Slashdot Mirror


Russia Plans To Extend Edward Snowden's Asylum

mendax writes "The New York Times reports, 'Russia plans to extend its offer of asylum to Edward J. Snowden beyond August, a Russian lawmaker said Friday at the World Economic Forum ... The lawmaker, Aleksei K. Pushkov, chairman of the foreign affairs committee in Russia's lower house of Parliament, hinted during a panel discussion that the extension of temporary refugee status for Mr. Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, might be indefinite. "He will not be sent out of Russia," Mr. Pushkov said. "It will be up to Snowden."'" Snowden said yesterday that going back to the U.S. is not an option because of the country's poor whistleblower protections "which through a failure in law did not cover national security contractors like [him]." He added, "This is especially frustrating, because it means there’s no chance to have a fair trial, and no way I can come home and make my case to a jury."

315 comments

  1. Good... by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe he can reveal how Putin is spying on Russians by any means necessary.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Good... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Snowden had better not do a movie along the lines of 2016, though. Vladimir has his foes show up in a cage.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe he can reveal how Putin is spying on Russians by any means necessary.

      Really? I don't get the rhetoric. What are you trying to say?

      Snowden is at his mercy. Okay? We all know this.

      We're in the UCSOA (United Corporate States Of America), we can say anything as long as it doesn't offend our corporate overlords.

      By the way, WalMart is the Most Fair and Just employer EVER!

      Silicon Valley has a legitimate gripe about getting qualfied help! Plah-ease do not hurt me...

    3. Re:Good... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure he doesn't want to be murdered if he is worried about getting a fair trial in the US.

    4. Re:Good... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but everyone knows about their spying. To learn the Russian government is secretly spying on their population would be about as scandalous as learning another Republican is secretly spending his time off at a gay club.

    5. Re:Good... by Dega704 · · Score: 5, Funny

      He already has the corrupt government of one superpower after his head, I don't think we should ask him to go for two. Maybe a Russian whistleblower will leak loads of damning details about Putin's government surveillance and be granted asylum in the US. That would be hilariously awkward.

    6. Re:Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He already has the corrupt government of one superpower after his head, I don't think we should ask him to go for two. Maybe a Russian whistleblower will leak loads of damning details about Putin's government surveillance and be granted asylum in the US. That would be hilariously awkward.

      No, they'd swap prisoners, after each interrogated theirs fully.

    7. Re:Good... by bossk538 · · Score: 1

      It would be awkward, but the cynic in me says that the US and Russia would then find common ground for a mutual extradition.

    8. Re:Good... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Yes, but everyone knows about their spying. To learn the Russian government is secretly spying on their population would be about as scandalous as learning another Republican is secretly spending his time off at a gay club.

      Nothing like leaking some hard evidence. We strongly suspect, but we do not know. If Putin were collecting all phone records I think the bombings of recent dates would have been followed up on with something to show. That tells me Putin isn't having it all his own way.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:Good... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      He already has the corrupt government of one superpower after his head, I don't think we should ask him to go for two. Maybe a Russian whistleblower will leak loads of damning details about Putin's government surveillance and be granted asylum in the US. That would be hilariously awkward.

      Considering how Putin uses his supply of Polonium-210 (see: Alexander Litvinenko) on his enemies I don't think Edward would come back at all. Nothing puts fear in your detractors and critics like a slow, horrible death.

      Besides, Putin isn't about to put Snowden in a position to expose anything more than which hand Vladimir shakes hands with.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:Good... by phmadore · · Score: 1

      No, that would be perfect. Even at that point, I'm afraid, Americans would miss the irony.

    11. Re:Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed.

      If Putin had phone records that could nail the leadership of the recent bombings, he could swoop in under the premise of "months of intense investigation", take them out and look like an effective leader who could (at least) get back at enemies that strike his country.

      Instead, Putin is (still) looking like he doesn't care about his own countrymen, spending time dangling Snowden to taunt the U.S. while the murderers of Russian civilians escape justice. (Former KGB man-turned-dictator can't catch a couple terrorists at home? Ha.)

    12. Re:Good... by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, he's gonna bite the hand feeding him the caviar while he enjoys premium vodka and nsa (no strings attached) sex with a Russian sex kitten with large breasts, before pooping out another NSA (no such agency) revelation.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  2. Make him a Russian citizen.... by unixisc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .... and end this saga! Give him a home in the Sakha Republic - that place will get populated

    1. Re:Make him a Russian citizen.... by wiredlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If Depardieu can be made a citizen over a petty tax dispute, surely the Russian government can extend the same courtesy over a more significant issue.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Make him a Russian citizen.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you meant Yakutia, asswipe

    3. Re:Make him a Russian citizen.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You expect Russia to take a clear stance for freedom and government transparency?
      They are almost as bad as the US government, the only difference is that Snowden haven't tried to help the Russian people yet.

    4. Re:Make him a Russian citizen.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Depardieu can be made a citizen over a petty tax dispute, surely the Russian government can extend the same courtesy over a more significant issue.

      Think carefully about why they are only extending his asylum instead of giving him citizenship.

  3. In Soviet Russia... by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

    whistle blows you!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Sounds hot. I'm sure there's a rule34 application of it too.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I am so getting a T-shirt with that printed on it.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally! That joke is funny again!

      --
      Burton Samograd

    4. Re:In Soviet Russia... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Just makes me glad everyone over there has a dashcam.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  4. Your regularly-scheduled Snowden story by Sarten-X · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just in case you'd forgotten that Snowden still exists, here's Slashdot to stir up all that nice outrage.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    1. Re:Your regularly-scheduled Snowden story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they didn't try to somehow fit bitcoin into this.

    2. Re:Your regularly-scheduled Snowden story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed the mainstream news? All terrorism and Muslims and how dangerous Russia is and the Olympics will be. The usual FUD storm that happens every so often. I'd like to hear something about a whisleblower to counteract the thinly-veiled propaganda that is blasted at me all day.

    3. Re:Your regularly-scheduled Snowden story by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just in case you'd forgotten that Snowden still exists, here's Slashdot to stir up all that nice outrage.

      So what? Snowden is "one of us" - I dunno if he had a slashdot account or not, he did post regularly on ars technica's forums. A great many of us here can identify with him - technical, libertarian, etc.

      Of all the places on the net, slashdot is one of the few where snowden's personal story is just as relevant as role in the surveillance state debate.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Your regularly-scheduled Snowden story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for, you know, every few weeks more of his documents are leaked. There are new NSA stories popping up every few days/weeks, where do you think they are coming from?

  5. With no disrespect mister Snowden... but: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, when "whistleblower protections" are provided to "national security contractors"... it's usually from entities other than those who participated in the original contract!

  6. TF2 by pellik · · Score: 1

    Engineer is spy.

    1. Re:TF2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineer is spy.

      The Announcer announces: "The enemy has taken our intelligence!"

      Suddenly your squad is surrounded by TV screens and newspapers telling you what a good thing this is.

  7. failure in law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nope, that law does exactly was it's supposed to do - protect the guilty.

    1. Re:failure in law by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      I would give you the last of my mod points if I hadn't already posted +5 my good sir anon

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  8. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's on here because Snowden is the biggest whistleblower of his generation, and this article will get generate views and comments for a less-than-interesting Friday afternoon/evening.

    Last time I checked, Russia's continual asylum was conditional on not releasing more information, otherwise Snowden had a year to find a new place to avoid a drone strike. One wonders if he made a deal, or the Russians just enjoy annoying the US.

  9. Come stand trial. by archmcd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's BS that Snowden is unwilling to come back to the US to stand trial. I'm sure there are plenty of great lawyers who would work pro bono to take his landmark case, and if he was willing to fight, he might be able to affect more change to the government spying program and achieve the goals he set out to reach.

    --
    I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    1. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem is that the way the laws are written, he would not be able to mount an effective defense against the charges. He would only be allowed to (basically) answer the circumstances around his alleged taking of those NSA files and would be forbidden from bringing any sort of argument regarding the public's right to know, the government's own wrongdoing exposed by those leaked files, and such and so forth. He is obviously guilty of taking the files so it is a guaranteed guilty verdict.

      There is no point for him to return until the laws allow for some type of whistleblower or public interest defense, which they currently do not.

    2. Re:Come stand trial. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Bad call.

      Spend life in relative freedom, eating non-spicy Russian restaurants.
      V.S.
      Spend life in federal-pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Come stand trial. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The US does have some protections for whistleblowers, but none he can use - national security information is specifically excluded, as is the public interest defence. Any trial would consist of this:

      Judge: "Did you release classified information?"
      Defense: "Only in the public interest."
      Prosecution: "Public interest defense is not considered a valid cause for releasing classified information."
      Judge: "Guilty. I sentence you to six hundred years in maximum security."

      There isn't really anything he could say. That's even if the trial were fair - and it wouln't be. Chances are almost all the documentation will be classified so high neither he nor his lawyers would be permitted to see it, so he'll be defending against evidence he can't even know about. The only good thing for him is that he was a civilian contractor, so he at least would get a trial, rather than a military tribunal.

    4. Re:Come stand trial. by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's BS that Snowden is unwilling to come back to the US to stand trial. I'm sure there are plenty of great lawyers who would work pro bono to take his landmark case, and if he was willing to fight, he might be able to affect more change to the government spying program and achieve the goals he set out to reach.

      Even great lawyers can't do anything when the evidence is hidden or heavily redacted in the name of national security. "Your honor, we'd like to introduce this document showing that the NSA was overstepping its legal bounds" "Objection! That document is classified top secret, so instead you can use this redacted version that is completely black except for the words "We", "love", and "freedom".

      It's especially difficult when the lawyer is going up against an agency that has already shown itself willing to lie directly to congress -- supposedly the people that are overseeing the agency. If they don't mind lying to congress, why wouldn't they lie to a court?

      With the deck stacked that heavily against him, what hope is there for any sort of fair trial? Esepcially when he's guilty of what he's accused of -- stealing and releasing classified documents. Without whistleblower protection laws to support him, the reason he stole the documents is immaterial.

    5. Re:Come stand trial. by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that. He's already stated that he took the job in the first place to find damning information to release. That is one of the details about the whole Snowden saga that causes me reserve in using the term "whistleblower" to describe him.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    6. Re:Come stand trial. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      If he came back he would die mysteriously and painfully inside a week of "natural causes".
      Or be locked in some deep hole in ground and torcherd the same as Manning awaiting trial for three years until they break him.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    7. Re:Come stand trial. by beckett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      snowden had been working in the defense industry for a decade before he decided to join Booz Allen et al. He had ample opportunity to find out what was really going on behind the curtain before he made the decision to blow the whistle.

    8. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soo... how else does someone who suspects the government of wrongdoing behind closed doors 'blow the whistle' ?

    9. Re:Come stand trial. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Possible, but very, very unlikely. The prosecution would be careful to block any jury member during selection who appears sympathetic to Snowden, citing grounds of bias.

    10. Re:Come stand trial. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Interesting logic. Why does the logic for "If you decide to be X, then you aren't really X" work [for you] for whistleblowers but not doctors?

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    11. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a TRUE fair trial, the jury would be informed about Jury Nullification . They would vote not guilty all counts, because of the great service he has done.

    12. Re:Come stand trial. by anagama · · Score: 1

      You could be on God or Satan's own legal team, and it wouldn't make difference. There is no way to have a fair trial in the US on this matter:

      https://pressfreedomfoundation...

      Snowden will not be able to make the case he'd like to make in court because, contrary to common sense, there is no public interest or whistleblower exception under the Espionage Act. In recent cases, prosecutors have convinced courts that the intent of the leaker, the value of leaks to the public, and the lack of harm caused by the leaks are irrelevant, and are therefore inadmissible in court.

      This means Snowden would never be able to tell the jury that his intent was not to help foreign countries or harm the U.S., but to inform the American public about the government's secret interpretations of laws used to justify spying on millions of citizens without their knowledge.

      Snowden would also not be able to explain to a jury that his leaks sparked more than a dozen bills in Congress, and half a dozen lawsuits, all designed to rein in unconstitutional surveillance. He wouldn't be allowed to explain how his leaks caught an official lying to Congress, or that they've led to an unprecedented review of government secrecy.

      The jury would also not be able to hear how there's no demonstrable harm to the United States in releasing this information. And if the prosecution argued that some harm was suffered, Snowden wouldn't be able to explain that the enormous public benefits of these disclosures far outweighed any perceived harm.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    13. Re:Come stand trial. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap. We have already seen exactly what happens with regard to Manning Trials. Every single bit of evidence that demonstrates adherence to rule of law with regard to exposing crimes is buried under national security. Not one iota of evidence proving adherence to law is allowed. A public joke, a disgrace to justice, US law proving the corrupt money and power based nature of the system of injustice.

      How stupid can you be to cite principles of justice with the US wealth and power based courts. Law enforcement routinely gets away with summary execution for contempt of cop. The poor and prosecuted and rich get away with everything or get laughable sentences. The US government has so blatantly corrupted justice that the trial system is now the punishment, with it extended for as long as possible and the enemy of the current band of politicians brutalised and even tortured during the whole process and to the point of death.

      Seriously wake up to reality, the US is as bad as the Soviet Union, not worse, equally exactly just as bad. Three cheers for The Shrub and the Uncle Tom bringing American justice down so low (now there is a real challenge picking the worst of the two, technically the Uncle Tom is far worse because he is smart enough to know exactly the consequences of what he is doing and the Shrub, well that was really all down to Darth Cheney).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He killed any chance to come back to the US the minute he started handing out data that had absolutely nothing to do with the publics right to know. The US bill of rights and constitution only applies to US citizens. Every country on the planet conducts foreign intelligence gathering on countries of interest with no differentiation between enemies and so called allies. His naivety in this matter is glaring. You may think this practice is wrong but until every single country ceases collecting foreign intelligence the practice will continue. He could have gotten off with little or no punishment if he had released only information related to US citizens. His appalling arrogance in deciding he alone knows what information is safe to release and which information might damage the US foreign relations has guaranteed he will be looking over his shoulder for a long time to come. In the meantime he best hope the Russian government doesn't need anything of importance from the US government because there is a long history between the 2 countries when it comes to making mutually beneficial exchanges of people for the right price. One outstanding mystery in this whole affair is why didn't Snowden attempt to release this data in such a way that the release could not be traced back to him. It wouldn't have been that hard.

    15. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he does have a chance... IANAL, but it would require him to argue (correctly) that yes he released the documents, but the documents were proof of a crime and the government doesn't have the power to hide evidence of a crime by classifying it. Thus the documents he took had no legal basis of being classified. If they were not legally classified, he broke no laws taking them.
      A successful argument of this, would at least get the contents of the documents before a jury, at which point Jury Annulment - or at least a hung Jury - become a real possibility.

    16. Re:Come stand trial. by phmadore · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. And didn't Manning's case reveal a similar circumstance of intent? I was an a devout left-leaning anarchist in my early youth (and still little or no justification for a ruling class and/or government to do its bidding) and when I joined the military, in fact, it came up. I read the contract carefully, and it prohibited me from having contact with any group which in any way sought to overthrow the US Government. So during my time in the army, I had no contact with such groups. To me it was similar to Coke asking a delivery driver not to deliver Pepsi using a Coke truck. You could still drink Pepsi (you could still maintain your beliefs, and your personal integrity therein) but you could not, while working for Coke at least, undermine the brand that paid your bills.

    17. Re:Come stand trial. by phmadore · · Score: 1

      A true trial would simply examine the facts and if there was reasonable doubt that Snowden was guilty of the charge then he would be judged not guilty by the jury. In a better country, Bush would have faced similar charges when he outed that CIA agent.

    18. Re:Come stand trial. by strstr · · Score: 1

      What about grounds of bias... for the US government? Thats grounds for dismissing anyone who doesn't support Snowden.

    19. Re:Come stand trial. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Whistle-blower protection is really only usable then the bad actor is the contractor and not the government. In that case the government can flex its legal muscle to exact punishment in the name of the public good. When the government is the one sanctioning illegal activity, it has every reason to create an unfair playing field for anyone who dares to point out the nakedness of emperors.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    20. Re:Come stand trial. by strstr · · Score: 1

      Plus there is no defense for this, as the laws are all stacked against him as has already been stated; there is nothing that says he can't be convicted, no matter how good his attorney's. Plus, the US government wants Snowden dead, so if they ever get their hands on him, he's in for it.

    21. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's BS that Snowden is unwilling to come back to the US to stand trial. I'm sure there are plenty of great lawyers who would work pro bono to take his landmark case, and if he was willing to fight, he might be able to affect more change to the government spying program and achieve the goals he set out to reach.

      Even great lawyers can't do anything when the evidence is hidden or heavily redacted in the name of national security. "Your honor, we'd like to introduce this document showing that the NSA was overstepping its legal bounds" "Objection! That document is classified top secret, so instead you can use this redacted version that is completely black except for the words "We", "love", and "freedom".

      It's especially difficult when the lawyer is going up against an agency that has already shown itself willing to lie directly to congress -- supposedly the people that are overseeing the agency. If they don't mind lying to congress, why wouldn't they lie to a court?

      With the deck stacked that heavily against him, what hope is there for any sort of fair trial? Esepcially when he's guilty of what he's accused of -- stealing and releasing classified documents. Without whistleblower protection laws to support him, the reason he stole the documents is immaterial.

      The content of the documents would be irrelevant for defending against the charge that he illegally copied and disseminated the documents. He's already admitted he did and isn't likely to dispute that fact. The content might be helpful in proving the level of damage caused by their disclosure if the Govt pursues treason charges. He could also argue that the content was over-classified, but keep in mind that the level of classification is determined by the level of damage to national security the release would cause.

    22. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, the US government wants Snowden dead, so if they ever get their hands on him, he's in for it.

      Not really, he'll just get the same treatment as Manning.

      Locked in an empty solitary cell, naked with a light that is too bright to sleep. Who said torture isn't fun?

    23. Re:Come stand trial. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      The US bill of rights and constitution only applies to US citizens.

      Did you even read it? It says "persons" or "people" everywhere, except for the qualifications of office for president, senators and representatives, the federal supremacy clause, and the privileges and immunities clause, where it says "citizens". So the distinction is quite explicit and obviously intentional.

      There's plenty of judicial precedent here, as well. Any person in US jurisdiction, whether citizen or not, has the rights and freedoms outlined in the Constitution, except for those few that are exclusively reserved to citizens.

    24. Re:Come stand trial. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      You raise your concerns about unconstitutional programs with your boss, in writing, and if that works you go to his boss. They need to get paper for the management toilets from somewhere.

    25. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So he stole classified documents. Released them to people not authorized to have them. He's guilty. Beyond a reasonable doubt. And he should go to prison for a very long time.

      Even if you grant the let's say a dozen documents related to the still legal meta data collection then he has still has stolen almost 1.7 million other classified documents of which he has released at least tens of thousands to some journalists. Even if you view he's a whistle blower for blowing the whistle on still legal behavior (its not illegal until the SCOTUS says it is since they already have a precedent saying that there is no expectation of privacy for business records) then he is still guilty on 1.7 million other counts of stealing government property, unauthorized releasing of classified information, etc...

      You then say that his defense lawyers won't be allowed to see all of the documents he's stolen and released to who knows how many people and/or countries not to mention stashed away in a million hidey holes. But yet he won't have a fair trial because he can't see all of the documents he already has?

    26. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another point is the classification system the Govt uses it opens up another whole debate, Is information that's in the public's interests without a direct threat to US citizens or assets a threat to national security? Or is it just that the information is embarrassing or illegal so its considered top secret so it can't be examined or debated except by a "select" group of people who simply seem to tow the party line.

      I don't consider coffee orders a national security threat, yet we have seen documents with a top secret classification and mundane information, the implication being if someone from your local starbucks saw your top secret coffee order they would be charged with espionage ?

      Snowden should be getting a pat on the back (or the nobel peace prize), he has done more for peace than anyone in the past 30 years. sadly I don't see it happening, from most comments by people from the US they seem apathetic to their governments control as they are "protecting them" from Terrorists, child molester's and dragons.

    27. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it is not. What is BS is that there are no legal framework for him to defend its actions.
        He stands no chance of winning any sort of trial before an American court at the moment.
        He is guilty of leaking those documents, and there is no legal basis to justify he did it because it was in the public's interest.
        And even if the USA would take a giant step towards democracy and freedom of information, even if Congress wasn't such a pack of scared and lazy 4 years old only driven by money, even if the supreme court wasn't a bunch of 80 years old with ideas dating from the 20's, even then he wouldn't stand a chance because his actions would predate any form of laws that would provide him with legal protection.

    28. Re:Come stand trial. by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

      Exactly the point. Snowden has taken way too many data needed to prove his point about US citizen rights violation by NSA. He leaked everything in the hands of a third party with no right to access this data. In a trial, it would be hard for him to prove he was really trying to make a point about violation of US citizen rights. It could easily be seen as an alibi to leak top secret data to foreign countries. It could be seen as fishing without knowing exactly what he will find in the data he has taken. Could a whistleblower been qualified as is if he doesn't have a clue about the data he has just taken? If you say yes to this, anyone taking any dataset from anywhere and leaking it to public could be seen has a whistleblower, including your credit card data and other personal records.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    29. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikileaks wants to overthrow the US government? They may want it to change, but to overthrow it? Interesting.

    30. Re:Come stand trial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's true, so what? Just makes him double the hero.

    31. Re:Come stand trial. by robsku · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be a whistleblower than one of the huge sheeple-mob of "I knew what was happening, but... I was just following orders" after someone else finally blows the whistle.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    32. Re:Come stand trial. by strstr · · Score: 1

      They've been talking about wanting permission to kill him instead of capture him. So they don't want to bring Snowden in alive, they want to bring him in dead.

      Link: http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyj...

  10. Re:Seems simple to me by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Can't we privately send him to Mars with a 3D printer? He'll do fine over there and he'll be in a new paradise far away from decaying Earth.

    Is going to Mars such a horrible thing? 200,000 people have signed up for a possible trip to Mars, why put Snowden at the head of the line?

  11. Re:Conspiracy time by Shados · · Score: 1

    Except that stuff happens all the time, with a bunch of different countries as the source, and many predate Snowden's events by a very, very long time.

  12. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or both.

  13. Re:Conspiracy time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you serious? Worst troll of the month.

  14. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by deconfliction · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can understand the earlier developments relating to this whole incident being on Slashdot. There was the technological aspect to it. ... ... Please, editors, let's leave these purely-political stories off of the front page. I don't dispute that they have value, but they just don't belong here.

    While I don't disagree that slashdot seems to put trollish/public-subset-opinion-polling/alarmist style headlines all over the front page more often than optimal, I have to disagree here about Snowden. I believe the Snowden revelations, and the way they came about, and continue to transpire as so, have so paradigm-shifted the computer and network security landscape, that articles such as this one are more than appropriate. First, it's merely a side-effect conveniency issue. While yes, some of your points may have merit, you have to forgive a bit that the slashdot audience really is that interested in how the Snowden saga transpires. I mean, this is some Epic War and Peace Shit going on here. A martyr being martyred slowly over years. How exactly, and how much pain and vindication end up in that story, I really think will have a profound place in the history of the internet's chapter in the history of humanity. This is a *BIG DEAL*.

    And even setting asside that real-politik drama and the slashdot audience's 'non-technical' interest, you must look at the legitimate 'technical' interest of the slashdot audience. How Snowden is handled by the overwhelming powers that be, truly does shape how many of us here will be developing technology throughout the remaining future of our carreers. At some point, one is tempted to say - 'if computer security matters are treated this profoundly by the un-(directly)-opposable powers that be, then you know what, I'm actually going to stop worrying about whether the firmware in my BIGNAMEBRAND computer system or consumer device is a security risk or not. But if Snowden is fully vindicated, and reclaims the rights and protections of a free citizen of the United States of America, including rigourous protection of his freedom of speech, then I may well say- I'd like to spend more of my carreer working on more secure open source firmware.

    Dunno...

  15. good points / bad points by lophophore · · Score: 0, Troll

    Snowden's revelations about the NSA spying on American Citizens should earn him immunity from prosecution as a whistleblower. That was a valuable and risky thing he did.

    However, his revelations about NSA spying outside the USA have caused severe and lasting damage to the USA's reputation, and to the USA's ability to collect intelligence that it needs to defend it's interests, **including national security interests**. That was a dangerous and over-the-top thing he did -- it **is** treason, and the severity of that (IMHO) outweighs any potential immunity he might have deserved from the above.

    Snowden dropped a tactical nuke when he could have used a stick of dynamite. This indicates to me that his goal was to bury the NSA, not to reform it. In my opinion, this moves him from hero to traitor, and he needs to answer for this.

    I think he is relatively safe if he stays in Russia. "Relatively". Should he leave there, he should prepare to be dragged into a van with a canvas sack over his head -- the subject of an "extraordinary rendition." (This is of course illegal. I don't condone it, but I do expect it.) He's barely safe in Russia, and probably not safe anywhere else. He made his own bed, now he gets to sleep in it.

    I fully expect this post to get down-moderated into oblivion.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:good points / bad points by bug1 · · Score: 1

      However, his revelations about NSA spying outside the USA have caused severe and lasting damage to the USA's reputation, and to the USA's ability to collect intelligence that it needs to defend it's interests

      His revelations about NSA spying outside the USA have caused severe and lasting damage to the USA's ability to betray its allies.
      The USA now has the oportunity to begin to earn the trust of its people so it can defend its national interests.

    2. Re:good points / bad points by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      The nature of the issue required full disclosure, they have no business spying on our allies, or utilizing military resources in the acquisition of oil, turning military power on Americans, undermining private sector computer security of Americans, abusing the national security apparatus, or violating the constitution. If none of this were the case, then Snowden would not have had a gripe or anything unlawful to expose. Elite corps owning politicians is the problem, the NSA did as instructed and probably unknowingly created a corporate espionage cash cow and undoubtedly a symptom of the problem, what Snowden did was inevitable at one time or another, one cannot commit a crime and call it a secret, or create retroactive law to legalize it without showing hypocrisy. The corruption behind this needs to eat their crow and like it.

    3. Re:good points / bad points by hawguy · · Score: 2

      I think he is relatively safe if he stays in Russia. "Relatively". Should he leave there, he should prepare to be dragged into a van with a canvas sack over his head -- the subject of an "extraordinary rendition." (This is of course illegal. I don't condone it, but I do expect it.) He's barely safe in Russia, and probably not safe anywhere else. He made his own bed, now he gets to sleep in it.

      Given that he's already said that all the docs will be released if he comes to an untimely demise, there seems to be little incentive for the USA to extradite him unwillingly, and much incentive for the USA to keep him alive and well.

      He made his own bed, now he gets to sleep in it.

      Which is why many people consider his acts heroric -- he sacrificed his own welfare and safety to reveal illegal activities by the US government.

    4. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Treason has a strict definition (which I am too lazy to actually look up). I don't think Snowden's actions were intended to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States ).

      You are otherwise correct and it's a shame you are being downmodded. He hamstrung the US, because we were the best at a game he didn't like. Now everyone else knows what it takes to win.

    5. Re:good points / bad points by anagama · · Score: 2

      The treason definition is in the constitution:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...

      Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

      In this context, I would think "adhere" means something along the lines of "devotion" -- the only country Snowden showed devotion to was the US. He certainly didn't wage war.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    6. Re:good points / bad points by lophophore · · Score: 1

      Oh Please!

      Do you not think the USA's allies were not spying on the USA? The French continue to conduct large scale industrial espionage against the USA to this day. They just have not had the whistle blown on them (yet.) It is pretty common knowledge that Israel spies on the USA continuously.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    7. Re:good points / bad points by lophophore · · Score: 1

      Merriam-Webster's first definition of "treason" is

      "the betrayal of trust."

      Snowden signed an agreement to keep things he learned on the job secret, and he betrayed that trust. Again, I don't disagree with him blowing the whistle on the NSA's illegal and unconstitutional surveillance of U.S. citizens going about their business here in the USA. My beef is that he unveiled way more than that, way more than he needed to, and I do not support that. I believe that was wrong.

      My opinion is that his behavior crossed beyond "whistleblower" into the range of "criminal."

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    8. Re:good points / bad points by lophophore · · Score: 1

      Yours is a thoughtful reply, and I thank you for that.

      However, I must disagree with your "elite corps owning politicians" being the root of this problem. That's a whole different problem, I don't believe the politicians knew what the NSA was doing at all. The NSA was running totally rogue, and the unlawful surveillance of US citizens on US soil -- with Congress having no clue at all -- clearly demonstrates that. Our corporate bought-and-paid-for politicians stack things in favor of their corporate sponsors, and this NSA problem is a loser for everybody.

      I don't think you and I agree much on politics, but I think we both agree that there is too much money in it, and the power of the individual has been subverted by big money interests.

      Thanks for your comment (and not down-modding me!)

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    9. Re:good points / bad points by lophophore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My point is that he did not need to reveal all of it, just exposing the domestic surveillance would have been enough... Congress and the average American don't give one tiny shit if the NSA bugged Angela Merkel's phone, and many are probably secretly pleased that we did and got away with it until this guy opened the kimono on that.

      My question is how was releasing that information helpful? While certainly unethical, bugging Merkel's phone (for instance) was NOT illegal under US law, and not forbidden under the NSA's charter, while the domestic data collection clearly was both illegal and forbidden. I applaud the exposure of the NSA's illegal activities, but I abhor the exposure of their legal ones.

      This is why I believe he had other motives. Snowden is not a hero, he's an attention whore.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    10. Re:good points / bad points by lophophore · · Score: 0

      Once again, Slashdot cannot tolerate a range of views on politics. If it's not approved by "Progressive Democrats", it's a "Troll".

      3 hours later, this post has been down modded 3 times -- "Troll" and "Overrated". For what? offering an unpopular opinion? Trust me, I would not have written over 200 words if I wanted to troll slashdot, because it is much much easier than that.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    11. Re:good points / bad points by anagama · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah yes -- the definition of Treason in Webster's trumps that in the US Constitution. You must be a member of Obama's legal team.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    12. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or may be some people care more about universal ethics than legality of something in certain jurisdiction?

    13. Re:good points / bad points by bug1 · · Score: 1

      So, is your point that the USA wasnt betraying the trust of its allies because there wasnt any to begin with ?

    14. Re:good points / bad points by callmetheraven · · Score: 1

      lopho. I consider the terms "progressive" and "democrat" to be hurtful slurs, fighting words if you called me that to my face, and I disagree with most of what you think.

      On the 1 to 10 "Hero" scale:
      Snowden = 8, NSA = 1

      On the 1 to 10 "Traitor" scale
      Snowden = 2, NSA = 10.

      --
      You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
    15. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your point would have been better made had your original post not ended with the phrase:

      "I fully expect this post to get down-moderated into oblivion."

      Just saying.

    16. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not know that NSA grounded branch of 50 Cent Party in USofA. You guys really import everything from People's Republic....

    17. Re:good points / bad points by allaunjsiIverfox2 · · Score: 1

      His point is that he's a warmonger with no principles whatsoever. The USA's reputation? The USA's ability to spy on its 'allies'? I hope it did damage them, because it should.

    18. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I see, everything he revealed needed to be revealed. If there was some stuff that didn't need to be, how is he, a lone guy, supposed to vet thousands of pages of junk? He can't. He did all he could as an individual. If you're one guy against the US government, don't whine that you don't like the quality of his work. Whine that the US government didn't do the job, and do it properly. That's like complaining you don't like how Hitler was destroyed. Once you go into battle against a big enemy, don't complain how it ends.

    19. Re:good points / bad points by lophophore · · Score: 1

      That is funny.

      Really that would have been Clinton's legal team.

      Perhaps perfidious would be a better word to describe Mr. Snowden.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    20. Re:good points / bad points by tqk · · Score: 1

      However, his revelations about NSA spying outside the USA have caused severe and lasting damage to the USA's reputation ...

      Get real. Who are these mythical utterly naive people who were blissfully unaware prior to Snowden as to what the NSA was and did? I have an EFF T-shirt from about five years ago that was protesting it loudly.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    21. Re:good points / bad points by robsku · · Score: 1

      My question is how was releasing that information helpful? While certainly unethical, bugging Merkel's phone (for instance) was NOT illegal under US law, and not forbidden under the NSA's charter, while the domestic data collection clearly was both illegal and forbidden. I applaud the exposure of the NSA's illegal activities, but I abhor the exposure of their legal ones.

      This is why I believe he had other motives. Snowden is not a hero, he's an attention whore.

      Reasonable people don't throw their life away for attention whoring, and I for one most certainly think Snowden is a reasonable person. Reasonable and *ethical* - what's wrong with USA (as well as most other countries and a whole lot of people) is the lack of ethics of any kind and I applaud Snowden for his clearly deep love for his country and hatred for sociopaths that are failing it and taking a huge dump on ethis of any kind.

      Granted I'm not american and I thus have other reasons than well being of USA only for thanking Snowden, but let's play pretend and imagine that I were the same person I am now except I was american and I'll grant you I would be just as much cheering for Snowden as I am now.

      I'm also thankful, as a Finnish citizen, to Snowden for uncovering how Sweden is in bed with NSA in spying out citizen.

      There's something to be said for a patriot who throws his life away to do the right thing for not only his country, by exposing the wrongs their government (and//or three letter agencies), but for other countries as well - thank you Snowden.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    22. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Substantial parts of how the current surveillance regime operates includes mutual-spying and intelligence-sharing agreements: Substantial parts of the surveillance of US citizens was done in the UK and other countries by their intelligence agencies to avoid the letter of the law of the constitution while violating its intent. Because of this it is relevant to talk about how the US intelligence agencies were trying to have it both ways, both using foreign spies as plausibly-deniable labour AND spying on the leaders of these allies at the same time. It's further relevant to talk about how a lot of the surveillance which is officially carried out in the interests of national security obviously has economic warfare or other political goals as the true objective instead of national security.

      Now it's possible you have either not learned about that, or you're trying to forget it. But either you don't grasp/accept that the US has been using foreign governments to unofficially perform acts like extraordinary rendition and spying on its behalf or you're a denialist shill trying to distort and whitewash the record of total corruption Snowden and other whistleblowers (like Chelsea Manning) have exposed.

    23. Re:good points / bad points by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      If "everybody does it, it's just that the USA got caught" as has been claimed by various pro-government trolls on /., then the USA's reputation has suffered no damage, because everybody already knew they did it, just as their own countries also do it.
      If everybody else *doesn't* do it, then the USA deserves their damaged reputation, and they deserve it.

      Do you think Rob Ford's reputation as a crack smoker was caused by Gawker, or by Rob Ford?
      If the USA's reputation has been damaged by this, it is entirely the US government's fault, rather than Snowden's.

      You're trying to blame Snowden for the US government's failures. That's why you were downvoted.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    24. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never would have been enough. The media wouldnt have run with it, foreigners wouldnt have cared so no news there. It all would have blown over in a couple of days. You still have sympathisers in America that claim even the domestic spying was ok because 'terrorists'. You need to pull your head out of the sand.

    25. Re:good points / bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the international relations and reputational damage of spying upon allies, most sensitively by spying upon their democratically elected leaders, is of no interest to you?

      Good, I just wanted to know why you are ineligible for a career in diplomacy. You are completely unsuitable.

      BTW, by spying upon the world, the NSA has made this a global issue. The opinions of Congress and the average American are but one voice. And yeah, I know that's the NSA's mandate. Makes no difference. It also makes no difference that "everyone does it" and all similar excuse-making.

      If it damages international relations and is offensive to the citizens of the world, then maybe we ought to take another look at the wisdom of these programs. And no, it' not about All-Or-Nothing. It's about boundaries and rules. Now let the fur fly, I'm sure there are lots of apologists for bad behaviour, as long as "it benefits us".

  16. Snowden is Putin's ticket to a free ride by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing you have to understand here is that Putin is an authoritarian douchebag -- but he's not an idiot. He knows that there will be extra scrutiny on his polices during the Olympics. By having Snowden around, it's a reminder that the US isn't in a position to finger-wag over such things.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  17. Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Both you and "ackthpt" should be ashamed of yourself.

    Unlike Mr. Edward Snowden, none of you have the guts to do the right thing, and yet, after the personal sacrifices Mr. Snowden has gone through - may even turn out to be a lifelong exile from the country he loves so much - you guys post smart-ass comments as if you are some how "better" than Mr. Snowden.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a ring that lets me save at +4 vs. misplaced shame.
      My remark was more about equating Putin and Obama's behavior toward dissidents than it was about Snowden himself.
      You may not like Snowden, but in the broader context of the IRS scandal, and now this indictment against Dinesh D'Souza, the real people who should consider whether they bear any shame are those who re-elected Barack Obama. Not only do I reject your attempted shaming, I say the buck stops here with trying to pass it on.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by ATMAvatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The people who bear shame are those who voted Republican *or* Democrat in any national election.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    3. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      Fair point, but I'd like to offer the flaccid excuse that it seemed we could get reform more quickly from the Republicans.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair point, but I'd like to offer the flaccid excuse that it seemed we could get reform more quickly from the Republicans.

      Had Romney won, we would have had Romney running for re-election in 2016. Hell Obama could then re-run too (or in 2020). As is, Obama is a lame duck effectively and can't run again. Romney is disgraced and won't run again. The slate is clean for 2016!

      I voted for Gary Johnson (L) in the general and Ron Paul (R) in the primary. My conscience is clean.

    5. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      not the voters' fault.

      we had no one good to vote for! same as last time, and last time, and last time.

      put someone truly good up there and then call us names if that guy does not get in.

      what we have is a choice of kang or kodos. either way, we lose.

      and no, voting 3rd party is a non-starter. don't even go there.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As you point out, neither of them stole 1,700,000 Top Secret intelligence agency documents and fled with them to live under the protection of American adversaries while dispensing many of them in a way to make them available to America's enemies.

      Russia is an adversary of the US? That's quaint Cold War thinking. China is a US adversary? Last I checked, China is our largest trading partner (in terms of imports).

      What China and Russia really are in the context of the NSA affair are two of the only nations on this planet that won't summary extradite an individual at the demand of the US government.

      But yeah, Snowden should have just fled to one of our lapdog allies instead. What a dope that Snowden is.

    7. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Both you and "ackthpt" should be ashamed of yourself.

      Unlike Mr. Edward Snowden, none of you have the guts to do the right thing, and yet, after the personal sacrifices Mr. Snowden has gone through - may even turn out to be a lifelong exile from the country he loves so much - you guys post smart-ass comments as if you are some how "better" than Mr. Snowden.

      Bah! Foo! and Arg, to you Sir Lackasenseahumour. Feh, too.

      Pity you can't read that post more than only one, very negative way.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by phmadore · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I mean, we can talk all day and say that Snowden made great personal sacrifices, but did anyone ever ask why he was working with the NSA in the first damn place? All Federal level police organizations are corrupt in one way or another and all of them are guilty of wiping their ass with the constitution. Contractor or not, working for the NSA was immoral. Now whistle-blowing on them should vindicate his conscience, but does it really exonerate whatever work against our right to privacy that he did before? In a more just world, that is what he would be charged with, not his present charges. Just my two cents. And let's not try to talk about my patriotism. I enlisted in the Army Infantry and deployed to Iraq in 2009. Snowden never did that. I did daily patrols. This was when I still had some faith left in America as a country and in Americans as a people. Now I'm sort of working on an exit strategy for my family. Sorry. I give up on this place.

    9. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Edward Snowden reported CRIMES that were being perpetrated by the US government. I can safely say he loves his country more than you ever will.

    10. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      With respect, whatever Putin is doing has nothing to do with Snowden's revelations and bringing it up looks like a distraction even if the intention was different (eg. using some other topic to push a personal barrow).
      Also the problem is far deeper than the current President and framing it in a way that attempts to blame one man looks both partisan and hopelessly naive.

    11. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      protection of American adversaries

      Did I just fall through a wormhole into 1982 or is there a wormhole between your ears?

    12. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Mr. Edward Snowden, none of you have the guts to do the right thing, and yet, after the personal sacrifices Mr. Snowden has gone through - may even turn out to be a lifelong exile from the country he loves so much - you guys post smart-ass comments, demonstrating the very freedoms that make this country so great.

      FTFY.

      Ok, maybe not. But you know how when someone insults the soldier who defended that person's right to throw that insult? I like pointing out the irony of such acts.

    13. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and no, voting 3rd party is a non-starter. don't even go there.

      Well since you've obviously made up your mind, I'll post this for everyone else.

      In many states, there is the guaranteed winner, guaranteed runner-up, and then all the "non-starter" 3rd parties. In those states, everyone voting for the guaranteed runner-up would do better to vote for any of the many 3rd parties. Sure, you won't disrupt the guaranteed winner. But you weren't going to do that anyway. Better to try and dislodge the guaranteed runner-up, send a message to those in charge.

      For those of you in swing states, by all means, continue voting either D or R. Since you guys don't have a guaranteed winner, it doesn't make any sense to ask y'all to vote 3rd party.

    14. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but did anyone ever ask why he was working with the NSA in the first damn place?

      When I was in high school, same time as Edward Snowden, I had no idea the kind of unconstitutional activity that took place within the NSA. I find it entirely plausible that he was unaware until sometime after getting employed by them.

    15. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Russia has decided to make its relationship with the US, UK, and NATO in general complicated. (And perhaps Australia as well / in time.) While they cooperate in various matters such as terrorism and trade, the Russians have resumed various Soviet practices, such as certain foreign policy stands, and probing Western defenses with bombers and submarines. To that you can add making various threats regarding nuclear strikes against NATO countries. (Former Soviet sample.) Perhaps you simply don't bother reading about such things?

      Russian bombers’ secret UK missions ‘not a friendly act’
      Russian Bombers Perform Simulated "Strikes" on Sweden, U.S.

      I would expect you to be at least somewhat acquainted with the various acts of Chinese encroachment and aggression against its neighbors. Various members of the Chinese government have also threatened nuclear strikes against the US. Perhaps you've heard that US forces are now providing greater aid in the defense of Australia?

      Both China and Russia are "great powers" in the classic sense, and pursue their interests. Sometimes that will mean working with the West, sometimes against it. China's power is ascending as they build towards a navy with four aircraft carrier battle groups, the first one now available, and India is right behind them. The US seems to be heading towards a much less capable navy than today, and Australia decommissioned its last aircraft carrier long ago.
         

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    16. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what we have is a choice of kang or kodos. either way, we lose.

      and no, voting 3rd party is a non-starter. don't even go there.

      So, let me get this straight: If you had a choice between A) a guy that will eat your face, B) another guy that will eat your face, or C) a guy you've never heard of who wants to do something like, I dunno, legalize drugs or use a tax surplus to give everybody a $10 gift card to Office Depot... you'd vote for one of the face-eaters?

      Suddenly I'm starting to realize why some people in other countries think we're collectively brain damaged.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    17. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is guilty of doing far worse, like illegally invading other countries.

    18. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      A bit more for you.

      Russian and Chinese espionage in Australia - News Weekly, August 18, 2007

      Chinese spies currently outnumber the Soviet intelligence presence that existed in Australia during the Cold War, it was revealed late last year. .... Last month, The Australian's Cameron Stewart revealed that the number of Russian spies in Australia had increased to near Cold War levels, "forcing ASIO to respond by training a new generation of counter-espionage officers" (The Australian, July 23 and 24, 2007).

      Canada spy case rocks ASIO

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    19. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Russia is an adversary of the US? That's quaint Cold War thinking. China is a US adversary? Last I checked, China is our largest trading partner (in terms of imports).

      If you bother to check you will find that both China and Russia have nuclear weapons pointed at the US and members of their governments make explicit threats. Russia regularly probes US and NATO defenses with bombers and submarines, and the Chinese have their own charms.

      The US and NATO countries used to trade with both during the Cold War, so you may not have this all nailed down yet.

      Sometimes Russia and China cooperate, sometimes they don't. Neither make themselves actual enemies at the moment, but neither do they quite make the grade as allies of the West either.

      People have different ideas about friendship and patriotism. Apparently you think friends and patriots have orange hair.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    20. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Are you meaning to say that Russia nee USSR didn't illegally invade Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Finland, Romania, Iran, Afghanistan, Georgia? Even more than just invading them, many of those countries were either annexed or had territory stolen from them. I'm pretty sure the people of Eastern Europe weren't thrilled about being forced into communist governments as well, nor are they thrilled about being threatened today with Russian nuclear strikes for trying to protect themselves from Iran. Did you know that the Soviets approached the US to see if the US would passively allow the Soviets to nuke the Chinese? Russia has also be quite free about throwing its weight around.

      Afghanistan was completely justified self-defense, and NATO allies are fighting with the US there. Saddam earned fate as well.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    21. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      KNOWING that we will never have a majority on a 3rd party, your whole rant is moot.

      that's all.

      note that I don't LIKE THIS, but I am old enough to know how the world really works. some games are not winnable because the game masters stack the cards against you.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      protection of American adversaries

      Did I just fall through a wormhole into 1982 or is there a wormhole between your ears?

      In cold fjord's case, it's definitely the latter.

      DEFINTELY !!

    23. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Your understanding of the 22nd Amendment seems incomplete.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    24. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      Unlike Mr. Edward Snowden, none of you have the guts to do the right thing, and yet, after the personal sacrifices Mr. Snowden has gone through - may even turn out to be a lifelong exile from the country he loves so much - you guys post smart-ass comments, demonstrating the very freedoms that make this country so great.

      FTFY.

      Ok, maybe not. But you know how when someone insults the soldier who defended that person's right to throw that insult? I like pointing out the irony of such acts.

      Thank you for pointing out that irony.

      Yes, I do recognize that irony - although unfortunately most of my fellow Americans seem to be unable to see that.

      My message was aiming at those two person whose attempt in cracking inane jokes about the predicament to Mr. Edward Snowden after he has so bravely disclosed to the world the secretive and activities carried out by the government of the United States of America in clear violation of the Constitution of the United States of America, which I personally find very distasteful and very insulting to the intellect of the many millions of True Patriots of America.

      And as you have put it so succinctly, yes, their juvenile attempt has, ironically, presented to the world the True Quality of Democracy, Liberty and Freedom which America should represent.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    25. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      Oh, it's every bit the voter's fault. What are the first three words of the Constitution?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    26. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      With all due respect, follow the links. I was not talking about Putin with respect to Snowden. Rather, Putin WRT to Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    27. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by phmadore · · Score: 1

      Trading partner? Okay, that's an odd concept. If we were trading partners and trade were free, you would protect your workers, I would protect my workers, and neither of us would sign deals which hurt our economies. At present, China does not protect her workers, we don't employ ours, and every trade agreement we sign gives away everything but the arms industry. Hmm.

    28. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always a treat to read informed commentary. Your post doesn't qualify.

    29. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      So far as has been revealed, it appears that pretty much all of the government's actions have been legal under US law. Edward Snowden's actions were not. When he exposed US foreign intelligence operations, and the intelligence operations of US allies like the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and NATO allies, he clearly went outside the bounds of whistleblowing to protect the civil rights of Americans.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    30. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if there was an election and nobody came?
      Message understood THEN?

    31. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      "The past is another country".

    32. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I was not talking about Putin with respect to Snowden. Rather, Putin WRT to Mikhail Khodorkovsky

      Then feel free to submit another article instead of highjacking this one and looking as if you are just trying to distract people away from the Snowden revelations.

    33. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Look here CHILD - I lived through part of the cold war and what you are going on about is TRIVIAL in comparison. I suggest you get your head around that before going on with superannuated warmongering rubbish fed to you by thieves that want to rip off the taxpayer by selling crap weapons that do not work at a 500% mark up.
      Stop being a useful idiot. Serve your country instead of those that would gut it for their own profit.

    34. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by RussR42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      KNOWING that we will never have a majority on a 3rd party, your whole rant is moot.

      Of course we won't as long as people keep saying things like:

      voting 3rd party is a non-starter. don't even go there.

      Maybe if enough people start voting 3rd party, it will be taken seriously and gain a majority.

    35. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I can't say for China, but I can assure you that Russia certainly does view US as its biggest and most dangerous adversary. Partly this is based on the objective fact that the two countries do actually clash quite often on the geopolitical arena; part is an elaborate stab-in-the-back myth that explains the downfall of the USSR as a successfully executed internal "fifth column" coup designed and implemented by the CIA.

    36. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Do you see this color guard? There is some very interesting symbolism there, at least as I see it. The Russian flag is followed by another color guard with the flag of the Soviet Union. Their history continues to follow them as they move forward, one might say it dogs them. They march to the tune of "The Sacred War," one of the great anthems of the Great Patriotic War we know as WW2. The Russian national anthem is the tune of the old Hymn of the Soviet Union. Unfortunately the Russians have found it more difficult than most of the rest of the old Soviet bloc to break free of the old ways, which they increasingly revert to.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    37. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Nothing in your answer negates the presence of Russian submarines in the waters, or bombers in the airspace, of the United Kingdom, Sweden, the US, Japan, or other countries that could be listed. Nor does it alter the Chinese ambitions of hegemony, military modernization and naval buildup, creeping territorial demands, and threats of military action against its neighbors.

      The end of the Cold War wasn't the end of history, or the end of Chinese communist power and ambition. Given the noises coming out of Beijing these days it isn't even clear that we aren't simply seeing an extended replay of Lenin's New Economic Policy.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    38. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by celle · · Score: 1

      "This was when I still had some faith left in America as a country and in Americans as a people. "

              Maybe early on Snowden did too. Eventually you reach a decision point. Why did you volunteer for a war you knew was unethical?

    39. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by phmadore · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The way I saw it, it was all of our unethical war. I'm sorry if that opinion offends you -- if you do not feel responsible for it for any given reason (I was also underage when it kicked off, I was 15) -- but I do believe that a society is, to an extent, the sum of its parts, and that we all owe it to ourselves to take ownership of whatever society we live in. It seemed like a better option than funding it with my tax dollars.

      I also knew that if I was going to be critical of it, I had better see it first hand. And after seeing it first hand, the truth of the matter for the average Iraqi citizen was that he feared Iranian troops far more than he did American troops, and his biggest fear would be American troops leaving and opening the door for Iranian troops to enter. That was the feeling I got, time after time, talking to interpreters and 10 year old English speaking kids. They loved the same idea of America I grew up loving. I did my best to be ethical, as an individual, and to this day I can't say I ever once compromised my morals. Hell, by the time I got there, we weren't even doing raids. We did "soft-knocks," meaning we knocked first and tried to communicate before any escalation of force. The only reason we'd be there is if there was a known "terrorist," that is "insurgent," that is someone who had actively tried to kill people who did not deserve it or tried to kill soldiers. And the quandary in all this for me is that many times this information was not received through fancy, high-tech intelligence gathering methods. It was received through good old-fashioned tattle-tales from the same neighborhood, people who needed something we could give them (usually money). We did some good things now and then, too, you know, things I am proud to say I was a part of, like handing out bundles of your precious tax dollars to folks who would 1) never forget it and 2) use it for something more than a new car in their driveway or a new television on their wall. I actually think that one day Iraq will be a modern, booming country with much more promise than many parts of America, and I'm not sure it could have been that way if Saddam had stayed in power. That's only my opinion, and it's not based on any sort of data (this is a thing I am trying to overcome this year on a general level).

      But to you, Citizen, I would like to apologize for having been a part of that unethical war. And I would like to apologize for the disability checks they send me. In hindsight, I'd probably have found another job if I had thought about it longer. But I wouldn't have commented on the war anymore, I wouldn't have felt equipped to. I was tired of people in my family telling me that 1) I couldn't have an opinion because I had not been there and 2) I simply did not have what it took to be a soldier. That last part is exactly why I went infantry. I'm not a violent person.

    40. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by nbauman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and no, voting 3rd party is a non-starter. don't even go there.

      “I’d rather vote for what I want and not get it, than for what I don’t want and get it.”
      -- Eugene V. Debs.

    41. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who are Americas friends, the countries they don't bully or spy on. The countries where they don't try to influence the local governments etc?

    42. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      There is some basis for that. The U.S. was openly trying to destroy the U.S.S.R. since its founding, with the exception of our alliance during WWII.

      For example, we armed the Mujahadeen with ground-to-air missiles in Afghanistan so that they could shoot down Soviet helicopters. Zbigniew Brzezinski said that he wanted to give the Soviets "a Vietnam." Ever hear of blowback?

      We were openly supporting nationalist groups within the Soviet Union, including the Chechnyans.

      All during the cold war you could read the hawks openly advocating these policies, in places like the Wall Street Journal editorial page. I remember them arguing that once the stifling hand of socialism was lifted from the creative Russian people, they would create a free market paradise.

      The final way the West contributed to the breakup of the Soviet Union was to immediately recognize the coup, thereby undercutting Gorbachev, rather than supporting him. The U.S. gave substantial support to the Ukrainian separatists, for example, through the National Endowment for Democracy, by supporting candidates in elections in ways that would be illegal for foreigners in the U.S.

      Hope you're happy with Putin.

    43. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Oh, for sure, US was playing against USSR during the Cold War, and vice versa. But Dulles' Plan is still bullshit, pure and simple.

    44. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What better time to remind people that there are other powerful countries around.Now that everyone is becoming disillusioned with the US. It's just good diplomacy, handed to them by the US.

    45. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Point taken on the hijacking. But this is /.: are you declaring certain kinds of tomfoolery out of bounds?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    46. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way are the Americans providing greater aid in the defense of Australia against its largest trading partner?

    47. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So wait - above, you insisted voters are not to blame, but now you're insisting, "But, but, we'll never have a majority on a 3rd party!"

      Which is it?

      Because the only thing preventing that is the stupidity of the average American.

      Sorry, gramps, but we have exactly the government we deserve. No more. No less.

    48. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by allaunjsiIverfox2 · · Score: 2

      They don't even need to have a majority; voting for third parties can send a message.

    49. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by allaunjsiIverfox2 · · Score: 1

      And let's not try to talk about my patriotism. I enlisted in the Army Infantry and deployed to Iraq in 2009.

      That has little to do with patriotism; you only feed the government warmongers. Joining during Iraq was a bad call, anyway.

    50. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by allaunjsiIverfox2 · · Score: 1

      From your other post:

      I was tired of people in my family telling me that 1) I couldn't have an opinion because I had not been there

      Unfortunately, your family seems a bit brain dead if they seriously put forth such a blatant fallacy.

    51. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by allaunjsiIverfox2 · · Score: 1

      But you know how when someone insults the soldier who defended that person's right to throw that insult?

      Soldiers don't necessarily defend our rights. Some support things such as the TSA, the NSA, free speech zones, etc. Furthermore, in order to defend us, a clearly identifiable country needs to attack us. No such thing has happened for a very long time, so soldiers can hardly be said to be defending our rights in any meaningful sense.

      Preemptive wars are not wars of defense.

    52. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much or all?
      How about the things yet to be revealed?
      As to the other countries you mentioned, lay down with dogs wake up with fleas comes to mind.

    53. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still others love America a bit too much. Attempting to defend the indefensible. I know who I prefer.

    54. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by robsku · · Score: 1

      Indeed it's sadly not an uncommon fallacy at all... Now I know that it's frowned upon to throw the nazi/hitler card, but I sometimes actually translate such arguments in my head into "you can't put judgement on what nazis did you you haven't been one" - guess they've never thought of it that way...

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    55. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by robsku · · Score: 1

      If you bother to check you will find that both China and Russia have nuclear weapons pointed at the US and members of their governments make explicit threats. Russia regularly probes US and NATO defenses with bombers and submarines, and the Chinese have their own charms.

      Not much different from US then...

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    56. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has been fucking over Russia and China ever since the end of WW2 if not before, of course they will be adversaries. If my country had nukes id hope we would aim a few at the US too. Someone has to keep the bastards honest.

    57. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your understanding of the English language seems incomplete.

      Had Romney won

    58. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Ah. Good point.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    59. Re: Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Snowden said the NSA was colleceting data on amreicans he is a whistleblower.
      When he told how the NSA is spying on the rest of the world he became a criminal.

    60. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Please read what I've written! The words "looking as if" are a pretty huge clue.

    61. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Right, participating in democracy is a horrific crime.

    62. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      yeah... sort of like how we got Bush instead of Gore. And that turned out so well.

    63. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You seem to have a really bad grasp of history. You might want to think about taking a step or two to remedy that.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    64. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You could try asking the Latvians, Lithuanians, Estonians, Poles, and Czechs. I'm pretty sure they see some differences, and it doesn't end there.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    65. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The result was at worst neutral, and likely better.

      Why President Gore might have gone into Iraq after 9/11, too
      What Would Gore Have Done? (WWGHD)

      It could have been much better than it was, if only ....

      Blame Fannie Mae and Congress For the Credit Mess

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    66. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize Republicans only want reform when Democrats are in power right? As soon as they get power (as has been repeatedly proven by every Republican administration in the past couple decades), the status quo becomes even MORE hardened against change. More war, more surveillance, more freedom shrinking laws, more militarization, more subsidies for the wealthy and more punishment for the poor.

    67. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by phmadore · · Score: 1

      Taco Cowboy invoked an old saying which something that slowed my roll: judge not lest ye be judged. I'll leave it to someone else to tear you up. At least I'm open and honest.

    68. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm honestly surprised you had faith for so long. Nearly everyone I know realized it was all over as illustrated by Bush's response to 9/11. We all knew the game was permanently over, and the US had went from a slow slide to hurtling haphazardly towards authoritarianism.

      I'm also 100% sure that if we DID get an elected official who seriously wanted to end the freedom wrenching overreach, they would be assassinated very quickly by some "crazed nutjob".

    69. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stories are readily available in the media. Along the way you might also look into the question, "Do trading partners ever go to war?" Should I give you a hint on that?

    70. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The "Dulles Plan" isn't just bullshit, it is fiction according to your link.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    71. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So lets say you are the soviet union and your rivals.. me lets say the US decides it wants to attempt to put ballistic missile defence systems into turkey. exactly how would you respond? like a little girl in the corner? or perhaps posture some of your own power to keep me in check?

    72. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You raise a fascinating question to bring up the next time the topic is the Cuban Missile Crisis.

      Britain, NATO and Turkey (1959-1965)

      In 1962, during the Cuba crisis Khrushchev sent a letter to the White House on 27 October. He sought to draw a parallel between Cuba and Turkey: missiles in Cuba would be withdrawn in return for the withdrawal of American missiles in Turkey; furthermore, the Soviet Union would pledge not to invade Turkey if the United States would make a similar pledge about Cuba[4]. This demand was based more on politics than on security or military grounds. The US had already suggested to Turkey in 1961 that she withdraw the Jupiter missiles. The Americans thought the missiles in Turkey old and useless[5]. The Turkish military leaders did not agree with this plan and they argued that these missiles were important for the defence and security of Turkey.

      You might be interested in Soviet planning for nuclear war against Europe.

    73. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by robsku · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Russia or USSR?

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    74. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by robsku · · Score: 1

      what we have is a choice of kang or kodos. either way, we lose.

      and no, voting 3rd party is a non-starter. don't even go there.

      So you vote for something you don't believe in, something that you call losing? Or you don't vote at all (better than the former option if you ask me)?

      Let me ask you, in the fictional situation that you would actually find yourself in the imaginary scene in Simpsons, would you vote for Kang or would you vote for Kodos? Coz voting for 3rd party is absolutely a non-starter.

      I'll leave it for others to figure out why, out of these four choices (of which the first two seem to be the same), voting for 3rd party is indeed the only sane option here (with possibility of choosing not to vote being less insane than voting for ass-poundings for everyone).

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    75. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I meant (and what I wrote earlier).

    76. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by houghi · · Score: 2

      What are the first three words of the Constitution?

      Once upon a time ...

      (Yes, those are four words.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    77. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Nicely played.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    78. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I was making a different point, but not consciously trying to distract from the Snowden revelations. Without getting specific about them, I submit that about our best bet is to drag Bruce Schneier kicking and screaming into public office and heed what he's got to say.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    79. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I've been coming to that realization, yes. There will be no reform until demanded by the people.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    80. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I would say both since Russia hasn't always been a friendly neighbor in the post Soviet era either. In fact it has threatened or tried to intimidate a number of its neighbors.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    81. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea thought so, It must be America stopping the Chinese from sailing their carrier group down under and not the fact it hasn't got any planes yet then can use it. Thanks America we owe you one. How about we pay more for all your products and you trade unfairly with us, is that ok with you?

    82. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice deflection

      But we know your research skills are good enough, that even if you intelligence wasn't enough you could have found many examples of the US fucking over China and Russia.

    83. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. If you bothered to look, you know that both Russia (USSR) and China were brutal communist dictatorships that killed 80,000,000 of their own citizens between them. They managed that on their own, the US had nothing to do with it. Both Russia (USSR) and China were hostile to the US. And as a matter of fact the US sent an enormous amount of supplies of all kinds to both Russia and China during World War 2 so that they could maintain their war effort against the Germans and Japanese. All of that equipment didn't just vanish at the end of the war. The US did help other countries avoid having communism inflicted on them, including by the Russians and the Chinese. If you think that preventing the USSR from gaining power over Western Europe was "screwing over Russia," we'll just have to disagree. The same goes for other places, such as Korea. As I said, you may not have a good grasp of history.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    84. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Gore had Lieberman for a running mate. In the choice between him and Cheney I remain totally ambivalent, actually not, it simply wouldn't have mattered.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    85. Re:Are you guys trying to threaten Snowden ? by Xest · · Score: 1

      I can answer that.

      I'd help allay the West's concerns that Iran has a nuclear weapons program by not blocking them at the UN to enforce provisions that would ensure Iran fulfils it's requirements as a NPT signatory.

      Then, when it was clear Iran didn't have a programme (or if they did, it could be destroyed/dismantled) the US' argument for it's missile shield would be removed.

      But Russia was busy supporting Iran at the UN in blocking IAEA inspectors, selling it defence systems to better protect military sites where it was carrying out unknown nuclear development, bitching at Israel at the UN when Israel unilaterally destroyed Syria's nuclear weapons program rather than condemning Syria for having a covert nuclear weapons program. At the same time it was being a whiney bitch about America wanting a missle shield against those nations.

      Look, I'm no fan of the US, but that doesn't mean I feel I have to be a fan of Syria, Iran and Russia either. The fact is Russia had a simple solution to the missile shield problem - to cooperate with America in dealing with a legitimate concern - Iran's possible nuclear weapons program and it's refusal to cooperate with the IAEA to prove it didn't have one. Had it done that the excuses for the missile shield would be non-existent and Russia would've been fully in the right.

      But you can't actively support a threat that gives the US an excuse for a European missile shield and then bitch about about them hence calling for a missile shield, that's just hypocritical and stupid.

  18. U.S. Willing to Talk if Snowden Pleads Guilty by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01...

    His response should be "you first".

    1. Re:U.S. Willing to Talk if Snowden Pleads Guilty by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01...

      Is this a new thing now, where /. cuts off the hyperlink?
      unmolested: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01...
      a href: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/us/politics/us-willing-to-hold-talks-if-snowden-pleads-guilty.html?_r=0

      This is dumb and whoever implemented it is dumb.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:U.S. Willing to Talk if Snowden Pleads Guilty by rbrander · · Score: 2

      And there's a punchline in the third sentence:

      And the attorney general reiterated that the United States was not willing to offer clemency to Mr. Snowden

      "Clemency", kind or merciful treatment of one who deserves harsh punishment, says the dictionary.

      So the full offer is: "We'll talk if you come back, plead guilty and are punished to the fullest extent of the law."

      It's like some kind of Woody Allen line, "My lawyer plea-bargained my sentence down to death".

    3. Re:U.S. Willing to Talk if Snowden Pleads Guilty by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It only cuts the text, the actual href is still valid.

    4. Re:U.S. Willing to Talk if Snowden Pleads Guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the dumbing down of Slashdot. Apparently Beta hides the userIDs too[1]. I thought this was supposed to be a site for nerds. Nerds aren't afraid of numbers or urls. Nerds would want to be able to easily distinguish between the different Slashdot users with similar usernames.

      [1] I haven't really checked to confirm that - every time Slashdot gives me Beta mode I just go away till later - and I recommend you do that too.

    5. Re:U.S. Willing to Talk if Snowden Pleads Guilty by robsku · · Score: 1

      It's like some kind of Woody Allen line, "My lawyer plea-bargained my sentence down to death".

      You know, I could almost hear it in the voice of Woody Allen in my head when I read this - it was hilarious =D Wish I coult mod you...

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  19. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

    I can understand the earlier developments relating to this whole incident being on Slashdot. There was the technological aspect to it. But at this point, this is purely political wrangling. There's no technology involved here. There's no science involved here. There's no mathematics involved here. Just realpolitik.

    The "technological" angle is really the issue of the US government sub-contracting technological work, and giving those people no legal protections that you'd expect for someone working for the government. This is something that everyone in the tech field should think seriously about when considering doing government contract work.

  20. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Whats wrong with legal side of how we got months of insightful new crypto and tech news? Thanks to the efforts of Snowden the history of US/UK gov computer science spending can be filled in from 199x to ~200x.
    http://cryptome.org/2013/11/sn...
    Without Snowden Slashdot would have been filled with years of the same old boring sock puppets. Bland, safe, bulk daily posting stories about trivial technical matters as they build mod points.
    Now we understand the old talking points of:
    Data sets are too big, telcos would never connect to govs, its only for foreign use, no vast surveillance of domestic groups, no parallel construction, the Constitution, private sector legal teams, press, political leaders, no cpu or cooling could cover that kind of sorting...
    We now know nothing protected the public from a vast illegal domestic surveillance network over the years.
    We now have news Snowden view of US legal protections for US contractors (as in computer specialist) who speak truth to power.
    http://cryptome.org/2013-info/... Many people have tried to stay in the US legal system but thats getting expensive and color of law seems to be getting re interpreted per case.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  21. Re:Traitor by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't care what you call it/try to spin it.

    He should be tried and executed like any traitor.

    The "should be tried and executed like any traitor" clause should be applied to Dianne Feinstein, James Clapper and all the rest of the bastards who have knowingly violated the Constitution of the United States of America, to the detriment of the nation of the United States of America and to the hundreds of millions of the citizens of the United States of America !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  22. Re:Traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [He's a] traitor

    Except that's wrong, you fucking retard.

  23. Re:Conspiracy time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The attack that was leveraged against Target has been hitting corporations for at least four years -- well before Snowden showed up in Russia.

    So at least one AC doesn't think it even remotely coincides, other than the fact that he ended up in a country that's home to a Russian malware author who is currently famous.

    And the stuff that was leveraged against Target points more to someone with knowledge of financial processing systems than someone with knowledge of Big Data or security vulnerabilities -- after all, the tech stuff was purchased on the black market; the real skill was in knowing how to effectively deploy it.

  24. Re:Seems simple to me by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey who let James Clapper on slashdot

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  25. The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Geste · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, I'll stipulate that Snowden is a hero to me. Half my age. Twenty times the guts.

    What really bothers me, though, is how the Administration bungled this. Amateur hour! The moment we arrogantly, petulantly forced Evo Morales airplane down in Austria, we pretty much guaranteed that Snowden would need to hole up and that Putin would take the opportunity to stick us in the eye. This is beyond amazing. We've put ourselves in the position where a vicious thug gets to posture as the nice guy and leave us with very little to do. We are depending on a thug to protect the fate and future of a man who initiated one of the most important discussions in our nation's political history. All because we couldn't think straight and realize that Ecuador or Venezuela or *anywhere" would be a batter outcome than what we got.

    It's one thing to get poked in the eye with a stick, but quite another thing to run into the stick full tilt. Amateur hour.

    1. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've put ourselves in the position where a vicious thug gets to posture as the nice guy and leave us with very little to do.

      Internally Russia may not be what other countries consider PC, but their external policies are MUCH friendlier than the US'. Russia doesn't go around invading any country without nukes, they don't go around trying to assassinate all secular, democratically elected leaders who don't kiss their ass.

    2. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by denis-The-menace · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Putin might be a thug but in America thug in government are a plenty.

      Until a critical mass of corrupt politicians and their conspirators die off or a revolution occurs, there will be no whistleblower laws.

      Government corruption is best measured on how bad whistleblower laws are in that country.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    3. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by khallow · · Score: 1

      Russia doesn't go around invading any country without nukes

      Counterexample.

      they don't go around trying to assassinate all secular, democratically elected leaders who don't kiss their ass

      None of the nuclear powers do. But modern Russia does poison people with lethal levels of polonium.

    4. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia doesn't go around invading any country without nukes

      Counterexample.

      they don't go around trying to assassinate all secular, democratically elected leaders who don't kiss their ass

      None of the nuclear powers do. But modern Russia does poison people with lethal levels of polonium.

      And modern America carries out illegal assasinations and torture around the world. And in the US, the US government it carries out an illegal wiretapping program that would have made Beria proud. Where exactly is the difference ? Freedom means jack shit if your government doesn't obey the rule of law. And the rule of law has been sidestepped in the US for more than a decade. At this point it is just a matter of choosing the poison you want to die of. Russia or the US are different only in degree, not in nature.

    5. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by lophophore · · Score: 1

      Uhh? really?

      "Russia doesn't go around invading any country without nukes".

      Guess what? before the USA invaded Afghanistan, the USSR did. It's in the history books, should you bother to read them. Or maybe some current news, like about The Ukraine, where the citizens want to ally with the EU, but ol' Putin won't have it.

      Are you living under a rock? Moron.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    6. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by lophophore · · Score: 1

      Putin stuck Obama in the eye. He thinks Obama is an amateur, a lightweight, and he is correct. Putin is a KGB spymaster, Obama is a "community organizer."

      This will not be the last time he poke Obama in the eye. Trust me. Ol' Vladimir is not a nice man, but he is not a stupid man. He knows an easy mark when he sees one.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    7. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by khallow · · Score: 1

      And modern America carries out illegal assasinations

      Not of democratically elected leaders which is what was originally claimed. I consider your claim mostly accurate while I consider the original AC claim to be mostly inaccurate.

    8. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin stuck Obama in the eye. He thinks Obama is an amateur, a lightweight, and he is correct. Putin is a KGB spymaster, Obama is a "community organizer."

      This will not be the last time he poke Obama in the eye. Trust me. Ol' Vladimir is not a nice man, but he is not a stupid man. He knows an easy mark when he sees one.

      Don't blame good ol' Putin for whatever happened to Obama.

      Obama is asking for it for the DAMN FUCKING LIES he has told the American voters.

    9. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What Russia did in Georgia was the equivalent of what NATO did in Serbia. When Serbia started to ethnically cleanse Kosovo of Albanians, they have lost any moral and legal right to that territory, and NATO intervention kicked them out and allowed Kosovo to be safe and independent. Similarly, when Georgia invaded South Ossetia, reduced its capital to ruins, and started slaughtering the local population, they have lost any right to claim that territory as their own - and Russia rightly kicked them out of it and handed it back to Ossetians.

      The only difference between Kosovo and Ossetia is that when Ossetia was invaded by Georgia, it already had Russian peacekeepers (with an international mandate, I must add) stationed there - and they were attacked by the invading forces before they even knew what was happening, resulting in numerous casualties. The equivalent would be if KFOR was stationed in Kosovo, and the invading Serbian army reduced its base to rubble with artillery. I strongly suspect that were that the case, US would have responded with a full-on boots-on-the-ground counterstrike complete with a takeover of the enemy capital. Russians actually showed some restraint there in only taking one Georgian city, and retreating after a few days (and after destroying the military capacity of Georgia to wage further wars of aggression).

    10. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Or maybe some current news, like about The Ukraine, where the citizens want to ally with the EU, but ol' Putin won't have it.

      It's Ukraine, no "the" - using it implies that it's a descriptive label rather than a proper name; in this particular case, it would imply that it is "the border region" (of Russia), since that's what the name literally means.

      And Russia did not invade Ukraine in the current crisis (well, yet). The clash that's going on is between some of the citizens, mostly living in the western part of the country and speaking Ukrainian as a native language (who want to join EU), against the government which is backed by other citizens, mostly living in the eastern part of the country and speaking Russian as a native language (who want to maintain a trade agreement with Russia).

    11. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by callmetheraven · · Score: 1

      It's Ukraine, no "the"

      Checked my RISK board game, turns out you're right on this one.

      --
      You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
    12. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Putin stuck Obama in the eye. He thinks Obama is an amateur, a lightweight, and he is correct. Putin is a KGB spymaster, Obama is a "community organizer."

      This is a comic book version of a political discussion.

    13. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin is to the American government what a petty drug dealer or pimp is to organised crime.

    14. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by callmetheraven · · Score: 1

      Doesn't make it incorrect.

      --
      You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
    15. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Putin would take the opportunity to stick us in the eye.

      What is it with people assuming Putin is playing this game of wits with Obama? You're really worried about Obama's or the US reputation from engagements with Putin? Obama can sully his reputation all on his own. Putin actually has very little to do with this situation. Quit worrying what other people/countries think.

    16. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We've put ourselves in the position where a vicious thug gets to posture as the nice guy and leave us with very little to do.

      Turnabout's fair play. I'm reminded of the USA selling fuel and metal to the axis to use to power german tanks and to build Zeroes (A relative stood on the deck of a ship and watched a Zero sink, metal still stamped ALCOA) and then coming into the war nice and late and looking like heroes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Government corruption is best measured on how bad whistleblower laws are in that country.

      That, and the prevalence (or lack) of functional Citizen Police Review Boards. Every so often I see a news item about one of these failing. It's always in one of the places with the most police abuse. As police departments in America become more and more indistinguishable from militaries (tanks, full body armor, fully automatic weapons in every car) this becomes only more important.

      Ever notice that this government's response to social unrest is more bullets?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was amateur hour was that a single guy, a contractor no less, had access and ability to copy such a wide variety of documents. Hey, I'm glad he did it, but that he was able to, makes the NSA look like a bunch of amateurs. This leak will probably go down as the biggest leak of all time, since everyone will learn their lesson and it will probably never happen again.

    19. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Raenex · · Score: 1

      It's pure fluff.

    20. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try talking to some Ukrainians before displaying your ignorance so publicly :)

      Putin has little to do with Ukraine, the Ukrainian president is just Putin's lapdog and refuses to perform the will of the people he was elected to serve. This is an extremely common political situation, one that America has been in for decades now. Rest assured that if the US population were to markedly oppose whatever administration's will, there would be much the same happening. The media has a way of shifting favor in the US though.

    21. Re:The US pokes itself in the eye with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me. Ol' Vladimir is not a nice man, but he is not a stupid man. He knows an easy mark when he sees one.

      I knew I'd heard that before:

      "Russian President Vladimir Putin is playing President Barack Obama like a fiddle as he pursues Russia's pro-Syria/pro-Iran policy, according to a Wall Street Journal editorial. "Putin may be crude, but he knows how to exploit weakness. And he's sure acting like he has spotted an easy mark in President Obama," Journal editors write."
       
      Please, respond with more talking points from the right wing media. I "trust" you can spout quite a few, and imply that they were your thoughts, instead of something spoon fed to you.

  26. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

    My bet is on annoying the US, hell if where Putin I would.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  27. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by jonwil · · Score: 1

    I would have thought that the Russians had no love whatsoever for the US and that they would like seeing Snowden release everything he has and leave the US with egg on their face.

    Or are the Russians using the same tricks and tools as the US (under different code names) and that's why they dont want Snowden to speak out?

  28. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Last time I checked, Russia's continual asylum was conditional on not releasing more information,

    Easy for him to live up to since he gave the entire trove to Greenwald, et al. Snowden hasn't released anything since, because he doesn't have anything left. Same reason all the talk about the FSB getting access to the files is also baseless speculation.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  29. Re:Conspiracy time by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    Anyone think it's more than a little coincidental that Snowden seeks asylum in Russia and then some Russian hackers stole all that credit card data from Target? Knowledge of backdoors and security vulnerabilities is pretty much the NSA's mission statement. Wouldn't surprise me in the least if he sold some information - the guy's gotta eat.

    no just no.

    Russia is stuffed to the gills with mellicious hacker working for the Russian mob, because Russia doesn't care about hacker targeting other countries.

    Snowden fled to left for Hong Kong the free-ish part of China first and handed over his copies of the documents the Glen Greenwald and Laura Poitrus. When thing looked like china would turn him over rather than piss of their biggest trading partner the US, a member of wikileak arranged to get Snowden out of China and into Russia. Why Russia because there are only two countries that are;

    A - Big enough to tell the USA to go fuck itself.
    &
    B - Not in cahoots with the USA.

    They are Russia and China. China didn't want to upset trade relations so they were getting ready to hand him over that why Russia.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  30. Espionage Act of 1917 doesn't protect whistleblowe by rwa2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep, this was handled yesterday in: http://news.slashdot.org/story...

    http://online.wsj.com/news/art...

    Highlights:
    In the Thomas Drake case, the administration retroactively marked documents as classified, saying, 'he knew they should have been classified.'
    In the Bradley Manning case, the jury wasn't allowed to see what information was leaked.

  31. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by deconfliction · · Score: 1

    my theory is that the Russians have less qualms and impediments to using the same types of tricks and tools as the US, however perhaps less technical ability. I say that latter thinking of Silicon Valley in the US and the history of the internet, though like the moon-landing style got-there-firsts, perhaps now the internet is mature enough that an early lead has evaporated.

    Back to your question though- another reason to consider the Russians not wanting Snowden to speak out is because it would anger the U.S, and perhaps in a real-politik sense, Russia is still afraid of what a really-pissed-off USA-intelligence-inner-circle-elite can do to Russia. Or again as before, perhaps there is no superpower-imbalance in this day and age to enable that silenced-by-fear effect.

  32. Re:Conspiracy time by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    That's not even worthy of a Flamebait mod--that's just stupid.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  33. Re:Seems simple to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you have to go there with one of the 200,000 people who have signed up. (Except for the few hot chicks who did it for fun.)

  34. Re:Seems simple to me by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't we privately send him to Mars with a 3D printer? He'll do fine over there and he'll be in a new paradise far away from decaying Earth.

    Is going to Mars such a horrible thing? 200,000 people have signed up for a possible trip to Mars, why put Snowden at the head of the line?

    First of all Mars is in the United States. He can't go there. Second, the population is nowhere near 200K. It's probably closer to 2,000.

  35. Unfortunately, the US government has become a thug by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    We've put ourselves in the position where a vicious thug gets to posture as the nice guy and leave us with very little to do. We are depending on a thug to protect the fate and future of a man who initiated one of the most important discussions in our nation's political history.

    Before I comment, I need to clarify that I am an American citizen, a naturalized citizen since I wasn't born in the United States of America.

    It is true that Russia is a thug. And it is true that right now, as we correspond on /. the fate of the conscience of the nation of the United States of America rests on the decision of the Russian thug.

    However, if we take a step backward, we can see that the government of the United States of America has become a thug itself, and a thug that is not unlike that notorious thug in Russia.

    On the Snowden affair, only a thug would tried so hard to hunt down Snowden, so much so that they actually grounded a plane carrying the president of another sovereign nation.

    The United States of America was the nation that I chose to be when I escaped from yet another thug - China - and I am very sad to say, the regime which is governing the land who has saved me from a thug has become a thug.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  36. Re:Seems simple to me by hawguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only if you have to go there with one of the 200,000 people who have signed up. (Except for the few hot chicks who did it for fun.)

    I hope "hot chick" is way down on the list of things they look for in an application - a "hot chick" is probably the person I'd least want to live with on mars, and I'd chose the nerdy chick (or dude) that sits in the basement all day building Arduino projects.

    That's not to say that there are no nerdy hot chicks, but they don't seem to be the norm. Plus, my only relationship with a "hot chick" ended dramatically with a visit from the police, and almost a restraining order.

  37. It will be Ok for Snowden .. by dogandpants · · Score: 2

    Chris Hadfield (recent tweeting/singing Canadian Commander of ISS) has some very encouraging words to say about Russia and Russians. I think myself that Snowden *will* have to stay there and that the Russians were decent to extend his stay, virtually indefinitely. Snowden I think is a loyal American and would like to return home, but the USA with pronouncements and anima pointed against him at this point are not likely to let him return. At least, not when Manning is in jail.

  38. Re:Seems simple to me by hawguy · · Score: 1

    I can never tell if people are joking, but are you mentally ill or just severely stupid?

    You'll have to give a little more context if you'd like me to answer your insightful question - I have no idea what point you're trying to make. Am I crazy and/or stupid for suggesting that being banished to Mars can't be all that bad if 200,000 people would volunteer, or is it because I implied that Snowden shouldn't get a free trip to Mars when hundreds of thousands of people are in line in front of him?

  39. So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    My remark was more about equating Putin and Obama's behavior toward dissidents than it was about Snowden himself.

    This world is occupied by 4.5 big thugs - China, Russia, USA, Japan, plus UK, which can only be rated as 0.5big, since they are living in their past glory.

    USA is trying its best to hunt down Snowden. Japan and Britain are USA's lap dogs.

    That leave China and Russia being the two entities left in this planet big and fierce and crazy enough to stand against USA.

    So, where do you want Snowden to go ?

    Sweden ? that another lap dog of USA ?

    Bolivia ? Whose presidential plane was forced grounded by yet another USA lap dog (Spain) ?

    I know very well (and I am not the only one in this) that Russia is far from the ideal location for Snowden to seek refuge in, but short of a miracle (that Obama and all his gang of traitors are thrown to jail), Mr. Edward Snowden is facing a stark future of being on the run all his life.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mr. Edward Snowden is facing a stark future of being on the run all his life.

      At a really high level of abstraction, Snowden's acts are kind of like the invasion of Iraq; both Snowden and W undertook decisive acts with tangible historical impacts.
      Hero? Goat? Who can say, sooner than a couple of decades?
      The quite obvious thing for Snowden to do is get his name on a ballot and win election to Congress. That's tantamount to the voters giving the guy a pardon.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This world is occupied by 4.5 big thugs - China, Russia, USA, Japan, plus UK, which can only be rated as 0.5big, since they are living in their past glory.

      Japan.... a thug? Really? And not just a 1/2 "thug" like you describe the UK, but a big thug? That is fascinating. Could you expand on that a bit? Between ninety to seventy years ago you would have been on solid ground, when Japan was at war with and occupying many of its neighbors, but today? How does that "thuggery" play out? Japan hasn't been fighting overseas wars like the UK has (to the credit of the UK). Why do you describe Japan as a thug?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      This world is occupied by 4.5 big thugs - China, Russia, USA, Japan, plus UK, which can only be rated as 0.5big, since they are living in their past glory.

      Japan.... a thug? Really? And not just a 1/2 "thug" like you describe the UK, but a big thug? That is fascinating. Could you expand on that a bit?

      I think I can: Japan gives a lot of aid and comfort to the other thug nations. It's like helping someone dump a body and cover their tracks.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Informative

      Japan gives a lot of aid and comfort to the other thug nations. It's like helping someone dump a body and cover their tracks.

      Japan has long been one of the more generous nations for foreign aid and its military has been pretty much limited to almost purely national defense of Japan itself since WW2. Although they can be highly competitive in business, I think it is hard to build a good case that Japan is currently a "thug" nation. Taco Cowboy's comment I can understand as Chinese anti-Japanese sentiment that has existed since at least the 1930s. But yours?

      China and Russia aren't especially friendly to Japan, whereas the US is. That leaves you portraying the US and UK as thugs, but not necessarily China or Russia. (The current Chinese regime is the same one that killed 60,000,000 of its own people and is trying to seize territory held by Japan even while it (China) is trying to claim the entire South China Sea as its territory, stepping on its neighbors.)

      So you are basically condemning your own country again, seemingly above others, and it isn't clear why. The influence of school reading assignments, perhaps? It's a pity that contemporary American education tends to be unfavorable towards some views.

      American History 101

      National Review Online:So how different is your history of the United States from, say, Howard Zinn’s?

      Larry Schweikart: They are as different as night and day. We assume that people usually mean what they say; that they don’t always have hidden motivations; and that ideas are more important than “class” or “race” or “gender.” Under more normal times, our book would simply be entitled, A History of the United States, because it is accurate.

      NRO:So a “Patriot’s Guide” isn’t all good?

      Schweikart: Absolutely not. As we say in the intro/jacket flap, we reject “My Country, Right or Wrong,” but we equally reject “My Country, Always Wrong.” I think you’ll find us quite critical of such aspects of our past-such as the Founders’ unwillingness to actually act on slavery on at least three separate occasions; or about Teddy Roosevelt’s paternalistic regulations and his anti-business policies. On the other hand, as conservatives, we nevertheless destroy the myth that FDR “knew” about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance. Instead, we try to always put the past in the context of the time–why did people act then as they did, and was that typical?

      History Lies

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      When you start lauding Russia and China for standing up to the US you know you've really jumped the shark.

    6. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huge, huge, HUGE difference that I will point out, please pay attention:

      What Snowden did is illegal because the government made it illegal to call out the bad behavior of government.

      The Iraq Invasion was illegal because there was 100% no purpose to it other than to spread unwanted economic influence into a region that had already been battered previously by us. Did you know that Bush and his administration are STILL wanted for war crimes in most of the world?

      Switzerland
      Canada
      Belgium
      Malaysia

    7. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious! Thank you for your post cold fjord!

      I remember reading an article over a decade ago about how a conservative think tank was trying to get a Howard Zinn-like history book published that basically inserted right wing propaganda wherever possible as the reasons why good things happened in America. A few of the authors who submitted manuscripts were interviewed, and they all mentioned that the think tank was not only willing, but actively seeking to create an inaccurate history rife with propaganda, kinda like how Conservapedia was created because Wikipedia didn't allow the lunatics to win edit wars.

      I do believe this is the book that was selected. I'm going have to dig up some old links now.

    8. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by riondluz · · Score: 1

      Snowden was a 'glitch' in a system trying desperately to scale up to its global surveilance potential knowing that Russia and China both were soon to be in the info-wars race; they believe that one/other/both will be the opponent in the next 'big' conflagration (prob China).

      I suspect that they (???) truely believe the USA will be severely dis-advantaged, competitively, for badly-needed resources in the years to come.

      "They" represent the will of our Establishment and as wrong as they have been about everything else, I count on them being wrong on this as well.

      The Black-Swan, the Blow-back, the counter-intuitive solution waiting in some mind's eye. We sorely lack good, visionary, leadership. What we have is cautionary CYA piss-poor managers
      who see everything as a control issue.

      Snowden, at worst, is a refreshing wind to tumble this house of cards; at best, hs is the spririt of "doing the right thing" that should make Americans proud.

      --
      resist propaganda
    9. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is either a clever troll, or you don't understand what you are reading. Perhaps you should read more widely? Certainly you should probably read more things outside the cocoon around you. It seems likely you are missing some key information. The real hoot is Zinn, and that his work should be taken so seriously.

    10. Re: So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this talk and your Cool Aid is getting warm. Drink up !

    11. Re:So, where do you want Snowden to go ?? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Your extensive rant notwithstanding, I feel compelled to point out that I was merely clarifying OP's statement, not positing my own position on the matter.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  40. Re:Seems simple to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should be named James Crapper for the amount of lies and crap that come from his hole.

  41. He hasn't been leaking it while in Russia.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the information that has been leaked was leaked before he escaped to Russia. Snowden planned out a method of slowly releasing the information to journalists over time beforehand. He didn't bring any data with him to Russia or China. Every news item you've seen up until this point regarding leaked information from Snowden has been the slow wheels of fate his slightly younger self set in motion when he made the decision to become a whistle blower.

  42. Re:Conspiracy time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are from the NSA, and of course, they have to troll for their master.

  43. Extended through the Olympics? by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprise if Snowden attempts to make contact w/US participants in Sochi.

    1. Re:Extended through the Olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You "wouldn't be surprise"? But you *are* a "surprise". I'm surprised that you would post such a vague and worthless thought. How about enlightening us - *why* do you think he would contact "US participants" at the games, and for what purpose?
       
      Or would that distract you from getting to your next tug session?

  44. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by phmadore · · Score: 1

    Putin really gets off on showing his citizens that he is not afraid of the US. Sometimes I think China's periodic fucking-with Hong Kong is the same sort of fuckery.

  45. One more thing by dbIII · · Score: 3, Informative

    Take a look at the subsequent careers of the lawyers that defended people in GITMO to get another angle on how unfair it would be. Some of them moved out of the USA so they could get work instead of being unemployed on a blacklist.

    1. Re:One more thing by swillden · · Score: 1

      Link?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:One more thing by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Google and some time if you are interested, I suggest starting with the defence lawyer for David Hicks.

      If you aren't interested enough to find out for yourself I won't be spoon feeding you sorry, because what I spoon feed you could be misinformation for all you know, but mainly because I couldn't be bothered spending a big chunk of a Sunday finding web sources of what I've seen in other media.

    3. Re:One more thing by swillden · · Score: 1

      So, don't have any. Got it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:One more thing by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Not trying are you? Well here is your link.
      http://www.google.com.au/search?q=defence+lawyer+for+David+Hicks

  46. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, Russia's continual asylum was conditional on not releasing more information,

    Easy for him to live up to since he gave the entire trove to Greenwald, et al. Snowden hasn't released anything since, because he doesn't have anything left. Same reason all the talk about the FSB getting access to the files is also baseless speculation.

    I would be naive to assume that Greenwald has the only electronic copy of these documents. The speculation is Snowden could have stashed them in other safe places, to which he would have access. I almost guarantee the govt has done an automated search of the popular cloud sharing sites for keywords. The recent rumors that he planned this ahead of time with Russia is most likely wild speculation by an irresponsible congress critter. If the US knew that as fact, they wouldn't have told us.

  47. Putin a defender of the US Constitution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironic that its Putin protecting the whistleblower who reported Obama and the NSA have violated the Constitution - now backed up with multiple rulings.

  48. So where are you coming from here? by dbIII · · Score: 2

    If you want to dumb things down to newspeak then yes - doubleplusgood so, but in English he doesn't quite fit the bill.

    Here's a question to sort things out since you are using your own personal definition. Do you think that Oliver North was a traitor for knowingly selling weapons to Hezbolla less than a year after they had killed over a hundred US Marines? If not North then why Snowden?
    That question should really establish whether you stand for "King" first and "Country" second or not. North put "King" first, betraying his country for the sake of his leader. Snowden put "Country" first, betraying his leader for the sake of his country.

    So where do you stand? Are you for "King" or for "Country". Would George Washington consider you an enemy or a fellow believer in an ideal?

    1. Re:So where are you coming from here? by lophophore · · Score: 1

      What Oliver North did was criminal. Doing the wrong thing for the right reasons is still wrong.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    2. Re:So where are you coming from here? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Treasonous or not?
      Let's see what your personal definition is. Breaking loyalty with the ruler or breaking loyalty with the rules? King or Country?

  49. In Soviet Russia by dale.furno · · Score: 1

    Asylum extends you!

  50. Obama Ultimatum to Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The favorable history of the Obama Presidency, i.e. Obama Junta, rests on the killing of Edward Snowden as Obama himself has concurred in a White House Situation Room Meeting this week.

    This week "El Presidente" Obama signed a secret executive order, ordering the killing at all cost and expense of Edward Snowden in the next 100 days.

    The Departments of Justice, Defense, Security, Energy and Agriculture are tasked to work together. With these US Federal Departments and resources President Obama tasked the NATO Alliance to coordinate and expedite the killing in of Snowden in Russia. This will involve embedding Olympic Teams with Sleeper Agents. The Sleeper Agents will be selected from US Green Berets and US Navy Seals. Shadow Personnel will be deployed to cover the Berets and Seals "activities" and if necessary eliminate them before discovery by national forces (NATO, USA and Russia).

    This will be an unprecedented move by El presidente de los Estados Unidos de América in modern Times si.

    Ho ho Ha ha

  51. Re:Seems simple to me by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Can't we privately send him to Mars with a 3D printer? He'll do fine over there and he'll be in a new paradise far away from decaying Earth.

    Is going to Mars such a horrible thing? 200,000 people have signed up for a possible trip to Mars

    In my case, you just answered your own question, sir.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  52. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    My bet is on annoying the US, hell if [I were] Putin I would.

    Same here.

    No fun having power if you can't use it to piss off powerful people every once and a while :)

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  53. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, Russia's continual asylum was conditional on not releasing more information,

    Easy for him to live up to since he gave the entire trove to Greenwald, et al. Snowden hasn't released anything since, because he doesn't have anything left. Same reason all the talk about the FSB getting access to the files is also baseless speculation.

    I would be naive to assume that Greenwald has the only electronic copy of these documents. The speculation is Snowden could have stashed them in other safe places, to which he would have access. I almost guarantee the govt has done an automated search of the popular cloud sharing sites for keywords. The recent rumors that he planned this ahead of time with Russia is most likely wild speculation by an irresponsible congress critter. If the US knew that as fact, they wouldn't have told us.

    I was going to wax philosophical about how and where Snowden might have stashed his cache, so to speak.

    Then I thought about it, and decided I didn't want to accidentally say something clever that might... compromise his negotiating position. Better safe than sorry, you know?

    Now, if you'll excuse me, there seems to be a commotion going on outsi

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  54. I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless of the merits of what Snowden has accomplished... Putin said he could stay in Russia if he stopped leaking secrets - and then he stepped up the attacks. This has just turned into international politics, games, and bullshit.

  55. Good. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    A talented fellow like Snowden should be able to lead a decent life in Russia. Why return to a nation owned by corporate globalist mafiosi who hate you? (Apologies to real mafiosi who haven't killed nearly as many people.)

    Russian Slashdotters feel free to weigh in on wether Russia is the hell portrayed in the US media, or something different.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:Good. by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      You need to read up on what's going on in Russia. It's increasingly become an oppressive regime. The US isn't really an option for him at this time, though I suspect at some point he'll be given a pardon. (Though that may be decades from now).

      --
      AccountKiller
  56. The other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they may have hired contractors for these jobs exactly because they cannot legally become whistle blowers.

  57. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

    Totally. He can lean back and use this for sooo much PR. "See? the west is corrupt! you have it good, in Russia, da?" And use it for bargaining later for stuff. This was an easy choice for him to make to offer, and the US still keeps making themselves look daft everytime they talk about Snowden.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
  58. Re:Seems simple to me by phmadore · · Score: 1

    Now I've learned something from this thread and I don't feel like it was all a waste of time. Thanks!

  59. Re:Traitor by phmadore · · Score: 1

    I would extend this further to ALL public officials who either have not adequately studied the Constitution (mine's on the wall, about 2 feet from my face right now) or who've knowingly denigrated it. There is only one member of Congress I could presently, willingly exclude from execution, and I don't even like him as a person.

  60. *** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I mean, we can talk all day and say that Snowden made great personal sacrifices, but did anyone ever ask why he was working with the NSA in the first damn place?

    Yes, I did, and because I did ask that question, I did some research into how what Snowden had done, and how he managed to get into that little circle under the NSA canopy.

    Unlike most regular posters in /., Mr. Edward Snowden didn't graduate from some fancy university, in fact, he didn't even have a high school diploma !!

    Mr. Edward Snowden studied at Anne Arundel Community College to gain the credits necessary to obtain a high-school diploma but he did not complete the coursework.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

    Mr. Snowden's first step action in his infiltration into the NSA circle was working as a Security Guard guarding the building in which NSA's contractors was using.

    From that position he gets to know people who work with the NSA contractors, and he gets to know what kind of position is opened.

    Once he learned that the NSA contractor needed sys-admins, Mr. Snowden studied very hard, self-study style, all the computer/network related skills needed to be employable as a sysadmin.

    From there he gained entry to the NSA contractor's computer systems, and from there he gained access to the - alleged - millions of secret files.

    I have analysed what Snowden did and I was very impressed with his determination and his other skill in hiding his real intention very very well ! That takes a lot of pre-planning, a lot of self-control, and a helluva load of patience.

    As have stated, Mr. Snowden wasn't a kid from a "high caste" of the American society. In fact, his family background, - if I am allowed to put it, and advanced apology to Mr. Snowden and his family for stating the fact - has been routinely categorized as "White Trash" by many Sociologists.

    But yet, unlike millions of others, Mr. Snowden loves his country, and it's His Pure Love Of The Country that he did whatever he had to do in order to gain access to the secretive evidences of the illegal activities of the Government of the United States so that he can expose it to his fellow citizens, in the hope that, one day, his beloved country may be better.

    True, he worked under the canopy of NSA, and true, NSA is part of the totally despicable regime which is ruling over the nation of the United States of America.

    But without getting inside the NSA, how was Edward Snowden going to gain the SOLID evidences of the dastard deeds which the invalid government of the United States of America has committed.

    It has been well known for many of us that the USA is no longer free. On the surface it is, but deep inside too many damn dirty things had happened, and we, the citizens, couldn't do a squat about it.

    There had been rumors floating around on the many secret programs that were in violation of the Constitution of the United States, but without solid evidences, there is NOTHING to proof.

    Before Mr. Snowden's revelation, every single time when I talk to others about the (then alleged) secret programs people looked at me as if I am one of those nuts who believe in conspiracy theories.

    It is because of Mr. Snowden, and thanks to his solid evidences, that today, even people who previously pooh-pooh at me whenever I talked about the illegality of the US government are coming to me to talk about the very matter that previously they thought were conspiracies.

    Last, but not least, remember the adage:

    "Judge not, lest thou be judged"

    You have unfairly judged Mr. Edward Snowden due to his working under the NSA program. Unless you want to be judged by others the same way you have judged Mr. Snowden, I suggest that you begin your own path of redemption.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Another rock-solid post from Taco Cowboy. I don't have any mod points to give, but you continue to have my respect, sir.

    2. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by phmadore · · Score: 1

      Okay, Taco. So long as we're not claiming that he innocently joined the NSA in the belief he was defending Americans. Thanks for the enlightening information.

    3. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dear Sir,

      I am not worth your respect. But there is one person that is worth all our respects - Mr. Edward Snowden.

      He is the one giving us the proofs of the many dirty deeds of the government of the United States of America.

      He is the one with the courage, the will, the determination, in telling the truth as it is, and he is the one, burdened with all the consequences of the courageous things that he had done for all of us.

      If it wasn't Mr. Snowden, hundreds of millions of innocent people all over the world will continue to have their privacy invaded.

      If it wasn't for Edward Snowden, more and MORE dirty programs would have been launched by the illegal regime that is lording over USA.

      Yes, sir, that's the type of person deserving your respect, and mine, and many others.

      There will always be those, like cold fjord, whom will do whatever they can to taint the reputation of Edward Snowden - and I guarantee you that they will play dirty, just like their NSA master, to achieve their goal.

      Thus, I urge you, and all, to defend Mr. Snowden when he's under unfair criticism.

      I am not saying that Mr. Snowden is perfect. He is just a human being, just like you or me. But at the very least, he has done good things for us, and we owe Mr. Edward Snowden this much, to return the favor.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    4. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by Vellmont · · Score: 2

      Umm.. So I looked up Snowdens family background. His father was an officer in the Coast Guard, his mother was a clerk in the district court of Maryland. I'm not sure where you're getting the "white trash" label, but normally "white trash" doesn't consist of clerks in district court, or Coast Guard officers.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The truth is a pittance to sacrifice when it comes to buffing the image of Snowden.... at least in some quarters.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom is a pittance to sacrifice when it comes to protecting Americans from terrorists.

      Justice is a pittance to sacrifice when it comes to protecting the NSA.

      Americans are a pittance to be sacrificed when it comes to protecting the powers that be.

      etc

    7. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's the great thing, Freedom, Justice, and Americans aren't being sacrificed. They continue on despite the demagoguery.

    8. Re:*** Judged Not, Lest Thou be Judged ! *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, you cant sacrifice something you no longer have.

  61. I wonder why I never saw it in the mainstream pres by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Wow! That newsweekly link really is scraping against the lunatic fringe! I wonder which of the two "independent minds" at that site wrote the article.
    Are you going to link the lizard conspiracy next?

  62. Re:I wonder why I never saw it in the mainstream p by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Russian spies in Australia at 'near Cold War level'

    China's spies come out from the cold

    Chen Yonglin, a Chinese diplomat who recently defected in Australia, claimed Beijing had as many as 1,000 spies in Australia alone.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  63. Well then by nensondubois · · Score: 1

    We should really have all of our current politicians exciled from this once great country. We should rightfully demand communication from their righteous churches that they harbour and salute.

    --
    http://gamehacking.org/vb/threads/12747-nensondubois-codes http://twitter.com/nensondubois_
  64. Re: Seems simple to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering they want to make it reality tv, I wouldn't be surprised if the 4 most aesthetically pleasing (hawt girls) would be send to their death to generate more as revenue.

    It's really cynic and has nothing at all to do with science, space exploration or advancement of human mankind.

    It only proves that companies will send people to their certain, early, unpleasant death for money, and that people are willing to throw away their lives for 15 minutes of fame. Sad state of humanity.

  65. Re: Seems simple to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *ad revenue. Damn autocorrect.

  66. Re:Unfortunately, the US government has become a t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I share the sentiment. I was born in another communist country. Back there and then US with all its faults was still seen as a great thing: free country of free people that if they try, they can achieve great things. few decades later I live in a country that is allegedly US ally which apparently only makes spying easier. I see rampant violation of common sense and human rights that US is guilty of and not because it had to do it or things just happened. Even NK army tried hard to stop violations of human rights and international conventions by its troops. Why NK army did that, I do not know now but while I have seen similar struggles of US military, at the same time I have also seen US gov moving all these questionable actions to special agencies where apparently the rule of law did not apply. My old home country is now US ally. We were really happy to get out of the system in which imprisoning a person is easy and torturing a person is possible. I and big number of my fellow countrymen were deeply shocked to learn that our country was used by CIA tags arranged secrete torture chambers. What a shame. As this was not enough you can see that country that we all respected for its drive for freedom is deeply corrupt regime where rights are given to corporations not to the people, where everybody is a suspect and where government can abuse you the way it wants if not on own soil then by other means including hunting people down anywhere in the world.

    I see parallels with ancient Athens here. There too - Athens were a cause for the good but after some time resented by everybody because of its ability and willingness to bully instead of leading others. The comparison and analogy are only that. The circumstances and technological capabilities have changed. We live in interconnected world where increasingly good reputation counts. It does not count for much but still does. One can be forgiven small things especially if one had shown great sacrifice elsewhere. But showing rampant disregard for rights and wills of others, lack of respect and intellectual and moral capability to lead the way, US is isolating itself. That is dangerous. We see that there are people on this earth that have even less regard for lives of others and are ready to act violently. We may be confronted by them sooner that we think and it would be better if we had a moral high ground and many good friends like a powerful and freedom and human rights supporting US - but not only in speech but in acts of law and in actions of its agencies. Shame this does not seem to be happening.

  67. Re:Seems simple to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of those 200,000 are actually prepared to do it though? Most of them are deluded kids or uneducated adults who think "whoa, that's cool" but would be completely unprepared for the realities and hardships it would take to make it. Come launch time, see how many of those people are ready to man up and make the voyage and of any who might, how many will go batshit crazy shortly afterwards and start crying about wanting to return home?

    Until we see astronauts and/or highly experienced military personnel and/or highly educated scientists signing up, it's just a bunch of people flapping their lips. Colonizing Mars is going to take highly skilled, tough as nails Robinson Crusoe types, not a bunch of kids who watch SciFi flicks and think they are ready to tackle an entire life off-world.

  68. Perhaps.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he should have thought of the ramifications before he stole stuff from the government.

  69. The only thing Cold Fjord loves is Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still others love America a bit too much. Attempting to defend the indefensible. I know who I prefer.

    The one thing that Cold Fjord really loves is FASCISM.

    No, that creep does NOT love America, nor whatever America stands for.

    America stands for Freedom, Liberty, Equality, Democracy.

    Cold Fjord doesn't want any of that.

    All Cold Fjord wants, all that asshole is after, is cold-solid-power.

    Yes, COLD-fucking-SOLID-POWER !

    As we can all see from Cold Fjord's message he talks about power, war, threats, enemy, nuclear bombs, and so on, and so forth.

    Cold Fjord doesn't care if the illegal regime that current lords over America takes all the liberties away - as long as that regime leaves him with some breadcrumbs (power, title, benefits) he would be happy.

    1. Re:The only thing Cold Fjord loves is Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately America hasn't stood for those things in a verry long time.

      Maybe if you did, and acted like you did. You wouldn't have so many terrorists bothering you all the time.

  70. Snowden needs to get out of Russia by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    So far Putin's government has arrested and jailed members of the band pussy riot, banned "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations among minors (which bans speech about supporting gay rights), had his political rivals charged with fraud, expelled a US agency that provides poverty and disaster relief (USAID), instituted internet censorship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R..., banned the adoption of Russian children by US parents, arrested an activist who planned protests against Putin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S..., started back up the tradition of using the psychiatric machinery to punish political protesters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P..., and countless other acts.

    Snowden is a smart guy, and I'm sure he realizes this. But he needs to get the hell out of Russia. Hopefully he's working on establishing asylum somewhere else, but Russia is becoming more and more politically oppressive, and isn't the right place for someone who values freedom.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Snowden needs to get out of Russia by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      very funny, we could make a list of even worse things, twice as long, about the USA. Maybe you need to get out of the USA.

      none of those things you listed are of any relevance to how Snowden will ever be treated.

    2. Re:Snowden needs to get out of Russia by Vellmont · · Score: 2

      ?????

      Please make this list. I'd like to know what the equivalent is in the US of jailing a rock band for free speech is, jailing people protesting the president, and making talking about homosexuality in a positive light illegal.

      Please, post the list. The US isn't perfect, but I seriously challenge you to post a list of freedom of expression opression that's anywhere near what's going on in Russia.

      And are you really so certain Snowden won't be treated like a pawn in international relations? He's a chess piece to Putin and Russia. A propaganda vehicle to show how Putin is a hero for freedom. Also something to potentially negotiate with Washington about. In a couple years.. maybe his asylum doesn't get renewed, and he's expelled from Russia for some minor offense.

      --
      AccountKiller
  71. If I were forced to choose ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    At this point it is just a matter of choosing the poison you want to die of. Russia or the US are different only in degree, not in nature.

    Since I came from yet another poisonous concoction - China - I'll say this ...

    If I were to have a choice - and I'm going to die anyway - I will die the way I choose, by ***FIGHTING AGAINST*** those fucking bastards.

    I rather die fighting than die being poisoned,

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  72. Re:Unfortunately, the US government has become a t by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    We see that there are people on this earth that have even less regard for lives of others and are ready to act violently. We may be confronted by them sooner that we think and it would be better if we had a moral high ground and many good friends like a powerful and freedom and human rights supporting US - but not only in speech but in acts of law and in actions of its agencies. Shame this does not seem to be happening.

    I fully understand what you mean. I do.

    Both of us came from the communist country background and both of us know how wrong can a system become and how badly it can fuck up people's lives.

    When ***THAT*** fight comes (against those you-know-who), I do not think we can rely on any other people but our own selves.

    USA is not only no longer a reliable entity, my worst case scenario (yes, I do plan ahead) is that illegal regime which lords over America may end up ***ASSISTING*** the "you-know-who" in conquering Europe, and then shove *that* problem to Russia and China (geopolitically USA is more immune to those you-know-who anyway).

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  73. America, not that illegal regime lording over it by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately America hasn't stood for those things in a verry long time.

    Maybe if you did, and acted like you did. You wouldn't have so many terrorists bothering you all the time.

    As I was not born in America, but have stayed in the States for quite a long time, I get to observe USA first hand, with a third-person vantage point.

    There are TWO Americas.

    One is the REAL AMERICA - the Americans, the people.

    The other one is that illegal regime which has lorded over the United States of America for ... God knows how many years ...
     
    The REAL AMERICA still stands for Liberty, Freedom, Equality, Democracy, and still believes in it.

    The other one ? That's the one you have mentioned - the paranoid sociopath regime which has acted totally against the very spirit on which the United States of America was created for.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  74. But is that what Snowden wants ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    If Depardieu can be made a citizen over a petty tax dispute, surely the Russian government can extend the same courtesy over a more significant issue.

    Think carefully about why they are only extending his asylum instead of giving him citizenship.

    Perhaps Russia is extending Snowden's asylum instead of granting him a citizenship because that's (Russian citizenship) isn't what Snowden want.

    You can say anything about Putin but there are two things that Putin really stands out ...

    1. Putin is no fool

    2. Putin does not like to feel like a fool

    Perhaps Putin already know Snowden will turn down the offer of the Russian citizenship, that is why he (Putin) isn't offering Snowden what he has offered that French guy. (That French guy actually asked for it so he doesn't need to pay that outrageous 75% income outrageous.

    If Putin were to publicly offer Snowden a Russian citizenship and Snowden turns him down, that would be a major embarrassment for Putin and for Russia.

    Of course Putin ain't gonna be stuck in that scenario.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  75. Level of damage to whom ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could also argue that the content was over-classified, but keep in mind that the level of classification is determined by the level of damage to national security the release would cause

    Wait a fucking minute here !!!

    The documents that have been revealed far do *NOT* the national security of the United States of America but was very damaging to the reputation (or what's leftover) of that illegal regime which is currently lording over the USA instead.

  76. Fuck Ron/Rand Paul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I could never vote for Ron Paul. Ron Paul had the most conservative voting record in congress between WWII and 2001

    And Rand Paul is another asshole cut from the same mold. Rand's grandstanding filibuster was nothing more that stating that Obama was an asshole, then reworded Obama's exact same policy as his own.

    So than makes both Ron and Rand bigger sacks of shit than Obama.

    Of course your probably jerking off to a picture of Ayn Rand as I type this.

  77. FUCK sNOwden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck that little fuck.

  78. Snowden is a bif fat SNOWJOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden is a counterintelligence operative and a fraud whose goal is to spread disinformation and fear about the NSA. He is neither a hero or a villain.

  79. Calling your bluff by dbIII · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

    Passed over three times for promotion for doing his appointed job and representing somebody unpopular.
    Unfortunately the link to the marine newsletter given as a citation is dead, but you don't have to be spoon fed do you? He's been interviewed a few times and some of those times were presumably for print media, or you may be able to find podcasts of radio interviews.

    Of course I've just wasted my time because you'll find another way to string me along if you are a troll. Are you a troll?

  80. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden is the biggest whistleblower of his generation

    Are we so quick to forget Bradley Manning? The man that started the whole whistleblowing epoch. The man that released thousands of documents to the entire world of all the corruption, military atrocities conducted during the Iraq war, etc.

    I guess it's easy come easy go with this retarded "facebook/twitter generation".