Slashdot Mirror


Cold War Plan Tried To Put a Copper Ring Around the Earth

Wired has the story of a plan enacted in the early 1960s by the U.S. Air Force and the Department of Defense that had the goal of safeguarding the country's long-range communications from Russian interference. The solution they came up with wasn't easy, but it was straightforward: launch hundreds of millions of thin copper wires into orbit in the hopes of forming an artificial ring around the planet. From the article: "Project Needles, as it was originally known, was Walter E. Morrow’s idea. He suggested that if Earth possessed a permanent radio reflector in the form of an orbiting ring of copper threads, America’s long-range communications would be immune from solar disturbances and out of reach of nefarious Soviet plots. Each copper wire was about 1.8 centimeters in length. This was half the wavelength of the 8 GHz transmission signal beamed from Earth, effectively turning each filament into what is known as a dipole antenna. The antennas would boost long-range radio broadcasts without depending on the fickle ionosphere. ... On May 9, 1963, a second West Ford launch successfully dispersed its spindly cargo approximately 3,500 kilometers above the Earth, along an orbit that crossed the North and South Pole. Voice transmissions were successfully relayed between California and Massachusetts, and the technical aspects of the experiment were declared a success. As the dipole needles continued to disperse, the transmissions fell off considerably, although the experiment proved the strategy could work in principle."

184 comments

  1. Sooo.... by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what you're saying is, we launched a crap-ton of space junk into orbit to test the theory that our leaders will buy anything as long as it's for the war on terr--er, communism. Sorry. Got my time periods mixed up there for a sec.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is...

      Some people have too much time/money on their hands.

    2. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they always get marked as informative, when they're usually just misinformed flamebait.

    3. Re:Sooo.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Close. If we were to launch ALL of the copper found on the earth, every last scrap of it, we could do what they wanted, problem is there would be no copper left to make radios to transmit or receive with. This was the problem, Yes it "worked" but the scale needed would have required global strip mining and launching every ounce of copper that this planet has in it's crust.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Sooo.... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

      The US is like a billionaire who can't find enough ways to blow their money.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:Sooo.... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      But...but...it is so we can fight those evil commies.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sssh! Past experience has shown that girlintraining does not take criticism well.

    7. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Glad we can joke about it .... now.

    8. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usually just misinformed flamebait.

      And this is going to be followed by a discussion of what exactly is wrong with the post? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

      Was it only a crap-halfton of space junk that your tax dollars launched into orbit to show them commies how government spending should be done?

    9. Re:Sooo.... by cusco · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Pentagon is like a coke whore who can't find enough ways to blow everyone else's money.

      FTFY

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    10. Re:Sooo.... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 2

      More like a broke billionaire who still spends like their wealth will never end.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    11. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's more like princessintraining?

    12. Re:Sooo.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it worked. It did exactly what they said it would. It was a successful experiment that tested dipoles and orbital mechanics. That you didn't personally find it valuable doesn't make it so.

    13. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duchessintraining seems more apt.

    14. Re:Sooo.... by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 3, Informative

      Close. If we were to launch ALL of the copper found on the earth, every last scrap of it, we could do what they wanted, problem is there would be no copper left to make radios to transmit or receive with. This was the problem, Yes it "worked" but the scale needed would have required global strip mining and launching every ounce of copper that this planet has in it's crust.

      Citation needed. From what I read it seams they did a succussfull test that formed a belt. I think your thinking of an actual unbroken wire going around the earth. Instead they launched short segments of wire. There was some distance between each bit.

      Early in May, 1963 a package containing 4.8×108copper dipoles, each 0.00178 cm in diameter and 1.78 cm in length, was placed into a nearly circular, nearly polar orbit at a mean altitude of 3650 km

      http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&tp=&arnumber=1444922&isnumber=31060

    15. Re:Sooo.... by ls671 · · Score: 1

      is like a coke whore

      They only have one way to spend everyone else's money.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    16. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah...the Duchess is a far less skilled troll than GIT...not that that says much...

    17. Re:Sooo.... by cusco · · Score: 1

      I take it you haven't known any. They have an amazing imagination of what to blow money on. Shoes, clubs, drinks, clothes, anything a mind spinning at 1k rpm can come up with.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    18. Re:Sooo.... by k6mfw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      also back then LEO was about as distant and exotic as Andromeda galaxy, lotsa room for all kinds of stuff i.e. spent boosters, loose nuts, flaked debris (space FOD). Who cares? this was also in days of "gas washdowns" where fire departments respond to traffic collisions to use fire hoses to wash gasoline off the pavement into gutters or side of road (gasoline makes asphalt soft leading to potholes). Totally illegal these days but back then there was lots of room for pollutants. But "earthrise" picture from Apollo 8 changed all when we saw our only habitat is this small speck in vastness of space (terraforming Mars don't count).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    19. Re:Sooo.... by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      hat you didn't personally find it valuable doesn't make it so.

      Dude, Maxwell's equations predicted this some hundred years before this experiment was done. By the time it was launched, the equations had been thoroughly and rigorously confirmed. By the time they launched, this was on the scale of commissioning a study to test the theory that apples dropped in Texas fall at almost the exact same rate as apples dropped in the middle of the Sahara desert in a vaccum. It's a well duh sort of "success" story. And as far as orbital mechanics... dude... we put men on the moon that year. I think we had the "orbital mechanics" problem sorted by then!

      No. I stand by what I said: It was a waste of money. This was a project funded solely and only because we were scared of the Russians having superiority in space, so we were throwing money at anything that could even be remotely construed as giving us the edge over them... and all of that because they launched a baseball into orbit called Sputnick and America collectively shit its pants. Let me reiterate: Paranoia and fear were the only reason this experiment happened. It had exceptionally limited scientific value. It did not, in any appreciable way, contribute either in raw data or in theory, to our body of knowledge regarding electromagnetic effect, orbital mechanics, or any other area of science.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    20. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pearls before swine. S/he actually said the theory being tested was that "our leaders will buy anything" to fight communism. This was official policy after JFK's 'pay any price, bear any burden' inaugural.

      But how s/he evaluate the results? Nowhere is the price of copper mentioned in the post, nor how to convert crap-tons into metric tons. It also displays a remarkable degree of hindsight bias regarding future of satellite technology and the outcome of the Cold War, combined with an ignorance of how long limited test materials would remain in orbit, as well as misunderstanding the definition of "junk". Presumably, components of an experiment are useful as such.

      Then s/he humorously confused terrorism with communism. (Oooooh what could that imply!) All you're doing is adding substance and sense to a nonsensical inane 5+ post made by somebody who didn't even rtfa, rarely ever does so, and almost never has a clue about anything.

    21. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This comment isn't the best example, although the poster has made quite a record of bad posts on science topics, which get modded up despite being flat out wrong with many unmoderated replies pointing out in detail why the information is incorrect. I don't usually look at the user name of posts, but still after the occasional glance have come to recognize a couple screennames because they are so consistently very wrong on the topics I'm interested in and/or have a background in. It can be amazing how a very small number of people can spread so much misinformation by repeating enough of it, even if completely unaware of what they are doing. And while it is tempting to reply to them non-anonymously when my background is relevant, having seen how they respond anyway, I don't need my name associated with arguing with idiots on the internet.

    22. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      dude... we put men on the moon that year (...1961?)

      Better to have people think you're a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    23. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sarcasm intended - thank you for posting this.

    24. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you stupid? "Broke billionaire?" WTF is that? Is it "broke" or "billionaire?" These things actually are mutually-exclusive.

    25. Re:Sooo.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      So they had a good idea of the dispersion of space junk in the early 1960s? And yes, the equations were well known, but had they been tested at long range with scattered dipoles?

      The practical realities of the time are they needed to test rockets. They were going to launch a dummy load of some kind for tests. So why not launch something that also tested another cold-war defense theory? It added little to the cost of the launch, other than some small bits of copper. So why the vitriol?

      They wasted $10 on copper in a larger moon landing project. The only rational reading of your post is that you think all governmental space launches are a waste of money, and we should never have gone to the moon or built a shuttle.

    26. Re:Sooo.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Congress is like a pack of pimps who can't help but use the DOD, DHHS, and other departments to buy support to keep their status...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    27. Re:Sooo.... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      No, it did NOT work as planned. Because those dipoles were supposed to de-orbit after a few months.

      Instead, a significant part is STILL up there.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    28. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And as far as orbital mechanics... dude... we put men on the moon that year. I think we had the "orbital mechanics" problem sorted by then!

      If you paid any attention to current research, you would see that there are still, even today, uncertainties in the both the dispersion of clouds of orbiting material, and how long their orbit will last in different situations at low altitudes due to variations in light pressure from the sun and the thin amount of material still around at those altitudes. This is relevant to proposals for removing space junk using various kinds of dust clouds capable of de-orbiting light material but not damaging satellites. And that work is being done with the help of computers to do larger scale numeric simulations than would have been previously available for studying a cloud of somewhat randomly orientated dipoles.

      Yes, Maxwell's equations have been around of a long time. Yet, in the real world, there is still an engineering step to making sure things actually work as planned and that some detail is not missed. I guess you've never been around someone working on something like antenna design, something far simpler and more reliable, where they still need to build an antenna to check that it performs as expected...

    29. Re:Sooo.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then it failed, even better. You learn little when you confirm your hypothesis. But failing in new and interesting ways adds to our knowledge.

    30. Re:Sooo.... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spoken like somebody who doesn't understand microeconomics. I have about half a million in total assets. Most of these aren't liquid, and moreover my various obligations are fairly close to my income, which is to say I'm close to broke most of the time. Being broke means you don't have disposable income, not that you don't have assets or income, and that in order to spend more you must go into debt.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    31. Re:Sooo.... by cartel1982 · · Score: 2

      You sound just like a physicist who thinks that because physics says something should work, engineering it should be easy.

      You just might find that pattern of thinking to be incorrect if you ever put it into practice.

    32. Re:Sooo.... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Glad to see the /. moderating system working so well. /sarcasm

    33. Re:Sooo.... by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      They wasted $10 on copper in a larger moon landing project. The only rational reading of your post is that you think all governmental space launches are a waste of money, and we should never have gone to the moon or built a shuttle.

      Hmm... launching something into space travelling at about 7 miles per second, knowing it will disperse over a wide area, along an equitorial orbit, and made of thin, long bolts of metal... at the same time we're launching men into space. Yeah, I can't see how anyone might find the "only rational reading" of my concern is that it's a waste of money, instead of being not only a waste of money, but also a hazard to lives and property.

      you think all governmental space launches are a waste of money, and we should never have gone to the moon or built a shuttle.

      "Hello? Strawman Delivers? Yes, I'd like to order a Large special with extra hyperbole and a side of melodrama. Yes. Can I also get dessert -- one small slice of humble pie? Cool. I also have a coupon."

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    34. Re:Sooo.... by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      No. First of all, half a million in assets does not make you a billionaire. Second, if all of your assets are illiquid, you are either terrible with money, or you think your assets are worth far more than they are. "Someone will pay $500 million for this SOME day, but today, I can only get $200 million."

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    35. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had succeeded they would have ended up polluting the skies above us for centuries...killing all possible satellite hopes etc....

    36. Re:Sooo.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So, what's your complaint? It changed after I refuted some of your claims, so I must assume it is not logic-based, but a deeper hatred of something else. What is it you really don't like about this? They tested a variety of new tech, and new applications of old tech. It was Good Science (tm). So you either hate science or the government. There, now you can claim false dichotomy without answering for your irrational and baseless complaints of this experiment.

    37. Re:Sooo.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The launch did succeed. And nothing has ever gone wrong from that debris. So, again, what's the complaint?

    38. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound just like a physicist who thinks that because physics says something should work, engineering it should be easy.

      Don't try to connect the parent's armchair confidence with physicists. Most of us know engineering things in real life is not always straightforward and requires some testing and iteration because we have to actually build things to run experiments. I was considering making a post along the line of, "Talk to a physicist and ask them about how building things differs from theory..." before seeing there were already responses.

    39. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had succeeded, then the junk would have had a lifetime of a couple years. The only reason it created a mess is because they failed to disperse the wires correctly, and they clumped, staying up there for decades instead. Nonetheless, the what the contributions are a small fraction at those altitudes compared to other junk we've put up there, and those aren't even that popular of an altitude for satellites.

    40. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      along an equitorial orbit,

      They were launched along polar orbits. Not only is this mentioned right in the summary, this was something critical to the project. Polar orbits can allow for a resonance effect with light pressure from the sun that keeps the orbit orientated toward the sun for maximum de-orbiting, and additionally can result in closest approach of the orbit to be near the poles instead of along the equator.

      Also, the first launch was half a year before the first orbital launch by the US, and the second launch came there was a two year gap in manned US flights. Plus the launches were into medium Earth orbit, much higher than any human launches for some years. The dipoles were supposed to have a much shorter lifetime than that, and by the time they would reach lower orbit altitudes (although mostly well away from areas traveled by human space flight), their density would be really low. The only problem was that their dispersing method failed, and due to clumping, a large part of the material is still in medium Earth orbit (anything reaching low Earth orbit disappears really quickly).

    41. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While there is a significant mess estimated to be ~40,000 clusters of couple of mm in size, this is only represents about 60g out of ~40 kg that was sent up. It could have gone a lot better considering the dipoles stuck together, making them more difficult to de-orbit from sunlight, and the first launch missed a window that would have made the de-orbiting much more efficient. But the mess is at least much smaller than other messes at those altitude and a density of like one mm chunk per 100 million cubic kilometers.

    42. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem was that their dispersing method failed, and due to clumping, a large part of the material is still in medium Earth orbit (anything reaching low Earth orbit disappears really quickly).

      While the amount of material still up there due to failures in the design and orbit is numerous, it is a rather small fraction of what is sent up at this point, about 0.1%.

    43. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did not, in any appreciable way, contribute either in raw data or in theory, to our body of knowledge regarding electromagnetic effect, orbital mechanics, or any other area of science.

      Which is why it has at least a couple dozen papers on just the orbital dynamics of the released needles and their electromagnetic properties...

      For a project that used a surplus ICBM and hence not needing to pay for a new rocket, this is not a bad return on investment. I've been on a similar scale (but more down to Earth) project before that produced fewer papers than that.

    44. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, ignore the first post, and check out some of the later posts by the same poster where she attempts to have more substance, but manages to make mistakes across the board, even missing something right in the story summary.

    45. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second, if all of your assets are illiquid, you are either terrible with money,

      I think that was the whole point originally of someone talking about a broke billionaire... a person with a lot of assets but terrible with their money.

    46. Re: Sooo.... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      And they always get marked as informative, when they're usually just misinformed flamebait.

      You do know this is slashdot, right?

    47. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. It would be kinda stupid to calculate a value for, say, a house using the value you could get for it in the next hour. Might be zero. That's what liquidity means. It takes some time to convert some assets into "cash".

    48. Re:Sooo.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Mathematics is all the citation I need.

      If you think you can have a permanent ring at 3650km up, then you need to research orbatal physics. just the sheer area needed to cover at a stable orbital point for a ring to stay up there on it's own for a short time, like a decade.. would require an immense amount of metal even in 1.78cm lengths. I actually think I am under estimating it, and they will need to launch every ounce of aluminum along with every ounce of copper on the planet into space to form this ring.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    49. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try selling your house to pay for your lunch.

    50. Re:Sooo.... by Spottywot · · Score: 1

      The plan was fairly ingenious to a point, obviously it had a fatal flaw 'Vandalising space' as the Russians put it. However at least the Communists were a credible threat, in that they could have wiped out a good portion of the globe with MAD. Why does everyone buy that we need to do the same bullshit because of 'terrorism'. The UK had a much more credible terrorist threat for much of the Cold War in the IRA yet the big UK defense money was still spent on the Cold War threat. Now about that ongoing IRA threat thats still happening because of lack of funds and secret wiretapping of the entire poulation.....oh and back on topic, the theory that the leaders 'bought' actually worked, things really have changed and not for the better.

      --
      In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
    51. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll vs troll. Who will win the argument? Who will emerge victorious? Who really cares?

    52. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we try some of this simple math. You can find that from some of the papers on the topic, that a density of about 100 dipoles per cubic kilometer is a conservative estimate of how many are needed for communication (although some communication would be possible with maybe a factor of 10 less). After about a year, the widest spread of the orbit was about 250 km. If we assume a volume in an orbit at that altitude and 250 km across, at 100 dipoles per cubic km, and a mass of about 30 micrograms per dipole, you would need about 7.5 metric tons of copper dipoles for the entire ring to be useful. Although, even after a year, the narrowest point of orbit was actually closer to 15 km across (orbits tend to return to a starting point, so spraying stuff tends to cause it to spread out then come back to a point corresponding to the origin plus or minus some spreading and shifting of orbits) . If you wanted to just have a specific spot to use for communication instead of the whole ring, you could get away with something closer to 100 kg.

      There was no expectation the ring would be permanent, and it was designed to actually decay in a specific way. The project was hindered initially by engineering failures as far as dispersing the dipoles (most of them clumped), and ultimately by lack of relative utility. Lack of copper would not have been an issue.

    53. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, Maxwell's equations predicted this some hundred years before this experiment was done.

      Unless your name is John David Jackson, you probably won't be proposing to solve Maxwell's equations for millions of dipoles. Instead, you will be making approximations that depend on their distribution and the bulk properties of space filled with such a distribution. Such models are not as straightforward as you try to make it, which is probably why there seem to be several papers on trying to formulate such models and compare them with measurements.

    54. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >BTW I'm a grill
      Yeah, nah, you're probably just some basement-dwelling foreveralone neckbeard. Fuck off.

    55. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one troll, like all her posts.

    56. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sigh... I'm finding out. It's a lot different from my memory of it in college.

    57. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ugh, you're right smh

    58. Re:Sooo.... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Do you know any good commies?

    59. Re: Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be amazing how a very small number of people can spread so much misinformation by repeating enough of it

      It is one thing to repeat something that is wrong but specific. Even very knowledgeable, smart people can get stuck on one thing, become overconfident despite being reasonable and insightful elsewhere. Something is wrong on a different level when you can be so consistently incorrect across such a wide range of topics though. That is not a case of mislearning something, but something more systematic.

    60. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this wasn't even LEO but MEO.

    61. Re: Sooo.... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      sigh... I'm finding out. It's a lot different from my memory of it in college.

      Probably because in college you were the know-it-all spewing misinformation on Slashdot.

  2. Imagine by DFurno2003 · · Score: 0

    Imagine looking to the sky and having a copper needle impale your eye.

    1. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would never happen. By the time it got anywhere near deorbiting, it would be hot enough to vaporize. But next time I look up, this is going to be in the back of my mind. Thanks a lot, asshole.

    2. Re:Imagine by smaddox · · Score: 1

      My mother had to have a small strand of copper wire about 1 cm in length (or was it 1.78 cm?) surgically removed from her hand several years ago. Odds are incredibly low that this was the source, but it does make you wonder. I don't know if the strands are guaranteed to burn up upon reentry, as implied by the above poster. Perhaps they are.

  3. Ah, cold war plans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When America dreamed big, and the impossible fantasies were based on science, not religion!

    1. Re:Ah, cold war plans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on religion too: "In god We Trust".

    2. Re: Ah, cold war plans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this comment even mean?

    3. Re:Ah, cold war plans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/science/ideological pissing contests

    4. Re:Ah, cold war plans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was added due to the cold war, so we could have smug superiority over godless commies.

      Its hard to even write that with a straight face

    5. Re: Ah, cold war plans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a metaphor for the Wizard of Oz.

    6. Re:Ah, cold war plans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its hard to even write that with a straight face

      I've reported you to the NSA, commie.

    7. Re:Ah, cold war plans... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Also when America realized that these small little humans could indeed have an impact on the whole planet.
      "I wonder if we can disrupt the Van Allen radiation belt with a nuclear bomb..."
      BOOM!
      "Oh! we can! neat! I wonder if it will regenerate and if it has any kind of uses for the ecosystem..."
      Luckily, it does regenerate.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  4. Your tax dollars at work by intermodal · · Score: 0

    Government plans tend to make me wonder if they ever just step back and listen to what they just said before they go and do it.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Your tax dollars at work by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      No they make the determination that they don't have to make a determination.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:Your tax dollars at work by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Government plans tend to make me wonder if they ever just step back and listen to what they just said before they go and do it.

      It's not the elected leaders who come up with this stuff, it's the promoted leaders in the DoD. Internet was a good thing, but it probably started as some plan to wipe out communism using university research.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Your tax dollars at work by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      dunno, this sounded like pretty interesting research. had it worked a bit differently, it might have made communication link satellites obsolete for a lot of stuff.

      certainly a lot better use of money than paying it off to private contractors to warehouse data that you had no business of getting in the first place.. or better use of money than half the aircraft carriers in US fleet. but you know, there used to be a time when they did actual research and trying out new stuff and this was part of that, like the nuke powered greenland base..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Your tax dollars at work by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Government plans tend to make me wonder if they ever just step back and listen to what they just said before they go and do it.

      Given the problem and the technology available at the time, how would you have attempted to solve it? Many at the time thought war with the Soviets inevitable. Satellites were being developed but their feasibility never tested, and the scale we have deployed today was almost unimaginable then. An entire satellite network for people just to watch television? Preposterous! Space-based communication relays were completely and totally non-existent.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    5. Re:Your tax dollars at work by slew · · Score: 4, Informative

      Government plans tend to make me wonder if they ever just step back and listen to what they just said before they go and do it.

      It's not the elected leaders who come up with this stuff, it's the promoted leaders in the DoD. Internet was a good thing

      Past tense, well maybe depending on your point of view...

      ...but it probably started as some plan to wipe out communism using university research.

      People are so cynical these days... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET

      The ARPANET was not started to create a Command and Control System that would survive a nuclear attack, as many now claim. To build such a system was, clearly, a major military need, but it was not ARPA's mission to do this; in fact, we would have been severely criticized had we tried. Rather, the ARPANET came out of our frustration that there were only a limited number of large, powerful research computers in the country, and that many research investigators, who should have access to them, were geographically separated from them.

      Of course the military wasn't to be left out of any hi-tech toys so they later created their own MILNET (in '83) that used the same ARPANET technology, but was totally under their control. In this case (as is often the case) the egg came first, then the chicken was adopted by the military.

    6. Re:Your tax dollars at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That ARPANET quote at wikipedia comes from a page on about.com that itself cites no other document. It could easily be fiction, and if not, sounds anyway like a whitewash.

  5. Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet his brother Edward talked him into it.

  6. One ring.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To rule them all...

  7. Aperture Science Was Real by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is Cave Johnson stuff. If we want to launch billions of copper needles into space to show those commies who they're up against then we'll do whatever it takes.

    1. Re:Aperture Science Was Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "If life gives you millions of copper wires, make life take them back... or launch them into space."

      Just don't burn your house down with them, like the lemons.

    2. Re:Aperture Science Was Real by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good news is the lab boys say the symptoms of copper poisoning show a median latency of forty-four point six years, so if you're thirty or older, you're laughing. Worst case scenario you miss out on a few rounds of canasta, plus you forwarded the cause of science by three centuries. I punch those numbers into my calculator and it makes a happy face.

    3. Re:Aperture Science Was Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The beancounters told me we literally could not afford to buy $7 worth of copper needles, much less 70 million. Bought 'em anyway. Packed them on a rocket, shot 'em into space, and guess what: didn't scale worth a damn.

    4. Re:Aperture Science Was Real by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cave Johnson was a parody, and any parody has to have a basis in the thing it's making fun of. The Cold War was filled with junk science and grandiose, delusional "engineering" projects to try to one up stuff that we imagined the commies were up to (and vice versa). Cold War threat assessment by both sides essentially ran on games of telephone and urban legends, and by god we would not have a mine shaft gap!

      Try these links on for size, this article surprised you:
      Nuke the Moon: 5 Certifiably Insane Cold War Projects
      10 Ridiculous Cold War Government Projects
      10 Creative Military Plans to Use Animals as Weapons (half of which are Cold War era).

      Me? There's almost nothing you could say that the US or the Soviets experimented with during the Cold War or thought about doing that I would immediately disbelieve.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  8. Lot's of bizarre Cold War comm tech by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was quite a lot of bizarre technology pursued/developed in the cold war for communications, among other things. A similar system was meteor burst communications. The idea was you'd bounce your radio signal off the ionization trail of a meteor for the brief time it existed then wait for the next and so on. This way you could communicate way beyond the normal horizon without satellites, ground repeaters, etc. Unlike many crazy Cold War ideas, it was successful and is still used for military, civilian and amateur purposes.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Lot's of bizarre Cold War comm tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been doing meteor scatter for over a decade now. Crazy range at frequencies normally limited to the local area. Fun stuff although I wouldn't call it reliable.

    2. Re:Lot's of bizarre Cold War comm tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so bizzare. Besides metoer scatter, there's ALE (Automatic Link Establishment), where stations monitor multiple frequenciy bands to figure out which one will support F2 layer ionosphere propagation between stations for various digital/data modes (think RTTY with much better thruput, bandwidth usage, error correction). At least one company was trying to use meteor scatter for cross-country truck dispatch and high-value asset tracking (using the cell phone network doesn't work everwhere and may get expensive to scale). I just saw some info on a firm recently licensed (FCC, so US only) to try doing the same thing using ALE and 1-watt transmitters.

  9. Ring on it by Ioldanach · · Score: 4, Funny

    The politicians just love the planet so much they tried to put a ring on it.

    1. Re:Ring on it by Deflagro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well considering how often the planet gets f**ked, it's about time someone committed :P

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    2. Re:Ring on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A copper ring, not gold, and there is no mention of a diamond the size of the Moon.

    3. Re:Ring on it by sconeu · · Score: 1

      The Russkies just would have used "Wisk" against the "Ring around the planet".

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3N_skYSGoY

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  10. Cost-benefit analysis by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pro: Awesome radio transmissions
    Con: Filling Earth's orbitals with junk that will fuck with spacecraft for centuries.

    Hm.

    1. Re:Cost-benefit analysis by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Pro: orbital junk will funk with alien spacecraft

    2. Re:Cost-benefit analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pro: speed up the development of energy shields on spacecrafts

  11. We paid for this? jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a stupendous waste of other peoples' (our) money.

  12. handy by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the Soviet union also could have used this primitive system of global satellite coverage, somehow that fact got lost on our own boneheaded leaders

    1. Re:handy by RajivSLK · · Score: 2

      No it's not boneheaded at all. The US would obviously only launch the rockets containing the copper filaments in the case of a communications failure. That is during an attack in which the soviets were able to knocked out American communication the copper filaments would be launched and be used as a backup.

      Seems like a smart contingency plan to me.

    2. Re:handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just ignore the little fact that there would be no launch facilities left, or anything to defend.

    3. Re:handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because communications and launch facilities are always in the same place, no?

    4. Re:handy by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      the Soviet union also could have used this primitive system of global satellite coverage, somehow that fact got lost on our own boneheaded leaders

      But Democracy thrives on an increase of communication. Socialism dies with communication; which is why the Soviets tried to hard to suppress free press, free speech, etc.

    5. Re:handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previous AC is right.
      If the Soviet's were to see a bunch of rockets heading up into space, presuming the war had not gone full scale globe-razing, it would be only right to assume these are ICBM's - not some form of golden space glitter delivery system.. and nuclear winter would commence.

    6. Re:handy by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Before widespread buried fibre optic, long distance communications were necessarily pretty vulnerable. A high altitude nuke does a good job of screwing up your radio (which wasn't really very long range anyway, except at night in good conditions) AND your land lines.

    7. Re:handy by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Totalitarianism doesn't seem to like communication, and communism was (usually) totalitarian. You'll notice from this map that many of the places with freest communication are in fact fairly socialist, an economic system that today is generally paired with democracy.

      http://filipspagnoli.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/reporters-without-borders-press-freedom-index-2012.jpg

    8. Re:handy by cartel1982 · · Score: 1

      Social democracy and communism are hardly the same thing. The SDP of Germany officially renounced Marx sometime in the 40s or 50s, and the rest of the rich world's "socialists" have more or less done the same.

    9. Re:handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was nothing left to defend, then there is no need for the communication system anyway, so it is pretty clearly intended for a less severe situation. No need to plan for the aftermath of a situation where nothing and nobody is left...

    10. Re:handy by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Read the comment I replied to.

    11. Re:handy by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      this ring of copper was useful only to the militaries of either the USSR or USA at the type, civilian comm couldn't utilize it.

    12. Re:handy by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      and then the soviets could use it too without restriction. it's boneheaded, of equal benefit to enemy as friend

  13. no more Beowulf cluster.. by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

    How about a Ringworld/Dyson Sphere of these?

    1. Re:no more Beowulf cluster.. by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Let's see...
      Earth's orbit is on the order of 10^12 metres. "Whisker thin" isn't very specific so let's assume 1mm^2 for the cross-section.
      That makes for about 9 million tonnes of copper, assuming an unbroken ring. Not all that much, considering.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  14. On a related note by koan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could you string copper wire in such a way the rotation and magnetic field of Earth creates power?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:On a related note by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Sure. You would slow the rotation of the Earth as you did so, but you could do it. And it would have to tie into the grid at one of the (rotational) poles. And it would be approximately as problematic as building a space elevator, for precisely the same reasons.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:On a related note by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Could you string copper wire in such a way the rotation and magnetic field of Earth creates power?

      But you'd slow down the planet! :)

    3. Re:On a related note by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Get the Tholians to do it, wouldn't take them long.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:On a related note by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Could you string copper wire in such a way the rotation and magnetic field of Earth creates power?

      But you'd slow down the planet! :)

      I'd say, "I could live with that, think of all the extra free time," but... well, we all know what would happen when the Powers-That-Be found out they could extend the workday by a few more hours...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:On a related note by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Could you string copper wire in such a way the rotation and magnetic field of Earth creates power?

      But you'd slow down the planet! :)

      I'd say, "I could live with that, think of all the extra free time," but... well, we all know what would happen when the Powers-That-Be found out they could extend the workday by a few more hours...

      I think the temperature swings would also be rather problematic.

    6. Re:On a related note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could we do this to Venus, Mars? The moon, perhaps?

    7. Re:On a related note by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Shiva!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    8. Re:On a related note by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      oops, spelt it incorrectly.

      Siva! http://www.amazon.ca/Siva-Lewis-Richmond/dp/0441768369/ Uses the pyramids to harness the energy.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    9. Re:On a related note by niado · · Score: 1

      Could we do this to Venus, Mars? The moon, perhaps?

      You would need a pretty strong magnetosphere. So, short answer: doubtful.

    10. Re:On a related note by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have been told that wrapping the planet in a loop around the equator will do this. Draw power, slow the planet. Add power, speed the planet. But you could add power anywhere, or draw it anywhere. Problem is, you need room temperature superconductors in order to even think about doing it, let alone to make it practical.

      The person who proposed this idea to me sold it as Freeman Dyson's idea, and called it a Dyson Motor, but I haven't been to find a reference that puts that name together with this idea yet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:On a related note by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Would you? Or would you slow down the magma flows in the earths mantle that create the magnetic fields, making it progressively weaker.

      It would also need to spin perpendicular to the magnetic field, so there is a change in polarity as it spins. You'd need to start spinning it some other way though, because the earth doesn't rotate north to south. The 23odd degrees offset of magnetic north probably would be enough to do anything.

    12. Re:On a related note by letherial · · Score: 1

      We are just going through all the isms

      it was fascism, communism and now terrorism, who knows what the next ism will be...seems to me they dont need another, terrorism seems to be more successful at destroying our rights then communism or fascism ever did.

    13. Re:On a related note by cartel1982 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, if you look at what the rights of a fully equal citizen were in 1939 (basically I mean white males) and compare them to the kind of federal policing, monitoring, record keeping, and surveillance that were going on in 1991, I think it's pretty obvious that the war against Communism did a lot to harm our rights.

      Sure, during that time women and minorities achieved (most of) the status of white males, but what that status is became more restricted.

    14. Re:On a related note by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      In the second Revelation Space novel, the idea you're describing is mooted under that name. I forget the details (even though I just read it) because it was shortly followed by a discussion of realistic relativistic space combat and just, wow. Anyway, I think the name was Alistair Reynolds' own coinage, using "Dyson" in this instance as an adjective synonymous with "megastructural".

      I'd Google up the relevant passage but I'm still knee deep in the last act of the book and, y'know, spoilers.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    15. Re:On a related note by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      It is tough to draw a comparison. If you want to live like people did in 1939 you have roughly the same rights.

      Things weren't great if you weren't a typical person. I wouldn't want to try being gay, looking weird, or having unusual hobbies back then. Most places you'd have a lot of trouble finding certain books, especially anything considered erotic.

      I'm no fan of the surveillance state we're drifting into but the truth is complicated. There has been no other time in our history when anybody could read the Satanic bible, Anarchists cookbook, and 34 kinds of porn.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    16. Re:On a related note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you misremember something, or the source was a little off. In order to generate power with a loop of wire, you need to change the amount of magnetic flux through it. This involves either a change in the angle of most of the magnetic field lines going through the loop, or changing the strength. And the faster the change, the more power you could potentially extract.

      The Earth's magnetic field changes very, very slowly. While you could capture some power from the drift of the magnetic pole or changes in the Earth's field strength, it would be pretty minor compared to daily changes from the solar magnetic field. Additionally, it would not actually change the movements of the Earth, it could only apply a force between the loop and the source of Earth's magnetic field: Earth's core. So it could contribute in a small way to the dynamics and movements of the core relative to the crust, but wouldn't change the total angular or linear momentum of the Earth.

      What you are probably thinking of trying to do is to capture energy from the changes in the magnetic field of the Sun. While you could still capture some of this with a loop at the equator, this would still be kind of slow as you wait for the solar magnetic field to change. Instead, if you built a coil that went through the poles and was perpendicular to the equator, it would capture variations on a 24 hour cycle from the spinning of the Earth. This would induce a small torque to slow the Earth down by pushing on the solar wind components carrying the solar magnetic field to Earth. You would need a low resistance wire though for anything on industrial scales (a 4/0 wire, using typical magnetic fields and not a storm, would generate maybe ~3-4 W). With a perfect superconductor, you could get, by a rough calculation, up to about 30 MW of power from a single loop. Although this would probably be worse for a real superconductor, as they usually have a maximum current carrying capability due to the magnetic field generated, and that gets worse at warmer temperatures too (which is why you see high temperature super conductors used at liquid helium temperatures still).

  15. Tables have turned by m1ndcrash · · Score: 1

    Oh those Russians! However, I don't think Russia is the evil side anymore. We should find a way to block the US spying on the entire world.

    1. Re:Tables have turned by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Oh those Russians! However, I don't think Russia is the evil side anymore. We should find a way to block the US spying on the entire world.

      Wait until the U.S. walks into Syria.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    2. Re:Tables have turned by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Oh those Russians! However, I don't think Russia is the evil side anymore. We should find a way to block the US spying on the entire world.

      Not even the US has as pervasive in spying on its own people as the UK (and many UK citizens are all for it, amazing enough.)

      Which is the most free country left in the world?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Tables have turned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh those Russians! However, I don't think Russia is the evil side anymore. We should find a way to block the US spying on the entire world.

      We can. Those idiots were just using the wrong metal. We need a ring of tinfoil filaments around the earth!

    4. Re:Tables have turned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is the most free country left in the world?

      Sweden? Iceland maybe?

      I'm sorry, were you expecting the USA? Silly rabbit.

    5. Re:Tables have turned by tftp · · Score: 1

      Which is the most free country left in the world?

      Somalia.

    6. Re:Tables have turned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking back on history I think the disturbing truth is that there were two evil sides and there were no real good sides.

    7. Re:Tables have turned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking back on history I think the disturbing truth is that there were two evil sides and there were no real good sides.

      Personnaly, I like it in the backside. I once knew a Russian girl who also liked it in the backside. I think that counts as a good side. Maybe it's the Greeks who will pull us out of all of this mess in the end...

  16. As wild as piping Lake Michigan to Arizona by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid we heard a story going around about piping Great Lakes water to Arizona, a couple thousand miles of pipe necessary, and laughed it off as garbage. Reading Cadillac Desert I found it wasn't fantasy, but actively being pursued.

    Nowadays our goal seems to sling BS around the world at the speed of light.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  17. So... by slick7 · · Score: 1

    Instead of a copper ring, they settled on a virtual one, around the Constitution, around our e-mails, around our cell phones, hmmm.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  18. That's actually...impressive by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    We forget how big some of the Cold War projects were. Nowadays, we have nuclear subs, international space stations, generations of supersonic aircraft and no-one against to use it. Back then when there was an arms race against an opponent who had some kind of budget, projects could scale up quickly.

    Utterly unneeded, of course but wow, they knew how to think big in those days.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:That's actually...impressive by cusco · · Score: 1

      And the Soviets would counter all this gold-plated, high tech, astronomical-budget crap and counter it with something that cost a tenth of the price to make. The answer was always some platinum-plated crap then. The reason for the depleted uranium armor on the Abrams tank is because Soviet factories could pump out cheap shoulder mounted anti-tank missiles with a shaped charge warhead by the thousand that could take out anything less. Pentagon computer-controlled equipment need to be hardened because the Soviets could build an EMP weapon for a few thousand dollars that could take them out, while their own manually operated weaponry continued to function (yes, nukes did the same thing, but that wasn't the primary reason).

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:That's actually...impressive by Ferzerp · · Score: 1

      And yet it was the Soviet Union that spent itself in to oblivion and collapsed first. History doesn't support your position.

    3. Re:That's actually...impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US spending on the other hand is just fine?

    4. Re:That's actually...impressive by cusco · · Score: 2

      That's the difference between the rigidity of their planned economy and slightly-organized chaos that makes up the capitalist system. Had the Kremlin stayed within their budget in Afghanistan it's likely that the Soviet Union would have been around longer. When combined with a couple years of bad harvests that necessitated importing expensive food it killed their currency.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:That's actually...impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for the depleted uranium armor on the Abrams tank is because Soviet factories could pump out cheap shoulder mounted anti-tank missiles with a shaped charge warhead by the thousand that could take out anything less.

      Uh, no. DU didn't make an appearance in Abrams tanks until the units built in the late 1990's - a little late for the dance if they were responding to some 1960's-era fear of Russian rockets. Ceramic plating (see: "Chobham Armor") is what you're thinking of that was developed in response to shaped-charge warheads, and that was actually fairly inexpensive - early variants of it used Tungsten as the principle metal in it, it wasn't until the 90's that DU gained any real market share there.

      And guess what!? Americans also cranked out cheap shoulder-fired anti-tank missiles (see: Bazooka, LAW, M47 Dragon, AT-4, SMAW, etc.) And the Soviets also countered that by building heavily armored tanks, as well.

      Curious revisionism is curious. The Soviets and the Americans were both cranking out lots of very cheap nasty weapons, and more expensive countermeasures for those weapons in the hands of their opponents. The Americans just had a deeper wallet.

    6. Re:That's actually...impressive by cartel1982 · · Score: 2

      I've recently been reading that, from a systemic standpoint, the Soviet Union wasn't doing much worse in the 80s than it had been in the 60s or 70s. Gorbachev really did seem to want to reform the Soviet Union just because he thought it was the right thing to do. But once there was limited political freedom and limited economic freedom, the system just kind of caved in on itself. Half-totalitarianism doesn't work.

      Internal accounts of the Soviet collapse make for interesting reading. Gorbachev and Yeltsin really deserve a lot of credit as humanitarian liberals who took brave stances against domineering military and surveillance powers. America could use a Gorbachev right about now.

    7. Re:That's actually...impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little down today I guess.

      We may get our Gorbachev, but first we will have our Stalin. The Fascism train is just leaving the station.

  19. I love mad science by Karmashock · · Score: 3

    Seriously... it might be out there... but I love it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  20. That sounds dumb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't they just invent a radio that could communicate via satellite relays?

    1. Re:That sounds dumb... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Because they didn't have any satellites?

  21. Bloom County by tobiasly · · Score: 1

    Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...

    http://www.thecomicstrips.com/store/add_strip.php?iid=83812

  22. What happened to the mylar balloons? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about the plan is that, unlike active retransmitting satellites, there are no controls on it. A better design is the large mylar balloons also mentioned in TFA. What happened to those? I can think of many amateurs who would love to be able to bounce signals off of something like that for cheap, reliable international communications.

    Think of the possibilities... Some have played with receiving TV signals from the other side of the planet via moon-bounce. A signal reflector so much closer would offer many more possibilities. It's an electromagnetic gateway to the other side of the planet. These days, it would probably get adapted to laser communications as well, while no current satellites have that option. Just as a test-bed for experiments like this which can't be performed economically any other way, it sounds like a great project to fund. Why haven't we even attempted any such thing, since active satellites became possible?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:What happened to the mylar balloons? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      We tried that, but it's too expensive and covers too little an area.

      Something that does work is to use chaff, like in this article. Say you're starting a war and don't want to be tracked by radar. You send up a rocket into the stratosphere with a million shards of metallized fiberglas (which weighs a few pounds total) and disperse them over a wide area. They float down over several hours; meanwhile all the other guy's radar sees is a bright cloud where normally he'd see your invading bombers.

      Unfortunately for you I just turned on my high bandwidth radar and I can now see the fast-moving specular points on your bombers through your widely dispersed, non-doppler shifting chaff. But oh well.

      The other problem with chaff is it has to be cut to a certain wavelength, and it's narrow bandwidth unless you cut them randomly and use a lot more.

      The dipoles in polar orbit at 2000 miles might have worked but took a lot of copper; we can do that better and easier now using HAARP, which makes an artificial ionosphere mirror. Meteors do the same thing; this week would be a good time to listen with your HF radio.

  23. That's not crazy by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    At one time this would have sounded crazy....then came Hyperloop.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  24. Job security by rraylion · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the government now funds NASA to find better ways of finding ever smaller pieces of space junk so that important items like the ISS don't get hit by stray debris.

    How pissed would you be, to be one of the people at NASA or US Air Force on the project and then reading this story.... or would you be thinking "Hey,.. job security"

    1. Re:Job security by similar_name · · Score: 1

      the government now funds NASA to find better ways of finding ever smaller pieces of space junk

      About that. I know it's the Air Force but NASA used it too.

  25. Just as war on terrorism! by aliquis · · Score: 0

    But it worked

    Just as war on terrorism!

    Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? There are none now!
    (Well, what do I know, at least there aren't any which isn't property of the U.S. or their allies I suppose.)

    Planes ran into WTC? Haven't happened since the previous time.

    And there's no Obama bin Ladin or Saddam Hussein!

    Success!

    1. Re: Just as war on terrorism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do drugs.

    2. Re:Just as war on terrorism! by NemosomeN · · Score: 2

      You are a moron. You are completely glossing over the fact that the experiment worked.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    3. Re:Just as war on terrorism! by aliquis · · Score: 0

      "Takes one to know one!"

      What do you mean? That they are free to violate everyone's rights in the name of watching out for the evul terruhammeds?

    4. Re:Just as war on terrorism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a bad troll, or just trying to demonstrate what a drug inspired non sequitur discussion would look like?

  26. Utter waste by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 1

    This is "Men who stare at goats". In space. With copper.

    --
    while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
  27. Proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, all you honored copper thieves across the world! I'd like to offer you once in a life time opportunity for rocket assisted travel to a copper laced place of a Cold War proportions. Why destroy historical architecture and cause significant power failures when there is a much better way for fulfilling the thirst for copper? The trip shall be one way only, but the benefits of easily accessible copper overrides any concern for anything. For those who lack the means for this enormous opportunity, we have the classical Persian solution available, which was suitable even for the Roman nobility!

  28. Millions of little copper bullets by viperidaenz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How much damage would one of those 1.8cm bits of copper do when hitting a space station travelling at 17,000mph?

  29. The Soviets had Cosmonauts First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of reach of the the Soviet Union? Everything else aside, the fact the Soviet Union could reach it as easily as Americans apparently never crossed their minds.

  30. The ultimate in Cold War madness by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Project Pluto, a missile that would destroy the territory of the nation launching it.

    1. Re:The ultimate in Cold War madness by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you are joking? The Soviets actually did that in WWII, "Scorched Earth." There have been many other cases of countries destroying their own resources before the enemy can steal them.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    2. Re:The ultimate in Cold War madness by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Except that in Pluto's case it was a side effect, not the objective.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:The ultimate in Cold War madness by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Eh, I'm not so sure I'd be that dramatic, but it and NERVA were solid proofs that open, solid-core nuclear engine technology suffers serious issues with ablation of the material. I think there's still good possibilities in nuclear rockets, but not in any open-core designs. (Yet some people still discuss them -- even open-core gas designs. Utter madness!)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  31. How would that even work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would that even conceivably work? How would you change the rotation or movement of the Earth without imparting momentum on something else? Does the Earth's magnetic field change relevant scale, as opposed the fluctuation from the solar magnetic field that would not require the ring to be at any particular location (neither at the equator nor required to encircle the Earth)? Why the equator, since if you wanted to impart a torque say on the magnetic core relative to the surface, a ring perpendicular to the magnetic equator would be more efficient? Likewise, if you wanted to capture variations of the Sun's magnetic field, perpendicular to the rotational equator would give you the most variation in flux.

  32. EME by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That is similar to EME - Earth-Moon-Earth communications, where signals are bounced off of the moon. Amateur radio operators still practice this for the exotic / novel QSOs to be had. This is one of the few instances Amateur Radio operators actually need to make use of the maximum allowed 1,500 watts of transmitting power. An interesting side effect is the transmission takes over 5 seconds to reach the moon and return. thus the operator can hear the last 5 seconds of their own transmission.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:EME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you use one of the digital signaling modes developed by K1JT. They enable much smaller stations (100-200W class, single yagi) to make successful EME contacts. I could manage one of those in my backyard. On the other hand, I think with a 1.5 KW station and large antenna array, I could monitor my signal by watching the neighbors' porch lights flash morse code.

      --... ...-- ..

    2. Re:EME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar but much, much lower bandwidth and interception risk.

  33. The Math by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    circumference of the earth: 40,075 Km
    diameter of the earth: 12756 Km
    orbit distance: 3650 km
    New diameter: 20056(157.22% bigger)
    New circumference: pi * D = 63007.78(157.22% bigger)
    Number of dipoles released in 1963: 480000000
    Number of dipoles per Km: 7618
    Number of dipoles per meter: 7.618
    The experiment worked untill the dipoles started to drift east and west away from the perfect circle. This increased the distance between the dipoles.

  34. I'm having a dipole moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now!

  35. More Math by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 2

    diameter of dipole: .000178cm
    radius: .000089cm
    length: 1.78cm
    volume of each wire: pi * r^2 * h = 4.42 * 10^-8 cm^3
    number of wires: 4.8 * 10^8
    volume of all wire: 4.8 * 4.42 = 21.216 cm^3
    density of copper: 8.96 gcm^3
    mass of all wire used in 1963: 190.095 grams