Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Gets Blow-Back Over Plan To Sell Kindles At Small Bookshops

Rambo Tribble writes "No sooner had Amazon revealed their plan to offer independent book shops the Kindle for re-sale, along with a kick-back on e-book purchases, than the fur began to fly. It appears the shops view the plan as Amazon-assisted suicide. Given the apparent terms of the deal, it looks like they may have a point. Amazon may well have done themselves more harm than good with this ploy. One storeowner wrote, 'Hmmm, let's see. We sell Kindles for essentially no profit, the new Kindle customer is in our store where they can browse and discover books, the new Kindle customer can then check the price on Amazon and order the e-book. We make a little on their e-book purchases, but then lose them as a customer completely after two years. Doesn't sound like such a great partnership to me.'"

176 comments

  1. May as well get SOME money by SigNuZX728 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You might as well get what money you can while you can. Owning a book store does not sound like a thing that is going to last for long. Maybe if you ask nicely, you can get Amazon to put some of their delivery lockers in your store.

    1. Re:May as well get SOME money by hawguy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You might as well get what money you can while you can. Owning a book store does not sound like a thing that is going to last for long.

      Exactly -- if the customer is in the store and the store can't show that they provide any value to that customer, it sounds like the stores have already lost.

      It's not like customers aren't going to buy a Kindle just because they can't find it in their local bookstore.

    2. Re:May as well get SOME money by undeadbill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I still use bookstores, but I go there to buy high quality hardbound prints of books that I like to re-read, or older paperbacks. The small bookstores I go to have always catered to this market, so while there may be some issues with bookstores staying afloat, the ones I go to have been expanding their selection of quality bound books. I've bought several copies as gifts as well, all from the same two stores near where I live. I never considered doing that on Amazon, as I can't gauge the print quality over the internet.

      Another thing is that certain specialty book stores (like scifi/fantasy genre stores) will always have the best fiction on their shelves, vs the metric assload of poor quality stories I find as the majority of Amazon selections, with a very limited ability to refine searches based upon preferences that I can more easily communicate to a person.

      And I'm saying this as an Amazon Prime user with an extensive selection of kindle titles. Most of those are copies that I own and keep for travel purposes. What I would like to see are book publishers distributing download codes with their books, so I could get an ebook copy after I pay for a high quality printing. I really don't consider the burgeoning ebook reader market of people who are rediscovering books on marketplaces like Amazon as the same market of avid readers who like the feel of a good book in their hands- if anything, I'd wager that many Amazon users will start buying hardbounds in the future much as I am doing now.

    3. Re:May as well get SOME money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You might as well get what money you can while you can. Owning a book store does not sound like a thing that is going to last for long. Maybe if you ask nicely, you can get Amazon to put some of their delivery lockers in your store.

      But if these customers are walking into your bookstore to buy books. Why would you essentially tell those people not to shop there anymore?

    4. Re:May as well get SOME money by hawguy · · Score: 1

      You might as well get what money you can while you can. Owning a book store does not sound like a thing that is going to last for long.

      Maybe if you ask nicely, you can get Amazon to put some of their delivery lockers in your store.

      But if these customers are walking into your bookstore to buy books. Why would you essentially tell those people not to shop there anymore?

      Because it's your last chance to show the customers why they should continue buying from you, even if they buy some content online. If you don't add any value, they are going to stop buying from you whether you sell them a Kindle or not, but at least if they buy it from you, you have the chance to show them how you add value.

    5. Re:May as well get SOME money by Desler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Totally. Just the other day I kicked over some whore, pissed on her and then threw a couple of bucks at her. And that bitch had the audacity to complain! So I told her "What do you have to complain about, bitch? You got some money out of this".

    6. Re:May as well get SOME money by Desler · · Score: 1

      Because it's your last chance to show the customers why they should continue buying from you, even if they buy some content online./quote.

      Doubtful. The vast majority of book buyers neither own e-readers or buy e-books. You're highly exaggerating the situation. Partnering with Amazon is simply just running yourself out of a business while Amazon makes the vast majority of the profits.

    7. Re:May as well get SOME money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and I both buy/read e-books, but we have voracious appetites for hardcopy books as well. That said, we love and support our favorite books stores - mostly independent ones with eclectic selections. Yeah, we can probably buy the hard copy for less at Amazon, but it just is NOT the same!

      FWIW, e-books with a decent reader are great for travel, but when we are sitting at home on a cold winter night, there is nothing like the feel of turning paper pages under your fingers.

    8. Re:May as well get SOME money by lgw · · Score: 1

      The demographic trend is strong. The bookstore will go the way of the print newspaper, one generation later. Hell, I have ~1000 books but even I realize it's time to switch. Ink smeared on bound paper has a certain appeal, but there's nothing really better about it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:May as well get SOME money by jythie · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that the bookstore does provide value to the customer, but when they finally make their purchase they do it form Amazon instead.

    10. Re:May as well get SOME money by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fate of paper books is not quite written in stone yet. eBooks have some significant advantages, but some real downsides too. I suspect long term we will just see a new equilibrium rather then a complete crushing.

    11. Re:May as well get SOME money by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The fate of paper books is not quite written in stone yet. eBooks have some significant advantages, but some real downsides too. I suspect long term we will just see a new equilibrium rather then a complete crushing.

      Right, the music industry made such a big comeback and now you see music stores on every corner. CD's are still sold, but not many in independent shops.

    12. Re:May as well get SOME money by beckett · · Score: 1

      Right, the music industry made such a big comeback and now you see music stores on every corner. CD's are still sold, but not many in independent shops.

      Who said anything about CD's? Before Technology seems to be interesting again.

    13. Re:May as well get SOME money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the 'demographic' of this trend? And is it even a trend?

      http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/16/e-ink-reports-46-sales-drop-expects-e-reader-shipments-to-be-flat-this-year/

      "Flash! Stair Entrepreneurs Predict Inclined-Plane Disappearance Within 5 Years!"

    14. Re:May as well get SOME money by jythie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While there are significant similarities between the two shifts, they are not completely parallel. For instance the actual playback mechanism for music remained unchanged even as the source shifted. You could unplug a CD deck and drop an mp3 player in and still use the rest of the stack, with primary advantages and disadvantages being linked to the rest of the equipment. With books we are talking about both a new medium AND new way of interacting with it (though there is the possibility of producing flashable 'paper' books), which puts it a little further apart.

      As for music stores, yes there are fewer, but the ones that are around seem to have found their niches and look pretty stable. Music distribution has changed, but just like radio and tape did not wipe out live performance, downloadable digital music has not wiped out physical stores.

    15. Re:May as well get SOME money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I will relate my experience in a bookstore.

      I visited, found a book ( an Arduino programming manual ), and, looked for somewhere to read it, as I am getting older and standing causes my feet and ankles to swell up.

      So I wander down to the cafe area and sit. No one much is there so I figured I would not be in the way. In no time, I had someone right over telling me this area is for cafe customers only. Sorry. My bad.

      It looks just like a Starbucks cafe with stuff served in Starbucks cups. Ok.. I'll order a frappucino - its only a dime more than if I got the identical drink at the Starbucks directly across the street. She makes it. I tender my Starbucks discount card. She is miffed - she can't take a Starbucks card. Do I have a Visa or cash?

      By this time I am really getting annoyed. Starbucks has this promotion going if I buy a coffee on their card, I get free refills. I ask her if the Starbucks free coffee refills work here. They don't. She still is standing there, wanting another credit card - while I am pointing to the logo pasted all over the cafe and the logo on the Starbucks card.

      Yeh, I had a VISA on me but damned if I was going to use it. By this time I am seriously annoyed. All I wanted to do was see how the book was laid out. First she demands I buy something in order to have a place to sit, now I have to forfeit what little incentive I have for buying a five dollar cup of coffee.

      I leave her with the coffee I am sure she is going to pour down the drain. I did like the book but I have already made enough of an ass of myself.

      I go to the register with the book and am quickly informed if I buy some sort of loyalty card, I get a 20% discount. With that, I figured the store played discount games just like every other store does... print full price on the cover and charge less to make the customer feel like he made a wise purchase - as only fools and rich people these days seem to pay list price - so I ask for the senior discount. I am well old enough to qualify. I am denied. No discount. List price,. I hemhaw around a while trying to see if I can get the price down a couple of bucks... at least enough to pay the sales tax. No way. Either I get a discount card right then, or pay full price. Being already in a sour frame of mind, I laid the book down and walked away.

      I ordered the same book online a little later while enjoying another Frappucino I got at the Starbucks across the street.

      Saved the price of the frappucino, sales tax, and a bit more by doing it that way. And made a mental note there was not much sense going across the street from the Starbucks to browse the bookstore anymore.

    16. Re:May as well get SOME money by smash · · Score: 1

      Pretty much this. People WILL buy books online irrespective of whether the book store owner sells kindles or not. They can either become a reseller for kindle/other book reader, or they die without making any money out of the inevitable change.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    17. Re:May as well get SOME money by GospelHead821 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure about book stores, per se, but I think that printed books have a long life ahead of them. I imagine that they're analogous to vinyl records. I've already begun moving the bulk of my paperback collection to ePub but some titles are worthy of better treatment and get upgraded to a hardback. I'll pay a premium for an elegant copy of a book that I love.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    18. Re:May as well get SOME money by David_Hart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While there are significant similarities between the two shifts, they are not completely parallel. For instance the actual playback mechanism for music remained unchanged even as the source shifted. You could unplug a CD deck and drop an mp3 player in and still use the rest of the stack, with primary advantages and disadvantages being linked to the rest of the equipment. With books we are talking about both a new medium AND new way of interacting with it (though there is the possibility of producing flashable 'paper' books), which puts it a little further apart.

      I'm not sure that I follow your logic...

      There definitely was a shift in how we interact with music when we shifted from CDs to MP3s. A single CD usually holds no more than 20 songs, at most. An MP3 player can hold thousands of songs. When we listened to CDs, we tended to listen to the CD as a whole and the songs in the order that the artist/producer created. With MP3s, we listen to the songs we like and dump the songs we don't like. Plus, most people like to shuffle their songs for a bit of variety. I could go on about other changes such as how we discover music, etc. But my point stands. MP3s and MP3 players changed the way we interact with music just as much as ebooks and ereaders changed the way we interact with books.

      I still buy CDs then convert them because CDs are still of higher quality. I'll stop buying CDs when the music stores offer songs in a lossless format, such as FLAC. However, I no longer buy physical books. My Kindle is small enough to carry around, will last two weeks, and can store way more books than I can carry. I see book stores evolving into specialty shops, much like the stores that sell vinyl records.

    19. Re: May as well get SOME money by matunos · · Score: 1

      Yeah the objection voiced above seems to be based in the premise that people won't know about Kindles if they're not on display in their bookstore. Sort of like how if I close my eyes, you can't see me.

    20. Re:May as well get SOME money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So basically, two employees told you that they're not *allowed*to ignore the rules (unless they want to lose their jobs) in order to give you a free drink, a senior discount for people older than you or discount your book just because...and you figured the bookstore was at fault? Really?

      Here's the kind of thing decent people do in situations like those:
      -- We realize the cafe is probably just paying to use the Starbucks name/equipment so customers will stay on-site for a quick drink/snack rather than leave & possibly not come back, and that the extra dime reflects the high cost that Starbucks is likely charging them for it.
      -- We ask how old people have to be to qualify as a senior, and probably make a lame joking comment like "hey, at least now I feel younger"to indicate we're not going to be a jerk about something out of their control. We pay for the book, wish them a good day, and head on out in a pleasant mood.

      Seriously, it's 2013, not 1953. Retail employees are typically not paid a great deal, are under a lot of stress, and will lose their job for doing the kind of things you harangued them for. Stores now have set prices, so folks hoping to talk their way into a deal now go to garage sales, the flea market or farmer's market.

    21. Re:May as well get SOME money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some major advantages to non-digital cameras too, but look what happened.

      With books, I think it partly comes down to your location. I live in central Oxford, I just don't have the space to store the books I read. I prefer the feel of a real book but I find myself more and more reading virtual books

    22. Re:May as well get SOME money by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the handwriting is on the wall. 99% of publications will become exclusively electronic at some point, for a number of reasons. It may be a generation or two but that its the future.

      All you will see in print will be 'special' items ( large format art, etc ), and run of the mill stuff will vanish off paper.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    23. Re: May as well get SOME money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there's still a place for paper books. For example I have an annotated version of all the Sherlock Holmes that would be would be a nightmare in ebook format (each page has comments about the story on the facing page so that if you just want to read the the story
        you can just read every second page). I think that the future of paper books might be have to offer something like this that ebooks can't do (for now at least).

    24. Re:May as well get SOME money by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      The only think I learned from the story is that you are a giant douchebag.

    25. Re: May as well get SOME money by lgw · · Score: 1

      I think there's still a place for paper books. For example I have an annotated version of all the Sherlock Holmes that would be would be a nightmare in ebook format (each page has comments about the story on the facing page so that if you just want to read the the story
            you can just read every second page). I think that the future of paper books might be have to offer something like this that ebooks can't do (for now at least).

      Yup, the tech isn't quite there yet, but the writing's on the wall. Annotated books and glosses really require a larger page to make for sane reading, but all that means is we're missing the large-format eReader.

      That's really my last reservation. I want a specific device: a bigger screen than most of todays readers, maybe 10" (because portable isn't my first goal) with a eReader screen (low power, long battery life, hires, but low performance) but otherwise a full tablet. Of course my eReader should also be my MP3 player (while I'm reading) and really anything else that doesn't require a high-power display.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:May as well get SOME money by lgw · · Score: 1

      What is the 'demographic' of this trend?

      Comfort with reading from screens is an age thing, as is the habit of reading printed novels. I expect fellow GenXers to have a hard time giving up printed books, but for Millennials (especially those just now learning to read), screens are just the natural place to read text.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    27. Re:May as well get SOME money by DedTV · · Score: 1

      Yes, really. Of course the bookstore was at fault. It's the bookstore's rules that require their employees to service the company rather the customer which created an unpleasant customer experience. He wasn't blaming the employees for enforcing the rules, he was pointing out the rules themselves, which employees are forced to conform to without any ability to logically use their judgement to balance the needs of the company against the needs of the customer is what is stupid.
      Not everyone is a masochistic consumer who will readily accept being treated like shit just because they once (or still) worked retail and sympathize with the employees over the people those employees are meant to serve.
      Who gives a shit about the employees? I never blamed the customer for yelling at me because our service failed them when I worked in tech/customer support. I took it and did my best to calm them and address the problem because that was my job. If you can't handle the smell of shit, don't take a job cleaning out port-o-pottys.

      Here's the kind of thing intelligent people do in situations like those: -- We realize the cafe is probably just trying to make people think they have a Starbucks so idiots will pay $5 for a $0.05 cup of swill. That seniors tend to be much easier to confuse into thinking it's a real Starbucks is just a bonus. So we stay at home, brew up a $0.80 cup of our favorite brew and shop online rather than shop at such sleazy establishments. -- We realize that a senior discount is meant to be a sign of respect for elder customers within the local community who are often living on a partial working income due after retirement or as retirement approaches. If a company will give some hipster a 20% discount for signing up to get spam and taking their stupid customer tracking card, they can give a similar discount to an aged gentleman who asks for it. If they don't, we shop somewhere else that better shows respect for the elders within the community in which they are located.

      But besides that, his main point was, the brick and mortar location did nothing at all to elevate the buying experience for him over the more efficient and cheaper option of buying online. And rather than make exception to their rules to court seniors, the most likely people to still be willing to buy products using such an archaic technology as paper, they seemed to be trying to repel them with confusing rules and marketing.

    28. Re:May as well get SOME money by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I still buy CDs then convert them because CDs are still of higher quality. I'll stop buying CDs when the music stores offer songs in a lossless format, such as FLAC. However, I no longer buy physical books. My Kindle is small enough to carry around, will last two weeks, and can store way more books than I can carry. I see book stores evolving into specialty shops, much like the stores that sell vinyl records.

      Curious. I stopped buying CD's a decade ago because (mostly) I'd rather pick out individual songs and I don't care about lossless quality. I still buy physical books because sometimes I don't want to deal with electronics, or because I can get a pretty good discount on used ones.

  2. No duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Big Warehouse Book stores kill the independent book stores. Amazon killed the Big Book stores. But the silver lining is that the death of the Big Warehouse Book stores gave new life to the independents. So now Amazon tries to kill the independents, but they are not morons.

    The independents were saved by Amazon, but that doesn't mean they are stupid enough to let Amazon kill them next.

  3. How is this worse? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is this any worse for the small bookstores than their customers buying a Kindle from some other retailer, or direct from amazon.com? They'd still be browsing in the store, checking online prices, buying the e-books, and eventually ceasing to be a customer. The bookstore would simply have deprived itself of an opportunity to be the one selling the Kindles and getting a cut of e-book revenues in the meantime.

    Do these bookstores really think that refusing to sell the devices themselves will slow adoption?

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    1. Re:How is this worse? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm kind of interested in the bookstores I know of that are not going under because of Amazon. At least here in Chicago, the independent booksellers I frequent appear to be doing very well, especially now that the Borders and B&N and other chain bookstores have all but disappeared.

      I don't see that they've changed their business model much with the rise of e-books, yet they are still busy, filled with customers, and in once case, even expanding.

      If you treat customers right, I think there's still room for booksellers to succeed. Don't compete on price - compete on service.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:How is this worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people would buy the Kindle at the bookstore were they to sell it then, yes, of course not selling will slow adoption. It's almost tautological.

      In the long run it won't help, but it will obviously slow adoption among a subset of the customers of that bookstore.

    3. Re:How is this worse? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It could be better. If Amazon were serious about it (and I think it would be in their interest to be serious about it), they could set up a kiosk in these bookstores that would keep cached copies of as much of the Kindle library as possible on a local server, and have some Kindles set up to use them, and allow people to browse the Kindle books in their entirety in the store - just like a real book. This would drive people to the stores for a better eBook-buying experience (where they can buy other stuff as well) and gets around the publishers' restrictions on doing the same online.

      Amazon, drop me a line if you wanna outsource this. ;)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:How is this worse? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      It's bad enough if someone else is slitting your throat - why do it for them?

    5. Re:How is this worse? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If people would buy the Kindle at the bookstore were they to sell it then, yes, of course not selling will slow adoption.

      If people would only buy the Kindle were the bookstore to sell it, then not selling would slow adoption. But how likely is that? A much more realistic scenario is that a person might have bought the Kindle at their favorite bookstore if it was available, but if not then they'll buy it at Best Buy or Wal-Mart or amazon.com, or even the bookstore down the street that's participating in the program. Either way they get their Kindle.

      At most the bookstore might be advertising the Kindle a bit by carrying it, increasing adoption by a miniscule amount, but by this point most people know what a Kindle is and where they can get one. Keeping them out of the bookstores won't change that.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    6. Re:How is this worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if they didn't already have a kindle, why the hell would you push one on them? "No, don't buy this heavy book... buy this kindle and get out of my store and don't come back!"

    7. Re:How is this worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bookstore would simply have deprived itself of an opportunity to be the one selling the Kindles and getting a cut of e-book revenues in the meantime.

      Yeah, 10% of the "takings". Which is likely to amount to pennies per ebook sale. The only way they would even make enough to cover a single full-time employee's salary (excluding any benefits) which amounts to a gross of 1160 at Federal minimum wage would be that their customers would have to buy 10000+ ebooks every month. That is highly unlikely.

    8. Re:How is this worse? by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      "Do these bookstores really think that refusing to sell the devices themselves will slow adoption?"

      Apparently Amazon does, or they wouldn't be offering to cut them in for a slice of the action.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    9. Re:How is this worse? by Kjella · · Score: 2

      People are creatures of habit, if you go to the book store and they serve your book needs why screw with what works? Just knowing that there's alternatives out there isn't usually enough to push people over the edge, but if you go to the book store and they're pushing the Kindle and eBooks maybe you figure it's time to follow the crowd. If you go to the whip & buggy store you expect them to try selling you just that, if they instead try to sell you a car on commission because that's where the market is going they're only spelling their own doom. Either you milk the market as long as it lasts or you sell your own car, but unless you're getting very well paid I don't see assisted suicide as being profit-maximizing.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:How is this worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because by trying to sell them on it is speeding things up. What if a customer had no intention of buying a kindle? Converting them to an ebook reader is not going to help them in the long or short run. Offering them the best physical book buying experience will.

    11. Re:How is this worse? by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This. The greatest example, I find, is with recommendations: try as they might, Amazon's recommendations are still very often inaccurate, backwards-looking (I already bought this thing, I don't want a hundred suggestions of other things exactly like it!) and very sensitive to trends. Your local bookstore, however, might have someone who knows just what you usually like and comes up with a few new books every so often when you pass by. They know you personally, they know your preferences and they actually read the stuff they sell. It's a more personal and customized experience which a blank, faceless website just cannot match.

      Yes, it does mean bookstores need to do more work to encourage and nurture a certain feel of community, actually talking with customers and engaging with them, but... That's a good thing. We need more of that and fewer standardized, giant corporation-driven stores.

    12. Re:How is this worse? by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      |Do these bookstores really think that refusing to sell the devices themselves will slow adoption?

      Of their regular customers? You betcha.

      Just reminding them about their competitors' product isn't a good idea.

    13. Re:How is this worse? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is one of the humorous sides of advertising online. I needed a part for my motorcycle. The original lasted for more than thirty years, but rubber compounds do age - so I made a purchase. For three weeks now, every place that advertising isn't blocked entirely, Google manages to slip an advert for the same or similar parts for motorcycles. DUHHH - the part I bought will probably last longer than I will now! I won't be needing another, unless I buy another 30 year old bike to add to my stable!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:How is this worse? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      So when the Grim Reaper comes for you, you'll offer to hold his cloak for him so that he has both hands free for the scythe, right?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    15. Re:How is this worse? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      Mentioned in some other stories is the fact that a lot of this program was tried first at the Waterstone's chain in the UK. In those stores, they sell Kindle devices, and customers can also bring in any Kindle (bought there or not) and read just about any book on Amazon for free for an hour while connected to the store's wi-fi.

      The "selling Kindle devices" part made it to the US, so it seems reasonable that the other bit isn't far behind.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    16. Re:How is this worse? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      Because then you get a cut of everything they buy on that device for the next 2 years, whether it's in your store or not.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    17. Re:How is this worse? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Wife and I used to spend voraciously in bookstores, now on the rare occasion we visit one, we're more likely to Window shop, preview the books we like, then check Amazon and discover we can get the same book for 20-60% less, and go home and order it there.
      People aren't made out of money, so we save where we can. We have e-book readers, but still prefer actual books when possible. E-Books are grweat for trsavel at least as other posters have noted, but nothing beats an actual, physical book.

    18. Re:How is this worse? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Wonderful, thanks for the info!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    19. Re: How is this worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. It doesn't seem to matter what I buy or browse at Amazon, I always get recommendations for romance novels. Yech!

    20. Re:How is this worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly Amazon thinks that this deal would allow Kindle to break into a market that is currently not buying Kindles. Otherwise why offer it?

    21. Re:How is this worse? by Joosy · · Score: 1

      So if bookstores can be a great place to discover books to read ... but many people prefer reading on a Kindle ... why not sell the e-book at the bookstore?

      A customer could leaf through a physical book at the store, think "Hey, I'd like to read this" and take something like a gift-card up to the register to buy. At that point they'd run the card through something to activate it (just like buying a gift card anywhere these days) and the book would then appear in your Kindle library. The bookstore would get a cut of the sale.

      In other words, let the bookstore sell (many) blades, not just one razor. The bookstores would have more customers actually spending money (as opposed to window shopping then ordering from home) and Amazon would have another way to sell you e-books.

      --
      I'm sick and tired of these hip, "ironic" sigs. This is an actual, honest-to-goodness no-nonsense sig!
  4. Soon, no more bookstores. by Animats · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At peak, Blockbuster alone had 9,000 video rental stores. The last day to rent a video from Blockbuster is tomorrow. All the stores are closing. When will the last DVD/Blu-Ray disk be made?

    Bookstores are following the trend of video stores, about ten years behind. Borders went bust two years ago. Barnes and Noble is the last big chain. Soon, no more chain bookstores. Then, no more bookstores. Then, no more printed books.

    1. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      The last disc won't be for a long, long time. Too many people like to collect them. It'll be years before they are totally superseded by digital downloads.

    2. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by mythosaz · · Score: 0

      People said that about books.

      The number of people who want book collections - as physical things to put on shelves to impress the rubes - are dwindling rapidly. Soon it'll be like music: A few holdouts with a bunch of vinyl shopping in dusty shops and yard sales and the rest of the planet with music in the cloud.

    3. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      I am not so sure about that. If I had to guess I would say between 5 to 10 years.

      Blue-ray has never taken off and DVD sales are falling. A large chunk of that is because people are switching from building their own personal DVD library to rent (i.e. NetFlix) or streaming. Renting implies a more efficient method of DVD ownership so that puts a floor under that until people switch to totally digital.

      And I think that will happen when 4k TV takes off. I don’t hear anybody talking about shipping physical media for that format.

    4. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      I think Barnes and Noble have pretty much already gone bust. Have you been in one lately? All they have is a big Nook section surrounded by puzzles, games, greeting cards and other knick-knacks -- hardly any books at all.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    5. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by intermodal · · Score: 1

      No, I haven't been to Barnes and Noble in years. But I guess that's the point of what you're saying...

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    6. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Borders went bust because they were horribly mismanaged for years. I am not sure the parallel applies.

    7. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The big coffee-table picture books will still be around (looking at some of the beautiful photography in those books is lost on an 8.9" kindle screen). I also think technical books will remain viable in print (I've got a handful of dev-related books on my kindle, and I've invariably bought the printed versions where available). I also still insist on buy DVD/BluRays, mainly because I don't like the Netflix availability (although I do use it), but also seem to be in the mood to watch movies when my internet connection goes down.

      The market is dwindling, I grant you, but there are niches where I think physical books will remain relevant. Maybe we'll see bookstores dwindle in size to become like a magazine stand or similar.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    8. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      At peak, Blockbuster alone had 9,000 video rental stores.
      The last day to rent a video from Blockbuster is tomorrow. All the stores are closing. When will the last DVD/Blu-Ray disk be made?

      Digital download/streaming videos still doesn't match the video/audio quality of a blu-ray, and wont for a long, long time (in the United States at least) because Internet service wont be fast enough/offer high enough caps to make that kind of product practical for long, long time.

      A book is a static image. If you don't have a fetish over paper and binding the experience can be reproduced much more easily.

    9. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Algae_94 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I think that will happen when 4k TV takes off. I don’t hear anybody talking about shipping physical media for that format.

      No way will this work. Bandwidth caps as they are today will prevent people from downloading 4k video. Here's a reference to a 4k documentary that is 160GB. Does that sound like something that's going to fly with the ISPs we currently have?

    10. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      It is an open question but yes, I do think it will be via ISP. Right now the only way you can get 4k movies is via digital download. Now it is still the early days so only a little weight there.

      Bandwidth is an issue and you have to start loading the thing in advance. Reminds of the early days of the internet. Who knows but maybe 4k is the killer application that will get everybody to buy fiber. I don’t know anybody who has had cap issues with the physical land line ISP but I am dealing with a small sample size.

      But in a war between ISPs and a new media format (I have heard suggestions that a hard drive format might be I n the works) I am going to guess digital downloads.

    11. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      The healthy part of BN, Nook & College bookstores, has been hived off to Microsoft.

      The physical stores are doing less well. Last I heard the online bookstore was being run by Amazon but that was a few years ago.

    12. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The last disc won't be for a long, long time. Too many people like to collect them. It'll be years before they are totally superseded by digital downloads.

      Plus, the movie studios will want to wring every last cent out of DVD sales before they move to a pure digital distribution model.

      Movie streaming catalogs (even pay per view like Amazon) have a long way to go before they will be as complete as DVD catalogs.

    13. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by hawguy · · Score: 2

      And I think that will happen when 4k TV takes off. I don’t hear anybody talking about shipping physical media for that format.

      No way will this work. Bandwidth caps as they are today will prevent people from downloading 4k video. Here's a reference to a 4k documentary that is 160GB. Does that sound like something that's going to fly with the ISPs we currently have?

      4K has only 4X more pixels than 1080p. Netflix says that currently, you need a 5mbit connection for Hidef streaming, or 7mbit for super hidef. So that would put 4K streaming at around 20 - 28mbit... maybe less if better graphics hardware means they can use better compression algorithms. Many people are already able to get that speed from a Cable modem or U-verse style DSL.

      Bandwidth caps are a business limitation, not a physical restriction. I'm sure there are bottlenecks that providers will have to overcome, but that's the nature of the business.

    14. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      At peak, Blockbuster alone had 9,000 video rental stores.
      The last day to rent a video from Blockbuster is tomorrow. All the stores are closing. When will the last DVD/Blu-Ray disk be made?

      Digital download/streaming videos still doesn't match the video/audio quality of a blu-ray, and wont for a long, long time (in the United States at least) because Internet service wont be fast enough/offer high enough caps to make that kind of product practical for long, long time.

      A book is a static image. If you don't have a fetish over paper and binding the experience can be reproduced much more easily.

      Likewise, if you don't have a fetish for the utmost in picture quality,existing hidef video streaming is already "good enough" for the majority of people.

    15. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Animats · · Score: 1

      And I think that will happen when 4k TV takes off. I donâ(TM)t hear anybody talking about shipping physical media for that format.

      That's going to be a real problem. You'll need 130Mb/sec to do a good job. (If you're going to play lower-res video, why have a 2K x 4K display?)

    16. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Digital download/streaming videos still doesn't match the video/audio quality of a blu-ray, and wont for a long, long time

      You know, I think this is a matter of personal taste. I couldn't care less about video quality, within reason. I have absolutely no desire to try to have a movie theatre in my home. Then again, I don't watch a lot of movies or TV. For audio, I'm a little more picky.

      A book is a static image. If you don't have a fetish over paper and binding the experience can be reproduced much more easily.

      While you're correct that it would now be pretty easy to replicate the experience of a high-quality printed book, nobody is really doing it. If only I could buy a "static image" of a decently designed book, I'd be happy. But most "ebooks" are just text that's thrown into some stupid engine that formats text like the worst version of MS Word, only with a smaller selection of fonts and less control over other things that affect readability.

      I actually own a Kindle, but I've purchased exactly two ebooks. I've tried downloading other free ones too, and they just look horrible, if you care at all about typography. I'd much prefer a static image (e.g., PDF), if it were sized so that I could read it on my screen properly. Almost all the books I actually have loaded on my Kindle are PDFs derived from paper books (even very old ones), because the typesetting is just so much better.

      It has nothing to do with a "paper fetish" or binding. Good typography just "looks better," just like high-quality video or whatever. Page layout, text-block size, spacing between lines, between words, between sentences, etc. does make a difference. Line-breaking automatically and hyphenating automatically is more-or-less possible, but it requires a better engine that most ebook readers. And different typefaces require different solutions.

      If someone wanted to really implement high-quality ebooks, they could make use of, say, a LaTeX engine which could regenerate and retypeset a book to fit whatever screen size desired, with the font size chosen. A durable PS or PDF version could be generated that would always look the same, once the user decides the specs for that book.

      This would better replicate the experience of paper books, not just from an aesthetic standpoint, but also the sense of "memory" one gets about "where something was on the page." When I actually sit down and read to learn something, I usually remember where something is discussed by the placement on the page, and the approximate location thumbing through the book. That sort of physical interaction with "browsing" through pages and remembering locations is much more difficult with ebooks, especially when text can reflow on a whim.

      I'm not saying everyone has to care about typography in this way, but some people do. To them, "the experience can be reproduced much more easily," but so far hasn't. Unfortunately, the people who want to have a movie theatre in their home seem to be much more numerous than the people who care about beautiful typesetting. Alas, Donald Knuth's vision for beautiful automatic typography seems to have been forgotten....

    17. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by borl · · Score: 1

      The days of screens are very much numbered too.

    18. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with dreamchaser that physical media will be around for awhile. They'll just be getting the physical objects more directly, either through amazon, or from the publisher/record label/artist directly. Cutting out most of the middlemen, whether it be a mom and pop shop or a national chain, was going to happen at some point.

    19. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this "good enough" bullshit is harshing my mellow. Really, what's the point in even getting a high end home theater, if Netflix quality, while getting better over the years, still doesn't come close for a lot of movies? What about uncompressed audio? You gonna deliver that too? Hell, even the cable service itself, has crammed more channels down the pipe, because they're cheap.

    20. Re: Soon, no more bookstores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compressed 25GB Blu-Ray films look pretty great at 2GB, I bet that "4k documentary that is 160G" will still look awesome compressed down to 10GB.

    21. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any place that always sells their goods at the MSRP deserves to die. B&N have the most offensive movie prices. They'll be asking $22.99, when you can get it Target for $14.99 and online for $9.99. I'm sure they are(were?) big enough to get a similar wholesale price, so why do the extra gouging?

    22. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      4K has only 4X more pixels than 1080p. Netflix says that currently, you need a 5mbit connection for Hidef streaming, or 7mbit for super hidef.

      Netflix is lying to you. Their hidef isn't blu-ray quality. Its 1080p with compression artifacts. The audio isn't as good either.

      Its better than then the regular hd which is even more compressed, and even that is better than some of the so called hd channels on cable some of which are badly compressed.

      Compared to bluray though its a complete joke.

      It's good enough, and there are only a handful of titles I would even care enough to pay extra for bluray, never mind "4k" but at the same time what's the point drooling over a netflix compressed 4k stream if their superHD is still well beneath even mere bluray 1080p.

    23. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      All this "good enough" bullshit is harshing my mellow. Really, what's the point in even getting a high end home theater, if Netflix quality, while getting better over the years, still doesn't come close for a lot of movies? What about uncompressed audio? You gonna deliver that too? Hell, even the cable service itself, has crammed more channels down the pipe, because they're cheap.

      I'm not gonna deliver anything, I'm not a streaming service, I'm a consumer.

      But I can tell you that even when I own a movie on Blu-ray, I'm more likely to pull it up on Netflix than get up and find the movie in my disk collection and load it into the blu-ray player. And it looks and sounds just fine to me.

      As for what the point is in getting a high-end home theater, well, I'm just not sure - I don't see the value in it, I have a decent TV, and since I don't want to wire surround speakers in the living room (which is not a great acoustical environment in the first place), I just have a 2.1 soundbar for sound. I spent less than $1000 for the whole system including TV + Bluray + soundbar and I'm quite satisfied with it.

      Maybe you color calibrated your TV and have carefully placed 5.1 speakers in your acoustically perfect room, but I think you'll find that content producers will end up charging you more since they'll decide that if you can spend $5000 on a home theater system, you can spend $50 for the latest movie release instead of watching a "good enough" steaming version for $3.99.

    24. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by hawguy · · Score: 2

      4K has only 4X more pixels than 1080p. Netflix says that currently, you need a 5mbit connection for Hidef streaming, or 7mbit for super hidef.

      Netflix is lying to you. Their hidef isn't blu-ray quality. Its 1080p with compression artifacts. The audio isn't as good either.

      I don't think they ever said that it *is* Blu-ray quality, but the point is, it's "good enough". I own dozens of Blurays and while I can see a different because blu-ray and streaming content, it just isn't that important to me.

      Its better than then the regular hd which is even more compressed, and even that is better than some of the so called hd channels on cable some of which are badly compressed.

      Compared to bluray though its a complete joke.

      It's good enough, and there are only a handful of titles I would even care enough to pay extra for bluray, never mind "4k" but at the same time what's the point drooling over a netflix compressed 4k stream if their superHD is still well beneath even mere bluray 1080p.

      Because it has 4x more pixels, which I thought was the whole point of 4K? If I'm happy with my 60" TV when I sit 8 feet away, if I had a 4K TV, then either I can sit at half the distance (4 ft), or get a TV that's twice as large (120") and get a more immersive movie experience with the same perceived quality.

      http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html

    25. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      No way will this work. Bandwidth caps as they are today will prevent people from downloading 4k video.

      They said the same thing about YouTube and Netflix, but when the mainstream starts using a service the caps tend to adjust. Granted I'm not in the US but in Norway however YoY bandwidth growth here is 25% and with H.265 promising the same quality at half the bandwidth the transition from 1080p to 4K is about three years of technological advance. Personally I suspect the bandwidth will arrive far ahead of TVs and content to watch, there's a massive fiber deployment and speeds are constantly upgraded as it seems most of the cost is in operating the line, not in bandwidth charges. Like my current provider, you can get a 10 Mbps line or a 90 Mbps line for 1/3rd more. I guess it's also because mostly it means my burst speeds are higher, really I already download all I want to download I only do it faster but averaged out I don't use significantly more.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    26. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Because it has 4x more pixels, which I thought was the whole point of 4K?

      But if they aren't streaming uncompressed 1080p adding more pixels for them to extrapolate into isn't going to make a difference.

      netflix hd is like playing a game designed for 1024x768 on 1920x1080 screen. Buying a screen that's 4k isn't going to make it look any better.

    27. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by felix+rayman · · Score: 1

      Been many a year since I found any good vinyl at a yard sale, and the shops are more shiny than dusty. Sales of new vinyl records in the US have grown about 500% in the last 5 years. Around 2000, I couldn't find a lot of the new music I wanted on vinyl. Things have changed, I can get pretty much anything I want on vinyl now.

      Vinyl vs. cloud is a false dichotomy, most new stuff you buy on vinyl you get access to it in the cloud too. Best of both worlds.

      Text-only books I will buy digital. Graphic novels, anything with art or other visual content I will kill some trees for. Best of both worlds. Except for the trees I guess.

      There are new record stores opening up all over the place, there are independent book sellers that are having record years, there are video rental chains that are opening new stores. You've gotta be quick and you've gotta be smart to stay in business but that's the same as it ever was.

    28. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Because it has 4x more pixels, which I thought was the whole point of 4K?

      But if they aren't streaming uncompressed 1080p adding more pixels for them to extrapolate into isn't going to make a difference.

      netflix hd is like playing a game designed for 1024x768 on 1920x1080 screen. Buying a screen that's 4k isn't going to make it look any better.

      Where are you getting uncompressed 1080p content? An uncompressed 1080p 60Hz stream would be about 3Gbit/sec

      You do know that even Bluray video is compressed, right?

      Why would a 4K stream compressed to 20mbit/second not be better quality than a 1080p stream compressed to 5mbit/second?

    29. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      You do know that even Bluray video is compressed, right?

      Yes, uncompressed, wasn't the right word to use. "not over compressed" is probably more appropriate.

      Why would a 4K stream compressed to 20mbit/second not be better quality than a 1080p stream compressed to 5mbit/second?

      I'm sure it would be better.

      But the relevant question is whether it would really any better than a 1080p stream compressed to 20mbit.

    30. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by bn-7bc · · Score: 0

      I agree, the DVD/Bluy-Ray will not go away, and not only because of the abbiolity to play when the internte connection goes down, but also for its grater audio/video quality. Will there be a day when Netflix et all can match Blu-Ray (or whichever is the lates physical media distribution" , maybe and when that day comes I guess owning physical copies will be a thing of the past bor not before

    31. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by rochrist · · Score: 1

      The compression artifacts are terribly annoying. I'll spring for Blu-ray for anything that I particularly like that's visually impressive. There's a vast difference.

    32. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Not the B&N near here (suburbs of Boston).

    33. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      A book is a static image. If you don't have a fetish over paper and binding the experience can be reproduced much more easily.

      While you're correct that it would now be pretty easy to replicate the experience of a high-quality printed book, nobody is really doing it. If only I could buy a "static image" of a decently designed book, I'd be happy. But most "ebooks" are just text that's thrown into some stupid engine that formats text like the worst version of MS Word, only with a smaller selection of fonts and less control over other things that affect readability.

      I actually own a Kindle, but I've purchased exactly two ebooks. I've tried downloading other free ones too, and they just look horrible, if you care at all about typography. I'd much prefer a static image (e.g., PDF), if it were sized so that I could read it on my screen properly. Almost all the books I actually have loaded on my Kindle are PDFs derived from paper books (even very old ones), because the typesetting is just so much better.

      That's probably half the issue here. When ebooks came along everyone was all "look what we can do! It's dynamically displayed so you can change the font or text size to match what you desire!" but they didn't consider how this effects things like layout and formatting. Had ebooks been designed to emulate paper books (or PDFs) more, this wouldn't be an issue. You'd have a normal ebook, and a separate "large type" ebook just as real books in a library are grouped, each laid out with a specific format in mind. But that requires the size of your display to be standardized too, and early ebook makers loved touting how their reader could display a "full page" document, only whispering it had to be scaled to 75% normal size to fit on the 1024x768 display, and that rendered small text unreadable when the document was formatted to be viewed at 100% its correct size.

      It has nothing to do with a "paper fetish" or binding. Good typography just "looks better," just like high-quality video or whatever. Page layout, text-block size, spacing between lines, between words, between sentences, etc. does make a difference.

      I was actually referring to people who get all silly about how an ebook doesn't have the "satisfying weight in their hands" or "smell of the paper" etc. That's not what a book is about. Books are about the content -- the words within them. The video and audio quality on a movie can have a very real impact on the retelling of the story because they are more closely tied to the transmission of the content itself. A book is a much more "binary" communication method if you get my drift. As long as you can understand the words on the page it really doesn't matter if they are printed on vellum or newsprint, just as it doesn't matter if I'm watching a Blu-Ray or an HD-DVD if the video and audio encoding are the same (as they are on some early WB movies). Formatting and typography is another matter, I agree, as these effect you ability to comfortably parse the content of the book and infer the meaning of the words -- and the work itself. A poorly formatted piece of text is very comparable to the poor quality DVD verses the Blu-Ray restoration. The ebook is "the same novel as the paper book" to the layman, but the quality of the transmission is much poorer and it isn't the same experience.

    34. Re:Soon, no more bookstores. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      The love for the physical object (the book) is not comparable to being home theater enthusiast. See my reply to AthanasiusKircher.

  5. I've seen this movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meg Ryan falls in love with Jeff Bezos at the end.

  6. your business model is suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BlockBuster just decided to close its remaining stores.

    Heres a hint, your business model is already dead.

    There will of course be some room for quite some time for novelty, nostalgia, and those who simply refuse to go digital... but that is a shrinking market.

    Sorry.

    P.S. i consider myself one of those who prefers paper - but im not dumb enough to think that my kindle which weighs nothing and has 40 giant volumes on it isnt fast becoming the FAR superior product overall (barring the Orwellian perishable drawbacks of E-readers).

    1. Re:your business model is suicide by captjc · · Score: 2

      The comparison is apples and oranges. Blockbuster was dead the minute Netflix became a viable option. In some cases, Disc is a far superior product between bonus features and if you have a crappy internet connection you don't have any significant load times. However, the convenience of internet steaming with the all-you-can-eat nature of streaming was the final straw for brick-and-mortar stores.

      Books and bookstores are not obsolete. They still have many advantages over ebooks and online distribution. First, paper is a great medium; It is dirt cheap; doesn't need batteries; I can annotate and highlight; If I ruin it, there is no huge loss; I can sell it when I'm done; and it comes in many sizes from trade paperbacks to huge coffee table art books. Bookstores are great because you can sample the merchandise. At blockbuster, all I can see is the blurb on the back of the box with a few pictures, the same stuff that can be found anywhere. In a bookstore I can pick it up, leaf through it, even read some of it. Best part is, if I buy it I have it then and there and not 3-to-5 business days from now.

      Books and bookstores are going to be around for a long while. As long as paper printing a still dirt cheap, and as long as eReaders are still a big investment for most people (When I see an e-Ink reader for under $30 sold at brick-and-mortar Walmarts or Target, then we'll talk). Sure, bookstores won't be a prevalent as they once were but they are far from being dead any time soon.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  7. Time for a different business model by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm firmly in camp ebook. Let's disclose that up front.

    Book stores should charge cover. The experience of browsing in a book store is much better than browsing Amazon's web site. The tablet kindle store is better but it still doesn't compare to browsing on a shelf, reading a page on a whim. So when it's time to find something new to read, I'll go spend an hour in Barnes & Noble and make a list of a dozen books. I'll probably buy a coffee while there, but otherwise B&N is making nothing off me.

    That's not fair to them, but that is how their business is structured. I fear bookstores collapsing. I preferred Borders and was disappointed when it went under. Don't want that to happen to B&N. But what answer is there? There are only a handful of reference-type paper books I would buy. Might get a calendar once a year. Couple presents. But Amazon gets most of my book dollars. That's just sad reality.

    So, I say, charge me cover. Heck, charge everybody cover. $2 to come in. If you buy a book, offer a $2 discount. The bookstore is suddenly less disadvantaged then previously. If you are a paper book buyer, you're not disadvantaged. If you really are a paper book buyer and are simply browsing, suddenly, you're the party suffering. But you're incidental to this- if bookstores are in trouble, you're going to lose them eventually. So you have the heavy burden of paying a couple dollars, or you can browse at a library instead.

    The small bookstores TFA discusses aren't necessarily the same as B&N - but that's the problem. They have even less to offer. Stocking Kindles may not be the answer, but they're getting squeezed by both Amazon and B&N. They need to find a niche compatible with their clients to survive.

    1. Re:Time for a different business model by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 1

      So I can buy Amazon Kindle books there, then?

      Oh.

      Guess it is the business model.

    2. Re:Time for a different business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you could spend your money at Barnes and Noble. It seems like you want them to stay in business - just not enough to actually buy their goods. There are a lot of people like you. At bookstores. At Best-Buy. Using these companies as show rooms - and even buying online while wandering the aisles checking out the products. That's no problem - there isn't really anything wrong with that. But, if you want these stores to stay around you should probably buy the stuff from them. Otherwise there won't be any physical showrooms for the internet anymore. Oh, and Amazon won't have to bother improving their search or book discovery capability...

    3. Re:Time for a different business model by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      I think that's a great idea. The ability to browse physical books in a nice environment is a service that I'm willing to pay for.

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    4. Re:Time for a different business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I say, charge me cover. Heck, charge everybody cover. $2 to come in

      I've always (voluntarily) viewed the coffee shop portion of a bookstore as achieving this to some degree. Many will buy e-books, etc., after browsing the physical books, but then stay and sit to use the wifi or read said book. Buying a cup of coffee is a nice way to give a few bucks to a store that helped you browse for new reading material, so I do it.

      I think if you forced a $2 cover, nobody would go in stores anymore. They'd just take their chances and order a book that they aren't sure is good.

    5. Re:Time for a different business model by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 1

      I would love to spend my money there. But with vendor lock-in, they won't sell books in the format I want. So what I would like to buy from them is knowledge. But they won't sell it, they give it away.

    6. Re:Time for a different business model by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

      I like how you conveniently ignore both the Nook, and the fact that they DO offer ebooks which kindles can purchase, download, and read easily. You could support them financially, you just choose to take advantage of their perks for free.

      I don't understand how your statement is different from this: "I really like the local coffeeshop, and love using their free wifi and sitting around there all day. But they don't sell coffee inside Starbucks cups, so I don't buy anything from them."

    7. Re:Time for a different business model by Algae_94 · · Score: 1
      You can buy print books there. This is the same as browsing at BestBuy and then buying stuff on Amazon. You are leaching off a physical store so that you can get a better deal elsewhere. That is not a business model, that's a terrible customer that no one wants. If you're real world show room goes under, you didn't support them at all and can only blame yourself.

      So, I say, charge me cover. Heck, charge everybody cover. $2 to come in. If you buy a book, offer a $2 discount.

      If you want to support them, how about buying a $2 magazine or a book every now and then instead of suggest they charge an asinine cover that will run them out of business faster.

    8. Re:Time for a different business model by swillden · · Score: 2

      They'd just take their chances and order a book that they aren't sure is good.

      I'm hoping that eventually authors and publishers will wise up and allow booksellers to distribute free previews, at least for fiction books. I love Baen's model, which allows me to read the first few chapters for free. I know that what I buy seems to be good (it could still fall apart later, but with a few notable exceptions -- Neal Stephenson -- most authors who can write a few compelling chapters can hold my interest for a whole book), and I actually end up buying more because I start reading for free (no barrier to entry), then get hooked, then buy the book... and then the next four.

      The Baen Free Library takes this concept to another level, with perhaps even greater success at sucking money from my wallet and making me quite happy about it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Time for a different business model by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately calling your customers names and stamping your feet doesn't pay many bills.

    10. Re:Time for a different business model by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible idea. Few people will be willing to pay to enter a store, which would instantly kill a significant proportion of their audience. This would make their stores look and feel empty, further driving home the idea that "bookstores are dying". They'd get reduced to a core audience (which would've stuck around regardless of this entry fee) which would be largely unsustainable for most bookstores.

      I don't claim to know the solution, but gating your store is perhaps the worst possible way around it. Can you imagine Blockbuster charging for when you come inside?

    11. Re:Time for a different business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bookstore is suddenly less disadvantaged then previously.

      All that reading and you still couldn't get this one right.

    12. Re:Time for a different business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should start the business then. If it really is viable, you could make a lot of money.

    13. Re:Time for a different business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm firmly in camp ebook. Let's disclose that up front.

      And I'm firmly in camp of traditional paper book.

      If you really are a paper book buyer and are simply browsing, suddenly, you're the party suffering. But you're incidental to this- if bookstores are in trouble, you're going to lose them eventually

      About once a week or so I walk through the largest bookstore in the area to see if they have anything interesting new stuff there. About 1/3 of time I don't buy anything, another 1/3 of time I buy one book, and the rest of time I buy two or more.

      I don't know anyone who puts as much money to books that I do. I know a guy who buys as many or even more books than I do, but he buys cheap paperbacks while the new books that I book are mostly hardcover non-fiction with prices starting around 30 euros. I spend easily over 1500 euros a year in that one single bookshop, and I also make regular rounds in old books' shops.

      Still, even with this purchase volume I leave that large bookshop with nothing 1/3 of time. If they switched to 2 euro cover charge, that's already a price of one hardcover a year lost. Yes, it's a trifle compared with the money that I actually put on books, but it would be annoying enough to strongly discourage me visiting the store unless I know for certain that they now have some book that I want. It would cut down the number of impulse buys by a large margin.

      Instead of getting 1500 euros a year from me plus the 30 euro cover charges, they would get, perhaps, 500 euros the most. Not a good deal.

      There's also the problem that if a customer comes in looking for a specific book and it's not in stock, then they just paid 2 euros to hear that. They will not be pleased. If they have check the availability from online before coming, why wouldn't they order it from Amazon?

    14. Re:Time for a different business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to support them, how about buying a $2 magazine or a book every now and then instead of suggest they charge an asinine cover that will run them out of business faster.

      Inefficient, if the physical artifact is worthless to you. Offering a donation jar or something might be a more viable option. A lot of people will find it distateful to buy a physical artifact which they'll then throw away just to donate its profit margin, both for efficiency and ecological reasons.

    15. Re:Time for a different business model by rochrist · · Score: 1

      The Baen free library offers a tiny percentage of very old titles that they hope will lead to further purchases of the author in question. as a source for reading material, it's vastly overrated.

    16. Re:Time for a different business model by swillden · · Score: 1

      I have gotten great value out of it. YMMV.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    17. Re:Time for a different business model by Joosy · · Score: 1

      So how 'bout if after making your list of books you'd like, you could just buy the e-books right there in the store, via a gift-card type thing? Then you could support the bookstore you enjoy browsing in.

      --
      I'm sick and tired of these hip, "ironic" sigs. This is an actual, honest-to-goodness no-nonsense sig!
  8. And it isn't like they have to do it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amazon is offering an option. Don't like it? Don't play. However Amazon isn't going away, they aren't going to stop selling eBooks (or physical books). So plan accordingly. If you think not partnering with them is best do that, if you think it is best, do that. But don't assume you can cry and they'll go away. You WILL have to deal with their competition.

    1. Re:And it isn't like they have to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You WILL have to deal with their competition.

      Not, apparently, in France: http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/10/27/1219244/france-moves-to-protect-independent-booksellers-from-amazon

    2. Re:And it isn't like they have to do it by gutnor · · Score: 2

      It is interesting to note that in France it was to other way around. Independent could not compete with Amazon because book price is fixed by law. The "protection" is closing a loophole that allow shop like Amazon and other to offer a discount price and free delivery on top.

      France has done nothing to protect the bookstores from the e-book.

  9. Kindles, not kidneys by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    I read that first as "kidneys" and I'm thinking, "ya, they'd probably see some repercussions from that."

    As for the actual, much less serious issue, I don't know about the bookstores' reservations. The people you're luring into the store are obviously interested in touching a Kindle before buying it and/or want it right now instead of tomorrow or next week on their doorstep. I'd think this overlaps with the population who'd see a physical book they wanted and also decide to buy it right now instead of ordering it online. They're probably also people who would buy certain books in e-reader format but not others.

    Besides, if a corner bookstore sells a Kindle or not, customers will get them if they want 'em. This way, they got them in the door. Retailers of all types complain of customers "showrooming." Is it as bad as they say? I've bought something in a bricks and mortar store I thought I was just going to look at -- "it's an extra five bucks here, but I feel impulsive now!"

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Kindles, not kidneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already sold my kidney at Starbucks, you insensitive clod!

  10. Bookstores need to shape up by Ichijo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If bookstores want to stay in business, they need to level the playing field. Requiring sales taxes on internet purchases was a good start, but only a start. For example, Amazon isn't forced by the cities to overbuild its parking lots as brick & mortar bookstores are.

    Bookstores also need to adopt Amazon's business model. Amazon has low storage costs (warehouses in rural areas) but has to ship individual packages to each customer, while bookstores have high storage costs but ship everything to the store by freight. Bookstores could downsize their physical presence, keep most of their inventory in inexpensive rural warehouses like Amazon, and offer free overnight or 2-day shipping to the store, no membership required.

    So there's still room for innovation, if bookstores are willing to learn from the competition.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by dcollins · · Score: 2

      "Bookstores could downsize their physical presence, keep most of their inventory in inexpensive rural warehouses like Amazon, and offer free overnight or 2-day shipping to the store, no membership required."

      So I get to travel to the store twice and not even view the product in the meantime? I guess?

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      If it's at the store, you could just buy it there.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tax on books cannot improve the book business for anyone. Oh right, taxing books is to fund education. Book stores have no reason to exist, except perhaps to serve a particularly idiotic clientele. They should specialize in high-priced novelty/coffee table books that no one wants, but which are amusing to give as presents, pop-up books, cookbooks, ladies fiction, and other junk like candles, Godiva chocolate, tampons, balloons, Red Bull, and switchblades.

    4. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and blackjack, and hookers!

    5. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by vectorious · · Score: 1

      In the UK at least book stores do have an advantage over Amazon Kindle - for unknown reasons VAT (sales tax) at 20% is chargeable on ebooks, but not on dead tree books - so the ought to have an advantage there - Amazon also has it selling paper books over the internet, but that is not instant delivery

    6. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. "Level the playing field" is big biz PR speak for "Do what the Big Box stores want, when they want it."

      Amazon, Walmart, and the other big box stores are some of the biggest supporters of the Marketplace Fairness Act, which aims to make small businesses like wee bookstores collect sales taxes, not on physical location like how we've had, but from every state.

      Internet taxes raise taxes while putting the impressive costs of compliance on every business out there, and also leaving less money in the hands of consumers. That aint going to help bookstores.

    7. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      35 cents per transaction isn't too oppressive. And somebody has to pay for the roads, schools, and so on.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    8. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      If it's at the store, you could just buy it there.

      Except it won't be at the store, it will be in a remote warehouse. So there's no incentive to go to the store rather than buy from Amazon.

    9. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Bookstores could downsize their physical presence, keep most of their inventory in inexpensive rural warehouses...

      (emphasis added)

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a really fucking good idea. There's some detail devils sneaking about, but nothing I'd call a deal breaker. Unless Amazon's lobbying dollars got some politician to fuck you over on a permit or some such.

    11. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Bookstores could downsize their physical presence, keep most of their inventory in inexpensive rural warehouses...

      (emphasis added)

      Oh, so only most of the books I want to buy are at the warehouse. I'll just stay at home and buy from amazon if the store is going to negate the only advantage they have by keeping most of the books I want to see and buy in their warehouse

    12. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      I see what you're getting at. We should all write our congressmen to force Amazon to build parking lots.

    13. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already have to keep paperwork and taxes for anyplace the have a nexus. Add that times every City/County/State in the US. It is not the money its the papework.

      I call it the kill small businesses act.

    14. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Bookstores could downsize their physical presence, keep most of their inventory in inexpensive rural warehouses...

      (emphasis added)

      Because you don't need to see two copies of the same title.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    15. Re:Bookstores need to shape up by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "Because you don't need to see two copies of the same title."

      So do I still get the benefit of, "If it's at the store, you could just buy it there"? Wouldn't doing so remove the ability for anyone else to see that title?

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  11. Kindles last more than 2 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What electronic device lasts more than 2 years? They have to buy new devices, if you've built the love of your customer over the past two years they'll come back, and you get their royalties for another 2....

  12. Kindles and Book Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Readers are smarter than that and book store owners should be too. I don't patronize book stores anymore. If I did however, I'd have an axe to grind with Amazon and wouldn't be an ebook person. If a book store owner doesn't want to profit from the sale of a Kindle, he simply doesn't sell them. Sorry, non-issue. To each his own.

  13. Take the handout, dumbasses by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    Your industry is falling from under your feet. Buying paper makes just about as much sense an putting 2 quarters into a filth phlegm & piss covered phone in a cold plexiglass & metal booth. Take the fucking handout. TAKE THE HANDOUT.

    1. Re:Take the handout, dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except that in 2-3 years, I can still read the paper. I don't have to worry about the durability of the machine, the license details and whether future versions will unsupport to delete previous purchases\\\\\\\\\ rentals. I also don't have to pay an upfront cost to read the books or worry about batteries or charge state.

      If somebody's a pot-boiler, read once kind of reader, then suitably priced e-books would be a win. Such prices don't exist today. For other readers, e-books don't work. They're either mis-formatted or merely unavailable.

    2. Re:Take the handout, dumbasses by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 0
      That may all be true, but you're outnumbered a hundred to one, so it really doesn't matter.

      Dead tree books are doomed, completely and utterly doomed...

      It is just a matter of time. We could debate how long that will be, 5 years, 25 years, 50 years, but doomed they are.

  14. Amazon Bookstore by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The independent books that I know have a small edges going for them.

    There is new market for “shopping / entertainment“. You go to the store to be entertained and you pay via a purchase. Kind of like renting office space at the coffee shop for the price of a cup of coffee. Most of these shops tend to be narrowly focused, have a deep catalog of hard to fine / out of print stuff (which is sold via Amazon), have lots of events (singings, clubs, etc.) and sell a lot of stuff other than books.

    Oddly the one that I am thinking about was the Amazon Bookstore specializing in woman and lesbian literature. There was a bit of a tussle between them and Amazon.com over the name and the more or less won that fight.

    1. Re:Amazon Bookstore by EdIII · · Score: 1, Funny

      There was a bit of a tussle between them and Amazon.com

      Were they sentenced to death by snu-snu?

  15. A handout of poison? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    This offer will directly undercut what remains of their business model. Someone might be a dumbass here, but it's not the shop owners.

    1. Re:A handout of poison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if they don't take the offer, they'll stay in business, right?

  16. You're losing the customer anyway by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

    Customers are increasingly looking for ebook editions. If the customer can't get what they're looking for, do you think they're just going to shrug and buy whatever the bookstore wants to stock instead? Nope. They'll shrug, go home and buy the Kindle off of Amazon's Web site and go ahead and buy the ebook editions like they were planning to. Either way, the bookstore's lost their business because the bookstore isn't selling what the customer wants to buy.

    Bookstores are going to have to figure out a way around this, or go out of business. No third option. If I owned a bookstore I'd be seriously looking at how I could work with Amazon and the Kindle store. The big attraction of bookstores has always been that customers can look at the books before buying, but Amazon can do that through their Web site with previews. The other big attraction has been bookstores with knowledgeable staff who can help customers select books. That, though, means the bookstore can't hire college kids for minimum wage to run the register. It might take a complete shift, from "bookstore as a place to buy books" to "bookstore as a place to browse and discuss books". Kind of like a coffee shop with a better reading library. It may be that there isn't a way for bookstores to remain in business without ceasing to be bookstores. But bookstores are going to have to accept the fact that electronic delivery of books has irrevocably changed their business.

    I'd note this may go for publishers too. It's hard to get into print unless you're already a successful published author. The only route is self-publishing through Kindle or the like. But if an author's successful enough through that route to attract a conventional publisher, what's going to happen when that author very reasonably asks what they need a publisher for at this point?

  17. Soon, no more libraries either by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    I used to spend days in the library, but lately all the information I want is easily accessible online, wikipedia or google. I haven't been to the library in years. What's it been now, 5 years? 7? I don't even remember. For all I know, it may have been demolished since then. I would guess that soon they all will be.

    1. Re:Soon, no more libraries either by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 2

      Our libray system just built an entire commercial/residential complex above/around the new library on one side of town. They did the same 15-odd years ago for the other side of town. And there's talk of expanding or opening another branch.

      They've also expanded beyond just books, offering CD, DVD, Blu-Ray, and even e-book loans. There are multiple computer labs available for rent (free for individuals if room not in use), multiple computer terminals around the library for patrons to use, study carrels, meeting/study rooms for groups, etc. They teach various courses (free for patrons) as well. The new branch even includes a gas fireplace and lounge chairs. All that's missing is a coffeeshop inside the library itself.

      Libraries aren't going anywhere. They're evolving with the times.

    2. Re:Soon, no more libraries either by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      All that new infrastructure and space isn't cheap. Unfortunately, only affluent areas can offer your vision of libraries of the future. Back in the pre-internet area, when print was king, even poorer communities could provide a reasonable standard of information to citizens. As it is playing out, wealthier areas are getting what you describe, and poorer areas are ending up with nothing at all.

    3. Re:Soon, no more libraries either by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Just another reason to work on that last mile problem. Why have physical libraries when people have portable devices that will read books? You can get a tablet for a bill, it doesn't take too many trips to the library before that's paid for itself

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Soon, no more libraries either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your vision to become real, the publishers would have to play along. Until the last year, most of the "big five" publishers wouldn't sell to libraries at all. In the past year a few of them have decided to sell to libraries, but only under onerous terms. (Extremely high pricing, relicensing requirements after X number of uses, no sales to consortia, etc.) So while you could for instance find every novel in a series in the physical library, if you bought an eBook reader or tablet and tried to download the eBooks from that same library, it would be pot luck whether you would be able to get the volume in the series you're looking for. Even if they have it, it might be "checked out" (because publishers don't like to license for simultaneous usage.) You might have better luck if your library belongs to a consortium that combines multiple libraries' budgets for greater buying power. But even then, they might have to have a special individual license within the consortium to be able to buy from a particular publisher because they refuse to sell to consortia, and will only sell to individual libraries. Many small libraries can't afford the fees required to buy into these individual purchasing agreements. Sad but true, and libraries don't like it a bit. Groups like ReadersFirst are trying to do something about it by uniting libraries and readers to push the publishers on this. http://readersfirst.org/, while various movements like unglue.it try to figure out different models that work around the limits of publishing while still getting authors paid for their work. Fortunately, libraries offer a lot more than books, including lectures, activities for kids, literacy work, maker spaces, co-working, etc., so they're not going anywhere anytime soon. But it would be nice if publishers would make it easier for them to get their users the eBooks they want!

    5. Re:Soon, no more libraries either by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      The new library building is built in the ghetto of our city (aka North Shore).

      And the previous new building was built right in the middle of the downtown core (aka inner-city).

      There are no libraries in the "affluent" parts of our city (anywhere above the valley floor).

  18. Do you want to jump ... by jamesl · · Score: 2

    ... or would you rather be shot.

    We make a little on their e-book purchases, but then lose them as a customer completely after two years.

    The way things are going now, they're going to be out of business in two years anyway. Maybe they can hang out with the guy that had the hardware store before Home Depot came to town. Or the people with the health food store before Whole Foods. Or the stationary store before Office Max. Or the printer before Kinko's. Or the computer store before Dell.
     

    1. Re:Do you want to jump ... by celle · · Score: 1

      "they can hang out with the guy that had the hardware store before Home Depot came to town. Or the people with the health food store before Whole Foods. Or the stationary store before Office Max. Or the printer before Kinko's. Or the computer store before Dell."

              Believe it or not, all those are still around here in the middle of the United States. Many are doing business the way all small businesses do for communities by providing valuable services that people want and/or need right there and not miles and/or days away.

    2. Re:Do you want to jump ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are going to be dead in 100 years anyway. Get my drift, commenter ?

  19. amazon assisted suicide alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your alternative to Amazon assisted suicide is Amazon unassisted suicide.

    1. Re:amazon assisted suicide alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The borg welcomes you to the collective. Sooner or later you will be assimilated and all your business profits will be ours ! No lie... I had a small but fast growing business, It was doing great and growing 300 percent per year. Got involved with Amazon and they assured me there would not be a lot of high level sellers in my catagory. About a year later the catagory became packed with other sellers each cost cutting to make sales. My business had to cut prices so low but Amazon continued to take about 15 percent of each sale. We were lucky to make a few cents per sale and folded a year later. If the collective gets hold of bookstores, the end is near!

  20. Who browses at a bookstore and then buys via Amzn? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2

    I get the model where you go into BestBuy, look at the TV, listen to the stereo and then purchase online.

    But what does browsing for the book on the shelves get you over searching Amazon.com? You still get the same 'about the author' and plot taglines on the back...

    Maybe there's some nostalgia that people enjoy walking through the stacks and prefer to read via eReader. For those people, the bookstore will die anyhow because no purchase will ever be made via the bookstore.

    These bookstores need differentiate themselves from eReader providers just like movie theaters differentiate themselves from watching at home and Netflix. Movie theaters provide a service you don't have at home (a 100ft screen and a huge wattage sound system, and stadium seating).

    Bookstores need something as well, book clubs (how do you keep people from joining the club that purchased the book via amazon), social gatherings, something...

    All of these businesses died because the physical location couldn't differentiate itself from the delivered direct to home version:

    *Arcades
    *Video Rental shops
    *Computer stores (CompUSA etc..)
    *Bookstores

  21. I must be missing something by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

    Isn't this the plan where the store that sells the Kindle gets a cut of all purchases made thru said Kindle? So that kickback expires after two years. Sell them a new kindle and reset the kickback clock. There's always a new reader coming out with new features, more storage, better display, etc.

    This reminds me of that thread a year or three back where it was pointed out that book publishers need to realize that they're in the business of selling content, not paper. Paper is a content delivery/storage/display method. Kindle is the new paper in this scenario.

    Paper books had a pretty good run. Over 500 years by my math. Now the business model is changing. Bookstores can find a way to change with it or they can bleed money until they go bankrupt. Their stubbornness isn't going to change reality. If they want to keep selling paper, they need to shift their physical inventory to publications that can't easily make the transition to electronic distribution. Large format books with lots of pictures. Art, atlases, photos, etc. Take the leftover space and stock it with readers (only from companies that will give you a kickback) and accessories. Put in a coffee/tea counter, comfy chairs, fireplace, etc. Fast WiFi, charging stations for devices. Have "meet the author" nights and "get the most out of your reader" nights.

    1. Re:I must be missing something by GospelHead821 · · Score: 1

      I think the one other feature of paper that they can sell, along with paper's quality as a medium for pictures, is the attractiveness of paper itself. Do good market research, determine what books people have an emotional attachment to, and sell those books in premium-priced, durable, beautiful, hardback editions. Don't try to compete with ebooks on cheap content delivery. People still buy vinyl records, designer clothes, luxury cars, and fancy hand soaps. People will pay a premium for a special version of something that they love.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
  22. Ye Olde Bookseller in the 21st Century! by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

    As someone who needs to read a lot for their job, I find the definition of a book does not necessarily imply a square block made out of slivers of paper. In fact, any of the things like that that I have obtained in recent memory suffer due to lack of portability - I don't have enough additional carrying capacity to keep a book geographically close to myself for times when I want to read it.

    If only there was a way for book stores to sell digital versions of the text with the item.... just like they did 12 years ago when I last had to buy an assload of textbooks.

    To be fair, I don't own a Kindle. Why would I? I have notebook computers and smart phones and tablets, projectors and text-to-speech applications. Hell, even graphic calculators. I mean, you would HAVE to be blind to actually consider crappy-ass Kindles a realistic threat to your business in the wake of the countless other alternatives to read electronically.

  23. Re:Who browses at a bookstore and then buys via Am by captjc · · Score: 1

    But what does browsing for the book on the shelves get you over searching Amazon.com? You still get the same 'about the author' and plot taglines on the back...

    Well, for starters, most books aren't shrink-wrapped. I can pick it up, leaf through it, and start reading to see if it hooks me. Sure some of Amazon's books give a sample chapter maybe even a "Take me to a random page" function but it isn't the same as holding it in your hand.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  24. Re:Who browses at a bookstore and then buys via Am by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But what does browsing for the book on the shelves get you over searching Amazon.com?

    Well, um... you, uh, get the see the book???

    Seriously. I buy almost all non-fiction books, and 2-3 minutes leafing through the book, looking up a few things in the index, and reading a couple specific passages on topics I'm looking for will immediately tell me: (1) does the book contain the information I need and care about? (2) does the author have a freakin' clue what he/she is talking about? (3) are these things valuable enough to justify the cost?

    I can spend time skimming dozens of reviews on Amazon and still have no clue about the answers to those questions. Sure, for some books on Amazon I can get a limited preview or limited search capability, but that's generally not enough to really let me check what I need to.

    I own a couple thousand physical books. I can only think of ONE physical book that I purchased in an actual store that I regret buying, and I was in a hurry and just picked up some Barnes & Noble special for $1.99 or something. On the other hand, I must have at least 20 or more books I purchased online that turned out to be much less useful than I imagined. I just can't tell adequately from online descriptions. And returning them is often too much of a pain to bother.

    On a related note, there's also the seredipitous encounter with interesting books on a physical shelf. While Amazon may be good at telling me what other people tend to buy who buy the books I'm already searching for, it's very unlikely to tell me about the really cool books out there that people like me may not always know about. Library shelves, on the other hand, are great for containing those hidden treasures, sitting there right next to a book I know on a similar topic. Actual physical bookstores can be good about that as well, though only if they have the kind of specialized non-fiction I like to browse for (and very few do anymore).

    I'm very likely to walk out of a physical bookstore with some book I found and thought to be really interesting, and I almost never regret those purchases. Online, I only tend to buy books I already have heard about and which already are supposed to be "good," because I often can't adequately evaluate them otherwise.

    Used bookstores are even more critical, because they carry all sorts of out-of-print stuff that's even more difficult to sort through on Amazon (if it's there at all).

    You still get the same 'about the author' and plot taglines on the back...

    I don't give a crap about the author bio or what some random other people say about how this is the "coolest book ever." I suppose if that's the way you evaluate the books you want to buy, I guess there's no benefit to a physical bookstore. I, personally, prefer to actually examine the merchandise... like the people you mention who might actually like to look at the TV or listen to the stereo before purchasing.

  25. Re:Who browses at a bookstore and then buys via Am by Tynin · · Score: 0

    My kingdom for mod points! Well said.

  26. that guy wrote a real book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now: in a few years being a writer one will come across the question if one has acctually published something "for real" or just ... virtual.
    real books are the new gucci bags and rolex watches?

  27. pricing is all wrong by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I'm just not going to buy ebooks until they fix the pricing. When the role playing game industry went to direct digital distribution, it was understood that the product was 50% off. Amazon, however, thinks that not only do I need to shell out a couple hundred dollars for a proprietary device that allows them to remote delete my purchased products, but that they also get to charge a premium for the product itself. No thank you.

    If I buy a used book through Amazon, odds are that I can find it for under 1 dollar. I can frequently find it for 1 cent. But I have to pay $3.99 for S&H for *each* book. Maybe the brick & mortar stores should sell said books for $2-$3, so that the total purchase price is less than Amazon + S&H. 50% of something is better than 100% of nothing, and that's what B&M stores are looking at.

    There's an old mantra about getting bodies in the store. It's not that simple. They need to pull wallets out. If people are going into B&M stores to window shop, then purchasing online via Amazon, then the B&M stores need to lower their prices to be competitive, or offer some other reason for people to spend money there. It has to be something that Amazon can't offer. Drinking coffee is not going to cut it.

  28. wake up by stenvar · · Score: 1

    You're going to lose the customer anyway because you're selling an obsolete item, something that joins expensive fountain pens, handmade suits, and buggy whips as items that once used to be commonplace but now are only used by elites with too much money.

    1. Re:wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you afraid of Hubbard?

  29. Re:Who browses at a bookstore and then buys via Am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what does browsing for the book on the shelves get you over searching Amazon.com?

    Well, um... you, uh, get the see the book???

    Have you ever heard of "sample"? You know, that box just below the buying button on Amazon's page when you are browsing a book?

    Yeah, you only get the first couple chapters, so you can see the index. But if you can't decide if you want the book even after seeing two chapters, then either the author is being extra sly, or you have a problem yourself.

    PLUS, you can return a Kindle book. I don't know exactly what the rules are for returns, I have done it before after buying a book and then found out another cheaper edition (quite stupid for Amazon to have 2 electronic edition of the same book for different price).

    You posted a whole page of rant about Kindle and never mentioned sample and returns at all, I got to wonder if you actually do own a Kindle or not.

  30. What does a physical bookstore offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selection. Far superior to Amazon, even though the breadth is more narrow. Searching for similar stuff is much easier when you only have 100-200 books on a shelf in a section such as SciFi/Fantasy, Physics, or other topics. Popular stuff stays stocked, the less popular is rotated out for room to stock new stuff.

    Amazon's suggestions are pretty lame really. Seeing the full cover in its own section is just...its almost alien to anyone familiar with books. Search is not that great either, and using filters to crawl through things is not as good as it could be. For a massive megastore online that started out offering books, I am usually fairly disappointed unless i know exactly what I am looking for.

    This is what small bookstores have to offer. Selection. Knowledge. Personal touch. They need to figure out how to make that work for them instead of against. Right now they give it away for free, people come in and shop then buy it on Amazon cause its cheaper. They don't realize that as more and more do that it means the store will eventually go away.

    They don't need protection, they need to innovate. They need to look at their strengths and figure out how to make those work for them. Work with publishing houses to get better discounts, better return deals. How to get money from the people coming into their stores. B&N has their cafe's. That's great for them but John's Bookshop down the street may not be able to do that on his own. so maybe he instead talks to Jane's Pastry Shop about an exchange program. She puts pastries in his shop for X price, with her advertising on it, he gets his cut of the sales and sends her new business. She puts adverts for his shop on her tables, with a small discount if they bring their receipt, and he kicks her back 5% of those sales. Local businesses need to realize they are part of a community and then make that work *for* them instead of treating themselves like a bunch of independent little states.

    This is not the only way to fight back. But it is a great one. cross promoting works wonders, but its work. And just like the biggest players, the littlest ones don't want to put in the effort. They want to bitch and moan and pine for the good ol' days.

    That's no way to run a business.

    1. Re:What does a physical bookstore offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, they should be jumping on this and trying to convince Amazon to give them 10% of ALL sales to the devices, not just ebooks.

      10% of Music sales. its a media device after all.
      10% of movie sales. again, that media device thing.
      10% of app sales through teh Amazon app store.

      That would add up to a LOT of potential revenue. And let bookstores branch out a little. Maybe they carry some movies or music too. B&N already does. Maybe they get really into the cross promotion thing with Amazon and with local retailers as well.

      I wish i owned a bookstore, there is a metric crap ton of potential here.

  31. Re:Happy Friday from the Golden Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, what a fucking disappointment.

  32. A telling admission. by Gondola · · Score: 1

    "We acknowledge that our customers will move completely to e-books once they get used to the idea and find out they can save money."

  33. buggy whip boutique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate to break it to you but that sounds incredibly niche, as opposed to selling books which is popular. Sorry buggy whip salespeople, dead trees are on the outs, which is good because we need more of them to live.

  34. Amazon Kindle !! by Wheelsdealers · · Score: 1

    In this digital era even books are getting encrypted and changing to E-books. future kids will be holding digital equipment like these at their hand . so i feel its a good intention in the future development perspective.