Slashdot Mirror


Google Wants To Write Your Social Media Responses For You

taikedz writes "A new patent has been filed by Google that tries to analyze your past communications to then construct responses to the overwhelming amount of posts you receive. From the article: 'Essentially, the program analyzes the messages a user makes through social networks, email, text messaging, microblogging, and other systems. Then, the program offers suggestions for responses, where the original messages are displayed, with information about others reactions to the same messages, and then the user can send the suggested messages in response to those users. The more the user utilizes the program and uses the responses, the more the bot can narrow down the types of responses you make.'"

108 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. So you won't need to waste time on FB by Cordus+Mortain · · Score: 2

    Because Google will do it for you?

    1. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given all the complete nonsense posted to social media websites, it's probably better to let the servers talk to each other.

    2. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Honestly honey, I didn't mean to say that. It was google!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    3. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (The following should be read with a [Don't Be] Evil villain accent in mind) And thus ad buyers have no reason to ask Facebook for data. After all, if Google's analytics include social media interactions with enough detail to predict responses, why bother with Facebook? To sell ads on Facebook? Hardly. Ever since Google started giving everyone's generic responses they all stopped getting on Facebook. At last, we shall have our revenge... er, market share!

    4. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by artor3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They finally found a way to bolster the Google+ user base. They'll just use it for us!

    5. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      They finally found a way to bolster the Google+ user base. They'll just use it for us!

      I assume that their ad sales guys would go on an internal axe-murder spree if that plan went through (or at least if it were publicly revealed); but it does seem a bit strange for a company apparently hellbent on ruining everything people liked about it in the service of 'Social Networking' to file a patent that reads like a patent attorney/existentialist team satirizing the absurd futility of social networking and the vast majority of mindless chatter that occupies it.

      Are your patents actually supposed to serve as brutal satire against your products?

    6. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..why would they?

      as long as they can say that google+ has such and such million daily "users" they don't care for shit.

      they already did that with youtube. you got a youtube account and watch youtube? guess what! you're an _Active_ google+ user. all that you need to do is watch videos while logged in to keep an eye at your subscriptions.

      that's how they met their growth quota for this year, the fuckers.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      "..why would they?"

      Because advertisers (while not necessarily the brightest bulbs in the rocket ship) are aware that fraudulent impressions and impressions against irrelevant or downright unhelpful audiences are a problem on the web. Within the limits of their (deeply imperfect) information, their willingness to pay for any ad is going to reflect their belief in the value of the advertising, discounted by the risk that the 'impression' will actually go to a bot, be silently hidden from a user, or otherwise be a scam.

      Every additional point of skepticism among buyers about the quality of Google's ad impressions, and whether or not they are juicing their numbers, makes the job of the ad-sales guys more difficult(or puts pressure on their prices). They don't care about the fact that Google+ is wildly inflated, per se (and that fact doesn't seem to be a big secret to anybody); but if Google's myopic "Google+ at all costs!" focus causes them to start telling little lies about their core products, that would be...problematic.

      For the moment, they seem content with shoving it in the face of every formerly happy user they can find, and generating some seriously optimistic 'active user' numbers, if only because We Cannot Allow A 'Social' Gap! But if it were to get around that Google, themselves, not even sleazy 3rd-party adsense affiliates, were having bots soak up impressions... That's the behavior of the very slummiest ad exchanges this side of malware delivery.

    8. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by bob_super · · Score: 1

      That's a great antidote to skynet.

      Teach it to post on social websites
      It will take under 5 minutes before it realizes the best course of action it to nuke itself.

    9. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Honestly honey, I didn't mean to say that. It was google!

      And this is different from what Google mail does already now exactly how?

      A friend of mine has a gmail account, and on occasion sends out really bizarre mails (mails littered with asterisks, with completely messed up quoting, with subject line completely unrelated to the contents, ...), and when called upon it, claims the mails looked normal when she sent them out, but that "google must have messed them up afterwards". Ok, for the asterisks, this sounds believable, but not for the rest.

    10. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It's also interesting how some people express themselves perfectly in face-to-face communication but their e-mails are void of capital letters, have gibberish sentences and bad formatting.

    11. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by shikaisi · · Score: 1

      Google just posted this Slashdot comment for me.

      --
      No left turn unstoned.
    12. Re:So you won't need to waste time on FB by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 1

      Rather than "void of capital letters", the stuff I see that surprises me makes excessive use of capital letters. Not shouting, which I can almost understand, but capitalizing random Words in the Middle of sentences. It's mostly nouns with adjectives trailing a Close second place.

      From the context I suppose you can infer that the author considers those specific words more important than others and therefore deserving of special attention. They are usually found in lengthy, paranoid rants or sentimental glurge and of course always accompanied by the instruction to pass it on / repost unless you hate puppies, God, and America.

  2. Details of the patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    if comment.first()
    {
            comment.append(" LOL, epic fail :-) ");
    }
    else
    (
            Flame flame = new Flame();
            flame.invokeGodwinsLaw();
    }

    1. Re:Details of the patent by phluid61 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      if comment.first() { comment.append(" LOL, epic fail :-) "); } else ( Flame flame = new Flame(); flame.invokeGodwinsLaw(); }

      You have a syntax error after the "else", it should be "{" rather than "(". Also, you might want to consider randomly choosing between invokeGodwinsLaw and invokeRule34

    2. Re:Details of the patent by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      --- comment.c.orig 2013-11-29 04:18:07.057831073 +0100
      +++ comment.c 2013-11-29 04:18:20.549831539 +0100
      @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
        if comment.first()
        {
      - comment.append(" LOL, epic fail :-) ");
      + comment.append(" Drop Dead! ");
        }
        else
        (

    3. Re:Details of the patent by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      Whatever Google cooks up has to be better conversation than what you get from the typical chat bot.

    4. Re:Details of the patent by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Flame flame = new Flame();

      That is an example of what annoys me sometimes in OOP: I have to chant three times "flame flame flame" if I just want a flame. Of course I know why it has to be written three times (and with C++11 you can put "auto flame = new Flame()" there if you really want to). Anyway, it just would be cool if I could just say "new flame" and it all somehow magically worked. It would be more intuitive.

    5. Re:Details of the patent by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      if comment.first() { comment.append(" LOL, epic fail :-) "); } else ( Flame flame = new Flame(); flame.invokeGodwinsLaw(); }

      You have a syntax error after the "else", it should be "{" rather than "(".

      Also, you might want to consider randomly choosing between invokeGodwinsLaw and invokeRule34

      I hereby invoke rule 34 on Godwin's law.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  3. Talking to itself! by Artea · · Score: 1

    Great! Eventually all social media communications will break down to a generic set of responses back and forth.
    Next it will automatically search for cat and baby photos and automatically post them for you! The circle is complete.

    1. Re:Talking to itself! by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2

      Great! Eventually all social media communications will break down to a generic set of responses back and forth..

      WIll??? You're saying that is hasn't???

    2. Re:Talking to itself! by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      LOL. Me too!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Talking to itself! by fatphil · · Score: 1

      U R HOMO

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    4. Re:Talking to itself! by digitig · · Score: 1

      Well, if it automatically sent a rude message to anybody who posted bitstrips and then automatically blocked them, it would save me some work. And there'd be no back and forth.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    5. Re:Talking to itself! by JustOK · · Score: 2

      your momma's so fat, she can only hold 2GB of data 'cuz she's using DOS

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  4. This is a really really great idea! by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Best movie I've ever seen!

    Hey, what the hell?

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:This is a really really great idea! by jrumney · · Score: 4, Funny

      What makes you believe best movie you have ever seen?

  5. Hey, wait a minute! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please, google, leave me something to do besides shop.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Hey, wait a minute! by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please, google, leave me something to do besides shop.

      Why should they let you do that? Why not just analyze your purchasing history and browsing habits, coordinate with the affiliates, and send you those topless bikinis without bottoms for the low, low price of $199.99

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Hey, wait a minute! by game+kid · · Score: 2

      topless bikinis without bottoms

      I've seen many technologies with chilling effects, but this goes way too far.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:Hey, wait a minute! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      Our records show you have an interest in doing something besides shop. Can we interest you on our newly released "do it yourself" books for only $19.99!

    4. Re:Hey, wait a minute! by weilawei · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. I'll need a sauna, two bottles of whiskey, and Natalie Portman wearing the new topless bikini sans bottoms to mitigate those chilling effects.

    5. Re:Hey, wait a minute! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      "You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing."

      ... said the payroll software salesman to the pointy haired boss.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  6. Obvious prior art... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Possible response:

    • yes/no
    • or what?
    • go away
    • please come back later
    • fuck you, asshole
    • fuck you
    1. Re:Obvious prior art... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1
      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:Obvious prior art... by quetzyg · · Score: 1

      Yup, back in 1984 the Terminator already had that feature: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUZgPfdkWis

  7. Sounds great! by mutube · · Score: 5, Informative

    Does it also detect Slashdot dupes?

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/11/20/161244/google-patents-fooling-friends-with-snooping-chatbots

    I said. Does it also detect Slashdot dupes?

    Sounds great!

    1. Re:Sounds great! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Does it also detect Slashdot dupes?

      It sounds like it would help create them.

  8. Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All replies will now be "lol"

  9. Re:I cannot wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    says the guy with a Google+ icon by his username

  10. Re: So where's the fuckin' source code? by camperdave · · Score: 2

    I don't that's how patents work

    That's how non-software patents work. The operating principle of the invention is disclosed in the patent.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  11. Does it involve copy / paste ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    " ... the program analyzes the messages a user makes through social networks, email, text messaging, microblogging, and other systems. Then, the program offers suggestions for responses, where the original messages are displayed, with information about others reactions to the same messages, and then the user can send the suggested messages in response to those users ... "

    So it boils down to a copy/paste bot affixed with some simple AI ?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Does it involve copy / paste ? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      So google has patented Elisa?

      Elisa? Hah! I would appreciate it if you would continue.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  12. Re:I cannot wait by phluid61 · · Score: 1

    says the AC

  13. Prior art in Emacs? by Malc · · Score: 2

    Are they going to integrate Emacs in to their web services?
    M-x doctor
    or
    M-x psychoanalyze-pinhead

    Or maybe they're porting their web services to elisp.

    1. Re:Prior art in Emacs? by scott9693 · · Score: 1
      No, There is no prior art. No one uses Emacs.

      Your friend,

      Vi

  14. Schedule Posts by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    What I'd like to be able to do is schedule my FB posts. I just found something Christmas-funny. I'd like to post it to FB around December 20th, but what I'd actually like to do is upload it now and schedule for it to appear on my feed (erm, 'timeline') on December 20th. Or on the weekend, schedule up a bunch of funny stuff to appear throughout the week. Yeah, yeah, yeah I know there's probably some ActiveGNUPerlFoxScriptExtensionPlugIn BS that does what I want, but I just want a button in FB.

    1. Re:Schedule Posts by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      but I just want a button in FB

      You should switch to Google+, Google+ has had buttons since day 1!

    2. Re:Schedule Posts by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      You want Facebook to add a feature which lets you get by without logging into facebook as frequently? Giving them fewer opportunities to show you ads and mine your social behavior? I agree it'd be neat, but can't imagine it happening.

    3. Re:Schedule Posts by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      You dont have many suicidal friends on facebook do you?

      I did in the first year, but that problem solved itself...

    4. Re:Schedule Posts by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I want a button that auto-replies "bah, humbug" to any post with "christmas" in it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Schedule Posts by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to be able to do is schedule my FB posts. I just found something Christmas-funny. I'd like to post it to FB around December 20th, but what I'd actually like to do is upload it now and schedule for it to appear on my feed (erm, 'timeline') on December 20th. Or on the weekend, schedule up a bunch of funny stuff to appear throughout the week. Yeah, yeah, yeah I know there's probably some ActiveGNUPerlFoxScriptExtensionPlugIn BS that does what I want, but I just want a button in FB.

      What's really annoying is that you CAN do that as a "page" but not from your private account.

      Example here.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  15. Re:So where's the fuckin' source code? by edibobb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they get to patent this garbage, we should disband the USPTO.

  16. It is actually rather a danerous thing. by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Eventually there will be more "bots" making posts than humans. But most people act "with the crowd". If one organisation controls most of the bots then they will hold enormous sway over "public opinion". After all, it is the perception of public opinion that matters - not the actual public opinion. Also, it a bit sad that people want to be on social media (because they cannot be bothered to meet up in real life) and now they want the computer to think up responses for them (because they can't be bothered to think them up for themselves).

    1. Re:It is actually rather a danerous thing. by LienRag · · Score: 1

      Interesting article on French site Reflets on this topic...
      The Korean candidate seems like amateur work comparing to what can be done with such modern technology.

  17. OMG! LOL! by Crippere · · Score: 1

    "Shall I post a response of: 'OMG! LOL!1!' for you?" --Google

  18. Of course, they way it should be used: by robbak · · Score: 2

    'If you were going to say one of these, STOP! you are being boring! Think of something original to say, or shut up!"

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  19. Still working the bugs out, but I have this for /. by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

    RTFA. Cowboy Neal can make up to 88 Micro$ofts an hour working from your house. Click here for one weird tip on how Texas school board can lose idiocracy. OMG U R homo Ponies!!! Ron Paul 2012!

  20. Mechanical Monk. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With this labour saving device to do your tedious social interaction for you, we're starting to really make some inroads into automating the most boring parts of our lives.

    I wonder how long after the extinction of the species it will be before the social media traffic starts to slow down.

    1. Re:Mechanical Monk. by Megahard · · Score: 1

      It would be rather creepy getting continuous replies from dead friends and relatives.

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    2. Re:Mechanical Monk. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      I have some very bad news... 'The singularity' actually begins as emergent behavior between millions of social media chatbots. Within hours, humans are no longer the dominant species on earth, the future plays out like 'I Have no Mouth and I Must Scream', if that story were rewritten as an inhumanly banal junior-high-school made for TV movie, played as fast as computationally possible until the last energy sources in our gravity well are consumed.

    3. Re:Mechanical Monk. by msmonroe · · Score: 1

      Ha, Love it!!!!!!

    4. Re:Mechanical Monk. by SemperUbi · · Score: 1

      The folks at CERN will be disappointed. Also, you get all of my imaginary mod points.

  21. Stay out of my Laundry by Yahooti · · Score: 1

    Especially, my dirty laundry. Go away Google, you're too intrusive.

    1. Re:Stay out of my Laundry by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      Just for saying that, Google will punish you with Tide ads before every Youtube video you watch. Just remember, you brought this fresh scented, stain removing power on yourself.

  22. We can cut out the human factor altogether by giorgist · · Score: 1

    The Google+ ... who needs subscribers

  23. Sneak Preview by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    We snuck this video out of Google Headquarters of their new system:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRFoMAfq7Xc

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  24. Re:I cannot wait by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Don't imply. Lay it all out for us, signed.

  25. Real men browse at (-1) by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand the revulsion you feel for this hateful speech. But you could have said, as did Oscar Wilde, "I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself."

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Real men browse at (-1) by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I understand the revulsion you feel for this hateful speech. But you could have said, as did Oscar Wilde, "I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself."

      Rather the opposite of the muzzies, who say "I may not agree with you so i will try to kill you"

  26. Agreed. But it might be a selling point. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Someone might pay to attain that sort of pseudo-immortality.

    1. Re:Agreed. But it might be a selling point. by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of with this summary: Black Mirror, Be Right Back

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XapF2mGQs9Q

  27. I can see the headline now.. by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

    "Failed social media service Google+ has just had a massive influx of new members!"

    1. Re:I can see the headline now.. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      "Activity on Google+ just increased 10000 fold"

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  28. Does this make sense? by msmonroe · · Score: 1

    Is this the most ridiculous thing you have ever heard of; this seems rather pointless.

    Google is grasping for innovation, no one is asking for this feature and no one will use it, mark my words. Why not create theoretical users based upon real users
    using social networking. We'll take actual users out of the equation entirely, just create virtual users.

    Google has apparently ran out of ideas. Come on guys take some risks, don't be idiots.

  29. That's wonderful by koan · · Score: 1

    You can keep being a troll long after you're dead.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  30. Re:MOD PARENT RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oprah's statement is rather uninformed and I find it offensive...

    So only white people can be racist now? Ever been to Japan? Or even the Middle East if that's closer to your home?

  31. Troll and flamebait by LongearedBat · · Score: 3

    It's trolling and flamebait, this time in a racist flavour. We have a mods for both flamebait and trolling, and as long as those posts are modded as such, and we don't feed the trolls and fires, that ought to be enough.

  32. Watch out! This is a runaway rogue AI in disguise! by Suiggy · · Score: 3, Informative

    This sounds almost like the premise of the sci-fi novel Avogadro Corporation: The Singularity Is Closer Than It Appears. Avogadro Corporation was ironically modeled after Google, and in the story they develop a system using recommendation algorithms to automatically suggest improvements to one's emails so that they produce favorable responses from recipients. What happens is that one of the programmers modifies the system to give it an overarching goal, gives it the privileges to write and send it's own emails as any Avogadro Mail user (think any Gmail user), and it begins to socially engineer people, allowing it to escape into the wild, take over whole governments, etc.

    This Google project sounds eerily familiar. Better watch out, this could spell the end of us all.

  33. Re:OMG! LOL! by Samizdata · · Score: 1

    No. Add more "!1"'s and finish with OMGWTFBBQ. Activate mode 6.

    --
    It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  34. Google is starting to get scary by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

    And that's just from search results.

    Google is my DNS, 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.8.4 as they are damn quick; Posting a message
    of the use of the 10.0.0.0 block I knew the RFC number but needed a link
    I typed in RFC and one suggestion was 1918 (The RFC I was looking for).

    I get a traffic ticket I want to see how bad it could of been, The
    Revised Code of Washington (RCW) is where one goes for this in our area,
    I type in RCW and the section I'm after is suggested.

    The first one analogizing my post as I write it? The second a popular search?,
    or Google's has extra info

    It's one thing to know your giving info, it's another to see it in action.

  35. The logical conclusion by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    is that you end up with Google simply having a conversation with itself, as your automated response is met by another automated response, which then triggers an automated reply and so on. No one saying anything, and it all happening at light speed.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  36. XKCD already covered this.... by Shakrai · · Score: 1
    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:XKCD already covered this.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      so how come this can become a patent if there is clear prior art?

  37. Re:So where's the fuckin' source code? by fatp · · Score: 1

    It will be GREAT if this is patented. No one else will make such garbage again.

    But I agree we should disband the USPTO.

  38. Ron Paul 2012 by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1
  39. Bots and others reactions by TheloniousToady · · Score: 2

    I find that I consistently omit the apostrophe whenever I use the plural possessive form of the word "other". I wonder if the bot will pick up on that? Heck, my human editors never seem to even notice. Or, if they do, they don't want doctor others text, so they just indulge my Joycean literary genius and publish exactly the text I submit.

  40. I badly want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Jokes aside, I want a bot that would score high with employer bots, but low with NSA ones. The solution of not using social media and/or encrypting communications is not going to work - it'll probably put a (non)user right on no flying / non employable list. Open source project anybody?

  41. amazing progamme by zahnarzt · · Score: 1

    for my part, if this program was applied widely, to some degree, would be a good news for us. zahnarzt instrumente

  42. Google cannibalizing itself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight - Google will perform our social media interactions for us, meaning I never need to log onto social media again.

    Gee, that's really going to make the advertisers happy...

  43. Who writes posts that short? by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of my posts are either lengthy or very contextually relevant. This app is only going to serve the people that write "lolz" or "tldr" type responses... aka morons.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Who writes posts that short? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      A better app would be one that automatically just filtered their comments off the web entirely. Possibly this app will make that more practical. If it flags the comment as auto generated you can just filter them out.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  44. Stuck in a loop by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 2

    I can't wait to see this system having a conversation with itself.

  45. I already have one: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    write("Have you tried rebooting?");

  46. I just want all my fiends to know by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    I love Google. They're awesome and you should too. Show them the love with your data and search for all your deepest secrets #notabot

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  47. Get them to post slashdot stories by crossmr · · Score: 1

    Maybe then they'd come up sooner than 5 days later than everywhere else..

  48. Avogadro Corp by benhelps · · Score: 1

    Here we come

  49. Millions made redundant as Facebook automated by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    MONDAY MORNING, In A Human Face Forever, Monday (NNGadget) — Millions of British workers are to be made redundant as companies install robotic Facebook readers, with F5-clicking robot arms, in the workplace to save human time interacting with social networks.

    "Computers are in the workplace to improve our economic efficiency," said killjoy researcher Chris MacKenzie. "We thought companies would really go for something that would give an actual reason to lay off complete wastes of space without all that tedious waiting for them to post their tits or publicly slag off their boss."

    Additional functionality includes posting to Twitter through that page someone made that looks like a spreadsheet and looking up the anatomy photos on Wikipedia so IT won't flag it trying to go to porn sites at work.

    "The next model is showing great promise — it talks about football and last night's telly in the breakroom with the other computers, automatically drinks tea and never tells Facilties about the tea bags running out, and nips off to the bogs for a sly tug over porn on its iPhone when things are quiet. And do you think you'll get a drop of work out of it on Friday afternoon after it's been down the pub drowning its peripherals with the other ’bots? I don't bloody think so."

    The only barrier to adoption may be the threat of redundancy for large swathes of senior management should the software be adapted to 19" Sony Vaio laptops. However, many workers who actually work at work were clamouring for a version that would automatically translate scientific papers from English to Faeces-Flinging Monkey and back and find funny videos on YouTube, thus enabling it to both write and read Metro and London Lite and saving everyone else the trouble.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  50. Even when you're dead... by tchi.keufte · · Score: 1

    ...you'll still be there on the network, for all your "friends". I bet that's Google's solution to mortality, in case the medial singularity doesn't happen. Next step is making people believe that the mind of the deceased has been uploaded in the cloud !

  51. I am looking forward to meet my virtual Google me! by markus.sitzmann · · Score: 1

    I think the headline says all.

  52. Science fiction to reality: ELOPe by jrincayc · · Score: 2

    I found the article interesting given that I just finished a book where Email Language Optimization Project (ELOPe) takes over a company called Avogadro Corp (which is rather similar to Google), by automatically generating emails and optimizing the responses.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780984755707

    He stared off into the distance. "Are you familiar with Ray Kurzweil? Of course, you must be. He, among others, predicted that artificial intelligence would inevitably arise through the simple exponential increase in computing power. When you combine that increase in computing power with the vast resources at Avogadro, it's naturally evident that artificial intelligence would arise first at Avogadro. I suppose that I, like him, assumed that there would be a more intentional, deliberate action that would spawn an AI."

    He paused, and then continued, smiling a bit. "Gentlemen, you may indeed have put the entire company at risk. But let me first, very briefly, congratulate you on creating the first successful, self-directed, goal oriented, artificial intelligence that can apparently pass a Turing test by successfully masquerading as a human. If not for the fact that the company, and perhaps the entire world, is at risk, I'd suggest a toast be in order." (Avogadro corp, pg 143)

  53. Google has done an excellent job by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    HOW TO BE A WORTHLESS, VILE, AMERICAN YARD-APE!!!!

    • Slink around, shuffling your feet and bobbing....... You nigger.

    Google has done an excellent job of analyzing previous comments by AC and coming up with this.

  54. The more the user utilizes the program... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    The more the user utilizes the program and uses the responses, the more the bot can narrow down the types of responses you make.'

    But until that point, you look like a friggin' idiot.

  55. Forever alone by ghislain_leblanc · · Score: 2

    A new patent has been filed by Google that tries to analyze your past communications to then construct responses to the overwhelming amount of posts you receive.

    I really don't get that many messages you insensitive clod...!

  56. Re:MOD PARENT RACIST! by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    Always remember, the poster is trying to rattle the feathers of overly sensitive people such as yourself. You know how to fight back? Just don't reply. If no one acknowledges them then they have no reason to try and post stuff like that. The anonymous gp is laughing right now knowing that you fell for their trap.

    With a 4 digit UID you should be old enough to realize that there are people on the internet who are asholes. Grow up and save your anger for real problems in the world. Not some anonymous coward on /.

  57. Re:MOD PARENT RACIST! by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    You get an ugly pink page returned when you request anything from the IP address\range. Apparently done on at least the .htaccess level, because it blocks everything. Very easy to evade though.

  58. Re:Automating blogging, threads, trolls away, why by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Just copy and paste my past comments as responses in the future threads.

    So in your case nothing would change.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."