Slashdot Mirror


Canada Post Announces the End of Urban Home Delivery

Lev13than writes "Canada Post is phasing out urban home delivery, raising the price of a letter to $1 and cutting 8,000 jobs to cope with dwindling volume and a projected loss of $1B/year by 2020. About 1/3 of Canadian homes currently get mail delivered to their door. Deliveries will remain weekdays-only and business will be unaffected (at least for now). Much like the USPS, Canada Post is mandated to be self-funded, but 5% annual volume declines and rising costs are taking their toll."

226 comments

  1. Slightly misleading. by PhotoJim · · Score: 5, Informative

    Buying stamps half a dozen at a time reduce first class rates to $0.85; businesses using postage meters will get $0.75. Not cheap, and still a big increase, but the $1 rate will be paid by a very small number of people too cheap to buy stamps six at a time.

    As for home delivery, it'll be sad to lose it but the alternative, the community mailbox a few doors down from most houses, will have one advantage: parcels will be loaded into it for you to pick up. Currently if you're not home you have to drive to the nearest sub-post office to get your parcels. This will be way more convenient.

    1. Re:Slightly misleading. by TWX · · Score: 2

      As for home delivery, it'll be sad to lose it but the alternative, the community mailbox a few doors down from most houses, will have one advantage: parcels will be loaded into it for you to pick up. Currently if you're not home you have to drive to the nearest sub-post office to get your parcels. This will be way more convenient.

      I see a whole lot of mail returned to sender for being abandoned, or being discarded for being abandoned, in those communal mailboxes. I also see a lot of people only visiting their mailboxes weekly, like how they take out their trash cans for the truck to pick up, so mailboxes will be even bigger targets for thieves as there'll be more payoff for the effort than before.

      What I don't get is why they just don't just raise the price of first-class mail. In the US, as a lower-volume mailer I'd be okay with spending a dollar to mail something, I end up mailing something about four times a year. It'd still be cheaper than using UPS or FedEx or the like...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Slightly misleading. by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Well, the title, Canada Post moves to end-of-street mailboxes to increase efficiency doesn't exactly meet with the media's goal of fear and panic.

      Tune in at 10pm to see what household object you own could be killing your children.

    3. Re:Slightly misleading. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      On the other hand... they're still raising their prices and offering less service for it.

      It's already cheaper to send most packages either UPS or Purolator ground ship. Canada Post wins out on actual letters or post cards, but for how much longer? Hardly surprising though... I can't remember the last time I got anything in the mail except for the insurance renewal and my investment statements... everything else is electronic or delivered by courier these days.

    4. Re:Slightly misleading. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Interesting. In the US the post office is more economical than UPS. In fact a lot of the time UPS drops off packages at the post office for last mile handling. I'm starting to get Sunday delivery of packages from Amazon now, routed through the post office.

    5. Re:Slightly misleading. by CreatureComfort · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd rather they raise the rates on all the business class garbage I receive. 9/10 of everything I get local delivered is a sales pitch to "Current Resident".

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    6. Re:Slightly misleading. by davecb · · Score: 3, Informative

      They don't at our cottage, where this is already in place. Instead, the boxes are about half as big as necessary, and the driver sticks a card in the box. You get to drive in to town to pick them up at the post office.

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    7. Re:Slightly misleading. by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      The USPS has some mandates from Congress about how they can raise rates and what they can charge.

    8. Re:Slightly misleading. by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I don't get is why they just don't just raise the price of first-class mail. In the US, as a lower-volume mailer I'd be okay with spending a dollar to mail something, I end up mailing something about four times a year. It'd still be cheaper than using UPS or FedEx or the like...

      Because unlike in Canada where Canada Post control their own rates, postal rates in the USA are controlled by Congress, several members of which have interest in sabotaging the USPS.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    9. Re:Slightly misleading. by compro01 · · Score: 2

      I'm sure Canada Post is just fine with you using Purolator rather than parcel post, given that they own Purolator.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    10. Re:Slightly misleading. by mpetch · · Score: 1

      An interesting foot note is that Purolator is 90%+ owned by Canada Post.

    11. Re:Slightly misleading. by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      It's already cheaper to send most packages either UPS or Purolator ground ship.

      Hidden irony: Canada Post owns Purolator.

    12. Re:Slightly misleading. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      As for home delivery, it'll be sad to lose it but the alternative, the community mailbox a few doors down from most houses, will have one advantage: parcels will be loaded into it for you to pick up. Currently if you're not home you have to drive to the nearest sub-post office to get your parcels. This will be way more convenient.

      I see a whole lot of mail returned to sender for being abandoned, or being discarded for being abandoned, in those communal mailboxes. I also see a lot of people only visiting their mailboxes weekly, like how they take out their trash cans for the truck to pick up, so mailboxes will be even bigger targets for thieves as there'll be more payoff for the effort than before.

      I think the reason people only visit their mailbox weekly (or less) is because they get so little valuable mail so there's not much for theives to steal. The only bill I get in the mail these days is my property tax bill from the county (I wish they'd move to electronic delivery, it would save them money (which ultimately saves *me* money), but it can be looked up online by anyone that knows my address, so I'm not sure why someone would want to steal it. The rest of my bills get paid electornically or mailed to my electronic bill pay service (Paytrust).

    13. Re:Slightly misleading. by nblender · · Score: 5, Interesting

      wrong. I've had one of these community mailboxes for years. I don't mind going across the street to get my mail. What I mind is my parcels don't get deposited in the box because there are only 2 parcel boxes per community mailbox. The 'sub post office' you mention is a drug store 8km from my house. The post office depot is in the back corner of the drug store, kitty corner to the doors. The aisles are all set up so you have to zig-zag through the store past all sorts of impulse-buy type merchandise and finally past the perfume counter staffed by sales people who are eager to spray a fragrance into the air as you walk through it. Then you have to stand in line with a dozen or so other disgruntled citizens who are there to pickup their parcel as well. The parcels are stored in the back room and the haggard worker (singular, one only) has to do a linear search for each parcel. Picking up my parcels is like lining up for meat in cold-war era east-germany.

      The other minor issue that I have is the CP worker doesn't come to the door with parcels that need to be signed for; even though they are supposed to. They just fill out a card and leave it in my mailbox. On occasions where I know my wife was home and home all day, I would check my ZoneMinder setup and see the postal truck pull up at the box across the street, and then pull away, with no attempt to even come to the door. When I get home, there's a notice in the box that says "Attempted delivery failure - No answer" and it means I have to line-up for bread again.

      I wonder why CP is losing money?

    14. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had nothing but bad experience getting packages from Purolator. If I'm not home they leave me a notice and take the package back to their depot outside the city. Then I have to call them to arrange for a new delivery time and date, then wait at home for the delivery. Not to mention that half the time they get the whole thing wrong and I end up wasting my time waiting at home...

      With Canada Post they leave the package at the outlet closest to my house - usually a pharmacy or corner store a few blocks away - and I can go and pick it up at my convenience.

      Screw the few dollars saved, we're not Americans, money's not on top of our value system, quality of life is, I'll gladly spend a few more bucks for the convenience of Canada Post.

    15. Re:Slightly misleading. by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      I see a whole lot of mail returned to sender for being abandoned, or being discarded for being abandoned, in those communal mailboxes. I also see a lot of people only visiting their mailboxes weekly, like how they take out their trash cans for the truck to pick up, so mailboxes will be even bigger targets for thieves as there'll be more payoff for the effort than before.

      I really have no idea where you get the abandoned mail thing from. My first house I had I only checked the mail once a month so I can pay my monthly bills. Unfortunately the previous owner gave to many charities and received lots of mail from them soliciting more funds. PETA, UNICEF, Child sponsorship, SPCA, Cancer society, March of Dimes, if you can think of it, he probably gave to them at some point. When my box was full, the mail man just crammed more junk mail in there. I swear he was probably punching the mail just to get it in there some days. Anyway, I really have no idea why you think mail would be declared abandoned for sitting there for a few days. Most people just check their mail on the way home from work anyway.

      Theft is always a possibility but the reality is that it is not really a problem. Yes there is more mail in once location but it's locked in small groups. By passing the master lock gets you 10 mailboxes. You need to repeat again for another 10. In these rural areas you are going from an unlocked box at the end of a driveway to a locked box down the road at a high traffic area. Theft is really not a concern.

    16. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily too cheap, but don't use them fast enough before the next hike.
      Unlike US stamps, the stamps are only good for their face values. You have to buy extra ones to make up for the increase in price since you last bought them.

    17. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...perhaps in 1990, but welcome to the present, bucko. The stamps don't even have a value printed on them anymore, and haven't for the past several years, at least. They're good until you use them, no top-ups necessary.

    18. Re:Slightly misleading. by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 2

      I don't know where you have been for the last few years because stamps in Canada no longer have a face value for domestic letter mail. They have a 'p' on the stamp and is sufficient postage for mailing one standard letter envelope even if the rate goes up since you purchased the stamp.

    19. Re:Slightly misleading. by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sabotage? No sabotage isn't postal rates, it's requiring that the USPS prefund 75 years of retirement pension in 10 years. That means in 10 years they have to fund the retirement for employees that haven't been born yet. That's sabotage. Refusing to raise stamp prices to pay for the prefunding requirement is just following through on the real sabotage.

    20. Re:Slightly misleading. by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      That happens anyway. I check my mail 3 or 4 times a year when the mailman mentions its overflowing. Its still rare that I get more than 2 pieces of actual mail on those occasions. Everything important is electronic these days.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    21. Re:Slightly misleading. by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      My canada post delivery guy in Toronto was stealing the games being sent to me for review. But since he marked them as "delivered" (eg. dropped on the doorstep) they told me it wasn't their fault.
      Except I worked right by the front door, and kept it open in the summer for fresh air. If the guy had even set foot in the driveway I would have heard his footsteps on the gravel, and if he came to the doorstep I'd have been looking right at him.

    22. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you Jim, but you get to share the parcel box with everyone else so 2 parcels in the same day means someone is going for a drive. And as someone who already has a community box, 90% of the time the carrier just says fukit and leaves a can't deliver notice. In fact getting packages is so bad I can log into the canada post parcel tracking system if I know something is coming and see it tagged as "could not deliver" 6 hours before my carrier actually delivers mail.

    23. Re:Slightly misleading. by Alex+Pennace · · Score: 1

      Because unlike in Canada where Canada Post control their own rates, postal rates in the USA are controlled by Congress, several members of which have interest in sabotaging the USPS.

      It seems this is not correct. The Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service and the Postal Regulatory Commission set and oversee postal rates respectively [1]. Ultimately Congress can pass a law changing the structure, but that is no different than Parliament overruling Canada Post, so it appears that the distinction you highlighted between the two postal systems does not exist.

      [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_Postal_Service&oldid=585515286#Governance_and_organization

    24. Re:Slightly misleading. by DizzyDave · · Score: 1

      Apparently some of my countrymen are a little vague on the term 'fascist'.

    25. Re:Slightly misleading. by dk20 · · Score: 0

      No, he's just your typical "anti government" type.

      I think everyone knows the kind, some small office in the middle of the Arctic closes and that was yet another "Harper decision" designed to end Canada as we know it.

      Armchair critics, if they know better why is their name not on the ballot form?

    26. Re:Slightly misleading. by dk20 · · Score: 1
    27. Re:Slightly misleading. by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      the community mailbox a few doors down from most houses, will have one advantage: parcels will be loaded into it for you to pick up.

      If the item fits in the box, sure. If it is larger than a loaf of bread, well, you're driving.

    28. Re:Slightly misleading. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Not cheap

      Au contraire.

      Boggles my mind that I can put a few pieces of paper in an envelope, put that envelope in a box half-a-block from my house, and then a few days later it will be pushed through a slot in someone else's house 4000 km away - All this for under a buck.

      Seems ridiculously cheap to me.

    29. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father, god bless his elderly soul, send me a gold coin for xmas last year. In the mail, uninsured. The post office 'lost it'. I had a tracking #, but since it was uninsured, it was 'my' problem. I won't miss the postal service.

    30. Re:Slightly misleading. by schnell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      9/10 of everything I get local delivered is a sales pitch to "Current Resident".

      Exactly. Those guys, by sheer volume, are the ones paying enough money to keep the lights on at the post office. If they raise that rate too much, then advertisers will just find another, more cost-effective medium and the price of your Christmas card to grandma will go up to about $3, or maybe even more.

      As unfortunate as it is, that crapmail is what is subsidizing the rest of the traditional government-chartered snail mail industry. And sorting through all the crapmail is the price (no pun intended) we pay for sending letters for less than the $8-$12 FedEx will charge you for a letter-size envelope at their slowest delivery pace.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    31. Re:Slightly misleading. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      What's really interesting, however, is that the postal carrier's union was a strong proporent of that 75-year prefunding law.

    32. Re:Slightly misleading. by SirLestat · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when I need them?

    33. Re:Slightly misleading. by ahodgson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The anti-Harperites are generally not anti-government. They just want the NDP in charge.

    34. Re:Slightly misleading. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      kitty corner

      Actually, the word is "catercorner". Amusing that both Canadians and US Southerners have picked up on the "cat" aspect of the word - down here it's usually referred to as "catty-corner".

    35. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the USPS should be sabotaged...as a developer there i've never seen such waste and incompetence....

    36. Re:Slightly misleading. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they raise that rate too much, then advertisers will just find another, more cost-effective medium and the price of your Christmas card to grandma will go up to about $3, or maybe even more.

      Sounds good! I sent, maybe, two paper letters last year. I would be delighted to eliminate all junk mail from my mailbox for only $6.

    37. Re:Slightly misleading. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I would PAY to get the US post office to stop delivering mail. I tried taping up the mail slot and they just dumped all the junk mail in my driveway. The postal service has been sucking the junk mailers balls for so long and now their upset they have jizz in their hair?

    38. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You understood what he meant, therefore the word was correct. This is not a thesis peer review forum, yet it is full of pretentious twats that fail to grow into reasonable human beings.

    39. Re:Slightly misleading. by number17 · · Score: 1

      I see a whole lot of mail returned to sender for being abandoned, or being discarded for being abandoned, in those communal mailboxes. I also see a lot of people only visiting their mailboxes weekly, like how they take out their trash cans for the truck to pick up, so mailboxes will be even bigger targets for thieves as there'll be more payoff for the effort than before.

      2/3 of Canada have been on the system for years. Any new developments in the past 10 have had this. None of the problems you mention are an issue.

    40. Re:Slightly misleading. by number17 · · Score: 1

      The post office depot is in the back corner of the drug store

      This is privatization at work.

      The other minor issue that I have is the CP worker doesn't come to the door with parcels that need to be signed for

      Purolator and UPS play the same game. Time is money and they don't want to pay it.

    41. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the word is "catercorner".

      Regional words are still words. Linguistic prescriptivism is a hobby for assholes.

    42. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't mind Conservatives but Harper has taken the approach of neocons. He's a warwalk and trying to destroy social services.

    43. Re:Slightly misleading. by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I see a whole lot of mail returned to sender for being abandoned, or being discarded for being abandoned, in those communal mailboxes. I also see a lot of people only visiting their mailboxes weekly, like how they take out their trash cans for the truck to pick up, so mailboxes will be even bigger targets for thieves as there'll be more payoff for the effort than before.

      The once-weekly visits will be a very small minority. I lived with communal boxes for years (since the community was built in the late 80s). Almost every household visits daily, it's never more than half a block away. Oftentimes people coming from work stop their cars nearby, get the mail, then drive the rest of the short distance home. It really isn't that big a deal.

      I don't know how long it takes to be considered abandoned, but I've left stuff in mine for a week while I was away, it was all there when I got back (I had the same junkmail on top that a neighbour who checks daily had).

    44. Re:Slightly misleading. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      He closed the Vancouver Marine Traffic Control Center while planning on increasing oil tanker traffic by at least an order of magnitude. He also closed Vancouver's Kitsilano coast guard station as it only did almost 300 (271 in 2011) rescues a year serving perhaps the busiest recreational harbour in Canada as the one at Sea Island was only 45 minutes away under ideal conditions. Should be easy to hold on for an hour when your boat flounders.
      http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Federal+government+closes+Vancouver+Kitsilano+coast+guard+station/7987072/story.html
      Our neighbours view on our oil spill readiness, http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2013/12/03/canada-unprepared-for-oil-spill-in-strait-of-juan-de-fuca/

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    45. Re:Slightly misleading. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      What I mind is my parcels don't get deposited in the box because there are only 2 parcel boxes per community mailbox.

      Yeah, bummer.

      But even with home delivery, they aren't supposed to leave them on your front step, and they didn't fit in the mailbox (which didn't even lock) stapled to your front porch either. So how is this 'worse'?

      Now, things will vary dependng where you are, but my post office worker may leave me a key to one of the community boxes, or they may just bring parcels over to the door, knock and drop them off in person, or leave a parcel pickup tag if nobody answers.

      That's all the benefits of both ideals, and still cheaper than full on home delivery of all the mail; since they only go to the door for parcels, and there aren't parcles for every door every day, so its still a huge time savings.

      Now they aren't doing that everywhere, and in some cases, yeah, you get a note in the box, and then have to go somewhere inconvenient during usually inconvenient hours to pick it up. But for a lot of us, the community boxes are just as good as home delivery ever was... if not better as there is more security.

    46. Re:Slightly misleading. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      when I lived at an apartment complex that had a shared mailbox area, I ran into the mailman and asked him if there's a way I can refuse the junkmail or just have him toss all of mine into the nearest trash bin (there's one nearby, building mgmt knew we needed one). he said that he really can't because that stuff is what is keeping him employed.

      he would not even throw my junkmail into the trash on my request. I have to frequent the mailbox more often than I would, just to pull out and dispose of the junk.

      I think in some countries, you can sign up at the PO and tell them you don't want crap delivered, and certainly not 'our neighbor' or 'current resident' addressed items. but in the US, they force you to have to take them and throw them out, wasting YOUR time. stealing my time, actually.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    47. Re:Slightly misleading. by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is that interesting? Most union shops hold their employer to ransom to the point where it's almost uneconomical to run the business. You can see examples of this all the time like how the already best paid airline maintenance teams in Australia decided to go on strike because the Airline didn't agree to their exorbitant pay rise demands.

      It would be more interesting if a union agreed to some reasonable terms for a chance.

    48. Re:Slightly misleading. by fnj · · Score: 0

      Let me get this straight. You want the postman to decide for you which items in your mail you might be interested in and which items not? On the company's time?

      So you don't want your own time stolen, but you're fine with stealing the company's time?

    49. Re:Slightly misleading. by jbenwell · · Score: 1

      Purolator has a form called "Customerâ(TM)s Authorization to Waive Delivery Signature Single Shipment Use" (a PDF is the first result in Google right now).

      Whenever I'm expecting something from them, I print out one of those and put it on my door.

      The only time that I've had trouble is when the shipment notification from the retailer gets to me after the delivery attempt has been made. In that case, I usually just go get the package at the depot (25km, sigh), but it may be possible to just call them and ask them to try again (and leave the form above on the door).

    50. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      How the holy hell in a fucking hand basket did this tripe get modded "Insightful", I would have thought it would have gotten Flamebait or Funny, but Insightful?

      Seriously, I have seen what Unions do and the good ones do great things, sure there are bad ones, but they shouldn't set the tone unless you are cherry picking.

      I have seen good unions and I have seen bad unions and the only thing I have seen worse than a bad union is no union at all. See Walmart for them examples which are very rapidly becoming the norm. I would rather have a bad union than no union dealing with them people.

      Most unions don't drain the company dry as that would be counterproductive to their goals.

    51. Re:Slightly misleading. by g1powermac · · Score: 2

      As a former rural carrier, I can say that the 'bulk business mail' (not allowed to say junk mail when you work for the USPS) does make up a good portion of the volume. However, the volume of bulk mail is barely staying stable. A steep rise in cost may cause it to plummet like first class. What is really keeping the doors open at the USPS, especially after talking with some of my friends at the local post office is the insane increase of packages. Amazon has shifted a tremendous amount of package volume to the post office, either directly, or via UPS SmartPost type things. Package volumes at my former post office are so high right now that they've had to send substitute carriers just to help deliver packages that the normal carrier can't fit in their vehicle. I've never seen that before when I worked there.

    52. Re:Slightly misleading. by g1powermac · · Score: 2

      As a former carrier, I can tell you that carrier was acting as legally required. They're not allowed to throw away mail at all, even at the request of the resident. Doing so will get you fired and/or in handcuffs very quickly. A carrier can only set aside undeliverable bulk mail that a clerk will later throw out. And only standard rate mail without a "Or Current Resident" endorsement going to a resident who doesn't live at the address (or all bulk mail going to a vacant address that doesn't have 'forwarding service requested' endorsement) can be given to the clerks as undeliverable. The rest is either forwarded, sent back as unable to forwarded, or delivered. Btw, some post offices will let you sign up for a list to stop delivering 'boxholders'. Those are the things that either weekly newspaper or flyer type things that have coupons and such.

    53. Re:Slightly misleading. by davecb · · Score: 1

      Formally, fascism is a name applied to government by councils of industries. It was also called "corporatism", which is probably more appropriate, and closer to what we have now. The new term isn't as insulting, though (;-))

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    54. Re:Slightly misleading. by jsab00 · · Score: 1

      You can place a "No Admail please" note inside your mailbox to stop delivery of unaddressed mail.
      Or call and ask them to not send you ad mail and the unaddressed stuff won't even leave the sorting office.
      See https://www.canadapost.ca/cpo/mc/personal/support/helpcentre/receiving/admail_stop.jsf?ssl=1

    55. Re:Slightly misleading. by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      what's a warwalk?

    56. Re:Slightly misleading. by Jabrwock · · Score: 1

      It's someone who wants to walk the walk, but can't talk the talk.

      --
      Magic doesn't work in my presence. My power of disbelief is too strong.
    57. Re:Slightly misleading. by Jabrwock · · Score: 1

      The newer community boxes have several larger boxes on the end for smaller parcels. The key for them is dropped in the smaller mailbox it's destined for. You drop the key in the return slot after you fetch your parcel. Most mail larger than a letter that I receive needs a signature anyway, so I'm always going to the local post office anyway.

      --
      Magic doesn't work in my presence. My power of disbelief is too strong.
    58. Re:Slightly misleading. by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Sabotage? No sabotage isn't postal rates, it's requiring that the USPS prefund 75 years of retirement pension in 10 years. That means in 10 years they have to fund the retirement for employees that haven't been born yet. That's sabotage. Refusing to raise stamp prices to pay for the prefunding requirement is just following through on the real sabotage.

      The low rates for a letter aren't helping. Congress has shackled them to the government's inflation estimate, which is a problem because health care costs for their workers and gasoline have been increasing faster than inflation. Plus many argue that the government's inflation estimate is manipulated into being too low.

      46 cents to send a letter is really cheap. Even if I had a Prius (I don't), I could only do a 3 mile round trip to deliver a letter myself before the gas alone cost me 46 cents. That doesn't include wear and tear on the car or my time. It sometimes seems silly for me to send a letter across town, but it is cheaper, saves me time, and is more convenient. Keep a box of envelopes at home/work and a book of stamps at home/work and it isn't a chore to send a letter at all.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    59. Re:Slightly misleading. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Go read about the bill: it was passed with very strong bipartisan support. Both Republicans and Democrats helped get that law pushed through.

    60. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should be getting fairly close as I have been hearing that since 2006.

      This is a good thing. Crappy for the short term. But long term those employees *will* have a pension. That is up in the air for the rest of the gov employees.

    61. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no the word is kitty corner, catercorner is a variation of kitty corner. Merriam Webster actually lists kitty corner as the parent word.

    62. Re:Slightly misleading. by davecb · · Score: 1

      Yes: a colleague from out in the country noted that the larger boxes are always too small. I suspect the postal service did more costing than modelling when they laid out the cabinets (;-))

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    63. Re:Slightly misleading. by nblender · · Score: 1

      So you have the nice conscientous postal delivery person who has an interest in ensuring you get your parcels delivered in a timely fashion. My wife works from home so is generally available to hear the door. Our postal delivery person would rather just make a single trip to London Drugs or Shoppers to drop off a big bag then to walk to peoples' doors or bother putting a parcel in the box and leaving the key in my box. I have no proof that the two boxes aren't full every time I get a parcel; but I haven't had a 'key' in my mailbox at all since the previous nice conscientous mail delivery guy retired... Of the neighbors I've spoken to about this, they have the same problem I do.

    64. Re: Slightly misleading. by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      Canada is even more spread out than the USA with 1/10 the people in huge areas. They lost the "critical mass" to keep the thing going.

      And people on he USA have no idea how hard USPS works to keep their ship afloat.

    65. Re:Slightly misleading. by Jabrwock · · Score: 1

      The "D" size parcel bins can hold a package up to 30cm/30cm/45cm. which can fit a standard sized document storage box. Some setups include a few "C" size, which can fit the "medium" FedEx/Purolator boxes, or the legal sized envelopes.

      --
      Magic doesn't work in my presence. My power of disbelief is too strong.
    66. Re:Slightly misleading. by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Most new developments since 1985, in fact.

    67. Re:Slightly misleading. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Not me, although raising the price of a stamp over $1.00 would have me paying my trash and gas bills online, since they charge that much to do it electronically. I used to just pay the gas bill at the gas company, but they closed their local office. The trash company is across town so mailing a check is cheaper than either driving or doing it electronically.

      Still, I probably spend less than $20 per year on stamps so it wouldn't bother me much.

      As to the junk mail, it seldom gets past my door -- there's a bag on the front porch with about fifty pounds of junk mail. However, I did actually get a piece of junk mail that was welcome, from a printer in St Louis (obviously got my address from Bowker). I may have them print the paperback version of Nobots for me, their prices are a lot more reasonable than Lulu.

    68. Re:Slightly misleading. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I hear ya.

      But your problem amounts to a lazy / dishonest postal worker, not a problem with the system itself. Or maybe its policy in your area not to do home delivery of packages ... I have no idea why I frequently get packages to the door and you don't.

      As for not using the key, maybe one of your neighbors has a habit of keeping it... its not always the postal workers fault.

      Although, in some cases it absolutely is.

    69. Re:Slightly misleading. by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you're located, but can't you use bill pay through your bank/credit union to avoid the $1 charge to pay your gas and trash companies online directly?

    70. Re:Slightly misleading. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The USPS is doing a pretty good job of positioning themselves as the premier delivery service for smaller packages. Their rates for small packages (like trinkets you buy on Ebay) are very low, much lower than UPS. Over 5 pounds or so, however, UPS and Fedex start being more competitive, and also if your package is high-value (over $500), UPS/Fedex are generally a better deal because USPS won't insure anything more than that without going to their very expensive services. These days, it seems like the USPS is making most of their money from two things: junk mail, and small package delivery (including that UPS last-mile thing you referred to).

      It sounds like Canada Post has really screwed up somehow, by missing out on the small package delivery market.

    71. Re:Slightly misleading. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Screw the few dollars saved, we're not Americans, money's not on top of our value system, quality of life is, I'll gladly spend a few more bucks for the convenience of Canada Post.

      Funny you should mention us Americans. Here in the US, our postal service (the USPS) is actually doing OK, despite that crappy 75-year-pension-prefunding law. The USPS is actually a very economical service to use for shipping small packages (e.g. Ebay stuff), and they're doing well with that. They even started a new deal with Amazon to deliver Amazon's packages on Sundays. It sounds like your postal service is much more concerned with profitability than ours is, since ours has managed to keep small-package delivery rates very low, and thus is keeping a large army of postal carriers employed.

    72. Re:Slightly misleading. by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I see a whole lot of mail returned to sender for being abandoned, or being discarded for being abandoned, in those communal mailboxes. I also see a lot of people only visiting their mailboxes weekly, like how they take out their trash cans for the truck to pick up, so mailboxes will be even bigger targets for thieves as there'll be more payoff for the effort than before.

      2/3 of Canada have been on the system for years. Any new developments in the past 10 have had this. None of the problems you mention are an issue.

      Not to mention any small town - my parent's town *celebrated* when they got the communal mailboxes, because that was an upgrade from having to go to the post office during normal business hours to pick up General Delivery.

    73. Re:Slightly misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The case you have is so small, that only small parcel can go in if not a bunch of letters is there. (all invoices for your services, btw)

      More often than not, the postman mess things up and my letter goes into my neighbor box.

      We don't need Canada Post anymore, we need good price fixing over the private mail services and we can't dream to have that.

      Bye bye CanadaPost.

    74. Re:Slightly misleading. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That was stupid. At least in the US, registered mail is the most secure way to get things from A to B. Jewelers use it for everything they can.

    75. Re:Slightly misleading. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but that doesn't seem to be how it works.

    76. Re:Slightly misleading. by KPexEA · · Score: 1

      I worked from home for three years and during that they never knocked on the door for parcels at all. I'd get a card saying that they tried to deliver it but nobody was home so I have to go pick it up. Bullshit, they never even tried to deliver it.

  2. Seems to be another death spiral in the making by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

    There seem to be a lot of them in the news lately. Some, like this, are created by disruptive technologies like the internet. Others by bad government planning. (See: ACA) Others by the economy has businesses. This will only force more change in the future, which will likewise create more opportunities, and more death spirals. Will we end up in Utopia, dystopia, or something in between? Whatever it is, it will be different.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Seems to be another death spiral in the making by TheGavster · · Score: 0

      Death spiral or technological change? No industry will last for all time; churn from new industries emerging helps to keep a crop of fresh minds at the helm of society. Modern efforts to bail out shrinking companies are directed by oligarchs seeking to hold onto the reins of power, under the guise of helping the little guy.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:Seems to be another death spiral in the making by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Some, like this, are created by disruptive technologies

      Horseshit. Pensions are the cause of this mess, same as for the USPS. These outfits have pensioners collecting full freight for 30+ years after retiring in their mid 50's. This particular death spiral has nothing to do with disruptive technology and everything to do with abusing the public treasury.

    3. Re:Seems to be another death spiral in the making by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone sounds jealous!

      Yours truly,
      A retired postal worker

    4. Re:Seems to be another death spiral in the making by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your pension benefits aren't constitutionally guaranteed.

      Yours truly,
      The American public

  3. Some people won't bother to pick up mail by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Especially people who are disabled or elderly and are very well accustomed to having mail delivered right to their door...

    So any mail they get through normal post will just sit and accumulate in their box... essentially turning these community boxes into a litter farm.

    1. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Nos. · · Score: 1

      If someone is unable to travel in some form (walk, scooter, wheelchair, etc) a few houses down, then its very likely you have some form of assistance to help with other daily tasks. This will just be another task for those assistants to do a few times a week (at most).

    2. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

      Oh please. There are already tons of places in Canada doing it this way. The walk to the end of the street to the mailbox isn't going to have that kind of impact.

    3. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much the way it is for my Dad's community box. Just fliers and junk mail littering the ground. Most people in rural areas have done with out house to house deliver for years here in Nova Scotia. I don't really care one way or the other, I get all my bills online now and pretty much just get junk and christmas cards in my mail box, so nothing that would need immediate attention.

    4. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      That's a good thing in my opinion. Leaving the piles of junk mail at the mailbox as a form of protest will pick up with this system. People will dump it in the outgoing mail or on the ground. Either way it will start costing Canada Post money and then maybe they'll reconsider their position on running that kind of ridiculous business.

    5. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It could still be an issue. I don't know how close those community boxes will be. If they're a few houses down, you might be right. If they're farther, someone who can live independently but is old, might have trouble. I drive my mom to the grocery store weekly, but she's used to getting her mail daily.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I've lived in a couple neighbourhoods with these in them. I've never seen the box be more than a block away.

    7. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by nbauman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have arthritis. I can walk 4 blocks to the supermarket and back, but by the time I get home it's painful. But what am I going to do? I want my independence.

      My post office stopped delivering packages, and I have to pick them up at the local post office. Every time I see a slip in my mailbox for a package, it means another painful trip to the post office.

    8. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm you know you can leave a note for the postman to not put junk mail in your box, right? That won't stop the "Current Resident" letters or the calendars/newsletters from your MP, but will get rid of all flyers which make up the bulk of junk mail.

    9. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily... what it means is that stuff that isn't necessary, like fetching stuff from a mailbox that couldn't be sent directly to their door, will just sit there... and all kinds of mail, not just junk, will sit completely unopened... bills, addressed mail from friends and relatives, or even stuff from the government will just sit there... because they never needed to ever have to make any special trips to pick up mail before.

    10. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by dk20 · · Score: 1

      I live in a newer subdivision (around 10 years old) and have never had "door to door delivery" as it has always been delivered to a "superbox". I sure wish they would put a garbage can there so i don't need to bring the junk home to get rid of it.

    11. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by sdoca · · Score: 1

      I still have delivery to my door and the postal and flyer delivery people respect my "no junk mail" sign. My friend just puts the junk in the outgoing mail slot. I plan on doing the same.

    12. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So everyone else in canada should pay more for this service?

      Ever thought of planning your trips in advance? Perhaps getting some pain killers?
      I want my independence by having someone else do everything for me?

    13. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by number17 · · Score: 1

      This is simply an attack on the obese. I will not stand for it!! You hear me, I will not stand!

    14. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Car, scooter, bicycle? Something with wheels.

    15. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      There's an idea.

    16. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by antdude · · Score: 1

      Just have the people, who wants the delivery services to their homes, pay.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    17. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So everyone else in canada should pay more for this service?

      It works just fine down here in the US. The USPS still delivers packages directly to peoples' doorsteps in most places, and the rates are quite low, much lower than the private services (UPS/Fedex) for small packages, and USPS even delivers a lot of packages for UPS ("last mile").

      Maybe you Canadians should take some lessons from us about how to run a government service. There's something I never thought I'd say.

    18. Re:Some people won't bother to pick up mail by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Most people in rural areas have done with out house to house deliver for years here in Nova Scotia.

      Did you mean without house to house or with outhouse to house? I think the former would be acceptable, but I'll pass on the latter.

  4. It's Fine With Me by Nos. · · Score: 1

    All new neighbourhoods in the last probably 10 years (or more) have had these community mailboxes. This will just be phasing it in to older neighbourhoods. I've been living with them for about 6 or 7 years now and really have no complaints about them.

    1. Re:It's Fine With Me by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      More like 20 years - maybe more. But that only helps your point.

    2. Re:It's Fine With Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rural Saskatchewan, right?

      Have you ever walked to the mailbox in the middle of winter?

    3. Re:It's Fine With Me by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have. It's not a big deal. And besides, most people just drop by the mailboxes on their way home from work, so you don't even need to walk from home.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  5. "costs" == "retirees" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    yay euphemisms

    Retire at 55, collect till 85. Yay public unions.

    Keep printing Ben.

    1. Re:"costs" == "retirees" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cotisation breaks granted by the govt is the real culprit

    2. Re:"costs" == "retirees" by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Since this article is about Canada post i think you mean Stephen Poloz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_S._Poloz

    3. Re:"costs" == "retirees" by number17 · · Score: 1

      Retire at 55, collect till 85. Yay public unions.

      When do Walmart employees retire? What do they get?

  6. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought with the online shopping boom, couriers and mail delivery would be booming as well.

    1. Re:I don't understand by Xeno+man · · Score: 2

      Those are packages. While package delivery is up, letter volume is way down. Over all the post office is still making less money.

    2. Re:I don't understand by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      1000 letters at 50 cents each fits into the same space on the delivery truck as one package that's 20 bucks to send... so.... yeah.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Delivering urban homes is hard work. by gumpish · · Score: 3, Funny

    Canada Post is phasing out urban home delivery

    Well, delivering homes sounds awfully resource intensive and is probably a departure from their charter to deliver mail.

    1. Re:Delivering urban homes is hard work. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      originally you could order a house by postal delivery in Canada through the Sears catalog - which you kept in your outhouse.

      True story.

      That was less than half a century ago.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Delivering urban homes is hard work. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      How wonderfully un-green! Replacing one vehicle on an optimized route with thousands overlapping a small chunk of that route both ways as people swing by on the way home. And this doesn't address moving most of it from walk to drive, or people taking a longer route throuh their subdivisons so they can get the box on the correct side.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Delivering urban homes is hard work. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Not many rural routes with mail vehicles left. This is in town where the mail people walk rather then drive.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:Delivering urban homes is hard work. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I think Eatons houses were usually delivered by rail, not by post. My grandfather bought one and I'm pretty sure he picked it up at the rail station (with his wagon).

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  8. How many licks does it take... by magusxxx · · Score: 2

    One year the USPS went before Congress to explain why a postage increase was necessary. Two weeks after it was approved the heads split several million dollars worth of bonuses. Wonder how much they're getting this year.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    1. Re:How many licks does it take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fucking stupid. We're talking about Canada. RTFS. Fail troll is fail.

    2. Re:How many licks does it take... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      This is the new Canada. When the postal workers negotiated a cost of living raise (using rotating strikes, eg taking one day off a week) the government legislated a pay drop and took the profits and spent it on pro tar, I mean oil ads. Every time you see an ad for the keystone pipeline, it's us Canadian tax payers paying as the oil industry is so poor from all the bonuses they have to give to management that they can't afford much else.
      The official position of our government is that all resources have to be directed to the bitumen, I mean oil industry as they are pro-(some)business.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:How many licks does it take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So just to clarify, are you upset with Canada flushing money down the toilet for the wrong organization or any and all organizations? Whether you're spending millions to prop up asbestos mines, car companies, banks, oil companies, or some artist or musician trying to get started shouldn't matter unless you're just another greedy hypocrite looking for a bigger piece of the pie, like most people who protest too loudly.

  9. Amazon by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    They heard about Amazon's autonomous drone delivery and thought they'd quit while they were ahead.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  10. Business! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We're losing money and customers. Let's offer a shittier service at increased prices! I refuse to see how this won't work.
    -Canada Post

    1. Re:Business! by fish+waffle · · Score: 1

      That is the essence of a traditional business death-spiral.

  11. Depressing by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    It's really easy to imagine just going to a community box if you are an able bodied person with a vehicle but if you're elderly or otherwise have mobility issues ... well let's just say with the lengthy winters and poor snow clearing I foresee two outcomes:

    -People not picking up mail for months at a time
    -Old people breakin' hips

    Ugh...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  12. ePost by lazarus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Canada Post already has something called ePost, which makes most regular postal mail obsolete now. It sounds to me like they're helping to put traditional postal mail out of business anyway.

    I'd like to have no mailbox altogether. The notion that I have a "postal" address (which everybody wants for some reason) that a human being drives a car to so they can fill it with unwanted matter printed on processed dead trees is completely ridiculous. Give me ePost for bills and a local post office for packages and I'm good.

    What's your address? 127.0.0.1. Same as yours.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:ePost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a mail digitization service, if that's what you're assuming.

      You'll still have to go clear the garbage out of your community mailbox every few days to prevent the mail from being suspended, even if all your bills go through ePost (why you would want that instead of it going to normal e-mail is beyond me).

    2. Re:ePost by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Give me ePost for bills and a local post office for packages and I'm good.

      So how do you get your Christmas cards?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:ePost by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The problem with ePost is that my credit card can also be used to simplify and automate bill payments.

    4. Re:ePost by zekele2 · · Score: 1

      ePost is dire, it's barely functional for clients, but for mailers it is verging on being unusable. I've been setting up an ePost Connect service for my employer, and there are weird and unforgivable bugs - such as not being able to send to hyphenated domain names (!) I hate the product as a client too, it mangles bills, sends out notifications late or never, and it is tied to a regular email address so offers no real advantage to having the mailer email you directly. Oh, and my address is ::1 and not 127.0.0.1 :)

  13. This kills on-line businesses by davecb · · Score: 1

    On-line ordering depends on cheap physical-world delivery, and this will drive them out of business.

    If they cut off mail, we'll either be reduced to post-boxes or parcel delivery. Boxes don't work for parcels, even in apartment buildings, where they used heavily. Parcel delivery has the same problem with boxes: everyone ends up getting a postcard and schlepping off to the local pickup point because the darned boxes aren't big enough to hold the parcel. And big boxes are unaffordable!

    Parcel delivery, on the other hand, is insanely more expensive: it loses out on the efficiency of loading up a truck and doing every house on the street, one after another. Parcel guys have to solve the "travelling salesman problem" in their head as they zig-zag across the city. Street-by-street delivery is O(n), parcel delivery O(n!) (and NP-hard in the general case).

    In effect, the government proposes we go back to the 18th century, and pick up rare and expensive parcels at a local substation, and pay through the nose for the manual handling that involves.

    If you aren't one of the 1% who can have their servants pick up the goods they ordered, you're not going to order anything on-line. You'll go to the store, just like grandpa and grandma. (Of course, the government says they're "conservative", so maybe that's what they intended (;-))

    --dave

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
    1. Re:This kills on-line businesses by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Boxes don't work for parcels, even in apartment buildings, where they used heavily. Parcel delivery has the same problem with boxes: everyone ends up getting a postcard and schlepping off to the local pickup point because the darned boxes aren't big enough to hold the parcel. And big boxes are unaffordable!

      Canada Post thought of that years ago. The community mailboxes have sizable parcel compartments (usually two, one "C" size (13.5x30.5x35cm) and one "D" size (30.5x30.5x35cm) for every 18 normal "B" size (13.5x12.5x35cm) mailboxes) built into them. If you have a parcel, they stick it in the parcel compartment and put the key for it in your own mailbox.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:This kills on-line businesses by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. The Canada Post community mailboxes have a handful of large compartments in several sizes that are used for package delivery -- the postal worker simply puts the key in your mailbox and you use it to unlock the compartment and then just drop the key into the mail slot afterward. The end result is that if I'm not home, the package from Amazon.ca that I'm expecting is available for immediate pickup from a secure and dry place.

    3. Re:This kills on-line businesses by fish+waffle · · Score: 4, Funny

      ..and then you copy the key and have free random parcels forever?

    4. Re:This kills on-line businesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that would be the case in the US, but in Canada we don't tend to steal each others mail.

    5. Re:This kills on-line businesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some, although probably not all, have two locks. One for the recipient and one for the mail carrier. When the recipient puts the key in and turns it, that key can not be removed without the 2nd key that only the mail carrier will have.

      A problem with many of these boxes is that people don't read the tag attached to the key that states that the key stays in the lock and they end up breaking the key off in the lock trying to get it out thus rendering that box useless.

    6. Re:This kills on-line businesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and then you copy the key and have free random parcels forever?

      You'll be hard pressed to find someone who can/will copy a mail key for you.

    7. Re:This kills on-line businesses by number17 · · Score: 1

      Canada Post thought of that years ago. The community mailboxes have sizable parcel compartments

      But not in apartment buildings at the GP mentioned. Neither the condo or apartment I lived in had one. Only mail slots wide enough for an envelope.

    8. Re:This kills on-line businesses by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Luckily I have box #1 so it's my package that is in a secure and dry place. Actually I guess yours is also dry and safe at the drug store 15 miles down the road.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re:This kills on-line businesses by davecb · · Score: 1

      A colleague from the country writes that the box "is always smaller than the parcel", so he has to drive into town whenever he gets a parcel.

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    10. Re:This kills on-line businesses by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Huh. Never seen that around here. With our boxes, you unlock the package compartment, grab your package, close it, and then you drop the key into the send slot.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    11. Re:This kills on-line businesses by freeweed · · Score: 1

      This is only the US version. Canada Post's "super mail" boxes only require one key. You use it, and return it to the outgoing mail slot.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    12. Re:This kills on-line businesses by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Unlikely because the key sizes are very odd. Where are you going to get it copied (or even get a blank to use to make a copy)? They don't use standard Kwikset or Schlage keys for applications like this.

    13. Re:This kills on-line businesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... And with door-to-door delivery, if you're not home they either (a) toss it on your doorstep in the rain or (b) drop it at the drugstore down the road.

    14. Re:This kills on-line businesses by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know which Canadian urban centre you live in where the local post office counter is "15 miles" down the road. Mine is less than one kilometre from my house at the local grocery store.

    15. Re:This kills on-line businesses by afidel · · Score: 1

      Take a couple picture with your phone, turn it into a 3D model, print the model, use the plastic model to create a mold, cast a near perfect copy of the key.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:This kills on-line businesses by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I exaggerate a bit, it is closer to 15 kms down the road. I'm about an hour (with really good traffic, doing 10% over the speed limit) outside of Vancouver in the mountains north of the valley.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  14. Hey! Listen! by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

    Do you guys hear that? That is the sound of Canadians not flipping out and loosing their shit and calling for the end of times due to reduced service.

    It's quite a pleasant sound up here in Canada, unlike the noise Americans made a short while back.

    1. Re:Hey! Listen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't Canadien. You're a pitiful troll. Wanna know how I know? Not anywhere in your post did I see one apology or use of the word "eh". Back under your bridge!

    2. Re:Hey! Listen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      !

      ...and loosing their shit...

      hey hoser, that's 'cos we gots us some of that immodium (tm) eh!

    3. Re:Hey! Listen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So youre saying meek acquiescence to people whom you pay to serve you is a Good Thing?

    4. Re:Hey! Listen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 'meh' attitude doesn't always work to our advantage. Our federal government is a good indication of that -- a pile of evidence showing voter fraud, and nobody gives a shit. What's on TV tonight??

    5. Re:Hey! Listen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So tell us about the last time you travelled and were almost gang-probed before getting on the plane, what did you do?

    6. Re:Hey! Listen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you haven't looked at the comments on the CBC webpage...

    7. Re:Hey! Listen! by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Do you guys hear that? That is the sound of Canadians not flipping out and loosing their shit and calling for the end of times due to reduced service.

      It's quite a pleasant sound up here in Canada, unlike the noise Americans made a short while back.

      Yeah, not to mention other earth-shattering changes like getting rid of the penny, changing from paper to plastic bills, going mostly chip-and-pin for credit cards... all in the last 5 years.

      Sure there've been hiccups along the way, but it's unbelievable how resistant Americans are to changes in "the way things are" when it's suggested by government, as if it's some socialist/communist plot or something. There was even bitching about adding colour (barely) to paper currency.

    8. Re:Hey! Listen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but just try to install another cell tower, and watch them scream bloody murder for the dumbest unscientific reasons.

    9. Re:Hey! Listen! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Do you guys hear that? That is the sound of Canadians not flipping out and loosing their shit and calling for the end of times due to reduced service.
      It's quite a pleasant sound up here in Canada, unlike the noise Americans made a short while back.

      What are you talking about? Here in America, the USPS isn't reducing service at all, it's increasing service by delivering parcels on Sundays. While we definitely have big problems in other areas (*cough* healthcare *cough*), our postal service is doing just fine, unlike yours apparently.

    10. Re:Hey! Listen! by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Here in America, the USPS isn't reducing service at all, it's increasing service by delivering parcels on Sundays. While we definitely have big problems in other areas (*cough* healthcare *cough*), our postal service is doing just fine, unlike yours apparently.

      Well either you haven't been paying attention or you have a short memory. There is this little thing how the USPS is loosing a bit of money,
      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/11/16/1440224/usps-reports-159-billion-loss-asks-congress-for-help

      And the bit where they cut out Saturday mail delivery...
      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/02/06/1738249/us-postal-service-discontinuing-saturday-mail-delivery

      Yea, other than that your doing fine. Package delivery is up everywhere, especially now during the holidays, but mail delivery is way down everywhere all year long. Things are going to change.

    11. Re:Hey! Listen! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't been paying attention either. Your saturday delivery article is from February, 10 months old now, and Congress told them no, so they're still delivering mail on Saturdays. And your other article is 13 months old now; since then they've raised prices. Got anything more recent?

    12. Re:Hey! Listen! by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      Oh, so they took care of that 16 billion dollar loss and fixed everything. My bad. Business as usual then. I'm sure the USPS won't have any more problems in the near future.

  15. Support blacksmiths! by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    We must support the blacksmiths, they're too big to fail! What we need it price support from taxes. Everyone will be required to buy at least two horse shoes each year as well. Those who cannot afford to buy horse shoes will be given horse shoes using tax dollars. Those who choose not to buy horse shoes will by fined $90/mo. That is all.

  16. How did the mail service cope 50 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody?
    There were no computers. EVERYTHING was done by hand. How did it work? How did they manage to pay a living wage to the staff?

    1. Re:How did the mail service cope 50 years ago? by green1 · · Score: 1

      several differences, without email, or other electronic delivery options, everything had to be mailed, economies of scale helped tremendously.
      also unions, they used to pay a living wage, now a postman makes far more with no education than many highly educated professionals. unions have priced themselves out of the market.

    2. Re:How did the mail service cope 50 years ago? by Quasimodem · · Score: 1

      What green1 said, plus CEOs didn't receive 250X what their workers were paid, and when they proved inept, they were canned the same way an inept worker was canned. They didn't get to bail out with multi-million dollar golden parachutes.

  17. Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    In rural areas of Canada, sometime the "end of the block" is 2 miles away.

    In cities filled with multi-story multi-family apartments this might not be such a big deal, but in a rural area this may mean you might as well drive into town (15 minute drive).

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Rural areas already run on this system, so nothing is going to change for them. If you're on a farm or such, you head to the town/village to get your mail. If you're in the village/town, you walk a block or three to the boxes (or you drop by the boxes on your way home from work) to get your mail

      This is just moving everyone else onto this system.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      No,
      it is delivered to the end of your driveway, sometimes that is several miles away.
      If it was switched to the end of the block that would not be too bad for me at least, that is not too much further than just the end of the driveway anyway.
      And if it actually accepted parcels, like one posted commented, that would be way way better.

      No one runs on the system you describe, it would be impossible. It wound be literally impossible to expect thousands of people, 10-20 minutes away, to drive into a one lane town, every day to pick up advertising flyers. That is not only improbably, and inconvenience, but literally impossible to pull off.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I live in a rural area and yes we all have community boxes, sometimes a 20 minute walk up/down the hill by the highway. Big boxes you drive into town and pick them up. Nobody has a problem with it. It's rural life, we don't live here for the urban instant gratification but for the quiet life.

      No idea where your advertising flyers come from. Pretty much everybody arranges with Canada Post to not receive them.

    4. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Rural areas already run on this system.

      Some do, some don't. Beyond a certain date, ALL new construction - even in cities - got community boxes; but older homes got to keep to-the-door delivery.

      This basically just removes the grandfather clause, and converts everyone to the same system. I'm not sure how they will save money by buying and installing tens of thousands of corner mail distribution boxes, though.

    5. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by PPH · · Score: 1

      I guess this is what they meant by ending 'Urban Home Delivery'. Rural may stay the same (not sure what the distinction will be). But I didn't read this as changing rural delivery. Your mailbox will still be 1 km away at the end of your driveway. (Come on! Miles? In Canada?)

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Come on! Miles? In Canada?)

      Nothing wrong with using miles in Canada, we're a multi-cultural society.

    7. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by Quasimodem · · Score: 1

      You do know the definition of the word "urban," don't you?

    8. Re:Sometimes the end of the block is 2 miles away by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, you have no idea what you're talking about.

      I live in a town of 5000 people on the prairies. We have one post office, located on Main Street. Everyone in town has a mailbox at the post office, and when you want to pick up your mail you walk or drive to the post office with your key, open your mailbox, and collect your mail. If you have a parcel to pick up, something you have to sign for, or whatever, you get a card in your mailbox which you take to the service counter and they hand you your package.

      Folks around here who live on farms also have a mailbox at the post office and have to come to town to pick up their mail. Nobody around here has rural delivery.

      We actually had to pay a yearly rental fee for our mailbox at the post office at one time, and if you didn't or couldn't pay you didn't get a mailbox and all of your mail would be given to you over-the-counter upon request by the clerk as "General Delivery". They discontinued charging the rental fee for mailboxes here about 20 years ago. Now you get a card in your mailbox once per year stating that you must renew your mailbox. To do that, you take the card to the counter and sign a form stating that you still live in town.

      I have never lived anywhere that mail was delivered to the door. I have always had to walk to the post office to pick it up. Walking to the post office on weekdays is part of my morning routine, and always has been.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  18. Look on the bright side! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also see a lot of people only visiting their mailboxes weekly, like how they take out their trash cans for the truck to pick up, so mailboxes will be even bigger targets for thieves as there'll be more payoff for the effort than before.

    Then the thieves will be performing a public service by making laziness more costly and painful. I mean if people are gonna steal shit anyway, and they will, might as well have some good come of it.

  19. A country without a fucntioning post office by drwho · · Score: 2

    ...is not a country.

    1. Re:A country without a fucntioning post office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in an area that already has delivery to a community mailbox. These have been installed in newer subdivisions for the last couple of decades. In other words, what they're proposing to do for all current delivery to the door is what I've already had for years.

      It's no big dea (a short walk)l, and it was obvious things were heading that way long ago.

    2. Re:A country without a fucntioning post office by number17 · · Score: 1

      So you are like the 2/3 of Canadians who already have this system in place?

  20. Less paper spam? by ark1 · · Score: 1

    Hopefully higher costs -> less spam.

  21. awesome! by csumpi · · Score: 0

    The Canadians are so awesome at everything! Let's copy their health care system, too!

    1. Re:awesome! by dskoll · · Score: 1

      Our health care system is great. If I had to choose between a well-run publicly-funded healthcare system or a junkmail delivery service... well, I know which one I'd pick.

    2. Re:awesome! by csumpi · · Score: 1

      Our health care system is great.

      That's what she said... before she left for the big city.

  22. at least canada has health care for all the ACA by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    at least canada has health care for all the ACA in the usa is a bridge to it and they need to remove jobs from health care

  23. What I want is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I want is a large recycling bin at every community mailbox.

  24. A marketing dud by J+Story · · Score: 1

    In marketing, there are well-known positioning areas:

    • "more (goods/services) for more (money)" -- i.e. a premium service
    • "more for the same" and "more for less"
    • "the same for less"
    • "less for (a lot) less

    Non-starters are "the same for the same" and "the same for more", because these give customers no added value to their existing service. However, Canada Post has gone even farther by proposing "less for more", which can only work when there are no other options available. By offering less service, and charging more for it, Canada Post is *guaranteeing* that customers will seek other options where they are available. And in the age of the Internet, other options are available.

    On the bright side, the Green Party must be pretty pleased. Canada Post's brilliant marketing strategy will save trees by causing snail mail usage not only to continue shrinking, but to plummet.

  25. BRENNAN v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE by Flammon · · Score: 1

    Why is the government delivering our mail anyway. That kind of work is much more efficient in the private sector.

    Here's an interesting clip on the subject.

    BRENNAN v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE , 439 U.S. 1345 (1978)

    1. Re:BRENNAN v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Why is the government delivering our mail anyway. That kind of work is much more efficient in the private sector.

      Because you want to pay $3 to deliver a letter, just wait until they figure out they can charge you a $0.50 receiving fee at the same time.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:BRENNAN v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE by Flammon · · Score: 1

      lol, you know nothing about basic economics.

      If the true cost of delivering and receiving a letter is $3.50 as you suggest then who do you think pays for that?

      If the stamp says $1 and the true cost of delivery is $3.50, trust me, you didn't pay $1 when it's the government who provided the service.

      When the postal service states that they lost a billion dollars, who do you suppose pays for that billion dollar loss?

      Do you not pay taxes?

      The government will state that they can do it for cheaper but it never is.

    3. Re:BRENNAN v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE by afidel · · Score: 1

      The USPS only lost $1B because they were forced to save for retirees who haven't even been born yet! The USPS is completely self funding, they receive no money from the taxpayers other than the stipend that the members of congress receive for political mailings and whatever business they receive from the branches of government. But don't let facts stand in the way of your anti-government hatred.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:BRENNAN v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE by Flammon · · Score: 1

      The USPS only lost $1B because they were forced to save for retirees who haven't even been born yet!

      Forced by who? Government?

      The USPS is completely self funding...

      You just said that they weren't. If they were they wouldn't owe $1B.

      But don't let facts stand in the way of your anti-government hatred.

      The facts that you presented certainly don't support government.

      It's about principles, not government. I believe in the non aggression principle and all governments today violate that principle.

  26. Re:Speaking as a European : by dk20 · · Score: 1

    OMFG, please read the summary before you post.
    You at least read the line which states "Canada Post Announces the End of Urban Home Delivery" right?
    Did it click in that "Canada post" isn't american?

    By the way, I'm pretty sure that Canada is larger then any of the Euro countries and that might be factored into the price of stamps.
    Canada is 9,306 km wide, not sure how you would manage "next day" on that.

  27. Wait. What? by geekd · · Score: 2

    "About 1/3 of Canadian homes currently get mail delivered to their door" WHAT?

    I'm an American, and I have always lived in a city or the suburbs. I guess I take to-my-door mail delivery as a basic human right. I thought all first world countries had this.

    Wow. my mind is blown.

  28. Re:Wait. What? by rueger · · Score: 2

    As a Canadian I'm seriously embarrassed. A few years ago I lived in the US and was astonished that USPS was fast, reliable, and that people actually trusted it to deliver on-time. And even had Saturday delivery.

    Canada Post has been under attack for a couple of (post Thatcher era) decades - part of the overall belief that government shouldn't actually supply essential services. It's now reached the point where postal mail is the last thing you think of when something has to be delivered.

    Call me an old fashioned socialist fool, but there are a lot of things that government should provide to any functioning society: police, mail delivery, and public transit to begin with. Education and health care as well. Those are why we pay taxes - to ensure that essential services are available to everyone.

    It's time to get rid of the idiotic mantra that government should be run like business. A lot of businesses are corrupt, nasty, inefficient, and act in ways that an individual would never be allowed. A lot of businesses close in the first year. A lot of businesses are run by idiots.

  29. Bah humbug by tepples · · Score: 1

    By joining Jehovah's Witnesses or another denomination that doesn't celebrate modern Saturnalia.

    1. Re:Bah humbug by camperdave · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, does that stop your friends from mailing you Christmas cards?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Bah humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How, exactly, does that stop your friends from mailing you Christmas cards?

      Look at his reply to you. If he has any friends now, he won't later, which should solve the problem nicely.

  30. Re:Wait. What? by dk20 · · Score: 1

    Which "Thatcher" are you referring to?

  31. UPS computer routing by tepples · · Score: 1

    Parcel guys have to solve the "travelling salesman problem" in their head

    I don't know about Canada Post or USPS, but UPS has computers to do that routing.

  32. Re:Wait. What? by dk20 · · Score: 1

    I'm Canadian and have lived in the US for years you are misreading/exaggerating things.

    The difference is newer subdivisions (actually probably 15 years old) have "superboxes" where Canada post deliver the mail to. The other difference is we only get mail Monday-Friday.

    If you haven't seen one they look like this: http://www.straight.com/files/styles/blog_main/public/shutterstock_153195602.jpg

    You get a key to one of the slots. If they have parcels they put a key in your box to open one of the large boxes and you just throw the key in the inbox when you are done. Mine is around 3 houses away and i just pick my mail up on the way home.
    Not sure "mail delivery" counts as a "basic human right"?

  33. Canada is on the same continent as USA by tepples · · Score: 1

    Did it click in that "Canada post" isn't american?

    Canada Post is both American and not American because though Canada != USA, they're both on the continent of North America. Though Canada shares some mentality with Europe, it shares other mentality with its southern neighbor.

    1. Re:Canada is on the same continent as USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American means and has always meant "The United States of America". No one in Canada refers to Canada or Canadians as American. If you are referring to the continent, the correct name is North America (to differentiate it from South America). If you are referring to both continents "the Americas" is also used.

  34. Re:Wait. What? by russotto · · Score: 1

    A lot of US suburbs have community mailboxes, and many areas have mailboxes on the street (as opposed to through-the-door delivery). When I lived in a community mailbox area, the mail carrier would bring packages or mail that didn't fit into the box to the door; if I had to go to the post office (their slogan: "when you have the time, we're closed") every time that happened, it would suck.

  35. Re:Speaking as a European : by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    The point is not Canada surface, it is only twice the surface of EU. What makes door delivery expensive is that Canada population is much more sparse the in Europe.

    Anyway, this is a sad regression. There was a time where western nations were able to do things for the public good, without whining everyday about the costs.

  36. Re:Wait. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, we got a superbox. It was a big improvement, as we had to go to the post office to get or send mail before that, and it was about 12 km away. Superbox got put in about 50m away.

    When I bought my first house, I got mail at the door. That was kind of cool.

    When I moved, I ended up in a much higher taxed area (that was poor planning on my part), and I now have to go to the Post Office to get or send mail. Fortunately it is only about 1 km away.

    So for some this could be an improvement, while for others it could suck. Depends on what you had before the change.

    I'm not sure boosting prices and reducing service will help the problem of reduced mail volume though.

  37. Re:Speaking as a European : by dk20 · · Score: 1

    Totally agree with you on the density thing. UE = 112 people/km2 whereas Canada has 3.2 people/km2 which translates into vastly different delivery costs.

  38. Able-bodied unemployed...yet cuts in delivery? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not sure why people blindly accept government "trade-offs" like this like well-trained sheep.

    On the one hand, we have a large number of able-bodied, sometimes well-educated people unable to find work, and often receiving government checks (for unemployment, etc.) On the other hand, we are announcing that we don't have the manpower to walk packages to doors.

    Why can't we say something like, "OK, so you're unemployed, but you're also a high school graduate who can walk at least three miles a day. If you want a check, food stamps, health care, whatever, could you please get off your ass for two hours a day and deliver mail to everyone on these six blocks?"

    1. Re:Able-bodied unemployed...yet cuts in delivery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't we say something like, "OK, so you're unemployed, but you're also a high school graduate who can walk at least three miles a day. If you want a check, food stamps, health care, whatever, could you please get off your ass for two hours a day and deliver mail to everyone on these six blocks?"

      On the face of it, this seems perfectly reasonable and I would support some variants of this for the ballooning Norwegian abuse of the welfare system. This has become an increasing problem, especially among immigrants the past few years.

      However, once you do this, as we and the Danes have tried some times before, you run smack into a number of problems:

      1. The second the government institutes this, some entrepeneur will see that there is an establishing market for these services, he will create a company to provide this service and then complain (loudly) that the government is undercutting him and that he should be granted a monopoly for providing the service. This has happened several times already here and we fall for it every time.

      2. You are dangerously close to instituting slave labor. If you are beholden to some entity for staying alive, that entity must be exceedingly careful about abusing its power over you. This is especially true for the government which represent us all.

      3. Ideally, the only people receiving aid for extended periods of unemployment aren't just unemployed, they are infirm. Since we clearly cannot expect a man in a wheelchair to roll around delivering mail, where do we draw the line? I'm usually in favor of leaving this bit up to the doctors since they know a hell of a lot more about infirmity then I or the politicians do.

      4. Related to 1 and 3, we have seen instances where a government established program proves highly successful. Next time we have a switch to a more right-wing government with their privatization fetish, the service is privatized, and the exploitation of workers begin. Remember, this was supposed to be a program where your compensation was not tied to your performance but *that* you performed. Ie. the goal was to get people out of the couch, not provide a service for profit. Suddenly you're stuck with a company that is outside normal working-environment regulations, its workers are paid by the government and yet they get to keep the profits.

      Have a plan to solve these (and many other, I'm sure) problems before you start something like this.

    2. Re:Able-bodied unemployed...yet cuts in delivery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of people would love to do that. The issue is that it's viewed as "make work" jobs, which are bad for some reason because they're arbitrarily created. You know, unlike full houred jobs that are also arbitrarily created.

    3. Re:Able-bodied unemployed...yet cuts in delivery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail carrier in Canada has traditionally been a union job that paid a non-exciting but definitely survivable wage. If you pay mail carriers too little the temptations of looting the mail they have to move gets much higher since the ratio of payoff versus expected-income goes up. That's a non-starter with good reason since mail carrier is someone operating in a position of trust that may be handling correspondence or goods of significant value.

      The economics you're looking at is what happened after the 'free trade' treaty (globalization) nonsense we signed on to in the 1980s has run most of its course and all the decent-paying factory jobs that used to exist in Canada went up in a puff of third-world sweatshops. Demanding serf-labour commitments from the welfare/unemployment/disability cheque peasants is not a good idea because that would be one huge step backwards to feudalism. We need a better answer to the problem that our economic elites have too much freedom to push economic externalities on others in their quest for greed.

  39. Waste of a stamp by tepples · · Score: 1

    Returning them to sender leads to a conversation about how Christmas cards are a waste of a stamp.

  40. Canada Post is a joke by quax · · Score: 1

    Having lived in Germany, the US and now Canada I can say with conviction that the postal service here is rock bottom. May as well close it for good.

  41. Re:ePost NSA is opening your Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and who gets to read it?
    I bet parcels to a community mailbox are also 'watched' . Huh, mail used to be sacrosanct.

  42. Do you believe in Santa Claus by fnj · · Score: 1

    Why is the government delivering our mail anyway. That kind of work is much more efficient in the private sector.

    I can't tell if this is an attempt at sarcasm, so I am forced to treat it at face value.

    Ah, another True Believer.

    The government's aim is to perform a service at cost. The downside is that there is not much incentive for cost control.

    A private firm's aim is to perform a service AND maximize the profit for the shareholders, who would rather not work for a living like normal people. The downside is so obvious that I won't belabor the point. No, actually I will take it a step further. The reason any firm performs any service is profit, end of story. The fact that they have to perform the service is just an unwelcome side effect to them.

    Looks like six of one, half a dozen of the other, in terms of where that leaves the consumer.

    1. Re:Do you believe in Santa Claus by Flammon · · Score: 1

      Profit incentives does the opposite of what you believe. When there's competition, the cost of goods and services are lowered while the quality increases. The end result is everyone becomes wealthier. I'm not going to go into all the details on why this works because frankly the supporting evidence is everywhere. Anyone who still thinks that central planning for goods and services works is either uneducated or in denial.

      If you're looking for a starter in economics, the Free to Chose series by Milton Friedman (Nobel prize in Economics) is excellent.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3N2sNnGwa4

    2. Re:Do you believe in Santa Claus by fnj · · Score: 1

      Like I said, only a fool argues with True Belief, but a genuine question. OK, two questions.

      1) If privatization is so great, why does no one anywhere think Defense should be privatized. Should we have thousands of competing mercenary militias?

      2) I get that competition has its good side (as well as its bad side), but who really believes that capitalism unchecked would end up with any competition?

      The USPS was centrally run and had no competition and performed superbly for some 200 years. Planned economies are subject to corruption, and so are capitalist enterprises. In a democracy, at least

    3. Re:Do you believe in Santa Claus by Flammon · · Score: 1

      1) If privatization is so great, why does no one anywhere think Defense should be privatized. Should we have thousands of competing mercenary militias?

      I'm not anti-goverment. Defense should be one of the only things that government does. Government's role should be to protect us from each other and from foreign invaders but not from ourselves. However, here are some good arguments that show that armies couldn't exist without government. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edtWe759KIw

      2) I get that competition has its good side (as well as its bad side), but who really believes that capitalism unchecked would end up with any competition?

      The government is a powerful weapon in a large corporation's arsenal. It's an expensive weapon but with a tremendous return on investment. Much too expensive for small business however. A large corporation will lobby for laws that eliminate competition, like patents. Large corporations are the greatest benefactors of such laws and they don't even need to enforce them. They let the government do the dirty work for them. All of this at the expense of tax payers. A free market allows everyone to compete equally without government help. It is extremely difficult for a monopoly to form and keep it's position in a free market without government.

      The USPS was centrally run and had no competition and performed superbly for some 200 years.

      How do you know? Maybe they were terribly inefficient or perhaps very efficient but no one knows because there was no competition and therefore nothing to compare them to. I doubt they were as efficient as they could be though because without without the incentive, innovation is rare. I would go as far as saying that laziness often ensues without competition.

      Planned economies are subject to corruption, and so are capitalist enterprises. In a democracy, at least

      Corruption is everywhere regardless of the system that we are in.

      Here, checkout the salaries of public 'servants' in Canada.
      http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/publications/salarydisclosure/pssd/orgs.php?organization=ministries

      The problem with these salaries is that no one really knows what they should be because government employees don't normally compete with other governments and so they just come up with their own arbitrary numbers. Any other business that would attempt such a thing would go bankrupt in short time.

  43. Re:Speaking as a European : by davecb · · Score: 1

    Actually our population is mostly in a band within 50 miles of the border, which makes broadband easier than in the central 'states. Presumably the same density equation applies to postal mail.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  44. All driven by profits and convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should not be a surprise to anyone. For years now, email has taken over conventional mail between folks (faster, and arguably just as reliable). But what is probably more impactful - companies are making many profit driven moves to cut down the costs of mailing. For example:

    • My bank makes be pay $2 for each statement they mail to me (or give me the choice to receive it electronically for free)
    • Travel tickets I purchase no longer are mailed. Instead, I get notice that if I don't print out a copy myself and complete (the admittedly time-consuming document provisioning process remotely), I may not be able to board by conveyance.

    There are probably many many more such examples. In the race to reduce costs, expenses are cut, and the postal services are competing with lower cost alternative processes that no longer involve them.

  45. Re:Speaking as a European : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The population density argument makes the assumption that the mean density is important. If, however, you consider where most people live (not in the far-flung reaches of Labrador or Yukon), but in small pockets clustered around cities, then the density actually becomes similar to E.U. or the U.S.A.

    A little over 50% of the population lives in a narrow corridor close to the border with the U.S.A. and a large proportion of the rest is clustered around other regional urban areas. There would be some extra expenditure involved in distribution, but not as much as is implied by the mean population density argument.

  46. Re:Wait. What? by dj245 · · Score: 1

    "About 1/3 of Canadian homes currently get mail delivered to their door" WHAT?

    I'm an American, and I have always lived in a city or the suburbs. I guess I take to-my-door mail delivery as a basic human right. I thought all first world countries had this.

    Wow. my mind is blown.

    The disparity between US and Canadian mail delivery quality is so high that many Canadians on the border pay for USPS post office boxes or third party delivery boxes. They cross the border a couple times a week to buy gas and milk, and pick up the mail.

    It was so commonplace in my hometown that there was a 2 year waiting list for a USPS box. Then a couple 3rd party delivery box places opened up about a mile from the border.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  47. Re:Speaking as a European : by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Hey, don't look at us Americans. I get every letter and every parcel delivered to my door step too. And letters are usually delivered in 1-3 days, depending on how far it has to travel. In-state, it's 2 days max, frequently 1 for nearby addresses. Do letters shipped from Greece to Norway take only 1 day? Somehow I doubt that.

  48. Re:Wait. What? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Those are why we pay taxes - to ensure that essential services are available to everyone.

    Here in the US, the USPS is fast, reliable, delivers on-time almost all the time (there are rare exceptions, but 99% of the time it's on-time), and has Saturday delivery, and on top of all of that, it isn't funded by taxes at all, it's entirely self-sustaining.

  49. Re:Wait. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a US citizen who moved up to Canada this past summer. The USPS is far better in terms of speed, reliability, customer service, technology usage, and price compared to Canada Post. I have been very surprised at the difference. I heard people making fun of CP before moving here, but I figured it was just like how people in the US make fun of USPS. No, it is not a joke. The service is much worse in Canada sad to say. A perfect example is I sent some urgent documents on Monday with 1-3 business day expedited service. By day 3 it has only made it through the nearby sorting facility and still has a continent to cross. :-S Will use FedEx or UPS next time.