Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Solve the Mystery of Why Zebras Have Stripes

Hugh Pickens DOT Com (2995471) writes "There have been many explanations for the zebra's impressive stripes including Darwin who thought that the stripes help males and females make sensible choices about whom they mate with. Now Henry Nicholls reports at The Guardian that Tim Caro at the University of California, Davis, has taken a completely original approach, stepping back from one species of zebra and attempting to account for the differences in patterning across different species and subspecies of zebras, horses and asses to see if there is anything about the habitat or ecology of these different equids that hints at the function of stripes. To answer that question, Caro and his colleagues created a detailed map charting the ranges of striped vs. non-striped species and subspecies. Then they worked on a map for the bloodsuckers that targeted those species — specifically, abanid biting flies (horse flies) and tsetse flies.

'I was amazed by our results,' says Caro. 'Again and again, there was greater striping on areas of the body in those parts of the world where there was more annoyance from biting flies.' Where there are tsetse flies, for instance, the equids tend to come in stripes. Where there aren't, they don't. Biologists who buy into the bug-repellent hypothesis say that, all other things being equal, striped animals would have an evolutionary advantage because they wouldn't suffer from the loss of blood, reduced weight gain and lowered milk production that's associated with bug bites. Tsetse flies are also associated with the transmission of diseases. 'There are a lot of them, such as sleeping sickness, equine anemia and equine influenza,' Caro says. Why would zebras evolve to have stripes whereas other hooved mammals did not? The study found that, unlike other African hooved mammals living in the same areas as zebras, zebra hair is shorter than the mouthpart length of biting flies, so zebras may be particularly susceptible to annoyance by biting flies. 'It's clear that the flies can get through that hair and get to the skin.'"

190 comments

  1. Cite your Refs by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, this is why very few referees suffer from fly bites? I always wondered.

    1. Re:Cite your Refs by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Deepwoods Off clothing accessories coming soon to an aisle in your sporting & more store.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Cite your Refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this would imply that referees are an evolved life form. Perhaps this is proof that God created the sports world in six days? He made referees with poor vision to provide a more entertaining environment. (Did Noah have two referees on board?) If there really is such a thing as "evolution" referees would have evolved from eagles and have better eye sight.

    3. Re:Cite your Refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Referees ARE evolving.

      Referees used to have 1 inch wide stripes on their shirts. Now from the NFL down, the referees are evolving to 2 inch wide stripes, therefore less stripes on their shirts.

      Too many stripes weighed them down and made it harder for them to run to get into proper position to make the calls. With less stripes, the calls will be made properly. (Please trust me and do not do any critical thinking)

    4. Re:Cite your Refs by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      But the evolution of referees is a huge problem. You see, if they keep evolving, they'll be down to only two stripes, and wars will ensue.

    5. Re:Cite your Refs by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I doubt the stripes help with bottle flies, though.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  2. 2 years old by Rutje · · Score: 0

    Please Google prior to posting: http://news.sciencemag.org/201...

    --

    I want my karma, and I want it now!
  3. Terrible summary by timholman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, if you're going to just copy and paste part of the article as your summary, you might as well post the last paragraph, and get to the actual explanation:

    Zebras have stripes because biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

    1. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      No, God made them that way, duhhhh.

    3. Re:Terrible summary by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      If it's proven that biting flies have aversion to landing on striped surfaces, it makes no sense to say it can't be true because flies would evolve. One should rather ask "Why didn't flies evolve past this limitation?"

      One could start with various hypotheses like:
      - It's a behavior that protects them from something. Maybe the advantage of biting zebras has a lesser weight than the disadvantage of losing that protection.
      - It's a behavior that's consequence of something they can't evolve past without not being flies anymore. Maybe their eyes are not able to know the distance of a striped surface with the required precision, for whatever physical reasons, and better eyes would be too expensive.

    4. Re:Terrible summary by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can evolve, but they have evolved to a local maximum where they can't determine whether visual information received indicates a zebra, mud, or water. As they seem to be thriving at this level, there is no pressure for them to evolve the required discriminatory abilities.

    5. Re:Terrible summary by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Biting flies, like the zebra, certainly do evolve... typically at a much faster rate than large mammals.

      That would make the idea of evolving insect repellent coloring even more amazing.

      For proof like in the pudding, the biting flies would have to be shown to exert selection pressure on zebras that is not present where equines without stripes flourish.

      It could be the striped coat offers an amalgam of advantages. Hindering attacks from predators trying to pick out a single quarry in a sea of seizure-inducing undulating stripes should not be considered mutually exclusive from hindering insect bites.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:Terrible summary by kruach+aum · · Score: 2

      replace "mud or water" with "things they don't want to land on." I made a thinko.

    7. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      slashdot "science" strikes again. here are the rules
      0. frame a hypothesis as a rule from good.
      1. imply causality for mere correlation.
      1a. bonus points for untestable (i.e. unscientific) theories.
      (the way to test this one would be to evolve zebras without tsetse
      files. there's no way to do the null hypothesis experiment.)
      2. no natural phenomena can have more than one cause.
      (i mean why didn't the zebra grow longer hair? how hard is that?)
       

    8. Re:Terrible summary by davewoods · · Score: 5, Funny

      better eyes would be too expensive.

      They simply ran out of evolution points when they were rolling their species.

    9. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      If it's proven that biting flies have aversion to landing on striped surfaces, it makes no sense to say it can't be true because flies would evolve.

      Correlation != causation.

      To me it makes much more sense that biting flies have evolved to avoid landing on Zebras (eg. because Zebras have a secret anti-fly weapon we don't know about yet).

      How do they know to avoid Zebras? Because of the stripes.

      Carts and horses. Make sure you know which is which...

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Not just /.

      This story is *everywhere* today. The level of uncritical thinking and mindless reposting is astounding.

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:Terrible summary by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      I read other articles that said the scientists basically found a correlation between heavy populations of biting flies and intensely stripped zebras. All they have is some statistical analysis that says these populations overlap. They [the scientists] then say that this is intriguing and someone should figure out if the stripes actually protect the zebras.

      that's fine. it's good science. It's the journalists that are claiming, that flies have an aversion to striped surfaces.

      For all we know, the heavy fly populations could be because flies tend to really like landing on stripped hosts so the flies are heaviest where the zebras are.

    12. Re:Terrible summary by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      You know, if you're going to just copy and paste part of the article as your summary, you might as well post the last paragraph, and get to the actual explanation:

      Zebras have stripes because biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Yep, or put another way:
      "Getting bitten by flies because your hair is too short? Fuck longer hair, let's get some stripes! Because evolution!"

    13. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been pretty much accepted for decades. Heck, they sell fly covers for horses with zebra striping on them with that argument.

      Ok, let's take on the "biting flies can't evolve" argument: the basic argument is that the zebra stripes mess with the visual system of flies (facette eyes connected to a simplistic visual cortex suitable for insects with a reasonable tolerance towards in-flight collisions). Now there is rather little variation in the principal apparatus involved here, and zebras are black-and-white, so there is not much potential to fix this with color or similar differentiation.

      I would guess the effect to be basically that the insects make an evasive maneuvre in the last flight phase because the imagery, lacking depth, is pretty indistinguishable from the kind of moving stark contrast when getting swatted. So that would take rather fundamental changes (we are not talking "species" level but a much broader category of invertebrates) to the optics and connected synapses (calling it "brain" seems a bit excessive) of the otherwise successful tsetse fly.

    14. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Biting flies evolve... typically at a much faster rate than large mammals.

      ...which makes it even less likely that strips would work to keep them away. They'd out-evolve the stripes before the stripes ever developed fully.

      --
      No sig today...
    15. Re:Terrible summary by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Bloody summary doesn't make sense without that nugget.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    16. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agree but would surmise, "they" are not all alike, they have evolved to a pool of variation that encompasses some more stripy biters and some less stripey biters, over some range of stripy and bitiness, and were all the zebras to get wiped out (by cancer of the stripes?) or stripe versa, the flypool would shift.

    17. Re:Terrible summary by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      Not only that, but wouldn't it be easier to just grow longer hair?

    18. Re:Terrible summary by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      For biting flies to evolve, there would likely have to be a considerable reason to, such as zebras being their only source to lay eggs. Chances are their ecosystem was hardly impacted at all by zebra evolution due to diversity.

      As evidenced, zebras did evolve due to considerable reasons, as their short hair made them rather specific targets for the flies above many other animals.

      Thankfully, evolution does require considerable justification. Questionable mutations would evolve otherwise, and we should be thankful it's not a knee-jerk reaction in nature, no matter how much we would like to prove it actually exists to those who refuse to acknowledge it on every level.

    19. Re:Terrible summary by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Biting flies, like the zebra, certainly do evolve... typically at a much faster rate than large mammals.

      That would make the idea of evolving insect repellent coloring even more amazing.

      For proof like in the pudding, the biting flies would have to be shown to exert selection pressure on zebras that is not present where equines without stripes flourish.

      It could be the striped coat offers an amalgam of advantages. Hindering attacks from predators trying to pick out a single quarry in a sea of seizure-inducing undulating stripes should not be considered mutually exclusive from hindering insect bites.

      Predator logic...
      A few stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it
      A shit-ton of stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it

    20. Re:Terrible summary by zerosomething · · Score: 1

      Biting flies can't evolve

      Like most science this brings up more questions. Additionally why didn't Zebras evolve longer hair if the flies can't get through that as well, apparently other animals did evolve long hair and not stripes. Maybe for different reasons, maybe none of the explanations are any good. Isn't science fun!

      --
      It all starts at 0
    21. Re:Terrible summary by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      You know, I was going to make a Roland Picquipaille joke, and then I looked, and lo it was Hugh Pickens, the second copypasta/clicktroll master.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    22. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I read other articles that said the scientists basically found a correlation between heavy populations of biting flies and intensely stripped zebras. All they have is some statistical analysis that says these populations overlap. They [the scientists] then say that this is intriguing and someone should figure out if the stripes actually protect the zebras.

      that's fine. it's good science. It's the journalists that are claiming, that flies have an aversion to striped surfaces.

      Or.... maybe the flies have a good reason to avoid zebras - Zebra blood tastes bad or something.

      The 'camouflage' explanation isn't very good either. I don't see many African soldiers wearing black/white striped uniforms, do you?

      My theory? Zebras live in a land full of hoofed animals and the stripes let them know which other animals they're supposed to hang out/mate with. ie. Zebra eyes find stripes irresistible.

      --
      No sig today...
    23. Re:Terrible summary by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Also, just because they haven't evolved to do this yet doesn't mean that they won't ever evolve to do that. People seem to think as "today" as if it's the pinnacle of evolution, but it's not. Who knows what kinds of species the Earth will be home to in 100,000 yrs? 1 million years?

    24. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zebras have stripes because biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces

      The real question is- why didn't zebras just grow longer coats, like all the other animals? (FTFA: "...unlike other African hooved mammals living in the same areas as zebras, zebra hair is shorter than the mouthpart length of biting flies, so zebras may be particularly susceptible to annoyance by biting flies") Why did evolution push them toward that method of avoiding bites (grow stripes, cuz flies don't like stripes), rather than the tried-and-true method of 'don't let the flies close enough to bite'.

    25. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Hindering attacks from predators trying to pick out a single quarry in a sea of seizure-inducing undulating stripes should not be considered mutually exclusive from hindering insect bites.

      Predator logic...
      A few stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it
      A shit-ton of stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it

      Yep. If that's their strategy, it doesn't seem to be working: https://www.google.es/search?q...

      The 'camouflage' explanation doesn't hold up under scrutiny. eg. I don't recall seeing human soldiers wearing black/white stripy uniforms in Africa...

      Me? I think other zebras just find stripes irresistible, ie. Zebra eyes have evolved to enjoy being surrounded by other zebras

      --
      No sig today...
    26. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      PS: Stripes might even attract lions: http://i.huffpost.com/gen/5923...

      --
      No sig today...
    27. Re:Terrible summary by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 2

      I half agree and half don't. Asking why the flies did not evolve to adjust is a good question; most animals do evolve to exploit readily available food sources, not to have seemingly random phobias of them, so there seems to be a large unanswered question. My problem with any evolutionary theory, though, that uses the word "why" is that it's implying causality from correlation, which is a science no-no.

      It could be, for example, that flies have some other aversion to zebras -- for example they may have a more effective swatting tail -- and therefore the flies evolved an aversion to zebra stripes. Since we don't have any good tests of ancient fly behavior we can't truly know which came first. It could be that there was some third related causal element... for example if zebras stripes were an evolutionary advantage allowing them to hide from large predators in some particular foliage that appeared striped, and that foliage also housed animals that ate tsetse flies, the flies could have learned not to go near the striped surfaces for reasons unrelated to zebra. Or the two things (stripes and aversion to stripes) could have evolved as a coincidence.

      Don't get me wrong, it's a good use of animal demographic data and a very interesting result. I also tend to believe that the result is correct: that the zebra evolved stripes because those with particularly dominant stripes were less prone to disease and problems brought on by fly bites, and this led to a positive selection for those striped traits. I'm just saying it's always going to be a leap to say there's a "why" that any particular evolutionary advance happened, because "why" is vulnerable to the "why not" counterargument, and it's unprovable because no experimentation can (reasonably) be done.

    28. Re:Terrible summary by bigrockpeltr · · Score: 1

      very unconvincing... wouldnt it be easier to grow your hair a few mm longer?

      --
      $ unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep
    29. Re:Terrible summary by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Isn't it obvious? This is why Elephants, Rhinos, Spring bucks, Antelopes, Giraffes, and Buffalo all have stripes too.

      And their stripe pattern has nothing to do with large, sight base feline predators like lions and tigers in Africa, or jaguars in South America. The selective pressure from being bitten by flies is way stronger than being eaten, especially since equines don't have to rely on camoflauge because they have armored skin, horns, and blazing speed like other potential prey species.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    30. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I also tend to believe that the result is correct

      Why?

      All we have at the moment is a correlation.

      that the zebra evolved stripes because those with particularly dominant stripes were less prone to disease and problems brought on by fly bites

      Maybe the stripes just help zebras distinguish other zebras clearly in a world full of hoofed animals.

      --
      No sig today...
    31. Re:Terrible summary by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3

      Assuming the statistical analysis is correct, I will give the answer:

      As the fly flies by, the alternate dark and light banding confuses the fly into thinking it is the moving shadows of some threat from overhead, like a hungry bird.

      Go write a paper and list me as lead.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    32. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      For biting flies to evolve, there would likely have to be a considerable reason to

      The same argument applies to stripes. Maybe more so - stripes aren't food, they have a much more subtle evolutionary pressure (assuming they're the repel flies).

      Longer, swishier tails to swat flies with seem much easier to evolve than stripes - there's already some genetic variation in tails.

      --
      No sig today...
    33. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It's hot over there.

      --
      No sig today...
    34. Re:Terrible summary by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Biting flies can and do evolve, but they can't say to themselves, "I'd like to bite more zebras, so I'm going to evolve better ways to decide what to land on."

      If the flies who could and did land on zebras reproduced at a rate significantly higher than those who didn't land on zebras, then they would evolve. As that hasn't happened (turns out landing on a zebra isn't such a great thing for a fly to do anyway), there has been no evolutionary pressure and the flies haven't changed.

    35. Re:Terrible summary by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Zebras have stripes because biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Which article is that the last paragraph of? I don't see it.

      AFAICS, they seem to have got as far as identifying that it has something to do with biting insects, but the specifics are not known yet.

    36. Re:Terrible summary by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      Agreed. I find it a little difficult to believe that biting flies couldn't evolve past this stripe defense. There are thousands, maybe millions, of generations of flies in one just one zebra lifespan, so flies clearly have the evolutionary advantage. Granted I don't know tsetse fly biology well, but I know many other biting flies can detect body heat and carbon dioxide from animals, which would reduce effectiveness of the stripe defense significantly, assuming the flies don't rely on vision alone to find prey/hosts. Furthermore, if zebras can evolve bug repellant stripes, why haven't other animals living in the same areas done the same? I don't think the bugs are that picky about which species they bite.

      Have there been any studies to correlate populations of predators to striped zebras to put to rest the old claim that stripes help the zebras blend together as a herd to confuse predators, which rely 100% on sight to make a kill? That still seems like a more plausible explanation to me, and any bug repellant properties of stripes just be a welcome side-effect.

    37. Re:Terrible summary by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I read the summary and then re-read the summary many times thereafter and wasn't entirely sure if they figured it out or didn't figure it out. "Scientists figured it out..." "... but then they realized that what they figured out didn't make a difference."

      It seems submitters and moderators aren't actually summarizing but rather, they're cutting up quotes and links in ways that don't jive with the post title.

    38. Re:Terrible summary by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget complexity of the change required.

      Flies eyes are segmented and see completely different to us. It could be that there's some sort of visual effect of stripes and segmented eyes.

      Evolving stripes is much easier than evolving a different kind of eye or vision system.

    39. Re:Terrible summary by Guppy · · Score: 1

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      Maybe they have. If you were to obtain some biting flies from however many millions of years ago, back when the striped zebra trait first appeared -- would they be even worse at coping with stripes than their modern counterparts? All we know is that there is still some differential even today.

      It's like asking why some arctic predators bothered to evolve white coats, when their prey should have out-evolved the ability to be fooled by the camouflage, or why some insects have eye-spots, when vision systems should have evolved to be able to distinguish real eyes from fake. Your system improves to some point, and then you hit some local maxima.

      BTW, there is a type of biting fly trap, where the bait is basically a large dark-colored ball at the end of a pendulum, that swings back and forth. Apparently, the fly vision system is cued to look for the silhouette of a curved body of a certain size, in motion -- in the wild, it was apparently good enough to distinguish a large animal from swaying trees, grass, or other non-animal objects. Would use of such traps -- imagine if they were used widely for a long, long period of time -- lead to fly evolution (perhaps more reliance on scent cues, or CO2 like mosquitos use, perhaps)? Would such alternative cues completely over-ride the former visual system, or would there be a local maxima, at which the probability of being caught in a trap balanced out with enhanced ability to locate a target animal?

    40. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll throw out another one: Food supplies are so abundant there's no need to evolve. Things might mutate for no reason, but the mutations don't (usually) last just because it looks like fun. If the difference is, say, 0.1% more food, the mutation is pretty much pointless.

    41. Re:Terrible summary by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Hello ... stripes are thinning. First you get a few females with stripes, guys prefer them -- breeding takes over stripes everywhere.

      Lest you think this is jest. Consider the standard evolutionary advantage explanation of peacock plumage as sexual preference based on the appearance. In fact, the literature abounds with appearance based sexual preferences as explanatory.

      The real question is why did Zebras evolve "fashion sense"

      Flies avoiding stripes, just happened to be a side benefit.

    42. Re:Terrible summary by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Very interesting idea... it could also be that they also evolved them together, each re-enforcing the other. I wonder if the idea about keeping cool...

      Of course the savannah is a very got place and keeping cool is very important. Another theory has to do with the way light is reflects from the pattern of stripes. The black and white stripes reflect the sun in different ways, the white reflects the sun and causes an upward movement of air. The black absorbs the sun, which causes a downward movement of air. This is said to create a circular air movement around the zebra, which is thought to help keep the zebra cool.

      If this causes turbulence which makes it difficult for the flies to land and take off?

    43. Re:Terrible summary by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 1

      Well, "why" I believe it is because I feel like it. :-) Not to be TOO snarky -- that's just the sort of line I draw between "belief" and scientific-fact. This is the strongest correlation I've seen, and to me it's convincing enough until something stronger comes along. I wouldn't call it a strong belief (I mean I just posted paragraphs on how it could be wrong, and it's not really a topic that I have any stake in whatsoever), but if some undead omniscient egyptian deity threatens to kill me unless I answer the question "why does a zebra have stripes" in a scientifically accurate manner, then at the moment this whole fly idea is probably a better guess than anything else I'd come up with.

    44. Re:Terrible summary by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 4, Insightful

      very unconvincing... wouldnt it be easier to grow your hair a few mm longer?

      What's to say that didn't happen? We just don't call the ones with longer hair instead of stripes "zebras".

      Evolution doesn't involve a species voting on how it would prefer to evolve. If there are multiple possible adaptations then it's entirely possible that different subgroups will evolve in different directions in response to the same environmental factors. This is one path to speciation, if the change are significant enough.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    45. Re:Terrible summary by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, the flies just move on to the millions of other herd animals around without stripes.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    46. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Longer hair may be disadvantageous in a very hot and humid climate (and as TFA notes, zebras evolved in the hottest parts of Africa). Equines sweat like people do, but that doesn't help much if you're wearing a thick coat.

    47. Re:Terrible summary by operagost · · Score: 1

      The 'camouflage' explanation isn't very good either. I don't see many African soldiers wearing black/white striped uniforms, do you?

      Do Africans have compound eyes like flies?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    48. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily, Zebras had a few left in order to completely alter their physical appearance (note: we all know that physical appearance has no benefits when it comes to mate selection in animals) in order to avoid a minor annoyance... rather than prevent being eaten by actual predators. Study is totes legits.

    49. Re:Terrible summary by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      They could... However just as long as they can find alternate food in enough quantity to pass on to the next generation, why risk it.

      Normally stripped animals usually poisonous. Its aversion to stripes means to avoid from biting anything poisonous.

      Now if the fly didn't have other food sources, I expect every once in a while a fly will try to bite a Zebra and make it, and if food was limited, that fly could have an advantage.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    50. Re:Terrible summary by crunchygranola · · Score: 2

      I also tend to believe that the result is correct

      Why?

      All we have at the moment is a correlation.

      ...

      Au contraire, if you read TFA you will find we have this correlation across multiple equid species (not just zebras) and we have experimental evidence that biting flies do indeed dislike striped surfaces.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    51. Re:Terrible summary by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

      My guess: Flying towards a striped surface, when you are dependent on multi-faceted bug eyes, looks like flashes of light. Flying insects have evolved instincts to avoid flashes of light, because that is your only tell tale sign that you are about to get caught in a spider web.

      So it is not that they have an "aversion" to striped surfaces exactly. But when approaching a striped surface they will tend to suddenly turn 90 degrees away, which comes out to the same effect.

    52. Re:Terrible summary by xevioso · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why this would make sense. Flies like the taste of Zebra, lets assume. The fly would not have likely evolved to not like the taste of zebra, unless something about the taste of zebra made it disadvantageous to want to taste zebra. What is more likely is that the zebra evolved stripes first, and the evolution of the eyesight of flies hasn't evolved to keep up with it.

      This is curious because perhaps evolutionary changes in eyesight take much longer to happen than changes in things like skin color. Perhaps the stripes screw with the eyesight so fundamentally that even with extreme amounts of generations of flies with all their possible mutations, they still haven't been able to evolve a response to zebra striping that allows them to go back to munching on Zebras on a regular basis.

    53. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you!

      Random poster provides better summary than original submitter, news at 11.

    54. Re:Terrible summary by xevioso · · Score: 2

      Well that assumes that the evolution to avoid light flashes is primarily to avoid becoming dinner of a spider. Perhaps it's because it screws with their ability to see so much that they can't even see what surface they are about to land on. Maybe it hinders their ability to detect their own "altitude" and rather than crash into a surface they will move away.

    55. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If this causes turbulence which makes it difficult for the flies to land and take off?

      Yes, but it really helps the Zebras when landing and taking off, especially when the circular airflow is clockwise. Don't make me explain it to you.

    56. Re:Terrible summary by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Elephants and Rhinos have tougher skin. There are multiple species of antelope that have stripes or patterns that may accomplish the same thing. Same with a giraffe. Buffalo have longer hair, so they maybe don't need stripes.

    57. Re:Terrible summary by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Possibly true.

    58. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how it works, though. Predators don't refuse to eat zebras because they have stripes. Rather, the stripes make it difficult for predators to single out a specific individual from the herd to chase, which lowers their odds of splitting one off from the herd, chasing it down and catching it. Thus zebras are a little harder to catch.
        The stripes are beneficial, but not a guarantee.

    59. Re:Terrible summary by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Like most science this brings up more questions. Additionally why didn't Zebras evolve longer hair if the flies can't get through that as well, apparently other animals did evolve long hair and not stripes. Maybe for different reasons, maybe none of the explanations are any good. Isn't science fun!

      Well, I'd think longer hair also has some disadvantages. It's maybe more of a case of zebras evolving shorter hair after stripes made that possible.

    60. Re:Terrible summary by mikael · · Score: 1

      If a bug lands or even flies past an area of white hair, it becomes immediately noticeable to fast-moving predators like birds.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    61. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to take into account eyesight of predators like birds too. Very often, you will see them perched on top of zebras. White patches would help them any tasty morsels of food flying past.

    62. Re:Terrible summary by WindowPane · · Score: 1

      That exactly what I was thinking. Wouldn't it be less costly to grow the hair just a bit longer than to develop stripes?

      Next they need to test this theory on the Okapi to see how it is affected by biting flies. Do flies only bite legs and shoulders?

      --
      No Brains, No Headaches
    63. Re:Terrible summary by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      There is a degree of guesswork I was making. It could be spiders, or it could be that these shifts look like movement, which might be a bird.

      I was just watching a mockingbird in my yard the other day. They hunt for bugs by standing still on ground under bushes, then opening their wings. The underside of their wings has a strong white & dark pattern. Apparently that can trigger an insect flight instinct of some kind, causing the insects to move, revealing their location to the sharp eyes of a very still bird's head.

      So this black & white trick is not unique to zebras. Even a hunter can use it against the insects. That suggests the instinct must be quite valuable to the insects themselves.

    64. Re:Terrible summary by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If the field of view of a single facet of the common biting bugs eyes is correlated to the width of the corresponding horse's stripes there would be actual evidence for some sort of bug vision artifact being exploited by evolution.

      It could be tough for a bug brain to evolve out of such an exploit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    65. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As evidenced, zebras did evolve due to considerable reasons

      Yeah, just like humans evolved the opposable thumbs in order to avoid long commercial breaks. Defining an extremely minor annoyance as a "considerable reason to evolve" or "considerable justification" is silly. 90% of this theorizing is all hogwash and you guys don't even realize it. There's no science to it, because we can't verify that's WHY it happened. We can only determine possible advantages to the zebras having stripes. That's the science. The rest is bullshit, untestable story telling.

    66. Re:Terrible summary by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      It is a little more complicated than that because perception within field of view changes with distance. But your idea does suggest some interesting experiments: how/whether variations in stripe width and distance to striped object can affect insect flight patterns.

    67. Re:Terrible summary by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sure; but all things being equal, a wider field of view/cell would imply a wider stripe to trigger a similar artifact. Biting flies being fairly similar in size/flight speed/wing loading, I'd assume their landing patterns are also similar. You could adjust data to the degree that's not true. Not sure there's enough striped animals, biting flies and variation in eye physiology in the world to get a statistically significant answer.

      Your experiment would be tricky to carry out. The 'will they prefer to land on pattern' test is easy and leaves little room for subjective interpretation.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    68. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As evidenced, zebras did evolve due to considerable reasons

      Yeah, just like humans evolved the opposable thumbs in order to avoid long commercial breaks. Defining an extremely minor annoyance as a "considerable reason to evolve" or "considerable justification" is silly. 90% of this theorizing is all hogwash and you guys don't even realize it. There's no science to it, because we can't verify that's WHY it happened. We can only determine possible advantages to the zebras having stripes. That's the science. The rest is bullshit, untestable story telling.

      If you had read carefully, you would have seen that "considerable justification" came in the form of disease and other ailments brought on by biting flies which weakens the overall species. Within the chaos of nature we find the development of some form of pigment mutation to create an unsuitable environment for the flies to continue attacking and feasting upon the one animal in the area with the shortest hair and easiest source of food.

      And it was observed and validated that this mutation was effective.

      When you read, you find facts based on the research, and not just "hogwash".

      As until we humans can stick around for thousands of years to actually observe the why, it is all based on what we theorize and evidence. We sure as hell didn't go from growing opposing thumbs to driving remote controls on the couch overnight.

    69. Re:Terrible summary by strikethree · · Score: 1

      As evidenced, zebras did evolve due to considerable reasons, as their short hair made them rather specific targets for the flies above many other animals.

      A person would think it would be "cheaper" in an evolutionary sense to evolve slightly longer hair instead of stripes. But meh, I am not an evolutionary biologist.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    70. Re:Terrible summary by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      What if the zebra is on a treadmill?

    71. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      What I'm trying to say is that maybe the dislike of striped surfaces came *after* the stripes.

      The flies might have learned to avoid zebras because zebras evolved a really good tail for swatting flies (or whatever).

      This research doesn't "solve the mystery of why zebras have stripes". At best it just presents a new theory to add to the list of possibilities.

      I don't think it's very likely because: (a) Flies can evolve to ignore stripes, and (b) Occam's razor (other theories are simpler).

      --
      No sig today...
    72. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      So why aren't zebras all-white?

      All-white would help with the heat, too.

      --
      No sig today...
    73. Re:Terrible summary by geekmux · · Score: 1

      As evidenced, zebras did evolve due to considerable reasons, as their short hair made them rather specific targets for the flies above many other animals.

      A person would think it would be "cheaper" in an evolutionary sense to evolve slightly longer hair instead of stripes. But meh, I am not an evolutionary biologist.

      Perhaps the simplest answer is the right one here with your theory.

      Water is a simple matter. When it flows, it does takes the easiest path based on its very simple makeup and ability to adapt easily to any environment.

      Complex organisms are well, complex, and perhaps they do not always take the easiest and simplest path to a solution.

      It would stand to reason in chaos theory as the field of entropy increases due to complexity, efficiency is affected and end results are as unpredictable.

      Alternating black and white stripes are pretty damn rare in nature.

    74. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if zebras were a large part of their diet.

    75. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Longer, swishier tails takes more energy to grow. A differently coloured fur probably doesn't require much additional energy.

    76. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier? Yes. More energy intensive? Also yes.

    77. Re:Terrible summary by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Someone above touched on this, but I'm guessing the flies didn't evolve to get past the stripes because of the size of fly eyes and what an eye of that size can interpret. If they could grow larger eyes maybe stripes would cease to bother them. ... but then we'd also have giant flies.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    78. Re:Terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does not exactly answer why. It is only an explanation of a path taken. It doesn't explain why the giant fly path or the flies with different eyes path was not taken. There are plenty of explanations, but none can be proven, and the result is not predictive. Not all mammals that are bitten by flies developed stripes and not all small bugs are afraid of stripes. This is a good explanation of how stripes were a benefit to zebras, but it has shortcomings in terms of being a model of causality. I doubt we can ever truly pinpoint causality in past evolutionary changes any better, of course, which makes this possibly the best expected result.

    79. Re:Terrible summary by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's a pile of speculation at best. When it evolved there could have been some other factor at work, and that flies dislike stripes might be serendipitous. We can guess, but we can't really know.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. But what about the really important question by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    Are Zebras Black with White stripes or White with Black stripes?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:But what about the really important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are Zebras Black with White stripes or White with Black stripes?

      Black with white stripes. Their snouts are black making them their stripes white.

    2. Re:But what about the really important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Re:But what about the really important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That question has a really important and obvious answer:

      Yes.

    4. Re:But what about the really important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White usually is a secondary color in equines. Most white horses are born with different colors. They have a gene that makes their hairs gray much sooner than usual, so they turn white after several years.

      True albinos or creame-white colors are quite rare and come at birth instead.

    5. Re:But what about the really important question by Nyder · · Score: 1

      ... They have a gene that makes their hairs gray much sooner than usual, so they turn white after several years.

      ....

      sounds like my facial hair

      --
      Be seeing you...
    6. Re:But what about the really important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The French scientist Professor Burp concluded several years ago that zebras are in fact green, covered with alternate white and black stripes.

  5. Important Quote from Article by Grantbridge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Relevant quotes missing from summary:

    "researchers built horse mannequins, painted them in a variety of patterns, coated them with sticky stuff, and found that horseflies seemed to avoid landing on the fake horses that were painted with black and white stripes."

    "The proposed explanation was that the flies preferred to land on dark surfaces. Such surfaces reflect the kind of polarized light that reminds the flies of the water or mud where they breed. Light surfaces aren't as attractive, but dark-and-light patterns are even worse — perhaps because such patterns confuse the flies' navigational sense."

    1. Re:Important Quote from Article by Thanshin · · Score: 1, Troll

      the fake horses that were painted with black and white stripes."

      Are we sure zebras are black with white stripes and not the other way around?

    2. Re:Important Quote from Article by lazarus · · Score: 1

      I am totally trying this with body paint next time I go to the beach.

      --
      I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    3. Re:Important Quote from Article by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Relevant quotes missing from summary:

      "researchers built horse mannequins, painted them in a variety of patterns, coated them with sticky stuff, and found that horseflies seemed to avoid landing on the fake horses that were painted with black and white stripes."

      "The proposed explanation was that the flies preferred to land on dark surfaces. Such surfaces reflect the kind of polarized light that reminds the flies of the water or mud where they breed. Light surfaces aren't as attractive, but dark-and-light patterns are even worse — perhaps because such patterns confuse the flies' navigational sense."

      Flies don't like to land on moving surfaces from what I've seen. They prefer stationary targets which won't move while they're trying to land, are less likely to be able to swat them, whatever.

      If you can't keep moving all the time (and in tropical regions, you'd really prefer not to), then the alternative is to provide the illusion of movement. As a fly approaches a striped object, those compound eyes are going to register a veritable pyrotechnic display of apparent movement, since the fly is moving relative to the stripes and is going to find it hard to tell how much of the movement is its own and how much is the target. Even humans, who have more precise vision and more brain processor power are routinely deceived by such illusions.

      Hey, it's as good a hypothesis as any.

    4. Re:Important Quote from Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    5. Re:Important Quote from Article by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Wrong. I am not, thus, although you may be, we* can't.

      *for sufficiently large values of "we".

    6. Re:Important Quote from Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horseflies that I know prefer blue.... Don't go outside in blue clothing.

      Also, as per the article quoted - All "bugs" are insects but not all insects are bugs. I would have thought higher of the editors on this note.

    7. Re:Important Quote from Article by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Your is a reasonable hypothesis. I would offer another hypothesis: that stripes seen through multifaceted eyes resemble flashes of light -- which is you only tell tale sign you are about you get caught in a spider web; thus flying insects will turn away from the perceived flashing object.

    8. Re:Important Quote from Article by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Shave the zebra to see the color of the skin.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    9. Re:Important Quote from Article by volmtech · · Score: 1

      I was a farmer in Florida. I had to drive my open platform tractors several miles of dirt road between fields. Even cruising along at 15 miles per hour large horseflies would circle around me like fighter planes attacking an aircraft carrier. They would land on the tractor hood and me. The tractor was green and yellow, both un-natural animal colors. I think the movement attracted them. Or it could have been the heat signature from the engine.

    10. Re:Important Quote from Article by matfud · · Score: 1

      Sort of.
      Insects with multifaceted eyes tend to only see montion flow. Changes in intensity moving from facet to facet. stripes can cause problems with this scheme due to what is in essence the equivenent of aliasing.

      I'm not saying this is why Zebra have stripes.But from what is known of compound eyes and the processing happening it is plausable. Even humans can suffer from a very similar problem. Drive past a bar fence (fence made of vertical metal plates close together) when the sun is setting behind it. Not for the same reasons but it is not hard to confuse the vision of any beastie.

  6. Completely original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The wikipedia article on Zebra's links to the following for a possible explanation to the origin of these stripes:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/16944753

    Notice anything similar?

    1. Re:Completely original? by Muros · · Score: 2

      The wikipedia article on Zebra's links to the following for a possible explanation to the origin of these stripes:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/16944753

      Notice anything similar?

      There was a similar story a few months back, also from the BBC, about a study with slightly different conclusions than polarisation of light.It concluded that the stripes cause optical illusions when moving. Link.

    2. Re:Completely original? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's the approach that's completely original, not the hypothesis.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  7. OK, but that still doesn't explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why zebras always blow big calls at the end of playoff games.

    1. Re:OK, but that still doesn't explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why zebras always blow big calls at the end of playoff games.

      I'm sure vegas has an answer. I wouldn't be surprised if a few of them have had some side bets here and there.

  8. What's black and white and eats like a horse? by badzilla · · Score: 0

    Slashdot insists that I actually type the punchline, a zebra

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  9. I thought it's a common knowledge !? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading about it as a kid - that zebra's stripes repel tsetse flies.

    1. Re:I thought it's a common knowledge !? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orrr you've been bitten by a tsetse fly and you imagine you've read about it as a kid.

  10. My idea of the stripes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Forget where I watched/read it, but I always believed the idea behind the stripes that it was more difficult for predators to single out one zebra.

  11. I thought it was for predators... by YalithKBK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought the stripes broke up the outlines of individuals and made it harder for predators to single one out of a crowd? Or did no actual research go into that claim?

    1. Re:I thought it was for predators... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I think flies are allowed to evolve to overcome things like this, but what do I know, right?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:I thought it was for predators... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      As other posters have pointed out, chances are that one of three things happened:

      1) The flies were doing well enough even with the zebra's stripe-protection and so there wasn't a strong evolutionary pressure to get past this.

      2) The stripe-aversion consisted of a benefit (e.g. kept them from landing on surfaces that could harm them) and this outweighed any benefit of being able to get past the zebra stripes.

      3) The biological cost involved with overcoming the stripe-aversion (e.g. better eyes) was too great for the flies so that any benefit they gained was outweighed by the disadvantage of the "improvement."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:I thought it was for predators... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope, it seems that predators are not a threat to zebras, and it's all about flies.

      There's no such implication in the article.

      The question is not "Why are zebras camoflauged?" but "Why do zebras have stripes?"

      As an AC below has suggsted:

      as stripless equine species also had predators to deal with but not the flies the flies are the more plausible answer. the effects against predators are therefor likely to be a secondary benefit, and could have caused zebra's to have evolved into forming larger groups then most other animals their size to take advantage of that.

      --

      I cant wait for the next "science" article here on slashdot.

      And I can't wait for the next hastily ill-informed, condescendingly dismissive post in reply to that article.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:I thought it was for predators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it would be totally impossible for an evolved trait to have benefits in more than one domain.

    5. Re:I thought it was for predators... by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Our hair serves more than one purpose, so why shouldn't Zebra stripes?

      --
      photosMy Photostream
  12. So, um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why don't humans evolve this if tse tse flies are so deadly?

  13. Evolved!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it have been easier to "evolve" longer hair?

    1. Re:Evolved!? by pahles · · Score: 1

      hmm, you beat me to it, while I was trying to log in...

      --
      Sig?
    2. Re:Evolved!? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      Evolution is like government, sometimes progress or in this case evolution makes little sense.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Evolved!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or pray to the zebra gods to make the flies go away? lolrite? Maybe growing longer hair takes too much energy? They'll have to eat more, which means they have to forage further out and expose themselves to predators more?

      Nah, too complicated, I want a simple story so I'll put evolve in quotes!

    4. Re:Evolved!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You login, you lose

    5. Re:Evolved!? by MiniMike · · Score: 2

      Longer hair might have other disadvantages, such as worse heat dissipation and (slightly) more weight. Longer hair might also make them more susceptible to burrs, ticks, lice, or other bugs.

    6. Re:Evolved!? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Try it and get back to me.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  14. Other relevant quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Other relevant quote:

    "Now Henry Nicholls reports at The Guardian that Tim Caro at the University of California, Davis, has taken a completely original approach, stepping back from one species of zebra and attempting to account for the differences in patterning across different species and subspecies of zebras, horses and asses to see if there is anything about the habitat or ecology of these different equids that hints at the function of stripes"

    Reading TFA I can conclude that flies prefer biting asses. So, cover yours.

  15. Hypothesized in 1982 by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Zebra stripes have traditionally been thought of as an adaptation against detection by vertebrate predators such as lions and hyaenas. A different hypothesis is suggested: that the stripes are an adaptation against visually orienting biting flies and act by obliterating the stimulus presented by a large dark form, which is important in host-finding by many Diptera. This hypothesis is supported by some indirect evidence, and by a field experiment in Zimbabwe in which biting fly catches were compared on moving and stationary black, white and striped models. Striped models caught significantly fewer tsetse (Glossina morsitans) Westwood and other flies (including tabanids) than solid black or white models, but this difference was much reduced in the presence of olfactory attractants.

    ~Waage, J. K. (1981)

    Maybe people studying zebras should start by reading the zebra wikipedia page.

    1. Re:Hypothesized in 1982 by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I don't think the article's particularly clear about this, but these guys aren't necessarily claiming to be the first with the idea. They've just done the work to back it up.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Hypothesized in 1982 by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, they didn't. They didn't do anything other than look at the number of flies in relation to number of zebras in a particular area and made some random guesses.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Hypothesized in 1982 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not science until it's tested at a U.S. university.

    4. Re:Hypothesized in 1982 by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Oh, what a shame that Nature Communications wasted all their time with their silly peer-review process when they have just asked Professor BitZstream from the University of... where was it again?

      Are you sure you're not just mad because you always felt so clever when you told people at parties that zebras had stripes to confuse lions?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Hypothesized in 1982 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointing out someone else's poor methodology does not imply that one is an authority on the topic, and peer review doesn't guarantee good results. Even non-professors have a right to object.

    6. Re:Hypothesized in 1982 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but his objection is a bit absurd. Claiming that examining a correlation is not work, is really facile.

  16. I thought it was for predators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the question here is what first caused strips to appear. what evolutionary pressure created and maintained them first.

    as stripless equine species also had predators to deal with but not the flies the flies are the more plausible answer. the effects against predators are therefor likely to be a secondary benefit, and could have caused zebra's to have evolved into forming larger groups then most other animals their size to take advantage of that.

  17. Greater Mysteries Remain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like why Marketing insists on ruining every useful functional design on the planet...

  18. Re: Evolved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that would have increased isolation(heat retention), hampering the zebra's ability to run for longer distances, making it more vulnerable to predators and less able to migrate. with the stripes it could keep both at bay.

    (for comparison, humans likely lost almost all hair to be able to jog for longer distances then any other creature. allowing us the catch pray through sheer exhaustion under the hot African sun. (our jogging pace is also finely tuned to be the most annoying to outrun, too slow for a sprint, to fast for walking away forcing the creature to keep changing speed increasing exhaustion)

  19. Genesis 30:37-39 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    37 Then Jacob took fresh rods of poplar and almond and plane trees, and peeled white stripes in them, exposing the white which was in the rods. 38 He set the rods which he had peeled in front of the flocks in the gutters, even in the watering troughs, where the flocks came to drink; and they mated when they came to drink. 39 So the flocks mated by the rods, and the flocks brought forth striped, speckled, and spotted.

    1. Re:Genesis 30:37-39 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

  20. Re: Evolved by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    our jogging pace is also finely tuned to be the most annoying to outrun

    I knew it! I knew people evolved to be annoying!

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  21. Solved? by jclarker6 · · Score: 2

    Why does the title claim this is solved? Even the summary calls it a hypothesis

  22. Not "solved" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do not title an article as scientists "solved" something, when they merely present a good theory as to why. Sigh...

  23. The obvious answer by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Zebras evolved to hide from German U-boats

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  24. So why not evolve longer hair? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    All other hooven animals in Africa found it easier to evolve longer hair to thwart the flies. Why Zebra did not choose that path? It is easier for the fly to adapt to landing on striped surfaces (change a few neurons reconnection in the brain, more like software update) than to evolve longer proboscis (more tissue, weight limit on flying organisms, more like hardware refit).

    Using painted fake horses and sticky glue is does not mimic a real zebra skin that emits sweat & odors. Real skin has subtle temperature variation patterns etc. A badly designed experiment, unwarranted conclusions, not a complete literature study to be aware of other prior explanations, no attempt to design the experiment to bolster the new explanation against existing explanations ...

    Will give a B for undergrad project, C for a masters project, D for masters thesis, and an F if it is part of any PhD level work.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:So why not evolve longer hair? by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Likely the stripes give the animal multiple advantages. Predators and biting insects. Possibly the long hair might also confer some negatives in terms of being able to disparate heat, etc.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    2. Re:So why not evolve longer hair? by aethelrick · · Score: 1

      All other hooven animals in Africa found it easier to evolve longer hair to thwart the flies. Why Zebra did not choose that path?

      Evolution is not a choice, their is no intellect driving it, it is not an active design process. It's more like throwing scrabble tiles at fly paper in the dark then seeing if any of the letters that stick make words. You keep the words and throw the rest away.

      Any random mutation that provides an advantage to a group or indivdual that makes it better able to procreate will do.

      There is no one true way for evolution, many solutions work imperfectly to solve any given problem. Having randomly mutated some stripes, does not have to provide a massive advantage, just a tangible one in order for it to make a difference to a population

      Something else to consider is that random mutations that DON'T have an effect on an animals abillity to procreate also occur all the time and many stay around in population groups simply due to dumb luck, geography etc

  25. Successful mutational adaptations that benefit an by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Successful mutational adaptations that benefit an organism may do so for multiple reasons, as those mechanisms cannot be known by the DNA, only the effect of the benefits, mutations that successfully accomplish multiple beneficial adaptions will be likely to highly adapt to the population within only a few generations. Similarly multiple overlapping beneficial adaptations will sometimes have compound effects that benefit an organism specifically against one aspect of the environment can evolve independently if each adaption is beneficial enough so as to give the organism an advantage.

  26. confused flys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that the stripes confuse or repel the flies. Is this a visual resistance mechanism?

  27. Traffic Zebras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Bolivia, Zebras are used to manage traffic in the streets! I even saw a Zebra flash mob in a fried chicken place. A very versitile animal.

  28. Bad Hair VS Sexy Stripes by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    Just playing devils advocate (I am sure there is a joke in there somewhere)...

    Anyway, as I understand it, evolution is about the selection of traits for survival, This usually involves environment, eating/not getting eaten, and procreation.

    It very well could be that Zebra's with their short hair, developed stripes to hide from biting insects, as their survival was significantly impacted enough to warrant the change. While on the insect side of things, perhaps they have enough of a food source that missing out on the Zebra buffet isn't a significant survival issue, and thus never bothered to evolve any eyeballs capable to seeing them for lunch (or perhaps the Zebra evolution isn't all that effective anyway).

    What is more interesting to me however, if this explanation is the case, then why didn't Zebra's just evolve longer hair? Then again, I suppose it is hot, so that might not work out so well. Then again not everything has a lot of hair or is striped in those parts either. I am pretty sure evolution isn't really all that exact anyway, which is partially why it takes so damn long to produce changes over generations. I liken it to randomly programming solutions to a problem, some are better than others, but some are pretty good and stick around for quite awhile, or are just good enough, though over time the best solution will get used more often eventually.

    Also mixed into the mess is not only physical things like hot/cold, eat/eaten, procreation, but behavior based on those traits. Basically at which point is a stripey Zebra more sexy to another Zebra as that is perceived as better unconsciously. Oh baby, that's nice stripes you got there... I have to think there is also a significant lag time between physical evolution, and behavioral evolution, as the one pretty much has to occur before the other. Perhaps that is the point, if a trait sticks around long enough, it sort of proves itself a bit, which then kicks in the behavior modification, which further reinforces the trait...

    Anyway interesting to try and figure it all out, even if only a thought experiment.

    1. Re:Bad Hair VS Sexy Stripes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also mixed into the mess is not only physical things like hot/cold, eat/eaten, procreation, but behavior based on those traits. Basically at which point is a stripey Zebra more sexy to another Zebra as that is perceived as better unconsciously.

      female zebras who found stripey males sexy passed on their genes. Hence, their daughters were also likely to find stripey males sexy. The daughters (having some stripey genes) were also more likely to survive to reproduce. Before long, all females think stripey = sexy.

  29. Break out the stripes... by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

    I'll be wearing my striped shirts this summer. It's the best defense against mosquitoes!

  30. Hypothesized in 1982 - more proof in 2014 by DavidMZ · · Score: 2

    AFAIK the Waage study did not map the respective habitats of zebras and flies; that is what is actually new in this study, and it supports the Waage hypothesis.

    1. Re:Hypothesized in 1982 - more proof in 2014 by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Tested? They compared fly population levels to zebra stripe quantities. The study in this article could have just as easily determined that stripes cause fly populations to increase! The 1981 study actually did tests with different colored dummies and checked which ones had more flies attracted to it.

  31. Alternate evolution by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

    Too bad they didn't evolve longer hair.

    --
    Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
  32. Not true by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    The zebra hid from leopards among forests and developed stripes to make it easier to hide among the "stripy, speckly, patchy-blatchy shadows".

    I was told 'Just So' by Rudyard Kipling:

    How the Leopard got his spots

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  33. Bar code by NapalmV · · Score: 1

    Those stripes are actually some very evolved bar codes. No one would admit that though since it would establish prior art and invalidate all the lucrative bar code patents. :-)

    1. Re:Bar code by mikael · · Score: 1

      Some insect species like those giant hornets actually have random patterns that help identify individuals to each other.. Cows are also able to recognize each other due to the spot patterns - they do exhibit preferences to who they stand beside. My own theory is that snails can recognise each other using the stripy patterns they have on their shells. They would make the perfect bar code that could be read from any direction - a method that was patented in 1949 (http://www.scdigest.com/ontarget/12-12-18-1.php?cid=6548).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  34. Striped horses by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Why would zebras evolve to have stripes whereas other hooved mammals did not?

    I don't think that's true. I distinctly remember seeing a shot of a mustang (not the car, the horse) with stripes on its hindquarters. These are wild horses descended from escaped Spanish horses in the western US. I distinctly remember the announcer saying their wild ancestors probably had stripes, and after half a millennium of independent evolution, some were regaining stripes.

    According to this link the horses the Blackfeet used often had these stripes. Despite what their legends may say, Native Americans like the Blackfeet got their horses by taming them from this same pool of the descendants of escaped Spanish horses.

    Wikipedia does say that the ancestor of the domestic horse, Equus Ferrus Ferrus, often had stripes on its shoulders.

    So it sure looks like there's probably some kind of genetic usefulness for stripes in non-domesticated horses, both in ancient Asia and the modern American West as well.

  35. solved a while ago by savuporo · · Score: 1

    The Onion guys figured this out a long time ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
  36. Snopes by cstacy · · Score: 1

    I remember reading an article on Snopes about this, quite a while ago.

    As I understand it, the fly's visual system evolved a beneficial mutation that glitches what they see. Zebras are in reality just black horses (look at their snout), but the fly's retina paints those white stripes on them. This allows the fly to more easily attack the zebra, although not as effectively as if the animal was all white. This effect is well known in our domesticated horses -- horseflies are attracted to light colored animals such as Palominos. Humans are also faked out into thinking there are stripes because we only see zebras on nature documentaries, and a TV cameras have similar scanning artifacts.

    That's the way I remember the Snopes article, anyway, and I read it on the Internet so it must be true.

  37. Nothing new about the reason for zebra stripes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is nothing new concerning this particular purpose of a zebra's stripes. For example, it has long been debated whether the now-extinct Cape Kwagga was simply a zebra which had been removed from the tsetse belt for long enough.

  38. Correlation? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Causation?

    I didn't see where zebra coloring schemes was demonstrated to repel or confuse pests like tsetse flies. Have these scientists demonstrated something about flies vision that the stripes interfere with? Do flies even depend upon vision to locate prey?

    I had heard the theory that zebra striping was a kind of dazzle camouflage which confused larger predators when trying to pick out one animal to pursue. I just didn't think flies could see that well.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Correlation? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have these scientists demonstrated something about flies vision that the stripes interfere with?

      That much has already been shown to be the case - or at least, that flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      I had heard the theory that zebra striping was a kind of dazzle camouflage [wikipedia.org] which confused larger predators when trying to pick out one animal to pursue.

      It can, of course, be both.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  39. Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we pay our scientists to research something important to humanity instead of Zebra stripes?

  40. Evolution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I know why you're biting me. Cause your mouth is longer than my hair. You don't bite the other guy cause you don't like having to snuggle past his long nasty beard, but you know what? Heard of evolution, B#$!h?!

    [Grows a stripe] uh... hmm..

    [More stripes...] Still biting? Take, um... that.. yeah land on that line, you bloodsucking bastard!

    I seriously thought my hair would just grow longer... wtf evolution?

  41. Yay science by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    I recall hearing this theory a short while ago and rolling my eyes at the ridiculous reach of "insect repellent." Goes to show you what a great experiment can reveal. Some of the ideas that natural science types come up with to test hypotheses are as simple and elegant as they are revealing.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  42. Clearly you've never been around a zebra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because they're still covered in flies despite their stripes. Every equine animal is a nasty fly magnet.

  43. Tigers by X10 · · Score: 1

    Do tigers have stripes for the same reason? If not, how do we know that Zebras don't have them for the same reason as tigers?

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  44. Silly Darwinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Quote: The study found that, unlike other African hooved mammals living in the same areas as zebras, zebra hair is shorter than the mouthpart length of biting flies, so zebras may be particularly susceptible to annoyance by biting flies. 'It's clear that the flies can get through that hair and get to the skin.'"
    So why stripes? Evolving longer hair would have been easier. But that only illustrates that one can explain virtually anything--or its opposite--with Darwinian arguments. An animal gets larger? Darwinian selection. An animal gets smaller? Again, Darwinian selection.
    And that means that proving anything is built into the theory itself. "Survival of the fittest" is really "survival of the fittest to survive," with fitness defined solely by survival. It's a bit like claiming the path to becoming rich is to "make more money." It's true but meaningless.

  45. Flies can't land on Zebras because of the Moir by intmanofmystery · · Score: 1

    Flies can't land on Zebras because their Arthropod eyes cause them to see Moiré at a certain focal length when they try to land and they don't have a low pass filter and anti-aliasing to battle this issue.

  46. Evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would zebras evolve to have stripes whereas other hooved mammals did not? The study found that, unlike other African hooved mammals living in the same areas as zebras, zebra hair is shorter than the mouthpart length of biting flies, so zebras may be particularly susceptible to annoyance by biting flies. 'It's clear that the flies can get through that hair and get to the skin.'"

    I don't buy it. So why did the Zebras not just simply evolve longer hair? Seems to me that's a much simpler evolutionary change than stripes.

  47. You absolutely nailed it. by erapert · · Score: 1

    This more than any other reason is why I'm losing my taste for /. and my faith in humanity.

  48. The real reason: by alfredo · · Score: 1

    Polkadots made them look fat, and floral prints are not suitable for the dry season.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  49. i dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the stripes have more to do with regulating the Zebra's body temperature than to deal with flies.

    Have you ever done that science experiment in elementary where the black balloon inflates itself when put on the top of a pop bottle, because of the heat absorption?
    Where as the white balloon doesn't inflate itself.

    Someone needs to take a black and white striped balloon and see if it inflates itself or if it regulates the heat better by acting as a kind of natural painted heat sink.

  50. Contrast theory #47 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I have a theory on why the stripes may confuse flies. Compare it to driving in sunlight and then entering a tunnel. Your eyes take a while to adjust to the tunnel's dimmer light, and then have to re-adjust on the way out of the tunnel. When you are fly-sized, you'll have a somewhat similar issue near black and white stripes. The changing light levels may make it hard to identify enough surface details to land properly. When your eyes adjust to the white areas enough to make out hair clumps, you then are in a dark area and your eyes are not ready for dark hair details.

    And while it may be possible for insects to evolve better eyes, if zebras are only one of many target animals, then it may not make sense to carry the extra weight and chemistry brewing mechanisms of eye improvements for just one kind of prey. It may keep away generalist insects, reducing the number of fly species that try to munch on your hide.

  51. NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no proof in PUDDING! The proof of the pudding IS IN THE EATING!

    Now, why don't you make like a tree, and get out of here?

  52. Holsteins? by Lanforod · · Score: 1

    So why doesn't this theory apply to Holstein cows? Just because of the stripes vs splotches of black and white?

  53. Please answer the real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this have to do with global warming?

  54. Re:Biting flies can't evolve? by piRSqrd · · Score: 1

    They did evolve... where do you think lions came from?

    --
    I put the 'Physics' in 'Physical Attraction'
  55. Giving Science a Bad Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again those writing this up spout all sorts of rubbish that does little else than give science a bad name.

    Scientists made the independent observations that zebras have stripes and flies don't like landing on the stripes. Putting these 2 together "solves the mystery of why zebras" don't get bitten by the flies as much, but it says absolutely nothing at all about "why zebras have stripes".

    There has to be some other mechanism involved to create the genes that code for the striping.

  56. Wouldn't it have been easier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it have been easier, from an evolutionary standpoint, for the zerbra to just grow slightly longer thicker hair to keep the flies away like the other animals mentioned?
    Why the whole stripes thing?

  57. i remember the days of mules and horse flies, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so i call bs