Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Can You Trust Online Tax Software?

An anonymous reader writes "TurboTax from Intuit and H&R Block's own tax package have been perennial mainstays for U.S. citizens trying to use software to figure out just how much they owe the country, without reading the tens of thousands of pages of IRS forms guidance. With tax season just around the corner, the new online platforms from both providers raise an interesting question: can you trust your return information any more or less to an online platform than you do to the equivalent software on your computer?"

237 comments

  1. I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...whose name you know. More than once it incorrectly calculated taxes owed, leading both the Fed and State governments to send me a check, saying, "hey, you way overpaid your taxes."

    I'm done with tax software. It's back to a human accountant. Her first consultation with us turned up a $3,400 deduction we had missed a couple of years back. That alone pays for a few years of returns and advice.

    1. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm done with tax software. It's back to a human accountant.

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      Her first consultation with us turned up a $3,400 deduction we had missed a couple of years back. That alone pays for a few years of returns and advice.

      Most likely she found that deduction by running tax software. I use Turbo Tax, but I also keep up on tax law, and changes to the software, so that helps me find deductions a less informed person using the same software, would miss. Software is a tool, it can do more in the hands of a skilled user.

      If you spend a day studying tax law and reading your software's manual, you will save more money than you earn at your job in a month. It is time well spent.

    2. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Her first consultation with us turned up a $3,400 deduction we had missed a couple of years back.

      And some years ago, I proved to my accountant that she was wrong about a deduction she claimed we were not entitled to. So what's your point? Two anecdotes don't prove anything.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No. No, I won't save more money than I earn at my job in a month. There's not that much more to save. And I earn a lot. Enough that I've decided not to spend my leisure time becoming a tax accountant - you know, someone whose *job* it is to know taxes. Software doesn't mean shit, it's the person using it *and* their knowledge.

      I could also paint my entire house, but I don't feel like doing that either.

      I don't regard spending time learning tax regulations as time well spent. And, wrong again... she didn't find the deduction using tax software, but by looking at our returns, how we work, and then interviewing us. You know, employing skills that software doesn't do well.

      Other than that, your analysis was spot on.

    4. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anrego · · Score: 1

      If you spend a day studying tax law and reading your software's manual, you will save more money than you earn at your job in a month. It is time well spent.

      For personal finances I don't feel this way. I suspect it would take the equivalent or more of the time spent working during that theoretical month to gain/maintain that knowledge, and (for me at least) would be an extremely boring and unpleasant chore. I'd rather take the hit and spend that time doing something I enjoy. Money isn't everything, or we'd all probably be lawyers ;p

    5. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Whoa, Perry Mason, slow down! I wasn't aware I needed to "prove anything".

      I related my experience, in which tax software made repeated mistakes, and then I used a human who did a better job. How in the world did my simple story get your panties in such a wad?

    6. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      I've used the Canadian version of turbo tax for years without any problems, but my taxes are pretty simple.

      I'm not sure how asking for a bunch of anecdotes will help you verify how good tax software is. Maybe there is study or review on this subject somewhere.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    7. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, Perry Mason, slow down! I wasn't aware I needed to "prove anything".

      I related my experience, in which tax software made repeated mistakes, and then I used a human who did a better job. How in the world did my simple story get your panties in such a wad?

      All your simple story tells anyone here is that you were unable to use tax software without a mistake being made. If you want us to believe it is the software (from a name we know!) and not you that is at fault, you will have to offer more than your silly little anecdote.

    8. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, how about three anecdotes? Last time I used TurboTax I got a polite letter from the IRS saying I owed $68,000. I ran over to an accountant who reviewed our return, ended up getting us a refund of over $5000 and more than payed for herself.

      Turbo Tax is OK, but the tax code is so complicated that if you have anything other than 'normal' income (ie, W2's and 1099's) you may miss out on big problems or rewards. No more TT for me. Actually, the accountant does use some form of Intuit software, but it's far beyond my interests and abilities. And I agree with other posters. I could probably learn the stuff, but would rather start pulling out my toenails with pliers, thankyouverymuch.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You insensitive clod, I don't have any hands.

    10. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Tax software is not somehow an exception to "garbage in/garbage out". It will only discover what you tell it about.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    11. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since you won't ever earn enough to file more than the 1040ez, this subject doesn't actually affect you. are you spending another boring evening in mom's basement? finished washing her lingerie, did you?

    12. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if you are using turbo tax ... and your income somehow has a possible 68K debt to the IRS .. I think you make WAY TOO MUCH for turbo tax.
      And if you don't have some sort of specialized assistance -- financial planner --- you're an idiot who clearly likes throwing money away.

    13. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ktappe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, employing skills that software doesn't do well..

      I'm not following this. Software (I use TaxAct) is quite good at making sure to ask you a lot of detailed questions about your life events and situation. Software can make sure to ask these questions and not forget one like a human can. If you, the end-user, neglect to check a box that says (for example), "I donated a car this year", then that's your fault not the software's. If you're trying to say the accountant would ask "Hey, are you sure you didn't donate a car?" and you respond "Oh yeah...you're right, I did," then OK, the human is better at coaxing info out of you (or inducing you to lie.) Personally, I'll stick to software.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    14. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by mjwx · · Score: 2

      No. No, I won't save more money than I earn at my job in a month. There's not that much more to save. And I earn a lot. Enough that I've decided not to spend my leisure time becoming a tax accountant - you know, someone whose *job* it is to know taxes. Software doesn't mean shit, it's the person using it *and* their knowledge.

      I could also paint my entire house, but I don't feel like doing that either.

      I don't regard spending time learning tax regulations as time well spent. And, wrong again... she didn't find the deduction using tax software, but by looking at our returns, how we work, and then interviewing us. You know, employing skills that software doesn't do well.

      This, a good tax accountant saves you more than doing it yourself because they know all the loopholes and deductions you can claim without being flagged for an audit.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      They do but none of them use Turbo Tax. Their stuff is A LOT more expensive than that. On a side note, modern pro tax programs all support an outsourcing button where all your shit gets sent to India to be computed. I recommend you verify with any accountant you use (in writing) that they do not outsource your tax forms.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    16. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is increasingly not the case. TurboTax will pull W-2s, 1099s and other tax forms from various financial institutions and enter the data automatically. And for the financial institutions that don't have automatic data import, if you're not the first couple of customers to have to enter a form from whoever sent it to you, you can usually take a photo of the form and TurboTax is able to OCR the data in.

      HR Block might do something similar, but I haven't used them since I started working for Intuit and get TurboTax for free.

    17. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've filed tax returns in both the States and Canada. Canadian personal tax is simple in comparison, there are few deductions and even if we miss a few we're content because money is not on top of our value system. In the States even a regular working person can make a lot of obscure dedcutions, you can still go the simple way and miss out on some, but (a) it's drilled in you daily to make as much money as possible, (b) it's drilled in you daily to spend as much money as possible, especially on middle-men like laywers, accountants, brokers, it's good for the economy.

    18. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by JJJJust · · Score: 1

      IRS said you owed $68,000. Accountant said you were due back $5,000.

      Since this is an anecdote about ineffective TurboTax, what did TurboTax say you owed/were due?

    19. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      Or even if flagged for an audit, as I was, they're able to justify the deductions... Yes, I really did go to grad school, even though the university never filed their paperwork to show my tuition. The supplies and equipment I donated to my church could be deducted, but I just had to get my minister to write a quick signed letter. The investment income I had that year wasn't all taxable, so it didn't all need to be declared as taxable income like the IRS claimed.

      Software's great for an estimate, and those estimates get closer every time I try my own hand at my taxes, but there's really no substitute for having a skilled professional look at your finances and figure out the correct arrangement. It's not even a matter of actually evading taxes, but legitimate deductions that the software could ask about, but the user won't understand.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    20. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      This, a good tax accountant saves you more than doing it yourself because they know all the loopholes and deductions you can claim without being flagged for an audit.

      Totally disagree. You will save far more by doing it yourself. The reason is that you will save little by finding a deduction here or there. You will save far more by actually understanding the tax law, and restructuring your financial life to take advantage of that knowledge. I make a very good income, but pay very little in tax. Most of my assets are sheltered in a living trust. I have set up several corporations, in Delaware, Nevada, California, and the Cayman Islands, and pass my income through whichever offers the most tax benefit for each type of income. Incorporation can be done on-line for a couple hundred bucks, and can save you thousands, so I am surprised so few people take advantage of that.

    21. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      there are humans and then there are humans.

      don't bother using a 'send it away to india' cheap service. they will fuck your shit up worse than a $9 tax program.

      if you want it done right, make sure it never gets sent offshore and its done by guys with white hair (ie, older guys). age does matter and experience is worth paying for. young guys don't know everything, but older guys generally more aware of how things work in the real world.

      if you have anything other than trivial tax returns, find a real accountant. you do get what you pay for (the experienced ones can usually find deductions to justify the fee they charge, so its a wash).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      If you have the sort of tax situation where software can make/break that kind of deduction or over/underpayment, you really shouldn't be using tax software yourself anyway. You can probably (and should!) have a professional helping you to handle your taxes.

      If you just need to file a 1040-EZ and don't want to print and mail in the paperwork yourself, it works just fine.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      just what I said, too. MAKE SURE they don't send it offshore.

      get them to sign a form that you create stating this exactly. all work will be done by person (xyz), signed by him and this person sits in office (abc). something to that effect.

      we have to stop this outsourcing shit before it gets even more out of hand than it already is. there are huge privacy issues at stake here and once it leaves the country, anything can happen to that info.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    24. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the last time I used tax software on my own, I followed all the simple instructions (my taxes were not all that complicated) and I got a letter from the IRS saying I owed something like $10k!

      I freaked out, of course.

      luckily, I had the name of the tax guy I used a long time ago (when I had a complicated return) and I brought my stuff over to him.

      this is the most amazing part: I brought the stuff to him on a tuesday and by wednesday mail delivery time, the completed return was PHYSICALLY in my mailbox. what the hell! how could he have done it that fast AND gotton it in the mail that same day? wow. blew my socks off.

      he charged me $500 or so. probably was only an hour of his time or maybe two, but that $10k bill turned into a $600 credit. he more than paid for his own time AND saved me a lot of worry.

      this sold me on using 'real guys' and not some hr schlock place.

      folks, take the time to find an actual CPA and give him your business. usually, they can find ways to pay for their own fee via deductions you are not even aware of.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    25. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by mjwx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Totally disagree. You will save far more by doing it yourself. The reason is that you will save little by finding a deduction here or there. You will save far more by actually understanding the tax law, and restructuring your financial life to take advantage of that knowledge

      Fine, let me know when you finish that 4 year degree and become a CPA (and how much it cost you). Then tell me how long it takes for you to become intimately familiar with the tax code and then tell me how long you spend keeping up on the changes to the tax code.

      Meanwhile I'll continue to spend a whopping $140 per year (which I claim on next years tax return, as well as the petrol I used getting from my home to his office) to have someone who does this for a living do it all for me and spend my time doing something I'd like to.

      So you think it's worth a 4 year degree, to save $140 a year... I'm sorry but after that I dont think it's a good idea to take tax advice from you.

      BTW: $140 p/a is expensive for a personal tax return in Oz, but this guy is brilliant.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    26. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Illustrating again that if you're rich there's always a way out of your taxes, if you're poor you pay every cent.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    27. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Illustrating again that if you're rich there's always a way out of your taxes, if you're poor you pay every cent.

      You don't have to be rich to take advantage of the tax system. You just have to be non-stupid, and willing to do a little work. Setting up a personal corporation takes just an hour or two, and maybe $200. It will pay for itself many times over in the first year. The janitor my company uses is incorporated, which means we run no risk of having his contractor status challenged, or dealing payroll tax overhead, etc. So we are willing to pay him more than we would pay a non-incorporated individual. If you are convinced that tax breaks are only for fat cats, then you will always be a skinny cat.

    28. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The janitor my company uses is incorporated, which means we run no risk of having his contractor status challenged, or dealing payroll tax overhead, etc. So we are willing to pay him more than we would pay a non-incorporated individual. If you are convinced that tax breaks are only for fat cats, then you will always be a skinny cat.

      Does your janitor realize that you are actually screwing him over in the long run by forcing him into a contractor status rather than paying him as a regular employee (presumably with benefits...)?

    29. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      > You will save far more by actually understanding the tax law, and restructuring your financial life to take advantage of that knowledge.

      I agree, but to be fair to the parent poster, a good tax accountant and/or financial counselor will offer advice specifically targeted to you and your needs.

      We have a guy on one of our talk stations here in Birmingham who shares all sorts of tips to save money like that, things I never would have thought of. For example:

      1. Buy a stock that you expect to decrease in value in the short term, but to make money in the long term. You pay, say, $10,000.

      2. It drops to $5,000. Sell, you can mark off the $5,000 loss on your taxes.

      3. Wait 30 days, then take that $5,000 and buy the same stock again. You can still take the $5,000 loss, but if (when) the stock finally appreciates, you make money there, too. :)

      He calls it "tax harvesting." I'd never heard of such a thing, but then, I ain't that sophisticated. :)

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    30. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile I'll continue to spend a whopping $140 per year (which I claim on next years tax return, as well as the petrol I used getting from my home to his office) to have someone who does this for a living do it all for me and spend my time doing something I'd like to.

      Pro Tip:
      If you're only filing taxes ONCE per year, then you're not talking to an expert who does it for a living. You're talking to someone with a certification who does it once a year at tax time.
      People who have REAL money are usually filing taxes at least twice a year, if not every quarter.

    31. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by csumpi · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      Yes. But theirs is better. And they already know how to use it.

      They also have knowledge of the tax code, which even if not complete, much more than mine, yours, and everyone's who commented on this article, combined.

    32. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by csumpi · · Score: 1

      ask you a lot of detailed questions about your life events and situation

      But time to answer those lots of detailed questions, is money. Or at least time wasted, from your life.

    33. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The janitor my company uses is incorporated, which means we run no risk of having his contractor status challenged, or dealing payroll tax overhead, etc.

      For those not familiar with how it works in the US, the "etc." he slides in at the end includes things such as Medical Insurance, Unemployment Insurance, Worker's Compensation, Disability, and a host of other things that they would normally have to pay for if he was on the payroll. Plus, if he does end up getting hurt, sick, or otherwise unable to work their premiums stay low and they can just terminate the contract when he breaches it... or he has to find someone else to pay to cover his duties in which case HE now has to setup payroll for all that stuff.
      I'm pretty sure they aren't paying him enough extra to make up for what they're screwing him out of.

    34. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Because poor people definitely have $200 laying around with which to start a tax dodge in the Cayman Islands.

    35. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I tend to view this the same way. The accountant experience is ~30 min total (~10 min question/answers on what's different this year than last year, and then he just setsup forms and sends them. and then it's DONE. That's it.). I can go back to doing more interesting things with my life (like... comment on slashdot :-)

    36. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      I assume most experts in their field use software that is relevant to their field of expertise. I also assume they use it more effectively than I would, given the fact that I use the software relevant to my profession far more effectively than a non-expert possibly could. I assume I'm not a special snowflake in that regard, and thus this is a reasonable generalization.

      If you spend a day studying tax law and reading your software's manual, you will save more money than you earn at your job in a month. It is time well spent.

      Wrong analysis. If we assume (and this is a big assumption) that I save as much as the professional I could hire would, then it doesn't matter how much I save, it's the same either way. If doing it myself is going to require me spending a day studying tax law, the relevant question is, will it cost more or less than a day's earnings for me to just pay someone else do it for me? If you get paid enough, that seems unlikely. The time would be better spent doing your actual job, and using the money earned to pay the accountant.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    37. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It seems odd for me to use a tax service, since they'd just ask the same questions turbo tax asks, and the most difficult part for me is often just gathering up all the necessary paperwork. Not much time saved, plus added inconvenience of setting up appointments and such. I doubt they'll find any non-obvious savings, since I don't have a variety of investments, I don't day trade, I don't have unusual tax situations, etc.

    38. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And they charge a ton of money for it, more money than they'd likely save by finding obscure loopholes for my situation.

    39. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What sort of deductions? Seriously, I can't think of anything significant that would apply to me that I don't know of. Certainly not enough that it could pay for a CPA's time. Sure, if I inherited parent's estate it would be complex and I'd try to get some help for that year, or if some other unusual situation came up, but for typical use the tax software will handle it.

    40. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It works for 1040 too. Start with entering W2, add 1099 INT and DIV forms you got in the mail, deduct charities and mortgage deduction, and that's most of it for most people.

    41. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your accountant a psychic?

      If not, how would they know about deductions if they didn't ask you questions about your situation?

    42. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Human accountants use tax software, that is true.

      However they have a much better idea of what things you need to put into the software to get the right answer out of it.

    43. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by leaen · · Score: 1

      1. Buy a stock that you expect to decrease in value in the short term, but to make money in the long term. You pay, say, $10,000.

      2. It drops to $5,000. Sell, you can mark off the $5,000 loss on your taxes.

      3. Wait 30 days, then take that $5,000 and buy the same stock again. You can still take the $5,000 loss, but if (when) the stock finally appreciates, you make money there, too. :)

      What about following plan.

      1. Put $10000 in bank.

      2. Wait 30 days, buy $7500 of stock and $2500 for taxes.

      3. ???

      4. Profit

    44. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      Yes, And they know how to operate it correctly.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    45. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Both you and the poster you're replying to have a point.

      Certainly in the UK (and I wouldn't be surprised to find it in the US, for similar reasons), the accountancy industry is in bit of a panic. Software that does 90% of what they do has finally become cheap and accessible enough for pretty much anyone.

      All of a sudden, Dave down the street starts offering accountancy services at a 40% discount (which he makes possible by having the cheapest kid fresh out of school punch numbers into a computer - or even outsource punching numbers into a computer to someone in a much cheaper country). Your accountant is stuck with a problem: How does he persuade his clients that it's worth using him rather than going to Dave down the street? As far as his clients are concerned, both people are doing the exact same job, it's just that one is much cheaper.

      Copying Dave and cutting prices is only going to go one way - all other things being equal, clients will choose one or other of them more-or-less at random and they'll be sharing a much smaller pie. Which is only going to get smaller as the software becomes more sophisticated and the clients think "Why do I need an accountant at all? I can sign up to use the software and do it myself". But accountants are subject to the same foibles as anyone else, so there's no shortage of them doing exactly this.

      Some accountants aren't doing this. They're looking at providing business advice and using ever more inventive ways of twisting tax law to save their clients money. They're not cutting their fees at all - instead, they're looking to do more things that justify their fees and even jacking them up. It's dead easy to charge a client £4,000 if you've just saved them £10,000.

      People like your good self clearly see the value in this. Lots of people don't see this value - either because they have simpler lives and hence the value doesn't exist or because they're quite short-sighted.

    46. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      I've been using TurboTax desktop software for more than a decade, maybe two, and never had a problem. It has helped find deductions I didn't know I could take because I took the time to answer all the questions. It has helped with difficult things like a cross-country move where I had to file in two different states. And when I failed to claim capital losses (didn't know you had to file stock trades if you lost money), it helped me to file a correction and get even more money back after the IRS sent me a 'you owe' notice. The end result was that without spending a dime more, Turbo Tax did all the paperwork once I entered the information that *I* neglected to do the first time. It's never made a math error, and the only times I've gotten anything from the IRS is when I neglected to report something that I got paperwork for.

      Now let's see .. $3,400 deduction at the 27% tax rate is $918. Exactly how many years of their service without finding anything new is that going to pay for??? It's an ROI question for me ... TurboTax may miss something once in awhile because *I* fail to enter it and it doesn't ask the right question, but that can happen with tax accountants too. I get to sit at my desk and use it, all the info is in Quicken, I don't have to dig through or organize receipts unless I get audited. It's time better spent to me. I also use it half way through the next tax season to make sure I'm not going to be drastically overpaying by 'faking' a tax return using YTD information. How much is that going to cost me at an accountant's office??

      My take on it is that someone like me that works at a regular job (i.e. no contract work), doesn't have a lot of complex tax situations like real estate purchases and sales or a home business, shouldn't have to spend the extra money for an accountant to do my taxes. My taxes basically don't change year-to-year because my life rarely changes much.

      But neither your anecdotal story nor mine is any real reason for someone else. Everyone is different.

      But, more on topic, I never use online software, don't trust it. Not one bit.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    47. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Turbo Tax is the right choice... for you. We have lots of investments, property, one of us is a corporation, etc. The tax service is actually more convenient, faster, and (in terms of the value of our time) much cheaper.

      One size does not fit all - also, since the tax software requirements were defined by tax professionals (one would hope), passed through a business analyst, and then given to programmers, any calculations more involved than what you described are pretty likely to get screwed up. It's whisper down the lane.

    48. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Computers can only do what they're programmed to do. During an interview, humans will ask questions more than one way, and uncover a better answer than the first one (and not a lie). A good example is when our accountant asked *which kind* of corporation my wife should be, and that lead to lots of questions about past, and more importantly, future prospects for the business. Computers cannot do this, not because it isn't technically possible, but because it's not economically feasible - the market for a tax accountant program with that level of sophistication is too small (for now, at least). They do okay for the majority of people with simple tax situations.

      I can tell you from experience that the popular tax software programs don't even come close to what a good accountant can do, for my tax situation.

      Software seems a good choice... for you. Is that easier to follow?

    49. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      I mistyped. We're getting back $3,400, not deducting that amount. The likelihood is that in future years, my accountant will find mistakes before they happen, as well as save me money, and give me financial advice I can use, outside of filing taxes.

      Like so many others who replied, your story sounds like software is good... for you. For me, I had multiple problems with software that incorrectly calculated my more complicated taxes, so a good human is better than software... for me.

      I never advocated that everyone, or even *anyone* stop using software. It's curious that so many inferred what I never even implied.

    50. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile I'll continue to spend a whopping $140 per year (which I claim on next years tax return, as well as the petrol I used getting from my home to his office) to have someone who does this for a living do it all for me and spend my time doing something I'd like to.

      Pro Tip: If you're only filing taxes ONCE per year, then you're not talking to an expert who does it for a living. You're talking to someone with a certification who does it once a year at tax time. People who have REAL money are usually filing taxes at least twice a year, if not every quarter.

      This is wrong. I file once a year, though I send estimated tax payments quarterly to avoid the penalty. I file once per year, and I have an excellent accountant - she does this for a living, and is quite good at it.

    51. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Again... sure, for your situation. So *you* should not use an accountant. But my accountant doesn't charge a "ton" of money, it's quite reasonable, and a tiny fraction of the money she's already saved me, not to mention peace of mind.

    52. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Both the state and federal tax authorities used the same information that my tax software sent them with my return, and concluded that I had overpaid. Your claim that it's my fault is nonsensical on the face of it.

      It's true; posting AC lowers your IQ by 25 points.

    53. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      I agree it's important to find a qualified accountant, and that it's wise to avoid a company that outsources the work to a third party.

      However, I don't agree with your sexist and ageist arguments. "Guys with white hair"?

      My accountant is in her mid thirties. She's very good at what she does. I don't need an old guy - anyway, I *am* an old guy, and I know there's a limit to the benefit of experience compared to the vigor of youth.

    54. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      That is true to a point. A good friend of mine is an accountant and has been doing taxes professionally for years. When you pay somebody like that you get a few things. One you get access to a professional grade piece of tax software. Which doesn't matter that much unless you have a more complex return, have prior years taxes that need to be done or some problem with the IRS that needs to be sorted out. The second thing you get is access to somebody, assuming you are using an accountant or an enrolled agent, who studies the tax code professionally. They simply have more time to learn the ins and outs than most people to because it is their job. If your an preparer is an enrolled agent you can usually get them to help you deal with the IRS should you get audited as well. Though they will likely charge you for this.

      Still if you have a reasonably simple return Turbo Tax, or any of the other major brand tax software, should be fine. I personally won't be using their online versions though I do use Turbo Tax for my own taxes. On the other hand major part of my friend's business involves people who use Turbo Tax without a full understanding of their tax situation. Where something happens that isn't a simple matter and they try to do it themselves and get into trouble. The biggest problem there is you typically don't know you are in trouble for a couple of years. By the time you do know you are facing a tax bill, fines and subsequent year returns that are also messed up. At that point you are really going to need somebody to deal with it. So the trick to doing it yourself is being prepared to have a realistic assessment of your own knowledge level and be prepared to either study up or hire a professional when you get beyond what you can deal with.

    55. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by gravis777 · · Score: 2

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      Truthfully, unless you go to a person who specializes in taxes, and has done so for years, I find that the online tax software is more efficiant than the human accountants. Many places, such as H&R Block, that sets up tax advisors in Walmart and places like that, hire out-of-work people, send them to school for a couple of weeks, hire them for about 3-4 months and pay them around $10 an hour. I know people who have done it. Many can hardly balance their check books, and they just run your numbers through the tax software.

      As far as the parent poster's $3400 deduction - the standardized deduction is higher than that, and pretty much everyone qualifies for that.

      As far as the original poster - I've been using online tax software for years. Really haven't thought anything about it. If you are refering to to security, I don't know if its really any more or less secure than any other option. As far as reliability - I have had a friend who was an accountant look over what the online service did from time to time, and she said it was fine.

      The online services seem to work fine if you qualify for the easy form. If you have tons of deductions and stuff like that you need to put in, such as taking care of disabled people, owning your own business, or something like that, you may want to go with a human accountant who does this type of stuff for a living (rather than a seasonal worker) who knows all the tax codes and all the deductions and stuff you can make.

    56. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      your taxes arent complicated yet you don't know why they were asking for 10k? And your tax account somehow figured out how to reduce it by 10.6k??
      Obviously either a) it is complicated, b) something unusually happened that year, or c) you didn't use the software properly and didn't double check your work.

      Guess what, one time I did use software, I was making 35k/year at that time, and it said I owed 100,000 in taxes! OMG! Then I double checked my work and I had put an extra zero so I had entered in 350k as my income. So by your logic I saved $100,000!!!!!

    57. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is there shouldnt be a shitload of deductions, exemptions, write-offs, etc. The tax system should be far simpler.

    58. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by csumpi · · Score: 1

      We use one of the best accountants in the entertainment industry. She charges us $300, for a pretty complicated tax return (husband, wife, investments, property income, kids). She saves us way... way more than $300. Not even counting not having to do much more than giving her a big ziploc bag of paperwork and signing a couple pieces of documents.

    59. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      And here we have the biggest problem with our current set of tax codes. AND yet, there is no outcry from the public that taxes are nearly impossible for the average person to complete without spending money, and even then, you're likely to miss something or another.

      THIS is not normal. There is NO two ways around this, our tax laws suck, but no politician is willing to take them on, because of all the special deductions and credits carved out for various sub groups that will cause outrage and panic among those groups, keeping the tax codes complicated and incoherent.

      I have a simple question, what benefit to society does a complicated tax code give us? It is time to abolish it.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    60. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by lxs · · Score: 1

      No. You really need old guys with white hair who sip Martinis and unknowingly quote from Mad Men to do your taxes. If only for the entertainment value.

    61. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by drfred79 · · Score: 2

      As an accountant I disagree with everything you said. We use more powerful tax software that does very little other than simple mathematical calculations, collate data, and file in the correct IRS format. We are not using Turbotax or any Turbotax equivalent. In actuality we appreciate simple tax software for consumers because they have to come to us when something is wrong like the example before. Spending one day to learn what I spend my whole year doing will not minimize your tax liability. If so I have a one day crash course to become a modern artist or a lawyer.

    62. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the opposite experience - my accountant messed up, and then charged me $100 to fix the mistake. I've been Turbo Tax online ever since. Well, except for the state; I use my state's free filing software, and just check that it matches what TT had thought it should be before I said no thanks to letting them do it. I haven't seen anything to make me think it is leaving money on the table.

    63. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by afidel · · Score: 1

      And my total time spent for filing federal + state + local was about 45 minutes last year and that was only doing federal using H&R Block Online and doing state and local through their websites (H&R would cut 10 minutes off this by doing the state but they want like $40 extra, I don't make near $240 an hour so I do it myself)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    64. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally disagree. You will save far more by doing it yourself.

      My wife makes a good living finding money left on the table by smart people like you who think they can do just as well.

      Smart doesn't have anything to do with it. The US tax code is too big for anyone to grasp in the hours or less per year that the average person (including the seasonal "help" hired every year by the IRS to answer the phones) spends on it.

      And if you are expending so much effort in hiding assets from the tax man, and think you know the tax code as well as someone who has made it their life's work... I expect to hear about your rape at the hands of the IRS at some future date. Death and taxes, baby.

    65. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by volmtech · · Score: 1

      If you have a business you need tax planing. I was forced to sell some property to offset a business loss and incurred a capital gains tax. I shifted some expenses from the upcoming year to offset the gain to lower my tax bill. However the next year I then had less expenses to deduct and made a larger profit on which I had to pay SS tax which I would not have to have payed on the capital gain. D'oh

      Even with a simple return double check your figures. I was out of work for three years. First year, $3000 tax credit, second year, $78 due, third year $3000 tax credit. Every year should have been the same. I downloaded the second years software and recalculated my tax bill and came up with a $3000 credit. I filed an amended return to get the credit but I still don't know what I did wrong the first time. If my financial situation had changed for the third year I wouldn't have noticed the discrepancy for the second year

      .

    66. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      Our tax guy loves to say "Tax software is no substitution for tax knowledge." ...and how very true it is.

      Software technically works fine, but it can't know *YOUR* personal situation and all the ins and outs of the many, many, many, MANY tax laws and how they affect YOU.

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    67. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the GP, but I think you're conflating "not all that complicated" with "so easy even master_kaos could do it in ten minutes".

      From my own experience, a person with a small business, 5 rental properties, a house, a recent divorce, and two kids in college has a moderately complicated return. Extremely complicated (and far out of my league) would be the 500-page returns of the top 0.1%.

      There are plenty of mistakes that tax software can't help you with. Common issues I have seen: incorrect filing of amended W-2s/1099s (IRS now thinks you have more unreported income), failure to retain source documents, failure to take any deductions for 1099s, failure to deduct mileage/vehicle expenses. From some larger tax firms that employ barely trained seasonal workers: blatant lies that will get flagged.

      If you get a single W-2, don't buy or sell securities, have no other income, rent a small flat, and are absolutely sure you don't get any other deductions or credits, file an EZ on your own. For anything else, I would at least consult with a tax firm that is open year-round.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  2. Sure by Greyfox · · Score: 0

    I do all my taxes on monkeybagel.com. Monkeybagels will do your taxes in about an hour! Tax-doing monkeybagels!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  3. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, probably not.

  4. Worried the government will see it by GlobalEcho · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given the recent revelations about NSA spying, I refuse to use these services. The risk is simply too high that the government might see my tax returns.

    1. Re:Worried the government will see it by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Crap, I used all my mod points yesterday!

    2. Re:Worried the government will see it by shentino · · Score: 1

      Are IRS audits worse than NSA snooping?

    3. Re:Worried the government will see it by MXB2001 · · Score: 0

      I like your sense of humour. :)

      --
      01/01/01
    4. Re:Worried the government will see it by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes!

      An audit requires a large amount of time and effort on the part of the victim. It's an extremely time consuming and frustrating process if you have _simple_ finances. The NSA spying is largely transparent and non-intrusive.

    5. Re:Worried the government will see it by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      Only because of the point of entry.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    6. Re:Worried the government will see it by melikamp · · Score: 2

      And more to the point: I will fully trust the online tax software if it's free (libre), secure against eavesdroppers, and operated by the tax-collecting government agency itself.

    7. Re:Worried the government will see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IRS might ask for info no normal person keeps

      like proof you lived at a previous address for 5 straight years. who keeps years rent receipts, cable bills, etc?

    8. Re:Worried the government will see it by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Uh... I do?

      I have every bill and major receipt received since 2008. I keep them in a small filing cabinet, organized by category (current employment, old health insurance, car paperwork, etc.), and I cull the oldest crap when it gets too full.

      I recently had to apply for a US security clearance, which involves filling out a nice big form detailing every residence you've had for the past decade, and in some cases they even want account numbers for utilities and such. I had mine accessible.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    9. Re:Worried the government will see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And it's free too.

    10. Re:Worried the government will see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IRS might ask for info no normal person keeps

      like proof you lived at a previous address for 5 straight years. who keeps years rent receipts, cable bills, etc?

      Unless you've severely misstated your taxes (by 25% or more) or committed fraud, you only need to maintain records used for a particular return for three years (with the caveat that some records will be used for a future return, like those involved with basis).

      And unless those documents are used for substantiating a deduction, you don't need to keep them. Most people can't deduct their rent or cable bills.

    11. Re:Worried the government will see it by gtall · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that the IRS should cut out the middle men (us) and just get the straight information from the NSA. That alone would pay for itself in lost time for the pop. to do their tax returns.

    12. Re:Worried the government will see it by khallow · · Score: 1

      My view is that if you aren't required to keep certain information (or need it for other purposes such as the other replier's security clearances), then destroy it. It's just a prudent data retention policy.

  5. Australia by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Been doing it for years with government provided software.

    Mind you it doesn't say 'cloud' every 5 words, but it submits it all online and even auto fills in a lot of your data from government databases.
    Not sure how long it has been available for but many many years without incident.

    Oh and its free.

    1. Re:Australia by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Been doing it for years with government provided software.

      Mind you it doesn't say 'cloud' every 5 words, but it submits it all online and even auto fills in a lot of your data from government databases. Not sure how long it has been available for but many many years without incident.

      Oh and its free.

      Thankfully, Intuit, Inc. (by a totally crazy coincidence also the maker of TurboTax(tm), a market-leading tax software solution) has been fighting to save us from communism...

      So here in the Land of the Free, the IRS probably has the information it needs anyway (for fraud detection, and because Joe Worker's employer already reports it); but we can't let them destroy the free market, and capitalism itself, by making the process any easier. Instead, you just hand over your money and personal information to an 'Authorized e-File Provider' and be glad that you live in the bestest ever country on earth.

      We will be rolling out a similar system for health insurance soon.

    2. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it were open. Being a governement developed project there are no valid reasons why it shouldn't be.

      This would also help fix the platform limitations it has (maybe even the poor input response times and display scaling too?).

    3. Re:Australia by cheater512 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure I DO NOT want to see it's source code.
      That would probably give me nightmares.

    4. Re:Australia by stinerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, I mentioned that at work once. That in foreign countries your return is pretty much done for you, and you just sign off on it. If it isn't correct you provide proof and then send that amendment back in. I got an incredulous stare and an "Oh, that'd be great for the government. They could say whatever they wanted and people would just pay up."

      *sigh*

      A good many people have no idea that the IRS already has all your W-2s and could fill out a simple 1040-EZ on your behalf. Sure, when you're itemizing it would get a bit more complicated, but for the vast majority of folks who don't itemize, there is no reason that the IRS can't have everything filled out for you, and all you need to do is sign and return.

    5. Re:Australia by ktappe · · Score: 1

      See, that's exactly how the U.S. should do it. It is moronic that we have to pay 3rd parties to submit data and money to the government. But we are responsible if the data is wrong, not the bad programmers.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    6. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by a totally crazy coincidence also the maker of TurboTax

      I hope this was sarcasm, Intuit purchased TurboTax back in ~2007.

    7. Re:Australia by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      At risk of feeding the trolls, do you realize the category error you are making?

      When I'm interacting with a given entity, state or private, yeah I definitely do expect to be able to do so through a website they provide or (if such is relevant to the situation) an API they provide for other front-ends and clients.

      Having to hire an 'authorized e-file provider' in order to send a tax return to the IRS is like having to hire a third party to send in this post on my behalf. There isn't anything stopping me from doing so, if my requirements are esoteric in some way; but hell yeah I expect to be able to deal directly with the IRS when I have business with them (especially if I'm one of the numerous Americans whose tax return is basically the 1040-EZ that they already have all the data in).

      If tax accountants, tax attorneys, and prep services wish to market their services, that's all well and good; but the idea that the IRS should be forbidden to provide trivial 20th century customer service lest it step on their dainty toes? Nonsense.

      Nothing about that notion implies that there should be One Website For The People, Comrade!

    8. Re:Australia by ArbitraryName · · Score: 2

      If by ~2007 you mean 1993, then sure.

    9. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking about eTax, it might be gratis but it sure as hell ain't Free.

    10. Re:Australia by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not saying the system isn't with its flaws, but saying you'd rather have the government do it for you "for free" just shows that 1) you're ignorant of how things work in the real world,

      The point isn't about it being "for free" per se or not. It's that to get to the point of accepting a tax return online and reviewing its accuracy at a fundamental level, the IRS already has to (or at least, should be) correlate all the known information about the filer in the first place. Ie, you're already 99.9% of the way there of just automating the rest and filling in the spots calculated for exemptions, adjusted income, etc. So to specifically exempt this rather obvious option seems to be of specific design.

      and 2) you don't have a firm grasp on why barriers to government involvement in private industry exist (hint: anti-totalitarianism).

      Nope. See, the tax code is already pretty damn simple for the vast majority of people. That's precisely why the 1040-EZ form was created. It's the claim of anti-totalitarianism that's used to justify a way to "funnel gov't money to their buddies in private industry" when it misses the point that nothing about the above of *allowing* government involvement inherent leads to totalitarianism--inherently is the point since the whole tax code is a government construct which makes the whole idea of government totalitarianism against its own tax code is circular.

      Most people don't have a good grasp on 1) or 2) anyways so your comment doesn't surprise me. And if you're going to argue against 2), why not take it to the next level and just nationalize any industry that bridges the private/public gap - which is pretty much where we're going anyways.

      Because the private/public gap in the tax code exists (1) for people who actually need to utilize features of the tax code involving areas of dispute (figuring out if an item is an asset or a liability, if it's income or not, if its cost can be spread out over multiple years, etc) especially to ease all the fundamental concerns of businesses which deal in much larger dollar values and hence have to be either (a) a separate tax code for businesses (which is more or less the effect of different forms) or (b) simply no taxes on businesses (which is enough of a loophole that the tax code becomes meaningless) or (2) to prop up previous, pre-digital tax services that did all the above mentioned auto-calculate stuff that now can (and likely must) be trivial done by the IRS's online services anyways. And since a vast majority of people so heavily fall into (b), there's good reason why the IRS should be a directly available option.

      The false dichotomy that is this thread ignores the really obvious solution: don't have a tax code so damn complicated.

      That's pretty much impossible. Yes, the tax code has been made intentionally more complicated to the ends of social engineering, but putting that aside and you're still left with trying to define "income" in some fashion that can't be somehow fundamentally worked around without crippling the ability of businesses to function. The general solution for most people is obvious: they're employed by someone else and are paid wages, of which all details of such have to be reported to the IRS. Hence, they functionally already live in a bubble of an uncomplicated tax code.

      The right doesn't want that because they want to funnel gov't money to their buddies in private industry and the left doesn't want that because a population not dependent upon them is much harder to control. I haven't heard anyone say we need a complicated tax code to protect the free market and capitalism, but the Feds have a track record of using the tax code as a weapon of last resort against citizens it finds uncooperative

      Uh, no. The right uses the tax code to social engineer families to stay together, to reward ce

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    11. Re:Australia by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There's also the fact that (since the IRS doesn't actually write the tax code, merely implement it), providing it to the public, in a format designed to be as agnostic and machine-readable as possible, would be the closest thing to 'simplifying' that anybody without control of the tax code itself could actually do... The messy business of mapping real-world phenomena to specific boxes on the worksheet would still occupy an army of tax lawyers, for a relatively small number of people and firms; but for those whose situation is either simpler or complex in historically-well-understood ways, automation is the next best thing to simplification.

    12. Re:Australia by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm annoyed myself that e-file is not free. I get it free with turbo-tax deluxe, but the state e-file costs money, enough that I'm going to stand in line at the post office rather than pay it. If it saves the government money as they claim then they shouldn't charge to e-file.

    13. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In most european countries, you receive a pre-processed tax form filled for you with all the data they have on you. You can simply agree to this if it's correct or you have two options: download the software provided by the institution and fill the parts missing, like deductibles or hire an accountant to do it for you, which isn't very expensive and takes an hour or so.

      Now, if you think everything works without a hitch, think that the day when all this forms are released to the public, the servers collapse and you need a few ours of F5ing to download it. Also, sometimes the software leaves a lot to be desired, specially on the UI design part (yellow backgrounds, millions of controls, etc).

    14. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My state has a free online e-file system - once you have done your Fed taxes, it's 20 minutes tops. If the number I get matches the number Turbo Tax was showing me before I refused to pay them, I'm golden. Check your state!

    15. Re:Australia by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Why do you stand in line at the Post Office? When we file State taxes at the latest possible time (we normally wind up having underpaid a few hundred), either we mail them as normal, or we drive through the local Post Office lot and a batch of people who look like they're having a great time are there to accept them.

      (Note: I doubt that standing in the parking lot intercepting tax forms on April 15 would be all that lucrative, since lots of people like filing earlier if they're getting refunds. Not worth being arrested and charged with mail fraud. Just my paranoia kicking in.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    16. Re:Australia by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Because the postage is above the normal rate, and I don't have a postal scale at home.

    17. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      roman_mir's karma is shot again...

  6. It's the NSA!!! by CajunArson · · Score: 1

    Come on, we all know that if you use online tax software then the NSA can get access to your tax information! They spent BILLIONS of dollars in sophisticated backdoor technology so they can read all of our tax returns!

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:It's the NSA!!! by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I realize it's a joke, but legally the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns. If you are a pimp or a drug dealer, you must file taxes with your correct occupation, however these taxes are not admissible as evidence against you, and law enforcement doesn't have access to it to point you out as a drug dealer.

      Theoretically anyway.

      There's been some funny side effects to the law, such as a prostitute who argued that her services weren't as much as the government claimed and she didn't owe so many back taxes. Congress passed a law that only the cost of goods sold count against revenue for dealing drugs (you can't include the cost of advertising) - however breast implants are a legitimate tax deduction as long as they're so large that they're purely for professional good and not personal enjoyment. And of course Al Capone going to jail on tax evasion, of all things.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Informative

      but legally the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns

      Unless you're buying health insurance in one of the new Obamacare exchanges. Or applying for a FHA mortgage. Or you happen to be the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation. Your State Government can access it too, if they have an income tax and wish to match up your State return to the Federal one. The IRS also shares returns with SSA.

      There's also a multitude of Federal and State agencies that can access your tax account, if not your actual returns. The Department of State will check with the IRS before they issue or renew a passport, for the purpose of collecting foreign income taxes and denying passports to serious tax scofflaws. Child support enforcement agencies can seize refunds, so they've got a mechanism of communication with the IRS too.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:It's the NSA!!! by JJJJust · · Score: 4, Informative

      I realize it's a joke, but legally the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns. If you are a pimp or a drug dealer, you must file taxes with your correct occupation, however these taxes are not admissible as evidence against you, and law enforcement doesn't have access to it to point you out as a drug dealer.

      Theoretically anyway.

      I don't buy this.

      Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103 states:

      (i) Disclosure to Federal officers or employees for administration of Federal laws not relating to tax administration
      (1) Disclosure of returns and return information for use in criminal investigations
      (A) In general
      Except as provided in paragraph (6), any return or return information with respect to any specified taxable period or periods shall, pursuant to and upon the grant of an ex parte order by a Federal district court judge or magistrate judge under subparagraph (B), be open (but only to the extent necessary as provided in such order) to inspection by, or disclosure to, officers and employees of any Federal agency who are personally and directly engaged in—
      (i) preparation for any judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to the enforcement of a specifically designated Federal criminal statute (not involving tax administration) to which the United States or such agency is or may be a party,
      (ii) any investigation which may result in such a proceeding, or
      (iii) any Federal grand jury proceeding pertaining to enforcement of such a criminal statute to which the United States or such agency is or may be a party,
      solely for the use of such officers and employees in such preparation, investigation, or grand jury proceeding.

      (4) Use of certain disclosed returns and return information in judicial or administrative proceedings
      (A) Returns and taxpayer return information
      Except as provided in subparagraph (C), any return or taxpayer return information obtained under paragraph (1) or (7)(C) may be disclosed in any judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to enforcement of a specifically designated Federal criminal statute or related civil forfeiture (not involving tax administration) to which the United States or a Federal agency is a party—
      (i) if the court finds that such return or taxpayer return information is probative of a matter in issue relevant in establishing the commission of a crime or the guilt or liability of a party, or
      (ii) to the extent required by order of the court pursuant to section 3500 of title 18, United States Code, or rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

    4. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns

      According to my lawyer you are correct with a single exception. I had to get sign-off on my BATFE form 5320.4 tax paperwork from the sheriff where I used to live and also from the police chief where I live now. To be more specific, federal law requires me to get the Chief Law Enforcement Officer for the area to not only review, but in addition, sign-off on my tax paperwork. The courts have ruled that is unconstitutional to require you to show tax paperwork to law enforcement, and several more even more specific rulings that you can't require people to show tax paperwork to local law enforcement, but of course as always, the BATFE ignores the courts and does whatever they damn well please.

    5. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize it's a joke, but legally the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns. If you are a pimp or a drug dealer, you must file taxes with your correct occupation, however these taxes are not admissible as evidence against you, and law enforcement doesn't have access to it to point you out as a drug dealer.

      Theoretically anyway.

      I don't buy this.

      Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103 states:

      (i) Disclosure to Federal officers or employees for administration of Federal laws not relating to tax administration
      (1) Disclosure of returns and return information for use in criminal investigations
      (A) In general
      Except as provided in paragraph (6), any return or return information with respect to any specified taxable period or periods shall, pursuant to and upon the grant of an ex parte order by a Federal district court judge or magistrate judge under subparagraph (B), be open (but only to the extent necessary as provided in such order) to inspection by, or disclosure to, officers and employees of any Federal agency who are personally and directly engaged in—
      (i) preparation for any judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to the enforcement of a specifically designated Federal criminal statute (not involving tax administration) to which the United States or such agency is or may be a party,
      (ii) any investigation which may result in such a proceeding, or
      (iii) any Federal grand jury proceeding pertaining to enforcement of such a criminal statute to which the United States or such agency is or may be a party,
      solely for the use of such officers and employees in such preparation, investigation, or grand jury proceeding.

      (4) Use of certain disclosed returns and return information in judicial or administrative proceedings
      (A) Returns and taxpayer return information
      Except as provided in subparagraph (C), any return or taxpayer return information obtained under paragraph (1) or (7)(C) may be disclosed in any judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to enforcement of a specifically designated Federal criminal statute or related civil forfeiture (not involving tax administration) to which the United States or a Federal agency is a party—
      (i) if the court finds that such return or taxpayer return information is probative of a matter in issue relevant in establishing the commission of a crime or the guilt or liability of a party, or
      (ii) to the extent required by order of the court pursuant to section 3500 of title 18, United States Code, or rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

      Just would like to voice this

      You took it literally, your not going to just flat out state you are a drug dealer, or pimp. But according to the law you still have to report what you make, and there are several ways to cover yourself if you are in those "professions" (if you'd like). However I have never heard of a Drug Dealer after being arrested and after perhaps a conviction having to then deal with the IRS. But the IRS/State steal a percentage of the money you win from a lottery, or even gambling, so explain (not you) how one is off the hook and the other they decide to steal from you.

      If I remember right the commenter is wrong in his assumptions about Al Capone they nailed him on other actual taxable business related dealings where he had to, but didn't pay taxes. Since they couldn't get him, on murder, or the other illegal things he had on the side. And the.government/prosecutors cut the tax laws very thin to nail him on that.

      But good post on the actual tax law...

    6. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the IRS/State steal a percentage of the money you win from a lottery, or even gambling, so explain (not you) how one is off the hook and the other they decide to steal from you.

      I would also add that I know they are interested in what they consider "earned income" legal means of money, with the paper work (paycheck W2's) but neither drug dealer, moonshiner, pimp, ho, or lottery/gambling is "earned income"..

    7. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      but neither drug dealer, moonshiner, pimp, ho, or lottery/gambling is "earned income"..

      Hey man, pimpin ain't easy.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The IRS isn't supposed to care what your politics are either.

      Yet, for some reason, in the last couple of years, they do.

    9. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone better tell Al Capone.

    10. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long as you're feeling high and mighty perhaps you could explain all that to the president.

    11. Re:It's the NSA!!! by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      You also forgot that tax information can also be released to the ruling political party in order to harass or otherwise damage the reputation of the political opponent and related organizations.

  7. error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    TRUST and TAX... no possible solution found.

  8. No, you can't by Kardos · · Score: 2

    With local TurboTax, you're just running closed source software. However, you can quarantine it such that it is unable to transmit anything over the tubes, and print the result, limiting the worst case scenario to incorrectly filled out forms.

    With online tax prep, you're sending all your details to some online server somewhere, and hoping that they only do the computations and wipe all the data. But they won't. It'll be stored so next year it'll be "half filled in already for your convenience". If you value your financial privacy, you would not use an online tax service.

    1. Re:No, you can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My take on this is to log in and provide hypothetical information under a pseudonym. I let it come up with whatever it will... then use that as a guide to hand fill in my official paper return.

      I highly resent being compelled to share my financial state of affairs with anyone, even the government, as much as they resent my prying into their affairs - such as how they are spending that which they extracted from me.

      Even more so, I resent being compelled to share personal private information to third parties.

      I get the idea the time is fast approaching that I will no longer be allowed to fill in my tax return by hand and be compelled to render the most intimate details of my life to organizations "working with" my government.

      My government has given ample evidence that they are not to be trusted. They give all indication of protecting the wolves from the sheep. The sheep have no business hiding when the wolves are hungry, but it's quite OK for the wolves to don sheep's clothing and rat them out. Any sheep that dares rat out a wolf will be dealt with severely ( Snowden ).

    2. Re:No, you can't by ArbitraryName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All of your tax information like your W-2 and various 1099s are provided to you by other people. People who keep that data on their servers. I'm not sure what sort of "financial privacy" you think you have, but the US tax system doesn't allow for much, if any.

    3. Re:No, you can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you care about privacy, buy a local copy of TurboTax and print your return. I do it every year. Easy.

    4. Re: No, you can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about me? I run Linux. I have no computers that run windows or mac operating systems. My choices are paper, or online. I have been doing online.

    5. Re:No, you can't by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Hope you didn't like your master boot record!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:No, you can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you care about privacy, buy a local copy of TurboTax and print your return. I do it every year. Easy.

      And then make sure you decline every time it asks you for permission to share your "aggregated" data with the vendor. Ugh!!

    7. Re:No, you can't by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      If I can't trust H&R Block to handle my financial data, I have a very big problem, and so do all those people who use them for accounting (and in-person tax handling).

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:No, you can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever wonder why you get such directed advertising? It's not from browsing the Internet. It's from people like H&R Block selling your information to data miners. You do have a big problem.

    9. Re:No, you can't by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      "If you value your financial privacy" is such a loaded phrase.

      Risk. What's the worst that could happen? Well, your AGI can be used as a form of identity. So can your SSN. Your employment history as well is used as identity (you will be quizzed on this when applying for loans). You file any address changes and your current address, and your address history is used as identity (same deal).

      Probability of any of these being hijacked is roughly identical. It's low: compound trustworthiness of the organization being paramount to their ability to continue to do business with government regulations and auditing, and then consider that the primary threats are internal (insider threats are always the greater probability risk) and that these people are more likely to work for personal use than bulk sale (meaning you'd have to be one of a dozen or so picked out of tens or hundreds of millions of users at random).

      Severity is of course rather high.

      Overall, "if you value your financial privacy", you'll never get a job where your employer needs your social security number to file taxes. All of these applications using your SSN even if you don't get hired. I typically file my taxes before I get my W2, because I can calculate all of my information without it by looking at my last paycheck.

      The risk of using an online tax service is marginally higher than the risk of doing my taxes by hand or on home software. It's roughly identical to the risk of engaging with a tax accountant.

    10. Re:No, you can't by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I just went to Amazon and searched for things. Those exact things and similar things started showing up on ads on the beer forum I was on.

      I googled for oriental furniture and browsed some futons. OrientalFurniture.com ads started showing up on fucking FACEBOOK who is at war with Google.

      I visited Straight Razor Designs and Classic Shaving directly, bought some shave soap and aftershave. I started getting straight razor ads on Fark.

      H&R Block is selling my information in real-time it seems.

    11. Re:No, you can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with "storing" it somewhere is that, once stored, it can later be shared. The privacy problem is with egregiously wide access to the information, so it makes a difference who is doing the storing. If it's "stored" by someone less likely to share it egregiously, that's better. If it's "stored" by one less kind of party, so it's less likely to be shared with the kinds of friends that party has, that's better. OTOH, if it's "stored" by some nameless "cloud" company buying adwords and then doing your taxes for $0, that's bad, because they're going to share it immediately, and then later when they're going out of business they'll share it promiscuously to try to stay afloat.

      This is magical derp-think: "oh, it's been 'stored,' let's just give up now." Even in the distant past when privacy wasn't so routinely trod upon and disrespected, people still "stored" things.

    12. Re:No, you can't by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I don't get directed advertising. They might be sending it, but I don't see it.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  9. Online is more secure now by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 1

    I don't keep any tax data on my PC for security reasons. Had an iMac a while ago that blew up and it was a pain to get the drive out before trashing the thing. Easier just to keep the data in the tax cloud.

    1. Re:Online is more secure now by JJJJust · · Score: 2

      I don't keep any tax data on my PC for security reasons. Had an iMac a while ago that blew up and it was a pain to get the drive out before trashing the thing. Easier just to keep the data in the tax cloud.

      The fact that you couldn't get the drive out isn't a security issue, it's an Apple engineering issue.

    2. Re:Online is more secure now by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      You are going about the secure data destruction business all wrong... Once the computer is toast, anything between you and the platters is just 'collateral damage'. A rifle, angle grinder, or cutting torch will go right through an iMac without much difficulty.

    3. Re:Online is more secure now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you couldn't get the drive out isn't a security issue, it's an Apple engineering issue.

      I'm fairly certain Apple would call that a feature.

    4. Re:Online is more secure now by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You've heard of this wonderful thing we call encryption, right?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  10. Local versions give more control by David_W · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A friend of mine made an interesting point to me a few years ago, and caused me to switch from online versions to the local ones you install on your system. With the local versions, you get to keep the data files. The online versions tend to purge from year-to-year, or at least after a couple years. If you want to refer to an older return, be it because you are being audited, or just to help figure out something on this year's forms, you'll have everything (worksheets, forms, etc.) with the local version, assuming you back up the software and data files. Online, you probably just have a PDF of whatever finally got submitted to the IRS, and that's it.

    So yeah, online versions work, but local ones give you more control.

    1. Re:Local versions give more control by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      You can file a FOIA request to the NSA. They make backups of your hard drive every month.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Local versions give more control by Kardos · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Local versions give more control by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      A word of caution, though. For reasons that, no doubt, have to do with fundamental difficulties in computer science, the rapid changes in the storage of integers and trivial floats; rather than being money-grubbing shitweasels, vendors of standalone accounting/tax-prep packages have a... spotty... record when it comes to compatibility of older files with newer clients.

      I recently had the pleasure of migrating some antique version of Quicken to the present. The "Well, just open the old file with the new software" procedure simply wasn't supported, they'd changed formats and killed compatibility with their own older format. "Export" from the old one and "import" to the new one resulted in some alarming munging where somebody's penny-ante garden club ended up having assets in the range of $20 million, and $1.3 billion in liabilities.... This seemed improbable.

      The officially-recommended(but not supported, or guaranteed to produce accurate results) solution was to take the oldest file, install an intermediate version a few years newer than that file, open the file with the intermediate version, allow it to convert, check the results manually, do the same with a second intermediate version, and then finally take the output from the second intermediate version and import it into the current version.

      If you don't get to keep (in some non-fucked format) all the output and intermediate data, I'd trust an accounting package's data files only as long as I'd trust whatever mechanism (VM, whatever) I had cobbled together to keep that version of the accounting package running.

    4. Re:Local versions give more control by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The officially-recommended(but not supported, or guaranteed to produce accurate results) solution was to take the oldest file, install an intermediate version a few years newer than that file, open the file with the intermediate version, allow it to convert, check the results manually, do the same with a second intermediate version, and then finally take the output from the second intermediate version and import it into the current version.

      .

      I don't know about you, but the first time anyone recommended anything remotely similar to that for their software would cause me to terminate the program with extreme prejudice, take the CD's and shred them into tiny, sharp pieces and mail them to company wrapped up in a pipe bomb.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Local versions give more control by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Oh, believe me, the only vestiges of politeness I preserved in that situation were for the poor sucker who had dutifully been typing her records in for years, and stood to lose them if they couldn't be migrated. Quicken... they can go to the special hell.

    6. Re:Local versions give more control by ArbitraryName · · Score: 1

      More effective than trying to explain the joke to you, I'm sure.

    7. Re:Local versions give more control by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      H&R Block's stuff prints out all the worksheets and such too, not just the final return. Not sure if others do it, but it's handy.

      1, you have all the data available
      2, you know how they calculated things

      Both very handy items to have around.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Local versions give more control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have filed federal and state taxes with TurboTax for the past 6 or 7 years. When you save your PDF files, all the worksheets and forms you/they completed are included.

  11. Major targets for attackers by guanxi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For attackers trying to collect personal information -- for identity theft, for dirt, for spying -- can you imagine a better target than servers holding everyone's tax returns?

    Remember, security needs to make an attack more costly than the data is worth to the attacker. What responsibility / liability do vendors have regarding security for these servers? A breach may not cost them very much.

    I file using paper.

    1. Re:Major targets for attackers by Kardos · · Score: 1

      Well the IRS still has the mother lode, the best target. But you're exactly right; if they are keeping all that info, they'll soon be the second best target. And when they get broken into, it'll be much much worse than the recent Adobe screwup.

    2. Re:Major targets for attackers by DaHat · · Score: 1

      can you imagine a better target than servers holding everyone's tax returns?

      Yes, healthcare.gov.

      Read in horror: https://www.trustedsec.com/files/CONGRESS_Hearing_HealthCareSEC_FINAL_v1.1.pdf

      Or, if you aren't keen on long reading, note that the website actually advertises the fact that it is the target of SQL injection attacks via it's search function: http://www.redstate.com/2013/11/18/healthcare-gov-site-advertising-sql-injection-attacks/

    3. Re:Major targets for attackers by guanxi · · Score: 1

      Well the IRS still has the mother lode, the best target.

      Agreed, but the IRS's data isn't designed to be available on the public Internet. That doesn't mean it's perfectly secure, but it takes more than a password to access.

      OTOH, if the NSA can't protect it's data from rogue insiders ... maybe we should assume our tax returns were sold to the highest bidder long ago.

      Another thought: Attackers have even softer targets than tax vendors' servers: Consider malware which installs on user computers, looks for connections with tax vendor servers, and captures the data. (Maybe it's simpler to break into a secured server than millions of end-user computers, however.)

    4. Re:Major targets for attackers by guanxi · · Score: 2

      (Thanks. If you could post a source besides a random PDF (which many people on /. will hesitate to download) and highly partisan, anti-Obamacare RedState, it would help your point and be informative for the rest of us.)

    5. Re:Major targets for attackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly your information is already out there. Given the billions in fraudulent returns filed, I don't think the IRS is really trying to protect you. Irregardless of whether you file paper or not.

      But go ahead and mail those dead trees if it makes you feel better.

    6. Re:Major targets for attackers by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Or... you could go beyond your close-mindedness, trust that your web browser will simply open the PDF up for you (as mine does)... and maybe take with a grain of salt what the evil RedState has to say... doubly so when you do not know how I arrived at choosing that link (hint, it was a quick search and was the top relevant result).

      Just for you, here is another link, but about the PDF above & a quote from the CEO of TrustedSEC who was testifying in Washington today:

      “Hackers are definitely after it,” said David Kennedy, CEO of information security firm TrustedSEC before a House Science, Space, and Technology committee hearing on security concerns surrounding the problematic Healthcare.gov website.

      “And if I had to guess, based on what I can see I would say the website is either hacked already or will be soon.”

      Source: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/11/19/healthcaregov-already-compromised-security-expert-says/

      Somehow I doubt Huffington Post, Daily KOS or MSNBC are going to cover these issues... in fact at cursory glance, I see not hints of such reports there today.

    7. Re:Major targets for attackers by DaHat · · Score: 2

      OTOH, if the NSA can't protect it's data from rogue insiders ... maybe we should assume our tax returns were sold to the highest bidder long ago.

      Who says they need to be sold? As of late they've been doing some strategic (and illegal) leaking:

      http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/13/the-irs-admits-to-targeting-conservative-groups-but-were-they-also-leaking/
      http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/04/National-Organization-of-Marriage-Chairman-IRS-Leaked-Info-About-Group-s-Donors-to-Liberal-Groups
      http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/06/04/report-irs-leaked-conservative-groups-confidential-info-to-opponents/

      And yes... I did pick the partisan sites deliberately in this case.

    8. Re:Major targets for attackers by Kardos · · Score: 1

      The point was that PDFs are, thanks to Adobe, attack vectors (http://www.iceni.com/blog/2012-was-the-year-for-pdf-viruses-trojans-and-exploits/) and asking someone to open one is akin to asking them to run a binary email attachment. Your "trust me, I'm a doctor" response does not address that concern in the least.

    9. Re:Major targets for attackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just tax returns. Many of these software packages have direct connections to your bank accounts to help you balance your check-books. All stored on the company's servers.

    10. Re:Major targets for attackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you've been miss informed about the risk of getting viruses from PDFs. Trust me, I'm a doctor.

    11. Re:Major targets for attackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he uses Sumatra and doesn't have to worry about such things?

    12. Re:Major targets for attackers by guanxi · · Score: 1

      RedState, Fox, etc. have lied to me consistently. I don't think it's close-minded to learn from that and disregard them. I think the Huffington Post or Daily Kos are prone to exaggeration and don't rely them either, but there's less outright lying and deceit.

    13. Re:Major targets for attackers by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      SEC regulations into mandatory financial security posture reporting being investigated currently?

    14. Re:Major targets for attackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not real Chinese people. Most Chinese people I know are conservative and like Fox News because they make logical sense.

    15. Re:Major targets for attackers by DaHat · · Score: 1

      *shaking head*

      I am familiar with the fear, the difference though is any sane PC user doesn't use Adobe Acrobat anymore to open PDFs.

      Forgive me for assuming that you are smart enough to open the Twinkie bag before eating it's contents.

  12. secure? by Kardos · · Score: 2

    I don't think that word means what you think it means. Reliable is probably what you're after.

  13. Equal and less by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

    For security and privacy, I'd say it's about equal. I don't recall any breaches of that data turning up, and if someone had breached it I'd think news would've turned up. That kind of breach is the kind the perps or someone in the know couldn't resist bragging about.

    For legal compliance purposes, you have to trust the on-line services less. The IRS puts the obligation to have the information on you, regardless of who you used to prepare your return. You need to make sure you've got copies of both the return and all the supporting information where you can still get at them if the on-line service isn't available, and you need either the software to access the saved information or have the information in a form you can use directly (eg. printable PDFs). Remember when saving things that it doesn't help to just have the final form if the IRS wants you to justify how you got the numbers on the form.

    NB: this applies to conventional tax software installed locally too. It doesn't help to have the data files if you've bought a new computer that doesn't have that year's tax software on it anymore and you can't reinstall it. I make it a point to keep one PDF copy of the return itself and one copy of the return including all worksheets and supporting data. Plus I print a copy of the full return and worksheets and file it with the hardcopy of all my documentation (W2s, 1099s, receipts etc.) so I have it if I lose the electronic copies.

  14. As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you know the Tax Code ok, or you actually have simple taxes*, software works fine.

    You have to be somewhat familiar with the tax code because there's no easy way for us to translate tax law into simple English, so it's very easy for people to misinterpret one of the numerous questions the software asks. If you do that you a) don't get a deduction you deserve or b) do take a deduction and get screwed if you get audited. I'm a bit out-of-practice, but the student debt/tuition credit/HOPE credit/etc. nexus of Feds giving people tax breaks for paying for college in particular is very easy to screw up.

    *Everyone I have ever met says they have simple taxes. Then they drop the annuity on the table and call it a W2. If you have any income besides interest on a bank account or a W2 you do not have a tax form H and R Block defines as "simple." You really need to read the paperwork that you are sent because many people take a chintzy $350 job helping their cousin cater a banquet, get a 1099, and are then surprised that I am legally required to put that on a Schedule SE and a Schedule C or C-EZ attached to a full 1040, and by the time you pay me for all those forms AND the self-employment tax you're losing money. The really big numbers at the top will tell you exactly what form it is. They'll be 1098, 1099, or W2.

    1. Re:As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > b) do take a deduction and get screwed if you get audited.

      Australia's software (mentioned above) has this covered too. If you use it and make an 'honest mistake' there are no penalties.

      It probably also helps that the software is developed in house at the ATO, so they can align the rules to work in the software environment.

      Though really, if your tax rules can't be done easily in software, they are probably broken.

    2. Re:As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The official policy of the IRS is that if you follow the advice of an IRS employee and that advice is incorrect, you are at fault.

    3. Re:As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Everyone I have ever met says they have simple taxes. ... You really need to read the paperwork that you are sent because many people take a chintzy $350 job helping their cousin cater a banquet ...

      Well, there you go. Seriously, $350 to cater a banquet? How about a carry-in? Or being "paid" with a free meal? It sounds like you live in a different social circle than the majority of people.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    4. Re:As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Everyone I have ever met says they have simple taxes. ... You really need to read the paperwork that you are sent because many people take a chintzy $350 job helping their cousin cater a banquet ...

      Well, there you go. Seriously, $350 to cater a banquet? How about a carry-in? Or being "paid" with a free meal? It sounds like you live in a different social circle than the majority of people.

      The $350 wasn't what the banquet cost, it's what the caterer paid the person expecting a free 1040EZ and a big tax refund. Neither of which is gonna happen, because I have to file a full 1040 ($100 or so), I have to file additional tax forms (we charge by the form), the caterer doesn't withhold on a 1099, the taxpayer owes Social Security and Medicare tax, etc.

      $350 for one job is probably a bit much. It would be 20-30 hours of work. But plenty of people help out their cousin's catering business for 4 hours once every couple of months for $10-$15 an hour. Others get chintzy jobs helping clean up leaves. And if they get paid on a 1099 they get screwed at tax time.

    5. Re:As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      A lack of centralized power is the reason US Law is so convoluted.

      In the US if a Congressman wants to help a group he generally can't do it by changing an existing institution (in this case a tax deduction, or other quirk of the tax code), because the beneficiaries of that institution will panic and call their Congressman. Which means the first Congressman's idea better be incredibly fucking popular if it wants to pass. OTOH, if he proposes a new program the beneficiaries will call their Congressman going "yeah! do that!" and it's much easier to pass.

      Which is why we have so many education tax credit programs I can't name them all, and I read the IRS book on them cover-to-cover back in February.

      I'm not sure how you do it Australia, but the Canadian party leaders can actually veto any of their MPs renomination, which makes it very difficult for an individual Canadian MP to oppose his government, which means that if the PM has an idea to replace a bunch of tax credits with a single one that can be easily explained in simple English most of Parliament can't go "But dude, I just got an email from a crotchety old bastard who was really fucking crotchety about how HIS LIFE would be RUINED if the Education Credit of 1957 was amended in any way."

  15. I can no longer trust Intuit Turbo Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can no longer login to my Intuit Turbo Tax online account, even after providing my SSN online as an 'added security measure'. I really do not want to be doing entering my SSN on any site on the Internet. Now they are asking for me to e-mail a scanned image of my driver's license. I'm not going to do that. The online chat help that they have uses a URL with a registered domain in some eastern european country. Ok enough. I'm done with Intuit. I'll just have to do my taxes on my own from now on.

  16. TaxAct by bhlowe · · Score: 2

    I've been using TaxAct.com for 4+ years for personal taxes and it is fantastic. Super cheap and reliable.. All information from previous years is stored on their servers so each year it gets easier to file. Unlike healthcare.gov, I trust their site, it works, is easy to use, cheaper than anything else, and they didn't the taxpayers a half billion dollars on the rollout.

    1. Re:TaxAct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using TaxAct as well. Good service.

    2. Re:TaxAct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too for taxact (online).

      I don't pay anything, so I have to re-type previous years information.
      It's always free. (you have to avoid the "click here to upgrade to Delux"..., but that's ok).
      I use calfile online for state, also free.

  17. H&R block accountants use software too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems that they might know just a little bit more than doing it online. Honestly, I would trust software over human accountants better in a sense because if done right, it is able to go by the tens of thousands of tax codes rather than a human which probably won't be able to know a quarter of that. Either way, this is probably the last year anyone will be getting anything back from their taxes. In fact, I'm surprised that the return is not taxed as income. hahaha But next year will be a year to talk to real accountants about finances because if anyone skips on an accountant, they might lose a significant amount of money in contrast to the previous years. Just be sure not to be a registered republican / libertarian if you plan on submitting your taxes *cough cough*

  18. I Use Excel To Model The Form 1040 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I usually hate to do my taxes.

    But one year I decided to use a spreadsheet to check some numbers. Next thing you know, I was building a software model of my Form 1040 - line by line. Took me maybe two or three hours - but they were *fun* hours, because I was programming - not doing my taxes.

    Finished the model and used it to evaluate several different scenarios. Selected the one that gave me the best return, and filed.

    Been doing that ever since.

    Anyone who pays for tax software is probably an idiot.

    ~childo

    1. Re:I Use Excel To Model The Form 1040 by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      Great!
      If you have a really - really simple return, and you understand all tax laws which may apply.

      There are good reasons why tubotax et al don't use software written in a couple of hours in excel.

    2. Re:I Use Excel To Model The Form 1040 by ktappe · · Score: 2

      Anyone who pays for tax software is probably an idiot.

      Or doesn't know how to program. Not saying I'm one of those, but there is a place in this world for nurses and cooks and carpenters who know their trades quite well but not how to construct an algorithm in a computer.

      Or were you trolling?

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    3. Re:I Use Excel To Model The Form 1040 by airdweller · · Score: 2

      "Anyone who pays for tax software is probably an idiot."
      I guess you do your own dental cleaning, oil changes, plumbing, etc? You'd be an idiot otherwise, right?

  19. go by nten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have heard circumstances like this multiple times. It really bothers me that we have invented a tax code that is on par with the game "go" as far as its ability to be computerized. There are extremely talented individuals making a living interpreting our tax code. Those same people could be doing something far more useful to society than they are now, but we have created an entire industry that sucks them away from more useful endeavors by cobbling together a tax code that is a mashup of bribes to interest groups, bribes to voters, authoritarian interference with our individual lives, and a glass ceiling protecting the one percent. If any highschool graduate can't just sit down with a calculator and pay the *exact* amount owed, we have done something wrong.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
    1. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not an accident that tax codes are as complicated as they are. My company (one of the two mentioned) spends a ton lobbying Congress to keep the tax laws complicated enough that people cannot reasonably do it with pen and paper without missing something or spending far too long doing it. Yet they don't want to make it so complex that you have to seek professional help. It's a tricky balancing act and it tends to tip towards being too complex because, in that case, they can then direct you to their CPAs that use their expensive tax product and charge a referral fee on top of that. From the CPA perspective, the referral comes with a ton of the information already entered into the system, so they can complete more returns. I find it funny that I've had conversations with the CEO where he talks about how excited he is that his company can so radically simplify the tax experience with software while, at the same time, he's employing lobbyists to make the tax software necessary in the first place.

      However even if there weren't intentional efforts to complicate the tax code, it would still be a lot more complex that you want it to be. Just like computer code that starts off elegant and simple and, through bug fixes, optimizations and new features becomes a tangled web of spaghetti code, the tax code will get more and more changes to close loopholes (bugs) and add new taxes/credits for various things (features). And business tax codes are even worse.

      I'd be more upset about it if I didn't now have a ton of stock in a company that benefits from making the process simple for those willing to fork over ~$100 each year. That, and we get the software for free :-)

    2. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The early taxes were simple and fair: a silver coin per head in the household, and a farthing per head in the barn/field. Didn't matter if you were "rich" or "poor" (although rich people had more heads in barns/fields). Then percentage of income, which helped catch rich merchants who didn't have livestock and make them pay their fair share. Then tiered percentages of income, and poor people didn't have to pay tax. Then poor people got negative tax, and rich people got tax codes that let them pretend they're poor people through exemptions.

    3. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JOB CREATION! We have created an entire sector of employment with no useful output but is still required.

    4. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Those same people could be doing something far more useful to society than they are now,

      The whole population cannot all be philosophers, scientists, space explorers, artists, or writers. But what do we do with the excess productivity? We could give everyone a 3 day week, or we could ignore it and allow our politicans to massively ratchet up complexity in every possible area.

    5. Re:go by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      The nicest street of Stuttgart, close to a beautiful park, south-oriented and overlooking the whole city is full of houses that basically are small castles.
      There's a "Steuerberater" (Tax advisor) shield on every single one of them.

    6. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd disagree. There are quite a few countries that have managed to simplify tax codes. This is especially true for large businesses, who very much dislike complex tax schemes. The Irish route isn't just popular because it's cheap, but also because it is fairly straightforward. They're unlikely to be suddenly charged for a few billion more. The US is a rather unique case in that businesses just can't avoid the US market (but they're quite successfully avoiding US tax)

    7. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are extremely talented individuals making a living interpreting our tax code. Those same people could be doing something far more useful to society than they are now...

      I couldn't agree more. And the fact that we are not using their talents in a more useful way does penalize our economy. All the bureoucracy that is required by our tax code must be paid for. That cost is paid by all of us - either directly in the price of everything we purchase or indirectly by making our economy less competitive.

      Personally, my issue with accountants is the following: At the end of the day, you ARE THE ONLY person responsible for your taxes. You can pay an expensive accountant but, if the IRS comes after you and they find a problem, you are the sole person responsible for it. Therefore, at then end of the day, you do have to understand your taxes regardless of the fact that you hired an accountant. If an accountant finds a way for you to save $3400, you must understand why that is the case and whether the deduction really applies to you. You are the one bearing all the risks of being assessed by the IRS.

    8. Re:go by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

      I am not sure what you are disagree about? Is it about the tax code should be complex? Or the country (U.S.) should make tax laws simply?

      To me, the GP is talking about the company he is working for. The company is attempt to make money by lobbying the tax code to be very complex. As a result, laymen would need to find a way to file taxes -- hire a CPA or use tax software. The company will earn more revenue from people buying its software. Is it bad to make tax code more complex? I think it is. However, there is no agreement or disagreement in what they are doing because to me it has only one answer -- it is bad (exploitation of the system).

    9. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the reason to collect taxes was to provide money for the government to perform only its constituted duties, the tax code would be extremely simple. Unfortunately, neither is the case.

  20. Just around the corner? by The_Star_Child · · Score: 1

    It's almost half a year till you have to submit taxes (in the USA anyway.)

    1. Re:Just around the corner? by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Taxes are DUE by April 15th, but the tax season starts at the turn of the calendar which, yes, is just around the corner.

    2. Re:Just around the corner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tax season" doesn't start until February 1, which is the deadline for employers and other institutional entities to get your tax statements into your hands. Until then, you should either wait or be ready to file a modification.

    3. Re:Just around the corner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxes are DUE by April 15th

      Which means you need to start working on your taxes by at latest 2014 April 15, 23:15.

  21. Kind of an Odd Question.... by rueger · · Score: 1

    ... since almost inevitably the final result is e-filed, either by you or by your tax preparer.

    YMMV, but a couple of things came to my mind.

    First, if you're asking this question it's really likely that doing your own taxes isn't saving you anything. An accountant or similar preparer can do them faster, and almost always finds savings that you won't. Plus, at least in Canada, if the tax people come a knockin' it will be your preparer who deals with them, not you.

    Second, if you're one of those people with one tax slip from your employer, and two or three deductible receipts for charities or medical expenses, or if you're the typical student, you should be able to fill out a paper return in about ten minutes, or do it on-line or on your own PC with free software and mail it in. It's dumb to pay HR Block money to do this. The CRA even has a list of companies you can check out, almost all of whom offer free choices for simple returns.

    Third, as with anything that could wind up putting you in jail, taxes are one of those things where I like to keep complete paper copies of the entire file. Somehow having it printed and/or copied on paper feels more secure than trusting bits somewhere on the Internet.

    1. Re:Kind of an Odd Question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IN the US, generally, it's the individual who signs the return who is ultimately responsible for errors and omissions from their returns, not their tax preparer -- unless they can show that the preparer altered the return after the fact.

      So, yes, it is implied that every citizen who pays taxes is supposed to know pretty much all of the tax law regarding individual tax returns.

  22. Esq. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    You guys are still paying taxes? Suckers...

    Last year, I declared my basement the Sovereign Kingdom of Ratzistan, and myself the Lord High Exalted Mystic Ruler for Life. Not only will I not be paying taxes any more, but I've just sent the US Government a bill for $100,000 for the easement of my front door where they insist on putting their so-called "mail" and "restraining orders" and such. I talked to a lawyer that I met on Craig's List and he says I got a great case and instead of taking a percentage, he charged me a flat fee of $1200 to set me up with all the proper documents. They look really nice, too with a gold foil trim and big official seal.

    You laugh now, but when I get that $100,000 (well, it'll be $98,800, after I pay back the nice Italian guy at the bar who lent me the $1200 for the lawyer), I'm gonna buy myself a sweet gaming rig and drop the rest on the Broncos to win the Super Bowl. Then we'll see who's laughing.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Esq. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.

      --
      Quoth the ping to his brain: Error 404.

  23. Captive markets and planned obsolescence by Slugster · · Score: 1

    This was sort-of my understanding of the big popular tax software also,,,,, that if you use the online services or not, the package is still only going to function for one year. And it's no accident.

    A friend spent a number of hours over a few weeks entering tax info into a (big-well-known) program they had purchased the previous tax-year, figuring they'd just print it out and mail everything in, because they couldn't e-file it because it wasn't a current version,,,, and guess what? "Sorry, you need an upgrade to print. Click here to go to our website" -- or something to that effect.

    1. Re:Captive markets and planned obsolescence by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Tax code changes year to year. It would have been irresponsible to allow you to do that.

      That said, it sure was awfully nice that they waited until the end of the process to tell you that...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Captive markets and planned obsolescence by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      If the vendor made any sort of potentially-binding-on-them claims about accuracy (and I think some do provide assurances of the "If you didn't lie on any of the input fields, we stand behind the output fields, terms and conditions do apply" flavor), I'd expect them to be null and void the next year; but disabling printing, rather than putting up a few obnoxious warning banners, reeks of lock-in. What if this friend had wanted a paper backup of his returns from last year?

      I wouldn't say that using last year's tax package to do this year's returns is a good strategy, just that tax-package vendors have done their best to enjoy 'software as a service' style economics even back when you were buying floppies in a big, sturdy, cardboard box at CompUSA, so the adjustment to online dystopia will be fairly small.

      (It makes one wonder, though, why isn't there room in the market for some tax accountant to knock together an Excel template and sell it for $5? It's not as though tax or accounting software does much heavy lifting, in software terms, it's just a matter of having the right formulae in the right places. Piggibacking on software not written by crackheaded monkeys would make the stuff massively more endurable, in terms of things like 'UI' and 'actual testing and support' and the customer would still have a need to buy your new ruleset next year...)

  24. Just use IRS.gov by students · · Score: 2

    figure out just how much they owe the country, without reading the tens of thousands of pages of IRS forms guidance.

    I have never found it challenging to file my taxes using just the information from IRS.gov. IRS documents usually explain things very well.

  25. Big time saver for complex taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retired accountant here. I use Turbo Tax.

    For two years I computed our taxes using Turbo Tax and manually. They come out the same, but it takes me a whole day to crank it out manually, and I can do Turbo tax is a few hours.

    We have messy taxes, though, with a rental home for an elderly relative and several different types of investments.

  26. Tax rules too complicated; start over from scratch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "tens of thousands of pages of IRS forms guidance" - I believe it! Besides professional tax preparers, does anyone want the tax laws to be so complicated?

    Congress should start over from scratch. For taxes for 2015 and later, they should start with no income tax rules. Then add taxes, exemptions and deductions only on items that Congress specifically votes for.

    Have a limit of 1,000 rules, or 10,000 words, in the tax code. If Congress reaches the 1,000 rule limit, and they want to add another rule, they must first remove an existing rule.

  27. Online TurboTax failed to file our return by blp · · Score: 1

    We used online TurboTax for the 2011 tax return. At the end, it emailed us a complete PDF of our state and federal returns, with a header saying that they would be filed online on a specific day. Then it failed to file either one. We only found out a year later when the IRS and the state tax board sent us letters asking why we didn't file our taxes. When we called the TurboTax people, they claimed that we had never had any kind of account with them, even though we showed them the email. We had to pay penalties and interest because of their bad software.

    So privacy is not the only reason to avoid online tax software. Sometimes it just loses all your information.

    1. Re:Online TurboTax failed to file our return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't wish alarm, but you were probably scammed by a copycat website.

      I have used TurboTax online every year for some time. They have never emailed me a PDF of my return and never stated that it would be filed on a specific day. There isn't even an option for that. It is filed immediately and you get a response as to whether or not it succeeded. That they lack any account information reinforces the claim of a scam. Of course TurboTax had no record of your use if you never used them.

    2. Re:Online TurboTax failed to file our return by blp · · Score: 1

      That seems doubtful. No mysterious charges appeared on our bank accounts or credit card statements, and the tax return was correctly calculated. If it was a copycat, they did a good job on our taxes and a lousy job at stealing our money or our identities.

  28. Establishe fact: by no-body · · Score: 1

    One version of TurboTax a couple of years ago transmitted every entry I did on my machine in this software package to some outside entity.
    Add a number - firewall comes up asking for permission to connect. Move around - same thing.
    May have been some debugging feature but who the hell needs to see every move I do in some debug-log, if this was the case.

    Do I trust the Co? Sure no, their attempts to tie you in and milk $$'s out of you are disgusting.

    1. Re:Establishe fact: by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      One version of TurboTax a couple of years ago transmitted every entry I did on my machine in this software package to some outside entity.
      Add a number - firewall comes up asking for permission to connect. Move around - same thing.
      May have been some debugging feature but who the hell needs to see every move I do in some debug-log, if this was the case.

      Do I trust the Co? Sure no, their attempts to tie you in and milk $$'s out of you are disgusting.

      I hadn't heard that they'd changed. One reason why I file my returns on paper. I figure that yeah, TT is probably tattling all my financial details back to Intuit where they can sell them to whoever they can get away with selling them to (plus, of course the NSA), but actually filing via TT is apt to pull in additional parties. If I can't stop it, at least, I'll try to limit it.

    2. Re:Establishe fact: by no-body · · Score: 1

      ...TT is probably tattling all my financial details back to Intuit ...

      You can configure a firewall to block what you don't like. Block everything, then open what is trusted. A lot of work but worth it. One problem is software updates. Snoopers may be in those processes, MSoft one big suspect.

    3. Re:Establishe fact: by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I don't put too much faith in firewalls. I know too many ways around them. Besides, the more recent TurboTax releases get very cranky when blocked from their mommy.

  29. Re:I Used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey you not very bright for not downloading the forms and doing it by hand/yourself to make sure"

  30. The fallacy of too much tax code by Cantankerous+Cur · · Score: 1

    Yes, there is a lot of tax code. No question there. The other half of that is it doesn't apply to 99% of the US population. Most people have relatively simple returns and software is a reasonably effective way to calculate one's taxes or use as a check after doing them by hand. Most people have a W2 or two, a 1099INT, and a few charitable donations. This isn't difficult to do by hand. And if you make less than 48K, you get H&Rs software free of charge for federal filing. If you own a business or have a lot of investments, then yes, paying a professional makes a lot of sense.

  31. Trust to get the return right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't even get the software to file my taxes correctly for two states and you want me to trust that the data that it can't even calculate right is going to keep it secure? I think not.

  32. Trust the software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more concerned about the taxers.
    Not sure I trust them to neither waste the money nor do wrong with it.

    1. Re:Trust the software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do *NO wrong with it.

  33. Trust in God, Everybody else pays cash. by rssrss · · Score: 1

    "can you trust your return information any more or less to an online platform than you do to the equivalent software on your computer?"

    Well, the information on your tax return will eventually be sent to the Internal Revenue Service. You may not know this, but the IRS is part of the same United States Federal Government that also has the NSA spying on you. Once the IRS has the information, you are hosed.

    I would not advise shorting the IRS. That is a very bad idea. They can be downright chippy about it. Protesting the loss of privacy is just going to get you rubber hoses.

    The problem is not online systems, it is the the US Government.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  34. F U H&R Block by Cammi · · Score: 1

    TurboTax or H&R? Turbo Tax all the way .... why? I filled out turbo tax one year, but did not submit, to see what the return would be. Went over to H&R Block and there was a $5,000 difference ... why? The stupid H&R Block software refused to allow my children to be listed. So we didn't get that "tax break" per child. So we basically paid the idiots $350, told them not to file, and finished filing with Turbo Tax. After that year ... F U H&R Block.

  35. TaxSlayer.com - Negative to Postitive Deduction by JakFrost · · Score: 1

    So I started using TaxSlayer.com because they offer cheap $9.95 federal filing and a discounted state filing and supported multi-state filing. Everything was great and it was a nice web interface, detailed access to the actual forms and good questions asked.

    I am familiar with the tax forms enough to do my own semi-complicated taxes for a full time job and a side-business sole-proprietorship that includes complex self-employment schedules and amortization and appreciation of equipment purchases, entertainment expenses, and business usage of your home and car. I would do my own taxes on a custom mulit-sheet and pivot-driven Excel spreadsheet that I created and updated to comply with each year's forms and then fill out my own PDF forms before I would go online to transfer my information to allow me to do e-file. I filed my forms through the online service but afterwards I noticed that a figure wasn't correct on the PDF produced by the online service.

    I noticed that my numbers for the carry-over yearly loss of income for my business would not add-up between my own forms and TaxSlayer.com forms. I investigated my spreadsheet, re-checked my PDFs and the instructions, and re-calculated the values and always came up with my own numbers being correct but the online numbers being wrong. After calling IRS to clarify the situation and also TaxSlayer.com's support I realized that the online service had an obvious error where they added instead of subtracted the last-year's carry over numbers.

    I informed the online service so they could fix it and informed IRS that my forms had an error and filed a 1040X correction amendment.

    Turns out that the IRS didn't really care that this error could affect a decent number of TaxSlayer.com users and the support people from TaxSlayer.com didn't really care about the error and reversal of arithmetic in their forms.

    Also getting access to past taxes on the online service start costing you money unless you were smart enough to save your filed PDFs and keep them. Trying to re-do your last year's taxes costs money also.

    Basically e-File service is nice and saves you paper and stamps and gives you fast direct deposit or withdrawal of your tax returns. They make errors with taxes and charge you for past access to your own data.

    I don't really trust the online service with my data but with such a massive amount of it already being out there available on the web and located in commercial databases such as people search engines and public legal search web sites this is just another one on the pile for hackers to get at.

    My taxes are easier to file online electronically so I take advantage of that instead of trying to do it the paper and stamp way.

  36. Just use an accountant. by csumpi · · Score: 1

    I tried TurboTax before, granted it was probably a decade ago. After several hours of trying to figure out how to correclty answer questions, gave up.

    Just go to an accountant. You can get your taxes prepared and signed for $100-$200. The forms will be filled out correctly. You save a lot of time. You save money by having someone who knows the tax code get you more money back (or pay less taxes).

    And spraying my info into the "cloud"? Yeah, no thank you.

  37. can not trust "Turbo Tax" by eviljav · · Score: 1

    Intuit has already proven that you can not trust Turbo Tax installed on your computer.

    http://slashdot.org/story/03/02/16/1549232/

  38. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes (nuff said).

  39. Can you trust anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the end of the day, you need to trust someone in order to do anything other than live 16 feet under the ground in a concrete lead-lined airtight bunker.

    You can start off by asking "Can I trust the online tax software?", but to that I ask you, "Can you trust the online tax software that H&R Block is going to use?"

    When it comes to security, there is no magic bullet, and there is not one right answer. You need to look at the likelihood of each option causing a problem, then you need to look at the likely cost of consequences in each situation.

    At that point, you can look at the likelihood of each thing happening, and the consequences of each thing happening, and ask yourself whether changing is actually going to change anything.

    Security is part of my job, and it's always a trade-off. Unless I unplug all my Ethernet switches and disable all connectivity, then you're always choosing an answer that has some risk associated with it. The challenge is to find acceptable risks and balance them with operational needs of your home, of your site, of your organization.

  40. at this point, what does it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    matter, really? American entitlement slaves have already given into government, so just have the govt prepare your return

  41. In other coutries... by Dareth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I heard that in other countries the government calculates the taxes and sends a bill. How can it make sense that the government that makes the rules leaves it to the people to figure out what/if they owe and only look at it after the fact? How does that make any sense at all?

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  42. Shouldn't the IRS supply tax software? by DoctorBonzo · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that the responsibility for supplying tax payment tools - i.e. tax software - should rest with the collection agency. Gripes about government incompetency aside, I'd expect a large majority of cases to be handled with fairly uncomplicated code.

    Of course, as one poster mentioned, a lot of lobbying goes on to keep this software in the private sector.

  43. Used the online version once and never again by mprindle · · Score: 1

    I have used TaxCut for years and have had very few issues with it. The one year I tried the online variant of it was horrible. There was one particularly nasty bug that caused my return to be rejected twice before I had to go over the print out with a fine tooth comb. I found they were inserting a bogus figure into one of the fields instead of leaving it blank. I finally was able to work around the system to get the issue fixed, but it caused way more work and aggravation than it should have. I did try calling their "help" line, but the person on the other end was completely useless.

  44. TaxAct by wytcld · · Score: 2

    I use TaxAct too. Not the online version, but the standalone. However the first year I used it I filed online through them after preparing it locally. The following year I went to file online again and found someone else had beaten me to it. Someone who had information that could only have been obtained from access to my prior year's return. Took me most of a year and help from a senator's office to straighten it out.

    Now, where did the perp get access? The laptop that I only boot into Windows once a year to do taxes, and then only on a well-firewalled home network (I'm a network engineer, I have confidence in my work here)? From the IRS itself (which, if it were that vulnerable, should lead to far more identity theft even than what we see now)? Or from 2nd Story Software? Odds are it's 2nd Story Software which was compromised somehow. Since then I still use their product, but only file on paper. So this isn't a caution about just preparing returns online. Filing online is similarly dangerous.

    Coincidentally, that same year I found a place where they misinterpreted state tax code. Confirmed that with my state's tax office. Contacted 2nd Story about it. Their response was, "We have expert advisors in every state. We trust them over your state's tax office." Fortunately returns are coded by which tax software is used, and the state office assured me they could spot and correct the mistake for all those using TaxAct, now that they knew to look for it.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  45. Why no Federal site to enter tax forms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I can't understand is why the Feds don't have a site where you can just fill in your tax form online. I know the Obamacare fiasco makes it popular to to bash the government on this, but why do I even have to buy H&R Block or TurboTax when all they really do is look up my tax in a table? Why can't the IRS simply provide the forms online and let you submit them.

     

  46. Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happily use HR Block's online service. Never had an issue with it.

  47. Privacy concerns by sinequonon · · Score: 1

    My concern with this software is more about privacy protection. As of 2013 TurboTax supposedly encrypts the files on your disk, but how strong is that?

    --
    -Bob-
  48. Oh no! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    The government might snoop on your tax data. You wouldn't want them to know how much you've paid them... wait a minute...

  49. What an amazing amount of FUD in this post. by VIPERsssss · · Score: 1

    I've never had any problem with online tax software. I will say, in all fairness, I have a simple return.

    --
    We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
  50. Re:I Used by HiThere · · Score: 1

    FWIW, I've gotten a letter saying that the spreadsheet I used added the numbers incorectly. I double checked, and it was the IRS that made the mistake. OTOH, it was only for $10 or so, so I didn't fight it.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  51. The U.S. government is EXTREMELY corrupt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    One of the effects of the extremely complex tax code is that it discourages small businesses. Because they therefore have less competition, large businesses can make more money. The rich get richer. It's an anti-democratic process.

  52. Major targets for attackers by MohitFarswan · · Score: 1

    For attackers trying to collect personal information -- for identity theft, for dirt, for spying -- can you imagine a better target than servers holding everyone's tax returns? http://updatemantra.com/

  53. libre, government-operated tax software by pne · · Score: 1

    And more to the point: I will fully trust the online tax software if it's free (libre), secure against eavesdroppers, and operated by the tax-collecting government agency itself.

    Eh? How is that supposed to work?

    Either the online website is operated by the government agency, then you have no way to know that the version of the code they run is the version they make available for download and scrutiny.

    Or it's libre, you download and scrutinise it, and run it yourself, in which case it's not operated by the government agency (and isn't particularly online any more).

    Also, why would you want libre tax software if you only want a single source to run it?

    Isn't the entire point of libre software that it can be modified... by whom, if you won't trust any other service suppliers?

    If you want a single, trusted supplier and are only concerned about being allowed to scrutinise the source code, then surely proprietary but gratis and source-available would be sufficient? (Though that still wouldn't solve the problem of proving that the code you see and the code you (implicitly) run bear any relationship one to the other.)

    --
    Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    1. Re:libre, government-operated tax software by melikamp · · Score: 1

      The government should only use free software, by law, so that we don't have to check. And it should definitely only serve free software to users (if it makes a Web app), which we can check just fine.