Slashdot Mirror


New Android App Encourages Users To Throw Device As High As Possible

kdryer39 writes "Like to tempt fate? Then you might want to check out Send Me To Heaven, the Android app that uses your phone's accelerometers to track how high it travels when thrown upward. Assuming you don't fumble your handset on its return trip, its distance will join that of other daredevils on the game's leaderboards. That's all there is to it. Really." I can't wait for the desktop version.

156 comments

  1. Desktop version? Pshaw. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Funny

    We need a version that runs on a VAX 11/780.

    "HOLY SHIT DUDE FIVE INCHES! That's awesome!! ...why is the floor cracking?"

    *CRASH*

    1. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Chemisor · · Score: 5, Funny

      XKCD is relevant, as usual.

    2. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfff. We all know the future is cloud services and SAAS. Lets see you throw that.

    3. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      flinging a phone in the air vs dropping a mountain.. ya, that's close enough.. not.

    4. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by solidraven · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is close enough if you're talking about a Nokia 3310!

    5. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Aww... I was betting your link was going to be: http://xkcd.com/194/

    6. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Context. The VAX 11/780 mentioned in the OP is not a phone.

    7. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by gronofer · · Score: 1

      I'd run it in my Android VirtualBox, but my computer isn't equipped with an accelerometer. I expect you'd have the same problem on the VAX.

    8. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Keruo · · Score: 1

      We used to arrange throwing contests with Nokia 3310 and 3110s.
      Best lengths were 30-40 meters and the phone broke into 3 pieces on landing, but worked fine once you put them back together.
      Better not try that with modern phones, I don't think the build quality today would allow such abuse and still allow them to function.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    9. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      http://finland.mobilephonethrowing.fi/ilmoittautuminen

      if you want to get in on the world championship 2013.

      (yes - it's a yearly event)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Why would you bother to reply to this post with a serious answer? It was a joke, google it.

    11. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! Yes! :D

    12. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know several people who would like to take their Android phone and accelerate it straight down.

    13. Re:Desktop version? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard? Is that you on the Internet?

  2. Already done by Noread · · Score: 4, Informative

    The people at Codepoke had an app which did exactly the same thing. They removed it from the app store a while ago.

    Click

    1. Re:Already done by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      The people at Codepoke had an app which did exactly the same thing. They removed it from the app store a while ago.

      Click

      The people at Codepoke had an app which did exactly the same thing. They removed it from the app store a while ago.

      Click

      I believe "War Games" said it best; The only winning move is not to play the game.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    2. Re:Already done by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      I once made a "Drop Height" application for... err... wait, let me check that NDA I signed... errr, well, let's just say "a popular smartphone device", which measured the height from which you dropped it (useful for calculating the height of a building, for example), but it was rejected because it might damage the user's device.

    3. Re:Already done by rpstrong · · Score: 2

      I believe "War Games" said it best; The only winning move is not to play the game.

      Which was wrong. Refusing to play may prevent a loss (or tie), but that does not constitute a win. Does a baseball team score a win for each team if the game is rained out?

  3. Rugged Android smartphones by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Casio Commando owners finally have a way to measure their machoness.

    1. Re:Rugged Android smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, my wife has one of those, not out of machoness so much as she radiates a field that destroys all electronics she comes in contact with. And to the Commando's credit the thing withstood her for 2.5 years.

    2. Re:Rugged Android smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motorola Defy, back atcha. :)

    3. Re:Rugged Android smartphones by volmtech · · Score: 1

      I have a wife like that. She once destroyed a keyboard and a flatbed scanner with one touch. He Galaxy S2 has survived the one month she has had it. Not having a path to ground may save the phone.

  4. But did you know... by NitzJaaron · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that it's the first app collaboratively designed by AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon? ;)

    1. Re:But did you know... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Heh heh.

      I was just thinking this is something like a skill-based version of the $1000 "I'm rich" app. Show off your high score and total disregard for the various costs of breaking your phone. Ideally the app should keep track of your number of "losses" and prominently display your phones/week score.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:But did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that the networks give a shit wheter you have a working phone.

    3. Re: But did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, yes, because if you dont, you'll soon have to buy a new one?

    4. Re:But did you know... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I'm coming out with an app that will count the number of skips you get across a pond.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  5. Get return on the insurance you paid for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a great way to get return on the insurance you paid for.

    1. Re:Get return on the insurance you paid for. by gagol · · Score: 0

      Sir, I was simply using an app... I don't get why I am not vover by my warranty!

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  6. Easily gamed? by Reason58 · · Score: 1

    Tie a string to the phone and spin it in circles. New world record and no broken phone.

    1. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where exactly would you be spinning around the phone without it crashing into the floor, and how?
      (Your going to climb the Eiffel Tower and then then what...?)

    2. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternately, one could game the system by attaching the phone to a helium baloon

    3. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tie a string to the phone and spin it in circles. New world record and no broken phone.

      So you don't think the app could tell the difference? Physics, nerds know it.

    4. Re:Easily gamed? by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

      When you throw something it experiences momentary very high gs followed by zero gs (except from air resistance). I doubt you can simulate that with a string.

    5. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking you might not understand what an accelerometer would detect in a phone under freefall. (Hint: it should feel the same forces on the way up as on the way down)

    6. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...With the exception that it uses accelerometers, once the motion has started and the helium balloon reaches it's maximum climbing velocity, there's no acceleration. The biggest you'll get with this app should be on the initial toss, and the "catch" or landing.

    7. Re:Easily gamed? by eneville · · Score: 0

      You are = you're

    8. Re:Easily gamed? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why not just use your root access and write a program that puts a different value on the accelerometers?

      Let's see if someone can hit the Apollo 11 landing site.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    9. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, it was a typo.
      Apparently I also wrote "then then".

    10. Re:Easily gamed? by solidraven · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to go bungee jumping with a phone in your pocket.

    11. Re:Easily gamed? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      When you throw something it experiences momentary very high gs followed by zero gs (except from air resistance). I doubt you can simulate that with a string.

      My fancy trick yoyo begs to differ - what you've described is, essentially, "walking the dog"

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    12. Re:Easily gamed? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      My fancy trick yoyo begs to differ - what you've described is, essentially, "walking the dog"

      Uhhh, no. The snap of sending the yoyo to the end of the string is a high acceleration, but while it is spinning on the ground it is feeling 1G. It is that 1G that keeps the tiny amount of friction from the string from catching the hub and ending the trick. If the yoyo wasn't pulling against the string it would easily catch and strart to wind back up.

    13. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd doubt it would register anything unless /g/ hit reasonably close to zero - indicating an apex.

    14. Re:Easily gamed? by Quila · · Score: 1

      If the developers have half a brain, they'll check for deceleration up and acceleration down according to gravity.

      I'm thinking a 20 foot vertical air cannon with a throwaway phone, the phone encased in foam in an aerodynamic shell. But then they may factor in human strength limits too.

    15. Re:Easily gamed? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Yoyo, yes.

      Extrapolate the same movements to a phone on a string - since it's not spinning on a free axis (like the yoyo), the force at the end of string travel is effectively 0g.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    16. Re: Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's = it is

    17. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      deceleration up and acceleration down according to gravity.

      Sorry, you fail physics. As someone has already pointed out, once the phone leaves your hand, and if we neglect air resistance (which would probably be negligible), then the phone will measure *no* acceleration at all at any point during its rise and fall. Determining how high it was thrown is likely done simply by knowing how long it was in free fall, and how strong the Earth's gravitational field is.

    18. Re:Easily gamed? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Yoyo, yes.

      huh?

      Extrapolate the same movements to a phone on a string - since it's not spinning on a free axis (like the yoyo), the force at the end of string travel is effectively 0g.

      The phone at the end of the string is subjected to much more than 1G as you spin it around. It is that force that is keeping the phone from simply dangling at the end of the string. Why do you think you need to pull back on the string so hard if there is "0g" on the phone at the other end? That pull you exert is the "equal and opposite" part of the laws of motion. It is the same principle that makes centrifuges work; the rotation of the centrifuge creates HIGHER forces (more g's) on the thing being spun, not because it creates a 0g environment.

      The rotation of the yoyo is not why there is 1g during "walk the dog". There is 1g experienced by the yoyo because it is subject to the earth's gravitational field and is being prevented from accelerating downward by the carpet/floor it is in contact with. If you simply hang a phone from a piece of string, it will experience 1g because the string will be pulling upwards to keep it from falling to the floor.

    19. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would the phone be moving toward the ground with an acceleration of ~9.8 m/s^2? If not, then it won't register as freefall to acceleromters. If you have it attached to a string, short of just dropping it in which case the string doesn't matter, then you will not obtain a downward acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2 for any sustained duration. If you spin it in a circle so it just barely clears the top, the acceleromters will register zero at the top of the arc for a moment shorter that if you just lightly tossed it. Otherwise, at any other moment, or for all moments of the loop if going any fast than the bare minimum, it will register non-zero acceleration. Any movement trick that causes the device to stay at roughly the same position relative to the ground will register -9.8 m/s^2 and be pretty clear it is not being tossed.

    20. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't a physics fail though. Near the Earth's surface you know that a gravitational acceleration of g is omnipresent, and subtract it as the background. You would definitely measure the acceleration during freefall part of the arc. Just because the acceleromters would be outputting something near zero doesn't mean it is not measured, but that it is pretty clear relative to sitting sitting still.

    21. Re: Easily gamed? by gagol · · Score: 1

      It's its way of talking!

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    22. Re:Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, someone failed physics but it wasn't the OP. Acceleration is defined as the rate of change in velocity. Once it leaves your hand, it immediately starts changing velocity, and continues to do so at the same rate of change until it is caught or hits the ground. Using positive direction as "up", you release the phone going X m/s and it returns at -X m/s.

      In theory, all the apps designers need to do is measure the initial rate of acceleration which is positive and they can calculate the rest. In all probability they are measuring the flight time....either way is accurate unless you toss it off a building...then the initial rate of acceleration is better.

    23. Re:Easily gamed? by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      Time for you and two levels up to go back to school. Acceleration under a balloon will be ~1 G. Acceleration while being spun around will be > 1 G. Acceleration during the ascent and fall will be ~0 G. Acceleration during the throw will be > 2 G, which is what most phone accelerometers top out out, leading me to believe that the app goes by low G duration rather than throw velocity.

    24. Re:Easily gamed? by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      No, see my post below. That condition does not result in ~0 G.

    25. Re:Easily gamed? by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      They can't measure the throw acceleration because most phone accelerometers top out at 2 G. Check the datasheets, or just wave your phone around wildly with an acceleration graph running.

    26. Re: Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      g will be constant throughout a free fall. Nothing special about the apex.

    27. Re:Easily gamed? by IAmGarethAdams · · Score: 1

      If I let go of an object from my hand, and it doesn't accelerate towards the ground, then it will never hit the ground. That seems unlikely.

    28. Re:Easily gamed? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      if we neglect air resistance (which would probably be negligible), then the phone will measure *no* acceleration at all at any point during its rise and fall.

      When anything falls to Earth under gravity it is accelerating at ~9.8m/s downwards. The reason why you are weightless during free fall is because you are not resisting the acceleration.

      Sorry, you fail physics

      Ironic, no?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    29. Re:Easily gamed? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      if we neglect air resistance (which would probably be negligible), then the phone will measure *no* acceleration at all at any point during its rise and fall.

      When anything falls to Earth under gravity it is accelerating at ~9.8m/s downwards. The reason why you are weightless during free fall is because you are not resisting the acceleration.

      Einstein says "wrong".

      From this principle, Einstein deduced that free-fall is actually inertial motion. Objects in free-fall do not really accelerate. In an inertial frame of reference bodies (and light) obey Newton's first law, moving at constant velocity in straight lines. Analogously, in a curved spacetime the worldline of an inertial particle or pulse of light is as straight as possible (in space and time).[2] Such a worldline is called a geodesic. Viewed across time from the viewpoint of an observer "stationary" on the surface of a gravitating body, the geodesics appear to curve towards the body. This is why an accelerometer in free-fall doesn't register any acceleration; there isn't any.

      Sorry, you fail physics

      Ironic, no?

      Ironic? Yes.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    30. Re:Easily gamed? by danceswithtrees · · Score: 1

      Thank you for clearing that up. The misconceptions/ignorance about basic physics displayed in the string/yo-yo comments makes me think that an app graphing accelerometer output (3 axis and/or total) as a function of time would be an eye opening demonstration to quite a few people. Much more useful and educational than a phone throwing app. See what happens when you shake the phone, hang it on a string, spin it on a string. Of course you can throw the phone too-- figuring out how far up it went could be left as an exercise for the thrower.

      Any takers?

    31. Re:Easily gamed? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      The rotation of the yoyo is not why there is 1g during "walk the dog". There is 1g experienced by the yoyo because it is subject to the earth's gravitational field and is being prevented from accelerating downward by the carpet/floor it is in contact with. If you simply hang a phone from a piece of string, it will experience 1g because the string will be pulling upwards to keep it from falling to the floor.

      I knew that... must not have ingested enough caffeine yesterday...

      At least I can take comfort in the knowledge that I'm not the first nor last person to write a post, then look at it the next day and go, "Damn, did I really say something that stupid?"

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    32. Re: Easily gamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * sigh *

      Yes it will. But g's - as in gees of acceleration: the measurement of which will translate into distance traveled.

      Cell phones use an accelerometer. They don't measure the gravitational constant - we don't, in fact, have a gadget that will do that.

      Sorry I was imprecise.

  7. Off to get my 3-person slingshot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...we'll see if this is really "lifeproof" or not today.

  8. Homebrew Rocket Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aaaaaaand its quickly not about how high you can throw. (Maybe a parachute, too, will be used if the phone isn't a cheapy sacrificed for the purpose.)

    1. Re:Homebrew Rocket Club by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

      Why not, we used to launch egg lofters. See if you can get the egg back in one piece... Even easier with a phone.

  9. Sure by drumsergio · · Score: 1

    The developers got high...!

  10. Diaper App by RedHackTea · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should add this to a diaper so that I can see how high I can throw babies!

    --
    The G
  11. Should have called it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    AngryDroids.

  12. Next up by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Next up: the app that uses accelerometers to detect sudden deceleration and encourages you to throw your cell phone against the wall as hard as possible.

    Because, really, why take chances when you can have a sure thing?

    1. Re:Next up by tsa · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Next up by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't even need an accelerometer for that. Just have the app send heartbeats to a server, and when the server stops receiving them, it knows you've won!

  13. Pictures, or it didn't happen! by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    Cool.
    Now what they need is an app that detects when it's pointed at the ground, and snaps a couple of pictures!

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Pictures, or it didn't happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool.
      Now what they need is an app that detects when it's pointed at the ground, and snaps a couple of pictures!

      Pitchers - or it didn't happen. There FTFY :D

    2. Re:Pictures, or it didn't happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one way to check on your bald spot, I suppose.

    3. Re:Pictures, or it didn't happen! by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      Based on my image gallery, mine already seems to have a variant on that: whenever I ask it to take a picture of something outside my car, it waits until it detects that it's aimed at my steering wheel, dashboard, side mirror, etc. instead. (I've heard it's related to the well-known one that waits to photograph a pet until they're either in motion or showing off their privates.)

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
  14. N900Fly exists from quite some time already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Somebody remember N900Fly ... been in circulation for more than 3 years http://maemo.org/packages/view/n900fly/

    1. Re:N900Fly exists from quite some time already by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Came here to post this. Maemo did it first!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:N900Fly exists from quite some time already by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Came here to post this. Maemo did it first!

      I think 4 ft -- over a queen size mattress -- was as high as I ever dared, even with the Otterbox on my N900.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:N900Fly exists from quite some time already by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      Ah, the good times, when Nokia still produced stuff that was worth bothering.

  15. iPhone 3GS in picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why on their official websites animated trailer does it show an iPhone 3GS?

    1. Re:iPhone 3GS in picture by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I'll hazard a guess: because they used an iPhone 3GS when they shot the video and pictures.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  16. N900Fly is years old by molukki · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is not exactly a new idea. http://maemo.org/packages/view/n900fly/

  17. You laugh... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    ...but there's probably already a thread at http://www.rocketryforum.com/ about it. Hell, they've discussed the methods and legality of using phones as tracking devices to death; might as well make them accelerometers as well. Of course, that'll mean somebody will have to figure out how to make the phone fire a pyro at apogee for the recovery chute.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:You laugh... by cusco · · Score: 1

      First thing that came to my mind was the 'punkin chunkin' crowd. How far can you launch an Android phone embedded in a pumpkin? Really, really far . . .

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  18. HangTime for iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    just like HangTime, which premiered for the iPhone in 2008.

    http://iphonehangtime.com

    (No longer available, alas)

  19. Brought to you... by bikin · · Score: 1

    by the Android Manufacturers Association.

  20. What can possibly go wrong? by bmk67 · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing a vision... of broken phones... and angry people.

    I'm quite the prognositcator.

  21. It's an improvement. by intermodal · · Score: 2

    Back when I had an iPhone, several features encouraged me to throw device as hard as possible against a very solid surface. I never took them up on the offer, but it sure was tempting.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  22. i miss SGI, sometimes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..now, if *only* they had survived until the expansion of the mobile market, Darwin awards may now be plus a few embedded skulls. None of whom would be missed ;)

  23. iPhone by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there an apple app that did that as well?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:iPhone by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Not that I recall. There *was* a Facebook forward going around that said the safest and fastest way to charge an iphone is in a microwave. Maybe this is revenge.

      Or maybe Ballmer is playing both of them.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:iPhone by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there an apple app that did that as well?

      Yes, there was. It was rejected on the grounds it would do harm to your device.

      Though I think there were others as well.

      I'm not sure how I should feel about the rejection. Angry because they rejected it, or pleased because it was a stupid app that honestly would probably result in a very negative user reaction as thousands of people drop and break their phones.

    3. Re:iPhone by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      honestly would probably result in a very negative user reaction as thousands of people drop and break their phones.

      And who would be at fault there?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  24. Oh, that. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    I tried playing something a lot like this on OnLive a while back, but somehow I didn't do very well.

  25. Send me to HELL!!! by ClassicASP · · Score: 1

    Soon as someone invents the app I'm throwing my G3 phone off the roof of a building, or perhaps into a botomless pit.

  26. geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Funny

    Step 1:)

    Purchase a waterproof smartphone enclosure from a sporting goods store. Like say, these generic ones. insert the phone inside the protector, and seal it.

    Step 2:)

    At the local post office, purchase a normal cardboard shipping box. I understand walmart also carries these. Then, buy a can of expanding foam insulation. Squirt the expanding foam insulation into the cardboard box, then, while the foam is still expanding and workable, embed the enclosure inside the foam. (You want to be able to get the phone out of the enclosure later. Keep that in mind.)

    Step 3:)

    Load the cardboard "shock box" into a "pumpkin chucker" trebuchet. You may need to troll newspapers or craigs list to find someone who has one. (they tend to advertise having them, so all you need to do is look.) Set the angle nigh, then let it rip.

    Enoy your ballistic smartphone score.

    1. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      At the local post office, purchase a normal cardboard shipping box. I understand walmart also carries these.

      The express mail ones at the post office are free. You only pay for them when you actually mail them.

    2. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking water balloon launcher for my old phone AFTER I move all my data to my new one...when I have about 5 megs of pre-paid service left.

    3. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

      So complicated... Just run Android in a VM, and fake the accelerometer inputs. You can make the phone think it's doing anything.

    4. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Or put the phone in airplane mode and start the app on takeoff. No fancy case required =)

    5. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At the local post office, purchase a normal cardboard shipping box. I understand walmart also carries these.

      The express mail ones at the post office are free. You only pay for them when you actually mail them.

      Technically, they're free for paying customers of the respective Priority service. But hey, why waste $4 to support the USPS's sale of generic boxes when, for the very slightest of ricks, you can commit mail fraud/theft instead?

    6. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea, but i would skip Step2 and 3, just do it over a body of water, like from inside a swimming pool.
      It will fall on the water surface and sink to the bottom without harm...

      Or attach your shock box to a helium balloon.
      Maybe you can even have it take some pictures of outer space

    7. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Let's see if I understand your universe. I want to mail something in one of those marvelous "all you can put in the box, one price" boxes. I go to the post office and pick up a box so I can take it home to pack it. Is this "mail fraud"?

      I get home and find out that what I want to put in that box won't fit. I've already taped the bottom so I can't take it back, so I use a different box. Since it's not an "all you can fit one price" box, I decide to let UPS handle it. Am I now committing mail fraud?

      It's interesting that your universe where it is mail fraud to send nothing by the mail seems to have a similar USPS and priority flat rate mail system ours does, with apparently the only difference being the thought crime of mail fraud for thinking about sending something by mail and then not following through.

    8. Re:geek cred and fun in 3 easy* steps! by guruevi · · Score: 2

      I'm sure there is some DA somewhere that could make it stick and I'm pretty sure that there will be a judge to convict you to 10 years for it. Welcome to the US-of-A

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  27. To quote a movie by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?"

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  28. I'll keep this loaded... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...for the next time something borks my SD card. I bet you can score really high if you aren't worried about catching it.

  29. Otter by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't be a problem for the otterbox cased I've had. Once, several years ago while going through my divorce, I threw my (HTC HD2) phone down a flight of cement steps, impacting first at the very bottom fairly hard. The phone survived without nary a scratch, dent, or defect; I was actually still on the call when I picked it up several moments later. The case did get a bit scratched up, though.

    While that phone is sadly no longer with us (best one I've ever had - the hardware buttons have stopped working, still might be fixable with a little investigation...), I have no doubt that a similarly equipped phone with an otterbox would survive simlarly. I'd definately run this app on it, and, in fact, might be tempted to rig the game a little bit.

    The only other phone I've had to survive stuff like that was one of the pre-polyphonic Nokia flip phones that pretty much everyone had, right before cell service became a 'mass consumer' thing.

    This thread reminds me of the 'iPhone throwing competitions' I heard of happening up in one of the Nordic countries. Related, maybe?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  30. If I needed to create this app by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    If I needed to create this app I would probably just measure the time spent in freefall/micro-g. No need to get fancy past that right?

  31. That's a big assumption. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    The app assumes acceleration due to gravity is a constant...
    And the winner is? The International Space Station!

    So, just take it to micro gravity, tie a string on it and spin it "up". You can do the same here on Earth, but it could be trickier since they can check for a wobble due to Earth's pull.

    1. Re:That's a big assumption. by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Why the ISS? Voyager I is 18 billion kilometers high and still "rising" which makes it the most distant man-made object chucked towards heavens to date.

    2. Re:That's a big assumption. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is feasible to get a phone on the ISS. Voyager, not so much.

  32. Sounds like a rip off of "N900 fly" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a rip off of "N900 fly"

    *sigh* I miss the N900. They should have kept GTK+ and it could have dominated :(

  33. How long until someone cheats? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

    1. build device to trigger parachute release on specific tone via 1/8" headphone jack
    2. write app which detects apex and triggers tonal playback on 1/8" headphone jack
    3. slingshot/water balloon launcher

    Or

    someone puts their phone in a model rocket

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
    1. Re:How long until someone cheats? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      someone puts their phone in a model rocket

      You know, I thought about that, but two problems: model rocket motors are not very powerful. Your standard D12 motor is designed to output 12N of thrust. Your .25kg phone* + .25kg rocket** is being pulled to the earth with a force of (.5 * 9.8) = 4.9N. So you get a net upward thrust of 7.1N for right about 1.5s. For the hypothetical half-kilo load you get 14.2 m/s^2 for 1.5s. This gives you a max vertical distance (discounting wind resistance and suchlike) of d = 1/2(14.2)*((1.5)^2) = 7.1 * 2.25 = 15.975 ~= 16m. You could probably just throw it higher than that.

      Model rockets use cardboard and balsa wood specifically to keep things as absolutely light as possible. If you get your weight down to say .1kg total then you're at ~120m and it looks really impressive.

      *I know the iPhone weighs about half this much, it's just convenient for the number crunching, and results don't change substantially.
      **Because you would need special mounts and housing to keep the phone in place on the rocket. Maybe you could cut this in half by being clever, but again, not a huge change in the numbers.

    2. Re:How long until someone cheats? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Relevant "What If" XKCD. TL;DR. The average person can throw something about 15 meters high. Someone with a good arm could throw about 25 meters. Even the best of athletes could probably only throw 80 meters high, and that's using a golf ball, which is pretty much ideal. Really people aren't good at throwing things up, and are much better at throwing things horizontally. The comic assumes a device which converts forward speed to vertical speed without causing the projectile to lose any energy.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:How long until someone cheats? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      The important thing to consider when throwing (or launching) a phone in the air is how are you going to save it from impact.

      Sure, you could probably thrown your phone 45 feet or more into the air - but could you catch it? Would you dare, considering how much a replacement might cost?

      But, you could launch it - and allow it to be carried down by a parachute.

      And you might use 2 or more motors. If you're going to such lengths to cheat - why not cheat it up right?

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    4. Re:How long until someone cheats? by danceswithtrees · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the ballistics calculations. I think that the phone throwing app would register a much lower throw than your calculations predict. Presumably the app measures the time of 0g acceleration. In that case, this would start at the end of boost, ie when the rocket motor burns out and then end when the parachute opens (sudden jolt followed by constant,1g, fall to earth).

  34. Apple rejected my app :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had an app that was effectively a digital scale. You just stand on your iphone to see how much you weigh. I thought it was a great idea so people could measure their weight wherever they were at any time. Seems handy right?

  35. Or... easier by billlava · · Score: 1

    Load the app up in an Android emulator, and feed the accelerometer canned data to simulate orbiting the earth. Indefinite freefall! High score!

  36. Challenge Accepted: Cheater's Edition! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I'd just put it on my quadcopter drone and fly that sucker straight up to the FAA-mandated flight ceiling for such craft; 400 feet ABL like it was nothing.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  37. It's been done before by Picardo85 · · Score: 1
  38. Today's Top score 42.81m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's impressive.

  39. Where is the IPhone version by dinther · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see the IPhone version. That should clean up a bit.

  40. almost analogous by bmimatt · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the common 'windows' fix recommended by some on IRC a decade or so ago: 'alt +F4'

  41. people who want to fool the app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just play the game over a body of water, the water will absorb the impact of your phone and it will be teh safes

  42. Underpants Gnome logic by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1

    Here's how you win:

    Step 1: Ship via UPS with big FRAGILE label on box
    Step 2: ???
    Step 3: Win!!!

  43. Innovation by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    This is an innovative way to sell more devices. As it turns out, the App was written by a consortium of companies: Samsung, HTC, LG, and Motorola.

  44. surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS Surface version is available?

  45. Let me guess by sconeu · · Score: 1

    This app was written by either Apple or Oracle, right?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  46. Other direction? by jonyen · · Score: 1

    The developers should release a game where the goal is to throw your phone to the ground as hard as you can (think "Send Me to Heaven", but in the opposite direction). That would be a lot funnier to watch.

  47. iPhone & Windoze app only! by rstanley · · Score: 1

    This app should only be available for iPhones and (And especially) Windoze phones only! Let them drop and break all their phones, then replace them with Androids! ;^)

  48. Uhm? by dos1 · · Score: 1

    Is *that* newsworthy? I remember app that did exactly the sam, for Maemo on Nokia N900 - few years ago...

  49. Photographers have done this for years by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1
  50. Two best things about ./ in this story by Acapulco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    THIS story and its comments is why I keep returning to /. despite having the many flaws we all know about.

    Take any random idea and code it. Post it on /. and two things happen:

    - People find prior art of it, to different degrees of precedence.
    - People start finding ways to improve/cheat the system, to different degrees of sophistication, complexity and plausibility.

    I mean, seriously. You can argue all you want about this community and its (our?) shortcomings, but you can't deny at some point just having a bunch of geeks or whatever you want to call us, discussing things like this story definitely gets interesting and fun.

    Cheers fellow /.ers!

    --
    Slashdot. Unreadable news to annoy nerds. - wonkey_monkey
    1. Re:Two best things about ./ in this story by borl · · Score: 1

      Nice try, 'Taco.

    2. Re:Two best things about ./ in this story by Acapulco · · Score: 1

      Uhmm... no.. not Taco. I eat tacos for lunch and dinner though. Not kidding! I'm from Mexico.

      --
      Slashdot. Unreadable news to annoy nerds. - wonkey_monkey
  51. New winner just topped leader board by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

    3.844 x10^8 meters, N. Armstrong

  52. trebuchet ! by vpness · · Score: 0

    just a matter of time till it's done

  53. The forgotten champion... by InvalidError · · Score: 1

    1.8x10^13 meters and still rising: Voyager-1.

    With such a head-start, I doubt it will have competition any time soon as the most distant man-made object.

  54. There is an iPhone one too! by JeremyWH · · Score: 1

    It's been around for a couple of years and is called Freefall! https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/freefall!/id416974946?ls=1&mt=8 But I hear they had to say jump instead of throw as apple originally rejected it! It even has a leaderboard.

  55. Electronic device IQ tests... by tlambert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Electronic device IQ tests...

    I wrote a program on a similar principle in 1983. It ran on a mainframe, and was called "He-man, Dangerous-man". Here's how it worked:

    1) Draw an ASCII art carnival hammer strength meter
    2) Put up text on the terminal telling the user that it is a strength meter
    3) Tell the user "When I say 'go!', hit the return key as hard as you can!"
    4) Count down from 10, and then print "go!"
    5) When the return key is hit, make the little ASCII art "weight" go a random amount 2/3-3/4s way up the screen toward the "bell"
    6) If the key to the left of the return key is hit, make it go all the way up and print ^G so you can demonstrate superior strength

    Obviously, I was forced to remove it, the first time some idiot actually fell for it and broke the keyboard on a Televideo 912 terminal.

  56. Cheap shit androids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not???

  57. High Enough? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Is this high enough for an Android device???

    It's a bit over 20km in altitude.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:High Enough? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  58. It's Been Done by coolioisay · · Score: 1

    Um ... this app isn't all that original. It's the first app of many (I wrote it while I was learning the platform), and was even the first app that Sergey Brin on Android. He even discussed it at the Android launch press conference "much to the chagrin of some folks on stage, like Andy and whatnot". It's dead simple: measure how long the measured acceleration is 0, and then use the ballistics formula you learned in high school physics to calculate how long the device was in the air, and thus how high it went.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_IFIqGf4ZM

    Which begets a question ... how do Slashdot posts get approved? I would like to advertise a few trivial/minor apps too.

    1. Re:It's Been Done by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      I think it serves a purpose: I have found out that many nerds (going by the slashdot motto) have no idea about physics and should be ashamed. All these idiots "cheating" the app using methods that don't result in free fall, which is obviously the only way this app could do the measurement.

  59. Camera Toss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Photographers have been doing this thing for years, without relying on cheap Android devices. And they have the pictures to prove it:

    http://www.flickr.com/groups/cameratoss/

  60. Every smartphone.. by BeCre8iv · · Score: 1

    Comes with a frisbee app

    --
    This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
  61. Platform port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard Steve Balmer has instigated a project to get this to run on a chair

  62. first place held by by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    one "C. Hadfield" with a maximum altitude of 435 kilometers. The legitimacy of that record is disputed.

  63. Another smashing one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another way to competitively break your phone:
    smashr.

  64. Pics or it didn't... by RandomFactor · · Score: 2

    The app should snap a pic at apogee and post that with submission.

    --
    --- Mercutio was right.
  65. Spud gun ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    And a small parachute.

    Sounds like fun to me. Repeatable fun.

    Now ... how to time-delay the release of the parachute? There's probably an app for that (detect the transition from upward flight to free-fall), but is there an appropriate output? Could you do it by, say, driving a solenoid from the data line of the USB connection?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"