Slashdot Mirror


US May Prevent Chinese Hackers From Attending Def Con, Black Hat

Taco Cowboy (5327) links to a report from Reuters that says "Washington is considering using visa restrictions to prevent Chinese nationals from attending popular summer hacking conferences in Las Vegas as part of a broader effort to curb Chinese cyber espionage, a senior administration official said Saturday. The official said that Washington could use such visa restrictions and other measures to keep Chinese from attending the August Def Con and Black Hat events to maintain pressure on China after the United States this week charged five Chinese military officers with hacking into U.S. companies to steal trade secrets."

30 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Good move US, isolate yourself from the rest of the world, so we don't have to do it.
    See how that goes for you. Moves like this will only make the next Con's happen in a non totalitarian country, your loss.

    PS: Isn't the 2nd amendment's sole purpose to prevent your government from acting against the people? Can you tell me what the f* you're waiting for?

    1. Re: Isolation by vux984 · · Score: 2

      so desperate for a new cold war

      Wot are you on about? A "new" cold war? Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

    2. Re:Isolation by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      PS: Isn't the 2nd amendment's sole purpose to prevent your government from acting against the people? Can you tell me what the f* you're waiting for?

      2017.

      No one wants to martyr the first black president.

      After he leaves office, if the next guy doesn't actually reduce the entire federal government, we won't last a decade without a new American civil war.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  2. better idea by ebonum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic.
    Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

    Keep in mind. The US sets the standard. If we start doing things like this, don't whine when the China does the same thing. They could make the same case for any conference on any topic. If Americans come, they will steal XYZ.

    1. Re:better idea by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      No, but there's nothing wrong with barring people based on political or military affiliation. China is not the US. They carefully control who they allow to leave China for the US, and so the Chinese citizens attending Def Con are doing so with the implicit permissions of the Chinese government.

      They could make the same case for any conference on any topic.

      Yeah, next time there is a hacker conference like Def Con based on complete freedom of expression and anarchy in China let us know. I won't hold my breath. And if China starts banning all US citizens from attending conferences, said conferences will no longer be held in China. But they won't, because the majority of China's economy currently revolves around placating American investors.

      You can trash the US all you want, but there are a limited number of countries in the world that would even allow a conference like Def Con or Black Hat.

    2. Re:better idea by dryeo · · Score: 2

      You can trash the US all you want, but there are a limited number of countries in the world that would even allow a conference like Def Con or Black Hat.

      Many totalitarian governments like to get all the dissidents together in one easy to manage group. Show up and get entered into the database for extra scrutiny plus having all those dissidents in one group makes doing intelligence on them much easier. Always a good chance of hiring some too.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:better idea by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Now how exactly does the NSA know it was members of the Chinese military. Let me guess after initiating proper diplomatic relations the NSA approached China's computer crime task force and initiated a legal joint investigation in the hacking and after proper legal investigation discovered the perpetrators. What, don't tell me this didn't happen, not even fucking close.

      So the NSA hacked computers in China, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt those computer could be hacked and placed 'er' discovered proof of network hacking in the US, conducted by the NSA 'er' government of China and now the NSA 'er' government of China seeks to cover it up.

      You can see the real problem here. The NSA blatantly and publicly lied repeatedly to it's own government, the NSA now has publicly declared it is hacking government computers in China based upon the evidence they are attempting to submit. Now we know how naughty the NSA has been, the question is would they, hack computers in the US and then falsify evidence and plant it on computers in China that it has now publicly admitted to hacking, in order to deflect attention away from it's own criminal activities.

      Surely those idiots can see the problem they have created for themselves in combining network defence and network assault in the one unit. They are an offensive computer network organisation, their role is to destroy and break the security of other countries networks. Which now they are publicly admitting to via this flawed investigation, all based around hacking networks and breaking security and publicly proved only thing, is did hack government computers and networks in China. As to the validity of the evidence, they utterly tainted it to the point that only corrupt courts within the US would accept it and the rest of the world and the international courts would have to reject due to that extreme contamination.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:better idea by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      You really don't get it at all. It is the sheer mitigated arrogance of the US government and claims that it's laws apply to every other country including the laws that the US government does not have to obey others countries laws in those countries. The total in you face arrogance of it all. For a start the NSA should have been told to STFU and everything should have been handed over to the FBI and the FBI should be pursuing the prosecution. This because they are a policing organisation that acts legally and not an espionage organisation that acts criminally (surely you can see the logical legal difference and also how the rest of the world would view it) but NOOOO, they had play knob head driven ego games and try to make the NSA look better after fucking up all over the place only to make US foreign affairs look stupidly arrogant instead and when that was failing double down on the stupid by banning arbitrary people.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:better idea by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic. Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      This is all highly unconstitutional. If they are allowed to enter the united states, AND they are not being arrested or detained, then they have the rights and privileges that those present in the US have...

      Including the right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to organize and assemble.

      The Defcon. and Blackhat conferences are an exercise of free speech rights. The government cannot lawfully prohibit those conferences or prevent anyone from attending; doing so is in direct violation of the bill of rights due to interference with and abridgement constitutionally protected activities and rights and privileges.

    6. Re:better idea by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Yeah, totalitarian. Clearly the US government is totalitarian. Or maybe you should go look up that definition before you use it again.

      Show up and get entered into the database for extra scrutiny plus having all those dissidents in one group makes doing intelligence on them much easier.

      What you have described is exactly the Chinese government model. Except for the hiring part - the US clearly does that at Def Con, but instead of threatening to jail people they threaten to pay them 6 figures.

    7. Re:better idea by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic. Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      This is all highly unconstitutional. If they are allowed to enter the united states, AND they are not being arrested or detained, then they have the rights and privileges that those present in the US have...

      Including the right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to organize and assemble.

      The Defcon. and Blackhat conferences are an exercise of free speech rights. The government cannot lawfully prohibit those conferences or prevent anyone from attending; doing so is in direct violation of the bill of rights due to interference with and abridgement constitutionally protected activities and rights and privileges.

      I didn't even need to read TFA to know that this will be accomplished by denying visas to those folks, not by posting law enforcement personnel at the doors to the conference and checking IDs. The US can (and does) deny visas to all sorts of people, and for many reasons, including this kind of thing. As do most other countries.

      Perhaps you should think about what you say before you say it? That's not meant to be an insult, just a suggestion.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    8. Re:better idea by dryeo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, America has inverted the normal definition of totalitarian to pretend they're the opposite. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re:better idea by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      I agree with this.

      If we believe in "America" and Democracy -- we should stick with treating people equally. Back when this was something we did with pride -- we had a lot of people defect. Now we've got Americans selling out for a buck and a lot of "espionage" is done by buying databases from contractors with the US Gov -- go check out a wikileaks document dump sometime and get back with me if you doubt this.

      By using drones instead of diplomacy. By cracking down on "Arab looking" rather than bad acting. By being police state pricks instead of a nation of ideals: we are alienating the next Einstein rather than offering him refuge from a country that abuses power, demonizes a "type" of person, and tries to use enforcement rather than empathy.

      Going after the obvious "you look Chinese so get out of the party" will only cause the committed "bad guy" to jump through another hoop and do the same thing -- while alienating the allies who "are Chinese" that might have helped you. We've got corporate espionage going on because it's profitable -- not because the world has Chinese looking people.

      It's amazing that "barring Chinese" is even considered an idea worthy of discussion.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    10. Re:better idea by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic.
      Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      This is all highly unconstitutional. If they are allowed to enter the united states, AND they are not being
      arrested or detained, then they have the rights and privileges that those present in the US have...

      Including the right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to organize and assemble.

      The Defcon. and Blackhat conferences are an exercise of free speech rights.
      The government cannot lawfully prohibit those conferences or prevent anyone from attending;
      doing so is in direct violation of the bill of rights due to interference with and abridgement constitutionally protected activities
      and rights and privileges.

      I didn't even need to read TFA to know that this will be accomplished by denying visas to those folks, not by posting law enforcement personnel at the doors to the conference and checking IDs. The US can (and does) deny visas to all sorts of people, and for many reasons, including this kind of thing. As do most other countries.

      Perhaps you should think about what you say before you say it? That's not meant to be an insult, just a suggestion.

      I don't need to RTFA or read your prior comment to understand that barring Visas for this sort of thing is STUPID. They'll just pay some white guy to give them the data while a few hundred thousand Chinese who MIGHT have learned we are a great nation will become annoyed and say; "Well, I guess they saved me from visiting a ridiculous police state."

      Making America act like the old USSR or some banana Republic isn't the way to win anything. By the time you protect virginity of your daughters, they've been walking the streets giving BJs to hobos.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    11. Re:better idea by russotto · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you have described is exactly the Chinese government model. Except for the hiring part - the US clearly does that at Def Con, but instead of threatening to jail people they threaten to pay them 6 figures.

      How soon we forget. The FBI arrested Dmitri Sklyarov at DefCon.

  3. Re:Better than arresting people at random by MobSwatter · · Score: 2

    In Soviet 'merica, the crooks jail you!

  4. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pretty much. I'm sure people are going to froth at the mouth and all the rest until you post stories like this.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  5. Re:Hysterical. by dugancent · · Score: 2

    Then we could stop buying goods from China and watch them collapse.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  6. No, the US hasn't been proven to anything. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    The only solid (and court-tested) proof exists on the Chinese against the US (and about every First World country).

    Snowden will only count when he and his case comes before a US court. Until then, any statements, materials, or positions held by him / his supporters are only conjecture.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  7. Time to move the conferences by spasm · · Score: 5, Informative

    When the US govt starts dictating who is allowed to come to your conferences you need to move the conference. Same as the AIDS research conferences have been held anywhere except the US since the 80s because from 1987 to 2009 the US govt banned people with AIDS from traveling to the US.

    1. Re:Time to move the conferences by Frobnicator · · Score: 5, Informative

      It isn't the only one. Quite a few conferences dedicated to cryptography and security have been held outside the US because of the ITAR controls and other regulations that treat encryption as weapons and security systems as terrorist devices.

      Cryptographic systems were listed as arms until about a decade ago, and even today some security technologies are potentially on the list. Even if they aren't on ITAR any more, attending the conference is certain to get your name entered to all kinds of US-based lists. Rather than risk being considered for international arms dealing and international terrorism, quite a few conferences take place anywhere but the US. The risk both to the conference itself and to those who might attend the conferences are just too great.

      Austria, Switzerland, France, Malaysia, ... many countries are still more popular for security conferences than the US.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  8. Xenophobia by phmadore · · Score: 2

    Why are they singling out the Chinese? Don't throw statistics at me. There are French, Israeli, Egyptian, South Korean, Japanese, and on down the line who've hacked facets of the US Government and US Companies. If you're going to go down this road, you have to disallow everyone. I'm not saying you should go down this road. Then again, I aspire to be a Chinese Citizen.

  9. Why not ban the NSA? by Casandro · · Score: 2

    I mean those people create _actual_ harm.
    China cannot harm people outside China in any significant way, and should they ever do, your local government would at least protest. However no western government ever protests against the US... even when they abduct people.

    China doesn't even run large sigint installations in Germany the way the US does.

  10. Re:Limit CS classroom education of Chinese student by GNious · · Score: 2

    Pro Tip: Get a passport and travel around a bit. You'll find that there are bright people everywhere, and often they have indoor plumbing and stuff.

    If you're telling an American to go travel, you'll first have to explain that there is part of the planet that is outside of US, Canada and Mexico .
    - Then you should explain the concept that people outside of those 3 countries do not always speak English ..
    - and that they have sovereign countries with laws differing from those of the US (1) ..
    - and that getting there likely requires more than a car ..
    - and that people outside of those 3 countries might not be Christian, or Muslims (2) ..
    - and that Americans usually cannot bring their guns with them when traveling internationally (3) ..
    - and that spending a week in Paris doesn't qualify as "seeing all of Europe" ..

    In fact, while I commend the idea of getting more Americans to travel internationally, I suspect you're setting yourself up for a lot of hard work.

    1: Judging from posts on Slashdot, the prevailing sentiment is that the World is subject to US laws
    2: Judging from Fox News, those are the only 2 type of people in existence
    3: See signs when passing from El Paso, US, to Ciudad Juarez, MX

  11. Re:Next defcon by cheekyboy · · Score: 2

    Why china? you still need a visa, why not taiwan which is next door, or hong kong or somewhere else thats reasonably easy to get into.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  12. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's always the rest of the world(read: countries within the NATO-defined First World) that doesn't want the US's head on a plate.

    Dude, I hate to disillusion you, but we ALL want your head on a plate. If you meet someone and they lead you to believe otherwise, you should try to recognize that he's talking out of both corners of his mouth in an effort to get something out of you. None of us like you. I was half tempted to say that, maybe, the Israeli's, but honestly, I'm confident they think of you as a self-absorbed pack of idiots whose only role is to be exploited.

    This is not a troll. At least, it's not intended to be a troll. I genuinely am trying to set you straight, help bring your perspective a little closer to the realities that exist outside your borders.

    The shit you guys are responsible for as a nation is not a joke. No one is laughing along with you.

    Inside your country, you can divide things up into "The CIA did this, the NSA did that, I didn't do shit, I was just here minding my own business and paying my taxes.", and that flies with the people you meet on the street.

    But then when Chinese hackers do something, you say "China did it."

    That's how it is for the rest of us too. Without open warfare, you can't intrude into the inner workings of China and hold individual citizens accountable, you need to deal with the entire state, hold them accountable, and leave it to them to hold the individual citizens accountable, or not.

    We can't intrude into the inner workings of America and hold individual citizens accountable, we need to deal with your entire state, hold you accountable, and leave it to you to hold the NSA accountable.

    So, basically, everything your government does to the rest of us, you have done to the rest of us. You can argue about fairness and prejudice till you're blue in the face, but these are the power dynamics, and that's just how it is.

    You seriously need to clean your house before the rest of the world is forced to come do it for you. If you don't realize just how precarious a position your government has put you in, you really need to wake up.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  13. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    you had me until breitbart

    That's nice, now go read the article and what will you see? Oh that's right, an actual ICE report(including metrics) that lists what they've been doing. That was later picked up by some other news services, damn that reality check.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  14. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's funny is I had a green card when I was doing some work in the US back 12-15 years ago, and considered seriously becoming a US citizen(from Canada). What burns my ass, is that if I follow the rules I could be waiting upwards of a decade. While people who enter illegally can skip the entire process, get a pat on the head, and basically gloat in the face of the rule of law. What the purpose of even having the rule of law, if no one is going to enforce it? And at the very worst, actively work against it because of their ideology--instead of "doing it the correct way."

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  15. Re:How now, 50 Mao? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then I guess all the corporations who let China build cheap crap for the US are traitors? And everyone buying something "Made in China" is as well?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. It all makes sense by jameshofo · · Score: 2

    The implied ending to "Yes we can" is "do whatever the hell we want"

    --
    Good leaders run toward problems, bad leaders hide from them.