Beer Fridge Caught Interfering With Cellular Network
aesoteric writes "A man's backyard beer fridge in Australia has been busted interfering with the cellular network of major carrier Telstra. Engineers used an internally-developed software 'robot' to crawl log files from the network and sent a field team out to pinpoint the cause of the interference."
Fosters! Australian for beer.
Incidentally, Australian beer fridges have the honor of being among the first commercially successful applications of refrigeration technology(the principles and some early prototypes were developed elsewhere; but Australia's not-exactly-robust ice-harvesting industry didn't imperil the cost effectiveness of the systems in the way that it did in places that actually have ice). Telstra should turn down whatever RF 'noise' the kids are listening too these days and let Grandpop play what he wants!
Irrelevant history aside, what kind of dodgy does a motor have to be to generate enough RF to degrade a cell system in the course of performing relatively modest compression duties for a small refrigerator?
I know a little about radio networks, not a massive amount but enough to get by. The fridge must have been somehow sending out a noise signature which was in tune with the radio conditions of the network. That is what I don't understand, a properly designed radio cellular network should operate outside of the range of frequencies put off by a simple compressor motor that would be a in fridge. So now I have to wonder either the fridge was designed in a very strange manor, or the fridge malfunctioned in a very strange manor or the network was poorly designed. Does anyone have more details as to the exact details of what happened? I would be interested in seeing the hardened data from the logs, fridge and network. I call BS that the fridge was the issue until someone can produce hard log data showing this.
You want reliable network performance or ice cold beer? That's a tough question.
Why can't we have more stories like this? Why does it always have to be something political or an advertisement for a product or the usual MS bashing stories? This title alone is more interesting than any "news" story I've seen on Slashdot in the last year.
The linked article is far more about the internal 'robot' and very little about the beer fridge. While perhaps the intent of the /. post, I was far more interested in how the beer fridge could have caused such an issue. Thankfully, TFA has a link to another, far more interesting, FA:
It includes an image of said fridge, which looks like something from the 50s/60s (maybe? I don't know, I still have people yelling at me to get off their lawns.) More modern models probably have much better, efficient motors that don't cause this kind of issue.
No mention of the resolution, but I assume it involved unplugging the fridge. (I wouldn't be surprised if he paid more in electricity for that thing per year than just buying a new, medium-sized fridge.)
Engineers used an internally-developed software 'robot' to crawl log files from the network.
Seriously? I know it's actually stated that way in TFA, but are people that stupid that they can't simply say "program"? In all likelihood, it's probably a 10-line Perl script. (Said as Perl fan, myself.)
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Slightly related, here are a few threads about radio-based baby monitors causing trouble in the ham bands:
http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php?topic=76680.0
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?310670-Bad-Baby-Monitors-on-50-125-FM
http://www.techzonez.com/forums/showthread.php/23722-HAM-Radio-and-Eavesdropping!!!!-LONG-ONE!
The first and second one are about hams tracking down the problems. The second goes into great detail on how the user of the monitor was busted by the FCC. The third is from a user of a baby monitor going full-retard.
Now I understand why, after I have 20 or 30 beers, why I have such a hard time finding my way home.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
We've already linked much of it back to pollutants. leaded gas links to violence better than any other theory to date, and carcinogens are widespread. A little non-ionizing radiation is better for you than sunlight. I don't think it'll ever be linked to anything.
Learn to love Alaska
That should be, used an internally-developed piece of software. The word "software," like "hardware" or "clothing" is plural. You have a piece of hardware, a piece of clothing, a piece of software -- not "a hardware" or "a clothing" or (ugh) "a software."
Since when does a log parser (Splunk much?) get such a lofty title of "Robot". I think perhaps they are mistaking it with their call centre staff!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_robot
At least it wasn't the cellular network interfering with the beer fridge. Could have been a disaster.
Isee. So if one is getting shitty service (what else) from their cell phone company and decides to improve the service on their own at their own cast, it's illegal. And you're stuck with the shitty service.
To play devil's advocate on this one, if doing so can actually further fuck the mobile phone network, then it being illegal isn't such a bad thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_robot
Sure, but from TFA:
The "robot" is effectively an algorithm that crawls a database of performance stats collected from equipment across the NextG mobile network.
So, it searches *a* database of stats collected from remote equipment. How that information is collected isn't mentioned, but "syslog" would be one way. Even if it was collected directly from remote equipment, that could be done by a simple Perl script and a few modules. Certainly nothing even remotely (no pun intended) special about any of that. I did stuff like that before the "Web" was even invented (yes, I'm old). Still, ultimately, it's just a program. Thanks for the link anyway...
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
What I really want to know is what happened to the man's beer. Did Telstra buy him a new fridge or what?
Agreed, a 'bot' might be nothing special in terms of coding, if you know how, but it *is* established terminology.
The Fosters Group brewery (formerly CUB) in Queensland still brews it. However on my last trip there they said it's one of their smallest production runs of any product passing through the brewery. It's outdone by all other beers brewed there even by import licence like Guinness, and even Smirnoff Vodka beats it by production volume.
'bots' ... you know, software robots have been around as long as I've been doing computer related crap ... so what, 30 years?
God, you shouldn't be allowed anywhere near slashdot without knowing what at least freaking eggdrop is.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
Agreed, a 'bot' might be nothing special in terms of coding, if you know how, but it *is* established terminology.
Sure, but given the description in TFA, I'm not sure it really applies. Scanning a local database for data *somehow* inserted from remote sources isn't anything bot-like... I think the interviewees were just trying to up the cool factor. My systems generate reports all the time - yawn. Sometimes my scripts even page/email me - automatically! Wow, I must be some sort of guru! :-)
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
The robot, apparently code-named 'Bender' was apparently not concerned initially until it determined that the fridge contained beer, at which point it flagged this as a priority.
I heard this robot codenamed Bender had an antenna connected to a faulty transceiver that might be responsible for cell phone network interference (as well as satellite TV interference)
I wish I had mod points today. This is hilarious!
http://xkcd.com/1171/
ACMA (the the FCC in the US too, I imagine) has rules about you causing interference in various spectrum (especially the licensed stuff that the telcos pay a lot to use), so it is his problem.
Sometimes bad things happen.
Or maybe because he was breaking the law. Not intentionally, but once notified if he'd continued then he becomes a criminal. According to your logic if he had a weapon, he'd be an armed criminal.
No, somebody mentioning a word which has previously been mentioned in an xkcd does not warrant the includion of the "obligatory" xkcd.
Is 1563649 a prime number?
Beer?
Cellular?
Beer?
c...e...l...l...
b...e...e...r
I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
Either way it seems like a silly way to go about it. I'm sure a dozen ham enthusiasts would have jumped all over a chance to practice their RDF skills on something useful.
For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
I shouldn't be allowed near slashdot? All you do is troll this site.
Good post, but slightly off.
The US part is actually part 15b. AC conducted emissions. This is measured conducted via the power cable and also in a semi anechoic chamber. Normally up to 1GHz.
In Australia, you can apply the measurements used for R&TTE, (Europe) This uses the EN 55022 standard. This measures the same like 15b except at 50 Hz at 220v up to 3GHz.
In non digital devices and devices without radios, there is no grant needed. You need only to perform the verification testing and keep that in your compliance folder in case something like in the article happens.
On the other hand, if the fridge had a built in display that can connect to a computer via cable, you would need to have part 15b grant. This would be "certification".
If you see a FCC logo on your device, that means it has either used a DoC (declaration of conformance) or the manufacturer performed the verification testing.
If you see "FCC ID:XXX-YYYYYY", this means that the device has undergone Certification at a FCC approved lab.
...This Baud's For You!
Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
What exactly is a rogue beer fridge? To me that kinda implies malicious behavior, which seems to indicate that we're personifying an inanimate object. I get that it's cool that they made a robot to detect sources of interference on their network, but it's not a freaking crime fighter exacting justice upon an unscrupulous sentient refrigeration device.
Long signatures suck.