Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Which VHS Player To Buy?

stkpogo (799773) writes "I have several old VHS tapes that I'd like to digitize but my old VHS machine died years ago. What's a good VHS player to get so I can make nice clean digital videos from my old tapes before they're gone? I have a few TV -> USB adapters." How would you go about this, especially with tapes (like old home movies) you might be worried about sticking into a low-end VCR? And with what number of tapes does it make sense to outsource the digitizing?

201 comments

  1. I remember my first VHS player by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was like my first first post.

    1. Re:I remember my first VHS player by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      It was like my first first post.

      As in, sort of neat but ultimately of little value, right?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:I remember my first VHS player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1983 called. They want to know what you did with the remote.

    3. Re:I remember my first VHS player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replacement remotes are available on eBay. Typical prices are $10-$20.

    4. Re:I remember my first VHS player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do I, it's when I lost my virginity to my first GF watching Big Trouble in Little China.

    5. Re:I remember my first VHS player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My family bought a new Mitsubishi VHS VCR in 1983. This VCR was used to record and playback several times per day until 1994, and is still used periodically. Best VCR I have ever used.

    6. Re:I remember my first VHS player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K. S. Kyosuke: You've been called out (for tossing names) & you ran "forrest" from a fair challenge http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  2. Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    Something before the macrovision chip with 4+ heads... Though Im not sure if the heads affect playback...

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 5, Informative

      The number of heads only matters if the content was recorded at SLP/EP speed. On a 4-head VCR, 2 wider heads are optimized for SP playback, and the other two narrower heads are optimized for SLP/EP.

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    2. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Or use a video stabiliser (AKA Macrovision stripper). But if they're not commercial tapes, there won;t be any protection.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    3. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a stabilizer will help with 50% of the videos.

    4. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by RackinFrackin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good point. Get two.

    5. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by beltsbear · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not always. Heads are used for many things. The first 4 head units were done for better pause action not for better EP mode.

      If you are playing back a regular 2 hour mode tape and don't care about the sound almost anything that was good quality will work. If you need good sound and the original was done in HIFI you should make sure the new deck you get is HIFI as well.

      My last good VCR was an 8 head unit. 2 for SP, 2 for SLP/EP, 2 for better pause and 2 for HIFI sound.

    6. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by CanEHdian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not always. Heads are used for many things. The first 4 head units were done for better pause action not for better EP mode.

      Was this right after "Basic Instinct" came out on VHS? ;-)

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    7. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Casandro · · Score: 1

      Macrovision is record only.
      Professional VHS and/or S-VHS recorders actually had a switch where you could turn of the Macrovision AGC so those never were a problem.
      Such professional VTRs are now available fairly cheap, even the ones with little use. I'd gravitate towards an S-VHS one since they are able to play VHS, and they provide the S-Video output for no cross colour.

    8. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Casandro · · Score: 1

      It depends on the way the "stabilizer" works. Most just blank out some lines while some might actually replace the whole sync signal which is what you want.

    9. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Not always. Heads are used for many things. The first 4 head units were done for better pause action not for better EP mode.

      Was this right after "Basic Instinct" came out on VHS? ;-)

      If you want porn, watch porn. What the point on pausing a movie to hopefully see some cunt's crotch.

    10. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I still have an old Hitachi 5 head VCR. As I understand it, the fifth head was actually for making pause look clearer.

    11. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by iamhassi · · Score: 2

      Not always. Heads are used for many things. The first 4 head units were done for better pause action not for better EP mode.

      Was this right after "Basic Instinct" came out on VHS? ;-)

      If you want porn, watch porn. What the point on pausing a movie to hopefully see some cunt's crotch.

      Because you're 13 and internet didn't exist yet, pausing a movie was the best you got.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by ai4px · · Score: 1

      5th head was flying erase head

    13. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      5th head was flying erase head

      Heresy! The truth can only be found through flying spaghetti monster!

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    14. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      "Macrovision is record only."

      Sure, but many (most) capture cards will see the signal and refuse to record. Therefore, the need for such device. Besides, it helps too if the tape is damaged and the AGC gets confused.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    15. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Casandro · · Score: 1

      To be honest I've never seen a capture card doing anything with the signal. I know the chipsets are capable of detecting it, but I've never seen it implemented in a driver.

    16. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      ATI Theatre 550s and AIW will detect and prevent recording (I can confirm, I transfered a bunch of tapes last year.). Furthermore, the old drivers (i don't know for the new ones) would disable DVD playback if they detected a VCR on the TV-Out output (that was using ATI's DVD player on w98)

      Hauppauge cards (PVR-150 and HVR-1600 so far) don't, same case for my crappy Easycap 11$ USB dongle. but I'm using a *AHEM* ""video stabiliser"" just in case (also helps to not confuse the capture card for old tapes)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  3. Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy a broadcast-quality Sony player from eBay.

    BTW remember to retension the tapes, which means to rewind the tape, then wind it to the end of the reel, then rewind it again.

    1. Re:Bees knees by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy a broadcast-quality Sony player from eBay.

      "Broadcast quality" Sony players run Beta, not VHS.

    2. Re:Bees knees by unitron · · Score: 2

      Sony developed Beta, but manufactured both formats for the consumer market.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Broadcast quality" Sony players run BetaCAM (or Digital BetaCAM). Not Beta. not VHS. But they do make higher end VHS decks that were known to be used for broadcast.

    4. Re:Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      F*ck Beta!

    5. Re:Bees knees by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "Broadcast quality" Sony players run Beta, not VHS.

      Beta?! It's a trap!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BetaCam SP (analog) and BetaCam SX (digital). I worked at a TV station in the late 90s. While we did have a Sony VHS rack mounted deck, it was never and would never be used for broadcasting, rather the rare need for something dubbed to VHS for a client.

    7. Re:Bees knees by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, rewinding (is a player that rewinds softly, not in one that just maxes the voltage to the motor) then playing, then rewinding again is a VERY GOOD IDEA.

      Also, not all players are created equal. With some tapes, you want a high-end player, with others, you want a player that can follow the tape's errant tracking WAY OUT OF BOUNDS.

      I go to a GoodWill store, buy 4-5 decent looking VCRs, exchange the 2 that don't work, and try the same tape in all of them. You will find different tapes work better in different VCRs.

    8. Re:Bees knees by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.

      see: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sony-S...

      Studios still needed a way to replay VHS tapes from a variety of sources, such as mailed in VHS tapes from regular people. Production was done in a format that's derived from Beta, but not quite beta.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    9. Re: Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Buy a broadcast-quality Sony player from eBay.

      There is no such thing as "broadcast-quality" VHS.

    10. Re: Bees knees by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      http://www.ebay.com/bhp/profes.... Usually used for Production recording and playback.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    11. Re:Bees knees by DigiShaman · · Score: 1
      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:Bees knees by Casandro · · Score: 1

      VHS never was broadcast quality, however there's still a large market for professional non broadcast TV. For example companies would want to put internal information video on VHS since it's cheap and "good enough". For that market you get better (S-)VHS recorders.

    13. Re:Bees knees by Casandro · · Score: 1

      Actually the "broadcast quality" equipment ran various forms of Betacam which only shares the cassette size with Beta. The closest thing ever promoted by Sony for actual broadcast use was U-Matic, an ancestor of Beta with 3/4inch tape. It came in Low Band, High Band and SP.

      However as stated before, there's a professional market where quality doesn't matter, and that's where (S-)VHS came in.

    14. Re:Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because a VHS deck can be manufactured to professional specs doesn't make VHS "broadcast quality."

      There are technical standards that have to be met. You have to put the signal on a vectorscope to see if it's broadcast quality.

      http://www.videouniversity.com/articles/is-it-broadcast-quality/

      (Aviso: VHS stands for "Video Home System" - good enough for the home, but that's about it)

    15. Re: Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pro(sumer) equipment != broadcast quality.

      VHS only offered ~250 lines of resolution and was WAY unstable for sync.

    16. Re:Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot. It bothers me that other idiots like you are voting you up for your fucking stupid recommendation of a player that was never produced by sony. Play in traffic, the world will be a better place.

    17. Re:Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL you're trying to be so angry. :D "Fuck fuck fucking idiot fuck, kill yourself, fuck".

    18. Re:Bees knees by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      The Sony "SVO-" line of VHS/SVHS VTRs were used throughout studio production in the 90s. At dear University we had SVO-5800s, and these could record and play back VHS and SVHS, they had a 9-Pin P2 remote control implementation for editing controllers and so they could be controlled from an MC. They also had a full time base corrector, VITC and LTC recorder, reader and decoder, and they could also be genlocked. They had I/Os on BNCs and XLRs.

      At my public access station in the mid 90s we had Panasonic AG-7750s, which were similarly equipped, and could do insert/assemble edits out of the box. Fancier Panasonics had dynamic tracking and could shuttle/scan without rollbars.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    19. Re:Bees knees by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      And even within the broadcast market sometimes video that is not "broadcast quality" is used. There are shows like "you've been framed" that showed funny home videos and there is also the news where sometimes the only video of an important but unexpected event was a home video.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    20. Re:Bees knees by Casandro · · Score: 1

      Yes, plus they want to be able to give out VHS copies to people. In fact some producers dubbed all their material to VHS to be able to have a portable editing station in their hotel room where they could do a rough edit. The final edit would be done on proper equipment, but they already got a feel for how it would look like.

    21. Re: Bees knees by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      VHS was not a broadcast quality medium, but that didn't stop VHS content from being broadcast at times. On those occasions broadcasters wanted to get the best possible quality they could out of the imperfect medium; that is what professional VHS decks were for. News programming might show a relevant VHS tape if it captured an important event and no better video was available, and there were shows that broadcast viewer-submitted content such as America's Funniest Home Videos or the Stupid Pet Tricks on Letterman.

    22. Re:Bees knees by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      The tapes you'll have the hardest time transferring with a new VCR are the ones made with a cheap VCR after ~1999 (after everyone had basically switched to DVD for watching movies, but VHS still existed as a nasty kludge for time-shifting prior to DVRs becoming affordable & common). Old tapes recorded with expensive VCRs generally play fine unless they were stored someplace humid. New tapes recorded with $99 VCRs might not be playable by anything besides the VCR that recorded them... and even THAT's questionable. 1980s tapes were built to last, and VCRs were precision devices built to exacting standards. Early-2000s tapes were designed to cost a dollar to manufacture & last for a year or two, and the VCRs were as mechanically shoddy as they could get without outstripping the capabilities of the DSP chip.

      In audiocassette terms, last-gen VCRs & tapes had CATASTROPHIC problems with what would have been called "wow & flutter" on an audiotape. Basically, VHS depends upon having a precise match between the tape speed and head rotation speed, and the last-gen models were UNBELIEVABLY sloppy with it. Often, as belts aged, they'd lurch and slip.

      Big tip: forget everything you've been told about the "real" resolution of VHS tapes. If your goal is to preserve them in digital form forever, without making them worse, capture at 720x480 & accept the fact that noise compresses badly, so you'll need a fairly high bitrate (6mbps BARE MINIMUM). And don't be too eager to throw away YUV color information -- keep it 4:2:2 unless you literally don't ever intend to try restoring it. Remember, most video-restoration tools depend upon exactly the kind of "higher-order" that aggressive compression throws away & mangles.

      Most importantly, never forget that the only thing Nyquist guarantees is that a sample rate less than double the information rate is guaranteed to fail... it says NOTHING (directly) about the minimum sample rate that will actually preserve higher-order detail.

      The really bad news: at the moment, there's no compression scheme that's mostly lossless (like lossless h.264 with x264) AND compliant enough with Blu-Ray standards to be directly playable by a random Blu-Ray player. So... don't get too hung up on near-line playability. Capture your minimally-compressed gold copy and carve it into (non-LTH BD-R) stone, then re-encode a DVD-playable copy (704x480 MPEG-2 6-8mbps, AC3 or MP3 audio, possibly with long GOPs and/or VBR if you know your player can handle them).

    23. Re:Bees knees by megabeck42 · · Score: 1

      What about the Sony SVO-5800? It would appear to be a "broadcast quality" sony s-vhs deck and would appear to be able to read and write regular VHS tapes. Am I missing something or is this a rare exception to your stated rule?

      --
      fnord.
    24. Re:Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K. S. Kyosuke: You've been called out (for tossing names) & you ran "forrest" from a fair challenge http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  4. Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And with what number of tapes does it make sense to outsource the digitizing?

    evaluate the cost of a vcr and the amount of time you have to transfer, I cannot provide a value to your time then compare it to the cost of outsourcing and make choice.

    1. Re:Do the math by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That, exactly. I can't really imagine how it could be worth your time and effort to do it yourself, unless you have VHS tapes that have material on them that you don't want a third party to see. Send your tapes to someone else to have them transfered to DVD and spend the extra time you just bought yourself doing something enjoyable.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Do the math by nowsharing · · Score: 1, Insightful

      VHS > DVD: Why go from one horrible format to another? It would be a complete waste of time transferring VHS at all if the source format is DVD. These are old memories that will probably never be transferred again, so the least I'd do is a high profile h.264 or something similar. If you've watched a DVD lately, you'll notice that they look like complete shit.

      It's kind of shocking to me that people still feel restricted by physical media's limitations.

    3. Re:Do the math by nowsharing · · Score: 1

      err, I meant "if the output format is DVD"

    4. Re:Do the math by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Standard MPEG2 capture is fine for VHS. x264 won't give you better quality as it can't create lines of resolution. Besides, *everything* can read MPEG2...

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    5. Re:Do the math by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

      You can criticize DVD all you want, but it is more lines of resolution than VHS. Now, some transfers are better than others, so one would be wise to look around before committing to let someone do the transfer for them.

      And while DVD may be a format approaching obsolescence (at least on the market), there are so many readers out there - and it is trivial to rip DVD to a file on your computer so you have another copy - that it is likely the most portable in the long-term sense.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    6. Re:Do the math by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "That, exactly. I can't really imagine how it could be worth your time and effort to do it yourself, unless you have VHS tapes that have material on them that you don't want a third party to see. Send your tapes to someone else to have them transfered to DVD and spend the extra time you just bought yourself doing something enjoyable."

      Exactly! Where I live, we have an audiovisual document center where all that stuff is archived for the community.
      They digitize any analog materiel, even for free if you give them a copy of stuff that's relevant for the community, like if you happen to have recorded anything historically relevant, like a concert, a speech, a jubilee, a parade, an inauguration etc.
      Lots of people are now inheriting boxes of super8 tapes where nobody knows what's on them.
      I'm sure there's something similar in the US.

    7. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > ... unless you have VHS tapes that have material on them that you don't want a third party to see.

      Best answer right here.

      To submitter: there's no need to hold on to your homemade pr0n. Put it in storage or bulk-erase it. Let the past stay in the past!

    8. Re:Do the math by mikael · · Score: 1

      I did some digitizing using a TV card (around $120) and and a cheap $50 VCR. The recorded visual and sound quality was as good as the tape itself. But then you need to weigh up the costs of a large capacity disk drive, the TV card, VCR and cables. Those cheap VCR don't last long even with modern cassettes. The motors usually end up burning out. No different from those low cost USB cassette players. The torque required to just loosen up the tape is equivalent to holding a pen firmly in one hand and trying to turn it with the other. They just can't handle it.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:Do the math by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      I still watch divx/xvid, and the worst thing is the 128Kbit/s MP3 sound. Sometimes sligtly better, 128K AAC.
      I hope a streaming/download service will comes up that satisfies my needs.. I want low bitrate, low res video and high btirate stereo sound!

      DVD is high bitrate and low res. Yes, the codec is old but with the max legal video birate you can afford with stereo or mono 48KHz sound, I'm sure it can look okay.

      Oh, I guess you have a too big TV with too much processing enabled. I suppose that if you don't disable all that crap you're looking at upscaled macroblocks run through a sharpen filter. I remember seeing first a Blu Ray demo in store, there was a lot of sharpen and the Blu Ray was maybe MPEG2.. Yes, it looked like crap. Really total crap.

      I am very concerned about the sound. The VCR has to be good at extracting the sound signal from old home tapes, sound must be degraded and muffled already. Then the recording of footage on a PC has to be done by someone who is not a complete idiot, with volume levels, gain set up accordingly, and not using a noisy sound input like the one on a random old motherboard.

    10. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't help save your retarded comment.

    11. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      x264 isn't just better quality. It's better compression. An mpeg file converted to x264 will be the same quality, but a lot smaller.

    12. Re:Do the math by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Sound like you need professional equipment +... Extracting good sound from old recordings needs a sound (or TV) engineer who knows what they are doing, along with at least a semi pro setup..
      DVD is pretty obsolete - but at least it works and it is about as universal as you can get.
      I'm in the same position of having loads of old VHS tapes, + my cataloguing went wrong & was very poor. Now stuck with that collection getting older and older, and about 5 - 10% of the stuff on those tapes (at most) is useful or worth keeping... A lot of old archive video that's not really available any more - and its all in crappy low res VHS, most of it with mono sound.
      MTV is one of the worst, (a long long time ago) there used to be a lot of good stuff on there played late at night and quite a lot of it wasn't released anywhere else. Alternative, Rave, Club, Dance type stuff. Some of it is on You Tube but not much - that version of the channel doesn't even exist any more and the only recordings that seem to exist are by fans..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    13. Re:Do the math by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      You can criticize DVD all you want, but it is more lines of resolution than VHS.

      So? What are you going to put into those extra lines? Copies of the original lines from the scan? Interpolated lines - according to what algorithm (hint: in 6 months you'll decide you should have used a different algorithm)? Your mother's cookie dough recipe?

      It's like using Word4DOS to edit autoexec.bat (if you go back that far) : sure you can do it, but it's a massive overkill for the actual task required, and there's a lot of opportunities to get it wrong.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    14. Re:Do the math by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      You can criticize DVD all you want, but it is more lines of resolution than VHS.

      So? What are you going to put into those extra lines?

      Nothing, actually. My argument was directed at the person who was saying that DVD would be a poor choice for transferring VHS movies to. Just because the lines are available doesn't mean they have to use used.

      Now, there may be other options available as destinations for such transfers (actually I'm rather certain there are), and some may even be better choices for various reasons. But for portability between different players, it's hard to beat DVD, and the lifespan of optical media is quite good as well.

      It's like using Word4DOS to edit autoexec.bat (if you go back that far) : sure you can do it, but it's a massive overkill for the actual task required, and there's a lot of opportunities to get it wrong.

      I believe the original topic of this discussion and article were how this person could get old VHS movies to a digital format. Person who submitted this article was asking for suggestions on VHS players for such a task; I continue to support the earlier suggestion of sending the tapes to someone who does this regularly and let them handle it instead - in no small part due to the opportunities to get it wrong, though for other reasons as well. In addition if it is transfered to DVD, ripping to a digital format is trivially easy on any computer with a DVD drive.

      And yes, I did plenty with autoexec.bat back in the day. At one point when the XMS/EMS battles were going on, I set up a menu system between my autoexec.bat and config.sys so I could select at boot which one I want. That was of course back when we purchased RAM in sub-MB increments.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    15. Re:Do the math by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      The biggest problem with most VHS-to-DVD transfers is inadequate sample resolution or encoding bitrate. VHS is low-res... but it's also noisy, and noise compresses badly. Encoding captured VHS video in a way that preserves it EXACTLY the way it was read from the VCR (preserving higher-order information like chroma shift and luminance noise) so it can be further restored later requires a MINIMUM 704x480 resolution and 6-8mbps bitrate. In English, that basically means you'll get about an hour of high-quality captured video from VHS on a single-layer DVD. Two hours might be do-able at good quality if you're digitizing 24fps content, but a straight VHS capture encoded to 4mbps or lower is probably going to look worse than the original from the tape did.

      A good way to think about it is to envision taking a photograph of an early-80s videogame's CRT display. The nominal resolution of the game might have only been something like 320x200 or 256x192, but other factors like the electron gun alignment, mask pitch, bleed, bloom, etc enter into the equation as well. If your goal is to just capture an approximation of the display, you could resample it down to its nominal resolution... but if your goal is to preserve every nuance of the video's appearance as it appeared on the CRT (so you can literally emulate things like CRT alignment bleed and color halos on a 2560x1440 LCD), your photograph of the CRT will have to be MUCH higher resolution than its nominal resolution.

  5. Tapes are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But tapes are better for long-term storage!

    1. Re:Tapes are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Digital tapes are better for long-term storage when they're kept in temperature controlled storage, and not subjected to constant read-write cycles.

    2. Re:Tapes are better by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      Yes and analog tapes are also quite good for long term storage - you can store a tape for 20-30 years without a problem, while digital media (other than digital tapes) cannot be stored for this long, they need constant copying.

    3. Re:Tapes are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have many 30 year old Commodore 64 5.25" floppy disks here that still load just fine.

    4. Re:Tapes are better by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      This is because the data density is so low. However, modern media (recordable CDs, DVDs, hard drives, flash memory) do not hold onto their data for very long. Hard drives might retain the magnetization, but their mechanical parts can wear out (if it's on all the time) or just fail (if it's off all the time, heads can stick or lubrication can harden and it's not like you can oil the hard drive like a floppy or tape drive).

      OTOH, analog tape (video or audio) retains the data for very long time (I have a tape recorded in 1951 and it still plays OK) and the machines that play it can be maintained and repaired and are still quite available (used).

    5. Re:Tapes are better by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      ....(I have a tape recorded in 1951 and it still plays OK) ....

      Just curious, is that a 1/4" tape?

    6. Re:Tapes are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, is that a 1/4" tape?

      That's what she said

    7. Re:Tapes are better by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      Yes, and unlike more modern tapes it is made of paper, the brand name is "Soundmirror". The paper tape can snap in some tape decks (like the Revox A77), but in a tape deck with servo tension or on that has one motor (the tension is lower on these) it plays OK. It was recorded full track, but it looks like only in the center - if played on a 4 track tape deck, only the right channel plays.

    8. Re:Tapes are better by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Your old tape probably has a very thick oxide layer on a fairly thick backing, compared to modern stuff.

      Back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, I got my VHS blank tapes from a guy who bought it straight from TDK -- at the time that was the only place I could find their best retail tape, which was about half again 'thicker' than standard consumer tape (and cost about half again as much, too). Per what he told me, this was basically the seconds from their studio-grade tape, and it was still miles above standard tape. When you're recording off a weak over-the-air signal, tape quality makes a huge difference.

      At the far end of the scale, you couldn't give me Kodak tapes.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  6. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will you actually bother watching the digital files when they're off VHS, or are you doing this "just because?"

  7. Panasonic AG1980P by tetatdo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am working on a similar project with old VHS movie, if you can pick up a SVHS deck, that will help. Anything prosumer is good too. I just picked up 2 Panasonic AG1980P and that is supposed to be one of the better decks for such a purpose. I found them on goodwill's website! Hopefully they work. These have TBCs (time based correctors) which are supposed to correct issues with the picture due to damaged or old tapes, etc.

    1. Re:Panasonic AG1980P by Bitmanhome · · Score: 4, Informative

      Be sure to test every tape with the TBC on and off. I've noticed a hint of pixelation with it on, and the dynamic range seems to be a bit narrower too. I believe you should leave TBC off as much as possible as long as your capture device likes the signal.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    2. Re:Panasonic AG1980P by microcars · · Score: 4, Informative

      These are excellent machines that will play back just about any VHS tape you can throw at them.
      I am looking at 5 of them across the room from me right now. 3 are in excellent condition, one needs some audio work and one needs all the capacitors changed.
      I also leave the screws off the covers so I can slide them back and manually clean the heads when I run into some bad tapes (tapes that were crinkled or damaged or have iron oxide flaking off).

      The capacitors is the big issue with these. Every.Single.One needs to be replaced at some point.
      I used to send my machines out to a place in Texas to have them changed for around $300 after I bought them on eBay.
      Then there was a guy selling them on eBay with the caps changed out for around $300 and they were running like new.
      I think he is still there.

      These machines are excellent at playing back difficult to track tapes, or ones recorded in SLP/EP mode.
      don't buy one of those all-in-one VHS to DVD machines unless your tapes are all in good condition and recorded in SP mode.

      --
      I like microcars
    3. Re:Panasonic AG1980P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another vote for the ag1980p. A fantastic device.

    4. Re:Panasonic AG1980P by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The Panasonic AG1980P is really great - as good as it gets when it comes to VHS.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  8. time base corrector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A "normal" tv -> USB dongle may not be sufficient for the usual VHS players, since their timing may be way off. You'll need somehting that has a TBC (time base corrector), either in the player or in the device to digitize the signal.

    Other than that, I'd recommend a player made by Panasonic, since they used to make more robust, metal drives thatn most other manufacturers.

    1. Re:time base corrector by unitron · · Score: 1

      A "normal" tv -> USB dongle may not be sufficient for the usual VHS players, since their timing may be way off. You'll need somehting that has a TBC (time base corrector), either in the player or in the device to digitize the signal.

      Other than that, I'd recommend a player made by Panasonic, since they used to make more robust, metal drives thatn most other manufacturers.

      The older Panasonic models, perhaps, but by the turn of the century or so, theirs were pretty much the same inside as everyone else's.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:time base corrector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than that, I'd recommend a player made by Panasonic, since they used to make more robust, metal drives thatn most other manufacturers.

      Starting with the G-series they went plastic which caused the frame to be flexible and they were skipping and stripping gear teeth all over the place. Pretty much the only Panasonics we see nowadays (that we're willing to fix) are the [AG/NV]-W1 World Video Recorders being used in libraries for archival videos.

  9. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They sell some pretty good ones at a place called time machine

  10. Depending on how many tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Find a reputable service and have them do it for you. You will only need to do it once, so buying an expensive set up to get the best results is dumb. However, a professional service will invest in top equipment, because they do it all the time. The devil is in the research of finding a reputable service that does quality work, vs Staples.

  11. least amount of pain.... by Velociraptor101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ... "Toshiba DVR620 DVD/VHS Recorder" Highly recommend it. Read reviews and follow fellow buyers recommendations and its fantastic. Non-tech users can be taught to use it as well.

    1. Re:least amount of pain.... by clifffton · · Score: 0

      Our family uses VHS to DVD for all the transfers. Once you have it on DVD most of the time you are done! It works better than you would think, but not as good as you might hope.

    2. Re:least amount of pain.... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      Hmm... No. I have one of these. It just ate a VHS tape. It does that time to time. Sucks it in and just keeps on grinding the tape to shreds.

      I bought this unit for the ability to transfer VHS to DVD. I was not happy with the results.

      It is better to just buy DVDs on eBay or used on Amazon for a couple of bucks if your VHS are commercial releases. The quality is far better and it doesn't waste your time. Put the VHS tapes in a time capsule.

  12. Best Possible Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should ask the specialist

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z4iw8Ppo1o

  13. Don't get a pro deck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no direct experience, but I read on the web that professional VHS editing decks have wider heads, so if a pro deck is reading and writing the tape it will make better use of the medium, and likewise it's ok if a consumer deck reads a tape written by a pro deck because the narrower track it reads will fall within the wider one written. However, if a pro deck reads a tape written by consumer deck, it will pick up noise on either side of the narrow track and actually produce worse output than a consumer deck would.

    I also read the advice about TBC and assume it's correct, but I have to say this seems really stupid. AIUI a TBC is basically a capture card and a video card, back-to-back. Why don't the capture cards include this function? It's where it belongs. Are there good capture cards you can buy that make TBC irrelevant, or do all capture cards suck?

  14. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The things Star Wars fans have to put up with just to watch some movies...

    1. Re:Wow by peragrin · · Score: 1

      you laugh but it was precisely because of VHS versus BETA that I spent 10 years trying to figure out why in one version of Return of the Jedi the Falcon loses it's sensor dish escaping from the Death Star II and in another it doesn't.

      our BETA copy of the video didn't have it and my cousins VHS did. It was an off comment made by my cousin that went along the lines of "Not a scratch". Only years later did I realize that lucas randomly edited and rereleased versions of the movies.

      Personally though if you going to watch star wars you have to watch it on Laser sword disc.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Wow by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I have a couple reels of 8mm film from the promos for Star Wars. I've thought of bringing them to a video transfer service, but just haven't had the desire to spend the money on a novelty. Maybe next year.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Wow by sh00z · · Score: 2

      The things Star Wars fans have to put up with just to watch some movies...

      I know it was intended as funny, but the internet search term that will help here is "Harmy Despecialized Editions."

  15. Prepare for a deep rabbit hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have been going though the same process. digitalfaq and videohelp are good resources.

    http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/dvd-video/
    http://www.digitalfaq.com/guides/video/capture-playback-hardware.htm
    http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/video-restore/1567-vcr-buying-guide.html

    Let me know when you decide to de-interlace or not. I'm still deciding on that. All the research on-line I have found says to not de-interlace. I feel it would be better to de-interlace though. The video can have a lot more detail before a video is compressed with h.264 or something a de-interlacer could use.

    1. Re:Prepare for a deep rabbit hole by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I would do a sample test of a segment, Do it both ways, see which you prefer (since im assuming its for you, not a wide audience) and do the rest the way you see best

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  16. Don't get a VHS player... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you want to go Betamax.

    1. Re:Don't get a VHS player... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      nah, Laser Videodisc is the future.

    2. Re:Don't get a VHS player... by unitron · · Score: 1

      Marty said different.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Don't get a VHS player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sucks for those of us who just filmed all the Super 8 reels onto VHS...

  17. Speaking From Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking from experience, the greater difficulty is going to be getting the digitizer to not freak out when your old-ass videotapes warble. Video input adapters, especially cheap ones, freak out and glitch on bad video signal, completely dropping the video sometimes for a second or more before it recovers. This can make the digital recording just unusable. I have heard that DVR-style recorders handle this better, but have no personal experience with this.

    I would highly recommend a SVHS deck that has video enhancement, to try to minimize this (SVHS standard doesn't come into play, just that the machine will automatically have four heads.)

    1. Re:Speaking From Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did all my VHS to digital transfer almost 15 years ago, using a Hi-Fi 4 head SVHS deck for video out, and a Sony Digital Handicam in passhtrough mode to Firewire for the digital conversion. It wrote straight to disk in Digital Video mode (1 hr of video took 13GB) at which point I could compress/deinterlace/etc. however I wanted after the fact. My archival copies are all in uncompressed D-Video format.

    2. Re:Speaking From Experience by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Just to make you and anyone else reading this aware: DV format is compressed (though iirc it's only intraframe compressed not interframe compressed)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  18. Ion Audio by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

    I've had good luck with an Ion cassette-to-USB deck for ripping an old tape collection to digital on the computer. They've got a VHS-to-USB one as well: http://www.ionaudio.com/products/details/vcr-2-pc.

    1. Re:Ion Audio by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      That's been discontinued, and AFAIK only has PC drivers. Their replacement is just a composite -> USB box, but it does have OS X drivers.

      Dunno if either has OSS support, alas.

      I like the VCR2DVD deck idea, assuming one can be found that does a quality job. I reckon finding a higher-end (S) VHS deck (with 4+ heads, stereo, auto tracking, maybe jog/shuttle knob) and testing it with a few sacrificable tapes is the way to go for OP. For 8mm video I'd recommend finding a Digital8 deck or camera, since it internally converts analog 8mm/Hi8 to digital before sending it up the firewire link.

  19. Make sure it has s-video output by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've converted several old family VHS (and Beta/Hi8) tapes to digital. In my experience, s-video output makes a much bigger quality difference than the type or quality of player. Composite video (the yellow plug in the yellow, red, white RCA triplet) combines both luminosity (brightness) and chroma (color) into one signal, resulting in a lot of crosstalk (the shimmering "marching ants" when you display high-contrast lines and borders). S-video keeps these signals separate so there is no cross-talk. Makes for a much cleaner transfer to digital.

    Of course if the original tape was recorded using a composite signal, then there's nothing you can do.

    1. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All VHS was recorded with composite video, S-Video output was invented to go along with S-VHS.

    2. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, on top of S-Video output, make sure it has all the latest VHS quality enhancements such as S-VHS (probaby has if it has a S-VIDEO output -duh!) and FM sound. Although it won't help with tapes that were never recorded in these formats, it will certainly bring out the best of the tapes that were.

      For old analogue audio recordings, being able to tweak the audio head azimuth will help bring out the best of the recording. I also consider this essential for archiving cassette and open reel recordings. You have to hear how much difference being able to tweak aziumuth makes to believe it. It is a critical adjustment and the playback azimuth has to match that of the recorder otherwise all your top end goes down the plug-hole and it sounds washed out.

    3. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think you're mistaken there. VHS recorded the luma and chroma signals separately, see wikipedia. S-VHS recorded more lines of resolution.

    4. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by Static · · Score: 1

      No, even VHS records them separately. It's just that S-VHS decks not only have better comb filters but provide access to the separated signal paths (S-video).

    5. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by tepples · · Score: 2

      In composite NTSC, (roughly) luma is 0-4.2 MHz and chroma is 3.0-4.2 MHz. Though VHS recorded luma and chroma separately, VHS recorded only 0-3.0 MHz of luma and far less chroma, making them easy to tease apart even without a comb filter. S-VHS had more luma bandwidth, requiring S-Video in order not to have them overlap.

    6. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by clifffton · · Score: 0

      As an old VCR tech (it paid the bills for 20 years :)) tepples is right. In VHS and Beta luma and chroma (B&W and the color overlay) have always been separate. Actually, that's true for NTSC broadcast too. Spend some time looking at NTSC you will be amazed how it ever worked. The math required is pretty amazing for the slide rule days. Analog FM stereo uses some of the same tech. SVHS decks were usually better quality and totally backwards compatible. If you find an "S" tape you will be glad that you get the better unit.

    7. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      There used to be an old joke name for NTSC Never Twice the Same Colour. In the UK we had PAL, which was slightly better but was dizzyingly complicated. People just don't appreciate how simple and easy digital video is compared to the old analogue and the days of video tape... (waves stick)

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    8. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by adolf · · Score: 2

      Eh?

      There's a lot of misinformation here: Not just with your post, but everywhere.

      Let's start with audio.

      Initially, all VHS tapes had a monaural sound track that is recorded linearly at very low speed, in a manner not at all dissimilar to a Compact Cassette (but worse). It sucks, but it's all that such a tape has: If you have such a tape, you'll have to make the best of it.

      Some VHS tapes (mostly original studio releases) also have a linear stereo soundtrack. This also sucks (again, because the tape speed is too low for excellent audio), but it's all the tape has. This stereo linear soundtrack is often recorded with Dolby B, but not always (and if it is, you better have a proper Dolby B decoder on the output, or you're doing it wrong). Consumer VCRs that could deal with linear stereo were and are rare.

      Many tapes, whether studio releases or otherwise, that were recorded on equipment newer than the mid-late 80s also have a Hi-Fi soundtrack, which can be either stereo or monaural. This is both recorded and played back using the helical-scanning video head, and is (indeed) rather Hi-Fi: It has excellent channel separation, and excellent signal-to-noise, and excellent frequency response.

      Lots of home-made Hi-Fi tapes have mono sound, because that was all the recorder could handle, even though the Hi-Fi standard specified two channels. This was for marketing purposes: You could sell a mono Hi-Fi VCR or camcorder next to a stereo Hi-Fi VCR, and both would perform similarly...except the former was cheaper, and the latter had stereo IO. (===$Profit!)

      Yes, VHS Hi-Fi uses a frequency modulation system to accomplish its awesomeness (and it is still awesome, even in these modern enlightened times). But it was never marketed as such, so looking for a VHS VCR that supports "FM" is a non-starter.

      Which of these is best for playback and archival depends on entirely the tape in question, and what audio formats it has recorded on it, and how those formats were handled through the original signal chain, the level of deterioration of the tape itself, the calibration of the playback machine to the recorded tape, [...].

      Meanwhile, video. Video is simpler to discuss, because VHS only has one video format: Composite NTSC.

      A lot of people keep saying "Oh, and make sure it has something with an S-Video output, because that's better."

      And I'm here to tell you: Dude, it doesn't matter. You might theoretically buy a VHS player with a Faroudja-scaled 1080p output over SDI, and it STILL doesn't matter: Regular VHS tapes always and only just have composite video on the tape itself, with the luminance and chroma signals multiplexed together. Accordingly, the very best unprocessed video that a regular VHS tape can present is composite NTSC, because that's all that is on the tape.

      The only inherent difference, again with regular VHS media, between a player with an S-Video output, and a player with a composite output, is which device is responsible for comb filtering the composite video: The tape machine, or the playback machine/capture device.

      So, one has a choice: Do you trust this role of Y/C separation to a possibly decades-old analog machine on blind faith that "S-Video is better," or do you trust it to modern video hardware wherein the capacitors have not yet aged, the solder joints are still good, and much of it probably happens in well-developed DSP-land?

      I'll pick the latter, myself, unless I had a remarkably good and recently tuned S-VHS deck which is known to have an excellent comb filter....and even if I had such a beast (which is going to cost a nontrivial amount of money), I'd still compare the two methods with a very skeptical eye. Digital scalers, de-interlacers, and digital comb filters have progressed by leaps and bounds over the past decade and a half or so, to the point that a cheap TV from Wal-Mart can a better job of handling these things than the very best (and very expensive) hardware from

    9. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by clifffton · · Score: 0

      I never got to experience PAL (Phase Alternation by Line) but it had some serious advantages. The biggest one, color phase, appeared to be much better since the sender determined the "tint" rather than the user. More luma bandwidth too as I remember. There was a time when RCA/GE put SCART jacks on some units, but 'Merica never took advantage.

  20. Re:Dude, don't a get a VHS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Betamax play VHS tapes? and if it does, does it play with better quality than that of a typical VHS player?

  21. Get them converted by someone else or ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check ebay, buy one, do your conversion then sell it. VHS quality for old tapes would be bad so don't worry too much about the player.

  22. Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't stick your tapes in crazy.

  23. Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 by Talinom · · Score: 4, Informative

    2 head VCRs are SP only. 4 head VCRs add two heads for EP. If all of your content is SP then a 2 head VCR should suffice. Depending upon the quality of the audio you want to present you might consider either stereo or Hi-Fi. Whatever VCR you choose should have manual tracking adjustment.

    For capturing content on a Windows box I cannot recommend the Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 highly enough. That capture card should also be compatible with MythTV.

    The output from my current consumer grade 4 head Panasonic Omnivision (mono audio) VCR was friggin amazing. My wife had a selection of out of print VHS tapes and I captured them with that card. She was missing one tape and while searching for it I found a three pack of DVDs, one of which matched what she was missing and two of which matched what she had. I had to look at the output frame by frame to see if there was any perceptible difference between the Hauppauge output and the DVD. There was none.

    Even with normal recordings from home there can be issues with the picture quality. If you have problems with the video becoming lighter and darker that my not be a copy protection issue (obviously as you are working with home movies). Consider purchasing a Digital video stabilizer. The guys at the electronics repair shop nearby recommend ones by MCM Electronics to help mitigate transfer issues.

    Tossing your MPEG-2 output from the Hauppauge through the NLE of your choice might help with noise reduction (I use NeatVideo> and color skew. YMMV.

    --
    "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will second a Panasonic. Video quality out of a 4 head omnivision rivals that of dvd. I've been in two small tv studios and broadcast houses as digital was coming of age, and they had many Panasonic recorders/players. Although they were svhs, the one I have now is a consumer vhs; still looks and plays great.

    2. Re:Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 by Talinom · · Score: 1

      WTF, that is a TV tuner. We don't need a TV tuner, we just need a VCR to PC adapter. Where do I get one? I don't even know where to start.

      The WinTV PVR has analog input for recording from analog sources. It does happen to have both analog and digital tuners but I do not use them. Their analog capture is the best that I have ever seen.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    3. Re:Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      My older Panasonic VHS (which I bought used in 1984, but it was about a year old then) is a two-head, and it does EP -- tho there's a considerable loss of quality. Not so noticeable on my newer Panasonic 4-head (got it about 1998, I forget exactly).

      You still want to go with a 4-head if you can find it -- trust me, having seen playback side by side, it makes a BIG difference -- even on tapes recorded with the 2-head, and especially on tapes recorded in EP by the 2-head. No comparison. (I checked with that some old tapes I'd recorded off TV that I wanted to rip, but the DVDs came along before I got around to trying it.)

      Any Panasonic new enough to not be in the bulky case is likely to be a 4-head anyway; they were fairly early to that party. Far as I've seen they all say which right on the case anyway.

      I've heard nothing but good about the Hauppauge capture cards, tho I haven't got round to trying it myself (I picked one up for free as part of a junked computer). Good info on using 'em, thanks!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Most VCRs sport a composite video out RCA connector on the back. With a cheap RCA to S-Video adapter you could use the S-Video input on the Hauppauge and be in business. If your VCR is fancy enough, it may even have a S-Video output making even it even simpler. If you had to, you could also use the tuner, as pretty much every consumer-level VCR will also output on either Ch 3 or Ch 4.

  24. Buy a new one by edibobb · · Score: 2

    Get a cheap, new VHS player. It's higher quality than the expensive ones were 30 years ago. Something like Toshiba SD-V296. A used one will probably work, but you're taking a chance that it's sold because it's unreliable.

  25. Don't forget the other half of the equation. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    evaluate the cost of a vcr and the amount of time you have to transfer, I cannot provide a value to your time then compare it to the cost of outsourcing and make choice.

    Include the cost of your time in dealing with the outsourcing service, too.

    There's also the issues of:
      - what values you put on letting others see your tapes,
      - the risk of them making copies,
      - whether anything you want to tansfer is copyright-encumbered and the service wouldn't copy that for you.
      - the relative likelyhood of quality transfers and tape damage when done by a professional service versus do-it-yourself. They have the experience but you have the personal involvement.
    You need to evaluate these as well.

    (I often do things myself rather than hire them done because I'm more comfortable blaming myself than someone else if something breaks - even if breakage due to my efforts may be more likely. I also enjoy learning new skills and technical trivia, even if I'm unlikely to use them again later, and surprising situations keep coming up where some tidbit turns out to be useful.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  26. Sony SLV-R1000 by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    http://www.ebay.ca/itm/NICE-So...

    That should do the job, and it'll keep its resale value. Skip the ultra cost-reduced thingies you see at walmart.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  27. How many tapes are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For just a few, just buy the DVD or Blu-Ray disc. Unless you want the unborked Star Wars.

    I've got some 40-50 tapes – Disney movies my children watched as kids and "original" Star Wars, among others. I've still got a working Sony VHS/DVD deck with composite outputs, which I feed to a Sony digital camcorder equipped with Firewire to a Mac where I use iMovie and iDVD. It's a bit Rube Goldberg, but I already had all the pieces and it does a good enough job.

    It beats buying the Disney movies all over again when grandchildren come along.

    1. Re:How many tapes are you talking about? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Unless you want the unborked Star Wars.

      One of these days I am going to get my parents VHS-DVD recorder and switch my VHS copies of the original Star Wars to VHS so I can forece my fiance to watch it-and also for when we have kids of course.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:How many tapes are you talking about? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I have a set of the earliest retail VHS tapes, and there are still things messed up in the audio (some substituted, some entirely absent) -- same stuff as is borked in the 1978 theatrical revision. Having seen the first run over 30 times, I noticed. :/

      Not sure what version is on laserdisk, having never owned that platform. Wonder if some kind soul out there has ripped it for the masses...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  28. Send them out by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had some VHS tapes converted to DVD at Walmart. Cost was about $20 for 2 tapes. Took about a week. Results are quite good, considering the VHS tapes were made from old 8mm movies going back to the late 40's. At the time I looked at doing it myself, but decided my time was worth more than $20.

    1. Re:Send them out by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Must be nice to be part of the 1%.

      It is.

    2. Re:Send them out by buybuydandavis · · Score: 0

      Stormfront down today?

    3. Re:Send them out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20 for easycap, 2 hours or so to get software installed and fiddling, tape playback time and recording, restarting when software crashes. I would say it is real easy to justify spending up to $100 to have someone else transfer the tapes.

    4. Re:Send them out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are 2 kinds of people in the world. People who say, "why should I pay someone to do it for me, when I can do it myself?" and people who say, "Why should I do it myself, when I can pay someone to do it for me?"

    5. Re:Send them out by toddestan · · Score: 1

      In case you haven't noticed, $20 isn't very much money nowadays. Unless you already happened to have the required equipment on hand, you'd be hard-pressed to do it cheaper yourself.

  29. capture device by tetatdo · · Score: 1

    Also in my experience the best quality you can get is to buy a MINI DV camcorder that has firewire, most have an input function where you can input video through the camcorder to firewire. I have a JVC GRD90u and it has this functionality. USB based capture devices seem to be flaky in my experience.

  30. Nobody you can borrow from? by shoor · · Score: 1

    If it's just a few tapes, don't you know anybody, friend or relative who still has a VHS player tucked away in their attic or basement that you could borrow from?

    BTW I still have a working VHS player. Once in awhile I'll find where somebody has put their old VHS tapes out on the street or something and there will be a title that intrigues me enough to take it home and try it. (I also still have an old analogue TV capture card from the late 90s that works.) I don't think you need to be too concerned with the player itself. The quality of the images from those old VHS tapes certainly leaves a lot to be desired after one has gotten used to HDTV, but, if there is no alternative, as when it's a home movie, then it's just a question of whether it's worth the bother at all. If the tape isn't playable in standard consumer equipment, then ask yourself it you want to pay the premium for a recovery specialist.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  31. May not be worth it by StonyCreekBare · · Score: 1

    I went thru this a couple of years ago. I had hundreds of movies on VHS I had bought over many years. I had a very good VHS deck to play them on. I spent several weeks playing them into my computer, using Pinnacle Studio to trim the beginnings and ends and remove some of the noise, and Handbrake to further transform them to MP4 files on my Plex server. The result was OK, if not spectacular. Since them I have found many of my favorite movies in the DVD bargain bin at Walmart, at much better quality than my VHS originals, and many more popped up on TCM or Cinemax, where I could capture a nice clean copy. In the end, many of the VHS files on my Plex server got over-written with better copies. I also discovered I could simply watch many of the same movies on Netflix, negating the value of owning a copy at all. For example, many years ago I bought a VHS release of the freshly restored "Vertigo", one of my favorite movies. A couple of weeks ago, TCM aired the same print, much better than VHS quality, and of course it is also on Netflix. The effort I spent making my own MP4 of my own VHS copy was a waste. I still enjoy the movie, but rather the low quality of my own Plex copy, I just watch it on Netflix. Think carefully about what videos you want to copy, and you may find that there are few, if any, you really want to bother with.

  32. my real life friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has a whole library of vhs. he has a panasonic and he has a sony and the panasonic plays the data better. but download the pirated dvds if you already own the movies. dont steal but if you already paid, get better copies for your xbmc or whatever

  33. Old stuff? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    I think we've got a problem here... there doesn't seem to be anything current in analog-video-in ports right now... I think you have to go all the way back to XP to get a driver for those things.

    1. Re:Old stuff? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my analogue video capture cards are XP (MCE) only

    2. Re:Old stuff? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Hauppauge PVR-150 works in 32-bit Win7. Same thing for my Syntek 1160 (EasyCap)
      Hauppauge HVR-1600 works in 32/64.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    3. Re:Old stuff? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I think you have to go all the way back to XP to get a driver for those things.

      All the way back? Kernel 3.15-RC3 released only a week ago still seems to have all the drivers.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Old stuff? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Hauppauge PVR-150 works in 32-bit Win7.

      It (and the PVR-250/350/500) also works well under Linux, either 32- or 64-bit. I used these for a few years with MythTV. I think I still have a PVR-250 in this computer, but haven't used it in ages. I'm ripping a bunch of DVDs and SVCDs to my server before I unload them; if I have any tapes that haven't been superseded by some newer source, maybe I'll rip those next. I think the last time I used this card was for a PAL-VHS to NTSC-DVD conversion...that was interesting.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  34. Re:Dude, don't a get a VHS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fuck BETA!

  35. Re:Dude, don't a get a VHS.... by mrbcs · · Score: 1

    LOL ... just awesome!

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  36. Hire Someone by odie5533 · · Score: 2

    Send your VHS tapes into a company and have them do it. They have much better equipment than you can afford, and it saves you the hassle of having to find a recorder and do it yourself. I recently sent VHS tapes + 8mm reels + slides in to a company to have them digitized. The results were incredible. I have a VCR and a capture card, as well as a slide projector and a slide scanner, but the quality of their high end equipment was unbelievable. I didn't realize an old slide could hold such high quality photographs, and the scans my little slide scanner made were not even approaching the quality of theirs.

    Have a company digitize your tapes. If the content on them is meaningful to you, you won't regret it.

  37. torrent (cough cough) is your best value by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    that is, if the content wasn't that which you created yourself.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    1. Re:torrent (cough cough) is your best value by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      If they're available in a torrent they are 90% likely to have been released on DVD or Blu-ray. You'd be surprised how cheap older movies sell for even in HD.

  38. Sony by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

    Have a 17 year old Sony player and it works great.

    1. Re:Sony by hambone142 · · Score: 2

      There is a lot of variability throughout the years with Sony VHS players. Back in the early '90s, the quality was very good (and I paid 700 dollars for a VHS/HiFi deck). Later, when they started outsourcing to China, their quality went to crap (early 2000 vintage). I own both decks FWIW.

    2. Re:Sony by clifffton · · Score: 0

      Sony VHS consumer units were quite terrible. Nothing like the pro decks. Love the Panasonic stuff, put I suspect all the power supply caps have failed by now. The JVC units has a known set of problems that any good hobby guy can fix (tach cap on the drum motor, guide post repair) Almost anything you find now is built by Funai and that stuff is universally terrible.

  39. Speaking from personal experience by Hamsterdan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I did about 15-20 of them last year, some of them Macrovision protected. I used an Hauppauge PVR-150 capture card (didn't seem to mind Macrovision like my Theatre 550), or I could have used my video stabiliser.

    I used two vcrs. A really nice JVC from around 1986 (HR-830U) for most of the tapes with the PVR-150. for some of the tapes where I couldn't get audio from both channels (mangled tape), I used a Samsung VHS/DVD combo since that one allowed me to force left or right on both channels (but no manual tracking).

    Most important thing, be prepared to clean the machine quite a bit using a wet cleaning system, not the abrasive ones, as those old tapes could flake (or be dirty). For capture, I used DVD movie factory (came with an old burner) and Video Redo (trial) for commercial removal and editing. Figure about 2GB/hour on DVD Quality (not worth going higher since it's only VHS.

    If it's an old VCR, be prepared to replace straps as some of them might have dried out or decomposed / broken (like I'm about to do on the old Beta, one of them is slipping).

    As someone else said in the thread, some home movies might have issues with white balance, a video stabiliser is helpful to help fix that issue...

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  40. Ask Slashdot: Which VHS Player To Buy? by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

    Several years ago, some high-grade hobbiests recovered data from warehouse-stored audio/video mag tapes from the lunar missions. The one important thing I remember is that they were able to get remarkably good recovery from these ancient tapes by using a very low (mildly warm) oven setting and warming the tapes for several hours BEFORE trying to read them. This had the effect of releasing the tape-to-tape stiction and also re-tensioning the mag-tape mylar base material. Good luck finding the article - possible by asking /. about it - - - or searching NASA's site. Another hint - tryout an empty cassette first to see if the other materials can withstand the temperature. You might have to remove the tape spool and heat it seperately. The tape removal and reinsertion is not child's play, but is fairly easy with a steady hand and patience. It all really depends on how valuable the material is to you personally. cheers

    --
    redneck geek
  41. farm it out by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    find a local place that will do it for you and pay them to do it.

    If you absolutely have to do it yourself, find a local place that does it and ask what tape deck they use.

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  42. Several years? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    A couple of hundred bucks and who knows how many hours of work and fiddling for movies you haven't watched since your last player died? That seems a bit steep to me.

    We just came across a bunch of boxes of old VHS movies, and after some conversation... we're just tossing them in the Goodwill donation box. If we haven't watched 'em in five years, there's no point in going to all the trouble of copying them to a new format. The handful we might have converted, we've long since bought on DVD or Blu-Ray, not knowing this box was buried underneath a bunch of other crap. If our DVD player wasn't a combo DVD/VCR unit, we wouldn't even have hooked the VCR player back up when we re-arranged the living room a month or so ago.

    Seriously, unless you have a ton of old (commercial) tapes that simply cannot be replaced, just convert the home movies (and possibly outsource that) and toss/donate the rest. If it's a movie that's in demand and it's one you actually want, odds are it's been remastered if it's available on DVD or Blu-Ray and you can get a copy pretty cheap at your local used disc place.

  43. DVD Recorder ZV427MG9 by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 1

    Find the Magnavox DVD Recorder ZV427MG9 with Line-In Recording at Walmart (or Amazon) for about $160. It is worth searching for, or having it delivered to your local store from another store. This is a VHS-to-DVD recorder, and does an amazing job. I copied about 40 VHS tapes to DVD's (priceless family videos). The audio is perfectly synchronized with the video. Now I am loaning it out to other family members and friends for their collections. Be sure to specify the highest quality. The results are amazing.

  44. Panasonic AG 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Panasonic AG 1980
    as far as I know is/was the best ever made

    1. Re:Panasonic AG 1980 by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The AG-1980 was excellent. The AG-6500 is also a good choice for SP only.

      --
      Sig for hire.
  45. Re:Dude, don't a get a VHS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Betamax play VHS tapes? and if it does, does it play with better quality than that of a typical VHS player?

    The two formats are incompatible.

  46. a few good points here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The best players are not made anymore but if you go back to around 1986 - 1993 ish 4 head hi fi should do the trick, otherwise get a Television with video (outs) there was a generic apex that did it around 2000, that particular tv would take care of that macrovision crap even if you are stuck with a newer unit.

  47. Get a used Panasonic or Sony Pro/Industrial deck.. by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    These are going cheap (like all the other analog NTSC gear) on eBay or from video supply houses now that the world has gone digital. You likely can buy a good used rackmount VHS deck for less than the shipping will cost you. I bought a Panasonic AG-6500 for $40 about a year ago.

    The only caveat here is that these things generally ONLY work in the SP (2 hour) mode. If your home movies were recorded in LP or EP/SLP, you obviously need to look for a deck that can play those speeds.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  48. Re:Dude, don't a get a VHS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im not even that old but hell growing up i kept my dss porno caputres on betamax just so my folks couldnt figure out what the tapes went too...... they set in plain sight right on equipment stack.

  49. Outsource it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.scancafe.com/services/video-transfer-to-DVD

  50. Outsourcing by philmck · · Score: 1

    Archiving old media is a time-consuming process, unfortunately. How many is "several" in your case? If it's more than a dozen or so you will probably run out of time and patience and will want to consider only doing the most precious ones or else paying someone else to do it. Also it may take a bit of experimentation to get the quality right. I asked around my friends and this is a common experience - so much so that I was considering making a business out of it.

    If you're considering outsourcing, there are quite a few companies that will do this for you for around $10 per tape. Obviously this can get expensive if you have hundreds of tapes - it's up to you to decide how much your time and the tapes are worth to you. Unless you're willing to trust the post (or a courier) with your tapes, you'll need to find a local company.

    A reputable commercial company is likely to get a better result than you would yourself, unless you're the obsessive compulsive type (not unlikely on Slashdot, I guess.)

    --
    Phil McKerracher
  51. Throw most of it away? by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 1

    I was about to write a longer post, but it boils down to this; you probably have too much stuff you don't need. And VHS tapes which you think you may want to watch later, but 95% of them you never will, and the remaining 5% is no big loss, or you can just get them on DVD or similar. If you are afraid of losing information, just put the VHS tapes in a box somewhere. If you find out later you really want to watch one of them, then you will find a technical solution at that time. Which is going to be cheaper and/or less time consuming than converting a bunch of commercial and/or personal videos, which you can then not watch in digitized format instead of not watching them on VHS.

  52. Hopefully expert info for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a BSEE who, among many things, has done VCR (etc.) repair for over 30 years. I own many VCRs and a really high-end A/D converter. I do this for people from time to time.

    The BEST VCR to play a tape is the _one_ it was recorded on. There is NO guarantee that the recording machine was 100% aligned to correct standards. Even among perfectly aligned new machines and adjusting tracking, a tape recorded on one can look terrible on another. There are so many possible mechanical variations due to normal manufacturing tolerances, and minute differences can make huge differences in the final picture. Each manufacturer has their own design ideas. Flying head thickness is a factor. Head wear is a huge factor- as the head wears, the gap will widen. You may not see the difference until it gets so bad that the video frequency response is bad and you see it. I could go on and on about tape path, head azimuth, etc., mechanical adjustments, and sometimes dozens of electronic adjustments (especially in older machines), but I won't bore you.

    Bottom line: I have many brands and models so I can pick the best VCR for the tape. Tape wear is negligible during transport, _unless_ there is a broken head, worn flying head (big gap), tape path guide misaligned, etc. If in doubt, play another tape for 20 seconds or so, eject it, flip open the cover, and see if the tape is visibly damaged at all before playing your good tape.

    Panasonic and Mitsubishi are great. At both a company I worked for and an A/V team I was part of did some tests and the Mitsubishis had the best video frequency response of 10 or so brands we tested. Sony wasn't bad, but cost more and seemed to wear out faster.

    A great A/D converter for the money is Canopus ADVC 110 Converter. Some high-end ones: http://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/intensity/, http://www.ospreyvideo.com/products/osprey-cards, and I have an AJA http://www.aja.com/.

    1. Re:Hopefully expert info for you by swb · · Score: 1

      The Mitsubishi HS-U52 was the best VCR I ever owned. The hifi stereo recording was so good I used to copy audio CDs from the library onto VHS. Back in the early 90s it was better quality than cassette and cheaper than DAT.

    2. Re:Hopefully expert info for you by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      As a thought experiment, how much linear resolution/sample bandwidth would you need to capture a VHS videotape "straight through" in a way that allowed you to digitally-reconstruct the path of virtual rotating heads AFTER the raw linear capture was completed? Say, if you had the means to somehow fabricate a custom high-density matrix of read heads that massively oversampled the tape as it followed a linear path... assuming such a beast doesn't already exist for something like DLT?

      Why? Because all present restoration technologies that involve rotating heads produce results that are very much dependent upon the player's ability to iaccurately track the helical paths at capture time. What I'm proposing is capturing a linear 2-D signal map of the tape that's so precise, you could analyze it & synthesize an optimal virtual path & instantaneous velocity to extract higher-order data in non-realtime that's not even visible when played back via normal means.

  53. Step by step guide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is there a step-by-step guide for copying your VHS tapes into digital files on your PC? What hardware, what connector cable, what software, and what settings to use? I honestly can't find a guide anywhere.

    Everything on the internet wants to describe coping VHS to DVD, which is useless. If I wanted to copy VHS to DVD, I'd just go buy a VHS/DVD recorder machine.

  54. JVC DigiPure SVHS/DVHS decks and/or Panny AG-1980 by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

    Not one VCR is best for all tapes. For SP speed tapes like home movies, the JVC SVHS and DVHS decks equipped with JVC's "Digipure" TBC/noise reduction from the late 90s-early 00s have some of the best picture quality out there. The Mitsubishi HS-HD2000U DVHS deck is another recommended model. Expect to pay upwards of $200 for a working deck on ebay. The list of model numbers can be found here: http://www.digitalfaq.com/foru...

    The Panasonic AG-1980P is best for EP/SLP tapes and is also better behaved with VHS-C tapes in the motorized adapter. The JVCs tend to have problems with the VHS-C adapters. The downside of the AG-1980 is that it is VERY prone to electrical problems. Almost all of them need to have full capacitor replacement, otherwise they have problems with herringbone noise, loss of color output, and "barber pole" patterns on the video output. Sometimes the deck even stops accepting tapes. Repair involves replacing close to 100 surface mount capacitors.

    For capture, find an old Pentium 4 with an AGP slot running Windows XP and an ATI Radeon All-in-Wonder with the Rage Theater 100/200chip. They have excellent analog capture quality and the ADC doesn't do any sharpening or muck up the video with AGC. Both of which are common problems on modern capture cards, including ATI's own PCI "TV Wonder" cards.

    To avoid frame dropping, you need an external TBC (different from the TBC in the VCR) acting as a frame sync. They also tend to strip Macrovision off of tapes *wink* *wink*. More info here: http://www.digitalfaq.com/foru...

  55. Sony SLV-678HF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony SLV-678HF ... for all the experts who claim Sony did not offer consumer VHS products.
    Sony RDR-VX530, RDR-VX535 and RDR-VX560 VHS to DVD converters ... current products ... again, for the experts
    Good luck on the MacroVision hurdle. Some people like the ADVC-100: S-video in from VCR and S-video out to the DVR.
    Also, there's a product from DiMax: http://www.xdimax.com/common/default.html. I haven't used it but the WWWeb sites has all the right words.
    Same for the AVT-8710: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=details&kw=TVAVT8710&is=REG&Q=&O=productlist&sku=276891. Actually, being a time-base corrector, this device should be the best.

  56. JVC SR-VS10 miniDV and S-VHS by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Few years ago I bought on ebay the JVC SR-VS10 which is a miniDV and S-VHS, and plays regular VHS. It also has a tuner (analog). There are S-video and composite in/out. AND it has firewire (DV) input and output to complement the miniDV, I've used this to firewire video in and out from a PC. I haven't had problems with jamming but with multiple kinds of inputs/outputs it makes for handling all kinds of video experiments. Retail price from when it was on market was $2000, this one on ebay for $500, http://www.ebay.com/itm/JVC-SR...

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  57. Get an A/D converter with DV output by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    I've done some VCR conversion and the main problem with basic came-with-the-computer video cards is that they'll stop recording at the first big glitch in the analog video signal being fed to them, and most home recorded video tapes will have more than a few. Very frustrating if say, you have a bunch of mystery 6-hour tapes that you just want to dump onto your hard drive while at work, and then pan the resulting file for gold at your leisure.

    I bought a converter like this one and it works great, converting the entire output to DV, glitches and all. Your PC will need DV / Firewire input to use it, and Firewire cards are available cheap. The added advantage is that they have unadvertised Macrovision bypass features (google the make/model and 'macrovision' for more info.)

    .

  58. TV to USB adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never seen one. I think there are some video cards that have RCA or S-Video inputs that you can connect to a VHS player.

  59. Re:JVC DigiPure SVHS/DVHS decks and/or Panny AG-19 by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    ^^^ DVHS, some decks also had firewire outputs, firewire out to firewire in on a machine avoids the need for third party A2D.....

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  60. Just Experiment. by enter+to+exit · · Score: 1

    I've only converted home tapes ;)

    Homemade VHS quality is not great to begin with, I used a new (old but in the box) VCR and an EasyCap (a clone i think). It worked fine. There was no noticeable degradation of quality. The mpeg was about 20GB for a two hour tape. The software i used was Virtual VCR

    To be honest, i think a lot of these best practices are voodoo (it entirely depends on how and when it was recorded), just to jack up the price. As for not wanting to risk a tape on an old player, just test it out on a junk tape first, if it works 10 times in a row, chances are it'll work the 11th time.

  61. I admit I have obscure tastes by tepples · · Score: 1

    It is better to just buy DVDs on eBay or used on Amazon for a couple of bucks if your VHS are commercial releases.

    Unless it's something that hasn't been rereleased on DVD like the film Pinocchio and the Emperor of the Night, or something that was taped off air and never officially released on home video at all like the TV series Spartakus and the Sun Beneath the Sea.

  62. External TBC by Venner · · Score: 1

    >> To avoid frame dropping, you need an external TBC (different from the TBC in the VCR) acting as a frame sync.

    ^This

    Let me add for the person asking the question that I found an external TBC extremely useful back when I was transferring family movies from VHS. Even though I used a nice SVHS unit with an internal TBC, some of the worst older tapes still had lots of dropping out, tearing, and sync issues that magically all but disappeared when I fed the signal through the external TBC. Perhaps you don't need it in your case, but I definitely did.

    Here's an in informative thread where someone asked about the need for an external TBC. Be sure to look at the images in post #7.

    If I have a VCR with TBC, why is a separate unit needed anyway?

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  63. Hardware Box best way to go by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

    I went with the Toshiba DVR610. I found the hardware conversion to DVD far superior to any form of computer conversion. I converted to DVD files directly and then used those DVD files to edit them into better DVDs on my computer with a program that could work with the files directly with no need for conversion.

  64. Don't Buy Anything!!! by runningduck · · Score: 0

    Don't go through the trouble of buying anything. There are dozens of service providers with professional equipment who can convert these tapes for you for less than the cost of the cheapest equipment you can buy. Try a google search for "VHS Transfer."

    --
    -rd
  65. COSTCO DOES THIS! by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    Get a COSTCO membership and they digitize videos. I had it done with some precious ones and they did a great job.

    1. Re:COSTCO DOES THIS! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Good to know... is it a regular thing with the Photo Department? What do they charge, do you recall offhand? Chances are they didn't buy the cheapest gear around, either.

      [You know you've spent too much at Costco when the manager sees you go by and pursues you waving the Executive Membership form... yep, he did. Really.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:COSTCO DOES THIS! by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      I did two regular VHS tapes for about $30. Good quality. They were tapes I made in Russia when I lived there, hence: priceless.

    3. Re:COSTCO DOES THIS! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That would be a wee bit tough to replace, all right! Glad to hear the quality is good. I may use it sometime myself. Thanks!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  66. Re:lol by segin · · Score: 1

    Only if you believe it takes more than tape runtime to convert a tape to DVD. Get one of those cheap VHS-to-DVD dubbing machines.

  67. Sony by w-wright · · Score: 1

    Get any major brand VCR (e.g. Sony, Panasonic etc) as they are usually quite good. To be honest, I have never seen a big difference between VCR's in terms of quality. However, I did once have a cheapo VCR (Only one in the Electrical Store) which did chew up a couple of tapes.

  68. multitasking and profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You dont have to sit there idly watching the vcr whike t records. Pop in a tape, go for a run, pop in another, watch a movie, pop in another, waste an hour on slasdot, pop in another, pleasure your wife, pop in another, write your congressman, pop in another, vacuum your house, pop in another, fold your laundry, pop in another, get groceries. Pop in anther, deposit $100 into your kids college fund.

  69. How old are the tapes? by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    I tried something similar with some audio cassettes a few years ago, and found that I was too late: the tape had begun to stick together, and required more power than my high-end Denon tape deck could muster to play back. Rewinding didn't work either, as there's a tape tension sensor that shuts down the motor if it gets overloaded.

  70. Use pro equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search eBay for VHS VTR. It'll turn up things like the Sony SVO-9600 which was studio-grade VHS. All mass produced tapes are made with similar devices and they support both manual and auto tracking.

    A BlackMagic Intensity Shuttle USB 3 is a "Studio Grade" full frame capture device.

    If you add a RS-422 to USB device and use a program like Adobe Premier, Sony Vegas Pro or even BlackMagic's tools, you can set start and end points for capture and then compress. Final Cut Pro works as well, but then you'll prefer a DeckLink Extreme.

    I worked professionally in the field of video hardware development and funded long development stretches doing media conversion. VHS simply sucks. Garbage in... Worse garbage out. But good decks and good cards make a huge difference.

    I recommend also getting some studio grade cables.

    You'll spend more on cables and shipping than on hardware, but if you're serious and want to retain what little quality is left, studio equipment is 50 times better than consumer and $200 will get you most of what you'll need.

  71. just search fleamarkets, junkyards, ebay or CL by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

    you will spend $0 and while some of the VHS players you get won't be work well, you are bound to get a decent one. A VHS head cleaner tape is not a bad idea though. http://www.amazon.com/CleanDr-...

  72. Panasonic by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Panasonic made good quality players that are remarkably durable. I'd pick one up used with little fear that it wouldn't work. My older Panasonic VHS dates to 1983 and still works fine. And no, you can't have my newer Panasonic, which also still works. Also, they have NEVER eaten a tape, and the older one in particular worked its little analog ass off. (I've often joked that Panasonic consumer electronics are too dumb to know when they're dead, since they generally work forever.)

    You want a four-head player, as the pickup quality is considerably better than a two-head. As someone mentions, S-Video output is a Good Thing too. My newer Panasonic has this, and it's at least 15 years old.

    You also want to make sure no one ever used a "head cleaner" on it... those only had value in a smoking environment, as they'd scrape off the residue. They'd also scrape off the head surface. This is the real cause of VHS players "wearing out". Needless to say you don't want one that's been in a smoking environment in the first place -- it'll gum up your tapes.

    With tapes that have been in storage a while, you should do a full wind and rewind (at low speed if you have the option) to make sure they're tensioned properly and not stuck together, before you do your ripping job.

    The other thing with Panasonic is that they used a generic-sized belt that can be replaced. So if the belt has cracked from age, you can probably find a new one.

    And chances are you can pick one up for free off Freecycle.

    Someone mentioned a tape/DVD DVR gadget -- much easier, but from what I've heard the quality of the tape heads on such gadgets is not great, being they're not really dedicated VHS units. On the other hand you don't have the loss from the data being horsed back and forth across cables, so it might be a wash.

    Please come back and tell us what worked out best...some of us also have boxes full of tapes we haven't got round to digitizing. :)

    (Actually, it was easier to just buy the damn DVD when/if those came out. *sigh*)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  73. Re:Send them out - Porno / Rule 34 by lucien86 · · Score: 1

    There'd a third type who asks 'do I trust this person to do this for me or will they mess it up and destroy the tapes? will the quality be good?
    And most important of all can I trust them?, my video isn't going to appear on YouTube transformed into a something else? Like a porno. Is it? (Rule of the internet 34 - Take something, no matter what it is, somewhere someone has made (will make) porn out of it.. No Exceptions.)

    --
    Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  74. 1980 called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. If any guy invited me into his house so I could take a closer look at his collection of VHS movies, I'd run for the hills, as far and as fast in the opposite direction as my feet would let me run. No second date. Seriously.

  75. I've got one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had no trouble with it, but I've only used it for a few things, so I can't speak to the longevity of it, but it is very easy to use.

  76. ebay is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found a seller on ebay that sells manufacturer refurbished VCR's. Paid $17 IIRC, came with the remote control, manual, and cables. Hooked it up to a Dazzle USB device and used VirtualDub to capture the video/audio. I then used VLC to do the encoding for simplicity since VirtualDub is a bit OP. You have to hit Play on the VCR (or remote) and then start the recording in VirtualDub and manually stop it when it is at the end of what you wanted to record. Most VHS movies have the runtime listed on the box, make a note of the runtime and figure out approximately when it will be over then just remember to check it around that time.

    The software that came with the Dazzle was largely useless, VirtualDub worked without issue as did VLC. Search online for guides on how to capture/encode video with them, there are plenty out there.