Slashdot Mirror


Linux 3.11-rc7 Release Celebrates 22 Years of Linux

An anonymous reader writes "It was on this day 22 years ago when Linus Torvalds humbly announced Linux and today he played on that in announcing the Linux 3.11-rc7 kernel release. The final Linux 3.11 kernel release is expected in about one week."

151 comments

  1. The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This year is the year!

    1. Re:The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      3.11? How many years after Microsoft reached that milestone!

      And Linux 2015 doesn't seem like it'll be timely.

    2. Re: The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shoulda went for
      Linux 3.33 you can (not) redo

    3. Re:The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 22nd year!

    4. Re:The year of the linux desktop by donaldm · · Score: 0

      3.11? How many years after Microsoft reached that milestone!

      Microsoft never did reach that milestone although they did get to 3.1.1 (Windows for Workgroups) before they dumped it for a VMS wannabe. :)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    5. Re:The year of the linux desktop by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Final WfW was Windows 3.11. Probably they thought that 3.1.1 would confuse people. Ironically, you are now confused.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just that version numbers in the PC world were considered decimal numbers, as opposed to dotted strings of integers. So in the PC world, version 3.11 signalled a slight improvement over version 3.1. Another example: Turbo Pascal went from version 5.0 to 5.5 to 6.0, and nobody thought they omitted four minor versions, because it was generally understood that 5.5 is just in the middle between 5.0 and 6.0.

    7. Re:The year of the linux desktop by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, it's just that version numbers in the PC world were considered decimal numbers,

      Who told you that? PC software was frequently released with traditional major-minor-tiny version numbering.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re: The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux 3.14, synergizing with the Raspberry Pi

    9. Re:The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not irony. A perversion.

    10. Re:The year of the linux desktop by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      The year Linux takes over the desktop is the year that they will stop selling desktops, which will be next year.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    11. Re:The year of the linux desktop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes it is. It is also the year we are going to send a rocket to the moon.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re:The year of the linux desktop by bmo · · Score: 1

      It's been "The Year of the Linux Desktop" for me since February 1998.

      What's your excuse?

      --
      BMO

    13. Re:The year of the linux desktop by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2

      and still most people would prefer windows 3.11 to linux.

    14. Re:The year of the linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give any examples?

    15. Re:The year of the linux desktop by bbsalem · · Score: 1

      Huh? I don't think so, or "most people" are more dim than I thought.

    16. Re:The year of the linux desktop by bbsalem · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on! By this year a low-power device running on mobile chips will get glued to your flat panel display and that will be running Linux and displace your desktop, or it will have the same form factor as your smartphone but dock on your desktop peripherals hub and do everything your desktop did. The desktop isn't going anywhere it is just going to shrink. That is what an iMac is really, only it will cost about $100 and replace your desktop box. This stuff is here now, it just has to grow in capacity a little to surpass what is dying off.

  2. Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linus was humble once?

    1. Re:Whoah whoah by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 2

      Doesn't take much when you compare Linus to Steve Jobs or Steve Ballmer, but he's always been a bit more down to earth than the rest of them.

    2. Re:Whoah whoah by lkernan · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nvidia probably disagree with you.

    3. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > he's always been a bit more down to earth than the rest of them.

      That's true, but in the same time Linus also does not care about the big picture at all. Linux is just the kernel of the system, and other applications have to use it's services. It makes you wonder, if GNU/Linux would have actually made it bigger on the desktop if Linus had cared about desktop users in 90's and 2000's.

    4. Re:Whoah whoah by kthreadd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Compared to the way Jobs and Ballmer treat customers I much prefer Linus, even if he is a bit rude sometimes.

    5. Re:Whoah whoah by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nothing wrong with direct, blunt communication.. It's refreshing compared with the passive aggressive kittycat games of typical government and corporate interaction. I think his blunt style is part of what keeps the kernel dev team clear of that passive aggression. It keeps the emos who can't handle blunt truth away.

      Nvidia got what they deserved, and it is clear to all other manufacturers what the kernel team thinks of closed drivers making debugging a royal pain.

    6. Re:Whoah whoah by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's just terse. Want him a bit more verbose, shoot a few "-v" his way.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Whoah whoah by kthreadd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing wrong except that it may keep new contributors away. There's no fun in contributing to a project where the boss is an asshole.

    8. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with direct, blunt communication..

      Fuck you.

    9. Re:Whoah whoah by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that it doesn't. It keeps thin skinned people away, who otherwise create needless drama.

    10. Re:Whoah whoah by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      That might very well be the case. All I can say is that the shortage of new contributors is a recurring topic. I don't know exactly why new people are more interested in contributing to other projects, but I have my theories.

    11. Re:Whoah whoah by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Yup! Exactly!

    12. Re:Whoah whoah by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Interesting

      some possibilities:
      1. kernel programming isn't something most people can do. not just linux, but in general.
      2. the project is mostly stable at this point. 90% of the work is drivers anyway, and those are submitted by hw manufacturers for the most part.

      It's not like he's constantly flying off the handle as claimed.. It happens occasionally, and for good reason. Broken code from senior people and/or closed drivers make a ton of extra work for the rest of them, so he's justified. Look at what happened to android. If he yields to political correctness, he then has to clean up the mess left behind by people who need a grilling they now won't receive. Choosing between not hurting feelings and/or keeping these people away, and getting the job done right isn't hard.

    13. Re:Whoah whoah by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      What? He's already used up all the words in the English language, he's had to resort to Finnish to fill the gaps already: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/13/132

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    14. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, that isn't blunt. Linux apologists misconstrue the true meaning of the word "blunt" as a way to minimize Linus's behavior. Being blunt and rude are 2 separate things and not synonyms.

    15. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, you're wrong. I have thicker skin that most people. You can say anything to me no matter how dirty or derogative. I won't be offended, but I'll simply choose to work with a more civilized, higher class of people because it's usually the crass ones who make the most drama. You don't really know what you're talking about, you're just in damage control mode because someone criticized your idol. Looks like you're one of the thin skinned ones.

    16. Re:Whoah whoah by cbope · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I hate to counter a possible AC troll, but Linus has always followed the "do one thing and do it well" mantra. In a sense, we are likely better off that he didn't "look at the big picture" and lose focus on the core.

      I believe the issue the AC brings up lies more with Linux desktop environments, rather than with Linus himself. If Linux had more or less standardized on a single desktop* for corporate use, we would likely see more Linux on the desktop today. But it didn't and the rest is history.

      * I am not trying to imply there should be one and only one desktop for Linux. I am simply saying that to address the corporate desktop market, a standardized desktop** is more or less essential. Of course there are also special needs outside the corporate desktop, and this is where different desktop environments can exist and fill a particular niche.

      ** Win8 is a good example where MS changed the standard desktop environment and is being shunned by the corporate crowd as a result. It's just too different from what had become the "standard" since Win95.

    17. Re:Whoah whoah by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's just terse. Want him a bit more verbose, shoot a few "-v" his way.

      Well, the Finnish equivalent of the F word would be the V word...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    18. Re:Whoah whoah by higuita · · Score: 4, Informative

      would you prefer to be ignored, with all your work and the patchs never getting merged and you didn't even knew why?

      That is the "correct and polite" way... but totally useless.

      And no, being polite and slowly trying to explain the errors will not work, too much people around, any manager will get tired of repeating the same thing over and over, and so getting more rude as time goes by.

      Please note that Linus is usually not rude for newbies, only for people that are around for sometime, specially for maintainers. Those should already know what is allowed or what is not and if maintainers, Linus already have some trust on then... if they fail that trust, Linus will be very direct.

      If you work with other top kernel developers (check the *BSD) you will see the same problem, with ones being more rude than others (ie: Theo de Raadt)

      If you are comparing with enterprise development, think again. Those can also be rude... but even if they are not, they are probably playing the ignore card, the faking/lying card or simple the "i can get you fired" card. And don't forget the "i'm the boss" card, where you don't even try to be a smartass and always do what you are being told.

      Finally, even if that attitude might scare some developers, at least have manage to keep the linux development together, there is no forks, so it isn't that much a problem.

      --
      Higuita
    19. Re: Whoah whoah by nbritton · · Score: 1

      Desktop standardization has nothing to do with it, the problem was, and continues to be:

      Application availability.
      Application toolkit interoperability.
      Inconsistent management of applications.

      The purpose of a kernel is to manage the operating system, and the purpose of a operating system is to run applications. After 22 years they still don't get this, users don't fucking care about some abstract kernel!

      It's just like a car... few people actually care about the engine, they just put gas in the fucker and expect it to get them from point A to B. Point B isn't a kernel, it's a application, the kernel is merely the engine in the car.

      You can bolt on the best engine in the world to a Yugo, but at the end of the day it's still a piece of shit Yugo.

    20. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I hate to counter a possible AC troll, but Linus has always followed the "do one thing and do it well" mantra. In a sense, we are likely better off that he didn't "look at the big picture" and lose focus on the core.

      Just because we don't agree, doesn't mean I am trolling you :) Then again, your statement has no logical merit at all, you just say "we are likely better" etc. The truth is, you can't know that.

      Android kernel for example is a pretty heavily modified Linux kernel core, and since Google focused in bringing their version of that core to especially Android handheld devices, it was successful: The Android kernel and it's supporting libraries has been devised with applications in mind, not hardware device vendors.

      >I am simply saying that to address the corporate desktop market, a standardized desktop** is more or less essential.

      Well, Android already is a living proof of that. And guess what? Why do you think GNU/Linux was so successful before in replacing Unix in 90s and 2000s? Because it used the same standardized interfaces on command line, like standard Unix tools etc. If Linus or GNU had introduced completely different sets of command line tools in 1990s and tried to get people to use them, Linux would have had a lot harder time to break through.

    21. Re:Whoah whoah by i · · Score: 2

      Vittu?

      --
      Mundus Vult Decipi
    22. Re:Whoah whoah by i · · Score: 1

      I don't recommend you to work in Finland... :)

      --
      Mundus Vult Decipi
    23. Re:Whoah whoah by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Yes, sir.

    24. Re:Whoah whoah by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have thicker skin that most people. You can say anything to me no matter how dirty or derogative.

      Right. Which, no doubt, is why you're posting anonymously.

    25. Re:Whoah whoah by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      "Damn the P.C.. Four Tweets ahead! Let the Fecal Matter hit the Rotary Impeller and where's my Clue Gun?"

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    26. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux could himself sit down and write some code for *his* kernel and it would still be a piece of crap. If he is doing so much as to curse your ancestors, you should be thankful of his treatment. Frankly I have only seen a few corporate contributions to the kernel but if they are anything to go by, I'd think they should be happy if they are only getting "Why suicide" web links.

    27. Re:Whoah whoah by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gah, you geeks can't be satisfied, can you? First you complain about Linux being beta forever, now you complain that Linus Finnishes it...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then FORK OFF!

    29. Re:Whoah whoah by RMingin · · Score: 1

      Awesome. My new thing I learned for today is "f***ing motherf***er" in Finnish! perkeleen vittupää!

      I'm going to memorize that for a while and then take a long nap, because my day has peaked before 12AM.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    30. Re:Whoah whoah by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      The "contributors" that keep away from projects where they are expected to be competent and write code that is robust and works are exactly the kind of "contributors" we don't want. So, no. There is nothing wrong with it. If you want someone who will be nice to you when you write horrible code, go work at Micros ... oh wait.!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    31. Re:Whoah whoah by bmo · · Score: 1

      I thought the Finnish F-word was the P word. Perkele.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op68Gh3BVEc

      --
      BMO

    32. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been on Slashdot since 1998. Never registered an account, never will. Perhaps you need to make a name for yourself, but that's you.

    33. Re: Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. Vittu is Pussy. And not the cat!

    34. Re:Whoah whoah by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fuck ~= vittu, literally cunt, from Swedish fitta

      Perkele's harder to translate into English, being the name of an pagan god. So you'd probably want it to be something that offends Church of England sensibilities through blasphemy. I can't think of anything apart from "Hell!" that fits that description at the moment, but that's not really any good as the Finns have "Helvetti" for precisely that meaning. I'm not sure how much the Finns distinguish "perkele" from "saatana" = "satan". It's worth asking a Finn.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    35. Re:Whoah whoah by bmo · · Score: 1

      Fuck ~= vittu, literally cunt, from Swedish fitta

      This ignores the versatility of the word "fuck" in English, which can be a verb, noun, adjective, and adverb all at the same time in the same sentence.

      Perkele, I am told, is just as versatile.

      --
      BMO

    36. Re:Whoah whoah by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      That's a good point.. If the PC crowd thinks their processes would yield better software, they should fork and create a development effort around their principles.. Lets see who does a better job in the long run.

    37. Re:Whoah whoah by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Fuck ~= vittu, literally cunt, from Swedish fitta

      This ignores the versatility of the word "fuck" in English, which can be a verb, noun, adjective, and adverb all at the same time in the same sentence.

      Perkele, I am told, is just as versatile.

      vittuilla -- to fuck with someone
      vituttaa -- to feel fucked up (originally meaning to crave for a fuck)
      vittumainen -- a negative adjective, literally cunt-like

      I can't think of verbifying perkele in any way. It's stronger than vittu, but far less versatile verbally.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    38. Re:Whoah whoah by bmo · · Score: 1

      Thank you for edifying me.

      --
      BMO

    39. Re:Whoah whoah by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      Choosing between not hurting feelings and/or keeping these people away, and getting the job done right isn't hard.

      False dichotomy. You can get you point across without hurling chairs. It's called not being an asshole.

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    40. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is but you're too dumb to realize and you're not even aware of your surroundings and context.

      You should know better simply because you know how to read and type; the bar is pretty fucking low and you still fail to clear it and that's still the case even if you fail it intentionally or try to convince yourself and others that it was only a lame attempt at trolling. If you were a horse you would be put down on sight out of pure compassion, yet as a lowest possible common denominator ‘human’ any ordinary horse is by far your intellectual superior!

      Since you're not a horse you're instead told to fuck off, otherwise flamed, or simply ignored, because you don't deserve the compassion a horse gets.

      Nobody should be expected to point out the reasons to you or hold your hand both while explaining it and while trying to comfort your endless grief when you realize what a utterly worthless piece of shit you are: you are not worth it and never will be when you are too dumb to realize by yourself.

      All those people you look down on? They're far above you.

    41. Re:Whoah whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 3. Linus is a dick and no one wants to VOLUNTEER their time to a dick!

      No? I find it quite enjoyable.

  3. Meanwhile by aliquis · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Meanwhile Windows has gone from Windows 3.11 to 95, 98, __, 2K, XP, 2K3, _______, Windows 7 and finally Windows 8 and each and every time made huge progress!

    Linux? Same old login prompt!

    JK. At least my comment is better than the two first ones.

    1. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huge progress? Windows 8 is a regression to 3.11 coupled with backdoors.

    2. Re:Meanwhile by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      ME? Vista? do I get a prize? also, if linus had moved his ass a bit, he could have had an official release on the 22nd anniversary. that's what jobs would have done. maybe linus should have used some of that legendary whip-cracking management skill of his.

    3. Re:Meanwhile by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile Windows has gone from Windows 3.11 to 95, 98, __, 2K, XP, 2K3, _______, Windows 7 and finally Windows 8 and each and every time made huge progress!

      Linux? Same old login prompt!

      JK. At least my comment is better than the two first ones.

      I think the picture will be slightly different if you only look at the NT kernel.
      Comparing kernels with kernels and so on.

    4. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess I forgot to include NT. Whatever.

    5. Re:Meanwhile by unixisc · · Score: 1

      NT was a different OS that ran parallel to WFW3.11, 95, 98 and ME. It was only at XP that it merged w/ the rest of the OS.

      Also, a lot of distros bypass the login prompt and go straight to the working DE.

    6. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even windows ME had far more users than linux ever has. or will.

      At some point you have to realize the community and support surrounding your product is what is holding it back.

    7. Re:Meanwhile by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Linux? Same old login prompt!

      Actually Unix from 1980 just called and would like it's FUD back.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    8. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good old 32 bit computing which Microsoft had a Century before Apple!

    9. Re:Meanwhile by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Are you pretending Android phones, Chromebooks, Tivo, Tom Tom and Kindle don't run Linux?

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    10. Re:Meanwhile by kthreadd · · Score: 2

      Apple Macs was 32 bit since the start in 1984. The Motorola 68000 only used 24 bits for addressing though.

    11. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99% of the people using those products would never care if you changed them from Linux to something else.

    12. Re:Meanwhile by Yomers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      99% of the people using those products would never care if you changed them from Linux to something else.

      Provided all software is working and GUI remains the same? They would not care if you change NT kernel on their Windows desktops to this mystical 'something else', then. Majority of people using any product do not think much about kernel, and rightly so.

    13. Re:Meanwhile by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Apple had 32-bit computing. The issue was that all OSs up to System 9 did not support preemptive multitasking. That's what Copland was supposed to address, but never materialized. Ultimately, Apple had to throw in the towel on that one and acquire NEXT.

      Looking back at it, since they were moving to a new OS, they could have also adapted SPARC and/or PA-RISC as platforms on which to support it. NEXTSTEP already existed on those 2 CPUs, so had Apple made Macs out of either of those 2, OS-X would have been ready a lot earlier than it eventually was.

    14. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be "its", not "it's".

    15. Re:Meanwhile by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Not caring doesn't invalidate my statement.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    16. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux? Same old login prompt!

      Joking aside, my Linux box shows no login prompt; you can easily set up most distros to automatically log in. Since I live alone I need no physical protection, just a password to get in from outside (I have to log in from another computer if I want to access the Linux files). Plus, I don't have to reopen all fifteen documents I was working on when it shut down. That's a damned handy feature Linux has had forever that Windows still lacks, and it's far from the only one.

    17. Re:Meanwhile by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's a regression to Windows 2.0 - Windows 3.11 had overlapping windows.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    18. Re:Meanwhile by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Having been an actual ME user back in the day, I have to say it would have been an interesting choice between using

      a) ME, which I knew how to use but could be depended on to crash all over the place, or
      b) Linux, which I didn't know how to use at all.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  4. 22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lazy lazy LAZY !!

  5. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by loosescrews · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the Linux kernel development team have slightly higher standards than Microsoft.

  6. I'm a believer. by tpstigers · · Score: 3, Funny

    Linux is the operating system of the people. This alone justifies its existence.

    1. Re:I'm a believer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what will happen to Linux when Linus stops working on it?

    2. Re:I'm a believer. by vomitology · · Score: 1

      Maybe 'for the people'... but unless you count Android, I think it has a ways to go before it can be considered 'of the people'.

      --
      ~Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, but Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.
    3. Re:I'm a believer. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      One of the Lieutenants gets promoted to HMFIC.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:I'm a believer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does any of them have the same vision that Linus have?

    5. Re:I'm a believer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could they? Completely distinct eyeballs.

    6. Re:I'm a believer. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Did you come to this conclusion before or after you saw her face?

    7. Re:I'm a believer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to "believe" anything. FYI, linux is now absolutely, utterly, indisputably mainstream (in the server and embedded markets).

    8. Re:I'm a believer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So without Linus it is likely that the Kernel development will turn in another direction.
      One usually says that it could be both good and bad but the people who are using Linux today do so because the vision of Linus suits them. With someone else making the decisions it may no longer be the best alternative for those who use it today. For others it might become more suitable.

    9. Re:I'm a believer. by petit_robert · · Score: 1

      Indeed, ovh.com has statistics on the systems installed on its dedicated servers :

      Windows =~ 5 000

      Linux =~ 60 000

  7. Is it ready for the desktop ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think so. the best video editing tool available on Linux (Kino) is no longer maintained. The other software are either in alpha stage or crash consistently.

    At least this video was made from Kino :
    Kino sample

    1. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by kwikrick · · Score: 0

      So, pick up the ball and maintain it yourself. Or, help improve other video editors out there. Or maybe you aren't ready for the Linux desktop?

      --
      assignment != equality != identity
    2. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, pick up the ball and maintain it yourself. Or, help improve other video editors out there. Or maybe you aren't ready for the Linux desktop?

      And that. my friend, beautifully summed up, is the reason why Linux will not, in the foreseeable future, cut it as a consumer desktop OS

      I'm not an AC, I just couldn't be arsed to log in to comment

    3. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by Teun · · Score: 3, Informative

      A bit pointless right? For all purpose such a video can be straight out of the camera.

      Anyway, these days we use Kdenlive for video editing.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And how much software for other os is there that is no longer maintained?
      At least with the sourcecode you have the option of maintaining it yourself... If you choose not to take advantage of that option, then you are never any worse off than the alternative.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by madsdyd · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are sorely lacking in the history department of Linux Video Editors.

      Kino was originally developed with only DV editing in mind. It grew to be pretty usefull, but around the mid 00's, the main developers (Charles Yates and Dan Dennedy) realised that the basic foundation of Kino would never accomodate anything besides a clip-oriented DV editor. They therefore wrote the MLT framework (http://www.mltframework.org/) that is a powerfull (open source) multimedia framework, which is used in TV productions, and is the basis of several open source video editors, most notable Kdenlive and OpenShot. (See list here: http://www.mltframework.org/bin/view/MLT/Projects).

      Dan Dennedy decided to keep Kino "alive" as it is usefull to some people, but not do any further development on it.

      Dan Dennedy still maintains MLT and have contributed to several of the MLT related projects. Kdenlive is a powerfull NLE video editor that can do most of, if not all, that the very expensive tools for other platforms do. In some cases way more. (And, yes, it runs under Gnome or other desktops, you just need the KDE libs)

      It is unfortunate that people keep referencing Kino. No new development have been made on it for literally years, and e.g. Kdenlive are much, much more powerfull.

      (On a side note, it is also unfortunate that so few people know of the massive amount of work that Dan Dennedy has invested in to Video editing on Linux. Besides Kino and MLT, he has been heavily involved in the Firewire/dv1394 drivers of the Linux kernels, and it is amazing how much he has contributed).

      If you want to see Kdenlive related videos, search for kdenlive on youtube. Tons of people have made videos with Kdenlive.

      Disclaimer: I have contributed code and translations to both Kino and Kdenlive. I belive I may even be listed as one of the authors of Kino (or at least was at some point).

    6. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of the times no longer maintained could stand for 'Project is stable enough'

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    7. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      LOL, yeah, that is why Linux doesn't' exist on the desktop. I use it all the time at work for projects but it stopped being a personal desktop for me roughly 6-7 years ago... maybe longer, can't remember anymore. I stuck with OS/2 until 96-97 too so it isn't like I don't give alternatives a chance past their obvious primes. My first Linux installation was Slackware 2.4 and the last one I personally used was Ubuntu X.X. Luckily Apple took FreeBSD and made it very usable and so I have a MBP now. I have a Nexus 7 though so I can claim to still be a Linux user.

    8. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, most of the software for other operating systems is usually good enough that it doesn't need to be maintained. If someone releases a polished product from the get-go, then there is little need for maintenance. With a lot of FOSS garbage, you either need to do your own maintenance, or pray to God someone else will.

    9. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by readingaccount · · Score: 2

      A lot of the times no longer maintained could stand for 'Project is stable enough'

      Strongly disagree. Maintenance isn't just about fixing bugs - it's also about making sure the damn thing keeps running after the environment changes. Newer toolkits, libraries, heck various distro changes can result in an unmaintained project not even compiling anymore without changes, which may or may not be trivial. Maintenance ensures said project can survive while everything changes.

      In Windows, maintenance isn't so important because Windows is extremely capable in terms of backwards compatibility. Linux is not quite as capable because of the availability of source for most of its software, as there's an assumption that a recompile is enough in most cases when running on newer distros. But things change enough that maintenance is still an important part, particularly for open-source software. A project without maintenance is something you should stay away from if you think you'll be using it for the long term.

    10. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows and Apple are plenty enough for most people who only use their computers as something akin to advanced TV's or specialized dumb machinery. Of course unless they value any meaningful sense of security or unless they value not being ripped off by people giving turtlenecks a bad name :)

      Linux and BSD really are in a class of their own if you want and need an actual computer operating system that let's you do absolutely anything. Windows and Apple are as irrelevant, uninteresting, and useless to my desktop use as gay men are to my sex life :)

    11. Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome post. Thank you!

  8. Where is the Workgroups support by jrumney · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think its about time that Linux was adapted for Workgroups. How anyone could justify releasing version 3.11 without them this late in the game is something I just cannot fathom.

    1. Re:Where is the Workgroups support by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Last time someone released a "For Workgroups" OS, IBM released OS/2 for Workgroups a month or two later and then killed the OS not too long after that. If we see an "AIX For Workgroups" anytime soon, the AIX team should start getting nervous.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Where is the Workgroups support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could be, but to me it's akin to a chessmaster caught in a game of checkers.

    3. Re:Where is the Workgroups support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      long done deal. just set "workgroup = workgroup" in your smb.conf and restart samba

    4. Re:Where is the Workgroups support by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 3

      Erm...
      http://linux.slashdot.org/story/13/07/15/1530233/linux-311-officially-named-linux-for-workgroups

      See with your own eyes:
      https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Makefile

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  9. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That could very well be, all I can say is that every time I update Linux chanses are way highter that one of a) sound or b) wifi is going to be either wonky or go completely bellyup, something I never see with Windows anymore.

  10. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Label the DOSe at 1 (win16 real)
    Label the extended DOS at 2 (w16 and w9x)
    Label the NT 3x as 3
    Label the NT 4x as 4
    Label the NT 5x as 5 (w2k, xp)
    Label the NT 6x as 6 (vista, 7, 8)

    Face the facts. These are that. Win 3.11 was a 2nd gen, and if you want to, pure shit compared to today. Not pure shit, but makes you think people were very, very stupid back then. Still are, but most are on Facebook so they wear badges considering.

    Linux kernel is there around NT 3x kernel.

    I have spoken.

  11. Re:20 Years of virus free computing for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. I'm a virus. Please send me to all your friends. Thanks!

  12. They messed up the login prompt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ";login:" worked perfectly well and they shouldn't have broken compatibility and confused millions of users.

  13. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They may have higher standards, but they very rarely reach them.

  14. Cant wait! by patriciacurtis · · Score: 0

    I cant wait till the windows version comes out!

    --
    http://luckyredfish.com
  15. Humility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was 22 years ago today that Linus Torvalds last humbly announced anything.

  16. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by r_a_trip · · Score: 1

    Buy better hardware...

    --
    # touch universe # chmod +rwx universe # ./universe
  17. Linus doesn't humbly announce anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nor does he do anything else humbly. He's too busy trying to be the biggest asshole he can be to do anything humbly.

    1. Re:Linus doesn't humbly announce anything by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      people who accomplish great things don't have to be humble.

      you're just jealous, you can't start nor manage such a hugely successful project for decades

    2. Re:Linus doesn't humbly announce anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different AC here. I usually don't respond to trolls, but I gotta take issue with your remarks.

      people who accomplish great things don't have to be humble.

      Says who? You? Thankfully, you don't set the standard for what is humble and what itsn't. You want an example of a humble project leader? Nicola Salmoria, the original developer of MAME (Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator). He's a classy guy who NEVER lashed out with the kind of garbage that Linus frequently spews. In fact, most the developers have been cool as a cucumbers. Over the years, there have been a few uppity assholes. Guess what... they were also die-hard Linux users. Coincidence? I think not.

      you're just jealous, you can't start nor manage such a hugely successful project for decades

      Very juvenile and way off-base. That's like saying Roger Ebert was jealous of M. Night Shyamalan because he put "The Village" on his list of all-time hated movies. You obviously haven't been a part of a project where the leader has humility and shows respect for others. Maybe you're the jealous one.

    3. Re:Linus doesn't humbly announce anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..He's too busy trying to be the biggest asshole he can be..

      He's got his work cut out for him trying to compete with Theo.

  18. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DIDhtt IT IN SIX !! by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 2

    Hey, at least they're making progress. 13 years ago Windows was up to 2000, now they've gone all the way down to 8. That's 1992 versions! At this rate they'll hit zero in just 19 days.

  19. I guess the Linux team isn't superstitious. by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Sometimes a version number is a version number and not an association of a long defunct product.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  20. Re:I thank 7ou For your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, the mystical BSD troll.

  21. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the original AC, but thought I'd mention that Linux updates have hosed my network interface configs on three separate occasions in the last year or so. If I'd been a regular user, I'd have given up on Linux after the first time because 'updates broke my internet'.

  22. I'm confused by tom229 · · Score: 1

    When I type uname -r on my Ubuntu install here it says kernel version 3.5.... what gives?

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    1. Re:I'm confused by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      instead of going 3.09, 3.10, 3.11, the Linus chose to go 3.9, 3.10, 3.11

    2. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most distros are way behind the current kernel and hopefully backport security updates, etc.

    3. Re:I'm confused by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      This is what "gives". At least it gives you an idea how to ask a question so that we might possibly be able to answer it. Your question, as written, is a useless waste of everyone's time.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:I'm confused by tom229 · · Score: 1

      Come on Zero__Kelvin, don't be another angry guy. The world has enough of those.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    5. Re:I'm confused by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with being an angry guy. I gave you an opportunity to learn. You should take it. Seriously. Now I have spent even more of my time trying to answer your question, and you have continued to waste it. If you don't ask a question that makes sense, how do you ever expect to learn anything?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:I'm confused by tom229 · · Score: 1

      For a guy so concerned about his time, you seem rather eager to waste it :).

      Your link to a pedantic article on "how to ask a question" was not help. At best, it was an immature attempt at condescension. You are angry. Someone needs to give you a hug.

      Regardless, I did discover the source of the confusion. Not being a programmer I didn't realize that the decimal simply separated major and minor versions. Like all normal human beings would, I assumed it had some sort of correlation to fractions of real numbers. Therefore version 3.5 = 3.50 > 3.11 . To avoid this ambuiguity I would suggest they start versioning with proper placeholders. Ie. 3.05 instead of 3.5.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    7. Re:I'm confused by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
      It isn't a pedantic article. It was written by an extremely well known Open Source developer named Eric Raymond. You clould learn a great deal from it. You seem to think you are quite privileged, and should never have to learn anything. "What gives" is a ridiculously stupid question. I can't even call it poorly thought out, since it wasn't thought out at all. Your ignorance isn't something the whole world should cater too, even if it made sense. e.g.:

      ". To avoid this ambuiguity I would suggest they start versioning with proper placeholders. Ie. 3.05 instead of 3.5."

      There is no ambiguity to be avoided. What is necessary is for you to learn what you are talking about before you make ridiculous statements. It isn't a quantity, ergo it doesn't follow the rules of a quantity. The format of a revision is major#.Minor# Your arrogance is virtually unbounded to think that you are smarter than every software engineer on the planet, and that you have a "correct" way of doing it. Your falsely perceived ambiguity is owed directly to your penchant to remain as ignorant as possible and then expect the world to change according to your misunderstanding of it.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way" had reached version 3.10, then your reply would have also answered the question!

  23. Linux for Workgroups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely, this will be the year of the desktop.

  24. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Well I don't know what you are doing wrong, but it is definitely something. I have been using Mandrake->Mandriva->Mageia Linux, as well as several other distros and I can count on one hand the number of problems like this I have had in the last 7 years or so, even if I lop all my fingers off and my thumb.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  25. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This what what Linux Zealots, and you are a fierce one, can't grasp: So, you've have very few problems. You want a cookie? Meanwhile, a significant number of others have had problems. And, true to the Zealots Code, you blame the user:

    Well I don't know what you are doing wrong, but it is definitely something.

  26. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    A significant number of people have problems "with Windows" when it turns out to be a matter of the user doing something wrong too. What's your point?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  27. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by petit_robert · · Score: 1

    Concurred : I spent the last seven years on Debian, all upgrades went without a hitch, all my software needs being covered many times over.

    Also, I have been working full time for over 3 years with an eee pc, which is close to unusable under Windows, and quite pleasant with linux.

  28. Linux will never reach year of the desktop! by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 2

    Linux will never reach year of the desktop even with this kernel release coming up. In a lot of ways Linux right now in various distro's such as Ubuntu and variants like it kind of remind me of the Windows 3.x and 95 days. You might have decent driver support for most hardware but come time to upgrading the kernel more often then not you break the official closed source nvidia drivers along with your nice GUI boot screen that usually hides all the normal boot messages from the kernel as it's loaded up until you see your fancy login screen. Same goes with the god awful support of AMD video support in Linux both with official and open source drivers and more often then not your network and ow wi-fi settings might be hosed or you may not even have the WI-FI driver needed and then it's a mad dash off to the official Ubuntu forums for help.

    And applications need to be improved too in some area's. There's really only one half assed decent CD/DVD/BR burning program and thats K3B that actually won't produce messed up unreadable discs. Wheras in Windows you have the excellent free CDBurnerXP or if you like bloatware "one does it all" package the commercial Nero Burning rom. Video players in Linux suck too when you don't have much choice been mplayer and it's front ends and VLC. Gnome Mplayer as a front-end example can't even jump to a specific point in hours, minutes, or seconds in a video if you want and won't allow you to save bookmarks.

    VLC on the other hand DOES allow you to jump to a specific time, but it sure as hell can't save bookmarks at any point in a video until you use a workaround of saving a bookmark into a playlist file, and not too mention that when playing audio files VLC will absolutely ignore embedded artwork in say Ogg Vorbis and FLAC files and by default will try and download cover art that's garbage in quality or completly wrong.

    When in comparison to windows xp/7/8 you have K-lite media codec pack and the great Media Player Classic HC (MPC-HC) that not only has more modern video renderers such as Haala and MadVR but can also use newer LAV audio/video decoders for much better picture and sound quality compared to VLC, and if you don't want to use LAV decoders you can use ffmpeg included with k-lite instead and STILL get better picture quality. Oh and also no problems playing DVD's either when even with restricted-extra's packages in Ubuntu and variants and some other stuff installed to play dvd's you still find the occasional DVD that will not play because of it's copy protection garbage.

    Image viewers and editors aren't much better. Irfanview and Xnview are great to use but all you have with Ubuntu is the newer XnviewMP (Multi-Platform) which is really the only decent image viewer on Linux these day's that isn't retarded. For editors sure you have GIMP on Windows, Linux ETC but Adobe Photoshop still has a fair amount of features that GIMP doesn't have. Audio players in Ubuntu suffer too when the only decent audio player is Audacious but in comparison to Foobar2000 on windows which does so much freaking more it's like night and day.

    Overall in a lot of ways windows has better apps in some areas or has more development in some area's towards audio and video quality in playback. It's just that for the most part a lot of people are dumbasses and don't take precautions of running ONLY Firefox as a browser with Adblock Plus, Noscript, Cookie Controller, Ghostery (or DoNotTrackMe if you prefer) and Socialfixer (to fix whats annoying as hell on facebook) and don't actually read each popup from an installer asking if you'd like to install "X toolbar" or "X program" and automatically default to YES until you click no or refuse to avoid getting malware and viruses and browser hijackers simply because people are too stupid to read and in a hurry to always click through every screen. That and people who still to this day launch attachments from emails.

    Linux is no better either these days with some newer malware packages showing up and with all those so called wonderful Linux help

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
    1. Re:Linux will never reach year of the desktop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but in comparison to Foobar2000 on windows which does so much freaking more it's like night and day.

      I used to use foobar2000 then I found QuodLibet/ExFalso. Which also runs on windows and spanks the ass of every other animal out there when it comes to mass tagging.

  29. no, 1.2.13 will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rule 4fr!

  30. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only time I've seen that in a Linux box was almost ten years ago, and Windows shared the same problem. Neither I nor Windows could find a driver for the sound chip so I bought a USB Sound blaster. Chip worked fine in Linux but not Windows, Creative Labs worked fine in Windows but not in Linux. As to wifi I've not had issues with wifi in either OS in an Acer notebook, or a Dell or HP tower. However, wifi connects a lell of a lot faster in Linux.

    I bought a bluetooth dongle to get pictures from my phone to my computer, and I didn't think it would work in Linux because there were installation programs for Mac and Windows but not Linux. It turned out Linux simply didn't need them, I plugged the dongle in and it just worked, no installation whatever.

    Your favorite OS is years behind linux, shill. And "chances" is spelled with a C and "belly up" is not a single word.

  31. This is insanity (and here is not Sparta) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kernel 3.11! WTF. I do embedded Linux and this sucks. Instead of splitting kernel and device drivers and stay with the kernel improvment/bug fixes we get now minor releases almost every month for the whole kernel. It's getting so complex that it looks more like a Windows than a *nix.

  32. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    One example : user installs Debian, can't see the wifi networks. What did he do wrong?

  33. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Exactly. You obviously agree with my. As another example. A user installs Windows. He can't see the WiFi networks. What did he do wrong?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  34. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    The Windows user can fix it himself by double-clicking a setup.exe stored on a CD-ROM or USB stick, provided by Broadcom or TP-Link or D-Link etc. ; the Debian user needs sysadmin skills , wired connection to the internet and knowledge about what a "firmware blob image" is.

  35. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Buy better hardware...

    That doesn't always work. If you buy a better sound card, you will get worse linux drivers, as ALSA devs are busy supporting Intel HDA and Realtek ALC instead.

  36. Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
    First of all, you keep confusing the terms user and sysadmin. Users use computers that already have an OS installed and configured. The minute that you start installing and configuring an OS, whether Windows, OS X, or Linux, you have left the domain of the user. You are performing a sysadmin task. Don't ever forget that, or you will keep making ridiculous statements like you have so far.

    The Windows user can fix it himself by double-clicking a setup.exe stored on a CD-ROM or USB stick, provided by Broadcom or TP-Link or D-Link etc

    No. They cannot. They don't know what a device driver is, in fact. They don't know how to verify if they have a hardware issue or a software issue. They just know "the damn thing isn't working! They have no idea what wireless networking is, except that they know they can connect to the intertubes.

    "; the Debian user needs sysadmin skills , wired connection to the internet and knowledge about what a "firmware blob image" is."

    ... and the Microsoft Server 2012, Windows 7, Windows 8, etc. "user" (i.e. sysadmin) needs the same sysadmin skills. Again, you have shown where the user is ignorant, and that ignorance has bit him in the ass. He is trying to play system administrator sans the qualifications necessary to do so. If he wants to try his hand at Linux system administration he could use a distribution that is designed for a "user" (i.e. sysadmin) of his skill level. For example, Mandriva and Mageia cater to the newbie crowd quite well. They are but two distributions that will handle all the tasks you mentioned for you quite well, and have GUI interfaces for everything you want to do, including setting up a DNS Server, etc.

    In fact, a good distribution like Mageia is easier to install and configure than Windows, and I mean by a long shot. If you have trouble believing that then you have never seen a typical user try to install Windows. I have never seen a user who could do it correctly.

    How do I install a LAMP stack on Windows? I couldn't possible answer that in this post. How do I install a complete LAMP stack in Mageia? Simple: Open a konsole using the menu, type su - followed by the enter key, and enter the password to become root, then do urpmi tsask-lamp. In case you missed it, that was the complete instructions to install an entire LAMP Stack in one sentence. Sure, there are some "packages" you can use for Windows, but lets look at the first FAQ I found. What? I'm a friggin user! How do I know if I have Service Pack 2, whatever the hell that is? I thought Firewall was a movie with Harrison Ford! What the hell is a port? WTF!:

    I have helped many, many people switch to Linux, and with one exception they all thanked me time and again for helping them get away from Windows and its complications. The one exception's objection? Somebody told me hackers use Linux! You installed it! Your a hacker! Get it off my system right now! Translation: He was a complete moron.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun