Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Measles Cases Triple In 2013

An anonymous reader writes "The U.S. Centers for Disease Control have announced that measles cases in the U.S. spiked this year, rising to three times their recent average rate. It's partly due to a greater number of people traveling to the U.S. when they're infectious, but also because a frustrating number of people are either failing to have their children vaccinated, or are failing to do so in a timely manner. Dr. Thomas Friedman said, 'Around 90 percent of the people who have had measles in this country were not vaccinated either because they refused, or were not vaccinated on time.' Phil Plait adds, 'In all three of these outbreaks, someone who had not been vaccinated traveled overseas and brought the disease back with them, which then spread due to low vaccination rates in their communities. It's unclear how much religious beliefs themselves were behind the outbreaks in Brooklyn and North Carolina; it may have been due to widespread secular anti-vax beliefs in those tight-knit groups. But either way, a large proportion of the people in those areas were unvaccinated.'"

73 of 462 comments (clear)

  1. Duh by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It goes without saying that the moronic get what they deserve, though sadly, when herd immunity is compromised, sometimes the innocent (those who cannot be inoculated) pay the price too.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Duh by compro01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It goes without saying that the moronic get what they deserve

      The moronic parents aren't getting what they deserve, it's their children that are paying the price.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Duh by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They deserve a fucking education.

      What if I told you I know a very well educated micro biologist who refuses to vaccinate his 7 kids? His wife's education is in psychology, but they are still educated, and they steadfastly refuse to vaccinate and when I try to argue I'm told "you don't know enough science to argue with me".

      I'd tell him he's being fucking stupid and tell him to get his kids vaccinated before he gets somebody killed. Want fries with that?

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Duh by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What if I told you I was the Emperor of Andromeda and that my farts didn't stink and every time I touched a dollar bill, it turned into a bar of gold?

      Talk is cheap, mate, and even if, on the outside chance you aren't some stupid antivaccer trying to make your objections sound the least bit rational, then I'd say the weight of your fellow biologists outweighs any particular claim you may make, and it is them you would have to debate, and it is them you would most likely get used to.

      Oh, and stay the fuck away from my kids, you arrogant asshole.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Duh by ArbitraryName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vaccination is basically the most studied and most well understood type of medical intervention there is. After public sanitation, mass vaccination against common deadly/crippling illnesses has been one of the most societal changing public health projects ever in history.

      The only unclear one here is you.

    5. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Survivorship bias. If you had died from one of those illnesses, you wouldn't be able to post on Slashdot and tell everyone.

    6. Re:Duh by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      just because you were lucky doesn't mean that others are hypochondriacs: as somebody who is suffering lifelong health issues due to measles (when I got it there were no vaccines yet, it was a long time ago) anybody who doesn't vaccinate their kids for it deserve as much scorn as they get in my book, but unfortunately you can scorn all you want it will be their kids that pay the price of their parents' choice.

      How would you like it if you had a kid, did not vaccinate them because of some mumbo jumbo you heard on daytime tv, they get measles and become deaf? what will you tell them when they grow up and figure out they have a lifetime of deafness to look forward to because of your choice? or maybe they get something even more fun like Meniere's (look it up) due to damages to the inner ear that happened due to the virus? or maybe simply they will die from it like a non insignificant number of kids do? what will you do then? or maybe you don't consider deafness, lifetime balance/vertigo and death "serious stuff"?

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    7. Re:Duh by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you might want to look at what OTHER things measles can do to you besides death, or maybe you find deafness a "not very important thing to worry about"?

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    8. Re:Duh by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if I told you I know a very well educated micro biologist who refuses to vaccinate his 7 kids?

      I'll tell you he's either (a) a kook, or (b) a visionary genius, and that only you get to decide which to believe when it's time to decide who your kids get to play with.

      [Hint: Let them play with kids who had their vaccinations...]

    9. Re:Duh by dosius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The funny thing is anti-vax started out on the hippie left, and spread to the religiot right.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    10. Re:Duh by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other than the simple examples (polio, smallpox, etc.) ... could you elaborate? Say, for example, the Hep. B vaccine given to infants (as in, at birth)?

      Are you arguing for vaccination in general or arguing, specifically, for every single vaccination that is recommended?

      It's simply not as clear as you want to believe, with reference specific vaccines. And no, I don't actually subscribe to the debunked/fraudulent vaccine-gut-autism link by Wakefield. But I have actually looked for specific data regarding specific vaccines and found them to be incredibly lacking. Or non-existent.

      In the case of the Hep B vaccine, it is given to infants, and yet, according to the CDC, the way infants get Hep B:
      How does a baby get Hepatitis B?
      A baby can get Hepatitis B from an infected mother during childbirth.

      But the infant is given the vaccine regardless of whether the mother has it. Huh. Yes, there are risks related to Hep B, but what are those risks to the infant if the mother is actually tested? Suddenly, we are narrowing it down to the risk of getting Hep B and the risks of the illness itself ... narrowing those risks down to the amount of women who are tested for Hep B and are given a false negative...

      tl;dr: don't assume that people who refuse individual vaccines (1) think all vaccines are bad and (2) only research quack sites.

    11. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I find it even more ridiculous people get vaccinated for the flu these days

      Do you know how many millions of people the flu has killed?

    12. Re:Duh by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Well, how about juvenile suicide? ten times as prevalent as measles, even with the spike (30x as prevalent in normal years)

      Or automobile safety - about 30x as many kids die in cars accidents than from measles.

      Hell, "natural causes" account for 200x as many deaths as measles...

      So yeah, there are more important things to worry about than measles.

      Though if we want to solve the measles problem, it's really pretty simple - don't allow people into the country unless they come from a place where measles are no more widespread than here.

      Yeah, that would mean cutting off immigration (and casual visits) from most of the Third World and a good chunk of the Second, but it would pretty much eliminate measles as an issue here.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:Duh by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nice, you survived. You have a daughter. She's happily married, you're expecting your first grandchild.

      She gets rubella. Your grandchild is born severely disabled because of the disease, but will likely survive and live a long and unhappy life.

      How do you feel?

      Fact is that around 40-60% of children did not survive to adulthood before vaccinations. Most of them died to various infectious diseases that we are forgetting they ever existed because of vaccination. You can be that other 40-60% that survive. Congratulations of getting good cards in that particular game.

    14. Re:Duh by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Anecdotal data is not evidence.

    15. Re: Duh by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Informative

      Honest question here: Exactly what price was that? How much did these kids suffer?

      With effective modern medical care, the death rate from measles is about 0.1%. If proper care is not given, it can be as high as 10%. Just prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine in the USA, approximately 450 people died each year of the disease, and 48,000 had complications severe enough to require hospitalization.

    16. Re:Duh by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      I dunno. Put the ghost of C. Everett Koop on TV for 30 seconds a night on every major network saying "Jenny McCarthy is an idiot, and you're stupid if you think some actress knows more about medicine than thousands of reputable scientists. Go vaccinate your kids, or they'll end up deaf with curved legs! Rich people, go to your doctor tomorrow. ...and don't worry poor people, it's free at a clinic near you with a short wait."

      theMoreYouKnow.png

      If C. Everett's ghost isn't available, the one who likes masturbation is still alive.

    17. Re: Duh by Cwix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Measles prognosis:

      There are many complications associated with measles. Some of the complications are very serious and occur most frequently in babies or adults who contract the disease. These include ear infections, bronchitis, and pneumonia. However, the most serious complication associated with measles is encephalitis, an infection of the brain. Encephalitis can lead to convulsions, hearing loss, and mental retardation, and affects approximately 1 of every 1,000 children infected with measles. Despite advances in medicine, measles can still occasionally be fatal because of these complications.
      How is measles treated?

      There is no treatment for measles. Once a person is infected, the virus must run its course (usually 10 to 14 days). Bed rest, acetaminophen, and other medications are often recommended or given to help treat symptoms.

      TLDR: Measles is rarely fatal but there may be severe complications in 1 in 1,000. Otherwise it is two weeks of hell that they have no treatment for.

      Word to the wise, if I had a kid who couldn't get the vaccine for some reason and they caught this from your kid. I would not be a happy camper.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    18. Re: Duh by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The potential for encephalitis can be a bit of a downer, even in the nonlethal cases. As much as I think 'neurological sequelae' is a cool phrase, it isn't one you want to see in your file.

    19. Re:Duh by real+gumby · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seriously, I've had like 5 diseases (measles, mumps, varicella, rubella and influenzaa) as a child...and I'm still alive and quite healthy with ZERO side effects of having had those diseases.

      Do you know you've had zero side effects? My dad's heard valve was damaged by measles (no vaccine when he was a kid) and he didn't know until he was in his 50s and it stopped functioning properly.

      In any case I've ridden in cars and jet aircraft without seat belts and am still around but that doesn't mean I don't use them when they've available.

      Big pharma marketing has apparently been successful in creating a nation of hypochondriacs.

      Actually vaccines aren't big moneymakers and in in fact stopped being produced at all in the US until Congress stepped in.

    20. Re:Duh by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Idiocy is not limited by party, race, creed or country.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    21. Re:Duh by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Not to be an ass, but you should look up what rubella does to children when contracted by pregnant mother. Rubella causes organ deficiency and organ failure. That means that baby is likely to have a cocktail of following problems:
      Blindness
      Deafness
      Severe heart deficiency
      Other life threatening organ disorders/failures.

      That is if it's unlucky and doesn't die in the womb. For death is a mercy when it comes to most children born with congenital rubella syndrome, which is the main reason why rubella vaccination is so common. Rubella itself is actually a fairly mild disease when contracted by adults, though it gets more severe when contracted by elderly.

    22. Re:Duh by serbanp · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but if he's living today in a western society and decided to procreate SEVEN times, he is definitely not well educated. He may belong to some cult or just is ignorant about how to use a condom, but either way it does not suggest an educated person.

    23. Re:Duh by Tuidjy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a matter of fact, I met some fishermen in Greece who pray and even leave offerings at a Poseidon shrine. I am not quite sure how much they actually believe, nor do I know how much my neighbors, who go to Church on Sunday, believe in Jesus's divinity.

      But I do know that either one billion of Christians are right and one billion of Muslims are wrong about Jesus's divinity, or vice versa. So, even if I were, for some reason, to accept one holy book before all others, I would still know that significantly more than two thirds of religious people are dead wrong, either because they reject the Savior, or the Prophet, or whomever.

      And lets not forget that many Christian denominations' doctrines say that most Christians are dead wrong, or at least wrong enough not to have a shot at Heaven. The same applies across many divides inside other religions. I have not done the footwork myself, but I have read solid arguments that no matter who is right, more than 90% of religious people are wrong.

      Now, I do not claim to know the Truth. I believe in small truths, like, for example, that it is impossible to disprove the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing entity. And I know better than to waste time on debating matters that cannot be disproved. But those are facts:facts:

      1. More than ninety percent of all people on Earth are wrong in their religious beliefs.
      2. The best predictor for people's religious beliefs is what they have been exposed to in their formative years.
      3. Most holy texts assign heavy consequences to not having the right religious beliefs, and living according to them.

      In light of the above, I have, personally, decided that I cannot respect, let alone worship a deity that's OK with the situation. So, at the end of the day, I make no difference between people who believe in Poseidon, and people who believe in the deity in the Bible/Torah/Qur'an. At at the end of my life, I may be in for a surprise. But I think I'm about as likely to be collected by the Chosers of the Slain as by a devil with a pitchfork.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    24. Re: Duh by quixote9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And just to be explicit about what some of those sequelae can be: retardation and/or blindness. Measles is NOT an "Oh, tough it out" disease.

    25. Re:Duh by AaronW · · Score: 3, Informative

      The vaccines are better. The problem with Chicken Pox is that it never really fully dies. It just goes dormant in the nerves. At some point it can come back in the form of shingles in adults. The vaccine is not a live virus that can replicate in people, so it doesn't infect them.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    26. Re:Duh by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Other than the simple examples (polio, smallpox, etc.

      Isn't that enough of an example?
      The idea is sound. Whether it works for specific situations depends on the specific case just like everything else.

    27. Re:Duh by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Any*one* could be a millionaire, but "everyone" could be a millionaire only through inflation. Some portions of the economy are zero sum, enough to prevent everyone being a millionaire. And it's vastly easier for Paris Hilton to make $1,000,000 than someone born into poverty living next to a decommissioned lead smelter who grows up with slight brain damage from low-level lead poisoning. But no, we'll blame the poverty on laziness, it's easier to tolerate inequality when we blame the victim for being inferior.

    28. Re:Duh by aztracker1 · · Score: 2

      Well.. Atheists do tend to have higher rates of anxiety and depression. Those who organize around religious beliefs are more likely to find a potential mate that shares a common belief system.

      I'm sure there are other negatives to choosing atheism, but that said, who really cares. I've met plenty of atheists preaching religiously about their beliefs (usually a vegan lifestyle), and have seen the westboro babtist church's idiocy at its' finest. Theists don't have a corner on stupid.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    29. Re: Duh by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Some risks are trivially avoidable. Being an idiot isn't "growing a pair," it's being an idiot. Not getting vaccinated is particularly stupid because you expose other people to risk, not just yourself.

      I jump off mountains and travel to places where a mosquito bite can kill you. I've got all my vaccinations.

    30. Re:Duh by overshoot · · Score: 3, Informative

      How does a baby get Hepatitis B?

      From other babies. Those of us who've had them know from experience that "bodily fluids" get exchanged in lots of ways that don't involve sex or needles.

      A friend's father (60-something) has chronic HepB, undoubtedly from a childhood infection. Fortunately, she doesn't -- but his liver is mostly gone, to the extent that she was considering donating a lobe of hers.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  2. Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... and other idiots

    1. Re:Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by RevWaldo · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Vaccines am bad. Electronic cigarettes am perfectly safe." - Jenny McCarthy.

      .

    2. Re:Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by arthurpaliden · · Score: 4, Informative

      The thing is that her kid did not even have autism and is now responding well to the condition he really does have.

    3. Re:Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Funny

      A pox upon her house!

    4. Re:Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm amazed that they were able to eradicate small pox

      Actually, it's not eradicated, and it's actually making a comeback (thanks to the anti-vaxxers).

      Smallpox, It wasn't eradicated from the world (many third world countries have outbreaks), but generally in North America and Europe, the chances of contracting it were nil. It's why they started going after chickenpox as well.

      Anyhow, those with a medical reason to not get vaccinated don't generally hang out with others who aren't vaccinated as well, so they get some herd immunity.

      It's the likes of Jenny McCarthy and their ilk - like attracts like so you end up with whole groups who aren't immunized congregating together and regularly and who will rapidly pass disease from one to another. One person in a herd not having it is fine. A whole herd not having it means the entire herd gets it.

      Last I heard, the only place you could get smallpox would be to break into one of about 7 sealed government health facilities on this planet and steal one of the preserved virus samples. Unless something very alarming happened very recently and I haven't heard about it, smallpox has been eradicated. Unless some idiot opens one of those labs and makes a biological weapon.

      Maybe you mean polio.

    5. Re:Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      eCigarettes still have nicotine, which is *not* good for you. It causes high blood pressure and contributes to heart and circulatory disease in other ways as well.

    6. Re:Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it's not eradicated, and it's actually making a comeback (thanks to the anti-vaxxers).

      Acutally, it *is* eradicated in the wild. The last documented case of naturally occuring smallpox was in 1977. WHO officially declared it eradicated in 1979. You may be confusing it with polio, which they're still trying to chase down and eliminate the last pockets of.

    7. Re:Thanks, Jenny McCarthy by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it's not eradicated, and it's actually making a comeback (thanks to the anti-vaxxers).

      You're mistaken. No known human has contracted any form of naturally-occurring smallpox (i.e. not laboratory grown) since 1977 -- and we actually know the first and last name of the last person who ever did.

      You're probably thinking of some other disease. There are lots of them; smallpox is the only one we've ever gotten rid of.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  3. Anti-vaxxers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I actually have a co-worker who refused to get the MMR vaccine for his two children, both of whom came down with the measles last year. They didn't shun the vaccine because of religious reasons; rather, Jenny McCarthy convinced them that it would give their children autism. And while it's entertaining to watch this, and it's fun to sit back and mock these people, their belief system, and the consequences of their actions, the fact remains that these idiots are a real threat to our herd immunity.

    The real answer to this is education, although that's almost as dirty a word as "vaccination" in 2013 United States.

    1. Re:Anti-vaxxers by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure, it sucks for the kids, but let's not pretend that the measles are fatal with the exception of a tiny fraction of cases.

      Huh? Quoth wikipedia:

      Between the years 1987 and 2000, the case fatality rate across the United States was 3 measles-attributable deaths per 1000 cases, or 0.3%. In underdeveloped nations with high rates of malnutrition and poor healthcare, fatality rates have been as high as 28%. In immunocompromised patients (e.g. people with AIDS) the fatality rate is approximately 30%.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Anti-vaxxers by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      I must not be reading something correctly, because I'm interpreting what the AC said as it being incredibly lethal...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. The really sad thing is vaccines improving by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We even now have a permanent Tetanus combo booster shot (TDAP) instead of the old every ten year one (that probably expired, don't step on a rusty nail!).

    Correlation is not causation, but not getting an MMR measles mumps rubella shot is just criminal. Without herd immunity we're starting to see hospitals requiring people to wear masks or stay in isolation wards, measures we never had to do before the "fad" of not getting shots started.

    And, no, I don't care what your objections are - there are nasal spray versions of all the shots, so stop endangering everyone else with your stupidity.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:The really sad thing is vaccines improving by compro01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You could at least get your talking points from somewhere that at least updates them. Thiomersal is gone from all childhood vaccines except flu, and even then it's only in the multidose vials.

      And guess what? The removal hasn't done anything to autism rates or anything else.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:The really sad thing is vaccines improving by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What he said should probably be qualified with the phrase "without a medical reason not to". My partner hasn't had all of her shots either, but that's because she had a heart transplant when she was 11 and has a compromised immune system. And I'm seriously pissed off at any fuckwit who, without a similarly good reason, puts her health at risk by not getting their own immunizations.

    3. Re:The really sad thing is vaccines improving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Way to change your tune, dipshit. Before, you maintained that European vaccines were safer. Oops, you're wrong! American vaccines have been Thimerosal for 12+ years - now you're all about the messaging and explaining to people about how the vaccine is totally safe.

      Where are these self-righteous doctors who haven't been explaining vaccine safety? It seems to me that the entire fucking world, outside of you and your retarded friends, has been explaining vaccine safety for over a decade. Guess what, we're tired of it. We've explained it until we're blue in the face, from a hundred thousand different starting points. There are still idiots who want to believe Jenny McCarthy because blondes are better.

      Produce ONE Doctor you feel fits the profile of the strawman that you just built, or STFU.

  5. I'm an Anti-VAXxer, you insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    PDP-11s forever!

  6. Mandotory insurance by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Make these people buy mandatory insurance with a special rider in case they get sick. The public should not have to cover a penny of their medical bills.

    Hopefully these people are not allowed in public or private schools or daycare. We care enough about our dogs and cats to not let them in kennels and grooming situations unless they have vaccinations. Why should we care about kids any less. I mean if someone want to start a vac-free school where everyone is not vaccinated, that is their right, but we shouldn't put innocent kids at risk.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Mandotory insurance by clarkn0va · · Score: 2

      And while you're at it, smokers, drug users, fast drivers, skydivers, safari goers, daredevils, worriers, hipsters, teamsters, mobsters, masturbaters, adulterers, tax evaders, loud talkers, smooth talkers, buffalo hunters, fast eaters, people who drive more than 5 km per day, GMO eaters, doughnut eaters, coffee drinkers, people who don't brush their teeth three times per day, people who don't eat enough vegetables, and people who eat too many vegetables.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    2. Re:Mandotory insurance by ewieling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wouldn't failing to get your child vaccinated be covered under existing child endangerment, reckless endangerment, or public endangerment laws?

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
  7. Re:stop the sensationalist crap by pezpunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    tell that to the 175 cases. the attitude that "measles is not a concern in this country" will only ensure that rates triple again next year and the year after.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  8. So.. by benjfowler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... this is what happens when you don't use your brain -- and you take medical advice from a stripper.

  9. A case of a rich nation blaming developing ones... by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that measles cases in the U.S. spiked this year, rising to three times their recent average rate. It's partly due to a greater number of people traveling to the U.S. when they're infectious...

    I find it interesting that in times when there's been greater scrutiny of who comes to the US, and in some cases tourist dollars having significantly reduced because of the tougher US visa regime and other factors, there are articles like those quoted that "blame" the incidence of disease on outsiders. Incredible!!

    The USA should man up and state categorically that some of its citizens are behaving like uneducated villagers by refusing to vaccinate. Do not blame those you call aliens because measles has been and still is on the decline everywhere else.

    What will happen when polio strikes?

  10. Tat''s OK by arthurpaliden · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least they didn't develop autism

  11. Vaccinations discriminate against middle class by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have insurance. My insurance covers vaccinations. However, my primary care provider will not administer vaccinations because they agreed to a contracted amount with the insurance company but they don't feel that that amount is enough. I called several other primary care physicians who similarly refused to administer vaccinations. I finally got one that agreed to do it but only if I also did a well child checkup, which would cost hundreds of dollars. All of these doctors suggested I go to the Health Department. So I did, and stood in line for a long time, to be told that you had to be on state aid in order to get vaccinations from the state.
    Walgreen's and other facilities would do vaccinations, but my insurance would not pay because they are not a Primary Care facility. I would have to pay full price.
    So basically, I have to pay for insurance which covers vaccinations AND I still have to pay full price for vaccinations, while if I were poor, I would neither have to pay for insurance nor pay for vaccinations.
    To me, the fact that a Doctor can refuse to perform a service because they don't like their profit margin on it even though the AGREED to accept that amount in their contract, is BS. This is akin to a retailer advertising a model of TV for a cheap price, but not having ever even purchased any of said model to be sold.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Vaccinations discriminate against middle class by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      I still don't understand why anyone would turn to insurance for predictable expenses - that's like getting car insurance that covers gas and tires. Just seems crazy to me.

      I don't. If it was up to me, I would have REAL insurance, ie Major Medical, ie High Deductible insurance. However, my company at the moment only has health plans. Since I am paying for this health plan, and since part of paying for that health plan includes paying for the coverage for vaccinations, then I expect to be able to use the service I have paid for.
      If I had not paid for the insurance I would be both wiling and also more able to afford to pay full price for the vaccination.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Vaccinations discriminate against middle class by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      I still don't understand why anyone would turn to insurance for predictable expenses - that's like getting car insurance that covers gas and tires. Just seems crazy to me.

      While I don't love that insurance is used for predictable things, insurance companies know that people who see the doctor regularly, get the tests their doctors recommend for them and take their prescribed medication cost less to insure when the unpredictable [well, unpredictable in small numbers] happens.

      So, to make sure that you cost as little as possible to insure, your insurance covers predictable expenses.

      Because insurers know this, they can buy in bulk -- sending you to in-network doctors, hospitals and pharmacies at a discount over their standard fee rate, further reducing the total cost (to them) to insure you.

      You could argue that your premium should be lower, and you should perhaps be required to comply with doctors orders, but I'm pretty sure we know how that'd turn out.

    3. Re:Vaccinations discriminate against middle class by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      This story is a total lie.

      No, it is the absolute truth. I'm sorry you don't want to accept it. Here is a link to an article that describes exactly what I experienced.
      cnn.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  12. Re:stop the sensationalist crap by samkass · · Score: 5, Informative

    Measles is tracked in part because it's really easily preventable with a safe vaccine which had eliminated it on the North American content a decade ago, and because it's one of the single most virulent diseases known to man. In a susceptible population, breathing the same air of someone who has it will make you 90% likely to get it. Many of the "pandemic" worst case scenarios is the measles virus combining with a more deadly virus to create a super virus, but even without that measles complications are common and can lead to permanently reduced vision, encephalitis leading to brain injuries, or other long-term problems. In the developed world the death rate is something like 0.3%, but in the undeveloped world it's sometimes over 25%. Nasty, easily preventable stuff worth tracking.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  13. Re:Or maybe it's the vaccine by GameMaster · · Score: 2

    No vaccine is EVER 100% effective for all people. That is, simply, the nature of vaccines and why many of these articles talk about "herd immunity". The reason we still see diseases effectively disappear when vaccines are implemented correctly is that a truly successful vaccine (like this one) will work for a large enough percentage of the population to ensure that it's statistically unlikely that a person who doesn't have the protection will encounter someone who is carrying the disease. The problem is that, the way the statistics work, it doesn't take the number of anti-vaccine nutters to be very large before the numbers reach a kind of tipping point and the number of outbreaks starts to dramatically increase. Also, as with anything statistic based, one anecdotal event (or even a few) like the one you described is meaningless in this discussion.

    --

    Rules of Conduct:
    #1 - The DM is always right.
    #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  14. Not to worry by arthurpaliden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After reports of half a dozen or so children dying because they were not vaccinated parents will start getting their children vaccinated again. Pitty some kids will have to die first though.

    1. Re:Not to worry by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the parents involved will blame the medical establishment for not saving their child.

      Measles is a serious disease that we have an established and functional protection from that they refused to use but they will blame the doctors for not being able to save their snowflake from the disease. There have already been people in this thread claim Measles is not a big deal when before the vaccine it used to kill anywhere from 1 in 10 to 1 in 4. In fact every 10 killer in 1950 is no longer on the list because of vaccines and IIRC in 1950 Measles was number 2 on the fatality list, right behind small pox and in front of polio. Only one of those diseases is gone, with the anti-vax campaign we're going to see a resurgence in the other two unless they can get rid of polio before some jackass brings is back from Pakistan.

    2. Re:Not to worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Will these reports reach the parents who need to hear them? I suspect any parent who reaches a "vaccines are bad" conclusion does so because their access to medical information is heavily filtered through particular propaganda objectives. They'll be the last to know and believe that "some kids dying" are connected to not vaccinating. Consider the same way an entire national population can be cowed into worrying more about terrorism --- which once killed < 3k people well over a decade ago --- than, e.g., automobile accidents (which kill more than that every month of every year), or even falls in the bathtub (far more deadly than Osama Bin Laden could ever dream of being; yet there's no public support for trillion dollar War on Porcelain). Rational evaluation of risks, for people entrenched in a media bubble that filters their perceptions, is unlikely to be a deciding factor.

  15. Re:A case of a rich nation blaming developing ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who said anything about blame? In order for an outbreak to occur, you need a source for the infection as well as a vulnerable population. The article is simply stating that increased travel provides more sources of infection, while anti-science idiots in the United States provide the vulnerable population.

    Yes, if the U.S. got the vaccination situation under control, no one would be particularly concerned about measles exposed visitors. That doesn't mean they aren't a factor in this present situation.

  16. What a bunch of idiots by giveen1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a conservative, religious man, I find the religious anti-vaccination crowd a bunch of blind ninnies. I have a few at my church like that, and I want to smack them as they put my children who are too young to receive these vaccination at risk of catching a deadly disease.

  17. Doing our best to keep suicide #1 by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Informative

    The numbers are low, because herd immunity is still strong. The reason for concern is that the infection rate curve probably isn't linear. At some point on the curve there is going to be an inflection point where a lot of people will start getting sick. So, while there are probably things that are currently causing a lot more child deaths now, this is could change quickly.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  18. Re:polio cases annually before vaccine released by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    You don't have to. Just remind everyone that FDR contracted polio at the age of 39 and was paralyzed for the rest of his life.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  19. Re:So the vaccine has a 10 % failure rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can't conclude that it depends on the population. If the population exposed to the infection is 90 unvaccintated nutcases and 10000 sensible people. You can get 90 unvaccinated and 10 vaccinated if the failure rate is 0.1%

    That is not to say that the failure rate is 0.1%. I don't know what it is but there is a failure rate and that is just another reason herd immunity is important.

  20. Re:So the vaccine has a 10 % failure rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, 10% of the people who were infected were also vaccinated. That doesn't mean there is a 10% failure rate in the vaccine. There are many many more people vaccinated than not vaccinated. To get the actual failure rate you would need to compute number_of_people_vaccinated_and_infected/number_of_people_vaccinated_and_exposed. With the later being very difficult to calculate.

  21. I doubt it by stenvar · · Score: 4, Informative

    40-60% is total childhood mortality in primitive societies. Most of the reduction in childhood mortality since then is probably due to better sanitation, better treatment of diarrhea, and the use of antibiotics, not vaccinations.

  22. Deaths are only PART of the damage from measles by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For every 1 person that dies, 2 people suffer brain damage or deafness, per the CDC.

    http://www.medpagetoday.cominfectiousdiseasegeneralinfectiousdisease/43268

    For measles, it says that for every
    500 deaths, you have:
    48,000 hospitalizations,
    7,000 seizures, and
    1,000 cases of permanent brain damage or deafness each year, according to the CDC.

    So brain damage/deafness is about 2x as common as outright death from measles.

    --PeterM

  23. Depends... by trims · · Score: 5, Informative

    When comparing modern mortality improvement over the older pre-industrial, pre-modern-medicine regimes, the "most helpful" reductions vary with the age group you're dealing with:

    • INFANT (i.e. under 2 years of age) mortality reductions are overwhelmingly due to two things: (1) improvements in reducing childbirth deaths and complications (2) infant vaccinations. Sanitation (but not necessarily clean water) has helped somewhat, but not anywhere near as much as getting the kid out of the mother in good shape, and effective pre- and post-natal care. Vaccines (even though most aren't fully protected until after 2 years of age) have nonetheless stopped cold the huge killers of infants: measles, smallpox, pertussis, etc.
    • CHILDHOOD (2-12) mortality reductions are pretty much split between vaccinations and improved clean water/sanitation, maybe with the latter edging out for bigger impact (probably due mostly to reducing malaria, cholera and typhus).
    • TEENAGE (13-18) mortality reductions are due to a combination of vaccines (TB, smallpox, polio, and measles being a big here), clean water/sanitation, and trauma medicine.
    • ADULT (18-65) reductions are mostly clean water/sanitation, with trauma medicine following up behind. Vaccinations aren't a huge contributor here, since the vast majority of folks died of the major vaccinated diseases before they got to be adults, and thus, a much smaller percentage of people were saved.
    • ELDERLY (65+) mortality reductions are heavily improvements in drugs and chronic illness treatments (think cancer and heart disease).

    Overall, clean water and sanitation probably win as the single most important advancement in public health, ever, but vaccines are a *very* strong second. Frankly, drugs are at best a distant fourth, behind even improved medical understanding of the human body (enabling more effective trauma and non-drug treatments of common diseases and accidents). Drug improvements really have helped two big categories of people: soldiers at war, and the elderly.

    -Erik

    --
    There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
  24. do something by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    This is a social problem. These people continue to be idiots because all of the rest of us are "too nice" to say anything when they start spewing their bullshit. Every time I run into one of these asshats at work, or at a party, I tell them they're committing child abuse, they should be ashamed of themselves, and more importantly they're child is not allowed to play with my child. Then I inform every other parent that might know them that they should let their kids play with them either and that they should shun the adult. This wont change until it's no longer socially "cool" to do this.