Slashdot Mirror


Stephen Colbert To Be Letterman's Successor

ralphart (70342) writes "CBS has announced Stephen Colbert will replace David Letterman on The Late Show, after Letterman retires in 2015. 'Simply being a guest on David Letterman’s show has been a highlight of my career,' Colbert said in a press release from CBS. 'I never dreamed that I would follow in his footsteps, though everyone in late night follows Dave’s lead.'"

193 comments

  1. Re:WTF? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is good to know about and all, but...

    WHY IS THIS ON SLASHDOT!?

    Because it's Truthy.

  2. So no change then by msobkow · · Score: 0, Troll

    So no change then. One boring excuse for a comedian that I haven't watched in years being swapped in for another boring comedian that I haven't watched in decades.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colbert is funny, so that makes him a comedian.

      But is letterman funny or a comedian? Not at all.

      Letterman is pants.

    2. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick, go and tell them, I'm sure they'll change their mind.

    3. Re:So no change then by xevioso · · Score: 1

      If you havent watched either one in years or decades, how do you know they are boring? Maybe it's you.

    4. Re:So no change then by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Funny

      Colbert is funny, so that makes him a comedian.

      But is letterman funny or a comedian? Not at all.

      Letterman is pants.

      Letterman is WORLDWIDE PANTS

    5. Re:So no change then by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Has Colbert been on for decades?
      He looks too new to have been on for decades.

    6. Re:So no change then by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Well played. Well played, indeed.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    7. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who would you like to see in a late night slot? Or maybe you're just a big Craig Ferguson fan.

    8. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His show is a spin off from the daily show. He started on the daily show in the late 90s. He started his career earlier though I believe.

    9. Re:So no change then by msobkow · · Score: 1

      People post clips. I start the clips. I shut them off less than half way through.

      They're not funny. Letterman especially reminds me of a high school smart-ass more than a comedian. He thinks he's funny, but what everyone is laughing at is the pissed off teacher.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    10. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who would you like to see in a late night slot? Or maybe you're just a big Craig Ferguson fan.

      Rush Limbaugh. Now that fucker's FUNNY!

    11. Re:So no change then by rockout · · Score: 1

      You think he's not funny. But don't assume that you know what the rest of us are laughing at.

      Comedy is more subjective than food. You can certainly disagree with what millions of people find funny about Letterman, and you can voice your opinion of those people for enjoying his humor, but when you make a statement about WHY those people are laughing, you reveal more about your own ignorance.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    12. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Limbaugh actually guest hosted for Letterman on Late Night in the 80's. Didn't go so well is my understanding, I vaguely remember a story that they had to clear out the audience at some point to finish recording the show.

    13. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fun to make things up, right?

    14. Re:So no change then by unitron · · Score: 1

      So much so that one suspects collusion.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    15. Re:So no change then by unitron · · Score: 1

      How do you know that they aren't only posting the clips of their worst work and not their best?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    16. Re:So no change then by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      if you watch a 2 minute clip and stop them at 1 minute, they are not going to be funny, you stopped it in the middle of the buildup and before the punchline

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    17. Re:So no change then by ganjadude · · Score: 1
      From wiki

      Stephen Colbert joined the cast of Comedy Central's parody-news series The Daily Show in 1997, when the show was in its second season. Originally one of four correspondents who filmed segments from remote locations in the style of network news field reporters, Colbert was referred to as "the new guy" on-air for his first two years on the show, during which time Craig Kilborn served as host. When Kilborn left the show prior to the 1999 season, Jon Stewart took over hosting duties, also serving as a writer and co-executive producer. From this point, the series gradually began to take on a more political tone and increase in popularity, particularly in the latter part of the 2000 U.S. presidential election season. The roles of the show's correspondents were expanded to include more in-studio segments, as well as international reports which were almost always done in the studio with the aid of a greenscreen.[28]

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    18. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was confused about the syntax for a bit, too, but here's the quotation with glosses:
      "One boring excuse for a comedian that I haven't watched in years [i.e., Colbert] being swapped in for another boring comedian that I haven't watched in decades [i.e., Letterman]."

      The confusing part is "swapped in" and I first quickly read this as "swapped for" incorrectly. I'm guessing your confusion comes from the same place.

    19. Re:So no change then by unitron · · Score: 1

      During Johnny Carson's three decades of near stranglehold on late night TV in the US, CBS threw a little of everything (fortunately that included The Avengers and The Prisoner and Adderly) against the wall to see if something would stick. Near the end, Pat Sajak had a talk show for a little over a year.

      Limbaugh filled in one night near the end of the run.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    20. Re:So no change then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Letterman used to be funny. Now he's just a grouchy old man. At least when Bob Hope stopped being funny, he was still a joyful old man.

    21. Re:So no change then by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of the Colbert Report which has been on since 2005 or 2006 or something in terms of his own show. But I guess you are right about him being on TV for decades. Thanks for the clarification.

    22. Re:So no change then by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Letterman used to be funny. Now he's just a grouchy old man. At least when Bob Hope stopped being funny, he was still a joyful old man.

      I feel that Letterman is a far better interviewer than he is a comedian. We'll see how Colbert interviews once he sheds his satire personality.

    23. Re:So no change then by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no problem, his show began in 2005 FWIW

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    24. Re:So no change then by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Based on that story, it seems like the audience was chosen to heckle him

    25. Re:So no change then by unitron · · Score: 1

      If by chosen you mean self-selected, then yeah, probably so.

      I expect it took CBS by surprise, though.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  3. Re:WTF? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And because most of us like Stephen Colbert. It fits under the "news for nerds" criteria.

  4. From the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Some media commentators hoped that CBS would inject some diversity into the late-night lineup by replacing Letterman with the first host who was not a straight, white man. Maybe next time."

    Arsenio Hall?

    1. Re:From the Article by used2win32 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean AAAAAAArrrsseeennnniioooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Haaaalllllll?

      --
      Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
    2. Re:From the Article by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Always race baiting. Can we all be like colbert here and not see race? I am sick and tired of the media always bitching when someone who deserves what he gets (and most people would agree that he has worked his butt off) what he has worked hard to do

      Lets look at some of the other people that were being spoken of shall me??

      Ellen - she just isnt funny, the only reason people wanted her is she is a lesbian, (or maybe you just need to be one to find her funny?)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  5. Good by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    So much for #cancelcolbert and the looney tune behind it.

    1. Re:Good by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Probably a win for them, actually. I imagine CBS will put more limitations on what Colbert can say than Viacom did.

      Note to those who think Viacom owns CBS - Viacom spun CBS off in 2006.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Good by Noishkel · · Score: 2

      I thought that entire thing was kind of overblown. But I do kind of wonder what would have happened what would have happened if someone had flipped the switch with a conservative comedian making this kind of statement. I honestly think there there would still be people bitching about it.

      Of course... about the only conservative comedian I can think of off the top of my head is Larry the Cable guy. Don't think he has the wit to pull something like that off.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First you'll have to wait for a conservative comedian to be critical (rather than defensive) of a sports team with a racist name. I expect you'll be waiting a long time.

    4. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CBS and Viacom are both controlled by National Amusements, Inc. which is owned by the Redstone family.

    5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is owned by....Haliburton!

    6. Re:Good by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      It may be turtles all down, but it's corporations all up!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re:Good by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Not looney tunes, she's just letting herself be taken in by the comfortable reality distortion bubble her backers create for her ... it's much easier to tell yourself all those people supporting you can't be wrong than to admit the mistake to yourself and others.

      Not very nice, but also not crazy.

    8. Re:good by rochrist · · Score: 1

      He's basically Bill Murray at this point.

      You say that as though it would be a bad thing.

    9. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His show is more comedic than the majority of what's one Comedy Central. I doubt they could do better.

  6. WHy would he do it? by koan · · Score: 1

    It's a step down IMO.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:WHy would he do it? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      His bank account will see a significant step up.

    2. Re:WHy would he do it? by linuxguy · · Score: 1

      More money and a wider audience.

    3. Re:WHy would he do it? by bscott · · Score: 4, Informative

      > His bank account will see a significant step up

      Not as much as you might think. He makes more than half what Letterman does now ($8 mil/yr vs Dave's ~$15mil) and it's unlikely CBS will pay him as much as they paid Dave, at least not to begin with.

      Since Dave (and Leno for that matter) took pay cuts a few years back due to declining audiences across the board, Jon Stewart has been the highest-paid talk show host on the air.

      --
      Perfectly Normal Industries
  7. Re:WTF? by pseudofrog · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Erm...people watch it on their computers? So it's...tech-related?

  8. Re:Which is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no, it is EGO over profit all the time. Why else would they come up with so many unwatchable, yet highly applauded shows?

    They like Colbert because he acts the way the suits like.

    BUT, if he doesn't pull the ratings, he will be gone. With a golden parachute that would choke Secretariat, but still gone.

    The entertainment business is so strange I no longer think it should be called an "entertainment" or a "business."

  9. Genuine? by multi+io · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Simply being a guest on David Letterman’s show has been a highlight of my career"

    Wait...he really meant that. It's kinda creepy when Colbert makes out-of-character statements. And now there's gonna be a whole show full of those? Ugh...

    1. Re:Genuine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he still going to do the Rapport, or is Viacom going to have to find a replacement for Steve too?

    2. Re:Genuine? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Replacement. Too bad John Oliver's on HBO now.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    3. Re:Genuine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would love to see a Jason Jones and Samantha Bee news anchor duo. Picturing Ron Burgundy and Veronica Corningstone like antics.

    4. Re:Genuine? by Cito · · Score: 1

      Daniel Tosh will replace Stephen Colbert

      That would be epic

      But they wouldn't let Tosh say what he really wanted

      Or give it to Anthony Jeselnik

    5. Re:Genuine? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Or give it to Anthony Jeselnik

      Oh god, that would be a disaster. He's really not funny; he doesn't know how to deliver a joke. He comes across as the high school bully who believes whole-heartedly in what he says, really DOES hate everyone, and doesn't have the skill to hide it (unlike, say, Daniel Tosh).

  10. Re:WTF? by Krishnoid · · Score: 4, Informative

    And if that isn't nerd news enough for you, you might prefer his RSA keynote instead.

  11. Will he still be an egomaniac? by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They said he is dropping the conservative character he portrays on The Colbert Report, but they didn't say if he will stop being the egomaniac part. That could make for good television. He could, after all, still be a liberal egomaniac...

    (and I know, the slashdot chorus will chime in and declare that to be redundant)

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Will he still be an egomaniac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      steven colbert doesn't even have an 'act' without his schtick.. and with or without it, he's gonna crash and burn, conan-style, in the big chair. i give it a year, tops, before someone else is brought in and colbert is chased back to cable.

    2. Re:Will he still be an egomaniac? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      steven colbert doesn't even have an 'act' without his schtick.. and with or without it, he's gonna crash and burn, conan-style, in the big chair. i give it a year, tops, before someone else is brought in and colbert is chased back to cable.

      He doesn't have an act, that you've seen. Have you ever seen him out of character? The man is brilliant, and I'm excited to see what he does with the new role.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:Will he still be an egomaniac? by axl917 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, Colbert is much, much more than the faux-O'Reilly persona he's affected in recent years. All the work he did on the Daily Show...I recall the "Even Steven" segment he did with Steve Carell was rather brilliant.

      I feel a bit bad for Craig Ferguson. He's a great comic but his shtick is a bit out there at times, and much less scripted and structured than I think CBS wanted for the prime night-time slot

  12. Strangers With Candy by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you like Stephen Colbert, go watch Strangers With Candy. It was one of the first Comedy Central shows and it's just amazing.

    1. Re:Strangers With Candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom always told me to stay away from strangers with candy

    2. Re:Strangers With Candy by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Great show, Amy Sedaris (David Sedaris' sister, I've seen him speak/read 4 times now) was awesome.

      I also recommend Upright Citizen's Brigade, specifically the Ass Pennies skit, my self esteem and confidence has never been higher:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      But Bong Boy was my favorite character in UCB, always showing up when there was human suffering...

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    3. Re:Strangers With Candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When some friends of mine recently bought a new house, I asked them if they were concerned that now that they had kids they shouldn't be buying one with a bucket of truth in it.

    4. Re:Strangers With Candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a stranger, but I don't have any candy. You can stay with me.

    5. Re:Strangers With Candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When some friends of mine recently bought a new house

      When you write "some friends" it's a given that you mean they are friends of yours and not friends of some random stranger. You don't have to write that part.

    6. Re:Strangers With Candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simmer down. Obviously you have a beef, Stu, but let's not stir the pot.

    7. Re:Strangers With Candy by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      I loved that show. Those who can't "do" teach, and those who can't teach, teach at Flatpoint High.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    8. Re:Strangers With Candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When some friends of mine recently bought a new house, I asked them if they were concerned that now that they had kids they shouldn't be buying one with a bucket of truth in it.

      ...or a hot chicks room.

  13. It's French Bitch by turp182 · · Score: 1

    I remember the first Colbert Report teaser on the Daily Show, and then a few months later it was a real show. And it was awesome.

    Go Stephen! Hate you see you leave the Central, but you need to be exposed to a wider audience.

    There is no doubt he is an entertainer.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  14. Meanwhile, at CONACO by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile at CONACO:http://conanhuman.ytmnd.com/

    Conan should've fought to jump into bed with Fox when they were mulling the idea over, affiliate issues be damned. It's not like it's a live show, let them air it whenever the fuck their news block ends. Fox is the only network that can actually harness his demo and generate ad revenue (via traditional broadcast ratings or "rich media integration" or whatever they call the internet today).
    He was dead at TBS before he started, just as we was in the earlier hour on The Tonight Show. NBC offering to push The Tonight Show back an hour and give him his old time slot back was actually very generous. But Conan wanted an ideal of The Tonight Show that didn't exist anymore. Anyone who watched Leno (or his audience) over the years would have known that.

  15. Ultimate irony by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    #cancelcolbert gets SC off of CC and the show dies...but only because he got promoted to a prime network spot with more visibility and more money.

    Colbert's writers couldn't have scripted this as well as it was performed in real life.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  16. Re:WTF? by recharged95 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Also, he's the only guy that:
    a. does the liberal/liberation spin that IS silicon valley
    b. actually talks about tech like DRONES, along with BEARS.
    c. has writers that are very, very tech savvy, much like the Simpsons and Futurama
    d. Michael Stipe and Patrick Steward as continuing guests. That is /.... but Need I say more?

  17. Re:WTF? by Zynder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Patrick STEWARD????? What? Is he the caretaker of the Enterprise until the day comes that the one true Captain returns to claim his rightful chair?

  18. free-market competition by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    So, either Colbert is a sell-out, or the MSM is nothing like as hostile to libtards as is claimed.

    Viacom and CBS are owned (majority shareholder) by National Amusements, conservative financier/Billionaire Sumner Redstone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

    They are oligarchs, but they ***still have to make a profit*** the game is rigged but not that rigged

    NBC is #1 and Fallon gets the ratings/advertising

    Colbert is, from a **COMPLETELY FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE** a great choice.

    He's a proven commodity across media and with young and old. Comedy Central is youth demographic 'central' and Colbert is at the top of the product chain there. He's sold books, audio, and gets things like a *treadmill on the ISS named after him.*

    Dont tell me Craig Ferguson or Chelsea Handler can come anywhere near that marketshare/reach. Colbert pwns.

    So "which is it?"

    Neither...Oligarchs still have to play the money game just like everyone else. Colbert pulled it off.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:free-market competition by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Craig was a lot better back before they gave him a new studio, a gay (naturally...this is Ferguson we're talking about here) robot skeleton sidekick, a pantomime horse, and a backing band.

      I mean Jesus Christ...he's been joking about it for years, but he actually wanted a band?!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  19. Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Nehmo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    WHY IS THIS ON SLASHDOT!?

    Colbert didn't observe the boycott and spoke at the RSA Conference where he said, among other incomprehensible statements, that Snowden was " practically a war criminal". In terms of government use of computer technology to control its people, the Snowden revelations are the most important in history. Colbert's ascension to the Letterman position means that the NSA and its accomplices don't need to worry about criticism from that quarter.

    Colbert noted.
    "I see the Norwegians gave Snowden 30 Nobel Prize nominations. The guy's practically a war criminal - I don't understand how they could put him up for the same prize they once gave to Henry Kissinger."

    Stephen Colbert's not a fan of Edward Snowden's whistleblowingStephen Colbert's not a fan of Edward Snowden's whistleblowing
    Colbert said. Snowden, he said, should be taken to court over the espionage charges.

    --
    (||) Nehmo (||)
    1. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Colbert noted. "I see the Norwegians gave Snowden 30 Nobel Prize nominations. The guy's practically a war criminal - I don't understand how they could put him up for the same prize they once gave to Henry Kissinger."

      That whooshing sound you hear? That's Colbert's satire going right over your head. If the Kissinger/peace prize reference didn't tip you off, consider that he said it at the same event that he said "I'm sure that under enhanced liberty you can have all the privacy that you want, just like under enhanced interrogation you can breathe all the water you want."

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. It's like reading from a news site that believes his satirical alter ego. Nice work, sir.

    3. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything Colbert says is double dipped in sarcasm. None of it should be taken at face value. Watch his show sometimes. Comedy Central streams all the episodes.

    4. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Nehmo · · Score: 0

      Everything Colbert says is double dipped in sarcasm. None of it should be taken at face value...

      I previously was a Colbert fan, and I fully understand his style of humor and method of message. In this case, I tried hard to find a way to extortionate Colbert, but he provides nothing. It is possible to distill the seriousness from the fake-seriousness in what Colbert says, and Colbert is seriously taking an anti-Snowden position.

      Colbert also states (by joking on the square) that his opinion is for sale. "...my conscience is clear, as long as the check clears."

      If you have something that indicates otherwise, you may post.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    5. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Nehmo · · Score: 0, Troll
      The Kissinger comment inclusion is simply sloppy mixing. Colbert is also criticizing the Nobel people - that's all. It's wishful thinking to conclude that that negates his stand on Snowden.

      However, I believe Colbert doesn't even understand fully what the Snowden revelations were about. Some of his humor is so lame from a tech perspective, you must give him a rather low rating in terms of understanding.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    6. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      God, you are an idiot.

    7. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Teancum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Steven Colbert's entire schtick is about double standards and how absurd some people can get. I seriously doubt you are getting the humor of his persona (and that is all that it is) of his Colbert Report.

      The interesting thing is to see how much of that persona is going to carry on with the Late Show or if he will be more himself.

    8. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, you are an idiot.

      You will soon experience an overwhelming urge to travel to tribal Afghanistan, as the punishment for blasphemy is death by stoning, followed by eternal torture in Hell.

      Love, God

    9. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      It's called "reductio ad absurdum" - in math, proof by contradiction. Take the apparently reasonable premises to their extremes and show that they contradict themselves.

    10. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      they also gave obama a peace prize prior to being elected president, that price is as good as worthless anymore

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    11. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Nehmo · · Score: 1

      they also gave obama a peace prize prior to being elected president, that price is as good as worthless anymore

      Sure, Obama wasn't deserving of the Peace Prize. (Incidentally, his *nomination* came only 12 days after he took office, and The Nobel Committee *announced the award* on October 9, 2009, about 9 months after he assumed office on January 20, 2009.) But Obama's standing is irrelevant to that of Snowden.
      The Nobel committee responsible for awarding the Peace prize is the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which although private, is a small group picked by the Norwegian Parliament. The people composing those eligible to nominate is a much larger group. Snowden has only been nominated, and the ones who nominated him are probably not on the committee.

      Although I'm a Snowden supporter, I would hesitate to say he is deserving either. It's a peace prize, not a whistle-blower or a patriot prize.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    12. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Colbert is also criticizing the Nobel people

      I think that's pretty fair regardless -- the Nobels are a joke outside of the hard sciences.

    13. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      If anything, Snowden did the opposite of something peaceful, he rekindled the Cold War.

    14. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by Nehmo · · Score: 1

      ...Snowden...rekindled the Cold War.

      What did Snowden do to "rekindle" the cold war?

      Snowden fled the US because the government here in the US would have put him in a cage (or maybe worse) had he stayed. There is no evidence he is working with Russia. He ended up there because the US revoked his passport while he was at Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport. He didn't have any choice but to stay, and afterwards, upon Snowden's request for asylum, Russia took its time deciding to give it to him.

      He released all the documents to a British news agency, The Guardian (and American news agencies as well), before he flew from Hong Kong.

      The recent acrimony between the US and Russia came about from the US government's opportunistic alliance with the neo-Nazi installed government in the Ukraine, which opposes anything Russian, including the Russian people inside the Ukraine.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    15. Re:Snowden, that's why it's relevant to /.ers. by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      Snowden's revelations exposed that not only was the US still playing the espionage game after the supposed end of the Cold War, but they did a poor job hiding it.

  20. Re:WTF? by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    "news for nerds, stuff that matters" used to be at the top of the home page

    this is both

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  21. The only stereotyp Suey park fought by markass530 · · Score: 1

    The only stereotype Suey park fought with #CancelColbert was the one that Asians are smart

    1. Re:The only stereotyp Suey park fought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The greater crime is that she also promoted the stereotype that Asians have no sense of humor.

  22. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Stephen Colbert is a nerd.

  23. I haven't seen Colbert out of character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone link to a gig of his where he's not playing the conservative republican on his show?

  24. Funny host by MildlyTangy · · Score: 1

    Woot!

    The late show will finally be funny.

    Letterman and his backup band are so predictable, so bland, and so American-Cheesy, its unwatchable for the rest of us.

    To be fair, the only truly funny regular joke is in the opening credits where New York is described as the best city in the world.

    1. Re:Funny host by itchybrain · · Score: 1

      It could still bomb.

      As I understand it, Colbert will have to don on a new persona for the Late Show gig.

    2. Re:Funny host by treeves · · Score: 1

      It used to be funny. Back when it started and for a while after that. I stopped watching, oh, in the mid nineties?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:Funny host by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      I figured that it was what people wanted, it being 100% predictable. There are no surprises, it's the same stuff over and over again like those stupid top 10 lists.

    4. Re:Funny host by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Will the same people who like the Top 10 lists understand "The Word"?

    5. Re:Funny host by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Maybe people occasionally want some reliability in their lives instead of being constantly on their toes.

      Nah, that's just crazy talk.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    6. Re:Funny host by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      If they wanted reliability, why would Windows have majority market share?

  25. There are right-of-center comedians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some, like Bill Engvall and Jeff Foxworthy are usually recognized by the general public, but there are others. Some show up late at night on Greg Gutfeld's "Red Eye" show. And there are others, like Evan Sayet, who conservatives know but who otherwise simply never seem to get air time where the general public would see them.

    1. Re:There are right-of-center comedians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dennis Miller.

    2. Re:There are right-of-center comedians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dennis Miller.

      About as funny as Fred Phelps.

    3. Re:There are right-of-center comedians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comedians have to be funny? When did this start!?

    4. Re:There are right-of-center comedians by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nah, Dennis miller is a conservative former comedian. Back when he was still doing comedy, it was pretty centrist, with the social aspect leaning a bit to the left.

      After 9/11 made him shit his pants, he started being conservative, and stopped being a comedian, opting to move his "big words and obscure references" style into punditry, where it works about as well as you might expect.

    5. Re:There are right-of-center comedians by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Nah, Dennis miller is a conservative former comedian. Back when he was still doing comedy, it was pretty centrist, with the social aspect leaning a bit to the left.

      After 9/11 made him shit his pants, he started being conservative, and stopped being a comedian, opting to move his "big words and obscure references" style into punditry, where it works about as well as you might expect.

      He is still to the left on social issues (abortion, gay marriage, etc.)

  26. Re:WTF? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    Also, he's the only guy that: a. does the liberal/liberation spin that IS silicon valley b. actually talks about tech like DRONES, along with BEARS. c. has writers that are very, very tech savvy, much like the Simpsons and Futurama d. Michael Stipe and Patrick Steward as continuing guests. That is /.... but Need I say more?

    no sharks with lasers, I don't know...
    Well, it is true he was effective against the laser bears!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJmWN1eMLi4

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  27. Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very disappointing. I had read that Chelsea Handler was a candidate. Was hoping they'd finally put a woman in charge of one of these shows.

    1. Re:Disappointed by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I think they're afraid of Chelsea. Terrified more likely.

  28. #BanLateNightWithStephenColbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trend it!

  29. Re:This isn't appropriate for Slashdot by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

    Totally agree. I'd much rather read more Q&A's from McAfee.

  30. Kissinger as "War Criminal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It isn't sloppy mixing at all. Kissinger has also been accused of being "practically a war criminal". See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trial_of_Henry_Kissinger. Whether you agree with the accusations or not (much the same could be said about Snowden), the parallels are there; hence the double standards satire reference.

    1. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You believe one ambiguous clause about Kissinger is the hint that clarifies that Colbert's position on Snowden is sarcastic, that is, the opposite of what Colbert actually is saying.

      Well, that, and having an even passing familiarity with his work for the past 8 years...

    2. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by HuDongQing · · Score: 1

      My god. Have you ever watched Colbert or did you just read the transcript? Or did you just read an article written by someone else who never watched Colbert?

      Almost *everything* he says is satire. If he says "A" it's a good bet he believes "not A". If he says Snowdon is a virtually a war criminal, what he means is "there's a bunch of crazy people who think Snowdon is virtually a war criminal and these people have such distorted sense of perspective that they deserve to mocked and ridiculed by an international celebrity."

      Get a grip, seriously.

    3. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by HuDongQing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unbelievable. I have to wonder if you're deliberately trolling.

      That whole speech is a critique of the NSA and invasions of privacy. It also includes a defence of Snowdon. You really need to take a moment to think about the role of satire.

      He mocked the FBI Director for saying invasions of privacy were an attempt to "enhance liberty" by equating "enhanced liberty" to "enhanced interrogation".
      He pointed out the role of elections and the ability of the public to demand their representatives ensure their privacy.
      He went to the conference of cryptographers and told them it's their responsibility to think about how their industry impacts critical social values.
      He talked about the importance of oversight of the NSA "All these revelations... of NSA survaliance just prove that when you give someone unlimited power and no supervision the results are always fantastic. You know the saying, 'absolute power succeeds absolutely'".
      He pointed out the total lack of value the NSA snooping has "We have absolute proof this program has saved... zero lives."
      He constantly reminded everyone the NSA is invading your privacy "it shouldn't bother you if you're not hiding anything, and since nothing can be hidden from the NSA nothing is bothering you."

      He also mocked the marketing spin of the security industry.

      I read your comment a few posts down saying "I previsously was a Colbert fan, and I fully understand his style of humor and method of message. In this case, I tried hard to find a way to extortionate Colbert, but he provides nothing. It is possible to distill the seriousness from the fake-seriousness in what Colbert says, and Colbert is seriously taking an anti-Snowden position.

      Colbert also states [slate.com] (by joking on the square) that his opinion is for sale. "...my conscience is clear, as long as the check clears."

      I can say with 100% certainty that you do not understand his style of humour at all, nor his method of message. Your entire interpretation is 100% backwards. Maybe when you used to be a fan you still had a sense of humour and have subsequently lost it? I don't know. But your criticism is so incredibly moronic that I'm beginning to wonder if you're actually trying to engage in satire yourself.

    4. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      It's clearly satire. You're wrong on this.

    5. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He pointed out the role of elections and the ability of the public to demand their representatives ensure their privacy.

      You know when I first skimmed this line I read the role of electrons
      Which makes the joke funnier
      I can see him ranting about how the electrons are fine with being examined by the NSA and if they have a problem they would email congress
      On the other hand I think I might just need to wait for the morning coffee to kick in before I read more /.

    6. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Being that everyone missed his ching chong ding dong joke I do believe that the majority reporting on him dont get it

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by Nehmo · · Score: 1

      ... everyone missed his ching chong ding dong joke I do believe that the majority reporting on him dont get it

      Colbert, being serious, quickly made an effort to "correct" the misconception that he was racist toward Asians.
      “I just want to say that I'm not a racist — I don't even see race. Not even my own,” --Colbert
      ""I am willing to show #Asian community I care by introducing the Ching-Chong Ding-Dong Foundation for Sensitivity to Orientals or Whatever,” was meant to be a satirical analog to the Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation, whose creation was announced earlier this week by the team’s owner, Daniel Snyder. " --Colbert

      He has made no such effort to correct the wildly held perception that he is against Snowden.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    8. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by rochrist · · Score: 1

      'wildly' held would be about right.

    9. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by Nehmo · · Score: 1

      'wildly' held would be about right.

      My compliments for the catch. With internet access, it seems a spell checker could alert the writer to unusual adverb-verb combinations.
      Interestingly, although the two words have different meanings, in some combinations, they are almost interchangeable.“Fluctuates widely” or “fluctuates wildly” In some situations, doing something in a "wide" manner is similar to doing it in a "wild" manner.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    10. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps since it's not widely held...

    11. Re:Kissinger as "War Criminal" by Nehmo · · Score: 2

      Perhaps since it's not widely held...

      Search: Colbert Snowden

      Weed out statements by Colbert himself. Currently, the first page results are all from different authors. Is there even one who sees Colbert's comments about Snowden as somehow pro-Snowden? If I'm missing some hidden bunch of people, enlighten me.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
  31. Re:WTF? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Letterman was lefty but I liked him fine. Colbert is lefty but he's got a weird quirky humor that is sometimes hilarious but often falls flat. Also he's not going to pick at the left's silliness like Dave often did, he's one sided and people will tire of the bias. He will lose a huge chunk of people that loved Letterman and I doubt he'll be able to make up the difference. Time will tell.

  32. Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that Colbert is a self-described pothead pushing unscientific pro-drug agenda on his show, he deserves to be on a show that's increasingly out of touch with younger viewers. That way nobody susceptible has to hear his drug-addled banter.

    Colbert can go fuck himself.

  33. Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...who really gives a flying fuck?

  34. Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't funny on his show, won't be funny on this one either.

  35. That's the end of that show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colbert is a glorified jester in the court and circus that is American politics. He only serves to make the bread and laughs go around, and keep the circus going. How does he think he can replace David Letterman? Wow.

  36. This has actually been studied by Wolvey · · Score: 2

    That's the cunning appeal of Colbert. Both conservatives and liberals love him but for completely different reasons. This has actually been studied:

    Summary: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in The Colbert Report
    Full Study: The Irony of Satire

  37. Who ? by dargaud · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who, as a foreigner, has no idea who David Letterman is ? I've seen plenty of clips of gifs of Colbert on the 'Net though. He certainly is a lot more relevant than whoever Letterman is/was.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Who ? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    2. Re:Who ? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who, as a foreigner, has no idea who David Letterman is ? I've seen plenty of clips of gifs of Colbert on the 'Net though. He certainly is a lot more relevant than whoever Letterman is/was.

      You've no idea who Letterman is, but you're certain that Colbert is more relevant?

      More relevant in what context?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Who ? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      In the context I described: he's all over the 'net making memes. Letterman isn't. Or I've never noticed.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    4. Re:Who ? by unitron · · Score: 1

      But since we're talking about one guy taking over another guy's TV show, I'm not sure that "internet relevance" is particularly relevant to this story.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  38. Just think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the only one out there. Not be a longshot.

  39. You come off like a twat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh we may post? Love how in another post, you tell the parent what their opinion is.

    You're taking what Colbert says far too literally. He's lampooning people that believe that A) Snowden truly is a war criminal (when reality suggests otherwise) B) people that believe Kissinger is not a war criminal (likewise, reality suggests otherwise).

    In your next snippet, he's lampooning the notion that all we should aspire to is making money.

    It seems you've begun to believe Colbert really is the character. And that has somehow turned you off to him.

    1. Re:You come off like a twat... by Nehmo · · Score: 0

      Oh we may post?

      My statement was elliptical. I apologize if I didn't make it so you understood. I mean you may post a *reference* (the "something" I referred to). IOW, ideally, if you have a cite of somewhere where Colbert states he is truly a Snowden supporter, then post it.

      You *do* realize my estimate of Colbert position is the prevailing one, don't you? Colbert must, as I suppose he reads about himself. And that being the case, I would suppose he would want to correct the prevailing (as you see it) misconception.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    2. Re:You come off like a twat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You need someone to post a supporting reference that proves to you, somehow, that Colbert is satirical? Like, a 5 second YouTube video were he suddenly breaks character, looks into the camera and says "You know, I don't really believe any of these things. This is called satire."? A signed affidavit which includes the phrase "Hey guys, I'm only kidding!"?

      Like another poster said: God, you're dumb.

      I feel as though your stupidity is leaking out of the internet and has somehow infected my soul.

  40. Thanks for the warning. by govett · · Score: 1

    Crypto-ideologue replaced by overt ideologue.

  41. Re:WTF? by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stephen Colbert has been called "The biggest Tolkien geek I've ever met". Coming from Peter Jackson, that's quite an honor. The guy's a nerd, so it's something remarkable that he's become as much of a cultural phenomenon as he is, and now he's set to take on one of the big late night shows. It'll be interesting to see what happens- weird to see him out of character, but he's phenomenally talented and versatile, if anyone can pull it off he can. The thing I like about Colbert is that it's clear he really enjoys doing what he's doing, there's just something about watching someone at work who's having the time of their life.

    It's also going to be interesting to see what Comedy Central does now. John Oliver and now Stephen Colbert have left, so they've lost two of their top three comics, and I'd argue that they've lost the best two. I know a number of people who are still John Stewart fans but personally I think Stewart has lost his mojo. He's not passionate, he seems tired and burned out, his humor has an edge that's not just self-deprecating, it's self-pitying, an endless series of sad jokes about how old he is and how short he is. The humor is also increasingly juvenile, but not in a good way. It's all dick jokes, which would be great if Stewart and the writers could make funny dick jokes like Parker and Stone, but they can't. The supporting cast has issues as well. In particular Jason Jones is supposed to be playing a character who's a dick, but he just comes across as actually being dick, and the show has taken on a mean-spirited tone that it didn't used to have.

    Personally, I think Comedy Central is in trouble. The Daily Show has some serious issues and Stewart's directorial gig and Oliver's stint as guest host makes it clear he's thinking about moving on. Colbert has now left. John Oliver demonstrated last summer that he's talented and charming enough to host a half-hour show, but now he's on HBO. This move probably doesn't come as a complete shock, so if Comedy Central was clever, they would have encouraged John Oliver to sign a contract that would leave him free to come back to Comedy Central. But the other issue is that Oliver seems like a perfect replacement for Stewart. It's unclear who would- or could- fill in for someone as unique as Colbert.

  42. Re:WTF? by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jon Stewart always impressed me for being a lefty that didn't seem to have a problem pointing out stupid lefty shit just like he did stupid right stuff.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  43. Re:WTF? by IrquiM · · Score: 0

    You don't know what a Lefty is. He's to the right of all the countries in Europe.

    --
    This is blinging
  44. Re:WTF? by Talderas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh give it up. There's this thing called context. It's a topic being discussed by Americans about an American involving American politics. It doesn't fucking matter if it offends your personal European opinion on what constitutes the Left because the Left in Europe doesn't fucking matter in this topic.

    I'd call you a damn turian, but at least then you would pull the stick out of your ass and use it to beat people up.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  45. Dennis Miller by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 0

    Nah, Dennis miller is a conservative former comedian. Back when he was still doing comedy, it was pretty centrist, with the social aspect leaning a bit to the left.

    After 9/11 made him shit his pants, he started being conservative, and stopped being a comedian, opting to move his "big words and obscure references" style into punditry, where it works about as well as you might expect.

    I suspect his reaction to 9/11 was just like Karl Rove's: he danced a jig when he realized it could make him rich.

    1. Re:Dennis Miller by rochrist · · Score: 1

      /After/ he shit his pants.

  46. A fantastic successor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as he drops his character, I want a real person with real views and opinions. Colbert is all over the place, I can never tell a genuine opinion from joke and sarcasm.

  47. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Oliver would have been a good replacement for John Stewart if he didn't have the slight issue of being British. As Piers Morgan proved, you can't have an Englishman on US television telling Americans what's wrong with their country.

  48. Wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this mentioned on slashdot? There is no relationship with technology whatsoever.

  49. Re:WTF? by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 0

    *news for libs

    --
    http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
  50. Re:WTF? by DutchUncle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Double down: Stewart seems *more* irritated by stupid lefty shit, in the tone of "Hey, why are you being as stupid as the other side, you're supposed to be the smart ones!!!"

  51. Re:WTF? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    I think he's be in line with Europe; the current events and public issues he discusses, being American, are what's to the right.

  52. good by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I really, really, really hope this somehow kills The Daily Show. Jon Stewart went from comedian to ultra-liberal political activist. When he replaced his entire show with a serious segment about 9/11 Fire Fighters just to make a political action, it was clear he belongs more on some 24 hour news channel than Comedy Central and I think he knows that. He's basically Bill Murray at this point. They should replace him with an hour long show that's ACTUALLY comedy.

  53. Re:WTF? by Bugamn · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about the Return of the Kirk?

  54. A Lose - Lose situation by assertation · · Score: 1

    A lose-lose situation.

    Colbert's fans get deprive of The Colbert Report.

    Colbert loses viewers from going on at a later time and having his humor constrained by the stricter rules of broadcast television.

    It seems like Letterman's ( or Leno's ) job is a place where comedians losing steam go to wait to die.

    1. Re:A Lose - Lose situation by Kierthos · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know when it airs where you are, but here, The Colbert Report airs at 11:30 pm, and Late Night with David Letterman normally starts at 11:35 pm.

      I suspect there's going to be some changes in viewership numbers and demographics when Colbert takes over the show, but it's not going to be from going on the air a whole five minutes later.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:A Lose - Lose situation by assertation · · Score: 1

      Good point, I usually watch Colbert on Hulu

    3. Re:A Lose - Lose situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And 11:35pm is later than 11:30pm!

  55. Kathleen Sebelius to take the place of Stephen Col by JohnnyConservative · · Score: 0

    Kathleen Sebelius to take the place of Stephen Colbert! Ding, Dong the Witch is Dead!

  56. Re:WTF? by Buck+Feta · · Score: 0

    I think you mean Jon Steward

    --
    I am Audience.
  57. Re:Hey bigmouth punk... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAAHAHAHAHH! Oh, the trollish irony.
    You're criticizing someone for having no balls while posting as "Anonymous COWARD". Grow up.

  58. Re:This isn't appropriate for Slashdot by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    (sig)

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  59. Replying by AC now pussy? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're going to have trouble explaining the +4 mod you got there after this punk http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    APK

    P.S.=> Keep "running" (ala "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!") you little pussy... apk

  60. Re:WTF? by Convector · · Score: 1

    Actually, I always had wanted Stewart cast as Denethor. Not only could he have played the character much closer to how he's portrayed in the book, he'd have been a great foil to McKellen's Gandalf.

  61. Re:WTF? by Serenissima · · Score: 1

    I see what you did there :)

    --
    Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  62. Re:Hey bigmouth punk... apk by rochrist · · Score: 1

    This from an anonymous coward? WTF?

  63. Are you geminidomino's sockpuppet or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why's geminidomino running from it and replying by ac http://slashdot.org/comments.p... then?

    * Hi sockpuppet...

    (Too obvious)

    APK

    P.S.=> Seeing you "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" being unable to disprove MY points (that trashed yours easily, lol) is going to make it TOUGH to explain your +4 mod there... apk

    1. Re:Are you geminidomino's sockpuppet or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good observation. geminidomino stopped posting completely too. Go figure (not).

  64. Never liked the "late night" shows. by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    Never really liked the "late night" shows.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  65. Re:Which is it? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    So, either Colbert is a sell-out,

    I take you don't watch the Colbert Report?

    Colbert is openly a total sell-out. But he manages to make it funny for everybody's involved.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  66. Re:WTF? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    You don't know what a Lefty is. He's to the right of all the countries in Europe.

    Or, some countries in Europe are way to the left of the rest of the world. Europeans can criticize Americans for feeling like they're representative of the world, which is a fair point, but don't let Europeans fall into the same trap.

  67. Re:WTF? by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 2

    To be fair, there's a reason the UK kicked Piers Morgan off their isles.

  68. Re:Hey bigmouth punk... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pot calling the kettle black. How cute.

  69. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haters gonna hate.

  70. Re:Hey bigmouth punk... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no way geminidomino's post with its mistakes should have been up modded to +4 when apk tore it apart and geminidomino called him names as he did after that.

  71. Replacement will be Tobuscus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait and see.