Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Prioritizing Saleable Used Computer Books?

g01d4 writes "I volunteer at a used bookstore that supports the local library. One of my tasks is to sort book donations. For > 5-year-old computer books the choices typically are to save it for sale (fifty cents soft cover, one dollar hardback), pack it, e.g. for another library's bookstore, put it on the free cart, or toss it in the recycle bin. I occasionally dumpster dive the recycle bin to 'rescue' books that I don't think should be pulped. Recently I found a copy of PostgresSQL Essential Reference (2002) and Programming Perl (1996). Would you have left them to RIP? Obviously we have very limited space, 20 shelf feet (storage + sale) for STEM. What criteria would you use when sorting these types of books?"

219 comments

  1. By Year... by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Although there are many good, reliable books that are several years old (on computer principles, logical logic and whatnot), you'll probably be better off sorting by year.

    You'll end up putting a few great books farther down the line than you otherwise would, but sorting by publication date will ensure that the vast majority of the books are still relevant.

    If you've got time, sort by quality. You're the expert, though, and your time is limited. Would you prefer something that is good enough - and done, or something that's perfect ... but not available.

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    1. Re:By Year... by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I might add, for the questionable books, put them in a box and list them on one of the online auctions for cheep or something- buyer pays shipping. There might be an admin out there that inherited something old and needs reference material or perhaps a kid getting a hand me down system and wants to make use of it.

      Try to make the same cash as you would selling it in store, but make sure your supervisor or someone else in charge knows about it so it doesn't appear like you are taking books and selling them on the side.

    2. Re:By Year... by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know, Programming Perl would be more relevant to more people than anything written in the last couple of years.

    3. Re:By Year... by Anrego · · Score: 5, Informative

      That book is great and has aged really damn well. I still dig out my second edition copy from time to time. The "gory details" section is great when you are trying to figure out some obscure incantation that some sadistic bastard left as a present for you in a legacy script.

      I'd still recommend reading that book cover to cover to anyone that wants to learn perl. You won't be a guru, but you'll have a pretty solid foundation.

    4. Re:By Year... by kcitren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What part of volunteer didn't you understand?

    5. Re:By Year... by anubi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe these people would be interested...

      http://www.emsps.com/oldtools/

      What is one man's junk is sometimes another man's treasure, but you are probably not interested in holding onto what may or may not be junk forever. These guys seem to be in the business of warehousing old stuff and may gladly pay the shipping before you dumpster it all.

      You will be doing somebody a great service by slipping your discards to someone who has the resources to remarket these old treasures. Its not so much emsps, but the bloke who is dying for some documentation for some old dinosaur that wandered into his life.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    6. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ooh, ooh, I love having been "that sadistic bastard". I'll make meself a merit badge, and even drink to that. :)
      The Perl books are almost timeless, even with the esoteric new features.

    7. Re:By Year... by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd add a bit of rough categorization here based on my own buying patterns.

      Applications (Office, Photoshop, etc) have a very short shelve life. Anything over a couple of years old is useless.
      Languages (Perl, PHP, Ruby); throw away after a decade or so. It differs though; old C books may still apply, old Java books less so.
      Theory (algorithms, methodologies); should be good for a long, long time.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:By Year... by rioki · · Score: 1

      This!

      Pure age is not the wisest. For example "The Mythical Man-Month" is still relevant as it was 1975 or "Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code" as of 1999. Certain things never change and that are the things that transcend specific technologies. You want to keep these. As GP said, specific technologies slowly die out and you should take his/her advice...

    9. Re:By Year... by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Funny

      I scan all my old books page by page. That way I always have a copy.

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a curious one: assume that you want to program high-quality numerical algorithms in C.

      "Numerical Recipes" (all code is in Fortran): buy. Either use extern "FORTRAN" with the code or rewrite it in (assembly-)equivalent C.

      "Numerical Recipes in C": burn at a stake of your choice or nail it to the doorframe of a computer lab and rip out its pages to let it serve as a warning to all who will listen. It's basically a "how can I naively recode Fortran programs in C such that they run an order of magnitude slower and have useless memory layout incompatible with anything else" guide.

      Of course, buyers going by title will lean towards the second book. So if your aim is to sell books rather than sell good books...

    11. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, sort by year, but for the computer languages you'll still want at least one per language, and if the latest in the library is 1996, then keep it.
      I guess you could also rank by Amazon Customer Rating if pushed.
      Hopefully the library isn't in the habit of buying references on faddish technologies, because they pass so quickly yet they could end up taking significant shelf space in a purely ordered by date system.

    12. Re:By Year... by fa2k · · Score: 1

      It's modded funny, but it seems like a fine way to get DRM-free ebooks, just like you can get superior quality music by ripping CDs vs. downloading MP3s. OCR software has advanced recently, and if you have an automatic book scanner it may not be that much of a hassle. Not only do you get a DRM-free copy in any format, you also bypass the legal hassles with downloaded goods (often can't legally give away, sell or pass on as inheritance).

    13. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I scan all my old books page by page. That way I always have a copy.

      True. A $500 doublesided scanner would fix many of the storage problems.

      Legal problems, on the other hand ...

    14. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That book is great and has aged really damn well. I still dig out my second edition copy from time to time. The "gory details" section is great when you are trying to figure out some obscure incantation that some sadistic bastard left as a present for you in a legacy script.

      ...or when you want to leave a present for the next developer.

    15. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A double whoosh! for you. Congrats!

    16. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll only get into legal problems if you try to distribute your scanned copy.

    17. Re:By Year... by BookScanner · · Score: 2

      Or you could just use http://bookscanner.us/ and forget about loosing any book ever?

    18. Re:By Year... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      Did you realise that these so-called "volunteers" don't even get paid!

    19. Re:By Year... by znark · · Score: 1

      Applications (Office, Photoshop, etc) have a very short shelve life. Anything over a couple of years old is useless. Languages (Perl, PHP, Ruby); throw away after a decade or so. It differs though; old C books may still apply, old Java books less so. Theory (algorithms, methodologies); should be good for a long, long time.

      Manuals for old, unique (non-PC) hardware platforms, peripherals, and programming environments may still have relevance to them, though.

      There’s always the retrocomputing/historical angle where you’d want to preserve books such as a register-level hardware reference explaining the capabilities of an old 8-bit home computer model for an aspiring programmer, or a system administration guide for an old minicomputer, or programming manuals (entry-level or not) for such systems. Or user manuals for the seminal applications which were driving the sales of such systems.

      Also: some people are very interested in preserving old product catalogs with pictures and technical information of what was available for such systems back in the day.

    20. Re:By Year... by outlander · · Score: 1

      I agree - I still have old Perl books, and as a basic language reference, they don't leave much to be desired. I've used them to teach beginning users and they're perfectly acceptable for that - particularly insofar as you make it clear to your student base that the language changes, but the core (generally) doesn't.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    21. Re:By Year... by carlos92 · · Score: 1

      Most Java books should be pulped immediately after printing. Or perhaps the authors should be. K&R's book should never be thrown away.

    22. Re:By Year... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Sure there is value to historical books on software and, in particular, hardware. Heck, I learned assembler for the C64 by reading then-already-outdated hardware manuals for the 6500 chip.

      But if you've got limited shelvespace, those books probably aren't going to be the most popular books. They'll probably be better served by selling them to collectors through eBay than keeping them in storage, or worse; shelves.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    23. Re:By Year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll only get into legal problems if you try to distribute your scanned copy.

      ... which is exactly what the OP is going to do.

      GAWD AM I ARGUING WITH MYSELF AGAIN?!

  2. Too late by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

    You've already put more into it than it's worth, but if you really want to know, find the local big book store's buyback locale and walk it in there. They have estimates for everything, and for what they don't have, they can speculate, but at that point it's usually due another trip to the dumpster/recycler.

    1. Re:Too late by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You might be right.

      Google a sentence out the the beginning of some chapter that looks kind of unique. Google it in quotes.

      If the book shows up somewhere on the web, trash it.
      You are not doing humanity any favors by keeping those fibers out of the recycle chain.

      (If you are worried about the apocalypse start saving gardening books, not computer books.)

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shhhh... if people could use Google all by their widdle lonesome, then there'd be no Ask Slashdot.

    3. Re:Too late by justthinkit · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's ok, icebike is giving incorrect advice -- you don't need to use quotes any more (they are ignored/invisible now).

      --
      I come here for the love
    4. Re:Too late by game+kid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't get me started about their + operator change either...

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    5. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're the one giving incorrect advice.

      They are not ignored. Try it yourself - the search results are often (not always) different.

    6. Re:Too late by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your metric will end up with no computer books being available. It took about 2 days between my last book being published and it being possible to find pirate copies online, and yet people are still buying it so obviously some people would rather have the dead-tree edition, and I suspect that most of those would happily buy it at a fraction of the price in a charity shop...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Too late by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's definitely not true. While I can't definitively state that the function hasn't changed, I can get different results by typing a phrase, and then typing the phrase with quotes. Ergo, quotes are not ignored.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    8. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they undid that a while back. Quotes work again.

  3. Let the market decide... by msauve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep anything you think might sell. Track by acquisition date. If it's not gone in X months, throw it on the free cart. Another month, toss it.

    "X" depends on your turnover, space, and how many books are coming in. Since you're space limited, get rid of the oldest ones first.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Let the market decide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that some clever people might wait for it to hit the free cart...

    2. Re:Let the market decide... by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure that's a problem, the books would at least be avoiding the dumpster or recycler.

      --
      (name withheld by request)
    3. Re:Let the market decide... by greg1104 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I let the market decide by seeing what Amazon is selling used copies for. If it's 1 cent plus shipping, it gets tossed. "PostgreSQL Essential Reference"? Trash. "Programming Perl" 1st edition? Gone! This has worked quite well for helping cull my personal old book collection. It's easier to get rid of something if I know I can always replace it, should there come an improbable day I would need that ancient book again.

    4. Re:Let the market decide... by msauve · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Problem is that some clever people might wait for it to hit the free cart..."

      Well, no. That only works if there's only one clever person (per book). Otherwise, they'll find out "snooze, you lose."

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Let the market decide... by SQLGuru · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bookfinder.com is a quick and easy search that covers Amazon as well as several other used book sources. It's got an ISBN search so you can see how well a particular version is doing on the market. My wife and kids have used it to pick up college text books.

    6. Re:Let the market decide... by arth1 · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't surprise me if some of the older O'Reilly first edition books have started to become valuable.

      And if not valuable as first editions, at least valuable to the guy who inherited a boatload of perl 4 apps and need to read about it to find out what the differences are to perl 5.

      Sometimes I wish there were a bookdiff that would go through editions and highlight the differences only...

    7. Re: Let the market decide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My copy of Practical C Programming preceedes the web. It isn't every book from O'Reilly &Associates that has NO urls plastered all over the cover, front and backpieces. It has an address to send a letter or postcard to if you want to request them to mail a catalog of their current books in print to you.

    8. Re:Let the market decide... by n7ytd · · Score: 2

      Keep anything you think might sell. Track by acquisition date. If it's not gone in X months, throw it on the free cart. Another month, toss it.
      "X" depends on your turnover, space, and how many books are coming in. Since you're space limited, get rid of the oldest ones first.

      This is the right answer. From the OP, the only options to him were:

      • save it for sale (fifty cents soft cover, one dollar hardback)
      • pack it, e.g. for another library's bookstore
      • put it on the free cart
      • toss it in the recycle bin

      One thing not explained: is there any financial consideration given by other libraries that they might send books to? I would take that option right off the list, or as a last option just before recycling. Other libraries probably have the same problem, and your unsellable books are most-likely destined to recycling at those other libraries.

      The OP also said that shelf space was at a premium, and none of those options involved keeping the books to be put into circulation in the library, so the goal is not to act as preserver of mankind's accumulated knowledge, but to maximize the donation to the library by selling as many books as possible.

      My opinion is that patrons of the library should have the chance to purchase first, just as a service to them. Give every book a chance to sell and make the library a buck (or 50 cents).

      After (or during) the time that it's offered for sale to the library's patrons, check what the going rate on Amazon or Bookfinder.com is. If it looks likely to sell for a price worth bothering over, and you don't mind the additional work of maintaining listings and a small shipping department, they could be listed on Amazon or half.com or similar.

      Another option would be to work out a relationship with a book wholesaler who might be interested in purchasing boxes/pallets of your used books. You would virtually give them away, but at this point they are only one step from the recycle bin, so even 5 or 10 cents is better than nothing.

      Give it another round on the free cart, then recycle.

    9. Re:Let the market decide... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      We're talking about giving books to a public library here. A public library does NOT need the latest version of Programming Perl; the basic stuff has not changed at all, and it's completely possible to type out the examples there in the latest Perl interpreter and run them. The latest version will have some updates for the latest version of the language, but nothing really huge. It's much better that the library have some version of this book, rather than no version at all. Someone interested in Perl can borrow this book and learn from it, and if they decide they want to pursue Perl further, they can go buy the latest version for themselves.

      The same goes for the PostgreSQL book; the basics of working with SQL databases haven't changed in ages. If the library doesn't have any PostgreSQL books, a 10-year-old one is much better than nothing.

      This isn't like, for instance, Adobe Photoshop how-to books, which are totally useless after a couple of years because no one runs a 10-year-old version of that program and it's changed so much over that time. Or worse, "Windows ME for Dummies" or something like that, which is obviously totally useless.

    10. Re:Let the market decide... by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      Introductions to SQL are a pretty small part of most PostgreSQL specific books, because that material is available from lots of sources. I think you're underestimate just how fast Postgres does change. I do support for a lot of PostgreSQL installs, and people who followed out of data information and have trouble as a result is a non trivial amount of traffic. I actively patrol online guides that have turned stale to get them updated or pointing to newer ones to try and improve the situation.

      Postgres has an enormous manual. While it's tough for beginners to navigate sometime, if you're reading a book that's more than a few years old you'd really be better off with the official docs instead. What you gain in easy intros from smaller, older books you give back in wasted time following obsolete suggestions. Right now for example, any book that covers a version before 8.3 is going to be full of broken examples, because there was a major tightening on casting rules in that version, among other large changes.

      When there is a complete free manual available online, it's really hard to get excited about an ancient book as useful to students. That's also something that makes this situation different from things like Photoshop.

    11. Re:Let the market decide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that some clever people might wait for it to hit the free cart...

      I need to learn Perl to decode some scripts ASAP...well, as soon as a Perl book hits the free shelf at my local used book store.

  4. Give older editions to beginners, the curious ... by perpenso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Recently I found a copy of PostgresSQL Essential Reference (2002) and Programming Perl (1996). Would you have left them to RIP?

    When I replace a book with a newer edition I set aside the older edition. Sooner or later a relative, friend, co-worker, someone will express an interest in learning to program or learning some new area. My old K&R The C Programming Language, Foley and van Dam Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics, etc all found new homes this way. Why toss out a book that someone curious might want to take a look at?

  5. Donate to Goodwill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lot of technical books end up being sold on ebay or through Amazon's used book dealer network. If you give stuff to Goodwill, chances are it will end up in one of those places if it has any resale value.

    1. Re:Donate to Goodwill by anubi · · Score: 2

      Thanks... Now that you mention it, I have seen a lot of stuff on Amazon marketed by Goodwill. They have the time and resources to warehouse stuff like this and wait it out until the guy who needs it finds it, and what money is made sure goes to a good cause. I would have modded you up if I had modpoints, but being I do not, I'll have to settle for a thankful reply to your post.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    2. Re:Donate to Goodwill by Radres · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm gonna pop some books. Got 20 dollars in my pocket. I'm I'm hunting, looking for a COM book.

      This is fucking awesome!

    3. Re:Donate to Goodwill by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I once had 4 books - Helen Custer's Inside NT, Richard Witek & Richard Site's Alpha Implementation Manual, and 2 more similar books that I forget. When I was really done w/ it and had space problems, I donated it to the local library. That's usually what I do w/ books. The thing w/ Goodwill is that whatever charity I give doesn't amount to much to be tax deductable.

  6. References become dated by Maow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd say the reference book has likely become outdated and current info is easily found on the internet.

    But books like the Perl Camel book - much more than merely a reference - those are valuable for long after their topic is upgraded.

    My 2 cents. Good luck...

    1. Re:References become dated by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, depending on when it was bought it may have come with all of the "animal books" about Perl on CD with it (mine did anyway). And, your local library may have a Safari subscription - mine does. No need for paper in the majority of cases. As a teacher its great because I can assign just a few great chapters from various books and not cost the student $250 in books for a 3 credit class.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:References become dated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes... but the 4th edition of Programming Perl is easily found online for free, so there's not much point in storing the book or giving it to someone who can't afford it. What I would do is take the book to the library of a college or community school with a CS-related course for them to put it in their free cart.

  7. learn Fortran by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

    I have a real cool book on "Fortran for Dummies". Does anybody want to buy it? I used to have another one about learning COBOL, but I forgot what happened to that.

    --
    A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    1. Re:learn Fortran by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      I think I picked it up at your garage sale.

      It looks great on my shelf next to the UCSD p-System reference.

    2. Re: learn Fortran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My PDP-11 Assembly Language book has some standing too. Particularly since I still have that weird old box with a 486 motherboard in it that has an ISA card with an LSI-11 chipset on it.

  8. What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is my opinion.
    Java--anything that doesn't say Java2 keep.
    Spring -- anything
    Application servers--keep anything.
    Anything Windows--pitch. Anybody buying used books won't be able to afford Visual Studio.
    Anything A+ -- pitch. Don't encourage that dead end.
    Anything Networking--pitch, another dead end.
    Anything design related--keep.

    1. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Anything Windows--pitch. Anybody buying used books won't be able to afford Visual Studio.

      Microsoft has several methods to get Visual Studio into the hands of the broke, not the least of which is their admittance they turn a blind eye to piracy in those cases. Throw in "school editions" and "work editions" and other such giveaways and frankly just about anybody could use those books.

    2. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the entire Microsoft stack is expensive. It's not the basis for learning. If you need to learn stuff, you should go Java where every damn last thing is free. Eclipse, app servers, everything.

      And frankly--I just cannot take seriously anything said by someone who comments as AC.... Ballmer, you're retiring.Give it up. Move along. These are not the droids you're looking for.

    3. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody buying used books won't be able to afford Visual Studio.

      Visual Studio Express is free.

    4. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the entire Microsoft stack is expensive. It's not the basis for learning. If you need to learn stuff, you should go Java where every damn last thing is free. Eclipse, app servers, everything.

      A virtual machine in the Windows Azure cloud costs $15 per month. It can run Java and .NET, providing a cheap opportunity to learn stuff about both.

      Quit trying to dictate what everyone should learn according to your own personal bias.

    5. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the entire Microsoft stack is expensive.

      why do you need the entire Microsoft stack? if you have a Windows PC all you need is the free VS Express. Java is not a bad choice but it depends entirely on what your goal is, Java is good in some areas and poor in others. It *is* portable to a degree which is good but the WORA concept is a joke, WOTE is more like it, and while you *can* build a single codebase that runs (mostly) everywhere, which is another plus on the portability side, it also looks shit everywhere so you need to wrap it in a platform-specific container for which you do need things like Windows programming, OSX's Cocoa, Android, GTK, Qt Jambi (not bad) or whatever for whichever platform you are looking at.

      And frankly--I just cannot take seriously anything said by someone who comments as AC

      right because you use the name curmudgeon99 gives you so much credibility. A pro-java, anti-windows post that is ignorant of visual studio express simply reeks of an agenda, using a logged in user doesnt change that.

    6. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, .NET. Yeah, let's all learn to program in a dying language tied to a dying operating system.

    7. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. .net isnt a language
      2. the operating system isnt dying, anybody who doesnt live in their mom's basement reading nothing but LKML can see that
      3. .net isnt tied to one operating system

      for learning basic programming it doesnt matter what language you use, for most actual development you use a low-level language that can be compiled natively to run just about anywhere and then use a platform specific UI (.Net on Windows, Android's Java API on Android, iOS's objective-c SDK on iOS). its not like you learn java or .net or whatever and then suddenly cant apply any of that to any other platform or toolkit.

    8. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pascal on MS-DOS it is, then!

    9. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Well, sounds like crippleware to me. On the Java side free gets you the best stuff--not crippleware.

    10. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Dude, If you read my first post, I prefaced it with "My opinion".
      Second, I've never had a job that expected anyone to know both Java and .NET. Java and .NET are such massive languages--with all the ancillary technologies you must know to be competent--that I wouldn't expect anyone to know both. But knock yourself out.
      Third, I have never been asked to spend a dime on anything I was learning. Learning "stuff" does not seem that fruitful to me.

      Lastly, where do you get off saying I'm fricking dictating to you--AC? Learn whatever the hell you learn. But I really can't understand why you would want to start learning .NET now since Metro is shit-canning it for HTML5 and Javascript. But it's your life. Enjoy your obsolescence.

    11. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Dude, nobody gets hired anymore for knowing "basic programming". Also, in most enterprises that I have worked in, mobile apps are novelties. Nobody really bets the farm on a mobile app unless that's their entire business. Enterprises have bigger fish to fry than making another Angry Birds.
      In NYC, having .NET on your resume was considered a black mark--because it meant you were a button pusher who didn't understand what was actually happening. It meant you were akin to a script kiddy: Why we don't hire .NET coders

    12. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Okay, here's why. As soon as you're using .NET and ASP.NET, you're informed that you have to use IIS. Oh, and IIS really only works well with SQL Server. And then and then...

    13. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      2010 seems to be crippleware, although I suspect it is unintentional. 2008 is fine.

      Audacity officially uses 2008 still, because it won't build on 2010. But it does reference bugs (just the word bugs so I'm not sure which ones).

      The wikipedia article is pretty good for listing the differences. Definitely crippleware in your sense of the word, but entirely functional. Most of the features are not used in daily life.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_Studio_Express

    14. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Okay, here's why. As soon as you're using .NET and ASP.NET, you're informed that you have to use IIS. Oh, and IIS really only works well with SQL Server. And then and then...

      you have to use IIS with .Net?! wtf? you don't really know a lot about this do you.

    15. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because somebody wants to learn programming doesnt mean they want to do it as a job and further to that not everybody that wants to learn programming that does want to do it as a job wants to be some corporate drone working on boring line-of-business applications, in fact i cant imagine anybody wants to do that, that's for people with no imagination.

      In NYC, having .NET on your resume was considered a black mark--because it meant you were a button pusher who didn't understand what was actually happening.

      and how is that any different from say Java? it isnt! that sort of bullshit is just parroted by morons.

    16. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It meant you were akin to a script kiddy: Why we don't hire .NET coders

      So you advocate for Java and then link to a blog post you obviously have not read because all those points apply equally to Java and in the article itself it points that out and it also links to Joel Spolsky's post on why the Java path is a bad idea. Advocating for .Net over Java or Java over .Net in terms of 'what language should I learn' is largely just blatant fanboyism.

    17. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      asp.net will be around for a while, metro or not, which means .net will be just fine.

      and we all deserve to know what makes your myopic opinion in any way a valuable contribution? you derailed the discussion, dismissed a majority platform, and continue to reply with ignorance about stuff that is a simple search away. a defense is in order here, or at least next post ask yourself if you are helping at all.

      like the guy below who hates books- you are not helping.

      I have had two fortune 100 jobs that had no training budget, and I bought most of what I learned from. and the first of those, I inherited a java app on top of my normal .net duty. I learned enough ant to deploy a bug fix in a week, and whatever random ass UI toolkit. I would have appreciated an old java book, because enterprise upgrades at enterprise scale. and I just worked with java devs pinch hitting on .net code, at the second job.

      now you know of two jobs that require .net and java. care to re-evaluate your answer?

    18. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the Java side free gets you the best stuff--not crippleware.

      That's because Java *is* the crippleware :P

    19. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for learning basic programming it doesnt matter what language you use

      Any true programmer can write BASIC programs in FORTRAN.

    20. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Anything Networking--pitch, another dead end.

      So say people that don't know what a network is.

    21. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      It meant you were akin to a script kiddy: Why we don't hire .NET coders

      So you advocate for Java and then link to a blog post you obviously have not read because all those points apply equally to Java and in the article itself it points that out and it also links to Joel Spolsky's post on why the Java path is a bad idea. Advocating for .Net over Java or Java over .Net in terms of 'what language should I learn' is largely just blatant fanboyism.

      Not entirely true. .net implementations on non windows operating systems (mono and .gnu are the big ones) have very little development or support where java actually is cross platform and well supported on all major OS's and many processors architectures. As for what is a better language outside of that it is pretty much a pissing contest.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    22. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Zenin · · Score: 1

      Wow...

      Any "enterprise" that isn't at a minimum strongly exploring mobile is missing the boat big time. We're at a point now where everything in enterprise should be considering mobile. .Net development is far from "button pusher". The fact is C#/.Net is really Java, only done right. MS had the benifit of seeing all the major ways Java screwed up and were able to avoid all that baggage and effectively leap frog it.

      The raw ignorance you're expressing is honestly incredible.

      --
      My /. uid is better then your /. uid
    23. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing "basic programming" for a lot of languages and applications is always a useful skill because sooner or later you'll be working on a project which includes things outside of your main area and you'll at least have an idea whether the developers on that side are telling the truth.

    24. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      When I was a student, you could get a student license to Windows 2000 and Visual Studio for under £100. You can now get both the latest OS and dev tools for free under the academic licensing. You don't need to have lots of disposable income to afford free...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    25. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the entire Microsoft stack is expensive. It's not the basis for learning. If you need to learn stuff, you should go Java where every damn last thing is free. Eclipse, app servers, everything.

      Java is among the worst programming languages ever created. If you want an object-oriented programming language learn SmallTalk and discovery what a true object-oriented language is designed.

      As for a low-cost, full-featured development environment recommendations you should use Debian GNU/Linux, Oracle VirtualBox, lighttpd/nginx/apache, perl, python, gcc/g++ & related toolchain, bash, vi/vim. All those GUI tools limit your ability to automate much of the development and deployment process.

    26. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had a job that expected anyone to know both Java and .NET. Java and .NET are such massive languages--with all the ancillary technologies you must know to be competent--that I wouldn't expect anyone to know both. But knock yourself out.

      Oddly I have read many job postings requiring a high-level of competence in both Java and .Net technology stacks along with extensive COBOL experience no less. Some employers do expect job applicants to have already "knocked themselves out".

    27. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pascal on MS-DOS it is, then!

      If the goal is to learn basic computer programming concepts then Pascal is a fine language designed for the express purpose of teaching computer programming concepts (variable scope, flow control, data structures, algorithm design and implementation and other useful fundamentals.

    28. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS have a free version of the stack (minus windows).

    29. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS "has" a free version.

      (Apparently Microsofties are illiterate)

    30. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Definitely crippleware in your sense of the word, but entirely functional. Most of the features are not used in daily life.

      Agreed. The Express version comes with all the good stuff of Visual Studio: IntelliSense, optimizing C++ compiler, .NET support, edit-and-continue, integrated debugger, and what else. One feature you might miss is the support for building 64-bit binaries, but usually you won't be shipping 64-bit stuff under Windows anyway. Profiling support has also been removed.

    31. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I'm using it today, in fact I have taught myself some programing with it. I am not a developer by trade, but I realized I could automate some of my monthly tasks with it. It has taken a two day job down to about 4 hours for me, and that is every month. I needed something that was relatively easy to learn, where I could find a lot of code examples, and had good interaction with office.

      I have yet to find anything "missing" from the express edition. I am sure there are some high level developer tools, and maybe some of the crazy database tools. I can tell you though that I have incorporated word, excel, acrobat, and sql express to create what I needed with out needing any of the pro tools.

    32. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the entire Microsoft stack is expensive.

      Visual C++ Express: $0
      Visual C# Express: $0
      Visual Basic Express: $0
      SQL Server Express: $0

      MS provides plenty of options for people to develop on their platform without having to shell out any money.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    33. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Every single item you listed is crippleware.
      On the Java side, for example, you get production class versions of everything.
      Express = Crippled and you know it.

      Ultimately, if a developer uses your crippleware to build an app, her company is just going to have to shell out big bucks to MS to buy expensive tool sets. I notice you did not list IIS on your list of CrippleWare. But I'm sure there's a crippled version of ISS floating around somewhere too.

    34. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I've written Pascal on MS-DOS, you insensitive clod!

      Version 5 I think. Back in the 8086 days. To do a Mandelbrot set at VGAish resolution would take overnight.

      We had one 386/387 machine in the department that could do it in a coffee break - if you could find a time when nobody was using it.

      Kids today, with their Scooby on Snails and their MVP paradigms...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Cover "network" with a sticker that says "The Cloud".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and that results in what I had to do 15 years ago. A company (a Fortune 500, that you'd heard of on the news) ran its accounting on a spreadsheet, one of the ones that learned the hard way that the 65k limit on the number of rows is a hard limit (raised in newer versions of Excel). They stored that 20MB spreadsheet on the network. Excel at the time cached the entire document before opening, so the opening time was "long". 20 MB over 100 Mbps is (20*8)/100 2 seconds at the absolute minimum, pushing 10-100 seconds at congested times.

      I proposed a 1G aggregation network and QoS to get the load time as close to the ideal 2 second load as possible. The fix I ended up putting in was a dedicated server hosting the spreadsheet, where the users would terminal-serve into it to open the sheet.

      Yes, my darkest hour was installing a dedicated server to host a single spreadsheet. Because those with money don't understand the network, or applications that run over it. If they did understand "network" the money could have funded an improvement for everyone, and still given them the results they needed.

    37. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every single item you listed is crippleware.
      On the Java side, for example, you get production class versions of everything.

      except that on the java side the idea of 'production class' is the worse than what you term to be microsoft's 'crippleware'. in fact the java language itself is a terrible mess and the most popular jvm (oracle's) is even worse, thankfully even Apple has stopped shipping that bug-ridden security nightmare with its products.

      I notice you did not list IIS on your list of CrippleWare.

      because you don't need IIS, of course it serves your agenda to be an ignorant idiot and pretend that you do though.

    38. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Funny, if Java is such a terrible mess then why oh why is it kicking .NET's ass in the marketplace? Why are companies--including even Microsoft--dumping the entire CLR like last week's cottage cheese? Java is not perfect but it gets the job done and all across the country it is the language of choice. It's fast enough and secure enough unless you code like an idiot and are still 4 versions behind.

      Finally, yet another meaningless AC, what application server do you stand up in a meeting and propose you use in a MS Shoppe, if not ISS? I've seen it happen before. A project takes on one tiny slice of the Borg from Redmond and before you know it, they have been forced to deploy the whole Redmond stack. It's comical. And I notice that you have not addressed the elephant in the room--Metro. Your own company--MS--has pitched you .NETers over the side. That had to smart.

    39. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Plus (at least for us unfortunates who, unlike the GP, aren't born knowing everything) it's a necessary stage on the way to more advanced programming.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    40. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, if Java is such a terrible mess then why oh why is it kicking .NET's ass in the marketplace?

      nobody is trying to say .net is better than java you retard.

      Finally, yet another meaningless AC

      nice try but i *know* this means something to you because you continue your pointless and ignorant responses :P

      what application server do you stand up in a meeting and propose you use in a MS Shoppe, if not ISS?

      i don't *need* an application server, if i code in .net (or java or any other language for that matter) doesnt mean i need an application server, which again proves you dont know what you are on about.

      And I notice that you have not addressed the elephant in the room--Metro.

      what about it? frontends are written in html5 and javascript, that's a *good* thing.

      Your own company--MS--has pitched you .NETers over the side.

      i have nothing to do with microsoft and i have no attachment to .net, i use whatever is the best tool for the job (whether that is .net, java, html5, c++, whatever) and i will drop .net for anything that it isnt suitable for unlike institutionalized people like you who obviously came from one of those java schools' "computer science" courses and any threat to java is a threat to your very livelihood. if microsoft dropped .net tomorrow that would make no difference to me.

    41. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Funny how your remarks are self contradictory. If you're writing in HTML and JavaScript, where do they run? Generally, that means an application server. But if you're writing standalone programs well yes they don't need an app server. But very few of us actually write stand alone apps that don't need some app server to run in.
      Secondly, the point of bringing up Metro is the effect it will have on .NET, which means making it obsolete. In case you haven't noticed, nobody but MS is pushing .NET. So, if your primary champion gets on another horse, the future of .NET is not bright. Yes, everybody says they use the "best tool for the job" and that's why there are so many Scala jobs out there. That's why so many companies are clamoring to write SmallTalk apps. I worked for a big company in NYC that used Flex until we discovered it sucked and wasn't up to the task and then we switched our front end to Ruby on Rails which was awesome. So, I in no way am implying that Java is the only game in town. Instead, my point is that .NET is not a language with a bright future ahead--and that's why I would not recommend the used book store guy at the head of this article keep around a lot of old .NET books. Point made. Time for more Anonymous Cowards without the courage to write under their real handles to swarm.

    42. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're writing in HTML and JavaScript, where do they run?

      if its a metro app they run locally.

      Generally, that means an application server.

      wrong.

      But very few of us actually write stand alone apps that don't need some app server to run in.

      that's just a merit-less, completely baseless assertion and frankly it is wrong, but even if you did need an app server and wanted to use IIS even amazon's free tier offers that, so once again your stupidity is exposed.

      Secondly, the point of bringing up Metro is the effect it will have on .NET, which means making it obsolete.

      yeah because *everybody* is writing and using Metro apps ::rollseyes:: its funny how ignorant you are of Metro apps and actually thinking they arent going to use .net but given your previous posts your lack of intelligence and general ignorance on this topic is not surprising.

      Instead, my point is that .NET is not a language with a bright future ahead

      because, as you have aptly demonstrated time and time again through this discussion, you dont actually know anything about it or where it is used. you actually believe metro apps dont use .net, that is how stupid and ignorant you are.

      Time for more Anonymous Cowards without the courage to write under their real handles to swarm.

      oh yeah a logged in user, so courageous! you can stop signing off with that crap, you know you will reply whether i post as AC or whether i create an account to post under which you have demonstrated many times already so that is irrelevant.

    43. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      You know something, Coward, you're so right! What was I thinking? Desktop Metro apps are sweeping the marketplace. Across the globe, enterprises are chucking their vast investments in Web Apps and building desktop Metro Apps using .NET. Thank you for bringing me to my senses, Coward. Yes, I think you're right. I need to rush right out and buy up a bunch of books on .NET and get started right away, learning the language of the future, .NET and the CLR. Thank you! You're my salvation. You've saved me from a career steeped in the massive Java stack and the occasional RubyOnRails. All of those are going in the trash--Coward. You're so right, Coward! I've been such a fool to see the market dominance of Java as being meaningful. The future is Metro, Metro, Metro and .NET is along for the ride. Yay! Thank you for helping me to see the light!

    44. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol you really are retarded arent you. a few posts ago you were actually suggesting .net had nothing to do with metro and now you are suggesting the entire future of metro hangs on .net, both are polar opposites and neither are correct. with that kind of blatant contradiction and demonstrable lack of intelligence you are not the person from whom anybody should take any advice.

      protip: have some knowledge on the subject before delving in and being made to look like the fool you are.

    45. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Single spreadsheet? Amateurs!

      You get round the row limit by having one spreadsheet per month (or week (or day)) with the individual transactions and then linking them into another one for the totals. You can never have too many exclamation marks.

      As long as no well-meaning person corrects a spelling error in accountsReciveableThirdMondayToTheFollowingThursdayAugust2012.xls it'll all be peachy.

      (Not personal experience; war story told by a colleague many moons ago)

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:What To Keep, What To Pitch by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They went with multiple sheets in the workbook. I don't know if there is a worksheet limit, but i think the row limit was raised before they hit it, if there was one.

  9. Sell it to Intellectual Property Law Firms by speedplane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Patent lawyers trying to bust patents from the mid 1990s live on this stuff. Call your local friendly intellectual property law firm and see if you can unload the whole batch. They'd probably pay much more than $1.00/book.

    --
    Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    1. Re:Sell it to Intellectual Property Law Firms by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interestingly, the last copy of the PenPoint Interface Guidelines I sold on Amazon was to such a law firm.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:Sell it to Intellectual Property Law Firms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I hate lawyers, this is a really good idea.

    3. Re:Sell it to Intellectual Property Law Firms by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      I believe it was more recent than revision 0.5, more like 0.9 --- whatever the last version bundled in the SDK before they published the final version w/ Addison-Wesley.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  10. Fundamentals by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Save anything that is foundational or fundamental to any particular field. Any book that continues to be cited academically or has increased in value on the used market should probably be kept.

    My local public library system foolishly trashed some true classics in algorithms, graphics, and fractals simply because they were old. Now all you find in the stacks are books focused on instruction for specific software applications, books which are certain to be obsolete in a few years.

    --
    +0 Meh
    1. Re:Fundamentals by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This.

      Books on the theory of computing, physics, mathematics, and so on far outlive reference manuals. Keep texts that describe things like O(n) notation, matrix and vector math, graphics, simulations, and so on.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    2. Re:Fundamentals by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Try to explain that to your average library worker, for whom a computer is a mere tool, and all they know about computing that in a few years a computer is considered old and obsolete, is replaced, and they have to relearn the applications all over again - hence all books about computing must be obsolete in a similar timespan...

    3. Re:Fundamentals by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Some of them even increase in value.

      To give examples that are not computer-related, I have been trying to find an affordable copy of Fishburn's classic Utility Theory for Decision Making from 1970 and it costs more than 100 Euro now. (Well, on Amazon.com it lists as $2,396.90 new and $1,899.33 used but I think we can safely ignore this offer. Amazon just sucks.) Or, try to find a copy of the classic (and IMHO best) text about communicating with aliens, Freudenthal's Lincos - Design of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse from 1960. Unless you're very lucky, it's going to be expensive. Finally, somewhat more computer-related, many out-of-print books on older calculators like the HP48g sell fairly well, because they are hard to get.

    4. Re:Fundamentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save anything that is foundational or fundamental to any particular field. Any book that continues to be cited academically or has increased in value on the used market should probably be kept.

      And nothing beats using "The Art of Computer Programming" for bashing in the head of some "Computer science PhD" who spends his time peephole-"optimizing" an O(n^2) or worse algorithm and/or asking for bigger iron because it doesn't scale to the problems in his job description.

      Probably a typical handyman feels like that when telling a mechanical engineer "this is going to snap". "What do you know about mechanical engineering?" "PLING".
      "Lucky guess."

  11. Non tool specifics. by nxcho · · Score: 2

    My guess is that books not on specific tools or versions retain their value much longer. Titles like Design Patterns, Network programming, Computer Graphics are more likely to be useful after a couple of years. Also check if the editions are used in any university courses.

    --
    When asked why, the answer is almost always: "It's 2014".
    1. Re:Non tool specifics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My guess is that books not on specific tools or versions retain their value much longer. Titles like Design Patterns, Network programming, Computer Graphics are more likely to be useful after a couple of years. Also check if the editions are used in any university courses.

      The Art Of Computer Programming (AKA "TAOCP" or "The Holy Bible"): Keep
      Compilers: Principles, Techniques, And Tools (AKA "The Dragon Book"): Keep
      The C Programming Language (AKA "K&R" or "The C Bible"): Keep

      Any of the animal books from O'Reilly: Maybe

      Teach Yourself foo In 21 Days: Trash
      bar For Dummies: Trash

      TL;DR: If the book has a nickname, keep it.

    2. Re:Non tool specifics. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      There's a programming language for foo?!? Surely that's overkill. I mean, C++ does some overkill, but foo was a variable for K&R. The other is worse, though: bar is an engineer's variable modifier, kindof like a subscript. To devote a whole pogramming language to it just seems a little grandiose and wasteful.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    3. Re:Non tool specifics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a programming language for foo?!? Surely that's overkill. I mean, C++ does some overkill, but foo was a variable for K&R. The other is worse, though: bar is an engineer's variable modifier, kindof like a subscript. To devote a whole pogramming language to it just seems a little grandiose and wasteful.

      Well, I did say they were trash, right? :-)

  12. Ya know... by rs79 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We worked really hard in the 70s on so you wouldn't need books. Everything I did was documented with roff/runoff. This begat, in a roundabout way SCRIBE which begat SGML which begat HTML.

    I've programmed C since 1974 and still do, daily. I've bought K&R, twice (and have touched a mimeographed copy dmr made pencil notes in belonging to Jim Fleming) and the O'Reily MySql book to get a fucking update statement right in 1997. Fifty bucks for one page. Other than that I just haven't found a need for them. And I've done pretty much everything.

    In the post-Internet era what is it exactly you can't learn about computers without a book. I don't even want to hear it's "easier". I'm used to not doing it and fins it much less efficient, especially for this kind of stuff where I'm one click away from a local file as opposed to go find the book, find the page...

    Read K&R, Read Knuth. The rest you can easily live without.
    (Skip the TeX stuff though, he went insane at some point)

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
    1. Re:Ya know... by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Books can provide a nice "all inclusive" feeling for a broad topic, or even a specific one. There are lots of great online resources, but most are limited in scope, and learning that way can have a piecemeal feeling to it. Sometimes it's nice to have a topic covered from a starting point to an ending point by the same author(s) and in a consistent style.

      Good example would be "Programming Perl". Sure, you can learn perl in pieces from the gazillion online resources (perlmonks is awesome), but if you read the book cover to cover, you get a kind of well thought out guided path through the language. Personally I've still got my (second edition) copy and occasionally dig it out... it's aged well and makes a great resource.

      I'll admit I haven't read a book on anything computing related in a while, but I fear that's more because I haven't really learned anything thoroughly in a while, which kinda scares me...

    2. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How much do you want for your old copy of Kids These Days?

    3. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably right around the time he wanted the garbage can in the middle of the kitchen.

    4. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell does your rant have to do with anything?

      Books are better than online documentation for learning how to program.. online documentation is great for quickly looking up syntax and quick info. Your 50 dollar MySql book to fix a statement simply shows that MySql's online documentation is crap.

      These days I choose tools based on online documentation and community support. Although most community support for tools comes from StackOverflow these days.

    5. Re:Ya know... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure how helpful your anti-book rant is going to be for a volunteer at a bookstore which helps a library, which happens to be a subculture which is going to be immune to any argument you make, no matter how well presented. They rather like their books, you see, and some of the people they serve don't have computers. Should they come to the library to read the books online?

      I will say that I bought an e-Ink device precisely so I could read stuff I got from the internet, in a book like format. I much prefer it, and I can't defend my preference any more than you can argue that I should prefer chocolate or vanilla. I just like it.

      If I am one click away from a local file, I would open it instead of the book. But I rarely am. How many times a day are you one click away from the book you need? If your answer is anything other than "okay I was exaggerating" you are weird. Seriously, most people don't keep books on the desktop or in a folder that is always visible.

      If I had to plug in an external drive or DVD, wait for it to spin up, browse to the folder, find the file, and wait for the PDF reader to open up, I would open the book. I can make things sound more complicated than they really are to make my point sound more convincing.

      I'm also actually quite good at finding what I want to in a book - with practice it gets easier.

      Some people agree with you - you are currently at +4. So you're not wrong. But others disagree with you, and we aren't wrong, either.

    6. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Books are better than online documentation for learning how to program

      I can usually copy and paste stuff faster with online documentation than with a dead tree book. If you bother to pay attention, you don't actually have to type the code examples character by character just to understand or learn things.

      And for stuff like javascript/html - quite often the online stuff works much better- since you can actually see the results immediately.

    7. Re:Ya know... by pkhs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What do you mean by "Skip the TeX stuff though, he went insane at some point"? Is there anything better for producing readable math with both ease and at low cost (that can be used for high quality print publishing if desired)?

      --
      /jokke
    8. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We worked really hard in the 70s

      You must have been the only ones

    9. Re:Ya know... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Perhaps rs79 meant "skip TeX unless you're writing a book about a subject that uses a lot of equations."

    10. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There might not be but god damn there ought to be. GP gave me a chuckle and a nod, he's right and he can't be blamed that all the alternatives are even more insane.

      No offence to Knuth because it's not really his fault, he only tried to cram it into the reigning paradigm (and succeeded) but we really ought to do better now at least as far as math is concerned.

      Disagree? It takes me fractions of a second to write my math on paper by hand and minutes (at best!) using TeX or derivatives. It flows naturally to make visual representations by hand rather effortlessly but cramming it into some scalable graphics is a tremendous bore unless you use (admittedly nice) cookie cutter programs for (admittedly nice) cookie cutter representations that often obscure more of the math than pronounce what you want to illustrate (because it's cookie cutter).

      TL;DR: napkins still beats the socks off the computer tools except for slaving through data sets (which is still way cumbersome compared to where we ought to be by now).

      Imagine a world where computers were as good with actual math, our math, the existing language, as they are with Unicode manipulation.

  13. Comp Sci 20 years, applications 2-3 years by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have some computer science / theory books that are twenty years old and still quite valuable. Those include Cod on relational database design theory. My Visual Basic 6 books are trash because they cover a specific, outdated version of the software.

    Thinking about it further, not only are the good old books theory oriented, the ones that come to mind on authored by the originators of the topic - Cod & Date, K&R, etc. The thoughts of the founding fathers of a discipline are always relevant.

    1. Re:Comp Sci 20 years, applications 2-3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a new version of Visual Basic which works the same as VB6? What's this language?

    2. Re:Comp Sci 20 years, applications 2-3 years by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Those include Cod on relational database design theory.

      There's something fishy about your post.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. What my local library does with books donated by Nyder · · Score: 1

    My Local library sells any books donated to them so they can use that money to buy more books.

    Go figure. They got a book, so instead of loaning it out, they sell it for less then it costs to buy another book. Great system.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:What my local library does with books donated by Camembert · · Score: 2

      My Local library sells any books donated to them so they can use that money to buy more books.

      Go figure. They got a book, so instead of loaning it out, they sell it for less then it costs to buy another book. Great system.

      Because a good librarian will keep the collection alive with books that enough people will actually want to read. Usually libraries are not interested in just accumulating people's old junk books.

    2. Re:What my local library does with books donated by damnbunni · · Score: 2

      It is a great system. It's a fantastic system.

      I used to work at a library ages ago, and that's generally the system we used. We might keep a donated book, if we thought there was demand for it, but it was rare.

      Because we didn't want to waste shelf space on random books people didn't want any more. Libraries generally have a pretty good idea of what books are in demand by their patrons, and selling books that won't ever be leant out lets them get books people actually want.

    3. Re:What my local library does with books donated by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my local libraries don't in general even want book donations for them to sell for 10-cents anymore. I think that the problem is that library budgets have been cut to the bone and they just don't have the money to pay their staff to deal with all of this extra stuff. Here's what one NYC library system has to say about this:

      Why does Brooklyn Public Library (BPL) no longer accept donations of books and other material from the public?
      Donated books and other materials incur costs and additional time to process. Before they can be shelved with the larger collection, their condition must be evaluated, followed by cataloging, processing and transporting. These materials ultimately have a shorter shelf life. It is more cost-efficient to purchase new books and media, which are delivered "shelf-ready."

      http://www.bklynpubliclibrary.org/support/donating-library-materials/

    4. Re:What my local library does with books donated by anubi · · Score: 1

      Our town library has a big bookshelf in the foyer. Ten cents each. I think every library patron knows exactly what is going on. We all bring our unwanted books and put them in this bookshelf. I got a really nice original Borland C++ for DOS manual set and a few other gems through this route, albeit I was probably the only one in town who wanted it. I get a lot of books from it. I also leave them there when its time for me to clean house.

      The library goes through the shelf occasionally and culls the junk out when it becomes too messy.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    5. Re:What my local library does with books donated by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Go figure. They got a book, so instead of loaning it out, they sell it for less then it costs to buy another book. Great system.

      You might have a point - a very good one, in fact - if books were fungible.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Re:Give older editions to beginners, the curious . by greg1104 · · Score: 2

    K&R C and the Folley/van Dam book are classics of computing. Those represent a tiny chunk of the used book market though, not really representative of the average old book. Books that have later editions at all are generally a good sign of quality. It's reasonable to bin those separately from the one-shot books and prefer keeping them around. By that standard, an old "Programming Perl" *might* still be useful to someone who just doesn't want to spring for a newer version, while "PostgreSQL Essential Reference" heads for recycling. Having read each, those would both be reasonable calls.

  16. Shocked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information professionals train for this reason - they are the experts in managing library stocks, and if you are sending things to other libraries, this means you should be looking at this in more of a macro than micro environment. Engage a properly trained librarian, and stop trying to second guess what you should be doing, or go and invest and go get trained up yourself.

  17. Older books can still be of use by g01d4 · · Score: 1

    I should add the main criteria I use are 1) is it (programming language, operating system, application) still popular and 2) whether it has changed much over the years. I figure it's an inexpensive way for someone to teach themselves the basics w/o having to stare at a screen. If they're able to get up to speed with the book they should be able to handle the changes or new features in later versions.

  18. Programming books are best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to work at a used bookstore, and I was in charge of our computer books section. My experience was that programming books would sell the best - I would put them on the shelf, no matter how old they were, and they would sell. You'd be surprised to see that some still look up for $10-20 on Amazon too, even at over 10 years old. Java & C/C++ sold the best, but they would all sell, I always had empty room on those shelves. The next best sellers were database/server books, then recent Windows OS/recentish OS X/any Linux books. Older OS books (especially older Windows books), most application books, and most how-to-use-a-computer/internet/laptop/etc books did not sell well unless they were less than a year old.

    So I would have also rescued your two books - I think they were good choices, and are likely to sell even though they are old. I would use the above criteria for determining what to keep, and if space is an issue, I'd limit some of the OS/application/textbook sort of stuff to 2-3 years back instead of 5 rather than get rid of older programming & server/database books.

  19. Reading is Fundamental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Fahrenheit 451 is reality, with a twist. Instead of paying firemen to burn books, we have people willing to volunteer to pulp books. Who could have predicted a mere sixty years ago that the people of the early 21st century would have such an intense hatred of knowledge to be eager to destroy it for free.

  20. scan them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Internet Archive will scan them for you; see https://archive.org/scanning.

  21. Amazon Sales Rank? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could you whip up a little tool that would scan the barcode, query the item on Amazon, and see what the sales rank is? There you'd have market telling you what is in demand and what is not. I'd bet (not looking now) the Knuth books have a decent used sales rank while "Learning Filemaker 2.1" does not.

    Find your threshold(s) and have the tool tell the clerk [shelve,sell,recycle].

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Amazon Sales Rank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what the bean counters over at Amazon are going to think when they see several thousand hits for "Learning Filemaker 2.1" over the next few days.

      Probably something along the lines of "We need to acquire more copies of that book. STAT!"

    2. Re:Amazon Sales Rank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Could you whip up a little tool that would scan the barcode, query the item on Amazon, and see what the sales rank is? There you'd have market telling you what is in demand and what is not

      Finally somebody suggested Amazon sales rank. Glad you got modded up to 5. Amazon sales rank can be used to prioritize ALL of the books in the library used bookstore, not just the computer books. It doesn't matter if the Amazon used price is a penny, because buyers pay shipping if they order online, so effectively all Amazon book prices are at least 4 dollars. You can ignore the Amazon used price and look only at the sales ranks. The books with the lowest sales ranks are more likely to sell. You can buy a barcode scanner that plugs into a USB port for about $30. If you scan the ISBN barcode into Amazon's search, you'll find the book. Then you can scroll down to Product Details to find "Amazon Best Sellers Rank", or just search the page for "Amazon Best Sellers Rank" to go directly to it. Books with sales ranks over 2 million will probably never sell in your used book store. Books with sales ranks under 50,000 should be kept to sell regardless of condition.

  22. Is there a PDF? by quenda · · Score: 2

    These books are all just copies, not original manuscripts. And O'Reilly books were never a work of art as a medium. Be ruthless.
    If you ever really do need an old edition of the Camel Book, it is available as a PDF download.

    As for, K&R C and the Folley/van Dam book - well, some things are special cases. I still have mine. But as above, very few books are as important as those.

  23. Things to dump or keep by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dump anything that is titled "for Dummies" or "Learn $X in $Y days!"

    Keep anything, no matter how old, from O'Reilly books.

    1. Re:Things to dump or keep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep anything, no matter how old, from O'Reilly books.

      Seconded.

    2. Re:Things to dump or keep by terremoto · · Score: 1

      Keep anything, no matter how old, from O'Reilly books.

      Sure. You never know when you'll need to reach for Securing Windows NT/2000 Servers for the Internet

    3. Re:Things to dump or keep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. You never know when you'll need to reach for Securing Windows NT/2000 Servers for the Internet

      We're still running NT4 servers as a critical part of our infrastructure. This is not my decision or area, I'm a mainframe type, but I rely on these servers.
      Problem is different parts of the company deny ownership so no-one will replace them.

  24. The Imposible Dream by martiniturbide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really want to see a way that old books (90's and early 2000) content get published for free under a license that allows derivative works like Creative Common Share Alike.

    I contacted some author and almost everyone wants to release the content of their books for free, but this can not be possible since the copyright of the books belongs to the publishers.

    The publishers are big companies and you don't even know to whom ask permission for this and some of them don't want to give anything from their IP. (I even tried once with MS Press by Twitter and never got an answer).

    Do we have to wait a 100 (or something like that) years for the content to be public domain? or does anybody knows any trick on some publishers to open some of their content?

    1. Re:The Imposible Dream by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to be done about old books. What authors can do is work clauses like this into their publishing contract, now, for new books that are written. From practical experience trying that, it's extremely hard to do that if you're an unpublished author. But if you've had a successful book already, it's possible to leverage that into future books eventually being available under a free license.

      Since quite a bit of the computing book market is constantly being rewritten to stay current, if enough authors did this eventually we'd be at a more useful place. There are some classics in the field that aren't going anywhere that would allow such a change, but it doesn't cost that much to pick up all of the major ones.

  25. brown shirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the brown shirt society. It doesn't matter what you do, you are irrelevant. They will keep getting rid of the best books because they don't conform to their agenda. They will eventually get rid of you because you don't conform to their agenda. This is one of the reasons I will never use a library again. You can't do ANYTHING at a library without being tracked. All of the best books have been filtered, sanitized, and removed. What's left, why go? Thanks brown shirts for destroying libraries across the nation.

    1. Re:brown shirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to library, take book off shelf, read book, put book back on shefl, leave library. How are you tracked?

  26. Tough call by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, RIP 'cause they're obsolete. On the other hand, there's a lot of obsolete stuff still in use that will be in use for a long time. The trick is getting those obsolete books to the people maintaining those obsolete systems. The chances of someone needing a 90s reference book that you have walking into your bookstore are pretty slim. Maybe you can list them on ebay.

  27. Most old tech books are useless for STEM by davidwr · · Score: 0

    Most old books about a specific short-lived or rapidly-evolving technology are useless for training purposes but they can be valuable as historical artifacts.

    Anything over 10 years old or anything that is a "1.0-version" book for a product that is more than a few years old and a few versions newer should be looked at from that angle before pulping.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Most old tech books are useless for STEM by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It all depends - an extreme is a book from the early 1950s I have on metal fatigue that is missing nothing in newer general texts on the subject apart from electron microscope images and has a lot more detail on case studies like the "liberty ships" than anything since. There's a lot of technologies that look as if they are cutting edge but instead really have fundamentals that have not moved in to long time, no matter what has happened in niches. Mathematics is another - you need to tackle stuff that hasn't changed in the last 50 years before you even think about reading about anything that has changed recently in that field. In engineering texts on thermodynamics, fluid flow, chemistry, metallurgy etc are not worn out after twenty years.
      It's not everyone's choice of tools, but I've found texts on TeX, sed, awk and shell scripts have a very long shelf life so there are similar items in computing.

    2. Re:Most old tech books are useless for STEM by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

      Exactly. One of my favorite publishers is Dover. They re-publish a number of the old classic STEM books for just a few dollars each. About as close as you can get in the publishing world these days to the Creative Commons ideal. Thermodynamics, mechanics, ODE, electromagnetic theory, fluid dynamics, and more, most by some of the most renowned names in their fields. It's not like Calculus, Maxwell's equations, or the principles of Statics and Dynamics have been rendered obsolete by Wikipedia.

      However, I am surprised by how much some of the old books I have are listed for on Amazon. $30 for the PDP-11/60 Processor handbook? Really?

      One of the best uses for old computer books, though, is to whip them out and show them to the Younglings who think they've discovered something new. My dog-eared Lisp 1.5 Primer and stack of punch cards for the first Lisp program I wrote in College long ago are somewhat shocking to those who think Lambdas and functional programming is state-of-the-art computer science.

  28. *Some* old ones are valuable by PapayaSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The APPLE II BASIC programming manual by Jef Raskin currently goes for $52 and up on Amazon. A few years ago I found a late-'90s book on embedded systems programming that turned out to be in demand and later sold for about $100 on Amazon. So look up anything unusual, specific, or that might have nostalgia value there or on Bookfinder.com before you recycle them or sell them for a buck or two.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:*Some* old ones are valuable by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There's someone in my workplace still using the copy of the "Fortran cookbook" that I picked up second hand in 1987.

    2. Re:*Some* old ones are valuable by Pfil2 · · Score: 2

      Also keep an eye out for BIOS Disassembly Ninjutsu Uncovered by Darmawan Salihun. People are asking $1500 for it on Amazon since it's out of print. I guess it's a collector's item. The company I used to work for paid $700 for it on amazon 6 months ago and as soon as I heard that I googled the book to see why it was in such demand and discovered it was out of print and the author had even posted a PDF of the book on his blog. So, there was no reason to even buy it for the information; it's only worthwhile buying it as a collectible. The funny thing is they didn't know any of this and wrote their name all over it with a sharpie thus destroying its collectible value. What's not funny is they probably just billed the government for the price of a book they could've read for free...

    3. Re:*Some* old ones are valuable by will_die · · Score: 1

      As the number of books for a title go down some software, be it amazon or the sellers, automaticcly increases the prices. So for that book there could just not be many people selling it.
      When you get a book like that the best place to check is ebay. When I was recently throwing out my old books I had a few books that amazon placed in the $100 range and ebay had a bunch at $.10; did not think that a 3rd edition of a management book that was currently near edition 20 would be of that much value.

    4. Re:*Some* old ones are valuable by adolf · · Score: 1

      Despite what you think, all of what you say is funny.

      Some of it is funny ha-ha, and the rest is funny-queer.

      Funny's a funny word.

    5. Re:*Some* old ones are valuable by tepples · · Score: 1

      and the rest is funny-queer.

      Funny-preferring intimate relationships with people of the same sex?

    6. Re:*Some* old ones are valuable by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      You are correct that listed prices on Amazon aren't definitive. Some people pull a number out of their butt, then subsequent listers think that's the market price. But there really are valuable old computer books.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    7. Re:*Some* old ones are valuable by adolf · · Score: 1

      Well, it could be funny-queer as in homosexual, or funny-queer as in strange.

      Funnily enough, queer is also a funny word.

  29. Pretty simple rules by dackroyd · · Score: 1

    If it's for either the current version of a technology or is for a technology that is version free - keep it. e.g. The Data compression book, and The Pragmatic Programmer are both 15 years old but are still great books that people could learn a lot from.

    If it's for a technology that has had a newer version (or versions) released - probably bin it. Even a book a couple of years old will be massively out of for technologies that are advancing rapidly. e.g. a book on how to develop for iPhones that was released in say, late 2009, would be almost completely irrelevant now.

    --
    "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    1. Re:Pretty simple rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's for either the current version of a technology or is for a technology that is version free - keep it. e.g. The Data compression book, and The Pragmatic Programmer are both 15 years old but are still great books that people could learn a lot from.

      You mean the pragmatic time wasting old man with the stories of when he was a little boy? Read the Amazon reviews.

    2. Re:Pretty simple rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      e.g. a book on how to develop for iPhones that was released in say, late 2009, would be almost completely irrelevant now.

      As a programmer, for server side applications. I have to say, that a book from 2009 is still relevant. When you do work with it, you notice that not that much change after all. Sure the book will be lacking the new bling bling features, but it will lay down the basics. Enought for Joe Doe to do some serious programming.

      If you work with IPhone app development, you probably want a newer book.. say from 2010 :-)

  30. Sounds like a job for Wikipedia by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a job for Wikipedia

    --
    I come here for the love
  31. Programming books by the inventors by StewBaby2005 · · Score: 1

    I collect books by the inventors of languades e.g. C++ by Stroustrop, C by Kernigan and Richie Pascal by (I forget the Swiss dude)... I feel these are worth while keeping just as references

    1. Re:Programming books by the inventors by zjbs14 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pascal? I'm not sure it's Wirth it.

      --
      No sig, sorry.
    2. Re: Programming books by the inventors by nbritton · · Score: 1

      Pascal not worth it, ha, I think I still have Fortran 77 books on my shelve. GCC has current compilers for both of these langanges. Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.

    3. Re: Programming books by the inventors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who forget the author's name aren't going to get the joke.

    4. Re:Programming books by the inventors by PetiePooo · · Score: 2

      Hah! That's Rich(ie)...

      A bit AWK-ward, though.

    5. Re: Programming books by the inventors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooooooosh
      (read here)

    6. Re:Programming books by the inventors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on whether you call him by name or by value.

  32. Re:Give older editions to beginners, the curious . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they really can't afford it, that's cool, but if the book is significantly outdated you could do more harm than good by having someone learn from it. For example, I would never give someone a book on Flash 3 development, since Flash has had a few major version bumps since then and anything they do in Flash nowadays will be in the new version of Flash/ActionScript, so they'd more than likely be wasting their time reading it compared to reading a modern edition. Programming Perl on the other hand is still quite relevant and useful today so it is a judgment call.

    I actually don't even look for tech books in used bookstores anymore because it's next to impossible to find anything recent and relevant. However, if a used bookstore had them sorted by publish date that would DEFINITELY help!

  33. Free shelf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These books have readership value, even if they are slightly obsolete. Caveat lector if they are on the free shelf. They are free advertisements for the products.

  34. The Swiss dude by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Although not (major) language inventors, I still see value in the writings of the Dutch dude and the Scandinavian-American dude . . .

  35. Old CS books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bassic may not be taught. But if you go under MS Visual basic, the code is still QBasic code. Also, when an author writes a book, if he or she is a PHD, then the chapters related to their thesis topic will be well written and rest are thrash. So, it becomes necessary to collect several books from different authors/publsihers and collect relevant information and make up your own booklet. This is very crucial for teaching and learning. So, instead of collecting junk, book library at home will be very useful for a long time to come. Also, most developing countries still use old editions and I found out that some Assian universities just copy (xerox) a old book and distribute it to its students. There is a definite market for the books we throw away. An entrepprenuer can create a good business.It is unfortunate we discard good food, books etc., without understanding the long term consequences. Most say the industry does not care, but some of the old programs can be rewritten in a new language as the underlying algorithms and procedures do not change. Ignorance is not bliss.

  36. Solution is Speculative Accumulation by retroworks · · Score: 1

    In the desert in Tucson, there's a massive airplane graveyard, where you can always go to find a part. I collect these used books in my business, and it's very frustrating. You can't afford to keep them in a rent-paying, heated building. But they always eventually go up in value. The solution is "speculative accumulation". Find a place in the desert, where they won't mold (they will anywhere else, unfortunately). And dig them up in 100 years. Look at what Kaypros and IBM 85 series monitors are selling for on ebay.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Solution is Speculative Accumulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I don't think that's going to do much to help the value of Windows 98 Annoyances.

  37. Two categories: Theory - About Some technology by gareve25 · · Score: 1

    I would order them by Theoretical ones, because this books tend to long more years. For example: The books of Knuth and the books of Cormen. The books that talk about some technology, "expire" faster, most of people don't want to read a book about some programming language/Operative System of the 90's or before. After this big categories, you can follow the sugerence of other slashdotters.

  38. Richie Pascal? by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    C by Kernigan and Richie Pascal

    Never heard of Richie Pascal? Wasn't he the one who sang La Bamba?

  39. Keep art, edu by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Hi g01d4,
    Have a look at any good bookshop with a 'computing' section. Computer graphics and fundamental CS/math education books seem to have a few extra years in them.
    Programming languages, mobile related, tax, product guides seem to have a life under a year with massive version drift.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  40. Use Amazon by ranton · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is even easier than that. Just go to Amazon and check the used book price for each book. If the book is selling for a dollar or less, there probably isn't any demand. Set whatever threshold is worth your time, whether that is $2 or $20, and toss the rest.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Use Amazon by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I have a stack of graphic novels, left behind when I moved in to a rented house.

      I listed them on Amazon.co.uk, and sold a couple for (after fees + my costs to post) about £10. Then one sold for around £5 -- after fees and postage, I'd have made about £1. It wasn't worth the time it takes to carefully package the book. I don't know how the people selling things for £0.01+postage (£2.70?) make any money -- it's certainly not possible for an individual to compete. My colleague sells stuff on eBay as a hobby, and says the same applies there -- unless it's rare, don't bother.

      When I get round to it, I'm simply going to take the books to a charity shop.

    2. Re:Use Amazon by cskrat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Assuming you have a smartphone of some sort, Amazon actually has an app that does most of the work for you. Especially if you want help from co-workers/volunteers/etc. that might not know the difference between "Learn Excel 20xx in 24 Hours" and "Code Complete 2nd Ed.".

      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.amazon.pricecheck

      If it sells for a penny, pulp it.
      If it sells for a dollar, give it away.
      If it sells for more, sell it.

      Or whatever thresholds you like.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    3. Re:Use Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Assuming you have a smartphone of some sort, Amazon actually has an app that does most of the work for you. Especially if you want help from co-workers/volunteers/etc. that might not know the difference between "Learn Excel 20xx in 24 Hours" and "Code Complete 2nd Ed.".

      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.amazon.pricecheck

      If it sells for a penny, pulp it.
      If it sells for a dollar, give it away.
      If it sells for more, sell it.

      Or whatever thresholds you like.

      There's an iOS app too.

      And since you didn't specify, I'll point out that it allows you scan the barcode to find the book, you don't even have to type anything in. Quite simple.

  41. there is an app for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use your smart phone and a price check app to get the latest prices from the internet. 5 seconds per book job done... use the date stamp they have at the front counter of the library to mark the date it was put one the shelf. Recycle the oldest as needed.

  42. Obligatory non-xkcd link by yurikhan · · Score: 1
  43. First edition fractals books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at abebooks.com, search 'fractals' and then click 'first edition', they have a nice selection, a lot of them are under $5.

    Repeat for other categories if you want. Good luck!

  44. eBay sort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check the average price on ebay, sort by the price where the book is typically sold. Dump the cheapest (or with no bids)

  45. Eat them! by rizole · · Score: 1

    Get some mushroom spores for a couple of quid/dollars off the intarwebs. Soak your book in water for a day and seedit with spores. 2 or 3 weeks later and you have some yummy mushrooms to cook with. There are you tube vids if you need em.

  46. My system.. by nbritton · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. I keep most programming books, in fact I still have 8086 assembly and qbasic on my shelf. My rational is they are as useable today as they were twenty years ago. However, books like HTML3 were recycled years ago.

    2. Technical books get recycled after ten years. I.e. Windows 95 for retards, Ethernet the definitive guide, Astrisk, CNE study guide, Master Fedora 3, Absolute FreeBSD. However, a book like "The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System" would be kept as it is a reference book ooperating system design... which fundamentally hasn't changed in thirty years.

    3. I unconditionally keep all math, chem, electronics, science type reference books. It's not as if the laws do the universe are going to change anytime soon.

    Basically, open the book up to a random section, if it is still relevant (I.e. calculus, electronics principles, x86 assembly programming, c programming, perl cookbook, etc.) keep it.

  47. Weeding criterias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By working in a library probably you are probably already aware of the weeding process. Here https://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ld/pubs/crew/index.html there is an in depth document about the whole process. My girlfriend works for the local library (they have approx 76000 volumes and 18000 population) here in Italy, and she used that document as a basis for the weeding process they did a few months ago.

    At page 58 you have the definition of the CREW formulas and at page 62 there is the criteria for the 004 dewey class (computers), remember that those are guidelines and not rules, the document itself states that depending on the mission of your library the weeding criteria can be different, but at least you have a strong framework from which to start.

  48. Use vs. Collect by iCharles · · Score: 1
    I think the less than 5 years is good for a useful computer book for the most part. There are a few folks who may want the older stuff for legacy systems, or things that are institutions (such as vi or EMACS) that will likely be around forever that it gives a good baseline on.

    However, there are a few cases where the book may be more of interest from a collectable/historical perspective. I have a battered copy of Programming Perl, with a copyright date of 1991--it has the pink spine. About ten years ago, I took it to a talk by Larry Wall, and he signed books afterwards. In front of me were several folks with shrink-wrapped copies of the latest edition (I think it was the third or fourth by then). When he got to me, he opened to the title page, then paused. He flipped back to the cover, noted that it was first edition, and well loved. He smiled at me, then signed and stamped by book.

  49. A singularly difficult question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you are both a domain expert who knows computing, and an enthusiast of historical computing, you're going to be hard-pressed to know what to keep and what to trash. I have books from the 70s and 80s which are still useful. I have books from last year I've discarded. I just happen to enjoy historical computing and have a lot of important books from the past. A lot of them are still relevant today. It's not like The UNIX Programming Environment is obsolete.

    There's also the obsolete technology angle - if all libraries and personal collections throw out their obsolete technology books, what will people confronted by legacy code do for information? So you just got handed that old Delphi project, and ... ? Where do you go to brush up on Delphi, or learn it from scratch? (Or that old non-.NET ASP project, or whatever.)

    There's also the history angle - something like Waite's HTML & CGI 3.2 book from the late 90s is absolutely fascinating to read just to see how people were trying to create a discipline of web development. Historically, this will be an important book some day as people study how early web pioneers struggled to bring order to the chaos.

    Still, you can't keep everything. I know that too well!

  50. Some old books still sell new by zwarte+piet · · Score: 2

    Like "The art of software testing" from 1976. Or the C programming language by Kerningham and Richie. I would certainly save the classics.

  51. Copy of Programming Perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    *Everyone reaches for their copy of Programming Perl* Sure enough, mine is the Second Edition, published 1996, and I use it almost every day.

  52. Re:Give older editions to beginners, the curious . by theskipper · · Score: 1

    It's getting difficult to find any tech books at physical bookstores any more, not just used. And the gasoline costs + paying full retail price really make it hard to justify not firing up Amazon and one-clicking with prime.

    Further, when Amazon fully offers guaranteed same-day delivery it's going to be even tougher to justify running out to bricks-and-mortar store to have a book in hand immediately. It will just depend on demand for what's worth stocking in their warehouses, i.e. whether the book you want is hard to get vs. a best seller. Knowing Amazon, they'll probably come up with a highly-professional instaprint system to solve that problem in the future, maybe at a somewhat higher cost to satisfy the publisher.

    Of course the same threat to local stores applies to anything else Amazon is willing to stock in their warehouses for same-day availability. Doesn't look like bricks-and-mortar stores are going to get a break any time soon.

  53. Check Amazon's Used Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that a quick look at Amazon's used marketplace somewhat accurately shows the relevancy of used books. Those that have been vastly superseded by changing times may be less than $1, while others hold a surprisingly strong used value. Typically those with a strong used value are found to still have relevancy among practicing programmers. Of course take it with a grain of salt.

  54. I think those were mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honest question... are you in Iowa because I just got rid of those two books as part of my effort to remove all physical books from my house. Damn useful books in general but just no necessary anymore.

  55. There Are Several Old Goodies by domukun367 · · Score: 1

    Don't throw it away if it is a book on theory. If it's "Learn xxx in 21 days" or "xxx version y.0", burn it with fire!

    Historical texts such as Gosling's "Hot Java"? ~1995 are invaluable in learning the original motivations for the language; they will most likely be lost in the mists of time!

    Classics like K&R C are invaluable and still useful today, and I've used them recently on ancient systems that don't have man pages.

    I passed 3rd year transistor theory only by visiting an old book sale and buying a textbook from the 60s that explained the bits that the dodgey lecturer "forgot about". Transistors don't change. The bindings were so cracked I had to drill the book's pages and sew them together...

    Books on design patterns are also still useful even if they are old e.g. Meyer's "Effective C++".

    --
    Please don't send a Word document when a text file will do the job.
    1. Re:There Are Several Old Goodies by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      I passed 3rd year transistor theory only by visiting an old book sale and buying a textbook from the 60s that explained the bits that the dodgey lecturer "forgot about".

      Do you remember the title of the 1960s book?

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    2. Re:There Are Several Old Goodies by domukun367 · · Score: 1

      Do you remember the title of the 1960s book?

      Sorry... I know it was paperback novel sized, white cover, about 1cm thick.

      --
      Please don't send a Word document when a text file will do the job.
  56. Theory, Syntax, Technology by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    By year is probably the most efficient way to filter. I would however split the lot between Theory, Syntax, and Technology. The former will have far longer relevance and the latter will have the least with the passing of time. Theory can last for decades, but technology is constantly overturning and starts to become irrelevant even a couple years after print.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  57. Why dont... by madcat_sun · · Score: 1

    try to give it at a local school, or sell it at a local university? There are always people there that wants info, even if this is outdated [that does not mean this isnt useful anymore] Cheers!!!

  58. Public Library != Academic Library by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    I know this is hard to believe, but public libraries don't care about books if they're not circulating.** If no one's come and checked out the book in a year or two, then it goes to make space for books that people are actually reading. It's no different than when people get all pissed off because of some great literary classic gets mulched -- if people aren't reading it, it's a waste of shelf space.

    Academic and research libraries have different rules for maintaining their collections. Typically, before 'deaccessioning', they'll check to see if copies are available through other libraries via ILL (inter-library loan). If they've got the last copy, they're more likely to hang onto it than if there are still 20 copies in their local system.

    So ... if you care about a book, check it out, then return it. The library won't love you messing up their statistics, but every 'circ' (circulation) helps them to justify their budget.

    ** with some exception for their intentionally non-circulating materials.

    (disclaimer : I volunteer at our local branch to deal with the book cart / sales until they're banned next week. Most programming & textbooks I sent to Books for International Goodwill)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. lol. His "12 rules" number 13, so he's fishy by raymorris · · Score: 1

    LOL. I figured he is fishy because his "12 Rules" is a list of 13 rules.

  61. Lots of hardware, not many manuals. by _BrianMahoney · · Score: 1

    I've been collecting antique computers for years and the constant dilemma is that there's usually lots of hardware but not much in the way of manuals that describe how to actually use that hardware. You probably come across much older books/manuals than most would expect, back as far as the Apple IIs and Commodores. Personally, I value the manuals and books as much or more than the hardware they refer to. This doesn't answer your question but you might want to search out some collecting sites to see if anyone hoards this stuff. Vintage Computers in San Fran, not sure if they're still around, and others would be very interested, I think, but the problem remains how to get the two things together. Thanks for the question, I hope you find a solution.