Slashdot Mirror


Irish Politician Calls For Crackdown On Open Source Internet Browsers

An anonymous reader writes "An Irish politician has called for tougher controls on the use of open source internet browsers. He said, 'An online black market is operating which protects the users’ anonymity and operates across borders through the use of open source internet browsers and payments systems which allow users to remain anonymous. This effectively operates as an online supermarket for illegal goods such as drugs, weapons and pornography, where it is extremely difficult to trace the identity of the buyers. We need a national and international response to clamp down on this illicit trade.' The politician added that the U.S. had 'taken action' to address this, but he seemed surprised that their solution was only 'temporary.'"

207 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. Shut up drinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Posting as ac because I am both Irish and drunk, I forgot my password

    1. Re:Shut up drinky by Narcocide · · Score: 1, Funny

      You also forgot to make a point.

    2. Re:Shut up drinky by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was implied

      because I am both Irish...

    3. Re:Shut up drinky by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Funny
      If the rumors are true, and the Irish would rule the World if not for alcohol,

      well,

      I'll drink to that.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:Shut up drinky by grcumb · · Score: 5, Funny

      A Fine Gael TD named Patrick
      Vied for the cluelessness hat trick:
      He blamed anonymity
      For people's affinity
      To gambling, drugs and well-stacked chicks.

      He represents Limerick, for Christ's sake. He had it coming.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    5. Re:Shut up drinky by zugmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your password is hunter2.

    6. Re:Shut up drinky by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      At what point does the brawl start?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Shut up drinky by msauve · · Score: 2

      That's not a limerick. It's not dirty.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    8. Re:Shut up drinky by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      when we run out of Whiskey...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Shut up drinky by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      It is statistically likely to begin shortly after the shift from pints to whisky.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    10. Re:Shut up drinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok. Here's one from an old issue of Playboy, back in the mid 1960s:

      There was a young maid from Madras
      Who had quite a magnificent ass.
      It wasn't pretty and pink as you probably think.
      It was grey, had long ears, and ate grass!

      Sorry Playboy, but this ditty has stuck with me for almost 50 years! :-)

    11. Re:Shut up drinky by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This makes you qualified to enter Irish politics. Congratulations!

    12. Re:Shut up drinky by plover · · Score: 3, Funny

      There was a young man named Frisk
      Whose lovemaking was exceedingly brisk
      So fast was his action
      That the Lorentz Contraction
      Reduced his tool to a disk.

      Dirty enough for you?

      --
      John
    13. Re:Shut up drinky by Adriax · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe you meant to say "At what pint does the brawl start?"

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    14. Re:Shut up drinky by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      If the rumors are true, and the Irish would rule the World if not for alcohol,

      well,

      I'll drink to that.

      Well would you rather be sitting in the Oval office surrounded by world leaders or in an Irish pub with a pint of Guinness listening to folk music?

    15. Re:Shut up drinky by Linzer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe you meant to say "At what pint does the brawl start?"

      Doesn't matter, it's pronounced the same in Ireland.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    16. Re:Shut up drinky by flyneye · · Score: 1

      You forgot to get his point.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    17. Re:Shut up drinky by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2

      There was a fag from Khartoum
      Who took a lesbian up to his room
      They spent the whole night
      arguing who had the right
      to do what and with what to whom.

      (The most grammatically correct limerick I know...)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    18. Re:Shut up drinky by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      There once was a man from Peru
      Whose Limericks stopped at line two.

      and

      There once was a man from Verdun...

      --
      Not a sentence!
  2. I think I speak for us all... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I speak for all people who know much of anything about computers when I ask, "what?".

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:I think I speak for us all... by iYk6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He starts by condeming browsers and proxies that help people browse the internet anonymously. Then he jumps to saying that anonymous browsing leads to trading drugs, weapons, and pornography. Then he commends the USA NSA for spying on Americans but is concerned that now that they have been caught Americans might do something about it.

    2. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "He starts by condeming browsers and proxies that help people browse the internet anonymously. Then he jumps to saying that anonymous browsing leads to trading drugs, weapons, and pornography. Then he commends the USA NSA for spying on Americans but is concerned that now that they have been caught Americans might do something about it."

      Seems to me there was something else I heard about that was anonymous, and can be traded for all kinds of illegal things.

      Oh, yeah. I remember now: cash.

    3. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Shh!!! Don't let them know our secret!!! They'll just make cash illegal too!

    4. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clearly IE, the popular closed source browser, ,is against anonymity. Who knows this for sure, the country with the code .ie - I feel dumb for not knowing earlier.

    5. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean they haven't yet?

      See United States v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency.

    6. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is both hilarious and depressing.

    7. Re:I think I speak for us all... by hodet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ya. Ow... The stupid, it burns!

    8. Re:I think I speak for us all... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Irish Ted Stevens. Needs more tubes.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    9. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there some link Ireland - Microsoft?

    10. Re:I think I speak for us all... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shh!!! Don't let them know our secret!!! They'll just make cash illegal too!

      I think the batteries are running low in your Euros, I'm having difficulty tracking you.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The more you are using credit cards (and, stupidly, paying the banks for that service), the less cash is being used. The less it is being used, the easier it is to get rid of it all.

      I suggest you drop on credit card usage, this will save cash for a while longer.

    12. Re:I think I speak for us all... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe he's a non-techy abusing technical language he doesn't understand. He seems to be referring to the Silk Road, and it's replacement, with the words "open source browser." Silk Road is the only major source of illegal shit that's recently been shut down in the US, and it has (predictably) already been replaced. He also seems to be lumping various other initiatives (like TOR) with the same words.

      It seems like he's an Irish ted Stevens. Some staffer has explained these concepts to him well enough that he kinda gets them, but not well enough for him to remember the words everyone else uses.

    13. Re:I think I speak for us all... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He starts by condeming browsers and proxies that help people browse the internet anonymously. Then he jumps to saying that anonymous browsing leads to trading drugs, weapons, and pornography. Then he commends the USA NSA for spying on Americans but is concerned that now that they have been caught Americans might do something about it.

      Would it be in poor taste to express a hope that the British come and show him how much fun being the object of 'security' is, like they used to? There's no cure for an authoritarian asshole quite like a bit of repression that he isn't in favor of....

    14. Re:I think I speak for us all... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't an 'Irish Ted Stevens' a politician who contains enough whiskey that it's illegal to drive across the bridge to nowhere after drinking one?

    15. Re:I think I speak for us all... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Clearly IE, the popular closed source browser, ,is against anonymity. Who knows this for sure, the country with the code .ie - I feel dumb for not knowing earlier.

      I strongly doubt that there is actually a connection here, rather than some pandering moron attempting to secure the Irish values voter/authoritarian 'security' freak vote; but MS (and most multinationals doing business in the EU) magically book enormous portions of the proceeds in Ireland, rather than countries with the actual customers and higher taxes...

    16. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget to mention that in most counties in this country, a large percentage of that seizure would go directly to that police department. It varies from state to state but many police departments end up getting new patrol cars and such have major busts. This is often sited as the reason minorities are so often targeted. Low hanging fruit with high payouts and low voter turnout means they're easy targets.

    17. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Cash isn't anonymous. At least on mine I can see the names of Washington and Timothy Geithner.

    18. Re: I think I speak for us all... by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      The credit card company charges the merchant about 4% to accept a premium credit card, and the merchant pays that fee with your money. They give you a quarter of the discount back as a "reward" and you think you're gaming the system. Just pay cash, especially at small businesses who pay the highest rates.

    19. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      The governments of the world have resolved the issue of upsetting their populations by spying on every aspect of their lives at all times by deciding to embrace *openly* spying on every aspect of their lives at all times.

      You know, a nice brush fire now and then really helps the forest.

    20. Re: I think I speak for us all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      news flash: the banks charge the small business owners just as much for the deposit service. Banks screws *everyone*.

    21. Re:I think I speak for us all... by epine · · Score: 2

      I lose no freedom using a card. The "company" handling my CC transaction is the same that would handle my cash-equivelent debit card. The banking system is broken, but I'd be stupid to not use the programs to my best advantage.

      If my conception of a free market, what the credit card companies are doing is collusion, and I would ban the practice. Many people think they believe in free markets who only believe in commerce.

      If the credit card company is providing a service the customer is willing to pay for, the customer can elect to pay the premium, without penalizing those of us who pay by other means.

      That's what a real free market looks like: clearly marked prices subject to conscious decision making. Once this governance mechanism is hidden under fatuous rebates, the invisible hand falls into a deep coma.

      But hey, if it floats your boat, sell your backbone.

    22. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me point out, that the great state of Nebraska's District court (most likely correctly) "concluded that the government had not established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that there was a substantial connection between the money and a drug trafficking offense." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._$124,700_in_U.S._Currency

    23. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're thinking of Ted Kennedy, and he didn't quite make it across the bridge.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    24. Re:I think I speak for us all... by dryeo · · Score: 2

      Mine has an anonymous loon on it.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    25. Re:I think I speak for us all... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The cost isn't hidden. I pay the same as cash. If you, as a cash buyer, don't like it, don't shop somewhere that takes credit cards. You have free choice. The fact that you are too spineless to exercise your "freedom" just shows you are a hypocrite.

    26. Re:I think I speak for us all... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you are using cash, you are paying for it as well. So why not use the card?

    27. Re:I think I speak for us all... by causality · · Score: 1

      The cost isn't hidden. I pay the same as cash. If you, as a cash buyer, don't like it, don't shop somewhere that takes credit cards. You have free choice. The fact that you are too spineless to exercise your "freedom" just shows you are a hypocrite.

      As someone who has never seen an established business that does not take credit cards of some sort, I have to say: it is far too easy and tempting, for some, to puff up with pride and look down your nose at someone for failing to exercise an option that doesn't really exist. Easier than admitting that maybe he had a point, at any rate.

      The number of businesses you can drive up to and shop in that do not accept credit cards of any kind is a rounding error in the face of all the business transactions made. You know this. Can you admit it?

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    28. Re:I think I speak for us all... by causality · · Score: 1

      Funny, YOU'RE abusing language you don't understand.

      "and it's replacement"? Think about it - the expanded version of what you wrote is "and it is replacement". Clearly the contraction is not appropriate and you should have used its, as in "and its replacement". It amazes me how easy it is to work out which version of it's vs its to use, and yet so many people fuck it up.

      Fucking up easy, simple-to-understand, basic things is a fine American tradition, you insensitive clod!

      Really though this one isn't caused by a lack of knowledge. If you were to test that person on it and tell them that they would win $500,000 dollars if they get it right, they will get it right. This problem is caused by a lack of even the slightest discipline. You know, the kind you have even when no one is looking. The real kind.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    29. Re:I think I speak for us all... by causality · · Score: 1

      Until and unless it happens too infrequently and there is far too much widespread, low-hanging fuel laying around in the form of ignorance. Then it engulfs and destroys many thousands of acres like the California-style forest fires and does much more harm than good.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    30. Re:I think I speak for us all... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      So start a business that doesn't take a credit card and passes the 85% savings on to the consumer, and you'll have people lining up to buy from you. Oh, the problem is all the liars inflating the level of rent seeking from the credit industry, and that the convenience is worth the price charged.

    31. Re:I think I speak for us all... by msmonroe · · Score: 1

      Got you beat I think....

      Death of Donald P. Scott

    32. Re:I think I speak for us all... by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      Because if more people paid with cash, businesses could lower their prices because they wouldn't have to pay as much for the credit card service fee.

      I see this at some gas stations. They have one price for cash/debit cards and a higher price for credit cards. They make the customer pay for the service fee.

      ~~

    33. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people seem to think that while the credit card processors will charge retailers a fee for accepting cards, that somehow accepting cash is free...
      It's really not, there are all kinds of costs to a business that takes cash. The retailer requires change to give customers, and the banks charge them for supplying small change... You also need something like a safe to store the cash in, and you face the risk of that cash being stolen and are likely to pay higher insurance costs to cover that risk. Similarly you will probably need to get that cash to the bank, which for any sizeable amount will probably mean hiring a cash courier service to take it for you. Large amounts of cash also attract the attention of the tax authorities, as its very easy to simply pocket some of the cash and never declare it for tax purposes.

      All of these costs add up such that in many cases it's actually cheaper to take cards.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    34. Re:I think I speak for us all... by k.a.f. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seems to me there was something else I heard about that was anonymous, and can be traded for all kinds of illegal things. Oh, yeah. I remember now: cash.

      Which is why cash is being so aggressively deprecated in all of its roles (anti-laundering laws, bonuses for loyalty cards, new methods of mobile payment every week...). It's always about control, and politicians love control.

    35. Re:I think I speak for us all... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If they could lower their prices, or charge two prices, why don't they? Oh, because the value of the card exceeds the cost of them. The are a "good" thing, compared to cash. More secure, easier to handle.

    36. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "So start a business that doesn't take a credit card and passes the 85% savings on to the consumer, and you'll have people lining up to buy from you. Oh, the problem is all the liars inflating the level of rent seeking from the credit industry, and that the convenience is worth the price charged."

      It's very simple. They typical small business is charged 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction. Sure, the rate varies slightly but that's about it. If you have a thriving business and you do a lot of $$ in transactions, you might get that down to 1.9% + $0.30.

      It's not a trivial amount. For a $20 purchase that's almost $0.90 and it goes up from there.

    37. Re:I think I speak for us all... by N1AK · · Score: 1

      As someone who has never seen an established business that does not take credit cards of some sort, I have to say: it is far too easy and tempting, for some, to puff up with pride and look down your nose at someone for failing to exercise an option that doesn't really exist.

      There's loads of them. Market stalls in the UK still rarely accept anything other than cash for example. The reason the option doesn't exist is because the costs in a shop that only accepted cash would be higher because they would lose so many customers who didn't want to pay with cash. If the few people who wanted to shop somewhere that didn't accept credit cards or debit cards were willing to pay a price premium then shops to service that niche would exist.

      What your suggesting is the opposite of a free market response (which doesn't automatically make it a bad idea). That somehow shops should be forced to separate out payment processing costs so that people paying with cash aren't "subsidising" card users, however I expect most shops would simply put in place an equal fee for paying with cash or outright refuse to accept cash because the majority of customers don't want the complexity it comes with.

      In short you seem to be equating the lack of availability of a specific service to a failure of the free market, when in fact it is a clear example of the free market in action.

    38. Re:I think I speak for us all... by N1AK · · Score: 1

      And if it wasn't worth paying then they wouldn't accept the cards. I don't like the agreements that state companies have to charge the same price for cash that credit card companies require businesses to agree to. I think those should be stopped, but I doubt many firms would change and have different prices even if it did. Typically in the UK it isn't unusual for companies to require a minimum spend before allowing you to use card payments (typically around $8 or $16) but they virtually never (except on very high value goods) charge a premium for using cards.

    39. Re: I think I speak for us all... by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The people raging against this don't see the futility in fighting against people doing what is best for themselves. It makes no sense for me not to use my cashback credit card if I would get charged the same amount in cash. Yes, theoretically if everyone used cards with lower fees then prices could be cheaper for everyone but they don't. Personally I think there is a clear failure of the market. In most countries there are only 2-3 common card companies (Visa, Mastercard and Amex being most common in my experience). In the UK the vast majority is Visa/Mastercard and you basically get whichever type your bank uses so there's very little need for them to compete to keep prices to merchants down.

    40. Re:I think I speak for us all... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Another politician known to contain whiskey!

    41. Re:I think I speak for us all... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Which is precisely why the "cash=terrorism" scare campaigns have already started.

      I dunno if I should be terrified that fascism is once again rising from its grave, or laugh at the sheer comical ineptness of the whole affair. It's like a zombie clown trying to get out of a clown car to eat your brains. Scary, yes, but also damn hilarious.

      Oh well, enjoy peace while it lasts and buckle up for World War Three: Here We Go Again...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    42. Re:I think I speak for us all... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      CITED!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    43. Re:I think I speak for us all... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I just assume that everyone is trying to skullfuck America to the best of their ability and try not to think too much about it.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    44. Re:I think I speak for us all... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      As someone who has never seen an established business that does not take credit cards of some sort

      Aldi and Woodman's.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    45. Re:I think I speak for us all... by speardane · · Score: 1

      hmm Browsers and proxies permit anonymity, anonymity permits drugs and pornography - these must be stopped at all costs - so anonymous browsers should be stopped. Politicians start wars, wars cause death - politicians must be stopped at all costs. So no politicians should be permitted I could go with both proposals - they're equally logical...

      --
      if "Faith" could be proved with facts - would it still be faith? So why does "Faith" try to present beliefs as fact? -
    46. Re:I think I speak for us all... by DanielOom · · Score: 1

      I propose a ban on narcotic drugs, lethal weapons, and child pornography, because overuse of the same may lead to anonimity, and severe cases of anomity may lead to Open Source browsers.

    47. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Are you asking for citation? Here you go:
      http://www.justice.gov/jmd/afp/02fundreport/02_2.html http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91490480 -- NPR story detailing the huge amounts of money getting sent back to law enforcement.

    48. Re:I think I speak for us all... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1
    49. Re:I think I speak for us all... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      No, you misspelled the word in your post. This is a common mistake that I keep running across: sight vs. site vs. cite.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    50. Re:I think I speak for us all... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So, for a 5% loss, why wouldn't someone open up the same shop next door as "no credit" and cut prices 5%? People here have talked about how "every" store takes cards but the dollar stores near me don't. It may be different where you are, or maybe the elitists that respond so far about how there exist no stores that don't take credit cards refuse to set foot in a dollar store, even for research.

    51. Re:I think I speak for us all... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've not read a merchant agreement in the UK, but in the US, the standard form requires same pricing between credit and cash, and no minimum spend. Violate that, and they can take away your CC agreement. And they do take complaints very seriously.

    52. Re:I think I speak for us all... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The terms may still be there, but enforced more loosely than in the US. In the US, they are enforced strictly. That's why I mentioned it as "read the agreement" not "seen someone claiming it".

  3. Not interesting by jbmartin6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Call me when a bill to this effect has some chance of passing, otherwise I am not interested. There is no idea so dumb or ill-informed that there isn't going to be some politician, somewhere, proposing it. That doesn't mean anyone else in that legislature takes it seriously, possibly even the proposer isn't serious and is just mouthing off for political reasons. This just isn't worth anyone's time to read about.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Not interesting by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      And in any case, such a bill would have to go through the EU parliament, not the Irish one.

    2. Re:Not interesting by Jaywalk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no idea so dumb or ill-informed that there isn't going to be some politician, somewhere, proposing it

      True, and yet the exceptional examples need to be discussed in order for them to exposed to the hoots of derision and mockery which they so richly deserved. I doubt they will learn anything from it since their cranial capacity seems to be, thus far, impervious to analytical thought, but it makes the rest of us feel better.

      Let the mockery resume.

      --
      ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    3. Re:Not interesting by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

      He's in Ireland's ruling party. He's not in the Cabinet, so it probably won't become law, but he's got more clout then most other TDs.

      Assuming he's using "open source web browser" (what else could he be using it to mean? he clearly doesn't know what an actual open source web browser is) to refer to the Silk Road website and TOR network, his idea isn't that different from US Government policy. Or any official government policy.

    4. Re:Not interesting by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2

      Call me when a bill to this effect has some chance of passing, otherwise I am not interested. There is no idea so dumb or ill-informed that there isn't going to be some politician, somewhere, proposing it. That doesn't mean anyone else in that legislature takes it seriously, possibly even the proposer isn't serious and is just mouthing off for political reasons.

      True.

      This just isn't worth anyone's time to read about.

      False. When politicians say stupid shit, it's our duty to mock them for it. Otherwise, that stupid shit starts making it into actual laws. (Sometimes it does that anyway.)

    5. Re:Not interesting by mevets · · Score: 1

      An EU directive officially protects Leprechauns in an area known as The Sliabh Foy Loop due to Irish Law.

    6. Re:Not interesting by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      This. I see too often people argue that something is not worthwhile discussing because it is so obviously idiotic, wrong, racist or god knows what else. They want to ignore it, make it illegal or somehow push it underground. That always makes things worse.

      The only cure for stupidity is wisdom, knowledge or public mockery. Indeed, please continue.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    7. Re:Not interesting by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. I see too often people argue that something is not worthwhile discussing because it is so obviously idiotic, wrong, racist or god knows what else. They want to ignore it, make it illegal or somehow push it underground. That always makes things worse.

      The only cure for stupidity is wisdom, knowledge or public mockery. Indeed, please continue.

      The root of that problem is a particular form of arrogance or ego-centrism. The form is: it is so ridiculous *to me* because I understand what's wrong with it, that no one else will ever be persuaded by it, so there is no reason to expend the minimal effort it would take to nip it in the bud...

      The Prohibition of alcohol happened this way. The Al Capones of the world were thankful.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    8. Re:Not interesting by causality · · Score: 1

      Call me when a bill to this effect has some chance of passing, otherwise I am not interested. There is no idea so dumb or ill-informed that there isn't going to be some politician, somewhere, proposing it. That doesn't mean anyone else in that legislature takes it seriously, possibly even the proposer isn't serious and is just mouthing off for political reasons.

      True.

      This just isn't worth anyone's time to read about.

      False. When politicians say stupid shit, it's our duty to mock them for it. Otherwise, that stupid shit starts making it into actual laws. (Sometimes it does that anyway.)

      If it does that anyway, it's because there is a monied interest behind it. All the more reason to mock and ridicule it as it deserves, or else that monied interest won't view that form of stupidity in the desirable terms of "wow, backing this could cost me a lot of profits".

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  4. Crackdown on the browsers or the market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It sounds like he's talking about Tor and/or Silk Road.

    It's hard to tell from the article whether he's advocating a crackdown on browsers and Tor, or the criminal activity.

    If it's just the criminal activity then he's being sensible, otherwise he's being obtuse.

  5. Huh? by bbroerman · · Score: 2

    Obviously, this person has no clue as to how the internet, or software works...

    --
    Logic is the beginning of reason, not the end of it.
    1. Re:Huh? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wait until he discovers IRC.

      Or telnet.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. WTF by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems like this rather confused politician is confusing Firefox with Tor. And I bet if he knew who was funding Tor, his head would explode.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:WTF by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      He's definitely confused about something, with statements like this:

      Law enforcement agencies in the United States have recently taken action to address this issue, however it appears the solution was temporary as replacement browsers quickly appeared to ensure the continuance of the illegal trade.

      He seems to think the US agencies seized some sort of browser or something. Assuming he's just confused about terminology, he's apparently seeking some sort of international ban on certain kinds of websites that are accessible via Tor, or a ban on Tor itself. Good luck with that.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In case any one is wondering. DARPA and the US Navy are two of the founders.
      https://www.torproject.org/about/sponsors.html.en

    3. Re:WTF by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most people are not technically knowledgeable. I fear that things will keep getting more and more silly as the human race gets more and specialized. In the 1700s is was possible to be pretty knowledgeable about all the technology of the day. Today it just isn't. You can see an example of that here on slashdot when talking about spaceflight or battery technology and some idiot makes a reference to Moore's Law.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:WTF by hodet · · Score: 1

      Ya he is saying the feds shut down 'silk road' (a browser) and then silk road 2 (another browser?) popped up (and subsequently closed). Comedy gold I tell you.

    5. Re:WTF by lgw · · Score: 1

      I can just see it. The politician is looking at a screenshot of Firefox being used to browse Silk Road, and asks an aid "what is this technology called", the aide, not knowing the context, replies "the .. Firefox web browser?"

      Many countries ban TOR, and work actively to block it - this wouldn't be that strange if he was talking about TOR.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:WTF by Palinchron · · Score: 1

      Then again, most people who are not technically knowledgeable don't try to make laws about it.

      --
      The lesson here is that a sufficiently large corporation is indistinguishable from government. --ultranova
    7. Re:WTF by couchslug · · Score: 1

      It's possible to get knowledgeable enough to fact-check the basics easily, but the mob never want to learn about tech in the first place. This isn't new.

      Slashdot wasn't profitable enough as a tech site which is why it's now 4chan in white-and-green.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:WTF by causality · · Score: 1

      In the 1700s is was possible to be pretty knowledgeable about all the technology of the day. Today it just isn't.

      No, but it is abundantly possible to say "hey, I am not knowledgable about this subject, so perhaps I should avoid forming any snap judgments until such time as I inform myself (not rely on anyone else to do it for you)". It takes such a slight amount of humility to recognize that your own ignorance is not equivalent to someone else's skill and knowledge, that to do otherwise is simply a severe character flaw.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    9. Re:WTF by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      True but knowing ones own limits is not easy. Just look at the people posting on Slashdot as an example. This guy had someone tell him that people are using FOSS browsers to hide from the law while hiring murders, molesting children, trading kiddie porn, and selling hard drugs.
      If you want to see people saying the same level of stupid stuff just get into any discussion of energy policy. The anti-nukes are just as bad as are the anti-climate change and the clean coal folks. You will find huge numbers of people that are sure that nuclear power is the worst thing on the planet and that hundreds of people died from Three-mile island and Fukushima.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  7. Damn those anonymous evildoers by PaddyM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only people who deserve no taxes in Ireland are those multinationals with accountants who drink a double Irish coffee with their Dutch sandwich.

    1. Re:Damn those anonymous evildoers by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The only people who deserve no taxes in Ireland are those multinationals with accountants who drink a double Irish coffee with their Dutch sandwich.

      Don't forget wealthy musicians who travel the world complaining about iniquities while paying no royalties on their music (before Ireland imposed a limit on the exemption).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Damn those anonymous evildoers by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Er...who would the musicians pay royalties on their own music *to*? I think you're looking for another word.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  8. Leave it to a politician to blow hot air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are there any browsers produced in Ireland that such a policy would affect?

    1. Re:Leave it to a politician to blow hot air by jonbryce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft, Google and Apple all have their European bases in Ireland. Firefox has its European base in the UK, and Opera is based in Norway.

    2. Re:Leave it to a politician to blow hot air by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      And Apple and Google's browsers are both by and large open source, so that's still all sorts of dumb for an Irish politician to say.

    3. Re:Leave it to a politician to blow hot air by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Obviously the Irish Politician has had too much Irish Coffee...

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  9. Wow. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2
    Seriously? I really can't tell if this is a politician trolling, or if it's the Onion.. OR for the love of god, any politician anywhere really feels this way? Ireland, if this is true -- you have my sympathies, apparently our idiocy and surveillance state mentality jumped the containment barrier (i'm in the US) :(

    How in the heck did the idea of 'privacy' which, used to be one of the tenets of western civilization become something that our elected leaders (who are supposed to be on OUR side) actively try to quash? What is wrong with that picture. Did we learn nothing from the USSR and the Iron Curtain?

    1. Re:Wow. by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Did we learn nothing from the USSR and the Iron Curtain?

      Mentally reviewing the last decade has led me to conclude...no.

    2. Re:Wow. by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did we learn nothing from the USSR and the Iron Curtain?

      Yes. We learned how to do it better.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    3. Re:Wow. by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      He's just under/mis-informed about his choice of technologies.

      He's afraid that using anonymous web technologies leads to bad things -- and to be fair, users of Tor are essentially divided into the paranoid, the pedos, and the paranoid pedos. Blame the early adopters for quickly figuring out that an anonymous web is a great place to sell drugs, guns and children... ...and host Linux ISOs or something.

      I can't tell you what "most" anonymous web-surfers do. I can only tell you the part of it that makes the news.

    4. Re:Wow. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Hitler and his henchmen. The trend seems to be that Putin is going the same direction, just with a lower profile. Under the cover the crackdowns on the opposition are the same.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  10. Dodgy. by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

    It's only the buyers that he wants to track?
    Does he want to know who is customers or competitors are?

    --
    Does it go on forever?
  11. Tor Browser Bundle; Dogecoin is so cash by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are web browsers based on the work of the Firefox and Chromium open source projects that allow browsing a parallel web with enough anonymity that users feel safe using it to trade in prohibited weapons, prohibited drugs, and prohibited sexually explicit works. One of them is the Tor Browser Bundle. And I think the "payment system" part refers to Bitcoin and the other coins that vary in the exact proof-of-work problem, such as Namecoin (Bitcoin with a parallel DNS tacked on), Litecoin (Bitcoin with Tarsnap's Scrypt hash), and Dogecoin (very Litecoin, much meme, so cash, wow).

    1. Re:Tor Browser Bundle; Dogecoin is so cash by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm currently devoting nearly all of my hate to Doge. It might be the worst thing the internet has done in a long, long time.

      wow, no love, much sad

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Tor Browser Bundle; Dogecoin is so cash by hodet · · Score: 2

      Much hash, so fashion, wow! :-P

    3. Re:Tor Browser Bundle; Dogecoin is so cash by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      someone set up us the doge.

      and yes, it was CATS. of course!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Tor Browser Bundle; Dogecoin is so cash by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Of course it was. :)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  12. Who let this guy on a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This just goes to show how people who know nothing about computers shouldn't be in a position to make public statements about them. I mean, while we're at it, why don't we ban cars from driving on the road just so that bank robbers can't use them as getaway vehicles?

    1. Re:Who let this guy on a computer? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the state of Irelands roads?

    2. Re:Who let this guy on a computer? by mosiadh · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the state of Irelands roads?

      We have roads now, and there I was avoiding the potholes on the cow tracks!

    3. Re:Who let this guy on a computer? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      You mean the holes that the pigs have made to create a mud bath?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  13. Yup... by 101percent · · Score: 1

    Yeah you shouldn't be held accountable for every cent. The US government on the other hand cannot account for trillions and that's justifiable.

  14. Internet Users call for Crack Down on Stupidity by Gavrielkay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, if we can complain about things that are going to bring the world down around our ears, surely stupidity outranks firefox.

  15. Good luck with that, King Canute by sandbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let us know how that works out.

    I agree with the people above, it sounds like he's confusing Tor and Firefox. For my part, I'm a member of an on-line community and am dealing with their 64-year-old admin who refuses to let anyone post live links in the discussion forum because "it's a security risk" and won't allow any images, or media. She's wondering why this little web community is dying.

    You sometimes need to keep old people away from the keyboard.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:Good luck with that, King Canute by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Informative

      You sometimes need to keep old people away from the keyboard.

      Patrick O'Donovan, the politician in question, is 36 years old. My father is a 70-year-old web developer. Sure, in general younger people probably understand the internet better than older people, but there are so many exceptions to this in both directions that any generalization based on age is pretty well meaningless.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Good luck with that, King Canute by melikamp · · Score: 2

      Oh, he understands everything. He just hates that people are free to express themselves in ways not approved by the ruling elite.

    3. Re:Good luck with that, King Canute by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he wants to crack down on people's freedom of expression, but his comments are so bizarre that I'm not at all convinced he knows what he's talking about. "Ignorant" and "evil" are not mutually exclusive, which I suppose is better for the rest of us ... Anyway, there's no need to bring age into it. Politicians of any age are much of a muchness.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Good luck with that, King Canute by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Neither does making an inane, unsupported aspersion. It was a stupid statement.

    5. Re:Good luck with that, King Canute by hyades1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Old people? You need to open your eyes.

      When you run into one of those nasty little fascists who have no respect for civil rights and damned little compassion, you can pretty much bet it's a 20-something.

      And my buddy's 83-year-old father knows a hell of a lot more about computer hardware and software than most people I know aged 15 to 35. Among other things, he's digitized and sorted generations of photographs, sketches and Super-8 films. He's turned a selection of them into some really excellent movies, and he's set up a data base that's both flexible and easy to search covering families, family trees, friends, events and much more.

      If you want a security nightmare, let a teenager loose on the family computer. Clueless little shytes, for the most part.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    6. Re:Good luck with that, King Canute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What does King Canute has to do with this? Canute had a great understanding of how the world worked, unlike somebody else making /. headlines right now.

      If you are referring to the story about the chair on the beach and the rising tide, then you are part of the majority, who is misinformed of what actually happened. The story goes that after conquering England, a rumor started that this pagan considered himself greater than God and that made him an evil man (at least according to the people who used to have the power in England). King Canute had a chair (his throne?) placed on the beach and commanded the water not to make his feet wet. When the tide made his feet wet, he stood up and announced that hit feet got wet because God and God alone controls the tide. He (Canute) was a mere human and was unable to control anything God didn't intend humans to control. Supposedly this was a strong and successful attack on the rumor and it is very possible that he avoided a rebellion by doing this. Still somebody didn't like him and wrote it like he believed himself that he could control the tide, which is aimed at making him look like a loon with megalomania. There is no indication that he should be silly. In fact he was known as "Canute the Great" while he was alive and "the great" refers to his mind, not his conquests (even though his conquests justified this name as well). Please don't compare him to a modern day misguided individual.

      Back on topic:
      I agree that it appears to be a confusion between tor and firefox. Imagine this scenario:
      Somebody with a black Audi with fake license plates commits a crime and drives away. To prevent this from happening, the politicians bans all black Audis, which are able to use fake license plates. After all the owners would have the means to modify their vehicle into hiding their identity and after that they can commit a crime, which would be solved more easily if they had used a license plate registered in their real name. (the difference here is that fake license plates are illegal, tor isn't)
      For some reason no politicians propose a bill like this. Why is it that once we say keywords like copyright that politicians can come up with ideas like this?

      I agree with the bitcoin statement though. I never trusted the system and viewed it from the start as a haven for criminals. Bitcoin mining doesn't help, certainly not when executed in botnets. Why should I trust a payment system, where botnets plays a role?

    7. Re:Good luck with that, King Canute by mosiadh · · Score: 1

      Oh, he understands everything. He just hates that people are free to express themselves in ways not approved by the ruling elite.

      They are just showing their true party colours, the "blueshirts" are not too far off a bunch of facist thugs!

  16. Firefox with Tor by tepples · · Score: 3

    confusing Firefox with Tor

    I don't see how Firefox with Tor is so confusing.

    1. Re:Firefox with Tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Firefox can be combined with Tor, but that's a conscious decision by the user and not bundled with regular Firefox. Hence his statements don't hold any real merit since he focuses on "open source browsers" which we would reasonably assume to mean things like Firefox.

      Heck, I'm sure you can also merge Tor with Internet Explorer if you were silly enough. Does that mean proprietary browsers are also a threat?

  17. This reminds me of when... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This reminds me of when Senator Orin hatch wanted to develop technology to destroy peoples computers if they were caught downloading anything that was copyrighted.

    I actually witnessed this exchange live on C-SPAN.

    Excerpt from an article that's no longer up:

    "No one is interested in destroying anyone's computer," replied Randy Saaf of MediaDefender Inc., a secretive Los Angeles company that builds technology to deliberately download pirated material very slowly so other users can't.

    "I'm interested," Hatch interrupted. He said damaging someone's computer "may be the only way you can teach somebody about copyrights."

    The senator, a composer who earned $18,000 last year in song-writing royalties, acknowledged Congress would have to enact an exemption for copyright owners from liability for damaging computers. He endorsed technology that would twice warn a computer user about illegal online behavior, "then destroy their computer."

    "If we can find some way to do this without destroying their machines, we'd be interested in hearing about that," Hatch said. "If that's the only way, then I'm all for destroying their machines. If you have a few hundred thousand of those, I think people would realize" the seriousness of their actions.

    "There's no excuse for anyone violating copyright laws," Hatch said.

    1. Re:This reminds me of when... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Also I am pretty sure I saw him say he wanted to make CD burners illegal because there was no legitimate legal use for them. I could not however find any good sources for this. It was around the same time ~ 2003

    2. Re:This reminds me of when... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's like teaching someone not to jaywalk by hitting him in the shins with a two by four.

    3. Re:This reminds me of when... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Of course almost everything we download is copyrighted, by definition, even if those are all legal downloads and are all free!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    4. Re:This reminds me of when... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Or hiring a an incredibly incompetent person to hit people in the shins that they think might have jaywalked. It is hard to say if this person would actually be accountable or even have to say sorry for mistakes.

  18. Well, is he going to hate the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The NSA snooping revelations have spooked quite a lot of people, including engineers who design protocols. Anonymous browsing will not remain a niche for "paranoid" people - it will become available in mainstream systems.

  19. Re:Simple Solution ... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Don't be so hard on poor O'Donovan. I don't know how to get those newfangled "Tweat" things on Prodigy or CompuServe either.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  20. Re:Simple Solution ... by anagama · · Score: 1

    You'll have to find a piece of paper, a pen, an envelope, and a stamp. Tweeting won't work here.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  21. Anybody check the name of his party? by mugurel · · Score: 1

    Fine Gals. Look who's talking!

  22. What, seriously? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Someone ask him what his position is on the internet being "a series of tubes".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  23. Wait what? by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Open access roads are used to transport drugs. Open access city streets can hold dealers and prostitutes. Public libraries have been used to read about revolution and bomb making and pot growing.The postal service has been used to facilitate illegal payments. Lets close them all DOWN.
    Pro tip, just because it is online, or open source, does not make human nature any different.

    Some people will beat their spouse or hire a hitman. Some people will be addicts. Some will sell to the addicts. Some will fondle their niece.

    Claiming some tool is enabling these behaviors and ignoring that tool's greater benefit greater benefit to society is either fear-mongering or blind unthinking fear (possibly instilled by other fear mongers). If the former, you are the worst kind of control hungry sociopath to use fear to restrict others. If the latter, you are a puppet and a simpleton. in either case, you do not deserve to be in any position of leadership.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Wait what? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      and often used for various smuggling operations across the NI border in bandit country - so dig up all the roads between Eire and NI then

  24. Double Irish by tepples · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Internet Explorer and Safari are produced in Ireland for tax purposes.

    1. Re:Double Irish by spasm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So if the Dáil Éireann passes a law banning any browser containing any open source code, we'll have rid the world of Safari and Internet Explorer?
      "There is no greater love than to lay down one's browser for one's friends."

  25. Because Open Source is the Problem by therealprologic · · Score: 1

    Since when did being open and free to all become the problem here?

  26. Pajitnov: FOSS "should never have existed" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Probably just a fan of Tetris, whose author has claimed in an interview that free software "destroys the market".

  27. I wonder if he even realises... by DrXym · · Score: 1

    ... that nothing he said makes a slightest bit of sense. Literally none at all.

  28. Thanks by willoughby · · Score: 1

    A few times I've heard an Irish use the term "gobshite" and I wasn't sure what it meant 'till today.

    1. Re:Thanks by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Seriously! I was so upset about the stupidity of this, that I overlooked the perfect word to describe them!

      Gobshites!

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    2. Re:Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A few times I've heard an Irish use the term "gobshite" and I wasn't sure what it meant 'till today.

      Etymology: "gob" is Gaelic for a bird's beak/bill, and came to be slang for "mouth", especially in the sense of a mouth always flapping on. And "shite" is, well, excrement.

  29. What more can one expect from total Assholes? by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just when you think that you have grown beyond caring, theses guys manage to poke beneath the shield and hit the "AAAAAARRRGGGHH" button !!
    I am sorry for taking this seriously, but after the Bank Bailouts, the corruption, the incompetency, the cover-ups and the sheer fuck-wittery of the past
    years, they attack OPEN SOURCE BROWSERS !!

    What more can one expect from politicians that:
    - kowtow-ed to the EU on the Maastricht Treaty re-Vote, (It puts the lotion in the basket, and votes again and again until the answer is YES)
    - sold 3 generations of their own people out, in the form of a bank bailout for *private* non-system critical banks,
    - have no concept of Justice whether social, civil or criminal
    - have no concept of public probity, of duty or what to be a servant of the people actually means
    - assume in blind arrogance that their own short-sighted, small-town, bigoted, religion-ridden, never questioned views are "NORMALITY"
        and those of everyone else, are simply illegal.

    In short. Olympic level Assholes.

    Winking and smiling and smirking, crapping out their "hokesy/folksy" catchphrases, with constant shit eating grins.

    Concepts such as free speech, right to privacy, equal treatment before the law, due process,
    womens' rights (especially reproductive rights), ... are considered amusing or just dismissed,
    out of hand, by these troglodytes.

    For example, the implicit assumption that *all pornography* is simply illegal!

    The US and Britain have blanket surveilled every Irish citizen for generations, and this cringing *lackey*
    assumes that *law enforcement* was the purpose.

    Call me harsh, but I interpret the failure of elected representatives to protect .the rights of their citizens,
    in the face of blatant intrusions, as more than incompetence, more than failure.
    It is treachery.

    Following the usual, endless cycle, whenever social unrest threatens, the Haves in Ireland,
    push the Have-nots to emigrate. Since, conveniently, the non-resident cannot vote, there
    was, is and will never be any pressure on the ruling elite to change any of their policies ... the opposition is simply disenfranchised.

    And nothing changes.

    I dream of another Ireland.
    A country where an informed electorate hold their elected leaders to account, demand the
    definition and enforcement of just laws which protect individual and public rights.
    A truly Free Ireland.

    Until then, I apologise to the world that we are represented by these fools and that
    you have to listen to their blather.

    --
    (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    1. Re:What more can one expect from total Assholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm seeing some very similar things here in Australia.
      Equally as fed up.
      Along all the awful stories of corruption I see coming out of America and the UK these days, It feels like the western world has gone completely nuts.

      Everything is becoming "The land of take what you can, and fuck the other guy!"

      At least when PMs get caught rorting expenses in the UK, they have to actually have some reform, over here that's not necessary, according to the people who were abusing the system in the first place.

    2. Re:What more can one expect from total Assholes? by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, entirely correct.

      I will present my apology, in person, to Zeus, upon my next visit.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    3. Re:What more can one expect from total Assholes? by tibit · · Score: 2

      Everything is becoming "The land of take what you can, and fuck the other guy!"

      And you will see most of them in church on Sundays!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  30. Politician is a rank amature by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

    He forgot to include the words "pedophiles" and "terrorists" in his call for a crackdown. I would've expected better from an Irishman.

  31. We need to crack down on doormakers too ! by burni2 · · Score: 1

    Because low cost and easy to acquire doors from doormakers (there might even be discount door sellers !) protect children from being seen when they get abused.

    Join, the remove all doors movement, we provide you the feeling of being better people, because you can morally pic on others that don't want to declare to you why they love to fuck asses or wear sissy dresses, or just want to be who they are .. unwatched & unsuppressed.

  32. No way it'll happen here in America by rmdingler · · Score: 2
    Our government encourages our assumption of internet anonymity.

    It's cheaper than actual freedom, and it makes keeping track of us easy as a cowbell.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:No way it'll happen here in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And what do you think the NSA is doing then?

    2. Re:No way it'll happen here in America by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Re-read the GP. Then comprehend it.
      Maybe you'll realize that your post agrees with the GP.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  33. Bad logic is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    saying Open Source browsers leads to anon browsing leads to black market deals
    just like
    iron leads to knives leads to stabbings: obvious conclusion, ban iron, yes?

     

  34. Re:News News News by tepples · · Score: 1

    As usual, you can substitute the word "cash" or "gold" in.

    Cash and gold take a lot longer to send from one continent to another than Bitcoin.

  35. As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and the fact that that idiotic Irish luddite can be elected as a politician says a lot about those who voted for him !!

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by Patent+Lover · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought only the U.S. produced these idiots. I'm slightly less embarrassed to be an U.S. citizen.

    2. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Democracy creates these idiots. The problem is that politicians are expected to have opinions on everything, yet it's impossible to know everything. These people end up making decisions on things they understand little or nothing about.

    3. Re: As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by Chaneera · · Score: 1

      ... and people keep voting for them. We get what we deserve.

    4. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Nope, public officials everywhere are short bus special.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by flyneye · · Score: 2

      Just cluing in that Democrazy is a BAD thing?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    6. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by 1s44c · · Score: 2

      Just cluing in that Democrazy is a BAD thing?

      That's oversimplifying it, but any system that puts people in charge of making serious decisions about things they know little about isn't good.

    7. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by TWX · · Score: 2

      "The Internet is a great way to get on the 'net." --Senator Bob Dole, during the 1996 Presidential Campaign

      "Those Internets" --President George W. Bush

      These are men that either campaigned for or held the top elected office in this country, and they really had very little clue as to what the Internet was or how it could be used. To an extent Dole can get a pass, as in 1996 very few people, relatively speaking, used the Internet commercially, but by the time that Bush-43 was president this should have been sorted out.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    8. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by jaq1an · · Score: 1

      the problem with Irish politicians is they're all ignorant luddites. doesn't matter who you vote for you are screwed either way.

    9. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by enharmonix · · Score: 2

      Democracy creates these idiots.

      Finally, an argument in favor of authoritarianism. About time.

    10. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by Reziac · · Score: 2

      "Democracy: that ultimate triumph of quantity over quality." -- Peter H. Peel

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      Education is the most important investment any nation can make. Democracies that have implemented this don't have the same extreme examples as the ones that have refused to.

      Democracy without a well educated public is better than a backwards totalitarian regime, yet remains similar enough to one that to ignore it and refuse to act on the awareness is the real problem of our age.

      Nobody wants to address the underlying problems, so nothing gets resolved. It's in the best interest of many of the exterme wealthy to keep it this way.

    12. Re:As wasted as that idiotic Irish luddite by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, everything else ends up being worse.
      At least, in a democracy, there is a way to have a revolution without killing too many people !

  36. Re:Good thing Ireland is irrelevant by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    Ireland doesn't really matter. It's the Midwest of the United Kingdom.
    --
    Only on Slashdot does an AC get modded Informative for pointing out that the LHC is in Europe.

    The combination of your post and your .sig is sadly hilarious.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  37. Re:Hurray! by ls671 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is that "Senior System Engineer/Architect" thing doing in a slashdot sig?

    Furthermore, your sig says: "Notice: If you post anonymously do not expect a reply" and you just replied to an anon!

    You seem to have problems following basic algorithms which is questionable for a " Senior System Engineer/Architect".

    Take care nevertheless man ;-)
    --
    Senior master/architect of the universe

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  38. Why use an open source browser as a base by tepples · · Score: 1

    Heck, I'm sure you can also merge Tor with Internet Explorer if you were silly enough.

    It would infringe copyright. The key difference here is that merging privacy tools with a browser distributed under a free software license does not infringe copyright.

  39. I told an internet cat and... by matbury · · Score: 1

    ..this was its reaction: http://i.imgur.com/M6SDzGZ.gif

  40. W3C + HTML5 + DRM by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'll tell you what this is all about:

    http://boingboing.net/2013/10/11/w3cs-drm-for-html5-sets-the.html

    Soon, all compliant browsers will have to be opaque, in order to have DRM that will protect Netflix and other streaming services. Independent browsers will disappear. Open source browsers will be a big hole in the plan to completely lock down the internet once and for all and cannot be allowed to exist. Irish politicians have learned their globalization lessons well and know on which side their bread is buttered. He may not be the most eloquent advocate, but he knows what the agenda is.

    We are very close to the end of the internet as we know it. I've long said that the internet is turning into cable television. Now the transformation is almost complete.

    http://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/post/72759474218/we-are-huxleying-ourselves-into-the-full-orwell

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:W3C + HTML5 + DRM by malvcr · · Score: 2

      HTML is not the only technology application exist on TCP/IP.

      If the time arrived for the HTML to bypass every right for privacy, maybe the time to forget HTML arrived and to look for a different type of technology.

      The problem is that for some law offenders, the authorities are accusing all the other users as criminals and forcing them to receive the same treatment. In this new world, we are becoming guilty by default unless we can give a proof that we are the good ones.

      Do you know what is the interesting thing? ... the firewalls work that way. Everything is closed and we open what we need to open, and we learned that this is the best way to control what the people do, so we are extending this to other knowledge domains.

    2. Re:W3C + HTML5 + DRM by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. We can still have browsers that don't support DRM services, or browsers that don't even support HTML5, or even browsers that don't support pictures. Nothing in any of this implies jail time for refusing to serve up DRM.

    3. Re:W3C + HTML5 + DRM by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. We can still have browsers that don't support DRM services, or browsers that don't even support HTML5

      Sure. Except we have a politician in a European nation, one preparing to be part of a new international trade agreement, saying they have to ban open source browsers.

      I'm just saying don't be fooled by his explanation that it's to "fight terror".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:W3C + HTML5 + DRM by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If the time arrived for the HTML to bypass every right for privacy, maybe the time to forget HTML arrived and to look for a different type of technology.

      Easier said than done. What happens if the major telecoms, in exchange for removal of net neutrality rules, decide they're going to limit certain types of traffic?

      Government's happy, corporations are happy and intelligence services are happy. One big happy prison.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  41. Well... by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

    Go home Patrick O' Donovan, it's obvioius that you're drunk.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  42. And this is a bad thing? by shugah · · Score: 1

    Do they have electoral recall in Ireland?

    --
    If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
  43. Re:Hurray! by s.petry · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe you have trouble with the English language. "Do not expect" does not mean what you think it does, or at least what you just portrayed. Consider the meaning of the terminology and re-think your position.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  44. Gives me a headache by JasoninKS · · Score: 1

    And here again we see a fine example of someone "explaining" something they truly have no clue about. PHB (pointy hair boss) picks up on recent buzzwords and tries to use them to sound smart.

    "If it's "anonymous" they must be hiding something! And open source can make things anonymous! So open source users are hiding something, like drugs and guns and other evil things! Oh think of the children!"

    Apparently he doesn't realize black markets existed looong before the internet ever came around.

  45. B-Bip bip bip bip bip bip. BIP! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    I propose his constituents send him the following letter:

    "Dear Sir,

    That's retarded, and you're retarded for saying it.

    Respectfully,

    your name."

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  46. what actions? by fuzzytv · · Score: 1

    I wonder what he means by "Law enforcement agencies in the United States have recently taken action to address this issue” - I'm not really aware of any actions against "open source internet browsers" (although they're certainly thinking hard about tor and tor browsers). Or is he talking about the internet dragnet that became common knowledge last year?

    1. Re:what actions? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Dont' read anything real into it, other than it being so factually incorrect it's laughable which clearly indicates that its just yet another politician who doesn't even understand the basics of the thing he is trying to legislate aganst.

      He doesn't understand because he privately doesn't actually give a shit, he's just pretending he does because he's getting a large backhander from some monopolist corporation such as Microsoft just for creating more anti-opensource FUD.

  47. OT - was Shut up drinky (and should be again) by The+Cornishman · · Score: 2

    A rather terse teacher in Beaulieu
    Had a class which was very unreaulieu;
    In a fine fit of pique, he resigned, so to spique:

    Dear Headmaster,
    I'm leaving.
    Yours treaulieu,

    Beaulieu

  48. Re:Politicians like these by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, Patrick O' Donovan wasn't born then.

    Reading such a clueless screed, I expected another clueless old luddite. Imagine my surprise to find out this schmuck is 37 years old!

  49. Not even I by hackus · · Score: 1

    drink THAT much.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  50. Where is Mark Twain when we need him? by mendax · · Score: 1

    Whenever some idiot politician opens his mouth and crap like this comes out, I wonder what wisecrack would come out of Mark Twain's mouth or erupt from his vitriolic pen. Perhaps he would rehash something like what he wrote for a newspaper in 1866 when he was living in California:

    "And speaking of steamboats reminds me of an incident of my late trip to Sacramento. I want to publish it, as showing how going north on the [Sacramento] river gradually enfeebles one's mind, and accounts for the strange imbecility of legislators who leave her sensible men and become the reverse, to the astonishment of their constituents, by the time they reach their seats at Sacramento."

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
  51. abusing alcoholic beverages by sxpert · · Score: 1

    see what abusing alcoholic beverages can do to you ?
    he probably had way too much guinness that night !

  52. Re:Politicians like these by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Which emphasizes the use of condoms is a good thing.

    Of course - since he's Irish then he's probably a catholic, so that means that a condom probably wasn't an option.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKFa6sVH_1k

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  53. Why stop there? by mythix · · Score: 1

    Since studies have shown this is used in nearly 100% of all illegal communications between illegal drug traffickers, weapons dealers and pornography distributers, we should really start looking for a way to ban the alfabet.

  54. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...and on Figure 4 you can observe a prime specimen of the "butthurt" species.

  55. well by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

    There is nothing wrong with the Internet tubes per se, as long as they are used in the right manner.

  56. not an exclusive irish problem by joseph90 · · Score: 1

    I would say I am embarrassed to be Irish but I am not. Dumb asses are spread pretty evenly throughout the world. This one just happens to be Irish. He displays the intellectual rigor I have come to expect from our politicians. Badly educated and unthinking. Nothing new here.

    I do fear for the future however.

  57. Re:Hurray! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    First of all, it's "frist psot", and secondly, anonymous coward is awesome -- he gets a ton of frist psots.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  58. Just Another Town Drunk by flyneye · · Score: 1

    When you have a town drunk, vomiting in gutters, pissing in alleys, driving away tourists, the obvious solution is to elect them to public office, where you can keep an eye on them, busy them and forget about them. UNTIL the day they blather out some rye whiskey induced blather about browsers. Then you just flat ignore them, theyll go away and drink some more. Problem solved.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  59. Who's Not Irish? by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    22 of America's 44 presidents, from Andrew Jackson to Barack Obama, count an Irish ancestry.

    And let's be honest, Boston is more Irish than Cork.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Who's Not Irish? by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Ah, you have them surrender their Irishness on the way out then... far and away the best strategy.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  60. Re:irish and drunk by isorox · · Score: 1

    If you were irish and sober...

    Why not ask if he's a leprechaun - it's more likely!

  61. Public domain even worse by allypally · · Score: 1

    The big problem is that criminals are accessing the internet using public-domain inventions that are intrinsically anonymous. I mean, of course, by using keyboards.

    Until we have a properly secure keyboard -- with govt approved letter order, built-in camera, and a mandatory license needed before you can use it -- the bad guys will continue to score easy wins against our freedoms.

  62. Back off! by Dareth · · Score: 1
    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  63. Careful Patty by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Google may need to find a new fool.

  64. The Irish get nervous when.... by mbeckman · · Score: 1

    ...confronted with things they cannot blow up. If you're anonymous on the Internet, conducting anonymous commerce, you cannot be senselessly slaughtered with a bomb.