Slashdot Mirror


Tiny $45 Cubic Mini-PC Supports Android and Linux

DeviceGuru writes "SolidRun refreshed its line of tiny 2 x 2 x 2-inch mini-PCs with four new community-backed models based on 1.2GHz multi-core Freescale i.MX6 SoCs. The CuBox-i devices support Android 4.2.2 and Linux, offer HDMI, S/PDIF, IR, eSATA, GbE, USB, WiFi, and Bluetooth interfaces (depending on model). All the models offer 1.2GHz clock speeds, OpenGL/ES 2.0 3D support, and video acceleration for 1080p video, while the two higher-end ones supply more robust GPUs that add OpenCL 1.1 support."

197 comments

  1. How much RAM? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    How much RAM?

    1. Re:How much RAM? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are 4 models; 512MB, 1GB, 1GB, and 2GB of RAM.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:How much RAM? by fizzer06 · · Score: 1

      The article http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-cubic-mini-pc-runs-android-and-linux-on-freescale-arm-cpu/ states there are 4 models with RAM ranging from 512 Meg up to 2 Gig.

    3. Re:How much RAM? by Score+Whore · · Score: 0

      1 GB.

      But more importantly is what exactly is the use case for this device? It'd be nice if the people who are designing these all-in-ones would stop thinking of a piece of bric-a-brac that is sitting on a shelf and start thinking in terms of sitting inside a cabinet built into the wall of my home. I don't need a cutesy little cube. I need a remotely managed, ruggedized unit.

    4. Re:How much RAM? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Up to 2GB, apparently. (In a 32-bit address space, you won't use much more of it anyway.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re: How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I suggest finding someone with a 3D printer?

    6. Re:How much RAM? by stanlyb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Media server - for this you need good video and audio processor power. RaspPi is not capable of it.
      File server - You could use the cheaper variant (RaspPi), but nevertheless, this one could do the job too. Maybe it will be able to run some more advance NAS server!!! To be seen...
      Router/Switch/Firewall - you name it. The nice touch is that you could make/build your own server, instead of praying that the nice little toy you bought from Wallmart does not have toooo many backdoors in it.

    7. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has SATA, Gigabit Ethernet,and enough RAM so it should make an interesting file server.
      RPi on the other hand shares Ethernet with USB so the bandwidth really not there (assuming that buggy USB driver issues isn't the show stopper).

    8. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that you don't need a separate computer for any of the tasks you listed. Media files can be stored on the computer you watch them on, and usually your internet router these days comes out of the box with all the networking functionality you could think of. Trust me, it's only an unnecessary hassle to babysit an extra server machine at home.

    9. Re:How much RAM? by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a tough choice between the 1GB and 1GB.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    10. Re:How much RAM? by blackiner · · Score: 2

      I actually was really liking the prospect of using this as a router. I currently have an old PC doing this, but it is not the perfect solution (power hungry, for one). The ethernet driver looks like it can do BQL which is great for the fq_codel qdisc, and the wireless card seems capable of AP mode (not 100% sure on either of these... just did a cursory glance). The main issue is it only has one ethernet port, would be perfect if they added an optional second or something, as I'd rather not add one via usb.

    11. Re:How much RAM? by blackiner · · Score: 1

      Certainly, the initial setup of a linux based router is a bit of work, but once you have it all configured, there is literally 0 babysitting aside from periodically installing distro updates if you want. I run fedora on mine, just type in sudo yum update once a week... couldn't be easier.

    12. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My problem with RaspberryPi for file server is the 10/100 ethernet. Gigabit is cheap and prevalent. I understand the keeping costs down aspect though.

    13. Re:How much RAM? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those models differ in other ways (CPU/GPU speeds, RAM speed, etc).

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    14. Re: How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, the suggestion is that they should build their own enclosure if the provided one doesn't live up to their requirements.

    15. Re:How much RAM? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the 64-bit ARMs. If they can do ECC RAM, I'll be a happy camper.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    16. Re: How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There once was a time on slashdot (and in the rest of the world) where people would tinker and hack and put things together for the *fun* of it. We truly live in dark times. Go on, I'm sure netflix is waiting.

    17. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually was really liking the prospect of using this as a router. I currently have an old PC doing this, but it is not the perfect solution (power hungry, for one).

      Power hungry for sure. I don't know what your "old PC" is but I'm guessing you probably spend more money on electricity to power it for six months than you would spend to buy a brand new, uh, router, that draws a fraction of the power upon which you could install dd-wrt or some variant if you require more customized tweaking. For what reason do you do this?

      (I used to do this too years ago until I did the electricity use calculation--that made me ditch a bunch of old PCs...)

    18. Re: How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes but they tinkered new and interesting things. Making a project box in the most expensive and roundabout way to avoid buying a 5$ project box is neither new or interesting. It is merely stupid and trendy.

    19. Re:How much RAM? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      My problem with RaspberryPi for file server is the 10/100 ethernet. Gigabit is cheap and prevalent. I understand the keeping costs down aspect though.

      The rPi has enough ethernet issues that Gigabit wouldn't make much difference (there are people who will sell you a 'gigabit' USB 2.0 NIC; but that's because there are bad people, not because it works all that well). The ethernet, and both accessible USB ports, are provided by a combo NIC/USB hub switch dangling from a single USB2 root port on the SoC. Since SD cards top out at fairly low capacities, that typically implies that the USB bus will be dealing with mass-storage chatter between the rPi and your external HDD enclosure and ethernet traffic for whatever file serving protocol you are using. Not Fast.

    20. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then buy one. There are a bunch like that. They won't show up on slashdot because it's not news and they hardly matters.

    21. Re: How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's right, mod me down instead of coming up with a rebuttal. Coward. Go spend 50$ and a week to 3D print a 25 cent part, you retard.

    22. Re:How much RAM? by IVI4573R · · Score: 2

      Power calculations is exactly why my latest home-built router uses an low-power mother board with an Atom CPU rather than something more power hungry. Not as efficient as some other options like this SOC, but it's still x86 so I had more options on Linux distros. In the end it was personal preference, tho.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    23. Re:How much RAM? by blackiner · · Score: 2

      It is interesting and I like to be able to play around with new tech. The codel qdisc is only available in fairly new kernels... was introduced in 3.5 I think. Most custom firmwares use rather old kernels and you have little control over the actual software versions. I also use an ath9k adapter with hostapd, it is hard to find routers with 450Mbs support in linux. Also, I can use it as a samba host, torrent host, plus the fedora builds use hardening techniques and it has selinux enabled by default. Plenty of other stuff I could do too if I wanted, like set it up as a RDP server, and it wouldn't bog the computer down too bad since it has an actual processor.

      Its basically just an interesting expiriment I wanted to try, and it works rather well.

    24. Re:How much RAM? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You aren't looking for a rugged unit. You are looking for a mentalist.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    25. Re:How much RAM? by PNutts · · Score: 1

      If you can't see it does it matter? And if it's tucked away in a cabinet why does it need to be ruggedized?

    26. Re:How much RAM? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Same problem as this model. The Gigabit is limited to 480Mbps (USB 2.0 bus speed). Actually this Cubic isn't all that different from an RPi, they run the same family chips, the same type of RAM, the same type of I/O.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    27. Re:How much RAM? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      My router, provided by ISP and that I'm forced to use no matter what, does a lot of things already but not quite everything. What I want most is a ssh server with screen sessions. Eventually I'd hope to be able to wake the big PC up. Some "personal storage cloud" (bullshit for stuff that I can access from outside), even just some data on the computer's flash but 100% accessible, would be nice.

    28. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its basically just an interesting expiriment I wanted to try, and it works rather well.

      Totally understood, one old PC's power draw isn't going to break the bank and tinkering is fun as hell :)

      (kids are what break the bank...)

    29. Re:How much RAM? by adolf · · Score: 2

      there are people who will sell you a 'gigabit' USB 2.0 NIC; but that's because there are bad people, not because it works all that well

      If I get ~9 megabytes per second in the real world from 100Mbps Ethernet on actual file transfers over the on-board Ethernet on my laptop, and ~30 megabytes-per-second on actual file transfers the USB 2.0 Ethernet adapter on that same laptop, then: Gigabit Ethernet over USB 2.0 should be a boon.

      Not because performance is improved by a factor of 10 (as going from 100 to 1000Mbps Ethernet might theoretically be in an ideal situation), but because it's more than three times faster than what I could do before, and I spend 1/3 the time waiting for stuff to move from A to B.

      And if I can plug in a cheap widget that gets me 3x the speed, no matter what the platform or the problem: As long as speed is an issue, I'm sold: 3x is always better than 1x, even if 10x is ideal and 3x is less than 10x.

      Why do you proclaim that the people who would sell me such an adapter are "bad people"?

      (Let me guess: You're an engineer. You probably even have the ring to prove it.)

    30. Re:How much RAM? by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Not a cabinet like a kitchen cabinet, a cabinet like circuit breaker box mounted in the garage. It needs to be ruggedized so that it can deal with high dust, high humidity, occasional bumps, not ruggedized such that I can throw it off the rim of the Grand Canyon to be found in perfect working order by whoever comes next after humans are extinct.

      I want people who are building small, moderate power computers to be thinking that I want a cloud in my home. I want to walk over to it periodically and replace some kind of failed storage device. But other than that I'd like the damned thing to be mostly hands off and not something I have to fit into the decor of my house.

    31. Re:How much RAM? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      You mean, your ISP is the good guy? LOL, man, get real. The best solution is to use this combination: Internet ISP router Your router Your home network.

    32. Re:How much RAM? by niko9 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not a cabinet like a kitchen cabinet, a cabinet like circuit breaker box mounted in the garage. It needs to be ruggedized so that it can deal with high dust, high humidity, occasional bumps, not ruggedized such that I can throw it off the rim of the Grand Canyon to be found in perfect working order by whoever comes next after humans are extinct.

      I want people who are building small, moderate power computers to be thinking that I want a cloud in my home. I want to walk over to it periodically and replace some kind of failed storage device. But other than that I'd like the damned thing to be mostly hands off and not something I have to fit into the decor of my house.

      You could buy something like this: http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-detail.php?product=TS-7700#

      This SKU: TS-7700-IND-800 TS-7700 with the industrial grade (-40ÂC to 85ÂC) PXA166 at 800MHz has the ruggedness you're looking for.

    33. Re:How much RAM? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Dear troll,

      Please explain what "the DOT," "a cave," Snowden, or whether or not I keep my head buried in sand has to do with the relationship between USB and Ethernet.

      Sincerely,

      adolf

    34. Re:How much RAM? by stanlyb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dear idiot, there is only one difference between engineer and engineer with dot (ENG.). The second one is the real one, the first one is...lets say just a technician. As for Snowden, you are either troll, or some extremely stupid bird with a head in the sand.

    35. Re: How much RAM? by miknix · · Score: 1

      I am considering purchasing one to make it some sorts if midi station connected to my piano keyboard. I already have a laptop LCD screen in place of the partiture, so this is just the last piece of the cake.

    36. Re:How much RAM? by ardor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same problem as this model. The Gigabit is limited to 480Mbps (USB 2.0 bus speed). Actually this Cubic isn't all that different from an RPi, they run the same family chips, the same type of RAM, the same type of I/O.

      Not true. Ethernet does not go through USB here; it is connected to the SoC directly. See http://boundarydevices.com/i-mx6-ethernet/ . The Raspberry Pi uses a BCM 2835 from Broadcom, while the Cubox-i uses a Freescale i.MX6 , so they are not the same chip family, they aren't even made by the same company. Raspberry Pi also does not have eSata, while the CuBox-i.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    37. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Media server - for this you need good video and audio processor power. RaspPi is not capable of it.

      File server - You could use the cheaper variant (RaspPi), but nevertheless, this one could do the job too. Maybe it will be able to run some more advance NAS server!!! To be seen...

      Router/Switch/Firewall - you name it. The nice touch is that you could make/build your own server, instead of praying that the nice little toy you bought from Wallmart does not have toooo many backdoors in it.

      You obviously have never used a Raspberry. I have two running as media servers and they will play the best blueray without issue. I recently played a 30 gig 1080p...blah blah.. no problem, no skipping....

    38. Re:How much RAM? by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      With HDMI out and an IR receiver, it looks like something you get with an HD-PVR and a programmable remote for the parents and set it up to download a DPG and record/play television shows.

    39. Re: How much RAM? by temcat · · Score: 1

      What distro, SW, etc. you plan to use? I would also love to read about how this works out for you. Do you per chance have a blog?

    40. Re: How much RAM? by miknix · · Score: 1

      I was not planning creating one but maybe that would be cool. I'll setup something tonight then,. I'll drop the link here, maybe you guys have some good ideas.

      Basically I want rosegarden and timidity to work. I didn't check yet if rosegarden can be built for ARM. Timidity can be built for ARM.
      Regarding the distribution, I'm going to create something dedicated using Gentoo.

        Then I'll need to find a good input device. I thought about using a cheap resistive touch panel over the LCD. But maybe that's not the best. A mouse is out of the question.

    41. Re:How much RAM? by chill · · Score: 1

      Then stick it in a closet, or a basement or the back of some cabinet. Screw the trendy little bricks. Get yourself a BeagleBone Black or a Raspberry Pi and mount it on a wall next to a switch in a closet.

      I ended up buying a small rack (12U, 2-post, desktop) and putting a small 1U switch, 1U UPS and 2U mini-itx server in it. It sits in a closet where I had a power outlet installed on a separate circuit and an air vent installed. I also cut small hole in the wall to the closet to allow conduit and run networking cables. One runs to a ceiling mounted wireless access point which I plan on upgrading to 802.11ac next weekend.

      Too much of what comes out (*cough* Apple *cough*) comes from the computer-as-a-fashion-accessory mentality.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    42. Re:How much RAM? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      These cubes could serve as media players, or browsing PCs or just as unobtrusive mail/file/web servers. I'm not sure what's stopping you throwing a Raspberry Pi or some other board into a ruggedized cabinet into the wall of your home if you so wished.

    43. Re:How much RAM? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Media server - for this you need good video and audio processor power. RaspPi is not capable of it.

      Indeed, my first question is "can it run MythTV?" (With an external tuner like a HDHomeRun, of course.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    44. Re:How much RAM? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I run fedora on mine, just type in sudo yum update once a week... couldn't be easier.

      Sure it could... you could make it a cron job.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    45. Re:How much RAM? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Even easier: Do nothing.

      If your toy is inside a firewall at home, then you don't need to update it all the time. Just leave it alone and it will run for many years.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    46. Re:How much RAM? by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Media server - for this you need good video and audio processor power. RaspPi is not capable of it.

      So, not knowing the math exactly, is there a configuration of this device (# of cores and RAM) that will play back AVCHD files without problems?

    47. Re:How much RAM? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      In my experience, that's a good way to come home to an HTPC that's not working anymore. Unattended updates scare me.

      OTOH, if yum has a way to just fetch the packages and not install them, that might be worth setting up a cronjob for, just to make the attended update that much quicker.

    48. Re: How much RAM? by eriqk · · Score: 1

      Coward.

      Oh, the irony.

    49. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you put it in bridge mode?

    50. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GAMING!

      It runs ANDROID. And has faster GPU OPTIONS.

      I would think it would be obvious what the use case is.

    51. Re:How much RAM? by AJodock · · Score: 2

      According to the Cubic website:

      (*) 1000Mbps link is limited to 470Mbps actual bandwidth due to internal chip busses limitation

      Sounds like they have the ethernet chipset off of the USB bus on this unit as well. Although I would expect the ethernet to perform better than a Pi since it has more CPU power to handle the overhead.

    52. Re:How much RAM? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I've always thought it would be neat to have a server built into a wall of my house, in a ruggedized fire resistant case, that was connected directly into the wiring and communicated over the ground line. Then have a few NAS boxes inserted into the walls in the same way.

      This way, I always have a network system and data backups, even if my house gets burgled or some TLA decides to raid the house for some random reason (if it's a specific reason, I'll have to let them know where the devices are, most likely).

      Downsides: storage is always too small, moving would be a pain, natural disasters would still be an issue, might not pass safety inspection.

      Hmm... another idea: a NAS-style system built into the ceiling that takes striped SD cards through slots?

    53. Re: How much RAM? by kharchenko · · Score: 1

      Speaking of that, can it run Netflix and Skype (through Android or otherwise) ?

    54. Re:How much RAM? by spudnic · · Score: 1

      This used to make sense but the logic doesn't hold up these days. Not only do consumer targeted routers pretty much just work these days, they use less electricity.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    55. Re: How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People still do that, they're just not on Slashdot anymore.

      Look at the news stories they post. There's hardly anything left here for tinkering geeks and nerds.

    56. Re:How much RAM? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I guess so, but I have absolutely no need to.

    57. Re:How much RAM? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Dear troll,

      So the difference between an engineer and an ENG. is that one of them may understand how to use English abbreviations with appropriate capitalization, while the other of them does not. And it is this distinction that makes the relationship between Snowden, USB, and Ethernet obvious.

      Did I get that right?

      Best wishes,

      adolf

    58. Re:How much RAM? by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      I don't know how good of a media server it would make. More people are releasing the retarded 10bit H.264 encodes that can't be decoded in most hardware, even in 1080P resolutions. The only hardware acceleration I know of personally is for 10bit is the tegra3, my nexus7 could decode it. Maybe more SoCs are starting to be able to decode it, but I doubt it.

      Other than that if you are careful about what encodes you get it should work out decently as a media server.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    59. Re: How much RAM? by temcat · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I don't seem to be able to leave a comment there, in addition to the UI being in Spanish (though I can figure it out by word stems :-) )

      Nice stuff you have there. What do you plan to use as the MIDI interface between the computer and the keyboard? Some DIY adapter? Or are there USB audio-MIDI interfaces that are supported with a generic USB audio driver on Linux/ARM?

    60. Re: How much RAM? by miknix · · Score: 1

      Aha, the UI was in Portuguese. I thought the language depended on your login and was not hard-coded into the blog, guess not!
      Regarding not being able to leave a comment there, can you provide more info? I checked through all the settings and everything seems fine. You just need a Google or OpenID login.

      The keyboard (YAMAHA PSR E-333) has a generic USB MIDI connection (no wave audio, just midi), it works perfectly with the usbmidi kernel module and is shown as a bidirectional MIDI device in ALSA. I can record MIDI events from the keyboard using (for example) Rosegarden and also use the keyboard as a general midi output (instead of timidity++). For someone who just started messing with this, I find it pretty cool.
      By the way, since ALSA is also used in Linux/ARM, I expect that it will work the same way.

      I was wondering if I could actually use my phone (since it has a MHL connection) instead of a beagleboard/cubepc/raspi. The thing is I need both the HDMI and USB ports but they are both in the same connector : \

    61. Re: How much RAM? by temcat · · Score: 1

      Regarding not being able to leave a comment there, can you provide more info? I checked through all the settings and everything seems fine. You just need a Google or OpenID login.

      I chose Google account authentication method, then hit Send. Nothing happened. I wasn't redirected to Google, and my message didn't appear.

      Regarding the UI language detection, I should have a Russian IP and do not take any measures against locating me, so in theory, the server should have offered Russian or English as a fallback.

      By the way, since ALSA is also used in Linux/ARM, I expect that it will work the same way.

      To me this is one of the most interesting parts, because it may or may not work. The only option is to try and see.

    62. Re:How much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that seems spot on. -i was interested in this usb RS-232 feature & how thats bussed

  2. Pre-Order... :( by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    I'll be more impressed when I can actually buy a sub $100 PC... Too many broken promises.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Pre-Order... :( by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll be more impressed when I can actually buy a sub $100 PC

      Here, for $89. Helluva better CPU than these: 4*2.0 instead of 1*1.0 ($45) or 4*1.0 ($120).

      Sadly, it has no eSATA (just some extra-fast eMMC), and 100Mb ethernet instead of 470Mb you get in the $95 and $120 CuBox models.

      Other competition seems to be several times as expensive and have terrible specs.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Pre-Order... :( by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      check out Cubieboard because it has lots of great features including a SATAII port but it doesnt have wireless. you can get the newest model for $60.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Pre-Order... :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      470Mb you get in the $95 and $120 CuBox models

      Some people get over 800Mb/s. But YMMV.

    4. Re:Pre-Order... :( by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem with these mini computers is the interface. Sure you can get a tiny computer for cheap now, but touch screens (the only interface that would remotely work and be supported at the same time) are still $200 minimum. Size of the screen has little effect on the price and there are very few choices so you have to adjust your application to fit the part rather than the other way around.

      What we need is a smart-phone that's not a phone, runs on 12volt DC and has a back brimming with I/O ports.

    5. Re:Pre-Order... :( by DogDude · · Score: 1

      There are millions of them on the market.

      Oh wait... did you mean a *new* sub $100 PC? Good luck with that!

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:Pre-Order... :( by symbolset · · Score: 2

      You can get any one of dozens of quad core ARM tablet PCs in 7" with 10-point capacitive touch that run Ubuntu or Android for under $100 delivered. SDHC and HDMI out at 1080p for the second screen, usb if you must have wired network, keyboard and mouse or whatever. For $200 you can get 10". Admit it: your complaint has an unstated "with Windows". That, you can't have.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    7. Re:Pre-Order... :( by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Here's a $88 PC, it's an old model (still has a compact flash slot) but it is a small, self-contained IBM compatible PC that uses a handful watts.
      http://www.norhtec.com/products/mcjrsx/index.html

      A $120 one which is much better (has a FPU for a start), a lot more RAM.. 512MB, and is bundled in a keyboard like an 8bit or 16bit computer.
      http://www.norhtec.com/products/surfboard/index.html
      Looks fun! But doesn't look powerful enough to play youtube videos (it will run any x86 stuff too, as long as it's not i686)
      Shipping cost is hell, though.

    8. Re:Pre-Order... :( by temcat · · Score: 1

      Can you specifically recommend any for Ubuntu?

    9. Re:Pre-Order... :( by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Other competition seems to be several times as expensive and have terrible specs.

      What are you on about? You can get a MK908 for $65ish from various sources, the GPU is only a bit slower, the CPU is slightly faster. I would have bought an Odroid U2 but they only offer a four week warranty. That does not demonstrate confidence in the product.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Pre-Order... :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ODROID-U2 is 90$, and much better than this one.

    11. Re:Pre-Order... :( by Formorian · · Score: 2

      I got: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mini-PC-TV-Box-AV-Android-4-2-AML8726-MX-1G-8G-HDMI-SPDIF-Remote-Control-/221275964220?pt=US_Cable_TV_Boxes&hash=item338513433c

      Under $70 shipped. I believe it can also run linux, but I want android for XBMC Full HW accel (thanks to PIOS team) and full Netflix HW accel in 1 box. Also that 70 has enclosure. Yes only dual core, but it has played everything I've thrown at it in XBMC and streamed from multiple sources fine, plays netflix great.

      I'm really satisfied with it for the price so far. Just need netflix to make a remote friendly app for android (have one for googletv, shouldn't be that hard.).

    12. Re:Pre-Order... :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ODROID-XU has usb 3.0 support.

    13. Re:Pre-Order... :( by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      they only offer a four week warranty

      The cost of shipping to Korea and back, together with customs fees, makes warranty pretty moot.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    14. Re:Pre-Order... :( by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The cost of shipping to Korea and back, together with customs fees, makes warranty pretty moot.

      Uh what? I don't care if they want the hardware back or not, that's their problem, but if it fails in less than 28 days I damned sure want a replacement.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Pre-Order... :( by houghi · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of computers that you can buy for under 100USD. e.g. the RaspberryPi and MK802 are two. Both can be used for Internet and email and word processing and many other things.

      But perhaps you need to be more specific what you expect.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  3. Will buy it... by stanlyb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will buy it, but will not preorder it. I have a bad experience with such a business strategy. And lets face it, preorder is like giving away a lot of money with the hope that the seller will fulfill his promise, to deliver....i hope you got the picture.

    1. Re:Will buy it... by RatBastard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Held on to that Duke Nukem Forever pre-order receipt for how many years?

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Will buy it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i hope you got the picture.

      I pre-ordered the picture, but it hasn't shipped yet.

    3. Re:Will buy it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you heard, but that did actually come out. Gamestop even honored receipts for pre orders.

    4. Re:Will buy it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have gladly pre-ordered if it was available in a Borg cube design. "We are the Android. You Will be Assimilated. Resistance is Futile."

    5. Re:Will buy it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pre-order should always come at a discount

  4. If you're looking at arms: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to give specific examples, but I think THIS says it all:
    http://dx.com/c/consumer-electronics-199/hd-media-players-103/android-hd-players-191
    Anywhere from 35 to 150 dollars with a mean price of around 80 for a quad core RK3188 with a mali 400MP(2 or 4), 1 or 2 gigs of DDR3, and either wifi/bluetooth, or wifi/bluetooth/ethernet options. Some models MIGHT even support ethernet over HDMI (there was one with a dock a month or two back that had an ethernet port on it and a passthrough for hdmi out to a monitor/tv.

    1. Re:If you're looking at arms: by alvarogmj · · Score: 2

      yes, only problem is that android on these systems is absolutely horrible for anything but media center work. If you want a PC, then don't go for any of those. I have a mk802 II and its capabilities as a general purpose machine are pathetic

    2. Re:If you're looking at arms: by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Oh I don't know. If general purpose is web browsing, email, Facebook, Netflix, and some casual gaming it's actually pretty good. It won't run Crysis, even through an RDP connection to my gaming PC, but I didn't expect that from a $40 HDMI stick.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  5. Will get one or two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will definitely buy a few ones if they happen to deliver what's advertised.

    We now need "open hardware" more than ever.

  6. smaller isnt always better by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    1) it's a small PC which is cool but there is something to be said for mechanical stability, which is why all those android sticks plug directly into an HDMI port. i'm not saying they should do that but they need to do something.
    2) eSATA enclosures are costly (nearly the same price as the CuBox) so why not just have SATA port and offer larger cases that incorporate everything you need, like a power system so that you you can run this using your 2.5" or 3.5" drive? it would even solve the mechanical stability issue.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:smaller isnt always better by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Smaller is ALWAYS better. Period. I can think of so many uses for these cubes my mind is racing.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    2. Re:smaller isnt always better by kesuki · · Score: 1

      imagine a beowulf cluster of those... with hdmi dongle there is a problem of needing an hdmi connection for every node in your cluster. usb and ethernet are both better. at least PoE is great for small clusters. i do not know which devices support PoE but it is great at reducing cable clutter for a beowulf cluster

    3. Re:smaller isnt always better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Smaller is ALWAYS better. Period. I can think of so many uses for these cubes my mind is racing.

      Why? Did it shrink?

    4. Re:smaller isnt always better by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

      I can think of several more if they changed the form factor so it would fit in my pocket. 2"x2"x2" is about the most inconvenient possible form factor for a device of this overall size.

    5. Re:smaller isnt always better by drkim · · Score: 1

      Smaller is ALWAYS better. Period. I can think of so many uses for these cubes my mind is racing.

      Agreed. The minute I saw the pic I was picturing a wearable with this... or maybe a gamer/VR or AR backpack with four inside.

    6. Re:smaller isnt always better by dremspider · · Score: 1

      You can connect into the serial port (same cable as most phones use) and then use putty to serial in on the 2 higher end devices. It is very nice and works well. You can also use SSH once it is all set up. I have the older unit.

  7. Android is Linux dumbasses! by the_humeister · · Score: 0

    Idiots! Gosh...

    1. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by dido · · Score: 5, Informative

      True. However, does Richard Stallman now seem so stupid for asking that everyone call "Linux" systems "GNU/Linux" systems? We now have Android/Linux as well as GNU/Linux, so the distinction actually turns out to be a rather important one to make. Everyone likes to joke about how RMS is a crackpot with bad hygeine, but it seems he's been right more often than not.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    2. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by khellendros1984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At this point, Android/Linux is usually just "Android", and GNU/Linux is just "Linux". The only times that I hear a different use in my life is when someone's trying to sound smart on the internet. So far, it seems like disambiguation has kind of taken care of itself.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone likes to joke about how RMS is a crackpot with bad hygeine, but it seems he's been right more often than not.

      This is a common quote parroted by may Linux Zealots and FOSS Extremists, however not even taking into account his idea that proprietary software is wrong/evil/immoral, if you look at the entire scope of what RMS has said, things like, "There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children", he's actually wrong more often that he's right.

    4. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a matter of an old-fashioned thing called 'common decency' to call it GNU/Linux. Without the thousands of GNU components the OS wouldn't even have a working compiler suite. Credit to where it's due.

      As for Android, it's just Android although it should be Android/Linux. That's because the company that made Android is not very decent.

    5. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And OP is the actual "idiot".

    6. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of an old-fashioned thing called 'common decency' to call it GNU/Linux.

      The correct term you're looking for is "common courtesy."

      Credit to where it's due.

      If you want credit for your work, go work on proprietary software. If you want your ego stroked, FOSS isn't for you.

      As for Android, it's just Android although it should be Android/Linux. That's because the company that made Android is not very decent.

      Yeah, right. Android is a hell of a lot better than Linux. Though it's just a Phone/Tablet OS, unlike Linux it doesn't require a buttload of tinkering to make it functional and monstrosities like X11 are rightfully kicked to the curb. Even Canonical can't get their shit together to package a distribution as elegant as Android, though they will try and fail.

    7. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      no the differentiation is not important at all. We have android and we have Linux. At least that is what most people in the real world call them, those that understand the difference don't need it pointed out and those that don't understand could not give a shit anyway.

    8. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of an old-fashioned thing called 'common decency' to call it GNU/Linux. Without the thousands of GNU components the OS wouldn't even have a working compiler suite. Credit to where it's due.

      As for Android, it's just Android although it should be Android/Linux. That's because the company that made Android is not very decent.

      If you think it "should be" Android/Linux, and you also think it's important that linux acknowledge the GNU contribution, then shouldn't it also be Android/GNU/Linux? Are there any more /whatevers you might want to tack on the end so we can make it even longer?

    9. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by emblemparade · · Score: 1

      Uhm, but Android truly is Linux. For many kinds of development work targetting Android, that fact is very important.

      It matters very much that Android and, say, Ubuntu, have the same Linux kernel. It allows for an amazing span of shared effort. And of course it matters very much that Android and Ubuntu are very different OSes.

      So, yes, RMS is exactly right.

      I'll furthermore add that Debian, and OS that many people like you would like to simply call "Linux", is also available in a totally entirely absolutely non-Linux version called Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.

      Names are important and the situation has not taken care of itself.

    10. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yes & No. Here, Linux means a conventional distro like Ubuntu, whereas Android means the tablet/phone OS based on the Linux kernel w/ the Dalvik VM on top of it. Android implies that a whole ecosystem of apps is available, whereas w/ Linux, it varies.

      The thing I'm wondering is - if it's not a tablet and needs to be connected to a non-touch external monitor, why use Android, instead of ChromeOS?

    11. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The moment anyone uses a different non-GNU userland w/ Linux, it would no longer be GNU/Linux, but it wouldn't be Android either. So it makes sense to just use Android for Android, Chrome OS for ChromeOS and Linux for conventional combinations of the Linux kernel and GNU/BSD/Other userlands.

    12. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by emblemparade · · Score: 1

      There's nothing "conventional" about desktop OSes. If anything, Linux is used much more in embedded and now mobile applications. It's desktop Linux OSes that are the outliers.

    13. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, but Android truly is Linux.

      Right....I never said that it wasn't. my claim is that the ones that it matters to (developers) already know that as well. I'll give you that RMS is technically correct, but I don't think he's *practically* correct. The people to whom a given system's architecture matters will either know it already or be forced to figure it out. For everyone else....well, my sister doesn't care how her phone's userspace is architected, but she *does* care that it's "Android", since that actually impacts how she uses it.

      I'll furthermore add that Debian, and OS that many people like you would like to simply call "Linux"

      I'd call Debian GNU/Linux "Debian", or "Debian Linux" if I were introducing it to someone that may have heard "Linux" but may not know specific distributions. If I ever had the need to, I'd call the Debian with an alternate kernel "Debian BSD" or something.

      Names are important and the situation has not taken care of itself.

      I disagree, for most cases. I've never seen a practical case of: "Ohhhhh, you wanted *GNU*/Linux. Sorry, I loaded Android/Linux on your computer!" or "I thought you meant Debian GNU/BSD, not Debian GNU/Linux!" If/when cases like that become a practical concern, I'll start specifying distro+userspace+kernel. Until such time, I'll stick with my current, sufficiently-unambiguous ways.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    14. Re:Android is Linux dumbasses! by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      True. However, does Richard Stallman now seem so stupid for asking that everyone call "Linux" systems "GNU/Linux" systems? We now have Android/Linux as well as GNU/Linux, so the distinction actually turns out to be a rather important one to make. Everyone likes to joke about how RMS is a crackpot with bad hygeine, but it seems he's been right more often than not.

      Being a crackpot and being right aren't mutually exclusive. Remember what they say about broken clocks being right twice a day.

  8. Semi-official support for desktop Linux by kLimePie · · Score: 1

    The only thing that's really news here is that the mini-PC comes with semi-official Linux support, basically a community forum that's linked off the home page. Otherwise there are dozens of other thumb to palm-size computers out there, starting from the most famous Raspberry Pi's to generic HDMI dongles. Except for the cheapest ones which run some chip-specific OS, all of the HDMI dongles run Android. Installing desktop Linux on them should, at worst, be a matter of rooting the device and bootstrapping a bare-bones ARM distro like Debian or Arch on top of the Android kernel.

    1. Re:Semi-official support for desktop Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheevaplug has shipped with Debian / Ubuntu for a few years now. So that's not even new.

  9. Custom router applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think this would work well for a custom router solution?
    This crappy router I have is due for dying (by my hands snapping it in half) and I don't think I want to bother going with someone else and would like more control over it, especially for security reasons.

    I've already made a basic AP before using USB Wi-Fi stick, which is extremely useful when the family goes on holiday since we can share the one connection from the USB wireless internet dongle I have which presently gets connected to my netbook. (which will be happening in a couple weeks in fact, oh wait no the hotel has free Wi-Fi, oh well one less thing!)
    This usually ends up handling my mothers laptop, her boyfriends laptop, sisters laptop sometimes, my netbook and tablet, maybe some cousins if they are there.
    Works fairly well, but I would rather not have an entire netbook on just for that, even if it does use very little power, not to mention the size is the main issue.

    I basically want something that is very small, can easily be tucked away, could handle some generic modem and a couple USB connections.
    This seems to have 3 USB (one being micro, I have adapters flying out my ears), so that fits the bill.
    Linux more or less supports USB things okay these days, correct? I haven't used it directly since 2004-ish on Slax at that, and it was fairly fine then, so I assume it has gotten better since?
    If so, USB modem and Wi-Fi sticks should be fairly good to go?
    Ideally I would want to have a firewall and stuff like that straight on it with some basic security features, some blocks to abusive sites (especially abusive advertisers like the ones that have annoying flashy crap, spy or resell data to anyone ever and fund human trafficking terrorist pedo dictatorships probably)
    Maybe some privoxy action and some stuff like that to keep stuff tidy.

    But I also want it to still, in the end, be useful as an actual computer too. (my tablet would be getting used as the main screen eventually using VNC.)
    So I can do some basic stuff on it that I couldn't, say, do on a tablet, and it would be replacing my netbook for the most part.
    Hell, this thing probably has more power than my netbook, and more connectivity!
    I do love my netbook, very useful for on holiday to do some coding, modelling and the like in the wee hours on holiday or out and about.
    So to be able to replicate the usefulness of that would be absolutely needed.
    Doesn't need keyboard, can use my bluetooth six-axis keyboard from PS3, works very well, has mouse on it too. Admittedly that mouse works terribly on my Samsung tablet, not sure how it would work on generic Android install, still, the stylus exists, and it is easy enough to script a key combination to switch to key2mouse input too.

    I've looked at so many different kinds of hardware over the years but I can never really settle on anything.
    This was one of the first I had looked at, the Fit PC.
    And looking again, daaamn, they have a bunch of new stuff there.
    See, here it begins again, aahajas why?!

    Anyone have any experience with custom routing solutions that are also useful for a computer?
    Or even people with experience in custom routing solutions and small computers that could suggest models that would be better suited to the task?
    Or should I just give in and buy NSA-backdoor-approved routers from 'murrica? Or from China? Then I can install custom firmware and get added to a watchlist.

    1. Re:Custom router applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think this would work well for a custom router solution?

      Probably. It sounds like it'll take some effort to set up to do what you want, but it shouldn't be too bad.

      Linux more or less supports USB things okay these days, correct?

      Generally, it should have very good support. I'm sure there's unsupported hardware out there, and hardware that you'd have to rip the firmware blob out of the Windows driver though, so I'm not going to try to make a blanket claim that whatever devices you have on hand will absolutely work out of the box.

      Calm down, though. Seriously. It would make your post easier to read if you didn't ramble so much.

  10. Check those numbers by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm underwhelmed. The top end quad core device is $130, and they want another $38 for "shipping" (Stated as "$18 to $38). Clearly a 2x2x2 device, even well packed, should cost a lot less to ship. And on top of that, the Android microSd card is "optional". In that price range I can buy a damn nice quad core tablet with HDMI output. Might not have eSATA support, but will have USB support and will have a color touch screen, battery, accelerometers and position sensor (and maybe a Gyro or even GPS) and a lot more utility. Or if you want to go completely low end you can still get low end tablets for close to the base price of this device.

    You would be much better off buying a Pi, or hacking a ChromeCast or ever a hackable Linux based router. This looks to me like another "me too" device to profit off the community funding model.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Check those numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy shit, which quad core tablet can you get for $130?

    2. Re:Check those numbers by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I agree. It seems they just want to push their profit margins while forgetting the early adopters (us) have a pretty good understanding of what we're [thinking of] buying. Build your market and following and THEN focus on profits when you've got a market. Here's what will happen, especially in Linux/Android based devices. Someone will ALWAYS be cheaper and they will use some of your ideas in the process. May as well accept it now. You will not own or dominate your section of the market without fans and followers as your 'edge' over others. This means acting more like Samsung than like Apple.

    3. Re:Check those numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a HiSense 7" from of all places, WalMart:

      http://www.walmart.com/ip/Hisense-Sero-7-Pro-7-Tablet-Quad-Core-Processor-with-8GB-Memory-M470BSA/24805142

      Technical Specifications:

                      1.3GHz NVIDIA Tegra 3 Quad-Core processor
                      1GB DDR2 of system memory and 8GB on-board storage memory
                      7.0" touchscreen, 1280 x 800 resolution
                      Bluetooth, WiFi
                      Back 5MP webcam and front 2MP webcam with flash and auto-focus
                      USB 2.0 port, mini HDMI port
                      8GB on-board storage memory, additional memory via SD card slot
                      Android 4.2 OS (Jelly Bean)
                      Built-in NFC (Near Field Communications)

    4. Re:Check those numbers by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      But that tablet lacks wired ethernet and eSATA and all that shit (display, battery, acceleromter, GPS) is useless if you use it as a desktop or server.

    5. Re:Check those numbers by ardor · · Score: 1

      Um, a RPi is much less powerful than even the $45 model.
      The ChromeCast uses a Marvell SoC. Marvell is notoriously uncooperative when it comes to documentation and details about their hardware, unless you are Google. (So is Broadcom btw.)
      Freescale is much more open and forthcoming.

      This one combines eSata with gbit ethernet (limited to 470 Mbit though, yes) and a pretty powerful video engine. Seems very nice as a DVR/HTPC combo, and/or a box for transcoding media.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    6. Re:Check those numbers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      roms?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Re:But can it run Crysis? by angelbar · · Score: 2

    Sorry, we need your cred's back... You confused subject with content.

    --
    -no sig today-
  12. Cheaper, smaller Android alternative with I/O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.walmart.com/ip/iView-IVIEW-435TPC-BK-with-WiFi-4.3-Android-Tablet-PC-Featuring-Android-4.0-Ice-Cream-Sandwich-Operating-System-Black/23597353

  13. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I make a beowulf cluster of these?

  14. Except its clear by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    Idiots! Gosh...

    Far too much debate on the internet goes into arguing about what words really mean. It is true that Android could be argued that it is simply another distribution based on a Linux kernel, and I would agree...and then call that version of Linux Android, but confusingly Linux is really a reference to GNU/Linux or Desktop Linux, shortened intentionally because Linus is awesome, or more likely out of "common usage" which has come about because its kind of catchy, even if you deep down think that GNU/Linux was probably a more deserving title.

    ...But then I suspect you probably knew that. Even if you didn't, there is nothing wrong with the English.

  15. How much VRAM? GPU specs? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    The picture shows it supports OpenGL ES 2.0 but how much video RAM do the various models have?
    http://files.linuxgizmos.com/freescale-imx6q.jpg

    Anyone have any specs on the GPU such as texture fill rate, bandwidth, etc?

    Aside, while the Arduino has a RTC (Real-Time Clock) the Raspberry Pi doesn't. At least this i.MX does.
     

  16. HEVC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't mind buying one for a media center PC for the house depending on how it compared to my Western Digital TV Live, my question is does it have what it takes to run the new HEVC spec due out within the next year as I plan to rerip and reencode my old content to the newer format for the space savings eventually if I can find a media player that supports it. I plan on reripping eventually anyways to mkv format to preserve the chapter splits and subtitles and all in a single file anyways.

    1. Re:HEVC by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I know /. is a nerd site and all, and you might get a bite from one of the contributors to weigh in, but a guarantee is asking a bit much.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  17. Re:How much VRAM? GPU specs? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    No Arduino boards I'm aware of come with an RTC.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  18. Am I the only one who wants what I want? by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want a car-puter that's worth a damn and I'm flexible about what I would find acceptable in that regard.

    1. I want it in a car (obviously) but that means it requires some things other computing devices will not but among these are power/heat management and tolerance most might begin to realize is completely hostile to computer devices.
    2. I want it to meet current expectations in software and in hardware. (For example, 1280x800 minimum display, not 800x480 and Android 4.x, not Android 2.x! I am looking at YOU Parrot! You insult us all with your specs.)
    3. I want it to be flexible and more general purpose even if it is limited by its use in a car. This means having a wide range of peripheral inputs and outputs and the ability to use a variety of displays and display types. It also means keeping it open and not restricted. (Parrot, could you explain to me your parrot store or whatever you call it? I get that things *can* be side-loaded, but I think that was more of a concession than anything else.)
    4. I want it to be open as Android was intended. This means we will buy your hardware, but don't try to tell us what we can do with it. We KNOW what's on your mind and we don't approve. It's not so much about "quality control" as much as it is consumer control. Parrot, once again, I'm looking at you. There are competitors coming hard and fast and you don't want to be forgotten simply because you thought being among the first means you can take advantage of the lacking consumer choice. Some consumers have a short memory while others like me do not. I will NEVER buy Sony again, for example. Sony doesn't respect consumers. I won't buy into that ever.

    I can't believe there isn't a market for what I want.

    1. Re:Am I the only one who wants what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded.

    2. Re:Am I the only one who wants what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should look at the road once in a while.

    3. Re:Am I the only one who wants what I want? by njahnke · · Score: 1

      how about you start your own business and find out?

    4. Re:Am I the only one who wants what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whhhhaaaa whaaa wwhaaaa. Do you stamp your feet too?

    5. Re:Am I the only one who wants what I want? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      yawn. It's about $125 for an installable 10" touch panel with hdmi adapter and under $100 for an android HDMI device, get one of the bigger ones and not a tiny one. done and done

      I can't believe there isn't a market for what I want.

      Well, there isn't. Most people are happy plugging their phone into their stereo.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Am I the only one who wants what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My buddy installed one of those Android head units recently. Even getting that in, with the backup camera etc, was a bit of a job. Most people aren't even going to do that much, let alone futz with different screens etc. So no, there's not really a market for what you want, but a sub-$500 Chinese Android head unit will get you part of the way there. What range of peripheral inputs and outputs do you really need in a car? Bluetooth & USB should just about cover you, and those things have that.

  19. Underwhelmed. How about a good Sub $100PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from some embedded type uses, I am not so sure this is all that useful. We already have a couple of existing options.

    OTOH, a "smallish" sun $100 system, running Linux around the size of a cable box (so I can stick an HD inside) would be somewhat useful as something that can be configured as a piece of office equipment - think FAX receiver, print server, or any number of dedicated machines in a doctor's or lawyer's office.

  20. good for headless usage? by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

    Why do these newer small computers always seem to lack a serial port? Do you have to connect a physical keyboard and monitor to configure sshd before you can get in through the ethernet or wireless interfaces and run it headless? Or can you get console IO through the USB ports?

    Related question: is GPU acceleration available without connecting a physical monitor? Some systems seem to require a dongle to fool the computer into thinking a monitor is attached before loading the drivers that provide access to the GPU.

    1. Re:good for headless usage? by markjhood2003 · · Score: 2

      Dang, replying to my own post here... just a little research revealed that you can get console IO through the USB ports: http://www.solid-run.com/mw/index.php?title=CuBox_serial_port

      Still haven't found anything about GPU acceleration in a headless setup.

    2. Re:good for headless usage? by ardor · · Score: 1

      GPU acceleration in a headless setup? More details please? What is the use case? They do mention OpenCL being supported in the more expensive models.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    3. Re:good for headless usage? by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      One use case is a top-of-camera video encoder-streamer like the miniCaster or Teradek Cube. Hardware accelerated H.264 or other encoding via the GPU instead of a dedicated chip combined with networking support would be much cheaper than the commercial devices.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    4. Re:good for headless usage? by ardor · · Score: 1

      But there is already the VPU in the SoC. It can encode and decode. So why do you want to encode with the GPU?

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    5. Re:good for headless usage? by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

      Anytime you have a remote client that needs or could benefit from graphics acceleration. Chrome, OpenGL applications, VirtualGL. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VirtualGL, http://blog.macminicolo.net/post/33839671756/build-a-dummy-dongle-for-a-headless-mac-mini.

    6. Re:good for headless usage? by ardor · · Score: 1

      But then, you transmit OpenGL commands as some sort of command stream to the client, which contains the GPU that renders the command stream locally.
      The other way is to render with the GPU on the headless machine. Then you need to encode the rendered frames and transmit them to the client on the fly. You could also use VNC, RDP etc.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    7. Re:good for headless usage? by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

      VNC and RDP are really slow screen replicators. Why would you use them if you have X11 running on your local machine with a Gigabit connection to your remote clients?

      If you have a web browser like Chrome as your remote client, then it will certainly benefit from having access to the GPU, especially for highly composited web interfaces and 3D WebGL web applications.

  21. no pci by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    Why didn't they break out the PCIe port on the imx6? I understand that cost is an issue but how much extra could a mini PCI port cost to add?

  22. MythTV / Multimedia Frontend by tji · · Score: 1

    This looks like it would make a great DVR frontend device IF it has usable video acceleration. The summary says that it does, but there is a huge difference between hardware capable of a feature and functioning Linux support for it.

    What video formats does it support? Only H.264, like most recent devices? Or, will it do MPEG2 (the U.S. broadcast HDTV standard)?
    Does it have Linux drivers for the video acceleration? VDPAU API support?

    There are tons of devices out there that look great on paper, but very few that are usable in reality. If this turns out to work, I'll buy a few of them. But, I'll wait for that to be proven before jumping in.

    1. Re:MythTV / Multimedia Frontend by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Or, will it do MPEG2 (the U.S. broadcast HDTV standard)?

      I expect it's fast enough to do that in software, certainly for SD. My ancient netbook can do 1080p MPEG2 just fine. I tested it once.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:MythTV / Multimedia Frontend by ardor · · Score: 1

      I have been playing around with the Freescale VPU. It is very powerful, can do 1080p easily, Linux support is solid. It can also encode in hardware. Supported formats I know of are: h264, mpeg-1/2/4, vp8, vc-1,wmv3,mjpeg. I think h263 too, not sure though. It also has deinterlacing and hardware scaling and color space conversion capabilities (think YUV->RGB).

      No VDPAU support. But VDPAU is nVidia only. You probably meant VA-API. I do not know if this is supported. There are GStreamer plugins for it, XBMC and libav/ffmpeg support is being worked on IIRC.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
  23. comparison to other soc? by Leninix · · Score: 1

    This seems very promising, especially as a small media centre. I wonder however how it compares to cubieboard2 and other dual core arm processors based soc. Also, community support is important for that kind of device and it may take some time before documentation is good enough. But all cubox versions seems fair-priced. Even Intel new Haswell Nuc is very similar to those board, albeit with much faster specs and slightly bigger case, but same 1.3 ghz and more and more integration inside cpu chip. Desktops computers may very soon turn into a battle between small soc and nuc, who both support Gnu/ Linux and Android, as windows seems a bit irrelevant now for that kind of device and to most people who prefer to use a phone or tablet. This is interesting to look upon too as it may be the sign of a second golden age of computing.

  24. Server oriented by JanneM · · Score: 1

    What I'd really want is a small ARM-based board that's good for a low-power server; something that can run a simple web site, Tiny Tiny RSS and keep a few git repositories.

    The boards we're seeing now are getting close; they have 1-2GB memory, networking and SATA interfaces. What's really missing is the software support over time. Unlike an embedded system you do want security updates and OS updates over time, so you really want a platform that is a regular target for a major distro, whether Red Hat, Ubuntu or someone else.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Server oriented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Beagle Boards are attracting solid distro support. I just got a BeagleBone Black because the Beagle lineup has gained an official OpenBSD port. I won't be using OpenBSD on it yet, but I point that out to show that this particular platform is drawing considerable open source support. Instead, I'll be running stock Ubuntu/ARM.

      Also, logic supply has sweet metal cases: http://www.logicsupply.com/categories/beaglebone. I'll install a regular development environment (GCC, etc) on this guy and make sure all my projects work properly on ARM, plus maybe use one to replace my hidden VPN terminator at work--currently an ALIX 3D. (The IT guys dick around with the Cisco boxes too much, causing too many headaches, so I took matters into my own hands Thank goodness OpenBSD makes setting up IPSec tunnels so effortless.)

    2. Re:Server oriented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you see that "solid support"? Getting working 3D support _still_ involves manually compiling your kernel and manually installing packages (if you're really lucky it will even work. Most likely not though). There aren't even prebuilt 3rd-party packages.
      Yes, if you are fine with half the stuff (sometimes a different half over time) not working, and possibly still needing to run code from some random guy on the internet it "works". Haven't seen an board where you'll get anything much better than that.

    3. Re:Server oriented by JanneM · · Score: 1

      The Beagle Boards look pretty good, but they lack a SATA controller and don't really carry enough memory. I'll keep an eye on them though.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Server oriented by xombo · · Score: 2

      cubieboard 2 is a good product and is essentially a souped up raspberry pi with SATA.

    5. Re:Server oriented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With even less official support (i.e. you maybe can get it half working by using hacks and patches by "random guy on the internet") than e.g. the beagleboard has...

    6. Re:Server oriented by xombo · · Score: 1

      It's compatible with the same distros as the Raspberry Pi. It's easy. You just use Berry Boot on it.

  25. High end a bit too much by echusarcana · · Score: 2

    I like the idea, but at the high end with shipping you are almost up into the Celeron price range. This would be for a 14W motherboard/cpu combo which should outperform this and would be a much more flexible system.

  26. HTPC? by eriks · · Score: 1

    Something like this might be just the thing I'm looking for -- There are other tiny android boxes I've been looking at to replace my (aging) htpc. I want to be able to use my nexus 7 as a remote -- to control *everything* on the TV -- that's local video, netflix & random web stuff. Also I'd like to have a single audio output to my sound system for everything, but not have to have the TV on to listen to music. I've yet to find anything truly ideal. Even this probably won't be perfect, but at least it would be inexpensive and tiny: my current htpc is in a large case. I've been thinking Raspberry PI, which would be almost perfect, except no netflix...

  27. Re:Android is Linux by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The proper way to say this is "Android is a Linux." It is neither definitive of what Linux is nor a representative member of what a Linix has come to be understood to be. But it is A Linux.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  28. low ram only 512 in base and max out at 2GB? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    low ram only 512 in base and max out at 2GB?

    1. Re:low ram only 512 in base and max out at 2GB? by njahnke · · Score: 1

      What are you planning on doing that you need that much RAM?

    2. Re:low ram only 512 in base and max out at 2GB? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Desktop replacement?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  29. Beowolf Cluster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of these 2x2 boxes!

  30. Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, I know, on /., that's asking for abuse, but realistically, there's lots and lots of applications for embedded windows (just about every piece of lab test equipment these days runs Windows in some form), and while mini-ITX mobos are fine, something 1/4 the size would be attractive, or at least give more packaging options.

    1. Re:Windows? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      This is an ARM, not x64 box, so Windows is a non starter. Unless someone manages to get Microsoft to port Windows RT to this platform

  31. better off with something else.. by sky770 · · Score: 1

    its always the tag "shipping cost" which makes the final cost pretty damn high. You might be better off with Parallella board(go figure) or..with the weed my neighbour dude gets me..

  32. Which GPU? Which GPU drivers? by coder111 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All these ARM SOCs are nice but they all have weird closed up GPUs that have crap close sourced drivers that barely work.

    There are projects to reverse engineer Adreno (Qualcomm) and Mali (ARM) GPUs and implement drivers for them, but these projects are nowhere near production ready. And as far as I know Qualcomm has other issues with openness- they are denying release of hackable Android for their devices because it contains some secret proprietary BLOBs, without which it won't work.

    So when it comes to Linux hardware support on ARM, it feels like 90s all over again... I'd rather buy a small x86, it will be larger, more expensive, it will consume much more power, but at least open-source hardware support is going to be nice and I won't need any BLOBs.

    --Coder

    1. Re:Which GPU? Which GPU drivers? by ardor · · Score: 2

      The i.MX6 inside uses a Vivante GPU. Vivante drivers work rather well, but for some reason, that company can't version their drivers, which is annoying. However, Freescale takes care of this. When working on Sabre SD boards, I always had stable OpenGL ES and OpenVG support. Newest Vivante drivers even support desktop OpenGL (only 2.1 though).

      There is also an opensource driver project called etnaviv https://github.com/laanwj/etna_viv it has come pretty far. People have been running GLQuake and others with it already.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
  33. Re:But can it run Crysis? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've abused an apostrophe. Prepare to die.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  34. Looking shallow by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Once you start browsing the web site for these cubes, it's surprisingly shallow. There is no real information, the forum has a total of 6 posts and the wiki is empty. If you want to find out what video codecs are supported, or what linux distributions are ported to this device, your search will turn up nothing.

    This may all change, but once you're getting your product up on sites like SlashDot, you really should have things like this taken care of. Right now it has a vaporware scent all over it and it may just be the next cheap dealextreme android HTPC device that comes with a load of half functioning applications and no way to get it fixed.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Looking shallow by ardor · · Score: 2

      All you have to do is to look for the i.MX6 specs. That gives you the infos you want. Having worked with Sabre SD devices (which also use the i.MX6 and performed very well), I am pretty excited about this.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
  35. Cube is worst shape for cooling by advid.net · · Score: 1

    After a ball or compact rounded shape, the cube is the worst shape for passive cooling efficiency.

    Also the shape must have been chosen only for aesthetic and not with any pratical considerations: this is not what I call design.

    1. Re:Cube is worst shape for cooling by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Apple, in their next Mac, is considering a cylindrical tower, w/ an internal 3 plane cooling that cools everything. It's a pretty nifty piece of work.

    2. Re:Cube is worst shape for cooling by advid.net · · Score: 1

      Apple, in their next Mac, is considering a cylindrical tower, w/ an internal 3 plane cooling that cools everything.

      Nice design, with the heat sink in the core like a funnel or chimney.
      Its shape isn't compact, the cylinder is hollow, and this is not passive cooling :

      "The form factor also echoes the shape of the single large fan located in the bottom of the machine." ref

    3. Re:Cube is worst shape for cooling by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I was wondering about that too. The layout of ports seems very dense too, increasing the likelihood of clashes between connectors (yes, I know that connectors should be a standard size ; the operative word is, of course, "should").

      Even at 3W/block, If you assembled a rack of these ("imagine a Beowulf cluster of them", to quote the Slah-meme), the ports would be nicely accessible at the back, but it's going to be generating quite a lot of heat in a compact space. Manageable, I'm sure. But it's an issue I'd be cautious of.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  36. Not enough to JUST run XBMC... by kizza42 · · Score: 2

    I'm sick of all these mini SoC that only have hardware decoding to do 1080p video but only JUST enough grunt/ram to run XBMC. Gimme something that can actually handle XBMC + Aeon or a skin other than Confluence at a decent clip, then I'll be impressed.

  37. Choose Two by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    So it's a Choose Two corollary: Cheap, Fast, Fully Open - choose two.

  38. Re:But can it run Crysis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see the mistake. Angelbar just wanted the back of Hsien-Ko's cred. Presumably Hsien-Ko could keep the front.

  39. Re:How much VRAM? GPU specs? by Narishma · · Score: 1

    They don't have dedicated VRAM like a graphics card in a PC, they just allocate some portion of the main RAM as VRAM.

    --
    Mada mada dane.
  40. Price check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see $119 for the cheaper model.
    For $45, maybe. Way over price at $119, considering RasPi price.

  41. rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks.
    For the half price, I can get ODRIOD with 2GB and 4 cores (and a Cortex 1.2GHZ, not a cheap CPU). For that price, I can get ODROID-XU with 8-cores.

    1. Re:rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, with a GPU that can do 1080p h264.

  42. oooo yeahh by xombo · · Score: 1

    Now we know where all those unsold OUYA units went.

  43. Re:But can it run Crysis? by clgoh · · Score: 1

    I would be happy if it just ran Half-Life 3...

  44. Some insight into their prior unit. by dremspider · · Score: 2

    I have their older 700MHz unit (single core) 2 GB of memory I bought not too long ago (of course, that is how it always works). So far the unit has actually exceeded my expectations and is a lot of fun to play with. For me I wanted something that I could install Kali Linux on (the successor to Backtrack Linux) to do some simple type attacks on a network (I teach part time at a community college an information security class). First what I don't like: The shipping comes for Isreal. The price of shipping is $30 which raises the cost of the product. That they came out with a new one shortly after I already bought one that includes a lot of features I wanted. What I like: Gigabit ethernet They have this thing called u-boot which is pretty slick. You stick a file on a usb memory stick and stick it into the top USB port. Connect the ethernet and then boot up and it asks you what OS you want to install. You can select Ubuntu, Opensuse, Fedora, XBMC and a bunch more and it just installs them to the SD card. Very slick. It has the ability to serial into the unit so you don't have to set up a mouse, keyboard and monitor to install OSes. Works in Linux and Windows (with putty fine). I can then do SSH X forwarding really easy from the network if you want a GUI. I have been able to run a slew of python things on it and the performance is reasonable. I really have been having fun with it.

  45. Re:But can it run Crysis? by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

    And you want it to run Leisure Suit Larry 4 too right?

  46. Light On! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be really cool if it could control the the lights of your house right out of the box. Then, at least it would have some good use for the rest of us, and for $45 that would be a good price for a electronic appliance.!