Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Takeover In Jeopardy Due To Alleged $3.4B Tax Bill In India

New submitter Snotboble_ writes "The government of India apparently thinks Nokia owes a lot of taxes. They originally told Nokia that the company owed around $340 million, but now reports suggest it could be an order of magnitude higher. Such a large liability would have consequences for Nokia's sale of its handset division to Microsoft. From the article: 'Nokia Corp.'s tax troubles in India worsened Tuesday as local authorities ratcheted up the amount of tax they say the Finnish company may owe to more than $3 billion. Nokia's battle to defend itself from the claims—one of the latest surprise tax bills slapped on big foreign companies in India—could affect its plans to sell its handset division to Microsoft Corp. as the phone company's factory in India is part of the $7 billion deal.'"

226 comments

  1. corruption by BurgEnder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    nothing like a good 'ol shakedown by a government's tax authority

    1. Re:corruption by war4peace · · Score: 0

      Does it count as racist if I say I am not surprised by this move from the Indian government?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:corruption by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does it count as racist that I'm absolutely *shocked* a western company has been dodging taxes?

    3. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does it count as racist if I say I am not surprised by this move from the Indian government?

      Probably not. I've had Indians explain that some businesses are hampered by the fact that traveling from one side of the city to the other crosses multiple local tax jurisdictions. Each wanting to collect a tax as goods move across the city.

    4. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like India wants to kill the sale of the handset division to Microsoft, driving Nokia stock even lower, then conveniently an India company will buy Nokia out. Sound Like India politics at its finest.

    5. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It almost certainly is, by all appearances the current Indian Congress is about to get stomped in elections coming up in just a few months. Part of the reason is mass corruption that's plagued India for years, and so they're desperate to do anything to make themselves look better. Including making themselves look tough on corruption.

    6. Re:corruption by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      Having worked for a company a decade ago, where the Indian government tried to blackmail them for "back taxes" I'm going to hazard out on a line that it's probably not on Nokia's end.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:corruption by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure I like your tone.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    8. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MSFT can't afford to back out of the deal. They are in desperate need of Nokia's support for Windows Phone 8. Without the merger, any slim hope of gaining a foothold in mobile is dashed. MSFT would have to admit defeat. That won't happen, so MSFT will use its political US clout to hammer the price tag down to something "reasonable" and then write the check. Even if the price tag didn't go down, they would write the check. They can't afford to not do so. It would be suicide.

    9. Re:corruption by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      The NSA is making it harder and harder and more difficult, too, for a pasting on of the tinfoil hat label. And then, like a moment of perfect clarity, someone like you posts something like this, and the universe gets a tiny bit less complicated.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    10. Re:corruption by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not sure I like your tone.

      You have a problem with his skin color?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    11. Re:corruption by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't need to go farther than California to find an example of the government blackmailing people for "back taxes". Fortunately, this time, the tax-hungry government was stopped in its tracks. However who in India will oppose taxing of a faraway, rich company?

    12. Re: corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe you people!

    13. Re: corruption by davidbrit2 · · Score: 2

      And MS has had loads of practice throwing good money after bad, so what's another go at it here and there?

    14. Re: corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you might b a dope.

    15. Re:corruption by EdIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure sounds like it.

      I know corporations are evil little demons when it comes to actually playing on a level playing field in regards to taxes though.

      It can also just as easily be possible.... that Nokia have been dicks for years trying to get around the taxes and India has finally had enough of their shit. An opportune moment? Absolutely. Egregiously So.

      Just playing devils advocate for India here, even considering the massive levels of corruption in their government.

      The only difference between India and the US, is that US politicians are already sufficiently paid to look the other way on taxes. Way too many assholes with their hands in the cookie jar to stop that over a few measly billion.

    16. Re:corruption by sjames · · Score: 4, Funny

      The color's fine, it's just too flabby.

    17. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That's homophobic.

    18. Re: corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing like having yahoo message boards hijack your site eh lamedot?

    19. Re:corruption by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not racist. The Indian government is pathetically corrupt. It's truly awful, and goes from the very bottom (police, petty local officials) right to the top. Finland, on the other hand, is one of the least corrupt countries in the world.

      I know nothing about this case, but I'm going to trust the Finns on this one until proven otherwise.

      (Disclosure: I'm a half-Indian who's lived in Finland and done a lot of work with Nokia. I also have business interests in India.)

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    20. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop voting Congress and vote for the BJP.

      Bring back the glory days when Vajpayee was in charge.

    21. Re:corruption by icebike · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, there at least 6 manufacturers making windows phones. They don't need to manufacturer their own.
      But if they want to, They could buy HTC out of petty cash.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    22. Re:corruption by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      dodging taxes? 3.4 billion doesn't seem like that really. it sounds more like changing the tax to be 10x of what they were told it would be when they started doing business locally.

      the thing is, they had no way on earth knowing the taxes beforehand. nobody has. so how are you supposed to price the hardware beforehand? even if you ask one state government then another sub-state government is going to claim otherwise since they want the money too.

      it's just another example why big industry is staying officially out of india... and it's hurting india. another option for a company is to bribe everyone continously.

      heck, ikea had to fight over the right to sell meatballs... good news for China, Korea, Taiwan & all though since why bother with spooling up factories in India when they can't make up their minds about the rules? unstability of rules is number one reason why developing countries have hard time attracting serious investment... so the jobs they then get are something that doesn't need long term investment(like hand assembly.).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    23. Re:corruption by davester666 · · Score: 1

      They are still made that we killed pretty much all the buffalo, killed most of them and made the rest live in reservations.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re:corruption by davester666 · · Score: 1

      er still mad, not still made

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    25. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay, India leads in getting these multi-nationals to pay up what's owed. We need the spinneless leaders of many other countries to wake up and close this gaping hole in the world economy. Because these big firms hide their income, everybody pays higher taxes.

    26. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it count as racist that I'm absolutely *shocked* a western company has been dodging taxes?

      Yes.
      There is a lot more to this story than a "western" corporation allegedly dodging taxes. The Indian tax authority has been going after all sorts of companies and claiming they haven't been paying taxes. In some cases it may be true, in some cases there are actually conflicting laws on the books, and put simply the whole thing is highly Political in nature.

    27. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't be racist to a nationality, and the company is from finland so while your statement _is_ based on ignorance, you're merely anti-american.

    28. Re:corruption by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It seems the Nokia purchase is not about making mobile phones so much as turning Nokia into a patent troll to cripple other companies with M$ buying an escape clause from that behaviour by buying the mobile phone manufacturing decision of Nokia. Now as this is all based upon stupid shallow Ballmer thinking, M$ has refused to accept the idea that all other companies will blame M$ for Nokia's behaviour and cimply direct the nuclear patents of mass destruction on M$ in retaliation for Nokia's behaviour.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    29. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finns prize their Sauna Society and it is one institution I know of where a politician has no more social bearing than a janitor. People work, they are respected for working, no special treatment.

      I worked for Nokia in the early 2000s, enjoyed the culture, it was a white knight compared to both US culture as well as the dregs that come out of India. I'm not sure there is a more openly corrupt culture on the planet, aside from wall street.http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/12/11/0038242/nokia-takeover-in-jeopardy-due-to-alleged-34b-tax-bill-in-india#

    30. Re:corruption by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      I know corporations are evil little demons when it comes to actually playing on a level playing field in regards to taxes though.

      Enforcement is one thing. The playing field is quite another. If you don't like the playing field, change the law. If you feel you can't change the law because those making the law are corrupt, say so with evidence in hand; there's plenty to be found. If you do that and fail to get enough of your fellow citizens to care, realize that your primary problem is precisely that: your fellow citizens, by and large, do not care. Good luck with changing that.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    31. Re:corruption by jopsen · · Score: 1

      Does it count as racist that I'm absolutely *shocked* a western company has been dodging taxes?

      +1
      Corruption on a $3.4b scale would be quite an achievement :)
      Anyways, as always, I'm sure there is nothing to the story if we read it... that's usually the case with shocking articles on slashdot... So this time I dismiss it without reading any futher :)

    32. Re: corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you know nothing about india

    33. Re:corruption by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      From all I can tell, Windows is doing alright in mobile.

      I don't know sales figures, but the murmer pre thanksgiving was that all the kids were getting surfaces and they were out of stock.

      The "I can do real office" adds or whatever seem to get the attention of a lot of the adults that I know.

      My sample group is certainly not a general population, I think I saw an article that listed top electronics sold by chain, and Surface beat iPad at Best Buy, and was top five somewhere else. They may not be winning, and I have seen very few in the wild, but it looks like this year they are selling at least, and if people like them, I expect they will continue to (not the phones though).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    34. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      major revolutions have not been done by majorities but rather by minorities using suitable anger of big portions of t he population at some stuff.
      so it is possible. The amount of blood and rolling heads depends on how unified the sides are and big a difference between their forces.

    35. Re:corruption by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Plenty of Indians are racist, usually against what they perceive as of different race of Indian people, the Nepalese or the Chinese though, not that often westerners - but that too.

      and classist, too. even fascist

      they have no intention of getting 3.4 billion.. but threatening with that is what they use to extort money for their parties cause, for their local gov, for their own pockets. you know, like the mob.

      you know, EXACTLY like a 3rd world cop pulling you over and threatening you with huge fines for whatever to get you to pay something on the spot. local taxi cabs then get around that by just having some cash ready to give to the crocodiles when they see them(but unfortunately for nokia, it is illegal for nokia to keep a bribery fund nowadays for that... so they have to see the texas hold 'em to the end).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    36. Re:corruption by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      No. That's homophobic.

      I'm not reading fear in it.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    37. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdotal, I know, but at the university I'm currently attending, the number one computing device you see in classrooms amongst the students is the Surface. All the profs are still using macbooks, but, the students are mostly using surfaces.

    38. Re:corruption by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Surface isn't Windows Phone though, its a tablet running Windows RT or 8.

    39. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      totally - I recall my Indian friend a few years back, talking about nuking Pakistan with complete seriousness. His level of racism towards pakistanis would make a skinhead neo-nazi blush.

    40. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft might just end up paying 2x the price, IF the ruining of Nokia even goes through.

      Don't play chess with the Finns.

      Checkmate, fools!

    41. Re:corruption by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      nice try Mr Microsoft marketeer.

      Anecdotally: I have not yet seen a surface in the wild. Plenty of iphones and a few ipads, the occasional Android tablet too. But not a single surface.

      Maybe if I hung around Redmond I might see a few I guess.

    42. Re:corruption by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Other reports make it sound like the two companies have already merged at the upper-ranks, I'm sure they will cough up some money. Reminds me of IT, best time to ask for support from a stingy company is right after their licensing invoice.

    43. Re:corruption by riis138 · · Score: 1

      I am inclined to agree with you based on the fact a co-worker has told me something very similar.

      --
      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
    44. Re:corruption by horza · · Score: 1

      All that would be needed to complete the coup would be for India to announce Elop had been secretly lined up to be India's Minister for Communication at some exhorbitant salary a year ago, and the long game of establishing TNC (Tata Nokia Communications) has finally fallen into place.

      Phillip.

    45. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is trolls trolling trolls Financial Edition... funny shit

    46. Re:corruption by war4peace · · Score: 1

      No, not at all. Western companies always tried to dodge taxes, just as well as Indian goverments always tried to inflate them. It's a game with two losers, in the end, from an image perspective.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    47. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Indian and one who has done rounds and rounds of government/university offices. So let me explain. You owe say 30 rupees tax. Then you can pay bribe to make it 3 rupees. The auditors visit every year. I guess what must have happened is due to the take over/transition part the accounts department neglected to pay the bribes to the auditors. Thus taxes went back to the original amount of 30 rupees.

    48. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/142fe2e6-623d-11e3-99d1-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2nBbbdv6Y

    49. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia paid their bribes on time, every time. They shouldn't have to put up with this crap.

    50. Re:corruption by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I was in upper Longisland for work (never go to Riverhead, it sucks).

      I was surprised.

      I am not personally buying one, I was simply surprised to hear "I need to find a Surface for my son, they're sold out at Best Buy" and it was in the top five list of a couple retailers, beating any single iPad product at Best Buy.

      Best Buy sales offered up an interesting twist with Microsoft's 32GB Surface tablet coming in as the holiday's best seller, followed by the 16GB iPad 2. The third place slot went to Amazon's 16GB Kindle Fire.

      --http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/ipad-scores-big-for-black-friday-retailers

      Though I guess Mac Observer is a MS marketing department too, so you caught me.

      And yes, Anecdotatly, I haven't seen many MS devices either, but it was a while before I started seeing Android ones too, and even longer before I started seeing high-end Android devices.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    51. Re:corruption by shentino · · Score: 1

      And maybe indian officials know this and smell a nice chance to extort some money out of the situation by taking advantage of microsoft's desperation

    52. Re:corruption by ThePhilips · · Score: 2

      it sounds more like changing the tax to be 10x of what they were told it would be when they started doing business locally.

      Actually this story bears stark resemblance to the one I have seen in Brazil. And it is not about corruption or retro-taxing.

      Small company in Sao Paulo (SP) was purchased by a larger company. Eventually, after sucking everything out of the small company, the large company decided to close it, inviting around 25% to relocate to their own office.

      They have actually managed to close the company and lay-offs were ongoing - but then the gov't send them some million Euro tax bill to pay.

      What has happened. Brasil (or only SP?) has provides special conditions to IT companies and start-ups, where they rip lots of benefits, including almost no taxes. To enjoy the benefits gov't requires a long-term commitment and conformance to certain conditions, expressed in the form of a contract with local authorities. Closing the company and laying off people for no good reason constitutes breach of the contract and consequently gov't demands you to pay back for all the benefits the company has enjoyed over the period.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    53. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that more than Nokia's worth? HTF did India ever come up with that #, but OTOH India's only marginally democratic...

    54. Re:corruption by Optali · · Score: 1

      Nope: Anti-anti is a code for... well, never mind

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    55. Re:corruption by Optali · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who is reading this thread with an Indian accent?

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    56. Re:corruption by Optali · · Score: 1

      "marginally democratic"?

      I bet it's as "marginally democratic" as the US

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    57. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah those Finns have a GLOBAL rep for tax dodging did one of the Nokia founders get his start at Apple ?

  2. Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    OK. If the new tax bill is 3B instead of 0.3B announce the closure of the factor and the layoff of its workers. This works in most other places around the world.

    1. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      They would still owe taxes. If Nokia ever has to do business in India, they better pay up (Nokia is one of the most popular brands in India btw)

    2. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. If the new tax bill is 3B instead of 0.3B announce the closure of the factor and the layoff of its workers. This works in most other places around the world.

      They would still owe taxes. If Nokia ever has to do business in India, they better pay up (Nokia is one of the most popular brands in India btw)

      The point is that such an announcement would probably result in the tax bill returning to the original 0.3B.

    3. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The tax is on the value of the factory. The factory is obviously more valuable than the tax liability. Shutting down the factory would have to be a bluff, a very bad one at that.

    4. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tax is on the value of the factory. The factory is obviously more valuable than the tax liability. Shutting down the factory would have to be a bluff, a very bad one at that.

      An idle factory has little value. Look at various neighborhoods in Detroit.

    5. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ok, so you have $10k in a bank account in Peru. You want to transfer the money to your account in the US. The bank says that before you're allowed to move the money you have to pay a $500 tax to the government. So, you propose to just tell the bank to close your account and keep the money?

      Sure, Nokia could abandon a factory to save on a much smaller tax bill. They could even burn their own factory to the ground to prove a point. However, it isn't exactly a great business decision.

      BTW, this is one of the reasons why companies didn't move all their stuff overseas a generation ago. It wasn't like the pay disparity was any less back then. If you want luxuries like reliable electricity, no hostage taking, no need to bribe the local politician, and no government shakedowns, well, sometimes you have to pay your workers a bit more to go along with that...

    6. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do they actually need that or any factories? Most bean counters won't even want to own their factory.

      It is not like contract manufacturers like Foxconn is not making phones and electronics or anything. MS already have someone else churning xbox and other electronics for them in China.

    7. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft didn't buy Nokia for their manufacturing.

    8. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just sell the factories and use the money saved on paying workers and that gained from the sale to pay the tax bill.

    9. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Art+Challenor · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wait, where are we talking about?

      If you want luxuries like reliable electricity

      It's better than many third world countries but "reliable" is not the word I would apply to the US power grid

      no hostage taking

      Unless someone, somewhere declares you a terrorist, then they have a spot for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp

      no need to bribe the local politician

      In the US they are called "Campaign Contributions" - functionally identical

      and no government shakedowns

      Unless you don't cooperate with the NSA - http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/09/30/a-ceo-who-resisted-nsa-spying-is-out-of-prison-and-he-feels-vindicated-by-snowden-leaks/

      well, sometimes you have to pay your workers a bit more to go along with that...

      Not really, the tax payers will pick up the slack - http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/04/news/companies/walmart-medicaid/

    10. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so you have $10k in a bank account in Peru. You want to transfer the money to your account in the US. The bank says that before you're allowed to move the money you have to pay a $500 tax to the government.

      The new tax is $3B. The old tax is $300M. The factory is not even worth $300M. Your analogy is silly.

    11. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Nuclear option is a bad one.

    12. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tax is on the value of the factory. The factory is obviously more valuable than the tax liability.

      No. The factory's value is its salvage value, ie. sale of equipment and real estate. That's probably not even worth $300M let alone $3B. The taxes were on the ***goods*** manufactured in the factory and then sold.

      Shutting down the factory would have to be a bluff, a very bad one at that.

      Not at all. India would not want the production moved to China. India's bluff is the weaker one.

    13. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      No, just sell the factories and use the money saved on paying workers and that gained from the sale to pay the tax bill.

      that wouldn't be enough.if they could have created 3.4 billion by selling the factory they would have sold it to the magical factory buying monkeys long time ago and bought another. it is not a chip fab.

      that's what makes it absurd and obvious fishing expedition by some indian mobsters aka politicians/judges. the value of the tax makes no sense in proportion to the value of the business. it's just another bunch of Indians fucking up their country to secure money for their family(doesn't even matter to them if they lose their jobs, that's not the point, the point is to secure some kind of payouts..).

      why does nokia have these assembly plants in these random 3rd world countries? absurdly enough usually for tax reasons(but this 3.4billion is really a kick in the face for local production since it's probably 5-10x more than what the import tax savings were, while they were still paying taxes on local workers etc...).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you have $10k in a bank account in Peru. You want to transfer the money to your account in the US. The bank says that before you're allowed to move the money you have to pay a $500 tax to the government.

      The new tax is $3B. The old tax is $300M. The factory is not even worth $300M. Your analogy is silly.

      I'm just explaining the post you replied to, which stated, "The tax is on the value of the factory. The factory is obviously more valuable than the tax liability." If that statement is not true, then my explanation of that statement would not be true. I cannot personally vouch for the value of Nokia's holdings in India.

      Sure, this is a shakedown, but it isn't like Nokia can just walk away. Most likely they need to bribe the right person, which is how business is often done outside the US/EU.

    15. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Look, I'm more annoyed with the civil liberty issues in the US than most, but you're stretching things. The US government probably has only detained a few people indefinitely on US soil in the last decade, and while their treatment is clearly unconstitutional they didn't exactly have clean hands. On the other hand, in quite a few countries out there you run a significant risk of being kidnapped and held for ransom simply for looking like an American. The risks are not comparable.

      Ditto for power reliability. Ok, so the US had a big blackout for a few hours 10 years ago, and California had a self-imposed series of blackouts about 15 years ago. I'd also agree that we're really pushing the limits on capacity such that we're at risk of some major problems. However, in many regions in Asia you can count on the power going out almost daily for hours.

      I won't claim that Walmart workers are well-treated. However, they certainly are much higher-cost than workers in Asia in absolute terms, which is all the company paying them cares about. There is a big difference between $7/hour and $5/day.

    16. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason they have the factory in the first place is due to the 100% import tax.

    17. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      I believe the factory is there due to India's huge import tax. There probably isn't a Foxconn type entity in India to contract the manufacturing to.

    18. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you qualify that with "on US soil"? Oh, that's right: we've run all of our torture, rape, and metal feeding tube puncture wound camps overseas. Where you can be held without trial for 12 years for looking or talking funny in a country we were obliterating.

    19. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Art+Challenor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it getting better or worse? If you go back a decade or so some of the problems listed didn't exist and things like required bribes (campaign contributions) from businesses were less of an issue. Changes like "Citizen's United", the Iraq war and increased domestic surveillance and big corporations dumping risk on the taxpayer ("too big to fail") which is coupled with the amount of corporate money in politics are all regressions. As is "trickle down economics" which, if you look at the 30 year experiment of lowering taxes for the rich and cutting social programs has not had the effect of raising the standard of living of all members of society - a "rising tide" did not lift all boat is a fact whatever your ideology. Then you have societal problems like school, theater, etc. shooting and gun violence that rivals many third world countries. At the minute there aren't many high-profile kidnappings, but I suspect that could change.

      So no, the problems are not as bad, but continuing on the path we're on will get us there.

    20. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt some factory in some crap hole in India is worth $3.6B, and I am entirely sure some place in China would build it for free for the business. Don't be ridiculous - $3.6B isn't even worth ever being in India ever again, for anything production related.

    21. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by celle · · Score: 1

      " The US government probably has only detained a few people indefinitely on US soil in the last decade, and while their treatment is clearly unconstitutional they didn't exactly have clean hands"

              '
      "Probably" means you don't know what you're talking about. The fact that the government has gotten away with it more that once proves there's a severe problem for something that by our own laws shouldn't happen at all. The numbers are irrelevant if it's you being abused. That's one of the problems in this country a culture of "if it's not me I don't care" and "better to ask forgiveness than ask permission".

    22. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, my whole point was that you were less likely to get kidnapped on US soil (or in the EU) than in some random third world country. So, I'd consider it relevant whether the US does the aforementioned abductions on US soil or not. You're more likely to end up in Gitmo if you're outside the US than in it.

      My post had nothing to do with whether this practice is right or wrong.

    23. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      "Probably" means you don't know what you're talking about.

      No, it simply means that I don't make wild assertions without fully checking the facts, like telling you that you don't know what you're talking about.

      I'm only aware of one or two cases in the last decade where somebody might have gotten indefinitely detained on US soil (the shoe bomber comes to mind). I'm not sure there are actually any cases of actual indefinite detentions. I think the US government has been charging anybody caught on US soil. However, I could be wrong.

      If I am wrong, well, you could be helpful and provide the stats.

      The fact is that you're FAR more likely to get kidnapped if you go visit someplace in South America than you are likely to end up in Gitmo if you go visit Chicago. In fact, I'd say you're probably more likely to end up in Gitmo if you go to South America than if you go to the US, because the US uses Gitmo to house people caught outside the US to avoid introducing them into the US justice system.

    24. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I never claimed that Nokia had assets worth $3.6B in India. My intent was simply to explain that if the parent post's assertion that the tax was based on the factory value was true, then Nokia really couldn't just walk away. I was faulting the deductive logic of the post I replied to, not affirming the premises the argument was based upon.

    25. Re:Announce shutdown of factory ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Sure, Nokia could abandon a factory to save on a much smaller tax bill. They could even burn their own factory to the ground to prove a point. However, it isn't exactly a great business decision.

      Or maybe it is, if you look at it from a long term perspective? Business generally does go along with corruption, so long as it's predictable and stable (i.e. you pay $X on a regular basis and that's that). If Indian government can get away with this kind of shakedown once, then 1) they may try it again later, and 2) some other government might decide that they want their cut, too.

  3. Cut out the factory in the deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Settle on the value of the factory in India and amend the deal. Let India try to collect from empty shell of the company which only owns that factory.

  4. Finally by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Alas! The first mathematically perfect use of "an order of magnitude". Well done sir, well done.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Begone, base-10 infidel!

    2. Re:Finally by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Funny

      poetic irony (n.) Using the phrase "Alas!" instead of "At last!" in a pedantic celebration of correctness.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    3. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case my dear sir, "Alas!" is entirely appropriate for Nokia.

    4. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blasphemer!, it's base-1010 infidel !

  5. It's not *absolutely* crazy. by Dputiger · · Score: 2

    According to records, Nokia did about $4B in business in India in 2010 and 2011, but saw 2012 revenue fall about 23%. Still, that's a fairly large chunk of change. If their business from 2006 - 2010 was strong as well, I guess it's possible that the company owes about $3.4B in tax over that time period.

    Thing is, they'd have had to be basically paying no tax at all to rack up that kind of bill. And since we can assume Nokia isn't stupid, it seems a lot more like a shakedown.

    1. Re:It's not *absolutely* crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your base assumptions are way off. Cell phone use in India has dramatically increased over that time period, so it would not make sense to imagine they did as well in previous years.

  6. Why wait until now? by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

    I know if someone owed me $3B, I'd be getting on top of that right away.

    How could any entity allow any valid debit to escalate to such a large amount before calling it in?

    Doesn't sound right to me...

    --
    Never happened. True story.
    1. Re:Why wait until now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thank you MISTER OBVIOUS.

      the following is a series of lowercase text that slashdot wants me to include to ruin the joke.

    2. Re:Why wait until now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if that person was unable to pay you and then ended up with the ability to pay...

    3. Re:Why wait until now? by saleenS281 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same way the debt can increase from $300 million to $3 billion overnight. They think they can get it, and they're corrupt as hell.

    4. Re:Why wait until now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the same way that a company can increase or decrease in value by hundreds of millions of dollars overnight?

      I think the point he's making is that it's not real money anyway.

    5. Re:Why wait until now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Nokia was unable to pay anything. It's TAXES for gods sake, you can't be unable to pay someting that is counted as a percentage of profit, unless that percentage is over 100%. Also, Nokia isn't and hasn't in any phase been exactly broke.

      Geez.

    6. Re:Why wait until now? by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      No, they think they can get less. But giving someone a sticker shock heart attack and then settling for a lower amount is simply negotiation technique.

    7. Re:Why wait until now? by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      The same way as nokia thinks that they can deduct any exports of software (dodge the taxes) and pay 0,001 % of that in ireland. And suddenly this does not work. Recently the dodging of taxes by moving the profits arround between serveral countries is more and more frowned upon by politician.

      The trouble is that no country can stop it first: they will loose and other tax evasion countries will smile. india is quite brave, even if the result may be that the nokia factory will be closed as result of this.

    8. Re:Why wait until now? by Xest · · Score: 1

      To be fair it can happen, whilst I believe it probably is just corruption in this case some nations have tax laws that allow companies to defer tax for various reasons. It varies from country to country but I know in some places companies manage to get away with deferring tax for multiple tax years. If they've been deferring tax for some reason for years such that it builds up and the excuse for deferring they used never actually comes to fruition then the authorities will come knocking for the full amount.

  7. Perhaps Tata wants to acquire Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like India wants to kill the sale of the handset division to Microsoft, driving Nokia stock even lower, then conveniently an India company will buy Nokia out. Sound Like India politics at its finest

    Knowing India as I do, I will not be surprised at all if Tata emerges as the "Knight in the shining armor" rescuing Nokia from the grab of the "dirty Microsoft".

    1. Re:Perhaps Tata wants to acquire Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I will not be surprised at all if Tata emerges as the "Knight in the shining armor" rescuing Nokia from the grab of the "dirty Microsoft".

      Nokia knows that as well, and are hoping it will happen.

      That's why they're hastily developing an Android phone range that'll at least allow them some cash flow while they extricate themselves from the market-share draining clutches of WinPhone.
      http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/10/5197746/nokia-android-phone-normandy

    2. Re:Perhaps Tata wants to acquire Nokia by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Given the roughly 35% yearly corporate tax rate in India, which also applies to Tata, and the 3 billion figure, you could estimate profits to 10 billions. If their margin averages 30%, their would have sold over 30 billion dollars worth of goods. If that's the case, I think the Indian government is right in their claim. Unless my math is way off.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    3. Re:Perhaps Tata wants to acquire Nokia by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Unless my math is way off.

      ...Or unless taxes have already been paid and this is just another bully tactic.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  8. OMG, HAHAHAHAHA! by Narcocide · · Score: 0

    Hold on, let me catch my breath...

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

  9. "Shakedown" looks very promising by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... it seems a lot more like a shakedown ...

    My company used to have 4 offices in India. Now we have only one.

    Why ?

    It's not that we don't like to do business with the Indians, it's the government that we can't deal with.

    They are worse than the Mafioso.

    They can turn the rules around overnight and demand the ransom, and they can do it in a totally legal manner.

    The longer the Indian government behaving like this the worse their reputation gonna be - and the less the multinationals will be willing to invest in India.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      If the rest of the American companies can deal with the Indian Government - and have done so for decades (Msft, IBM, Oracle, Cisco, Fidelity, GM, Ford... and remember, every one of those firm also have to abide by US laws.

      Then it is not the Government that you need to finger. It your company's incompetence - your planning was probably fcked up!

    2. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is like they are trying to drive business to China.

    3. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

      They're just bribing the right officials to make things work smoothly for them. Nokia is apparently too honest for their own good.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    4. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah there's totally no corruption in the indian government ::rollseyes::

    5. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      It is like they are trying to drive business to China.

      Or they're being highly protectionist. I'm not sure what the angle would be here. Somebody mentioned Tata buying Nokia factories. The Indian government, for all their supposed openness to global trade, can be very protectionist. They got their initial start in programming when they basically kicked out IBM. Remember, it's ok for India, (or much worse) China, to be highly protectionist, but if the US puts a nickel tariff on something, or questions whether pet food should be poisoned, we're either evil or idiots for interfering with the wonders of free trade.

    6. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      They can turn the rules around overnight and demand the ransom, and they can do it in a totally legal manner.

      Sure, but that isn't saying much. The de facto definition of legal is whatever the prevailing government says it is, anywhere.

    7. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by icebike · · Score: 2

      More likely they discovered early on that the best Indian Lawyers are a wise investment.
      Never try to do business in a country without hiring a well connected local lawyer.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You should teach them a lesson by moving the entire business unit to a a western country that exhibits none of those problems - like Venezuela!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ... it seems a lot more like a shakedown ...

      My company used to have 4 offices in India. Now we have only one.

      Why ?

      It's not that we don't like to do business with the Indians, it's the government that we can't deal with.

      They are worse than the Mafioso.

      They can turn the rules around overnight and demand the ransom, and they can do it in a totally legal manner.

      The longer the Indian government behaving like this the worse their reputation gonna be - and the less the multinationals will be willing to invest in India.

      All third world nations are like this, same in the Philippines, Thailand, China or Dominican Republic.

      It's not an Indian specific trait. However companies are still willing to do business with them because whilst they might ask for $3 million, they'll settle for $300,000.

      As someone who's also had to deal with local politicians in places like this, it is a complete pain in the arse.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time is money. It's often cheaper just to pay the bribes. I know my company does, and I'm sure others do as well.

    11. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Its like this in a LOT of developing countries. Corruption is just business as usual, government makes things up as they go along, noone knows wtf is happening from moment to moment. Thats why they are developing countries and in arrested development at that. You might call them 'retarded countries'

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    12. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they might be removed from office by a different branch of the government.

    13. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, the US has the biggest, bad-est spying setup in the world by far which enables it to stack the deck by ubiquitous industrial espionage to advantage US companies. So it somewhat cancels out.

    14. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      The problem is that those bribes are probably very illegal in the company's home country. Indian officials may not care, but if authorities in the US or Europe find out, it could result in jail time.

    15. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the rest of the American companies can deal with the Indian Government - and have done so for decades (Msft, IBM, Oracle, Cisco, Fidelity, GM, Ford... and remember, every one of those firm also have to abide by US laws.

      You hire a local law firm to represent you. You direct a lawyer (#1) to create and local shell corporation which will be owned by a different lawyer (#2) within the firm. You do "business" with this shell corporation. The shell corporation pays high "legal fees" to another lawyer (#3) in the firm. This lawyer (#3) makes sure the right government employees are "compensated". You can further muddy the waters by using multiple legal firms, mixing monies through operating companies, and using additional corporate shells.

      --I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.

    16. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mafia, mafioso is a singular mafia member. Mafiosi is of course multiple Mafia members

    17. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll get no tears from me. Some executive decided that paying bribes was cheaper than doing business in the US. They get what they deserve.

    18. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by shentino · · Score: 1

      it's easy to be legal if you're the one making the law.

    19. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Unless they might be removed from office by a different branch of the government.

      By "government" I meant the totality of government, not some random representative of it.

    20. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      invictos! ...
      para siempre!

    21. Re:"Shakedown" looks very promising by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I dunno, in my experience, a decent percentage of government officials in India are outright c**ts. And some of the laziest people on the face of the earth. The police are horrid, as well.

      And I moved to India from Finland. Serves me right, I suppose.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  10. Welll. MS let the EU fine grow for about a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before finally agreeing to pay.

  11. Standard Operating Procedure for India. by lemur666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked at a large multinational that was slated to be acquired by a larger multinational.

    Then, mid-way through the process came the "Oh no! India wants billions in 'back taxes' due to the sale!"

    The solution was that rather than merging the two companies (triggering the giant tax bill), the Indian Development Center was kept as the last remnant of the old multinational and was now considered a "wholly owned subsidiary" of the buying multinational. Apparently the lack of a formal merger of just the portion of the company based out of India negated the tax bill somehow.

    So

    a) This is nothing more than the standard shakedown the government of India does whenever there's a merger of giants like this.
    b) It can also be avoided by some rather facile legal trickery.

    It strikes me as foolish both to make such huge claims of taxes owed when a merger like this occurs and to make those taxes so easy to avoid.

    --
    Corollary to Hanlon's razor: Any significantly advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.
    1. Re:Standard Operating Procedure for India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, a number of people were almost certainly bribed to get that tax break. The FCPA could cause problems if MSFT did it.

    2. Re:Standard Operating Procedure for India. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      the Indian Development Center was kept as the last remnant of the old multinational

      Yeah, if Microsoft thinks that Nokia is worth $6.5B and India thinks Microsoft would owe it $3.5B in taxes, then Microsoft would have to conclude (assuming it can't be resolved for $2M in bribes) that abandoning the India unit (sell off the assets, let the debt go into bankruptcy) is the only financially feasible move. They can always move back in as a new business unit out of the Microsoft office next week.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Standard Operating Procedure for India. by tlambert · · Score: 2

      The solution was that rather than merging the two companies (triggering the giant tax bill), the Indian Development Center was kept as the last remnant of the old multinational and was now considered a "wholly owned subsidiary" of the buying multinational. Apparently the lack of a formal merger of just the portion of the company based out of India negated the tax bill somehow.

      Yeah, this is exactly the solution I would have suggested.

      My second choice would be to send all 8,000 workers at the Chennai plant a letter explaining which court was at fault for them losing their paychecks this month by forcing them to be furloughed, and which might be responsible for them losing their jobs permanently.

      My third choice would be to just close the plant and let them seize the thing, assuming it's tooling is at least 3 years out of date, it's easier to open a new one the same size in another country; I hear Brazil is pretty favorable to people bringing in jobs these days, they just try to screw you on currency conversion if you happen to use a bank.

    4. Re:Standard Operating Procedure for India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My second choice would be to send all 8,000 workers at the Chennai plant a letter explaining which court was at fault for them losing their paychecks this month by forcing them to be furloughed, and which might be responsible for them losing their jobs permanently.

      As if a single Indian civil servant would care.

    5. Re:Standard Operating Procedure for India. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      My second choice would be to send all 8,000 workers at the Chennai plant a letter explaining which court was at fault for them losing their paychecks this month by forcing them to be furloughed, and which might be responsible for them losing their jobs permanently.

      As if a single Indian civil servant would care.

      India is well known for rioters storming courthouses and then lynching people:

      http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-10-18/kolkata/30296226_1_iron-ore-rampaging-mob-gas-shells
      http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=11..230813.aug13
      http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2002-04-16/news/0204160102_1_india-mob-gujarat

      So yeah, I think at least the first civil servant dead would probably care.

  12. Pulling the sheets off bedfellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the India does not want a branch of the NSA called "Microsoft" obtaining marketshare to spy on its citizens/government with hardware backdoors.

    1. Re:Pulling the sheets off bedfellows by Desler · · Score: 1

      They just want to do it all themselves?

    2. Re:Pulling the sheets off bedfellows by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Want to? They do it openly. It's in the license agreement for telecoms. The room & equipment have to be provided at the telco's expense. As well as the A/C, phone lines and other things.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  13. Nokia's getting what it deserved. by bstarrfield · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You want cheap labor?

    You want little environmental regulation?

    You want to hide from taxes in your home country?

    Then build in the developing world. But don't cry when the developing world's lack of rules and regulations bite you in the ass with sudden "fees", "taxes", and other sundry costs. You chose to leave your home country to enhance shareholder profits. Surprise, the rest of the world doesn't have to operate according to your shareholder's profit motive.

    --
    /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
    1. Re:Nokia's getting what it deserved. by sjames · · Score: 1

      This. Internationals don't seem to mind operating under foreign laws when they get to avoid minimum wage, benefits, etc. Perhaps they should have considered the downside.

    2. Re:Nokia's getting what it deserved. by q.kontinuum · · Score: 2

      You want cheap labor?

      How about "you want to produce where you sell"? Or "you want developing countries to ... well ... *develop*"? I see it might be my disadvantage as an employee when companies move their production to other countries, but as a customer I'm happy when they find locations to lower production costs, making the goods more affordable for me. And thinking about fairness, I think if one of the biggest markets is in India , it is also fair to produce there. Being born in a western culture doesn't make us better people; 3rd world workers have a right to compete with us.

      You want little environmental regulation?

      You are aware that Nokia won a couple of awards over the past years for their efforts to produce eco-friendly?

      You want to hide from taxes in your home country?

      Now this is ridiculous. The issue at hand is that Nokia did pay the SW tax in their home country, and Indian tax authorities suddenly got it into their head that Nokia should pay taxes for the same transaction in India as well. So exactly the opposite of what you wrote.

      Then build in the developing world. But don't cry when the developing world's lack of rules and regulations bite you in the ass with sudden "fees", "taxes", and other sundry costs. You chose to leave your home country to enhance shareholder profits. Surprise, the rest of the world doesn't have to operate according to your shareholder's profit motive.

      Where exactly to you see Nokia crying? in your dreams? They defend themselves in court, which seems sensible. They hope for the help of their Government, which would seem sensible if you hadn't ignored the fact that they paid the tax in Finland.

      I like to bash big companies and blame them for all our misfortune just as the next guy, but your collection of platitudes just doesn't fit here. Nokia probably also made lots of mistakes.

      I'm definitely not an advocate of the free market to solve everything - free market mainly means absence or minimization of regulation, which in the end means to let the strongest rule over the weak. I'd prefer a Government which also protects the weaker and creates an environment to encourage the development of polypolies instead of rewarding monopolies.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    3. Re:Nokia's getting what it deserved. by Akzo · · Score: 1

      India has some of the highest import taxes in the world, if you want to sell things there you have to make them there.

      --
      Sig is for Signature, so you don't have to manually sign every post.
  14. At least it's only taxes by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Imagine the world's surprise if India began charging the same hourly rates for it's workers as Western countries charge for theirs. So not only does it appear that Nokia used Indians for cheap labor, they're also trying to scam the government. The government of India is probably the most corrupt in the world (seriously, bribery is a part of the system there, but rather than call it "lobbying" they actually call it "bribery" and care not what anyone thinks about it), and are no one to fuck with.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:At least it's only taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we're close to the top in terms of bribery, I think bangladesh would like a word with you.

    2. Re:At least it's only taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're also trying to scam the government.

      No.
      Normally I might agree with you but India's tax extortion schemes are well known and nothing new. Any time there's some kind of high-profile corporate ownership move some local tax authority shows up with a stack of allegedly unpaid back taxes. They make a bunch of noise, throw out some huge numbers of supposedly unpaid back taxes, hold up the court process, and jack up the business deal as best they can. Eventually the businesses trying to sell/buy/merge will settle for a small percentage of the claimed "tax bill", and a significant portion of the settlement will never make it into the public coffers.

    3. Re:At least it's only taxes by shentino · · Score: 1

      you mean like castro does with cuba?

  15. what's the basis for the dispute? by belmolis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    None of the articles explains the basis for the Indian government's claims. Does anyone know the basis for this dispute?

    1. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've been following this pretty closely, since I have a large position in NOK stock which I initiated about the time this news started percolating. You can get most of the story via following the links in the comment sections at seeking alpha (search for "nok", then look in news and alerts). This is not new, and has been going on for over a year, and is complete BS. NOK was in compliance with the laws when the work was done, then India changed the tax laws (and made the changes retroactive), and now expect NOK to pay. NOK is a trial balloon, and if they get away with it, there will be many other western corporations hit by this same 3rd-world silliness. A large oil company was also shaken down in a similar manner (forgot which); they settled for much less than $3.4B.

      Even if India somehow wins here, I don't believe this won't affect NOK or MSFT at all. If this goes through, and NOK have to pay these taxes in India, which is highly unlikely, then they'll file an amendment on taxes they have paid to Finland for the amount they have to pay to India. The end result if India wins will be a massive loss in western investment for India, significant misery for the Indian people affected by the Western pullout, and a miniscule amount of additional tax revenue.

    2. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      "Hey, you've got a lot of money. GIve us some of it."

    3. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Massive loss of investment ? my foot !

      Has the West ever bothered to give back anything that it has looted out from the East ? All it has ever been upto is stealing and corrupting everything - labour, natural resources, people's mindset and even its grand legacy !

      India has always been rich in its resources - be it human, natural or spiritual.... Creating a desire against all the goodness we've always possessed is all that has been managed by the plundering West ! Now that the West is in the brink of a total collapse, we'll happily return back to our Roots...

      We're praying that the Govt. play the spade and take NOK/M$FT for a ride !!

    4. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finland invaded India?

    5. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess the people suffering from bopal gas tragedy are very much happy from western investments.

    6. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the fuck did this get modded down?

    7. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess India can turn to itself and it's internal markets. It's not like "the West" really needs it for anything. It would actually be better for "the West" to pull out from every cheap labour country and return the jobs back home. Would give the economy a huge boost. Money would stop leaking over seas, and bigger part of it would return to local economies. Yes, the rich owners would not be able to get as rich as fast, but who cares? They are not exactly starving. If this happens we will surely limit the availability of cheap chines crap, because, hey, why would the local rich ones allow the people to give their money overseas? You buy Aplle, or motorola, manufactured in USA. Maybe they would be a bit more pricey, but most likely of better quality, and the people would have more money to spend, having jobs at Apple factories and all.

    8. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by SEE · · Score: 1

      The basis is that Nokia is a bunch of idiots that actually tried to do manufacturing in India, showing all the judgment they did when they went with Windows Phone as a platform.

      See, India's intelligentsia, by and large, doesn't like manufacturing. It might be necessary to some degree, but, offered a chance to replicate Taiwan or China's success by starting with cheap manufacturing, they'd decline. They want to jump straight ahead to a service/software economy via education rather than pass through an intermediate step of actually making physical things. So the basic self-interested counterbalances that you'd see elsewhere ("But we need to learn from Nokia so we can do this!" or "We need to treat Nokia well so others will build plants here too!") are weakened.

      So, there's going to be a new owner for the factory, and thus there's an opportunity to extract protection money. After all, it's not like India wants manufacturing anyway.

    9. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by goddidit · · Score: 2

      What have the Romans ever done for us?

      --
      This .sig is exactly 120 characters long.
    10. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by q.kontinuum · · Score: 2

      For reference to the cultural illiterate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExWfh6sGyso :-) (You might have to watch the whole movie to get it into perspective)

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    11. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by riis138 · · Score: 1

      The roads

      --
      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
    12. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by justaguy516 · · Score: 0

      "The alleged tax evasion pertains to royalty payment made against supply of software by its parent company, which attracts a 10 per cent tax deduction under the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) category."

      Basically, Nokia India pays Nokia International royalty for each copy of software that it loads onto the phone - as per Indian IT law, they should deduct 10% tax at source. Nokia claims that this is not applicable to them because they are in a Special Economic Zone and the IT department disagrees.
      This is an old dispute and the inflation is due to penalties (Nokia has been operating in India for a long time). It has nothing to do with the Microsoft deal - the whole issue has come to the forefront because Microsoft may refuse to go through the deal if this issue is not settled first.

    13. Re:what's the basis for the dispute? by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      India and Finland have a tax treaty. If the taxes have been paid (whether in Finland or India) on a particular transaction or set of transactions, or profit in one or the other or both countries or several other conditions, and has otherwise been keeping up with it's fiscal responsibilities in that country, Nokia doesn't owe jack to India.
      http://law.incometaxindia.gov.in/DIT/File_opener.aspx?fn=http://law.incometaxindia.gov.in/Directtaxlaws/cbdt/dta/A1_Finland.htm

      (May be oversimplifying the situation, but that's the gist).

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  16. Goodbye India, Hello China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should call their bluff. Both Microsoft and Nokia completely shut down operations, sales, call centers, factories and licensing in India and move it all to China. 3 Indians for one American, but 2 Chinese for the cost of one Indian after all.

    1. Re:Goodbye India, Hello China! by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      call centers

      I doubt that one. It's much easier to find people who speak English well enough, and can even be trained to use American accents, in India than in China. As I understand it, the reason Chinese speakers find it so hard to learn English, and vice versa, is because the languages are so different. Are some of the Indian languages closer to English? Also many Indians, especially those with more educated parents, learn English from a very early age. There are even public (government) schools that are taught in English.

      The language barriers are much less dealing with India than China. That helps with programming, engineering, R&D, etc. Manufacturing is a different story, but the ability of many Indians to speak English is a big advantage they have over China when it comes to these things.

    2. Re:Goodbye India, Hello China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call centres are already starting to pull out of india.

      The Philippines is so much cheaper... and well the attendance of the indian reps are starting to go bad. Guess they've realized how trivial it is to jump around from centre to centre

    3. Re:Goodbye India, Hello China! by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The Philippines is so much cheaper

      That makes a lot more sense than China. AFAIK English is pretty widely spoken in the Philippines.

    4. Re:Goodbye India, Hello China! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, the reason Chinese speakers find it so hard to learn English, and vice versa, is because the languages are so different.

      IIRC, there was some research that showed (suggested?) that if you don't hear some phonemes when you are very young (1-2 years), you can never be good at distinguishing them later. That's the root of the l/r problem.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Goodbye India, Hello China! by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      The report I read was that the neural net which distinguishes phonemes is trained up to the age of around 10-14.

      Out of the 110 (approx) (IIRC) human phonemes, most languages use no more than 85 (approx) (IIRC), sometimes far fewer.

      The classic Japanese/English "L"/"R" problem is an symptom of this, where for a Japanese person who hasn't been exposed to the "L" sound regularly at a young age, it is mapped to an "R" sound.

      Note also, that the single "R" sounds that the Japanese-language person is making instead of "L" and "R" may not be the "R" sounds that the English-language person is hearing. Different "L" and "R" sounds may spoken by Japanese-language person, but the English-language person may only hear them as a single "R" sound. Since there's no common frame of reference, the phoneme corruption could be happening in either or both directions for any phoneme mapping.

      I recall reading somewhere else that the French language has three different sounds which map to the English "R" sound. That's my excuse for scraping high-school French, anyway.

      There are people who are exceptions to the rule, of course, and there's also the possibility of learning to speak a language correctly by an external feedback loop. All you need is to make different sounds until a person who can hear the difference confirms when the sound is correct, and use that mouth/larynx shape when appropriate. Easy!

    6. Re:Goodbye India, Hello China! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      There were two 'K' sounds in an Indian language used in a study they showed us in Highschool Biology. When taken from the middle of the word they were indistinguishable to my (and implied by the video most American's) ears. They'd play the sound, and one would be followed by a loud and fanciful scene to the right of the child a few seconds later, the other would not.

      It was far earlier than 10-14 that the children were no longer able to learn to anticipate the scene to the right, and I want to say it was before they were even particularly effective at communicating (thus seeing if they looked to their right rather than asking what they heard). I want to say it was 4, maybe 5.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  17. Nokia has little value for MSFT by schlachter · · Score: 1

    they should just call off the deal. The price has effectively gone up 50%.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  18. It's a game by renzhi · · Score: 1

    It's a game played by the Indian government. Nokia's handset division is to be sold to Microsoft, which has a ton of cash on hand. It's a game worth playing, as Nokia has no way of packing their bag and getting out tomorrow, so does Microsoft. Microsoft wants that handset division as part of its strategy, and the liability can be worked out by Nokia/Microsoft to transfer to Microsoft, which will then work out a deal with the government, which will promise to sweeten via some kind of tax break on the condition that Microsoft invest more in the country. At the end, they will make a join release, saying that each one has made a score, it is good for the consumer, for the shareholders, for the country, for Jesus, for Buhda, for Ganesha, for Annapurna, for Hanuman, and whatever deity you've got. Everyone would be happy, and it would be the end of the story.

    It's the same kind of game governments play all over the world.

    1. Re:It's a game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they then break out in spontaneous Bollywood song-and-dance?

  19. Takeover in Jeopardy by musth · · Score: 2

    I'm glad somebody finally knocked that snooty Ken Jennings off his perch.

  20. That leaves one question .. by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

    .. Rupee's or Dollars?

    1. Re:That leaves one question .. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      .. Rupee's or Dollars?

      Euro.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  21. You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by bayankaran · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are certain sectors in India which work well. The tax department being one of them. And surprisingly there are honest politicians, policemen, judges and so on. Broadly categorizing India and Indians as corrupt is a weak generalization.
    What if I say every adult Finn is a closet xenophobe? Will you agree to this generalization?
    Nokia may or may not be liable to this tax. The rule of the land you have to follow. There is a judicial process if you want to take that path to contest. Indians and Indian government need not be blamed if the sale of Nokia is held up due to this issue. It does not matter to us. Blame the consulting idiots who are advising Microsoft and Nokia in this sale for overlooking these issues.
    And any comment regarding "India will lose, we will take our business elsewhere" is an empty threat. India is one billion strong - we have one of the biggest middle classes and the largest group of young population in this planet. Take your business elsewhere and you will lose. Ask yourself - where will you take your business - China? Russia? Yes, they are great places as far as I know.
    Now, get off my lawn.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that western countries shouldn't take their business to other corrupt countries of the world either.

      Seriously.. pitting India against Finland... that's like night and day.

    2. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      What if I say every adult Finn is a closet xenophobe? Will you agree to this generalization? .

      That's pretty spot-on, yes. But most do try to lie about it.

      Taxes are a bit of a taboo subject in Finland, and tax evaders are morally ranked somewhere between murderers and rapists. I'm looking forward to the public lynching of these people.

      (discloser, I'm an adult Finn, and try to lie about my xenophobia to be polite)

    3. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right. I might sound as a racist fuck, but I have to work with Indians almost every day. Maybe it's just the company not paying enough to get quality indians, but _everything_ they do is somehow wrong. I think I haven't got a single issue handled correctly. In many cases it takes more time to work with Indians than to just do it myself, but because of super stupid corporate politics I can't cut them out. I'd take any business out from there in a heartbeat judging by my own experiences. They have 1 billion people, thay can handle it without foreign businesses.

      About this Nokia thing. Kinda funny how they first owe 300 million, then the week after the sum is 3 billion. Taxes just go up tenfold overnight? As far as I know Nokia claims they paid the taxes to Finland about the things Indina tax authorities are having an issue with ( some software installations or something ). I don't think India actually can stop the Nokia Microsoft deal from happening, they will simply remove said factory from the deal and continue. Maybe Nokia will simply leave India after that, I don't know if they manufactured anything but phones there.

    4. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honest politician is like an honest thief.

    5. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by pla · · Score: 1

      Nokia may or may not be liable to this tax. The rule of the land you have to follow.

      You've just hit on the real problem here, but not how you meant it.

      Yes, each culture has its own "rule of the land" that foreign investors need to follow. In the case of India, that means "Grease every palm you see or everyone from the PM down to the beat-cop will make your life hell". And that holds true in a great many places, not just India (though India seems to have institutionalized that practice to a degree that completely dwarfs any other nominally-1st-world nation).

      Unfortunately, since Nokia also does business in the US, and the US has this curious delusion that we can impose our laws on the rest of the world, obeying this Indian "unwritten law" would put Nokia in violation of the FCPA. That then puts everyone in an awkward situation.

      I fully expect we'll start seeing more and more companies simply skip the US market entirely to avoid dealing with our bullshit. We resemble the guy at the party giving away free cocaine at this point - Grudgingly popular, but no one hangs out with him the next day.

    6. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      I didn't actually say that every Indian is corrupt, but most are complicit. They might not like the bribes, but they pay them (because they also need to get things done) or they say nothing when others take them (because they don't want to lose their jobs). And there's the problem - the only thing that can change the system is a massive change in attitudes. And it can't be just a few people - it pretty much has to be everybody at once.

      I'm guilty too - I've paid my share of bribes. I don't feel good about it, but I can't afford to be the hero - I need to get stuff done.

      I do know lot of honest, hard-working people in India - I wouldn't bother to try to do business there otherwise. But my dealings with government always leave a bad taste in my mouth.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    7. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but in case you're following this thread... there was an interesting study on racism in Europe some years ago. They found that racism is about the same everywhere, but the effects of racism are quite different.

      In a country like Finland, everything is "by the book". There are rules, and they are followed strictly. That means that if I, as a foreigner, am applying for a loan, the loan officer might be a horrible racist, but if I qualify I'll get the loan anyway. In a country like Italy the loan officer has more discretion and is more likely to find some reason to deny the loan if they happen to dislike me personally.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    8. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I work with quite a few Indians and they have a story of corruption in India for every day of the year. And yes, if the Indian government is making shit up about the amount of taxes owed, then they should be blamed for holding up the sale of Nokia. Honestly, you come off as no better than an ignorant flag waving American.

    9. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Broadly categorizing India and Indians as corrupt is a weak generalization.

      Every single Indian that I have worked with has categorized the Indian government and society as corrupt. I think it's rather telling.

    10. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians are filthy dishonest people. Get over it.

    11. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That made me chuckle too actually, I thought it was well known that Finland had quite an insular society in that respect.

      Not faulting them per-se as I was under the impression it's simply a cultural difference stemming in large part from hundreds of years of fighting against being used as a pawn between East and West whilst wanting to just be left alone to do whatever Finns do only to come to the conclusion everyone else is fucked, needs to grow up as a result.

      Am I right?

    12. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by Xest · · Score: 1

      To be fair couldn't you say that of people of most nationalities?

      I think most people believe their government is corrupt :)

      Though I think in this case they're right, India's corruption problems are well documented, though the GP is an Indian nationalist so don't expect him to hear it - he believes India is the most perfect nation on Earth and superior to all others.

    13. Re:You are not a racist, you are ignorant... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Well, yes. As a Russian, I can also assure you that our government is extremely corrupt, and that it is strongly rooted in society :)

      The differences usually start to come up when you ask the person about details. What Americans describe as "corrupt", vs what me or my Indian friends can tell them about our countries, is worlds apart.

  22. Divest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine - dump the factory in India. India can get fucked and the deal can proceed.

  23. Obvious solution: Audit Software licenses. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just take a survey of all Indian government software licenses. Given the expense and the insanity involved in tracking MS licenses, I'm sure that they could be found to owe at least 3.4 Billion in Licensing and penalty costs.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Obvious solution: Audit Software licenses. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      But they can quote some law that may let them slide it. Or at least say fine it must work Through OUR Court system.

    2. Re:Obvious solution: Audit Software licenses. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

      Its Microsoft, the company that bled its competitors to death while beating them mercilessly with their own severed appendages during the 90's. I'm sure they just need to unleash their inner bastards and they'll be fine.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    3. Re:Obvious solution: Audit Software licenses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indian gov would then turn to Linux. That would be a huge huge loss to MS.

  24. Shades of the Vodafone case by palemantle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This government tried something similar against Vodafone in 2012 but got smacked down, first by the Supreme Court, and then by the Shome committe. The Vodafone case was quite similar because that too involved an M&A scenario and the government was claiming retroactive effect for some new tax laws.

    Vodafone case details:
    http://www.thehindu.com/business/companies/vodafone-wins-rs-11000-cr-tax-case-in-supreme-court/article2817238.ece

    I suspect something similar will happen here and Nokia will settle for a significantly lower amount.

    More details on the Nokia case:
    http://www.thehindu.com/business/nokia-owes-rs21153-cr-it-dept-tells-delhi-hc/article5440948.ece

    1. Re:Shades of the Vodafone case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      by your links it is not the same at all. The Vodafone case had the government contending that even though the sale occurred between 2 foreign entities. the asset was Indian therefore liable to tax in India. The Government lost the case but changed the law retroactively to apply for all transactions including the vodafone one. While this is bad for business it is legally sound. Every government makes laws that apply retroactively including the U.S. government.

      In the Nokia case, the company routed all the profits out of India as "royalty payments" and did not pay tax on them over a period of seven years. In addition they are claiming Tax free status (due to their being part of Special Economic Zone) that claim is also not valid.

      Not all $3.4B is tax, significant portion of it is penalties for offending over 7 years. Basically they tried legal trickery to maintain their cash flows when things are going bad business wise and now trying to dump it on MSFT.

      Indian Government is actually doing good here, if they allow the sale to go forward then MSFT becomes liable, Like it happened in the vodafone case, instead they are ensuring NOK clears the dues, so MSFT is not in for any nasty surprises.

    2. Re:Shades of the Vodafone case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every government makes laws that apply retroactively including the U.S. government.

      Not really; that's unconstitutional, no ex-post-facto laws and all that. The only one that I can think of is the Megan's Law, and that only allowed because not even SCOTUS wants to deal with being seen as liking sex offenders. You can saw what you like about unconstitutional laws being made, but those are always blatant violations where no one likes the people it hurts, not anything with taxes.

  25. ok,so dont include the tax bill in the MS deal by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Just state in the merger contract that any tax liabilities owed by Nokia are the responsibility of Nokia and do not follow the Indian factory to Microsoft.
    Its Nokia that owe any taxes and the sale of the Indian factory to Microsoft shouldn't mean that somehow the taxes owed go with it.

    1. Re:ok,so dont include the tax bill in the MS deal by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I don't think that you quite understand the distinction of buying assets of a company vs. buying a company.

      the real legal problem is that the taxes were created retroactively... but hey, if they want to create chilling effects for companies then go ahead..

      Though I guess it makes certain twisted logic that they could change the merger contract after it has gone into effect if the Indian government is trying to prop up retroactive taxes to the tune of all profits from last couple of years.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  26. small fish get caught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tax dept took penalties with interest of few 1000 Rupees for 2009 from me recently due to arachaic formulas. Big fish will compromise with corrupt authorities & govt will loose a billion rupees. Laws are same for rich/poor ONLY ON PAPER.

  27. More likely they've been dodging taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More likely they've been dodging taxes and playing the shell game with money: No we didn't make any money, those are licensing fees payed to owners of the Nokia name who just happen to live elsewhere.

    The fucking cheats are getting caught and asses nailed to the wall.

    Maybe they can jail the HMFIC for tax evasion as well.

  28. Brought to you from the creators of karma. by Culture20 · · Score: 0

    I know it's not the real definition of karma, but it's a better subject line than "neener, neener, that's what happens when you sell out to Microsoft!"

  29. Don't confuse the govt with the bureacrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've actually dealt with both the indian govt and the income tax dept. This is nothing to do with the government. In the tax department, every division has yearly quotas to meet. The quotas increase every year, so the higher level officials are always on the look out to find an easy way out. Sounds familiar?

    Nokia might have also taken advantage of a tax free zone to set up their factory and imported machines and inventory, duty free. That comes with riders to create jobs, and generate revenue of so much per year for a number of years. Any attempt to prematurely close, or move the factory, is taxable, along with punitive charges.

    Someone made a comparison with the Vodafone case. This doesn't look like that at all.

  30. Realpolitik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Nokia Takeover In Jeopardy Due To Alleged $3.4B Tax Bill In India

    In another news, the USA and Israel suddenly decided not to sell advanced weapons systems to India and halt the currently ongoing deliveries, including that of the the C-17 "Big Mac" strategic military transport plane, which is essential to replenish remote indian army outposts in the Himalayas region.

    In yet another news, the USA suddenly lifted long-standing weapons exports sanctions on Pakistan, India's belligerent neighbour, even though the two countries have conflicting claims on Kashmir and have been to war twice over the issue. The USA is now offering to export lastest batch F-16 Block 60 fighter-bomber jets and JASSM air-launched stealth cruise missiles to Pakistan, to allow replacement of its antiquated, chinese-made MiG-21 copycats.

    In yet another news, the US Congress revokes free trade rights from India, owing to Delhi's military-industrial collaboration with the undemocratic russian regime of President Putin, including the development of nuclear powered submarines and stealth warplanes, which threaten to upset the stability of the region.

    1. Re:Realpolitik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't selling arms out of the goodness of their hearts, you moron.

      They were making out, ironically enough, like bandits in the deal.

      You think that they'll piss about and lose billions in current AND FUTURE deals over this?

      Get real.

    2. Re:Realpolitik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mostly because the Muslim POTUS sides with Pakistan in the disputes with India, and favors Pakistan in the upcoming planned war between them.

  31. Could still be cheaper than it ought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Elope hadn't fucked off with all the working products and tanked Nokia, would it be worth twice what's offered? Yes? Well, given that MS don't want those products, then even hiking the cost of takeover 50% still leaves a large deduction due to Elope's knifing of the company to Microsoft's benefit.

  32. Damn you Burgundy! by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    "Don't make jokes off my jokes."

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Damn you Burgundy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell your mother I said "Hi!"

  33. Cool, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India is helping to slow down this terrrible offshoring of my job from the US to India.

    Thanks guys, I really appreciate it.

    So if our source trees are in India and they seize the facility, do they get the tree to publish?

  34. just strip and abandon the factory by swschrad · · Score: 1

    gut the sucker and burn it down, let India collect on the 6-buck value of the land. still the extortionists.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  35. Finland by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    It's Finland... I guess they are west, sort of. West of Russia. Then again everything is except Canada and the US, does that make more sense?

  36. Bribe them and evade taxes by NewYork · · Score: 1
  37. Lot of Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see lot of racist comments here on India. Being an Indian I know we have corruption but companies like Nokia use the very system to get lewageDo u think they are stupid not to setup a plant in "Least-Corrupt" Finland and pick India? Once in a while they get caught on the wrong side then yell on unfairness.Also we have no idea who is on the right side.
    FYI the plant in question is from my city and I know the state govt in power was elected recently as a replacement to the hugely corrupt previous govt and they have been fairly clean for more than a year now.
    So let us not come to conclusions or brand a whole population.