Slashdot Mirror


Dear Asus Router User: All Your Cloud Are Belong To Us

New submitter Trax3001BBS writes "Ars is running an article about a vulnerability of Asus routers that are becoming very popular at the moment for connecting USB devices to the Internet. From the article: 'An Ars reader by the name of Jerry got a nasty surprise as he was browsing the contents of his external hard drive over the weekend — a mysterious text file warning him that he had been hacked thanks to a critical vulnerability in the Asus router he used ... The guerilla-style hacking disclosure comes eight months after a security researcher publicly disclosed the underlying vulnerability that exposed the hard drives of ... Asus router users. ... According to Lovett, the weakness affects a variety of Asus router models, including the RT-AC66R, RT-AC66U, RT-N66R, RT-N66U, RT-AC56U, RT-N56R, RT-N56U, RT-N14U, RT-N16, and RT-N16R. Asus reportedly patched the vulnerabilities late last week...' And this old news, come new again: The Asuswrt Merlin ROM took care of this vulnerability months ago (defect #17)."

148 comments

  1. Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just install DD WRT and have done with it.

    1. Re:Open Source is better. by cheater512 · · Score: 2

      Yep DD-WRT is on my RT-AC66U. Works brilliantly.

    2. Re:Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asuswrt is OSS

    3. Re:Open Source is better. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      No, not quite "have done with it." Keep it up to date as vulnerabilities are found and fixed, just like everything else.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed DD WRT on a D-link machine, hoping to get advanced range extending features beyond what D-link was offering... Unfortunately, DD WRT (atleast the only version available for this particular product) was so buggy, that I don't want to work with it.

      Applying changes works 50% of the time.... the other 50% I get errors loading page etc...

      And on top of that, I never actually got the range extending feature to work (it did on the D-link firmware).

      Not saying DD WRT is bad, it just didn't work in this case, which shows, you shouldn't blindly recomend it to everyone.

    5. Re:Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed DD WRT on a D-link machine, hoping to get advanced range extending features beyond what D-link was offering... Unfortunately, DD WRT (atleast the only version available for this particular product) was so buggy, that I don't want to work with it.

      Applying changes works 50% of the time.... the other 50% I get errors loading page etc...

      Aahh... that sounds like typical "open source quality"... good software, but the proper quality assurance is missing. :(

    6. Re:Open Source is better. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Just install DD WRT and have done with it.

      +1 for this. Most of the cases DD-WRT is more secure and stable than the manufacturer-provided firmware.

      But still, these kind of community-built firmwares should not be required to have a good experience. As paying customers, we should demand high-quality firmware and consistent security updates directly from the manufacturer.

    7. Re:Open Source is better. by psergiu · · Score: 1

      Known issue.
      Empty your browser's cache.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    8. Re:Open Source is better. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Watch out for SSL bugs in dd-wrt.

    9. Re:Open Source is better. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've got an RT-AC66U myself and honestly I like tomato (shibby version) a hell of a lot better for it. Multiple reasons, but the biggest include:

      The interface in DD-WRT is clunky; by that I mean they use a worse than MS Windows* style of individual fields for IP address octets so that you have to tab between fields instead of naturally typing it out in the dot notation like you do everywhere else; and if you change one setting that uses a refresh object it *very annoyingly* undoes any unsaved settings you may have made on that page. *(MS Windows is actually slightly better here because if you type in the dots it automatically moves to the next field, whereas DD-WRT does not, requiring you to tab instead, and if you make an error in a previous field you have to shift-tab and arrow to your mistake instead of simply hitting backspace.)

      Tomato has really nifty links for doing things quickly. A beautiful example is like giving a MAC address a sticky dynamic IP address just requires a click, typing the IP address and desired hostname (for local DNS resolution if you desire) and then clicking save. With DD-WRT you have to go through numerous steps just to type in the MAC address.

      DD-WRT's QoS functions, and its network monitoring and analysis functions are downright awful compared to tomato. Just straight up awful.

      DD-WRT deliberately cripples certain features unless you pay for them (such as its QoS features, which even the paid version is worse than what Tomato offers for free.)

      (Kind of hypocritical too because DD-WRT was originally built by a group that was tired of the Sveasoft guy hoarding his changes to the GPLed code to only those who paid him, but I don't count that against them because I'm more of a "I use what works" kind of guy.)

      Then again I'm a hobbyist when it comes to networks, so I might have more stringent demands than anybody else.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    10. Re:Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aahh... that sounds like typical "open source quality"... good software, but the proper quality assurance is missing. :(

      Open Source Quality is the same than comercial software.

      I have many problem with comercial software. Including one special case, the Cisco SPA122 ATA comes with a factory firmware that was useless. It has so many bugs that the first thing i have to do was update it. But the SPA 122 is one of the many cases of Cisco destroing Linksys software.

    11. Re:Open Source is better. by TyFoN · · Score: 1

      Got to agree here, my N66U is flying with shibbys tomato.

      I can't really figure out why one would want to put hard drives on the edge device, but still the custom firmware is best.

      And the hardware of these devices are excellent :)

    12. Re:Open Source is better. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I have the opposite experience. I've got a Buffalo WBMR-HP-G300H that shipped with a horribly, horribly broken firmware that never worked right in the first place, was unstable as fuck and, worst of all, its web-based management system only worked with Internet Explorer. Installing DD-WRT on it was the best decision I could've made; the thing is stable as a rock, fast, it provides heaps and bounds more features and functionality than the original firmware and it allows for fancy things like e.g. running a Mumble-server on the router itself, completely negating the need for a separate machine for that.

      It sucks that your experience was lackluster, though :/ Have you checked if there's been newer releases of DD-WRT for your D-Link?

    13. Re:Open Source is better. by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      I used DD-WRT on my Linksys router and it was great. However, the ASUS RT-N16 stock firmware does everything I need out of the box. It's very stable and didn't have to reboot it so I'm not going to bother changing it. It would be nice to have info from ASUS on a fix.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    14. Re:Open Source is better. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It sucks that your experience was lackluster, though :/ Have you checked if there's been newer releases of DD-WRT for your D-Link?

      And if the problem persists, submitting a detailed bug report might be a good idea too.

    15. Re:Open Source is better. by jiriw · · Score: 1

      My experience is, in general, Asus makes decent featurefull router firmwares. However, I like tinkering and moar ;) options so my RT-AC68U soon got DD-WRT on it and some custom scripts. Multiple WLan segments with their own SSID so I have a public and private channel, multiple VLAN segments, one for DMZ, one for local lan, one for 'experiments'. Everything with a proper IPTables script which runs at boot... Custom DNS lookup table. It's just fun to hack router.

      A clunky interface doesn't matter to me, as long as it has the options I need. At the time I flashed my router I couldn't find a Tomato firmware for it, else I sure would have given it a spin...

      What I do miss with the RT-AC68U is '3rd party' binaries support. It's a shame Optware, or something similar, doesn't work yet on the AC-68U. I did try something with a crosscompiler but I have not yet had good results. I'd really want to run bind and postfix on it... amongst other things.

    16. Re:Open Source is better. by Algan · · Score: 1

      Actually Asus' firmware IS open source. GPL even. You can download the sources and play with them and improve them. Which is exactly what Merlin does.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    17. Re:Open Source is better. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I prefer Tomato too but what drove my to DD-WRT is a lack of hardware support. If you want a reasonably priced, reasonably fast router with 802.11ac support you can't run Tomato, which is a real shame.

      Fortunately QoS is irrelevant once your internet connection is fast enough (I'd say 100/100 or better), but unfortunately most people don't have that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Open Source is better. by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

      I installed Tomato once, went back to DD-WRT less than an hour latter.
      Tomato does some cool stuff, but its complete lack of pretty much every feature that DD-WRT has was a deal breaker.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    19. Re:Open Source is better. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why anyone would use the stock firmware. I use the RT-N16 with Tomato. It's the best router I've ever had. I hardly care that it doesn't have the 5GHz band, which would only reach the one room that doesn't have any wireless devices anyway.

    20. Re:Open Source is better. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You might put a thumb drive in there to hold log files. I do this to track my bandwidth usage. Well no- I use the CIFS support in Tomato for that.

    21. Re:Open Source is better. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you like the Asus RT-N16, I don't recommend DD-WRT anyway. I have the same model and love how stable Tomato (Shibby build) is. The UI is very clean compared to DD-WRT, so you're not losing convenience for functionality. I also think the router is actually a bit faster on Tomato vs. stock. Then again - if you don't use the USB ports, you're not at risk anyway.

    22. Re:Open Source is better. by twocows · · Score: 1

      Like what, specifically? Not doubting, just curious.

    23. Re:Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed Tomato once, went back to DD-WRT less than an hour latter.
      Tomato does some cool stuff, but its complete lack of pretty much every feature that DD-WRT has was a deal breaker.

      I'm curious if you're comparing Shibby's Tomato or PolarCloud's original Tomato. If it's Shibby's what features are you missing?

    24. Re:Open Source is better. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Only used it for half an hour, so all I remember is that I could not do anything that I wanted to do.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    25. Re:Open Source is better. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      its web-based management system only worked with Internet Explorer.

      Hmm, I may be mistaken, but it seems like the DD-WRT interface wanted me to use IE as well, at least for flashing.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    26. Re:Open Source is better. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I switched to DD-WRT because I needed some logging information so I could tell which MAC addresses were using the most bandwidth. I got a notice from Cox that I had used more bandwidth than my plan allowed (although a bandwidth allowance was not discussed when I signed up), but I was not able to tell which computer was using all the bandwidth using the built in firmware.
      It turns out that it was the minecraft client that my daughter was playing. Apparently, minecraft client uses more bandwidth than streaming movies.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    27. Re:Open Source is better. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All I know about feature sets in tomato vs. dd-wrt is that when I followed the instructions on the dd-wrt website to do WDS on dd-wrt it didn't work, but the tomato instructions worked to get WDS working on tomato. Otherwise they seem to do all the same stuff.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Open Source is better. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      But basically what struck me was.
      DDWRT has like 40 option pages with like 40 options each, and a command line.
      Tomato has like 3 option pages with like 3 options each.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    29. Re:Open Source is better. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I prefer PFSense on a netgate appliance.

    30. Re:Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The interface in DD-WRT is clunky; by that I mean they use a worse than MS Windows* style of individual fields for IP address octets

      I might agree on that part (or not, whatever) but.. how many times do you change IP addresses fields in your home router for that being a deciding point ??!

    31. Re:Open Source is better. by suutar · · Score: 1

      I use the stock firmware because when I tried tomato it kept hanging and needing power cycling every couple of days. This was some time back; I could try a newer version, but I haven't gotten around to it.

    32. Re:Open Source is better. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I was going to try Shibby, which everyone recommended, but I had trouble finding a recent one and went with Toastman instead. I used Tomato-USB prior to that. My about screen (on my RT-N16) says I'm using Tomato Firmware v1.28.0503 MIPSR2Toastman-RT-N K26 USB VPN. So it's a special build specific to the RT-N models.

      Great stability. Make sure to do a hard reset both before and after the firmware upgrade. Hard to find the proper instructions out there. Current uptime: 105 days, 17:33:22. And that was when I got my new cable modem.

    33. Re:Open Source is better. by GNious · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why anyone would use the stock firmware.

      I'm going to go with, "because we want to buy a box, at a given price, and be done with it".
      Tinkering is all good and fine, but the majority of end-users just want shit that works.

    34. Re:Open Source is better. by suutar · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll give that a shot :)

    35. Re:Open Source is better. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I was referring specifically to the audience I was addressing - didn't feel like spending my time being so specific with my words. Who know that router firmware tends to be bad all around.

    36. Re:Open Source is better. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Just FYI - I had a lot of trouble finding instructions. So here you go:
      http://tomatousb.org/forum/t-2...

      I used Lassik's instructions (multiple posts). And yes, I only found the firmware on the 4shared site:
      http://www.4shared.com/dir/v1B...

    37. Re:Open Source is better. by Caedite+Eos · · Score: 1

      >but the majority of end-users just want shit that works. Exactly why I load Tomato on any router I set up. Of course this assumes the person I do it for bought a router I recommended, or I used one of mine. Tomato's "access restrictions" are dead easy to set up, and it's a simple, quite efficient, first line of defence to keep kids in line. I can show even clueless parents how to setup a "no internet after 21:30" rule, or block specific domains by keywords. Most of this is not easily achievable with OEM firmware.

    38. Re:Open Source is better. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely curious what features you're missing, because as far as I'm aware there aren't any that DD-WRT has and Tomato does not. Tomato even offers several features that DD-WRT does not. There was some paid hotspot service (e.g. you get commissioned or something) I recall DD-WRT including out of the box in some releases that Tomato didn't have, but if you really wanted that service (it has VERY limited use cases) you can add it to tomato rather easily using optware.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    39. Re:Open Source is better. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      That description isn't accurate for either one, actually. DD-WRT has a lot of pages that just have a single option in them, and navigating among them requires an entire page reload (part of why the UI is really badly designed IMO.) For example, in DD-WRT there are two separate pages for configuration data (one for backup/restore, another for factory reset) whereas Tomato consolidates these into one page.

      If you want raw numbers, to my count (I have DD-WRT running on one of my switches, tomato running on two) DD-WRT has 39 option pages, Tomato has 63. DD-WRT is missing a bunch of little things here and there, for example it can't do static ARP binding, whereas tomato can.

      Tomato also uses an AJAX interface that permits you to make multiple changes on a page at once without having to save each change as you go along (you can instead commit all of the changes to a given area at once, whereas DD-WRT in many cases will flat out reset one setting upon changing another unless you manually SAVE EACH SETTING as you change them.)

      Also I'm not sure where you get the idea that Tomato doesn't have a command shell. You can gain access to it not only via SSH/Telnet, but the GUI shell it uses instantly executes and returns results, whereas it takes a good 15 seconds for DD-WRT to execute any commands you enter into it and show the response.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    40. Re:Open Source is better. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Well you make me want to try it again. All I know is I re-imaged it the very same day when I did give it a try, because I could not get it to do the same things.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  2. Best way to let someone know something's amiss by cosmin_c · · Score: 2

    Is a text file. The average computer user will not go and dig through log files, nor they will go around on the internet reading everything about each vulnerability that is exposed everyday. Years ago I copy pasted a similar text file to computers on a neighbourhood network, letting them know those specific folders were exposed on the local network and also been given r/w permissions. I was (and somehow still am) a humble user, passionate about tech, but I can always appreciate the heads-up. Just did what I think I'd like done if I were to accidentally share something on the local network, since although it might not be sensitive at first, mistakes are made regularly.

    1. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by TWX · · Score: 2

      I thought that the best way was to put dozens of iterations of something in the run folder of their start menu. Like that "screen mate" program that launched iterations of rams that walked around on top of the windows and "munched" on GUI items, or Tiny Elvis, which would walk around on the taskbar and comment on how huuuge things were...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do be careful about that...

      I did that once, years ago, on a hotel WiFi network while traveling - I found a wide-open shared directory (I was bored, so I sniffed around, and...) The folder had a lot of rather sensitive-looking stuff laying about in it, judging by the filenames. I left a small anonymous text file asking the owner to secure the laptop in the future, and wrote out step-by-step how to do it. The next morning, I was walking by the front lobby desk when I heard a hysterical woman demanding that the staff call the cops because she'd been "hacked".

      First, last, and only time I'll ever be a good samaritan. :(

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which works until you use this method to "advise" the wrong person, who contacts the cops and you end up arrested for computer trespassing. Too often we hear stories about people intending to do good are blamed for the message they bring.

      Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any "right" way to bring these problems to the attention of the user or the developer since the laws all seem to be unfairly balanced against the whistleblower. There is an automatic assumption that anyone providing the information could only have come upon the data because they were intending to do something malicious.

      Having said that, there are many the times I've been tempted to rename the SSIDs of wireless networks that still use WEP in some vain attempt to knock some sense into the user's head. Never gave into that impulse, but boy, sometimes it was quite a struggle.

    4. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

      Way open I was able to print to the office center printers from my room at one place (it was just an small area near the front desk) I only needed to print a few pages. But some could of really printed off pages and pages of stuff. Also lot's of other guests systems showing up as well.

    5. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really.
      The best way is to hide every file in one folder, and THEN have a text file.

      People don't check file names unless they don't know what they are looking for.

    6. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      I left a small anonymous text file asking the owner to secure the laptop in the future, and wrote out step-by-step how to do it.

      That wasn't very elegant way to handle that. Snooping into other people's files and telling them what to do is not cool, no matter if the objects are password-protected or not. I guess that's why the woman freaked.

      And if I were to get a little text file like that, how would I know that you didn't actually tamper something else in the process.

      I know you were just trying to help, but still...

    7. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try sometimes calmly reading back your own message before sending it.

    8. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having said that, there are many the times I've been tempted to rename the SSIDs of wireless networks that still use WEP in some vain attempt to knock some sense into the user's head. Never gave into that impulse, but boy, sometimes it was quite a struggle.

      There are legitimate reasons for using WEP.

      I still use WEP on my home network, because I still have a few devices that simply won't reliably do anything better. I figure that this is largely ok because:
      1. Everything I do over the wireless network internally is using encrypted protocols anyway, and I wouldn't be using non-encrypted protocols for transporting sensitive data externally anyway.
      2. There are a bunch of my neighbours' completely unsecured APs visible from my house so I figure if someone is interested in cracking a wireless network, they're probably going to go for the easy option and use one of those networks rather than cracking my WEP key.

      Whilst I'm of the opinion that if an AP is left completely open, it should be legal to treat it as a public hotspot, I do still think that if you're having to crack some kind of security, however weak, in order to gain access then you need to be arrested and punished because you're clearly stepping over the line. (And yes, cracking someone's WEP key and router password in order to change their SSID counts as stepping over the line).

    9. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by liquidrocket · · Score: 1

      And if I were to get a little text file like that, how would I know that you didn't actually tamper something else in the process.

      You cannot know whether anyone tampered with your files regardless of whether the text file was put there. That's the whole point of letting you know about the problem: anyone can do whatever they want with your files and hopefully after you see the file you will take steps to fix that.

    10. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way open

      No idea what this means

      I was able to print to the office center printers from my room at one place (it was just an small area near the front desk). I only needed to print a few pages. But someone could have really printed off pages and pages of stuff. Also lots of other guests' systems were showing up as well.

      FTFY

    11. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by liquidrocket · · Score: 1

      I still use WEP on my home network, because I still have a few devices that simply won't reliably do anything better. I figure that this is largely ok because:
      1. Everything I do over the wireless network internally is using encrypted protocols anyway, and I wouldn't be using non-encrypted protocols for transporting sensitive data externally anyway.
      2. There are a bunch of my neighbours' completely unsecured APs visible from my house so I figure if someone is interested in cracking a wireless network, they're probably going to go for the easy option and use one of those networks rather than cracking my WEP key.

      Cracking a WEP key takes minutes and almost zero effort if there is already traffic on the network (and a bit more if there isn't). There may be completely unsecured APs around but whether they are actually as usable as yours depends on 1) the signal quality and 2) how many others are connected to these open APs and sucking up bandwidth. You say that everything using the network is encrypted but that is only half of the problem. The other half is somebody using your network to do (very) illegal things on the internet, all of which you would be potentially liable for. That is, unless you require VPN authentication before allowing internet access.

    12. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like saying with a note to your new neighbor that he forgot his front door open in the morning and you closed it for him. It would be fine if the neighbors knew each other but questionable between strangers. Both cases need some kind of community arrangement or a standard to fix the open door situation without unnecessary concerns.

    13. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by FireFury03 · · Score: 2

      Cracking a WEP key takes minutes and almost zero effort if there is already traffic on the network (and a bit more if there isn't). There may be completely unsecured APs around but whether they are actually as usable as yours depends on 1) the signal quality and 2) how many others are connected to these open APs and sucking up bandwidth.

      Smashing a window and entering your home takes minutes and almost zero effort. There may be completely unsecured homes around but whether they are actually as vulnerable depends on 1) the value of anything in the home and 2) how many people are present in the open home at the time.

      My point was that placing encryption on a network, however insecure that is, demonstrates that the network is private - anyone who accesses the network has conciously broken into it in the full knowledge that they were committing a crime. Compared to an open network where there may well be no way to know that it wasn't intentionally left open as a hotspot. So, if you break into my network (however trivially) and start screwing with things like SSID settings, I'd want you to be arrested because you were knowlingly committing a crime.

      You say that everything using the network is encrypted but that is only half of the problem. The other half is somebody using your network to do (very) illegal things on the internet, all of which you would be potentially liable for. That is, unless you require VPN authentication before allowing internet access.

      Where I live, people are not criminally liable for other people's actions, so no, I wouldn't be liable for someone doing something illegal through my network.

    14. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are legitimate reasons for using WEP.

      Not really. There's just one: your devices don't support WPA. Otherwise, you might as well use no encryption. Given recent revelations, though, that's probably true anyway; you should use openvpn, or ipsec, or whatever else you like in order to provide encryption.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a text file. The average computer user will not go and dig through log files, nor they will go around on the internet reading everything about each vulnerability that is exposed everyday. Years ago I copy pasted a similar text file to computers on a neighbourhood network, letting them know those specific folders were exposed on the local network and also been given r/w permissions.

      Why use a text file when a simple goatse jpg will do the trick? :-)

    16. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by liquidrocket · · Score: 1

      Where I live, people are not criminally liable for other people's actions, so no, I wouldn't be liable for someone doing something illegal through my network.

      "for other people's actions" applies if the evidence is interpreted to show that it wasn't actually you, when it shows the incriminating traffic coming from your IP address. You can try your luck with "it wasn't me, it was somebody who hacked my router" and maybe you will succeed (after being raided and possibly arrested) but it is not as straightforward as you might think. At least in the US and Canada, from what I've seen, this often gets the same reaction as when saying something like "the evidence was planted in my house" (i.e. the onus becomes on you to prove it as opposed to the "assumed innocent until proven guilty"). It may be different in Europe and other places.

    17. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      There are legitimate reasons for using WEP.

      Not really. There's just one: your devices don't support WPA.

      Doesn't that constitute a legitimate reason?

      Otherwise, you might as well use no encryption.

      There is a significant distinction between no encryption and weak encryption: There is absolutely no way for someone to know whether or not an open AP is a public or private network (in fact, many devices will automatically connect to an open AP on the assumption it's a public hotspot, completely removing the user from the equation). Conversely, in order to use a weakly encrypted network, you must make a concious decision to do something that you know is criminal.

      Breaking into a network and changing the SSID to let the owner know it can be broken into is akin to chucking a brick through someone's window with a note attached telling them that it's possible to break in through their window, or climbing over their garden fence and spraypainting a note on the side of their house warning them that it's possible to climb over the fence - it's not a "good samaritan" geasture, it's wanton criminal damage.

    18. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have more than one virtual AP on a single hardware device. Firewall everything on the insecure points not comming though a VPN.

    19. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget it, Joe's an illiterate moron or an eight year old. You can safely ignore any Joe Dragon comment (I mod him down on GP, he doesn't belong here)

    20. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty good analogy. I would say that someone who took the time to write you a note explaining that they closed your door for you is probably not someone looking to steal all your stuff. A malicious person would want to expend the least amount of energy for the most gain, and leave the least amount of evidence of tampering to reduce the risk of getting caught. Writing you a note explain the situation to the vulnerable really doesn't benefit a malicious person, especially if they are not trying to extort you or something like that.

    21. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once was in a hotel, setting up my tp-link hotel router (you know, you get one IP number per room and with 5 devices you want your own NAT router there).

      Or so I thought. My laptop had switched network to the hotel one, and I got _another_ tp-link router up. Almost the same interface, but this time it was a 3g router with a marginally different interface. Using the default password as well.

      I decided not to report the problem, just because of the reason you mention. If the staff can't switch from the default password on their routers, they most likely can't take security advice from guests anyway... :/

      Another time I noticed I was getting a portscan on 23. Who uses telnet these days? I did a telnet back to the origin, and I was - without login - granted a root shell on a linux-running zyxel router. I decided to exit. How could I possibly report that?

    22. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is a significant distinction between no encryption and weak encryption: There is absolutely no way for someone to know whether or not an open AP is a public or private network

      Right, but that's a problem for someone else, not for you.

      Breaking into a network and changing the SSID to let the owner know it can be broken into is akin to chucking a brick through someone's window with a note attached telling them that it's possible to break in through their window, or climbing over their garden fence and spraypainting a note on the side of their house warning them that it's possible to climb over the fence - it's not a "good samaritan" geasture, it's wanton criminal damage.

      That is a stupid thing to say, and only a stupid person would say it. It's not damage at all. It's equivalent to picking up someone's car and facing it the other way. It's an annoyance, not damage. Now, if you did that to someone who was depending on it for work, it might cause them actual loss, but someone who is using a network for work and doesn't secure it is an asshole. That doesn't change the fact, but it does change who it's done to.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by cosmin_c · · Score: 1

      It isn't debatable that humankind lacks the enforcement agencies to deal with this kind of stuff. IT&C isn't a particular new field, but stuff happens a lot faster here and in the last 20 or so years we've witnessed terrible abuse and incompetence when dealing with IT-related stuff - and yes, this includes jailing/fining 10 year olds for one song downloaded from the internet. For example, in this particular case - and the case of leaving a text file with "dude, your security lacks" - a specialized agency would clearly investigate and conclude that the person was meaning well and didn't access any sensitive files, nor did he copy them - thus calming the hysterical and re-assuring people. Maybe issue a communique stating this, this and that and why securing your wi-fi network is really a good idea. Stuff that getting people arrested for nothing doesn't really solve, the Police should have better things to do than investigate why there's an anonymous text file in an unsecured location over a network. But then again, why invest in something that actually makes sense.

    24. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      There is a significant distinction between no encryption and weak encryption: There is absolutely no way for someone to know whether or not an open AP is a public or private network

      Right, but that's a problem for someone else, not for you.

      No, I treat that as my problem - I have no expectation of someone not treating my network as a public hotspot if I provided no way for them to know it wasn't.

      That is a stupid thing to say, and only a stupid person would say it. It's not damage at all. It's equivalent to picking up someone's car and facing it the other way. It's an annoyance, not damage.

      If the person who owns the network isn't very technically literate then it's equivalent to damage - they suddenly won't be able to connect to their own network and will have to hire someone to undo the damage and make it work again. You are making the assumption that everyone knows how to diagnose and fix the problem you're creating which is fundamentally untrue - a significant proportion of the population don't know how to do this and will have to pay someone to do it for them.

      Now, if you did that to someone who was depending on it for work, it might cause them actual loss, but someone who is using a network for work and doesn't secure it is an asshole.

      Someone who uses weak security on their network either has a legitimate reason for doing so, or doesn't understand the problem. Either way, they are not an asshole - the only asshole in this situation is the person who broke into the network and damaged it in the full knowledge that they were committing a crime.

    25. Re:Best way to let someone know something's amiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WEP is a latch on the door and a sign saying authorised personnel only, WPA a lock, WPA2 a good lock. WEP may be worthless for security but it satisfies the intent of limiting access.

  3. Hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF does a ROUTER need a hard drive? That just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.

    1. Re:Hard drive? by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      For network accessible storage that doesn't require someone to leave a computer up 24/7 to run? The Internet accessibility is so you can get stuff from home when you're away from home.

      It's all part of giving Joe Sixpack the abilities of a techie with a FreeNAS server, without making him learn anything about computers or networking -- or security for that matter.

    2. Re:Hard drive? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Shit, man - I can do that with a Raspberry Pi, a copy of FreeBSD, a multi-GB MicroSD stick, and I'd get an infinitely more secure solution to boot. :/

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Hard drive? by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      Shit, man - I can do that with a Raspberry Pi, a copy of FreeBSD, a multi-GB MicroSD stick, and I'd get an infinitely more secure solution to boot. :/

      No one is doubting that. I'd venture it a safe wager that nine Slashdotters out of ten can set up some form of network storage using a RasPi or a spare desktop. The reason why router-based access is handy is that most routers take roughly the same electricity as a CFL light bulb, and by definition are network accessible, either via SMB, FTP, or DLNA. You're not putting a Samba share accessible on the WAN port. It's the same principle as the Western Digital Personal Cloud drives, only without using an ethernet port. The routers also allow printer sharing for standard USB printers. As an added bonus, these routers run Transmission along with QoS - no need to leave your desktop on to run your BitTorrent downloads, and the QoS is done at the router level, so instead of the computers competing for the bandwith, the router can give the torrent downloads lowest priority, and /know/ when to flush stale TCP connections. Again, all of this is done at the router level, using whatever USB storage medium happens to be handy.

      If you don't see the utility in such a solution and would opt for the RasPi instead, then to each his own, I guess. I personally find the hard disk + router combination to be a lot more compelling.

    4. Re:Hard drive? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      WTF does a ROUTER need a hard drive? That just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.

      These routers don't have a hard drive included. They have a USB port, to which the user can connect an external hard drive, which will then be made accessible on the router's LAN. This lets inexperienced users have network-attached storage without having to go through the process of sharing a network drive (and without having to leave a particular computer powered on all the time). Unfortunately, it looks like they weren't as careful about security in this instance as they should have been.

    5. Re:Hard drive? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      So you can turn your "big" computer off and let your router download a larger file 'overnight' to usb storage if you have a low end adsl connection.
      i.e. you put a url to a file into the “Download Master” gui and the file will download onto the usb "hdd" device.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Hard drive? by davester666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wuss.

      I can do it with a stick of gum, a hair dryer, a usb jack, an RJ45 jack, some aluminum foil, and several hamsters with a hamster wheel.

      And food for the hamsters for as long as you want the device to work.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:Hard drive? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      These routers don't have a hard drive included. They have a USB port, to which the user can connect an external hard drive, which will then be made accessible on the router's LAN.

      There's a Netgear that goes one step further.

    8. Re:Hard drive? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Shit, man - I can do that with a Raspberry Pi, a copy of FreeBSD, a multi-GB MicroSD stick, and I'd get an infinitely more secure solution to boot. :/

      So the idea of the Asus product is that you don't have to do the hours of manual crafting that your solution requires.

    9. Re:Hard drive? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      It also costs about $100 extra and requires a whole bunch of extra configuration and knowhow.

      Theres basically no reason not to use your router as your NAS as long as it doesnt have any vulnerabilities and it meets your performance need. Simplicity is a good thing, you know?

    10. Re: Hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buy a cheap NAS. The Internet facing device should not be an all-in-one device for security reasons.

    11. Re: Hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone everyone! Attention! We've got a l33t haxor here! make way you scumbag windoze and linsux users! he's coming through, so just shut your mouths and dream of touching his long luxurious neck beard!

  4. I have an Asus RT-N66U with OEM Firmware and... by mandark1967 · · Score: 2

    I don't have to worry about this, AT ALL, because the router only worked for 2.5 hours after installation before it died. so there!

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  5. An inexpensive way of transferring huge files by azznice · · Score: 0
  6. Re:and this is why smart peiple don't touch window by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You realize that open FTP servers used to be the norm? You realize that the RFC itself requires PORT to be open so that you can do a bounce attack?

    Please don't be an idiot. This stupidity has nothing to do with windows, and is clearly the fault of Asus and not anything OS related.

  7. Re:and this is why smart peiple don't touch window by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    ...oh the irony.

    I have a couple of the Asus routers, and I love them. One runs as an openvpn server, the other runs a few services to simplify remote administration of an offsite location. Good little boxes.

    But, it has really opened my eyes as to how bad security can be. These systems are at least slightly more secure than the WD drives. Third party firmware adds some levels of complexity, but a whole lot of functionality.

  8. Re:and this is why smart peiple don't touch window by Anaerin · · Score: 1

    Yes. Linux prevents it. Right. And what software do these routers run as their firmware? That's right, a customized version of Linux.

  9. My router keeps reporting no new firmware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The best part about this, IMHO, is that my router reports that there is no new firmware. I was able to download it from ASUS and it installed successfully. But had I not seen this article, I would have kept on assuming that mine was the latest and greatest because that is what the router told me.

  10. Re:and this is why smart peiple don't touch window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a proprietary version of Linux."

    I fixed that for you. You can't blame Linux in most cases, you blame the company who has exclusive access to the firmware and judgment of when and what to update.

  11. Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So I try a random IP, paste it in my URL bar (specifying an old, insecure file transfer protocol) and bam next second I'm looking at a guy's medical files (an excel sheet with daily blood sugar levels, what he ate that day, and sometimes comments) and his tax returns. Looked at a few pics too.
    Another IP doesn't work immediately, another has the server up but no shares, another has some music and I'm downloading some to try it out, hell I even curlftps'ed in for the sake of it and it works albeit slow. Aww fuck I can even write. Dropping a few music files into an unknown spanish speaking person's short music collection.

    For once.. Don't read TFA! makes feel dirty.
    I wonder what's so "white hat" about some of the information that is included.

    1. Re:Holy crap! by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      you also probably just technically broke the law.

      Heres a tip to all voyeurs out there: dont probe random IPs specified as "vulnerable". You probably wont get noticed, but if you are you can get in a whole bunch of trouble. "Unauthorized access" means you unless you have permission.

    2. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it's hacking only when the other end has an expectation of security. In the case of a security vulnerability, the user does expect to be secure, even if wide open. In the case of someone else's story of being at a hotel on their wifi and a fileshare with no password setup, probably not.

    3. Re:Holy crap! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In the case of someone else's story of being at a hotel on their wifi and a fileshare with no password setup, probably not.

      You're assuming an educated user who has any idea about any of this stuff.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Holy crap! by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's hacking only when the other end has an expectation of security.

      Im not aware of that being a factor. Whether it is illegal or not is up to the courts, but it truly is best not to tempt fate.

      See:
      http://nmap.org/book/legal-iss...

    5. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the original AC.. I agree at with your parent that I broke the law, and there's a simple analogy I read of some years ago on slashdot. What if someone forgot to lock his front door or doesn't care about it : if you enter the home to have a peek, you're still trespassing.
      I expect no consequences, as I only briefly made a few directory trasversals and uploads/downloads and I doubt the router will log and report this, but I could as well get into real trouble.

  12. Asuswrt Merlin ROM did NOT take care of this by tmo72 · · Score: 3, Informative

    From Merlin himself:
    http://forums.smallnetbuilder....
    He says disable aicloud and the ftpd for now.

  13. Thanks by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

    Genuine thanks. I have one of these models in my office, where there's just a couple of us. Never even thought about it, as we don't use it for anything other than establishing PPPoE on ADSL. Turns out we had those features all turned on, too. No disks attached - but still.

    1. Re:Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genuine thanks. I have one of these models in my office, where there's just a couple of us. Never even thought about it, as we don't use it for anything other than establishing PPPoE on ADSL. Turns out we had those features all turned on, too. No disks attached - but still.

      So you decied to deploy network hardware in a business/enterprise environment without so much as consulting someone competent? For one thing someone competent would have said you don't need such a complex device for your use case. For another thing they'd have disabled any features you aren't using.

      You deserve anything that happens. You are what's wrong with computer security. Every time you hear about a huge data breach and millions of identities stolen like what happened at Target it was because of someone like you. You really believe you can just screw about with what you don't understand and nothing will ever go wrong. No amount of headlines or high-profile breaches will change someone like you.

      If nothing truly bad happened you got lucky. Take the lesson and quit being such a shortsighted douchebag. You probably won't but you know you should.

      Any chance you could name that office so I know who to never trust my information with?

  14. Re:and this is why smart peiple don't touch window by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    I thought Asus router firmware was open source.

    has ... judgment of when and what to update.

    That's more the problem. As I understand it, the last DD-WRT vulnerability was fixed within hours (not that that'll do much good if people aren't keeping it up to date)

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  15. Re:and this is why smart peiple don't touch window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter if it was fixed even before the flaw was found, if nobody applies the patches. Routers and other small devices are "deploy and forget". In the future when your toaster runs linux, do you really want to check & apply updates every hour? And what if the bleeding edge patch breaks the timer/thermo and it burns someone's house down? Laugh at them because the source was open and they could have checked/fixed the code themselves?

  16. Good or bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Ars reader by the name of Jerry got a nasty surprise as he was browsing the contents of his external hard drive over the weekend — a mysterious text file warning him that he had been hacked thanks to a critical vulnerability in the Asus router he used

    I wouldn't call that a nasty surprise. In fact, I would call it a welcome surprise since it doesn't seem like his files were messed with and he is now aware of a security hole which he can take measures to protect.

    1. Re: Good or bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome? No. I'd be paranoid my private files had been downloaded and/or malware was floating around (either from the same attacker pretending to be nice, or a different malicious attacker)

  17. Dear IT People by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dear IT People,

    Despite what you might think in the modern day, exposing things to the Internet unnecessarily is still just asking for problems. Especially things with firmware rather than regularly- and automatically-updated software.

    Yes, we all run websites. Yes, we have RDS and VPN and all kinds of clever technology. And, yes, I'm sure you "keep it up to date" and have 28-digit passwords.

    But that doesn't change the fact that the connection that comes into your business/home is "hostile". It receives rogue packets and attacks 24 hours a day whether you know it or not. In fact, it's kind of a credit to most firewalls how LITTLE you actually notice coming down the line because it's just handling all the obvious attacks and scans all the time.

    But every port you open, everything you expose past your firewall (and even your firewall can be a problem if it's not good enough to handle unusual packets like a lot of ADSL routers that crash if they get too many connections or large packets, etc.) is a risk. Honestly. It's a risk.

    If you buy some cheap piece of commodity hardware and port-forward direct to it on the standard ports, you are relying on the security of that device to keep intruders out - not your firewall.

    If it's some cheap router, or some crappy CCTV PVR or a games console or even just a test experiment or network switch or something else in your home, then you are relying on THAT to be a secure gateway from attacks from the Internet. And guess what, the weakest link in the chain will be the first exploited.

    Please, before you go exposing this crap to the general Internet, limit its damage potential. Don't put it on your local network, but a VLAN of some kind. Don't forward every port. Don't have things like UPnP enabled (which is just automated, authentication-less port-forwarding). Put some authentication on it. Don't rely on some web interface knocked up by a foreign CCTV manufacturer, intended as a GUI for the local network to be as trusted as your firewall.

    Similarly, don't let these cheap, shit ADSL routers to be exposed to the general Internet while having all your personal files on them (and presumably running Samba, Bonjour, FTP, all kinds of shit to the local network to let you access them). Just... don't.

    You want to do this kind of thing? Use the VPN functions and make sure you keep on top of their updates and security. They will allow you to join the local network remotely, and that local network can be as insecure as you like with this cheap shit dangling off it unauthenticated if you like, as your VPN access can be secured, logged, audited and checked quite easily.

    Don't allow some piece of firmware junk, probably written in some C/Perl CGI/PHP that hasn't been updated since the day it started working enough to be saleable, to be your public face and guardian on the Internet.

    The principle applies all the way up too. Don't put AD controllers on the visible Internet. Don't let your public RDS server be the same as your DC or even on the same VLAN. Don't run IIS exposed to the world for some crappy HP utility, or external page.

    Do what those weird old tech guys used to do for decades and limit your exposure at all times. Sandboxing, VLAN'ing, permissioning, auditing. And, in the extreme, run a server OUTSIDE your home for this kind of shit. Seriously, VPS and cloud server with large storage allocations are cheap as chips nowadays. And they are kept up to date for you. And if someone compromises them, you have someone to blame AND you can be sure they haven't popped onto your home network and downloaded everything off your private laptop too.

    If some random consumer buys this crap and gets attacked, that's their problem. This is a site for damn geeks, though. We should know this kind of stuff. We should be advising against this kind of stuff. I should be able to nmap any one of you, at home or at work, and come up with nothing but a handful of secured ports running the latest software (if any

    1. Re:Dear IT People by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Secure your internal network too, don't rely solely on your border devices... All it takes is one pinhole and you're totally screwed.
      Treat every device as if it was directly connected to the internet, use secure protocols, disable unnecessary features and choose wisely when buying devices. If you then want to hide these devices behind a firewall *as well* then more power to you, but never rely totally on a firewall because eventually they will fail you one way or another.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Dear IT People by ledow · · Score: 2

      That's the way I do things, too, but the critical first step is to secure the borders.

      My usual home setup is actually:

      Internet router (everything disabled and DMZ enabled so it merely pipes all traffic to next device without processing it, like a modem).
      - to -
      Router / firewall (which treats all external traffic as hostile).
      - to -
      Wireless AP and LAN (separate ports / numbering / VLAN)

      But even there, the Wireless has client separation (so one dodgy PC on the wireless can't see another), it's treated as "untrusted" to all my client devices (so they are providing software firewall to all traffic too) and they actually VPN into the router/firewall to do everything. Not going to get stung by all that WEP/WPA/WPA2 junk going wrong, historically they just aren't secure enough and I don't trust them.

      It blows people's minds that I can give them the wireless key and they STILL can't do anything while my computers (with their VPN keys) work just fine over it, and the performance impact is absolutely negligible even for gaming (it has to go through the same network devices anyway, and there are no more round-trips than normal, just a tiny bit of encryption at each end which on a modern machine isn't worth worrying about). I have guest wireless access which I can manually enable if people are over, and it obviously does nothing more than lets them talk out (not to the LAN).

      The router/firewall is the only device "at risk" and I take great care to make it do as little processing as possible and to separate out the networks (wireless is, again, untrusted on that router but it can access the VPN port, LAN is "trusted" and all-cabled, the only external access is via the VPN port).

      Almost no impact on my life past setup (have to install the VPN client and keys on a new computer - takes about a minute - and you're putting in WPA2 keys etc. at that stage anyway, so no big deal). The VPN auto-connects and verifies the server whenever it's on the home wireless - I don't have to click anything at all. When an authenticated device is taken outside the home, the same VPN software can connect remotely with the same keys.

      None of this MAC authentication crap - a MAC is too easily read and forged. You have to have my VPN keys (and hence, have been seen, verified and installed by me) to get anywhere. They are non-reversible, revokable, and can be limited in any number of ways (i.e. internal but not external access, external access but no file-sharing, etc.)

      The setup of the whole thing I have redone every few years when I've moved house or whatever. It never takes very long. My girlfriend has zero problems with it - it all "just works" after a one-minute VPN client/key install. I game and don't notice any problems.

      And yet, when you look at the junk in the logs that comes out of a single friend's wireless connection or bounces off from the Internet-side of things, it's scary.

    3. Re:Dear IT People by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need to think of operating this kind of equipment more like driving a car. You need to learn how to do it safely, and manufacturers have a responsibility to make sure their products are safe and issue fixes/recalls if problems are discovered.

      Allow dumb routers with minimal features for those who don't want all that, and any router with more power has to be developed and operated responsibly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Dear IT People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have included a TL;DR in the beginning.

    5. Re:Dear IT People by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      use secure protocols, disable unnecessary features and choose wisely when buying devices

      While absolutely correct, your strategy does not account for 99% of the users who lease Internet connections.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  18. Re:This gray text SUCKS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  19. Re:and this is why smart peiple don't touch window by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure the attack is on an Asus router which if i had to guess is running some unix variant...

    not sure if you're trolling or what, but you really never know on slashdot.

  20. Re:Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why we moved already to Soylent News.

  21. The FEB-12-2014 firmware fixes N66 units by rs1n · · Score: 4, Informative
    As the title suggest, the firmware update on 2/12/2014 supposedly fixes the issues. http://support.asus.com/downlo...

    ASUS RT-N66U Firmware version 3.0.0.4.374.4422
    Security related issues:
    1. Fixed lighthttpd vulnerability.
    2. Fixed cross-site scripting vulnerability (CWE-79).
    3. Fixed the authentication bypass (CWW-592).
    4. Added notification to help avoid security risks.
    5. Fixed network place(samba) and FTP vulnerability.

    Improvement:
    1. Redesigned the parental control time setting UI.
    2. Updated multi language strings.
    3. Adjusted FW checking algorithm.
    4. Adjusted Time zone detecting algorithm.
    5. Improved web UI performance.

    1. Re:The FEB-12-2014 firmware fixes N66 units by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Did they fix the download master killing ping times? One of the selling points of the router for me and ended up being worthless since it drove latency to 2+ seconds whenever it was enabled.

  22. Connecting USB devices to the internet by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Do it with a pogoplug. You can run debian (or allegedly BSD) from an SD card, it gets updated more than the various router firmwares, and you can get one with USB3 for $20 brand new.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. RT-N16 will be secured automatically when it dies. by compwizrd · · Score: 2

    Haven't checked into other routers, but the RT-N16 has a "warranty cap". There is a capacitor on the far right of the unit, roughly centered. It's clearly designed to fail after a period of time. The rest of the capacitors are a different brand that isn't generally known to fail, the warranty cap is known to be a defective make.

    Normally it takes a bit longer than the actual warranty length to fail.

  24. Guerilla-style hacking disclosure?? by WD · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. A vulnerability was disclosed, and then some time after that it was leveraged by attackers in the wild. This is what happens.

  25. School me up - how does this happen? by landoltjp · · Score: 1

    I'm using Bell Fibe in Canada, and they supply a Modem / Router solution. I believe that Rogers (other major ISP) provides similar technology. So for many people they would not have their own router / firewall as first line of defense, they'd have ISP-supplied equipment.

    Is it common in Canada or the US for people to just get a WAN Modem / Driver from their ISP and then put their own router into place? Or worse, plug their laptop right into the Driver and hope that MS firewall will keep the wolves at bay?

    For wireless, the Bell / Rogers solutions both suck ass, so I disabled wireless and bought a small office WAP to punch a signal through the house where needed (the rest of my stuff is hard-wired to the switch). I don't think that would be an entry point if the security is turned up enough, right?

    1. Re:School me up - how does this happen? by ruir · · Score: 1

      yes, most of us have a modem router solution. I also have it too. Are you stuck with it? Not necessarily... If you are fortunate like myself, you can disable the routing/wifi functions, configure it in bridge mode, and connect to it proper hardware.

    2. Re:School me up - how does this happen? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Unless you're cursed with a Zyxel 5001... That piece of crap completely soils itself if it loses connection (such as might happen given SW Florida's weekly power flickers) in "Transparent bridging" mode. For some reason, it seems completely incapable of reestablishing a connection until I log into the admin panel, set it back to DHCP, and let it reconnect before resetting the whole thing.

      I thought about getting a UPS for it, then I decided that if I'm going to spend more dough on it, I'd be better off getting a real DSL modem and ditching the one that the assholes at my ISP can log into regardless of settings. Now I just have to find one.

    3. Re:School me up - how does this happen? by ruir · · Score: 1

      Good luck connecting/activating the service with a non-approved ISP equipment...It is not the same as connecting a TV or a switch in your local network.

    4. Re:School me up - how does this happen? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Sure it is, you just have to know how to configure it. It's not that difficult.

    5. Re:School me up - how does this happen? by ruir · · Score: 1

      You dont know what you are talking about sir, at all. And I am telling you that after running the Internet side of a Internet Cable company during 5 years. Custom firmwares, specific revisions of hardware, support of security protocols, authorisation/provisioning of clients/service based on MAC address, and often in ADSL routers deviations to the standard protocol...It is not the same as buying a fridge or a home wireless router at al.

    6. Re:School me up - how does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree, it's ISP/telco/cableco dependent.

      I have a VDSL connection. My telco doesn't give two hoots what modem I use, provided it can do VDSL2. In practice I use their supplied modem because it gives them more reporting of line stats and makes life easier if there's a line problem, and it is simply an ethernet to VDSL bridge. But I can use my own if I wanted.

      My ISP does not care what router I use, provided it can speak PPPoE. I have used Cisco and pfSense on that connection, with no quibbles from the telco (who operates the DSLAM/transport network) and the ISP. I have also used Cisco/other hardware on an ADSL connection for about 8 years with no problems. My ISP doesn't even supply equipment, it's up to you to source your own. They give you the PPP username/password and it's your responsibility to make it work. Even when using the telco's own ISP, 3rd party hardware is trivial to configure for their service.

      This is true for the vast majority of ADSL and VDSL connections in the UK. There's one ADSL ISP that doesn't really want you to use anything other than the equipment they supply, but they aren't totally outraged by it, as evidenced by their apathy towards users who extract the PPP credentials and use their own hardware, and that they recently bought a competitor which did allow third party hardware, and announced that they have no plans to make those customers use different hardware.

      Cable might be considerably different, due to the need for MAC registration on DOCSIS, but the US operators generally seem quite liberal about what you use provided it's CableLabs certified. The cableco in the UK certainly refuses to let you use anything other than the exact router-modem that they supplied, which is unfortunate as it is crap.

      I find that people who bang on about how many years experience they have tend to not "know what they are talking about".

    7. Re:School me up - how does this happen? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      This is a DSL provider, not cable (who do tend to make setting up the client side an utter pain), and I do know what I'm talking about. I've done it before, multiple times.

  26. Which D-Link model? by SIGBUS · · Score: 1

    I have a couple of D-Link DIR825-C1 units on my network, both with DD-WRT, one in client bridge mode and the other as my router. Both have been rock solid, and a worthy upgrade from my classic WRT54G boxes.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
  27. Asus router self update annoyance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of annoying that my RT-N66U STILL does not see this firmware when I tell it to check for updates, even though it was released 6 days ago.

  28. Re:RT-N16 will be secured automatically when it di by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Is it easy to recognize? It was still worth it to me to buy a second RT-N16, but I still have the failed one. Would love to resurrect it.

  29. Not the best ideal to hook storage up to router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want local storage your better off with a server then setting something up through a router. Most router makers don't concern themselves with security as much as ease of setup. The other question will be, is how long will it take Asus to do a firmware revision to correct this if they can?

  30. "a mysterious text file" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did something similar to this once during college, we found a student on the campus network who had their entire computer shared with no password. We posted some text files on their desktop warning them of the issue and instructing them how to fix it. I think we even printed off the text file on their printer.

  31. Virus warning by jovius · · Score: 1

    ClamXav on OS X reported a virus infection in one of the files in the archive: ASUSGATE/FTP-dirlist/75.183.112.181.dirlist: JAVA.Exploit.CVE_2012_1723 FOUND

    I don't know exactly what to make of that, but be careful.

  32. Re:RT-N16 will be secured automatically when it di by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It'd probably take you less time to rip it open and find out than to wait for the reply, or even to find pictures in the fcc database

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  33. Re:RT-N16 will be secured automatically when it di by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I already had it open. I never figured it out. No obvious problems in there (no bulged caps), but it behaved just like a capacitor problem.

  34. Re:RT-N16 will be secured automatically when it di by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The description said that it was a different-brand cap on one side of the board all alone. You could probably have found it and desoldered it by now, if it's there. Could always be another rev of the same board, in which case any answer would be useless. If you can find your ass with both hands and a map and pour piss out of a boot with instructions printed on the heel, you're qualified to figure this one out on your OR.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. THIS is the big problem with DD-WRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Have you checked if there's been newer releases of DD-WRT for your D-Link?"

    It's next to impossible to know what DD-WRT version/build/release to install on anything.

    The site posts binaries in what, 8 flavors, and then says 'read ALL of the wiki AND ALL OF THE PEACOCK THREAD before deciding what to install!!!'. The site's version selection tool is about guaranteed to give you bad advice, and the forums tell you "make sure you install the {Eko|Brainslayer} version but NOT THE LATEST NIGHTLY!!!" 'cuz apparently Eko and Brainslayer are really good guys and strong coders, though you'd have a hard time figuring who they are or if they're so good why the site doesn't host their magic binaries at the root.

    DD-WRT is, no bones about it, awesome in many, many ways. But you have to be a very patient, determined geek to understand which version to try first. Once you get it installed and the lid nailed on, it doesn't give you the warm-and-fuzzies to think about finding a new version to update it with, especially because you have to wade through the misinformation again.

    Howsabout this: if there's someone in charge over there, bless a series of builds for the Broadcom, and a series of builds for the other chipsets. And skip all the binaries linked in the forum, the wiki, the broken selection tool.

    Just make it easy to know what to install. Not bricking your router is hard enough as it is.

    1. Re:THIS is the big problem with DD-WRT by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      It's next to impossible to know what DD-WRT version/build/release to install on anything.

      It's certainly not easy. It's clearly a mess. I wouldn't say it's "next to impossible". I spent about an hour figuring out what I needed to do, after installing a version suggested by the selection tool (that did not work very well).

  36. Re:RT-N16 will be secured automatically when it di by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I didn't have it open today - I had it open 6 months ago.

    I misread on the brand part.

    Why is this bother you so much?

  37. Re:Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's people!

  38. The WORST part is ... by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    This firmware has been available for several days but if you go into your router and have it check for an update (and you are running the one from months ago like I was) it still says you are using the current version.

    I'll NEVER buy another ASUS router again. Their routers get such good reviews. I think it's time to just start running pfsense in a VM on my linux box and just be done with it. Just use the wifi on these shitty routers for wireless lan access.

  39. Burn other firmware (DD-WRT rant) by whitroth · · Score: 1

    The way I did. Now, if you're not an experienced sysadmin, and want to use your Asus router for *anything* else, give up. I've got DD-WRT on mine, and it took months, for the simple reason that I wanted to use the router, as it advertised on the box, to serve a USB printer.

    Calling Asus about the stock firmware, when I told them my printer, they told me, "oh, it servers printers, but not that printer, you should have checked what we support...." The box does *NOT* say "only supports some printers...."

    So I went for DD-WRT. That's a disaster. The web site - after a month or so of screwing around on and off, I found someone who knew something, saying, IGNORE THE ROUTER DATABASE. You know, the first thing it tells you to use when you go to the DD-WRT home page? And the guy went on to say, that the d/b was out of date at best, and *wrong* at worst.

    Then I got into the "help" forum. I've been in the field since before some of you were born... and I have *never* seen a project where folks talked about their "favorite build". !!! And one where one thing gets fixed in a build by one person, but something else breaks (regression tests? What are those?) And they have no formal releases, just some lead developers' builds.

    I can't see how I can ever update the firmware, since I don't want to break what works...

    So if you just want it as a router, or maybe even w/ QoS, DD-WRT ok. Otherwise, be prepared for a lot of grief (and you'll get real familiar with restoring the original firmware to start all over again).

                          mark

  40. Merlin FW may not address this exploit by Toby_Meyer · · Score: 1

    Hi all, it's an honor to be linked by /. as part of this story. I wanted to post to draw further attention to what has already been discussed here: it hasn't yet been confirmed that the fix from months ago addresses all vulnerabilities mentioned. As Eric, the author of the firmware stated, please ensure the AI Cloud and FTP services are disabled for now if using this firmware. I would further add (also already discussed here) that a better-safe-than-sorry approach is to stick to alternative software for "AI Cloud"/FTP solutions. For example, if I needed FTP, I'd rather use a much tested/hardened/known good dedicated FTP solution rather than one baked into any router. Thanks!

  41. Re: Open Source is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ditch the consumer router for firewalling and instead use an old pc with Moonwalk or Presence installed. Then to allow wireless access to the network just setup your consumer router to pass though the network access to Monowall/Pfsense and on out to the internet.

  42. Stupid beta subject line requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, much better to install a new lock on said neighbor's door. Isn't that what those helpful ransomware people do?

  43. Firmware was updated 02/12... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please see http://support.asus.com/download.aspx?SLanguage=en&m=RT-N66R&p=11&s=2&os=36&hashedid=yaPRqqZuiBsRlS5W for the latest upgrade; I just upgraded mine.

    There does seem to be a defect in the firmware upgrade check utility as it doesn't see the upgraded version for some reason and reports the current version as the latest. Seen this before on this router as well as various Linksys and Netgear. Automated checks are a great idea if they're coded correctly...

    Ciao!

  44. Re:RT-N16 will be secured automatically when it di by compwizrd · · Score: 1

    Very easy, yes.. there's one that stands off on its own. I had 5 of them in service, they all died within the same month.