Slashdot Mirror


Lucasfilm Announces Break With Star Wars Expanded Universe

RogueyWon writes: "A recent blog post from Lucasarts had confirmed that the new Star Wars movies planned for release by Disney will formally break continuity with the Expanded Universe novels, comics and video games. They say, 'In order to give maximum creative freedom to the filmmakers and also preserve an element of surprise and discovery for the audience, Star Wars Episodes VII-IX will not tell the same story told in the post-Return of the Jedi Expanded Universe.' The news is unlikely to be a surprise, given George Lucas's previous pronouncements on the issue."

102 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We found out that by keeping the time- and storyline, we could not cram enough cuddly merchandising crap into the show. Expect a lot more fluffy aliens, cutsie droids, and if you thought that Episode 1 was an overblown trailer and ad for the podracer computer game, we have a big surprise for you in Episode 7!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Translation by Khan · · Score: 2

      Spot on. And yeah, no surprise in this announcement. I have no doubt Jar-Jar (or some other equally annoying creation) will be the lead in the next 3 movies \TV shows.

      --

      "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

    2. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NO NOT ANOTHER JAR JAR!

    3. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So they want to sell a cheap light gun game where all they have to do is show the movie and hand you a light gun?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Translation by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Disney hasn't done this with any of the Marvel movies; why do people assume they are with the Star Wars movies?

    5. Re:Translation by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Because Lucas has already been leaning to these things? And with the cart blanche from this we have every faith that Disney will go the extra mile.

      Besides there were some great stories in the EU (among some not so great or even bad). Just throwing the baby out with the bath water can only mean bad things...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    6. Re:Translation by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We found out that by keeping the time- and storyline, we could not cram enough cuddly merchandising crap into the show. Expect a lot more fluffy aliens, cutsie droids, and if you thought that Episode 1 was an overblown trailer and ad for the podracer computer game, we have a big surprise for you in Episode 7!

      I can only agree with you there, the extent to which boosting merchendising sales has taken priority over making a good film sucks ass. Antoher thing I hate is when film sequels and in particular TV scifi shows get cancelled and you are left with a half told story because some beancounting corporate functionary did an Excel session and determined that the fucking merchandise sales weren't good enough even thought he film/show itself was quite well received by the viewing public. Some of us actually watch a film for the sake of the story being told and not because we like 2-3 hour infomercials.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    7. Re:Translation by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Episode Seven: Jedi Academy of the Ewok Homeworld.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:Translation by Enigma2175 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not surprised. Books, comics and video games tend to not be canon for Star Wars, and only half heartedly canon in Star Trek.

      My personal opinion is that only Film-TV can be canon. Everything else in another format needs to be adapted to that format to be canon. This is why I never read fanfic trash on the internet, as much as someone might have a good head on their shoulders for writing fanfiction, it will never be canon. Parodies I sometimes see (eg robot chicken) but they're easily forgettable.

      So the Lord of the Rings movies are canon, screw those dusty old books. Why rely on Tolkien when I can have Peter Jackson tell me about Hobbits?

      --

      Enigma

    9. Re:Translation by aevan · · Score: 1

      Considering how many movies are just derivatives, retellings or reimaging of previous older works... that's an interesting view.

      I'm of the view ideas can be limited in scope, underutilise the potential, and be poor in execution; something ripe for continuation or revisioning in the hands of another. i.e. canon can just plain suck, so fidelity to such is a waste.

    10. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because it simply was by no means necessary. There is no need to butcher a super hero movie on the altar of merchandising. They come packed with merchandising opportunities aplenty, no need to include cutsiepoo crap sidekicks.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a very bad feeling about this.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Translation by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Disney hasn't done this with any of the Marvel movies; why do people assume they are with the Star Wars movies?

      The Marvel movies are not completely consistent with the huge comic "continuity", in fact the published comics themselves do not always maintain continuity. I don't know that trying to be thusly consistent is a good goal.

      At best, the Marvel movies have been fairly self consistent with the movie storylines. Certainly the trailer for "Guardians of the Galaxy" does not look like it is going to be very consistent with the published comics.

    13. Re:Translation by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would think it has more to do with the fact that most of the writing and plotlines in the expanded universe are absolutely shit. I've struggled my way here and there through a few, and they're just terrible, most of it on the level of amateur fan fiction.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Translation by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Certainly the trailer for "Guardians of the Galaxy" does not look like it is going to be very consistent with the published comics.

      From what I've been reading, it is consistent, with the most recent version of the Guardians, not the Martinex/Charlie-27/Vance Astro/etc etc Guardians you're probably thinking of.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

    15. Re:Translation by j-beda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Certainly the trailer for "Guardians of the Galaxy" does not look like it is going to be very consistent with the published comics.

      From what I've been reading, it is consistent, with the most recent version of the Guardians, not the Martinex/Charlie-27/Vance Astro/etc etc Guardians you're probably thinking of.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

      Which is, I guess, an indication that being "consistent with the comics" at best can be understood to mean "consistent with some group of comics picked from fifty plus years of inconsistent storylines, restarts and re-imagings".

    16. Re:Translation by spire3661 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Letting only VISUAL depictions be canon is an INCREDIBLY limited way to tell a richer story.

      --
      Good-bye
    17. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, I do not think that is the translation.

      I think the translation goes more like "We do not care about those fans who read all that anyway. Their money is nice but what we really want is the mass market plus their families. So why should we bother if we carefully created a movie that fits in the existing content when we could just slap the name Star Wars on some script someone (whoever) produced and call it a day? Yes, that is what we thought, no cry in the corner, you are standing in the way of all those Joes with their sons who want to buy tickets..."

    18. Re:Translation by GarethIwanFairclough · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Name ANY worth shit outside of I, Jedi or the Thrawn trilogy.

      You cant because there isnt. FUCK the EU with a barge pole

      Knights of the old republic? Shadows of the empire? The Dark forces/Jedi Knight series? Rogue Squadron?

      There's four for you right there.

    19. Re: Translation by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      totally 100% wrong. this is some jj abrams star-trek-style reinvention, where he breaks free of old conventions to tell a new story. thank goodness that movies 7-9 won't be stuck in a little narrative box that was delineated 30 years ago. 1-3 were a disappointment to me, but I have big expectations here.

    20. Re: Translation by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Funny

      Meesa sorry yousa getsa jar jar

    21. Re:Translation by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      i assume the old cast will all have 2 minute cameos, not major parts. you're right about lame indiana jones 4... which was created by lucas and produced by lucasfilm. i have a lot of faith in this sequel.

    22. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, more than half of the clone wars series was too. There were a few authors that did a good job. Personally I like the majority of Zahn's work better than the original Star Wars Story itself. It is an incredible saga showcasing the triumph the human(oid) mind, and will above all else. The original hand of Thrawn trilogy was so artistically done. Allegiance, & Choices of one were just as good.

      If Disney / Lucas cared at all they would make those into a subset of movies of some kind. They flesh out the universe in ways no other work has touched (not even the originals). Ysalimari, force bubbles. Defeating an enemy utilizing psychological flaws deduced by studying their species artwork. An enslaved group of stealh assassins as strong as wookies?!. Beautiful, just beautiful. Then there was the ever-present competence, and problem solving ability of Mara Jade, and Thrawn showcased in a variety of situations. It doesn't get better than those works.

    23. Re:Translation by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Turn the movie around...

    24. Re:Translation by Ries · · Score: 2

      I also fear the worst after having seen The Clone Wars season 6 last episodes. They changed from space shooter with a hint of "magic" to full blown harry potter with lasers.

    25. Re:Translation by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Which is, I guess, an indication that being "consistent with the comics" at best can be understood to mean "consistent with some group of comics picked from fifty plus years of inconsistent storylines, restarts and re-imagings".

      Indeed! It's better than it was though. I'm old enough to remember the Captain America TV Movies (which the recent movie homages with the motorcycle), the Spider Man TV show with Nicholas Hammond, the Cathy Lee Crosby Wonder Woman TV Movie and the Dr. Strange TV movie.

    26. Re: Translation by dciman · · Score: 1

      Shadows of the Empire is an awesome book. So much good backstory and plotting. Loved it.

      Knights and Rogue are also excellent.

    27. Re:Translation by aix+tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. Add Visions of the Past / Spectre of the Future to that.

      If you want to "breaks free of old conventions to tell a new story" just TELL a new story. If your new story needs to re-hash "old characters" to get people interested in it, then it's probably a not very interesting story to begin with.

    28. Re:Translation by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Obvious troll is obvious. But episode I seriously???

      No, tard, he was referring to "I, Jedi".

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    29. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In the company of people who know how to dress and who have spare cash 'cause they don't have kids to worry about?

      But I guess we're going off topic now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Well, write for your audience. And let's be honest here, what do you think is the audience for a rather badly drawn cartoon series with a plot that fits on a sheet of paper per season?

      I've watched a few. I even tried to enjoy them. It just doesn't work out. The characters are stereotypes and shallow, the plot predictable, the storyline unbelievable, with the only surprises being the deus-ex-machinas when the writers painted themselves in a corner.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re: Translation by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      this is some jj abrams star-trek-style reinvention [...]

      So you mean the first film will be an awesome fresh take on the franchise, and the second will be a ham-fisted sexist attempt at fan service?

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    32. Re: Translation by schnell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      thank goodness that movies 7-9 won't be stuck in a little narrative box

      Thank you, precisely. I say this as someone who has read 15 or so Star Wars EU books and thoroughly enjoyed many of the video games: the EU was >50% shit sandwich.

      In fact, it was destined to be shit. Timothy Zahn kickstarted it with some very good (but not as good as some people believe) SF with the Thrawn trilogy. Lucas never thought he was going to go back to Star Wars, so he waved his hand "whatever" and was pleasantly surprised when the royalty checks started rolling back in. "Shadows of the Empire" was interesting (in part because it was the first time sexuality was openly introduced into the Lucas prudish universe) and a few other things. Star Wars video games were great, but who ever imagined those were canon when what you as a player did could impact them? ("History records that Darth Revan boned Bastila... wait, no he didn't. But she became his Dark Side apprentice... wait, no she didn't. It turns out Revan died in a casino on the underworld of Taris because he couldn't make any money playing Pazaak.")

      But mainly it just quickly descended into "resurrected or clone Empire person or weapon of the year" bullshit and just wanked itself (and milked its readers) for years.

      Then Lucas decides to make Episodes 1-3 and right there you have already invalidated 50% of the mythology of the EU. Spaarti cylinders? Whatsisface the Death Star designer? Using the Force is like some sexually transmitted disease? Jedis can't date? And, if Force ability was hereditary, WHY THE FUCK wouldn't you want Jedis to breed lots of little Jedis? Huuuuuhhhhhh? So the EU was already dead even then.

      For the record: despite all its story consistency failings, Episodes 2 & 3 were NOT THAT BAD. Episode 3, in fact, was a genuinely enjoyable movie! Episode 1 was exactly the steaming shitpile that everyone makes it out to be, except for the first 15 minutes, the pod races and Darth Maul's battle with Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon.

      But of course it still carried on, and of course the results were mixed. "New Jedi Order" was an interesting idea badly implemented, and I'm sorry but the death of Anakin Solo was a terrible idea. The later series had their ups and downs... take for example the latest, "Fate of the Jedi." There were very enjoyable parts, especially the "Luke and Ben road trip" aspects of visiting all the Force users across the galaxy. But a previously unknown super-Force-user had to be invented out of nowhere, and somehow they repeated the NJO "the bad guys must control Coruscant" story line, and it just ended up being a mess. Would you really expect a new Star Wars movie with Han, Luke and Leia to be constrained by the frequently awful story lines of the last 30 years?

      So long story short: the EU was kind of a hot mess and was destined to go away the second anyone tried to remake Star Wars. And even if I miss Kyle Katarn, Admiral Thrawn, the Witches of Dathomir and Mara Jade, it's a trade-off I'm willing to make for decent new movies.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    33. Re: Translation by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      For the record: despite all its story consistency failings, Episodes 2 & 3 were NOT THAT BAD. Episode 3, in fact, was a genuinely enjoyable movie! Episode 1 was exactly the steaming shitpile that everyone makes it out to be, except for the first 15 minutes, the pod races and Darth Maul's battle with Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon.

      interesting... i agree the movies got better from 1 to 3. 3 still had its problems - noooooo! do not want! but 1 was abysmal. interesting you call out the moments you chose. the first 15 mins were a super let down for me. trade dispute with the trading guild the fuck? CGI droids? the only cool part here was when they plunged their lightsabers into the metal wall to cut a door. the pod race went on about 10 mins too long, and featured that kid which made it even more annoying. the darth maul battle was pretty awesome. generally speaking, both obi won and qui go were awesome and saved the movie.

    34. Re:Translation by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Honestly I found the Thrawn trilogy much better on TVTropes than as an actual book.

    35. Re:Translation by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      Personally there was the first Star Wars film that came out when I was 7. Full stop. Even Empire and Jedi seemed a bit unnecessary to me. I do remember talk of there being 9 films at the time though.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    36. Re: Translation by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Star Wars video games were great, but who ever imagined those were canon when what you as a player did could impact them? ("History records that Darth Revan boned Bastila... wait, no he didn't. But she became his Dark Side apprentice... wait, no she didn't. It turns out Revan died in a casino on the underworld of Taris because he couldn't make any money playing Pazaak.")

      This is nothing new, as the same problem existed for game sequels for a long time now. And there is already a well-known way of dealing with non-railroaded games as part of the canon - only one particular sequence of player choices is deemed canon, and all others are AU.

    37. Re: Translation by jxander · · Score: 2

      The sad thing is that 1-3 actually has a very compelling story that they're trying to tell. A beautiful deconstruction of Joseph Campbell's "Hero's Journey," which a lot of people associate strongly (and wrongly) with the original 3 movies

      The prequels start out with a very simple "Chosen One" story arc. QuiGon was so completely convinced that Anakin was this ONE of prophecy that he (and later Obi Wan) completely ignored the fact that their Chosen One was a complete head case and spent all his time with someone who couldn't possibly be more obviously evil if they started twirling a Snidely Whiplash moustach.

      The whole prequel series is a thesis to why Prophecy or Destiny takes should be handled with copious skepticism. And that ties in perfectly with the original three which actually bucked the prophecy.

      Even in Luke's time, the Jedi leadership (Obi and Yoda) is still on the chosen one kick. Only now Luke is the chosen one, and their entire plan is "Teach him strongest kung fu, send him to kill evil Kung fu master." And they're so tunnel-vision locked into this plan that they'd rather just let Luke's friends (and sister) die on cloud city while like finished his training. And they definitely never even considered the plan that ultimately saved the day: redemption. Even if Luke had been strong enough to take Vader in a straight up fight (he wasn't) Palp still would've killed or turned Luke, wiped out the rebels, roll credits.

      All sux movies practically scream "Prophecy bad!" and the prequels seem to reinforce this. The only problem is that they were horribly scripted, had terrible pacing, over relied on CGI, used flat out racist characters, and a host of other problems ... but I think there was a nugget of a good story buried in there. Somewhere.

      --
      This signature is false.
    38. Re: Translation by MPAndonee · · Score: 1

      schnell,

      I wish I had mod points and you had not been modded to the top already. As someone who completely agrees with everything you said and has apparently read the same amount of novels and feels the same about what has happened in them, I would feel threatened by not using the EU which I have been a loyal follower for almost 20 years now, BUT, seeing that the misses have been more than the hits lately, maybe it's time.

      Just one thing J.J. -- PLEASE, PLEASE, please!!! No time travel. I hate time travel. Especially if not done well.

      --
      Nothing to see here -- move along now...
    39. Re:Translation by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have altered the canon. Pray I don't alter it further!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    40. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that he killed so many Jedi proved that he was the chosen one. The prophecy said he would bring balance to the force and that is exactly what he did by bringing the Sith into parity with the Jedi.

    41. Re: Translation by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Step Zero: Mod parent up.

      Step One: Invent a new universe.

      Step Two: Film it with a compelling script and actors.

      Step Three: Fight off copyright lawsuit.

      Step Four: Profit!!

  2. Why? by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I cannot claim to be much of a Star Wars fanatic and haven't read a Star Wars book in years, but I remember reading Timothy Zahn's Heir to the Empire along with the rest of the Thrawn Trilogy as a child and wishing that someday that would be adapted for the big screen as future episodes of the film series. Judging from its critical acclaim, I imagine many had the same wish. Strange that Disney would leave that all behind when its storywriting work was already done for it.

    Perhaps not enough opportunities for tie-in marketing in existing plot material?

    1. Re:Why? by putaro · · Score: 1

      I read a few of those long long ago but don't remember many plot details except maybe for some anti-Force sloths. Were Han, Luke and Leia in those novels and if so, how old were they? That may be part of the problem in adapting them.

    2. Re:Why? by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Yup. I can imagine that exactly. With Disney in control, they need the toys to market. Things like Thrawn would be great, but as a film? Can't see it happening alas.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dunno. Haven't read them,

      However, all Disney is saying that they aren't going to be bound by the countless shitty "expanded universe" stuff... because most of it is retarded fan bullshit.

      They may well decide to go with the one you mention - but they don't want to be forced.

      Good, I say... every time I hear about how fans really want a movie about Ramala Minoon - a black lesbian Jedi whose legs only work via the force - and featured in book 3 of the Dark Jedi academy decology

      It frankly makes me want to take a meat cleaver to every Star Wars aspie.

    4. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The Thrawn stories would make a great movie plot, but any movies out of them would neither fit into the Star Wars nor the Disney catalog of movies. Any movie about Thrawn would be a diplomacy/political thriller. Thrawn is an admiral, and a very fine one (from a purely military point of view). A Thrawn movie would have a completely different air to it than what you'd expect from a Star Wars movie, it would be a war movie, not unlike a lot of movies about contemporary admirals and generals, rather than the fantasy/sci-fi opera mix that SW movies usually are.

      It would be a great movie if you ask me. It just would never be a Star Wars movie.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Why? by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      I read a LOT of the Expanded Universe stuff around 7 or 8 years ago, when I had a job that involved a lot of international travel. The novels are a decent way to pass the time when you are constantly crammed into planes, or sat in a strange hotel room feeling jetlagged.

      I think the issue is that the Expanded Universe stuff mostly fits into two camp. The first - which is typified by the Timothy Zahn stuff - is the stuff that is decent sci-fi (better than franchise-fiction has any right to be) but which is fundamentally unsuited to film. The Heir to the Empire trilogy is good, but it's slow-paced, involves a lot of politics and it doesn't really have any scenes that would really adapt into big set-pieces in a movie (and Star Wars movies have always been heavy on the big set-pieces). As a TV series, putting aside the casting difficulties, Heir to the Empire might have worked. As movies? No hope.

      The other category - typified by the Kevin J Anderson stuff - is what could, most kindly, be described at "bad fanfiction". This is the stuff that's badly written, tone-deaf and schlocky. This stuff is filled with stilted dialogue, paper thin characterisation and plot holes you could fly a Star Destroyer through. Admittedly, everything I've just said could be applied equally to Lucas's prequel movies - but you really do hope they're aiming higher than that with the new stuff.

      Plus if you stuck with the existing Expanded Universe timeline, at some point you'd hit New Jedi Order. And that's where it gets difficult. For the uninitiated, the NJO is a very, very long multi-author series of novels, beginning around 20 years after Return of the Jedi, and centred around an invasion by extra-galactic aliens. It kills a lot of major characters (including characters from the movies) and, in case I didn't stress this enough above, is extremely long. Some of the authors who worked on it are fairly good. Some are terrible. But even when it works, it doesn't feel like Star Wars. It's a lot darker, a lot bloodier and even fits awkwardly with some of the other Expanded Universe stuff, let alone the movies. In terms of tone, it feels a lot more... well... I'm not quite sure... perhaps "Wing Commander" (from the fourth game onwards) than "Star Wars".

    6. Re:Why? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps not enough opportunities for tie-in marketing in existing plot material?

      Because a lot more goes into movies then just finding a good plot. They do focus groups on what will sell this year. Which words and titles are most popular. This is about making money, not art. Ever wonder why we get 3 movies released at nearly the same time with very similar plots? How many asteroid destroys the earth movies can we squeeze into one year? This year the hot topic seems to be Artificial Intelligence. A few years ago it was the earth getting back at us for polluting. Then there was the alien invasion summer.

      How can they use existing plots when those books were written decades before anyone would do a focus group to know what the public was currently panicking about? Without targeting the publics flighty paranoia, how are you ever supposed to make money?

    7. Re:Why? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I think they'll treat it as a partial reboot. They'll re-use the good ideas from the EU (Thrawn, Rogue Squadron, the Corellian trilogy, etc.) and ignore the bad ones (the Sun Crusher storyline, for one). But the only "canonical" things would be the movies and maybe the TV shows.

      Just like how most Batman continuities have similar events re-occur, I expect they'll re-tell the good EU stories simply because they're good stories and the fans want them. The chronology and specifics may differ, but if they're even remotely smart they'll use some of the good EU stories. Of course, "even remotely smart" might not be a low enough bar for Disney to clear...

    8. Re:Why? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, it's possible that the screenwriter and director they hired to work on the new movies thought that Timothy Zahn's work didn't provide the groundwork for the sort of movie they wanted to make, and so they went another direction. It may be as simple as "going a different direction.

      Last I heard, the movie was being directed by Abrams, who I'd imagine would like to write his own story. One of his more recent projects included a reboot of a scifi series that was badly in need of an overhaul. If I had to guess, I'd guess that the new movies may capture the spirit of the original 3 movies, while breaking substantially from the associated canon. I think you may find that the new movies are disappointing to the super-nerds who have spent years studying the exact science and star charts of the Star Wars universe. If there's already an explanation of how lightsabers work, or exactly which race exists on what planet, Abrams might not stick to it. That doesn't seem to be what Abrams does. But on the other hand, I predict it will be less stupid, and a hell of a lot more fun, than the prequels.

    9. Re:Why? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I didn't even think Zahn's Star Wars books were all that good. It's been years since I read them. I've read other stuff by Zahn that is a lot better. Some of the plotlines and characters were interesting, but the writing was atrocious.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Why? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the sun crusher the ship that discovered the empire and the sith and started the first emperial invasion?

    11. Re:Why? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      IMHO the X-Wing books are most deserving of movie treatments.

    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's so true - because Star Wars never sold toys with the first 3 movies. Those were pure art.

    13. Re:Why? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      but it takes 2 or 3 years from story origination to opening day. do they do focus groups of precogs to see what people will be panicking about in the future?

    14. Re:Why? by hubie · · Score: 1

      LOL! As someone who was a kid when the first one came out, your comment made me chuckle. You should have seen all the merchandise crap that came out, even after the first one. And the Ewoks only existed for their marketing potential.

    15. Re:Why? by SEE · · Score: 1

      Why is simple enough. The Thrawn stuff is five years after Jedi, not thirty, so you'd have to re-cast the original trilogy roles (Luke, Leia, Han, Lando) in order to film them. And the twenty-five years of stuff in the EU timeline after Thrawn is full of really stupid stuff.

    16. Re:Why? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      No, they have Media companies. They are tied into the news companies, so they can drum up interest in a topic as they please. Asteroids pass by Earth all the time, why is one more interesting than the other, around the same summer that they plan to have Deep impact and Armageddon released?

    17. Re:Why? by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      IIRC, for comparison purposes (spoiler warning):

      Death Star: Size: "That's no moon." Destructive potential: Destroyed Alderaan in one volley. Defeated by: the entire Rebel navy taking advantage of a small design flaw.

      Sun Crusher: Size: Millenium Falconish? Destructive potential: Causes suns to (super?) nova. Defeated by: boarding party, who fly it through (not just into) a Star Destroyer.

  3. Jar Jar Abrams by MrDoh! · · Score: 2

    I'm sensing a disturbance in the force.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
    1. Re:Jar Jar Abrams by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      ...as if a million fanboys suddenly cry out in terror, and will suddenly be silenced. I fear something terrible will happen.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. Spoiler Alert... by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    So stop reading if you haven't read the Thrawn Books. I liked them books, but I just wish they could have come up with a better solution then just killing him at the end. It seems every time they do something interesting they cop out later on when it's time to resolve it. It's like the writers can't figure out what could possibly be a threat to a Jedi, which is silly. Blasters in sufficient quantity are threat. Bounty Hunters are a threat. Hell, Aurra Sing freakin' _hunts_ Jedi. I always thought the Star Wars MMOs missed out on a cool end game where gangs of Bounty Hunters would hunt the Jedi in PvP mode.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  5. And there was a great disturbance in the Force... by danaris · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...as if a million Star Wars EU geeks had suddenly cried out in terror, and then immediately took to the Internet to vent their rage.

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  6. But wait... by jddj · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...What about "Children of Star Wars"? What about "Star Wars Messiah"? Does Leia kill herself? Is Luke Atredies REALLY the Kwisatz Haderach?

    I realize this is George Lucas' universe, that he "made up myself", but come on, aren't there another nine books of story to tell?

    1. Re:But wait... by Carcass666 · · Score: 2

      Heh, Carrie Fisher might have a shot at pulling off a reverend mother superior. And, if you put Idaho Duncan in a stormtrooper uniform..

    2. Re:But wait... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      george lucas has no say here. for better or for worse, he sold it all off. his opinion counts just as much as that of any blowhard in these comments.

    3. Re:But wait... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Does Leia kill herself?

      No, she fell to the Dark Side and tried to kill Jake Blues.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  7. Good. by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up with the expanded universe, and it was good back then, but at this point it's super depressing. They've killed off a bunch of main characters (both from the films and the EU), and they've sketched out a future that makes it clear that there is no hopeful future in the EU, just an endless cycle of collapse and ruin.

    1. Re:Good. by doreen3 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I feel...

    2. Re:Good. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Yeah that darth mouse is a scary one.

    3. Re:Good. by grim4593 · · Score: 1

      I would disagree that Lucas tried at all to fit into the expanded universe. I read most of the expanded universe books including the Thrawn series, X-Wing, and Jedi Academy. Those books did well taking all the existing plot before them and integrating them in a way that made sense and pushed the Star Wars story further. It was clear to me when the prequels came out that Lucas had no intent on fitting in with the world that grew during his absence after the original trilogy. At this point the EU has more material than the original and prequels. Granted there were quite a few low quality books and stories and I was never able to enjoy anything after the Vong were introduced but I feel it is a mistake to delete a large part of the universe that he created.

    4. Re:Good. by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      Yup, I stopped reading the expanded universe during the New Jedi Order series. It's been many years since I read a NJO series book but it seemed like they were all filled with war and unhappiness. Bad stuff happened in other books too but it didn't seem hopeless and the other books/trilogies/series generally had a happy ending of some sort.

    5. Re:Good. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      New Jedi Order is really where it all went wrong. That was when they decided to let evil win.

      They always will, because 'good' is dumb.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  8. Good. by thrift24 · · Score: 1

    It has been a long time since I was extremely familiar with the "extended universe", but at one time I had read somewhere around 50 of the books from this universe...and while many of them were great individually as a universe the universe as a whole was set by 20 different writers with different prerogatives...so for one I don't think the expanded universe is even a great universe but then on top of that it just totall ruins any ability for creative writing. There is hardly in an unaccounted for day in that universe.

    Lucas screwed up a lot in the prequels but I think some of that was due to trying to fit his story into the expanded universe. Primary example: midochlorians are right from the expanded universe. But he obviously referenced it throughout the films, the whole clone wars business -> mandolorion armor -> boba fett business was defined in the expanded university and then Lucas made his story to match that mold and it was the worst thing ever. I'm not totally blaming the expanded universe, Lucas is awful, but there is no reason to follow it.

    So anyway I will be glad to see some surprises. Hell I wish they'd forget the prequels happened and we just started from scratch after rtoj. the only real expanded universe bits I'd keep would be shadow of the empire and the bounty hunters...they don't pidgeon hole the story. Or start inventing new ships and tech and forcing the writers to reuse all these predefined assets.

  9. "Expanded Universe"? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    So the outrage is that the people who own the rights to make the movies aren't going to use some fan-fiction about the original movies? Why should I care?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:"Expanded Universe"? by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      Officially licensed fan fiction.

      I think the real outrage is that they're breaking with the EU before they break the other fan fiction, a series of moves that oddly were written and directed by the original author himself....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:"Expanded Universe"? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      your grammar makes no sense

  10. How is this surprising? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    This should come as no surprise to anyone who understands how the world works. Spin-off works have never been binding on any franchise flagship. Sure, the Star Trek films and TV series have been free to pick up bits of continuity from the novels or comics, but they've freely ignored them when it suited the purposes of the story they were telling. Marvel Comics can take what they want from the films (e.g. Phil Coulson), but they're still going to ignore them and tell their own stories. Episodes I-III already contradicted the Expanded Universe; why in a galaxy far, far away would anyone expect Episodes VII and later not to do so? Expecting the writers of these films to read and accommodate the metric tonne of professional fanfic (however good it is, however authorized it is) that comprises the EU is totally unrealistic.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  11. Yoda version by davidwr · · Score: 1

    A fork in the universe, I see.
    Take it, they will.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  12. At least in Star Trek... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    ...they did the whole 'we're going back in time to change everything' thing.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:At least in Star Trek... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I'm still confused about how going back in time was supposed to change the past from before the time travellers arrived. It must be because Apple invented the Starship Enterprise.

  13. only way by confused+one · · Score: 1

    As someone who saw the original movie when it first came out... only way that this works... Is to go waaaaay back in time. ( a long long long time ago in a galaxy far away) or to go forward far into the future (many generations after Luke and Anakin restore balance to the Force). There they could create new and interesting story lines that parallel the existing one(s).

  14. Am I the only one who thinks this is old news? by BluPhenix316 · · Score: 1

    I know they probably made it official now, however, I could have swore i've read this a while back when they announced they were making a new Star Wars movie. As I said, they are probably just making it official now, but I think everyone was already prepared for this to happen. So its kind of a non-story?

  15. Re:Fuck Star Wars by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Which asshole are you referring to?

  16. Only logical that it's gone by Guru80 · · Score: 2

    Has anyone ever dug deeply into the EU "canon"...I haven't but just scratching the surface you see dozens of pieces of work that contradict another dozen pieces of work. If they were to even attempt to keep it they would have to dig through 30 years worth of works to figure out which half needs to go anyway.

  17. I have a much neater solution. by teslar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone from the future travels to the past, changes something fundamental and the universe slips into an alternate reality from which it can never return and in which no event can be expected to unfold as it did in the original.

    Not only will this by definition never be inconsistent with the EU, it will give the writers ways of amusingly rehashing old stories by subtly altering some key elements things, like who gets to die of radiation while saving the crew. Maybe, in Episode VII, Luke will hack off Vader's hand?

    What?

  18. He did the same thing to star trek by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    they rebooted the universe... they blew up Vulcan... they have old spock as some kind of time traveler from a future that doesn't exist.

    Etc.

    So imagine if they do the same thing to star wars... You could see Tatooine blown up in the first movie. You could see a time traveling vador giving force advice to yoda or something. Who the hell knows.

    Generally not a fan of this sort of thing but it is what is happening.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  19. Star Wars was never intended to be serious drama. by mmell · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just to say - it was (IMHO) a romp - a chance for a bit of more or less mindless diversion from the routine workaday world some of us inhabit. George Lucas wasn't out to make a statement (Avatar, anyone?). He wasn't out to do serious drama (too many examples to cite). He wasn't out to do science fiction (practically no scientific credibility that it could ever have been or ever be what he depicted). It was fun. Lots of Battle of Britain style dogfights in space, because George Lucas had a liking for the old fighter pilot camera footage that was obtained during WW II. Ships in space don't fly like that.

    Okay, breaking continuity does make it harder to suspend disbelief. Most movie viewers can get over that within a few minutes, and I'm not really watching Star Wars for the dialog, social commentary, or even the technical predictions. I'm there to see the money shot, and hopefully a fun story to keep me from disbelieving while I wait for Luke's X-wing to fly down the trench. You know what impressed me even when I was a teenager? The fact that fast moving objects actually looked blurry, and that the Millennium Falcon was dirty. That was the first interstellar vessel I ever saw represented on film as having grease on the walls. Hell, there were even chrome (fuzzy) dice hanging from the rearview mirror, and it was the first time that I saw such incredible detail - detail which correctly got blurred when the viewpoint moved quickly. I just want the underlying story to not ruin my ability to suspend disbelief, so that I can enjoy the money shot.

  20. Good and Completely Unsurprising by coaxial · · Score: 1

    When the prequels, came out, Lucas tossed everything the EU under the bus, including everything stated and implied in the films. ("I just remember my mother was always very sad," No! That was your adopted mom!) About the only thing he kept was Obi-Wan and Anakin fought over lava. So none of this is surprising.

    When milking an existing franchise there's this need to be different-yet-similar, and a need to ramp everything up a notch or two. Eventually, everything gets a bit stupider as a result.

    Years, ago I ingested everything out of the WEG RPG source books. I loved it. Now when I look out at the EU, it seems like such overwrought load of rehashed crap. A perpetual war of Sith and Jedi with even the uniforms and technology always looking the same. It's like the Star Wars Galaxy didn't even have changes in design, or different empires to grow and fall. (The Rakata being the notable exception.) Its quite a boring universe really.

    1. Re:Good and Completely Unsurprising by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Wow, with the exception of the names of planets, that's a whole lot of meaningless fan service cameos.

      But fan boys are cheap right?

    2. Re:Good and Completely Unsurprising by coaxial · · Score: 1

      thanks. I'll have to check this out.

  21. Not caring much either way it goes by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I had forgotten about the new movies before seeing that /. headline.

    Let me guess, there will be space planes, robots, creatures and sword fights. I think I summed up the movie already.

    1. Re:Not caring much either way it goes by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, there will be space planes, robots, creatures and sword fights. I think I summed up the movie already.

      Exactly what I wanted. I'm getting in line tomorrow for tickets.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  22. So Star Wars Episodes VII-IX will not be canon by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they made that clear before I spent money on them.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Re:Star Wars was never intended to be serious dram by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Very good review of Star Wars. Too many people take the content of Star Wars way to serious. It's like listening to people argue about Woody Woodpecker canon.

  25. Ah, the Name-space-time Problem. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck even call it "Star Wars" then? Because you bought the rights to it and a combination of plot elements, etc? Is it illegal for other fictional works to reference another? No. So, why even call it "Star Wars"? Name Recognition, ugh.

    We solved the Rifts issue of namespace-time decades ago with GURPS.

    Creators exist within a culture and leverage the entirety of existence by reworking the tiniest layers atop it all. Without the culture they are irrelevant.
    All your Metaverse are belong to us.

  26. Re:What Makes Star Wars Work Is ... by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    What makes Star Wars work is:

    (1) No time travel
    (2) No time travel
    (3) No time travel

    For some reason, time travel has become the be-all and end-all trope of speculative fiction in comics, movies, and books.

    Your fictional works are reflective of your Technological Epoch.
    At risk of violating the prime directive, I'd also say that Star Wars works because:

        (0) No quantum coherency remodulation.

  27. Neater and messier at the same time! by billy3 · · Score: 1

    That someone first makes a jump further back into the past, but is a real quickie about it and rejumps to a later date. Vader: "Luke... I am your son..." Luke: "NOOoo, WTF? JUST NO!"

  28. Not a bad idea, I'll give Disney a fair chance by forrie · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the reasoning for this is along similar lines as the Star Trek venue in the theaters.

    While at first my reaction was negative -- after thinking about it, I would imagine that the folks at Disney are well-aware of how devout Star Wars fans feel about the the spirit of the story and the characters and worlds behind it; further, if they mess this up not only will they lose the income potential, they will have a lot of very angry fans on their doorstep. It could be that Star Wars doesn't live in a box anymore, that it's time for some fresh energy into the story - I can live with that, provided it's done appropriately. We don't want to see Mickey Mouse behind a tie fighter :-) I am willing to give Disney a fair chance.

    I agree with a previous poster here, elsewhere, about the "prequels" being very cookie-cutter -- cities, venues that we are already familiar with. Boring. We need more unknown worlds like Dagobah, et al, to stimulate our imagination, to keep a rich storyline going (along with interest).

    But I think they will have only one chance at this...