Motion To Delay Sanctions Against Prenda Lawyers Denied
rudy_wayne writes with news that the Prenda lawyers recently sanctioned by a federal judge are starting to face consequences. From the article: "On Friday, Paul Hansmeier, a Minnesota attorney who has been pointed to as one of the masterminds of the Prenda copyright-trolling scheme, filed an emergency motion to stay the $81,000 sanctions order while he and his colleagues could mount an appeal. Today the appeals court flatly denied his motion. Two appellate judges signed this order, and it gives Hansmeier the option to make a plea for delay with the district court judge. That would be U.S. District Judge Otis Wright, the judge who sanctioned Hansmeier in the first place. Hansmeier is also getting kicked off a case he was working on that was totally unrelated to Prenda's scheme of making copyright accusations over alleged pornography downloads. On Friday, the 9th Circuit Commissioner ordered Hansmeier, in no uncertain terms, to withdraw from a case involving Groupon since he has been referred to the Minnesota State Bar for investigation. The commissioner has delayed Hansmeier's admission to the 9th Circuit because of Wright's order, which refers to Wright's finding of 'moral turpitude.'"
I need a bigger monitor. I had a hard time reading all that with the massive erection the summary gave me. Seriously, this is fucking awesome. We're talking, distilled, 180 proof justice-porn here.
If you've been following the coverage on Popehat or FightCopyrightTrolls, you'll know that the Groupon class-action case is another one of Hansmeier's schemes to make money. He has a few cases where someone in his family files as an objector in a class-action case at the 11th hour (meaning that they are going to hold the case up and not let it settle, unless they get a nice payout of course), and then Hansmeier himself acts as the attorney for the objector. There are theories that he simply files the objections himself under a family member's name, and then proceeds to represent them. The objector in the Groupon case is Padraigin Browne, Hansmeier's wife (and a patent attorney). He's also represented his father, another attorney, in other class-action cases. I like how the judge ordered Hansmeier to provide proof to the court that he notified his client (wife) that he wasn't eligible to represent her.
"Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
So, because the judiciary is very conservative, his appointment is being suspended until the allegations are cleared.
They're not doing this because the judiciary is very conservative; some judges are, some are very liberal. It's just because our court system has centuries of experience with this type of thing and knows that judges are like Caesar's wife. They not only need to avoid doing anything that would call their impartiality into question, they have to be above suspicion. Being investigated on a "morals" charge could jeopardize every case he works on because his integrity would become an issue on appeal, and the easiest way to avoid that is by not having him hear cases where the charges against him might become significant.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
Huh? I didn't read the article (naturally!) but I didn't get anything like that out of our summary. Wright's finding of "moral turpitude" refers to his judgement of Hansmeier. Hansmeier is getting kicked off of a completely different case (about Groupon) because the comissioner of the court presiding over that case won't let a lawyer with "moral turpitude" bring the case into his court. The original Prenda case was about porn downloads, and that set the whole thing off.
So?
The roasted flesh of sanctioned lawyers is like sweet, tangy, smokey, savory BBQ baby back ribs. I just made myself hungry. More lawyers on the coals!
You can dance if you want to.
Obsessive compulsive, or just trying out a new word counter?
Where the hell did you get that the judge is under fire for downloading pornography? It doesn't say anything like that in the summary or the article.
The summary didn't do a good job of explaining the appellate court order in this case. The judges were essentially saying that the issue was not ripe for consideration at their level, because Hansmeier needs to make the request in district court and have it denied there first. He can appeal the district court's refusal to issue a stay, but only after that decision is actually made.
Good one, judges. Please follow it thru to the completion and make an example out of these vile cretins.
Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
If I was the judge I'd embrace it.
"Yeah I download porn and I'm proud of it. I'm a red blooded dirty minded american, what's it to ya?"
Um, what are you talking about?
To my knowledge, no allegations have been made against Judge Wright.
They're not doing this because the judiciary is very conservative; some judges are, some are very liberal. It's just because our court system has centuries of experience with this type of thing and knows that judges are like Caesar's wife.
When I used the word 'conservative', I was describing their reaction, not their political views. Conservative, as in excercising an abundance of caution, not conservative as in prudish.
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
Yes, but if this is that same illegal downloading that this lawyer is into revealing, then you cannot really condone that publically as a judge.
Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
Moral Turpitude is a prerequisite for copyright and patent attorneys.
His morals may be fucked but his tears taste like honey..
"Will this never-ending series of PLEASURABLE EVENTS never cease?"
Sure they have: the grandparent just made some.
Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
for that is indeed what is happening here. crook lawyers running a RICO are finally losing their meal ticket. woo hoo!
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
free lawn service and snowblowing for life! bring it on.
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
a world unto their own, praise the Lord. they really should retire to an island with no communication to the rest of the world and protest themselves to perfect their drooliness.
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
like Fields studied the Bible. "looking for loopholes."
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
Sure they have: the grandparent just made some.
And you just referred to them. That's a second source, so we have confirmation. Let's print it!