Slashdot Mirror


NYC Is Tracking RFID Toll Collection Tags All Over the City

In the northeast U.S., most of the tolls people encounter when driving make use of a system called E-ZPass to let them pay the tolls electronically. Drivers are given small RFID transponders that are scanned in tollbooths, at which point the toll is automatically deducted from a pre-paid account. One hacker got curious whether the RFID tags were being scanned elsewhere, so he tweaked his E-ZPass to blink a light and make a noise every time it was read. He tested the streets of New York City, and wasn't surprised to see it light up in plenty of places where there were no tollbooths to be found. From the article: "It’s part of Midtown in Motion, an initiative to feed information from lots of sensors into New York’s traffic management center. A spokesperson for the New York Department of Transportation, Scott Gastel, says the E-Z Pass readers are on highways across the city, and on streets in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Staten Island, and have been in use for years. The city uses the data from the readers to provide real-time traffic information, as for this tool. The DoT was not forthcoming about what exactly was read from the passes or how long geolocation information from the passes was kept. Notably, the fact that E-ZPasses will be used as a tracking device outside of toll payment, is not disclosed anywhere that I could see in the terms and conditions. When I talked to the E-ZPass Inter-agency Group — the umbrella association that oversees the use of the pay-toll-paying tags in 15 different states — it said New York is the only state that is employing this inventive re-use of the tags. ... 'If NYDOT can put up readers, says [the hacker], 'other agencies could as well.'"

314 comments

  1. Trending political procedures... by killfixx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do a lot of tracking of everything a person does and only come clean when someone calls 'em out...

    I hope this "hacker" is anonymous... Otherwise he's headed for a jail cell...

    It used to be okay to point out when your government was being shady...

    Not anymore!!

    Yay!

    Welcome to 1984!

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    1. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You are an idiot, this was a well-known initiative to improve traffic flow in Manhattan. It has never been secret.

    2. Re:Trending political procedures... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I've rarely lived anywhere that had toll roads or toll bridges, but when I have and had to use them (like when moving all over creation after Katrina), I just paid cash.

      To me, it was worth the little extra they charged to keep from being tracked every time I crossed the bridge, etc.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It has never been secret.

      Except for:
      - where the RFID detectors are.
      - if they store the ID of the EZ-Pass tag.
      - if they store the geo-location data.
      - how long the keep the data.
      - who has access to the data.
      - if they sell the data.

      So you're right, no secrets here.

    4. Re:Trending political procedures... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You could actually use this the other way.

      Remove the tag before you go do something naughty but keep it in your car other times.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Trending political procedures... by fizzer06 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the Dallas-FortWorth area, you can't pay cash, no toll booths. You get a bill in the mail if you don't have EZ Pass. The bill includes extra fees for examining the photograph and mailing the bill.

    6. Re:Trending political procedures... by alen · · Score: 1

      the last time i drove to the Bronx Zoo i bet some government worker had an alert flash when i paid my toll via ez-pass
      he jumped up and screamed, we got him. we got him. he's driving to the bronx

    7. Re:Trending political procedures... by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      That is increasingly the case in my area as well. Basically the older toll roads have booths but the newer ones do not. I also notice that increasingly the booths on the older ones are only manned at peak travel times. So realistically if you use those roads much at all you pretty much have to have an EZ Pass. Fortunately my current job doesn't take me through the areas with the tolls very much so I haven't had one for years. The rest of the time I just detour around the toll roads whenever possible.

    8. Re:Trending political procedures... by tian2992 · · Score: 1

      You still are tracked. Most bridges and toll booths have cameras.

    9. Re:Trending political procedures... by curunir · · Score: 0

      And it's not exactly unique. Caltrans uses the sensors for the FastTrak toll devices to monitor the flows of traffic and respond to accidents faster. It makes a lot of sense and you can opt out by putting the transponder in your glove compartment. You can test that this works (I've done it) by forgetting to remove it from your glove compartment when you drive through the toll collection area. The sign won't signal that you've paid, but the license plate recognition will resolve the fare properly.

      Yes, there's a potential for abuse in stuff like this, but the benefit to everyone is undeniable. Faster response from officials to traffic conditions will help alleviate them sooner and may result in emergency personnel arriving on scene sooner and saving more lives. And I'd rather they use a technology that's both cheaper and easy to opt out of than to install expensive camera systems that track license plate numbers and give drivers no way of avoiding being tracked.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    10. Re:Trending political procedures... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This should have been in the agreement. Most would have no problem with it -- as long as it wasn't secretly used for law enforcement.

      Lawyers started supoenaing driver self-cams used in driving safety research, and volunteers dried up.

      Of even greater concern is illegal NSA type stuff. I suppose more people will put in these read-detectors to map them all out and force government to explain them all. This is a good thing.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    11. Re:Trending political procedures... by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      initiative to improve traffic flow in Manhattan

      If your goal is to improve traffic flow, you don't use EZPass, you use traffic counters that get laid down on the street (or use the pole-mounted radar counters) that are probably cheaper than the RFID devices they're using. Those don't identify each individual vehicle's path, but they do make it really clear where people are going (e.g. "the exit ramp has a count of 400 per hour, and and there's 350 more just to the right of that ramp than there was coming from the other way you can get to that spot.").

      Alternately, you can ask yourself how many major construction projects have occurred in Manhattan to improve traffic flow in response to the data from this program. I'd be really surprised if New York City even considered, say, rerouting 5th Avenue.

      Ergo, traffic flow isn't the problem NYC is trying to solve.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    12. Re:Trending political procedures... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      eventually it will be illegal to drive without EZPass, and you will be billed for driving all over the place. All roads will be toll roads.

    13. Re:Trending political procedures... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      There's an Impeach Obama to Stop World War 3 booth RIGHT NEXT TO ME, RIGHT NOW. I really don't think you can rule out people paying cash to avoid the Government tracking their cars.

    14. Re:Trending political procedures... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      Illinois has also been doing this for several years, especially around the Chicago area.

      There are some locations where they have signs up stating that "No Toll is Being Taken" and others that are not marked. The transponders they used to use had displays and beeped when accessed, I imagine that's why they put up signs, people used to notice accesses. Of course, the new replacement ones do not have any external indicators that they are being polled so that allows them to interrogate them anytime silently.

      They are now also interrogating them at small antenna sites between the major toll gates for traffic flow analysis, but AFAIK they are not using them anywhere but on the tollways. It is not known if they are gearing up to do speed measurement or anything nefarious with them, I don't think they can get away with that since not all vehicles have them.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    15. Re:Trending political procedures... by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      And so you take your EZ-Pass, iPass, or whatever, and put it into its metal box after you're past the toll-whatever.

      Some of the tollbooths now take RFID-based credit cards. Same answer. These are radiological tokens. Kill the radio by putting it into a metal can, box, or even most ashtrays.

      That it's tracked isn't surprising. I'm looking at your cam right now. Stop picking your nose.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    16. Re:Trending political procedures... by sfm · · Score: 2

      The problem with cash is the number of places that accept this form of payment is shrinking rapidly. I see a day in the near future where your only 2 options for Highway/Bridge tolls are Tolltag and Pay-By-Mail (They photograph your plates and mail you the bill).

      But no matter how you pay, you are still being photographed, not only as you approach and depart, but also while you pass the toll booth. Check out those vertical cameras at ALL of the SF Bay toll plazas.

    17. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, soon it's 1985 and we can put all of this behind us!

    18. Re:Trending political procedures... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      That's like painting a big red X on your vehicle when you go to do something naughty, because you and your vehicle is also tracked other ways, such as your cell phone location, tracking of your license plate. Correlating records will make them want to know why you decided to drive downtown without your transponder.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    19. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is this just really widespread paranoidal response to 9/11 that all elected politicians become assholes and implement dystopian surviellance policy, or have I missed something here? I'm not paranoid enough to think there are master puppeteers behind all this, and I won't attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity, so I'm just gonna suspect this is all an irrational response by behavior types prone to positions of power thinking what they are doing is best for America.

      I HOPE, the voters of this country have truly had their eyes opened by what the NSA has been doing, and how Federal, State, and Local governments have all overreached their authority, but the cynic in me knows full well willful ignorance come relection time will end up allowing these politicians to remain in place. And if not these policies directly, slight variations thereof.

    20. Re:Trending political procedures... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      And this is why my version of the easy pass sits in the glove box when I'm not near toll booths. How do I know it works? I forgot to take it out once, and blew right through the toll booth without a beep anywhere.

      On that thought: as soon as I renew my passport, I'm getting one of the aluminum card/passport holders/wallets. Having RFIDs about all kinds of data available out in the open is nuts. Yes, I'm aware of LPSs, facial recognition from video, but those are still a lot harder to do than just reading an RFID.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    21. Re:Trending political procedures... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      In the Dallas-FortWorth area, you can't pay cash, no toll booths. You get a bill in the mail if you don't have EZ Pass. The bill includes extra fees for examining the photograph and mailing the bill.

      So, how exactly does this work for people from out of town/state? Don't they have to take cash for situations like that?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re: Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every question you made is likely answered on the website of your State DOT and/or the metropolitan planning organization that exists in every medium to large sized city in the country as required by Federal law.

      IF it is not on either of these, a freedom of information request will be answered as required by law. All you have to do as ask.

      Myself, I already know the transponder # is thrown out, making the trip anonymous. These anonymous trips are used to plan transportation improvements. That's all.

    23. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope ... MY sister visits about 1x a year and she has never received a bill.

    24. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those don't identify each individual vehicle's path, but they do make it really clear where people are going

      If I were trying to get traffic to flow smoothly, I'd be very interested in how long it takes an individual vehicle to get from A to B. Of course, I'd probably just try to find a way to get access to Waze's data...

    25. Re:Trending political procedures... by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      Same for the Port Mann and Golden Ears bridges in the Greater Vancouver area (neither are in the city of Vancouver). No cash. They send a bill in the mail (or in my case, charge my card once monthly as they scan my RFID transponder and have a card on file for me).

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
    26. Re:Trending political procedures... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Alternately, you can ask yourself how many major construction projects have occurred in Manhattan to improve traffic flow in response to the data from this program. I'd be really surprised if New York City even considered, say, rerouting 5th Avenue.

      Ergo, traffic flow isn't the problem NYC is trying to solve.

      You are aware that improving traffic flow involves more than tearing up roads and physically changing them, right? Traffic flow adjustments are made by changing the timing of the synchronized lights, rush hour/non-rush hour regulations, etc. I think you're implying a nefarious motivation where that's not likely.

    27. Re:Trending political procedures... by Pope · · Score: 1

      Do you carry your passport on a daily basis?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    28. Re:Trending political procedures... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 0

      Really? What's the actual value of not being tracked, in practical terms? Your peace of mind that some extremely unlikely intrusion on your rights was just slightly more unlikely? The satisfaction of not doing what "the man" is suggesting you do? Can you compare that to the actual, measurable impact on your life by the additional time you had to wait for the privilege of paying cash?

      Waiting in line at a toll booth is one of the more unpleasant routine annoyances in life, so I avoid it when I can.

    29. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They take photos of your LP anyway, so they can still see where you go.

    30. Re: Trending political procedures... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could site a public accessable reference?

    31. Re: Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 2

      Myself, I already know the transponder # is thrown out, making the trip anonymous. These anonymous trips are used to plan transportation improvements. That's all.

      You know this how?
      Because they told you that was what the plan said 10 years ago when they set it up?
      What about that telephone call from the Police Commissioner to the head of DOT that never made it to the files?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    32. Re:Trending political procedures... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "That's like painting a big red X on your vehicle when you go to do something naughty, because you and your vehicle is also tracked other ways, such as your cell phone location, tracking of your license plate. Correlating records will make them want to know why you decided to drive downtown without your transponder."

      It would probably never happen.

      Bureaucrats learn to rely on their tools. If the vehicle shows up at certain checkpoints, it would probably never occur to them to spend the hundreds of man-hours necessary to check things like traffic cameras to see if they could find it running without the tracker.

      Possible, but unlikely.

    33. Re:Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 2

      On that thought: as soon as I renew my passport, I'm getting one of the aluminum card/passport holders/wallets. Having RFIDs about all kinds of data available out in the open is nuts. Yes, I'm aware of LPSs, facial recognition from video, but those are still a lot harder to do than just reading an RFID.

      The State Department says your RIFD enabled passport can't be read unless the passport is opened:

      Skimming.” We use an embedded metallic element in our passports. One of the simplest measures for preventing unauthorized reading of e-passports is to add RF blocking material to the cover of an e-passport. Before such a passport can be read, it has to be physically opened. It is a simple and effective method for reducing the opportunity for unauthorized reading of the passport at times when the holder does not expect it.

      With any Android phone having NFC capabilities, and a free app from the Google Market ,you can prove that to be another government big lie.
      So the shielded holder might be a good idea.

      But Which LPSs are you aware of?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    34. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay!

      Welcome to 1984!

      Oldthinkers unbellyfeel Ingsoc.

      Your complaint is doubleplusungood. Report to Room 101 for correction of your thoughtcrime, Citizen.

      Seriously though... "NEWS FLASH! GOVERNMENT SPYING ON YOU IN INCREASINGLY CREEPY WAYS!" is a headline that should be as surprising as "MEN ENJOY LOOKING AT AND HAVING SEX WITH WOMEN!"

      See DUH, 2.

    35. Re:Trending political procedures... by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 2

      Seattle has something similar on the 520 bridge. People with out of state license plates don't get billed. Last I checked, occasionally locals would get bills in the mail (in unmarked white envelopes, of course) if they had the same license plates as the out-of-state ones.

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
    36. Re: Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.nymtc.org/

      Data and Model link

    37. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the fun bit. Out of town people don't have to pay the tolls. I did this for years with NJ plates on my car.

    38. Re:Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 1

      Except that the focus of DOTs these days is no longer to improve or increase traffic flow, it is to reduce traffic.

      The assumption that no nefarious motivation is in play is quaint and charming, but no longer warranted in the modern era.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    39. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is more difficult to use them for speed measurement except in gross terms as thier placement isnt as carefully measured. Now the at the actual toll plazas, there are inductance loops in the pavement that are placed and measured to with 1cm. (The software that tells what type of vehicle you are requires a fair level of accuracy to cover its measurements.)

      The vehicle speed out of them is very accurate.

    40. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh my, yes. I use my passport (passport card actually) exclusively for identification. It doesn't show anything but my name, where I was born many, many years ago, and my birthday. Plus, since the format is different from the state driver's license, many times my name gets keyed in wrong as an added bonus.

      Usually when people claim to want identification what they really want is all that other data.

    41. Re:Trending political procedures... by mi · · Score: 1
      Anonymous transponders would've done just as well for this purpose. And yet, currently, the transponders are registered to both name and car. The same person can not even move a transponder from one car to another without violating EZ-Pass terms.

      Though I agree, Mayor Bloomberg does not carefully study personal driving habits through his city every day, the information is there for the law enforcement to use. And not just law-enforcement — divorce lawyers, for example, have subpoenaed the EZ-Pass records to prove (or disprove) allegations of infidelity.

      That the government, when designing this system, deliberately chose to not make it anonymous (as the subway cards are, for example), is a sign, they intended to use it to violate our privacy.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    42. Re:Trending political procedures... by mlts · · Score: 1

      Here in my neck of the woods, there are plenty of toll roads, and none will accept cash. One uses a TXTag transponder, or it will snap a pic of the license plate and mail a bill. No cash booths since January.

    43. Re:Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 2

      I've rarely lived anywhere that had toll roads or toll bridges, but when I have and had to use them (like when moving all over creation after Katrina), I just paid cash.

      To me, it was worth the little extra they charged to keep from being tracked every time I crossed the bridge, etc.

      Next time you pull up to the toll plaza, pay attention to the license plate readers.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    44. Re:Trending political procedures... by zuvembi · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about you, but I'm already paying sales tax, gas tax, property tax and other taxes to pay for roads. Personally I'm fine with that. Nothing wrong with using taxes to maintain infrastructure.

      I'm more worried about what other uses the data is being used for. I find the idea of faceless individuals continually knowing everywhere I'm going sort of creepy and worrying from a civil liberty standpoint.

      Of course the obvious solution is to put your EZPass in a Faraday cage of some sort when you're not using it for tolling. Or ride a bike, which is healthier for you and less amenable to tolling or tracking.

    45. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would probably never happen. Possible, but unlikely.

      Really? And for whom do you write this, the NSA, CIA, FBI, the TSA? The FDA? USPS, UFS, NPS, DOD, DON, DAF, IRS, BATFE, MI-5, GIU, SS, FMA, DNC, RNC, CPA, KKK, PIG, RFQ, DXG, MS, S&W, AT&T, ABCDEFG, HIJKLMNOP, QRS, TUV, WXYZ?

      Sad thing is, there are probably many more of these groups than are covered by this jumble of letters about whom we should be concerned, but I don't know how to type characters on my computer with little squiggly lines coming out of them or hooks under, or carrots or dots over them, or are written right to left, etc. Then there are some groups without names... or acronyms at all, perhaps the scariest of the bunch. You're probably in the employ of one of these.

      Fact of the matter is, if you can think of a way in which they COULD be spying on you, odds are they're already doing it. Where do you think the paranoid assholes running the show spent all the money they stole from everyone? You may not have realized it, but a trillion dollars, even speaking of today's highly inflated, worth-less-than-they've-ever-been dollars, is still a metric Fuckton of money. (That's one and a tenth again as much as an Imperial Fuckton, just FYI.)

    46. Re:Trending political procedures... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      But all this stuff is or is getting automated now. They don't have to manually search for hours. Low-hanging fruit would be for software to notice that a car with license plate X passed by location Y, but the registered owners cell phone is off and the toll bridge rfid isn't in it and flag it as interesting...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    47. Re:Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 1

      Its simply not worth the effort to chase a 50cent or 2 dollar toll, especially if the plate readers indicate an out of state plate.
      Locals might get their plate read by automated plate readers and sent automated bills in some jurisdictions.

      Washington State tolls at highway speed, none of those silly easy-pass cattle chutes, and it was found by scoff-laws who refused to sign up for a pass, that they read your plate at speed as well.

      Still, they aren't going to chase you across the country for 2 bucks.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    48. Re: Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's publicly accessible information available from your state DOT and/or Local planning organization.

      I am a transportation planner using similar data. There are no fields in the database for transponder numbers or anything that identifies a vehicle or person. The software ends the trip after not seeing the transponder for a set period of time and correlates an approximate route taken based on the few locations it picked up the device. It's stored as a route with average speed, that's it. This is used to target improvements where bottlenecks are detected, increase capacity, etc. I'll also tell you that there were tests using anonymous cellphone data to do similar things. The carrier stripped out subscriber info and added a sequential number by trip, with each trip ending when the phone stayed in the same cell for a certain amount of time.

      Research on this is available from the Transportation Research Board (TRB).

    49. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, that is until someone builds a piece of software that makes it easy for them.

    50. Re: Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 1

      That's what they give you.

      That's not necessarily what they collect. In fact its almost certain that they collect everything the transponder can deliver.

      You get anonymous data. The police and state patrol probably get ALL the data, and they may save it for a lot longer than you might imagine. Unless you wrote the software handling the readers you aren't in a position to know what is happening.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    51. Re:Trending political procedures... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      ...is not disclosed anywhere that I could see in the terms and conditions.

      You are an idiot. Our governments are ostensibly under OUR employ, since when is it ok for people YOU pay to keep tabs on you without a court order? Unless you're ok with that sort of thing. Idiot.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    52. Re:Trending political procedures... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Transit vectors are notoriously hard to trend; it is easy to know how many people are on a segment of road at a given time, but much harder to understand origin, destination, and choices of route without something like this.

      Transit vectors help you to develop long-range planning for busses, trains, and road improvements.

      Simple theoretical example-- 30% of people use exit 33 when exit 31 is a shorter route, because of a traffic light after the exit. Your capital upgrade can either to improve exit 33 (which just makes problems worse), or re work the intersection with the traffic light.

      Of course this doesn't preclude nefarious uses, but there is a legitimate purpose.

    53. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your example missed what they would actually do - put a traffic light after the 31 exit as well :)

    54. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually when people claim to want identification what they really want is all that other data.

      Funny story. When my brother turned 21, he tried buying beer prior to getting his new license (under 21 license looks completely different than 21 and older). But the cashier refused to look at it, refused to even explain why he would not look at it, just being an overall douche about the whole thing. So he later went back with his passport, which the cashier happily accepted.

    55. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, there will be the next step, like what CA had as a proposal... tie the EZPass to GPS locations and charge on addition to the yearly registration taxes a tax for miles driven.

      Of course, a tax for miles driven can easily be done with a gas tax, but having a constant real-time track of everyone's vehicle in the state makes life a lot easier for the state and that info can be sold to private companies or other countries for a mint as well. Multiple monetization opportunities. The MBA graduate would be proud.

    56. Re: Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the telephone call from the NSA to the Police Commissioner that also never happened. Yeah, those are "off site" backups... we'll take care of them.

    57. Re:Trending political procedures... by argonaut · · Score: 1

      He presented at DefCon 21 this year. https://www.defcon.org/html/links/dc-archives/dc-21-archive.html#pukingmonkey

    58. Re:Trending political procedures... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I just paid cash.

      Except the new toll roads being put up don't take cash. If you don't have the little "track me" device you have to pay by credit card, or simply accept that they'll photo your license plate and bill you a much higher rate by mail.

    59. Re: Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data isn't collected by the police, it's collect by the State DOT or toll agency depending on the state. There really is nothing to see here. At some point there would have been public meetings discussing the implementation of this, but few outside the transportation industry show up. DOTs are typically the most open state agencies, because there are Federal laws that require it. They all have public participation plans, which if they are not followed, they could jeopardize the federal funding they receive.

    60. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) That shit won't fly where I live, out in "flyover country".

      2) Those of us from "flyover country" will stop visiting anywhere where this becomes true, and your tourism and economy will suffer.

      Go ahead. I dare you to do it, New York. I'll gladly watch you fuck over your own local economy. Then you'll have to realize that the nation doesn't revolve around your asshole. (I've seriously never been anywhere else where people so completely and arrogantly expected that everything was about them. I wish this same reality check on every place this occurs.)

    61. Re:Trending political procedures... by cob666 · · Score: 1

      Not sure about this. There are currently laws that say if a state is collecting tolls on a specific road then they get no federal assistance for those roads. This is why CT removed tolls on several roads a few years ago.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    62. Re: Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 1

      So you say.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    63. Re:Trending political procedures... by richlv · · Score: 1

      i travel a lot ( > 50% of time away from home), thus yeah, my passport is almost always with me. i even do that at my home country, as i just don't take it out of the bag - smaller chance of forgetting to grab it when heading for the airport...

      i might consider the action gp suggested :)

      --
      Rich
    64. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brand new passport could not be read from the outside with my Nexus 4. It would acknowledge that there was something there, but could not get a read on any data. Upon opening the passport, however, it read it just fine. I am fairly confident that you wouldn't be able to read it while it's closed without beaming a lot of power, and the passport would have to be perfectly still.

    65. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take the figures in the press release [1] as you may, but they claim to have reduced travel times in Midtown by 10% using the information from this system without any "major construction projects." It's hard to verify such a claim independently, but it does seem to suggest that without any major physical changes to the streets, they can change timing on signals in response to vehicle volumes.

      Analogizing to a website, street-laid traffic counters are like a mere hitcounter, while EZPass tracking is more like full blown analytics, with both RFID tracking and web analytics having similarly terrifying privacy implications. I wish there was more transparency on data handling, usage and retention from collection through to disposal.

      [1] http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/pr2012/pr12_25.shtml

    66. Re:Trending political procedures... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Next time you pull up to the toll plaza, pay attention to the license plate readers.

      Not if you live in a sane jurisdiction.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    67. Re: Trending political procedures... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Myself, I already know the transponder # is thrown out, making the trip anonymous.

      f paying tolls were the primary motive for these things, they'd be available anonymously with pre-paid cards sold at 7-11 to refill them.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    68. Re:Trending political procedures... by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Bureaucrats learn to rely on their tools. If the vehicle shows up at certain checkpoints, it would probably never occur to them to spend the hundreds of man-hours necessary to check things like traffic cameras to see if they could find it running without the tracker.

      Man-hours? The tools the bureaucrats have include:

      • License plate scanners
      • Facial scanners
      • RFID scanners
      • Cell phone location scanners
      • E-mail and other online activity scanners
      • Databases to store all of this data
      • Automation to look for pretermined patterns
      • Data mining to look for unexpected patterns and deviations from them

      What happens is that you do anything unexpected, the bureaucrat gets a notification from all this automation, along with your online and offline history. This isn't the 1700's anymore, there's no manpower or other resource constraint to keep every single person under 24/7 surveillance, and apparently no social one either, since you're a potential terrorist/child molester/drug user/kidnapper/whatever. Welcome to the Panopticon.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    69. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "Remove the tag before you go do something naughty but keep it in your car other times."

      Pointless--they're already tracking your vehicle, and have been for years. I've discussed this in the past--The T.R.E.A.D. Act allowed the US government to force RFID tracking devices on the entire nation. The Firestone/Ford Explorer-rollover issue was used as reason to pass this legislation. Removing those tags is not only a federal offense, driving over a sensor (they're everywhere there is a stop-light sensor, utilizing the same antenna) without tags is sure to get you noticed eventually...and singled out. You'd end up drawing more attention then leaving them alone. Repealing the T.R.E.A.D. Act is the only way your getting rid of this problem.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TREAD_Act

      Specifically,

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tire_pressure_monitoring_system#Legislation

      From linked article:
      "Embedded in a tire or affixed to the sidewall, an RFID tag the size of a grain of rice is a powerful
      tire-tracking tool. Some tiremakers have already recognized its potential. Some commercial truck
      and aircraft fleets use RFID to identify tires and to ensure regular service. Tires used in
      NASCAR racing are embedded with RFID to keep tabs on these high performance tires. Many in
      the auto industry have identified recalls as one of its possible uses. With a chip embedded in the
      sidewall and inexpensive readers installed in service shops (or an interface with the vehicle
      computer), motorists could have the status of their tires checked every time they take their
      vehicle to be serviced, or through their instrument panel."
      ( https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZrXHlyRR8y4J:http://www.safetyresearch.net/Library/Recalls_RFID.pdf%2BFirestone+tire+RFID&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&hl=en&ct=clnk )

      Here are some specifics regarding one manufacturer of the technology:

      https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_cXTVCFeXZIJ:http://www.lawfuel.com/860-to-950mhz-rfid-tire-tag/%2Btire+RFID+federal+law&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hl=en&ct=clnk

      Interestingly, I found the following article--front-page, main headline--in a nearby news-outlet this morning. By the time I started writing this post, it had been yanked from the outward-facing website:
      http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2013/09/12/3200503/study-proposes-tolling-interstate.html

    70. Re:Trending political procedures... by icebike · · Score: 1

      You failed to read exemption "e" in your own link.

      Since we are talking toll plazas, and since easy-pass is given a pass, you can bet they share it with the NSA, and police.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    71. Re:Trending political procedures... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      You're welcome to waste your time and psychic energy on plots that likely don't exist, but that's just what they want you to do, so you don't notice what's really going on as they steal your future.

      If you can get in the odd snarky remark to anyone who questions that attitude, well that's just gravy.

    72. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone challenged this? Force them to staff the booth and take cash. "Legal currency for all debts public and private". Argue that they cannot refuse cash payment.

    73. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I get a new passport that has on RFID it's going in the microwave for 15 sec. OOPS! I work around some high voltage and strong magnets and took it to work right before I went to the airport.

      Let them prove otherwise.

    74. Re:Trending political procedures... by cusco · · Score: 1

      It was interesting to me that when the original RFP (request for proposal) was issued for the RFID-equipped passports it required that the RFID be readable from a minimum of 20 feet away.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    75. Re:Trending political procedures... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "What happens is that you do anything unexpected, the bureaucrat gets a notification from all this automation, along with your online and offline history."

      No, it doesn't. If we are very unlucky, and keep electing the wrong people, it may happen that way some time in the future. But it isn't being done NOW. In fact that was part (though maybe a minor part) of OP's point.

      There is a lot of resistance to this kind of shit, as well there should be. It may never happen.

    76. Re:Trending political procedures... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      um that's is just it this isn't being used for law enforcement. At least there are no cases where it is known that this data was used by law enforcement.

      Knowing NYDOT I would say law enforcement and every other agency probably didn't even know this data was being collected for traffic monitoring.

      Every EZPass I have seen comes with a little RFID resistant bag(poly bag with metal foil lining the inside) to store the unit when not in use.(That makes 6 total units at least)

      Sure the average person probably doesn't remove the unit from the windshield ever. I know I don't anymore. but I did when i first got the unit.

      lastly NYDOT can't issue traffic fines againist ezpass transponders. they tried a couple of times when the system first came out issuing speed tickets to who took drove 90 miles in an hour. but those were quickly overturned in court. As EZpass registered to cars and speed/ driving tickets are issued to Drivers.

      a minor difference but if you let someone else drive your car you are not liable for driving tickets they generate.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    77. Re:Trending political procedures... by Maudib · · Score: 1

      Actually they have done extensive rerouting based on traffic pattern data. Some examples include:

      (1) Express cross town streets that bar left/right turns on most avenues.
      (2) Tons of bike and bus lanes with restrictions on car traffic.
      (3) Eliminating lanes an altering the flow of traffic on Brodway above Union Square

    78. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen this? http://hairycow.name/commute_map/map.html

    79. Re:Trending political procedures... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess we just drive around with a big copper net over our car then.

      Not everywhere has complete coverage like london or new york yet but your point is valid.

      On the flip side, I *very* much doubt that every sensor has been replaced yet. I mean, come on- we have bridges falling down from rot but we are going to install new sensors before they are needed?

      But eventually it will be true in the big population areas. Still doubt it outside of them.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    80. Re: Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny because red light cameras and speed cameras (say in Maryland) only capture the plate and a citation is send to the owner

    81. Re:Trending political procedures... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Most places allow you to pay cash to buy a "filled" stick-on pass.

      Originally used so DV victims could avoid tracking. You stick them in your glove compartment when not in use so your vehicle is not tracked.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    82. Re:Trending political procedures... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Audi dealerships already use the RFID to track the history of the factory-provide tires of the vehicle, I'd be very surprised to find that the other vehicle dealerships aren't doing the same.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    83. Re:Trending political procedures... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Three seconds in the normal microwave will kill the chip in your credit card without damaging the mag strip. Five seconds will warp the card though, so watch it.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    84. Re:Trending political procedures... by tipo159 · · Score: 1

      Need more tin foil for your hat?

      The TREAD Act does not even mention RFID (or any other tracking technology). Neither does any of the implementing regulations.

      You deliberately quoted a paper out of context to try and make it look like tire manufacturers are installing RFID tags in their normal road tires when, in fact, that is just a proposal (for the purpose of tracking recalled tires that have been recapped, a common practice for commercial tires).

      The RFID tag that you linked to is a product for specialty tires, not for general use tires.

      As far as the Interstate tolling story, maybe up there in the sticks outside of Bellingham, this is news, but, in Seattle and Olympia, this issue has been discussed for some time. In fact, tolling on the I-90 bridge across Lake Washington is in the planning stages. There has been on-going discussion of how to replace revenue to maintain the Interstates in response to declining gasoline tax revenue because cars are getting more efficient and using less fuel. This is a real issue. Many people are opposed to the tracking/tolling solutions because of the possibility of Big Brother use of the resulting data and the issue remains open. Nothing has been implemented.

      But do you know what has been implemented? Tolled roads that collect billing information through transponders and/or OCR scans of license plates. Why didn't you put links to info about that system in your post?

      BTW, there are roads here where solo drivers can pay to use the carpool lane. For drivers who have a transponder in their car, but are not solo drivers, there is a shield that you can put on your transponder so that it isn't read so you don't get billed.

      But, let's pretend that there are RFID tags in all tires. How does the government associate a particular tire with a particular car? Why would they bother when license plate OCR is fairly reliable?

    85. Re:Trending political procedures... by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Reducing traffic volume improves traffic flow. Just sayin'

      =Smidge=

    86. Re:Trending political procedures... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I have for a number of reasons. Odd that now that I'm in a foreign country, I feel less need to carry it with me.

      I've had more than one employer argue with me that a passport wasn't sufficient ID for a job. You must have one category 1 ID and one category 2 ID, and passport is the only one in both. Twice I've had managers argue that they would only accept a driver's license and SS card (though one would accept a birth certificate in place of the SS card). After pulling out the paperwork and trying to show me wrong, the realized they were wrong, and both ended up accepting it.

      But it was easier to carry it around than hand over my driver's license and SS card to people.

      My SS card was kept secure, the passport isn't. I lose nothing but a $100 fee to replace it if it goes missing. Someone who gets my SS card could build a life around my name and make my original life miserable through duplication. So, in practice, if I thought an SS card was "necessary" I'd keep my passport on me. I also thought it cool at the time to hand over a passport when someone asked for ID, as so few Americans have one.

    87. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets be legal here.

      "Legal currency for all DEBTS public and private." Getting a pay my mail thing can be paid in cash. However, when the item is incurred at the checkpoint, it is not a DEBT yet. So they can take used condoms for payment and be 100% within the law.

    88. Re:Trending political procedures... by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Let them prove otherwise.

      They don't really need proof to use it as pretense for making your life miserable.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    89. Re: Trending political procedures... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      And you can ignore most such tickets.

    90. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've gotten billed by the Washington DOT multiple times for crossing that bridge. I have never been to Washington state. Have to fight with them every single time. Here in Illinois, the same characters can be issued on multiple plates, such as "Veteran", "Firefighter", "Cubs", "Bears", "Sox", "Birdwatchers", "NRA", "I Like Pie" etc etc etc. There are dozens and dozens of these Special Interest plates. Since I have the plain ol' vanilla Illinois plate, it probably comes up first in a search. WADOT refuses to provide me the photo they use to bill me from, and I tell them that I refuse to pay them without photo proof. I also offer to provide proof via my tollway records from Illinois and security footage from work that prove I was 2000 miles away. Eventually they drop it. Looking forward to dealing with them shortly after Thanksgiving again this year, when whoever has a similar plate to mine goes out there to visit again, and then again for Chistmas, and Easter. If I ever go out there, I will take a picture of some WADOT employee's plate and tape it over mine and drive across that bridge a dozen times.

    91. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See my post above. Yes, they do chase you across the country. Also, at least in the Chicago area, the I-Pass has been converted to "Open Road Tolling", meaning it reads your RFID at highway speed, and takes your picture to verify car and plate. No cattle chutes unless you are paying cash.

    92. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also from the Chicago area. I seem to recall Blago wanted to implement speed measurement, but was shut down because too many people would avoid the tollways and cause massive traffic havoc on all non-toll alternate routes. I would be one of those people if they ever do that. Also, they photograph every single vehicle that passes through, be it cash or I-pass, so they could ticket absolutely everyone that averaged one mile per hour (or more) faster than posted speeds. It would impact tens if not hundreds of thousands people's commutes daily. I seriously think there would be shootings of those responsible if that occured.

    93. Re: Trending political procedures... by Chickenlips · · Score: 1

      Rather than ignore the ticket, just send a photograph of the amount of the fine in cash.

      http://www.snopes.com/autos/law/handcuff.asp

      I doubt either strategy will work, however.

    94. Re:Trending political procedures... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Sure, today, the system isn't in place.

      But if you think it won't be in 5 years, I think you would lose the bet.

      And yes, you WILL keep electing the wrong people. As in people who will do NOTHING to stop this from happening.

      Because too many people will buy the "he is soft on terrorism and child molesters" label on anybody running for any level of gov't that has a platform of limiting gov't tracking people and access to personal information.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    95. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poison the well - have everybody in the general populace do such things completely at random. Try to bury the mofos under a mountain of bogus notifications.

    96. Re:Trending political procedures... by hacker · · Score: 1

      I picked up one of these (Black Hole Faraday Bag - RF Signal Isolation for Forensics, Large Window Size) and toss my gadgets in it, roll it up when I'm out traveling and don't need my phone broadcasting my location, GPS or AGPS every 3 seconds. Same with my iPad, GPS, EZ-Pass, and so on.

    97. Re:Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? How does this work for out-of-are/state visitors? How do they collect? As an Arizona resident, I simply wouldn't pay.

    98. Re:Trending political procedures... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Which is to say... Remove the one you KNOW about.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    99. Re:Trending political procedures... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Until they tie 'em into the car's ignition interlock...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    100. Re:Trending political procedures... by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      There was nothing trollish about this you fucktarded morons. You're just mad because I called out your obvious bull shit. If you're such an activist then start proving it before you continue with your idiotic claims.

    101. Re: Trending political procedures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about New York, but when I got my FasTrak transponder in the SF Bay Area it came with a little Farraday bag and a letter explaining that it's used to collect traffic info all over the region and if I didn't want to be tracked just put the transponder in the bag.

    102. Re:Trending political procedures... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You failed to read exemption "e" in your own link.

      No, I'm well aware of that. The only permitted use of that data is for revenue collection. All other use is prohibited.

      Since we are talking toll plazas, and since easy-pass is given a pass, you can bet they share it with the NSA, and police.

      The AG regularly smacks down any PD's that try these things. If there is data being shared with the NSA, then either the AG is unaware or complicit in a crime.

      One of our gubernatorial candidates is exploring those possibilities.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    103. Re: Trending political procedures... by jxander · · Score: 1

      It isn't being used for law enforcement ... that you know of.

      A few months ago, the NSA wasn't secretly monitoring everyone's phone records either.

      How easy would it be for cops to cross reference an outstanding tickets database with the EZPass location? Or use it to track "20 minute parking" violators. The cops wouldn't have to admit the EZPass use in court. Just say that they were walking around and noticed.

      --
      This signature is false.
    104. Re: Trending political procedures... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I don't know how this works in America, but in Britain a ticket (speeding, parking, red light jumping ...) is issued to the "registered keeper" of the vehicle, and they are personally liable for it, unless they enter a defence that some other named person was driving the vehicle at that time. If they do, the fine and license endorsement point get applied to that person. Yes, there have been "he said, she said" cases, most noticeably a recent one where a Member of Parliament, a surgeon and a barrister all got jail time or fines for "attempting to pervert the course of justice" in such a case.

      "license endorsement points" significant traffic offences e.g. speeding will attract a number of points reflecting the severity. Say 3 or 4 points for normal speeding. These are applied to your personal license, but expire after so-many years (typically 3 or 4). If you end up accumulating 12 points, that's it, you're not licensed to drive any more, until some of your points expire. Yes, the police do check this for the keepers of vehicles ID'd by automated number plate readers.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    105. Re: Trending political procedures... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      What do they need to prove? That you don't have a valid passport? They can tell that with the RFID reader. Yes, you do have a piece of paper with writing on it ; no, you do not have a passport, the RFID reader doesn't recognise it as a passport.

      You wanted to go somewhere? Please hand over your passport.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Were you expecting anything different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...when you put a RF transponder in your car with identifying details unique to you?

    I have a tupperware bin in my car lined with foil that I leave my Fastrak (Bay Area equivalent) in, and I pop the lid whenever I pay the bridge crossing. They know when and where I commute to work (they'd actually know that anyway because of the bridge cameras), but I won't make it that easy for them anywhere else.

    1. Re:Were you expecting anything different by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually it probably has no identifying details at all... it's almost certainly just a serial number, and that's it. It may also have a checksum on the device that might be derivable via a one-way hash from personal information that the company has about you, but in general this would not be practical to try to reverse, Such a checksum id could potentially be used to verify at their end that the device was not a forgery.

      The company that collects the data on the device has your identifying details and has recorded which device, by serial number, they assigned to you. Whenever they are scanning the device, all they need to do is look up its serial number in their database to get all of your identifying information that they have... unless somebody else had suitable access to that same database, they would not generally be able to identify who you were or anything else about you for that matter.

      A third party could, however, potentially use the information even without access to said database to track where it was you were going... although as far as they are concerned, they'd be tracking some anonymous device, with no idea in general who actually has it... only knowing where it was detected by scanners.

    2. Re:Were you expecting anything different by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Except if they have cameras and can identify the vehicle or identify a vehicle uniquely present in all N pictures, they can now identify you.

    3. Re:Were you expecting anything different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, none of what you say is relevant.

      If the government comes along, it's NSL, all your data are belong to us, and stay mum. Done. Otherwise, it's trivial to set up an ANPR device somewhere and gather some data to couple with the tag. It instantly gives good linkage between number plate (and what government agency does not have access to that database? n'mind that you can easily cross-reference its ownership data with driver's licence data and, in plenty places, even get a picture of the owner which may not be the driver but is someone close) and the tag. So everywhere you see that tag go, good chances it'll be that number plate, that car, and still good chances that person. But amazingly, even that isn't really relevant.

      The sticking point is that this is abuse of facilities sold for a different purpose. And it's not even for law enforcement. There's no opt-out, because they're not even honest about it. It's bait and switch, really. Oh, and you still have to pay the tolls. So you're not getting anything in return either.

      This is a complete integrity fail, and it's been going on for years. That's not an excuse, it's wilful keeping the citizenry in the dark.

    4. Re:Were you expecting anything different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could file a FOIA with the state and even get others groups involved, the EFF, ACLU, ect. to get any and all information on the E-Z pass program, and details on the device itself.

      You may even be able to log into the patent site and see if the company has any logged patents. I'm guessing that an outside company makes the cards, again getting a FOIA would divulge that information. Even an internet search more then likely will have something on this, seeing how a lot of people like to expose programs that are being kept secretive, until they get caught, then its all PR hype from them. (of course he is a hacker he was able to rig up the pass to capture when it was signaled, but doesn't appear to know much more about the card itself)

      I live in PA, I am wondering if the state is also doing this, and refused to bother informing the public about it, I would like to see the device this hacker created and try it here in PA too see for myself, i seriously doubt this is limited to one state, and the company gave me a good laugh by saying something that bold.

      This alone, combined with traffic cameras, is illegal, oh wait, I forgot we do not have any privacy, or courts that uphold the constitution..

    5. Re:Were you expecting anything different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A serial number tied to your prepaid account which is most likely tied to your name, also it doesnt need to even handle the gps data it self on the ezpass just get that data from the tracker that picked you up, "Person xyz was at station 1" station 1 is located at xx,-xx.xx pretty quickly you have a way to track where individuals are going.

    6. Re:Were you expecting anything different by mark-t · · Score: 0

      No... more like 'rfid #xyz is located at xx-xx". In other words, absolutely no personal identifying information at all.... you have to look up atht serial number in the database of the company that is actually tracking that particular rfid to get access to that information.

      Which, if you think is so easy, why don't you go ahead and see how simple it is to find out somebody's address from their license plate without police cooperation?

    7. Re:Were you expecting anything different by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Do you know the name of the person driving in front of your car simply by looking at their license plate?

      And just how much work is it to find out the name of that person without police cooperation?

    8. Re:Were you expecting anything different by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

      Give me the serial number I will tell you who it is. This is most certainly an anti terror program that is why it was not disclosed. For traffic management you put down much less costly devices that collect no personally identifiable information.

    9. Re:Were you expecting anything different by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Well if the New York DOT is supporting this....

    10. Re:Were you expecting anything different by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Actually... in my state, I can walk into the MVA and give them a license plate number and get a name and address. Registration information is public information.

    11. Re:Were you expecting anything different by mark-t · · Score: 2

      How will you find out who it is, exactly?

    12. Re:Were you expecting anything different by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Point being that you need somebody's cooperation who administrates that database.

      What evidence is there that the private information associated with these RFID's is equally accessible to anybody who can just walk in and ask who something belongs to?

    13. Re:Were you expecting anything different by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      Actually it probably has no identifying details at all... it's almost certainly just a serial number, and that's it.

      How is a serial number unique to you not an identifying detail?

    14. Re:Were you expecting anything different by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's work to get set up, but get a shell company, set it up as a vehicle test station, and many places let you check license-to-registration details in real-time. Then save that site to your phone's browser, and checking by just looking at their plate is trivial. And some of the bad guys have already done it.

    15. Re:Were you expecting anything different by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The company tracking is the government, and it's the government most people have issues with. It's trivial for the government to use this as a law enforcement tool.

    16. Re:Were you expecting anything different by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Do you know the name of the person driving in front of your car simply by looking at their license plate?

      You can have a camera at, say, 50 locations with RFID. You can correlate that X car is the uniquely present vehicle in each of a few pictures (as low as 2 if all other cars are different). You can then look at the license plate and pull the driver information out of the state vehicle registration database. The state (in this case, the city) is running the camera and RFID stuff, so they basically administrate the database.

      Of COURSE they can find out who you are, you blunt skulled dufus.

    17. Re:Were you expecting anything different by mark-t · · Score: 1

      .... pull the driver information out of the state vehicle registration database

      And of course, anybody can just go and do this.... with absolutely no credentials or cooperation by other responsible parties who are administering that database.[/sarcasm]

    18. Re:Were you expecting anything different by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      We're talking about the government, sanctioned by the highway administration, having access to a highway-administration database to look up information that any individual--me, you, the coke-fueled tweenaged hooker that sucked your dick last night--can access by walking into one of the many motor vehicle administration locations where you go to get your license and saying "WXZ395 who is this?" No questions, no background checks. Just poke, poke, print, here you go kid.

      This isn't a top-secret database that requires credentials and authorization and need-to-know. It's PUBLIC INFORMATION. It's the kind of thing you can just ask for. It's as public as how much INCOME TAX you pay and the name of the person who owns a house. In the case of license plates, you have to go into a building to ask--unless you're a state facility and set up access. Right now it costs me a dollar to punch in a license plate and get a VIN, insurance information, criminal background check, name, and home address. I don't have a special job function for this; it's just a service that's out there. A dollar is cheaper than driving to the MVA and asking.

      Obviously the City of New York would access New York State's license plate database for free. Or just use taxpayer funds.

      Wanna see the real property database for Baltimore City? Go here and punch in, say, 1402 Madison into "Property," then hit "Search". Then click the link marked "Select" in the results to see that BCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, 2911 CRESMONT AVE, BALTIMORE, MD. 21211 paid $201.60 to the state and $4046.40 to the city of Baltimore in property taxes in 2012, minus a special credit (it's a historical district property).

      You thought tax information was private too?

    19. Re:Were you expecting anything different by mark-t · · Score: 1

      When it comes to a government, we're talking about an organization that could effectively end anyone's life as they know it anyways... I'm not saying corruption is impossible or even unlikely, but I find absolutely no compelling reason outside of paranoia to presume that they'll even be interested enough in any given individual who hasn't done anything wrong to even *try*. Exceptions happen, but deal with them on a case by case basis instead of just assuming that most people's lives are even remotely interesting enough for someone else to even care.

    20. Re:Were you expecting anything different by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes but that's not the point. The point is that you can, relatively easily, identify an RFID tag by the use of cameras to see who is incidentally at this position when this RFID is present, until you narrow it down to a single vehicle and RFID present in all compared cases, and identify the license tag. This is relatively intensive, although some automation is possible with modern visual analysis algorithms (and license plates can be snapped and read by OCR very effectively, if you're not just using your standard traffic cam).

      You're trying to argue that the government can't look up the license plate, because it's some kind of super-secret information. It's not. It's public record. The hard part is the correlation of RFID to present vehicle, which isn't a difficult problem but does require more intent than "hey, let's have this automatically get_id_from_plate() from the camera and notate down the RFID for that plate, too!" Notably you also can't definitively say an RFID associates with one vehicle or one person--it's owned by a person, but his wife or kid might also use it sometimes. But you get the idea.

  3. Pretty sure GoodToGo Pass (WA) does this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard from the truckers that use it the weigh stations have scanners for the GoodToGo car passes. This might sound innocent (ie. you know when a truck is passing a weigh station), but that isn't listed anywhere in the terms. I wouldn't be surprised if they are scanned in many more places.

  4. Cup holder by A10Mechanic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it also chart the size of the soda in your cup holder?

    1. Re:Cup holder by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe. It's RFID based, could be capable of activating all RFID tags in the vehicle, including ones used by shops to track stock.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Cup holder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloomberg's KGB agents would like a word with you. After which you'll be audited by the IRS.

    3. Re:Cup holder by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Maybe. It's RFID based, could be capable of activating all RFID tags in the vehicle, including ones used by shops to track stock.

      Why would I need an RFID enabled cup or cupholder?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Cup holder by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When your cup gets to 20%, the navigation system will route you to the nearest Starbucks. For a $0.50 convenience fee the drink will be pre-ordered and charged to your card, waiting for you.

    5. Re:Cup holder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not really RFID based. It's way too far away from your car to pick up the signals of "normal" RFID tags. E-Z Pass uses tags with built-in signal amplifiers.

  5. Tin Foil Hat for your car? by ntshma · · Score: 1

    This kind of thing isn't even a surprise anymore. Something I learned as a kid: "You pay for convenience" It's just that today you're paying with more than just your wallet.

    1. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 5, Informative

      When I received my EZ-Pass, I also received a bag (like those used to protect electronic chips) that I could put my EZ-Pass in when I don't want it to be read. It's my choice.

      People were so up and arms of the UUID in iPhones and iPads being used to track their activity...but, the ability to collect this type of UUID in EZ-Pass has been available for years and nobody gave a rat's ass. The difference over license plate numbers (readable via OCR) is that these are easier to read....AEI tags, the tags used on railcars (EZ-Pass on steroids) were designed to be read as trains passed at over 90 MPH.

      If you run a GPS such as Waze or another with real-time traffic analysis....it's, likely, reporting your position, speed, direction and...an identifier (maybe just your Waze account ID). All modern cell phones are E911 capable - they know where you are ... if they care. Do you turn your phone off when you drive your the car or go about your daily business? Unlikely.

      There are far bigger things to worry about.

      That being said, it would be interesting to know how this data was actually being used, stored and shared.

    2. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by BlackSupra · · Score: 1

      Re: Cell data used for traffic data:

      http://news.verizonwireless.com/news/2009/07/pr2009-07-14.html

      Keywords: Verizon AirSage

    3. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I don't, I only turn it on when I want to use it, I think I used it once last year.

    4. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That bag wasn't so you could avoid your vehicle being tracked -- there is no way to put the transponder in the bag once you apply the adhesive to your windshield. This purpose of the bag is to avoid spurious scans while transporting the transponder from one location to another (such as when mailing it).

    5. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Great...I guess you don't even have to be the NSA to get access...
      Nice find, Supra.

      From the AirSage Website (my emphasis):

      "AIRSAGE GENERATES BILLIONS of anonymous location data points, transforming over 5 terabytes of signaling data every day into valuable, relevant and accessible information.

      Taken separately, anonymous signals don’t mean much, but in aggregate they form a detailed picture of clusters of people showing how and when they move through the day.

      On roadways, clusters of signals are often a key indicator of congestion and heavy traffic, so knowing where and when these clusters appear is the first step in helping others to avoid those locations. Or helping planners address the congestion with road improvements or alternate forms of transportation.

      AirSage locates cell phone signals to within a few hundred feet extremely useful for businesses and advertisers, providing unprecedented insight into the behavior of consumers at specific locations and at different times during the day.

      Tap into this data to understand locations, behaviors, and movements – vital information for advertisers, corporations, commercial carriers, departments of transportation, and urban planners – any group that needs real-time geo-targeted information to plan, build and grow. "

    6. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are far bigger things to worry about.

      Because it's happening a lot and people don't notice? That means there is more to worry about.

    7. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by hacker · · Score: 1

      Do you turn your phone off when you drive your the car or go about your daily business? Unlikely.

      If you leave your battery in your phone, even in the 'off' position, your phone is still on, still capable of receiving and sending, including E911. Just because the screen says it's been turned off, doesn't mean it's been turned off. Pull the battery out.

      Soon though, that won't be enough, and your phone and other devices will be able to transmit their location, data, etc. without the need for a battery.

    8. Re:Tin Foil Hat for your car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That being said, it would be interesting to know how this data was actually being used, stored and shared.

      That's the main point of the article.

  6. NY isn't the only place tracking toll tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CalTrans does the same thing with FasTrak tags in California

  7. Still pissed by Spiked_Three · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm still pissed I was labeled a troll when I mentioned that there was no privacy in the US. And since then 1/4 of all news stories have been about how we have so much less privacy than anyone thought.

    Want to discuss wireless tire pressure gauges in your tires, how 4 somewhat constant numbers (or at least predictable changes) can be read from sensors in the road, and have been on cars for 10+ years? I know, another conspiracy theory.

    For every 4 surveillance things you know about, there are 100 others you don't, half of which have been used somewhere sometime.

    So give up on the privacy whining. You don't have and will never get it back. And the biggest point, WTF do you care for? You think anyone cares you are butt fucking your same sex roommate? Society doesn't care anymore. The poeple who will use that info against you will find out some other way. The only dumbasses who care about privacy are the ones doing something they know to be illegal, immoral or otherwise dangerous. I bet Castro was a privacy advocate.

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    1. Re:Still pissed by brainboyz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny you mention gay sex and then go on to list the only ones that care about privacy are those doing something "illegal, immoral or otherwise dangerous." Have you not been paying attention to Russia lately? Gay sex recently became illegal again. Just because society and politicians don't care NOW doesn't mean they will continue not caring.

    2. Re:Still pissed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm still pissed I was labeled a troll when I mentioned that there was no privacy in the US.

      Yea, I'm sure it was because you "mentioned" it; surely you weren't labeled a troll for gems such as:

      So give up on the privacy whining.

      Or

      The only dumbasses who care about privacy are the ones doing something they know to be illegal

      Or maybe even

      I bet Castro was a privacy advocate.

      Now GTF my lawn, you fucking troll you.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Still pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're not doing anything wrong, you don't have anything to hide. /oh-so-obvious-troll

    4. Re:Still pissed by Shortguy881 · · Score: 2

      Its not the collection of the data, its the shady circumstances under which it is collected. All of this huge data collection happening outside the public's eye can be used for nefarious acts, not only by individuals, but by corporations and governments. What better way to control a population than through analytics?

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    5. Re:Still pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you are right once in a while doesn't mean you're not a troll.

      If you act like a troll, use the tone of a troll, complain like a troll, etc, etc ... well, then we'll think you're a troll.

      BTW, does the bridge you live under have EZ-Pass?

    6. Re:Still pissed by Spiked_Three · · Score: 0

      What better way to "protect" people, than through analytics? Or is the tradeoff that we don't want the best (or at least better protection) if it means ATT will be able market to us?

      Every technology advancement comes with potential for abuse, hell I think they tried to teach that lesson in the first Star Treks. I have seen nothing that shows the data is being abused in any way. I know of lot's of cases, mostly unknown to the public, where the data has stopped events like the Boston marathon. That one got through, sure, but have you thought about how many don't?

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    7. Re:Still pissed by newcastlejon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you not been paying attention to Russia lately? Gay sex recently became illegal again.

      No, it didn't. Talking about it, however, is a different story.

      Have you not been paying attention?

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    8. Re:Still pissed by Spiked_Three · · Score: 0

      good point, accepted. I'm not the most tactful writer, and people who read here are not my drinking buddies, I care less what they think, fuck em.

      It's just when you're labeled a troll because someone doesn't like your point, that it twerks me a little. I generally think of trolls as people who make shit up just to argue. Labeling them trolls is like calling them liars, to me. I guess I need to read up on what the slashdot moderator definition of trolling is next time I have points.

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    9. Re:Still pissed by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

      BTW,

      "BTW, does the bridge you live under have EZ-Pass?"

      http://www.pbase.com/mikep/image/152069058

      That is one of my newest neighbors. 3 of them WITHIN 1 block. You think I think I have privacy?

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    10. Re:Still pissed by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I think I see why you were labeled a troll... you pack retrospective, editorial, controversial opinion and passing off opinion as fact into the same comment. If you broke this up into multiple comments, you'd probably find that the passing off opinion as fact was the only bit that got modded troll.

      Basically, I'm sure when you mentioned that there was no privacy in the US, someone else mentioned that you can have no expectation of privacy in the US (different than saying there's no privacy), and got modded Informative.

      The US is big. People came to the US from other countries because there was room to have privacy and freedom of expression -- through obscurity. If you burn flags in the middle of a forest and there's nobody there to see you do it, does anyone care? BUT, if you burn flags in the town square and shout "down with the government!" even if it's not illegal, you can rest assured that your name and face have been noted and will be remembered during the next uprising.

      The only dumbasses who care about privacy are the ones doing something they know to be illegal, immoral or otherwise dangerous. I bet Castro was a privacy advocate.

      I agree. Everyone else who cares about privacy are aware of how private information can be taken advantage of by others. Only the dumbasses, as you state, care about it because they have something socially unacceptable to hide. Privacy, of course, is not anthropomorphic, and doesn't care whether you're a dumbass or not.

    11. Re:Still pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you're a tad conflicted here. "I care less what they think, fuck em" and "It's just when you're labeled a troll because someone doesn't like your point, that it twerks me a little" are a bit at odds.

      Don't worry about being modded a 'Troll'. It's the catchall "I disagree" moderation. People do it to surpress someone else's ideas or just to be a prick. Either way you shouldn't take it personally. Yes, they can and do target specific users (happens to me once in a while) but that just means you've pushed their buttons in advance that they'd disagree with you if you told them the time of day.

      Just think of it this way: something you're saying on the internet is pissing someone off on the internet. And something someone on the internet is doing or saying is pissing you off on the internet. Go have that beer and let the people who know you, those that look you in the eyes, judge you for who you are.

    12. Re:Still pissed by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I built a dipole sniper rifle once that could fry electronics from 500 meters. No boom, no bullet. Just one glorious column of invisible EMP death reaching out to skullfuck your television into the grave.

    13. Re:Still pissed by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      You would think a lot of Republican Senators would be up in arms over this. :)
      Every time one of them gets caught with a "rent boy" it warms my heart. Can someone tell me why it is almost always the "Family first" ones that get caught with a male prostitute?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    14. Re:Still pissed by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention gay sex and then go on to list the only ones that care about privacy are those doing something "illegal, immoral or otherwise dangerous." Have you not been paying attention to Russia lately? Gay sex recently became illegal again. Just because society and politicians don't care NOW doesn't mean they will continue not caring.

      This just made me remember something else; the adage that in an established society, it is impossible to live for a week without committing at least one illegal act*.

      *"Illegal act' being something that COULD be deemed illegal by a court of law, depending on interpretation.

      As such, everyone has something to hide, because everyone is breaking the law. But that's not really a useful argument to drag into the discussion anyway; just thought I'd point it out while I was thinking of it.

    15. Re:Still pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know of lot's of cases, mostly unknown to the public

      Ahh, ok so you have some secret insider knowledge that proves everyone wrong. Well either provide the knowledge of go away troll.

    16. Re:Still pissed by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My rule #46:

      The number of skeletons in [most famous person]'s closet is usually directly proportional to how sanctimonious or pious they act in public.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    17. Re:Still pissed by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Just like it warms my Heart when Obama appoints someone he once demonized to some post or another.

      http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/09/obama-appoints-former-bain-capital-exec-to-top-post-2762156.html

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    18. Re:Still pissed by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Good rule.
      Just to be clear, I don't want this trend to stop. It provides me with immense entertainment.
      I do think they should be forced to be on a float in the local gay pride parade, with a large banner over their heads explaining their affiliations, and what they were caught doing.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    19. Re:Still pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, which is it, were you too chickenshit to use it, or are you posting from prison?

    20. Re:Still pissed by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The only dumbasses who care about privacy are the ones doing something they know to be illegal, immoral or otherwise dangerous.

      Ah! That would be why politicians get so upset when they are tracked.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    21. Re:Still pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So give up on the privacy whining. You don't have and will never get it back.

      And you seriously wonder why you got marked as a troll?

      And the biggest point, WTF do you care for?

      Ah, a troll and stupid.

      You have just said "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear". If you're too stupid to know why that's a terrible idea, that's your fucking problem.

    22. Re:Still pissed by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1
      42 according to the agencies collecting the data, and seeing as they are the only ones that know for sure, Im sure they are a little biased on that number. Also, there is no way to know if these plots were foiled do to direct results from these programs.

      Furthermore, you apparently are not familiar with evidence based economics/policy. The possible potential for these are astounding, however in the wrong hands this type of analytics is dangerous. It is population control, pure and simple. The issue with using this information doesn't stem from some innate fear of technology, but of the powers that be. How am I supposed to trust a government to act in the best interest of its people when they do all of this analysis behind closed doors?

      My example is this: this data collected is supposed to be used to improve traffic conditions. That is what we are told it is doing. This data could be used to target specific people ie terrorists, criminals, gun owners, foreigners, protesters, Jews, or African Americans. The point being we have no say in how the data is used, so what was once designed to help us can be used against us and with the government we have in place today, I don't see that as much of a stretch.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    23. Re:Still pissed by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Privacy is a human right, as declared in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which the United States signed. However it seems you are all to ready to give up your privacy. What you do with your rights is your business, but you don't decide what other people get to do with theirs. And the downside of privacy can be summed up in the following quote from one of France's more famous tyrants:

      "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." --Richelieu

      See the problem with having no privacy, and being able to cheaply record everything you say and do for all time, EVERYTHING YOU DO AND SAY CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU. It's just a matter of someone making that decision - if you voted for the "wrong" party. If you're the "wrong" religion. If you do something that goes against the party line. If you say the "wrong" thing. At some point in the future. Now, how do you defend yourself from the future? How do you deny every little off color joke, every line of sarcasm, every politically incorrect thing you have ever said? Giving someone your private life puts you firmly in their control.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    24. Re:Still pissed by presspass · · Score: 1

      The number of skeletons in [most famous person]'s closet is usually directly proportional to how sanctimonious or pious they act in public.

      Or:
      "The more the preacher preached, the faster we counted the silverware"

    25. Re:Still pissed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Yup, the streak continues.

      Better to be a logical jerk than an emotional idiot.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  8. Not completely news by RedShoeRider · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Notably, the fact that E-ZPasses will be used as a tracking device outside of toll payment, is not disclosed anywhere that I could see in the terms and conditions. "

    In NJ, buried in the fine print, is a line that reads something like "other information may be obtained by the the Consortium at their discretion", which easily translates to: "We're going to use this to monitor traffic flow, and by doing that, we're monitoring you".

    If you're driving on the Parkway (a New Jersey toll highway), there are plenty of places where you can see EZPass pickups buried in the road surface that are nowhere near the toll sites.

    --

    Chris Knight is my hero.

    1. Re: Not completely news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EZ-Pass readers are not buried in the road, they must be positioned overhead. What you're probably seeing are magnetic loops used to count and classify vehicles passing over them. If there are two loops in each lane, they're also using them for speed/traffic flow data.

    2. Re:Not completely news by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 2

      I remember this being discussed several years ago (I think here on Slashdot, in fact), but for Houston. The toll tags were being read by sensors mounted on nearly every overpass sign and used to create the traffic speed maps that we've all come to know and love. The controversy was primarily that they were not anonymizing the data and had no defined retention period. It surprised a lot of people at the time. Now, not so much. I'm actually surprised that anyone is actually surprised by this story. I now just assume that my toll tag is being read in any state I travel, whether it's "compatible" with their system or not. :-/

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

    3. Re:Not completely news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you see them if they're buried in the road?

    4. Re:Not completely news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The controversy was primarily that they were not anonymizing the data and had no defined retention period. It surprised a lot of people at the time. Now, not so much. I'm actually surprised that anyone is actually surprised by this story. I now just assume that my toll tag is being read in any state I travel, whether it's "compatible" with their system or not. :-/

      Yeah, my state has toll roads and uses the tags for traffic monitoring. Prior to the toll roads, if you wanted to help, you could pick up a tag for free. I can't find the website that stated this, they may have taken it down, since so many people have tags already. This isn't a secret or a conspiracy. It's a service. As you say, there should be procedures in place for handling the data, but you can't tell that just because they pinged your tag.

      The author of this story drives around holding his cellphone up to take video in heavy traffic. I consider that a bigger threat than his tag being read.

    5. Re:Not completely news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is probably seeing loop detectors for traffic light timing or traffic monitoring loop detectors that measure speed and density of traffic as it passes. These are usually used for motorist info signs and traffic reports. If you are paranoid, they are also xray machines that know who you are and what you have in your car. And they are everywhere.

    6. Re: Not completely news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The magnetic loops show up as octagonal cut lines in the center of the lane. They make the cut, feed the loop in and then fill the cuts with epoxy to seal it back up. There's usually a cut line off to the shoulder of the road as well which routes the wire to a junction box. It's then connected to a low power traffic counter with a network connection.

    7. Re:Not completely news by Animats · · Score: 1

      If you're driving on the Parkway (a New Jersey toll highway), there are plenty of places where you can see EZPass pickups buried in the road surface that are nowhere near the toll sites.

      Loops in the road surface are a different kind of sensor. Those just count vehicles, and if installed in pairs, measure speed. At least in California, that's where the CALTRANS road data comes from. That's been around since at least the 1980s; LA used to have a cable channel which just showed the freeway status map.

      Interestingly, the LA area and the SF area have quite different privacy policies. Compare Bay Area Fastrak, which is quite reasonable, to LA Metro, which asks "customers for demographic information, including but not limited to, zip code and income level."

    8. Re:Not completely news by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      The CA fine print has the same info.

      If you don't agree, you can can ask the provider for a RF shielding bag. This comes with a warning that you're liable for fines if you forget to take the pass out of the bag before using a toll.

    9. Re:Not completely news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are called induction loop sensors

      They are also found at stop light and, if you have a motor cycle, you might not have enough metal for the sensor to sense.

    10. Re:Not completely news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, Illinois has been doing this for years with its IPass. You can actually see the receivers on the side of the highways up on tall poles with a solar panel. It is what feeds the traffic on travelmidwest.com.

      The Constitution only states that you are free in your papers and such FROM prosecution. The Gov can track you all they want, they just cannot use it to build a profile and then go after you with it. That is fishing trip and fruit of a poisonous tree.

      Lighten the fuck up.

  9. Quick hardware hack by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Time to put your transponder into a flip-lid Faraday Cage that springs open only when you require it, then closes by default.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    1. Re:Quick hardware hack by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, EZ-Pass devices installed in rental vehicles do EXACTLY this to allow the renter choice of whether to use EZ-Pass or normal tolls.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:Quick hardware hack by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I'll bet somebody has patented the 1836 technology.

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    3. Re:Quick hardware hack by swb · · Score: 1

      I don't know how other transponders work, but my Minnesota EZ-Pass turns off when I remove it from the windshield-mounted holder -- there's a pin in the holder that hits a recessed switch.

      I remove it when I am using an HOV lane as an actual carpool so I don't pay the toll for using it.

      I would assume that this would keep it "off" for all other uses of it, unless the apparent off setting is only valid for HOV lane readers, same with the "beep" it generates when the HOV readers scan it.

    4. Re:Quick hardware hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to make the spring open thing work, you can use the RFID activation signal from the toll booth right? That way you don't have to open it yourself. Then no one is tracking your transponder, just your faraday cage door opener.

    5. Re:Quick hardware hack by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1

      And to make the spring open thing work, you can use the RFID activation signal from the toll booth right? That way you don't have to open it yourself. Then no one is tracking your transponder, just your faraday cage door opener.

      I pondered that but non-toll-booth signals could trigger it open too, so probably a manual system is best.

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    6. Re:Quick hardware hack by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      I'd bet there were at least two such patents: One for shielding electronics, and another the same but, "on a carputer"...

    7. Re:Quick hardware hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The unit usually comes shipped in an aluminized plastic bag - that usually does the trick.

      However, thanks to you I have now seen the pinnacle of tinfoil hatness - the tinfoil closet.

    8. Re:Quick hardware hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your link-

      Plastic bags that are impregnated with metal are used to enclose electronic toll collection devices during shipment to the customer, so that a toll charge is not registered if the delivery truck carrying the item passes through a toll booth.

    9. Re:Quick hardware hack by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      And I'll bet somebody has patented the 1836 technology.

      Patent 1836 technology? Well yes, someone has patented it, including:

      Gridirons (cooking)
      Circuit breakers
      Propellers
      Colt's revolver
      Sewing Machines

      Personally I'm holding out for 1839 - both the bicycle and the hydrogen fuel cell. Of course vulcanized rubber is nothing to sneeze at.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    10. Re:Quick hardware hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah Funny I said the same thing today when I read this article. Now were is that trash can to throw out my cell phone damn need to ditch my whole car thanks to the nsa I mean on star gods watching every place I go.

  10. Illinois also uses the data for non-tolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also use the data for Traffic information purposes, but only on the tollroads. That is how they get all the travel time information for the traffic signs on the toll road. They have several data collection locations that are not used for tolling at all, but only at the ends of the tollways not covered by toll booths. To my knowledge, the data isnt kept longer than the time required to traverse the tollway.

    Note: Anything using EZ-Pass tags will contain a tag identity number, the agency that issued the tag, and potential, a weight or vehicle size class, with the number of axles of the vehicle. Nothing in the tag itself, identifies the vehicle it is in, or any account holder information, That is up to the agencies to maintain.

  11. Don’t keep it on the windshield by LMariachi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have never kept my FasTrak (our version of EZPass) stuck to the windshield. It lives in its mylar foil bag in the center console until I’m approaching a toll. Besides, people will break a window and steal it. It can’t be linked to a different vehicle, at least not without me setting that up, so it’s pretty much worthless to anyone else, but crackheads don’t know that.

    1. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I do the same, but I tend to keep it attached to my car if we're going on a road trip. Otherwise, during normal car use, the EZPass is in a bag in my glove compartment.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      It can’t be linked to a different vehicle, at least not without me setting that up, so it’s pretty much worthless to anyone else, but crackheads don’t know that. . . .

      Why not? Does the system cross-check against license plate photos or something like that? I've seen friends move turnpike transponders (not called FasTrak, so not in your area) and I didn't know they'd done anything special to use it with a rental or company car, etc. But I never thought to ask, either.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the tag is flagged as stolen, It is flagged as suck on the issuing agencies system (They can use it to trigger a violation, call police, whatever they want) for OTHER agencies, the tag is just marked as a bad tag, the agency you just drove through, takes your license plate pictures and treats it like you didnt have a toll tag.

    4. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Illinois, they have you register the plate so that if the read fails and they get the plate from the camera, they just charge back to the account rather than start the fine process.

    5. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never kept my FasTrak (our version of EZPass) stuck to the windshield. It lives in its mylar foil bag in the center console until I’m approaching a toll. Besides, people will break a window and steal it. It can’t be linked to a different vehicle, at least not without me setting that up, so it’s pretty much worthless to anyone else, but crackheads don’t know that.

      Yeah, I know what you mean man, those damn crackheads and their electronic toll pass addiction...so stupid they'll look right past the $2000 in-dash infotainment system to to go for that $10 piece of shit transponder every time...

    6. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      You could probably use it until it’s reported stolen, but you would be taking a risk every time you went through a toll, not knowing if it had been flagged yet. Toll evasion tickets go to the owner of the plate, not the pass. The only way to legitimately associate the pass with a different plate is to log in to the account on line. Likewise refilling it.

    7. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the tag is flagged as stolen, It is flagged as suck on the issuing agencies system

      I reckon that must be a Freudian slip of some sort. I'm just trying to figure out which direction it swings. ;-)

    8. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      When I got a new car I used my ezpass for years before I rememberd to update my acct. The terms say you can't use it in a different car but it's not enforced in my experience.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    9. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I just observe that crackheads and drug addicts are actively a negative on the experience the rest of us are having, but they walk free, and yet people on websites like this can't stop screaming about 1984 bullshit? Does nobody else see the cognitive dissonance between the level of freedom we actually have and the level of oppression that we imagine is there? I'm not arguing right or wrong, I'm just saying maybe this isn't a big deal, or at least it's not as big a deal as the drug addicts and desperate people who I live next door to.

      It just seems all around like people who use websites like this aren't very good at assessing what is actually worth worrying about.

    10. Re:Don’t keep it on the windshield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Illinois, yes, it is cross-checked against car model and plates.

  12. You already have something like this on your car.. by ravenscar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's called a license plate. With technology that allows license plates to be read by cameras, any government organization could track the movements of every vehicle everywhere in their jurisdiction. Don't think you can't be tracked because you don't have an RFID tag in your vehicle.

  13. to find another good spot to setup a toll booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are probably tracking people to find another good spot to setup a toll booth

    1. Re:to find another good spot to setup a toll booth by alen · · Score: 1

      NYC tried to pass london style congestion pricing a few years back but the state killed it. idea was to make people pay to drive in midtown manhattan

  14. just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they want to tell you what to eat and drink, what doctor to go to, and even who your neighbors should be

    1. Re:just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! We should vote for the other party that tells us what to eat and drink, what doctor to go to and who your spouse should be.

  15. Hubris by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a tactical mistake borne of hubris. When the RFID chips came out, people were paranoid they'd be use to track instead of ease on off congestion in toll roads as advertised. Officialdom trotted out the usual assurances. Now they're using them to track cars.. (as if they can't already do that through other means).

    The long term effect is to breed distrust of government and technology. To induce a cynical turn of mind .

    Seeing as 99% of security relies on public buy in , cooperation, the feeling of a shared purpose and identity and absent those things or if those things are greatly degraded, we have no effective security, this has to be seen as a big security blunder.

    Tricking, coercing, forcing, sneaking by people what's needed for security is a bad idea. It was a bad idea when the NSA started doing it whether they were getting away with it or not. It's a bad idea wherever it goes. It works against security in a million ways none of which anyone can control.

    The way to security buy in is through more openness, more sharing of the problems and threats we face and above all the verifiable protection of our civil liberties against the abuses which inevitably occur when identity and details of people's private lives are exposed for examination by the state.

    You have to firewall international (or national) terrorism from all other concerns. You cannot use this information to, say catch drug dealers or common murders. Neither can you over-define what terrorism IS. Copyright violations aren't terrorism and neither are the activities of organized crime. Mainstream , even violent political protestors aren't terrorists and neither are the Tea Party or anarchists. That's called- regular life, normal criminal deviance that is NOT terroristic; the goal is not to undo Western civilization.

    Deniers are of course not terrorists, despite my hyperbolic moniker.

    Because that IS a slippery slope and what will happen is there will grow widespread, covert, person to person rebellion ande non-cooperation, subversion and ultimate undermining of security.

    People don't want to live in Stasiland, whatever benefits there are to living in Stasiland and it' takes not very much to get people to thinking that they are living in Stasiland.

    I am to the right of most people on this forum, (yesterday's rating drubbing) which is to say in the middle of the political spectrum. Even I am creeped out by some of the things that have been going on. It's human nature to abuse power in ways that lead to undue influence by the power wielders and then on to a kind of defacto fascism. That's not a political perspective, that's a historical and psychological fact and moreover instinctive knowledge. It is not possible to talk your way around instinctive knowledge.

    1. Re:Hubris by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't commented already, I would throw some Karma your way on this one, Woofy. It's amazing how difficult it is to explain to otherwise very intelligent people the difference between "perfect" security and "effective" security.

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

    2. Re:Hubris by latead0pter · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you say, except for the part where you state "even violent political protestors aren't terrorists".

      I think that violent political protestors are terrorists by definition.

      terrorism |terrizm|
      noun
      the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

    3. Re:Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. That might not be their intention; they could just get angry and lose control of themselves.

    4. Re:Hubris by houghi · · Score: 1

      The long term effect is to breed distrust of government and technology

      There are people who still trust their government?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great writeup.

      All it takes though is one soppy story about a toddler being abducted and all this goes out the window.
      Within minutes all those databases are linked together, vehicles tracked and traffic cameras activated.

      Try saying "Yes, we would have the technical ability to do this, but we can only use this for TERRORISTS not for missing babies."
      Oh, the humanity!!! Mothers crying on the 8-o-clock news.

      And then after that, all else is fair game. after all, if we can track a baby thief, we gotta be able to track drug bosses, and petty criminals, and students missing class, and political dissidents missing their mandatory re-education session.

    6. Re:Hubris by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Great points woofygoofy.
      As others have mentioned its all a huge fishing trip around basic domestic rights with a long term storage and mapping options.
      Organised crime and drug dealers would have been warned during project testing by layers of state and federal corruption i.e. friends in the politics, police and press.
      Tracking long term political protestors seems to be about the only aspect that this method will work for.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. Time to put a shoe box sized faraday cage in car by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative
  17. Did you know your tires have RFID also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the law was passed that cars need to have airpressure sensors, your tires now help to track you. Don't think that not having a EZ-pass is making you safe.

  18. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by Spiked_Three · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and a sample license plate tracker comes with openCV these days. Takes about 20 minutes to put together a tracker that observes all visitors to the adult movie booth place down the street, and another hour or two in front of the government offices to associate license plates with bureaucrats. You know what they say, "information is power."

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  19. OMG, they are studying traffic patterns by alen · · Score: 1

    everyone complains how government is so dumb in how they build out the wrong infrastructure in the wrong place
    and when they try to study things for future build outs its suddenly a huge violation of privacy

    1. Re: OMG, they are studying traffic patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      State DOTs are not linking the transponder # to the EZ-Pass database with your account info. They're just looking at complete trips. The car started here, took these routes and ended the trip over there. Once the trip is complete, the transponder # is thrown out, because quite frankly they don't care who you are, they just want to know where they need to concentrate their spending of your tax dollars. Or they can just piss your dollars away on educated guesses. Either way there's some group that complains...

    2. Re:OMG, they are studying traffic patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is they did it in secret. They didn't ask permission or even let them know. Most people wouldn't give a damn if they did this openly.

    3. Re:OMG, they are studying traffic patterns by alen · · Score: 1

      i'm sure this was a super secret code word only program where you needed the bloomturd level clearance to know what was done

    4. Re: OMG, they are studying traffic patterns by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      And you know this - how?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:OMG, they are studying traffic patterns by AlphaWoIf_HK · · Score: 1

      everyone complains how government is so dumb in how they build out the wrong infrastructure in the wrong place

      Which is exactly what's happening with this. If they can't do something without violating people's privacy and rights en masse, then don't do it.

      --
      Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
    6. Re:OMG, they are studying traffic patterns by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      There are better ways to study traffic patters, than to look for only SOME of the vehicles. Like you know maybe studying ALL the vehicles, like pretty much any other metropolis does.

  20. 1984 and the Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The reference to 1984 correlates the political disposition of the state of NY (and NYC in particular). A dogma of leftist political ideology that the state Is Good For You(TM) to the point that you shouldn't want anything BUT the state to intervene in your life. So it is not surprising that a state dominated by Left-Liberal politics is taking a lead in using tracking technology to find out how its happy masses are managing their lives -- and to keep them happy by doing so.

    1. Re:1984 and the Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "So it is not surprising that a state dominated by Left-Liberal politics is taking a lead in using tracking technology to find out how its happy masses are managing their lives -- and to keep them happy by doing so."

      Ron Paul(TM) and the Gold Standard(TM) would've stopped all this, I'm sure. Why won't you people ever listen to the AC geniuses in your midst?

    2. Re:1984 and the Left by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Oh, I think I see. So apple trees vote R and people vote D, is that it?

    3. Re:1984 and the Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the republican population in that 95% of the area is not very dense, which is why NY is overall a blue state.

      Ironically, those republicans are also much denser than the average New Yorker.

  21. How hard to pull a "Little Brother" ? by Mahldcat · · Score: 2

    ...Not sure if this was just Science Fiction, but how hard would it be to clone an EZ pass off a random stranger and then reprogram a second random stranger's pass with said data?

    1. Re:How hard to pull a "Little Brother" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone used a "cloned" tag? When the actual owner contested the charges the nice people at EZ-Pass would just go to the video tape to see who used the tag. They take front & rear images of the cars as they pass through the toll booths. You can even see yourself in the pics pretty well (not to mention the license plates).

    2. Re:How hard to pull a "Little Brother" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your post I infer you've read something by Cory Doctorow. From the score of your post, I infer that the moderators on /. have not.

      From the title of his book, I infer Cory Doctorow isn't afraid of inviting comparison between himself, as an author, and George Orwell. From having read both books, I infer that Doctorow should, in the future, avoid inviting comparisons between himself and authors like George Orwell, as he doesn't write as creatively... Or well.

      Hahaha...

    3. Re:How hard to pull a "Little Brother" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading, not hard; cloning, I can't say. Programming an random one remotely? somewhat harder, maybe impossible, at least covertly.

  22. Wouldn't that be true for *ANY* type of RFID? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Informative

    I mean, if you have an RFID chip, wouldn't it be detecting that it's being read whenever it passes near *ANY* scanner, whether or not the people who operate the scanner are actually even interested in that RFID? All someone else would know, in general, is that the RFID isn't one that they are trying to track, and I'd imagine at *MOST* they may be able to know which company was tracking that RFID (although I'm not even sure they could do that). And even then, without access to the other company's database of users they would have no way to know who it was who had that RFID or any other personal information.

  23. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you implying that this makes it right?

  24. Microchips in people will be the next step.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microchips in people will be the next step, this way your injectable bio chip would eliminate the need for cash, the need for ID or the reason for having to carry a wallet. Crime would disappear. Identity theft would go away. No need for EZ Passes as a reader would be able to read your bio chip. Everything in your chip would be tied to your bank account and the government's central database. You will be tracked by a government database and by local and national 'security' agencies for your protection and for the overall good order of society. If East Germany still existed today, this is the system they would be using.

  25. yawn. by nblender · · Score: 2

    As others have mentioned, if gubmint wanted to track you, they'd use your license plate because everybody has to have one of those whereas these toll passes are optional... In my city (Calgary, Alberta) the municipal government uses bluetooth ID's to track phones/cars as they travel down the roads to generate traffic information. We have handy signs that report the expected time to various exits. I've found it handy because I know about how long it should usually take to a specific exit and if the reported time is wildly different, I can choose to exit sooner and take an alternate route...

    I suppose I could surmise that the municipal government has some way to tie my cellphone to my name and is tracking me... But I think it largely improbable and I can always turn off my bluetooth if I'm doing something nefarious just as NYCers can put their tags in a metal box.

    1. Re:yawn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, the government owns the license plate database. They need a warrant to get access to the EZ-Pass database if they want the conviction to stick. All they have otherwise is a bunch of random serial numbers.

    2. Re:yawn. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      There is a mall near me that now has license plate scanners on the entrances and exits.

      The justification the local police gave was terrorism. Well excuse me but when is the last time terrorists attacked a mall? What kind of idiot terrorist is going to drive his own car to the mall?

      http://nj1015.com/freehold-raceway-mall-installs-license-plate-scanners-privacy-intrusion-or-necessary-security-tool-poll/

  26. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would like to see regular citizen's have license plate scanners installed on their cars like many police vehicles already have, only specifically looking for license plates associated with the police. With enough people doing it and uploading to a central database we could have a real-time update of where police cars are located and maybe integrated with google maps in an app. Watch the watchers.

  27. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by flogger · · Score: 1

    government organizations do track the movements of every vehicle everywhere in and out of their jurisdiction

    Fixed that for you.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  28. Screw YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everyone complains how government is so dumb in how they build out the wrong infrastructure in the wrong place
    and when they try to study things for future build outs its suddenly a huge violation of privacy

    You(and many others) are quick to suggest that people are being paranoid/ridiculous/stupid for fearing this type of tracking. But the fact of the matter is that the privacy advocates have been railing against these tracking technologies from their inception, for fear of abuse/misuse. Repeatedly the proponents, government, and people like you have shouted them down saying that these technologies will only be used for this specific purpose or that and that they'll be protected against misuse. But, here we have yet another story of the tracking technology being used for unintended purposes without disclosure and when specific requests ofr information are made, they are ignored.

    Yet, despite all this you still suggest that it is somehow inappropriate for people to be concerned about misuse, demand accountability from their government, or simply maintain their privacy.

    Specific to your traffic analysis assertion, it is no more difficult nor less accurate for the traffic department to use good old fashioned counters for their analysis as has been done for decades. There's no need for them to use individually identifiable tracking information, nor is it easier/less expensive/etc. This is yet another case of overreach that will be used against the citizenry and the fact that you lack vision doesn't invalidate those concerns.

    Here are a couple of likely possibilities for you to consider:
    1. The tracking program is a trial run to test the effectiveness of the devices for implementing a Londonesque traffic congestion charge, where they charge YOU a fine/fee for driving into a district.

    2. It allows the government to maintain a detailed history of your activities and travel for their convenience and later use against you. This is especially prescient in light of NYC's unconstitutional stop and frisk policies.

    1. Re: Screw YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, get a grip. Do a freedom of information request to ANY state DOT and they will send you documentation on IF they're doing this, and how it all works. They probably put out a press release at some point too explaining how they're getting all this new planning data.

      Another source to request information is from the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) that exists in any medium to large sized city as required by Federal Law. They work with your State DOT to plan transportation improvements.

      Instead of flying off the handle as if they're spying on everyone with a toll transponder, you take a look at the facts that are freely provided if you ask. They have nothing to hide.

    2. Re:Screw YOU! by alen · · Score: 1

      yep
      every day the drones will make a list of the peons driving on 34th street in rush hour and the mass arrests are coming next month

      and i'm totally for some kind of congestion pricing in manhattan and i own a car. my wife and i pay for the train. lots of people drive in over free bridges that aren't tolled and paid for by my taxes. there is no reason why there shouldn't be some kind of toll on all the bridges. traffic around these bridges is so bad it takes an hour to drive a mile. charging people for using these resources should be priority #1 instead of relying on taxes from people who don't drive into manhattan

    3. Re:Screw YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I see what you're saying. Other people should be charged more so that you are not inconvenienced.

      The "free" bridges that you refer to are not free and have been paid for, many times over by the taxes you cited, and few if any complained about it. Paying more again, on top of those said same taxes, so that you can benefit doesn't seem as fair as you seem to be implying.

    4. Re:Screw YOU! by alen · · Score: 1

      taxes pay for the trains as well, but its not enough to cover the cost of the system
      no reason not to have use fees on the bridges for people that use them. and there is a maintenance cost on them every year. not like you build it and its free to maintain

    5. Re: Screw YOU! by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      That would be a reasonable action if we had reason to believe that the information being given was complete and correct. However, history teaches us that we should not take that as a given.

  29. Future plans outside New York by Applekid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Florida, we have a toll transponder system too. Recently waves of notices have been going out that the older style transponders are being deprecated for newer ones. I always thought that was kind of silly because the new style transponders are currently compatible with the existing system just like old ones are, so it's not really a "protocol" type change (I'm a software guy, not an EE, so there is likely some RFID stuff I don't know about).

    The biggest change? The older transponders would beep when scanned, the newer ones no longer have that functionality. Sounds like perpetual tracking is coming to my state.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
    1. Re:Future plans outside New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like the camera image data collected OCR'd and sold to 3rd partys.
      http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19548772-license-plate-data-not-just-for-cops-private-companies-are-tracking-your-car?lite

  30. Hence the reason I don't keep mine in the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only take it out to go through the tolls.

    The rest of the time it's in the console glove box.

    And yes, I've confirmed that that's sufficiently far enough from the window to not get double charged when I opt to pay cash at, e.g. a NY toll booth that does double duty as both manned and E-Zpass.

  31. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1974

  32. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by ravenscar · · Score: 1

    Not at all. I just think it's important that people understand that they can be and most likely are being tracked regardless of whether they have an RFID in their vehicle. I think it's likely a losing effort to try and thwart government privacy invasion by avoiding technology. Things like license plate scanners, face recognition, drones, backdoors to hardware, backdoors to service providers, etc. make it really difficult to pratically avoid detection and tracking. It seems like it would be better to change the mindset (and legal precedent) that makes the governement think that it is okay to track us. That might be even less practical, but it's the avenue I would prefer to pursue.

  33. expectation of privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is there any expectation of privacy when driving on public roads? do you get equally offended when your face is captured on a security camera (used nearly EVERYWHERE)?

  34. It's public info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right here in this public press release from 2011

    Cameras, Microwave Motion Sensors and E-ZPass Readers Provide Real-Time Information Used in Wireless Adjustments to Traffic Signals

    http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/menuitem.c0935b9a57bb4ef3daf2f1c701c789a0/index.jsp?pageID=mayor_press_release&catID=1194&doc_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyc.gov%2Fhtml%2Fom%2Fhtml%2F2011b%2Fpr257-11.html&cc=unused1978&rc=1194&ndi=1

  35. Lawsuit by Quila · · Score: 2

    In the conditions of your contract you gave up a specified amount of privacy (your time/location information at toll booths) in exchange for the consideration of the convenience the service provides. They have now taken more privacy than you willingly gave up, providing more value for themselves than the contract gave them, and have provided no further consideration to you.

    Classic example of "Give government a tool, and it will be abused."

  36. Your tires have RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it wasn't EZ-Pass, it would be something else. Your car was sold to you with 4 RFID transponders.

    TPMS (Tire Pressure Monitoring System)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tire-pressure_monitoring_system
    Ever wonder how your car knows when the tire pressure is low? RFID is used to convey this information from each tire to the vehicle. Mandated in US since 2007. In Nov 2014, all new cars sold in EU must have it as well.

    The threat of tracking has been known for a while:
    https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/12/tracking_automo.html
    http://www.cse.sc.edu/~wyxu/papers/TPMSUsenix.pdf
    The second item suggests a working distance of 9m (31 feet), but had examples working at 40m (130 feet).

    Even active tracking, where a tracking system prompts the TPMS chip to reply, is hard to identify because the car is interrogating the tires periodically. Worse than that is that passive listening of the comm between car and tire is easily done (although the polling rate is only about every 60 seconds).

    I haven't heard of any commercial systems exploiting this. Instead, there has been more going on involving tracking the location of cell phones:
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/metro-vancouver-project-monitors-private-cellphones-to-track-traffic-jams/article13756279/
    Apparently Vancouver is doing this already - again for traffic management.

  37. Traffic counters like the Traf-O-Data? by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    Traffic counters like the Traf-O-Data? :)

    Playing devil's advocate here, knowing the specific flow of multiple vehicles can help with more specifics of popular routes. Using the across-the-road counters won't do that, and snow plows rip them up, so you can't reliably use them for 1/4 of a year.

    I don't know about NYC, but at least outside of Boston, the general trend for road planning isn't for throughput but for traffic-causing "traffic calming" measures, designed to make driving slower and push people to mass transit.

    1. Re:Traffic counters like the Traf-O-Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austin is the same, except that there hasn't been a road improvement since 1995, other than turning existing highways into toll roads. (The new toll roads in the area are funded by the state. The city is good at putting speed bumps and roundabouts in random roads, but refuses to make life easy unless you have a posh pad downtown with the rent/mortgage/HOA costs it entails.

      It is easy to plan traffic here... look where the wrecks are, and you know where people are going.

  38. I'm all for it. by koan · · Score: 1

    All cars both old and new should be retrofitted with RFID tags that broadcast far enough to allow constant monitoring, you speed you get a chime warning you, if you don't slow, a moment later you get a electronic ticket attached to your RFID number, you park incorrectly, you get a chime, moments later you are electronically ticketed and a tow truck is called.

    Face reality, the majority of people out there aren't even as smart as my dog and I don't let my dog drive. The only way these ignorant masses learn is when it hurts, you can not reason with them, you can't legislate stupid away, you can not expect or hope "They will make the right decision" they are dumb animals pushing tons of metal with their irrational egos, you have to hurt them by taking their money, yeah I said that, and who ever thought flying cars were a good idea was a sociopathic moron.

    The reason I'm behind this is simple, a car is a form of transportation, it isn't your living room, the road does not belong to you simply because your car is sitting on it, and that is the attitude I see in so many drivers.
    The ideal World would not allow the average citizen to manipulate a +ton vehicle with only minimal licensing and testing, the ideal World would realize the absurdity of this idea.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:I'm all for it. by rk · · Score: 1

      But if you made real driving tests before people could get their driver's license, who would buy all the cars?

    2. Re:I'm all for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by logical extension, you should also be happy with implanted RFID tags in every man, woman and child. I mean, there's no telling what kind of trouble people might get up to if they aren't zapped for stepping outside the lines through automatic control mechanisms.

      Yeah.., no thanks.

      I'd rather live in a dangerous and uncertain world where people get to choose rather than exist in one where Big Brother is wired into our daily lives at every level.

      Remember, we are only ever one election away from total evil, (as though we weren't already there!); I'd be much happier not having such control systems in place which are so ripe for abuse.

    3. Re:I'm all for it. by russotto · · Score: 1

      All cars both old and new should be retrofitted with RFID tags that broadcast far enough to allow constant monitoring, you speed you get a chime warning you, if you don't slow, a moment later you get a electronic ticket attached to your RFID number, you park incorrectly, you get a chime, moments later you are electronically ticketed and a tow truck is called.

      That ever happens I'm going to locate an Oldsmobile 442, fill the trunk with toilet paper, and break every traffic law in existence.

      (Why the TP? Because I don't know how to use the 3 seashells, damnit)

  39. Toll roads by sjbe · · Score: 1

    eventually it will be illegal to drive without EZPass, and you will be billed for driving all over the place. All roads will be toll roads.

    We already are billed for driving all over the place. It's called taxes and it requires no special equipment for your car.

    1. Re:Toll roads by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      And its collected every time you put gas in your car or perform the periodic registration of said vehicle.

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
    2. Re:Toll roads by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes and I pay money in taxes that covers city services, and when I call to have those services performed they close the ticket and say "alleyway cleaned, debris removed" and I go back and see they have removed zero of the trash bags, tires, or abandoned building materials. Call again, they remove... most of it, leave some building materials and concrete around. I pay for this shit in taxes you know. And people tell me, "Do it yourself and pay a junk company to remove it, you freeloader!"

      Do you really think the city won't bill you extra tolls for roads you already pay for?

    3. Re:Toll roads by ultranova · · Score: 1

      We already are billed for driving all over the place. It's called taxes and it requires no special equipment for your car.

      Taxes are a flat-rate uncapped Internet connection and toll roads are a pay-per minute. Both people and the businesses are better off with the former than the latter; in fact the only ones who benefit from pay-per minute are the toll booth owners.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  40. Re:Time to put a shoe box sized faraday cage in ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll take an extra one to put my head in!

  41. I'm sure this extends past EZ Pass by jbeach · · Score: 1

    Makes putting my passport in some sort of signal-baffling enclosure feel a bit less paranoid.

    --
    The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
  42. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is already used all over the country via traffic cams. Even petty repo men can access this information to find cars that are behind on payments.

  43. Houston has been doing this for years! by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    There are EZ Tag readers on all the freeways in Houston, and have been for years, to track traffic congestion. Compaq Computer (remember them?) used readers to scan EZ Tags to track who came and went from their headquarters, well before they merged with HP. The Houston airport system, for a while, allowed EZ Tag customers to pay for parking using their EZ Tag.

    It could be worse! They COULD use the GPS on your phone to track your every move, to find out who you are with and where you go, even when you aren't in your car. Oh but wait, they already do that!

  44. Orlando does this as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One need only look at key intersections to see the same 'reader' apparatus as seen in the toll plazas.

    When this was rolled out, we were assured the data were anonymized - by stripping most of the serial number, I believe. The goal was to better understand traffic patterns.

    So far, I haven't heard of any cases where positioning data from those was used as evidence one way or the other.

  45. Self-demonstrating by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I'm still pissed I was labeled a troll when I mentioned that there was no privacy in the US.

    No, I'd bet cash money that's not what you were modded Troll for.

    So give up on the privacy whining. You don't have and will never get it back. And the biggest point, WTF do you care for? You think anyone cares you are butt fucking your same sex roommate? Society doesn't care anymore. The poeple who will use that info against you will find out some other way. The only dumbasses who care about privacy are the ones doing something they know to be illegal, immoral or otherwise dangerous. I bet Castro was a privacy advocate.

    I'd bet it was this sort of nonsense you got modded Troll for. In a single paragraph, you are hostile & insulting, highly opinionated, dismissive of people with differing opinions or lifestyles, and just flat out wrong on details. You call an opinion other than your own "whining" and tell people to just give up and accept things the way you see them. The Castro thing is just random. Like you wanted to toss in a "you're all as bad as Hitler" comment but were afraid of being called out for Godwin's Law. The sig in which you pat yourself on the back for how "compelling" your own arguments are is also a point against you.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  46. You are really surprised? by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I would have been surprised if it would have been otherwise, but suit yourself in your capitalist police state across the atlantic.

  47. Here in NYS we use more advanced technology by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    This is how we mount our EZ-Pass transponders. You can even request new ones for free from your EZ-Pass online account.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  48. and that's why by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    ...I keep my device in a part of the car that can't be read. and I take it out only when I get onto the toll road.

    1. Re:and that's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a violation of the EZ-Pass agreement, which stipulates that you must have it adhered AT ALL TIMES to the inside of your windshield above the AS1 line and with the center of the EZ-Pass unit within 8 inches of the centerline of the windshield.

      You also agree to have your movement tracked as a condition of possessing the unit, as was posted by another poster.

    2. Re:and that's why by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      All that is under the heading of "while in use" or "while I'm a customer" or "while using the road". It doesn't apply to times when I'm out of the country, or my car is being repaired, or it's in my garage, or I'm on some other road.

  49. Not at all surprised... by mi · · Score: 2
    If the government cared for privacy, they would've made these tags anonymous — to be purchased and/or re-charged at gas-stations and convenience stored. Instead they must be registered to both your name and your license-plate and even using your own transponder in a rental car while yours is in a shop, is a violation of the terms (though people normally get away with it).

    It was obvious from day one, data-collection was at least a secondary objective. Nominally the system is owned by a private company(ies), but with the government-enforced monopoly we get the worst of both worlds — a business' normal desire for profit, with government-style absence of competition.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  50. MOD PARENT UP by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by asylumx · · Score: 1

      The difference is that people are pretending to care about privacy right now because of Snowden. Don't worry, this will pass as soon as the next manufactured crisis comes around (probably the debt ceiling, again), and nothing will change.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      You are being cynical and your words are sad, sad, sad.

      Unfortunately, you're probably right.

      Phooey.

  51. Traffic by phorm · · Score: 1

    Actually, it might be useful for long-term traffic planning.

    Traffic-counter. You know that 300 people come in from A, 400 people come in from B, and 300 people come in from C
    Also, 500 people go off at D, and another 500 at E.

    So you know where there's traffic, but you don't know how to direct it.

    However, if you knew that most people come in at B and exit at E, while A and C generally exit at D, you might be able to improve traffic conditions by building more direct routes for traffic between B and E.

  52. good job "hacker" by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing this "hacker" kept his name out of it. The NYPD would be arresting him on a trumped up "hacking" or "terrorism" charge.

    1. Re:good job "hacker" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It went over the internet. Do you really think they don't know exactly who originated this story?

  53. Maryland EZ-Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Terms and Conditions:

    "You expressly understand that the Authority and other Facilities monitor the use of the transponder for the purpose of toll collection, traffic monitoring and detecting violations of this Agreement."

  54. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Have fun associating those licence plates with bureaucrats, they figured out this ploy and used "terrorism" as a rational to shield them from discovery. After all we have to protect our bureaucrats from terrorists don't ya know.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  55. Not just EZ-pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RFID is used in a LOT of places, such as workplace i.d.'s; school i.d.'s; and BANK CARDS, complete with account information. The problem is not the fact a corrupt Person could access the data but the fact the data is there for a corrupt Person to access in the first place.

  56. AT what speed is this no longer any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having lived in up-state NY and using the thruway with EZ-Pass, I had to slow down to 5-10 MPH else it wouldn't work. Did they upgrade the system and just not let us know about it? If they didn't, it could lose effectiveness. Now, I know, NYC is a different monster in that there are a lot of lights that will stop people making it easier to read these, otherwise, does it work or does it have the limitations that the thruway has?

    1. Re:AT what speed is this no longer any good? by neo8750 · · Score: 1

      In NH the speed limit through the tolls is 25mph. In PA that have what they call "Open road tolling" where you can go 65mph. So i assume just depends on the sensor.

  57. In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Organized crime has stopped using EZ-pass, allowing the Criminals to blend in with the rest of the populace.

  58. Real time traffic monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure PennDOT is doing something similar with EZ-Pass on many of the highways around here in PA. The sensors mounted overhead the lanes on Route 1, Route 309, I-95, etc. look a heck of a lot like the EZ-Pass sensors at the toll booths. That would be the easiest way to populate the message boards with the approximate travel times.

  59. Re:Time to put a shoe box sized faraday cage in ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are you going to stop THIS ?
    http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19548772-license-plate-data-not-just-for-cops-private-companies-are-tracking-your-car?lite

  60. That's illegal, right? by catfood · · Score: 2

    It's unauthorized access to my computing device.

  61. Houston went a step further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Houston, Tx, the city was tracking the RFID tags and using sensors all over the highways to generate real time traffic data, and openly said they were doing it. Of course there were privacy concerns, but they assured the citizens that it was strictly anonymous.

    They went a step further and now use Post Oak's sensors to detect Bluetooth devices, using the repeated detection of MAC addresses to estimate traffic flow and speed.

    http://traffic.houstontranstar.org/bluetooth/transtar_bluetooth.html

  62. Re:You already have something like this on your ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be an invasion of the cops privacy and they would harass you over it, possibly even have to "defend" themselves vigorously when you "resisted" arrest. You can't contest their version of the story in a coma in ICU.

  63. Time to buy more tinfoil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes me sad. I always thought I was just being paranoid when I imagined local governments misusing EZ-Pass for widespread tracking.

  64. Re: You already have something like this on your c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's harder, though, to convert an image of a license plate into useful data than to just grab the EZ-pass pre-formatted data.

  65. Lazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the EZ Pass is issued with a plastic bag that = a faraday cage.

    At least it used to be when I got mine....

    It's a voluntary service anyway.

    Why doesn't he map the parts that it beeps at and make that information available?

    Playing with that information is a better use of everyone's time!

    1. Re:Lazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it also came with instructions on how to use the special plastic bag and (if I remember correctly...) why it's a good idea.

      Use it, put it away....

      did I miss something? lol...

      You can barely be upset when you're carrying around a radio transmitter...
      I guess these people have those RF credit card and RF key bobs... :)

      Also have your phone fingerprint you every time you exit an app.
      Brilliant!

      They don't issue the iPhones with a special plastic bag. :(

  66. Philadelphia RFID Trucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Philadelphia they have RFID scanners on trash trucks. It could be there to track recycling. The mayor here has no regard for the citizens privacy or fiscal responsibility. His answer to everything is more taxing, punishment, and intrusion.

    They went around tearing everyones trash open, photographing it and sending fines to everyone for not recycling non-food stained cardboard and cans and plastic, etc. He wanted to charge everyone $25 for every trash removal too, but he didn't get that. I think the mass trash inspections was his answer.

    They tried to get everyone to sign up for recycling tracking. There may be RFID tags in the stickers they give you when you sign up.. and could get discounts or something if you recycle correctly. There are very few of these stickers on recycling bins though.

    I've come to expect these things to be abused. Walmart has RFID tags on some items. The library has a few on some items. They could scan the trash and everyone's homes.

    Also, the library seems to be giving info to google. Not sure how extensive that is, but I think it's wrong.

  67. Satellite tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cars for a long time have had VIN numbers everywhere, especially on the windows. But there is always one facing up that can most likely be read via satellite.

  68. Not particularly new by k8to · · Score: 1

    It's common knowledge here in the San Francisco bay area, that the google maps traffic progress data is largely based on pickups of people's ezpass information along the highway at various points. This allows them to estimate flow by seeing how long it takes for cars to go from given points along the highway, which lets them determine if the highway is operating at reduced speeds.

    Many people do not keep their ezpass available. Some do. Generally people seem happy that some tracking occurs to provide the public with a useful service.

    Maybe that's the key difference. If NYC was providing realtime data to the public as a result, the public opinion would probably be different.

    --
    -josh
  69. No different than using ANPR/ALPR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how is this different to using automatic license plate readers (or ANPR, for non-US-English) to monitor traffic flows? That's been done for years, and doesn't even require the vehicle to contain anything but the legally required plate (though they work a lot better if the state mandates front plates as well as rear, as is the case in most of the world).

    Google Maps tracks it's users movements to work out where the congested roads are.

  70. Conspiracy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big industry secret: vehicle-mounted RFID toll tags just do not work. The industry still relies on reading license plates, and they need that capability anyway for the no tag drivers. They still want you to buy a tag for accounting reasons and to commit you. Of course you are not supposed to know this. The secret has been kept remarkably well. All existing systems will be replaced as soon as the 5.9GHz ITS technology becomes available.

  71. Time for a tinfoil hat for your EZ-Pass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't want "them" knowing what your EZ-Pass thinks...

    1. Re:Time for a tinfoil hat for your EZ-Pass... by Deemus · · Score: 1

      I used to live in NYC. When you're shipped an EZ-Pass it actually does come with an RFID blocking bag and since it's attached to the windshield with velcro it's not really a problem to block the signal. Many rental car companies use an RFID blocking box on the windshield that you have to slide open to use the EZ-Pass (which they charge you 10x the toll for the convenience).

      Down here in Atlanta (where I live now) they have a similar system called the Peach Pass however it's a sticker you put on your windshield that you can't block and can't remove without destroying it. I'd say New Yorkers have the better deal.

  72. Anyone can do it by yakatz · · Score: 1

    I did an undergraduate honors paper about reading E-ZPass somewhere besides a toll plaza. Not only were we able to do it easily, we also looked into (but did not follow through) creating fake tags using scanned IDs from other cars.

    We were even able to purchase E-ZPass lane equipment from XXXXX (redacted - the lawyers don't want me to say). They did not ask for any verification about what we were going to do with it - if we could come up with the money, they would send it to us.