Slashdot Mirror


Code.org: Give Us More H-1B Visas Or the Kids Get Hurt

theodp writes "Fresh off their wildly-hyped Hour of Code, Code.org headed to Washington last Thursday where H-1B visas were prescribed as the cure for U.S. kids' STEM ills. 'The availability of computer science to all kids is an issue that warrants immediate and aggressive action,' Code.org told Congress. "Comprehensive immigration reform efforts that tie H-1B visa fees to a new STEM education fund,' suggested Code.org co-founder Hadi Partovi, is 'among the policies that we feel can be changed to support the teaching and learning of more computer science in K-12 schools. We hope you can be allies in our endeavors on Capitol Hill.' Also testifying with Partovi was inventor and US FIRST founder Dean Kamen, who also pitched the benefits of H-1B visas (PDF). 'We strongly encourage Congress to pass legislation that directs H-1B visa fees to enable underserved inner-city and rural schools to participate in FIRST,' Kamen testified. 'Specifically, these fees should support efforts to enable underserved inner-city and rural schools to participate in FIRST.'"

163 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Train the kids in valuable skills by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like asking if you want fries, or how to fill out forms to receive government cheese.
    Train what you have, fix what you have, rather than importing more of the problem. It's like selling a product at a loss, but making up the profit on volume.
    Dean Kamen is a cool rich guy, and like most rich guys, can afford to advocate things that don't impact him.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Training them to get government cheese would probably be more useful than teaching them programming. At least then it wouldn't get their hopes up that there are actual jobs awaiting them at the end. It's my experience that most advertised IT jobs these days are just mirage jobs. They're posted for legal reasons and so that tech companies can run to Congress and say "Look at all these jobs we can't fill! We need more H1-B visas!" But if you actually waste your time trying to GET one of those jobs, you'll find that they're as fake and inaccessible as a closed movie set.

      And even the jobs that ARE real have their wages kept artificially low by all the H1B's. And god help you trying to get anything these days in programming if you're over 35 (only hip kids can code, I guess).

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      Looks great from the ad, but the closer you get, the more you see it's not real.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    3. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly how does programmer or IT person get a job that requires minimum 2 years Win9 experence ? They can't so the company hires H1b and states no local talent.

    4. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      All so we can pour money into India, to keep the Chinese out.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    5. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by w1kL3f · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a lot of ageism now in the software engineering sector. I'm over 40, first began programming BASIC and C in the 1980s, and have kept current: I now program in Python and JavaScript. Does the latter matter to employers? Not that I see. I'm unemployed and can barely get an interview or a meeting, let alone get hired after they see that I have a couple of strands of grey hair (I still have all my hair, though). Doesn't matter how I dress, or if I wear a hoodie and chucks. I'm old, and apparently that means I'm worthless in this market.

    6. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Dean Kamen is a cool rich guy, and like most rich guys, can afford to advocate things that don't impact him.

      The term "limousine liberal" comes to mind.

    7. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by jythie · · Score: 2

      The problem with 'rich guys' is that as a society we highly prize wealth and associate it with superiority in general. If one knows how to make lots of money then usually they are seen (and see themselves) as being generally more intelligent then people who do not. Some get really wrapped up in this perception and forget that they are domain experts, really good at a narrow (but profitable) field but not necessarily skilled in other fields. It is the same basic problem we see in tech sites like slashdot (I am an engineer! that means I understand sociology and economics better then those experts that make half my income!) and why the small business lobby is so easy to manipulate (I made a bunch of money, so I understand how to build a good economy!). Scale up to richer people and the effect can get even more pronounced.

    8. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by careysub · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dean Kamen is a cool rich guy, and like most rich guys, can afford to advocate things that don't impact him.

      The term "limousine liberal" comes to mind.

      Because there is no catchy pejorative coined for right-wing billionaires pushing their own policy preferences?

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    9. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Because there is no catchy pejorative coined for right-wing billionaires pushing their own policy preferences?

      Increased immigration ("immigration reform") is usually associated with the "liberals" in this country. The right-wingers are generally associated with anti-immigration sentiments.

    10. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      You exaggerate the requirement a bit because an impossible requirement like that will have high risk of being rejected. The way the requirement posted for a job is usually crafted directly from the person whom they are going to give a job to. So if the person took courses in X, Y, and Z, and has (even very little) experience in A and B, all of these A, B, X, Y, and Z will become parts of the requirement! It is very unlikely to find a person who has all of these requirement besides the person whom they have already pre-selected. Or even you found the person, the person would likely not apply for the job because the person evaluate himself/herself for much higher pay rate of the similar job. For those who come from a cheaper cost of living country would not mind the pay rate because it is still much much better than what they would be paid in their own country. For an American, it is totally different mind set.

      Anyway, I am all for the reform, but I am not satisfied with the way they use this code.org because doing so has a lot more reasons (that benefit the lobbies' employers) behind what they are trying to show.

    11. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahaha, funny. So, that means that big business leans liberal??? Hahahahahahahaha

      You're funny and your political bias is showing, and in this case, it's misdirected and pointless. H1B is all about firing US residents and citizens and ALL about importing cheap labor from countries where a salary of $20,000 per year is a king's ransom.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    12. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hahahahahahaha, funny. So, that means that big business leans liberal??? Hahahahahahahaha

      No, it means that in America, there's not much difference between "liberal" and "conservative", esp. when you look at the politicians on both sides.

      The Democrats push for "immigration reform" and lax policies because their constituents have been brainwashed into thinking unlimited immigration is a great thing somehow ("we need to reunite families!!!"), and push for this when they have power, but their real motivation is to help big corporations import cheap labor. The Republicans speak publicly against "immigration reform" to their constituents usually, because they're generally more anti-immigration, but then when they're in office they push for easier immigration and laxer policies, because their real motivation is to help big corporations import more cheap labor, but then they blame it on the Democrats. This of course is exactly what the Democrats do for other issues, where they do the same thing as the Republicans, to help their corporate masters, but then blame the Republicans for it. So we have two parties, doing mostly the same thing, and screwing over middle-class Americans, while keeping us distracted with a divide-and-conquer strategy so we won't vote for anyone outside these corrupt parties, because then "the wrong lizard may get in".

    13. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahaha, funny. So, that means that big business leans liberal??? Hahahahahahahaha

      On many issues, yes. Republicans are more pro-business on most issues, but Democrats are "better" on immigration, education funding, non-defense corporate welfare, and intellectual property (big media companies are big donors to the Dems).

      ALL about importing cheap labor from countries where a salary of $20,000 per year is a king's ransom.

      Once they are here, many of them will apply for permanent visas, and then citizenship, and then they will register to vote ... as Democrats.

    14. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Increased immigration ("immigration reform") is usually associated with the "liberals" in this country. The right-wingers are generally associated with anti-immigration sentiments.

      The right-wingers are generally opposed to amnesty for illegal aliens and also want stronger border enforcement, etc. When it comes to increasing the H-1B quota they, or at least their supposed representatives, are all for it. Look at the voting records. The Democrats aren't much different, which is why people get so screwed by the endless stream of H-1B's. This is a bipartisan screwing. Occasionally you get a decent politician like Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) who actually want at least some protections, but they're such a small minority it doesn't matter.

    15. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by swb · · Score: 2

      Billionaires pushing policies that benefit billionaires lacks irony.

      "Limousine liberal" generally applies to a wealthy person pushing a putatively altruistic solution which imposes costs on those less able to bear them.

      It's often associated with increased taxation. A limousine liberal may advocate for an increase in property taxes to help fund schools, a cost that they can easily bear but which is regressive on the rest of the population (while all the while sending their kids to private schools).

      Other examples include "gas guzzler taxes" or increased gasoline taxes; trivial increased costs to them, but more imposing to people aren't rich.

    16. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      So, that means that big business leans liberal?

      "Liberal" means very little. At the very least you have to distinguish between social and economic politics. Plenty of big business types, especially in places like Silicon Valley, are social liberals (gay marriage, etc.), but economics is another matter. Democrats are very good at pandering to this crowd in both aspects, and Republicans cater to their economic leanings. In other words, you're screwed. Real Democrats and moderate Republicans are, if not extinct, at least endangered species.

    17. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The right wingers say they're opposed to amnesty and want stronger border protection, but when they're in power they don't actually follow through with it, because cheap farm labor is important to many of their big donors in the ag industry. Bush's track record on border protection wasn't very good.

    18. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, but not exactly for the same reasons. Within big tech companies there's a disease. It's an ugly disease, and one that needs to be cured. It's called HR. Whenever we have an opening for new people within the company I work for, it's impossible to hire an honest american. Why? Because the recruiters in the HR department put the following requirements:

      Expert in:
      IP Engineering, C Programming, Java Programming, SQL, Unix Administration, Windows Administration, SS7, VoIP, etc, etc etc.

      Also, requires a masters degree or preferable a phd.

      Ok problem 1: Nobody whose honest can get past their computerized screening process. Basically for any and every job we post their screening process makes applications check through a list of technologies. If you say you're not expert in one of those technologies? You're screwed - I never see your resume. So not only do I not see many resumes, but the ones I do are usually people who know so little about technology that they think they're expert in everything that they've heard of. Those people are almost never expert in any one of the technologies listed. That, or they're just plain dishonest. Or they're an H1B visa holder... Which are the only people who ever make it through the screening process (because they're clueless or dishonest or both).

      So I work at a large company, a VERY large tech company. And the process of actually hiring someone who applies to work here is just shit. On top of the stupid screening process, which only exists because we have a lazy HR department (a proper online screening would be relevant to the job), we have this legacy that says we should only being hiring people with masters degrees or better. And quite frankly, the US education system sucks. So many people went into computer science without a passion for it, when I talk to people who do have CS degrees from the states - they're usually people totally disinterested in technology, only went into it because it was the hot thing at the time they were in school and though they'd get good paying jobs. These people don't really care for the job they do, and it turns out know less than the kid who never finished college because he was too busy starting a dotcom with some wizzbang idea that didn't make it. Ironically, that kid is the one we should be hiring but I've seen the rejected applications: we never get to interview him because he wasn't an expert in every single technology and doesn't have a masters.

      And so how does the company get stuff? Well they hire contractors. Some contractors are turned into fulltime employees via skirting the hiring process. Other contractors, after being hired as contractors, and seeing the extra crap that full times go through, combined with higher pay rate that contractors make decide that they don't want to convert to full times. So now you have a company dependent on contractors who make more than their full time counter parts, but in all other ways are equal.

      And what does the employer do? They scream!!!! We can't hire any people in America! We need new blood, new people! And it's true: they can't. They create roadblocks that prevent it through their stupidity. They put power in the hands of HR people who are better off not having any at all (except like, the power to explain to me some question about dental, or to deal with problems of work place shit - but NOT fucking hiring).

      And so you get this big Indian train going. Most of the Indians on this H1B train don't have masters degrees, not real ones anyways. And get this, they don't have tech experience. The ones I've worked with have a 6 month class in technology. They're super duper eager to learn, but they lack base. And guess who has to teach them? And on whose dime? And out of the thousands that move through you're going to encounter a few people who are naturally gifted - and that's great. We got those ones here now, in America, and they're productive. But they're the exception - not the rule. The rule is most of the H1Bs f

    19. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 2

      Absolutely true. H1B Visas are destroying tech job opportunities for American citizens and stealing our jobs. A flood of Indians who drives down wages and basically makes it next to impossible for Americans to easily find Tech work, discourages American students from going into this field. It costs significantly more for an American student to go to College, letting in Indians who went to third world schools who had to spend far less on their college undercuts American students.

      While Liberals claim to be so "globally aware", they seem to be ignorant of the fact as well that allowing Indians to come to the US basically dooms India through the brain drain,and retards Indias development, since these Indian tech people are so wonderful, they are more needed in India to help their countries economy. The US can produce its own home grown talent, and that is what we should do.

      the best thing we can do is to abolish the H3B program, this would be best for other countries such as India and as well is best for the USA.

    20. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      We should abolish the H1B program rather.

    21. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Doesn't matter how I dress, or if I wear a hoodie and chucks. I'm old, and apparently that means I'm worthless in this market.

      Think out of the box a bit. Try applying for a QA engineer job. I work for a very large, well known software company, and it's stunning how hard it is for us to find good candidates. Your extensive history would be considered an asset, as you probably have the experience needed to see the mistakes these "crazy kids" are making in their code and designs. You'll still be writing plenty of code, too.

    22. Re: Train the kids in valuable skills by JimboFBX · · Score: 2

      I put my resume on dice.com and got bombarded by phone calls for jobs the next day. In contrast, I've gotten very few responses for jobs that I applied. Apparently that is how job hunting works now. Publicly listed jobs get overwelmed so you need to get first dibs on a subset of the job market via a recruiter.

    23. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by danlip · · Score: 2

      Perhaps Python and JavaScript are not as valuable skill set as you think (they're not, try Java or (shudder) .Net) or perhaps you live somewhere crappy. But I am 42 and get to pick from multiple job offers in Denver.

    24. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is certainly ageism at some companies, but not everywhere. When I was looking last, at 48, I had 3 different offers from around the country, and one of the companies is a well known company to most computer geeks. A large percentage of their staff was over 40, and I was probably going to be the youngest on the team I was invited to join. I don't consider myself a rockstar by any stretch. I eventually took the offer in Southern California in order to enjoy the weather, even though the cost of living sucks. At least half the engineers at my company, both hardware and software, are over 40, with a handful in their late 50s. Recent hires too. I would seriously think about switching geographic areas if you're having that hard of a time. Not always easy, but better than getting further behind.

    25. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your mistake was to not specialize or learn the right things?

      I'm over 40 and have a PhD in computer science, with decent experience in databases and scientific computing. I'm still having an easy time getting work in the greater Boston area.

    26. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I'm turning 40 at the end of this year, and haven't seen much in the way of ageism. Though, I'm also not in Silicon Valley, or NYC, though the company I work for does have some presence there. I work in the Phoenix area, and most of the software development jobs here are in business software. Most of the jobs I see are centered around Java and .Net in that space. There are some PHP jobs at 1/2 the pay or less, and rarely see Python. Node.js is on the rise, and there's a pretty healthy community around it. The node.js user group is pretty much spread between older guys (some in their 60's) and younger (14-16yo even) ...

      I think it really depends on what jobs/markets you are going for, and where you are looking.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    27. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by aztracker1 · · Score: 2

      Beyond this, if you don't have anything on github, or similar, you should consider putting something out there, or helping out. Participating and even running a local user group can help a lot too... It's not that you work 60+ hours a week, but that you are active in the community that raises your profile.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    28. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Without a corporate sponsored Super PAC, I think Slashdot is about all we can do to "make this public". Unless one of us it bold enough to pull some ridiculous stunt that will get on TV.

    29. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      My economic strategy for the nation then would be to put a permanent stop-payment on all government bonds, jack up the price of our agricultural exports, cut off all foreign aid, and return our military back to within our own borders. Many nations do not produce enough of their own food, and the USA really is the bread basket to the world. Of course this would trigger a global massive depression and possibly TEOTWAWKI, but wouldn't it be a great way to stick it to the 1%?

    30. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Personal wealth is relative to the level of disparity between you and the other guy. Thus it only makes sense for the elite to bring in cheap labor from overseas than it does for the elite to move to a 3rd world nation. The former is the best of both worlds for the elite in America. Plus, they can now hire cheap labor at minimum wage as a house nanny and/or maid.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    31. Re:Train the kids in valuable skills by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Going by that annoying typewriter font you're using, ditching some old-fashioned habits and mannerisms might help, else you're not going to make it past HR screening no matter how talented you are. :-P

  2. They're not even trying... by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to make sense anymore.

    They might as well say "Wombat refuges must be funded so as to secure America's future in space exploration.

    The whole thing is a non sequitur.

    Visas have nothing what so ever to do with the academic success of American kids. Nothing.

    Aliens could come bubble out of the 10th dimension and seal the US off in a pocket universe... and guess what... they could still get a decent education. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE!?! Because immigration has nothing to do with education. The US could be utterly isolated and yet have a fantastic education system.

    Example? Look at Japan... notice how their education system is terrible because they don't have really permissive immigration policies.

    Oh wait, their education system is great despite having pretty tight immigration.

    Stupidity. Anyone that honestly gets suckered into such arguments should get the word "moron" tattooed on their forehead. Just for efficient identification.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:They're not even trying... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's worse than a non-sequitur:

      Let's play EC101 for a second here:

      1. Not enough students are persuing 'STEM' education.

      2. Hypothesis: 'STEM' education needs to be improved, to improve retention and attraction and/or the rewards of pursuing 'STEM' education need to be more visible, greater, or both.

      3. Ergo, we should issue more H-1B visas in order to lower the real wages for workers in 'STEM' fields and thus incentivize more students to study the (even if rewarding, quite challenging) 'STEM' subjects!

      A non-sequitur would be downright sensible by comparison. At least disconnected statements tend to not be internally contradictory...

      If you are having difficulty recruiting students for a subject, why would you possibly want to reduce the rewards for studying a subject? That's the opposite of what you want to do. Now, admittedly, some non-STEM students or STEM-abandoning students are motivated more by shitty teaching or other similar factors than they are by future job prospects; but unless you want to abandon basically all theories of human motivation underlying vaguely capitalist economies, you have to admit that expected payoff is sort of a major factor in whether to stick with hard math or go and do something else.

      This one strikes me as similar to the (also surprisingly common and equally absurd; but self-interested) "We can't attract enough good talent, also wages are too high!" whining from employers. Hey, dumbass, supply curves, no? If you can't attract good talent, how can you also be paying too much? Unless your work environment is brutally fucked on various social levels, if you were overpaying, talent would be knocking down the door to come join you...

    2. Re: They're not even trying... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything in your post that indicated you knew what the arguments were.

      Kamen et al think they have found a revenue stream in the fees collected from H1-B visas that could be used for additional funding of STEM programs. It has nothing to do with more permissive immigration policies being sold as a way to improve the education system (other than through money only).

      Unfortunately, I expect the gov't to be losing money on the H1-Bs due to inefficiencies, but I don't know for sure.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    3. Re:They're not even trying... by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stop reading Slashdot headlines.

      It sounds like Code.org is pushing to have H-1B visa fees earmarked for education programs, rather than just going to general funds.

      I skimmed through TFAs (poorly-organized as they were), and I didn't see anything implying they want more H-1Bs. Rather, the most I saw was implying that there could be an increase in H-1Bs, so it would make sense if that increase also increased STEM funding so we don't need H-1Bs in the future.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:They're not even trying... by njnnja · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This makes sense once you realize that it isn't about what they are claiming it is about. Tech businessmen want cheap labor - everyone here on slashdot gets that. But the other half is more about transferring wealth from the middle and upper middle class (in this case, through the lowered wages of developers, a moderately well paying profession in America) to the poor by providing funding for inner city schools.

      We can't tax the rich since they have the ability to control their income, and the poor can't provide funding for their own schools or else they wouldn't be poor. So the funding for programs for the poor has to come from the middle class and those with high incomes in high cost of living areas who have relatively little wealth and therefore can be easily taxed either explicitly or implicitly.

    5. Re:They're not even trying... by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      Visas have nothing what so ever to do with the academic success of American kids. Nothing.

      No, but they DO have something very much to do with your chances of getting a job when you leave academia, and the wages you're going to make.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    6. Re:They're not even trying... by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful
      As painfully obvious as is the logic, it's a way to present a distasteful, wage-lowering piece of immigration reform in a positive light.

      Your Congressional representative can always use a positive spin to sign something favorable to large campaign contributors.

      For the children.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re:They're not even trying... by theodp · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the link to Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us PAC: "Modifications to the guest worker program must also include an increase in the number of H-1B visas". Many of Code.org's backers are also FWD.us backers.

    8. Re:They're not even trying... by Nemesisghost · · Score: 1

      Did you actually even read the summary? They aren't saying, "Visa will magically allow us to train better STEM" or even that more STEM people will help train new ones at home. Instead, what they said was "Give us more H-1B Visa, but put the fees from them towards funding STEM education & activities like FIRST." In other words, allow companies more H-1B Visas to meet the immediate need while using the funds generated to train up locals to fill those gaps when the Visas run out.

    9. Re:They're not even trying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If H-1B visa fees are earmarked for education then more visas means more fees means more education. So yes it's implied that more H-1B visas would be better. For the children, of course.

    10. Re:They're not even trying... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

      Not particularly realistic. Every tax...er...."fee" is being glommed to band-aid the yawning budget deficit. Prying those funds away from the pork salesmen just isn't a realistic goal. Once fees/taxes pass through the US government's fiscal event horizon, it just disappears.

    11. Re:They're not even trying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If cigarette taxes are earmarked for smoking cessation programs then more cigarettes being purchased means more non-smokers. So yes, it's implied that more cigarette sales would be better.

      What?

    12. Re:They're not even trying... by careysub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ....We can't tax the rich since they have the ability to control TAX POLICY...

      There. Fixed that for you.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    13. Re:They're not even trying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to wrap my head around why STEM funding for kids in the US is even being uttered in the same sentence with H-1B visas? These are 2 vastly seperate problems that have nothing, other than say money and funding, to do with one another! As top parent said, "they aren't even trying to make sense anymore".

      If they're trying to use H-1B visas as a scare tactic for more STEM funding, well... I know fear and intimidation usually works when it comes to government funding, but this is tantamount to an infant chewing your fingers off if you don't hand over your wallet. Absolutely rediculous!

    14. Re:They're not even trying... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      It's connected by the oft-used justification for hiring foreigners: the American workforce isn't qualified to meet the business needs.

      The assumption is that if you're hiring a foreign tech worker, it's because the existing STEM programs didn't produce an American to fill your needs, so more funding should be sent to STEM programs to make better candidates in the future.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    15. Re:They're not even trying... by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      I'm still trying to wrap my head around why STEM funding for kids in the US is even being uttered in the same sentence with H-1B visas?

      Clearly you're hung up on things like "logic" and "reason". In order to understand politics you must abandon that obsession.

    16. Re:They're not even trying... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Once fees/taxes pass through the US government's fiscal event horizon, it just disappears.

      Not at all. The government buys stuff with that tax/fee money. Some of what they buy is the labor of federal workers, who then go on to spend their income at various private sector business. Some of what they buy is corporate welfare for the military-industrial complex, and as wasted and counterproductive as most of that is, if comes out to shareholders and employees of Northrup-Grumman and Lockheed Martin and thus out to various private sector business.

      Taxation doesn't make money disappear. It moves it around. The problem is that in our system it often tends to move it from working people to the wealthy, and move it in a way that leads to the production of useless -- or even counter-productive -- goods and services.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    17. Re:They're not even trying... by njnnja · · Score: 1

      Actually I had originally written something like "control their income and wield sufficient political power" but took out the part about political power because the ability to control their (US) income is so much more important. Even if tax law was changed that increased taxes on wealth, I doubt it would generate much revenue to pay for stuff because the truly rich have the ability to manipulate their income such that it still would avoid taxation. For example, they might move it to Swiss bank accounts, or into whatever politically favored (and therefore tax-free) investments are allowed, or simply leave US jurisdiction entirely and move to Hong Kong or Singapore.

      So IMHO merely limiting political power after someone has already accumulated great wealth wouldn't do much to increase tax revenue; I think the massive accumulation of wealth needs to be prevented in the first place (e.g. through reductions in the acuteness of benefits received through state-granted monopolies such as copyright) so that a greater portion of the nation's wealth is held by middle-income individuals, which would allow them to bear the tax burden more easily.

    18. Re:They're not even trying... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      Can you settle this argument? Is the craptastically wrong headline your fault, or did Dice fuck it up for page views ?

    19. Re:They're not even trying... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I never said they can't work. I said they don't fit the business need, for having a particular skill set at a particular amount of experience.

      You mention 39,000 tech workers, half of whom are on the wrong side of the hardware/software divide, and only a third of those remaining have any experience with the primary requisite skill, and only ten percent of those have the desired secondary skills. Out of the 650 qualified unemployed candidates, half are overqualified and risk bringing in undesired habits or leaving for greener pastures quickly. A third of those remaining have had long enough careers to understand the project without risking office political problems. Half of those 108 candidates that would be a good fit won't be willing to relocate, and half again won't accept the offer.

      If all 39,000 unemployed or underemployed tech workers applied to one position, only about 25 of them would make the cut. Of course, not everyone applies to every job. It's no wonder employers complain of a shortage. Being able to hire foreigners greatly increases the available labor pool.

      Go ahead, though. Blame whatever politicians you want. Doing so won't change the fact that hiring is a complicated matter, however.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    20. Re:They're not even trying... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Got two $20's for a $10?

      They've been using a "temporary" supposed shortage as an excuse for H-1B's for at least 20 years now.

    21. Re:They're not even trying... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      You too can try to make a point by pulling absurd numbers out of your ass.

    22. Re:They're not even trying... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      My point is that it's not as simple as saying "make X jobs for X candidates". Employees are not interchangeable.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    23. Re:They're not even trying... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      makes no sense... first because we have very high unemployment and much of it in the industries they're saying they need people. Second, the people being brought in from India etc aren't that exceptional.

      We have data on it all. Its a believable argument.

      Furthermore, the companies in question could actually train people. But they don't want to do any of these things which makes the whole argument rather dubious.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    24. Re:They're not even trying... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      how are US academics more likely to get a job if the US has higher immigration?

      That's illogical.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    25. Re:They're not even trying... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      If that was your point then you should have said so. It's a credible argument, rather than ridiculous hyperbole.

    26. Re: They're not even trying... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I don't think the stem system is actually correcting our education problem and I don't think it would if we funded it more.

      To the contrary, I think we'd get farther with this if we just told companies to train people to a level where they'd be comfortable hiring them.

      What does that cost? If they want government subsidies for that then I think most would be okay with that because they get a job at the end of it.

      But short of that... no sale.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    27. Re:They're not even trying... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      If Project C needs $10 from the General Fund, but the General Fund only has $5 in it (with B's income being earmarked), Project A won't be cut.

      Earmarking is a way to set proportional expense rates without being dependent on the periodic budget.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    28. Re:They're not even trying... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It sounds like Code.org is pushing to have H-1B visa fees earmarked for education programs, rather than just going to general funds.

      That's all well and good, but it's important to realize that funding is almost perfectly fungible.

      Remember how back in the day ticketing by police in some area was used to fund the police departments? How this led to abuses and eventually most of those areas were forced to either put the ticket money in the general fund or education funds? All 'the government' needs to do in that case is reduce the organization's normal funding by the amount of earmarks it'll get (so it stays absolutely level), and increase the part of the government that is no longer getting those fees the same. The only difference is that now you have the local government pushing the police department to write more tickets to ensure the local schools are well funded.

      In this case there may be no department that suffers, instead this amounts to an increase in the deficit, which harms us all. I will admit that I'm probably a bit more obsessed with a balanced budget/paid down deficit than is healthy, but geeze, something like 6% of our spending is already on interest. That's more than a lot of our programs, and somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 of our largest 6 departments.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  3. All because they don't want to pay people by Thantik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what they're worth. Flood the market with H1Bs, so they can tank the amount paid because then there is lots of competition. STEM education is there, the people are there, the (large) businesses simply don't want to pay them the $100k+ they deserve. They want a large pool of $20k/yr workers.

    1. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and there's the rub... there are plenty of programers. The problem is, someone that's smart enough to code is also smart enough to do lots of other things that pay well. It doesn't matter how many coders they get in the market place, they're always going to be able to find a better job in management, accounting, engineering or whatever that pays twice what their employer wants to pay for coding. I'm sorry Microsoft/Apple, coding is not factory work. There's no way you're going to be able to pay minimum wage for this kind of talent.

    2. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also because they don't want to train people to work in technology. There is legitimately a shortage of tech people in the US, and one potential response would be to increase wages until the right candidates are motivated to apply, but another potential response would be to take not-quite-ideal candidates and provide the necessary on-the-job training that would make them suitable employees.

      And I'm not even talking about being willing to hire Java guys to write C#, although that's in play too. For example, a guy who spent 15 years keeping an assembly-line humming and has been unemployed for 5 years now might well be somebody who could help keep a network cruising along. You'd have your senior-level network admin start him off as a cabling monkey, then teach him what he's plugging things into, and as he gained experience he'd eventually get familiar with the monitoring tools and be able to recognize and respond to common problems. This kind of hire might never reach the top-notch skillset of your senior network admin, but he could be an effective and inexpensive junior-level employee. You could pretty easily dream up similarly effective training programs for desktop support technicians.

      These kind of programs were exactly what the major corporations were doing in the 1950's, because there was such a shortage of available workers after WWII that they would basically hire anybody with a high school diploma and no demonstrable idiocy, and then train them for whatever the corporation needed to them to do. They provided good wages, benefits, and a career track for people who did their jobs well. This was an investment, but it worked well, and you ended up with people who were fiercely loyal to the company and proud to be a part of it.

      H1Bs are basically stopping those kind of market corrections from happening - they both prevent the IT guys from getting paid what they're worth, and prevent non-IT people who want to get into IT from making the move.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The $100k+ they deserve? Were you born in the 80s? $200k programmer salaries came because there were no programmers. You don't deserve $100k+ you entitled bastard; everyone in the fucking world went to college to be a Web designer and now we can just hire one for a few shiny nickels.

      Look up how guilds work. You know, medieval unions. They increase salaries by having skilled workers not work--less labor availability. We have the opposite: get everyone a college education so we can pay people less.

    4. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If there are lots of people who want to do a job, for a low amount of money, maybe that's all the job is worth. What does it matter what country the people are from.

      Tell you what. First let's eliminate all the immigration and "guest worker" restrictions on doctors, lawyers, accountants, and most importantly, small business people. Then we can get rid of region pricing, greater IP "protections" in the US than elsewhere, the restrictions on people directly importing pharmaceuticals (despite having US prescriptions and the drugs coming from the same plant that the US stuff comes from). There are a bunch of other things, but it might take me 5 or 10 minutes to think of them.

      After all that is done we can talk about freely taking advantage of the "global village's" supply of STEM labor. Otherwise what you're saying is that you're willing to get screwed some more (thank you sir, may I have another) in the pursuit of some economic ideal that's preached to the peasants, while the politically powerful enjoy the fruits of protectionism.

      There is no global village, and there won't be, at least in our lives (and our children's and our grandchildren's). It's a fantasy preached by those who stand to benefit economically, and their numerous sycophants, to people who stand to loose economically. If gazillionaires stand to benefit economically from "free trade" and labor mobility, they and their sycophants will talk about the global village and the virtues of "free trade". If they stand to benefit from keeping things in the US, or defense contracts, then they'll wrap themselves in the flag.

    5. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      There is legitimately a shortage of tech people in the US

      Evidence?

    6. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by bmajik · · Score: 2

      Have you been involved in the hiring process for GOOG, MSFT, Facebook, or AAPL?

      I have.

      We (Microsoft) throw a LOT of money at people we're trying to bring on board. I have to assume our competitors are doing the same -- because we lose (and gain) talent from GOOG all the time as people move back and forth between companies.

      If you make it through my interview loops, you won't have to worry about your starting salary being high enough. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised when you see your offer package. I know I was.

      H1B isn't a wage suppression mechanism at Microsoft. It's a way to try and increase the size of the talent pool that we get to look at. I talk to a lot of people who are qualified on paper but who don't meet the hiring bar for various reasons. It costs us a ton of time (e.g. money) to interview people who we end up not being able to hire.

      We need more qualified people and the US isn't producing them fast enough domestically.

      Being good -- truly good -- at STEM has always paid well. There are other things that pay better (Wallstreet is a tough competitor), but if you are exceptional, the big players will open the checkbook.

      I wish the recent Oracle story hadn't happened -- because it really undermines the credibility of the whole industry.

      Fwiw, I (and Microsoft more broadly) am trying to play a role in improving American STEM educational outcomes. I volunteer to teach highschool computer science at the crack of dawn before heading into the office. Check out the TEALS program at http://tealsk12.org./ If you're passionate about improving the American labor force's competitiveness, see if there's a way that you can get yourself or your school district to participate.

      This isn't an "either-or" situation. We can import top level talent from around the world to improve the American labor force, and we can also try to make the native-born labor force more competitive. But the latter is a long-lead effort, and the talent shortage is real _right now_.

      And, if we're going to be nationalistic about things; here's my bit of nationalism: I want every foreign born great engineer possible working on harmless software in the US, instead of working on the nuclear or space programs of whatever places they come from.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    7. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      1. Salaries in technology are rising at a rate of 7.5% or so per year. That's not really fast enough to stimulate the supply of people they need, but it's indicating that they can't get what they want for the price they were originally offering.
      2. According to the BLS, they're projecting a 22% increase in demand for developers. The supply has gone up, but not by that much.
      3. Unemployment among techies is about 4.4%, half the national average, and as low as 0.5% for DBAs. So very few who bill themselves as techies are out in the cold.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    8. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by Copid · · Score: 1

      I've always thought the way we do work visas for skilled employees is absolutely insane. If I were King of Everything, I'd probably try something like this:

      1) If you want to hire a foreign worker, go ahead. But by his or her first day of work, you'll need to provide proof that you have a license (not a visa) for that worker.
      2) Licenses are limited in number just like H1-Bs are. However, they're sold on an open market and can be resold.
      3) The company need not necessarily buy the license. A worker could legitimately purchase one and carry it from job to job.
      4) Speculators are allowed to buy and sell licenses without ever using them.
      5) Each license has an expiration date. No idea what good policy would be for this, but they'd look like bonds in the bond market. Good for another year? 10 years? Price will differ.

      I'm no immigration expert, but this seems to me like it would solve a few problems:

      1) Lotteries and queues are stupid. These slots represent the allocation of hugely valuable resources. Allocating them at random is like randomizing the allocation of oil or copper. No more wasting a visa on a mundane mid-level job when it could have been allocated to a superstar who was producing major surplus.
      2) Systemic underpayment (real or imagined) of H1-B employees would be arbitraged out. If you can pay the average H1-B employee $10K less on average, that $10K will be built into the market price of the license. No more need for the Department of Labor to enforce salary bands and ask if people are "really" doing the work it says on the visa.
      3) High productivity employees who command good salaries can always buy their own licenses with their surplus cash and be beholden to nobody from that day on. We want to keep these people and allow them to be free agents, not enslave them to one employer who may not make optimal use of their skills.
      4) The market price of the licenses should be a good indicator of the real state of the skilled labor market. Deciding whether we "need" more foreign workers would be a lot easier. They could even set a target price and maintain it via open market operations.
      5) Rolling expiration dates give even more data. You can get a "yield curve" and use it to measure the market's expected future demand of skilled foreign labor.
      6) No need to do phony job postings that you'll never follow up on in order to do "due diligence" on a potential replacement for an employee you fully intend to keep. Market mechanisms will handle it.

      Stupid, or smart?

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    9. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Salaries in technology are rising at a rate of 7.5% or so per year [forbes.com].

      No, they're projected to increase by that much in 2014, by folks who have a vested interested in making it look attractive. If you look at historical data, you'll see them rising by 23% over the last ten years. That's less than the inflation over that period.

      According to the BLS [bls.gov], they're projecting a 22% increase in demand for developers.

      Here's another one from the BLS that says 8% (same as average). The BLS breaks up software jobs into a bunch of categories that nobody has been able to figure out.

      The supply has gone up, but not by that much.

      It could. You're talking about 10 years. CS enrollment was booming in the 90's. Then came the crash in 2000/2001. CS enrollment dropped by over a third. High school students are not as dumb or historically ignorant as some people believe. They know what happened back then, and so are much less likely to fall for the current hype.

      Unemployment among techies is about 4.4%

      Which makes it 1.1% higher than the average for people with bachelor's degrees.

    10. Re:All because they don't want to pay people by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      It would seem that if there was significant growth in the "IT Sector," that anyone who was mildly qualified would be able to switch jobs easy. As my own anecdotal evidence suggests, it still isn't easy.

  4. Analysis of another option... by JD-1027 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what if we allowed zero H-1Bs? Wouldn't wages for these positions go up, which would attract more people to the fields requiring workers. If they need workers so bad, why isn't anyone willing to pay increased wages for it? (tongue firmly planted in cheek) By the way, this is coming from someone who recently helped hire a great programmer and wonderful person from India on this very type of visa.

    1. Re:Analysis of another option... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That, or perhaps the jobs would just be outsourced to Indian contractors instead.

  5. Fuck off by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are plenty of coders in the country ready, willing and able to take these jobs. You're just too cheap to pay them what they're worth or willing to wait the three months it will take to get them up to speed.

    Hauling in people from other countries who are no better than the ones here is just an excuse.

    Again, you want the unemployment rate to decline? Hire people who are unemployed. They'll work harder and better for you than someone who has a job because they don't want to go back.

    Oh, and Slashdot, the fuck off applies to you as well. Your interface just plain sucks and selecting 'Classic' doesn't do shit. Hmmm, maybe we do need more H-1B visas so you can read this site.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Fuck off by bmajik · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you are in a position to make this claim.

      I've been interviewing candidates for software engineering jobs since I was in college. I constantly talk to people I cannot hire because of raw smarts issues.

      My current employer is paying obscene amounts of money to hires of all ages, but especially entry level positions.

      The base comp package at my company has grown significantly during my career, often in response to market pressures. Furthermore, there are legally required flyers that post job titles and salary ranges in each kicthenette that are there to help prevent abuse of h1-b workers by making sure nobody is in the dark about prevailing salaries for a given job.

      The bottom line is that in my 15 plus years in interviewing and hiring, finding good people is hard, even if you're throwing around big money.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    2. Re:Fuck off by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      ...we would have double the amount of coders and an increase in availability of coded products and software...

      Woohoo, double the amount of shitty code!

    3. Re:Fuck off by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      The wife and I would be willing to move. When do I start? :p

    4. Re:Fuck off by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      If I were an employer, why the hell should I pay someone $15k for three months of "getting up to speed", when I could bring in a guy from India who can start being productive now, because he's spent the last three months of his own time becoming an expert in the new up-and-coming buzzword technology this project will be using, while the American candidate was brushing up on his old COBOL skills, because he knows that will give him "job security" just as soon as he can find a job that needs it?

      Two reasons:

      Not many have the money/time/use case to buy a 48TB disk array just to play with or develop large scale software in order secure meaningful employment. Many of us play with tech on a much smaller scale. We may develop an app here or there or submit some simple patches for our favorite FLOSS project. No one I know are developing out of date skills. Part of the problem is that HR/Recruiters/Head hunters/Managers are pigeonholing people such that you must have paid experience doing the exact same things they require. This makes it look like the COBOL programmer is only doing COBOL - maybe they tried to get skills in other areas, but no one would hire them to do something different, so they could not justify the cost/effort and refocused on COBOL.

      The other implication we see here is that what happens when we graduate STEM people and they can't secure meaningful employment? The implication being they cannot pay back their loans in a timely fashion and the bubble bursts. Also, if there are no junior-level jobs (that allow for growth), why would one want to go into STEM in the first place?

    5. Re:Fuck off by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      In most of the Midwest, hiring is a challenge.

      Where in the Midwest? That's a big chunk of territory.

    6. Re:Fuck off by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      No one I know are developing out of date skills.

      I don't think I know anybody actively developing outdated professional skills, either... but I can think of several of my colleagues who are actively maintaining skills that are falling out of use. A large portion of Slashdotters, for example, outright refuse to learn about the new-fangled NoSQL technologies, claiming that the traditional RDBMS is absolutely superior. True or not, that's a set of jobs they're missing out on, as more established and start-up companies turn to a business model based around gathering messy data and distilling meaningful statistics for sale. Even when someone does learn a new skill, they'll often leave the old one on their resume, to show off all the great skills they have.

      In contrast, in countries with less-established tech industries, the outdated skills simply aren't present. The foreign candidate is less likely to be stuck in old bad habits or using paradigms that don't fit with the new project. That leads to the pigeonholing, as managers try to find candidates with all of the desired skills, but without the risk of extras.

      what happens when we graduate STEM people and they can't secure meaningful employment? ... Also, if there are no junior-level jobs (that allow for growth), why would one want to go into STEM in the first place?

      I'm not sure what you're saying here, but you seem to be implying that employers should hire American workers because if they don't, then they won't be able to hire Americans in the future.

      That wouldn't be a problem, because the companies could hire foreigners, just as they do today. In fact, with other countries developing their technology further, the foreign candidate pool will be growing much faster than American labor, so there's little incentive to spend extra time and money investing in American labor now. It's a tragedy of the commons.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    7. Re:Fuck off by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      Even when someone does learn a new skill, they'll often leave the old one on their resume, to show off all the great skills they have.

      That's because the old skill(s) puts food on the table and hiring authorities don't consider "I read a couple of books and did some side projects" to be valid experience. Or they could be working somewhere where management wont move to NoSQL because they spent $millions on their current RDBMS systems that are "working," regardless of any benefit a new system would offer. That's why there still is a demand for RDBMS professionals and there will be for a good long while.

      I'm not sure what you're saying here, but you seem to be implying that employers should hire American workers because if they don't, then they won't be able to hire Americans in the future. That wouldn't be a problem, because the companies could hire foreigners, just as they do today. In fact, with other countries developing their technology further, the foreign candidate pool will be growing much faster than American labor, so there's little incentive to spend extra time and money investing in American labor now. It's a tragedy of the commons.

      I think you're missing the mark... For example, the government pays for K-12 education and subsidizes college in various ways, with the understanding that a well educated population is good for the country as a whole. Whether it is successful or the right thing to do is another matter for another topic, but there are arguments for investing in education. The problem is that if we don't see a ROI of spending all that money, just for someone to default on those loans and go on the dole? Someone has to pay for that, and it is my contention that it would hurt America in the long run - higher taxes for those that are employed and companies, less tax base, less educated work force and voters, etc. Employers complain that they can't find local (American) workers, but are unwilling to make any investments in them. I have tried to keep current on various topics, but It's a paradox of sorts.

    8. Re:Fuck off by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Until the cost of a coder drops to near minimum wage -- say $15 an hour, there is a shortage of them

      Wouldn't that be a surplus of coders and a shortage of jobs?

  6. My own proposal for fixing H1-B by khallow · · Score: 1

    Drop the program and most of the INS madness. Instead for a fixed cost, say around that of a cheap new car, allow anyone to enter and stay indefinitely on a green card.

    1. Re:My own proposal for fixing H1-B by CommanderK · · Score: 1

      That actually exists, it's called an investment-based visa (code EB-5) and it takes $500k to get (by investing that money in businesses in certain areas). Most foreigners don't have $500k though.

  7. Holy journalistic spin, Batman! by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Informative

    So let me get this straight... Code.org wants to tie H-1B visa fees to education programs, and somehow that's twisted into the headline saying they want more H-1Bs?

    It sounds more to me like they're saying "if you're going to bring in a foreign tech worker because Americans aren't good enough, you're going to pay for American STEM programs so Americans are good enough in the future". I can't really object to that idea.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    1. Re:Holy journalistic spin, Batman! by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      This is exactly the argument your Senator will use when he signs the bill for you.

      Use the smell test.

      A major employer of nerds wants to import hordes of foreign nerds to work for less money than our local chaps during a prolonged dearth in the job market..

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Holy journalistic spin, Batman! by Sez+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ok, I read the testimony.

      You are right, Kamen specifically didn't ask for more visas. Instead, he asked that the visa fees, at least in part, be directed to his program, FIRST. TL;DR: Give me money.

      Partovi barely mentions visas, but also wants part of the fees to go to a new STEM education fund and wants changes to E-Rate (internet/telecomm to school libraries). He's got his fingers in a lot of pies, so skeptically I'm assuming one of them would benefit from unspecified E-Rate "changes".

      Jona, a prof at Northwestern, basically wants more scientists to be involved in teaching STEM. No visa mention.

      Cornwall, an ME, writes like an ME and doesn't mention visas; instead focuses on education.

      So, yes, there's a lot of spin in the headline. Because headline.

  8. FIRST soured me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lego and Robotics, sounded like great things to get my boy involved in STEM, when I was asked to help coach I was shocked to find it was $800 for a team of 6 kids (the cost is per team, we just happen to be on a small private team) most of these teams are school funded so tax dollars pay for it. I'd love to see the financial breakdown of that organization. BTW Up to the state level I never found a employee, just volunteers. Still wondering where the money went.

    Another fact I found annoying, It mattered little how good you were at STEM it was more about cheer leading and exposure. The kids from that team went to state, and while all the other teams were nice and friendly, they did not appreciate watching teams who lost on the field advance because essentially team spirit was 50% of the the score. I understand professionalism and all, but "rah rah, go team go" won't help you in a career like real results.

    None of those kids wanted to participate this year. They don't think it's a fair competition.

  9. Re:Inner city kids don't give a fuck about softwar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We should shun them, isolate them, and otherwise keep them away from real society. There's no hope for them.

    You were a social worker, and your plan to fix society is to remove the undesirables? Why can't we all get along, social worker? Why? I'll tell you why: because you don't want people to get along.

    I was an inner city American youth, and I was interested in programming, software, and computers. Social workers like you actively prevented me from working in IT because "you live in the inner city so you must be a thug."

    Admit it, social worker. Social workers like you would be out of a job without thugs, wouldn't you? A social worker's real job is to perpetuate social stereotypes, isn't it? You are the problem with society, social worker. You are the problem.

  10. Re:This is already being done by Koby77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a side note, the United States is already one of the biggest spenders on education, and yet gets very mediocre results.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/06/25/where-u-s-stands-in-education-internationally-new-report/
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-education-spending-tops-global-list-study-shows/

    So even if they decide to throw a lot more funding for this STEM education it is unlikely to have any real impact.

  11. Hire locally by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 2

    If I had a nickel for every "consultants by the pound" pitch where they sent in just barely competent coders for me to review, I'd be a millionaire (all of the big subcontinent body shops are guilty of this). Then they've got the balls to pay these poor saps peanuts and attempt to bill me $100-200/hour (depending on how many hours they've spent in front of an Idiot's Guide to C## training video). Then you see all the even poorer saps who are going through 2 or 3 layers of additional consultancies before they make it to our HR dept's door. I feel bad for them, but...I'd rather just recruit at local universities and get people who have identifiable skills, already speak English that most folks can parse, and won't get rotated back to the subcontinent randomly as one or more of their handlers has "visa issues."

    Talk to your local university with a decent Engineering or Comp Sci curriculum and start recruiting. Save time, money, aggravation, and help our own college grads get into the game. I refuse to even take calls from the body shops anymore even though my corporate overlords are trying to force the issue. It's just not worth the hassle.

    1. Re:Hire locally by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      If I had a nickel for every "consultants by the pound" pitch where they sent in just barely competent coders for me to review,

      Finally, an argument for obesity!

  12. Re:Destroy-Your-Own-Economy by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Citizens have all these pesky rights to quit, ask for raises, etc. that you don't have to worry about when you're employing someone who knows they're going to get booted out of the country if they don't do exactly what you tell them to do.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  13. Atlernate sources of funding by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TFS is not very clear, but if you read it closely (twice, in my case) it appears these guys are suggesting diverting the money collected from H1-B visa applications into "STEM" (how I hate that acronym) education for poor American kids. That makes a little bit more sense insofar as, if you stand on your head and squint, it looks like a token effort to tax immigration to pay for education in the US.

    It's funny how everyone who makes his living on research or advocacy for a particular problem says the solution to that problem is to provide more funding for his organization. That is what TFS appears to be really saying - a bunch of people working on STEM education want more government funding for STEM education. Film at 11. ;-)

    I don't know how much an H1-B visa fee is, but it must be less than the salary difference between an H1-B guest worker and the actual labor rate set by the domestic market. Otherwise no one would make money off H1-B workers and there would not be this constant clamor for more of them. This small amount of money, collected from a relatively small population of H1-B workers, will never be more than crumbs from the table anyway. It might be enough to fund a dog and pony show like FIRST, but not nearly enough to effect systemic change in the educational system.

    In September 2013, the IEEE magazine ran a special series on the STEM "crisis," and based on that, I am now convinced that crisis is nothing more nor less than wishful thinking that high-tech industries can someday, somehow get skilled workers for less than the fair market rate.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  14. Better yet... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2

    Better yet, instead of redirecting H1-B fees to inner schools, reduce the number of STEM related H1-Bs. This should allow wages in these fields to increase and with increased wages there will be more people wanting to pursue careers in those fields. You would think a country based on capitalism would understand how supply and demand works.

    1. Re:Better yet... by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      ...a country based on capitalism...

      Penny in the air...

  15. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No Amnesty.. Reform = actually enforcing laws..

    No more H1Bs - there are plenty of willing unemployed US citizens..

  16. 35% by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    35% of IT related graduates over the past three years have failed to find gainful employment in their field. It would seem difficult for a company to justify H1-B employees given that. The only logical conclusion is that H1-B visas are being used for some other purpose than a shortage of skilled workers. I would posit, as many others have, it is to keep costs low to maximize shareholder value.

    1. Re:35% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Having worked with a few recent IT grads I can understand why. The schools they come from teach the fundamentals fine but then either use non-OO or "flavor of the month" scripting languages as an intro to coding. So when they go out to real world and can't code in Java or .Net, no one's going to hire them.

    2. Re:35% by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Citation here?

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:35% by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Citation here?

      Center for Market Labor Studies, Northeastern University. The amounts vary by year, so the 35% figure was just an average of the rates for the last three years reported. The information from the study was also reported by the major US news outlets.

    4. Re:35% by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      There is some expectation that there will be some training when students get out as Universities can't teach everything. Students will generally have a good breadth of knowledge, maybe not the required depth.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. It's not just the SV billionaires. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

    I have always hated the comment about hitting the ground running. It is effectively impossible for anyone to do so since they don't know the internal structure and political climate of the company. At best they can make educated guesses but they don't truly know what they're getting into until they're working for a few weeks.

    Any time an interviewer uses that phrase should send up warning signals to the interviewee that the company doesn't really know what they want and the job will not be what is advertised.

    If you want someone to hit the ground running, hire from within.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. I have a better plan. by Ken_g6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, force companies to pay H-1B workers a lot more - unless they pay for training of an American for the entire duration that the H-1B worker works for them. Then, if the American they trained does not work for that same company at least as long as the training period, penalize the company the salary difference they saved. This forces the company to pay the American what they're worth, or lose a lot of money otherwise.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Re:This is already being done by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

    From the opening statements, Congress allocates about $3 billion to STEM education already.

  23. these people need to be beaten with sticks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're not 22 anymore, so they can't hoodwink you into working 70 hour "crunch time" 52 weeks a year. You probably expect paid vacation, also.

    Also, regarding these code.org people:
    WHORES! FILTHY SYPHILITIC WHORES! Burning alive is too good for these people.

    1. Re:these people need to be beaten with sticks by Sentrion · · Score: 2

      If you're too old for the job then brush up on your Hindi and re-apply. But be ready to take a 60% pay cut, no vacation, and 80 hour work weeks.

  24. but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by Cryofan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    get with the program--multiculturalism is COOL and if you are against mass immigration you are a bigot and probably the next Hitler.

    The fact that multiculturalism and mass immigration makes millionaire investors richer is just a coincidence. Just keep saying that....Just keep saying that....Just keep saying that....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is this not modded up? The only ones that believe in free trade and multiculturalism anymore are the 1%ers and politically correct, the rest of us can plainly see the only "trade' is the importing of slaves and the exporting of misery.

      In my own area not only is the local college shutting down the programming courses (because only a fool would go 60K+ in debt to compete with someone who paid peanuts for theirs in India) but construction USED to be a good job for those that weren't able to go to college, now? you can go by any job site and yell "immigra!" and watch them scatter like deer. oh and if they take a header from a scaffold YOU PAY for their medical bills as they are dropped off by the nearest ER with a "tough luck Paco".

      I've been all over the flyover states and have seen first hand what "free trade" has gotten us, its gotten us abandoned factories, boarded up buildings, and for many areas the only "jobs" are applying for government handouts and flipping burgers. To quote George Carlin "You know why they call it The American Dream? because you have to be asleep to believe in it"

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by TheBilgeRat · · Score: 2

      There are still bulwarks of coding being done here in the US. I just recently graduated with a CS degree and had no problem finding employment here in the states, with a family and grey hair.

      I think the AC above, talking about 70 hour crunch times is closer to the mark. H1b visas means getting young Chinese and Indian employees for low-end salaried pay but who routinely work much longer days (as well as being well trained) than most typical US college grads. At least, that is what I see in the company that hired me. However, you have to be in an area actively searching for talent or be willing/able to relocate, and not every city has a thriving tech sector.

    3. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 2

      The Free Trade nonsense is a scam being perpetuated by the 1% class and sold to unsuspecting Economics students. It is pure snake oil however, for obvious reasons, it is a disaster. It is designed to enrich a few wealthy elites at the expense of the middle class in a race to the bottom that equalizes first world countries with third world countries. Basically, third world countries basically remain such while first world countries become third world economies, while a global wealthy elite becomes vastly wealthier. Much of the money is sucked out of the middle class and into the bank accounts of the elite.

      More entitlement and welfare programs does not help. All that does is route money around a shrinking middle class into a growing low income class. We dont need to grow the low income class. We need to grow the middle class. To grow the middle class, we must 1) stop all immigration 2) re-establish tariffs and begin to implement protectionist policies that will bring manufacturing back to the US.

      Look, during the 1950s, the US had a rapidly growing middle class, at a time that we were producing most of our own goods and with most of our manufacturing base right here. Ever since free trade took hold, the US has been driven into the ground economically, since then there has been no middle class growth. the country is full of abondoned factories and people who cannot find work. things were working in the 50s, the economy was growing and the middle class was actually growing by leaps and bounds. According to the Free Trade liars, the 1950s should have been a time when there was no economic growth, but in fact, the Free Trader economy since the 1970s has seen no economic growth for the middle class. Dont you think its time that we fully and totally reject all immigration, free trade , and all of the multiculturalism horseshit of the anti-american traitor globalists and go back to what worked in the 1950s, where we actually had an economy with growing middle class job opportunities, low rates of divorce, low rates of crime, a country that was maintaining its own unique character and identity, a children-loving family values culture with strong healthy middle class families with a lot of children, the identity and the character of the country was not being destroyed by immigration from everywhere.

      For most of the history of the country, including since the time of the founders, the US was a country of immigrants from mostly Europe, so there is no precedence for immigration from everywhere and this actually runs totally contrary to the original vision of the country which was a country with a European identity.This was reflected by the Naturalization Act of 1790 signed by George Washington himself, as well as the writings of most of the founders who clearly wanted to create a European Christian majority nation, also reflected by the 1924 Johnson Reed Act.

      Current immigration policies are basically designed to turn Caucasian americans into a shrinking minority in the country they founded and is driven by a pathological hatred of Caucasians and a wish to attack this group. Current estimates predict that current immigration policies coupled with the too low Caucasian birth rate, the result no doubt of amorality and an attack on family values orchestrated by the mass media, is basically predicted to turn Caucasians into a shrinking minority by 2040. This is basically pure genocidal vengeance and hatred. Immigration basically is being used as a weapon to cause population losses for white America. Such policies also harm the traditional minority groups, such as the African American and Native American minority groups by causing them to become a shrinking percentage of the population as well. I support an end to all immigration which would take away the ability of the pro-immigration genocidalists to be able to use immigration as a weapon to attack and decimate this countries current populations.

      In general, in a global perspective, immigration is harmful. If we want to preserve the local unique cultures

    4. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why is this not modded up? The only ones that believe in free trade and multiculturalism anymore are the 1%ers and politically correct, the rest of us can plainly see the only "trade' is the importing of slaves and the exporting of misery.

      Gee, I guess I need to support centrally-managed trade and western-centric culture, or else that makes me either wealthy (I'm not) or a bleeding heart stereotype (I'm not). Strawman much?

      In my own area not only is the local college shutting down the programming courses (because only a fool would go 60K+ in debt to compete with someone who paid peanuts for theirs in India) but construction USED to be a good job for those that weren't able to go to college, now? you can go by any job site and yell "immigra!" and watch them scatter like deer. oh and if they take a header from a scaffold YOU PAY for their medical bills as they are dropped off by the nearest ER with a "tough luck Paco".

      These guys are willing to work a real job for less money than you. I don't like being forced to pay for someone else's health care either, but it's lazy and backwards to blame the recipients instead of the thieves. Do you think many American-born citizens are choosing to die rather than accept emergency care they can't afford?

      You've fallen for it. America's elite have convinced you that it's the destitute Mexican keeping you from farming your own crops and building your own widgets.

    5. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      It can be said from the above that immigration which minoritizes or shrinks a countries current traditional racial groups from their traditional levels is basically inherently racist and is used by those who hate a countries current populations and use such things as a weapon against them. This runs contrary to the goal of protecting all of the countries current racial groups and populations, from being overrun by immigration, both the majority and the minority groups deserve such protection and to not be overrun with immigration. An end to such immigration is needed to protect all groups in the country, Majority and Minority, and fits in with a larger goal which should be to make sure that that citizens of each racial group in the country have access to equal job opportunities, something I fully support, assuring that that all citizens of each racial groups in the country are protected, including both majority and minority groups, from any threat to their existence as unique and distinct peoples, so that we can protect the traditional demographics of the country from people who want to genocidally destroy such, so that all traditional racial groups be protected from such and can exist in perpetuity into the future.

      Immigration from everywhere policies are harmful and are immoral, and supported by those who want to attack and use it as a weapon against a countries current populations.

    6. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Uh, being near and occasionally in Charlotte. There's a significant and growing portion of the population here that didn't like Buffalo either, despite being born there.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    7. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by dwpro · · Score: 1

      how much are you paying? Do you have a link to the jobs?

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    8. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      You're conflating two different things. Multiculturalism is loosely defined as the tolerance and acceptance of cultural diversity in society, and getting the best of all worlds. Without multiculturalism, the United States would never have existed, survived, or become successful. If you are against it, then yes, you are a bigot by simple dictionary definition. Mass immigration, in contrast, is an issue of immigration laws and pressures. It is a much more difficult subject, which potential economic advantages and disadvantages depending on a lot of factors.

      And we're not even talking about free trade, as dragged into the discussion by Hairyfeet above, which is completely unrelated (with a good dose of hyperbole, one could even state that ultimate free trade and mass immigration are mutually exclusive) and even more complex. My opinion is that too much free trade is about as harmful as (or possibly slightly more than) too little of it.

      Anyhow, if you guys can't tell these issues apart, then you make it tempting to conclude you are xenophobes, in the narrow definition of being afraid of everything foreign. :-P

    9. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      I've been all over the flyover states and have seen first hand what "free trade" has gotten us, its gotten us abandoned factories, boarded up buildings, and for many areas the only "jobs" are applying for government handouts and flipping burgers. To quote George Carlin "You know why they call it The American Dream? because you have to be asleep to believe in it"

      Just want to point out that "free trade" isn't a bad idea, rather "free trade"with non-free countries where only those with pull, who participate in graft, who ensure large sums go to the gatekeepers...these are why this impoverishes people here: when the other country plays by a different set of rules and the result is a vampiricism enriching those here who help to enable it to get a (significant) chunk, and when those people there can never be permitted to be productive enough to counter-buy/participate (aka have economic means that might scare their governments), well...what do we expect?

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    10. Re:but, but, racism and diversity is strength! by TheBilgeRat · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of jobs out there for "non-sexy" coding, like C++ or even Ada. One of my classmates managed to get on with Boeing doing Ada programming. Ada! He had to move to Oklahoma City (which is a serious change for a West Coast kid), but the program is funded through 2046 or something. It isn't Rails or the next craptastic web language, but its solid unsexy well paying work for as long as he wants it.

  25. Makes as much sense as... by Pollux · · Score: 1

    This makes about as much sense as when the Clinton administration opened trade with China by personally promising reforms in Chinese government and an increase in Chinese demand for American cars and products, leading to an increase in manufacturing jobs. Yep, makes perfect sense.

  26. but how are the rich gonna get richer that way? by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    remember, above all else, the USA was from the start set up to make the rich richer.

    James Madison, the designer of the federal constitution, wrote that the structure of the fed govt created by the constitution was to preserve wealth inequality by making it harder for the majority to control the govt.

    Don't you love the constitution?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  27. The attitudes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GP:

    I constantly talk to people I cannot hire because of raw smarts issues.

    Parent:

    Guess what.. most people are idiots!

    The attitudes! And people wonder why kids are reluctant to go into the field.

    "Hey kids! You need to learn coding! You won't get jobs though because you are stupid! So, sign right up kids!"

    See, if it were me - just lowly stupid-unintelligent me - I'd be creating a campaign to show HOW kids and current coders are coming up short.

    Like, "Hey educators! The analytical skills are coming up short, so how about concentrating on that instead of the technology du jour?"

    And if you are currently having problems finding people, how about ignoring Dice, LinkedIN and other lamoe places.

    But hey! I'm stewpid.

  28. need apprenticeships and more trades schools forIT by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    apprenticeships and more put into trades schools will fix the education part and it can be done in less time that the older college system at a lower cost.

  29. 20K with 60-80 hours OT with no OT pay by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    I think pizza hut and others pay more for mangers with the same unpaid OT needs.

  30. remove healthcare from job and fix unpaid OT by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    TO many places use salaried pay to get lot's of OT work out of people with out paying for it as well use it or lose vacation policy that you can't use all of it due to the high work load. Or OT comp time goes to vacation but you don't get the time to use all up.

  31. Re:It's not just the SV billionaires. by JWW · · Score: 1

    If you want someone to hit the ground running, hire from within.

    You can also hire back people who had previously left your organization. I've done it before and the current position I'm in is back in an organization I'd left previously.

    There may be some changes to absorb but people who come back do have the ability to actually hit the ground running.

  32. Same 'ol 2-pronged attack on tech wages by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    More cheap foreign labor, and pulling the floor out from under the market by making basic coding a common skill. Then it won't pay any better than flipping burgers.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  33. Backwards thinking by rkhalloran · · Score: 1
    The problem with increasing H-1B numbers is that it swamps the domestic market with offshore workers, likely at lower rates than domestic talent (ref the Oracle lawsuit filed yesterday), making STEM training less desirable for US students as they won't be able to find jobs when they hit the workforce. Now you want to push H-1Bs into the academic market too?

    Waiting for the teachers' unions to start raising bloody hell about the impact to their livelihoods. Hmmm, given the clout they have with politicos, this may actually work to all our favor.

  34. Re:Kill H1B & Enforce ITAR by catfood · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see H1B's cut back or eliminated along with easier availability of Green Cards. I don't mind competing with foreigners for jobs in the U.S., but I do mind competing with foreigners who are in a weak bargaining position that hurts all of us.

  35. Direct contradiction by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    Just looking at it as a practical issue, if you reduce demand by bringing immigrants in to do the job (especially at sub-market rates), then the people here will have less incentive to learn those skills.

    By eliminating short term demand spikes, you are reducing the long term supply of workers.

  36. Abolish H-1B Visas by jpatters · · Score: 1

    The problem with H-1B Visas is that they smell like indentured servitude. I say abolish them, and then create a visa program for skilled professionals that is not tied to a specific job or business sponsor. That way, the "guest worker" would have some actual bargening power and could change employers.

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
  37. Re:Destroy-Your-Own-Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    et me shed some light on this as a former H-1B visa holder.

    Technically speaking, H-1B visa holders also have those pesky rights. In reality, it is like, some nice pesky rights you have there, it would be a shame if you have to walk through the immigration maze another time.

    H-1B visa has no restriction on changing jobs. But you have to restart the process if you are in the applying the green card through the employment based channel. Another rub is that there is a quote system. (I am always wondering if this is considered as special treatment based on country of origin). The numbers of green cards granted each year for some countries such as China and India is very limited. Just by coincidence, those countries have the most H1-B visa holders.

    If a H1-B visa holder does not want to endure the insanity a few more (normally 5-10) years, you stay at you current job till you got your green card. The system is designed nicely so that different processes collaborate together to persuade the H1-B visa holder to waive those pesky rights. There was a push to adopt the simpler immigration system like Canada's point system. but the immigration lawyers argue against it because it would reduce the quality of the immigrants. How considerate of them.

  38. well start looking at people who don't have B.S an by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    well start looking at people who don't have B.S and other degrees. AS lot's of them are very theory based while the tech / trades schools are more hands on.

  39. Re:Indentured servants or bust! by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    When I was in college in the early 90's, a lot of us would cut tobacco for local farmers during the summer. It was hard work, but it paid damn well for the time ($7/hr. in cash at a time when minimum wage was still $4.25). A few years later I went back and was talking to some old friends from the area and I asked them if they still cut during the summers. They told me that the farmers had started bringing in illegals for $4-$5 an hour, basically the same as minimum wage (by then up to over $5 an hour) and so the locals no longer bothered (it paid just as well to work much easier jobs).

    Now, I'm sure those farmers, if asked, would have been happy to tell the government "We just can't find Americans willing to do the work." But what they really MEANT was "We just can't find Americans to do the work AT THIS WAGE." There were plenty of Americans willing to do the work when the farmers paid a decent wage (I was one of them). But when the illegals came in, it artificially drove down the wages to the point where Americans were simply driven out. No legal citizen was going to do such tough, nasty work for the same wage they could get working anywhere else.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  40. Re:It's not just the SV billionaires. by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

    Say it, brother/sister!

    For example, management often thinks a new developer can be instantly productive. S/he can't, because no matter how competent and experienced that developer is with the language and toolset, s/he doesn't know anything about the company's internal code library which is protected by trade secrets and NDAs and other dire consequences if anyone outside the company ever learns about it. And that internal knowledge is often more critical to the job than what the developer could possibly bring with them.

    So if a manager thinks that anyone is going to contribute directly and immediately to the company's success on their first day, run! Some more fun translations between interviewer-speak and reality:
    - "Fast-paced environment": We replace actual decision-making and prioritizing with simply whipping the employees to work harder.
    - "Comfortable office space": We supply you with a $200 chair.
    - "Open office plan": We have one room we rented out for $400 a month, and we haven't bothered even installing cubicles yet.
    - "Break room with perks": We have a coffee machine.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  41. Wish I had mod points by BigDaveyL · · Score: 4, Informative

    This type of thing is so frustrating.

    For example, I applied for a job recently that wanted 1-3 years of Linux admin experience. While I never had formal paid experience, I do have 15 years of:

    • taking several college courses in the subject matter
    • my masters project was a sys admin heavy
    • I attend the local lug and help people and have given several technical talks over the years
    • I volunteer as a sys admin at the local humane society that has 100 employees, more volunteers, processes 10,000+ animals a year and has a fully staffed vet clinic
    • I use Linux at my day job and do a bit of shell scripting there (I'm one of the go to guys it seems)
    • Use Linux as my primary OS
    • Have set up/manage servers for my own/others personal usage
    • Have attended conferences on my own dime to learn more about things
    • More things I'm probably forgetting

    Somehow, I don't know why they can't extract/find 1 year of experience in there. I can understand if they were asking for 5 or 10 years, but the bar seems low. In other words, what technical day to day tasks does someone in the job face, that I can't handle or figure out? Judge me on my actual technical merits, not something arbitrary.

    Pay is not an issue either. Their top pay would represent something like a 40% increase from what I make now, which I do not expect to get. They list no floor. I would be estatic to get even a 5%-10% increase, but can understand that I may have to take the same money or a slight pay cut because of the experience factor (which is fine since I get by well on my current salary).

    Of course, the job listing states the team is overwhelmed with work, but the job has been posted over a month. One would think they may have to re-adjust expectations in order to fill the job and get some relief.

    1. Re:Wish I had mod points by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      It's called Human Resources, staffed as it is with people who look at certifications as though they must always be formal degrees: there's a reason even Forbes has called for literally firing every single human resources department in America (and possibly blacklisting those people), though they still haven't figured out that those auto-sorting-applicants computers/programs are about as bad.

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    2. Re:Wish I had mod points by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      They want 1-3 years, and you have more than 3.

    3. Re:Wish I had mod points by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      As I said, I never held a job title of "Linux Admin," even though I have acquired some of the skills needed of an Linux Admin elsewhere. Let us look at it another way, if I applied to a job that "required" more experience than this one, I would expect to be summarily rejected for not having enough experience. So which is it, I have too much or too little?

      Secondly, the job advert said the company offered great career growth potential. Pay would not be an issue, which the numbers prove. So the "overqualification" I may appear to have could be rendered moot.

    4. Re:Wish I had mod points by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      I was joking. :-) I was trying to ridicule a possible HR excuse.

  42. Hadi Partovi, Dean Kamen, Unconvincing Liars by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    With the obsolesence of currency approaching, one would think these fools would get it.

  43. Have an auction for H1b visas .. by echtertyp · · Score: 1

    The U.S. is so messed up :( One thing that would make it a little less messed up would be to have an auction for H1b visas, rather than allocating them like IP address ranges to big companies. It would be interesting to see what happens when Microsoft, Oracle and Cisco start bidding up the price of cheap labor visas.

  44. Industry calculations by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    It's simple from the corporate position; you'll spend less on STEM contributions than what you will save by driving compensation costs down with H-1Bs.

  45. What a disaster. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    The proposal is outrageous on its own; train kids for nonexistent jobs that have been outsourced to the lowest bidders.

    The suggestion that H1Bs are enabling opportunities to foreigners by providing a path to immigration is equally offensive. The reality is that any individuals interested in immigrating are going to do so via the traditional means, and that's assuming they didn't come here to study first.

    The vast majority of H1B applications are filed by outsourcing companies in an amusing twist of irony. These companies are realizing that a remote workforce can be problematic. So they've discovered that they've got a cash cow in H1Bs. Apply existing employees for H1Bs and then charge double or triple for the opportunity to ship them over to the US. In most cases they're still cheaper than employing Americans, especially for higher level positions. And if an outsourcing company has someone critical to a client then they've got them by the balls. Pay more to retain that employee or they've already got someone lined up to hire him. I've seen it happen firsthand.

    Second, we really need to end this mentality that dumping more money on the inner city is going to fix anything. That money almost always goes to building a beautiful new school to replace the old one to create the illusion of progress and that the government cares. But the same old problems persist. And there's a fundamental reason for this; if the parents don't care and can't be bothered to participate in the education of their children then the kids will never excel.

    This is why teacher reviews is such a problem. A poor teacher in a better district is always going to score well. But a good teacher stuck merely trying to keep order on the class in a bad area will always score poorly. Not that the schools in wealthier communities are much better with all the helicopter parents and self-important, spoiled brats.

    I haven't even touched on the fiasco that is common core, where they're not only trying to impose what to teach but even how to teach it, oblivious to the variety of teaching techniques and individual personalities. It's typical garbage formulated by management who is completely disconnected from the realities of the situation. The fact that politics plays a factor here only makes it worse.

    Fix those fundamental cultural problems and then we can start talking about fixing the schools. But it's next to impossible to even get started when you've got assholes undermining the entire system for their own gain.

    The appeal of H1Bs is that it's easier to exploit those workers. What the government should be doing is giving green cards to anyone with a degree or proof that the have a good handle on English and can sustain themselves. But that inevitably means empowered immigrants who are more likely to question the crap offers they're given.

    1. Re:What a disaster. by CommanderK · · Score: 1

      The reality is that any individuals interested in immigrating are going to do so via the traditional means, and that's assuming they didn't come here to study first.

      What would those "traditional means" be?

  46. Green cards, not H-1B by danlip · · Score: 1

    I'm all for importing as many smart talented people as we can, but not as indentured servants, which is what H-1B is. Give them green cards and a path to citizenship and the freedom to change jobs.

  47. Re:Inner city kids don't give a fuck about softwar by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    "you live in the inner city so you must be a thug."

    Well to be fair to those social workers, you did end up as someone who posts anonymously...

  48. Wher have I heard this before? by rnturn · · Score: 1

    'We strongly encourage Congress to pass legislation that directs H-1B visa fees to enable underserved inner-city and rural schools to participate in FIRST,' Kamen testified. 'Specifically, these fees should support efforts to enable underserved inner-city and rural schools to participate in FIRST.'

    Just like we were told that allowing the state to create lotteries was going to make all sorts of money available for the schools. If that were really the result, we wouldn't be seeing property tax increase referendums appearing on the local election ballots year after year.

    Just like the fees that we were being charged by the phone company were going to be used for building high-speed internet access to rural areas.

    When the hell will we learn to stop believing these liars? Whenever they trot out the ``think of the children'' argument you can be certain that the only thing they're really concerned with is their quarterly profits. The children -- along with the rest of us -- always get the shaft.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  49. Offer techy immigrants citizenship instead. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Rather than pit them against citizens under conditions where their employers can exploit them then throw them back to Bumphuqistan, have a reasonable (five years max) path to becoming Americans instead. Maintaining the "brain drain" is greatly in favor of the US economy. Training our competition then sending them back is pants-on-head retarded.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  50. $50,000 by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    The real motivation for ever-more H-1B visas: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/13/oracle_sued_over_pay_discrimination/

    "$50,000 is enough for an Indian."

  51. Re:This is already being done by rnturn · · Score: 1

    How much of that Congressional funding is earmarked to be used in purchasing by the schools on technology that will be obsolete before the students even graduate?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  52. FIRST sucks by wytcld · · Score: 1

    I was talked into running a FIRST-based Jr. First Lego League Robotics club at my 3rd-grader's school. The materials provided were awful. For instance, the instructions suggested handing each kid a few Legos to put together, then having them talk about what feelings they had when gazing at them. Considering the high skills serious 3rd-grade Lego users have, they were immediately bored by the program materials and beginners-level kits provided. We ordered more advanced materials mid-stream, but it took them weeks to even ship them out right. They lost the order, then sent something else instead the second time around. FIRST puts on great airs, but they don't deliver much. There's no evidence they've put any serious thought or effort into it at all. It's just a vanity thing for Kamen. A disgrace, really.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  53. Location by snadrus · · Score: 1

    I've owned 2 houses & know it's all "Location, Location, Location".
    Tech isn't everywhere, but where it is, it's booming.
    My kids will start school soon, so I"m in a rush to a diversified tech area before they won't want to leave.
    Because where will the next great tech startup likely succeed? wherever they can get developers!

    --
    Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
  54. Mod parent up. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    H-1B visas are a scam and they DO suppress wages - these corporations only like the market when it benefits themselves; when they have increased resource demands they do not want their costs to rise up. They get government to stop market forces.

    Sure they pay H-1B people going rates but it keeps wages from RISING while supplying indentured servants which are naturally more desirable to MBAs.

    They need to pay more if they want to attract talent, they need to TRAIN employees instead of expect them to list whatever buzzwords the HR drones have on their checklists. They need to RETAIN employees but with non-compete clauses, deportation (H1B,) short term market rewards, and golden parachutes they don't have to care about retention.

    Good paying jobs with a path to citizenship and a good quality of life are what make people from around the world want to become citizens. REAL immigration reform would address the green card issues and completely destroy H-1B loophole. Then you have to restore business culture to the way it used to be by taking away their wishlist items which has created most our problems today. Remember what happened when George Lucas got everything he wanted and everybody listened to him unquestionably.... Giving successful people everything they want is not recreating what made them successful in the first place.

  55. Whoa Whoa Whoa by bogie · · Score: 1

    Let's get one thing straight.

    There are a fuck-ton of conservatives in Congress. There are not a fuck-ton of liberals in Congress.

    There may be a bunch of Democrats in Congress, but they sure as heck aren't all Liberal. This is vs the Republican party where they are all Conservative.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  56. Re:Yes, a lot of countries love socialism by khallow · · Score: 1

    The primary reason people buy citizenship is for the welfare benefits.

    Actually, it's for the economic benefits. It's a choice whether those benefits are due to welfare rather than opportunity or other possible advantages.

  57. Re:Yes, a lot of countries love socialism by khallow · · Score: 1

    to the companies complaining about US regulations yet refusing to move their businesses out of the US

    I don't see a lot of "refusing" here. Over the past few decades, a lot of US manufacture and other business has moved out of the US via outsourcing. Similar movement between the states happens as well, with California and the Rust Belt states in particular losing businesses and employees to other parts of the US.

  58. Overspecialization turns minds to mush by marxmarv · · Score: 1

    You're implying that the political act of buying a certificate makes one's bloviations on any particular subject more credible. Which, like all elite outgroup favoritism, is the position of the supplicant and the traitor.

    The marginal value of a degree has nothing to do with education. It's the debt and the acculturation to bourgeois Whig values that employers consider desirable.

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  59. Re:Evil Crony Capitalists by tangle001 · · Score: 1

    Love your words, I might have written a comment similar to yours on a different day. May I just add that the incompetent business leaders are so lacking in ability they can only imagine getting their positive returns from the low-hanging rotten fruit of exploitation and extortion of workers and couldn't create a true return or value if their lives depended on it.

  60. Caste system due to H1Bs by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Americans should be worried about creeping Caste system due to H1Bs/Immigrants from India.
    Caste system is worse than terrorism. It's slow poison that will destroy your middle class.
    to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_politics_in_India