Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs To Appear On US Postage Stamp

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Steven Musil writes at Cnet that the US Postal Service hopes Steve Jobs can do for it what he once did for Apple as the late Apple co-founder will be featured on a commemorative US postage stamp along with Johnny Carson, Ingrid Bergman, Elvis Presley, and James Brown. The former Apple CEO's stamp is still in the design stages and will be released at some point in 2015. Jobs, who passed away in 2011 after a battle with pancreatic cancer, has also been posthumously honored for his visionary achievements with a special Grammy Merit Award and a Disney Legends Award. Jobs was also inducted into the Bay Area Business Hall of Fame, has had a building at Pixar named after him, and was featured in an exhibit at the US Patent Office Museum. "The profitable first class mail business has been decimated by email over the past decade, thanks in no small part to the contributions of Steve Jobs and Apple," writes Derek Kessler. "It's no small feat to be so impactful that the USPS feels compelled to honor you despite the fact that the work that you've done is dismantling the core of their business.""

184 comments

  1. Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the stamp will be a little bit more expensive than usual and it comes only in 2 colors.

    1. Re: Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And don't forget the rounded corners!!!

    2. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      despite the fact that the work that you've done is dismantling the core of their business

      Yes, all the advances made in email, texting & IMing were made possible by Apple.
      No wonder journalists are considered a joke these days.

    3. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up and take my money!

    4. Re:Obviously.. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      F8ck the Jobs.

      I WANT the JAMES BROWN stamp!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:Obviously.. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I haven't bought an actual postage stamp in US or UK since....

      Maybe 2001?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want a cookie? Oh, wait you would probably prefer an e-cookie.

    7. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No Forever Stamps either. You'll definitely have to buy another one in a few months.

    8. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... the stamp will be a little bit more expensive than usual and it comes only in 2 colors.

      and 5 fruity flavors.

    9. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      elvis james brown and johnny carson for me

    10. Re:Obviously.. by SpankiMonki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget a stamp for Michael Jackson. It could even make a "hee hee" sound when licked.

    11. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriousy, fuck that guy.
      He was an asshole without a shred of human decency. If you're going to put an Apple founder on a stamp it should be Woz.

    12. Re:Obviously.. by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Funny

      It will only be available in one color, that no one really wants, to begin with, and then ~6 months later, it will become available in the color you really do want, forcing you to buy a second roll of stamps... That's what the USPS is counting on - selling twice as many stamps!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    13. Re:Obviously.. by russbutton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno. Will his ego fit into a 3/4" square?

    14. Re:Obviously.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      And if you try to use the stamp to pay a medical bill it will come back ""returned to sender." Letters to your guru or the guy who runs the juice bar will go through. And obviously the stamps expire after six months.

    15. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not seeing any understanding of sarcasm. Reading comprehension problems?

      Some contribution? Just being there doesn't count. They've made no significant contribution to it in any way.

      From the biased linked company bullshit Since determining the client in which an email is opened requires images to be displayed, the data for some email clients and mobile devices might be over- or under-represented due to automatic image blocking.

      Useless statistics considering how many mail clients block images. This data is as useful as using Ferrari drivers as a basis for all driving habits.

    16. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and from now on, any other stamp which is made and is "squared" will get sued

    17. Re:Obviously.. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      and all letters with this stamp on it will be shipped to apple headquarters to make sure the message is approved before hitting the reciever

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    18. Re:Obviously.. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Funny

      As long as you're going for novelty why not a Jerry Garcia stamp? When you lick it you're dosed with a small amount of LSD. Initially the stamp is simply a black and white image, but after a few minutes, wow!

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    19. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Over Woz'es dead body...

    20. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamnit we need a Score:6

    21. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, just try to replace the stamp's battery...

    22. Re:Obviously.. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, it will only work with Apple envelopes.

    23. Re:Obviously.. by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      Steve did have a shred of human decency.

    24. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What advances are those? All the advances I can think of that they're known for were done by other people.

    25. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stamp does not have a battery.

    26. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You could say that, but you'd sound as silly as somebody saying that Google is responsible for the popularity of cell phones. In much the same way that everyone was already using email by the time Apple got into the mobile devices market, everyone was already talking on a cell phone by the time Google entered that market. It's junky, misleading weasel talk. Sure, both companies can be credited with enabling X users or Y traffic, but the wheels were already turning... they made contributions to the method of use, but not to the adoption of the technology, which was the BS point this journalist was trying to make.

    27. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or in a less controversial analogy: attributing Glock with having contributed to the downfall of archery.

    28. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but some Anonymous Cowards do have a sense of humor.

    29. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget a stamp for Michael Jackson. It could even make a "hee hee" sound when licked.

      ROFLMAO

    30. Re:Obviously.. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Why, you want to lick him or stamp on him?

    31. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps with the same glue that George Costanza got for his wedding invitation envelopes?

    32. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And only young boys are able to lick it.

    33. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some contribution? Just being there doesn't count.

      Yes it does. What you're saying is like saying a car company hasn't done work to dismantle the horse-drawn carriage business because they didn't invent cars, they just happen to be a profitable niche seller of cars.

      Just selling cars is dismantling the horse-drawn carriage business, and just making and promoting modern computers with email access reduces the need for physical mail.

    34. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you put it on a non-apple envelope they burst into flames.

    35. Re: Obviously.. by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      You probably don't have much going on I your life. However those of us that deal with lawyers and governments still post the odd letter every now and again.

    36. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when people like yourself have been living in your mother's basement for the past 13 years, you really don't have to worry much about paying the bills.

    37. Re:Obviously.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that Justin Bieber invented the gramophone?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re: Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who have anything going on 'I' our lives pay someone else to post letters for us...

    39. Re: Obviously.. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that - the latest issue 'Forever' international stamps are in fact round.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  2. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone can give his backside a lick.....

    1. Re:Finally by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I hate the taste of stamp glue, so I lick my thumb and wet the stamp with my thumb, doe that count, too?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Finally by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I hate the taste of stamp glue, so I lick my thumb and wet the stamp with my thumb, doe that count, too?

      No, but if you use your middle finger instead that counts as a win for the rest of us.

  3. Rod Serling by Megane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was going to mention that Rod Serling needed a stamp, too. There's been a petition since 1988. But apparently he finally got one in 2009, so we can finally send our mail to... The Twilight Zone.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Rod Serling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to mention that Rod Serling needed a stamp, too. There's been a petition since 1988. But apparently he finally got one in 2009, so we can finally send our mail to... The Twilight Zone.

      The rule is, no one is allowed such an honor until after they're too dead to enjoy it.

    2. Re:Rod Serling by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      Poor Larry Ellison!

    3. Re:Rod Serling by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We can hope for an Ellison stamp soon. It's too late for the 2009 Obama Half Dollar, though.

    4. Re:Rod Serling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a little behind the times. Since 2011 living subjects are allowed on US postage stamps.

  4. What emailer did he write? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The email client that comes with Mac OS X and iOS both kind of suck. I'd say Apple has contributed very little (relatively) to superceding snailmail.

    I use Mac OS at work, and after various laughable problems, I ended up having to replace Apple Mail with Thunderbird, just to get basic 1990s functionality.

    1. Re: What emailer did he write? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like? I use Apple Mail everyday and have no problems at all. What features are missing?

    2. Re: What emailer did he write? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      That's not really the point. Apple was not instrumental in any way to to the development of email or any of the associated support technologies. It doesn't matter how good or bad the MacOS bundleware email client is. Apple simply isn't that relevant to the development of the Internet, email, or the web.

      Even the connection with NexT is tenuous at best.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re: What emailer did he write? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, actually, it's revisionist history at its best. The tenuous nature of this screed aside, though, the World Wide Web had and has little to do with the adoption of email as a product. Web-based mail companies didn't invent the concept, after all... email did then and does now operate over protocols independent of the WWW. Not that this matters, since the whole point is how, when, and by whom it was popularized, and if you really think that Safari was the reason the WWW took off, then you're beyond help.

      So... did you have a point, beyond [t]rolling your face around on the keyboard?

    4. Re: What emailer did he write? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow

      Posting this "if you really think that Safari was the reason the WWW took off, then you're beyond help." and has the guts to call me a troll. Nice asshattery. Safari wasn't even mentioned. But nice kindergarden tactic for a troll. And i even haven't mentioned webmail. What kind of idiot are you?

    5. Re: What emailer did he write? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not mention NextOS, its network stack, and how that was hard-boiled into Mac OS? Because that ultimately presented itself as the Safari web browser.

      You did know that, right? I mean, you weren't just pasting shit you found on cultofmac or something, right? No? Well, troll it is, then, shit-fer-brains.

  5. Stamp will cost $4 by hessian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stamp will cost $4, do the same thing that $0.49 stamp does but have stylistic design. If anything goes wrong, you throw the whole letter out and buy a new one based on someone else's refurbished mail. If you mention this bad experience online, ten thousand Steve Jobs fanboys attack your inbox with gay pornography to "open your mind."

    1. Re:Stamp will cost $4 by jkrise · · Score: 0

      but have stylistic design.

      You mean like rounded corners?

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    2. Re:Stamp will cost $4 by StripedCow · · Score: 2

      And it is only compatible with letterboxes from one company.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    3. Re:Stamp will cost $4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They saw it in 2001, Star Trek The Next Generation, and with any kid who's ever cut the corners off a piece of paper.

  6. Chinese Stamp? by ad454 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering that apple out-sourced all of their manufacturing overseas, it seems that China and not the USA should be the ones honouring Steve Jobs with a stamp.

    Alternatively, if the USPS wants to honour Steve Jobs in a historically accurate way, they could design the stamp in the USA, have China produce the stamps, and then sell those Chinese made stamps to Americans.

    1. Re: Chinese Stamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. They haven't outsourced all of the manufacturing jobs. Anyway factory jobs are low tier. All the upper tier jobs are in the US.

    2. Re: Chinese Stamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Way to back that up with a source. (Since Jobs death, some manufacturing is moving back)
      Also, go suck an egg with that elitist who cares about low tier jobs attitude.

    3. Re: Chinese Stamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your food stamps, but beer and shut up.

    4. Re:Chinese Stamp? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Overseas would be OK. Had it not been more about taking advantage of indentured, and child labor than creating good jobs for people in need.

    5. Re:Chinese Stamp? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      Don't know about their other products, but much of the iPhone is manufactured in the US. The RF Chip, Audio Chip, Gorilla Glass, CPU and other controller chips are all made in the US.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    6. Re:Chinese Stamp? by burningcpu · · Score: 1

      I full heartedly agree with your second sentiment. What gets me is the abundance of American flags and such gear that is made oversees -- and people gobble it and feel damn patriotic about the whole thing.

      Side note: Apple is opening a plant in Mesa, Arizona and will employ about 700 people. http://cdn2.geeknation.com/gee...

    7. Re: Chinese Stamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how is 99.9% of the rest of the country supposed to make a living when only the uppermost tier jobs are in the USA? I think you supporters of outsourcing and globalization have forgotten that small important detail.

  7. DRM, copyright, trademarked by Teun · · Score: 4, Funny
    How long before Apple sues the USPS for copyright infringement and Trademark dilution?

    Maybe they'll be OK with the stamp DRM'ed.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  8. Forget Jobs by oldhack · · Score: 1

    USPS, put out a bieber stamp - ships anything and everything to Canada, no questions asked, no return accepted.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Forget Jobs by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bieber stamp: Costs $4 but is worthless for postage, looks like a drunk lesbian, adhesive has bad taste and won't stick to envelopes

    2. Re:Forget Jobs by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Since he has to be dead before they'll put him on a stamp.......

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Forget Jobs by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      So, another six months at this rate.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Forget Jobs by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We were all hoping for a more proactive solution.

    5. Re:Forget Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Print the stamps now, and then the USPS will have to kill him?

  9. Pathetic by AntiBasic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, let's honor a "man" who was a billionaire who refused to acknowledge his daughter's existence for 17 years, while she and her mother lived paycheck to paycheck. While this was going on, he named a computer after her.

    1. Re:Pathetic by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I kind of agree. Even without the personal baggage, I'd feel better if our stamps honored contributions to humanity, not stylistic creativity, monopolistic business strategies, or modern day robber baron philosophy. I recognize his contribution to technological progress, I just don't think, on balance, that we should honor him with a stamp. That's just my gut reaction...I could be wrong.

      --
      The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
    2. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Albert Einstein was a shit in his personal life too, doesn't mean we can't honor his work.

    3. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recognize his contribution to technological progress

      I don't. He was a miserable human being with very limited technical skills that had a knack for knowing what would sell, and of making the public believe he was responsible for the work done by others.

    4. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting that ChrisAnn Brennan was a total loony toon. In Isaacson's biography it's discussed that she convinced her daughter to sign over the house Steve bought for them. Once Lisa did this, ChrisAnn sold it and traveled to India with her guru.

      ChrisAnn wasn't a total victim like you're making it out to be.

    5. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody is a shit about personal life. This is why it is personal and we don't mention it.

    6. Re:Pathetic by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's honor a "man" who was a billionaire who refused to acknowledge his daughter's existence for 17 years, while she and her mother lived paycheck to paycheck. While this was going on, he named a computer after her.

      You could ask Jobs' first daughter what she thinks about it (he had four children, by the way, including two daughters). For all that is publicly known, she was quite OK with her father, so it is very unlikely that she would protest against a Steve Jobs stamp.

      On the other hand, whatever you accuse him of in his private life is actually quite irrelevant. If you think he shouldn't get on a stamp for being a bad father, then surely there should be at least a few thousand men put on stamps for being extraordinarily good fathers? But they aren't. Qualities as a parent are entirely unimportant on that scale.

    7. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people take confuse Steve Jobs with the tech industry as a whole and, obviously, Apple in particular. Inasmuch as his image is really a symbol for all that, then there's technological progress.

      (I think we should all realize that just about everyone with a statue was either a narcissist that ordered it built for themselves, or a symbol for something beyond the person).

    8. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, they gave one to Ayn Rand, so clearly the bar is set very low.

      I think the overriding concern of the USPS is "How many suckers can we get to buy these things as collector's items and not mail them?"

    9. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He tried to re-instate slavery by suing employees that left his company to work for a competitor.

      After he lost the court cases, he conspired with other tech companies to cap worker pay. At one point, he threatened to punish anyone if they didn't join in.

      http://pando.com/2014/01/23/the-techtopus-how-silicon-valleys-most-celebrated-ceos-conspired-to-drive-down-100000-tech-engineers-wages/

    10. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, whatever you accuse him of in his private life is actually quite irrelevant.

      No it isn't. Unless your moral compass is skewed. or are there levels of what happens in someone's personal life that make a difference? if so then your argument is moot as one man's 'meh' is another man's 'WTF!'. I.e. if Steve Jobs was a convicted 'rapist' in a previous life would that not matter?

      Yeah yeah, I know "let him without sin etc."

      however, you can appreciate the contribution of the man (or woman) but sure as hell don't 'celebrate' that person.

    11. Re:Pathetic by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 2

      While we're at it let's make a stamp of Adolf Hitler. He also was a bad person who advanced technology.

    12. Re:Pathetic by beanMosheen · · Score: 1

      Well, I can finally piss on his head like I've always wanted too. Random fact: My wife stuck a needle in his arm once. Small world.

    13. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me that you didn't just compare Jobs to Einstein.

    14. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron.

    15. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recognize his contribution to technological progress

      I don't. He was a miserable human being with very limited technical skills that had a knack for knowing what would sell, and of making the public believe he was responsible for the work done by others.

      So apart from the last two, he was just like you.

    16. Re:Pathetic by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I don't. He was a miserable human being with very limited technical skills that had a knack for knowing what would sell, and of making the public believe he was responsible for the work done by others.

      Obvious Haterade is obvious. And tired. You guys have to dig up 30 year old material for the "Jobs is a asshole" storyline, and pretend that he personally took credit for designing the iMac, iPod, iPhone, etc. When that's not the case.

    17. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I think his daughter is relevant. First thing which came to my mind as well.

  10. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never use stamps anyways

  11. Re:this is so sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ac as I've been moderating, but I think the first of these should be for Jon Postal. But as a networking tech, I'm probably biased. Although I would think it somewhat difficult to beat the possible alliterations possible.

  12. instead of artsy fartsy designer by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    shouldn't Woz be on a stamp for whatever technological and contribution to progress the Apple systems have made?

    1. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but jobs has more fanboys.

    2. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a good idea, having 'the Woz' on a stamp would mean he'd have to be deceased.

    3. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      in twenty years he won't, more than half of people won't even know or care who he was.

      and on unrelated note, the new mac workstation looks like a camp composting toilet

    4. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      in 2011 the USPO said living people were eligible to be honored on stamps also

    5. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think having living people on stamps is appropriate? Personally, I think they should have to be deceased.

      However, if we ever have to honor a zombie, that's a trickier issue.

    6. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      in 2011 the USPO said living people were eligible to be honored on stamps also

      Thanks, I forgot that. In that case, Woz should be honored with a stamp before Jobs. Without Wozniak, there would be no Jobs.

    7. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      stamps have short useful life, then certain ones go into realm of the philatilist. so it hardly matters.

    8. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by pauljlucas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's generally not a good idea to commemorate a living person because they still have the potential to end up in a scandal or do something embarrassing.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    9. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      Pish... everyone knows Steve did everything and Woz was just there to reel in the hippy nerds? Geez, haven't you learned anything from Apple's revisionist history?

    10. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I forgot that. In that case, Woz should be honored with a stamp before Jobs. Without Wozniak, there would be no Jobs.

      Don't be silly. That leech would have found someone else talent to ride on. Someone like Steve Jobs, free of human decency, free of morality, free to step on anyone, is bound to become millionaire and die of AIDS (don't fool yourself, cancer is a PR way of dying from AIDS).

      I am still holding my breath for the Dennis Ritchie commemoration and homages. As always, real contributor are robbed and marketing leeches reap what other sow.

    11. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You said, instead of artsy fartsy designer? It really surprises you that someone 'artsy farts' will be portrayed by an artist on a stamp?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and on unrelated note, the new mac workstation looks like a camp composting toilet

      HA HA

      Yes it does.

      http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/

      Although I got a 'flash blocking' icon on this website.

      !!

      i thought Flash was evil to apple?

    13. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard Stallman's already done just about every embarrassing thing he can, why not immortalize him on a stamp? You can't seal the envelope, though, because information wants to be free.

  13. Dennis Ritchie instead! by rstanley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dennis Ritchie, the creator of the C Programming Language, along with Ken Thompson, co-creators of the UNIX Operating System, Brian Kernighan, and many, many others, laid the groundwork for ALL Operating Systems, and technology that followed. Linux, all flavors of UNIX, Android, etc... lead the world in O/S's, NOT Apple.

    Steve Jobs would still be a amateur Geek in his garage if it were not for all the Giants of the industry that came before.

    Considering that they only died 6 days apart, where is Dennis's stamp?

    Dennis's home page: http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dm...

    1. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by GoJays · · Score: 2

      I agree, Dennis should have a stamp long before Jobs... He won't though because the average person doesn't know who Dennis Ritchie is while everybody knows who Steve Jobs is.

    2. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am not going to lick the back of Dennis Ritchie.

    3. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by gnupun · · Score: 1

      The problem is not many people, outside of hardware/software geeks, know who Dennis Ritchie and the rest are. Everyone knows who Jobs was and what he did.

    4. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't about honoring him, exactly; when they put someone famous on the stamp, people will want to collect the stamps. That's why they chose Jobs, because it will essentially be a money maker for the post office.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about Jack Kilby? He laid the foundation for modern computing. Or the U.S.P.S. could put out a set with all of the major figures in the field of computers and their precursors.

    6. Re: Dennis Ritchie instead! by NapalmV · · Score: 2

      Oh c'mon. We all know the truth, regardless of it being relegated as an April fool's joke:

      https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/unix-hoax.html
      .

    7. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Black.Shuck · · Score: 0, Troll

      Steve Jobs would still be a amateur Geek in his garage if it were not for all the Giants of the industry that came before.

      The whole computer industry would still be geeks in their garages if it weren't for Jobs.

      That's not to say he's more important than Richie, but nerds like us need to recognise value outside of that which is purely technical.

      Concerning stamps, you could put Balmer on for all I care.

    8. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of commemorative stamps is to make the pleb aware of these relevant peoples. Steve Jobs, the con artist does not deserve a stamp, his name will be forgotten when the idiot generation that bought his product die off. The C language will live forever. Dennis Ritchie's contribution to humanity is what should be remembered.

    9. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you'll happily lick Steve Job's backside. Hmmmmm...

    10. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by slickepott · · Score: 1

      Which was - Nothing Useful / Being an ass! :)

    11. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      +1 insightfull.

      Sorry no points left, but it needs to be said.

    12. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by pcjunky · · Score: 1

      That's the reason to have stamps with them. Education.

    13. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Which was -

      Bringing highly useful and fun-to-use technologies in well-designed (albeit expensive) packages - Mac OS and the iPhone. What type of phones were Nokia, Motorola, Blackberry and Samsung selling before Apple reinvented the mobile phone? Pre-iPhones were crappy, slow, plastic case phones with tiny screens and very tiny buttons that make even the simplest task look like trying to program a VCR.

      Also, Apple was dying before Jobs saved it by introducing OS X. The man had great taste in design.

    14. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      OTOH, Dennis Ritchie also gave us UNIX and C.

      I'd say it's a wash.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    15. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be an idiot. Ritchie was greater than Jobs will ever be.

    16. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Dennis Ritchie, the creator of the C Programming Language, along with Ken Thompson, co-creators of the UNIX Operating System, Brian Kernighan, and many, many others, laid the groundwork for ALL Operating Systems, and technology that followed. Linux, all flavors of UNIX, Android, etc... lead the world in O/S's, NOT Apple.

      Steve Jobs would still be a amateur Geek in his garage if it were not for all the Giants of the industry that came before.

      Considering that they only died 6 days apart, where is Dennis's stamp?

      Dennis's home page: http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dm...

      ===
      YES YES YES

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    17. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      I won't argue that a lot of Apple products were a repackaging of stuff someone else had invented, and certainly they're an assembly of stuff someone else makes (for example, Samsung makes the displays for the iPhone and other products). But it takes a special kind of talent to design said package, provide a "fun/easy" way to interact with it, make people want to buy it, create and grow a Market segment around it.

      Granted, Jobs didn't do all of that on his own; but I'm willing to accept he was leading the "projects" (for lack of a better word) behind them, and certainly was critiquing the work rejecting stuff he didn't like and approving what he did like. He's practically as responsible for the iPhone as whoever did the actual product design and specs.

      Where was Blackberry before the iPhone came out? where are they now?. The Creative Rio and other portable MP3 players existed years before the first iPod, where are they now? Winamp existed well before iTunes, where are they now?

      I'm starting to sound like a fanboy, aren't I? All I'm saying is Jobs&Co were successful in some business segments were others had tried and failed or simply where out-marketed by apple. Of course they Jobs was standing on the proverbial shoulders of giants (and probably stomping on their faces with smelly feet), but it takes a special kind of talent (and a good dosage of luck) to be successful at it.

      Having said that, Dennis Ritchie should have been honored by a stamp before Jobs. And there are plenty of other innovators in the field of computing that should have been there before Jobs too. It's a Edison v. Tesla argument all over again.

  14. THE BETA SUCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do I have to look at that garbage and waste my time changing back to default. It is so ugly and poorly designed. I hope whoever made it reads this comment and cuts their wrists.

    AC signing out.

  15. "Steve Jobs To Appear On US Postage Stamp..." by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    ... and I thought, "Like Hari Seldon?"

  16. stamp honoring scott olsen due out in spring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coincides with the celebration in central park.. what's this about??? http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=scott%20olsen&sm=3

  17. poster boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPhone? iMac? iPod?

    iDon'tReallyGiveaCrap!

  18. Would have to use a proprietary Apple envelope by mrflash818 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You would have to use a proprietary Apple envelope, or the stamp wouldn't stick.

    The Apple envelope would be prettier than a regular envelope, but cost twice as much, too.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
    1. Re:Would have to use a proprietary Apple envelope by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      The Apple iEnvelope will also have exclusive patented round corners.

    2. Re:Would have to use a proprietary Apple envelope by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      The Apple envelope will also have extremely innovative square corners, which nobody in the envelope industry would ever have thought of. Ergo, Apple will patent it and proceed to sue other envelope manufacturers. Also Samsung, somehow.

    3. Re:Would have to use a proprietary Apple envelope by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Yes, proprietary like BSD/DDR/IDE/SATA/Ethernet/802.11/Samba/gcc/html/Intel/mp4/aac/Bluetooth, etc etc.

      Any jokes that ceased to be relevant in the 90's?

  19. Instead..... by Dega704 · · Score: 2

    How about a Dennis Ritchie stamp? Or Douglas Engelbart? John E. Karlin maybe? They all recently died as well. Anyone? No? Nobody knows who they are because they spent their time actually inventing instead of whoring for attention and taking all the credit to satisfy their nacissism? Damn.

    1. Re:Instead..... by pcjunky · · Score: 1

      I am for this.

    2. Re:Instead..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need both - those pushing ideas into the world and inventors (and their many forgotten assistants)

      Maybe Alfred Vail should get a stamp for his Morse code contributions.

  20. Apple and Email by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

    The profitable first class mail business has been decimated by email over the past decade, thanks in no small part to the contributions of Steve Jobs and Apple

    Huh? What the hell did Apple do for e-mail (beyond what every OS/application developer has done)? "OMG, they make computers, therefore, all things done on computers are their responsibility!"

    --
    $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  21. Big Queues already by PsyMan · · Score: 1

    Plenty of fans out there who would queue up to lick the backside of those.

  22. Will the stamp have rounded corners? by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    Just asking...

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  23. What about Dennis Ritchie? by Punto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He died the same year, and was way more important than Steve Jobs.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    1. Re:What about Dennis Ritchie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dennis who? I don't think he could have been as revolutionary as steve, no one can.

    2. Re:What about Dennis Ritchie? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Revolutionary? Certainly not more revolting, in any case.

    3. Re:What about Dennis Ritchie? by Teun · · Score: 1

      Sorry but Wallstreet doesn't know him.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:What about Dennis Ritchie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the developers of C and UNIX isn't as revolutionary as a sociopath who uses everyone else's ideas and then expect worship for that?

      I think the only revolution needed here is that of a roundhouse kick to your face, to knock some sense into you, dipshit.

    5. Re:What about Dennis Ritchie? by Uberbah · · Score: 0

      What about Richie's best work being 40 years ago on two products? Whereas Jobs was influential in the 70's, 80's, 90's, 00's, across multiple fields, from the Apple II to Pixar to the iPhone.

  24. I wonder... by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

    if Apple will sue the USPS for copyright infringement? Cause we all know Steve created the first postage stamp and I'm sure Apple has a patent for it somewhere.

  25. But you have to pay twice as much for it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gold Plated turd syndrome ... could get the Post Ofice system out of its bankruptycy.

    Can even have the stamps be made by slave-wage laborers in China

  26. Meh by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

    So has Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse, amongst other cartoon characters.

  27. Welcome to your Steve Jobs iStamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (1) iStamp must be licked left-to-right;
    (1)(a) laterally licking a non-iStamp stamp is grounds for patent infringement;
    (2) any information derived from user (e.g. DNA) will NEVER be shared with third-parties (subject to exceptions below);
    (2)(a) exceptions include but are not limited to: response to law enforcement requests; business servicing (e.g. billing purposes); or as required in iStamp's sole discretion to protect the intellectual property rights of iStamp;
    (3) iStamp will only function when affixed to iEnvelope;
    (3)(a) note: iStamp 2.1+ requires iEnvelope2;
    (4) intrastate delivery requires enrollment in the iStamp development kit;
    (4)(a) iStamp development kit licensing fee is $99/year;
    (5) iStamp not available for sending donations to nonprofit organizations; and
    (6) iStamp will leave a very bad taste in your mouth.

  28. agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely agree - Jobs is the antithesis of a "good" business leader (or a "good" person for that matter).

    You might appreciate my "iStamp" comment below (above?).

  29. Lame by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    They're making a stamp for someone who pioneered devices used for smart marketing. Can't we give one to someone whose pioneering work in agriculture is being used to feed more people in impoverished nations? Clearly this is a popularity contest.

  30. Oh Steve Jobs... by Buck+Feta · · Score: 2

    Still pushing the envelope.

    --
    I am Audience.
    1. Re:Oh Steve Jobs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in life, somebody else will be pushing the envelope, while people trip over each other to give him credit for it.

  31. right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't know re-inventing the wheel multiple times and hyping good-looking, yet terrible 'innovations' means you're worthy of being on a stamp, but okay.

  32. Apple fanboys happy; haters happy too... by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Now they can lick the backside of Steve Jobs.

    Others can place him on the envelope skew; maybe tear an edge... then pound it with their fist just to "make sure it is attached."

  33. Why does it have to be Steve Jobs? by nathanpm · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have a Bill Gates stamp. This image is way better than whatever piece of crap photo Steve Jobs would get. http://www.neowin.net/forum/up...

  34. It doesn't stick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because you're licking it wrong.

  35. The guy was a thief and a prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't know which side to spit on.

  36. Screw Jobs Stamp, Hendrix IS The Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jimi Hendrix has my vote.

  37. Come off it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is getting ridiculous. The man didn't invent the internet or even really make the personal computer popular, both of which are far more responsible for the downfall of the USPS than what has been, for the vast majority of its existence, a niche hardware manufacturer. He's not the fucking messiah of the digital age that everyone is treating him as.

  38. Where do we line up to buy them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm assuming that I should be in line a couple of days early.

  39. iStamp by NoNsense · · Score: 1

    It will be coming out in 2015 so they can attempt to settle all the naming disputes this will cause.

    iStamp ... you should see the package it comes in!

    --
    So there.
  40. One of these things is not like the others... by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Carson? Big entertainer, loved by tens of millions for decades.

    Bergman, Presley, and Brown -- same thing.

    Then there's the odd man out. A man who bought out companies and technologies, refined and repackaged them, and made obscene amounts of money selling the resulting products.

    Why, precisely, are we celebrating Jobs? Despite the ravening and vocal fanbois, it's not like he was anywhere near as loved and famous as Carson, et. al. He was just a lucky business man, not an icon adored by millions.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Johnny Carson? Every one of his jokes was original? He mined Vaudeville humor and brought it to TV. He didn't even start the Tonight Show.

      Elvis Presley? All of his hits were written by others. Let's face it: He made his money and fame bringing black music to white people.

      James Brown? Definitely an original, whose life unfortunately went off the rails at some point.

      Ok, that's enough rant. Every one of those folks earned their place on a stamp. I just wanted to point out your double standard. It's easy to dismiss one person or another with cherry picked criteria.

      If you walked up to a random 20 or 30 something on the street today and asked them if they knew who Carson, Bergman, Presley, Brown or Jobs was, I imagine Steve would beat out most of them.

      I'm no Steve Jobs fanboy. (I've never owned an iPhone or iPod, and I'm posting this from a Linux box.) But even I can recognize the reality of the situation.

    2. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Millions of people didn't actively dislike Carson, Bergman, Presley and Brown, believing their work to be inferior, industry-damaging shit and their supporters horribly misguided and exploited.

      Jobs was a fast talking carpet bagger who did his level best to screw over the computer industry and dumb down the population in one vast campaign.

      Only fools fell for his shtick. Sadly, that's a lot of people, and I guess some of them work at the post office.

      Or more likely, somebody at the post office figures they might as well fleece that legion of idiots while they're all still gathered into one giant "Buy Now" market segment.

  41. Aggrandizing criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jobs was an abusive, egotistical, thieving scumbag who threatened his competitors with illegitimate patent litigation if they didn't participate in his scheme to fix employee salary.

    Unfortunately he died before he could be put in a prison cell, — he certainly doesn't belong on a postage stamp.

  42. Of course we should honor Jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only did he revolutionize the PC, but he also. . .

    Was the first to map the Human Brain,
    Made Linux possible,
    Invented solar panels,
    Invented insulin,
    And wrote, "Toy Story".

    He's a pioneer! Steve Jobs is like Batman!

    He's doubleplusgood!

  43. "Contribution to technological progress" by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    By that standard it should be a Steve Wozniak stamp.

  44. Man, at first I was angry about this, ah, but then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HE'S DEAD!!! Hahahahaha... Ahhh. The Narcissist missed his exaltation hahahahaaa. Oh, and, there was no way they could ever put his whole head in an image...... Hard enough for it to fit through a door.

  45. No, I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the work done by Ritchie is how a twerp like jobs got anywhere. texting? Ritchie.. IMing? Ritchie... Why weren't you throwing scads of cash to him?

  46. is there a contest...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just like Elvis, voting for Fat Steve or Skinny Steve?

  47. And... by echen1024 · · Score: 1

    Anyone who makes something similar will get sued.

  48. How about a Richard Stallman stamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you lick it, it will taste like toe jam!

  49. old or young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will we have a contest for the old steve jobs or the young one?

  50. To be expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt a picture of his arse for "fanbois", or whatever they're called, so they can lick and stick.

  51. mattallmill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFLMAO! That is easily the best comment I've read yet!