Slashdot Mirror


TEPCO Workers Remove Wrong Pipe Get Splashed With Radioactive Water

An anonymous reader writes "A day after TEPCO workers mistakenly turned off cooling pumps serving the spent pool at reactor #4 at the crippled nuclear plant comes a new accident — 6 workers apparently removed the wrong pipe from a primary filtration system and were doused with highly radioactive water. They were wearing protection yet such continuing mishaps and 'small mistakes' are becoming a pattern at the facility."

214 comments

  1. Oblig by binarylarry · · Score: 1, Funny
    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Oblig by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Oh, a wiseguy, eh?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Oblig by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would be willing to bet that things like this happen frequently at nuclear power plants in the U.S. but they aren't being closely scrutinized so you don't hear about it.

    4. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      WTF?

      Please hunt down the moderator who rated this as insightful and ban them from /. forever.

      (or, someone, explain the insight here)

      Asshats have sock puppet accounts with good karma and then use them to mod up their own AC asshattery or mod down people that disagree with a post they created from one of their accounts.

    5. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there was a place where we could scrutinize the scrutiny!

      Oh wait, there is! NRC Scrutiny

    6. Re:Oblig by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 0

      But then who will scrutinize the scrutinizer of the scrutinized?

      It's scrutiny all the way down!

    7. Re:Oblig by binarylarry · · Score: 0

      Turtles, bro.

      TURTLE power.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    8. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Calling Dr. Howard, Dr. Fine, Dr. Howard..."

    9. Re:Oblig by plopez · · Score: 0

      We need a Central Scrutinizer!

      (google it if you didn't get it)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    10. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks ya been watching way too much Simpsons episodes.

    11. Re:Oblig by erikkemperman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh dear, forget to check the anonymous checkbox did we? This post is basically word for word the same as countless anon troll posts... So either you have no imagination or, more likely, we have finally identified the fetid feces troll. Idiot.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    12. Re:Oblig by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Ouch! dude is cold busted.

      Let this be a lesson, kids... dont drink and troll.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    13. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be willing to bet that it is more common in a make shift emergency setup like the one in Fukushima though. I am amazed that they can get anything done in that chaos...

    14. Re:Oblig by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait, most everybody has been furloughed...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    15. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is scrutineer.
      Who will scrutinize the scrutineer of the scrutineer?

    16. Re:Oblig by kinnell · · Score: 0

      What we have here as far as I can see is two incidents caused by human error in which there were no serious consequences. What's the news, that humans make mistakes? If people can make stupid mistakes in a nuclear power station and not cause any serious problems it just shows that the systems and procedures in place are well designed and managed.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    17. Re:Oblig by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      it could very well have been a misclick. Whenever I manage to do it I try to post to null it out, though.

      It's been happening ever since the web2.0 "rewrite"

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    18. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how a comment that merely speculates with no citation whatsoever can get 5: Insightful around here.

    19. Re:Oblig by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Don't hate the internet troll: he is a sad and pathetic creature. Why would someone do such a thing if they weren't terribly lonely. Aside from annoying you temporarily, he causes you no harm. Pity him instead.

      Or maybe ask why slashdot doesn't take steps to counter this. Why exactly are comments still listed by time rather than by score by default? Is it just that we're all so used to first post nonsense that we'd miss it were it to go away? Why can you post AC or with a brand-new account immediately when a story is posted? If someone is posting something anonymously, they can wait a half an hour to do it.

    20. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How comical! How comical! I simply speak The Truth. If someone were to ask you what 1 + 1 is equal to, you would answer "2" every single time. Why? Because it is The Truth. Likewise, my posts are similar because I merely speaking about reality. Now, vanish, you inconsequential piece of garbage! You're a mere clone trying to get my cheeks to boil as such never before, all so that Crashhhelper's dad can use his diamond-hard, elastic cock to get to my location at the speed of light and take greater delight in violating my bootyasscheek johnson ultimatum supremacies! But it's not going to work because you're such an obvious little clone!

      Disappear. You're an eyesore!

    21. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What! No NOT THE CUM VO

    22. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe ask why slashdot doesn't take steps to counter this. Why exactly are comments still listed by time rather than by score by default? Is it just that we're all so used to first post nonsense that we'd miss it were it to go away? Why can you post AC or with a brand-new account immediately when a story is posted? If someone is posting something anonymously, they can wait a half an hour to do it.

      My perception is that comments to get reshuffled from time to time. I've seen first posts burried under insightful posts. They'd get sarcastic replies, but they were actually first when posted. I haven't verified this using the scientific method, so it's just an anecdote, but I may be on to something.

    23. Re:Oblig by Diamonddavej · · Score: 2

      That's rubbish, if they were exposed to excess radiation from accidents that are covered up, nuclear workers in the US would have increased rates of cancer. They don't (Boice et al, 2011).

      The overall health of nuclear workers is better than the national average. They have over all, a lower incidence of all cancers and non-cancer illnesses. Only after adjusting carefully for lifestyle factors and closely examining the health rerecords of 100s of thousands of international workers, some of whom worked in the 1950-70s and were exposed to higher levels of radiation in accidents (e.g. some UK Sellafield nuclear workers in the 50-60s were exposed to high level radiation in accidents) ... a weak relationship between radiation dose and cancer risk is noted.

      Importantly, the average radiation exposure for nuclear workers has fallen considerably in the last two decades, safety standards are now so strict almost no worker gets more than 10 millisieverts per year (1/10th the dose where any effect is seen). Their average dose of nuclear workers is barely higher then the general public (who by virtue of greater ill health are exposed to more radiation from medical examinations and therapy).

      As such, it was noted epidemiologist John D. Boice, that modern nuclear workers are now little use in examining the theoretical relationship between radiation dose and cancer risk, their radiation exposure is now far too small (Boice 2010).

      I admit this may change with Fukushima. But my main point is, a nominally operating nuclear industry poses no risk to workers or the general public and there's no cover-up going on.

      Boice Jr, J.D., Cohen, S.S., Mumma, M.T., Ellis, E.D., Eckerman, K.F., Leggett, R.W., Boecker, B.B., Brill, A.B. & Henderson, B.E., 2011. Updated Mortality Analysis of Radiation Workers at Rocketdyne (Atomics International), 1948-2008. Radiation Research,.

      "All cancers taken together (SMR 0.93; 95% CI 0.84–1.02) and all leukemia excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (SMR 1.21; 95% CI 0.69–1.97) were not significantly elevated." and "Radiation exposure has not caused a detectable increase in cancer deaths in this population, but results are limited by small numbers and relatively low career doses."

      Boice, J.D., 2010. Uncertainties in studies of low statistical power. Journal of Radiological Protection: Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 30, 115–120.

    24. Re:Oblig by Meski · · Score: 1

      And in other news, a worker digs up the wrong pipe outside a LPG powerplant and gets blown into orbit. Radioactive water is fairly tame compared to that.

    25. Re:Oblig by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Things like this happen not just at nuclear facilities but in the process industry in general. I'm more worried about some of the dangerous chemical plants where instead of "splashing" local workers you could release a large cloud of HF or something similar over a town.

      Check out the Chemical Safety Board website. About half the advisories on major accidents are issued due to "control of work" issues. It's the biggest buzzword in the industry in the last 10 years.

      Hell the plant I work at we cut a live butane transfer line with an angle grinder. Pure luck prevented a major incident that day.

  2. look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is no shame in calling a friend for help.

    1. Re:look by bob_super · · Score: 2

      In Japan? Even asking for a giant Mech to help fight Godzilla is considered a failure.

    2. Re:look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fukushima cartoons!
      http://nav.cx/46f2Yy

    3. Re:look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bribe them/pay them, Capitalism

    4. Re:look by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, there is.

      Recently, I have been going over distinctions between western/American and Japanese cultures. It has been widely accepted that Japanese cultures do not require leaders as much as western/American cultures. When and where things are established and routine, accepted and understood, the Japanese excel in ways that make western/Americans a bit jealous and often awed. On the other hand, crisis management is best handled by smaller numbers and individual thinkers who can collectively see more because they all see things differently.

      There are other aspects as well and among these are in how errors, mistakes and anomalies are perceived and handled. When and where the first response is denial, it is an early sign of delayed problem resolution. In a crisis, delays in problem resolution are sometimes deadly. I believe we are seeing this at play now.

      I once, in a committee with both Japanese and American members, pointed out that Columbus Day essentially celebrates a mistake of navigation and of understanding the world. The goal was to reach India. Columbus ended up somewhere else. We literally celebrate that and name things after this man. (The truth behind myth and legend is for another discussion and does not change the general truths, myths and legends the holiday actually celebrates in the hearts and minds of the people celebrating.) I pointed out that Americans, at times, celebrate mistakes. This is something the Japanese simply cannot do. The room went silent for a moment. Mistakes are not to be discussed, let alone acknowledged, in Japanese society.

      I could go on and on about my experiences in this area, but each approach has its merit and each approach has led each culture into extremely successful growth and development in the world. After all, Japan and America (by which I mean the USA obviously) are highly developed and sophisicated world powers. To simplify and say one approach is wrong while another is right is ridiculous. Japan's way is "mastery" but it takes lifetimes and usually multiple lifetimes to achieve and maintain mastery of any given thing. America's way relies on talents, aptitudes and abilities of individuals to achieve great things. Which is better? We're both here at the same time after all.

  3. fried fish by Moblaster · · Score: 2

    The most troublesome thing about this nuclear pipe water tipping incident is that there is nothing funny about it. What possible humor is there in this? Shall we call the place "Tipco" or something? Shall we make jokes about the water itself, and say silly things like, "Oh, they spilled water? Hopefully it wasn't heavy water! Get it? Hehe." Dumb stuff like that. Or talk about the fact that at least they were wearing protection. So they won't get a disease. Surely, that joke would be pregnant with humor. This is the trouble with posting on Happy Hump Day.

    1. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to your rant I say...

      http://i.imgur.com/1lsr7zN.gif

    2. Re:fried fish by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The most troublesome thing about this nuclear pipe water tipping incident is that there is nothing funny about it."

      We never found it funny, that they are telling us now for 50 years that it's perfectly safe and that they are professionals who can handle any problem, no matter what.

      Now we know that they can't even handle a bunch of simple systems that have a tank, a hose and a pump.

    3. Re:fried fish by lgw · · Score: 2

      Here you go: we should send the NSA employees over to work on the dangerous reactor cleanup - that way we solve two problems at once!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:fried fish by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It does seem increasingly clear that TEPCO couldn't be trusted to take care of your fishtank for a weekend(not even the freshwater one that's really relaxed about sampling and balance adjustments); but it should be noted, in fairness, that wacky piping accidents do get easier the more thickly built (ideally ad-hoc, and in poorly labelled stages, with evolutionary growth here and there) the piping rat's nest gets.

      The essence of true competence is to avoid getting into situations where continuous high levels of competence are needed; by not backing yourself into a clusterfuck of a system that is always one false move away from doing something dangerous; but if you've fucked up and done that, it's really just a matter of time until somebody gets tapped as the fall guy by the pitiless gods of blind chance.

    5. Re:fried fish by dyingtolive · · Score: 2

      Oooh, someone forgot to tick the Anonymous Coward box....

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    6. Re:fried fish by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
      From the summary...

      yet such continuing mishaps and 'small mistakes' are becoming a pattern at the facility

      The most troublesome thing is that this pattern is continuing from before the tsunami even hit. Otherwise there wouldn't be any problem right now. And the fact it goes so far back and they're still letting those stooges run things.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:fried fish by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, the first post linked to a picture of the three stooges so...

    8. Re:fried fish by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But it isn't a pattern of small mistakes. A design that guaranteed that a generator failure during a power outage would result in a meltdown was (and still is) considered safe. That's not a mistake, that's a fundamental design/regulatory issue. That they put the generators in line with a tsunami path, rather than mounting them on the roof of a reinforced shed (which would have prevented the meltdown, so long as the fuel wasn't contaminated before the backup fuel was brought in), wasn't error. It was intentional. There's a difference. An unfortunate event that was intentional is negligence. Opening the wrong pipe mistakenly believing it to be a different one is a 'small mistake'/mishap.

    9. Re:fried fish by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      When you get a question wrong in a math test you still intentionally put the answer you did. And it is still a mistake.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    10. Re:fried fish by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      When graded for partial credit, they'll not get the same results. Not all errors are mistakes, and not all mistakes are errors

    11. Re:fried fish by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's not a coward?

    12. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you should excuse them, it's hard to work coherently with a plan when you have radiation sickness.

    13. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    14. Re:fried fish by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Opening the wrong pipe mistakenly believing it to be a different one is a 'small mistake'/mishap.

      That's one small mistake for man, one giant leap for mutantkind

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    15. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magneto would approve.

    16. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's not a coward?

      Nah, he posts AC plenty... when his login gets banned or auto-modded to oblivion. Eventually his sockpuppets bring him back to life or he creates a new ID and repeats the cycle.

    17. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. As an engineer myself I often find myself explaining this to my coworkers. Basically, after explaining a chain of cause and effect events, and seeing that no one is willing to refute a single step of it, I then announce that if we now follow this path we are "doing it on purpose." That means that when we reach the failure point, you are not allowed to come and say you didn't know. Because I just explained it. And if you ignore my warning, you are doing it on purpose. It's like "I told you so" in advance. It's very interesting how effective this can be, particularly if I offer it in writing. It is unfortunate that such a warning was not issued more strongly in this case.

    18. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if my buddy explained the problem in detail to me before the test, and I understood him and got it right on my homework, and then STILL blew the question on the actual test, it's not just a mistake, it's an *avoidable* mistake.

    19. Re: fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does it! You are definitely not working on my reactor.

    20. Re:fried fish by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for helping me blow my breakfast out of my nose! Where are modpoints when you need them...

    21. Re:fried fish by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Now we know that they can't even handle a bunch of simple systems that have a tank, a hose and a pump.

      Do you mean to say that nuclear engineers are incapable of procreation?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    22. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't the reactors that were damaged directly by the tsunami, it was the diesel generators. It is true the design is inherently unsafe - a machine that runs at 1% of 800MW (or 8MW, or 133 thousand 60W light bulbs) for a month is an invitation to melt down because aux systems will eventually fail. Nuclear systems that cannot be shut down without sustained external cooling will eventually fail catastrophically.

    23. Re:fried fish by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that the waste heat was sufficient to run the pumps to prevent a meltdown. But the design didn't include smaller secondary generators that could generate local power to prevent a meltdown. I remember when I was a kid and I asked the same thing about a nuclear plant in Texas. They had mains power coming back in, so of course I asked why they'd need power coming in if they were a power plant. They responded they aren't allowed to use any local generation until after it had joined the grid. So apparently it is a common design. No idea if the same problem would hit that plant, though there isn't much that could hit it there, maybe a tornado and not much else.

    24. Re:fried fish by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      As an engineer, the hardest discussion is explaining to people that I don't care how it works, but how it fails. People think "fail safe" is a switch on a bomb, not a design principle. Engineering is a philosophy most people just don't get.

    25. Re:fried fish by Megol · · Score: 1

      Ah the mythical "they". Are you perhaps strictly against nuclear energy so we should read "they" as everyone pro-nuclear energy? Or perhaps you are a racist and we read it as "those *censored* asians"? Or should we read it as "companies having already showed gross incompetence"?

    26. Re:fried fish by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Including engineer's it seems.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    27. Re:fried fish by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's better that way?

    28. Re:fried fish by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      That's really weird. I would think they'd use their own power first, and use the grid as a backup? And then generators after that? That would make a lot more sense imho. The way it is now, if the grid fails, they have to resort to generators?!

      Another thing I never understood is those "spent" fuel pools. They put these rods into a big swimming pool and then have to cool it constantly to keep the water from boiling. Errr, and why exactly aren't you using those to create power somehow? These things can boil a swimming pool, and instead of using that to create energy, you're spending energy to cool them? At the very least, it should be able to power its own cooling? Hot water drives turbines, turbines feed pumps, put in plenty of redundant ones so half of them can fail, perpetuum mobile until the rods are "really" spent.

    29. Re:fried fish by dj245 · · Score: 1

      That they put the generators in line with a tsunami path, rather than mounting them on the roof of a reinforced shed (which would have prevented the meltdown, so long as the fuel wasn't contaminated before the backup fuel was brought in), wasn't error. It was intentional. There's a difference.

      1. It probably wasn't intentional. The nuclear industry takes this kind of thing very seriously if anybody points it out during the design stage. It was overlooked.

      2. They would have been screwed even if the generators were fine, because the pumps, and the motors/turbines which drive the pumps, were also located in the basement and were ruined. This placement is almost unavoidable because you generally need to put the pump below the lowest possible water level of the supply tank.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    30. Re:fried fish by jbengt · · Score: 1

      They would have been screwed even if the generators were fine, because the pumps, and the motors/turbines which drive the pumps, were also located in the basement and were ruined. This placement is almost unavoidable because you generally need to put the pump below the lowest possible water level of the supply tank.

      If that's the case, then next time it should be remembered that it is possible to use submersible pumps.

    31. Re:fried fish by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The essence of true competence is to avoid getting into situations where continuous high levels of competence are needed; by not backing yourself into a clusterfuck of a system that is always one false move away from doing something dangerous; but if you've fucked up and done that, it's really just a matter of time until somebody gets tapped as the fall guy by the pitiless gods of blind chance.

      Unfortunately, this means that you get the credit for savings due to doing the bare minimum of maintenance to keep things running until tomorrow, and whoever gets caught holding the damn thing when luck finally runs out gets the blame. That's how industrial systems are run, because that's how the incentives are set up.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    32. Re:fried fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to retrofit the plant with better safeguards and higher anti-tsunami walls as was recommended 10 years or so before the disaster. Ignored by TEPCO probably for reasons of cost...

    33. Re:fried fish by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My favorite was Katrina. the pumps failed. They used submersible pumps. With the driving electronics co-located and non-submersible. The pumps were not damaged, but inoperable because of the location of the control circuits. What idiot designed a submersible pump install that wouldn't work submerged?

    34. Re:fried fish by Galatamon · · Score: 1

      My favorite was Katrina. the pumps failed. They used submersible pumps. With the driving electronics co-located and non-submersible. The pumps were not damaged, but inoperable because of the location of the control circuits. What idiot designed a submersible pump install that wouldn't work submerged?

      I believe that honor goes to A. Baldwin Wood.

    35. Re:fried fish by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The pumps didn't fail. The power to them failed. The pump design was fine, it was the US Corps of Engineers install of updates and upgrades over the years that made the (silly) assumption that all flooding will rise slower than the pump can pump it out.

    36. Re:fried fish by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The problem is that things aren't black and white. As an engineer myself I could likely dream up 100 ways in which you could die in your house right now, let alone a process plant. The issue then is that the hazard needs to be assessed according to consequence and compared to the risk a company is willing to absorb. No company can be 100% risk free.

      If you go and talk about your design blowing up after a 1 in 100 year tsunami following an unheard of earthquake you'll likely get ignored. The reality is they did understand the problem except their risk ranking only assumed a much smaller tsunami, one which their wall wasn't able to hold back.

    37. Re:fried fish by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree that the institutional incentives are almost always perverse (plus, in the case of a badly damaged nuclear plant, I'm assuming that some serious bodging, emergency rerouting, and general urgent-and-ill-documented ad-hoc modification happened to the piping after the accident as they tried to cut off coolant loops too damaged for use, reroute whatever systems were available into coolant loops that were still functional, make do without access to heavily irradiated and/or rubble-strewn areas, and so on).

      My wish was largely to point out that, humans being what they are (fallible, easy to stress beyond their limits, liable to the occasional dumb mistake), any sufficiently fucked-up system will provide a steady stream of 'human fucks up, something bad happens' stories; but the individual fucker-up is just a hapless fall guy. Occasionally a hapless fall guy with a BAC of .15 who should probably see some slammer time; but normally just some guy. That being so, we should always avoid letting the individual losers distract us from the broken system that makes their failures into accidents, rather than safely contains/ignores/interlocks them.

  4. Poor oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they keep this up, we'll have 3 eyed fish in no time.

    1. Re:Poor oversight by icebike · · Score: 1

      That will look perfectly normal to the three eyed Tepco workers.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  5. Circus music.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear circus music every time I read a story about TEPCO.

    1. Re:Circus music.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Anybody feel up to a rendition of 'Yackety Sax' on a geiger counter and a selection of alarm klaxons?

    2. Re:Circus music.. by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Comedy capers would be quite suitable as well :-)

    3. Re:Circus music.. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Me to. If anyone somehow doesn't get the reference... this will do.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  6. Line Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Line Up! Drug tests all 'round.
    Failing that, DNA tests to see if Mom and Dad were siblings may provide shocking revelations.

  7. Again by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

    . . . the boys should not be trusted with nuclear anything. They know how to take notes and make lists, but when it comes to handling risk, they're clueless.

    I once found a radioactive test sample in a dumpster when I worked for a medical device manuf. in Tokyo - there are many more stories to go along with that one. Like how we were told if there was a fire to first order a pizza, then tell the firemen to follow the delivery to the fire. A lumber yard caught on fire one night, and we watched as the sirens and flashing lights on the fire trucks zig zagged around the neighborhood - 45 minutes later, the fire was out and they still hadn't found it.

    An outside multi-national agency must be brought in or these types of calamities will only continue with TEPCO.

    1. Re:Again by Deadstick · · Score: 2

      A lumber yard caught on fire one night, and we watched as the sirens and flashing lights on the fire trucks zig zagged around the neighborhood - 45 minutes later, the fire was out and they still hadn't found it.

      I didn't even have to leave Exceptionalistan to see that happen. I live in a suburban square mile bounded by four section-line streets, trisected by the confluence of two streams, and bisected by a power-line easement. My son's buddy hurt himself on a dirt bike, I called his HMO, the HMO operator set off a full-boat response of police, fire engines and ambulances...and I got to listen to the sirens dopplering up and down and fading in and out until I sent a kid out on a bicycle to tell them how to do their job.

    2. Re:Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just when I had thought the "Bootyass" troll had disappeared forever, it's back and is revealed to be AlphaWolf_HK. I'll definitely have to bookmark this.

    3. Re:Again by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      How are they to be expected to find the fire? Have you been to Japan? All the signs are in Japanese!

      But the real question was, did you finish the pizza before they got there?

    4. Re:Again by cffrost · · Score: 2

      [W]e were told if there was a fire to first order a pizza, then tell the firemen to follow the delivery to the fire. A lumber yard caught on fire one night, and we watched as the sirens and flashing lights on the fire trucks zig zagged around the neighborhood - 45 minutes later, the fire was out and they still hadn't found it.

      From the details you provided, it sounds like you neglected to order a pizza before calling the fire department — is that what happened?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    5. Re:Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he is not the owner of a Japanese lumber yard?

    6. Re:Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the fire happens to someone else, they're basically screwed!

      When people are more into burning down into the ground than losing "face" or "honor", in time, nature will take care of those misguided notions.

    7. Re:Again by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Like how we were told if there was a fire to first order a pizza, then tell the firemen to follow the delivery to the fire. A lumber yard caught on fire one night, and we watched as the sirens and flashing lights on the fire trucks zig zagged around the neighborhood - 45 minutes later, the fire was out and they still hadn't found it.

      I can't believe such an obvious lie was modded up to +5 insightful. Ignoring the rest of your post which may or may not have merit, this kind of stuff is obviously nonsense. At best you were probably confused and the emergency services were attending other events.

      Japan has some of the most detailed city mapping the world. Long before Google started doing it their sat-nav systems have full street level 3D views with texture mapped buildings and landmarks, even street furniture. It was quite remarkable being able to drive along and see foot bridges appear on screen as they appeared in front of your car. Naturally all emergency service vehicles, as well as taxies, have access to this kind of technology.

      The only hitch is that addresses in Japan can be a bit odd, but we are only talking about once you get down to a single block level. If a lumber yard was on fire they would have been able to see the rising smoke, if nothing else. The idea that the yard wouldn't have been signposted in some way is laughable too.

      TEPCO shouldn't be allowed to run anything, but there is no need for this kind of borderline racist nonsense.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Again by dj245 · · Score: 1

      . . . the boys should not be trusted with nuclear anything. They know how to take notes and make lists, but when it comes to handling risk, they're clueless. I once found a radioactive test sample in a dumpster when I worked for a medical device manuf. in Tokyo - there are many more stories to go along with that one. Like how we were told if there was a fire to first order a pizza, then tell the firemen to follow the delivery to the fire. A lumber yard caught on fire one night, and we watched as the sirens and flashing lights on the fire trucks zig zagged around the neighborhood - 45 minutes later, the fire was out and they still hadn't found it.

      In Japan, an address is generally a number on a block, not a number on a street. Giving directions becomes a lot more tricky. You can wander around for a while looking for the right block even if you know generally where it should be.

      If the addresses were tied to the street, eventually you could find the right street and travel along that street, but in Japan this is not the case.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    9. Re:Again by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you didn't use words like "trisecting" and "confluence" in your directions...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    10. Re:Again by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that there is now a rule that we can only criticize our own demographics about anything.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  8. Anyone else hear Homer Simpson's Voice? by AlienSexist · · Score: 1

    Every time TEPCO appears in the news I swear I hear yet another "Doh" soundbyte.

    1. Re:Anyone else hear Homer Simpson's Voice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJBKyTfCjCc

      Is this a videostream from:

      A: Fukushima Nuclear Plant
      B: The House of representatives

  9. What a tepco by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    I think tepco has now become the new 2013 slang word for cluster fuck or a dumbshit move.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:What a tepco by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      Oh, that's just because their mistakes are in the media cross-hairs. All the preventable and expensive stupid mistakes I could tell you about at my place of employment would give TEPCO a run for its money, but I've agreed to several kinds of NDAs and don't feel like getting sued and/or going to jail for divulging specifics. And I'll bet you even money no place is immune.

    2. Re:What a tepco by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Yeah well that's because NO ONE ELSE HAS CREATED A BIGGER MESS THAN CHERNOBYL in recent times.

      fuck the slashdot caps filter, snakes begone!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:What a tepco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Tepco really fucked up with that earth quake and tsunami. I mean, why the hell would they have that? They should have known better!

  10. What's really facinating about this whole mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that somehow someway, the only collection of people on earth who have actually seen an atomic detonation and fallout event in their front yards were convinced to allow a six unit fission plant anywhere on the island. On their volcanicly active, earthquake prone...ISLAND.

    Apparently nopes have a shorter half-life than stupidity.

    1. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Energy" is an awfully persuasive argument. Without it, your civilization will crumble to little more than medieval standards of living surprisingly fast.

      Given that Japan has ~0 coal, oil, gas (not even much wood, per capita), it was either nukes or imports. Much of the rest of the world hasn't had to face up to the problem as dramatically because they've got a big stash of cheap 'n nasty coal somewhere convenient. That has its own downsides; but those have proven easy to ignore (unless you make the mistake of living in our under-construction Appalacian Lunar Theme Park or something).

    2. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They have sun and water. You'd think they'd be looking at something, anything else.

    3. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It's entirely possible that much of 'they' weren't really asked. If the decision-making around Fukishima (when it was first installed) was anything like that around Minamata, stonewalling and general contempt for the 'opinions' of whiny little people was the official policy of both business and state.

    4. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Energy" is an awfully persuasive argument. Without it, your civilization will crumble to little more than medieval standards of living surprisingly fast.

      In my estimation, Japan was not remiss in using nuclear power. Your comments about their lack of energy resources are spot on. nuc was and is a good option for Japan.

      What they were stupidly and criminally negligent in was building the way they built it, and mainly in the location where they built it. The plant was built in an area of historic Earthquake and Tsunami activity. Worse, the wall built to protect against Tsunami waves was insufficient to protect against waves that they knew would hit it.

      The historical and geologic record shows this to be the case. The Japanese have records of when Tsunamis happened in the past, The geological record shows the gravel drops where the waves hit their highest level.

      The Fukushima plant was going to be hit with an earthquake and Tsunami, and one of these events was going to have a wave height higher than the protective barrier.This was as close to scientific certainty as it is possible to be.

      So what is a country to do that needs power and decides that nuclear is the way to go?

      First of course, is to determine the risks, and determine how to mitigate them.Earthquakes and Tsunami are the main bugaboos in Japan. Since a large source of water is needed, you probably want to site the plant by a fresh water river. You want it far enough from the ocean and at a sufficient altitude that the Tsunami wave that will happen will not reach the plant. You want to place it in relative stable area regarding seismic activity.

      Then after all that, you add a nice big safety factor in your design

      But the toughest part is the politics. As likely as not, someone has a nice piece of property they think would just be crackerjack to sell to the company making the plant. There will be pressure to get done on schedule, and almost always, the bean counters trump the engineers.So other factors end up compromising the design, and you get a plant that has total certainty of a catastrophic failure.

      As the technological issues are addressed and surmounted, it is yet to be shown if the political and human factors can.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes yes; I - admitedly a non-expert nobody - can figure out that
      when you put in a battery backup for when the main pump motors
      fail to start; it is just reasonable to put in a good deal more
      that the absolute minimum! (6 hours indeed - 60 hours would
      not have saved everything but...)

    6. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, both the US NRC (presumably because GE was involved, or because somebody asked) and their Japanese equivalent pointed out that there were... issues... with various aspects of the facility(including flooding-related ones that ended up being a problem, in addition to retro reactor design problems that they didn't know about); but nobody likes that guy who can't be a team player, and so such issues were not addressed.

    7. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Energy" is an awfully persuasive argument. Without it, your civilization will crumble to little more than medieval standards of living surprisingly fast.

      Given that Japan has ~0 coal, oil, gas (not even much wood, per capita), it was either nukes or imports

      It was nukes or geothermal. They got plenty geothermal potential, but so far had no incentive to use it. Fuel for nukes is also imported so the reasonable choice would have been to build geothermal plants and be self sufficient. I don't think there is another country which has blanket-coverage geothermal supply. But if they had gone geothermal there would have been no sales for GE.

    8. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you'd be underestimating how much energy you can get, the cost (and radioactive contamination) you get from the rare earth metals in many efficient solar panels, or the environmental impact of going after tidal energy.

      It's a pity it's so hard to get new nuclear plants going, then we could get rid of the old, bad designs faster. I imagine there are still enough badly designed plants out there that should be gotten rid of, preferably sooner rather than later.

    9. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      The densities are higher with Japan, but in the US, if everyone put panels on their roof, we'd be able to close most power plants. And no, the radiation from the heavy metals isn't that bad.

    10. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plant was built in an area of historic Earthquake and Tsunami activity.

      In other words, Japan.

    11. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Chas · · Score: 2

      Okay, this is complete and utter bullshit.

      Maybe, in the southern states of the union, this MIGHT be a plan. But only if SOMEONE builds in the appropriate power storage infrastructure (which currently doesn't exist). Otherwise you have no power in the evenings.

      In northern climates, care and maintenance of panels would eat up massive quantities of time, and the weather can be severe enough to destroy panels. Additionally, there are going to large swaths of time, due to ambient conditions, where the panels generate NO power whatsoever. Even during the day.

      Sorry, but "ubiquitous solar" is a pipe dream. And most solar advocates know better than to try and suggest it.

      Then there's the environmental impact of building all those panels...

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    12. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by bob_super · · Score: 1

      And given that it's 40 years old and US tech, they'd probably be talking to the wrong decider.

    13. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Maybe, in the southern states of the union, this MIGHT be a plan. But only if SOMEONE builds in the appropriate power storage infrastructure (which currently doesn't exist). Otherwise you have no power in the evenings.

      It's a shame nobody has come up with any means to fix that. Perhaps they could use the surplus day energy to pump water up hill, then use hydro in the night. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricity Nope, someone's thought of it, and there are plants in place right now (though they run the other way, base power at night pumped in and peak take out the next day).

      Sorry, but "ubiquitous solar" is a pipe dream. And most solar advocates know better than to try and suggest it.

      They get tired of arguing with ignorant Luddites. I don't mind. It's kind of fun. Like playing with an ant or other small bug.

    14. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Chas · · Score: 1

      Thanks for failing to address the issue of "what do northern states do?"

      Well it's obvious isn't it? Become economic slave states to the energy producers!

      Also, what's the environmental impact of having panels and hot salt towers EVERYWHERE?

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    15. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for failing to address the issue of "what do northern states do?"

      Sounded like an idiotic rhetorical question. There are lots of off-the-grid cabins in Alaska. Quite a few of them get by with solar and batteries. Yes, even with things like 24/7 satellite Internet. It works in Alaska, but would fail miserably in Kansas or whatever moving line you'll assign for declaring failure.

      And if energy was "free" how would they be economic slaves?

      Also, what's the environmental impact of having panels and hot salt towers EVERYWHERE?

      Less than coal plants outputting the same power.

    16. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by Chas · · Score: 1

      Not talking about a hunting cabin in BFE Alaska. Talking about states like Illinois, Wisconsin, New York, Maine, etc.
      Many of these states simply don't see the amount of sunlight necessary, and/or suffer inclement conditions that reduce the usefulness of solar.

      "If energy was free"

      And if we all rode unicorns....

      Sorry, but this is a stupid, bullshit pipe dream. The materials used to manufacture panels are a nonrenewable resource. And it costs to acquire them and manufacture (not to mention install) the panels. "Free power" is a myth.

      And when I asked about the environmental impact of all those panels?

      "Less than coal plants outputting the same power."

      You suppose right? Call me when you have real data, not pie-in-the-sky hopes and dreams.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    17. Re:What's really facinating about this whole mess by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      It'd work the same in Illinois as it would in TX. Enough light hits manmade structures such that if they were generating electricity, IL would be self-powered. There would still need to be a grid to "keep people honest" and move electricity around areas of poor production. E.g. the Pacific Nortwest may end up a net importer due to persistent cloud cover.

      You suppose right? Call me when you have real data, not pie-in-the-sky hopes and dreams.

      Yeah, any question I don't answer is because I don't know anything. Any question I do answer, you dismiss if you don't like the answer. I do have real data. And the cost is less than 1/10th what the naysayers assert. Solar panels got cheap enough in the US that we banned imports of cheap ones. Yet we aren't buying them up when the cost is low.

  11. Plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Queue the malcontents to stir up the idiots with OMG TEPCO IS KILLING TEH EARTH!!!1

    Stop it. They're handling vast quantities of water in thousands pipes, tanks, tunnels and pumps. Some of it is going to leak. Some of it will spill. Sometimes it will get on someones rad suit. This isn't incompetence or the end of the world. It is the natural and expected consequence of dealing with fucking plumbing.

    Whatever. This hysteria has an expiration date; after the 50th OMG THEY SPILT SOMETHING story people will get tired of it and the media will seek out some new source of hysteria.

    That is, at least, as it should be. It would be nice if we could just not indulge this stupid shit to begin with.

    1. Re:Plumbing by flimflammer · · Score: 0

      Wish I had mod points for you.

    2. Re:Plumbing by fnj · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Living proof why this level of bumbling exists. Because millions of lazy ass ignorant unengaged morons like you stand for it.

    3. Re:Plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Queue the malcontents to stir up the idiots with OMG TEPCO IS KILLING TEH EARTH!!!1

      Woah, woah, woah. Now hold it right there. We malcontents were saying TEPCO are a bunch of hopeless dipshits somehow trusted to manage nuclear safety coupled with an ingrained cultural stigma towards requesting outside assistance.

      We never said anything about them killing the earth.

    4. Re:Plumbing by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      we could just not indulge this stupid shit to begin with

      Wow! You took the words right out of my mouth.

    5. Re:Plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're going to make comments that are that useless, at least ramble on about your fetid a-hole like that other guy.

    6. Re:Plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep sucking that corporate cock, I'm sure they'll reward your efforts soon enough.
      And don't you dare spit.

    7. Re:Plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Republican apologist for everything. Yes it IS incompetence.

    8. Re: Plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a dickhead manager. we put dickhead managers in boxes to keep them away from areas where we need people who know what they are doing. please stay in your office and write memos describing your new 360 eval program and stay the fuck off the shop floor.

  12. Culture by headhot · · Score: 1

    Its almost like the are in a culture where you can't call out people's mistakes and follow orders blindly.

    1. Re:Culture by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its almost like the are in a culture where you can't call out people's mistakes and follow orders blindly.

      A corporation?

    2. Re:Culture by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That was the most insightful thing I've seen in this thread, thank you. There was a slashdot topic a while back, and I asked Samantha Wright about neurochemistry affects the brain, and she replied with this link, which isn't chemistry at all but a fascinating treatise on human cultures (and in fact answered my question). We are all products of our environments. The linked article notes that westerners are weird, and the weirdest of the westerners is Americans from testing different peoples.

    3. Re:Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the most insightful thing I've seen in this thread, thank you. There was a slashdot topic a while back, and I asked Samantha Wright about neurochemistry affects the brain, and she replied with this link, which isn't chemistry at all but a fascinating treatise on human cultures (and in fact answered my question). We are all products of our environments. The linked article notes that westerners are weird, and the weirdest of the westerners is Americans from testing different peoples.

      Mod this up! Great link, just read the whole thing: Americans are weird.

  13. Of course! by felixrising · · Score: 1

    ... this is what happens when all the smart people stay well away.

  14. History lesson by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    And that, boys and girls, is where tentacle monsters come from.

  15. In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Other News... three giant flying TEPCO workers have been spotted flying around town.

  16. How does this happen? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do you accidentally remove the wrong pipe when you're working with nuclear stuff?

    I've worked in the software and IT industry for quite a few years, and in that time I've learned that there are things you do that need to be precise, because you can make a hell of a mess if you don't. To do this, you measure twice, measure a few more times, and have your second who has been watching what you're doing confirm you're doing what you expect to be.

    I learned this from maintaining production systems for business critical stuff, and a few things for which lives could literally be on the line. But at the end of the day, it's still less dangerous and critical than working on a nuclear plant.

    This just sounds to me like either they're fumbling around in the dark, working from incomplete plans and don't actually know what the parts are, or are just simply not taking time to do the diligence on what they're doing.

    Especially when it's your ass that's going to get splashed with highly radioactive water.

    For a nation which has a reputation for fastidious attention to detail, obsessive safety drills, and engineering excellence ... how the hell are they ending up with a company which has made so many 'mistakes' in this?

    Once again, I have to wonder if these guys are actually qualified to be running nuclear reactors. Because this is two accidents in a few days, and I get the impression that a lot of this was also caused by human error.

    The mind boggles.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:How does this happen? by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is the Japanese nuclear industry. Somebody higher up the chain of command identified the wrong pipe to remove and the peons that had to do the work are socially conditioned to accept orders without question. This saves said superior from the embarrassment of having underlings point out his mistakes... until the mistakes can't be shoved under the rug where everyone can pretend they didn't happen.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:How does this happen? by Osgeld · · Score: 1, Informative

      please tell me which pipe is the correct on in this tiny fraction of a plumbing schematic for a power plant

      http://carlwillis.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/p1020050.jpg
      (that is 1 room of Chernobyl btw)

      now bend it all up by being hit by a GOD DAMNED TSUNAMI

      I am sure your C# is impressive, but seriously

    3. Re:How does this happen? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      please tell me which pipe is the correct on in this tiny fraction of a plumbing schematic for a power plant

      See, if I was actually qualified for, and responsible to do that, I might try.

      That I don't know how to do it is irrelevant. That they don't know is appalling.

      Because every place I've worked in that had extensive piping that carried dangerous stuff ... the piped were clearly labelled, and people had good schematics of them.

      My dad makes hockey ice, and you can bet your ass that the pipes that carry ammonia for the cooling are all brightly labelled as such. And if the sensors detect anything, he and several other people are all getting paged to look at it right away, because an ammonia leak could wipe out a few city blocks.

      Are you telling me the Japanese nuclear industry can't label pipes and keep good schematics, but people who make hockey ice are onto something new?

      Sorry, not buying it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:How does this happen? by Osgeld · · Score: 1, Informative

      did you not know the place was nearly destroyed?

      http://resources2.news.com.au/images/2011/03/16/1226022/657762-japan-reactor.jpg

      yea those tidy schematics are really helpful

    5. Re:How does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You can't reason with stoddart. He just wants to run his cocksucker about how shitty nuclear power is and how awesome Clean Mitt Romney Coal is. Just give up.

    6. Re:How does this happen? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      I've worked in the software and IT industry for quite a few years, and in that time I've learned that there are things you do that need to be precise, because you can make a hell of a mess if you don't.

      "Measure fifty times... cut ONCE."
      Radioactivity justifies taking this koan as close to verbatim as possible.

    7. Re:How does this happen? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Once again, I have to wonder if these guys are actually qualified to be running nuclear reactors. Because this is two accidents in a few days, and I get the impression that a lot of this was also caused by human error.

      The mind boggles.

      I guess it wasn't the Germans that bought the Springfield nuclear power plant. And then they used Homer as the model employee when HR went on a hiring spree.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:How does this happen? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      If you ignore the catastrophic earthquake, tsunami, explosions and fire(s), you might have a point.

    9. Re:How does this happen? by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 3

      That was my experience in the Japanese IT industry as well. Fastidious and near anal retentive attention to detail.
      Unfortuantely it's also got it's fair share of it's bumbling halfwits that the company can't/won't fire due to the lifetime employment custom.

      The head honcho representative of the large Japanese-IT-company-that-many-people-will-have-heard-of at the place I was working once had to apologise for accidently unplugging the wrong production server (Nope he didn't even shut it down or turn it off)

      The Japanese actually need the anal retentive planning, because they recognise that they are actually pretty hopeless. The REAL problems begin when something happens OUTSIDE of their plans. They lack a complete inability to think on their feet and respond in a timely manner... preferring to sit on their hands and wait for a roundtable discussion and confirmation from their higher ups. Contrast that with the situation at Fukushima. In fact it was the initial Fukushima engineers at the beginning of the disaster that made some critical calls in defiance of Tepco (who were only interested in saving the plant), that may have prevented a greater catastrophe.

      In fact, when the Tepco engineers were starting to explain and reassure people about what had happened at Fukushima on TV on the 12th of March, they sounded just like the voice of the bumbling server engineer, trying to apologize for unplugging the server, that i remembered from years earlier.
      It was at that time I knew that they had no control over the plant....

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    10. Re:How does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Let's recall for a moment that the man who flooded the reactors with seawater and saved the situation from getting terribly worse was violating the law and all of his superiors when he directed his staff to flood the reactors. His superiors didn't want to ruin the reactors with seawater. So badly disconnected with reality they were, that they hadn't yet written them off to save the situation.

    11. Re:How does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish you would never have the right to vote and you should hand in your Slashdot account for a such stupid comment. It seems like the fan club of nuclear power can never see the faults.

      1. Any nuclear powerplant should hopefully at least have a plan of all the pipes, cables etc. Appararently they either neglected to keep a such plan or never updated it.

      2. Even when a phone cable is dug into the ground, you can follow it completely by placing a transmitter above it on the ground, and the with a receiver, also above the ground paint out were it goes. Surely there are instruments for following pipes too (which are made out of metal too). And even if they are not metal, there is no reason to not have a cable running together with it, so you can trace the orgin.

      Nuclear power will never be safe as it is impossible to keep the human stupidity out of picture. Even if we would manage to do that, a completely new situation that nobody thought about might appear.

    12. Re:How does this happen? by eulernet · · Score: 1

      There is an excellent article in french explaining the problem:
      http://www.lepoint.fr/environnement/fukushima-des-liquidateurs-temoignent-de-l-enfer-sur-terre-27-09-2013-1735686_1927.php

      In fact, it appears that all these tasks are done by unqualified people, like bus drivers or fishmongers.
      These people went unemployed, following Fukushima's problems.

      Tepco is unable to handle these problems, so they seek contractors to work on them.
      The winning contractors are always the lowest bidders, and they tend to find sub-contractors (some of them are linked to yakuza).
      Finally, the job is assigned to people having no experience, since they are the lowest paid guys.

      The article explains that the people are so unqualified that sometimes it's the team leader that has to do the tasks, and the other employees just watch.
      Another example is that they should use iron pipes, but they use pipes in plastic.

    13. Re:How does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no expert on the matter, but the fact is that they'd had to install an enormous amount of tank capacity for ground water that is running into the facility and getting contaminated. They can't really start cleaning up the mess until they get this under control, so they're currently planning to freeze the ground around the facility - as far as I understand this won't be completed until next year or 2015, though. The scale of this is huge.

      So in other words, they are dealing with an ad-hoc solution for a big and growing amount of contaminated water. Mistakes will happen. You can't really compare it to ordinary maintenance on a nuclear plant.

    14. Re:How does this happen? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Nothing special there. You TRACE piping as you would any other schematic.

      Fun fact:
      You can physically VERIFY what is inside a pipe before severing it!
      "Cold tap" and "hot tap" fittings allow connection even to PRESSURISED and FLAMMABLE pipes and pipelines. (An interesting example is hot-tapping burning railroad tank cars to remove the non-burning portion of the contents while the rest flares.) Hot and cold are common and commercially available and if you need a special fitting any competent machine/fab shop can make it for you.

      Where useful, water or other liquids may be frozen at either side of a proposed joint or cut to plug leakage.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    15. Re:How does this happen? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Actually, I work with piping diagrams more complicated than that quite often. The diagram is easy, figuring out which pipe in the field matches which pipe in the diagram is the hard part. But it's done correctly by workers all the time, and in the case of really seriously hazardous fluids, mistakes are exceedingly rare (and never repeated;).

    16. Re:How does this happen? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      It looks scary if you're not familiar with them, but there's nothing really difficult there. I remember when I was still in uni, the lecturer handed out diagrams similar to that for the shock value, by the end of the semester everyone understood it fairly completely.

      Also remember that that type of diagram is arranged in such a way as to make everything fit on the page and be easy(ish) to follow. The actual equipment will be arranged in a more ordered way, with the pipes between them arranged on pipe racks, and if they're doing it right there'll be a tag on every piece of equipment and every pipe so you know what you're looking at.

    17. Re:How does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, but if I were them I'd pick the one that wasn't so radioactive using the radioactivity detector I'd be carrying around "just in case".

    18. Re:How does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please tell me which pipe is the correct on in this tiny fraction of a plumbing schematic for a power plant

      http://carlwillis.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/p1020050.jpg
      (that is 1 room of Chernobyl btw)

      now bend it all up by being hit by a GOD DAMNED TSUNAMI

      I am sure your C# is impressive, but seriously

      So that is your answer: "Nuclear Engineering is hard, so it will always be fucked up like the html code on my website."

      It is their god damned job to know what pipes connect to what.

    19. Re: How does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have pipes in my bathroom. some carry shit away and some supply potable water. They are not even labeled! You have to hand it to the engineer who designed that sytem so an idiot like me didn't confuse the two. My dog doesn't know that hot's on the left and shit rolls downhill, so occaisionally he drinks from the toilet.
      I don't let my dog fix the plumbing.

    20. Re:How does this happen? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I dont think there is enough data to support that workers do it all the time in a heavily damaged facility

    21. Re:How does this happen? by muffbagmuffbagmuffba · · Score: 1

      > They lack a complete inability to think on their feet and respond in a timely manner.

      So...are you saying they don't have a problem? Or that they do have a lack of a problem? Or perhaps both?

  17. Fatigue by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More than likely the workers are all getting fatigued and small mistakes are starting.

    It's well beyond time for the Japanese government to bring the Japanese military in to bring this under control. After that an international effort to assist Japan in any way required. Even considering the pride of the nation as a factor it's now becoming an international problem for any country that shares the pacific ocean.

    This is well beyond TEPCO's ability and expertise, they are a utilities company. Furthermore it was their negligence through nonfeasance that got us into this mess in the first place. A criminal investigation should be conducted and the future of the company considered.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:Fatigue by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Even considering the pride of the nation as a factor it's now becoming an international problem for any country that shares the pacific ocean.

      If every bit of contaminanted water was dumped in the ocean, and raw seawater was pumped in for cooling and not collected, would the levels have an effect that would be measurable from the US? The ocean is pretty big. Japan does more harm with illegal whaling than this, and the US condones that.

    2. Re:Fatigue by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      dump the fucking slagged reactor core directly in the Pacific ocean and you would be safe across the Pacific.

      Your comment suggests you are unclear on the difference between radiation and radionuclide which illustrates you have a poor understanding of the situation. Whilst it is clear you are trolling Mr AC, you are also propagating misinformation and ignorance detrimental to both sides of this debate.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:Fatigue by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Even considering the pride of the nation as a factor it's now becoming an international problem for any country that shares the pacific ocean.

      If every bit of contaminanted water was dumped in the ocean, and raw seawater was pumped in for cooling and not collected, would the levels have an effect that would be measurable from the US?

      That's a great question but not the issue that is a threat to human health, the best answer I have (in light of the lack of real data being provided) is probably not very measurable.

      It's the effects radionuclides bio-concentrated in the food chain, how they analogue micronutrients presented to metabolisms and the gestation period of cancer in humans that is the issue. Propagation and transportation of radionuclides is more likely to occur via biological and random means as higher order predators eat, humans being the most sophisticated predator. Also it's likely that even the direct effects won't even be noticed in Japan until at least 2018, and even then only in children as their uptake of vital nutrients is higher than adults while they grow. Chernobyl saw a very large increase in Thyroid cancer in children many years after the actual accident. It's reasonable this will happen in Japan and, possibly the west coast of the US.

      The ocean is pretty big. Japan does more harm with illegal whaling than this, and the US condones that.

      The US did not really have any choice about the airborne fallout that they would receive from Fukushima as the Jet stream would have been the perfect vehicle to carry all sorts of radionuclides to the west coast affecting any produce grown there.

      The size of the ocean is pretty much irrelevant as our lives are relatively small compared to the geological timeframes of the radio-isotopes involved. For example, Plutonium (pu-239 - a biological analogue of Iron to metabolisms) has a half life of 24000 years. Fukushima (and Chernobyl) have left behind a radio-isotope legacy that will affect the human race for generations to come. This is a radiological legacy left for future generations the same way a carbon legacy was left for our generation. The sooner we resolve this issue, the less of an issue it will be for future generations.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:Fatigue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are saying does not make any sense. The west coast of the US? Can't you see how far this is from Fukushima.
      Chernobyl was x times worse than Fukushima and we didn't see a cancer epidemic in Europe and the middle east.

      What radio-isotope legacy? The radiation that we get from these accidents is zero compared to the background radiation on world-scale.
      (And you failed to mention all those nuclear bombs that we detonated.)

    5. Re: Fatigue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I understand quite well, thanks. What you don't understand is:
      (1 slagged reactor)/(700 million cubic kilometers of water in Pacific) =~ 0 for all intents and purposes.

      I will say it again: measurable != dangerous.

      Perhaps you should read about the lead, arsenic, and mercury in your drinking water supply EPA report. I guarantee that there is some, even if it's not reported.

      Like I said: calm down.

    6. Re:Fatigue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the water has cooled down to ambient why cant it be reused. It seems odd that they seem to be using and storing such huge quantities of cooling water. I cant imagine the contamination in the water would matter if your just putting it back in the "cycle". Anyone know what stops them doing that ?

    7. Re: Fatigue by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I will say it again: measurable != dangerous.

      Like I said: a poor understanding of the situation.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    8. Re:Fatigue by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Chernobyl was x times worse than Fukushima and we didn't see a cancer epidemic in Europe and the middle east.

      Educating yourself about which international organisation has interdiction authority over the W.H.O in publishing results for Nuclear matters may assist you finding that actual truth here. Hint: it has I and A and E and A in its name.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    9. Re:Fatigue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were problems with thyroid cancer after Chernobyl because they didn't give those affected iodine supplements to flush out any radioactive iodine in their bodies (specifically the thyroid where iodine concentrates). The Japanese didn't make the same mistake after Fukushima so there shouldn't be any significant increase in thyroid cancer.

      The longer the half-life of a radioactive material, the less radioactive and therefore less dangerous it is. What you need to worry about is the isotopes with short half-lives.

    10. Re:Fatigue by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Also, there are no established safe procedures for these improvised systems. This means you actually have to understand what you are doing. As not even the TEPCO reactor designers and operators had that level of insight, how are low-level workers supposed to move safely in such an environment? I expect we will see a lot of cancer casualties in the next 10-20 years among these workers.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  18. Yup by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    More than likely the workers are all getting fatigued and small mistakes are starting.

    It's well beyond time for the Japanese government to bring the Japanese military in to bring this under control. After that an international effort to assist Japan in any way required. Even considering the pride of the nation as a factor it's now becoming an international problem for any country that shares the pacific ocean.

    This is well beyond TEPCO's ability and expertise, they are a utilities company. Furthermore it was their negligence through nonfeasance that got us into this mess in the first place. A criminal investigation should be conducted and the future of the company considered.

    Replying to you because I accidentally moderated "Offtopic" instead of "Insightful", oops. Apropos of your comment, I'm really tired today and it's been a long day at work.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  19. Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by gargleblast · · Score: 1, Informative

    News from Fukushima? Excellent! Let me update my Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report. Here it was yesterday:

    Deaths..Injuries/Illness..Location/Cause
    .....0.................2..Fukushima Daiichi NPP (Radiation exposure)
    .....2................37..Fukushima Daiichi NPP (Earthquake / tsunami)
    .15000..............6000..Rest of Japan

    Here it is today:

    Deaths..Injuries/Illness..Location/Cause
    .....0.................2..Fukushima Daiichi NPP (Radiation exposure)
    .....2................37..Fukushima Daiichi NPP (Earthquake / tsunami)
    .15000..............6000..Rest of Japan

    1. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and here is your little chart if we keep trusting mere mortals with the power to create a country sized wasteland:

      Deaths..Injuries/Illness..Location/Cause
      999999999999999999999999..Fukushima Daiichi NPP (Radiation exposure)
      999999999999999999999999.Fukushima Daiichi NPP (Earthquake / tsunami)
      999999999999999999999999..Rest of Japan

      That is one hell of a 10,000year - 100,000 year long mistake. Which could very well happen at those timescales, even if its rare, even if its got 8 safeties. We are all fallible human beings running this shit after all. No amount of clean, "safe", cheap power should be worth the risk of generating pollution lasting tens of thousands of years.

      --
      -
    2. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chemical sources of power and industrial activity often generate pollution lasting indefinite timescales, not just tens of thousands of years.

      Nuclear power creates stuff that is radioactively hot for awhile. Not a super-long time. The stuff with the really long half-lives is by definition not so radioactive.

      Yes, the waste is more radioactive than the input fuel for 10,000 to 50,000 years (and afterwards less). But it's really only super super radioactive for a few hundred years. A lot of the chemical waste we're making may still be a problem in millions.

    3. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      There's a long term cost here which isn't just measured in lives (though hundreds will die eventually of related cancers from the clean up crews due to incompetence, coverups and negligence in exposing them over accepted limits). While the tsunami is over, the costs of the nuclear plant problems are still climbing, with no end in site, and 20km of land is now unusable, including several towns.

      The Fukushima cleanup costs are 5 trillion yen and climbing (50 billion USD), likely to hit hundreds of billions of dollars long-term.

    4. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      We are all fallible human beings running this shit after all. No amount of clean, "safe", cheap power should be worth the risk of generating pollution lasting tens of thousands of years.

      Think of the big picture: Pollution or not, Humans WILL become extinct unless they achieve extraplanetary footholds of life.

      What better motivator to fund space agencies than, "Oh fuck! The whole planet is screwed!"

    5. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the long run, we are all dead.

      The biggest casualties from Fukushima are the Chinese coal miners.
      1.000-2.000 every year.

      It is the substitution of nuclear energy by coal that costs lives. Not the other way around.
      But those are the lives of Chinese peasants. So nobody cares.

    6. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Lying with statistics done well! An impressive example!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re: Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think of the little picture. you're an idiot.
      if you think the universe is going to allow a moron like you muck up the works, you got another thing coming
      extinction is a design process.
      "everybody's gotta die sometime red"

    8. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      There's a long term cost here which isn't just measured in lives ... likely to hit hundreds of billions of dollars

      Funny, I usually hear this meme the other way around. Try and google measured in dollars:

      Not all that matters is measured in dollars
      Success is not measured in dollars
      The true cost of war is not measured in dollars
      Our lives are not measured in dollars
      Benefits cannot be measured in dollars
      College value is not measured in dollars

      Now Fukushima. Of Fukushima, you say "the cost isn't just measured in lives. Think of the dollars."

      Why is that, Serious Callers Only? Too few injuries for your liking? Not enough dead? 15000 people died in a tsunami. Thousands die annually from coal mining. From skin cancer from sunburn. From lung cancer from smoking. But only two people got beta burns at Fukushima, got treated at hospital and went home. And now probably do non-nuclear work back at TEPCO. And all over the world, slashdotters and bloggers are crying "OH NOES! THE FACTS DOES NOT SUPPORT MY WORLDVIEW!"

      Well if the facts don't support your worldview, one of them must be wrong. And you know what? It ain't the fucking facts.

      So GET A GRIP. ON REALITY. Sometime. SOON.

    9. Re:Tohoku Earthquake Casualty Report by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      Lying with statistics done well! An impressive example!

      Thanks, I guess. But I would dearly like to see how you, personally, would go about "telling the truth with statistics."

  20. Let's all do the TEPKO HAIKU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TEPCO Workers Remove Wrong Pipe
    Get Splashed With Radioactive Water
    Three Eyed Fish Swims Out

    1. Re:Let's all do the TEPKO HAIKU by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      TEPCO, Forrest Gump. Stupid is as Stupid Does. radioactive.

  21. TEPCO still in charge by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    It is difficult to understand why TEPCO is still in charge. Their record for managing this mess is not appealing.

  22. Radioactive is Now Only Toxic? by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    I grow tired to reading with radiative elements and contaminated materials being labeled merely "toxic."

    Sitting in a room for few hours with a closed bottle of bleach won't terminally wound you, not like the water leaking from the Fukishima plant.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Radioactive is Now Only Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sitting in a room with an open bottle of bleach for a few hours, however might cause you issues, depending how large the bottle, and how small the room.
      Sitting in a room and getting splashed with bleach unexpectedly probably *will* cause you issues more severe than what these folks will experience from this incident.

      Living within 10 miles of a coal power plant means that *daily*, you're exposed to 10-100 times the radiation levels that the people around Fukishima have been exposed to. Coal-burning power plants release into the air more radioactive materials over a single decade than all nuclear power incidents in the history of the world, including Chernobyl and Fukishima. Bump that timeline up to 2 decades, and you can throw in every nuclear *weapon* incident in the world, including the two nukes we dropped on Japan.

      But I guess we shouldn't let a little perspective interfere with your panic mongering.

  23. Is MR bruns running the place? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    It seems a lot like SNPP

  24. Is this.... by wcrisman · · Score: 1

    the plant where Homer Simpson is working?

    1. Re:Is this.... by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

      The goggles! They do nothing!

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. RAC by koan · · Score: 1

    Radioactive Clown Music.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  27. seriously? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    My last post on this topic a couple days ago was "I'm starting to get the impression that Tepco only hired idiots." This has now been 100% confirmed.

  28. Re:Oblig, thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to make the same comment. It is getting ridiculous every time something happens at the facility slashdot reports it as if no other nuclear disaster had it mistakes.

    Having said that I would expect TEPCO to learn lessons from others mistakes. However this is only really the second such MAJOR failure/meltdown of a nuclear plant.

  29. Really silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So .... why not have colour coded pipes? It's not like the pipes are multiuse. Unless they don't want to freak the workers out.

  30. Well a couple of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The reactors were too old. They should have been mothballed 15 years ago. The failsafe system was redundant, but not inherent. This is a mistake. If the workers need a complex set of maps and drawings and with all their skill and caution, they still make a mistake, then clearly the design of the plant is overly complex. I know there are people who cry out "destroy them all", but really, there is no good replacement for nuclear power. Wind, water and solar are no replacement. They just aren't. Where I live, its 8 watts per square metre. 8 watts during the daytime, at its peak. 8 watts if the panels were 100% efficient. That's what the sun puts out. My house uses a lot more power than that. Cutting back is not an option when its in the middle of winter. I already use LED lighting. I already use efficient equipment. We need nuclear power. We need clean, safe, nuclear power. We need modern designs. 99.9% of all nuclear plants use a 50 year old design. Modern designs don't have the problems of older systems. Why do we still use them?

  31. Re:Oblig, thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is getting ridiculous every time something happens at the facility slashdot reports it as if no other nuclear disaster had it mistakes.

    It's salamitaktik from Tepco and the nuclear power industry's reputation managers. .

    They're releasing a steady stream of "meh" stories to desensitize the public in the leadup to a genuinely damaging story. Something has gone badly wrong, and they'll tell us about it when we're all thoroughly jaded with these puff-pieces.

    Slashdot reports it as news, because that's what it's being paid to do.

  32. Measurable - yes. Harmful - unlikely by Goonie · · Score: 1

    Yes, it would be detectable. But that doesn't mean it would be at levels that pose a significant incremental risk to the wider ocean environment or human health.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  33. Call in the military - the universal solution by Goonie · · Score: 1
    Militaries tend to be expert in fighting wars. They are not expert in civilian nuclear power plants and environmental remediation.

    Should we militarize the entire American workforce given that 13 Americans die every day in workplace accidents?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  34. Re:Oblig, thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to make the same comment. It is getting ridiculous every time something happens at the facility slashdot reports it as if no other nuclear disaster had it mistakes.

    Having said that I would expect TEPCO to learn lessons from others mistakes. However this is only really the second such MAJOR failure/meltdown of a nuclear plant.

    Well, it might be they keep making mistakes, it might be they're just paying for past mistakes. Kind of like whatever ass goblin did the wiring in our datacenter originally; the wire which is normally color coded to mean 'ground' in fact carries live current. (that was a fun outage) So maybe they removed the wrong pipe, and maybe they removed the one the design said they should, only it wasn't what it said it should be. The story doesn't really give any details.

  35. another mod up, please by ridgecritter · · Score: 1

    Great link, thank you.

  36. Not TEPCO per se... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all likelihood, it was a second or third tier subcontractor's contract/temp employee who did this. Which means that was probably a somewhat recently unemployed and possibly homeless person from Osaka trucked up by mafia-shady subcontractors on 6 month or less contracts. No TEPCO boys dirtying their dainty hands.

    The real kicker is the 2 year contract worker limits on employment means there will be precious few contractor employees on site with more than 2 years experience (hell, most probably got bounced at 6 months). The contract employee hiring merry-go-round is so fast that proper documentation of rad exposure to the workers is hopelessly failing, which is particularly bad as this would normally be considered a particularly socially vulnerable class of worker.

    TEPCO has for a long time before the accident been using homeless subcontractor workers for high rad maintenance work (turbine and steam pipe inspection/cleaning) who are dismissed after exceeding estimated lifetime dosages (you think they actually clocked the individual workers with dosage film badges?), so this is standard operating policy for them. Why are we still leaving them in charge?

  37. Don't be silly by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    They got people in Japan who can read Japanese signs. Chinese vistors!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  38. There haven't been that many people, ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't realize made-up numbers were so insightful. If you added up everyone who ever lived, you'd still be several orders of magnitude too large.

    Besides, you're not very informed. It's the short-lived contamination you have to worry about. I'm much more worried about highly radioactive waste that might contaminate an area for ~30-50 years, than some lousy, low-grade radiation that might raise the natural background radiation level by some pitiful percentage of the radiation dose you get from eating a banana for a thousand years.

    Finally, if you're you want extinction-level events to worry about, watch out for large comets and asteroids, or nuclear war. It's simply not realistic to expect a power plant to destroy everything. Not even Chernobyl managed that, and it was as bad as we've ever seen.

    1. Re:There haven't been that many people, ever. by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And apparently an earthquake is going to kill quadrillions. Welcome to the New Slashdot. Where Facts are Flamebait, and Idiocy and Innumeracy are Insightful.

  39. song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A silly old bastard was milking a cow
    The silly old bastard he didn't know how
    He pulled on the tail instead of the tit
    The silly old bastard got covered in shit

  40. Re:Measurable - yes. Harmful - unlikely by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Would it be detectable? The background radiation would be many times higher than anything Fukushima caused, unless the type of radiation is different enough to pick out of the background.

  41. More proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again more proof that TEPCO should receive an award for providing equal opportunity employment to the mentally handicapped!

  42. The people working there are probably not by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    The people working there are probably not very qualified or intelligent, I mean anyone who was would not be there. These people probably can't find work elsewhere. I imagine the danger pay of being around that much radiation is very attractive to certain people, who are willing to take the risk of cancer in later life for money now.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  43. Let's see... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Known unstable and dangerously radioactive environment. Workers fully aware of dangers and thus, arguably, more than a little careful about their every move. And still, dangerous mistakes were made. Given the profound consequences of human mistakes in the operation of nuclear reactors, tell me why, again, that it's a good idea to build them?

    1. Re:Let's see... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Simple: Satisfy greed for power in politicians that want the bomb or want to be able to build it fast if needed. Satisfy greed for money (and lots and lots of it) in the nuclear industry.

      No rational reasons otherwise. And we are burning nuclear fuel that will be essential should we ever want to travel around this solar system. Wasting precious resources in this stupid way could well kill or much delay colonization of the solar system.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re: Let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the alternative to letting a few people kill themselves is balanced against a large segment of your society freezing to death in the dark. Of course you know that, and you also know the real problem is assholes. anyone is capable of accident prevention. but the real problem is, the same people that don't want to freeze to death in the dark don't know how to operate much of anything. cars, computers, knives and forks. - and governments.
      See. "THEY" get "THEM" to do it. it's really not anybodys problem, so it's not a problem.

  44. Well I happen to know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    As a nuclear industry insider, I'm privileged to have access to Institute of Nuclear Power Operators (INPO) industry updates, the communication system we use to talk about incidents like this. (No, it won't be made public, Ralph Nader already tried. And that's also why I'm posting AC)

    Yes, occasionally incidents like this happen. There are 100 reactors at 60 sites in the US, and at each of those reactors, 6-12 pieces of equipment get tagged out, dissambled and worked on each day. Offhand, I'd say incidents 'like' this (That is to say, embarassing screw-ups with managable consequences but no catastrophic outcome) happen perhaps 5 times a year. (100 reactors*250 working days*6 work items = >150,000 oppurtunities for errors.)

    It wouldn't be accurate to say that it's not closely scrutinized- the resident NRC inspector at each site is aware of everything that happens at each site. As long as the incidents are managed properly and happen rarely, these incidents won't even be a footnote in the NRC public reports.

    From what I understand, the NRC is much more strigent than the japanese equivalent, and US Nuclear Emergency Preparedness has always been way ahead of the Japanese. After 9/11, for example, the NRC ordered a whole new level disaster response capability for every US nuclear site. I would say that if the japanese had done the same, the Fukushima Diachii Reactor cores would still be intact. The NRC has ordered new post-Fukushima contigency plans, but these additional measures are rather simple given that they build on post-9/11 contigencies finished years ago.

  45. Re:Oblig, thank you by fritsd · · Score: 1

    It's salamitaktik from Tepco and the nuclear power industry's reputation managers. .
    They're releasing a steady stream of "meh" stories to desensitize the public in the leadup to a genuinely damaging story. Something has gone badly wrong, and they'll tell us about it when we're all thoroughly jaded with these puff-pieces.

    I read somewhere that they're soon going to begin trying to pull the 1331 rods out of spent fuel pool #4 (the full one on the first floor), one by one, without dropping any to the bottom of the pool. That sounded like a very risky but necessary operation. I sincerely hope that there won't be *any* news about it except for before and after the successful operation.
    GO TEPCO! The world doesn't hate you, it cheers you on, guys and gals!

    PS. Triskaidekaphobia is lame.

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  46. The "protection" is not worth much by gweihir · · Score: 1

    The only protection worthwhile is protecting the respiratory and digestive system, because anything going in that way will stay long. These people got the same dosage as if they had been doing this naked, but with filter-masks. Might not be a good idea for any of them to reproduce now and they have won a significantly increased risk of cancer as reward for their incompetence.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  47. Re: Oblig, thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is "don't hire dumbasses" a lesson or a rule?
    surgeons spend 10's of thousands in x marks the spot training. Nature compensates by giving u two of most things.

  48. Re:Oblig, thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >second such MAJOR failure/meltdown

    Wrong.

    Just for starters:

        SL-1 prototype at the National Reactor Testing Station (three killed)
        WindScale (Sellafield)
        Fermi Fast Breeder (we just got lucky or Detroit would have been trashed)
        Lucens reactor, Vaud, Switzerland

    The list is LONG.

    en. wikipedia.org/wiki /Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents