Slashdot Mirror


Is Google Building a Floating Data Center In San Francisco Bay?

snydeq writes "CNET's Daniel Terdiman investigates an oversize secret project Google is constructing on San Francisco's Treasure Island, which according to one expert may be a sea-faring data center. 'Something big and mysterious is rising from a floating barge at the end of Treasure Island, a former Navy base in the middle of San Francisco Bay. And Google's fingerprints are all over it,' Terdiman writes. 'Whether the structure is in fact a floating data center is hard to say for sure, of course, since Google's not talking. But Google, understandably, has a history of putting data centers in places with cheap cooling, as well as undertaking odd and unexpected projects like trying to bring Internet access to developing nations via balloons and blimps.'"

115 comments

  1. best guess by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 4, Funny

    A giant cage to trap Cthulhu for their Japanese R&D branch. Google Tentacle; the perfect accessory for Google Glass.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    1. Re:best guess by auric_dude · · Score: 4, Funny

      Best to sink that rumour right away.

    2. Re:best guess by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Shit floats?

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    3. Re:best guess by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Googlelingus

      Admit it. They have you licked.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:best guess by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Don't be evil" is just lip service?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:best guess by trillion · · Score: 1

      LOL

    6. Re:best guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet America, Google searches YOU.

    7. Re:best guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're just waiting until they can afford their own aircraft carrier.

    8. Re:best guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A giant cage to trap Cthulhu for their Japanese R&D branch. Google Tentacle; the perfect accessory for Google Glass.

      Google tentacle porn will take on a new meaning. Well, not new, but more direct anyway.

    9. Re:best guess by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      "Don't be evil" is just lip service?

      Well, obviously, considering they've now constructed a floating citadel of doom...

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    10. Re: best guess by grcumb · · Score: 2

      Googlelingus....

      Puts the Zune squirt in a whole new light, doesn't it?

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    11. Re:best guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure the viewers of that kind of porn where imagining themselves as the school girl. So a new, scary meaning.

    12. Re:best guess by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Your rejoinder added nothing to this 'oral' history, alas.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    13. Re:best guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah he totally blew it.

  2. "Secret" by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Informative

    Something big and mysterious is rising from a floating barge at the end of Treasure Island, a former Navy base in the middle of San Francisco Bay. And Google's fingerprints are all over it,'

    It's hardly a secret guys. They were granted a patent on sea-based data centers... in 2009. They want to build a sea-water based data center, and given the mild seasons of California and abundance of internet peering points, this is the logical place to start.

    The thing is, sea water isn't exactly computer-friendly... so they probably aren't going to get it on the first go. But the water a hundred feet down in the ocean is actually pretty cool. This makes sense... it all comes down to materials selection. Salt water is highly corrosive and they'll need something that can handle hoovering up large jelly fish and such without dying.

    All in all, an interesting, and definately not very secret, project.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:"Secret" by jo_ham · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why use the seawater as your working fluid?

      Just make a closed cycle and put a heat exchanger down there. No need for the seawater to be exposed to anything except the exterior radiators.

    2. Re:"Secret" by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I assume they'd use some kind of a binary system, with fresh water in the cooling loop and pumping salt water through the heat exchangers. I don't think you'd want to rely on natural heat dissipation, as you'd need a very large radiator, and sea life would love to grow all over it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:"Secret" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the radiators are the part you would worry about corroding.

    4. Re:"Secret" by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Are there even any datacenters, power plants, or other such facilities that don't use a closed-loop (full of suitably domesticated, additive-laced, and probably unpleasant enough to be illegal to discharge in quantity, between the metal ions and the assorted biocides, coolant fluid) and then a big, durable, heat exchanger that couples the internal loop to the hostile-but-cheap cold water from the outside world?

      This doesn't change the general "Oh, you want to put that on a boat... Just go back over my price list and double all the numbers you see..." rule; but I'd be more surprised to hear about somebody playing fast-and-dangerous with an open-loop cooling system, directly exposed to the environment, than by Google attempting to put a rack of servers almost anywhere in or near Earth's gravity well...

    5. Re:"Secret" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      definately

      :-(

      Greetings from a foreigner.

    6. Re:"Secret" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oil is better than water in cooling loops.

    7. Re:"Secret" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      definately

      :-(

      Greetings from a foreigner^Wproduct of the American educational system.

      FTFY

    8. Re:"Secret" by umghhh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is not the point actually but even if it were - secret is not that the big artificial island is built but what is its purpose. From all the movies I have seen last few decades, this never ends well - the evil starting from the artificial construction destroys civilization leaving small group surviving if at all. That is actually a good solution because it tends to show idyllic surroundings and Tom Cruise (or other Hollywood world savior) with some nice female over a newly born that is a hope for the human kind etc.

      Alternatively James Bonds arrives and destroys the damned thing and the human kind continues its pointless existence. Either way this thing is going to sink. Possibly in flames.

    9. Re:"Secret" by umghhh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Japanese use seawater for cooling their nuclear reactors so I guess there must be some advantage in doing exactly that.

    10. Re:"Secret" by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      Glycol is better in non phase change cooling loops as it has a higher specific heat. However, using cold sea water to condense refrigerants is very common. One nice way would be with Alpha Laval plate heat exchangers (or the Indian copies), and a hypochlorite generator on the sea water side to control (kill) the marine life internal to the apparatus.

    11. Re:"Secret" by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Informative

      For example, the Navy uses 2190 mineral oil to cool the 23699 synthetic oil in the LM2500 gas turbines that move most of the fleet. The 2190 is also used to lube the main reduction gear that steps down the RPM of that LM2500 by a ratio of ratio of 21.3746 to 1 (ISTR it was 27:1 on the old Ticonderoga-class, but this is a different drive train).
      The 2190 mineral oil system has a heat exchanger, trading all that lovely hotness with seawater.
      The rationale for using 2190 to cool the high-performance 23699 is that, in case of a heat exchanger failure, a bit of mineral oil in the synthetic (for which the engineers test repeatedly throughout the day) is a lot less damaging than getting seawater in there.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    12. Re:"Secret" by TheResilientFarter · · Score: 2

      Usually the Navy (and others, I'm sure) mitigates contamination with pressure. The system of greater concern will operate at a higher pressure, so when there is a leak it goes in one direction.

    13. Re:"Secret" by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      You see that a lot in CBR systems, too.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    14. Re:"Secret" by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Japanese use seawater for cooling their nuclear reactors so I guess there must be some advantage in doing exactly that.

      You can use tsunamis to rapidly cool your core after the earthquake shuts the system down.

      Oh. Wait.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:"Secret" by ALeader71 · · Score: 1

      If it was my project I'd use extendable plastic pipes to circulate the cooling liquid and let the colder sea water carry away the heat. It's certainly more efficient than air, and San Francisco Bay's water is pretty cold to being with. It would take a monumental amount of heat to alter the Bay's ecosystem.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
    16. Re: "Secret" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, don't worry about blowing salt laden air over electronics, it's gold plated, right?

    17. Re:"Secret" by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems like a big investment to build on a barge that can get swamped by the first storm that comes along.

      You then have the problem of power, and communications that have to be fed to the barge. If you run your own
      generators you have a refueling problem, with risk of spill at every refueling.

      Once you get out of the bay, you have a police protection issue. Pretty hard to call the cops. Pretty risky
      to start shooting at lookie-lews.

      You have transport to and from issues as well. And if you think anyone is going to allow you to avoid taxes this way, well good luck with that.

      In the first world, this makes no sense, and even the sea water cooling could be accommodated by cheaply laid pipe to land.
      In the third world, this might make sense, because towed to Africa and guarded by some friendly government you
      could use it as a base to handle all your balloon wifi or what ever hair brained scheme you might be planning.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    18. Re:"Secret" by icebike · · Score: 1

      Put down the pop-corn big guy.

      There is a reason this is done only in the movies. Its because they are movies.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    19. Re:"Secret" by Cryacin · · Score: 0

      What they don't want you to know...

      The tsunami was caused when the Angels first impacted in the pacific ocean. The radiation actually emanated from their destruction, showering everything in the deadliest of Weapons grade Baloneum particles. The nuclear reactor was just a clever coverup. The NERV of those guys.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    20. Re:"Secret" by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Add warmth in deep cold water and you get sky rocketing growth and your heat exchange fails. Coat your heat exchanger with sufficiently toxic products to prevent growth and you not only limit heat exchange but you also pollute the environment. The commute is now also a huge problem especially in stormy whether, you limit you possible work force to those who will accept being trapped at your whim or the weather's whim. Salt corrosion will occur through out the vessel, water vapour droplets generated through wind turbulence (not evaporation) are very salty (as a result of partial evaporation) and will be a permanent nightmare to block, clean, prevent corrosion.

      This has nothing to do with cooling as pumping the water would be car cheaper and everything to do with what is becoming a rather douchy company simply cheating on property taxes. Of course this will blow up in their faces when, it comes to supplying energy to the thing, removing waste especially sewerage, supply fresh water and food, especially during extended inclement weather and one power disruption and profits gone.

      Note also I would have to side with coastal inhabitants who complained that they hunk of junk spoiled their view and who demanded a block to the permanent mooring unless it was far enough out to sea not to obstruct or interfere with their view.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    21. Re:"Secret" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And - as based in America - none of the data dat will be stored there will be safe from the "spy-on-every-person-in-the-world" NSA.

      Be very, very, very, carefull if Google start to offer any form of "cloud storage".

      Really - company's can better stop using cloud services (that also includes everything offered by Microsoft) and start storing heavely encrypted data local. That goes especially for sensitive data (that can be used by American based concurrents). Do not trust anything that's based in America!!

    22. Re:"Secret" by hebertrich · · Score: 1

      See sacrifice rods.

    23. Re:"Secret" by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      If they build the thing around an OTEC power can't be interrupted very easily. And is dirt cheap, only costing them the capital to build the plant. And is renewable and environmentally friendly. Everything else is a solved problem. Ever heard of deep ocean oil platforms? They deal with storms, salt corrosion, and everything else on your list. It's not a nightmare. It just requires engineering that accounts for salt plus ongoing maintenance. There's plenty of experience out there and an extensive body of knowledge and Google has more than enough money to hire a shipyard that knows what the hell they're doing.

      Coastal inhabitants have nothing to worry about. For best efficiency, an OTEC operates in very deep water, well out from shore. I wouldn't be shocked if Google puts it out in international waters. That could have interesting consequences.

    24. Re:"Secret" by True+ChAoS · · Score: 1

      Google already have the Hamina facility in Finland which has been using sea water to cool the centre since 2009/2011. They've had a good few years to start getting the kinks ironed out.

      --
      WARNING: May contain traces of nut
    25. Re:"Secret" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you found something on Wikipedia that would power it from ocean temperature gradients- good job. Do you know about how much power generation we are talking about? Google is manufacturing power plants now?

      Deep ocean oil platforms are not OTEC. They are not there for tax evasion. They are there because thats where the oil is. People deal with it because that is the price to pay for getting the oil which is very profitable. They also don't have tons of sensitive electronics in servers like a data center does.

      The nightmare IS the engineering, preventive maintenance, repairs and failures. If you want a data center that is reliable with low upkeep costs, building it in the middle of the ocean is not the best idea. They don't need to just hire a shipyard for repairs, they need a full time specialized engineering staff to combat the NEW issues they will be dealing with with thier NEW technology on a daily basis. Everything in the datacenter will need to be redesigned, including the computers and racks they put in it.

      Also, just because they have the money to combat these issues with more people or more technology, doesn't mean that the idea is good. The only aspect of this I can see that might make it feasible is tax evasion, and that is an incredibly greedy, wasteful, and stupid reason to do it.

    26. Re:"Secret" by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      The specific heat of metal is much lower compared to water.

      Meaning the temperature of the water changes very little as it moves, unlike metal.

    27. Re:"Secret" by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You do realise there is a significant amount of difference between an oil platform and it's crew versus a data centre and it's engineers. Between diesel powered drilling equipment and banks of computers. National exclusive economic zones now extend 200nautical miles out and no you can not sit out there and pollute with sewerage. The further out you go the greater the problems. Then of course you data needs to make it way back to shore but now you are importing and exporting data and subject to fees and charges as well as limits on transaction. You want to sail on the high ho jolly pay no taxes just parasite on the infrastructure that everyone else pays for, you will likely find that governments will give you short shrift. Hell, if it all just about cheating on taxes, relocate your data centres to tax havens and be done with it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  3. Stupid place to put it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lee shore with high winds

  4. San Francisco? by BlindRobin · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll have to sail it around the horn or teleport it because everyone knows they only place to put a floating data centre is at the centre of the Bermuda triangle so that it can take advantage of all the free energy from the astral vortex.

    1. Re:San Francisco? by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      I don't recall seeing this when I was at the centre of the Bermuda Triangle some time back. Maybe it was hidden in the mysterious mist that is supposed to arise there.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    2. Re:San Francisco? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Oh thanks. That explains things. I wondered where the "as well as an inexpensive source of power -- the sea" quote came from.

      Other than the journalist's last hit off the bong.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:San Francisco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll have to sail it around the horn or teleport it because everyone knows they only place to put a floating data centre is at the centre of the Bermuda triangle so that it can take advantage of all the free energy from the astral vortex.

      Based on the numbers in the article, it should easily fit through the Panama canal, so it looks like they already thought that through.

  5. Treasure Island by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    as well as undertaking odd and unexpected projects like trying to bring Internet access to developing nations via balloons and blimps.

    In this case they're trying to bring internet access to pirates.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  6. To quote Betteridge's law by Introspective · · Score: 1

    ... Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered "no"

    I just can't see how an underwater data centre could be more economical than a normal one on land. Maybe they're experimenting with some new offshore cooling system, but a whole data centre? No.

    1. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not underwater, it's floating. And the area has a very mild climate in the summer which will reduce the cooling load, and the San Francisco bay is also freezing cold, so the water can probably be brought in for cooling. This is why prisoners didn't often make the swim between Alcatraz and SF.

    2. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is seems like we've heard this fairytale before. Glomar Explorer. A plausible idea on the surface, but completely stupid if you really look into it. Anybody really think they are testing out a new fangled cooling system at this scale? Is google really having trouble keeping computers cool at this scale? Why keep that a secret?

    3. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Four floors, and built out of shipping containers - the dirt-cheap construction option. It isn't actually that big, and a lot of it might be empty space. It may well be a testbed to work on those new-fangled cooling systems, refining the technology. Half the energy cost of a datacenter goes on cooling - it's understandable google might be looking into the idea.

    4. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by smith6174 · · Score: 1

      "Half the energy cost of a datacenter goes on cooling" And now the cost will be replaced by a mobile generator or a really long power cord? I think it is obvious that Google is involved, but why jump to conclusions about energy savings? Isn't it more likely that putting a data center on a barge will save real estate costs and property taxes?

    5. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly these barges are designed to harvest manganese nodules, Venusian swamp gas and other minerals from the floor of the ocean and have absolutely nothing to do with intercepting SIGINT from, well, everyone once we get a fleet of these "manganese-mining super wifi convenience routers" built and parked off the coast of every major city within reach of an ocean or river.

    6. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Because slashdot is full of engineers. We think in engineering terms.

      Supplying data to a floating center is easy - just a few short undersea fibers and a kevlar rope to support it coming up, no problem. Power, though, you are right - you can't just chuck a power cord in the ocean. Undersea power cables are very expensive. It could well be a tax dodge. Risky, though - spending a lot of money on something that could be regulated to uselessness in a few years.

    7. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by icebike · · Score: 1

      Unlikely they would build it on a barge to operate it in San Francisco bay.
      It would be way cheaper to build it on land and build a pipe to the bay.

      Besides, anyone thinking of pumping massive amounts of heat into the bay is going to find their head meeting a green brick wall in short order.
      And there would be permits already being filed for such activity.

      This thing is going to be towed away somewhere where governments are more cooperative, or have less to say about what is going on.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by icebike · · Score: 1

      Isn't it more likely that putting a data center on a barge will save real estate costs and property taxes?

      Only if you tow it out of some citie's jurisdiction. Which, requires having a massive fiber-optic cable, and shore support facilities. You can't just go out and anchor some huge barge just anywhere. There are shipping lanes to consider, risks to navigation, 200 mile economic exclusion zone issues.

      On the other hand, if Brazil was getting seriously pissed at US Snooping, and insisted that Google either get out of the country or build an in-country data center, this platform could be floated there in two weeks, and would allow an in-country presence.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:To quote Betteridge's law by EETech1 · · Score: 2

      It seemed to me like it was going to be wave powered.

      If your power is free and your cooling is free a project like this makes a lot of sense.

  7. Can you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Metal Gear?

  8. There'a another in Portland, Maine by WaxlyMolding · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:There'a another in Portland, Maine by EdZ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Google are outgrowing intercontinental fibre-optic cables. Too expensive, and insufficient bandwidth! Instead, they're implementing an extension of RFC1149, with the avian carriers replaced with bulk cargo shipping. A station wagon full of tapes has nothing on this!

    2. Re:There'a another in Portland, Maine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The registration numbers on the barges are in binary: "BAL 0010" and “BAL 0011." So, where's "BAL 0001?"

    3. Re:There'a another in Portland, Maine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cables? Where we're going we don't need cables." - Tesla

    4. Re:There'a another in Portland, Maine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no. They'll go with shark-mounted laser transmission.

    5. Re:There'a another in Portland, Maine by adolf · · Score: 1

      Uranus.

  9. 'google' these days by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    functions perfectly as a front for You Know What.
    There's trade in them data, you know.

    1. Re:'google' these days by smith6174 · · Score: 2

      By 'Google', you mean that intelligence organization we keep hearing about with unlimited cash provided by ads nobody has ever clicked?

  10. Structure Envy by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Apple going to build a fancy Spaceship? Fine, Google will just build a goddam giant undersea fortress!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Structure Envy by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      . . . meanwhile, Microsoft is building a giant wooden rabbit . . . once Apple takes the rabbit inside their spaceship, Ballmer will jump out and surprise . . .

      . . . maybe Google will fall for a giant wooden badger . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  11. Neal Stephenson by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    How can they get a patent on this? Wasn't pretty much the same thing done in Snow Crash, albeit for a different reason?

    1. Re:Neal Stephenson by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      The fact that something was done in a work of fiction has nothing to do with getting a patent for developing the idea in the Real World.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Neal Stephenson by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      How can they get a patent on this? Wasn't pretty much the same thing done in Snow Crash, albeit for a different reason?

      Are you suggesting that Google is building a prototype depleted-uranium railgun? If so, this is going to be awesome... Redmond will never know what hit them.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:Neal Stephenson by RDW · · Score: 1

      With all those mysterious shipping containers and the Bay Bridge, this looks much more William Gibson than Neal Stephenson.

  12. Wrong by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    Obviously, they are battle hardening, in order to protect our data from the NSA.

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:Wrong by davester666 · · Score: 2

      No, they just want to be able to charge the NSA for the data, rather than just turning it over for only a small charge.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  13. Sail Away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they are planning on taking it out into international waters...

    1. Re:Sail Away... by JustOK · · Score: 2

      with black jack and hookers

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Sail Away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going Galt...

  14. 1. Take operations into international waters. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    2. Deliver all ads from those servers.
    3. Evade taxes in every jurisdiction by declaring that all ad revenue is generated in FloatingAdServer1 through FloatingAdServer14.
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:1. Take operations into international waters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd be pirates, literally, if they would operate without flying a national flag. And once they do, they're subject to the tax laws of that jurisdiction.

      Of course, Google can now choose in which country to register, and still get nanosecond latencies to the west coast. Putting your datacentre in Ireland itself would give you milliseconds of latency to the US.

    2. Re:1. Take operations into international waters. by fa2k · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't be pirates at all, they'd be like another nation. Governments could decide to allow them to exchange data or to block everything with import restrictions (or even threaten with war). The datacentre wouldn't be protected by a national government, so they'd have to protect themselves against pirates.

  15. Don't worry by greggman · · Score: 1

    It's only Google planning for another epic Holiday Party

  16. Fewer building permits, chance of no property tax by silicon+dad · · Score: 1

    Even with Steve Jobs showing up at city council, permits still might sink Apple's mothership. And if they register it in Lyberia and moor it in Mexico for a while they might escape property taxes too.

  17. There's another one here in Portland, Maine by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Pretty much the same, on a floating barge here in Portland. Just read an article about it the paper (dead tree version). It's pretty clearly tied to google, that's clear. Also, the registrations of these two barges were a three letter designation and then 0010 and 0011 so there's probably at least one more out there (0001) somewhere and quite possibly at 0000 too.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:There's another one here in Portland, Maine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The three letter designation, BAL, is the front company's name abbreviated. The name? "By And Large." That is, "barge."

    2. Re:There's another one here in Portland, Maine by CFD339 · · Score: 1

      Fscking Google. Too clever by half.

      --
      The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    3. Re:There's another one here in Portland, Maine by wimh · · Score: 1

      Check http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/CoastGuard/VesselByName.html - search for BAL0: there's 0001, 0010, 0011 and 0100...

  18. You are over a month behind on news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Apple mothership building was approved last September.

  19. EIR? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I would think that rejecting lots of waste heat into San Francisco Bay would require an Environmental Impact Report, as well as approval from the Coastal Commission and probably other government checks. IANALaywer or expert on these things; but just follow the news on things like the remodels of piers in San Francisco and other things that touch the water. If Google somehow manages to be "special" on something like that, well... EVIL!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  20. And? by The+Cat · · Score: 0

    The government's "Stop Building Things" Committee and "No More Jobs Here" Department haven't confiscated it yet?

  21. gurgle by GrimShady · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe they will change their name to Gurgle

  22. yeah it IS California. You need a permit to piss by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Although the the heat from some servers would make zero difference given that the ocean currents mix with the entire Pacific Ocean, this is California. Specifically, San Francisco. Last I heard, you need a permit to urinate in SF because the odor could effect air quality and if you can get a piss permit it takes a few years.

  23. Daniel Turdman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh heh, heh heh, heh heh!

  24. Bandwidth? by Bazman · · Score: 1

    I say I say I say, how does a floating data center connect to the internet?

    Pier-to-pier networking!

    But seriously, what bandwidth and latency can you expect from something out in the ocean, unless they drag a wodge of fibres with them or tap into something on the seabed...

  25. There's 4 of them by wimh · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the US ship registration database (go to http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/CoastGuard/VesselByName.html and search for BAL0), there are four similar barges, with the convenient names:
    BAL0001
    BAL0010
    BAL0011
    BAL0100

    Looks like there's a pattern there, and it does scream Google...

    1. Re:There's 4 of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more on the way (not transferred from the builder?) http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/pls/webpls/cgv_pkg.vessel_id_list?vessel_id_in=1243693

    2. Re:There's 4 of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lab 1
      lab 2
      lab 3
      lab 4

  26. Re:"Secret" of the secret by hebertrich · · Score: 2

    see sacrifice rods

  27. Floating? No. Submersed? Better by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    How do you get all the network cabling to a floating datacentre? One good gust of wind and the datacentre moves (unless it's like an oil rig, but that doesn't sound like a "floating" datacentre) and the cables stretch and break.

    Better to submerge the datacentre. When it's firmly anchored to the seabed it can't move - but it still has all the seawater around it for cooling. You'd probably need something like Stromberg's setup (from 007: The Spy Who Loved Me) in reality, to get peope to & from it.

    In addition it has the advantage that not being in any one country's territotial waters, the tax situation could be very beneficial.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  28. Microsoft is ready to take measures against this. by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    Microsoft set up some time ago a submarine fleet, whose purpose is now clear: they want to torpedo Google's fleet!

  29. They got a patent on sea based data centers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you get a patent on something like this?

    Can I just go through the patent book and apply for patents with "sea based" prefixing everything in it? What about "land based"? Or I guess if you were very forward thinking you might want to go for "moon based" .....

  30. The real question is power (maybe network) by markhahn · · Score: 1

    Containerized servers are old hat, and they don't make a lot of sense under normal conditions. Mobility and redeployment really need to be important goals to justify the compromises.

    Containers are roughly 8x8x40, so naively could contain 80x 54u racks, which means up to 2 MW/container. In reality, density probably wouldn't be nearly that high, but probably the better part of 1 MW. Water cooling with aquasar-type heatsinks would be an obvious implementation. The barge looks like a 3x3x2 prism of these containers, so will likely want around 20 MW. My first guess about cooling would just be to make the whole hull into a heat-exchanger - double-walled hulls are quite common in shipbuilding and it wouldn't take that much engineering to create a reasonably efficient circulation pattern.

    But I'm pretty skeptical about whether that kind of power could be gotten from wave generation.

  31. Floating Energy and Cooling source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about the cooling and self sustaining energy. This looks like a rebirth of Sun Microsystems 'Black Box'. http://inhabitat.com/sun-microsystems-project-blackbox/ in another form.

  32. for the NSA by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

    move the NSA out there, cut the cables and give 'em a push out to sea. google has the right idea.

  33. It's only a matter of time... by skelly33 · · Score: 1

    it's only a matter of time before they get shut down by environmentalists. The problem with using sea water as cooling is that the net result is the warming of the sea water. Even only a few degrees can alter the local ecology. It would be one thing if what they were doing was a net zero effect, but if they are pulling energy off the grid, then they will be putting grid energy into the water as heat, and that is not good...

  34. barges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1234

  35. OTEC works in warm waters by dandv · · Score: 1

    If you read through the Wikipedia article you quoted, you'll learn that OTEC only really works in warm waters, where the heat difference between surface and depth is large enough. The best US location for OTEC is Hawaii, and there's only one functioning OTEC plant in the world, near Japan. So Google is most likely not building an OTEC plant, or they'd do so in a very different shipyard instead of on Treasure Island.

    1. Re:OTEC works in warm waters by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      The construction site doesn't mean all that much. Whatever they're building it's mobile. If it's not self-mobile, it can be moved with tugs. I'm sure they were much more interested in who was doing the building than where. Building structures for long term deep ocean deployment is a solved problem, but you still want to hire a competent shipyard.

  36. Just moor it by dandv · · Score: 1

    You don't have to submerge a barge to keep it in one spot. There are two easier options: mooring (a few $M upfront cost) and Dynamic Positioning (high running cost).

  37. No permit by dandv · · Score: 1
    According to this CBS Local article, construction stopped a few weeks ago due to a lack of permits:

    The reason: Google does not have a permit for a floating anything. “Google has spent millions on this,” said an insider close to the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. “But they can’t park this barge on the waterfront without a permit, and they don’t have one.” A BCDC official confirmed the agency has held discussions with Google about “hypothetical operations” on the water, but he complained the tech giant has been vague about how the barge would be used.

  38. No permit for Google to park the barge near SF by dandv · · Score: 1
    According to this CBS Local article, construction stopped a few weeks ago due to a lack of permits:

    The reason: Google does not have a permit for a floating anything. “Google has spent millions on this,” said an insider close to the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. “But they can’t park this barge on the waterfront without a permit, and they don’t have one.” A BCDC official confirmed the agency has held discussions with Google about “hypothetical operations” on the water, but he complained the tech giant has been vague about how the barge would be used.

  39. Two more on the way by dandv · · Score: 1

    In addition to the one above (USCG Doc. No. 1243693), here's another one on the way: USCG Doc. No.: 1225103.