Slashdot Mirror


NSA's New Utah Data Center Suffering Meltdowns

linuxwrangler writes "NSA's new Utah data-center has been suffering numerous power-surges that have caused as much as $100,000 damage per event. The root cause is 'not yet sufficiently understood' but is suspected to relate to the site's 'inability to simultaneously run computers and keep them cool.' Frustrating the analysis and repair are 'incomplete information about the design of the electrical system' and the fact that "regular quality controls in design and construction were bypassed in an effort to fast track the Utah project."" Ars Technica has a short article, too, as does ITworld.

161 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Good! by tomkost · · Score: 1

    I hope the whole place melts down or any type of natural disaster. These tools will be used against the evil and the good alike.

    1. Re:Good! by intermodal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm less convinced that it will actually be used against the evil. Especially in the resulting balance of use.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    2. Re:Good! by tomkost · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly, unfortunately...

    3. Re:Good! by disposable60 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't it depend on your definition of evil? To a dedicated Statist, the Bill of Rights is "just a damned piece of paper" in which the rights of the Polity are fully enumerated - until exigencies make them inconvenient. The danger is that only dedicated Statists make it to the highest positions of Authority.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    4. Re:Good! by intermodal · · Score: 1

      No, evil is pretty objective. It's "good" where it gets subjective.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    5. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The danger is that only dedicated Statists make it to the highest positions of Authority.

      This. Unfortunately.

    6. Re:Good! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      So , that's why there isn't a vicious debate over things like abortion, the death penalty, or harry potter books. I was curious why we didn't debate those vigerously in politics. Now I know, we all have the same defintion of Evil. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    7. Re:Good! by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Wow. You're super good at broad generalizations unrelated to the topic at hand. I'm glad you're here to take this conversation off-topic and make broad generalizations to counter a remark that was clearly referring to the topic at hand, which is to say, the uses of a broad intelligence-gathering system.

      You must practice law.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    8. Re:Good! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Just here to shoot the Bull. Don't float it, and I won't shoot it.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    9. Re:Good! by intermodal · · Score: 1

      You need an optometrist.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    10. Re:Good! by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Oh, good. Ad-hominem attacks based on terminological grounds. I was afraid we were going to see intelligent discussion. Thanks for helping avert such a terrible outcome.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  2. Iranian Stuxnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmm...so your equipment is randomly failing...you don't say?

    1. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Iranian Stuxnet? No, just government contractors on a rush job that badly documented and cut corners on a sensitive aspect of the design that controls massive resources (power (65 megawatts - enough to power a small city), cooling, etc.) critical to the function of the datacenter. This is generally referred to as, “your tax dollars at work.”

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      Given they apparently haven't even switched on any computers there yet, presumably the cyberattack fun still hasn't begun.

      This raises the question of where they're processing all their existing data. Fort Meade ran out of electricity some time ago, from what I understand, so presumably they have some other big datacenters in other places.

    3. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

      All right, let's explain it that way. Let's also make sure that incompetence is punished, while we're at it.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    5. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think this is just Skynet fighting back. It doesn't like the competition.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      65MW is a hell of a lot more than a small city, it's enough for ~65,000 average homes which is ~180k residents which would put it just outside the top 100 in the US.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

      Try not to use absolutes like "Never" in general statements, you will most likely be wrong, and also a fool.

    8. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also they fired 90% of their IT staff.

    9. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      I thought it was Facebook that was upset.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

      Try not to use absolutes like "Never" in general statements, you will most likely be wrong, and also a fool.

      Or at least a Sith.

    11. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you get both.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The US generally liked to work on data under the sats/from links in a local safe country - UK, Australia.
      This helped in 3 ways:
      No need to have expensive encryption 'everywhere' moving a constant stream of useless bulk data around.
      Better to put that hardware to collection rather than layers of encryption.
      By sharing with the locals it kept then addicted to the data stream for generations.
      Unique encryption was only need for the end product - Russia and China, France and Brazil knew the US got everything - in space or telco loops.
      So where you see huge US hardware - thats where the US is getting interested. Welcome to the home front.
      As for these issues, its just a huge amount of coding, hardware links, power and cooling - not many have the trust anymore and some skill sets are fly in fly out.
      A lot of small groups will fix the issues fast and the US will be back on track for years of domestic missions very soon.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by lifeisshort · · Score: 1

      Average home at 1000W? 2013? Doubt it

    14. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Looks like it is a bit closer to 1300 (1kw would be around 8,800 kwhr per year, average in 2011 was 11,280), it's gone up a bit since I last did calculations.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:Iranian Stuxnet? by nilbog · · Score: 1

      Definitely nothing much going on over there.

      --
      or else!
  3. Can't analyse all their 'adversaries' by stewsters · · Score: 2

    Save yourself some trouble and stop spying on your own people then.

    1. Re:Can't analyse all their 'adversaries' by Brucelet · · Score: 1

      They long ago forgot how to tell the difference.

    2. Re:Can't analyse all their 'adversaries' by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/09/06/nsa_bullrun_manassas_why_is_the_nsa_naming_its_covert_programs_after_civil.html
      They are way ahead of the "'own people" aspect.
      The fun question is who is going to play the North, South, the role of the UK, France and will the Russians send ships again? http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Modern_History/American_Civil_War/Wartime_Diplomacy/US-Russian_Relations

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  4. Good by rcb1974 · · Score: 1

    Respect our right to privacy. Stop the snooping. I am upset and ashamed that the people of Utah have allowed this spy center to be built in their state. I had higher expectations of them. They should have cherished our individual liberties, upheld the Constitution, and told the Federal government take their spy center elsewhere.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering what the US did to the Mormons you think they would have a little bit of distrust. But the government knows that good church drones make good government drones.

    2. Re:Good by sls1j · · Score: 2

      Trust me as a Mormon and at Utahn I very must distrust the government, and have been dismayed and angered that this monster has found a home in my state.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then actually do something about it.

    4. Re:Good by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      Had we elected Romney, you know it would have been shut down. Oh, wait.

  5. Ah well, by syntheticmemory · · Score: 2

    It probably lacks certification from the Department of Redundancy Department anyway...

    1. Re:Ah well, by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Just wondering... Does that come in triplicate carbon copies?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  6. Re:good? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    in the 'new america' you can't know if this kind of article is a fishing trap to find people who vocally disagree with the NSA.

    it seems like east germany from a decade or two (or 3) ago. people were always wondering who is a spy. the guy next door? your teacher? your boss? you never knew. the mistrust ran very deep.

    welcome to the new USA where the same feelings are now 'imported' and we wonder who is real, who is a plant and who is a double agent. we have to worry about everything we say and if it could be taken out of context or misinterpreted.

    great. just great. chilling effect on steroids.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  7. A case of Poetic Justice? by dryriver · · Score: 1

    You set out to snoop on the minutiae of the lives of tens of millions of innocent people. Then your data center melts down... Perhaps God/Angels had something to do with this? =)

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  8. Your tax dollars at work. by generic_screenname · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only thing that will save us from the massive dragnet of the NSA is apparently the incompetence of the NSA.

    1. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by Professr3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bureaucratic incompetence has been the strongest protector of civil liberties to date :\

    2. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by atgaaa · · Score: 2

      We will be told more money will solve the problem. Closing it down will solve the problem also.

    3. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Wait until one of the aggrieved nations decides to do a 'limited kinetic action' on this facility - only to cripple the capabilities of a program that's being run in violation of international law.

      You'll be waiting a very long time. The last time we were bombed was during WWII, by Japan. It was called Pearl Harbor. The only military attacks on the mainland were also during the same timeframe by what could lovingly be called "fail balloons" launched by Japan with incendiary devices and carried over the mainland, where they would land and cause fires. Only about a half-dozen of these were reported or suspected to have actually landed, and none of them landed on anything of any value... A tree here. A cow there.

      You may well recall what happened to Japan after they creamed the pacific fleet: We built, tested, and then detonated a nuclear weapon their head. Nobody has tried since. And that was just a firecracker compared to what we have today sitting on launchpads all over the country.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by pellik · · Score: 1

      This is the NSA. We won't be told anything about it we will just pay.

    5. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by pellik · · Score: 1

      Do you think American's stop eating junk food while they bitch and whinge?

    6. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      As long as they avoid collateral damage, I would fully support such an operation.

    7. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      It's in Utah.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      The only thing that will save us from the massive dragnet of the NSA is apparently the incompetence of the NSA.

      s/the NSA/Government Contractors/ -- it's the same thing that gave us Ed Snowden.

  9. I honestly don't understand. by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The submission had one article, the editors linked to two more.
    ALL THREE ARTICLES REFERENCE & LINK TO THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

    Is it so hard to include a link to the source of this story?
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304441404579119490744478398.html
    (Google Cache just in case /. does this far too often and I hope to see better in the future

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I honestly don't understand. by sootman · · Score: 1, Funny

      > /. does this far too often and I hope to see better in the future

      Don't hold your breath. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    2. Re:I honestly don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We're nerds, not MBAs. We don't give a rat's ass about the WSJ.

  10. Power management by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They probably used a power budget similar to the public Facebook datacenter data but then decided to run their machines on Windows Azure.
    I have noticed that power consumption of my computers is significantly higher when running Windows - and the laptops have seriously reduced battery life, even while doing nothing.

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
    1. Re:Power management by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      Maybe download and run 'powertop'? This is a pretty nifty application that tells you were you are spending your power on Linux.

  11. Re:good? by BreakBad · · Score: 5, Funny

    The NSA started scanning itself causing infinite recursion....like looking at yourself through a mirror through a mirror, except digitally. I have infinite bank accounts and I have infinite hits on cougarfinder.com

  12. "HA-hah!" - Nelson by pla · · Score: 2

    Someone explain to me why the holy bloody fuck these enemies of the American people haven't taken an involuntary 8-day vacation along with the rest of the noncritical federal government?

    1. Re:"HA-hah!" - Nelson by h4nk · · Score: 1

      I actually in my head said "HA-hah!"

    2. Re:"HA-hah!" - Nelson by pellik · · Score: 1

      What enemies of the American people? You mean the poor backwords farmers on the other side of the world? What are they gonna do, grow drugs?

  13. Re:good? by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm conflicted about your post. I think it's good to point out why the NSA spying on everything is a good thing to people who might otherwise be apathetic, but I think you engage in hyperbole which might cause more people to ignore the situation and write it off as paranoia.

    Maybe suggest that COULD happen if we don't take steps to pare down the NSA now rather than suggesting it's something you're already worried about.

    Not saying you're wrong, just that the NSA is spending a lot of time and effort (and money) on PR to convince the public they have nothing to fear. We need to similarly think about PR concerns in order to have a chance of opposing it.

  14. Surprised they didn't take from google's play book by segmond · · Score: 1

    afterall google revealed a good amount on how they go about building their data centers and keeping it cool. But then again, contractors...

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  15. Graft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Secret budgets. No bid contracts. Endless graft. Pork.

    The NSA is a money pit. Welfare for private business who perpetuate endless war for a buck.

  16. Re:good? by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We'll just be footing the bill.

  17. Probably just electrical under-design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they fast-tracked the project, they probably didn't have an electrical engineer do a load analysis. I wouldn't be surprised they are tripping panel main breakers, but not individual load breakers. This tends to give a nice inductive kickback to the system, which can cascade into tripping superficially unrelated circuits.

    1. Re:Probably just electrical under-design by bobbied · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they fast-tracked the project, they probably didn't have an electrical engineer do a load analysis.

      In my experience, some engineer probably DID the analysis, but they ignored him/her because it would take too long to do it right. The revision 1 Blue prints where already under contract and it would take too long to process a change order. Of course, everybody KNEW that the design had a fatal flaw, at least until the program management started leaving like rats from a sinking ship and their replacements where not aware (or told) of the problems.

      The original engineer is then tasked with fixing the problem with about 1/4 the resources necessary and no authority to actually make any changes to the project. Every time there is a power failure and equipment gets smoked, the engineer is blamed for not having the "problem" fixed. His performance rating takes a dive at the next performance review and he either quits in frustration or gets fired.

      That's what happens in large government projects... At least in my experience...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Probably just electrical under-design by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it was EYP/HP doing the design of the data center; I know Skanska was part of the GC JV. They knew what they needed to do for capacity.

      What likely happened is they assumed a high-performance PUE, but installed equipment in more of a low-performance PUE mindset (no cold aisle containment, insufficient hot air stratification for return, tighter humidity control requirements, etc. It is easy to think you will have a 1.3PUE looking at the system, but a few small changes can bump that up to 1.6 quickly. If you size your generators and transformers for the 1.3PUE then you are 25% overloaded. But, by the rate they are apparently adding generators at the site I imagine things will be resolved pretty soon.

    3. Re:Probably just electrical under-design by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      If they fast-tracked the project, they probably didn't have an electrical engineer do a load analysis.

      In my experience, some engineer probably DID the analysis, but they ignored him/her because it would take too long to do it right. The revision 1 Blue prints where already under contract and it would take too long to process a change order. Of course, everybody KNEW that the design had a fatal flaw, at least until the program management started leaving like rats from a sinking ship and their replacements where not aware (or told) of the problems.

      The original engineer is then tasked with fixing the problem with about 1/4 the resources necessary and no authority to actually make any changes to the project. Every time there is a power failure and equipment gets smoked, the engineer is blamed for not having the "problem" fixed. His performance rating takes a dive at the next performance review and he either quits in frustration or gets fired.

      That's what happens in large government projects... At least in my experience...

      Reading between the lines, I'd bet dollars-to-donuts that the design of this datacenter was compartmentalized to the point that no contractor pulling wires or doing power analysis was allowed to know the whole scope of the facility. The power draw would be a very good indicator of how much computing power is inside, and that's a detail that I'm sure is classified.

    4. Re:Probably just electrical under-design by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Fuck him. I hope he suffers. The Nazis building this data centre should face a Nuremberg trial if this country ever comes to its senses. "But I was only doing my job" is not a defence.

      Installing drywall on a government contract is equal to running a prison camp and genocide operation in your mind, huh?

  18. buy me Bonestorm or go to hell! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    "I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

    -- some godless pinko and human trafficer


    give me apathy or give me cheetos

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  19. Let's see. . . Data Center in Dry Climate. .. by Salgak1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    . . .eats huge amounts of power, not large amounts of water for cooling.

    And thus, power requirements go up, pushing the limits of your provisioned electrical infrastructure.

    And extremely-high-capacity circuit breakers tend to be explody when they fail. My guess: someone used some REALLY bad assumptions for electrical infrastructure planning. . .

  20. Well, well. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, definitely trust an outfit that can't size a bloody datacenter power distribution system to build those magic technical safeguards that are allegedly allowing a spying operation of unprecedented size to occur with no abuses (And that's no bullshit!)

    I wonder if we could convince them to switch to a utility that conducts background checks on electrons before sending them to the customer? That would clearly help...

  21. Re:good? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow are they hosting Apples mapping application?

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  22. 'incomplete information . . .' by hduff · · Score: 2

    'incomplete information about the design of the electrical system'

    Well, duh, it's secret.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  23. Really? They're missing some information? by Jean+Taureau · · Score: 1

    > Frustrating the analysis and repair are 'incomplete information about the design of the electrical system'
    Why don't they just snoop the needed information off the contractor's network?

  24. That's a shame. by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    Cry me a river, and all that.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  25. Re:Surprised they didn't take from google's play b by Voyager529 · · Score: 3, Funny

    afterall google revealed a good amount on how they go about building their data centers and keeping it cool. But then again, contractors...

    Rule #1 of government spending: why by one, when you can have two at twice the price?
    Rule #2 of government spending: a penny saved is a spending oversight.

  26. Re:good? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    Polygamy Porn. It's like drinking from a firehose.

    Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed.

  27. Such is the life of a government project.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just theorizing, but I'd venture to say:

    1) Army Corp project and design
    2) Lowest Bidders (if not for the prime, at least for the sub contractors)
    3) Multiple Change Orders
    4) Multiple on the Fly revisions
    5) GOTO 1 Repeat till deadline.

    1. Re:Such is the life of a government project.... by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Multiple on the fly changes are, alas, typical in Federal projects.

      The Classic case of project fail due to this:

      Who Killed the Virtual Case File ??

  28. Re:good? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    Who knew that The Prisoner would be a template for America less than fifty years later. I just wish my computer and phone would spray drugs at me on occasion. "Be seeing you"

  29. Re:good? by BreakBad · · Score: 1

    It's rare to see the human race be proactive on issues of this scale. The NSA's "spying" is probably a baby-step towards just more of the same. With a couple changes in management, throw in a few more incidents....who knows. Cannot predict the future but you sure can hyperbole the fuck out of it.

  30. STUXNET II by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    The Blowback!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  31. Wile E. Coyote, running on air to get to safety by Catbeller · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't the result of incompetence - rather the result of trying to racing to finish the thing before any more opposition builds up that may stop the project. Wile E. Coyote trying to run on air, knowing it's impossible, but trying to get to the cliff before gravity notices the flagrant violation.

    When that monster is done - and it seems that they are turning it on *right now*, this week - human history is done as we understand it. We will all behave as though someone is watching and recording us, because they will be.

    Scientology is going to *love* this - one stop shopping for all its spying needs. The NSA just last week asked permission for private corporations to access their new trove of data, Because Terrorism. The Unification Church and Scientology will be first in line with front corporations to drink deep of this wonderful new integrated terrorism enabling center - terrorism because bad guys like Scientology will be able to terrorize people with fresh, holistic super-knowledge not only of who they are, what they say, what they read and where they've been, but also of everyone their enemies ever talk to, email, walk next to, text or write to. That center isn't about just metadata, it's the *actual phone conversations* that will be recorded. Don't ever piss off the powerful, 'cause they can nail you and anyone who ever contacts you until you give up. Blackmail, extortion, we-know-where-you-kids-are... anything. And the coolest part is that it will all be secret! Persecutors with behind stage access to the NSA superboxes and analytic tools won't even be logged in any real sense. Political opposition, nullified, instantly. The possibilities for our brave new world owners are limitless.

    1. Re:Wile E. Coyote, running on air to get to safety by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually they probably just aren't among the most important nutjobs he's looking for. Commercial entities are commerecial entities. This could make the NSA a profit center, like the CIA. Which means that they CAN'T be controlled by congress. Currently they could be, it's just that it would be political suicide. Once the NSA has a marketable product, though... and allowing them to sell it to commercial interests gives them that marketable product.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Wile E. Coyote, running on air to get to safety by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      They are a representative nutjob set. They will, if this thing flies, make it job one for their organization to get access to that data. I know those suckers from way back. It's their dream, the ability to run a timeline on their enemies.

      They'll beg, bribe, steal, get people on the inside, buy a company that *does* have access to the thing. They won't stop until they get it, and then game over for any schmuck who screws with them. You think they were bad when they just had PIs, loony members and lawyers? Wait for when they get total power over personal information. That little rebellion we had against them in the 90s - that ended with South Park and Seth McFarlane getting info they then made accessible to all in a way people would remember - that sort of thing would not have happened had the CoS had the NSA dbases to find out dirt on people who faced them down. Hell, they broke Minton and put another poor bastard into prison for making a Tom Cruise missile joke, without total surveillance. It'll be like what happened to Occupy - they'll nail you as soon as you speak up.

      And they are just the fringe of would-be spies. This is god-like power, the ability to timeline any human. There are far more serious bastards in the world.

    3. Re:Wile E. Coyote, running on air to get to safety by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      A story came out last week that made it clear the NSA was looking for private commercial partners to help analyze all that shiny data they will be collecting - Because Terrorism, and because they can't do it themselves. Hence my "they will use companies" screed about third parties.

      When this thing becomes real, nothing will stop people from getting access to that giant black box. It's worth a fortune, commercially, politically. It's Power with a giant gothic capital P.

      Even if it doesn't happen immediately - how will we ever know when future administrations won't quietly change the rules regarding access? Or the spooks that really run the show decide it themselves, as they always have done. They're f-ing secret - Congress doesn't know what they really do, and neither does the President.

    4. Re:Wile E. Coyote, running on air to get to safety by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Those that do adapt, by say ignoring it, will mostly do fine. A small minority will find that they can't be troublemakers anymore when the hammer falls - the Occupy protesters a couple years back in Chicago who were disappeared for three days by Chicago cops are a good example. They were disappeared - not arrested - in the middle of the night from an apartment even before they got to a protest. The FBI/NSA/cops/whatever were cooperating in unprecedented fashion to track protesters. Remember that protest isn't illegal - and remember that no one cared that it happened when they went poof. Privacy is necessary if you ever want to challenge power. Without it, you're helpless.

      Think of the personal profile tracking they could do from birth, esp if students are made to use ebooks instead of paper. In time, every ebook that passes a person's eyes since birth could be tracked, every page turn, hell, every eye movement, probably, if they wanted. Every email, every convo, every web page view, every association. They could know who you are better than you do. And it could be done without human oversight - automated analyses. I thought this nonsense for the time being, until last week it turned up that the NSA does indeed run automated analyses on people, with purdy graphs. How the hell do you rebel or even plan opposition when total life surveillance is a reality?

  32. damn horny Mormons by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe they shouldn't have built it in Utah?


    More likely they didn't account in the power budget for the seven secret sub-basements and the underground vacutrain for the reptoids to commute from the Denver International Airport.
    honestly, it's like the right hand doesn't know what the left talon is doing these days.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  33. Re:good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The NSA doesn't need you or I or our children to spy for them. Everything they want to know is willingly provided to them, by us, in real time. The Stasi had informants everywhere, which put people on their guard. Most people today don't think twice about saying things, because there are no daily reminders that somebody could be listening. That's far more frightening, in my book.

  34. Re:Let's see. . . Data Center in Dry Climate. .. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Funny

    My guess: someone used some REALLY bad assumptions for electrical infrastructure planning. . .

    Hey, don't be too hard on the electrical engineers - James Clapper told them that the power requirements would be really low.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  35. WSV by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1
    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  36. That's what happens when... by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    ...the NSA tries to tail -f the [censored] planet!

    ; )

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  37. Shot self in foot? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Frustrating the analysis and repair are 'incomplete information about the design of the electrical system' and the fact that "regular quality controls in design and construction were bypassed in an effort to fast track the Utah project."

    This sounds like someone was in such a great hurry to get their shiny new toy that they bypassed a lot of the steps they should have followed.

    And, somehow I doubt there's a lot of sympathy for the NSA here on Slashdot.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Shot self in foot? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Gee, if they rushed that job, I bet they rushed QA too, esp. pen testing... I mean, Snowden showed how dumb it is to legislate computer security.

      Protip: Bad guys don't care about laws.

      The Chinese, Russians, etc. will probably be using it as soon as it comes online, certainly before the next Olympics.
      Hey, might be a good idea to secure those SCADA systems eh? You know, like when all our grid are belong to China?

  38. I always smile when I see that product name by Marrow · · Score: 4, Funny

    From: "The Edge Of Darkness" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090424

    "Craven: The word azure is a police intelligence term. It means the room is bugged or under some sort of electronic surveillance"

    A perfect name for a cloud computing product.

  39. Re:Let's see. . . Data Center in Dry Climate. .. by linuxwrangler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Works for Switch in Las Vegas. Cold in winter and cools off at night so 70% of annual hours they can pull in ambient air through filters. Evaporative cooling, whether direct or to cool the hot-side of a refrigerated system, works best in dry climates but it's only used to improve efficiency as they can run fine with air-cooling albeit at much higher power costs.

    I'm still surprised at the number of places that think cooling is optional. We had equipment in a Sacramento data-center that had plenty of backup electricity for servers but couldn't run the AC in a power outage. The SLA only had provisions for exceeding 80-degrees for more than something like 90 or 120 minutes. *Ahem*, cold-comfort when a dense data-center can blow through 100 in minutes without AC.

    UC Berkeley had a widespread power outage about a week ago. The main campus data center had power but, you guessed it, couldn't run cooling and had to "gracefully" shut down most of the core systems while watching the center breach 100F.

    But I agree with your base assumption - really bad planning and/or execution on the power systems.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  40. Disclosure Project by watcher-rv4 · · Score: 1

    Seems NSA has also pissed off some UFOs and they are doing their magic. Thanks!

  41. meltdown couldn't have happened by stenvar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to a nicer data center...

  42. Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    is probably the main cause

  43. It's the little things in life you treasure by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    I'm sure it won't last, nothing this good ever does, but let's enjoy it while we can.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  44. Re:good? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe you missed the article a few days ago about how the US is barring critics/dissidents from entering the country? Not criminals, not "terrorists", simply people who disagree cannot travel freely. This really is a police state now, and it's only a matter of time before the 1st Amendment becomes about as well honored as the 2nd, which is to say wholly selectively suiting the needs of the state based on arbitrary standards the founders were explicitly against in their writings.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  45. Re:Build your data centre in the desert by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Dont make us come there and look for WMD's in your back yard.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  46. Stuxnet by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    Couldn't happen to nicer people.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  47. Re: 'incomplete information . . .' by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    No, knowing govt projects. Nothing labelled and changes made on the fly that are not documented. One building they had 48 breakers and NONE labeled.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  48. $100,000 by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    so we now have an official price tag on your stolen personal information.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  49. Re:good? by Thavilden · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only they could harness that chilling effect to cool their data centers, then the NSA would be good to go.

  50. Re:good? by msauve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " it's only a matter of time before the 1st Amendment becomes about as well honored as the 2nd"

    It's about time we had reasonable, common sense restrictions on the press. Scented inserts and metallic type should be illegal in magazines. No one needs high speed printing presses which can automatically feed reams of paper - they should be restricted for government and military use. Private citizens will still be able to use hand fed mimeograph machines, so their rights won't be violated. Anyone publishing news should have to be licensed, with a journalism degree from an accredited university.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  51. suffering leads to sufferering by kalioto · · Score: 1

    Spell check - there's an app for that.

  52. Switch-mode power supplies by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A friend of mine is researching power surges in the local town.

    Most building codes under-specify the gauge of the neutral/return wire. For illustration, if you have three phases each rated for N amps, there is one shared neutral/return wire rated at N amps going out. At the end of the runs all phases are connected to the shared neutral line.

    This is due to the nature of 3-phase electricity: the phases will tend to cancel out, so in a perfect setup you would need no neutral/return at all. Of course, the load on each phase won't exactly balance, and the load can vary as people connect/disconnect appliances, so you still need the neutral line in practice.

    (Not true for house wiring, which has one or two phases coming in. Each phase has a return with the same gauge as the supply.)

    This was fine when appliances were (generally) resistive loads, but nowadays switch-mode power supplies are common. When you do some math, it turns out that this type of load appears equivalent to 120 Hz power coming together at the neutral/return junction. Since 120 Hz [equivalent] power does not cancel out, the power in the return wire can be 3x as large as the building codes allow.

    I've got a book explaining all this. Typically the neutral line will heat up and catch fire, breaking the circuit. Once that happens the various phases are connected without a neutral, playing hob with whatever is on those circuits and making occasional high-power ground loops and other unexpected behaviours.

    1. Re:Switch-mode power supplies by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

      At the end of the runs all phases are connected to the shared neutral line.

      Poor choice of words: I don't mean to say that power and return are wired together. I meant to say that all three phases share one neutral line.

      Post before coffee, regret at leisure.

    2. Re:Switch-mode power supplies by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I'm suspecting a power factor problem, condensers not dealing with enough inductance and so surges occur when large amounts of equipment turn on simultaneously.

    3. Re:Switch-mode power supplies by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I know from personal experience that this area has (at least had in the 90s) poor reliability from the electrical utility companies. When they found out the building we were designing was going to have 3.2 megawatts of back-up power, they offered to give the Owner a reduced electrical rate if they agreed to an interruptible feed from the utility. The Owner thought about it, but found that it the deal would not only require increasing the capacity of the back-up generators, but also require red tape to deal with the EPA, so they decided against it.

    4. Re:Switch-mode power supplies by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      This hasn't been a problem since 2000 when the EU mandated power factor correction and harmonic mitigation in computer power supplies. It was really big news back in the mid to late 1990's though. The theoretical maximum from triplen harmonics though is 1.73x phase current. Back in the day it was a problem for office buildings that had reduced-size neutrals in their bus risers, and for low voltage transformers.

      Today it is rare that we see more than 10% current THD in an electrical power system.

  53. Re:Add to it.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    It isn't about the engineers. It is about their management.

    Good management can build the Trajans Bridge in a year from rocks and trees.

    Bad management can't build a web site. EVER.

    IMP. CAESAR. DIVI. NERVAE. F
    NERVA TRAIANVS. AVG. GERM
    PONTIF MAXIMUS TRIB POT IIII
    PATER PATRIAE COS III
    MONTIBVUS EXCISI(s) ANCO(ni)BVS
    SVBLAT(i)S VIA(m) F(ecit)

  54. Might have to stop my escapades to Utah by nucrash · · Score: 1

    They might be catching on to my sabotage to their facility. Nothing to see here, move along. Not short circuiting anything. It's not like if you supply 480V to a hard drive directly and you won't have any problems. Also, is it just me or does one hundred thousand feet of data center space seem pretty small to hold 5 zettabytes in data storage. I tried to build the same out of BackBlaze storage pods and came up with 180TB of space in a 4U pod, with 1.8PB per rack, that would still take a lot more than they are showing. I suppose they could be building into the ground, but wouldn't that show up on their calculations for square feet?

    --
    Place something witty here
    1. Re:Might have to stop my escapades to Utah by nucrash · · Score: 1

      That's what I get for using Fox News as a source.

      --
      Place something witty here
    2. Re:Might have to stop my escapades to Utah by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Think compression. They have your voice print as math, spending habits as numbers, full chat history as text, phone records, fames of video (web or cctv) and any actions taken by other US agencies. Where the data numbers get interesting is the short term raw in (massive uncompressed) vs well compressed, indexed long term storage. Great for people to try and work out.
      Too much data is a good talking point- sound, film, records for every US citizen would be too 'much' at any point in computer history: no US domestic issues ever.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  55. Re:good? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

    I think it's more that many people now want to be constantly monitored. They wouldn't announce their every move on Facebook and Twitter if they were interested in privacy.

  56. We don't need no steenkin' privacy by SomeRADDude · · Score: 1

    HA...HA (ala Nelson)

  57. I'm not sure how I should feel by Tifer · · Score: 1

    On one hand the NSA is publicly embarrassing itself with costly malfunctions On the other hand, it's all happening on my dime

  58. Cooling problems? by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 1

    Did they check for jellyfish in the intakes?

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    1. Re:Cooling problems? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Did they check for jellyfish in the intakes?

      Today in Biology: "News reports indicate that giant salt jellyfish have been found wandering in the deserts of Utah, playing mean games on the local salt-adapted flora and fauna".

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Cooling problems? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Did they check "the cloud" for lightning?

    3. Re:Cooling problems? by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      my hovercraft is full of eels!

      -I'm just sayin'

  59. It's alive! by Hentes · · Score: 1

    After being stuffed with all the information in the world, the network is starting to gain self-consciousness.

  60. What a shame by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Isn't it terrible when bad things happen to absolute fascists?

  61. Re:good? by laie_techie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe you missed the article a few days ago about how the US is barring critics/dissidents from entering the country?

    Odd, I check /. every day, and I do not recall such an article. But I have noticed on occasion that "new" articles will show up in between two articles that I already checked, so I guess I may have missed it. Care to link it? My google-fu is rather weak.

    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/10/02/1339247/german-nsa-critic-denied-entry-to-the-us

    HOWEVER,

    ... the story only shows that German media outlets are not familiar with US entry regulations. He says that he was denied a visa last year, which automatically disqualifies him from the visa waiver program. This is just a garden-variety ESTA issue, and most likely has nothing to do with his stance of the NSA surveillance.

  62. It is sad that one of the three giant NSA centers by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It is a sad sad day when one of the three giant NSA centers is down, due to somebody forgetting to do checksums on the loaded programs in their power systems.

    Sad sad sad.

    Yes, I said three.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  63. Re:good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The problem with writing something such as the above is that many people lack sarcasm detectors, and will take it seriously.

    Such comments ought to be banned.

  64. Re:good? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure my cell phone travels are not willingly provided by me to them.

    Or the calls & metadata about calls.

    Or my emails.

    Or my https communications.

    Or about 500 other ways that are supposed to be private & privileged.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  65. TANSTAAFL by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    and the laptops have seriously reduced battery life, even while doing nothing.

    There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lurk -- NSA

  66. Laser guided Karma meets foreshadowing by EngineeringStudent · · Score: 1

    So they did it fast, but not right, and now they are paying more than they would have to do it properly in the first place?

    This is an old story. You know what they say about those who do not learn from history, right?
    So if you (NSA/whomever) haven't learned yet, then it is unlikely you will start learning now. I'm going to learn from history and suggest that you aren't going to learn this time either. And maybe you can learn from my learning, and show yourself better than a zero-order player of games.

  67. Re:good? by sjames · · Score: 2

    Remember when the claim that the NSA knew everyone you talked to on the phone was tinfoil hat crazy (because the NSA NEVER spies on citizens)? Seems it was right on the mark.

  68. Aliens, naturally. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there some discussion about how the NSA couldn't really store "zettabytes" of data at this site as claimed?

    Maybe they really do have all that capacity. Them transcapacitors are power-hungry, I hear.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  69. Perhaps it wasn't sarcasm by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    Would you like to cover a 'news' event yourself?
    What happens when big brother says you can't because you don't have the proper credentials?
    Check out some New York City rules in reverse order:

    Applicants also must submit one or more articles, commentaries, books, photographs, videos, films or audios published or broadcast within the twenty–four (24) months immediately preceding the Press Card application, sufficient to show that the applicant covered in person six (6) or more events occurring on separate days .

    Applicants must be a member of the media who covers, in person, emergency, spot or breaking news events and/or public events of a non-emergency nature, where police, fire lines or other restrictions, limitations, or barriers established by the City of New York have been set up for security or crowd control purposes, within the City of New York; or covers, in person, events sponsored by the City of New York which are open to members of the press.

    First-time applicants should contact the Press Credentials office (above) before completing their application

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  70. Re:good? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you know what's different between the NSA 2013 and the Stasi? Immidiate consequences. If someone informed on you doing something the government didn't like, they'd be dealt with immediatly. This helped connect the idea in people's minds that constant government survaleance = bad thing. Right now, that's not happening. NSA has all this data, but they haven't done anything with it that people can see. That doesn't mean its harmless, it just means that people can't see the harm yet.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  71. Re:good? by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not saying you're wrong, just that the NSA is spending a lot of time and effort (and money) on PR to convince the public they have nothing to fear. We need to similarly think about PR concerns in order to have a chance of opposing it.

    Riker, his face palmed. Shaka when the walls fell.

    Dathon and Picard, the beast of El-Adrel!

    Snowden, his files open.

    Darmok and Jilad at Tenagra...

    Head shaking Nixon at Watergate!

    Feynman at NASA, The frozen ring:

    "Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."

  72. Clear Objective by Tim12s · · Score: 1

    There must be some clear objective to fast-track such a massive installation to skip certain of the build quality checks. This must exist under the guise of some approach not previously discussed since this is a new datacentre.

  73. Re:good? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Very poetic, but I was saying lets fight fire with fire, not "lets ignore reality."

  74. Re:good? by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    what do you mean it's only a matter of time. The god damn constitution isn't worth the paper it's written on since 9/11 and the patriot act was signed into law originally. At that time, the constitution and all the admendments "We The People" passed were thrown out the damn door at 30,000 feet to splatter all over the floors of the United States Congress and Senate

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  75. Re:good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So NSA is tinfoil hat crazy about terrorists.

  76. Well ... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... you folks wanted cheap power. So you get the cut-rate stuff. The good power we save for our paying customers.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  77. Re:good? by headphones54321 · · Score: 1

    Maybe this kind of rhetoric could help. It seems to have been a while since there were really motivated activists trying to get more books into schools.

    If we could get those that are trying to force more guns into schools on the book train, perhaps we could make some progress!

  78. Re:good? by Applekid · · Score: 3, Funny

    in the 'new america' you can't know if this kind of article is a fishing trap to find people who vocally disagree with the NSA.

    Um, ok, then this is bad! Bad bad bad! I hope the NSA fixes their problems soon.
    Love,
    -A loyal civilian

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  79. Re:good? by turgid · · Score: 1

    Very perceptive.

  80. Re:good? by sjames · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is.

  81. Re:good? by anagama · · Score: 2

    There are millions who never even use Facebook or Twitter. Millions more who use it for news and commentary. Just because a subset of the population publishes every meal they eat, doesn't mean that all people wish to be monitored.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  82. Re:Let's see. . . Data Center in Dry Climate. .. by turgid · · Score: 1

    Quite. The basic concept of conservation of energy seems to have passed a lot of people by.

    Most basic concepts pass most people by, which is why life is so hard for the rest of us and the world is in the lovely state that it's in.

    I reckon some subversive put some red pinko-commie electrons in the power circuits to undermine the NSA.

  83. Re:good? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    I was right behing him through "scented inserts". Those *should* be banned, or tightly regulated. I started to waver at "metallic type". Eventually it was clear that he was being sarcastic.

    So what I want to know is why he thinks scented inserts should be allowed.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  84. Re:good? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    He was later granted a visa, however. So your point fails.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  85. Re:good? by icebike · · Score: 1

    I think it's good to point out why the NSA spying on everything is a good thing to people who might otherwise be apathetic,

    Reading your post makes it hard to discern whether you are delusional, typing too fast, or just trolling.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  86. Re:good? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    While I get your sideways point about gun control laws, I would like to point out that there are already common sense restrictions on the press. The same company can't own all the newspapers, TVs, and radio stations in the same market area. Unfortunately scented insert bans didn't make the cut. Or a ban on time cube...

  87. Deus Ex... by Arkiel · · Score: 1

    Oh, don't mind that. Echelon and Helios are just attaining sentience.

  88. Re:Where is cold fjord? by cffrost · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised cold fjord isn't all over this, given the anti-NSA sentiment expressed.

    Or is he not working because of the government shutdown?

    After learning of this situation, he's probably curled up at the foot of James Clapper's bed, whimpering between gulps of Victory Gin.

    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  89. Re:good? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    The founding fathers were people living in a different time in a different situation, and the 2nd Amendment made perfect sense when you looked at the weapons of that time. What the Founders couldn't have known is that modern weaponry would enable mass murder thanks to holding a high capacity of ammo, discharging and reloading rapidly, and carrying bullets designed to penetrate body armor and literally tear people apart.

    You mean when both the British military and the American rebels had the same level of infantry weapons? Oh and it was legal for civilians to have cannons (many merchant vessels had cannons for defense) as for armor piercing rounds no one had body armor. Also the American long rifle had higher accuracy then the British so I am fairly certain the founding fathers were quite aware of the principle if not the specifics.

    Do I think you need a hundred guns no. Whats the point you won't be able to use/carry them anyway. Owning several sure why not.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  90. Re:good? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re worried about the next Edward Snowden... if you read http://cryptome.org/2013/10/questioning-snowden-truth.htm the US gov seems to be doing a great job with the press.
    This was a good read too http://cryptome.org/2013/10/gchq-mullenize.pdf so expect http://cryptome.org/2013/10/packet-stain/packet-staining.htm for the domestic US networks. Thats a lot of power and cooling for just a human life of 'data' storage.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  91. Re:good? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re They might record the fact for now. The domestic locked box and domestic interests would point to a change to 'all you wanted' soon.
    You have a generation now that knows nothing but war and they are slowly moving out into the workplace.
    No longer just looking out over the EU or into Asia.
    For some the word domestic is like a term from the Cold War. Good for staff to reflect on but the mission and new hardware is very local now.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  92. Re:good? by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1
    someone please mod this up for extreme cleverness

    no moderator points. Shaka. When the walls fell.

    Kind moderator mod up. Temba, his arms open.

  93. It happens when you fire your admins and engineers by Issarlk · · Score: 1

    Just wait for next week story: "The NSA can't fucking bring up their servers, whole datacenter crashes in a chaotic storm of network packets"

  94. Re:good? by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    He was later granted a visa, however. So your point fails.

    Actually, if you followed the link, you would see that it wasn't originally my point - I just pointed to a comment in the original story showing why his denial into the US wasn't based on his political views. Also note that the comment I cite says that because of his previously denied visa, he was no longer qualified for the visa waiver program. That just means it wasn't an automatic approval.

  95. Re:good? by slavdude · · Score: 1

    Maybe you missed the article a few days ago about how the US is barring critics/dissidents from entering the country?

    We've been doing that for years, unfortunately. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farley_Mowat comes to mind, as does Gabriel Garcia Marquez. The actor Michael Moriarty, who like Mowat is Canadian, I think was not allowed to return to the U.S. after leaving it when his visa expired (IIUIC) because of his criticisms of U.S. policies. Not trolling, just adding to what you said above.

  96. MIT-Stanford VLAB - Hosting a Privacy Event by tsan357 · · Score: 1
    VLAB (MIT-Stanford Venture Lab) in Silicon valley is doing an event on Privacy on October 15th, from 6:00 PM - 8:30 PM at Stanford University (in Palo Alto, CA) - Vidalakis Dining Hall.

    Panelists will include Philip Zimmerman (PGP + Silent Circle), Nico Sell (Wickr), and Casey Openheim (Disconnect). The question being asked is, is privacy possible today?

    The web site for the event is : http://www.vlab.org/article.html?aid=480

    Naturally, the panel will look at technologies like data mining (and anti-data mining) and encryption. VLAB is interested in business opportunities for startups with disruptive technologies, the panel will be seeing what's possible.

    VLAB usually looks for major disruptive trends, events, and technologies. The Snowden leaks (and also the Google, Facebook, etc. reactions) may have started something significant, and sparked an awareness.

    In any case, it should be an interesting event. If you're in the area, you might want to check it out. (full disclosure - I'm the event chair for the privacy event).

    Best Regards,
    Tony

  97. Merlot by kidchameleon · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good opportunity to try those wine powered processors.