Slashdot Mirror


China Bans Government Purchases of Windows 8

itwbennett (1594911) writes "Last week, China's Central Government Procurement Center posted a notice on new requirements for government tender, that included, among other things, the mysterious request that Windows 8 be excluded from the bidding process on computer purchases. The agency could not be reached Tuesday, but China's state-controlled Xinhua News Agency said that the government was forbidding the use of Windows 8 after Microsoft recently ended official support for Windows XP."

200 comments

  1. So do we end up with the ironic situation by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    where china windows XP is supported but not united states XP?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Funny

      but to have it supported you first need to buy a licence for it... that kinda rules out Chinese copies of XP.

    2. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the flip side, forcing everyone to use Windows 8 would be a violation of fundamental human decency.

    3. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by savuporo · · Score: 1

      Also, it would be against Geneva convention

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    4. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      Also, it would be against Geneva convention

      Well, at least MS can count on a big CIA purchase then.

    5. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by peragrin · · Score: 1

      The CIA gets windows for free. After all they know where Ballmer hides the chairs

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      The CIA gets windows for free. After all they know where Ballmer hides the chairs

      But Ballmer is no longer in charge...they still probably have the scoop on the new guy though...

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    7. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by savuporo · · Score: 1

      He is probably still in charge, he simply outsourced his chair throwing to an .. oh, well.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    8. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but is isn't torture, it's "enhanced OS experience"

      captcha is PAINED, and believe me, I have been by various and sundry of MS OS...

    9. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I thought that for waterboarding, one needed Mac OS X? If anyone else used Aqua, Apple would sue for sure!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The CIA gets windows for free. After all they know where Ballmer hides the chairs

      ...and people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw chairs, right?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shill time already? How quaint.

    12. Re:So do we end up with the ironic situation by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Oh no someone says something positive about MS. They must be a shill. I have no problem using Windows 8. Is it a perfect product, no, but that is what updates are for. I am not a shill, but if MS wanted to pay me just to say how great windows 8 was I suppose I'd take their money.

  2. Linux by johnsie · · Score: 1

    They are obviously heading for open source instead of being locked in to Microsoft.

    1. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Governments have enough money to hire programmers with enough knowledge to look at the source code and make sure it's NSA bullshit-free.

      It's the same reason on should be wary of closed source code written in China... the shenanigans that can be covered up is massive.

    2. Re:Linux by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Even if they could review the source, there's no assurance that the binaries provided actually come from said sources. Further, there's no assurance that the "NSA bullshit" is in any way obvious. It could be as simple as an exploitable memory leak which can be tripped in certain, very rare conditions that would have no indication at all of being exploitable or "NSA bullshit".

      My guess is that China wants to start pushing their "Red Flag Linux so that they can at least have a chance at knowing when their security is compromised.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    3. Re:Linux by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      They are obviously heading for open source instead of being locked in to Microsoft.

      You would be surprised at how little Linux is used in China. A few years ago, I went to a Linux User Group meeting in Shanghai. Nearly everyone there was either an expat or a haigui, and most of the meeting was conducted in English. When I bought a computer at a local shop, and asked them to install Linux instead of the normal pirated copy of XP, the shopkeeper told me no one had ever requested that before. I have never understood why the Chinese government doesn't promote Linux, rather than relying on a foreign corporation. Open source should naturally appeal to them, since they are nominally commies anyway.

    4. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even if they could review the source, there's no assurance that the binaries provided actually come from said sources.

      So compile/check it yourself.

      It could be as simple as an exploitable memory leak which can be tripped in certain, very rare conditions that would have no indication at all of being exploitable or "NSA bullshit".

      Well yes, but it's still better than proprietary software, where you have almost zero chance of finding out.

    5. Re:Linux by codecore · · Score: 2

      I'd say it's more accurate to speculate that they have the Win 8 source code and will roll out their own.

    6. Re:Linux by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 0

      And who said you had to use the binaries that are provided? If you've got access to the source and happen to be paranoid as hell, compile it yourself.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    7. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they could review the source, there's no assurance that the binaries provided actually come from said sources.

      So compile/check it yourself.

      You need to trust trust to trust in your compiler!

    8. Re:Linux by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      They did for a while, with Red Flag Linux. I thought that was going to be huge. But for some reason its dead now. No idea why. It seems like they could have spared a little bit of money on supporting that on a larger scale than they did. Short sided, IMHO.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    9. Re:Linux by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      So, isn't gcc one source? Just compile the compil...oh...

    10. Re:Linux by laird · · Score: 1

      When everyone runs Windows OS and Apps for free, what incentive is there to run Linux? That's the down-side of widespread piracy of closed-source software - it is proprietary so it can't be improved by anyone else, and since it's (effectively) free, that wipes out the incentive to make a better competitor, because there's no business return on the (massive) investment and effort to migrate off of Windows.

    11. Re:Linux by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just takes time to vet the code, and 'fix' all the exploits the NSA put into it.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    12. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You need to trust trust to trust in your compiler!

      I normally toggle the boot code directly into the front panel, then use a hex keypad to enter the base OS and compiler bytecode directly. This all happens while all electronic components are in a Faraday cage.

      Of course, this happens only after I use an electron microscope to verify the silicon traces on each individual chip die and pass each chip through customized black-box and integration tests to verify there is no undefined behavior or data leakage.

      I estimate that in 37 years I will have a perfectly secure Altair 8080 that I started working on 40 years ago. 77 years is totally reasonable for a secure computing base.

    13. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't alleviate the headache of fully checking your compiler's source code to make sure it doesn't do anything nefarious in select circumstances.

    14. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know we're all joking around here, but there's some people that still haven't been caught up on why this is a non-issue.

      In short, for those of you who want to know how you can trust that your compiler doesn't have a backdoor in it, you do this.

    15. Re:Linux by ai4px · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I hate to be a hater, but if you are ragging on a guy for misspelling SIGHTED, you should not misspell Genious (Genius). Not to be confused with a beer by a similar name.

    16. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So having choices and being able to verify them (open source) is communist, but being forced to trust a single source, without being able to check their source code, because fuck you, that's freedom?

    17. Re:Linux by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, be able to requisition all those machines into a giant botnet ready to be used as weapons in a cyberwar.

    18. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you just hated on a guy for correcting himself. Not to mention the ironic finish that failed to smack you as it sailed overhead.

    19. Re:Linux by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      When my wife does something silly, sometimes I tell her "You are a Guinness." Yes just like the beer... She doesn't like it. I think it's funny.

      One time she asked me where the broom was I asked her if she was going to the store. She liked that and has used it on co-workers.

    20. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his misspelling was intentional.

      At least he didn't retort with, "your a moran."

    21. Re:Linux by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I'm stealing that.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    22. Re:Linux by Teresita · · Score: 2

      Doesn't alleviate the headache of fully checking your compiler's source code to make sure it doesn't do anything nefarious in select circumstances.

      If you search the comments in the source code for the text "nefarious" or "evil" you probably won't catch it. But if you can spot an obfuscated system call handing out permissions like candy then you might have better luck.

    23. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      because its harder to write malware/spyware for windows xp/8 so they ban it so they can continue to spy on there own population via rootkittd copys of xp

    24. Re:Linux by nukenerd · · Score: 0

      When everyone runs Windows OS and Apps for free, what incentive is there to run Linux?

      Because Windows is a crock of shite? It would be "free" for me to run Windows right now (it came "free" with my PC whether I liked it or not) but I don't. Sometimes I try it and get sick of its patronising pop-ups and don't know whether it's safe to do anything without being either pawned or sued over something.

      No, the reason why people in places like China and India prefer to use Windows, pirated or not, is that they hear that the West mostly use it and don't want to be left out of something, though they don't know what that something is. They also still believe in the old adage "You only get what you pay for" (or maybe ought to have payed for in their case), the fools.

    25. Re:Linux by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Open source should naturally appeal to them, since they are nominally commies anyway.

      When it comes to commodities they're not even remotely communist anymore, they literally don't care where you get your groceries and clothes and household items, unless those businesses or their owners try to have a political agenda. There's plenty of private enterprises and they don't care if the maker of the toothpaste factory cashes in big and the workers don't. What they do care about is control of public information, strategic industries and technology, infrastructure, natural resources and of course their own hierarchy and when that is at stake they will steamroll the individuals but my impression is that for most of the people most of the time it doesn't affect them very directly. The way most people don't see revolutionary changes if the US goes from Democrats to Republicans and back, the talk changes but daily life goes on.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    26. Re:Linux by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      They are obviously heading for open source instead of being locked in to Microsoft.

      You don't say...

    27. Re:Linux by Lennie · · Score: 2

      I wonder if you've heard the news and read the page you linked to, it says:

      "On 10 February 2014, Red Flag Software terminated all employment contracts and closed down. "

      So I doubt it.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    28. Re:Linux by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Compile clang with g++, and gcc with clang. Or Visual C++. The trick only works when there's only one available compiler.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    29. Re:Linux by vandamme · · Score: 1

      So, it's like here in the USA, but with one less political party.

    30. Re:Linux by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Wow, I actually got down modded for ragging on myself. I'd consider this a win. I sure roped the dope on that one.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    31. Re:Linux by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Want to.. it's not a question of want to.. but are they smart enough to actually make it work. It's like saying we want to be smart. Yeah, but just cuz you want to, it does not mean you can be smart. But wanting to be smart is often the only requirement to be smart.

      By the way Linux is just as much, if not more, fucked than windows xp. It has all the traps and back doors and remote access and what not. You're dreaming if you think differently. One way to kinda mess with the whole remote control and backdoor system is to run nonstandard things, like ancient versions of linux from the late 90's. Then whoever is snooping on you has to run both the ancient stuff, and the new stuff, and it gets kind of annoying to them, because they like to keep everything under one hat, it's easier to analyze, manipulate, whatnot.. standardization of remote control cannot happen if people keep running nonstandard things, especially really old obsolete shit, like DOS (and I don't mean the modern FreeDOS, but more like DRDOS and IBM PC DOS, and what not. They probably all had traps and intentional backdoors programmed into them, but back then size was so limited, whatever backdoor or trap might have been impleneted, it must have been very small scale, low on features.

    32. Re:Linux by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      In fact it was the Chinese who ported USB drivers to DOS. It's like the powers that be wished the Chinese used Linux, they'd be easier to hack without recourse to a lawsuit/compensation, compared to something like XP, where within China, they set the rules, and may require whoever does computer business there to pay up or get out of the country, stop doing business there, and that includes hardware manufacturers.

  3. 8.1 update mandatory then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news, China is the strongest proponent of Windows 8.1 update.

  4. makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably want to pirate it

    1. Re:makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, this is proof of the recent industrial espionage allegations against China; they've obviously seen the source code for Windows 8, and they know they don't want it.

    2. Re:makes sense by geogob · · Score: 2

      I didn't need to see the source code for Windows 8 to come to the same conclusion...

    3. Re:makes sense by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      No, this is proof of the recent industrial espionage allegations against China; they've obviously seen the source code for Windows 8, and they know they don't want it.

      Actually Microsoft gives governments (No espionage needed) access to the windows and office source code including the US, Russia, China and other big licenser's. My guess is in this case it backfired and they found shit in it they don't want to touch with a ten foot pole. Possibly another _NSAKEY check?

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    4. Re:makes sense by cpghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, they give access to source code, but no instructions on how to build a binary that's 1:1 identical to the released version. This source code, for what it's worth, isn't proof that the release version is spyware-free.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    5. Re:makes sense by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just saw the interface...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  5. considering what is known about the NSA by FudRucker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    seems like the rest of the entire world would ban everything that comes from the USA, or even just passed through the USA, things like routers, computers & software, TVs, Stereos, portable radios, cellphones, anything electronic, the NSA's spying methods have basically gutted any confidence & trust the rest of the world would have in the USA

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! I don't blame them one bit... I also no longer purchase Microsoft, or any other company that does the Fed's bidding.

    2. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, not the people. Some of us are awake and trying to educate (awaken) others. I think trumpeting it loud and clear from the rest of the world what the American government is doing might help wake the others up.

    3. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Threni · · Score: 1

      Most of those things pass through the USA on their way from the far east (korea, japan, and of course china).

    4. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nothing better to do that than to basically have the rest of the world boycott your fucking products and stop cooperating with you.

      When Americans finally realize their own jobs are on the line, they'll make their own politicians do something.

      As long as the rank and file American is oblivious to this ... well, then they're part of the fucking problem, and deserve to be caught up in it.

      If the overwhelming response in the US is "who cares what happens in some foreign country", then it's too fucking bad, and it's time to bring it home to them.

      Americans like to hide behind the fact that most of your populace is ignorant ill informed. It's time that became your problem, and not ours. If your populace is stupid and allows your politicians to do shit like this, then your populace should be the ones who pay the consequences.

    5. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by laird · · Score: 1

      It's already happening. I think that it was Cisco that just made the economic case (10-25% drops in sales, depending on the country) due the NSA's corrupting the company's products in transit. Because when the NSA's behavior drive the whole planet to buy someone else's products, that's bad for business.

    7. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by INT_QRK · · Score: 1, Troll

      That "'sketchy definition of "national sovereignty' when it isn't their own," is so unlike the other Five Eyes, the EU, Russia, BRICS, and, oh, say, China. Might I point out that we're all in one big round (or slightly oval) glass house, eh?

    8. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by wiggles · · Score: 1

      You say this as though China is innocent of such shenanigans. It's been known for years that they backdoor stuff made in China - we still buy all our crap from them.

    9. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 2

      And nothing better to do that than to basically have the rest of the world boycott your fucking products and stop cooperating with you.

      When Americans finally realize their own jobs are on the line, they'll make their own politicians do something.

      As long as the rank and file American is oblivious to this ... well, then they're part of the fucking problem, and deserve to be caught up in it.

      If the overwhelming response in the US is "who cares what happens in some foreign country", then it's too fucking bad, and it's time to bring it home to them.

      Americans like to hide behind the fact that most of your populace is ignorant ill informed. It's time that became your problem, and not ours. If your populace is stupid and allows your politicians to do shit like this, then your populace should be the ones who pay the consequences.

      I agree with that sentiment in general and while the United States of America continues down a very slippery slope they can still be talked out of it. Their crippled institutions still have a large, albeit disparate civil society interested in change of direction.

      But since the issue here was initially about the Chinese "Communist" Party (aka self-declared government of China with more tentacles than most outsiders realize) banning a significant american export from that market, I can't but see the irony here.

      It was the USA in 1970s (as proudly represented by Kissinger and Nixon) who rehabilitated the most murderous regime in history just to flip the USSR the finger, and Clinton completed the task 20 years later by granting that regime the Most Favored Nation status and trade priviledges. Most. Favored. Nation.

      Next the US let the PRC become full-fledged member of the WTO and again without any concrete concessions. The US however gladly dropped their earlier post-WWII human rights objectives (like freedom for Tibetans whose country was invaded and annexed by China in 1950), being happy to continue with a less trade-disruptive and brief annual criticism facade.

      This was the final call for certain types of wealthy europeans to join the "party" and join forces with the CCP's upcoming 5-year plans.

      In the last twenty years the PRC has been busy massively building up all their military forces, acquiring nearly all available western manufacturing knowledge (fairly or not) and vacuuming foreign currency reserves with the help of globalization and the wealthiest class of westerners keen on maximizing their "ROI" without bothersome welfare taxes.

      Now that the second twenty-year cycle is complete we suddenly find a People's Republic of China that is aggressively claiming maritime territories very far from its shores (but very near most of its Asia-Pacific neighbours!) and increasingly willing to attack anyone willing criticize it in any way.

      See where this is going?

      Czar Putin already did. He engineered a significant gas/trade-dependency for major European economies and that completed he knew he could repeat China's anachronistic land grab of neighbour's territories without any noticeable repercussions.

      Point being that when trade was stopped to be harnessed towards achieving positive political and human rights development, the new unfiltered free trade was turned into a tool against those very objectives.

      So here we are. With a political hierarchy in the western world having the business class dictating that economic sanctions are not acceptable. Interestingly it is very much simpler under CCP and Putin, both of which are accomplished in punitive boycotts. And now, "Yes they can!"

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    10. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should the US give a single shit about any other country? It's not like any of them are doing anything besides bitching and moaning about how the evil US has ruined the world. The hatred hurled at the US over the past decade has eroded any chance of the average American really caring about what foreigners think. US politicians, like politicians world wide, are morons but when it comes to foreign policy they do listen to the public. No politician is going to win an election these days pushing an interventionist foreign policy. In fact they have a much better chance of winning an election by pushing a foreign policy of benign if not total neglect. It's already started to happen if you take a look at the world right now. The mid-east is mired in unchecked violence, forced migrations, and there is no solution in sight. eastern Europe is being slowly brought back under the soviet boot and the western Europeans are just as incompetent as they have always been when it comes defending their interests. This time around they are own their own which means they probably should write up the surrender documents and save everyone the drama. SE Asia is on the verge of military conflict across the resource rich South China sea and there is no sign that this problem is going to get any better any time soon. As a matter of fact it will most certainly get worse. This conflict will pull in 2 of the 3 top world economies and the top 3 of 3 if the US decides to honor it's defense treaty obligations which at this point is not a for sure thing given the mood of the general US population. Treaty or no treaty the average US citizen has been under assault for so long from insufferable foreigners that treaties can be easily annulled by populist politicians looking to advance themselves domestically. Meanwhile the US has chosen energy self sufficiency over climate control and jobs that were once outsourced to cheaper manufacturers are returning as the cost savings decrease due to the rise in living standards in the countries which prospered on cheap labor. China has advanced by exploiting cheap labor. Not innovation, reliability, or friendly customer service. US energy self sufficiency has also attracted foreign manufactures to the US due to the cheaper energy costs and reduced shipping costs for their goods. So again I ask why should the average US citizen worry about offending or ignoring foreigners who stereotype, insult, and constantly deride them as fat and stupid idiots?

    11. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Not really. Nothing about what he says implies to me that China is innocent.

    12. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 2

      Why should the US give a single shit about any other country? It's not like any of them are doing anything besides bitching and moaning about how the evil US has ruined the world. The hatred hurled at the US over the past decade has eroded any chance of the average American really caring about what foreigners think.

      Yet there was a time in that distant past before the 1990s when most of the free world, and even many outside it, looked up to the USA as the defender of great values such as freedom.

      After that exhilarating period when the Iron Curtain came down there was great hope and expectation, but something had changed... and only a few years later both the PRC and the post-USSR Russia realized they were free to act whatever way they wanted while the USA was busy waging various pointless religious oil wars against proxies. Those explosive shows were greatly enjoyed by audiences in China and Russia (to the great benefit of the regimes!) but no quite so much in democracies having the benefit of a free press.

      There's even a certain leftover TLA in the title of this very thread. Do you reckon the peoples in free democracies (in fact everywhere) should just ignore that all-encompassing shit?

      From where I look, already since both Clinton and GWB the USA has stood less for all the respectable and moral things and more for the arrogant total surveillance and business-before-rights realpolitik than any time in the history of world democracy. The way I feel about american democracy activists is increasingly similar to what I feel towards actual freedom fighters elsewhere, although the latter are still more likely to lose their life or be incarcerated and/or tortured in the process. So far America only tends to afford that treatment to non-americans.

      I realize that American leaders will always continue to make grand speeches for domestic consumption (it's now part of the "culture") claiming to not just hold dear all the fine moral values but be the very torch-bearers of those values for the rest of the world, and for the foreseeable future enough people there will just lap it up. Well God bless you!

      Elsewhere you are judged by your actions however. And that "elsewhere" is pretty big and some day it will suck to just have a massive and aging military, small ruling elite and lots of religious rightwing fervour but no real friends. Pax Americana is soon entering the post-free-for-all.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    13. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by bmo · · Score: 1

      . China has advanced by exploiting cheap labor. Not innovation

      And the "Colonies" exploited cheap and plentiful waterways, tons and tons of fossil fuel, and technology to create the Industrial Revolution in the US, thus releasing our dependence on expensive English and other "foreign" textiles and machinery.

      China has learned what John Cabot and Samuel Slater learned - that innovation goes to where the production is. Where production goes, the scientific and engineering talent will follow. We, bucko, have largely forgotten that. We rested on our laurels starting in the late 60s and continue to do so.

      In the 80s, Deng Xiaoping finally got people to listen to the fact that science & technology isn't just a "western" idea - that it's decidedly Chinese - and that it was time that the Chinese were no longer dependent on western interests. The only reason why China is behind Japan and Korea is that the Maoists held back China technologically and intellectually after WWII. Had Mao not had his Cultural Revolution, they'd probably be on the same level as Japan, technologically.

      I read your comment and it's exactly what I heard about the Japanese and Koreans 40 years ago.

      What good is a STEM education when it can't be fucking applied?

      You and your ilk are the fucking problem.

      --
      BMO

    14. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, 90's were in another world. The USA can again be torchbearer tho. But they need to do it in a different area than military. I suggest give NASA a mammoth of budget. Let space exploration, interstellar traveling, manned deep space missions be the torch. Nations will flock on this, because of scientists and free thinkers have great effect on public thinking and election. And when all your scientists work on this, noone will have resource to think and implement nuclear football scenarios. And when you have space stations all over the sol system noone will care about what OS you are using lol.

    15. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

      In the 80s, Deng Xiaoping finally got people to listen to the fact that science & technology isn't just a "western" idea - that it's decidedly Chinese - and that it was time that the Chinese were no longer dependent on western interests.

      The red-tinted glasses...

      What, apart from the maoist revision of Soviet Thought and its current national-corporatist followup (another foreign revision), is inherently Chinese? Even their nationalism and even ethnic supremacism harks back to the worst of western ideas.

      Their system leaves little room for human characteristics other than hard work, the benefit of immediate family and whatever the State sloganeers at the time. There are some liberal jewels, but most only rebel - violently - for immediate self-benefit. (witness some 100,000 "mass incidents" annually)

      Would the Chinese Communist Party's economic "miracle" have been possible without full access to western ideas, sciencific development and unlimited funding? And who invented the "selling the capitalists the rope" idea? The ultra-rich politburo members must really love that one.

      China's policies stem from the 1800s (the period of late western imperialism when race theories and nationalism were all the rage). Effective, but brutal.

      However I can't see them replicating the liberties that were integral part of that (social and scientific) development.

      If you want to see the past repeated, but this time without certain crucial moderating factors, you just may get your wish.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    16. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop apologizing. He's a jerk, you're a jerk. Countries do jerky things. People do jerky things.
      The only thing more annoying than someone being a jerk is someone giving that whole "oh, I'm one of the good guys, not like those sleeping fools, like me please?" I can hate a jerk. But you, I both hate AND cringe at.

    17. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by bmo · · Score: 1

      The point that sailed clear over your head is that the Chinese are willing to put the effort into bringing the nation into the 21'st century, while we here in the west have some sort of fantasy that we'll somehow profit off of *their* efforts without having to do any of our own.

      It's an entitlement mentality here in the West, one fostered by the so-called "investment" community that has laid waste to our own riches by selling our assets overseas for cheap and taking the cut off the top for the transactions.

      Useful Idiots indeed.

      --
      BMO

    18. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by cavreader · · Score: 1

      The Chinese are willing to do anything that makes the Party leaders rich. This can be said about a lot of the ruling classes across the world but the Chinese do not even bother hiding their motives and any of their citizens who voice a complaint are quickly silenced. China does not honor any UN economic sanctions when it comes to doing business with some of the most despotic countries on the planet starting with NK. They will do business with anyone and practice capitalism with gusto. They simply do not care what anyone says about their actions and while everyone is busy pillaring the only country able to check their power they are getting away with anything they are doing. In some aspects their willingness to do anything they want with no apologies or subterfuge is impressive. It's even more amusing that when I have visited China on business they have been the most friendly and accommodating hosts I have encountered especially compared to the sanctimonious pricks you run across in the EU. And for all those people romanticizing the US in the 80's or 90's they should really take a closer look. People talk like the US reached some sort of pinnacle of freedom and democracy and have regressed but the US has never been as good as people like to claim just as the US is not as bad as some people think today. In the 80's Japan was slated to bypass the US economically but ended up crashing on their way to glory. Today China is in a precarious state as far as economic progress goes. Their growth was the result of taking advantage of cheap labor and nothing else. Not innovation or quality. Their success has resulted in the average workers demanding more money which result in higher labor costs. They aggressively manipulate their currency to maintain low cost exports but there are limits to this strategy. They also have to contend with other SE Asian countries that are starting to compete with them on low labor costs.

    19. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the USA in 1970s (as proudly represented by Kissinger and Nixon) who rehabilitated the most murderous regime in history just to flip the USSR the finger, and Clinton completed the task 20 years later by granting that regime the Most Favored Nation status and trade priviledges. Most. Favored. Nation.

      Pinochet in Chile?

      China

      Oh, I see...

    20. Re:considering what is known about the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The number of items in your list of electronics that are actually made in the US is vanishingly small. Pretty much all other those other than routers are made in Asia now.

  6. China produces a shitload of computers, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like they might want to play a little bit nice with Microsoft...

  7. They are going back to OS/2 by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Might as well use some other unsupported OS

    1. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      you are silly, windows 7 supported until 2020 at least

    2. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by FudRucker · · Score: 2

      China has a state sponsored Linux distribution, plus at least one other distribution being developed in China, why do you think people MUST use MS_Windows, i have not had windows on a PC in over 10 years and i am doing fine without it

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has a state sponsored Linux distribution, plus at least one other distribution being developed in China

      Seems like a no-lose proposition for China... revenge on Microsoft for killing Windows XP support (which is a pain for China); strong encouragement to government departments to look for alternatives to Windows (especially domestic OS's with no NSA back doors*). All the while, keeping Windows 7 open as an option when absolutely necessary**.

      Plus avoid the pos that is the Windows 8 desktop interface.

      * a gentle reminder that Chinese state back doors are a non-issue here -- this is for internal use by the Chinese government after all
      ** the cynic in me says that Windows 7 probably has special back doors for every government that has asked anyway (no idea of the actual truth here though)

    4. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then explain to me why they aren't making an SP2...

    5. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is hardly a desktop OS for the masses. Stop being obtuse.

    6. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by clifffton · · Score: 0

      Anywhere in the world other than the US any modern OS is an option. Maybe some ancient ones too. (I did love me some Warp back in the day) Linux is a great choice for China. Hail Hydra!

    7. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that even that is only five and half years.

    8. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by unixisc · · Score: 1

      China has a state sponsored Linux distribution, plus at least one other distribution being developed in China, why do you think people MUST use MS_Windows, i have not had windows on a PC in over 10 years and i am doing fine without it

      If you're referring to Red Flag Linux, it's dead - just search 'Red Flag Linux' on /. and you'll find the story in February that describes the company being shut down

    9. Re:They are going back to OS/2 by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      pfft, that's an eternity in the desktop IT business, and special clients with deep pockets like banks will be able to get extended service far beyond that.

  8. Only Windows 8, not Windows System 7... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Windows 8, not Windows System 7 that M$ is still selling.

  9. To be fair, they'll probably buy one copy... by gubon13 · · Score: 1

    ...and then do absolutely nothing to stop the rampant pirating of that copy...

    1. Re:To be fair, they'll probably buy one copy... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      ...and then do absolutely nothing to stop the rampant pirating of that copy...

      Stop it? They'd promote it! ...after hacking it to send keystrokes and user-data to their own intelligence servers.
      Windows CN, coming to a torrent near you.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  10. Breaking: by mujadaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    This just in: China was considering paying for an operating system!

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    1. Re:Breaking: by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      Huh? You can pay for operating systems? :P

    2. Re:Breaking: by jkrise · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's not funny any more. Windows 8 and later do not seem to be operating systems at all, that description seems to have stopped with XP. An OS manages the hardware resources and provides an operating environment for application software to run.

      Windows 8 has made it very cumbersome to use the hardware, focusing largely on touch, which is wasted on a desktop. And many legacy application software simply refuse to run on Windows 8 or later. Even simple web based applications are a pain to navigate and use in Windows 8.

      So China or elsewhere, people need a decent desktop operating system, and Microsoft seems to have exited that business.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    3. Re:Breaking: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong though about what an OS is. If you ask 10 people familiar with computers, you'll get 10 answers on what an OS is, and assuming they aren't idiots, they'll all be correct. What an OS is, is not we defined.

    4. Re:Breaking: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I paid a few dollars for Debian, as well as other distros, discs back when 56k was the fastest most homes could get in the US. That is also about the time when there was Suse, Red Hat, and other distros on the shelf in electronic and office stores for more than $100.

    5. Re:Breaking: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no they weren't... this announcement simply means the chinese government has finally figured out how to run their own kms server

    6. Re:Breaking: by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 has made it very cumbersome to use the hardware, focusing largely on touch, which is wasted on a desktop.

      No. Windows 8 has made it possible to transition to touch hardware while continuing to support desktop applications. Of course it sucks on the wrong hardware. And that's Microsoft's fault for allowing non-touch hardware to be supported without a substantial OS penalty.

      And many legacy application software simply refuse to run on Windows 8 or later.

      Windows 8 includes a VM manager. You can run those legacy applications against Windows XP. But shockingly few companies did that even with Windows 7, this seems to be more of a complaint in theory than in reality.

    7. Re:Breaking: by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I have a friend that works at a government contractor and I had to explain to him how to use both XP Mode (for an older program with drivers that wouldn't run on 7) and also DOSBox (for a DOS program that wouldn't run on 7 or XP Mode).

      People really do this.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    8. Re:Breaking: by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I understand people do it, but in my experience not as often as claimed. Mostly what happens is they complain they will have to upgrade, and then they upgrade the application. Some of course do it, and Microsoft provided a good transition in Windows 7 with the built in XP. In Windows 8 they are being more aggressive in trying to encourage application upgrades which is a good thing IMHO. I'm on OSX and we have annual OS upgrades for which about 1/3rd of non-upgraded applications would break. So everything upgrades regularly. A much better system IMHO.

  11. And what's better? by kevmatic · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this is because they're upset at Microsoft for dropping XP support so quickly, then what are they going to? What OS has a longer support cycle than XP's 12.5 years?

    Red Hat's is 10 years. AIX is 5-7. HP-UX is 8. Ubuntu LTS is 5 years. Mac OS is 4-ish. Solaris is likely the closest at 12 years... But its still less. Maybe they'll roll their own support?

    1. Re:And what's better? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Windows 2.0 was supported for 14 years

    2. Re:And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet this is a response to the US Government crying about some Chinese hackers bullying them the other day.

    3. Re:And what's better? by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      In the case of all these other OS's though the cost of upgrading is trivial. Even Mac OSX only costs $20-40 vs. Microsott's $100+ pricetag

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    4. Re:And what's better? by mspohr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft was still selling XP until October 2010 and ending support less than 4 years later so this is about par for an average OS.
      However, XP is far from average and still runs on about half of the computers in China, most ATMs worldwide and, of course, most developing country computers, granny computers as well as on many corporate computers which are in the dinosaur category.
      Everyone knows they need to get rid of XP but "change is hard".
      China seems concerned about loss of support for XP (i.e. can't rely on Microsoft) and US spying in Win 8 (can't rely on Microsoft).
      They would be better off going with their own home grown Linux distro but "change is hard" and they have an incredible installed base problem.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re: And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that isn't U.S. It's compromised from a security viewpoint, therefore worthless.

    6. Re:And what's better? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      If this is because they're upset at Microsoft for dropping XP support so quickly, then what are they going to? What OS has a longer support cycle than XP's 12.5 years?

      Red Hat's is 10 years. AIX is 5-7. HP-UX is 8. Ubuntu LTS is 5 years. Mac OS is 4-ish. Solaris is likely the closest at 12 years... But its still less. Maybe they'll roll their own support?

      That have state-sponsored Linuc distributions, too, you know. I think one a long time ago was called Red Flag Linux.

    7. Re:And what's better? by Patch86 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is disingenuous to count XP's support period from its first release date, considering that each Service Pack represented as big a change to the OS as each Ubuntu release (for example).

      Support for original XP (without a Service Pack) ended in 2005- only 4 years supported. The last Service Pack, SP3, was released in 2008- giving it a respectable 6 years supported. If XP had exited support when it was scheduled to (2012- it was only extended due to a Microsoft product-line-up cockup at the hight of the netbook craze), it would have had 4 years in support too- less than any of the others you named.

      Even if you stubbornly disagree with what I'm saying about SPs and wish to count it all the way from SP0-SP3 end of support, might I also reiterate above that support was only extended at the last minute due to a Microsoft cockup- namely, that Vista was wildly unsuited to the then very popular netbooks. The standard offer from Microsoft is 10 years support (which is what you might reasonably expect to receive from Windows 8). This is the same as Red Hat, and comparable with other Enterprise-market OSs.

    8. Re:And what's better? by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but remember that you've got to pony up just over a grand before you can even use Mac OS.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    9. Re:And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually RHEL support is now set to 13 years, but this is only for the support provided by RH itself. Any local company can extend the support of past, present, and future versions of RH (through CentOS) for an arbitrary duration, while you won't get support anymore for XP from anyone, so definitely RH is a better choice.

    10. Re:And what's better? by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      And everyone stopped using it, because it was shit and doesn't run all their (pirated) application software.

    11. Re:And what's better? by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      That was a lame troll -- and wasn't worth the 50 cents you masters paid you for it.

    12. Re:And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you build a Hackintosh. I have a few of those myself and they didn't even cost close to a grand :D

    13. Re:And what's better? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      It is disingenuous to count XP's support period from its first release date...Support for original XP (without a Service Pack) ended in 2005- only 4 years supported. The last Service Pack, SP3, was released in 2008- giving it a respectable 6 years supported.

      That sounds about right. I refused to upgrade from Windows 2000 until XP had made it past SP1, because XP had so many problems on release. These days, we think of patches to fix security issues. But with XP, most patches just fixed things that were plain broken. The years before SP2, and probably SP3, really shouldn't count in XP's lifespan.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    14. Re:And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see your point. The Chinese government is well within its rights to tell its employees what software it can and cannot use. And it would hardly be alone in banning a specific supplier. They are heavily dependent of Windows XP right now and MS has basically said 'you're on your own' to them.

      I am aware of the piracy rates in China and how ridiculously old XP is, but the Chinese government is a huge player in the Chinese market. Its actual purchases are massive and likely to grow not shrink. It also has tremendous influence on how other players in the Chinese market behave. Furthermore, symbolic tit-for-tat retaliation is a common practice in Chinese business and government in exactly this kind of situation. All this does is wave a giant neon sign saying 'MS competitors welcome'.

      The Microsoft China sales team should fired if they didn't see this one coming.

    15. Re:And what's better? by Scragglykat · · Score: 1

      There have been articles talking about China creating their own Linux distribution so that's probably where they are headed. A distribution they can support themselves, indefinitely.

    16. Re:And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solaris 10 came in 2005 and support ends in 2021. It makes 16 years.

    17. Re:And what's better? by Mojo66 · · Score: 1

      I've submitted this story as well, even before the OP (not that I'm bitter....), and with additional information regarding China's plans:

      Apart from purchase restrictions for central government offices, China will focus on the development of its own OS based on Linux, a move which An Yang, a security expert with Qihoo 360 Technology, said was a necessity although progress has been disappointing. There are several Linux-based OS developed by Chinese companies, such as KylinOS and StartOS, but they have not proved popular. An said the first step is to promote the use of Chinese-designed OS among official users, while their popularity among civilian users will be subject to market forces.
      HP recently announced shipping PCs with Kylin pre-installed, while there have been about 4 million downloads of the OS from the website so far.

    18. Re:And what's better? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The cost of upgrading also includes the cost of upgrading the hardware as well. Even a free upgrade from Windows XP to Windows 8 will be expensive to the typical XP user.

    19. Re:And what's better? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Since Microsoft has essentially a monopoly in the OS market, anything Microsoft does is automatically close to the average.

    20. Re:And what's better? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Remember also that five years ago you could buy a brand new computer running XP. So 5 years support only (and substandard support too, as soon as they had a new version they treated the old one like a pariah almost instantly).

    21. Re:And what's better? by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 has yet to be supported at all.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    22. Re:And what's better? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      SP2 was the last fundamental change to XP's architecture (to the point that some programs that ran on SP1 *stopped working* with SP2). It added Data Execution Prevention and some other under the hood goodies. SP3 was basically a security update rollup with some essential hotfixes thrown in for good measure. Nothing major changed architecturally.

      I just wish they would have released one final update rollup with all supported public updates to make it easier to get people up to a final patch level. Having to have 150+ post-SP3 patches makes things a bit cumbersome when fixing PC's for people that never upgraded.

    23. Re:And what's better? by stub667 · · Score: 1

      If this is because they're upset at Microsoft for dropping XP support so quickly, then what are they going to? What OS has a longer support cycle than XP's 12.5 years?

      Red Hat's is 10 years. AIX is 5-7. HP-UX is 8. Ubuntu LTS is 5 years. Mac OS is 4-ish. Solaris is likely the closest at 12 years... But its still less. Maybe they'll roll their own support?

      Every Open Source opearting system has support for as long as you want to keep making fixes for it. It isn't like China lacks people capable managing this process and patching the code. And if they somehow can't, it isn't like Canonical or Red Hat or a hundred other companies wouldn't do it for them for peanuts compared to Microsoft licences.

    24. Re:And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, it's "stubborn" and "disingenuous" of us to start counting from the beginning of a well-defined product version. You know, like what's done with, I don't know, every other software product? But you keep insisting that SP3 is it's own version, despite the presence of the words "service pack" in there. I admire your determination, if not your logic.

    25. Re:And what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just put the latest Ubuntu on a low-powered ex-Vista laptop I had sitting around. Runs slow as shit. I think if you want to keep antique hardware around you're going to have to settle for antique software too if you want it to be usable.

  12. only forbids purchase, not use by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't sound like they are actually forbidding the use of Windows 8. They are just forbidding the purchase of windows 8. I guess as long as pirated copies are used, then everything is fine?

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:only forbids purchase, not use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the difference is now when microsoft calls someone out, whichever department can point to the ban and either say 'not using it' or if really busted their boss can say 'we told them not to use it - see.'

      no more anti-piracy money for microsoft. a lot of microsoft's money comes from china, not sure how much of that comes from government. But if this includes SOEs it will make a big big dent.

  13. "Openly accuse us of cybercrimes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....that'll learn ya.

    1. Re:"Openly accuse us of cybercrimes... by benjfowler · · Score: 2

      The butthurt is strong with these guys.

      Even funnier is their behaviorr in the South China Sea. Totally unreasonable, bullying behaviour, but if you want to see somebody go off their brains, trying pointing out to China they're objectively behaving like bullies and that they have no right to seize territory that isn't theirs...

      Everyone in their local neighbourhood thinks they're cunts, but in the eyes of the Chinese themselves, they can do no wrong, and it's everyone else's fault.

      I guess we know why China and Russia are getting so lovey-dovey recently. They both have the disease of 19th-century nationalism, lunacy and paranoia -- and misery loves company.

      I guess state-level paranoia and stupidity is the season's new look.

    2. Re:"Openly accuse us of cybercrimes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess state-level paranoia and stupidity is the season's new look.

      Ask the NSA.

    3. Re:"Openly accuse us of cybercrimes... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Yes to all this. We taught them well, just as the British taught us to be a bunch of self absorbed nationalist miliaristic crazies. The 19th and 20th centuries were quite instructive.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  14. China's way of saying..... by danknight48 · · Score: 0

    "Windows 8 is shit, and they dont want the population to have to use shit."

    Go China, save your country from the worst OS ever created!
    If only other counties had that much balls, the world would be a better place (OS wise anyway).

  15. But have you tried using Windows 8? by androidph · · Score: 2

    If I were procurement I would ban it too.

  16. No trust in Windows 8 by cpghost · · Score: 1
    Maybe the Chinese government didn't get access to the W8 source code (unlike with XP), or maybe they got some access, but where unable to produce out of those sources a 1:1 identical binary to the released W8 version.

    With all the NSA spying going on worldwide, it's prudent for the chinese administration to steer clear of Windows 8 at the moment.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  17. Missing the point by Rant-a-Holic · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not about Windows 8. This is about the MS / NSA love affair. My company has done the exact same thing. No more windows after 7. Only approved Linux variants from here on....

    1. Re:Missing the point by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think Microsoft was ever interested in cooperating with the NSA, but eventually they were compelled to heel. It wasn't a love affair, it was a shotgun wedding.

      Regardless of why they got married, they still had an ugly kid.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is not about Windows 8. This is about the MS / NSA love affair. My company has done the exact same thing. No more windows after 7. Only approved Linux variants from here on....

      haha I don't believe that for a second... love the pure fabricated posts of Slashdot. Either that or when you say "My Company" you mean yourself doing freelance work.

    3. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your source for wether microsoft was willing or not is what exactly?

    4. Re:Missing the point by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I don't think Microsoft was ever interested in cooperating with the NSA, but eventually they were compelled to heel. It wasn't a love affair, it was a shotgun wedding.

      And your source for wether microsoft was willing or not is what exactly?

      How about *your* source, Mr. AC? It's all speculation, but there is no rational incentive for Microsoft to do such a thing without coercion. Can you show that? Has Snowden commented on this?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as the NSA paid to put a backdoor in RSA crypto. I wouldn't be surprised that NSA was paying businesses to put backdoors in their systems. Is money, coercion or an incentive?

    6. Re:Missing the point by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Just as the NSA paid to put a backdoor in RSA crypto. I wouldn't be surprised that NSA was paying businesses to put backdoors in their systems. Is money, coercion or an incentive?

      Microsoft would need considerable *more* money than RSA to make it worth their while. Microsoft could buy RSA with the spare change they waste on stupid hardware and software projects that they later abandon. Iâ(TM)m suggesting that the NSA canâ(TM)t afford Microsoft, so they would need some other leverage.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is twisted logic but Microsoft thought they were helping the US. Only when their help to the NSA and others became public did they start to claim that they were anything but good citizens. For this help the US government was very happy and provided Microsoft with all sorts of inside help against competitors, other governments and last but not least all the users of Microsoft products. This help was a very large rational incentive for Microsoft. This became negative when this became publc knowledge.

    8. Re:Missing the point by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Huzzah!

    9. Re:Missing the point by jbolden · · Score: 1

      My company has done the exact same thing. No more windows after 7. Only approved Linux variants from here on....

      There is a long history of failure of companies that try to suddenly migrate from Windows. Mostly the success are:

      a) Companies that had a Unix culture to begin with and thus Windows wasn't deeply entrenched.
      b) Companies that had owners who didn't care about the cost and were willing to make this cost ineffective.

      If your deeply entrenched company makes it, terrific! But we shall see.

  18. Can you blame them? by riis138 · · Score: 2

    Honestly, I feel that many of the news services that have reported this story got the motive all wrong. I think that the Chinese government not wanting to adopt Windows 8 has much more to do with a convoluted interface and inflated licensing fee than spite over the Windows XP support debacle. Of course this is just my opinion, but from what I hear in the workplace every day in regards to Windows 8, there is a very similar narrative going on here at home.

    --
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
  19. In Bejing they call the Windows update process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    a Microsoft fire drill....

  20. because nobody anywhere else pirates Windows... by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    I love how you pretend that China is the only place where Windows is pirated. I'm pretty sure piracy of Windows is widespread in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and all of Asia.

    1. Re:because nobody anywhere else pirates Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh
      captcha: apology

    2. Re:because nobody anywhere else pirates Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how you pretend that China is the only place where Windows is pirated

      Umm...no, OP did not imply that at all.

      OP implied that all Windows in China is pirated.* This is not the same as implying that all Windows pirates are Chinese. Logic does not work that way.

      (* Of course, not all Windows in China is pirated, but it's close enough that the joke stands.)

    3. Re:because nobody anywhere else pirates Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Retard,

      Logic is not your strong suit, is it? Nowhere in that joke is the statement or the implication that China is the ONLY country for which OS piracy is common.

      HTH.

    4. Re:because nobody anywhere else pirates Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how you pretend that China is the only place where Windows is pirated. I'm pretty sure piracy of Windows is widespread in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and all of Asia.

      I love how you write like a retarded faggot. I'm pretty sure that using the way you write as an example, I'm getting the hang of it. Although this is not text and I cannot affect a lisp, or pubes in my teeth, or semen breath like you certainly have, but still, I think I've got it.

  21. Moral high ground? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Classic jumping on the NSA-hatewagon. Are the Chinese less despicable because they're obvious about it? Do they have some moral high ground because at least they're not hypocrites?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  22. Not a bad idea! by methano · · Score: 1

    Maybe the US government should consider doing the same thing.

    1. Re:Not a bad idea! by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

      And everyone else!

      --
      http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  23. probably not a conspiracy. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    More likely it's just recognized that 8 is a shitty OS, that deviates too far from windows xp / windows 7, and that the next iteration of windows will wind up veering away from 8.

    China likely has a huge number of government users and they don't want to pay for training them to use 8, then having to pay to retrain once 8 is dropped in favor of 9, or whatever alternative is chosen.

    1. Re:probably not a conspiracy. by jbolden · · Score: 1

      and that the next iteration of windows will wind up veering away from 8.

      I doubt it. Microsoft is not going to back down. They absolutely, positively must have a viable touch based OS or they simply will have no role in home small business by around 2020. Their major point of leverage is their existing compatibility. They are not going to be put into an ever narrowing, ever shrinking platform.

  24. Wow by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    So having millions of machines running unpatched XP, and then telling the Americans to go fuck themselves by banned a supported OS... isn't that a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face?

    I'm sure the Fifty Cent Army will find a way to justify this stupidity though.

    1. Re:Wow by Teresita · · Score: 1

      So having millions of machines running unpatched XP, and then telling the Americans to go fuck themselves by banned a supported OS... isn't that a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face?

      It's a communist plot. China asked Mr. Softie to please support WinXP past April 8 because it runs on 70% of the PCs over there, and Mr. Softie said no, so this just retaliation, like when China cut off oil to the Norks for a few months for lighting off a nuke. But it's not really going to hurt Mr, Softie very much, because finding an actual licensed copy of Windows in China is like finding an unwokked house cat.

  25. As hosed up as my machine was by the 8.1 upgrade by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

    I think they're making the right choice.

  26. Migrating to Windows 7, Qilin and Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In our company all new office machines have to be Qilin (Ubuntu based Linux with some extensions), mid and top tear bosses are allowing themselves to use Windows 7, and the document handling has been switched to Debian Samba server.

  27. If I were China by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 0

    I would basically say, unless there is absolutely no alternative then no non Open Source software at all. Welcome to the 21st century, Microsoft, where we have choices.

    It would also appear to be "Welcome to the 21st Century, Intel, where we have choices."

  28. Yes and by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    This is in response to the DOJ announcement of indictments against named Chinese military / governmental officials for IP theft and espionage. The Chinese temper-tantrum is just beginning.

  29. I wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish someone had banned me from buying Win 8.

  30. "surprising" microsoft by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Yeah, SURPRISE! Nobody likes your crappy operating system. I certainly didn't find it surprising. How can they look at their sales numbers and find this surprising at this point?

  31. This makes no sense by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Maybe something got lost in the translation. Something like, you know, reason.

  32. Decision based on other world leaders experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  33. But we need to buy Windows 8! by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    Said no organization ever.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  34. I I was thinking they finally come to their senses by ruir · · Score: 1

    It is stupid to use software developed by the enemy. Very unwise.

  35. The US gov should insist on western made items by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, we should be pushing for buying western, if not American, made networking, computing, etc. devices. And for the same reason that I think that China is doing the RIGHT thing.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:The US gov should insist on western made items by cpghost · · Score: 2

      Right! Cisco's gear likely has value-added NSA backdoors inside. That makes it a lot more desirable to buy than Huawei's likely built-in chinese backdoors. We should definitely buy more of our surveillance gear than their's.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:The US gov should insist on western made items by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Seriously, we should be pushing for buying western, if not American, made networking, computing, etc. devices. And for the same reason that I think that China is doing the RIGHT thing.

      And what brand is that then?

      What hardware is NOT made in China? And what hardware do you know for sure is not backdoored at the hardware level OR firmware running on the hardware?

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  36. Don't yall think its high time to take back by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Don't yall think its high time to take back our manufacturing....all of it screw China im betting 99% of the Windows Installs in China are stolen anyways. Screw the bastards I say. we need the jobs more then them anyways.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:Don't yall think its high time to take back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when we take it back only machine maintanance jobs will be left. Machines don't need overtime payments.

  37. Diverse double compiling by tepples · · Score: 2

    You need to trust trust to trust in your compiler!

    So long as your compiler can compile itself, and so long as you have access to other independent implementations of the same language, you can defeat the Ken Thompson attack with the David A. Wheeler defense. Just bootstrap your compiler with each of the other implementations (compile it with the other compiler, then compile it with the resulting binary), and if there's no attack, the binaries will converge. For example, if you have independent compilers A, B, and C, then C compiled with (C compiled with A) will be bit-identical to C compiled with (C compiled with B) unless an attack is in progress. Start by using Visual C++ Express, Clang, TCC, and even a C interpreter to verify your GCC.

    1. Re:Diverse double compiling by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Except that since recently you need a C++ compiler to build gcc, which puts a severe block towards reproducibility: you can write a basic C compiler that can handle most programs in a week (with a plain libc, at least), and get all bits needed to let old gcc bootstrap in not much longer. A basic C++ compiler, on the other hand, is a matter of years.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Diverse double compiling by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Which only works if you can compile the same source with the same compiler and get a bit for bit copy.

      Ever compile something twice?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    3. Re:Diverse double compiling by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Then get your faulty memory sticks replaced!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Diverse double compiling by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Nothing wrong with my ecc-ram.

      P.S. you suck eh?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    5. Re:Diverse double compiling by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      In that case, please continue with replacing your deficient compiler toolchain, since it's doing something it shouldn't be doing.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  38. Only China? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure most governments already decided on Windows 7 anyway when XP starting coming to a close. This seems less a reaction than just a prudent large IT procurement decision. Pretty sure if I was in charge of the decision and someone thought that adding Windows 8 into the mix was a good idea, i'd tell them to go to hell also.

  39. Windows XP is the MSIE6 of OSes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows XP is the MSIE6 of OSes.

  40. Open Source and State Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see one big problem for the Chinese state.

    The general population does not have the source to XP, if the government has added something to help control information the vast percentage of the general population can not see it.

    With a local version of Linux you don't have just open source, you have to add local support. Even if the government tries to control the source the people who do the support can now make versions without the government add-ons.

    Plus, without a lot of rework other versions of Linux (ie. not the Chinese version) will be quite usable.

  41. Retaliation for XP support ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is just retaliation by the Chinese government against Microsoft for not agreeing to give them (free) Windows XP security updates forever.
    That is all. Seriously.
    Won't patch our already purchased/pirated WinXP copies? NOBODY USE THE NEW STUFF.
    It's that simple folks.

  42. Backend Cloud Ties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that the Chinese government is probably concerned about the backend ties to the MS cloud. Between the visible connections and the requirement for an MS account to install & use one might suspect they wonder about what else is there in the background. Might be harder to keep secrets...

    Now personally, I find Win 8.1 is almost pleasant -- although I despised 8/Win2012. But anything sensitive gets done on another platform -- I have several other flavors of Windows, Linux and Solaris in use. Besides -- their 'touch' stuff only sort of works...

    Timesharing (now called 'the cloud') always made sense. But few places have good, cheap, fast internet connections available that one needs to make moving to the 'cloud' practical. Forcing people into it was not a smart move. Suggests that MS execs have lost touch with what the world looks like outside of the Redmond campus.

  43. Re:I I was thinking they finally come to their sen by cpghost · · Score: 1

    If you consider your biggest debtor an enemy, yes.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  44. Old g++ in the bootstrap sequence by tepples · · Score: 2

    You can use the other C compiler to compile old g++ and use old g++ to compile new g++.

  45. Timestamps by tepples · · Score: 2

    Ever compile something twice?

    If you're passing the same source files and the same flags to the same compiler and not getting the same result, then either A. your linker is leaking timestamps, or B. you've got RAM issues (as K. S. Kyosuke suggested), or C. you're compromised.

    1. Re:Timestamps by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Oh, i'm definitely compromised :)

      Wait, were you talking about my computer?

      As an aside, that's all too tin foil hat for me. I'll leave that problem to the paranoids to deal with. I'm all for complete access to everything by everyone. I've got a beautiful system no one will use because all of it is open for inspection and change on the fly. For mature users only.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    2. Re:Timestamps by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      Or D. you're compiling C# code. http://ericlippert.com/2012/05...

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    3. Re:Timestamps by tepples · · Score: 1

      Good point. In this case, the compiler is generating internally-used sequential names for objects that are anonymous in the source code, but the sequence depends on input from the operating system's thread scheduler. In such a case, you need to configure the compiler to use one thread. So "D. you need to build your compiler in single-threaded mode."

    4. Re:Timestamps by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      +1 much better answer :)

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
  46. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...China decides to promote internal insecurity by blocking an obvious upgrade path. Hackers around the world rejoiced and then got back to work!

  47. Red Flag Linux by unixisc · · Score: 1

    My guess is that China wants to start pushing their "Red Flag Linux so that they can at least have a chance at knowing when their security is compromised.

    We had a story about this some time ago - about Red Flag Software shutting down. While China may be doing just pirated XP (which should be easier to pawn) or Android, they're certainly not pushing their own flagship, which at one time was the #2 Linux distro worldwide.

  48. You are all missing the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Win 8 has better security than Win 7 and below. The Chinese like to spy on their citizens too much to give up the capability of projecting their will in cyber.

  49. China's advance continues unabated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So China makes another massive stride ahead of the US... getting rid (eventually) of all the parasitic "Windows" malware-disguised-as-software, since ultimately they'll have to move to a new OS when M$ drops support for Vista and 7... while in America, we still suffer from a near-monopoly of M$'s design. Advantage-China! To keep up, we need to dump M$'s wretched crapware too. If we don't, we're going to continue to stagnate, or even slide down-hill.

  50. In China "8" is a VERY LUCKY, Auspicious number by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    China began their impressive hosting of the Olympic games on 08-08-08 just to illustrate how strong the sentiment.

    Perhaps its just a little nauseating to the Chinese culture that they "Kentucky Fry" their national good fortune with yet another mediocre iteration of oppressive corporate software that aims to dominate the market, serve self interest at the expense of the customer, to be the remaining choice available.

    Furthermore, the Chinese are pragmatic, and in light of the fact that Microsoft, quite undemocratically, willfully ignores the majority preference of XP in a "free market" it would seem a bit inconsistent of them to endorse such backward economic policy.

    They're not complete fascists, after all. Just L8 bloomers.

  51. The German government thinks the same ... by MoserMichael · · Score: 0

    Now that's because of Trusted Platform Module ; in order to support this DRM feature , each new windows PC has a chip on it that can override part of the OS. Now the German government thinks that this DRM features is also a Troyan horse that allows some agencies unlimited access to the PC ; now the Chinese government thinks the same. Too bad for Microsoft. Also see this article here for more info: http://news.techworld.com/secu...

    1. Re:The German government thinks the same ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Trusted computing is a published standard and not hard to implement. There is no reason that Germany couldn't produce their own trusted chips. If the Chinese government wasn't pro-piracy same applies.

  52. red flag is no alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I baught a Laptop (shenzhou) once with Redflag Preinstalled. As a longtime linuxuser i thought to myself "hey thats great". But after turning it on i realized imminently that RF is utter rubbish. It runs desktop as Root by default, Chinese typing doesnt work, qq doesnt work. The screen resolution refused to go beyond 800X600 it was a nightmare. I tried fixing it for days, then ragequit and installed Archlinux. That was in 2010. But i bet not much has changed.

    I can understand why they dont want windows 8 but also why they dont wanna use Redflag. Both systems are cripples in their own right.