Slashdot Mirror


Foxconn Accused of Forcing InternsTo Build PS4s Or Lose School Credit

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from a short article at Geek.com, based on this Chinese newspaper report (Google translation) that thousands of students have been (figuratively) press-ganged into assembling PlayStation 4 consoles, ahead of the PS4's November launch. From the article: "The students involved were offered internships at the company while studying an IT engineering course. But those that accepted aren't being assigned work that matches their course or skill set. Instead, they are being put on the production lines. The reason it is being called a forced internship is because if any of the students refuse to do the work they are assigned, six credits will be deducted from their course total. Without those six credits it's thought to be impossible to pass, meaning the students have to do the work or risk losing their qualification."

196 comments

  1. better than building Xbones. by harddriveerror · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Just Saying

    1. Re:better than building Xbones. by wynterwynd · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are building Xbones. Foxconn is making both consoles and I have little doubt that students are building both, yet it's the PS4 that gets pushed to the forefront.

      How about an article titled "Foxconn Accused of Forcing Interns to Do Assembly Line Work or Lose School Credit"? I guess that wouldn't have as much sizzle, now would it? And then we couldn't show our displeasure with our wallets, to the benefit of Sony's competitors.

      --
      "Not all who wander are lost" -- JRR Tolkien
    2. Re:better than building Xbones. by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1

      Foxconn have the contract to assemble the Xbox 720 as well - not to mention Nintendo consoles. I remember pointing this out after a smug ex-MSFT blogger posted a link about Foxconn, bragging that Foxconn would never meet Microsoft's supplier criteria, so Apple must have lower standards...

    3. Re: better than building Xbones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SlaveStation

  2. Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slavery? Nah. Wage slavery! It's new, you'll like it. Or else.

    1. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Wage Slavery, but Grade Slavery.

    2. Re:Everything old is new again. by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      You know, as much as it sucks and is a screw over, the students still likely have much better prospects than the non-student workers at foxconn. And I'm not necessarily saying it's good for the students.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    3. Re:Everything old is new again. by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      In all fairness to Foxconn, these interns did voluntarily enroll in the School of Hard Knocks.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    4. Re:Everything old is new again. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      bribing of the school officials bribery.

      it's their fault. they shouldn't be providing credits for assembly work in the first place!

      *unless of course the school is actually an assembler school, ;) just not the kind of assembler course they thought it would be..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Everything old is new again. by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure that assembly line work isn't going to improve their prospects much. Foxconn may have fed them a line that this is a "show of dedication" that's going to improve their chances of getting hired for management or executive positions, or some such horseshit. But at the end of the day, they've only shown themselves to be desperate slaves. And that's not going to earn them any respect, from Foxconn or anyone else.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    6. Re:Everything old is new again. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Slavery? Nah. Wage slavery! It's new, you'll like it. Or else.

      Except that it is not new. Since the 1950s, students in China have been required to work in factories, farms, or military service. It is not supposed to be an "internship" related to their work, but rather normal work to give them an appreciation of the proletariat/peasant/soldier. They are treated the same, and paid the same, as the other workers. Building PS4s is probably an easier assignment than 99% of the students get, so they should stop whining, and get the job done. If they don't like it, I am sure some students assigned to mosquito infested rice paddies would be happy to swap with them.

      These students are going to be the future leaders, in both business and politics. It is reasonable to require them to have an appreciation for the people they will be leading.

      My wife is Chinese, and during college she spent six months working in a car factory in Tianjin, installing door handles. She remembers it as a mostly positive experience.

    7. Re:Everything old is new again. by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Honestly not a bad system even if all they learn is why they should continue their education. My family did not require my economic contribution when I was a child but from the age of 15 I held various jobs for spending money, car insurance and most importantly to my parents so I could see what sort of someone without much education would be likely to get. Once you have spent a summer of 8-12 hour days washing dishes you know you would like to do more with your life.

    8. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This does not strike me as much worse than what other countries do with required internships as part of educations - which companies use to get a cheap/free naive youngster to make them coffee or whatever else they can't be arse to do themself.

    9. Re:Everything old is new again. by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's an experience which should bar Chinese products from being imported under the laws which forbid imports produced by slave or other forced labor.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    10. Re:Everything old is new again. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Yes, but it's an experience which should bar Chinese products from being imported under the laws which forbid imports produced by slave or other forced labor.

      Withholding college credit hardly counts as "forced labor". In America, if you don't work, they withhold your paycheck. That is even more coercive.

    11. Re:Everything old is new again. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Not at all.
      A paycheck is what you get for work, not a grade.

      If they want to pay these kids as well as give them a grade that would be fine.

    12. Re:Everything old is new again. by operagost · · Score: 0

      Don't like it? There's the window!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are fine with the products of companies that benefited from unpaid intern work in North America being banned for import into other countries?

    14. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These students are going to be the future leaders, in both business and politics. It is reasonable to require them to have an appreciation for the people they will be leading.

      And when those students become the future leaders in business/politics; when asked why they're employ forced student labor in their factories/militaries, they will simply say that was how they were raised and whiners should suck it up.

    15. Re:Everything old is new again. by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Actually if you read the law in question then you'll see that forced labor is defined so it's under "menace of penalty". I suppose a lawyer could argue the credits are a reward for the course and not a penalty and thus legal, but that would be defying the spirit of the law.

      I'd like to see U.S. customs seize the items the moment they hit our borders, but I doubt they will.

      Freedom for all, except if you're a large corporation, it seems.

    16. Re:Everything old is new again. by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      A bit of a correction:

      I seem to have misunderstood the article. If they are penalizing credits for quitting, then it does count as forced labor. Keep in mind "offer himself voluntarily" doesn't apply if you offer yourself for an electrical engineering position but they make you clean toilets. Which is synonymous to what they're doing here.

    17. Re:Everything old is new again. by SteveFoerster · · Score: 4, Funny

      And not press-ganged, but Shanghaied.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    18. Re:Everything old is new again. by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      These students are going to be the future leaders, in both business and politics. It is reasonable to require them to have an appreciation for the people they will be leading.

      Well said. Everyone who manages labour workers should have done that work at one time, from the CEO on down. But since that's never going to happen I suggest that the CEO's office be placed in the middle of the factory floor. No walls either, just right out in the open.

    19. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be fine with this. Unpaid intern work is bullshit. Back in my day (ha) we had Cooperative Education. No course credit, instead you actually got paid for your work. And I actually learned something during my assignments: I wasn't just making coffee or sorting files.

    20. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internships in the US do the same kinds of things, You intern at a company, you'll be doing their dirty work with a small compliment of useful experience.

      If you interned at Wal Mart, don't think you wouldn't be stocking shelves.

    21. Re:Everything old is new again. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So you are fine with the products of companies that benefited from unpaid intern work in North America being banned for import into other countries?

      You seem to suffer from two misunderstandings:
      1. Unpaid internships involving productive (rather than just educational) work are illegal in the United States.
      2. The Chinese internships are not unpaid either. They receive the same wages as other assembly line workers.

    22. Re:Everything old is new again. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      If they want to pay these kids as well as give them a grade that would be fine.

      The students are paid the same as other assembly line workers. The English article says they are not paid, but that is wrong. The original article, in Chinese, explicitly says that they are paid (yes, I can read Chinese). I am also somewhat familiar with these internships. I lived in Shanghai for several years, and my company had an electronics assembly plant in Pudong. We had some interns there, and I wanted to use some of the engineering undergrads to do actual engineering rather than assembly line work. But I found out that was against the rules. They had to do "proletariat" work on the assembly line, not desk work. They were paid the same as other assembly workers, and were treated the same in every way.

    23. Re:Everything old is new again. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me then.
      I wish we could do that in the states. It would be a great educational experience. Not only urging the kids on, but for them to see the life of the normal person.

    24. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If unpaid internship WERE illegal in the US, then the DA would filing charges and not the students filing lawsuits. If the laws are enforced, then unpaid internships would not be an issue. I am sure that their legal departments of these major corporations would have know better.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/30/us/interns-resist-working-free.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
      NEW YORK — A backlash against unpaid internships in America, manifested in a spate of lawsuits this year, is now spreading to Europe, where the issue of exploitation hit headlines in August with the death of the German intern Moritz Erhardt, 21, after allegedly working at Merrill Lynch’s London office for 72 hours without sleep.

    25. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These students are going to be the future leaders, in both business and politics. It is reasonable to require them to have an appreciation for the people they will be leading.

      Well said. Everyone who manages labour workers should have done that work at one time, from the CEO on down. But since that's never going to happen I suggest that the CEO's office be placed in the middle of the factory floor. No walls either, just right out in the open.

      That might make it a little hard to focus.

    26. Re:Everything old is new again. by Mitchell314 · · Score: 2

      And I'm not necessarily saying it's good for the students.

      The point that you and the moderator missed is not that the students are better for it; it's that it's an indicator of how bad the company manages it's human resources. And since the students are temporarily working while getting degrees to make them competitive, and yet this is how they're treated, then this is only the tip of the ice berg for the poor folks stuck to the company in the long run.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    27. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly not a bad system even if all they learn is why they should continue their education. My family did not require my economic contribution when I was a child but from the age of 15 I held various jobs for spending money, car insurance and most importantly to my parents so I could see what sort of someone without much education would be likely to get. Once you have spent a summer of 8-12 hour days washing dishes you know you would like to do more with your life.

      I envy people with drive. I worked for UPS putting packages into cars a few summers. The pay was ok for a summer job, and while I had no qualms about the work itself, it wouldn't pay enough to support me buying more toys.

      Now I work in software engineering, it pays better, and I can buy more toys. I care about quality in my toys and code. But I wouldn't mind doing menial work if it actually paid enough. Doing 12 hour days systematically would be illegal here.

    28. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you DON'T do the work DOES something bad happen to you?

      Yes.

      Sounds like slavery to me. Just because the bad thing isn't being beaten doesn't make it not wrong....

      And here people are arguing this is a GOOD thing for the world... Pretty fucking sad imo.

    29. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it assumed that getting an education makes a difference? Because of the correlation between it and the better jobs? Correlation isn't causation.

      In North America the *majority* of people are going to college/university. Somehow, the majority of jobs didn't suddenly become cushy desk jobs. Instead, many of them are finding they are in the same position they were after high school, but with a lot more debt.

      The drive to find decent employment is what matters. For some people, that happens when they work a shitty job. For others it's debts. And for some it's just the lust for wealth. For many people, it just never happens at all. For almost none the driver is having gotten an education.

    30. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need money for food and rent, and the main way of getting money is through labor, isn't all work forced? These Chinese at least will have a better understanding of real life than the fat American students who will be playing on the PS4s while they get a passing grade in journalism or English and then find out they can only get a job flipping burgers.

    31. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly not a bad system even if all they learn is why they should continue their education. My family did not require my economic contribution when I was a child but from the age of 15 I held various jobs for spending money, car insurance and most importantly to my parents so I could see what sort of someone without much education would be likely to get. Once you have spent a summer of 8-12 hour days washing dishes you know you would like to do more with your life.

      Doing it by choice is completely different from being forced to do it.

    32. Re:Everything old is new again. by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure that assembly line work isn't going to improve their prospects much.

      That's not necessarily true.

      If these are hardware engineering interns, then spending a day or two working every position in the assembly line for a short period of time could be a valuable job skill. By letting them see firsthand what parts of the design are assembled easily and what parts aren't, they would have a better idea of what works and what doesn't (and why), which might actually make them better design engineers.

      Similarly, if their internship is in manufacturing management, then seeing what workers have to do can make them better able to understand the challenges that their future employees will face.

      If, on the other hand, they're spending a month doing it, or if their internship is in an area other than hardware design or manufacturing management, then yeah, they're just getting screwed.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    33. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that is an interesting view from the Chinese perspective. But from the American perspective, we should not purchase anything which was created in a system of labor which we would not want to live in ourselves. Besides the golden-rule aspect, there is also rational self interest. Supporting that system will only lead to ourselves becoming part of that system.

    34. Re:Everything old is new again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and this is why you became a teacher, right? because you realised the value of education in improving lives, having seen first hand the effects of inadequate access to education, and wanted to do something to help improve the lives of others, right?

      right?

      or were the other dish-washers around you not actually people, but mere object lessons in your own superiority?

    35. Re:Everything old is new again. by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      A day or two, I agree. This isn't a day or two, and they're not rotating every job in the factory for a short while. They're sitting down for a few months in a single spot of the assembly line.

    36. Re:Everything old is new again. by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      These internships aren't payed, big difference.

  3. Time to Re-evaluate by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Any executive worth his/her weight in warm spit would look at the problems Foxconn is constantly having and give a hard second look at producing equipment in the states. Tesla has revolutionized car manufacturing, so could the electronics industry.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This stuff causes a lot of waste. We don't want it here.

    2. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. Assembly is fairly clean, and the chips are going to be made anyway. And then, there's the savings in marine diesel from not having to ship it back from overseas. Lastly, I think we'd rather have the jobs over here. . .

    3. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Any executive worth his/her weight in warm spit would look at the problems Foxconn is constantly having and give a hard second look at producing equipment in the states.

      Sadly, most executives are going to say "are we still profitable? Awesome" and not give a damn.

      Making the equipment in the US will likely cost more, cut down on profits, and therefore reduce executive bonuses.

      The current mentality says "cheap as possible and cut as many jobs as you can". I don't see that changing any time soon.

      Most executives are worth their weight in warm spit, and that's the problem.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by alen · · Score: 1

      that would be kind of awesome

      instead of me paying to send my kids to camp, i'll get paid to send them to build some electronics for 18 hours a day

    5. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      'cause a very expensive luxury car and mass market consumer electronics have similar margins and assembly requirements. Where'd you get your armchair economist degree?

    6. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Most executives would be happy to say 'we'll accept a slightly lower margin if we can make up for it in sales volume because more people will buy our product if we can guarantee a certain standard of living for people on our production lines'. At least, they would be happy to say it if it were true. Unless people are willing to boycott Sony and not buy a PS4 over this kind of thing, they have no incentive to stop.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by khallow · · Score: 1

      Any executive worth his/her weight in warm spit would look at the problems Foxconn is constantly having and give a hard second look at producing equipment in the states.

      These "problems" aren't so for Foxconn. An ammoral government-backed business turns cheap labor and resources into high value products. It's not teaching the lesson you think it is.

      Tesla has revolutionized car manufacturing, so could the electronics industry.

      Tesla's tricks work just as well in China and a lot of the costs would be cheaper. The difference is that Elon Musk lives in the US not in China.

    8. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Executives? What about the masses running to WalMart every payday to buy as much crap to stuff in their homes as they can get even if they never use it?
       
      Always pointing fingers at the corporations when the reality is that if the consumer gave a crap about Chinese slavery we wouldn't be reading stories like this. So don't act like it's the CEOs who are devils and Joe Sixpack is a fantastic human being ala Sister Theresa.
       
      It's just like the "green" economy. I worked in retail for a lot of years in my youth and the number of green product I seen that came and went was staggering. Why? Because adding another 5% to the price of a product dooms it in the eyes of the consumer even if it's for a cause the same consumer claims to support.
       
      If you don't support your ideals with your dollars than you don't really support it at all. Instead the so-called progressives would just rather sit back and wait for the government to do something. It'll be a cold day in hell that'll ever happen now that the partnership between corporations and the government is forged in steel and is as evident as the clear summer sun.
       
      Most consumers are just as guilty as most executives. Put that in your pipe and smoke it tonight.

    9. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Lastly, I think we'd rather have the jobs over here. . .

      And Sony (a Japanese firm) would give a damn about that why?

      Obviously, they've done the math, and even with all of the shipping costs, it's cheaper to have someone in China who gets paid very little than it would be to have people in places where wages are higher do the work.

      And I'm sure they'll just say "hey, we're complying with local labor laws, we're the good guys".

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Cost increases are insignificant and may actually be a savings if you can call them part of your marketing budget. Now if you think 100 Chinese workers will turn into 100 American workers you are deluded. More like 10 Americans and the rest of the jobs will be replaced with automation. This will also cut QA jobs since machines don't do worse on Friday at 16:30 as they are not eager to leave nor a Monday at 8:00 from a hangover.

    11. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Someone would have to offer a competing product that did that first. If box MS and Sony decline to do so the buyer cannot vote with his dollars for that option. Declining to buy only sends the message that the good is not attractive to that buyer not why.

      A new competitor could take that risk, I think someone building SteamBoxes might. They have a lot less to risk and can be more willing to take chances. Since there will be many builders it also presents less risk to the platform.

    12. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The folks who are buying at walmart likely can't afford the extra 5%. Same thing with those green products. The 100k and up households, many of those populated by these executive devils are the ones buying a lot of that green stuff and keeping any of those companies in business.

      Education is also a problem. I have some not well off in laws, they were spending a fortune on batteries for kids toys. They had no idea there was another option. We bought them some eneloops and a fancy charger. Sure this means they have to have some extra batteries on hand, since charging takes some time, but the savings are there. The cheapest AAs I saw on amazon were $0.24 a battery. The eneloops might be 10 times as much but they will last for 1500 charges and the kids will go through 10 charges in a very short time.

      On the other hand the layout for the smart charger and the batteries would have been a major purchase for them. I am not sure they really had that option, unless they stopped buying the Alkaline batteries to save up those funds. Also they tend to shop at stores were only very bad rechargeables are commonly available.

      Here is my pinko communist idea about this; the battery sellers should be forced to list the mAh on the box when selling them. Not sure if that is too much government regulation for you, but markets work better when all participants have the information they need to make proper decisions.

    13. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sister theresa was no saint, btw.

    14. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      "if we can guarantee a certain standard of living for people on our production lines"

      You actually think Humans care about that?. It's a slim minority, most likely countable on your fingers. And boycott? yeah THAT'S worked well in the past. We still see things like the Foxconn incident precisely because of lack of care and no willingness, except for a handful of people, to do anything about it as long as they can get their product. I've learned to accept that, because it's not going to change and I can't change it.

    15. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And the reason no one does this?

      Simple. It's because the moment someone slaps a sustainable or sweatless sticker on their E-product, people are going to start looking at where the caps, commodity chips and resistors come from. Are the components 100% made without slave labour? Can their million part suppliers guarantee this all the time. It becomes a very risky business proposition and a PR disaster waiting to befell any competing product thats dares to promise that which cannot be ever guaranteed.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    16. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Which is why you say assembled in $X. You do the best you can.

      The folks who nitpick like that tend to be folks who will never buy anyway though. Like people who claim hybrids save no money, but drive SUVs. The SUV saves no money and in fact wastes it but they just want to be assholes anyway.

    17. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Most executives would be happy to say 'we'll accept a slightly lower margin if we can make up for it in sales volume because more people will buy our product if we can guarantee a certain standard of living for people on our production lines'.

      Nah, most executives prefer to trick people into believing that while still manufacturing in China.

      Proof? Labels that say stuff like "Designed in California"...

      --
      No sig today...
    18. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing my point where the standard is a moving target. I don't disagree with what you've said, (I drive a small fuel efficient SUV, but I'm a goalie and need to lug a giant hockey bag that never quite fit in my Corrolla), but I also understand why companies do not commit to hitting the target of utopian, sustainable manufacture. Until replication technology is available, no one will be happy with their commitments when it comes to input (slave, union, living wage labour) and output (price, availability).

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    19. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The folks who are buying at walmart likely can't afford the extra 5%.
       
      Maybe you haven't been to a WalMart recently but about 90% of their goods fall under the non-essential category. If these people can't afford 5% for essentials then maybe they don't need a 46 inch LCD TV, a BluRay player and 50 discs to go with it. You're clearly thinking of the thrift store... where people go to pay 5 dollars for a 40 dollar pair of pants because someone thought they were worthless because a drop of bleach got dripped on the cuff of the legging. There's a gulf of difference in the lifestyles of the two consumers.
       
        Same thing with those green products.
       
      If you can afford beef as a main course 5 nights a week for your meal, you can afford 5% to make a difference. Stop crying poverty where there is no poverty. the excuse gets old. People spending themselves into debt by buying smartphones, tablets and huge TVs with bigger cable bills is not poverty. It's stupidity.
       
        Education is also a problem. I have some not well off in laws, they were spending a fortune on batteries for kids toys. They had no idea there was another option. We bought them some eneloops and a fancy charger. Sure this means they have to have some extra batteries on hand, since charging takes some time, but the savings are there. The cheapest AAs I saw on amazon were $0.24 a battery. The eneloops might be 10 times as much but they will last for 1500 charges and the kids will go through 10 charges in a very short time.
       
      Ignorance is not a valid excuse either. And if they're "not well off" then why exactly are they buying toys that batteries used in? I'm sorry, I know it's 2013 but the toys and gadgets are still non-essential. If these people would knuckle down and not let themselves be nickled and dimed into poverty they might actually have enough money to make life better for themselves all around. When I was in my teens there was a choice between an Nintendo 8-bit and a Commodore 64. I decided on the Commodore. If my parents told me that I couldn't have either I would have dealt with it as there was plenty of other stuff I did without because my parents had priorities. I didn't suffer for it. In fact, I was better off for it.
       
        Here is my pinko communist idea about this; the battery sellers should be forced to list the mAh on the box when selling them. Not sure if that is too much government regulation for you, but markets work better when all participants have the information they need to make proper decisions.
       
      You start by claiming it's an education problem then you turn around and claim it's a regulation problem and try to soak it in with a bit of self-pity while trying to make fun of me at the same time? Really? Is that all you got going on? No wonder you think it's a government problem. You obviously are so passive-aggressive that the concept of standing up and having the man on the street actually work to make his life better without the need for a nanny state is too much for you to handle.
       
      You're probably one of those same kinds of people running around MSNBC who tried to proclaim that kids had to eat junk food and parents had to buy it for them because those nasty ad executives are too clever for the adults to resist their ploys.* If education is a problem what do you think making more information available to the consumer is going solve? The end consumer who pays through the nose for a product that isn't of the same quality of another product because they're lazy gets what they deserve.
       
      *And, sadly, yes. I really had a couple of people there tell me that they had no choice in the matter of what kind of food they bought for their children because the ads on TV were so persuasive. Sad that the same society that produced "The Greatest Generation" a mere 80 years ago has fallen into this way of thinking. I don't blame the elderly for hating the youth, seeings as what we've become in their lifetime.

    20. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I want to see this goalie stuff that does not fit in a hatchback. I have a small hatchback car and as the seats fold down I can haul a ton of stuff. Not saying you should not own an SUV, just that it would be mighty disingenuous of you to find fault with the fuel economy of my car.

      I think companies go for realistic goals and can meet them. See some restaurants not using factory farmed animals, or only organic produce.

      I would love to buy a PS4 made without this sorts of shenanigans.

    21. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      battery sellers should be forced to list the mAh on the box

      so then they would resort to making batteries with very high mAh on them, and which would only be good for a couple dozen charges before the battery doesn't hold a charge. Then you would say we need to then add how many charges til while maintaining 80% original capacity etc. and on and on. The best way is education, but that takes generations and the market is misleading all the time.

    22. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You are expecting far too much from folks. People are not like you expect.

      I am sorry that even those in poverty do not want their children to suffer. Clearly you have never been in that situation. Pray to FSM it never happens to you. The people I am speaking of have a breadwinner working 50 hours a week. How many more hours should he work? He made some mistakes as a young man and it is costing him dearly now. This is because our society gives no second chances.

      How exactly is the man on the street to choose when he does not even have access to this information? Education requires access to information. You are obviously so much of an ideologue you can't see a joke.

      I can understand a parent who works 50 hours a week for $8/hr having trouble telling his kids no. I do blame our government for making that shit cheap. Corn subsidies need to go away.

      The greatest generation was no different, go talk to some of them. The vast majority of them were idiots keeping up with the joneses as well. They hate the youth for different reasons than that. Hell, they worked less than we do. The Greatest Generation had mothers staying at home raising kids and getting buy on a single wage. They had jobs for folks like that guy I mentioned. He could get a factory job, there just aren't any.

    23. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      What problems are they having, exactly?

      They are so in demand that everyone uses them to build their stuff, and they have such control over the labor market that they can get free labor.

      If you ignore human civilization/ethics for the moment, FoxConn is doing EXACTLY what a business should do. They are literally following the text books on this.

      Tesla hasn't really revolutionized car manufacturing any more than any of several car manufactures that came, did something awesome, and still failed. Just because Tesla is the first company you've heard about doesn't mean its doing something completely out of the ordinary.

      You aren't going to 'revolutionize' low wage factory workers in America unless you simply remove the factory worker and replace them with a robot, thats the only possible way to beat what FoxConn has. American minimum wage is ridiculous compared to what the get workers for, oh and their workers are happy to be getting a paycheck at all so they can eat, unlike the fat fuck American workers who bitch about minimum wage while living on welfare and complaining about factories in China.

      And in a week, no one will give a shit that the PS4 is made in a crappy FoxConn factory the same way they don't give a shit that its made right next to the iPhones, Nexus and Galaxy devices, and Xbox One's.

      Again I ask you, what problem is FoxConn having other than you're being dramatic about this when it will have no effect on them worth mentioning. They'll have to put out a few press releases over the next month and it'll be over, things will go back to the way they were last month.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    24. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      I have a family too. It is simply not practical. Like I said I bought an efficient SUV, which is essentially a taller Camry. I tried to be responsible, but at some point I threw out my prinicipals in order to be practical.

      > See some restaurants not using factory farmed animals, or only organic produce.
      Where most people cannot afford to eat. Or simply unsustainable to feed everyone who needs food.

      You can't even buy a PC without these shenanigans, so I'm just left to wonder if we're simply being dishonest with ourselves.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    25. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Most executives would be happy to say 'we'll accept a slightly lower margin if we can make up for it in sales volume because more people will buy our product if we can guarantee a certain standard of living for people on our production lines'. At least, they would be happy to say it if it were true. Unless people are willing to boycott Sony and not buy a PS4 over this kind of thing, they have no incentive to stop.

      Thats nice and idealistic and all, but most people, including a lot of people like yourself who pretend to be high and mighty will still go out and buy a PS4 or Xbox One or iPhone or PC made with parts from FoxConn without a moments hesitation.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    26. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I have a family as well. I guess you have more than 4 people then. I understand that desire to be practical.

      Most people could afford to eat that way, they just might not get beef every night. Considering the size of our people that might be a very good thing.

      I think you can't because the level of demand is low and the level of fraud is likely high. I think at some point you will be able too. Both from rising wages and desire from all over the world and automation.

    27. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      Any executive worth his/her weight in warm spit would look at the problems Foxconn is constantly having and give a hard second look at producing equipment in the states. Tesla has revolutionized car manufacturing, so could the electronics industry.

      Assembly workers at Flextron's new "American" Moto X assembly plant are paid $9 hour and have to work 12-hour rotating day/night shifts. The reality of large scale mass production isn't pretty -- there are very few good jobs to be had in the supply chain, and lots of thinly disguised sweatshop labor.

    28. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I actually think the white paper for the battery should be accessible to everyone. Not sure we need a law for that, but I do not buy batteries that fail to have the proper data on them.

      The market is not misleading, marketing is. Marketing is about damaging the efficiency of the market.

    29. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketing is about damaging the efficiency of the market.

      Actually, marketing increases efficiency, as it keeps consumers informed.

      Efficiency is damaged when consumers are (purposely) misinformed, but that's not marketing. That's just fraud

    30. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No, marketing is generally not. When Bud Light shows how it will make you athletic and attractive to cheerleaders, do you think they are informing anyone?

      Marketing that informs anyone is far more rare than the other type.

    31. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are really out there. Sorry. I'll put something here but I already know I'm wasting my time with someone like you.
       
        I am sorry that even those in poverty do not want their children to suffer.
       
      Not having electric gizmos to feed what little expendable income you have into is not suffering. The fact that you consider it suffering means you simply haven't come to grips with what is essential and what isn't. I had few toys like this and my parents had none. They didn't "suffer" because of it. I didn't "suffer" because of it. Those who can't understand how this way of thinking fits into the real world are little selfish self-absorbed jerks who think they're entitled to anything they can find.
       
        Clearly you have never been in that situation. Pray to FSM it never happens to you. The people I am speaking of have a breadwinner working 50 hours a week. How many more hours should he work?
       
      Oh, and I don't work that hard? My parents didn't work that hard? Who are you to say what I did and did not do? Who are you to say what kind of background I came from? I did without plenty, mister. My parents knew where to draw the line. They didn't give in whims I had and said they did it so I didn't "suffer."
       
      You must have some gaul to act like no one has ever been in this possition before. I'm seeing more of that passive-agressive crap coming out of you and I can see through it. Go cry to someone else.
       
        The greatest generation was no different, go talk to some of them. The vast majority of them were idiots keeping up with the joneses as well. They hate the youth for different reasons than that.
       
      Uh, I have spoken with them. Keep making your foolish assumptions. The ones I know are sick of how entitled the current generation is. They're sick of people who don't take hold of their own lives and expect others to do for them. They're sick of the likes of you who think that everyone should live their lives under the thumbs of others just to ensure that every luxury is given like manna in the promised land.
       
        The Greatest Generation had mothers staying at home raising kids and getting buy on a single wage.
       
      Yeah, because they had priorities! Understand that there were luxuries they did without because the value of having a parent at home was greater than having the latest hi-fi in the living room. This generation doesn't see that. If it did we wouldn't have people running to WalMart for Ice Age 23 on BluRay so they could use it to keep their kids quiet in their room with their own 32 inch flat panel TV while the parents are watching reality TV at the tune of 10 dollars a day on a cable bill or playing XBox games at 60 dollars a pop then turning around and crying poverty and being able to file for bankruptcy.
       
      I really don't know where people like you come from. Your lack of common sense and priorities simple baffles me to no end. Not to even bother to mention your assumption that everyone else you don't know somehow never had to do without.

    32. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG! This is the Joint Chiefs to The President of The United States:

      Suggest dropping everything at hand (Syria, Iran, Afghanistan,...)
      We got these sub-human Chinks dispensing JOBS to students!!!
      Who does that and gets away with it.
      Here in America, students get NO jobs.

      We have taken the liberty of master arming our entire Minuteman and Trident arsenal awaiting your approval Mr. President...

    33. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Bud Light shows how it will make you athletic and attractive to cheerleaders, do you think they are informing anyone?

      Absolutely. At minimum they inform and remind viewers that their product/service exists. The cheerleaders or the frogs or the wassup guys are there to grab your attention. It's up to you the consumer to discern the difference.

    34. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows you can buy canned horse piss. The other stuff is the point, it is not just to get your attention.

    35. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows you can buy canned horse piss.

      No, not everyone. Not everybody enters the market at the same time. Those who come later need to be informed too. My 2 year old cousin probably doesn't know. Hey, maybe she likes canned horse piss when she gets older, that's her freedom who am I to judge. For those who are already there, the advertisements can still be informative: it informs you that the horse piss is still around.

      The other stuff is the point, it is not just to get your attention.

      Not to me, and I doubt it is to many people who can discern fantasy from reality. My 2 year old cousin might not be able to quite yet, but it's up to her parents to teach her that, not Budweiser.

    36. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Simple. It's because the moment someone slaps a sustainable or sweatless sticker on their E-product, people are going to start looking at where the caps, commodity chips and resistors come from. Are the components 100% made without slave labour?

      Yes and no. When you move manufacturing to a country where workers are treated better, the component manufacturing tends to follow, because it is generally cheaper to source parts locally than to ship them halfway around the world. So no, you can't guarantee every component immediately, but at least you're pushing the boulder in a way that would cause it to pick up speed as it rolls downhill towards that ideal goal.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    37. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really what problems are you referring to?
      Or are you some parasite in the public sector that gets paid regardless of production/output?

      And are you serious about Tesla?
      Tesla is a taxpayer money stealing scam that's lost money hand over fist.
      If Nissan, Mitsubishi, BYD for Christ sakes can produce technically comparable vehicle for 1/3 the price and still not make any impact in the automotive marketplace (and the big boys Toyota, VW, GM...wouldn't touch electric only vehicle with a ten foot pole), you think some guy who looks like a Bond movie villain (not that there is anything wrong with that) has some magical Midas touch?

    38. Re:Time to Re-evaluate by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I just had a pair of AAs die. They're about five or six years old, maybe older. My infrared mouse has a slip-in charger, so whenever one of the TV remotes dies I just swap batteries with the mouse.

      I'm with ya on that pinko commie idea, it would be helpful to know how much juice is in that can. But we can't allow them to take away corporations' rights to fuck us over, now can we?

  4. Ah I love the smell of RAW Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the morning, is is the exploitation of the means and resources of production after all.

  5. On the bright side... by Dreth · · Score: 1

    As opposed to paying them $5.00 a day, they're getting a better deal.

    --
    All glory to Arstotzka!
  6. Modern bueraucratically organized slavery by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Despicable. But not a surprise.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. rage by Korruptionen · · Score: 1

    Well when it breaks, I'll know who to blame!

  8. Use the Force, Luke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sometimes, nothin' is a cool hand."

    1. Re:Use the Force, Luke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sometimes, nothin' is a cool hand."

      That'll never get seen, AC. What we have here is failure to communacait.

    2. Re:Use the Force, Luke by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      "Sometimes, nothin' is a cool hand."

      That'll never get seen, AC. What we have here is failure to communacait.

      Well... if that's the way he wants it...

  9. Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in time! by Craefter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does China get the job done?
    - They understand their priorities when the world wants the latest gadgets
    - Cheap labor
    - Small kiddy fingers == smaller gadgets
    - Lost of cheap labor
    - Factories run at 24/7 which means a more efficient use of factory resources
    - No workers's union which could jeopardize deadlines.

    Currently China is a booming economy (partially because they have lots of cheap labor). Maybe The West has become too elitist in A) Gadget demands and B) Worker rights. Our demand is there, China is just for filling our wishes.

  10. Outrage by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 1

    "But those that accepted aren't being assigned work that matches their course or skill set."

    This is different from 90% of internships in any other nation in the world... how exactly?

    1. Re:Outrage by gmclapp · · Score: 2

      I came here to say exactly this. I am a mechanical engineer and the company that I did my internship (where I am currently employed full time) put me on the floor running production more than once. I gained very valuable expertise doing this and coincidentally, if I had refused the company would have, and rightfully so, fired me. If they had fired me, I wouldn't have received the 9 credits that I got for my internship which were also necessary for me to graduate. There is nothing wrong with that. I didn't feel as though I was being taken advantage of and at the end of the day production work had better be in every engineer's skill set. Otherwise, you're going to have a lot of product design that works on paper and turns out to be shit in the real world.

      --
      Common Sense (+1)
    2. Re:Outrage by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      It teaches one very valuable lesson. And that is that almost every job description includes something along the lines of "and other duties as assigned."

    3. Re:Outrage by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm misreading the story, but as I understand it, people who do not do the work aren't just not receiving credit, they are actually having credit *deducted*. If that is correct, there is definitely something fundamentally wrong with this.

    4. Re:Outrage by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm misreading the story, but as I understand it, people who do not do the work aren't just not receiving credit, they are actually having credit *deducted*. If that is correct, there is definitely something fundamentally wrong with this.

      Most likely it's like a maths test where you get 10 points for solving a problem, and get points deducted for errors in the solution. Just depends on how it is expressed.

      Independent of that, it is very hard to decide whether an English language article matches reality in China, when there is huge room for misinterpretation, innocently or intentionally, or mistranslation, innocently or intentionally.

    5. Re:Outrage by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Even in that case, however, you only typically get points deducted from that test... or even at most, from your score for that particular class only. It may affect your overall GPA, but won't affect how much credit you have already received. It's my understanding in this story the latter is what would.happen.

  11. Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by Stolpskott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In most of the companies where I have worked, the interns were judged to be incapable of direct involvement in frontline work, whether that was coding, sales, process-based QA, support or technical documentation.
    I did show on a couple of occasions that they could be useful in the QA, support and documentation roles on a limited basis, and when that was not possible, I always dragged my interns off to any meetings I was attending, and talked for what felt like the whole day about what I was doing, but mostly about "why" and "how" - by the time they got out of an internship and finished their education, the chances of them using the same tools as me was minimal anyway, so the processes and reasoning were more useful anyway.
    Just about every other engineer and manager used their interns as coffee boys/girls or errand runners.
    I cannot say that my interns were happier or felt more fulfilled than any of the others, but they were the ones who wanted to come back a second time, and I am pretty sure they learned a lot more (although one or two of our interns actually made coffee for the first time ever when they were with us).
    The whole point of this self-patting-on-back is to say that interns rarely get tasks relevant to their skillset or needs. In this case, it seems like a bit of Chinese pragmatism, using the free resources they have available to maximise profit.

    1. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by gmclapp · · Score: 1

      I agree. Internships are supposed to be learning experiences first and foremost. Most companies that have internship programs would also like to hire on some of the interns they put so much time and effort into training. I personally wouldn't hire an intern that thought a little manual labor was below him/her. You learn a lot doing that stuff. Should they exclusively run production? Of course not. But should they do at least some of the manual stuff? Absolutely.

      --
      Common Sense (+1)
    2. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by MtHuurne · · Score: 2

      We put our interns (CS students) on proof-of-concept projects. This gives the intern some shiny new tech to play with and it minimizes the risk to the primary business. If the project goes well, you can see whether the concept is promising to develop further, plus you get advance warning on some of the implementation problems, such as bugs in new devices or tooling. It does require some effort to get the intern up to speed and help them across some roadblocks they will encounter, but if the intern is any good this will be less work than figuring out everything yourself.

      Internships are also a useful way to find people to hire after they graduate. You get to observe their work closely, so you'll know whether they are the kind of person you'd want to have in your company or not. And the intern gets to know people at the company, making your company more attractive and accessible for them to apply for a job when they start looking for one.

    3. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 2

      In the US, at least, it's illegal for interns to do any front-line work because the company is not paying them. They are not allowed to do anything that could provide a competative advantage to the company to discourage corporations from bringing on tons of interns for free labor.

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    4. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by jsrjsr · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... We must be getting a better crop of interns than you. Our interns start out testing products and a year later are usually writing code for testing those products. Several interns have written code that ended up in our products -- these are the ones that we usually hire when they graduate.

    5. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      x labor practice by China = pragmatism
      x labor practice by USA = exploitation

      If this were a thread about US internships, the sentiment would hardly be as positive as I've read so far, with 3 top comments all talking about how this isn't so bad and actually good for student's character development.

    6. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      If you went to a US engineering school to recruit for unpaid interns you'd get laughed off campus.

    7. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      The answer is to pay them for doing work. I know, it's a shocking concept...

    8. Re:Don't count on tasks relevant to your skillset by dj245 · · Score: 1

      In the US, at least, it's illegal for interns to do any front-line work because the company is not paying them. They are not allowed to do anything that could provide a competative advantage to the company to discourage corporations from bringing on tons of interns for free labor.

      It is illegal for unpaid interns to do this kind of work. But generally companies pull it off anyway since the law doesn't have very measureable criteria to judge against.

      For paid interns, you can have them do whatever you want. They are basically summer temp workers. Ideally you should give them something slightly interesting to do; part of the goal of such programs should be to help recruit future talent. But that is not mandatory. You could make them be janitors if you wanted.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  12. Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not everyone gets to be an astronaut.

  13. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    The rush to the lowest common denominator. How about we cull from the top, eliminate those who want to push us into the rush to the lowest common denominator and see what happens then. Don't forget they get paid the most and do by far the least, so massive savings to be had. No Golden parachutes, no private jets and, no insane bonus schemes. At least in China they are teaching future management what it means to work the production, sounds like that lesson should be spread around some more.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  14. We aren't 'forcing' anyone! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    These accusations of coercion are blatantly defamatory. We are simply offering incentives, which the interns, as free and rational agents, are choosing to accept or decline. It's practically a libertarian utopia, trade among men, as equals, free from the dead hand of state power. Anyone who says otherwise is probably some sort of commie, who thinks that labor and capital negotiate from positions of unequal strength or some bullshit like that.

    1. Re:We aren't 'forcing' anyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I really can't tell if this is an honest libertarian post, or a parody of one.

    2. Re:We aren't 'forcing' anyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You need to make your use of sarcasm a little more obvious. The first time I read this I thought that it was a full and accurate representation of your point of view.

    3. Re:We aren't 'forcing' anyone! by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      You ignored the fact that "commie" is not an insult in China...

    4. Re:We aren't 'forcing' anyone! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That was the marker that was intended to ensure that you recognized it as sarcasm.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  15. Re:Ah I love the smell of RAW Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the SOCIALIST economic system used in China... No "capitalism" involved there. But this is /. and facts of an issue never matter when somebody can instead make a political lie.

  16. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

    It's kind of a relief to know that pretty soon China's economic model will evaporate once 3d printing becomes consumerized.

    At least, the part where cheap labor is mercilessly exploited in an inhuman fashion by lazy, worthless douchebags.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  17. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China (Foxconn) commits civil rights violations and treats their workers unethically.

    Wake me when one of the following happens:
    1) They start paying their workers fairly
    2) They start giving their workers some actual benefits
    3) Their workers work "normal" hours (i.e. not 80 a week, minimum)
    4) Their workers actually get some time off to spend with families
    5) The workers can live somewhere off-site (though we fail there too, see the Googleplex, and Facebooks upcoming town)
    6) Another Chinese company starts up that begins any of the above

  18. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    Except we never had a chance to choose.

    Because if we had any real and informed choice between product A whose money stays in the local economy and product B foxconn style, we'd have chosen A even if we had to fork more money.
    Because it's better to fork more money and have an income and some rights, like western economies did before the 90s, than race to the bottom and have the whole economy race with you. "Sorry, for us to be competitive you have to work more hours". "Sorry, for us to be competitive you have to work for less". "Sorry, for us to be competitive you have to get lost".

    Instead, in practice, we have to choose between brand A and B, both supported by the same financial system that in the 1990s decided to bring down western economy by lowering consumption using job flexibility as an excuse to take a sense of security away. No matter what economic indicators say, no sense of security means less consumption.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  19. Where is the story? by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    I am a little confused at the real point of this story this is not about rioting of abusing child workers. Students "worldwide" working are routinely treated badly in a work placement. Personally I love the idea of future designers and engineers working on a production line. I can't help but think of the vast differences between the notoriously difficult to manufacture iPhone and the designed to be assembled Moto X.

  20. Too common for too long all over the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exploiting the labor of students under the guise of "internship" learning experience has been too common for too long all over the world, not just in China. The fact that there's growing sentiment against it is a good thing that will hopefully lead to reform. For now all anyone can do is shine a bright light into these dark corners and try to let the public see the disgusting scurrying cockroaches that those who run these programs (including officials at the universities who sponsor them) really are. My own internship experience while in school was mixed. I DID have to pay for the credits earned for both internships I participated in, but also received a small monthly "stipend" that helped pay for groceries (that didn't come close to offsetting the cost per credit of the course, but it was still nice to have). One of them allowed me to develop some criitical skills that really provided me with a professional advantage in my career. The other was pretty much a "make-work" job that didn't seem to have any purpose.

  21. They could always jump off the roof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh, wait. they will just land in nets. worst internship ever.

  22. Can we finally agree by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    to stop having shit made in China? We have the labour, technology, skills and parts to make it here at home.
    I know why we don't (capitalism!) but damnit, we should.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Can we finally agree by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I read somewhere that if the iPhone was made in the USA, it would cost around 16000$. Economy is ill, until all the countries in the world will have reached an equilibrium.

    2. Re:Can we finally agree by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      No wait, I did some research and that number is probably too high, but a 3-4x factor would not be too far from reality.

  23. I get a cheap PS4 by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 0

    They get their qualification. It's a win for all involved.

  24. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by khallow · · Score: 1

    The rush to the lowest common denominator. How about we cull from the top, eliminate those who want to push us into the rush to the lowest common denominator and see what happens then.

    You haven't changed the lowest common denominator by doing that. Instead, merely by sending substantial business to the LCD we have increased the LCD. At some point, the developed world might become part of the LCD for various reasons. In that case, you'll be relatively happy that someone else is throwing you some business.

  25. Stop interning by areusche · · Score: 2

    This whole "intern" experience annoys the hell out of me. I had the unfortunate pleasure of being a coffee runner / bottom b!tch while I was in school too. If you're going to intern the companies need to pay them a minimum wage or whatever the going rate is for entry level people. Yes I know this is China, but even in the US a few years ago the whole intern thing was a complete excuse to slave labor college students.

    My internship was a complete joke and a waste of my time. I know a few kids who were lucky, but the majority never had any "connections" to use when they left the internship and post college. Get a real part time job locally or in my case work at the on campus IT department which coincidentally helped me land my real first job with a salary and benefits.

    Onto the topic at hand, when I buy products made in a third world country, I know for a fact somewhere along the line little starving children made it for pennies so I can buy it at a 300% markup. That's the whole point of globalization, to exploit a lesser countries cheaper labor and resources so we can upcharge local americans and pocket the markup. I don't understand the outrage people have. You're knowingly buying a product made from a country that doesn't care about its environment and people. That is why it is super cheap!

    There is a reason there aren't any "free trade Xboxes" or "100% Fair Pay iPhones". If you don't like third world countries abusing their people and environment for your shiny new toy then don't buy it and live like it is 1994 without any real technology or keep using tech that was built from fabrication plants that were in the US.

    1. Re:Stop interning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should do *both*. Both complain, and stop buying products we know is made from slavery.

    2. Re:Stop interning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone born prior to 1994, what do you think we had?

      Curious minds...

    3. Re:Stop interning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my first ever job through my internship, I started out as a production planner Gofer and because after a couple of weeks I could do the basic role in about an hour to combat boredom I started resolving the smaller issues that were holding up the jobs that showed up day after day in the production report that were all ready late for one reason and another and had penalty clauses.

      Id walk the job right through the factory and into a delivery truck simply by asking each person at each stage what is your problem with this job and what can I do to solve it. Production cant run the job because they are awaiting parts then off to stores. Short handed in the picking department causing a delay for these parts? well I have done the health and safety courses and have safety boots loan me a hard hat and I will do the picking and ALL the paper work.

      They offered me position doing this doing this full time so sometimes you really do just have to make the best of 'poor' situations.

    4. Re:Stop interning by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      What does he think China had, for that matter?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:Stop interning by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      Engineering students in the US have pretty good internship opportunities which are frequently paid well over minimum wage and if they like you it can lead to job offers and help young engineers build their professional network.

      That other industries might not even pay their interns seems very wrong to me. Companies aren't in the business of training interns for charity so the company must derive some benefit, therefore the interns should be paid at least minimum wage. Even if the work output is low the company can use internships as a recruitment and assessment method for hiring new full-time workers.

    6. Re:Stop interning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My internship was a complete joke and a waste of my time. I know a few kids who were lucky, but the majority never had any "connections" to use when they left the internship and post college.

      Most of the interns I hire are also a complete joke and a waste of my time. The good ones get job offers.

      I'm sorry you didn't get the Participation Trophy you were expecting. Life takes more than just showing up, and sometimes, even when you try your utmost, there is someone better than you.

    7. Re:Stop interning by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This may not have much to do with the USA and more to do with a field that expects to get paid for their work, or the company offering it.

      I also had an internship in engineering (Australia). I was put on a $60k salary for the 3 months I worked. My sister however did an internship in journalism. Completely unpaid, and that's apparently the norm for journalists. On top of that she also spent a lot of time demonstrating skills outside work (running a blog, posting opinion pieces to newspapers etc) which was unpaid and needed to build her resume.

      I asked my company why my internship was paid so well (I ended up taking a job there after uni) and the answer was supply and demand. They were chasing the best interns and using it as a 3 month long interview for graduate positions and they were worried if they paid below "market rate" then they wouldn't get any applications.

    8. Re:Stop interning by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Onto the topic at hand, when I buy products made in a third world country, I know for a fact somewhere along the line little starving children made it for pennies so I can buy it at a 300% markup. That's the whole point of globalization, to exploit a lesser countries cheaper labor and resources so we can upcharge local americans and pocket the markup. I don't understand the outrage people have. You're knowingly buying a product made from a country that doesn't care about its environment and people. That is why it is super cheap!

      Can this continue indefinitely? Why should I buy from a middleman with 200-400% markup when I can just buy the thing on Aliexpress (Ebay of China) directly from the company who makes it? Such middlemen should be very worried. They are in the same position that travel agents were in 10 years ago.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    9. Re:Stop interning by intermodal · · Score: 1

      The intern system is BS, that much is clear. The real question is, how do we eliminate it? With actual field work. Several of my friends studied geology while I was in college.

      One of their degree requirements was "field camp", a couple months or so of actual surveying in the mountains of Utah where they could meaningfully get hands-on with the rock formations they had been studying. All of them found the experience valuable, and they gained hands-on experience in their field alongside some actual geologists in a noncommercial setting without being treated as indentured servants.

      Similarly, when I did EMT school, and when I worked at a fire department where we had ambulances, the Paramedic students rode along as part of crews, and were expected to familiarize themselves with the ambulances so they could treat actual patients when calls came. Their performance was reviewed and they were required to complete these ride-outs to become certified, while demonstrating proficiency in their duties.

      If nobody can find a legitimate analog to what these geology students and EMT/Paramedic candidates experienced, there's no reason to require an internship.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    10. Re:Stop interning by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      I know it's a supply and demand problem, but an overabundance of supply for internships in certain fields shouldn't allow companies to accept unpaid interns. This can make it very hard for people without significant financial support from their family to enter these fields.

  26. Celebrate by CimmerianX · · Score: 1, Funny

    Three Cheers for the Unregulated, Free Market...... hip hip .... (*WHIP*) Get back to work!!!

  27. Re:Ah I love the smell of RAW Capitalism by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China is socialist and not capitalist? Have you been asleep for the last few decades? Or do you also believe that the Democratic Republic of North Korea is actually democratic, and that the United States of America is actually united?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  28. Similar schemes in the USA. by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

    It's not like we have similar schemes in the USA. Go into Legal, Entertainment, or Teaching and they all require long UNPAID internships doing work vaguely related to their field. Medical internships vary... Some are paid, some are not... It's really Manufacturing and Engineering internships in the USA that are Unique for almost always being paid in addition to college credit. Many internships you pay for college credit, and you pay again for "supervision" fees... And you work a bunch of free hours.

  29. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elitist in Worker rights? If you are advocating moving the cheap labor (with all the adverse parts) to "The West", you should stick with China while you can.

    Reality is China won't be forever the cheap labour house, and they too will get the Worker rights they sorely miss.

    Sooner we get this, sooner the labour comes back to where the consumers are. After all what would be the purpose to use labour from China and produce something to "The West" -- when we all have same rights?

  30. Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foxconn is offering internships that provide six credits. If you fail to perform the requirements of the internship you do not get the credits!

    I don't know of any company where the intern gets to dictate or choose what they want or feel like doing. The intern does what they are told or they can leave.

    This whole story is bullshit! It is starting to look like Chinese students are developing the same sense of entitlement that U.S. students have. That's the end of your cheap electronics, bitches.

  31. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    - Small kiddy fingers == smaller gadgets

    When my uncle was 5 years old, his father came to school and took him home so that he could help a young sow giving birth. Small hands. Nothing new.

  32. Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But how can this be tied back to Apple? Isn't everything bad that Foxconn does Apple's fault? I'm sure Apple is responsible for this somehow if we dig hard enough!

    1. Re:Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by JDeane · · Score: 1

      PS4 It only does slavery!

      I jest but wow that's a pretty dick move, work the assembly line or else...

    2. Re:Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS4 It only does slavery!

      I jest but wow that's a pretty dick move, work the assembly line or else...

      Meanwhile in America, thousands of students sit back with an $80,000 piece of paper hanging on the wall, riddled for years with massive student loan debt...

      ...all because they were told go to college, or else.

      First-World Slavery still kinda feels like slavery.

    3. Re:Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      First-World Slavery still kinda feels like slavery.

      Don't exaggerate - it's more like indentured servitude.

    4. Re:Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Informative

      But how can this be tied back to Apple? Isn't everything bad that Foxconn does Apple's fault? I'm sure Apple is responsible for this somehow if we dig hard enough!

      Like "300 workers at Apple factory threaten suicide" (because they were in danger of losing their jobs when Microsoft Xbox production dropped). Another one was an article about employees complaining mostly about overtime - when they actually complained that they couldn't always get as much overtime as they wanted.

    5. Re:Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have to agree. There is a finite amount of time they are forced to do that particular task and then they move on in life. It kind of messes up my business plan to stand in the parking lot selling "I was a slave at Foxconn and all I got was this stupid tee shirt" shirts to graduating interns...
      "I was an indentured servant at Foxconn and all I got was this stupid tee shirt" just does not have the same humorous impact.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    6. Re:Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof that moron Android fanbois are all over slashdot. Lumpy speaks the truth and is modded down.

    7. Re:Apple must be responsible for this somehow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter? Low IQ rabid android fanbois will do anything to blame apple.

      This is necessary to preserve balance in the universe. After all, low IQ rabid Apple fanbois will do anything to support Apple.

  33. Yeah yeah the US does this too by sandytaru · · Score: 2

    I agreed to be a "web intern" for the local newspaper one semester. I thought I'd be helping to design layouts or code bits. No, it turned out all I did was copy news stories from Quark and paste them into HTML, and modify/crop the newsprint images for the web. It was tedious, it was boring, and all I learned was that there really REALLY needed to be a pure HTML export feature in Quark and there wasn't one. It sucked.

    But hey, I got free web experience and a line on my resume, right?

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Yeah yeah the US does this too by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

      I agreed to be a "web intern" for the local newspaper one semester. I thought I'd be helping to design layouts or code bits. No, it turned out all I did was copy news stories from Quark and paste them into HTML, and modify/crop the newsprint images for the web.

      A recent Supreme Count ruling makes that type of work paid. If it isn't education and setup to benefit the student, then you get should get paid.

    2. Re:Yeah yeah the US does this too by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Well that was also 14 years ago or so. Unless that ruling was retroactive it doesn't help me now.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  34. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While true, I read that as different. Do not buy launch PS4's. Wait 6 months for the crap ones to work their way out of the chain.

    Forced labor = shody work.

  35. Boycott Who? by tuppe666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless people are willing to boycott Sony and not buy a PS4 over this kind of thing, they have no incentive to stop.

    Why boycott Sony? When you can boycott Foxconn products like the iPhone and Xbox. Sony have their own manufacturing plants. Where do you think the UK made rasberry Pi is made? Sony's Pencoed factory. I suspect that Foxconn will not be making the PS4 long term, but have used Foxconn to deal with its initial demand, their are very few companies who could have taken on this contract.

    1. Re:Boycott Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you think the UK made rasberry Pi is made?

      Sounds like a trick question, but I'm going to go with the UK. Final answer.

    2. Re:Boycott Who? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Why boycott Sony?

      I don't boycott Sony, but I refuse to buy anything electronic from them, the bastards rooted my PC ten years ago. It was vandalism against thousands of people and someone should have gone to jail for it.

      Then they pitched OtherOS and removed it after the poor suckers bought it (should have learned from XCP). Like your car dealer taking out your cars AC after you've paid for the car.

      Boycott? Nope, I just don't buy and laugh wildly when I see someone that does. No good can come from buying a Sony product, they've proven time and again that their customers can't trust them.

      And like Sterling Ball* says about Microsoft, I refuse to do business with someone who treats me badly.

      * CEO of the Ernie Ball company, who make the famous guitar strings used by everybody.

  36. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by Craefter · · Score: 1

    Cheap labor will just shift to another poor country, there is still enough of them to choose from. Next up: Made in Africa.

  37. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Because if we had any real and informed choice between product A whose money stays in the local economy and product B foxconn style, we'd have chosen A even if we had to fork more money.

    Except Wal Mart has more or less proved that to be untrue.

    See, since everyone's job has been eliminated or off-shored, most people don't have the luxury of buying ethical. They just need to buy cheap to stretch what little money they have.

    I fear this race to the bottom is far from over.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  38. Sony "just the customer"?" My ass. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Sony is not "just the customer" here. First, they know that Foxconn regularly utilizes inhuman practices. Second, Foxconn ain't doing this with everyone. Sony is leaning on them hard.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  39. You mean like our furloughed guys here in the US by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    There's quite a few people that are considered essential to national security (DHS, CBP, etc) that are still working right now, but with no paychecks coming in (presumably they will get back pay). I joked to a friend that having a job but no paycheck is called an internship. So maybe Foxconn is just taking a queue from the US only using students instead of essential employees.

  40. slaves building useless crap for slaves who buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are on both sides (in my case my side is New York, their side is China) essentially wage slaves. I had a conversation recently, with food prices through the roof, at least we can balance the expense by having cheap technology here in the US. It is so sick of a world, I took today off from work, I had no choice I couldn't move my body, it felt like I just got home, and now it was time to go back to work. So I called in sick. An unfortunate burden on my co-workers, but I am getting to the point of complete breakdown of my body and mind. The stress for a 60 hour week, plus a 4 hour per day commute into the pit of hell in Manhattan does not compare to the hellish insanity the poor Chinese people have to go through. I followed the plan book, I studied in school, I graduated college and even got a graduate degree. All this to make about $40k after taxes to have to spend on food, clothing, shelter and electronic gadgets. I'm 36 years old male, never had a girlfriend and I just can't take it anymore. No one at work offers prostitution services, well because it's illegal so I am left with a PS3 a porno blu-ray and a fleshlight to prevent me from snapping.

  41. Not so old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 80's I had to do a lot of mandatory, unpaid, farm work, and all the product of that work was being exported for the profit of one guy who happened to be president of the country. The students they are talking about at least got scholarships, but we got absolutely nothing. It was illegal at the time for students to be paid, so the work was labelled as "voluntary". We did get something though: punishment in case we did not show enough enthusiasm for this form of slavery.

    And there are no skills to learn from manually harvesting potatoes.

  42. Easily fixed by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    1) Go to work dressed like this:
    http://starckmarcandthefarc.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/china_art_1.jpg

    2) Hand out these to the other factory workers, and recite loudly from it during lunch breaks:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/90/Quotations_from_Chairman_Mao_Tse-Tung_bilingual.JPG

    3) Repeat 1 and 2 until reassigned to IT work, or until fellow workers trash supervisors office for counterrevolutinary activity

    .

  43. Nothing new and overblown by Guru80 · · Score: 1

    This has been how it's done in China for all of recent history. It's not going to change and there are a lot worse "internships" than assembling consoles in a factory. They assign kids to jobs ranging from the worst job imaginable to the best, it's just how things are done there.

    Culture differences make things appear more "right" or "wrong" depending on where you live. There are a LOT of worse things to worry about China (or any nation) than their internship practices

  44. put it in perspective by Moblaster · · Score: 2

    Hold on for a second here, people. Let's remember for just one second... These students... they chose (ok - an assumption on my part - they presumably chose) to intern at Foxconn. FOXCONN. Putting physical devices together is what they DO. That's their entire POINT in the universe. What are these kids thinking, that they'd be working on advanced logistics and supply chain management right out of the gate? There are two kinds of jobs in a contract manufacturer. Ones you can train for over a week, and ones you can train for over a year (or more). Not a whole heck of a lot in between. On some level you gotta ask -- what did these kids expect? If you don't want to learn (by doing) some assembly, then you're really looking for an internship somewhere else.

    1. Re:put it in perspective by gmack · · Score: 2

      What makes you think they had a choice where they ended up? They needed to pass an internship to graduate and I wonder how many potential opportunities wouldn't exploit them this way.

    2. Re:put it in perspective by dosilegecko · · Score: 2

      Not only this (I'm in full agreement), but learning a little humility on an assembly line i.e. doing 'yer time is not a bad thing for people to learn. It builds character, something a lot of my fellow U.S. grads lack nowadays. Life is not all flying around in a corporate jet, wheeling and dealing. There is hard/boring/monotonous work to be done, and getting an appreciation for that is not a bad thing. God forbid the students learn some work ethic...

    3. Re:put it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foxconn will do just about everything if you want them to, including the circuit design. Ultimately it's a matter of how much you want to pay them.

    4. Re:put it in perspective by mysidia · · Score: 1

      t learning a little humility on an assembly line i.e. doing 'yer time is not a bad thing for people to learn. It builds character, something a lot of my fellow U.S. grads lack nowadays.

      Yes --- however, this is not the purpose of an engineering internship. That is something you get from the job you had to work to help you pay for the education.

      The interns are supposed to participating in engineering relevant to their course of study; an internship is not free menial work.

      Abusing their countries' future engineers in this way, is eventually going to lead to negative outcomes for Foxconn.

      What happens when word gets around about how badly Foxconn treats their IT engineers?

    5. Re: put it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf? Engineering IS a practical profession. You are NOT doing engineering if you don't get your hands dirty. You DO NOT get to know the business if you won't participate in any aspect of the business ESPECIALLY the core activity of the business.

      And as an engineering intern you don't know shit about any; all experiences are pure learning. And you have certainly not earned any right to be a prissy dilettante about what jobs you will and won't do as part of your internship.

      Anyone playing that game on my watch will have their internship ended and if that affects the academic standing so be it. They don't have what takes to be an engineer anywhere.

      The ONLY issue is whether they are being asked to do anything that any other employee isn't also asked to do and is stepping up to do either as an engineer or assembly worker. From my direct experience working in Chinese factories I'm pretty confident that this is not likely the case. I've done plenty of late hours alongside line engineers keeping things running on the line.

    6. Re:put it in perspective by nobodie · · Score: 1

      oh Jeez, give it up on the "learning humility." Believe me, the students had no choice about nothing, ever. They do it to get to the end, and if they can't hack the 14-16 hour days on the line (7days a week, for probably unknown duration) they can always commit suicide. That is their choice. Oh, you say, they can just go home! Oh yeah right, you have not a clue what that entails: no life, no wife, no hope for anything in their future because they let their parents down. Yeah, you have no clue what their world is like.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    7. Re:put it in perspective by mysidia · · Score: 1

      oh Jeez, give it up on the "learning humility." Believe me, the students had no choice about nothing, ever. They do it to get to the end, and if they can't hack the 14-16 hour days on the line (7days a week, for probably unknown duration) they can always commit suicide.

      WTF is your problem? Your suggestion of suicide is a disgusting proposition, regardless of the circumstances: please go crawl back into whatever hole you have come out of.

      Like I said; trying to sneak slave labor work into an Engineering internship is reprehensible, and it should be attacked by professionals and other people in and out of the country.

      For example: trained engineers refusing to take jobs at companies that abuse their interns. US-based companies refusing to make orders to or purchase products from suppliers that abuse interns, etc

    8. Re:put it in perspective by nobodie · · Score: 1

      It is, perhaps to you, a disgustiing proposition (suicide that is) but your American view of how the world works is laughable. In China, entire villages are covered with lead dust from battery factories and people die of inhaling the dust. Do you have any clue at all how bad things can be in these places? No, no you don't. I do, I've been there and I know what good looks like there, and you would refuse to step foot in it.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  45. Not just accused - confirmed... by mangobrain · · Score: 1
  46. but they should be paid not working for free by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    but they should be paid not working for free It's one thing to do work like that but for free?

    1. Re:but they should be paid not working for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They get paid in the form of college credits. Interns working at colleges here in the west do the same thing. Sometimes the work is better, sometimes it is not. The students don't care, because it saves plenty of money and doesn't require studying yet another 1000+ page textbook.

  47. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    Why does China get the job done?
    - They understand their priorities when the world wants the latest gadgets
    - Cheap labor
    - Small kiddy fingers == smaller gadgets
    - Lost of cheap labor
    - Factories run at 24/7 which means a more efficient use of factory resources
    - No workers's union which could jeopardize deadlines.

    Currently China is a booming economy (partially because they have lots of cheap labor). Maybe The West has become too elitist in A) Gadget demands and B) Worker rights. Our demand is there, China is just for filling our wishes.

    Actually, there is a worker's union. China is a Communist country. Under Communism, the union is the Party, which represents and benevolently guides everything for the benefit of all the workers.

    And America is a Democracy, where the will of the people is reflected in their elected representatives without respect to who has the most money and/or can be the most annoying.

  48. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    It's kind of a relief to know that pretty soon China's economic model will evaporate once 3d printing becomes consumerized.

    At least, the part where cheap labor is mercilessly exploited in an inhuman fashion by lazy, worthless douchebags.

    I can't tell if you are being facetious or not. While tech advances can make things cheaper in certain markets, it's unlikely it will be cheaper than laborers in under developed countries. Robotic assembly lines are cheaper in the American manufacturing market, it's still not as cheap as human laborers in countries such as China. 3D printing can't print using metal, computer chips, glass, etc. So it will be decades (at least) until electronics can be "printed". It's also unlikely that mass manufacturing even something as simple as plastic figurines could be printed cheaper. Building unique items or prototypes will certainly be cheaper than manual assembly lines, and can be done "in house".

  49. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLUS, China is abundant of organs for donorship. It's Win Win for everybody!

  50. Re:Ah I love the smell of RAW Capitalism by steelfood · · Score: 1

    the United States of America is actually united?

    Ah, that one has actually come true for the most part, after WWII. There is a certain amount of unity, especially as the expanse of Federal power continues to increase with every administration and every "war".

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  51. The moral of the story is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't answer want ads from Foxconn looking for CS grads who know "Assembly."

  52. Foxconn? Wait, what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Foxconn that factory that ONLY build Apple products? Also, only Apple does visits and enforces regulations. At least that's what I read on the internets...

  53. Re:Ah I love the smell of RAW Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is socialist and not capitalist? Have you been asleep for the last few decades? Or do you also believe that the Democratic Republic of North Korea is actually democratic, and that the United States of America is actually united?

    How is the USA not united? The states can't secede and federal law overrides their local laws.

    I think your confusion might be because you think the USA is capitalist.

  54. college credits that they have to pay for by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    also under the law to for for free in the USA

    The internship, even though it includes actual operation of the facilities of the employer, is similar to training which would be given in an educational environment.
    The internship experience is for the benefit of the intern.
    The intern does not displace regular employees, but works under close supervision of existing staff.
    The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern; and on occasion its operations may actually be impeded.
    The intern is not necessarily entitled to a job at the conclusion of the internship.
    The employer and the intern understand that the intern is not entitled to wages for the time spent in the internship.

    also there maybe workers compensation issues as well.

  55. Wonder when Ontario will have a similar program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems one step away from the "forced" 40 hours of volunteer work you must do before you can graduate high school.

  56. Slavery by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    The most efficient form of labor. No employer matching 401k contributions here.

  57. Interns is just the modern word for Slavery by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    When you get down to it, there's not much difference between unpaid interns and slaves, except the slavemasters get to pretend they have ethics.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Interns is just the modern word for Slavery by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The difference is that it's temporary. I might be legitimate to refer to them as indentured, however.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Interns is just the modern word for Slavery by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Most slavery was temporary too.

      Same diff.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Interns is just the modern word for Slavery by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Most slavery was temporary too.

      Citation?

      While theoretically Roman slaves could buy themselves free, in practice it rarely happened. It definitely wasn't the practice in the Southern US. That was lifetime not only for the slave, but also for any children she might have. (Not sure about Rome on that matter.)

      Also, though I'm less certain, I believe that Greek slaves were slaves for life. It's true, though, that there are many times and places where I don't know what the custom was.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  58. Blame by GrBear · · Score: 1

    Slashdotters will attempt to find a way to blame Apple as they use the same factory.

  59. Looks like Microsoft behind the trolling by vision33r · · Score: 1

    Looks like Microsoft behind the trolling, first they went after Apple for Foxconn slave workers then Samsung got hit too and now they hit Sony with the PS4. The Sithlords of Microsoft is finally revealed.

  60. Skeptic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no mention of how long they are being asked to work on any given day. Seems to me that understanding how this stuff gets put together might actually have some value. Are the students being rotated through out the facility?

  61. Moderation Slipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moderators on /. seem to be a lot less strict about quality articles these days.
    The linked article is a word for word scrape of another article.
    And the other article misquotes the original article it was based on to sensationalize the claims.
    Nice.

  62. For the PlayStation fans by andrewandrew · · Score: 0

    Hey guys if you are a PlayStation fan you can get some free goods from this guys ;) This is the best thing that can be found on the internet but if you are an xbox fan better not check it it is just for PlayStation fans Psn Cards Generator

  63. In the United States you have to PAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (in some fields/industries/professions/workthingies)

  64. Re:Sorry, but we NEED our new techno gadgets in ti by mysidia · · Score: 1

    It's kind of a relief to know that pretty soon China's economic model will evaporate once 3d printing becomes consumerized.

    No, because the Chinese manufacturers will leverage 3D printing as well. And at scale, it will probably result in it still being cheaper to buy than to print on your own.