Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Experiences With Free To Air Satellite TV?

Dishwasha (125561) writes "Just a few days ago I incidentally discovered a little known secret called free-to-air. Amazingly enough even in the depths of Slashdot, there appear to have been no postings or discussions about it. Just like over-the-air programming, there is free programming available via various satellite systems that only requires a one-time cost of getting a dish and receiver. Both Amazon and Ebay appear to have a plethora of hardware out there. I personally settled on the Geosatpro MicroHD system with a 90cm 26lbs light-weight dish (queue lots of comments about my describing 26 lbs as being light-weight) and I should be receiving that in just a few days. I'm curious, who else is using satellite FTA? What are your setups? Has anyone hacked on any of the DVR/PVR devices available? Besides greater access to international programming, what are your channel experiences?"

219 comments

  1. Big Ugly Dishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    C and KU band is a big investment, and I think most places encrypt these transmissions now, so you might want to check around a little more to make absolutely sure you're going to get anything worthwhile.

    1. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by Change · · Score: 2

      C-band requires a large dish (10-12 feet in diameter), Ku is much smaller (around 3 feet).

    2. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by Dishwasha · · Score: 2

      I don't believe that is true. You typically want the dish diameter to be 20x the wavelength. A 90cm dish can receive 3.33Ghz signals and above which is right at the C-band frequency range.

    3. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe that is true. You typically want the dish diameter to be 20x the wavelength. A 90cm dish can receive 3.33Ghz signals and above which is right at the C-band frequency range.

      The problem is 2 degree satellite separation. I have had pretty decent success with C-Band ona 5' dish but you're better off going 8'+ for C-Band.

    4. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by man_ls · · Score: 2

      I think there's a power density component, too. C-Band signals are broadcast at a lot lower power than the enormously powerful signals put out by the providers which use 18" dishes.

    5. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have a C-band dish in the 90's. At the the time there was a lot of free-and-clear analog stuff out there before it became digitized/scrambled, but this was mostly direct news feeds (eg the stuff being sent to the TV stations from on-location) and various affiliate stations for FOX/ABC/NBC/CBS/CBC/CTV where instead of seeing the commercials you just saw the broadcast continue uninterrupted or a blank screen for the duration of the commercial break.

      The pizza dishes (which are mainly Ku-band) have no free-and-clear channels whatsoever because they can only be pointed at one location, the one associated with the broadcaster (eg Dish/DirectTV in the US or Shaw Direct(aka Starchoice) or BellTv(ExpressVu)) The key interesting detail is that if you want to watch US TV in Canada or Canadian TV in the US, you were far better off buying the receiver and using it with the local market's physical dish since those dishes work best for their geographic location. (Dishes for Alaska for example look like they are pointed straight at the ground.) Want great reception? Get a BUD (Big Ugly Dish) with both the C-band and Ku-band LNB's and route the Ku-band to the Dish/DirectTV/Shaw/Bell receiver and use the controls for the big dish to fine-tune the signal.

      Now, Europeans have an entirely different digital system than the North Americans do. This allows for for somewhat more free-and-clear digital broadcasts to be available in the DVB-T system using aftermarket receivers and not being locked in as you are in the US.

      Needless to say, there is -no- free-and-clear digital DVB-T in north american, and you can only receive it if you live in NYC and point your dish at the European birds. Likewise if you want to receive Japanese/Asia birds you need to live in Seattle, Vancouver, San Francisco or in the state of Hawaii, and even then you're lucky if you can get a lock on a good day. There aren't any free-and-clear digital broadcasts in North America that can be received with the Dish/DirectTV/ShawDirect/BellTV (which are DVB-S), so therefor there is little interest in it beyond some piracy aspects. There ARE some DVB-T/S broadcasts, but these can only be received with European or (counterfeit) Asian satellite gear running special firmware to emulate the STB.

    6. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      FreeSat in the UK uses DVB-S and DBV-S2 for some (most, possibly all?) HD channels. I believe the pay service from Sky uses the same system as it is possible for a free channel to broadcast to both from the same channel, they just need to transmit two sets of EPG data.

    7. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by schnell · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think people here (and throughout this thread) are conflating a few different things when they say "free TV." The following explanation is an oversimplification, but anyway...

      In the US, back in the '70s and '80s, there was "free" satellite TV. The reason that it was free, though, is that you weren't supposed to have it. Big TV networks, HBO, ESPN, all those guys used analog C-band satellite transmissions to distribute their content to local TV affiliates and early cable TV providers. People discovered that if you bought your own analog C-band dish (the big 6+ footers) you could tap into those transmissions and watch them for free, and a cottage industry sprung up around getting people hooked into this feed. Note that it wasn't like "pay" satellite TV today where you point your dish at one satellite that gives you all the channels you subscribe to - you actually had to point your dish at different satellites to get different content feeds.

      The content providers got upset about this and migrated to digital delivery, which could be encrypted. You could still buy de-scrambler gear for your home dish (not so legally) but for most people it was enough of a PITA that they just moved over to a paid cable TV service (whose reaches were growing in leaps and bounds then) or to one of the emerging paid satellite TV services, which sprang up to meet precisely this need. You still have DISH and DirecTV as the two main US paid satellite TV providers today, and they use higher frequencies than C-band (Ku or Ka) which enable those nice little .75m dishes you see everywhere today.

      Elsewhere in the world, "Free To Air" TV has always had much more content. In my very limited experience, it's either state-funded TV like the BBC, or it's some other party that buys transponder space on a satellite and says "Okay, here it is for whoever wants to watch it." When travelling internationally I occasionally see ads for FTA TV, but it always seems to be creepy Phillipine megachurches or Al Jazeera wannabes that just can't get their content distributed any other way. Your mileage, of course, may vary.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    8. Re:Big Ugly Dishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about gain and SNR. Because C-band transmissions tend to be wide area transmissions, rather than spot beams typically used by Ku band, the received signal strength per unit area is less. The gain per unit area of the dish is also less, but this is cancelled out by the decrease in loss per unit distance (the wavelength term). The result is that you need a bigger dish. You also need a bigger dish if you want to receive Ku band outside of it's intended area, called out-of-footprint reception. You also typically need a solid dish for Ku band, and definitely for Ka band (not much used yet), where-as you can get away with a mesh dish for C band.

      The bigger the dish, the more signal you will pull. You can't just add electrical gain because of the noise floor of the LNBF, antenna and because of CMB. Also with a bigger dish, the aiming requirements become tighter as the BWHM (beamwidth at half maximum) is reduced, so you need better targeting. This is one of the reasons hyperbolic two reflector dishes are preferred for large 20+m dishes; those birds move around a little, and with the very small beamwidth the signal would go in and out of view without aim corrections. By having a small secondary reflector, that can be moved quickly and accurately, those corrections can be made without moving the primary reflector.

  2. Its pretty good! by w-wright · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My Nana and Grandad goes on Holiday a lot in their Caravan, they used to use Sky Satellite in the Caravan which they found to be very expensive. However, my Grandad then switched over to using a simple freesat system which suits their needs. It recieves BBC, ITV etc which is what they want! I did see on ebay a Satellite Box running Linux (I think it was called Dream Box) and I heard you could load decryption keys onto it for the Sky Channels. However, that is illegal!

    1. Re:Its pretty good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or in other words, the poster forgot there are readers that are NOT in the US when posting, and there are commenters who didn't realise this guy was talking about the US. In the UK you call a dish installer, get a Freesat box and Elizabeth's your Queen. In the US? You bend over for the monopoly du jour and whatever they managed to lobby this time.

    2. Re:Its pretty good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except it is not free. Just to have that dish or that TV you have to pay a tax. We have no such tax requirements.

    3. Re:Its pretty good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rock on with the CCCAM servers ;-)

    4. Re:Its pretty good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For those of us NOT in the US, the freesat FTA service is pretty good. Channel linup etc is at http://www.freesat.co.uk/

    5. Re:Its pretty good! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      For definitions of 'have to' the equal 'should, if you feel like it, '.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Its pretty good! by JoeMerchant · · Score: 0

      Elizabeth's your Queen, and the bobbies drive TV detection vans around to make sure you're paying the appropriate TV taxes...

    7. Re:Its pretty good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It beats being expected to watch ads.

      Imagine that, there's no such thing as a free lunch. That doesn't mean some deals aren't better than others.

  3. FTA information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Google wants to be your friend!

  4. Is this the 90s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the bandwidth is available, there are a lot easier ways of getting free programming...

    1. Re:Is this the 90s? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Now that the bandwidth is available, there are a lot easier ways of getting free programming...

      But in general less free legal ways

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:Is this the 90s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, South Korea.

      .

  5. April First????? by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where's the flood of April First stories? Do I have the date wrong? Is the lack of them the joke? Am I not getting the jokes?

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:April First????? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Where's the flood of April First stories? Do I have the date wrong? Is the lack of them the joke? Am I not getting the jokes?

      Maybe that's the prank.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:April First????? by PIBM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In case that`s no prank; depending on where you live, the required operations to obtain the feed might be illegal. Where I live, there`s 3 months of summers where trees block a lot of the signal and rain just cut it, and 6 WINTER MONTHS (sorry had to vent about this weekend extra feet of snow) where the antenna won`t pickup anything because of the snow. So yeah, we didn`t use that much before just selling all of it back.

    3. Re:April First????? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      No the prank is beta. Jk, jk, it's not that bad.

    4. Re:April First????? by cusco · · Score: 1

      Well, Dice Holdings has never been known for its sense of humor (just look at Beta).

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:April First????? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Last year there were a zillion April 1st stories, and so much so there was backlash. They may be taking it easy this year.

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    6. Re:April First????? by Teun · · Score: 1

      Dyce is not into joking, as witnessed by this: http://beta.slashdot.org/ :)

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:April First????? by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      You do know that you can get heaters for satellite dishes that fix the snow issue? Try your favourite internet search engine.

      Note the issues with rain suggest that you needed a bigger dish. That might also apply to trees, though you could also try pruning the trees is possible.

    8. Re:April First????? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      OMG! Pwnies!

      Happy now?

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    9. Re:April First????? by Anrego · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Last year was terrible, with most of the stories being along the lines of "lulz, windows announces it's using windows kernel". I don't mind a clever joke, but most of it was just plain stupid.

      There was a lot of complaining about it, so I'm assuming they've decided to take it easy this year. Personally I'm grateful.

    10. Re:April First????? by Anrego · · Score: 1

      * using linux kernel

      .. sigh

    11. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, have an April Fool's article:

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

      The best are the ones that are almost believable. I've seen a lot crazier ideas from people who were serious.

    12. Re:April First????? by PIBM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Snow in trees was problematic too. It`s like permanent rain. I live in the middle of a forest and I even took the extra work of bringing electricity, cable and phone through ground entrances, so I wasn`t about to cut trees for my satellite, which I wasn`t using that much at my previous location. And heating trees wasn`t a part of the solution :)

      The gear came as a free goodie with a television purchase years before, with free to air access and 3 years of free subscription to a service. I`ve used the service a bit, but the FTA wasn`t worth investing in a bigger or better dish and I didn`t want a large ugly one somewhere either.

      Oh well, that was for me. At this time, I get all I want from my internet connection and rented blurays at 1$ a pop in those auto-dispensers.

    13. Re:April First????? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      I'm hoping this "audio stories" thing is the joke. I'm getting audio versions of the Slashdot stories. This wouldn't be too bad, but they auto-play. I don't want to come to Slashdot and have audio blast from my speakers! Luckily, I keep my volume muted at work unless I decide to put on some headphones. Still, auto-play is bad policy for all sites except ones where the person expects audio/video to play (e.g. YouTube or NetFlix).

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    14. Re:April First????? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      ObiWan, the need for entertainment is strong with this one.....

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    15. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs came to me and told me that beta is the future. Embrace beta.

    16. Re:April First????? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Where's the flood of April First stories? Do I have the date wrong? Is the lack of them the joke? Am I not getting the jokes?

      That is the prank.

    17. Re:April First????? by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I actually have fond memories of some good April fools jokes.

      A internet "radio" station I used to listen to had a great DJ who was known for being a little edgy but had a huge fan following. The day before April fools he went a bit further than usual, so that on April 1'st he could make a heartfelt statement about how he'd gone to far and after discussion with management it had been decided that he would be leaving. I _totally_ bought it (as did la tonne of other people). He played a song while the forums and IRC channel exploded.. then came on a few minutes later with "haha, I'm not going anywhere!". No one even suggested it might be a joke the whole time, he totally sold it... was brilliant.

      And the infamous pink ponies (before ponies were cool.. if only we'd known..).

      Pages and pages of onion-esq "SCO buys IBM" and "RMS buys a mac" is just tedious.

    18. Re:April First????? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Beta is hillarious, in an Andy Kaufman kind of way.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:April First????? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I am hoping you are right. Because otherwise it is a stupid idea.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    20. Re:April First????? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      It's funny. I first registered a ./ account back around 2001 to complain about the lame April Fool's Day stories. If they are taking it easy, it's about time.

      Rick

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    21. Re:April First????? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone with a modern install dont even need heaters. the new eastern arc is so steep on the dish that a coat of car wax will keep it snow and ice free even when I got 6 feet of snow overnight this past winter.

      99% of the people bitching about Sat TV are clueless people that haven't touched it on 3 decades.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wouldn't be too bad, but they auto-play. I don't want to come to Slashdot and have audio blast from my speakers!

      Yeah now you know why I have been using NoScript all these years.

      But it's okay. You can go on being another helpless sheep, at the mercy of every last web site you visit, if you want to. No control at all just like TV!

    23. Re:April First????? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      No, unfortunately, it seems about 2-3 years ago, for some unknown reason, they did away with all the April Fools stories.

      I dunno why..I used to LOVE to see what would come up each year.

      Sadly, slashdot lost its sense of humor for some reason.

      OMG Ponies, R.I.P.

      :(

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like it much better this way. It's one thing to slip in the occasional joke, quite another to spend the entire day posting one lame joke after another, each more obvious/not-funny than the next. Leave the comedy to the professional comedians, please.

    25. Re:April First????? by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      One good April Fools Day joke = funny
      Thirty lame-as-fuck April Fools Day jokes = annoying

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    26. Re:April First????? by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      It iss probably because of the story about Mel Brooks finally getting around to mAking history of the world part two.

      A lot of people were pissed to find it was a prank.

    27. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only get jokes if you switch permanently to beta.

    28. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us hated it. Good riddance.

    29. Re:April First????? by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Which means it`s perfectly aligned toward the trees! YAY!

    30. Re:April First????? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The dish yes. the focal point in the sky it's aimed at? no it is much higher in the sky than the western birds. You do understand that Dishes dont point at what they a re receiving anymore right? they do a 60 to 90 degree bounce to the feedhorn so they are easier to mount and dont have anything in the way of the dish.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    31. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, if the joke were nearly as bad as beta, it'd be taking things a bit too far.

    32. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're over at SoylentNews (which for today is BaconNews), along with most of the community that used to come here.

    33. Re:April First????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pipedot too. It's all comic sans with heavy pink and purple coloring.

      Slashdot is too much of a business to have any fun.

    34. Re:April First????? by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Actually, last I looked at it it was in 2009, and the only reason they would provide me for the paid service shortcomings were the numerous trees in the path of the signal, which at that point were covered in snow much higher than the pointing direction. I would say that in the ground direction it was pointing to, the trees were at most 15 feet in the horizontal direction and 25 feet higher than the antenna installation.

  6. Are you in the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Then there's no allot you can watch, everything is encrypted. Dish Network was popular with these systems, you could run software on the FTA receiver and pirate the signal. That's gone, so unless you live in a country with UN-encrypted programming it's a waste of money. You can use these systems, but the dish would need to be motorized. It's just not worth the money, there is no free TV in the USA anymore (Beyond an antenna).

    1. Re:Are you in the USA? by rgbscan · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of random free stuff out there. This list is pretty up to date usually. You'll need something motorized though...

      http://www.lyngsat.com/freetv/United-States.html

    2. Re:Are you in the USA? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

      Agreed, there's no free tv in the us anymore (beyond the two a dozen free OTA HD channels, including all major networks).

    3. Re:Are you in the USA? by DewDude · · Score: 1

      That list constantly shows satellites you cannot get in the US. I see European birds showing up, last I knew you couldn't get any of the birds on the other side of the prime meridian very well, if at all. I mean, from DC the birds at .8 W come in at an elevation of 1.8 degrees. At that point you'd need something bigger than a 1m dish to even get the signal. I also have to question the inclusion of OTA channels in that list; as they have pretty tight distribution per FCC rules.

    4. Re:Are you in the USA? by Megane · · Score: 2

      Motorized? Not really, look up toroidal antennas. You can hang up to 16 LNBs off of those babies to cover 40 degrees of sky.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Are you in the USA? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes there is a Lot you can watch, I get all the soccer I want from south america, and there are tons of other things if you actually install a proper setup with a moveable dish. No there is no NBC/ABC/CBS/FOX except for a few here and there as uplinks and feeds. a LOT of PBS, NASA, and other channels. A couple of birds are full of shopping and jesus-freak channels.

      Works great, and if you get a clear shot eastward on a clear night , you can pull in a lot of stuff from europe.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Are you in the USA? by CityZen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lyngsat is the best place I have seen to get information about what programming is available. However, its organization takes some getting used to.

      The page linked above shows the programming that originates from the US but is broadcast around the world. Similar pages can be used to find programming originating from other countries. However, you need to understand what satellites are viewable from your location.

      Other pages are those that show what's available from satellites you can see, such as: http://www.lyngsat.com/america...
      This page shows the satellites that broadcast to the US, ranging from 61.5 W way over toward the east to 139 W way over toward the west. If you are located on the east coast, you may have trouble receiving 139 W unless you have a clear line of site toward the west and a perhaps larger-than-typical dish. Similarly, if you are located on the west coast, you may have trouble receiving 61.5 W. Satellites that are more directly overhead your particular longitude will typically be easier to receive. You can find your own longitude very easily by googling your zip code plus "longitude".

      Once you're looking at a particular satellite, say Galaxy 19: http://www.lyngsat.com/Galaxy-...
      then you need to understand the information that's presented. The first table lists frequencies in the ~4000 range, which corresponds to C-band. To receive these, you need a "BUD" (big ugly dish) of size 6-12 feet (2-4m). The next table lists frequencies in the ~12000 range, which corresponds to Ku-band. These can be received with a 30" (0.75m) dish.

      The next columns to pay attention to are the provider name and the system encryption. Look for the "F" icon in the encryption column, indicating that the channel is FTA. Also confirm that the first entry for the transponder in question shows "DVB-S" (or "DVB-S2") and that this is compatible with the receiver you have. The first entry provides info about the multiplexed stream, whereas the subsequent entries provide info about each individual channel within the stream. A decent receiver will be able to figure out all these details itself, but older hardware requires programming in some details.

      There's really a couple of ways to use FTA. One is to just set up a system locked to a given satellite and stick with a channel or small set of channels that are stable. The other way is to hop around different satellites and see what's available, since programming does change over time. For this, it's important that your receiver has "blind search" capability (which should be pretty common by now, but you should verify). Having the ability to program the channels easily with a computer program is another nice feature that many receivers offer. This can be a lot better than fiddling with the remote and endless menu layers. And, of course, a motorized dish mount makes it easier to change satellites.

      A final word before you embark on this: Lots of these channels have online viewing options, which can be much less frustrating to view (or they can offer a different type of frustration). At least you won't have to fiddle outside with dish alignment on a rainy day to peak the signal. You can instead learn about proxies from the comfort of your desktop.

    7. Re:Are you in the USA? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Back in the late 70s my grandfather got a big satellite dish for his home in the mountains (US), where normal broadcast TV reception was very bad. A 6 foot dish though, with a motor. But it picked up a lot of major channels for free because they didn't encrypt them. Ie, HBO. And this was the time when cable outside of major cities was still rare.

      I think for a long time many stations would just not bother to encrypt when transmitting between stations (ie, a microwave link from San Francisco to San Jose) because they assumed that the equipment to intercept was very expensive and it wasn't worth the effort to encrypt.

    8. Re:Are you in the USA? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Had the same thing when I was a kid. 10' dish, receiver with analog meters. The whole setup was several grand if I remember right. I remember one week where I could switch between west and east coast feeds of a couple premium channels and watch Holy Grail and Delta Force back to back continuously. I think it was HBO and Cinemax. HBOw, CINw, HBOe, CINe, goto 10.

      Crazy thing there was cable on the street behind us. The neighborhood all kicked in and paid to have the line extended. When my family found out, they asked if they could buy in and have cable run along the utility poles that ran thru our property to deliver electricity to their street. Offered to pay each house part of their cost then pay the full cost of running it on our poles. The assholes voted and said "no".

      When encryption caught on, the dish was pretty much ignored. After I went to college, the cable company finally wired our street at no cost to us. (Other than the monthly subscription, of course.)

  7. Looking at the North American list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I recognize them as the channels I skip over on cable.

  8. FTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA in the USA anyways typically means pirated. Pretty much all that's up there on true FTA is religious or ethnic programming. You can find some in the clear wild feeds from time to time, there's even a website for finding them, google FTA wild feeds, and the first link will help you out.

    You do need some decently expensive gear though. Something that'll do DVB-S2, 4:2:2, sometimes even one with a CAM slot if you decide to subscribe, etc. The Ku band has a bunch of stuff, but the more fun stuff to find is still on C band, meaning 6-8 foot dish. (Ku is still a 3.5 foot dish)

  9. Helpful Website by Huntr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try Satellite Guys. There are a bunch of ppl there who are way into satellite tv stuff and who are eager to help.

    1. Re:Helpful Website by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      Great link. Several past google searches rendered forum posts from that site.

    2. Re:Helpful Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WELL, yes, BUT you have to be careful what you say there. The moderators are REALLY anal about certain things and they will ban you with very little provocation.

      Some things that could get you banned, depending on the mood of the moderator:

      * Talking about receivers that can illegally pirate signals, even if you had no idea the receiver could be used in that way (eBay ads aren't usually forthcoming with that information). I'm all for keeping it free of talk of piracy but sometimes users just don't know when a receiver sold on eBay is really intended for piracy, so they walk into this minefield.

      * Saying anything negative about a dealer of satellite equipment (if you are a dealer you can be a total asshole on that board, but if you are not a dealer and a dealer insults you, best not respond or you'll get banned). Note I do not mean sponsors of the site - I don't even think they have those anymore - just any dealer of non-piracy satellite equipment. If you sell equipment that can pirate signals, you'll be banned too.

      * Disagreeing with a moderator.

      Some people enjoy that environment, just as some people seem to enjoy living in those gated communities where someone comes around and fines you if your grass is too high. Personally, I tend to value freedom a bit more than that, so while I may occasionally read that forum I no longer post there.

      Here are a couple of other forums that I think are actually better in many ways:

      Ricks Satellite Wildfeed & Backhaul Forum
      http://rickcaylor.websitetoolbox.com/
      (there should be a comma after "Satellite" - it's not just about wildfeeds and backhauls)

      FridgeFTA True FTA forums:
      http://www.fridgefta.info/forums/

      Digital Home - Free to Air Satellite Television (Canadian forum)
      http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/forumdisplay.php?s=b3c8f6e1c7fbfe405a3f5f9489db9232&f=57

      LegitFTA (requires registration even to read threads)
      http://www.legitfta.com/forum/index.php

      LEGALFREETOAIR.COM (requires registration even to read threads)
      http://legalfreetoair.com/

      As far as I know, none of those are "pirate" boards, though I haven't really spent any time on the last two (I hate having to log in just to read posts so usually I don't even bother) so if they have any dodgy areas, I'm not aware of them - their names would imply they don't.

      All this said, FTA satellite is not something you should get into lightly. The best "free" stations are on C-band (for which you really need a dish of 6 feet or larger, with at least 7.5 feet being optimum) and there really aren't that many of them. If you get good reception of all the major networks with a TV antenna then having a satellite dish may not add much value. But if you live in a rural area, or an area with crappy local affiliates (don't get me started) then a big dish will add value for you, but keep in mind that you need to have a receiver, dish, dish positioner, etc. and all the little incidentals (RG-6 wire, maybe a controller box for the positioner) AND you will need to learn how to set up a dish to track the satellite arc correctly. Plus many cities, and virtually all HOA's (if you were stupid enough to buy into one of those) simply will not allow you to put up a big dish. And as with all satellite dishes, you need clear line of sight to the satellites you want to receive. Everybody loves trees, except satellite dish owners - then you pray a violent windstorm will pass through the yard of your neighbor to the south, and knock down HIS trees! :)

  10. You were living under what stone? by Teun · · Score: 5, Informative
    I haven't played with North American satellite for years so I can only comment on the European situation.

    Over here there is an absolute plethora of FTA satellite channels.

    Many, if not most, are junk. Porn previews and selling crappy stuff.
    But there are still many dozens quality channels like the BBC and the various German stations.BR> Just about every country has one or more FTA channels and as most people (outside of France and the UK) speak or at least understand several languages there is for people like me sufficient on offer.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:You were living under what stone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is country dependent. For example, several Carribean islands have no agreement in place to allow satellites to broadcast. As such, in some of those locales it is legal to decode and receive any programming flowing from the satellites. The encoding vs. decoding is always a bit of an arms race, but it certainly changes the options for "free" and associated quality.

  11. Old news, but new to Slashdot? by podmf · · Score: 2

    Free to air statellite has been big in Europe since the 1980s, and digital (DVD-S) since the 1990s.

    Hacked Linux-based receivers have pretty much dominated the European DVB-S market for the last decade, and especialy in FTA.

    It's a shame that it has had little attention from Slashdot and other mainstream open source media over the years, because that has left the field free for some pretty unsavoury people in the TV encryption cracking market.

    I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that cracked satellite receivers were up there with cracked routers as a major source of Linux malware.

    1. Re:Old news, but new to Slashdot? by Anrego · · Score: 2

      <old man voice activated>

      The satellite cracking scene was actually a frequent topic here back around ~2000, back when DirectTV and others went on the war path.

      There was also a story on Christopher Tarnovsky more recently, and actually one of the more interesting things to come out of wired (http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/05/31/0013220/satellite-tv-hacker-tells-his-story .. unfortunately the link to the wired article is 404, in case someone actually wanted to RTFA).

    2. Re:Old news, but new to Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://web.archive.org/web/20130316063309/http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/05/tarnovsky?currentPage=all

      That link works

  12. Enjoy the endless hours of UniVision! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They way I see it, the issue with FTA is the fact that you have to put up with a motorized dish and endure the wait for this dish to move around and lock onto whichever satellite you are looking for, or you need to fill your yard with several dishes and it gets more complex and expensive (Head End in the Yard). If you live in many places, you can't fill your yard with those larger dishes.

    Besides, there is pretty good HD quality 8VSB content available OTA from local TV stations thanks to the digital TV conversion.

    If you want to nerd on something, it's far cheaper to get a nice Winegard HD8200U antenna and a HDHomeRun tuner, unless you live out in the middle of nowhere.
    You can also experiment with amplifying the signal off the antenna. The problem is you raise the noise floor along with the signal (lowering the effective SNR), so it is sometimes required to pad down the input a little depending on where you put the amplifier.

    1. Re:Enjoy the endless hours of UniVision! by Megane · · Score: 1

      you have to put up with a motorized dish, or you need to fill your yard with several dishes

      Look, ma, no motor!

      Anyhow, ATSC OTA is plenty enough for me. Good thing I'm not a sports fan.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Enjoy the endless hours of UniVision! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with a torodial dish you do not need a motor.
      http://www.tvfreak.cz/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=17837&d=1336654512

  13. cm and lbs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    uh.. someone put centimeters and pounds in the same sentence? Author should put either centimeters and kilograms instead.

    90 centimeters = 35.4 inches.

    queue = to arrange (a number of programs) in a predetermined order for accessing by a computer

    1. Re:cm and lbs? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Ah, welcome to the US, where we have 2 liter and half-gallon bottles next to each other on the grocery shelves. In engineering school, I had to learn about units called "slugs". I hate slugs.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:cm and lbs? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      It's the same thing in Canada. Even flyers have mixed units. I saw a tile cutter on sale at Canadian Tire, which had the following specifications: can cut tiles up to 12" wide, 12 mm thick.

    3. Re:cm and lbs? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      We have that with tire measurements - 205/45R17 is a 205mm wide tire with a 0.45*205=92 mm sidewall, made for a 17 INCH rim.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  14. It does work by SlickNic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up with this as my only source of TV in the 80s and 90s (we were too far from town and lived in the mountains to use local over the air tv). We had an 8' dish though and it must have weighed well in excess of 26lbs so yes your dish is quite light. We never seemed to have issues finding channels with something to watch and were able to pickup news, cartoons (very important), shows, and movies. The main issue was that the channels had to be scanned manually then. There were two sets of numbers, the first number if I remember correctly would physically rotate the dish outside then the second number would scan the channel options available available at that dish angle. This took a lot of time and ended up with us writing down the common locations for shows that we wanted to watch. Today I would hope there is an auto-scan feature that would allow you to just scan the channels to see what you're able to receive and store those. Unfortunately I haven't used this system in more than 10 years so I'm not very knowledgeable on what the system is like to use today. Hopefully something in my post was useful to you or someone else reading through.

    --
    Saying "all faiths are equivalent" is akin to saying "all drugs are the same".
    1. Re:It does work by DewDude · · Score: 1

      You're not describing a free-to-air service; you're describing the old TVRO system that existed in the 80s and 90s, before DTH satellite and digital killed the BUD business. These weren't free, you had to pay for them. There's a BIG difference between FTA sat channels and pay sat channels.

    2. Re:It does work by Megane · · Score: 1

      I dunno, it sounds more like C-band to me. At one time the joke was that the C-band dish was the state flower of Oklahoma.

      But from what I've been able to tell, what really killed off FTA satellite was that digital made it so easy to encrypt content. The size of C-band dishes at 2-3 meters didn't help much either, which is why pay satellite went with the Ku/Ka bands that only need a half-meter dish.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:It does work by LoRdTAW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a friend whose family had a house in the mountains. They had TVRO and a BUD, I think there were two boxes one was some kind of amplifier or power injector and the other was the actual tuner.

      Every so often they had to have the dish realigned to the satellites or something like that. They would pay a satellite technician something like one hundred dollars to come in and perform the alignment. He would actually chase everyone out of the room to perform his magical feat of calibration. My friend hid a video camera to see what the guy was doing (back then it was a tough ordeal as they used VHS tapes and were enormous). Turns out they guy simply went into a menu and punched in some numbers that were available in the monthly guide. My friends father ripped the guy a new asshole after he found out he was taken for a ride.

      The fun part about BUD TV was you could receive uplinks from reporters/camera crews in the field. So you see a reporter standing there playing with his tie, conversing, picking his nose etc. Then suddenly he would stiffen up and a few seconds later make his report, go silent, ask if he was finished and then walk off camera. The feed would either continue for some time or go blank.

    4. Re:It does work by SlickNic · · Score: 1

      The fun part about BUD TV was you could receive uplinks from reporters/camera crews in the field. So you see a reporter standing there playing with his tie, conversing, picking his nose etc. Then suddenly he would stiffen up and a few seconds later make his report, go silent, ask if he was finished and then walk off camera. The feed would either continue for some time or go blank.

      Yes, I remember this happening. Usually it was super boring though since they generally just stood there and looked at the camera.

      --
      Saying "all faiths are equivalent" is akin to saying "all drugs are the same".
    5. Re:It does work by DewDude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see...for a period of time the BUD's supported both C-Band and the Ku/Ka band systems. You generally saw more "classic" providers using C-Band becuase they had long term agreements for those transponders. The ability to encrypt didn't kill FTA; they've *always* had scrambling systems and had gotten quite good at them. Going digital did allow them the extra security, but it also allowed them to cram more channels in to a single transponder. You have to remember that in order to get an analog video source to even work on satellites, they had to go wideband-FM and use a LOT of bandwidth; I believe around 20mhz or something per transponder vs the 6mhz we get for terrestrial NTSC. But, due to the extremely low SNR involved (C-Band sats only pumped out a whopping 5 watts per transponder), it was required. Digital changed things; they didn't need to go overkill on bandwidth to carry a clear analog signal; and they could cram more feeds in an already expensive transponder lease. What really killed FTA is capitalism and greed. Think about this; US cable providers have to *pay* the channel to carry them on the system even though they're already funded by advertising. DTH (directv/dish) systems went with the small dishes because the Ku band sats allowed them to get enough gain with a smaller dish; which was more attractive to customers. Also, I believe the actual joke was the BUD was the state flower of West Virginia.

    6. Re:It does work by DewDude · · Score: 1

      The thing about BUD back then with TVRO is there were countless configurations of hardware. You generally needed three or four things; first you needed a motor controller that would aim the dish for you; then you needed a descrambler to descramble channels you had paid for; depending on the generation of your hardware, you may have needed a power injector to send the voltages to the LNB to trigger horizontal/vertical switching for C-Band or the circular polarizations for Ku. I don't remember how that all hooked up; my uncle upgraded in the early 90s and had a brand new single unit IRD that integrated motor control, power injection, and the latest descrambler in to one box. As far as the feeds, those were quite popular...and my uncle used to get not only master network feeds (which generally had a black screen during commercials) as well as the occasional uplink feed. Yes, it was possible to watch Letterman at 5pm when it was uplinked to the west coast...if it wasn't scrambled. Whenever I went down on vacation, my uncle would record about 3 hours of Simpsons a day since they were uplinked at around 4am from the west coast for the syndicated airings. It was interesting watching them without commercials and the lovely color bars with episode info other technical details. What people don't realize is the cost of transponder time is outrageous; back in the 90s I think it was around $145,000/month for a full-time lease on a C-Band transponder. A friend of mine that used to work in TV said the cost of the guys out in the field was anywhere from $500 for a 5 minute window to sometimes an inflated $5,000 for a 5 minute window. That's largely because remote broadcasts tend to take the entire transponder, it has to be downlinked and muxed on the ground from a single source...i.e...two people running digital can't point at the bird and send two digital streams at once...unless they're premuxed on the ground.

    7. Re:It does work by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. It certainly was a pretty cool thing to see. I tried to convince my father to get a BUD but he would never pay for TV, not even cable.

  15. us fta worth it? by claytron5000 · · Score: 1

    I'm always intrigued by free over-the-air broadcasting. If I didn't live in a valley 50 miles from the closest broadcaster I would definitely have a TV antenna. No cable for me! That said, I looked at the list of US FTA broadcasters and they don't look that great to me. Maybe I'd check out eh Pentagon Channel a couple times.

    1. Re:us fta worth it? by garrettg84 · · Score: 1

      Free to air is satellite TV. You may still be able to get it if you've got a view of the southern sky if you are in the northern hemisphere, north if you are in the southern hemisphere. Free to air is not the same a terrestrial TV.

      --
      -g
    2. Re:us fta worth it? by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an opportunity to install an antenna tower!

  16. UK perspective by Sockatume · · Score: 2

    Interestingly (perhaps) the UK has a lot of free-to-air content, and satellite in particular is popular because lots of people have mini-dishes on their houses from their own or a previous Sky TV installation. Freesat doesn't get as much coverage as Freeview but you can still walk into your local electronics retailer and find a big-brand satellite PVR next to the other TV hardware.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:UK perspective by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The USA in contrast does seem strangely backwards in a lot of ways with regards to TV & Radio broadcasting.

    2. Re:UK perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright laws, corporate lobbying, and an absurd belief that anything free is the same as communism.

      America doesn't believe you should be able to get something for free, and the lobbyists have convinced government that it's a good idea.

    3. Re:UK perspective by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the US doesn't have any kind of TV licence fee for receiving broadcasts. Terrestrial OTA broadcasts are free but relatively limited in channel selection. I receive broadcasts from LA and can receive perhaps 20 stations. Satellites are more expensive than terrestrial towers though (and provide a much, much larger range of programming), so it makes sense to me that they would have associated subscription costs.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    4. Re:UK perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, we specifically avoid the whole "government pushing programming" thing. Very backwards. I know, the Beeb is very independent, and what not, and will, of course, continue to be that way. However, It's a good thing to not have government control of the mass media.

    5. Re:UK perspective by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Most of the free-to-air satellite channels don't receive licence fee funding. A few are non-profits running on ad revenue and the rest are fully commercial; even Sky, that expensive subscription service that got half the country to install satellite dishes, has free-to-air stations.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  17. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Satelliteguys.us forums are hands-down one of the best sources of information and experience on the net when it comes to FTA.

  18. Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by bigpat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The satellite providers should provide some free basic tv with no monthly fees and just charge the full cost of equipment or allow people to use their own equipment and then make the additional revenue on the advertising side. Other paid cable channels could be an up sell with monthly subscriptions or pay per view. If the satellite providers presented a sufficiently attractive mix of advertising supported channels for cord cutters, then it would be a no brainer for people just to add satellite to their household mix of entertainment options for a couple hundred bucks worth of equipment. The number of viewers would go up by many millions. It really would be an opportunity for a win for the public and a big win for the satellite companies.

    A better selection of free over the air advertising supported broadcasts are something that is really missing from the current market.

    1. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by gurps_npc · · Score: 2

      That is a good idea - especially if they include access to pay per view. A lot of people can't afford $100/month but can afford $10 for a special occasion.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Megane · · Score: 1

      I think one reason they don't is because it's not trivial to set up a dish properly, there is some math involved. The average /. reader could do it, but not the average Wal-Mart customer. Nothing like pissing off thousands of "free" customers because they can't their equipment to work and they want a refund for the stuff they bought used at a flea market somewhere. In fact, they don't even want you opening up a new account with used equipment, to discourage theft of equipment from actual paying customers.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The satellite providers should provide some free basic tv with no monthly fees and just charge the full cost of equipment or allow people to use their own equipment and then make the additional revenue on the advertising side. Other paid cable channels could be an up sell with monthly subscriptions or pay per view. If the satellite providers presented a sufficiently attractive mix of advertising supported channels for cord cutters, then it would be a no brainer for people just to add satellite to their household mix of entertainment options for a couple hundred bucks worth of equipment. The number of viewers would go up by many millions. It really would be an opportunity for a win for the public and a big win for the satellite companies.

      A better selection of free over the air advertising supported broadcasts are something that is really missing from the current market.

      Nah. Fuck that. We would much rather sit around and watch net neutrality get destroyed because cheap fuckers refuse to pay more than $8/month for entertainment via Netflix (a.k.a. the internet backbone).

    4. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by kcitren · · Score: 1

      there is some math involved.

      Behind the scenes, yes, but in reality, no. To set up a dish, you get yourself a compass (most smartphones have this built in) and a protractor. Then go to a site like http://www.satsig.net/maps/sat... or your providers site, put in your zip code and point. Turn the TV where you can see or hear it, and start moving it around til the signal comes in clear.

    5. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by egarland · · Score: 1

      I've long thought the government should buy out/launch their own free-to-use satellite tv service and treat broadcasting on it like OTA broadcasts. Disallow any two channels to be owned by the same company and poof: the era of crappy tv funded by annoying commercials returns.

      --
      set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
    6. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by bigpat · · Score: 1

      The issues you have raised all seem pretty minor and manageable compared with the upside of the satellite companies having access to another 50 to 70 million households for advertising or for selling additional products and services.

      Honestly these issues sound like trivial or even silly concerns. Pointing a dish is no different than pointing an antenna and somehow millions of people over a couple of generations of people managed to work that out and get OTA TV broadcasts. Dishes for existing paying customers get misaligned by strong winds from time to time and people have to either align them themselves or get someone in to do it, so it is really not anything different than now. And if they aren't paying customers then they simply wouldn't get customer service, just like people don't get in-home service from other broadcast tv stations. But if they wanted to become paying customers, then sure the company would have to do some quality control checks and have a list of supported equipment versus not supported. And I don't see the stolen equipment being much of an issue when most equipment prices I see are under $100 and most people mount the dishes up higher where they are harder to reach. I don't think Disney worries about whether the DVD player their DVD is playing on has been stolen or not. They are just concerned with getting paid for the DVD.

    7. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "I think one reason they don't is because it's not trivial to set up a dish properly, there is some math involved. "

      No math involved, and in fact if you actually do a little bit of research plus reading first and have a $19.00 tool you can zero in a dish in 15 minutes. All without a calculator.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, you just enter your zip code in the setup menu and it gives you alt and azimuth. It could take some fiddling back in the '90s to get close enough that the signal meter would help you, but the newer hardware is much less touchy. Meanwhile, back then it was all self-install only. These days it's easy to find someone who can do it for you.

    9. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by bigpat · · Score: 1

      Yes I think the pay per view would be pretty key for the satellite company to make money also. I could see the pay per view rental model itself being an interesting stand alone business model. But I think you have to throw in some advertising supported channels for it to make sense from a customer standpoint of plunking down a couple hundred bucks for equipment and maybe more for an install.

      But if literally almost every household and bar in the country had satellite hooked up because the only cost was an upfront $200 in equipment that you could install yourself or hire someone to install, then that means over a hundred million households plus some number of businesses that might be willing to plop down $10 or $20 on any given month on top of all the additional advertising revenue from a larger viewing audience.

      And if it is rolled out incrementally with a good selection of a few mass market oriented channels along with some niche channels, then I don't see it undercutting the existing core business nearly as much as it adds to it to have new dishes pointing up with customers having an opportunity to become paying customers with a few clicks or a phone call.

      Sure, there might be some people who just go for the free option over paying $20 per month, but they were probably likely to just go with Internet streaming anyway if that is the case. Anyway, I think whichever company can make this work with the right mix of channels, pay per view and add-on services, and a good roll out, then they are going to be a big winner and it will really benefit consumers also.

    10. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case the government isn't necessary except to regulate the spectrum. I think the market can drive this and only if one of the companies becomes too dominant should antitrust step in and impose competition.

    11. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days Dishnetwork even sells a portable "tailgate" dish, so obviously they don't think it is that hard to point a dish to someplace in the sky.

    12. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by nomad63 · · Score: 1

      As a former employee of one of the Satellite Broadcasting companies, I know how costly to put one channel onto the airwaves and in no way they can recoup their money from advertising or equipment costs. The only thing they can do is to change the device requirements every couple of years and upcharge you for those cheap Chinese plastic things, which will drive the customers away.

      I am not even going to go into opening the doors for legality of stealing signal with the argument "if it is free to receive from the air, I can do anything with it" stupidity.

      So, it is a no starter...

      --

      __________
      The more I know people, the more I love animals
    13. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is incredibly easy to set one up.
      Grab the dish and move it around in the sky until it beeps, then fine tune until you get a full lock.

      Some sats will even tell you which one you are on just in case you happen to lock onto the wrong one.

    14. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by swb · · Score: 1

      Why not a motorized dish that will automatically scan the sky and find the satellite(s) you're looking for? Maybe this is overkill for programming on one satellite, but the FTA listing in wikipedia shows them appearing on multiple satellites meaning if you cared about content on multiple satellites you'd be re-aiming anyway.

    15. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, GEO satellites are all in one orbit, so you only need one motorized axis to scan them. The difficult part, then, is establishing the other two rotational axes such that traversing one motor actually scans all of them, rather than being high/low for all, or being high to the west, low to the east, and correct for satellites at your longitude. You could add a second motor, and be able to sweep the whole area, but it's cheaper to pay somebody competent to align the mount (once) than to include an additional motorized axis (also once).

    16. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by bigpat · · Score: 1

      It appears that there are quite a few free satellite channels and the number of choices has been growing. So, if Montana PBS can afford to broadcast from a satellite, then I don't think the limiting factor is cost.

      The question isn't whether it is economical to support a satellite tv channel with just advertising. I think the answer to that is yes it is possible. The question is about quality and profitability, since most of the free satellite tv channels seem to be less profitable and carry more niche programming than the cable and big network providers who seem to be quite happy to be making money on both advertising and on subscription costs... with some premium channels like HBO making money on top of that even with subscription costs in addition to the cable subscription.

      So I think there is a valid question about having a big enough mass market to support some free channels and it still being profitable enough to make sense, but the evidence is there that it is financially within the range of some pretty niche individual channels to broadcast individual channels over satellite.

      But what I am talking about is being able to point at one satellite with one dish and get 5, 10, 20, 30 HD and other channels of which some of those will attract enough interest to put a satellite dish on every home in America and point it at that satellite. I don't think it would be a loss leader, but it would itself be a profitable business.

    17. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The satellite providers should provide some free basic tv with no monthly fees and just charge the full cost of equipment or allow people to use their own equipment and then make the additional revenue on the advertising side. Other paid cable channels could be an up sell with monthly subscriptions or pay per view. If the satellite providers presented a sufficiently attractive mix of advertising supported channels for cord cutters, then it would be a no brainer for people just to add satellite to their household mix of entertainment options for a couple hundred bucks worth of equipment. The number of viewers would go up by many millions. It really would be an opportunity for a win for the public and a big win for the satellite companies.

      A better selection of free over the air advertising supported broadcasts are something that is really missing from the current market.

      My cable box is hot enough to make me think they're bitcoin mining on those damn things as it is. Even when "off"

    18. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      not even that. I live not many miles from the Prime meridian, and to align my satellite dish (done it several times, most notably after I had to replace it after my south wall fell off the back of the house), all I did was point the thing South and elevate it about 20 degrees. 65% average signal strength on the Astra constellation - enough to actually decode - a full channel list on my 5K receiver (Fortec Star 4400). I'm pretty sure if I used a satfinder I'd get better than 90% signal strength, but that doesn't bother me too much if I can pull enough signal to lift it above the noise floor and decode it, I'm golden. :)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    19. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

      I have only ever set up DirecTV, but it was indeed trivial. there is a level built in to the top, you just make sure its level, set the angle using the built in protractor next to the adjustment bolt to whatever the website ( http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/... )says to for your zip code, then swing slowly in a circle till the TV works. Not rocket science. What math did you believe was involved?

      Remember when it first started they mailed all the shit to you and you HAD to set it up yourself. Somehow all the hicks in the boonies managed to get it done.

    20. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by kesuki · · Score: 1

      this will never happen. directv was the company that found out people were hacking their hardware to get everything and sent updates to fry the chips inside countless dishes because they were only paying for a small package and getting everything else including ppv for free.

    21. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by bigpat · · Score: 1

      I am not suggesting that people hack their way to free premium content. I am suggesting that the advertising model could provide valuable content to viewers in order to entice them to connect their tvs to a satellite dish and still be a profitable part of the business and that for the satellite companies they would be in the living rooms of millions more households so they would have greater opportunities to sell additional content and services in addition to making money off the advertising. Heck try it with 5 channels like USA network, TNT, TBS or whichever ones might fit under the advertising revenue only model. It is a model that used to work for the big broadcasting networks, so there is no reason to think it won't work again for broadcast.

    22. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If motorised (or even better electronically steerable) satellite antennas were cheap and reliable, providers would quit using geosynchronous satellites, and use LEO/MEO meshes, due to the much lower launch cost, and the much lower transmit power required for the shorter distances.

      Actually I believe this is inevitable, ESA can't stay super-secret-military tech forever, and ESAs have several other advantages like mounting flat on the roof of a house or car. My idea is that you have a mesh of low orbit spacecraft, time-shared by regional broadcasters, so that each craft transmits the signal intended for the area under it, and when it passes over, the next craft in the mesh picks up the service, as it goes on to transmit a different service for the next area. Meridian satphones work this way.

    23. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing cable box hacking with DSS hacking. In the old days you needed basic cable and a friendship with a cable guy. With DSS, there's nothing stopping the signal from reaching you, so you didn't have to pay jack except for an occasional unlooping when you weren't paying attention.

    24. Re:Dish/Direct TV should offer free basic channels by nomad63 · · Score: 1

      Problem is the "selective" market space. You know, every channel that satellite service provider beams up to the sky, is occupying certain bandwidth, which, otherwise, can always be used for something more profitable, which is something that the provider has a finite supply of. So, let's say they provide free (adv. supported) local channels to Los Angeles, 5 total channels, it might be sustainable by advertising. But the same 4 or 5 channels beamed for Boise ID, definitely, will not be.as profitable and will be the money pits. As a matter of fact, outside few select mega-metro areas of US, this is the case. So, since providing free channels to certain demographic (which probably needs them the least, due to the average income levels of residents living in these mega-metro areas), will bring wrath of FCC ov er them. They already have enough legal issues at hand and are better off without any additional ones in my opinion.

      For the techies like me, and may be yourself too, it might be a boon to get local channels, crystal clear without paying anything and using that money to enrich my tech arsenal, but I know it will not make a lick of business sense to those at the helm of satellite companies. Heck, some people are getting sattellite to get clear local channels and whatever else is coming down n the beam is just the gravy. Give them free local channels and you will never see that income again.

      Also, about the advertising revenue, Directv and Dish, just like any local cable TV provider, have a certain time allotted to them for "local" advertising in between shows. So, you pay a fee to watch those channels but they double dip by forcing you to watch commercials as well. So, why go down to a single stream of income while they can have two. Needless to say, with the progress in the DVR technology, I think, the conventional advertising is going in the way of dodo birds. WHy would any company invest in any technology on a dying breed of income streams ?

      --

      __________
      The more I know people, the more I love animals
  19. Not in the 90s by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's fun to play with, nothing wrong with that, but ultimately it's not a good way to watch TV. If you just want basic TV, an antenna will get you a good amount of channels. My $5 Radio Shack antenna gets me like 50 channels including weird shit like the Dog channel. If you want to watch extended channels like HBO, go to Piratebay or Playon or Torrentstream or Hulu.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Not in the 90s by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Do baluns cost that much at Radio Shack? Ouch.

      http://www.current.org/wp-cont...

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:Not in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you even find wire hangars any more, an antique store? LOL. Cool link but it's another 90s relic.

    3. Re:Not in the 90s by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Where do you even find wire hangars any more, an antique store? LOL. Cool link but it's another 90s relic.

      Wire hangers are not obsolete. You can buy high quality ones at the store still but that's not how most people get them.
      All of the cheap wire hangers I have I got from and still get from places like dry cleaning and uniform cleaning shops.

    4. Re:Not in the 90s by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I use my analogue antenna as part of my HF radio array now since there's no analogue TV in England anymore.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    5. Re:Not in the 90s by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Huh, there isn't in the US either, but the same old antenna picks up digital signals. I imagine if I cared about optimal results it would make a difference. I am a Computer Engineer but must admit I know almost nothing about such things.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    6. Re:Not in the 90s by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      yeah it's doable but I can't be arsed going to the roof and realigning it to the nearest digital ground relay (which is about 140 degrees off from where it's pointing now). With the switchover here came the news that the analogue relays were being shut down and the sites abandoned, which was bad news for TV owners but great news for cable and satellite companies.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  20. MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myth TV works out of the box with a DVB-S(2) card and gives you access to FTA sat TV. In the UK we have FreeSat ( on 28.3E) which I use with my Myth Box and a DVB-S2 card, it provides me with both Standard Def and HD channels. Myths EPG also updates of the on-air data provided by Free Sat.

    I also have a Linux based Techosat box that access as a DVR in another room.

  21. Don't expect it to be Cable by Controlio · · Score: 4, Informative

    As someone who puts those shows up in the air, I'll tell you it all depends on what you're looking for.

    If you're looking for sports backhauls, you'll most likely be disappointed. Almost every professional sports venue in the country uses fiber as a backhaul, not satellite. The only places that use birds are places that do small numbers of broadcasts infrequently (think college campuses). And even then, a lot of networks have policies that require them to use BISS encryption. So unless you're friends with someone in the uplink world (because yes, they do share downlink info and BISS codes with each other so they can watch live events while on the road) you'll find the content to be sparse.

    If you're looking for TV networks, look at it this way. If there's any value to the network (i.e. if it's on anything but the base tier of your cable or satellite operator), it's encrypted. Because why would they give away for free what they're getting $1.60/subscriber to sell? You'll find some foreign networks and stuff you most likely don't care about, but that's about it. If you know the timing you might find syndicated shows being fed to your local TV stations (think Ellen or Judge Judy) or something mildly useful like that, but even more of those shows are now being BISS encrypted. The only reason more syndicated shows don't encrypt is because they get sick of having to pay to re-feed shows because of inept downlink ops.

    The holy grail for FTA is finding "wild feeds" - temporary uplinks from site to a network (think breaking news). You can find some serious hilarity here sometimes. But the feeds come and go in a matter of quarter hours, so they're tougher to find.

    The feeds are out there, but there's not a lot of FTA ones in North America. Further complicating things is the myriad of encoding specs (bitrate, constellation, FEC, encoder model, etc etc etc). It ends up being a total crapshoot trying to find things. So I guess what I'm saying is it depends on what you're looking for. If you're doing this as a hobby to see what you can find, it can be a lot of fun and even rewarding at times. If you're looking to replace cable, you're going to wish you'd spent your money on a Roku or a Slingbox at your friend's house instead.

    1. Re:Don't expect it to be Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say at minimum, grabbing the available NASA feeds would be rewarding enough. I'd rather watch the ISS feed, than 90% of the crap that passes for modern TV programming.

    2. Re:Don't expect it to be Cable by jittles · · Score: 1

      The holy grail for FTA is finding "wild feeds" - temporary uplinks from site to a network (think breaking news). You can find some serious hilarity here sometimes. But the feeds come and go in a matter of quarter hours, so they're tougher to find.

      I watched the Columbine shooting news coverage live on one of these wild feeds. They showed things that did not air on TV (victims trying to escape and leaving blood trails, etc). Not exactly what I wanted to see, but the ability to watch these things was interesting. The news anchor bloopers and such can be interesting too. I've caught a rare sports feed (15+ years ago) and its always interesting to see what the camera men are up to when the commercials are airing. Overall, though, I agree that it is too much work to actually use this to watch TV. It's not like the golden days when you could watch network shows the night before they aired for the rest of the country.

    3. Re:Don't expect it to be Cable by antdude · · Score: 1

      Basically, we are better off with the over the air (OTA) local TV stations (100+ channels in Los Angeles (L.A.) areas!) than satellite TV for local broadcast stations and Internet assuming viewers have access to both. I read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F... and nothing really good interest me. :/ Adjusting dishes can be a pain and annoying. It is already bad enough for my antenna(s/e). :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Don't expect it to be Cable by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1

      I remember the film Spin which was made of out takes from wild feeds of politicians and church leaders appealing to their constituents for money. It showed them making outrageous remarks not realizing they were on the air at the time.

    5. Re:Don't expect it to be Cable by pjwhite · · Score: 1

      I had a FTA receiver connected to a small dish that was mounted on the roof of the house when I bought it a few years ago. After some fiddling with the receiver settings, I was able to detect several dozen channels, only a few of which were unencrypted. The best one was the NASA TV channel, which I watched quite a lot until one day it went encrypted like the others. I tried re-aiming the dish a few times, to see if I could pick up other satellites, with no luck. Without proper equipment, aiming is very difficult if not impossible. For a casual TV watcher like me, it wasn't worth the time and effort.

  22. Not so much FTA, but I do have a satellite setup. by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    I got into IKS for a bit, but Netflix and Hulu aren't that much more expensive. Plus they aren't illegal and they don't get cut off in heavy snow or rain.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  23. Oh my shock, Europe has been doing it for DECADES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I've come to think the USA is technological and cultural wasteland.

  24. Not so amazing by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazingly enough even in the depths of Slashdot

    It was old news before this site started so that's probably why it hasn't been discussed.

    1. Re:Not so amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, being old news, it has of course been discussed on /. several times.

  25. Great hobby, essential to get ethnic programming by Isao · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've been running FTA receiver setups in the US for about a decade, so my data comes from that. My own setup uses 3 dishes (one with multiple satellites), and I operate two others at different locations. I have relatives in Europe who've been doing this for longer, and it's very easy and common over there. It's pretty rare in the US. I started because some family members wanted to receive ethnic programming in their own languages and I love to experiment. It requires some practice to set up and aim, but is very doable and doesn't have to be expensive. You can get started under $300US. Take a look at Sadoun in Texas. He also has a lot of information for beginners.

    You'll need a dish (typically 90cm), somewhere with a view of your selected satellites to plant it, an LNB to go on the dish (Low Noise Block Amplifier, the actual "antenna"; the dish is just a reflector), a bunch of RG6 cable leading to your TV, and a receiver.

    Before buying all this, take a look at the various satellites and channels available to you, and pick a starting satellite. You'll need to be sure that you have a clear line of sight to the "bird". A great site for this is lyngsat. In the US I suggest starting with Galaxy 19, which has several hundred channels on it.

    Summarizing the rest, plant the dish, aim, and scan with your receiver to program the channels. You can get all sorts of things regularly, and occasional "wild feeds" that aren't intended for public consumption. There's also encrypted video, which is either pay TV, private company channels (like Ford, etc.) or network backhauls.

    Later on you can get into multiple satellites, either with multiple LNB's on one dish, multiple dishes and a switch, or a motorized (!) dish. They're all fun.

    It's a lot of fun, and can be a great intro for kids to electronics, radio reception, satellites, orbital mechanics, space, etc.

  26. Free-To-Air like OTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just learned about free to air myself a few months ago when I was researching on how to improve my OTA reception. My house has a substantial multi-antenna rooftop installation that was installed in the 1980s. When we got our first TV with digital tuner, we were thrilled to find we had well over 40 channels (including 30+ digital). After the shutoff, and over the last few years we've lost most of them save for the major networks which are now intermittent (My bandwidth usage has gone up steadily as I've lost channels). In researching fixes, I've found lots of conflicting info (75 or 300ohm coax or twin lead... lighting protection or not/ where to place amp, how/not to pull cable/you should/n't need an amp, you can/can't combine multiple antenna signals, you need a rotator/rotators suck). So free-to-air got my tail wagging. But like OTA, reliable consistent info is difficult. I asked Radio Shack about free-to-air but they assumed (no matter how many times I tried to explain) that it was illegal and a big pain because "you have to chase codes down on the internet." (I know it was dumb to ask them, but sometimes you get lucky and meet an enthusiast). That said, I'm very interested in your experience, I hope you're documenting it.

    1. Re:Free-To-Air like OTA by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'd share more with you later on but you posted as an AC :(

  27. You need to consult Lyngsat by DewDude · · Score: 2

    Years ago I used to be infatuated with the BUD, so much so that when I visited my uncle, he'd save me the program guides and channel lists he used to get in the mail. Then along came Lyngsat, which tells you all of that. http://lyngsat.com/

    But more importantly for you, they will tell you if a channel is encrypted or not on whatever satellite. So the *best* way to tell if FTA TV is going to be worth it to you. It's largely a joke in the US, but a slightly more serious deal in other countries. Lyngsat also has a precompiled list of Free TV in the "US", although it still shows satellites you can't see over here. Still, it's a good way of having some idea of what you'd get. TL;DR: if you're not an immigrant that speaks a foreign language or a very religious person, there's next to nothing worth watching on FTA satellite in the US; I do not know for sure if the "local" channels that are uplinked to satellites are actually FTA or not; since they control the distribution of them I'd have to say the list is incorrect. Maybe it's not.

  28. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lies upon lies from the top to the bottom. You can choose to remain ignorant, I can't help you with that.

    Sure you can, just ask the Koch Brothers, who keep putting forward more and more lies about the ACA and its reforms. They love helping with people's ignorance, and feed it daily.

    You're right, the individual mandate hasn't been a success. Yet. Because it's not been fully effectuated. It's a slow implementation, not a rapid and immediate one. Go figure, apparently they're letting it settle in for people instead of going for a drastic solution.

    Besides, my premiums were rising for over a decade prior to Obama being elected into office, so obviously you cannot by default assert an increase in premiums as necessarily meaning anything related to the ACA. If you wanted health care costs to immediately drop across the board, certainly you could advocate for that, but I've not seen you doing so. Is that what you wanted?

    BTW, there was no blowing up of the health care market, there never was a free market health care system.

  29. Windows Media Center / Myth TV? by DarkKaplah · · Score: 2

    I did some research into this when I was first transitioning to a LCD HDTV. At the time there wasn't quite enough to make the transition worth it. Now between Hulu, Netflix, FTA antenna tv, and a few other streaming sources I'm looking at this again to fill the gaps. DVB-S is supported by WMC and would offer you a descent way to combine Antenna and FTA Satellite services. Take a look into this if you find the DVR included with your kit lacking. I am not sure if you could set this up with MythTV and XBMC. You can add a motorized mount to this kit if you find you need it. If you are doing a roof mount you may want to order it now. The extra cost now may be worth not having to scale your home twice. If you're doing a deck mount then no worries! ;)

    --
    Coffee: The lifeblood of intelligence in civilization.
  30. Satellite TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife and I live on a boat in Europe and have used satellite tv - free to air - for around 15 years. Receive about 340 channels from Astra 2 of which around 100 are worth having - news, drama, documentary, film, old show re-runs etc. Our dish is 85cm and receiver an (now) old Technomate which can pick up any satellite available so we have cover of thousands of programmes from Korea to Brazil. As we cruise rivers and canals we have to retune daily by rotating dish and varying up-angle for different satellites.

  31. Too much junk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I live in Europe. I have a motorized dish that I use daily and depending on the languages you may speak, you might find interesting FTA channels. Nevetheless there is too much junk on FTA (sex-phonelines, shopping channels and low-quality programming). However, on 28.2E, depending on your location you might be able to watch many free, and some decent, UK channels. Also, hundreds of arabic channels from nothern africa and the middle-east are available on Nilesat, 7W, and Badr (somewhere around 30E). Also, on 19.2E (Astra) you will find most German FTA channels, and in 13E there is Hotbird, with many FTA channels from Italy.

  32. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    brietbart is your source? lmfao

  33. Useful projects/sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    VDR: http://linuxtv.org/vdrwiki/index.php/Introduction
    Linux based DVR for DVB-x devices

    OpenPLI: http://openpli.org/
    software for STBoxes below

    forum: http://www.i-have-a-dreambox.com/wbb2/

    STB Hardware:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vu+
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreambox (deprecated)

  34. Wild Feeds by chipperdog · · Score: 1

    The best part of TVRO/FTA systems was finding wild feeds: syndicated programming being delivered to locals (many times a whole season at a time for re-run tv shows), news & sports remotes (loved hearing reporters and PBP announcers when they weren't "on-air"), corporate video distribution, teleconferences, etc... Sadly it has been 20 years since I've been able to play with such...MMDS systems were also fun to hack (the service no longer exists, I believe -or at least all the operators went out of business), my local one was too cheap to scramble everything (didn't want to have to provide a descrambler for each customer if they didn't subscribe to premium programming), so if you had a 2.8 GHz to something your TV could tune (it was transmitted in VSB) downconverter you could get quite a bit, there was also channels in that band used for tele-education, so one could watch some university classes, etc.. Cheap, abundant IP bandwidth has moved many of those off satellite and microwave, so there isn't as much as there used to be...If we could implement IP multicasting effectively internet wide, we would see even less satellite distribution.

    1. Re:Wild Feeds by chipperdog · · Score: 1

      Should point there were THOUSANDS of audio feeds available on each satellite, both as sub-carriers of video channels (could be tuned by most consumer receivers), and SCPC (required a little more than the standard TVRO receiver)...Now that everything is a digital stream, unsure how many of those still exist

  35. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh did you want the ACA to immediately provide for everybody to pay for their health insurance?

    Goodness me.

    You should have told Joe Lieberman about that.

    Maybe you can tell Mitch McConnell and John Boehner today. All they want is another repeal vote.

    Do see if you can help them with the details, I'm sure they need it.

  36. Glad you discovered it, hope you enjoy it. by sootman · · Score: 1

    > Amazingly enough even in the depths of Slashdot,
    > there appear to have been no postings or
    > discussions about it.

    Because it was old news when the site was founded?

    The Scroungers Guide to Satellite TV
    By Gary Bourgois
    Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, The Birdwatcher's Report

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Glad you discovered it, hope you enjoy it. by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      Nifty. Thanks for the reference.

  37. Hack it. Flip it. Update and Rip it. Technologic. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Well gee, I don't know, my big motorized dish is pretty useless since all the birds are ciphered and there's just no way on Earth to even crack the codes.

    So, I just modded mine to TX instead of just RX and beamed out some Welcome to Earth messages to the alien planets we've discovered.

    Yep. That's all it's for. Total coincidence if Gliese 581 just happened to be around the same declination and right ascension as ECHOSTAR 7 was when I last listened for a reply.

    The Internet has got a lot more content on demand, or even off demand, I hear. Maybe I'll get tired of maintaining it and cover it in bits of mirror to assume Form Of: Solar Death Ray -- if the squirrels or flying drones keep acting up... I just hate ants.

    What else can you do with 'em?

  38. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Oligonicella · · Score: 0

    The con man *always* says the other guy's stuff is crap. How's that easy access going for people with OC? Hospital access? Doctor access? Not, is the answer. Replacing presumed junk with actual empirical junk.

  39. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh come on. No sane person is going to read past breitbart.com, nor should they. They're like Fox News on stupid steroids.

  40. You just found out about this? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    You just found out about this? Where were in in the 1970s when people were putting Arecibo sized dishes in their backyards?

    1. Re:You just found out about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-existant.

      Some of us weren't born back then.

    2. Re:You just found out about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry genius, but I think you missed the point. Many (most) do not realize that there is FREE to air programming on satellites that require no per month subscriptions. Even back in the 70's, almost no one knew you could pull free programming without having some sort of subscription so long as you had the right equipment. It's a niche and as such may make for interesting reading by the uninitiated. Thank God you came along and made us all realize just how incredibly pedantic this whole thread is. What a tragic waste of time. If only we'd known.

  41. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by roccomaglio · · Score: 0

    So you believe in censorship when you do not like what people say. It is defacto censorship to ignore everything said by conservative outlets. You will claim that their news is not true and should be ignored. I want to see your examples of fox and breitbart inaccurate stories. I will then point you to equally inaccurate stories on the other news sources. ABC had the edited video segment to have George Zimmerman imply that he was racist. They also purchased the DC Madam list of clients and only released the names of republicans (rational was republicans have a stance on morality, so they are hypocrites. Democrats never mention woman issues). CBS had the anchor Dan Rather report and vouch for a made up story about George W Bush serving dishonorably in the National Guard.

  42. Project Free TV by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    there are a ton of **free** streaming sites that just host links...

    I watch all shows the day they are released

    free-tv-video-online.me/
    watchfreemovies.ch/
    tubepulus.me

    many others

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:Project Free TV by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Nothing like watching shows on illegitimate, foreign-hosted websites laden with pr0n ads and drive-by zero-day flash exploits... Sorry, no. I, for one, have a detectable amount of self respect.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:Project Free TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a detectable amount of self respect? I call BULLSHIT on that one!

    3. Re:Project Free TV by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Free, and illegal.

    4. Re:Project Free TV by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      its completely legal....they obey all takedown requests

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
  43. what are you a District Attorney? by globaljustin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But in general less free legal ways

    why, for years here on /. every discussion about using media on a computing device...**every time** some joker has to chime in with "it's not legal"

    according to the DMCA it **is** fair use to give a file to a friend...the Federal Government doesn't define "friend" so **anyone** can be your friend, even if they are just a link from megavideo or one peer in a bittorrent

    when people say "but it's illegal" what they really are saying is "the lawmakers in this country aren't tech-savvy enough to make proper laws, so I'm going to point out that technically downloading files could be considered a violation every time the subject comes up to draw attention to myself"

    just stop...forever...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  44. FTA satellite by jslaff · · Score: 1

    I'm a huge British football fan (soccer to you Yanks), and a few years back the only way to get certain matches (if I didn't want to totally blow up my cable setup) was on a satellite system called Globecast, which carried an Irish subscription sports channel called Setanta. So I had the dish installed. Setanta went out of business, but I still have the dish, pointed at the Galaxy satellite. I get tons of Arabic channels from the Middle East, 10 or so expatriate Persian hip hop video channels from Los Angeles, Nigerian TV (where you can watch Who Wants to Be a Millionaire in Nigeria), Khazak TV, five channels or Thai and Lao shopping, and lots of US based religious channels. It's free and very very weird.

  45. Re:NewsoftheDay:Beta moved RC1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beta lovers rejoice, RC1 was announced.

  46. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they are. For the Koch Brothers:

    http://www.politicususa.com/2014/03/18/pummelled-fact-checkers-koch-brothers-dump-obamacare-horror-story-ads.html

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2014/03/11/koch-backed-organization-uses-cancer-victim-to-run-deceptive-anti-obamacare-tv-ad-violates-ftc-law/

    BTW, did you ask the people you found who opposed it if they were opposed because they didn't like the idea of reform, or because the reform didn't go far enough?

  47. FTA sat TV not much for me by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    I dabbled a little few years ago but there really not much interests me. Taking a look at Galaxy 19 lyngsat.com as suggested by Isao has stations of little interest to me. However, it was interesting to get some hands-on experience receiving signals from a satellite, ironically the day I first locked on to bird in the Clarke Belt was the same day Arthur died.

    Also back then there were websites that you can download software and load this into one of those sat receivers and be able to watch DishTV, Direct, and other encrypted sites for free. However, these didn't offer much (I have no interest in football, soccer, hockey which all have 200 channels each). There were some premimun channels like TCM that I already have on cable, but then I may also dump cable because even TCM shows same movies over and over again (occasionally they will show something different i.e. a series of Mamie Van Doren movies). There were "local" TV stations from various towns like Bakersfield on these dish tv stations. But then almost all I have no interest so why bother.

    Getting back to when I setup my satellite receiver. Someone at DeAnza Electronics flea market was selling DishTV Ku-band dishes and oddball sat receiver boxes for dirt cheap, had a whole stack of these and didn't want to crate them all to the dump. Living in a condo reduced my opportunities (all the birds were aligned away from my windows), I was not interested in mounting the dish on a awning of sorts (I was experimenting and had no long term deployment interest). I was able to just fit the dish into my skylight, borrowed a sat finder meter to help lock onto the bird, and it was exciting to see the bars all light up on the satellite receiver box (Comet I think was the brand). Go through the motions to select the frequencies and download the channels. It seemed it was more interesting technically than watching entertainment (again almost all channels were of no interest). I also referred to these sites, http://www.uksatellitehelp.co.... and http://emantechnology.com/stor.... There were some channels that were non-encrypted including NASA-TV Public channel (and this was back when Shuttle was flying). However these stations were able to do encryption far more difficult to hack, and they also encrypted all channels including "FTA" like NASA-TV.

    Now there is C-band birds which NASA-TV provides non-encrypted including the Media channel but the antennas are big and hard to find. However, NASA-TV mostly has usual drivel repeated over and over. There was a time when everyone was dumping C-band dishes for free and great opportunity for experimentalists including those wanting a dish to do EME.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  48. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by sumdumgai · · Score: 2

    No. It's not. Intelligent people get their information from the source, and not biased bloggers and reporters. Your bloggers are not scions of fact. That would be like us using Huffington Post to "prove" something. No reason to do that. It is just another opinion. We don't cite NBC or ABC or any reporter as proof of anything.

    Real information comes from records, and not anecdotes, or suspicions. The fact is that you don't know if the ACA will be a net positive or negative because you haven't given it time to even be implemented and the market to adjust. It will be at least 4 years before we know what the effects are. All you have are predictions about how it will ruin the country.

    The voting record of congress is a citation you can use for proof. Breitbart is just another person's opinion. They teach this stuff in critical thinking classes. You might check it out. You could learn the difference between a reliable citation source and an opinion.

    --
    âoeIn theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not." â Albert Einstein
  49. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by sumdumgai · · Score: 1

    My guess is that there are Less people who have health insurance now... than before it passed.

    There you go guessing again. If you want us to believe all of the doom you are saying, show some real evidence. Just standing hear spouting your guesses doesn't accomplish anything.

    --
    âoeIn theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not." â Albert Einstein
  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. GoaTsePro MicroHD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read the the quoted phrase as "I personally settled on the GoaTsePro MicroHD system".

    I do not wish to see the corporate logo now.

    BonusClicky: Fleshed

  52. a very typical digital setup by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    Fortec Star receiver with a handy USB port for channel programming and the facility for adding a hard drive (or SSD, flash, whatever) off a standard Sky 90cm dish.

    Outlay: £50 for the receiver, £0 for the dish. 5,000 channels and nothing on.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  53. Re:Hack it. Flip it. Update and Rip it. Technologi by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    get two of them and weld them together, make a hang drum. They make a wonderful noise. :)

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  54. hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buy a DVB card for the PC, then you can emulate a conditional access module, if you're good at programming then you can write your own custom hacks. I will not point you to the right places because I think you're just fishing for this kind of information, and just want the free no work required hacks.

  55. Here ya go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.satelliteguys.us/forums/24-Free-To-Air-(FTA)-Discussion

    You’re welcome.

  56. I used to have an FTA Setup by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    First, you're going to want a motor to point the dish at various satellites in the clarke belt. There's some free programming available on each sat, but not a single sat you're likely to want to use all the time. Info on the sats and where to point your dish is here: http://www.dishpointer.com/
    You'll also want to make sure you at least have a Ka and Ku band capable LNB device on your dish. If you ever upgrade to a fullsize dish you can also pull in channels broadcasting in C band.

    I eventually upgraded my dish to a 120cm model for better signal, but never got a fullsize dish. Like I said in the title I USED to have an FTA setup. IMO it was a pain in the ass. Hardly ever found anything I wanted to watch, and I spent countless hours setting things up and keeping them working. Good luck getting local anything. You're not going to be getting HBO or anything like that without some kind of pay service (or a hack). It was a constant hassle to scan for birds that I could pick up, scan for channels on that bird, then go and see what was on the bird.

    1. Re:I used to have an FTA Setup by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing your experiences. Getting FTA was actually not my primary objective for why I bought the 90cm dish, instead it's just a nice to have/play with. Just bought a SG6100 today so pointing should be a cinch.

    2. Re:I used to have an FTA Setup by dacut · · Score: 1

      I have a FTA system which is half setup, cobbled together from some spare parts plus a new receiver and LNBF.

      The terrain near my house has proven to be unfriendly. I live on the west side of Puget Sound, so the satellites are already fairly close to the horizon. We're in a old-growth forest area; most of the trees around my house are around the 100' mark. We're just on the other side of a few hills which block antenna reception from any of the local networks, hence my tinkering with FTA equipment.

      Even so, Satellite AR shows that I should just be able to pick up AMC 6 which has the NBC feeds. Alas, despite a few hours of trying, I haven't been able to get a signal.

  57. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, astroturfing. Unfortunately, the GOP operatives are trying to astroturf a basketball court. I guess you get what you pay for when you outsource to the cheapest labor.

    And if it was the Democrats they would astroturf an ice hockey arena.
    Politics is a septic tank and the biggest chunks float to the top.
    We are stuck with two large chunks.

  58. I use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Linux as my OS for all my FTA and ATSC viewing. Im more interested in the signal analysis rather then the content. Never the less Linux has excellent support for various DVB/ATSC hardware.

    UDL

    1. Re:I use Linux by CityZen · · Score: 1

      > Never the less Linux has excellent support for various DVB/ATSC hardware.

      One reason for this is that many receivers (set top boxes) use Linux as their internal OS.

  59. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    That logic fails to account for the VAST majority who don't set their savings aside, or those who are on bare-bones plans they don't understand. Beyond that, what if you get hurt/sick before you've had time to save up? I'm not arguing for "Cadillac" plans, just plans with coverage to prevent you from being a ward of the state, no matter when a bad event happens. People with inadequate insurance who can afford adequate insurance are NOT being responsible people.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  60. It's common... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...especially for us older folks who experienced both metric and imperial systems. Use the system you like or is convenient.

    Lots of us quote distances in km but still use MPG for vehicle 'gas mileage'. The metric standard is L/100 km, which inverts your historical expectations. With MPG the larger the number the more efficient the vehicle. With L/100 km then larger numbers indicate less fuel efficient vehicles.

    It's hardly a deal-breaker issue, just one of comfort and expectations.

  61. long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In New Zealand, we have freeview. You can get it two ways - either using terrestrial UHF(HD) or via satellite (SD Only). It was launched when analog was switched off. Anyhow the satellite system has been broadcasting for years and with the launch of the freeview brand, there is something like 15 tv channels and 10 radio stations you can pick up. If you use a bigger dish, and can see more birds in the sky, you can pick up some australian channels, as well as a few german ones like DTV. With a 1-2m dish, you can pick up a bunch of asian channels - fish&chip takeaway / dairy/corner store owners always seem to have them cause they are all asian or indian.

  62. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't miss them at all.

  63. HMM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably off target..

    When Sat, first came out and even after, you could hack the cards to decrypt the signals, however it required additional equipment. And yes that was obviously illegal.

    If it is encrypted then its probably illegal, however is it encrypted? Or are they compressing the signal, the equipment would be able to handle that on its own.

    And the providers swamp out the codes, so you'll have to continue to decrypt the signals. I am not sure I'm guessing that would vary on your location. Maybe once a month, or every couple weeks. I am not sure if they can monitor your equipment, Concast can quickly tell if you've managed to hack their digital signals they use computers that can give detailed information. Someone once told me they do this for 2 reasons, one when they are about to send you a bill, and two if your having any trouble with the equipment and are trying to fix it yourself, of course you call in to their offices and ask them if the trouble is on your end, or somewhere along their lines.

  64. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't say that. My mom is currently struggling with Obamacare right now because, (and this might sound familiar) you can't actually find out which of your doctors are covered (in network) until you actually pay for the plan first. This sucks for her because she already has a few pain specialists she's already been seeing and neither them, nor the insurance company, nor the healthcare.gov website can tell her if that plan will pay for her to visit them. She has to be issued a card for the plan first and THEN take that plan to the doctor before they can say whether or not they'll take it. I guess some aspect of the law (it is 10,000 fucking pages long) requires they actually see the card; simply giving them the information about the plan via another means doesn't work for whatever reason.

    The result? After the first and second plans didn't cover them, she just opted to get a refund, eat the obamacare fine, and pay for the visits out of pocket. Now she pays more.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  65. Free to air TV from my location near San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recommend you get a dish with a motor mount. I set up a FTA system a couple of years ago with a CoolSat receiver. The LNA support arm has rusted out and I have the dish in the garage awaiting a new LNA mount.

    The satellite dish pros probably aim a dish in 40 minutes. It took me two weekends. Installing the dish and aiming it at the satellites was an interesting exersize in practical astronomy. You basically have to position the mount and dish in three dimensions. First I used a piece of 3/4" plywood and shim it perfectly level. The post goes on the plywood and you set it vertical. Then you rotate the post so the dish mount points due south. Attach the dish and read the stamped angle marks. You set that tilt mechanism equal to your longitude or 90-longitude. I didn't know the easy way to do this so I dug out Positional Astronomy and Astro-Navigation Made Easy so I used a Brunton pocket transit and a 4 foot level and a portable TV on a long coax and extension cord. What you are looking for in tthe sky is an arc called the ecliptic and the sun just crossed it last month at equinox. The satellites are slightly offset from the geometeric ecliptic because we reside one earth radius up from the geometeric center (the offset doesn't matter practically). A small mirror attached to the dish rim (with a magnet) is a very sensitive indicator of the normal plane of the dish.

    Anyhow, the DiskEq satellite motor drive works great once you get the dish pointed at the first satellite. When fiddling around looking for the first signal allow plenty of time for the satellite receiver to lock on to a satellite signal. My satellite receiver takes about 20 seconds to lock on to a satellite signal.

    The programming is largely culture. The highest quality most consistent broadcaster was Saudi Arabia with 2 or three channels. At best I was getting maybe 20 consistent channels on three satellites. To broadly generalize, I would say the content of each channel was the broadcaster's culture and the core audience for each channel are expatriates of that culture. I am probably a tertiary audience member, as I am trying to understand who is running the camera and paying for it. A person I know a lady working on a PhD in anthropology with specialization in Turkish areas, who said to me, "Dad, I don't have time for this right now."

    Your opening puzzlement of why isn't FTA Tv more often discussed on Slashdot is a very important observation. From a discard box at an elementary school where I work I just picked up a copy of "The Culture of Narcissism. American Life in an age of diminishing expectations", Christopher Lasch, published 1968. Like I mentioned above, my daughter and the rest of my family simply prefer domestic television for entertainment. The FTA material, mostly, is simply not the comfortable domestic cultural material. A Saudi program on how to cook a traditional Saudi dish started out with "Heat some ghee in a pan." Then the man doing the narration asked the seated silent woman 4 feet away doing the cooking some questions in Arabic and then he switched back to English and said, Well, ghee is pretty much like butter, so use butter if you can't get ghee..."

  66. Re:majority of Americans ... have seen their premi by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    So being responsible == having enough income to make high savings?

    Even then, what if you have a $30k income (that would be about a typical US american income) and save $3k per year, and then you have a $250k surgery (uh, that's probably very generous).. With 30 years of savings you're short by $160k. Sounds about doable if you move into a trailer, slash your expenditures on food and other products, and pay debt for a couple decades.
    Unless you have a fully paid off, owned house which you can sell to pay for the surgery, but that's asking much if you have $30K income and savings. But it sounds barely doable.

    Now, what if the surgery and treatment is $750k.. hahahaha

  67. offset feeds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DISH and DirecTV, yes, they use offset feedpoints on their receiving antennae, but the 6 to 12 foot diameter C and Ku dishes are not offset feeds, they must be pointed straight at the C or Ku band satellite which is transmitting the desired programming. With the small dish systems, the program transmission satellites are close enough to each other in the Clarke belt (geosynchronous orbit) that you can use a single offset dish with two side-by-side LNBs and receive two satellites without having to repoint the dish. The higher the frequency, the smaller the dish required generally, BUT the higher the frequency, the higher the path loss and loss from rain and foliage as well.

  68. Re:BIngo by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    You write the checks each month, we (the taxpayers) write the check when you have a baby that spends a month in the nicu, or you drop a tree on yourself playing lumberjack.

  69. FTA satellite TV by sornord · · Score: 1

    Used it overseas during my career and most English channels were encrypted/subscription. Only English free channels I saw were news (occasionally) and infomercials. Years ago I read that there were sidebands on the C-band signals that contained radio and data but never investigated it.

  70. why would i want to buy something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i'm already watching tv from all over the world? the problem is location. the solution is proxy.

  71. Re:Mixed feelings as a seattlelite by zakkudo · · Score: 1

    -_- I posted to the wrong story. Gah.