Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Ups Ante In Smartphone Size Wars: 6.3 Inches

New submitter jarold writes to note that Samsung has launched two extra-large cellphones: a 6.3 inch LTE ready version, and a 5.8 inch version. "Branded as Galaxy Mega, one would struggle to fit [either in a] pocket or use it with just one hand. The good thing, it is only 8mm thin and weighs under 200 grams. More portable than a tablet, it comes with a durable polycarbonate body. Unlike most of Samsung's latest smartphones, it does not have a super AMOLED panel. Instead, it has an HD super clear LCD display, which is bright enough to please most users. It features split screen and multitasking between video and other apps." For a phone that big, users might need to brush up on their side-talking skills.

221 comments

  1. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stop calling these phones. They are wide-screen monitors.

    1. Re:Ridiculous by BlackPignouf · · Score: 5, Funny

      THE BRAND NEW iPad Mini Mega
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abtmeXXT7VA :D

    2. Re:Ridiculous by thsths · · Score: 2

      If the kindle fits in my pocket, why shouldn't this?

      Maybe it works both as a tablet and a phone. I can certainly see a market for this.

    3. Re:Ridiculous by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well... my 6.1" screen is to a 4" screen what a 23" is to a 15" on the desktop. Would you go back to a 15" on your desk ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    4. Re:Ridiculous by neokushan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't go that far. It's more like the difference between a 24" and a 21" monitor. Both are still "big" compared to what the majority of people use (Which is probably about 19" these days, perhaps 17") but there's a shift towards them. Your point is still valid, however, once you go bigger it's hard to go back.

      That being said, you don't cart that 23" screen around with you. I have a 24" monitor on my desktop, but I still go back to a 15" laptop because 17" is too big to carry around.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    5. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      however, once you go bigger it's hard to go back.

      That's what she said

    6. Re:Ridiculous by citizenr · · Score: 1

      actually they are called Phablets in China, and are the next big market after everyone and their dog started making tablets.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    7. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not everybody wears the XXXL Buster Big Boy Cargo Pants your mom buys you, bro.

      A 6.5" by 3.5" "phone" is not going to fit in the average person's pocket. This means it will be used by:

      -- women who always have a decent sized purse with them;
      -- men who don't mind wearing a fanny pack everywhere they go;

    8. Re:Ridiculous by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      there's a burger called minimega in a finnish burger chain..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re: Ridiculous by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

      My nexus 7 fit in my pants pocket, and this seems smaller, so that shouldn't be a problem except for tiny males with miniature pants.

    10. Re: Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 6'3" and about 170. Sure as hell doesn't fit in the pockets of anything I wear.

    11. Re:Ridiculous by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      You're probably looking for a +1 Funny mod, but I don't have to carry around a 23" display to use it on my desktop. I don't have to hold a 23" display to the side of my head when I'm using it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    12. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar to what my friend had said 3-4 years ago regarding his larger-sized cell phone: It is not a phone with a built-in camera function. It is a camera with a built-in phone function.

    13. Re:Ridiculous by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      If I had to carry around the 23" monitor everywhere I went? I'd go back to 15" without hestitation.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    14. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm old enough to remember when it was progress when the phones got smaller.

    15. Re:Ridiculous by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      This is the burger: Hesburger | Minimegahampurilainen.

    16. Re: Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put it in the pocket of your suit jacket; it should fit fine.

      "Oh, but I only wear skinny jeans and ironic T-shirts!"

      Well, there's your problem; you are a man, but wear the clothing of a boy.

    17. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a dual monitor setup at my desk: 21" and a 24" monitor, side by side.

      Yet when I leave my desk and go mobile, I happily go back to the 14.1" screen built into my laptop.

      Where is your god now?

    18. Re: Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a chemist and work in a lab. I don't wear suits.

    19. Re:Ridiculous by fnj · · Score: 1

      Pssst. 15" is too big to lug around too. 13" is the appropriate size.

    20. Re:Ridiculous by neokushan · · Score: 1

      I actually agree with this, but I am an unfortunate oddity on this one. I have terrible eyesight so I can't drop down to far screen-size wise or I can't read anything because laptop screens are generally all 1080p these days (or at least, they are on the laptops worth actually paying good money for). I could just up the DPI but this breaks far too much stuff to be practical.

      I used to have an old 11.6" Laptop and that was perfect but it's actually hard to find a small(ish) laptop that DOESN'T have say a 1080p screen that I just cannot use.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    21. Re:Ridiculous by Shark · · Score: 1

      Unless they have very large tomatoes, there's nothing mega about this! To me, a mini-mega would just be a burger where you skip the fifth layer of beef and maybe one of the transitory slices of bread.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    22. Re: Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, gotta be a big manly man and wear suits! Sorry, I'm immune to your sudo-macho bullshit.

    23. Re:Ridiculous by fnj · · Score: 1

      I hear you brother. I had the nice jewel-like HP 2133 with the keyboard to die for and 1280x768 on an 8.9" display, but I got to where I would have to bend over it about 6" away to see anything at all. My Thinkpad X301 13" 1440x900 was a thing of beauty but also got too hard to see. I'm afraid the future is realistically just one with no notebook.

      I did find out that with GNOME 2, and after finding out the secret with stupid Firefox and Thunderbird which do things their own way, I could get everything to scale satisfactorily to just about 1.5 size (148 so called dpi). I now actually use that setting on my 24" monitor and I usually hold my face within 12" of it; many times 6"!

      Full HD in a laptop should be ideal. It would be a gimme to add a mode to the display driver that just doubles all dots horizontally and vertically, giving 960x540 with perfect scaling.

    24. Re: Ridiculous by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Suit jacket?

      What century is this?

      Ahh, suit jacket - the uniform of the robber barrons.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    25. Re: Ridiculous by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can Sudo macho bullshit?

    26. Re: Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Put it in the pocket of your suit jacket; it should fit fine.

      And there's your problem: you wear the clothing of a man, like a boy.

      It's funny you're slagging other people's clothing decisions, but appear completely ignorant of how foolish jamming shit into the pockets of your suit makes you look. If you're wearing a suit, your moronically oversized phone goes in your briefcase, Spanky. Not in your suit pockets.

      "+1, Ironically, I'll Get Taken More Seriously Wearing Khakis and An Oxford Than You Ever Will Wearing A Misshapen, Lumpy Suit Jacket That Looks Like You Stole It From Your Dad's Rag Pile."

    27. Re: Ridiculous by JWW · · Score: 2

      Just wait, you will.

      That will be the size of the screen on the Galaxy XVI.

    28. Re:Ridiculous by fzammett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm 5'9" and I wear almost nothing but jeans and jean shorts most days. I don't wear skin-tight jeans, but neither am I wearing "fat guy" jeans... they fit "right" in my eyes: no struggle to button, but they're far from cargo pants territory.

      My Nexus 7 TABLET fits in the BACK POCKET of my pants without struggling to get it in and out. It's actually comfortable there (aside from the weight, which is a bit much and tries to pull my pants down). Now, yes, that's only true if I'm standing up... sitting ain't happening... this "phone" (phablet I guess is the term they invented?) should fit just as well as it's smaller.

      Now, me personally, I don't want a phone this big. I have an S4 and I think it's just about perfect... I considered the Note II and I could see possibly going to that size, but that's the upper limit for me I think. To me, this phone is just too big to be carrying around all the time. But to say it doesn't fit in "regular" pants I just don't think is accurate. You most definitely do not need a fanny pack or anything like that.

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    29. Re: Ridiculous by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Labcoat?

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    30. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. I might think about upgrading to a smartphone when the ability to actually make phone calls gets as good as it was 10 years ago on a flip phone. All these seem to be now is great devices for texting, etc. in which case larger is better. I just hate squinting at tiny screens.

    31. Re: Ridiculous by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The 'uniform' where I work is long-sleeved shirts for management types, short-sleeved shirts for all others, including polos. No one wears a jacket unless they are meeting the 'big guys', which is pretty rare.

      But I would not be wearing a fanny pack anyways. I'm looking for a hand bag to keep a bigger phone, front-pocket wallet, and sunglasses in. And not look too jolly. Not hopeful, unless I make one out of duck tape.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    32. Re:Ridiculous by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I carry a man-purse (shoulder-bag) whereever I go. Makes it easy to bring gum, phone, keys, tablet, headphones, pen, multi-tool, workpass, forms/coupons, and wallet wherever I go. I like having this stuff with me, and the man-purse is a practical way of doing it rather than just walking around running into situations where I wish I had been carrying ______ with me.

      Keeps me from having lumpy pockets, allowing for a clear view of my glorious posterior. Buddies made some jokes at first, but it blew over pretty quick. Ladies never even bring it up unless they want to compliment it. It's even more practical these days for carrying extra stuff when we take my son out somewhere.

    33. Re:Ridiculous by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      5'10, nexus 7 fits in my dress slacks too (but as mentioned in another post, I keep it in a sling-bag)

      I too chose the 5-inch S4, because it's the upper limit of how far my thumb can reach across a screen when holding the device in 1 hand. If I want a bigger screen, I'd get more screen space, but I'd sacrifice one-hand usability. If I'm giving up one-hand usability, I had better get a good amount of screen space to make up for it, so a 6-7 inch screen makes more sense to me than the Note II's 5.5inch screen.

    34. Re:Ridiculous by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I don't move a 23" monitor everywhere I go. Portablity means something. It's why I have a 13" MBP instead of a 17" MBP. If a phone won't easily slip into the jacket pocket of my sport coat or suit, I don't care what it does. I am not watching hollywood blockbusters on my phone.. I want my phone to be easily portable. To me the Galaxy S4 is a larger phone than I want to hold. But my clients are more likely to call than email or text me.

      The future wife, she carries her phone in her purse mainly. And she uses it far more for social media and texts than phone calls. She can get away with having a larger phone.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    35. Re: Ridiculous by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Put it in the pocket of your suit jacket; it should fit fine.

      "Oh, but I only wear skinny jeans and ironic T-shirts!"

      Well, there's your problem; you are a man, but wear the clothing of a boy.

      butlers wear suits all the time... others reserve them for the occasion.
      though if you're a man wearing tight 501's jeans you can still fit a 4.5" screen phone and a pack of smokes in the pocket or one 7" device.

      who the heck works wearing a suit anyways? even the people i knew who oversee 1000+ workforces reserved them only for social happenings, sure, some of them were work related but the fuck would even they need a suit for when playing around in excel..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    36. Re:Ridiculous by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      This should actually be quite a bit smaller, since not only the screen diagonal is smaller, but it also doesn't have the fairly wide bevel of Nexus 7.

    37. Re:Ridiculous by green1 · · Score: 1

      And I choose the Note II for the same reason, biggest screen that I can still operate one handed. It also fits in most pockets without too much trouble (as long as you aren't trying to cram a dozen other things in to the same pocket)
      Honestly though when looking for the Note II the s-pen was the deciding factor, I would have bought an SIII if they made one with the s-pen. but now that I have the Note II I know I made the right choice.

      I can't imagine going to a 6.3" screen though, that stops being usable without both hands, and won't fit in a lot of pockets, so I might as well get the biggest tablet I can (which apparently is only a 10.1" screen unfortunately, my ideal would be about the size of an A4 sheet of paper)

    38. Re:Ridiculous by green1 · · Score: 1

      Having a "phablet" (the Note II) I definitely appreciate the functionality. I have the Note II, I also have a 10.1" tablet, and a desktop PC with a 30" and 23" screen.
      The tablet gets used about once a month when I'm staying out of town, and I'm starting to debate giving up on that and just using the phone.
      The PC gets used probably 4-5 days a week.
      And the phone gets use constantly. The Note II is big enough and powerful enough, to do a large portion of what I use a computer for. It's no mystery that PC sales are down, so much can be done these days from a device everyone carries everywhere already.

    39. Re:Ridiculous by green1 · · Score: 1

      Do you also remember how people were scrambling to get their hands on those fancy PDAs? And no serious businessman was ever without his laptop?
      Not to mention people carrying paper address books and daytimers. And even with all of that, they still had to wait to get home to send an email.

      Sure a smaller phone is nice, but I'd rather have a larger phone then carry multiple devices to accomplish the same task (and the larger phone does more than all those previous devices put together)

    40. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big is the new small.

    41. Re: Ridiculous by RoboJ1M · · Score: 2

      $ man macho

      http://www.google.com/search?q=man+macho

      Hmm, it seems you can.

      (ooh, yeah!)

    42. Re:Ridiculous by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      It's not an opinion, it's fact: a 6.1" screen has 232% the area of a 4"; a 23", 235% of a 15" (assuming both are the same ratio such as 16:9 or some such)

      As for "carting" around, a 6 incher doesn't need carting either, it fits in my pockets.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    43. Re: Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could try shoving it up your ass. That is, after you've pulled the stick out.

    44. Re:Ridiculous by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a reasonable comparison as it doesn't take into account all the considerations.

      I have a 23" on my desktop at home and a 20" in the office, both widescreens. I wouldn't want to go any smaller or go back to 4:3.

      OTOH, I used to own a 9.7" iPad and now I own a Nexus 7. I would consider something iPad Mini sized if they can make the bezel a bit smaller, but I certainly wouldn't go any bigger. In this scenario, the benefits of a smaller device (portability & comfort of holding) outweigh the benefits of a larger screen.

      In my shirt pocket, I have an iPhone 5 at 4". It fits comfortably without feeling too big and bulky. Its location in my shirt pocket is non-negotiable btw - I feel secure with it being there and it's easy to access so putting it in my trouser pocket is not an option. Also, I can just about operate it one-handed - any bigger and I would need to use two hands to operate it. That's fine if I'm on the train for example and am happy to use it in two-handed mode, but that should be my decision and not forced upon me by the size of the device.

      It's great that you're happy with a larger screen on your mobile device, and I see a lot of people every day who have made the same decision as you, but I think it's a fallacy to suggest that bigger must always equal better.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    45. Re:Ridiculous by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why not just call it a Maxi iPad? With wings?

    46. Re:Ridiculous by tooyoung · · Score: 1

      I wear almost nothing but jeans and jean shorts most days.........But to say it doesn't fit in "regular" pants I just don't think is accurate. You most definitely do not need a fanny pack or anything like that.

      Believe me, jean shorts are the pants equivalent of a fanny pack.

    47. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > laptop because 17" is too big to carry around.

      No it is not. Wuss.

    48. Re:Ridiculous by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      That's what people usually think indeed. Until they actually use a big device for a few hours or days, and then most (not all) change their minds. The "must fit in my shirt pocket because I'm me and I express my being through random criteria" can easily be morphed into "must fit into my pants pocket" or "must be usable without hunching over" or "must be able to browse w/o panning and zooming constantly" or "must be able to double as my ebook reader", so random criteria don't *have* to be altogether lost in the process, they can be substituted.

      OTOH, some people do use their phones mostly for phoning, and/or have eagle eyes, and/or are very fashion conscious.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    49. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the same. I proclaim it a purse outright though.

      And, made sure to get something that would make ladies jealous.

      I made the transition this summer, because in the past every summer (once it was too warm for a jacket) lead to it being impossible to cary what I wanted comfortably. Nobody cares, because after high-school, you just look like an ass giving somebody shot for something like that (of course my friends gave me shit for a few days, because that's what they are for, if they didn't I'd feel let down).

    50. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots. They put the cheese UNDER the patty.

      Finland, learn how to burger.

    51. Re:Ridiculous by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go that far. It's more like the difference between a 24" and a 21" monitor. Both are still "big" compared to what the majority of people use (Which is probably about 19" these days, perhaps 17")

      Sub-20" appears to be practically dead to me: if you check online stores, you see 0-10 sub-20" models vs 200+ models for the 20-27" range... and half those sub-20" are MORE EXPENSIVE with much lower resolution than the cheaper 20" 1080p models. At a glance, the majority of displays in the 20-24" range appear to be 21.5" or larger so even 20" seems to be falling out of favor.

      With 20" 1080p available for as little to $100 these days, there is very little room even at the low-end for anything less than that.

    52. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... my 6.1" screen is to a 4" screen what a 23" is to a 15" on the desktop. Would you go back to a 15" on your desk ?

      Pretentious "look at me" douchebag font detected.

    53. Re:Ridiculous by neokushan · · Score: 1

      This is true and it does highlight the "shift" I mentioned. However, that doesn't account for what's actually in use today. Do a quick survey of the people you know and very few are running 20"+ monitors (those that still have PC's, that is).

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    54. Re:Ridiculous by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      The "take everything out of your back pockets" dance that some jeans-wearing people do when they sit down amuses me. You know your jeans have pockets in the front too, right?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    55. Re:Ridiculous by netsentry · · Score: 1
      Well, a phone isn't going in the same pocket as keys, and I don't like to jingle when I walk so I tend to keep spare change in the opposite pocket as my keys. That leaves wallet and Nexus. Back pockets seem logical.

      Not to mention that a decent-sized smartphone is not exactly comfortable in the front pocket when sitting down, and also it involves standing up to fish it out and answer a phone call. First world problems.

    56. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one on /. will understand this joke.

    57. Re:Ridiculous by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Even my non-tech-savvy friends and family members who have upgraded their PCs in the past 4-5 years have 20" or bigger LCDs.

      Those that don't have "upgraded" to laptops.

  2. Ah, Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard you're idea's and their definately good.

    1. Re:Ah, Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, come on, did no one see xkcd today?

    2. Re:Ah, Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, come on, did no one see xkcd today?

      I guess no one is going to free themselves from insecurity today.

    3. Re:Ah, Samsung by Therad · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Xkcd is for NERDS, here we are either fans of Android, Windows or Apple. Slashdot, news for fanbois, Stuff that rages.

    4. Re:Ah, Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Well, the important thing is you've found a way to be superior to everyone else here.

      Isn't that nice?

    5. Re:Ah, Samsung by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      reply to undo incorrect mod. Damn you, /., for not having an undo button.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    6. Re:Ah, Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, your not wrong.

    7. Re: Ah, Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or bad grammar & misspellings.

  3. Dead Zone? by erikwestlund · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know that for a while people thought 4" screens were overkill, too big for people's hands, etc. I'm using a 5" Galaxy now and, while it took some getting used to, it's manageable with one hand (and I don't have large hands).

    However, 6.3" just seems like a deadzone. Too big to hold in a hand and use effectively, unless you're Shaq, but smaller than a 7 or 8" tablet like the Nexus 7 or iPad mini, which perform tablet duties pretty well.

    Conventional wisdom on device size has been proved wrong time and again over the last few years, so who knows? Maybe what we're seeing is devices for every size. With rumored smart watches on the way, we may have 1-2" smart watches, followed up with 3.5-6" phones, and 7-11" tablets, after which the ultrabook/laptop market takes over. Maybe every device will excel at somethings while providing enough functionality for other basics (email, media) to keep people happy.

    Interesting times.

    1. Re:Dead Zone? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well they have devices from 10" to 2.5" now.. samsung is just big, big big.

      and since the sw is pretty much the same anyways, they just keep churning.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Dead Zone? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2

      However, 6.3" just seems like a deadzone. Too big to hold in a hand and use effectively, unless you're Shaq, but smaller than a 7 or 8" tablet like the Nexus 7

      Don't forget that the correlation between screen size & device size is not neccessarily linear. Samsung managed to increase the screen size of the S4 (over the S3) by 1/5 of an inch while (slightly) reducing the phyiscal dimensions of the phone.

      The Nexus 7 has a massive bezel, these devices do not & will be smaller than the 0.7 inches you'd expect placed side-by-side with a Nexus 7.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    3. Re:Dead Zone? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Depends on your size. 6.3" is about the max size that will fit comfortably in my pockets. 7" will but it's a stretch (see what i did here ?), really, I tried, because I'd love it if I could carry around a 7" phone. Maybe when they do away with bezels...
      And I can handle my 6.1" Ascend Mate mostly one-handed, to call, scroll pages, even type with the "stuck to the side" mini keyboard.

      I got laughed at for my humongous HTC HD2 (4.3"), then for my Samsung Galaxy Note (5.1")... Now I'm getting more interested looks about my 6.1" Mate.

      I guess people are coming around to the fact that "smartphone" is a misnomer, and "minitablet" or "minireader" would be more apt: I use my phone to read/type on it 99% on the time vs 1% for calls. I'm not counting music, it's tucked in my pocket for that.

      Anyway, it's just great to have a choice. I can understand people who prefer a mini-phone too...

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    4. Re:Dead Zone? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      i got a 4 inch phone its a good dam size. anything over 5 inches is pushing it.

    5. Re:Dead Zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anything over 5 inches is pushing it.

      it's a lucky man that has a gf who thinks as such

    6. Re:Dead Zone? by tippe · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time that you start wearing track pants. They stretch, so might be able to accommodate up to an 8" "phone" in comfort. Who knows, you might be the first to start up a new fashion trend and show the world that there's a third use for track pants other than: a) exercising or b) showing everyone that you've "given up" and just don't care what you wear anymore.

      While I'm at it, here are a couple of other ideas that people can use to comfortably carry a 6-7" phone around with and look trendy doing it (I really should be patenting these ideas so that I can make a lot of money, instead of blabbing about them on the Internet, but whatever):
      - create a holder that has an integrated shoulder strap so that you can carry the phone around like a "man purse" (or just "purse" if you're a woman)
      - Replace the strap with a gold chain, install a gold "wall clock" app then rotate the "man purse" holder 90deg towards the front so that it hangs like a necklace. Presto! Suddenly you look like a hip-hop artist.
      - Create a belt (for your pants) where instead of a buckle, there's a holder for your phone. Customize the look of your belt by installing different "skins". Just some ideas for skins off the top of my head: "The Texan Cattle Rancher" (with a longhorn steer on the front), "The Santa Claus" (simple gold rectangle), "The Hulk Hogan" (WWE Champion title belt). The possibilities are endless...

    7. Re:Dead Zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A luckier man would have no need for such a girlfriend

    8. Re:Dead Zone? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      "I know that for a while people thought 4" screens were overkill, too big for people's hands, etc. I'm using a 5" Galaxy now and, while it took some getting used to, it's manageable with one hand (and I don't have large hands)."

      Is it comfortable, or just manageable? I've tried the Galaxy S4, and i certainly _could_ use it with one hand, but it doesn't seem like it would be comfortable. There's no way i can wrap my fingers all the way around the back and simultaneously reach the entire screen with my thumb. I can reach _most_ of the screen if balance the phone on my hand rather than wrapping my fingers around it, but if i'm going to be comfortable with a $600 device i need to feel like i've got a decent grip on it when i use it. (This is aside from the fact that it doesn't seem to fit comfortably in my pocket.)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    9. Re:Dead Zone? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Choice .. No, No, not another choice. Its like some people dont want black Fords!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    10. Re:Dead Zone? by green1 · · Score: 1

      That's not always a good thing though. going from my previous phones to the Note II I miss having some part of the device that isn't a control surface. fishing the thing out of my pocket is usually enough to accidentally either accept of reject most phone calls before I can even see the display.

    11. Re:Dead Zone? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of comfort. I have the Note II, and I love it. sure it's a slight stretch to reach the far corners with my thumb, but I can. though how often do I actually need to? My comfort though is in a screen so large that I have to do very little scrolling compared to any other phone I've ever seen. That is what makes it the most comfortable experience.

    12. Re:Dead Zone? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      "b) showing everyone that you've "given up" and just don't care what you wear anymore", nah, only judgmental assholes jump to that deductive a conclusion. And fashion victims (which are the same, mostly).

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    13. Re:Dead Zone? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      - Replace the strap with a gold chain, install a gold "wall clock" app then rotate the "man purse" holder 90deg towards the front so that it hangs like a necklace. Presto! Suddenly you look like a hip-hop artist.

      So you're saying this is why the Nook always had that retarded hole in the corner?

    14. Re:Dead Zone? by erikwestlund · · Score: 1

      I consider it comfortable at this point. I can use it without thinking about how I'm holding it and I've never dropped it or fumbled with it. (FWIW, it's the same physical size as the S3, so if you want information on what its like to hold it/use it, you'll learn just as much from the S3 reviews.)

    15. Re:Dead Zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " 7 or 8" tablet like the Nexus 7 or iPad mini"

      Don't forget the Surface!

      Full disclosure: I work at MSbut I actually like their products (for the most part) so I'm not just a paid shill : )

    16. Re:Dead Zone? by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      The Nexus 7 has a massive bezel, these devices do not & will be smaller than the 0.7 inches you'd expect placed side-by-side with a Nexus 7.

      I'm already annoyed with how often I accidentally activate random things by accidentally touching the screen with my holding hand on the N7's bezel, I would probably go nuts on a device with a thinner one. My on-screen keyboard accuracy is already bad enough on the N7, that would probably drive me nuts too on a 6" device. And 6" likely wouldn't comfortably fit in most of my pockets.

      For me, 6" seems to provide optimal inconvenience. I would prefer a smaller phone for which I would not need to worry about which pockets it fits into and a larger tablet I can behind when not needed.

      As for the N7's bezel, it is indeed pretty wide. They could release a Nexus8 on the same footprint by thinning that out and still have ~3/4" diagonal to spare for the front-facing camera and other gadgetry.

    17. Re:Dead Zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCKING DOUCHE BAG, USE A NORMAL FONT. What tHe FUcK Is WrONg WItH YOU?

      asshole douche fag

  4. There are already bigger though by JenniP · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://uk.asus.com/Tablet/Fonepad/ASUS_Fonepad/

    I just bought an Asus Fonepad to replace my ageing Galaxy Note (Which is still a nice phone but too small). The Fonepad is 7" (Nexus 7 sized), and is a completely functional phone, although I haven't had to take a call yet I can imagine you will look a complete idiot.

    Jen

    1. Re:There are already bigger though by Stolpskott · · Score: 2

      I think the design gurus at the various phone handset manufacturers are closet Dom Jolly/Trigger Happy TV fans...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27aVPqpnL7Y

    2. Re: There are already bigger though by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      Get a Sony smartwatch or something similar, and a earphone-style bluetooth headset such as jabra clipper. This is what I do with my 8 inch Galaxy Note. I take it out of the bag only when I need to reply to an IM or SMS

    3. Re:There are already bigger though by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      You use this style of device with a Bluetooth headset. Nobody expects you to lift this to your face. Maybe even a smart watch, too.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re: There are already bigger though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. And you don't need to put the screen to your face to talk, so you can use it like you were on a videocall.

    5. Re:There are already bigger though by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      "looking like complete idiot" is just a fashion statement. Things like this change really fast.
      Just look at how wearing huge headphones in public is now acceptable somehow.

    6. Re:There are already bigger though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After doing a quick Google search...

      Yes, yes you will.

    7. Re:There are already bigger though by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      Just don't hold it to your head like a regular phone. Hold it out in front of you, like a regular phone in speakerphone mode or like a tablet using video chat.

    8. Re:There are already bigger though by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      IT'S RUBBISH!!

      --
      +1 Disagree
  5. Samsung already do bigger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samsung have the Galaxy Note 8.0 3G.. Which is a phone you can hold to your head... It's not available in phone version in the UK at the moment... But I imported one from abroad and it works great.. 8 inch screen... S-Pen... Everything I need.

  6. Before we give our judgement... by IanPote · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People used to say that the Galaxy Note was too big and wouldn't be a best seller and they were blown out of the water after launch day. I'm holding out for this one.

    1. Re:Before we give our judgement... by codeButcher · · Score: 2
      Happy Galaxy Note user here too (5.3"). I do get a lot of comments about the size, but no problems with usability.

      I do like the stylus drawing ability (agreed, not everybody needs this), as well as better readability. So I will definitely give this a look come upgrade time.

      That said, if they can improve the display to make it sunlight readable, that will be a big plus. Also, better battery life is always a boon (not too unhappy to have to plug in every night or second night, though, but it takes a bit of planning when going on trips).

      They would do good of providing some convenient belt-carrying (or other) method for a beast this size. Cargo pants take you only this far, and some jacket pockets are already at the limit of squeezing the Note into.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    2. Re:Before we give our judgement... by green1 · · Score: 1

      Happy Galaxy Note user here too (5.3"). I do get a lot of comments about the size, but no problems with usability.

      Everyone tells me my Note II is too big to use, but they aren't the ones using it, I am.

      I do like the stylus drawing ability (agreed, not everybody needs this),

      That's why I bought the Note II, I would have got an S III instead if they made one with a stylus. It's an amazing input device.

      That said, if they can improve the display to make it sunlight readable, that will be a big plus.

      They did. Try comparing the Note II to almost any phone made a year before it. Sure there are better, but it's actually quite good. This seems to improve with every generation of phone (my wife just got the S4 and it is better yet)

      Also, better battery life is always a boon (not too unhappy to have to plug in every night or second night, though, but it takes a bit of planning when going on trips).

      It's really hard to complain about a device of this size and ability that requires charging once every day or two. It's also hard to find a situation where you can't arrange to charge it every night. In fact mine is my bedside clock while charging, at home, in hotels, or anywhere I happen to be.

      They would do good of providing some convenient belt-carrying (or other) method for a beast this size. Cargo pants take you only this far, and some jacket pockets are already at the limit of squeezing the Note into.

      Many options there, look in to a company called "RipOffs" they make belt pouches of pretty much every size (ignore what phone they're supposed to be for though and just find a pouch that fits) I'm sure there are also companies making Note specific pouches, but I haven't looked. personally I always manage to pocket the phone, regardless of whether I'm wearing cargo pants, jeans, or a suit.

    3. Re:Before we give our judgement... by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the pointers. Yes, living in a developing country does have some drawbacks - while you can order most stuff via the internet (if you can afford it and the shipping), you can't always try something in-store before buying. It also provides ample opportunity for getting away from the grid :-)

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    4. Re:Before we give our judgement... by green1 · · Score: 1

      If you are refering to buying the note2 without seeing one first, I'm not sure I can recommend that. It's a personal choice, it works great for me, but others may find the screen too big to use comfortably (my wife can't use it without both hands).

      As for getting away from the grid. I do that frequently too, but the spots I go without electricity usually don't have cell service either, so charging the cell phone is relatively moot. If you have a vehicle with you it's easy to charge from 12V, there are solar chargers available too, but I've never tried one. I do have an external battery pack that I could use, but I generally haven't found much point.

  7. Too heavy for a modern phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was into using big and heavy phones I'd be still using Nokia 2110. Anything that doesn't fit in a jean pocket or weights over 100g is bygones for me.

  8. You know what they say.... by Fengpost · · Score: 2

    You must be compensating for something if you have a big phone.......

    --
    The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity....Calvin
    1. Re:You know what they say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, usually said by people to cant afford a big phone.

    2. Re:You know what they say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am.

      I have a natural tendancy to dress to the left and I find having a nice weighty phone in the right pocket centers my gravity nicely.

      In all seriousness, if you want to worry about my cock size because I've got a large phone (Note II) feel free. I assure you I'm just as large holding a nokia 1010.

    3. Re:You know what they say.... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Small ears.

    4. Re:You know what they say.... by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Yes, usually said by people to cant afford a big phone.

      So you are saying that unlike an iPhone, which people buy for its usability, Samsung phones are sold to show-offs as status symbols?

  9. Demo Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I hate this obsession with thin phones. Like holding a razorblade, just awkward. Give me phone twice as thick and heavy, with the extra volume made of battery!

  11. Reinvent the laptop by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

    Are they trying to reinvent the laptop?

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
    1. Re:Reinvent the laptop by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      No hardware keyboard. Pass.

      Either you use it as a slightly smarter dumbphone, in which case extra size is inconvenient, or as an actual computer, in which case some reasonable input device is a must.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Reinvent the laptop by turp182 · · Score: 2

      At this size, doubling the thickness to add a slide-out hardware keyboard probably makes sense, it would be pretty easy to type on compared to a Blackberry. Could probably also increase battery life considerably with the extra space.

      Of course I'm looking forward to the day when I can use my 15" laptop as a "clamshell" phone... I'm surprised how close we are to that being some sort of reality.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  12. please respond here if you want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why on earth would I want such a large piece of plastic stuck in my pocket?

    1. Re:please respond here if you want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't seem to have a problem carrying around that butt plug and dildo.

    2. Re:please respond here if you want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, that's different of course. it's not stuck in my pocket, it's up my ass.

    3. Re:please respond here if you want it by thisisnotreal · · Score: 1

      this is not reddit. are you trying to bring down quality on this site?

  13. Cock Size? by polyp2000 · · Score: 0

    Overcompensating much? N...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  14. Muppets. by irn_bru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Still happy using my Sony Xperia Mini precisely because it's so tiny (88mm by 52mm) I'd love to replace it with something newer/more powerful but it seems nobody is making anything even near this size anymore. I don't even want a 4" screen, let alone these monsters...

    1. Re:Muppets. by gspear · · Score: 1

      I agree -- I don't know what will eventually replace my HP Veer (84 x 54.5 mm2).

  15. Shaq will love it by bazorg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I follow Shaquille O'Neal on Twitter and his iPhone does not seem to be the right size for accurate typing :)

  16. Samsung Gentileman`s OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it sure seems that the iphone and gewgleAndroid still run everyones personal smartphones, data and all....

    I heard Samsung`s next-gen super-smartphone will be running an OS which will break the monopolists ack.

    1. Re:Samsung Gentileman`s OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must mean Tizen then... :)

  17. Undue attention by halexists · · Score: 1

    I fear that side-talking page has now received more attention than $DEITY ever intended.

    1. Re:Undue attention by Threni · · Score: 1

      Yes. The original device which inspired side-talking was a joke, but many smartphone users barely make any callers. They're called phones but they're really no more a phone than a laptop is. The phone part is just an app -one of hundreds of thousands available for all platforms (well, except Windows phones). You want a large screen so you can look at web pages, video etc. I don't think many people are that bothered about the whole `what you look like when you hold the phone to your head for a few minutes a month` thing.

  18. Too tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come on Samsung. Put the telephony part in your 40"+ TVs and call it a day. /s

    1. Re:Too tiny by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      Replying to undo an accident mod.

      But seriously, a TV with built-in video conference features might be useful, as long as they don't go and invent their own standard for it. I have been playing with the thought of setting up sort of "virtual windows" between separate office spaces, to allow a different, ad-hoc mode of communication between people at different locations.

    2. Re:Too tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they did that they make sure that no Fruity device could work with it. The Patents are already applied for...

  19. Different shape / aspect ratio by grimJester · · Score: 1

    Whether a phone will fit in one hand is up to its width. The 5 inch Galaxy S4 is 69,8mm wide, the 6,3 inch Galaxy Mega is 88mm. The iPad Mini has an aspect ratio of 4:3 instead of 16:9 so it's 134mm wide although it's only 0,7 inches larger in screen diagonal.

    Back around the time the Nokia E90 was launched, I predicted a good smartphone would eventually be around 20x9cm with a slide-out keyboard and a large touchscreen; mainly based on the fact that I wanted something that would fit in a normal inner jacket pocket, thought the keyboard was needed and the idea of two screens (on the E90) was stupid.

    I hope we'll be moving past 16:9 aspect ratio to 2:1 or something similar in the near future. The keyboard/cover on the MS Surface seems like a better idea than what I could imagine at the time. Maybe a 2014 smartphone will finally be what I wanted back in 2007.

  20. I have a Samsung Galaxy Note by maroberts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and I have no problem using it as a phone. I tend to use my little finger to support it underneath when talking on it, but apart from that don't really notice any difference.

    I'm still not sure why people want their phones paper thin.
    Personally I'd be happy with something twice as thick as a Note if it trebled the battery life, and possibly improved wireless/GPS reception.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:I have a Samsung Galaxy Note by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd be happy with something twice as thick

      That's what she said :'-(

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:I have a Samsung Galaxy Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want it paper thin because thickness and weight are generally correlated - the iPhone 5 was one of the first phones light enough for me to switch over to smartphones and I wish it was even lighter. If a foam body made it more sturdy while lightening it, fine, but without a change in materials reducing weight means reducing thickness.

  21. So what is the causative process? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does your whanger shrink when you buy a bigger phone? If so, where does the redundant flesh go? If not, then since they didn't have as big a phone as this before this phone was bought, their whanger hasn't shrunk, has it? Therefore the size cannot correlate with whangsize, can it?

    Me? I don't want this phone, I have an N900 which is enough and a £10 cheap-ass tiddler phone for going out with (so if it's lost, I've not lost much).

    But someone who points out that ridiculous meme has something to say about their own insecurities. Maybe your phone isn't as big as theirs and you're worried your e-peen is minimised by the comparison?

    I say "I have what I have, like it or lump it, I don't care".

  22. Ante has already been upped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The poster doesn't appear to be aware of the Sony Xperia Ultra that's been doing the rounds. It appears to be competing more with the 7" tablet part of the market than the mobile, especially as shown paired with the Bluetooth headset.
    * http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z_ultra-review-944.php

    1. Re:Ante has already been upped by yurtinus · · Score: 2

      Never buying another Sony phone after they abandoned software updates for their 2012 phones... Shipped with 2.3 when everybody else was updating to 4.1, and finally got the 4.0 update near Christmas. Later found out "Nope, we're done updating those phones, go buy a new one" less than a year after they were released.

      Thanks but no thanks, Sony. I'm done with you and will not hesitate to tell others what to expect from you, either.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  23. Weird that people think that way by grimJester · · Score: 2

    although I haven't had to take a call yet I can imagine you will look a complete idiot.

    I called a friend who was testing some 7" tablet as a phone. I couldn't understand why he kept giggling until I met him and he told me he felt stupid talking into something that size in public. It's kinda funny how people worry less about how comfortable it is to use than what others will think.

    1. Re:Weird that people think that way by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah and then the same guys use green suspenders with red jeans..

      i had a n-gage. it was good for talking into.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Weird that people think that way by fnj · · Score: 1

      o-gauge trains were much more fun to play with than n-gauge.

    3. Re:Weird that people think that way by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Phones were huge in the 1960s and 70s. Even the biggest thing they make now is small by comparison to a Motorola brick. Anyhoo, these large tablets make nice desk phones and they work fine with a bluetooth headset.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    4. Re:Weird that people think that way by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      He might want to buy a bluetooth headset. Then he can read the numbers he is dialling AND hear the calls.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  24. Why the obsession with thinness? by jeremymiles · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't care how thin it is, I want a bigger battery.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:Why the obsession with thinness? by maroberts · · Score: 2

      Me too!

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    2. Re:Why the obsession with thinness? by DamageLabs · · Score: 1
    3. Re: Why the obsession with thinness? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Why not a thin phone with a more power efficient OS?

  25. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    And have a phone constantly reminding the self-conscious user that it's thicker than his penis/her cup?

    C'mon, that's not going to happen.

  26. Its not the size that matters by vlad30 · · Score: 1

    Its how you use it !

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  27. HELLO!! by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I'M IN A LIBRARY!!! :-)

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  28. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by luther349 · · Score: 2

    not a problem man i seen huge battery's made for most phones that you can buy with a replacement backing.my buddy has one and he said he said it goes for days without charge. you will need a rooted phone so reset some power settings so it takes full advantage of the large battery.

  29. Canon saw this coming years ago... by Mirar · · Score: 1

    ...you can just see that in this old commerical (Swedish):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YKbb_AZysE&list=PL297D4F38934324C9

    "In the future everything is bigger".

  30. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have to say I agree. Give me a thicker phone with twice the battery and four times the horsepower plox.

  31. Galaxy needs a redesign by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have an S3 and have seen the S4. Instead of just making the thing bigger, then bigger, I think Samsung should focus on quality and usability. It's almost like they design it w/a computer but never do a physical mock-up to see how usable the units are.

    Button placement is just bad: the power button is opposite the volume rocker, so when you (awkwardly) shut it off w/the side button, the tendency is to cancel out the button press by hitting the volume rocker. Dumb. The 4 words I utter most often when using my S3: "F&^%ing P.O.S."

    Too thin. Way too thin. Very awkward to hold when talking on it. Double the thickness and use it for a better battery and use some better materials (aluminum).

    Cheap, plastic-y look and feel. This is again, really bad. Just looks and feels cheap, especially compared to the newer iPhones and HTC One. You're charging us a small fortune for these things; how about spending more than 2 cents on the case?

    Come on Samsung, this isn't rocket science...

    1. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      very few people use their iphones without protection. iphones could just as well be plastic.. plastic isn't viewed as bad for long term use by consumers, for example you bought it still.

      I just wish I could find a decent android in the shame candybar touch form factor as 5800 xpressmusic was in. a bit thicker and a smaller screen - and a toggle slider for screen on/off, which all androids seem to miss(and windows phones for that matter even from nokia).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the typical Samsung way - they make a product based on the competition, and then start throwing features into it whether they make sense or not, as well as going with traditional product think like 'well if 4" screens were good, then 5" screens must be better, because it's a whole extra inch!'

      They then flood the market, and see what gets traction.

      Posting anonymously because someone will think this is somehow a Samsung-bashing post, when it isn't. It's just what they do, and it works. It may not be the most efficient way, but it's an effective way.

    3. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Am I the only one who thinks it's in fact you that's the problem? You didn't like the S3, saying it's too thin, has a bad battery, and poor button placement, then go on to slate the next iteration of that handset? Dude, take your experience and learn from it; Don't look at buying a Samsung Sx next time. There are hundreds of Android phones available. Hell, the Nexus 4 is half the price, just as capable, and not bound to a network contract.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by dfghjk · · Score: 0

      "very few people use their iphones without protection. iphones could just as well be plastic.. plastic isn't viewed as bad for long term use by consumers, for example you bought it still."

      That's some great logic there...you bought so it must be good. I once bought lunch at McDonalds too.

      People put iPhones in cases for emotional and personal reasons. The iPhone is also too small and too thin for many to hold comfortably. So yes, the iPhone *could* be plastic but that doesn't mean the S3/S4 *should* be plastic. Fewer S3/S4 users use cases. Different product, different perception.

      Phones should either be designed to take a case or their materials should be high enough quality to stand alone. Neither the iPhone nor the S3/S4 get this exactly right.

    5. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish I could find a decent android in the shame candybar touch form factor as 5800 xpressmusic was in. a bit thicker and a smaller screen - and a toggle slider for screen on/off, which all androids seem to miss(and windows phones for that matter even from nokia).

      As somebody who is still using their 5800, I agree that it has a very functional form for many users. However, the size of the screen does limit some of the functionality of the phone as compared to its more current rivals and this makes it less appealing to the high-value (to be differentiated from high-income) customers. Since getting my 5800 4-5 years ago, I've used a handful of blackberries (great for responding to emails, good-but-not-so-great for phone calls, and meh for everything else), a hand-me-down iPhone, and a couple candybar dumbphones (which I was unable to find any with decent call quality), but I keep on coming back to the 5800. The combination of built-in GPS, plethora of connectivity features (e.g. traditional voice & video cell towers, SIP, Skype video chat, &c.) continues to challenge contemporary cell phones, and I'm able to use it on discounted phone plans because I'm not leveraging 2-year contracts to subsidise the phone. Since it still works, I have very little incentive to pay more for a new phone.

    6. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on the physical buttons (galaxy note 2). I turned on/off my phone unexpectedly way too often, sometimes even rebooting it mid-call.

      However, I like the plastic case. There is nothing wrong with plastic, it is light and strong. And I won't trade that user replaceable samsung back cover with anything these new aluminium phones have.
      Want your S3 thicker with a better battery : just get an extended battery kit and clip it in. Something you can't do with iPhones and HTC Ones.

    7. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything that was said here. I have been using the GS3 for quite some time:

      Pros:
      1. Spectacular screen
      2. Amazingly fast (coming from my iPhone 4S anyway... by today's standards I guess it's just average)

      Cons:
      1. Industrial design is just plain awful. It doesn't NEED to be this thin! I could barely use it without adding a case: too thin, terrible button placement, terrible button quality, too big for comfortable one-handed use (reaching the bottom left corner while using it right handed is near impossible).
      2. Battery life is total crap.
      3. Camera focus is schizophrenic, especially when using the flash
      4. Stock Samsung keyboard is quite possibly the worst piece of software ever written (I'm only exaggerating slightly)
      5. More software stability issues than iOS (sample size of one): Prior OS release I had a 100% repeatable but where copying some text to the clipboard would cause the entire OS to crash reset, with the latest update released by AT&T, it only happens some of the time; Still have the alternate keyboard bug at startup (need to manually switch back to SwiftKey every time I reset the phone). Yes I know that this is as much the carrier's fault as it is Samsung + Google's, but the fact is that I have to deal with it and neither Google nor Samsung bothered to force the issue with the carriers the way that Apple did... the end result is frustration for the end users.
      6. This is really an extension of #1 above, but they have a SIGNIFICANT issue with screen breakage on the GS3s, this is likely down to their insane quest to make the phone thin thin thin, and therefore they don't have proper support for the screen. I believe that certain cases (which are required to make the phone usable) exacerbate the problem by putting the screen under tension such that any mild impact results in the screen cracking.

    8. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by martinQblank · · Score: 1

      I have the S3 as well. If slimness and battery life are a concern, consider the Mophie case. Doubles as a case and back-up battery system. I hear you on the power/volume buttons though. I often inadvertently change the volume settings.

    9. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Except people buy cases for their iPhones that are made out of the same material as the S3/S4. People have come to the misconception that plastic = weak. Then they wrap their expensive iPhones in plastic to stop them from breaking. Good plastics are great materials for products in high stress environments.

    10. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by green1 · · Score: 1

      I have a Note II and my wife has the S4. most of the usability is pretty good, but they'd be hard pressed to find a worse design for the power button.
      Coming from a Motorola Milestone with the power button on the top edge and just slightly countersunk the power button on the Samsung devices is such an obviously stupid design. I never once bumped the power button on the Milestone accidentally, and it was still easy to hit when wanted, but on the Note I'm constantly hitting it when I don't want to, or hitting the volume buttons at the same time. I'm also not a fan of the hidden menu and back buttons, sure you get used to them, but there's no reason they couldn't be visible a little bit when not backlit.

    11. Re:Galaxy needs a redesign by thisisnotreal · · Score: 1

      thanks for the mophie reference. i hadn't seen that before..

  32. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you're on verizon, Motorola makes two current gen phones that fit this description. Razr M and Razr HD. Both have exceptional battery live, and the HD Maxx has ridiculous battery life. Let's just hope the multi-carrier moto-X follows the same pattern.

  33. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you.
    Get a ZeroLemon battery for the Galaxy S4 or S3. 4 days of battery life and it has the added bonus of handling better because it's thicker.

  34. Next: Super Duper Hyper by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    7-11 noticed they could just make a bigger cup and people would buy it, in a process without end.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  35. budget phones from Samsung by strstr · · Score: 1

    in other news, these are budget versions of the Galaxy S4 series and Galaxy Note series. note the price, the LCD instead of super amoled screen, and the dual core instead of quad core. and apparently cheaper chipset on the phone (only HSPA+ 21, vs 42). no other details about the phones.

    the Galaxy S4 is maxed out, nicest hardware you can get. just, not in a large size like this budget big phone. The Galaxy Note 2 is nearly as large, but has Super AMOLED screen, and quad core.

  36. ghetto blaster by joss · · Score: 1

    We've been through this a few times. Once upon a time portable stereos were cool, they made them as small as possible. Then people realised the really tiny ones sounded like shit so they got bigger, and bigger until 'portable' needed quotes.

    Being quite anti-mobile I'm quite keen on this new trend as quite a few people who use them run out of battery so often they end up giving up and getting over their mobile phone habit so you can engage them in conversation again. It's progress.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  37. Meanwhile Apple... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    is not aware that phone size is anything worth fighting about. (I still think they should build phone capability into the iPad Mini).

    1. Re:Meanwhile Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main driving force with larger phones is people who want to buy a big phone instead of a phone and a tablet. Apple wants you to buy both a phone and a tablet, so they don't have much incentive to play the bigger phone race, nor to make their tablets also phones.

    2. Re:Meanwhile Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite what whackos tend to believe, the phablet market is quite small. According to Google the 4.5"+ market captured just 10%. 90% of all smartphones are small than 4.5". Tech forums have little in common with the real world.

  38. Bad analogies by sjbe · · Score: 0

    Well... my 6.1" screen is to a 4" screen what a 23" is to a 15" on the desktop. Would you go back to a 15" on your desk ?

    Haven't figured out a way to get a 23" screen in my pocket yet.

    Seriously, were you trying to come up with the least relevant analogy possible?

    1. Re:Bad analogies by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      wha? His analogy was exactly correct, even the ratios are almost exact. 15/23 vs 4/6.3. By math alone, he basically made your analogy comment incorrect.

      I'm not suggesting a 6.1" screen - I think it's too big to hold, but I will say that the 4.7" HTC one (larger than my previous HTC rezound/SGS/droid/razr) is visually a lot better than the 4" and smaller preceding phones, as referenced. However, even 4.7 is hard enough to use with one hand, which is a staple of most mobile devices - 6.1" would make that a guarantee in that it would be impossible to do so.

      Once you have a larger size phone, it's really, really hard to go back. The difference in UI real estate and functionality is substantial.

      Your nonsequitur, however, is not accurate. Nobody is implying you're putting a 23" monitor in your pocket, dumbass.

    2. Re:Bad analogies by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      wha? His analogy was exactly correct, even the ratios are almost exact. 15/23 vs 4/6.3. By math alone, he basically made your analogy comment incorrect.

      GP wasn't criticizing the poster's math, but the fact that his analogy completely ignores the different use cases between desktop monitors and cell phones/portable electronics. A 15" monitor is a large step backward from 23", yes, but a 6 and a half inch phone is a step backward in portability.

    3. Re:Bad analogies by fnj · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting a 6.1" screen - I think it's too big to hold

      The diagonal size of the screen is completely irrelevant to whether you can hold it conveniently. The width of the larger of the two phones is 88mm (3.46"). If that's too wide to hold, you must have the hands of the Gerber baby-food baby.

    4. Re:Bad analogies by nightcats · · Score: 1

      Settle down kids, this product is almost certainly designed primarily for a demographic that is the elephant in the room of western culture. Here in America we call them Baby Boomers; you may look down your nose and merely say, "ugh, the OLD." They will go away, children, but not as fast as you or our youth-obsessed culture may like. Be that as it may, aging eyes and fingers need devices that accommodate them and their compromised functionality. And thanks to 401k's and Social Security, their little plastic cards are just as or more valuable and profitable than those held by Gen-x, y, or z. Currently, Madison Ave. continues to treat us as Gen-ZZZ -- they sell us sleeping pills and Depends. Perhaps Samsung will bow to that culture and call these the "GetOffMyLawn Phones".

      --
      Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
    5. Re:Bad analogies by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand phone sizes. Too big to hold is referring to functionality not "can you put it in your hand". The question is, can you palm a basketball? if so, this phone is fine. If you can't? I'd be guaranteeing that this phone is probably too big for one hand thumb operation.
        So while I'm sure you can support a device of any size in your hand beyond what is reasonable, whether you can operate it 1 handed is another story altogether. Phone have been getting wider and wider, although apparently you think only people with enormous hands pick up phones or something.

      However, not everyone can comfortably hold a 3.46" wide phone that is 6 inches high, as that begins to get unwieldy. It's not a "simply incapable" issue. The previous generation of phones was around 65mm wide (~2.5 inches) - So that is a pretty significant difference.

    6. Re:Bad analogies by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      If you are over 40, a large size may avoid the need to wear glasses to read ebooks on it. Or even text messages. (or use the command line :-) Being able to read the screen may be more important than holding it in one hand.

      Not everyone is a teenager.

      Lawn: off!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:Bad analogies by green1 · · Score: 1

      It's not always about bigger print, I get a big screen with smaller print so I can scroll less.

    8. Re:Bad analogies by bdwebb · · Score: 1
      Not to everyone. As another commenter posted already, the back pocket works perfectly for his Nexus tablet:

      I'm 5'9" and I wear almost nothing but jeans and jean shorts most days. I don't wear skin-tight jeans, but neither am I wearing "fat guy" jeans... they fit "right" in my eyes: no struggle to button, but they're far from cargo pants territory.

      My Nexus 7 TABLET fits in the BACK POCKET of my pants without struggling to get it in and out. It's actually comfortable there (aside from the weight, which is a bit much and tries to pull my pants down). Now, yes, that's only true if I'm standing up... sitting ain't happening... this "phone" (phablet I guess is the term they invented?) should fit just as well as it's smaller.

      I'm a large guy at 6'1" and I also wear comfortable clothing...I currently own a Note II and it will be nigh impossible for me to ever go back to a screen size that is not at least comparable to this one. Larger than the 5.5" that my phone currently offers may be pushing it but for some who use their back pocket or for women who don't store their phone in a pocket, I can see this being extremely useful. For example, my mother is getting older and has difficulty seeing the keyboard on smaller phones so she purchased a Note II and she loves it. She can use it somewhat like a tablet while also easily being able to type, call people, etc.

      All I'm pointing out is that for many people, portability is a non-issue and functionality becomes the most critical aspect of their purchase. To each his/her own.

    9. Re:Bad analogies by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      fits in pocket - check (it's actually only about 1cm longer than my 5.1" Note, not wider, a bit thicker)
      fits in hand - check
      thumb-navigable - 80%:
      - I can reach a tad less than half the screen while holding it securely one handed; and that's the area of the screen where most interaction goes on: typing, scrolling dialing...
      - I can reach the whole screen one-handed while.. not... holding it securely
      - I do have 2 hands, so having to occasionally use the second one is not a catastrophe. My nose is going a bit more unpicked, though.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    10. Re:Bad analogies by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      I'd never put my phone in my back pocket, for fear of sitting on it. It does in the front, and nobody ever noticed it. And no, it's not being overshadowed nor given extra rooms by having an overly large or tiny neighbour.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  39. Just Remember... by BlogTheHaggis · · Score: 1

    ... It's not the size that counts. It's how you use it...

  40. Nothing new by pahles · · Score: 1

    Seen them here in the Netherlands over a month ago...

    --
    Sig?
  41. the phones, they are a-changin' by Biosci777 · · Score: 1

    It was not so long ago that phones were shrinking over time, to the point people were asking how small they could get and still be useful. Now we're facing the *opposite* issue! What I think is happening is actually: phones and computers continue to shrink, so we've merged them. However, we want bigger and bigger screens (as other posters have mentioned). That's the only reason for the increased sizes.

  42. Too Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got a Galaxy S4. It's great, except... IT'S TOO BIG for a phone that goes in your pocket! IT'S TOO BIG to hold against your head when speaking on the phone.

    It's a fantastic mini computer or internet terminal. Its physical dimensions make it a poor portable phone.

  43. Impressive featues, except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who finds it super annoying all these "high end phones" are still being shipped with the almost decade and a half old tech??? Come one, switch to USB 3.0 for #$%^ sakes.

  44. Sidetalking? by c · · Score: 1

    That meme pretty much bit the dust with the advent of decent bluetooth (or even wired) headsets, or integrated vehicle sets.

    If a device is too big to hold comfortably to the ear, you're pretty much an idiot (or, to be redundant, a hipster) to stand there holding it that way if there's a better solution.

    At this point, the only significant difference between "tablet" and "phone" should come down to pocketability and how well you can hold it.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
    1. Re:Sidetalking? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      If a device is too big to hold comfortably to the ear, you're pretty much an idiot (or, to be redundant, a hipster) to stand there holding it that way if there's a better solution.

      How many people actually make calls nowadays anyway? Other than old people.

      I'm actually old from a Slashdotter perspective, but even for me - my last month usage report showed I used a grand total 20 minutes call time... and that was a higher than average month! I'm texting and/or using data most of the time when I've got my phone out.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Sidetalking? by c · · Score: 1

      How many people actually make calls nowadays anyway?

      For personal use, I'd wager not too many.

      I'm texting and/or using data most of the time when I've got my phone out.

      I don't have a landline, and my personal cell gets maybe 10-15 minutes per month of calls.

      My work phone, on the other hand, probably racks up a few hours a month. I telecommute a couple days a week, and while I use data for most communications I still have conference calls and other discussions. Eventually that stuff might go to VoIP or something, but we're not there yet.

      And yes, I use a headset most of the time. My work cell is, ironically, a bit too small to hold comfortably for the length of a call.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  45. i know now by beefoot · · Score: 1

    I always thought that these stupid 5" or 6" smart "phones" are WAY too big for anyone's hands until my latest oversea visit. I saw lots of young girls carrying these monster phones using them as if they are tablet pc. I only saw a girl making phone call on it using a head phone. That stroke me that these "phones" are too big, it is the i-what-pad or any other 10" tablet pc is WAY TOO BIG for these people.

  46. Oh I can hear it now by cjjjer · · Score: 1

    Cue the "well, my cellphone screen is bigger than your dick!" comments from scorned women.

    1. Re:Oh I can hear it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testing

    2. Re:Oh I can hear it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sire you haven't heard that already from iOS users?

  47. PLASTIC! by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    "...durable polycarbonate body..."

    I am sorry, but why are we using terms like this here? Unless this is just an ad...
    Saying something has a plastic case probably doesn't sound as good as a "durable polycarbonate body"... Obvious and stupid.

    Anyway, the only problem I see with a 6.3 inch smart phone is this:

    The only problem with the S3 and it's 4.7 inch screen, or likely the S4 and it's 5 inch screen is the battery.
    No matter how you slice it, back lighting and running a screen that big chows down on battery life. One of the only gripes I have with my S3, is that if you actually use it, the battery life is pretty terrible as that screen sucks down all the battery energy in no time flat. Unless they have come up with some super low powered screen, or some transcending battery technology that somehow solves this issue (which I truly doubt they have), you are inherently building a flawed device from day 1. Enjoy your 6 inch cellphone that has a battery life of 2 hours.

    1. Re:PLASTIC! by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      It is a response to mass confusion led by the marketing of other products. I agree it shouldn't be necessary here but read through the comments. People believe that the Galaxy products are built flimsy and poorly because they're made of "plastic".

    2. Re:PLASTIC! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Except with added width and height you have added space for bigger lithium cells. The two cancel out. Just like tablets have bigger batteries (width and height not necessarily depth) there's no reason to believe that a larger phone will be any lower battery life than the current one.

      I've had a Galaxy S (1500mAh battery), my girlfriend had an S2 (1850mAh) followed by an S3 (2100mAh) and I'm now on an S4 (2600mAh). My sister has a Note (3100mAh). All of them seem to have quite comparable battery life yet each phone and battery are larger than the previous model, and in the case of the S series, each one is thinner too.

    3. Re:PLASTIC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because polycarbonate is a specific type of plastic, just like aluminum is a specific type of metal. Polycarbonate is very strong, stronger than metal. Polycarbonate is what they make unbreakable glasses out of. You wouldn't want a phone made out of aluminum right? You would want magnesium or titanium or something if you needed it more rugged. You can run over polycarbonate with your car and it still won't break. That's an improvement over whatever other kind of plastic they were using before.

  48. Convergence by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    This is convergence of Phones, Computers and Self Defense Weaponry. Hitting someone with these phones would probably cause a concussion.

  49. Padhole by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Don't be a Padhole

  50. As I keep telling my wife... by shikaisi · · Score: 1

    ... 6.3 inches ought to be enough for anybody.

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
  51. I own a tablet. My next phone will be smaller. by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    At the beginning of my current Sprint contract I got a Galaxy SII. It's been a good phone, no complaints. But durring this time I also picked up my first tablet (Asus Transformer Infinity) and I now find I've backed way off on the smart functions and apps on my phone.

    I think at this point I'd be happier with a smaller device that acted as a solid 4G LTE hotspot to my tablet (and a new carrier because Sprint lied through their teeth about 4G deployment in my area)

  52. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The HD Maxx is a great idea, but there's one major issue: I couldn't live with myself if I bought a product called "HD Razr Maxx."

  53. Re: Ridiculous - MPU +1 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up pls

  54. not just width that matters by Chirs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I think that if you can touch the entire surface of the screen with your thumb while holding the device in one hand then it's still useful as a phone. If not, then it's essentially a tablet.

    1. Re:not just width that matters by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I agree - this is to a degree what 3.5" wide phones basically end up as - they are too big for thumbwork.

    2. Re:not just width that matters by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Problem there of course is that standard varies from person to person. An ipad mini would count as a phone to some people.

  55. "plastic" is meaningless by Chirs · · Score: 1

    "polycarbonate" actually means something. "plastic" could be anything from low density polyethylene to Kevlar

  56. next year by Frontier+Owner · · Score: 1

    We return to the '80 when every one walked around with giant boom boxes on their shoulder. The difference is we will now be carrying cell phones.

  57. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're on verizon, Motorola makes two current gen phones that fit this description. Razr M and Razr HD. Both have exceptional battery live, and the HD Maxx has ridiculous battery life. Let's just hope the multi-carrier moto-X follows the same pattern.

    The fact that phones actually called "Razr" are the ones that less resemble a razor blade seems to reenforce the GP's point IMO.

  58. Impossible to fit in a pocket? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    C'mon man, get with the times and the JNCOs and PACOs!

    Hell, those pants can fit a fucking VCR in the back pocket.

    When I was a bad teen (back in the 90s,) we'd wear those to steal stuff like laptops from the mall. Those running display laptops were prime targets. Pick it up (advertised 'feel how light it is') pop it closed and slip into our back pocket, and walk out. You couldn't tel if we even had anything because you were too busy looking at our feet to see if they actually moved (since the legs in those pants were so damned big it looked like you weren't walking at all unless you were a tall person with a long gait.)

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  59. 6.3 by freeasinrealale · · Score: 1

    Doesn't microscrooge have a patent on 6.3?

    --
    A man spends the first half of his life accumulating stuff, the second trying to get rid of it all.
  60. Re:I want a THICK phone with more BATTERY goddamni by yurtinus · · Score: 1

    Can somebody mod this guy "insightful" ?

    --
    +1 Disagree
  61. Business as performance art by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    New from Samsung... the GALAXY MEGA!

    *drops mike and walks offstage*

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  62. Who cares about one-handed use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is everyone so concerned with one-handed people? They probably make up less than 20% of the population, so who cares?

  63. I predict: Tablet market will dwindle by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    I have a 7" Android Tablet that I used to use heavily. I had a Moto Droid 2 smartphone that was nice, but the bigger screen of the tablet was enough of a draw that I'd use the tablet a fair amount for personal browsing.

    That all changed when I got my new phone, a Moto Razr Maxx HD. The screen is bigger and sharper than the Droid 2, just enough that the relative usability of the tablet almost disappears, and the fact that my phone already has all "my" stuff on it from earlier today is more of a draw.

    My 7" tablet has been charged and ready to go for months, but I haven't picked it up even once since.

    There's a balance; I think the Galaxy Note is too big, but I think that the Razr Maxx could be just a few bits bigger. If the Galaxy S3/S4 had the battery life of the Razr, I'd probably bite. However, the battery life of the Razr Maxx is so ridiculously awesome, (especially when traveling) I'd never want to give that up!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  64. Multiple devices with the same phone number by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Instead of trying to decide on "one" device for a phone and debating whether the tablet-like screen size is more valuable than phone-sized portability and ergonomics, the debate should be about why I can't get my "cell" phone number to work on more than one device.

    I can (sort of) see why cellular networks may not "work" with two or more devices with the same number, but with VoIP this really ought not be a limitation for secondary and tertiary devices.

    If AT&T could make my phone work on whatever device I had (iPhone, iPad(s), even PC) then it wouldn't matter what size device I had. If I wanted easy portability and good ergonomics, I'd take my iPhone. If I wanted a bigger screen but mostly good portability, I'd take my iPad mini and possibly a bluetooth headset or headphones for taking calls. And so on.

    Basically, screen size doesn't have to be a permanent choice, it can be a "What works best today?" choice.

    I don't see where this hurts anybody -- I certainly wouldn't buy an iPad over an iPhone and an iPad because I could make calls on my iPad, and it's not like cell phone companies aren't looking for Yet Another Thing to charge you for.

    1. Re:Multiple devices with the same phone number by green1 · · Score: 1

      If you're choosing which device you want to take with you, and you use a reasonable carrier you can already do that, take whichever device you want, put your SIM chip in it, and go.

    2. Re:Multiple devices with the same phone number by swb · · Score: 1

      Well, if the device has phone capability.

      I don't know but I think even the cellular capable iPads don't have enough hardware to do voice calls, but no matter, even if they do (and I suspect they do) they lack the software for voice calling, and I'm sure that's true of most tablets generally unless they were specially meant to be Phablets.

    3. Re:Multiple devices with the same phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cellular networks can work with two devices on the same number. My sister had this option with one SIM in her phone and the other in her car, whenever the car was switched on the incoming calls would be routed to the car, otherwise her phone got the calls. That is until her work switched networks and the network they switched to didn't support this functionality.

      So the technology to do this (at least on GSM networks) has been around for years, just so long as the network operator is willing to support it.

    4. Re:Multiple devices with the same phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O2 actually have an Android app for this, letting you have your mobile number on up to 5 devices.

  65. Sony will one up them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sonymobile.com/gb/products/phones/xperia-z-ultra/

    a tad bigger with the same IPX rating as the previous Z as well.

  66. Just when things are getting smaller by toddbanng · · Score: 1

    Too bad for Samsung, since most tech articles are stating that manufacturers are planning to go small again -that the current "SUPER SIZED" effort isn't doing anything - and pointing to sales numbers of Samsung levelling off in the super sized screen category. Great news - because a 6.x" screen on a phone is RIDICULOUS!!! and is now no longer a functional phone (let me hold my netbook up to my ear - how does it look?) Stupid is as stupid does - as long as the stupid buyer bears it