government.

      If you listen to what they say, you will be fooled. If you watch what they actually do, you will be enlightened.

    3. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is kinda funny to see so many references to needles and haystacks crop up since Schneier said that, but despite the unoriginality of the people who quote it, I think the reason it's so often quoted is that Schneier managed to finally articulate something a lot of intelligent (but not so eloquent) people have been thinking for a long time. Ditto with XKCD -- it taps deep into the geek mind and displays the results with wit and elan. People read Schneier (or XKCD) and because they are well-written and well presented, they think "oh my gosh, he *gets* it." So of course they're going to repeat it.

      Anyway, snark all you want, but the unoriginality of an oft-quoted argument has no bearing on the merits of said argument.

    4. Re:The Haystack by c · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

      I thought it was to burn the entire field to the ground, then sift the ashes over a magnet?

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    5. Re:The Haystack by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

      Are you suggesting the police forces adopt a "scorched earth" tactic?

    6. Re:The Haystack by P-niiice · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An eyewitness report of an actual crime and a tip on some subjective activity that is arguably suspicious are two different things entirely. In florida, sitting and reding the Koran on my front porch would probably be enough to get me called in.

    7. Re:The Haystack by P-niiice · · Score: 2

      and the result of that is a shitload of hay

    8. Re:The Haystack by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who says they haven't? Rounding everyone up and decide who to actually arrest later sounds like scorched earth tactics to me.

    9. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's one thing to report someone breaking into a house, backing up a truck filled with electronics to their garage, or seeing somebody get beat up; but what we're talking about is reporting your neighbors. And we're talking about Florida.

      So, some woman is wearing a Hijib? Looks suspicious to Bubba.

      Brown skin? Hoodie? Suspicious.

      While in Florida, and I'm a white guy, I was taking pictures of a local historic house. The neighbors - all old people - were all peaking out their windows and hiding when I looked their way. The local cops didn't do much because they were the ones that told me about this house.

      You see, the public lives their lives watching TV and the fanciful things that happen there and they have a problem disguising between reality and fantasy. Why, for example, the current president of the NRA is under the impression that just owning guns (I'm all for it, but I'm a realist) will help in fighting tyranny. ANd he used the Revolutionary war as a example. If he actually read a book instead fo basing his opinion on what's shown action movies, he would know that in the beginning, the British were mopping up the armed rebel citizens of the American Colonies with very little if any causalities. It wasn't until this German mercenary started drilling the Americans and teaching to actually fight that things turned a little bit better - of course, the French Military and Navy (professional soldiers) were the ones who tipped the balance in our favor.

      Why? Because the British were sending trained soldiers and the Americans were a bunch of farmers with guns.

      Don't me started on the people who think just owning a AR-15 with the over priced M-4 package, spending an or so at the shooting range will prepare them for "fighting against tyranny".

    10. Re:The Haystack by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The edges of a "kettle" would be the absolute best place for a suicide bomber to strike. You'd get to kill a ton of tightly packed innocents & as a bonus, eradicate quite a few LEOs at the same time.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    11. Re:The Haystack by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 4, Funny

      The edges of a "kettle" would be the absolute best place for a suicide bomber to strike. You'd get to kill a ton of tightly packed innocents & as a bonus, eradicate quite a few LEOs at the same time.

      You don't happen to live near Jacksonville, do you? 'Cause I might need to report that.

    12. Re:The Haystack by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Duh, kill all the people with the idea.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:The Haystack by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Rounding everyone up and decide who to actually arrest later sounds like scorched earth tactics to me.

      Well, it's an excellent analogy. When you have nice law abiding citizens who do what the police say, kettling works. You can round up a bunch of innocent people and deprive them of their democratics rights---all piling hay onto the haystack.

      When you actually have rioters as was demonstrated a month or two notice who are charging around at random, hurling petrol bombs, steling things, overturning cars and setting fire to stuff, kettling isn't a tactic which even works in the slightest.

      But the police seem to love hay since those needles are prickly and hard to deal with.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re: The Haystack by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can only watch so many hours of video.

      Sorry, if that is a revelation to you.

    15. Re: The Haystack by JustOK · · Score: 2

      You've got two eyes and you're only watching one video at a time? Slacker.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    16. Re:The Haystack by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you don't report it, yer a terrorist sympathizer. I'm gonna report you.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    17. Re:The Haystack by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

      Tightly packed people are more likely to have lower casualties. Suicide bombs can only be so powerful. Humans are quite "squishy" and the people immediately around the bomb will absorb most of the blast energy and the people next to them may or may not survive though they will have severe injuries. Just look at how many people died in the Boston attacks vs how many were injured. Three people died yet nearly 300 people were injured by two bombs.

    18. Re:The Haystack by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the Koran, but "Sitting on a front porch in Florida" should probably be a red flag of imminent drunken lewd behavior in public and/or violence.

  4. Oh, good. by illumastorm · · Score: 2

    What can possibly go wrong?

  5. Dear Sen, McCarthy by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have here in my hand a list of all the people I suspect of terrorism. It includes many of my business competitors and personal acquaintances I find annoying or otherwise repulsive. For example, you'll see on page 5 I've included Ms. Johnson from down the street who lets her dog shit in my yard and never cleans up after it. I've noticed her making furtive glances at my front window while the dog is dumping and I'm pretty sure she's making notes of when I'm not home so she can steal the propane tank from my Grillmaster and use it in her reign of terror.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It also includes all the people who live near me that I think are Muslim. I don't have any evidence that they're doing anything bad, but I'm scared of them because of what Osama bin Laden did to us, so I think you should investigate them for terrorism.

      My list also can include, for an appropriate fee, any prominent members of political groups that opposed you in the previous election.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

      You'd think that after too many of those calls (and wouldn't the second or third verifiably false call have been too many?), the police might consider arresting her for filing a false police report or for misuse of the "911" emergency response system!

    3. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Depending on the breed of dog, they might be terrier-ists.

    4. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly how a lot of people ended up in Gitmo. Besides the hundreds we've released already, there are other innocent men certified as such by our intelligence services that they won't release.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  6. Well color me not surprised. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi

    Read it, think, reflect.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Well color me not surprised. by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure Stasi PR didn't refer to the organization that way.

    2. Re:Well color me not surprised. by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The Stasi was primarily an organ of political control"

      Do you think for one second that Stasi did not use the exact same rhetoric as NSA, Homeland Security etc? What they did and what people in east germany thought they did are not at all the same.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    3. Re:Well color me not surprised. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Stasi was primarily an organ of political control, not an anti-terrorism or ordinary local law enforcement.

      Trying to draw a parallel is nonsense.

      Contrary to popular perception, the DHS can also be used for political control. Remember when the Occupy Wall Street movement was considered a terrorist threat? Remember when students staging a sit-in were pepper sprayed by the police? That's political control right there.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  7. Ooh great by maroberts · · Score: 2

    I am just looking at my hate list and deciding who deserves more more than just a minor SWATting....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  8. Sigh..Florida. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a relatively reclusive person with an electronics "lab" in my garage with the door always open I can see it now.. Police barge in and force me to the ground. "what is this device? it's used for making bombs isn't it!" "no sir.. that is called an oscilloscope." Hell, that might be enough to ship me off to gitmo, but I'm white so probably not.

  9. There your country goes... by GodGell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...right down the drain.

    I genuinely don't know what to say to Americans now. It's not like they can just pack up and move to the next country over. But I sure as hell wouldn't be staying another week if I was there... what a sad ending to a country with great promise.

    --
    [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    1. Re:There your country goes... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      What? Over? Did you say "over"?

      Nothing is over until we decide it is!

      Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!

      And it ain't over now. 'Cause when the goin' gets tough...

    2. Re:There your country goes... by cuncator · · Score: 2

      ... the tough get going! Who's with me? Let's go!!

      What the fuck happened to the Slashdot I used to know? Where's the spirit? Where's the guts?

    3. Re:There your country goes... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...right down the drain.

      I genuinely don't know what to say to Americans now. It's not like they can just pack up and move to the next country over. But I sure as hell wouldn't be staying another week if I was there... what a sad ending to a country with great promise.

      I don't know what to say to Americans either, and I am one. Most of my fellow citizens have no idea what is happening. They think the world is just as it is presented on the news. And they are so conditioned that America = Awesome, and so take their rights and liberties for granted, they are blind to the state trying to take them away. As I have said before, people think fascism has to look like Nazi Germany and even then it has to look like it does in the movies. It's frustrating and scary to me.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    4. Re:There your country goes... by GodGell · · Score: 2

      It's frustrating and scary to me too, and I'm nowhere near as close to the fire as you are!

      Since you mentioned Nazi Germany's case, the irony is that the social climate that allowed Hitler to rise to power was also largely based on patriotism (<our country> is/was the mightiest) and paranoia about the "enemy" corrupting that great country of theirs - without that fear, Hitler's "it's all because of the Jews" propaganda wouldn't have worked, or at least nowhere near as effectively. In today's USA, it's terrrists and Muslims instead of Jews, but one can't ignore the similarities with the fear-mongering tactics being applied (making people feel as afraid as if they were at war). Except, of course, in the 21st century, all you have to do is sprinkle them into the News Cycle and add water!

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    5. Re:There your country goes... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      One of the benefit of them getting democracy later in the game is that they could learn from your mistakes. And 200+ years of US democracy include slavery, genocide of Indians, a civil war, witch hunts for communists, and Japanese internment camps, so there's plenty to learn from.

      Also, I wouldn't diss Hungary on the grounds of little experience with liberty. After all, they were the only country in the Soviet bloc that had a country-wide armed popular uprising against their Soviet government - even if that ultimately failed.

  10. Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by scotts13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Otherwise, I'd be spending all my time talking to the cops. I'd probably set off every single alarm that's on their "suspicious activity" list. I'm active in hobby rocketry, and sometimes transport my engines in surplus bazooka shell cases. Plus, the girlfriend is a dive instructor.

    Hey, anyone remember the 50's and 60's? One the AWFUL things were were told about the Soviet system was the constant suspicion - people encouraged to turn in their neighbors, children encouraged to turn in their parents... (SIGH)

  11. Re:Might be a good idea by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    chemical (water processing etc) engineers are interested in one of the country's largest man made chemical(water) processing structure.

    shocking!

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  12. Re:All Of Them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean the sheriffs? The politicians? The newspaper editors? Who exactly do you want us to report all of?
    Maybe it should be a poll:

    Who should we focus on when making reports about terrorism in Florida:
    * The local police department.
    * A state or federal police-related department.
    * The local judiciary
    * State or federal judiciary
    * State politicians
    * Federal politicians
    * Newspaper editors
    * Cowboy Neal

  13. Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, if you replace the word 'terrorism' with 'witchcraft' - it sort of reads like a document from Salem, MA circa 1692.

  14. Double by Jericho+Whiplash · · Score: 2

    Double plus good! Vote "Fascist" for a seventh glorius decade of secure stability!

  15. Perhaps we could call by ai4px · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps we could call the terrorist hotline and report a black car with tinted windows. I just saw the driver looking around suspiciously as he sat in the car and just before he closed the door, I noticed he was carrying a pistol out in the open and had what seemed to be a sawed off shotgun in the front seat. He spoke using a lot of codes, as if they were second nature to him. I strongly suspect this individual to be involved in a rather large, well organized group who seems to want to harass and harm people. I think he's either a terrorist or a government agent in an unmarked car.... it is so hard to tell the difference these days.

  16. Re:If you don't want to be tagged by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then wouldn't dropping out of school be suspicious?

    Not in Florida, unfortunately.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  17. I am Confused..and want to Do It Right by NEDHead · · Score: 2

    Should I report Mike Holmes alone, or do I need to name each member of his crew

  18. Re:Might be a good idea by fl!ptop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    chemical (water processing etc) engineers are interested in one of the country's largest man made chemical(water) processing structure.

    I'm a chemical engineer, and I too visited several water and wastewater treatment facilities while in college. The whole class went at the same time on these "field trips." But, from TFA:

    Shortly after midnight Tuesday, seven people were caught trespassing at the Quabbin Reservoir.

    All of the "field trips" we took were during the day, and never "shortly after midnight." And, the trips were made while we were still in school, not after we graduated. The actions of these people seem very suspicious to me.

    --
    When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
  19. Re:Friend Computer... by ghmh · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Computer wants you to be happy. If you are not happy, you may be used for reactor shielding.

  20. Re:Might be a good idea by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    State Police say there were no warrants or advisories on any of the individuals and "there was no evidence that the seven were committing any crime beyond the trespassing."

    How does that justify a tip line for people to report suspected terrorist activity?

    Even if those people were trying to poison the water, that reservoir holds 412 billion gallons of water. You would have to dump tanker truck loads of poison it before you'd have any chance of making anyone sick.

    There's simply no way that seven people trespassing can carry enough of anything to have any real effect, yet that's exactly the sort of thing that would get reported to the tip line (along with crazy people reporting their neighbors and all the people reporting Florida Man).

  21. Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by hoboroadie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I immediately (certainly didn't RTFA) thought of the retirees already staking out the pressure cookers at Wal-Mart.
    Now they'll have a # to call, this should save the 911 operators a lot of grief.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      I immediately (certainly didn't RTFA) thought of the retirees already staking out the pressure cookers at Wal-Mart.
      Now they'll have a # to call, this should save the 911 operators a lot of grief.

      We're talking North Florida, here. Not as many retirees, more rednecks. Most of whom actually probably only would buy a pressure cooker for bomb-making purposes.

    2. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by Jawnn · · Score: 2

      We're talking North Florida, here. Not as many retirees, more rednecks. Most of whom actually probably only would buy a pressure cooker for bomb-making purposes.

      Hey! Them pressure cookers is great for makin' a really tender 'gator stew, you insensitive clod.

  22. So gardeners are screwed? by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So when I pull the plans for my home and the neighbors, then purchase stump remover and fertilizer I can expect a visit from the cops? If I have a pool I am double screwed?

    Bomb materials are quite often things that have very many innocent uses. Last time I was at homedepot I saw no bomb aisle. I did see a pool section and a garden section that would give you just about everything you needed.

  23. Soviet Russia won, after all. by Moskit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is exactly the methods used in Soviet Russia and other countries with similar political system.

    For years various such countries lived under communism, and they finally got rid of it 25 years ago. For years USA was hailed as the "country of freedom", and it recently adopts communist-like methods.

    In California if you want to purchase medicaments, they check your ID and input your date of birth to the cash register, because law prohibits sale of medicaments (known to Americans as "drugs") to minors.
    You also need to provide your ID and date of birth if you purchase a knife sharpener (made in China, of course). Sales of knives to minors is prohibited, and knife sharpeners are put under the same "knife" type of merchandise.
    Heck, you cannot even buy something as simple as contact lenses without a prescription! Apparently it is too dangerous for people to buy without doctor approval. Must be true, so many people in Europe die because they bought wrong lenses, right?

    Combine this all with extensive spying on their own citizens, security theatre (most visibly by TSA) and now encouraging citizens to spy on the others... Stalin would have been proud!

    What next? USA remake of Pavlik Morozov?
    Wait, they already have people sue their parents... some will surely chose to denounce instead.

    (note: this is slightly on pessimist side to compensate for the optimists out there who will surely reply "nah, it's not an issue, we don't have a problem")

    1. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      countries lived under communism ...

      I think you're confusing communism with a surveillance society. Sure, the USSR encouraged a climate of fear, but that was because the regime was poor and having the citizens in a continual state of fear is the cheapest way to control them. The way that the USA and other western democracies used to use to control their citizens was the threat of taking away their wealth and lifestyle. They've now discovered that the same goals can be achieved much cheaper by the use of fear - so they've adopted the tactics of the totalitarian regimes. It's true that dictatorships and poorly run communist states are poor, but it's not a requirement of communism to monitor and terrorise its population - it's just the easiest way to keep them subjugated.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Moskit · · Score: 2

      Why do you think I confuse it?

      I wrote that communist countries (mainly Soviet Russia) used certain methods, and that USA now uses them. This is accurate, as you have also described very clearly. Nothing about USA becoming a communist country.

  24. Re:Might be a good idea by Triv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's your lesson, kids: caring about the thing you got your degree in should stop the minute you graduate, because any learning not done between 9 and 5 and in a school building by a tenured professor will get you arrested.

    wtf is wrong with you?

  25. Learn baby learn by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks like they haven't learnt from the Korean debacle.
    Korean govt started this thing for traffic offenses (South Korea).
    There was a monetary benefit too attached. Soon there were people, who deliberately slowed down while crossing on green, so their hiding snapper friend would click pictures of motorists caught unawares. Soon this developed to a stage that motorists beat up a few people., and it also resulted in streetfights. Needless to say, it was abandoned.
    Now of course, there is no monetary benefit here, but you will have a small percentage who would be misguided into thinking that its their patriotic duty. There will also be a small percentage of malicious people who want to get even with their "weird" neighbor. Then there would be some douchebags who will think its a nice prank to have a swat team in their neighborhood.
    So its going to be a party now

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  26. Catch 22 by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

    "The site provides examples of red flags to watch for, such as people with an unusual interest in building plans or who are purchasing materials useful in bomb making."

    So, you report your neighbour for purchasing chemicals X and Y from the gardening store because they can be used to make IEDs, and are yourself flagged because you know that chemicals X and Y can be used to make IEDs.

    Dear America,

    Please add me to your No Fly lists so I never, even accidentally, come anywhere near your Orwellian country again.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  27. How nice of them ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 2
    ... to have a lots and lots of PDFs about the sites to watch and the possibly suspicious activities.

    I'm sure the terrorists(tm) will never ever read those PDFs and even if they do, will not at all use the information found therein to obfuscate their activities.

  28. :%s/witch/terrorist/g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how do you know she's a witch?

    she turned me into a NEWT!

    a newt?

    well, I got better...

  29. Re:First terrorist by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Slipstream
    Species
    Thunderbirds
    The Love Guru
    The Dictator

    Everyone's done some stinkers in their time.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  30. Measuring is not a crime! by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love the first one:

    People drawing or measuring important buildings.

    I really just want to go grab a sketch pad and a measuring tape and head downtown...

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  31. Re:Might be a good idea by WilyCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the ultimate goal is to observe something then it is best done during daylight when you can see better.

    Trespassing, at midnight, to satisfy educational curiosity?

    The only time I have been that hungry for knowledge was when i lived next door to some hot sorority girls who kept the window shades open while changing.

  32. America doesn't need to worry about terrorists by FuzzNugget · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's doing a perfectly good job destroying itself from the inside.

    Budding chemists, engineers, pilots and generally skilled people are being caught up in the dragnet and being rounded up as potential terrorists in this persistent culture of fear. Especially if they're brown.

  33. Re:The State Militia by hoboroadie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone planning armed resistance to our criminal government is an idiot. (Peaceful resistance looks pretty fucking foolish, as well.)
    Anyone who thinks that taking away my guns improves security is an idiot. (If I can't be trusted with WMDs, then wtf am I doing AT LARGE?)
    I can't seem to get through to anyone that the Second Amendment's purpose was to keep us from maintaining a tyrannical military, to be used for crimes against the People. Publius had to do a lot of hard selling to convince everyone that we could trust a national army. I think we got conned.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  34. I've got a name for it by Cigarra · · Score: 2

    Florida System for Normalizing Information on Terrorists, Criminals and Hazards.

    Now if only I could come up with a good short name for that...

    --
    I don't have a sig.
  35. Re:Might be a good idea by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quabbin, though... I dunno, sounds suspiciously Muslim to me.

    Al-Qabin? I hear they've been collecting supplies for weapons of mass achusetts.

  36. Just change the name to DDR already by X.25 · · Score: 2

    And be done with it.

    Sad.

  37. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Shooting a crackhead that attacked you should be punishable offense" said the dumbass liberal dem

    How do we know the crack head attacked you? Because you say so?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  38. Re:Might be a good idea by Microlith · · Score: 2

    Of course this means that they're TERRORISTS out to kill people, and not just stupid people tresspassing.

    The important thing here is that you adapt to the state of perpetual fear that you're supposed to live in.

  39. Witnesses at fault in 75% of wrongful convictions: by denzacar · · Score: 2

    http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Eyewitness-Misidentification.php

    Eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing.

    While eyewitness testimony can be persuasive evidence before a judge or jury, 30 years of strong social science research has proven that eyewitness identification is often unreliable. Research shows that the human mind is not like a tape recorder; we neither record events exactly as we see them, nor recall them like a tape that has been rewound. Instead, witness memory is like any other evidence at a crime scene; it must be preserved carefully and retrieved methodically, or it can be contaminated.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  40. Re:Might be a good idea by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    Your 'reconnaissance of vulnerable targets' is why i cant take pics of bridges anymore without feeling the chilling effect on my neck. You REALLY should study the meaning of Liberty.

    --
    Good-bye