Slashdot Mirror


FBI Pressures Internet Providers To Install Surveillance Software

An anonymous reader sends this quote from an article at CNet: "The U.S. government is quietly pressuring telecommunications providers to install eavesdropping technology deep inside companies' internal networks to facilitate surveillance efforts. FBI officials have been sparring with carriers, a process that has on occasion included threats of contempt of court, in a bid to deploy government-provided software capable of intercepting and analyzing entire communications streams. The FBI's legal position during these discussions is that the software's real-time interception of metadata is authorized under the Patriot Act. Attempts by the FBI to install what it internally refers to as 'port reader' software, which have not been previously disclosed, were described to CNET in interviews over the last few weeks. One former government official said the software used to be known internally as the 'harvesting program.'"

59 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. ENOUGH ALREADY! by xystren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since I have nothing to hide, YOU have no reason to look!

    How about we pull a reversal and be permitted to monitor the FBI, NSA and CIA own internal network? All in the name of the constitution to ensure they are not overstepping their mandates and/or boundaries.

    I wonder how well that would go over with them?

    1. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow! That's the best response I've heard so far in this whole debate. Let us monitor those that monitor us. Great idea! Seriously...this is not sarcasm. And if they try and use encryption to hide what they are doing we pay them a SWAT team visit. ;-)

    2. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably not at all. People by definition assume others are like they are, and when they themselves are crooks and lying bastards who wouldn't allow them to exist if they had a choice, they assume that others are just like that. Combine that with the psychological need to overcompensate and you're set.

      That works for governments as well as it does for superiors in the work place. The more he assumes that you're a slacker, the more likely he is one himself. The more he wants to "measure" your progress, the more likely he himself has nothing to show.

      And the more a politician goes on about the importance of "family values" and "morals", the more likely he's cheating on his wife with some 12 year old boy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sheldon, shut up.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by kheldan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The word we're looking for here, I think, is "oversight"
      This is still supposed to be government "by the people, for the people" so there should be direct citizen oversight of the NSA, CIA, FBI, military intelligence, and any other alphabet-soup agencies within the government, preferably standing there with a big, heavy hardwood yardstick, ready to smack down hard on the knuckles of anyone of these goddamned spooks getting too nosy into what other honest, hardworking, tax-paying citizens are up to in their normal, everyday, absolutely non-terrorist lives. Of course the problem with that, is that the people involved in the oversight are going to be human beings, full of the same flaws that all other human beings are full of, and that's quite a powerful position to be in. No, I think maybe the best solution here is to have citizen oversight into the complete and total dismantlement of these surveillance networks, and make them go back to the good old days of actually doing "police work" to track down so-called "terrorists" and other wrong-doers, instead of using "protecting America" as an excuse for their blatant spying on everyone. The United States of America is not supposed to be a goddamned prison for it's citizens, where we're under armed guard 24 hours a day/365 days a year by those that are supposed to be serving us, and if these intelligence community jackasses don't like it, then they can all go to hell.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    5. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Black+LED · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a lot to hide. That doesn't mean any of it is illegal.

    6. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Guilty until proven innocent. It's the new American way!

    7. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Informative

      And even if most/all of what you have to hide is illegal, GET A WARRANT!

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Seumas · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, for fuck's sake. It's not like the entire government is out to get people. It's only the FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, Police/SWAT, and the Executive office.

    9. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Most people seem to never mature. They just get older.

    10. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by jbolden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Up until recently the civilian population strongly supported aggressive anti-terrorism efforts. Were their civilian oversight it would have looked like what congressional oversight has. Now the civilian population is more evenly divided, but they still aren't strongly pro-freedom.

    11. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by BlueStrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And even if most/all of what you have to hide is illegal, GET A WARRANT!

      USGOV: "We DID get warrants! We made up an extra-Constitutional, secret-decoder-ring-court out of whole cloth, and it gave us warrants for everything, everyone, and everywhere at any time. See? All "legal"!"

      Off-topic, but just out of curiosity, I wonder how many government/TLA big-wigs and/or their families drive "remotely-hackable" cars that could be made to "Michael Hastings" someone? Might be worth looking into.

      TLAs and other nosy government types need to remember that this shiny tech they abuse is double-edged. We citizens can maliciously hack and do drones, too...and on a scale that's orders-of-magnitude larger.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    12. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by classiclantern · · Score: 2

      Well there's your problem. There are NEVER enough laws. When all the good laws have been passed do the politicians stop making laws. Nope. They just continue making bad laws.

      --
      Now that I said that, I fell better.
  2. I wonder when.. by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder when this whole top heavy mess in washington will come crashing down.. They don't need to worry about 'terrorists', foreign or 'home grown'. Their own self destructive behavior will do them all in first...and drag the rest of us citizens down with them.

    1. Re:I wonder when.. by geekymachoman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What self destruction ? It seems to me 'they' have a plan for a long time now and it's working out quite well, even with negative publicity.

      What's gonna change ? The president. .. ? So what ... the president is a spokesman for somebody, and this ain't tin foil shit, it's obvious to everybody but naive.
      Especially if you're looking at America from outside.

    2. Re:I wonder when.. by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmm... considering that Bin Laden's goal was (allegedly) the destabilization of the USA along with its bankruptcy... Damn that guy was a strategy genius. And one in psychological warfare, too.

      That bastard really accomplished all his goals for this war. He read his enemies like an open book and played them like a violin.

      That, ladies and gentlemen, is genius. I don't like him or the development any more than any other sane person, but you have to admire that, whether you like it or not. He knew the weak spot of the US is the combination of greedy leaders and fearful followers, mixed with an industry ready, willing and able to exploit both, and he knew how to use that to his own goals.

      Brilliant. But why does brilliance in leaders always come packaged with being a complete asshole?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:I wonder when.. by Coditor · · Score: 2

      Plus we still have no actual proof that he was killed. He might have already been dead long ago, or maybe he showed up at his funeral in a wig.

    4. Re:I wonder when.. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As much as I'd like to support your conspiracy theory, I think you overstate the ability of the US government.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:I wonder when.. by craigminah · · Score: 2

      Yeah...kind of funny how the "killing of Bin Laden" went down...no proof whatsoever he's actually dead.

    6. Re:I wonder when.. by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God dammit, you retarded sack of monkey shit. If there was any possibility of bin Laden being other than dead, it would destabilize the entire US of A to the point of people actually revolting.

      The amount of outrage people felt for him was enough to give up civil liberties continuously for a decade, and feel good about it. If, 20 years from now, bin Laden poked his head out from under a rock and gave an interview, or said a word, or farted, the American people would riot in the streets. The coverage of his killing (alleged, for your sake) was so complete and his death was so final that any variation from the truth would be more outrageous than failure to capture him.

      There is only one thing at this time that would unite the American people to overthrow the government, and that is bin Laden being alive. Nothing threatens the life of a soccer mom - financial crises, food chain shortages, coastal real estate being lost - nothing that she would give up the SUV and life of relative luxury, other than bin Laden being alive.

      Take every violation of the constitution, put it in one place, and soccer mom says "if it helps keep the terrorists away, I'm all for it." Do you know what the opposite of that is? Literally the one thing that is the complete antithesis to every justification anyone anywhere has put forth for anything done since 2001?

      Keeping the terrorists not only the opposite of "away", but alive. Lying about having killed him, and having him turn up somewhere on a video with a newspaper dated today. The SINGLE thing that could turn America into a rioting cesspool of VERY angry people, and you think that somehow the government thought it would be a good idea to lie about THAT?

      If he turned up somewhere, it would defeat every justification, every court decision, every individual's belief that the government is doing things for the people. Not just that they lied - that happens all the time and no one bats an eye. But they lied about the number one terrorist in the world - the one person who can scare every average person just by appearing on TV - being killed. Not by some random ass clown in a desert, but by America's most elite using America's latest technology. A fucking stealth-coptor dropped out of the sky and put an end to America's long national nightmare.

      And you think not just a few people but every person on record so far would be stupid enough to lie about it? I am all for caution, and have repeatedly posted such. But this is completely, unforgivably ignorant to even mention.

      I can go with you on the long thought train to thermite and faked moon landings and the grassy knoll and whatever other lunacy you want to repeat. But this is simply knee-jerk contrarianism.

      "What if it were true"? What if 9/11 was an inside job? Patriot act. What if there was more than a lone gunman? Plenty. What if the moon was faked? We beat Russia. What if everything Snowden leaked was true? Assumptions confirmed.

      What if bin Laden were alive? What purpose would that serve? A political boost for Obama, to give him an easy ride to a second term? We can eliminate every Republican ever, and every closeted racist as beneficiaries. Who has anything at all to gain? No one has ever justified anything by saying "It helped us get bin Laden". No secret court, spy program, political organization has ever seen benefit. There is nothing to gain, and everything to lose. Americans had forgotten about him nearly completely, and if he disappeared into the sunset few would have noticed other than Bush haters who liked to point out the shift from "number one priority" to "not a priority".

      Do you still think it is even a possibility that this did not happen?

    7. Re:I wonder when.. by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the small group of people who write checks with seven or eight zeros to the left of the decimal place to both parties. You don't write checks that size to buy common sense. That shit's free.

      Examples: the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which states:

      SEC. 322. HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.
      Paragraph (1) of section 1421(d) of the Safe Drinking Water
      Act (42 U.S.C. 300h(d)) is amended to read as follows:
      ‘‘(1) UNDERGROUND INJECTION .—The term ‘underground injection’—
      ‘‘(A) means the subsurface emplacement of fluids by
      well injection; and
      ‘‘(B) excludes—
      ‘‘(i) the underground injection of natural gas for
      purposes of storage; and
      ‘‘(ii) the underground injection of fluids or propping
      agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic
      fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal
      production activities.’’
      .(emphasis added)

      Energy companies make billions pumping natural gas, but those pesky things like the Clean Water Act get in the way of injecting hydraulic chemicals into the ground. It sure is good Congess employed common sense to pass legislation exempting "underground injection of fluids" from laws regulating "underground injection." Wait, that's not common sense...why else would they...?

      Example 2: H-1B visas to "solve" the phony STEM shortage so the most profitable companies in America can drive down wages for tech workers. That is not in the interests of the American people.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  3. Don't you think it's a little late now? by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has been A LONG time coming. Decades of mission creep, no one complains. But now that it's come back to bite us in the Gluteus maximus, we're all surprised? Personally, I love the idea that it's happening. Sure, I'll probably be one of the ones tortured and jailed for no other reason than "suspicious activity". And I'm not looking forward to that bit at all. But people have been screaming at us that this was going to happen. And no one listened. You reap what you sew, etc. As it was stated in the past, When they start coming for you, it's too late to change things.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:Don't you think it's a little late now? by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't imagine why anyone is so indignant about this now. It has been on-going since 1997. THAT was the time to be indignant, not 15 years in.

    2. Re:Don't you think it's a little late now? by DrLang21 · · Score: 2

      Thank you. I remember wigging out about Carnivore back when it first made it to the press and no one else even cared. Not even the most paranoid of my friends.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    3. Re:Don't you think it's a little late now? by Rougement · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, I completely disagree. Snowden provided proof of domestic spying and now the story is blowing up big time and going into all sorts of places. The world is waking up to this, now is the time to be indignant. Just because a few people "knew" 15 years ago, it doesn't mean it's old news for the vast majority of people.

  4. The harvest by puddingebola · · Score: 3, Funny

    The "harvesting program" brought in a bumper crop of civil liberties this year.

    1. Re:The harvest by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Too bad that those civil liberties are considered the pest plants by those harvesting.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All this capability and warnings from Russia, and they still could not stop the Boston bombings. They also could not stop the Detroit shoe bomber.

    1. Re:Incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They needed the Boston bombing to justify the surveillance. They probably let it happen just like they let happen the 9/11 attacks. The peasant need to be reminded time to time that they should be afraid of the terrorist and that the government is there to protect them.

      The only way to win is to not play by their rules. Mock them, laugh at the attack, refuse to condemn violence. Be seditionist, corrupt morals, piss on their gods and tell them to fuck off.

      Being compassionate, supportive and patriotic only strengthen them.

    2. Re:Incompetence by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those are not the target of this surveillance. Their target is the people that could throw out them from power: the citizens.

    3. Re:Incompetence by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's because they look at everything. When you have too broad a search you can't find what you are looking for. The real threats get lost in all the noise.

    4. Re:Incompetence by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you look at history the biggest threat to the citizens of a country is always their own government. No one is more likely to enslave or kill you. The founding father's realized this hence the protections built into the Constitution. Unfortunately the population is too easily manipulated into breaking the chains that keep the monster under control.

    5. Re:Incompetence by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      Be seditionist, corrupt morals, piss on their gods and tell them to fuck off.

      If I piss on their gods all my cash will be wet and stinky.

    6. Re:Incompetence by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      I think it's hard to determine whether Hanlon's Law or mcgrew's law applies here -- never ascribe to incompetence that which can be ascribed to greedy self-interest.

      They didn't show that they needed the surveillance by the bombing, rather they showed the opposite, so I think Heinlein (who Hanlon's law came from) is correct here. But there's no way to be sure without proof one way or another.

      BTW, "who's" is a contraction for "who is". "Whose" is what you meant.

    7. Re:Incompetence by dryeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's only true for the larger more powerful countries. For smaller (population or area) countries with large neighbors the largest threat is usually the neighbor.
      Almost all my life I've considered the largest threat to my freedom (and even my life) to be the United States of America, a country that seems to believe rights only belong to citizens so it's fine to abuse other countries. A country with a long history of oath breaking who can't even follow their own constitution.
      My country was actually created in response to that powerful neighbor at a time when they'd killed millions(?) of their own citizens over a power structure between the individual States and the Federal government.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re: Incompetence by StarFace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you are misunderstanding, or perhaps conflating, the limitations in any system designed to monitor information, and being unable to detect all deliberate actors within that system to foil monitoringâ"with "stupidity". Given how vast the data set is (basically all of social, and even to an extent, natural reality) it is nearly trivial to slip undetected through it, and the burden of detecting not only overt threats but clandestine ones is a problem of incredible complexity, since the resources of any monitoring agency cannot exceed the natural throughput of reality. There will always be more information than can be processed, since processing information is also a system generator.

      To put it simply: one can be extremely intelligent and capable, and even whole groups of like people can gather together and be effective as a unit, and still be utterly awash in the vastness that is the background noise of societal information. It is actually amazing, and a testament to their diligence, that they can get anything done at all.

      But oh no, go on and spout your narrow minded and simplistic essays on how things must be This or That.

      --
      V
    9. Re:Incompetence by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I used to feel that way, until I saw the government reaction to the spying leaks. That's malice.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    10. Re:Incompetence by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Actually, the revolution will be bloodless and quiet. It will, shockingly enough, happen at the ballot box. It will not be televised, but it will be liveblogged.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    11. Re:Incompetence by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2

      Actually, the revolution will be bloodless and quiet. It will, shockingly enough, happen at the ballot box.

      Maybe...but I have serious doubts. Have you seem the re-election rate of the incumbents, despite the record low approval ratings of the President and Congress?

      http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/reelect.php

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_stagnation_in_the_United_States

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    12. Re:Incompetence by XcepticZP · · Score: 2

      You, and people like you, say that every time there is an election.

      It's like an abusive relationship: "But this time it'll be different. He's changed now, he won't hurt me anymore. I know he can change, just if I love him a little more, then he'll change and love me back. Yesterday while he was beating me, I could see a tear in his eye. That must mean he loves me, I know it's somewhere in him... The last time I took him back, I didn't bake the cookies the right way and so he beat me. Today I'll make the cookies just the way he wants it, and we'll change together. Yes, we can, we can change!"

      Really now, get over yourself, and quit fucking things up for the rest of us because you can't say no to an abusive relationship.

    13. Re:Incompetence by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

      Read up on Operation Northwoods. They are not only evil enough to stand by and let them happen, the US government has been evil enough to plan their own terrorist attacks on US soil to try to get Americans to support going to war.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    14. Re:Incompetence by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Couple elections ago in California, the net approval rating of the candidates was just 13%.

      So how many got re-elected?

      100%.

      I think this goes to show that at the ballot box, name-recognition trumps everything else.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  6. List of Those Who Decline - Marketing by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let me know who's declining to install warantless taps and I'll put them on my list of businesses to engage for projects.

    For those wondering, Democracy Now carried the Senate hearing a day or two ago with Senator Lahey grilling the Deputy Director of the NSA, who revealed that of all the S.215 intercepts that have happened since 9/11, he could point to only one terrorist plot that maybe (just maybe) would have happened 'but for' the NSA spying. This is the purported benefit of sacrificing the privacy of three hundred million people.

    I haven't seen this make the mainstream news yet, at least from the links on the aggregators I read. Oh, but since the spying justification is falling apart, there's going to be a terrorist attack on Sunday. :P

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  7. Corporate regime locking in. by boorack · · Score: 2

    With latest revelations going mainstream, we're transitioning from stealth surveillance and oppresive state to overtly oppresive corporate fascist state. How long will it take for government opressions to become mainstream ? US police and security apparatus is already quite oppresive and corrupt (propably the worst in the developed world with the biggest prisoner population in the whole world), yet people tend to ignore this. Opressions from corporate fascist state will become part of everyday life sooner than people expect.

    1. Re:Corporate regime locking in. by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/07/30/198097/for-congress-its-classified-is.html
      ~ weapons to the "freedom fighters" in Syria.
      Welcome to the "It’s classified" world :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Corporate regime locking in. by vettemph · · Score: 2

      Quick, Create a false flag by putting our middle east embassies on high alert. This will quiet most of the resistance!

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  8. Time for politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    to either blow up the patriot act to bits or loose their jobs. Are they for or against the people ? That should be the only matter on the next election agenda.
    looks to me like they're against the people they are " supposed " to serve. If that's not true , how is this a democracy ? Or is it just tyranny under the disguise of democracy ? I mean .. i don't know what's less frustrating. Is it knowing you're screwed like in Russia or living with one's pants down pretending we're not getting screwed ?

    1. Re:Time for politicians by PPH · · Score: 2

      Time for politicians to either blow up the patriot act to bits or loose their jobs.

      A nice thought in theory. But how do you propose organizing support for this initiative. You don't think the NSA is watching for attempts to undermine their operating charter just as earnestly (if not more so) than backpacks and pressure cookers?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  9. So tired of hearing Patroit Act by Guru80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a bogus name given to bogus laws that flies right in the face of everything patriotic. Whenever that damn name is invoked (Patriot Act) it means we are having something taken from us be it rights or privacy.

    1. Re:So tired of hearing Patroit Act by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

      I f the term "Department of Homeland Security" doesn't send shivers up your spine, you haven't read enough.

      Unfortunately it seems that american citizens value their safety more than their freedoms: A decades of cowardice is throwing away the liberties won by centuries of heroism.

      There may be nothing to be done - this may be the result of the democratic process. Just because *I* don't like the results, that doesn't mean that the majority of people agree with me.

  10. President McCain strikes again by Kohath · · Score: 2

    They told me if I voted for John McCain we would see this kind of escalating government abuse. And they were right!

  11. I wish by fullback · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I could move to another planet. I don't like this one anymore. It's too polluted with asshole politicians.

  12. We Never Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People often look back at datelines where fascists thrived (Germany, Cambodia, Spain, etc.) and think, "Wow! How couldthey just sit back and let that happen!"

    Well, ladies and gentlemen, this is how.

    1. Re: We Never Learn by spyfrog · · Score: 2

      Please. The people of Germany where neither uneducated or lived in a military dictatorship. The where one of the worlds best educated people and lived in democracy.

  13. Undernet by GrBear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how long hacks and other enthusiasts get tired of being monitored up the ass before an alternative Internet gets created. Piggy backed on the Internet, but offering true end to end encryption and complete anonymity. I'm not talking TOR with it's limited exit nodes, I'm talking where every person on the 'network' is an exit node. Visiting a website with say a page of 10 images results in a server log of 11 different IP addresses.

  14. First they came... by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    When the target of snooping were foreing citizens all was OK, no reason to complain. Then they started watching "suspicious people", but it was for national security, just a few, is justified. Now is on everyone, specially US citizens, your time to complain has passed already.

    Now wait for the same sequence with drones. Just try to avoid the wrong neighbourhoods

  15. What goes around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it amusing and disturbing that the normal ideals of "what goes around, comes around" strictly does not apply here. If Bradley Manning leaks information, if Edward Snowden tells of systems used for spying (not even the details, just that the programs exist), or if Julian Assange stands behind the information being revealed, then the US government goes all ballistic on them, they are criminals, and enemies, and must be stopped, tortured, killed, sent to a kangaroo court with a secret trial, secret evidence, and millions of years in prison. I thought about Snowden, and what the shadows he has to hide in, and it reminded me of Leon Trotsky (killed by the Russian government in Mexico in 1940). The Patriot Act grants absolute power, and is wide open to absolute corruption, and they cleave to it like a rat pup to its mothers teat. What Orwellian hell has this country created for itself? Clearly the citizens are in no way able to control the out-of-control nature. The poor cannot affect change so their ranks swell. They desperately vote for the political left, yet see little relief. The right are desperate to keep getting richer, and also to stem the power of government, and while they keep getting richer, the government keeps going out of control. The political machine in the US is broken, and as a result, the US is a country out of control. I see 1) The middle class to all become poor, 2) the rich to become ultra rich 3) the government spy agencies to swell to 10x their size, 4) US foreign debt to swell 5) More cities in the US to go bankrupt 6) Increased salaries for executives 7) continued abuses by banks ...since we did not learn from the last disaster, we are prone to another, bigger one 8) The US government using drones to kill thousands/millions of its own people. The poor will lose their citizenship. The US government may even try to deport them to other countries.

  16. therein is the stupidity, monitoring me instead of by raymorris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    you are correct they cannot effectively monitor all communication. Yet, they attempted to do just that rather than expending the resources monitoring threats they had been warned about repeatedly.

    Pretend you are responsible for reducing terrorism. You're giving a hundred million dollar budget, a list of 50 people who appear to be threats, and the phone numbers of major internet providers. Do you:
    a) use that money to closely monitor the 50 suspects
    Or
    b) make logs of every email and phone call of every law abiding citizen, so you have more data than you can possibly look at.

    Choosing B is stupid.

  17. There's Only One (Practical) Solution by classiclantern · · Score: 2

    There's only one way to get our privacy back (and it's a long shot). Use what Constitutional power we have to change the law. Proposed 28th Amendment: No person, group, or agency, public or private, foreign or domestic, may collect, record, transmit, or disclose any private information beyond that defined in the United States Census about any individual without express written permission of the individual or court order specific to an active criminal investigation. Private information includes, but is not limited to, location, financial transactions, medical records, school records, arrest records, associates, and associations. Candidates for elected positions must submit seven years past income tax records at least ninety (90) days before elections.

    --
    Now that I said that, I fell better.