Slashdot Mirror


Should We Eat Invasive Species?

The Washington Post's Energy & Environment section raises today the question of whether the best way to control certain invasive species is to eat them. The biggest success story on this front in the U.S. has been the lionfish; it destroys the habitat of some other fish in the areas where it's been introduced, but it turns out to be a palatable food fish, too. Its population has gone down since the start of a concerted effort to encourage it as a food, rather than just a nuisance. The article touches on invasive species of fish and crustaceans, but also land animals and plants. I know that garlic mustard (widespread in eastern U.S. forests) is tasty, and so are the blackberries all over Seattle.

64 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. On that note by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:On that note by TrekkieGod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

      I assure you that they try. All the time.

      We're not at the top of the food chain because the other species are nice to us. Or because we're nice, for that matter.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    2. Re:On that note by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

      At a population level, the reverse might actually be true:

      One of the few tactics that any species large enough to gun down faster than it can reproduce, or touchy enough that you can just set its habitat on fire, can embrace to survive, and even thrive, is to be docile and tasty. Humans go crazy for that, and promptly allocate massive amounts of effort, and delicious calories, to encouraging your population to increase dramatically. Sure, then they put a captive-bolt stunner into your brain and chop you up for parts; but being a darwinian winner isn't about quality of life...

    3. Re:On that note by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      I vote the submitter of this article starts by eating some Cane Toad eggs.

    4. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

      Homo sapiens is pretty tough prey. We're tough enough catch and kill on an individual basis, on a group basis it becomes virtually impossible, even if you take away our technology.

      The only predators that can kill humans in comparative safety are ambush predators (salt water crocodiles) and predators more adapted to their environment than we are (sharks). The former are probably the biggest man eaters on the planet and the latter don't regard us as optimal prey, because we're not energy dense enough for them (insert obese American joke here) when compared to their preferred prey.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Plenty of species have benefited from humans without becoming primary sources of food for them. Easy example: Cats and Dogs. Other examples: Squirrels, pigeons, and rats.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:On that note by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

      We are NOT on top of the foodchain. The housecat is. They have us trained to bring them food.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:On that note by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Other example: my roommate.

    8. Re:On that note by tyme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shakrai wrote:

      Plenty of species have benefited from humans without becoming primary sources of food for them. Easy example: Cats and Dogs. Other examples: Squirrels, pigeons, and rats.

      Except that cats, dogs, squirrels, pigeons, and rats have all been (or are) on the menu.

      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
    9. Re:On that note by davester666 · · Score: 2

      OMG...people are bacon flavored! Yum. Time to go shopping.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    10. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, a bunch of zombies walking around staring at the tiny screens in their hands while wearing earbuds. Real tough prey there.

      The only way humans would survive is IF you took their tech away!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    11. Re:On that note by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only predators that can kill humans in comparative safety are ambush predators (salt water crocodiles) and predators more adapted to their environment than we are (sharks).

      You're forgetting mosquitoes (and other insects). When you calculate the biomass of the things, the number of humans killed or injured by insects and the ecological footprint of them, they win.

      "Please -- not green ..."

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:On that note by HiThere · · Score: 2

      You just picked the wrong animal, otherwise you are correct. At the top of the food chain is the microbe. Just like at the bottom.

      Remember, you have more microbe cells in your body than human cells.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Remember, you have more microbe cells in your body than human cells.

      I've seen that repeated many times, but I have never seen any actual figures or evidence to support it.

      I doubt that very much. In order for it to be true, the average "microbe" would have to be incredibly smaller than the average human cell. Otherwise there would be no room for them all. After all, the colon is internal, and the surface of your skin does not actually add up to very much volume.

    14. Re:On that note by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clearly you've never had your cat in your lap at the onset of a sudden summer thunderstorm...

    15. Re:On that note by evilviper · · Score: 3

      Homo sapiens is pretty tough prey.

      That's completely wrong, and any expert will say so. Without our technology and herd mentality, humans are VERY EASY prey.

      We have very low strength for our body mass. Compare us to chimps, cats, etc., and we're weaklings. We don't have any biological weapons to aide in our defense, either. We don't have long, hard and sharp claws, and our jaws aren't powerful enough, nor properly designed to make our teeth practical defensive weapons.

      Humans make difficult prey because of technology. We're well-fed, far away from wilderness, spending the overwhelming majority of our time inside defensive structures, out-of reach of predators, and when we are vulnerable, we have high tech items like knives, keys, or sharpened sticks which make very good defensive weapons. Our herd instinct means an injured individual will get immediate help rather than being food. And furthermore, we've eradicated the overwhelming majority of large predators that could, possibly predate upon us.

      You go out, naked, into the wilderness of Alaska, and see how you do up against the first grizzly bear or a pack of wolves you come across...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:On that note by warrax_666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here: http://www.ted.com/talks/bonni...

      Not being an expert in the field, I cannot vouch for its accuracy.

      --
      HAND.
    17. Re:On that note by dcollins117 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you ever eaten squirrel? Stringy, gamy as hell and hardly any real meat to speak of.

      ... and the portions are so small.

    18. Re:On that note by qwak23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So without our defining characteristics, we're easy prey? Of course! Our intellect and its products (technology, shared learning, etc) are exactly what make us tough prey. Throwing someone into the wilderness of Alaska naked is not a realistic proposition, aside from the fact that our bodies aren't adapted to the cold (again, clothing is technology, and part of who we are), it's akin to taking away a snakes fangs and throwing them back into the wild.

      Some animals are born with physical defenses, some animals are born with the mental capacity to build physical defenses. The former are limited to the environments where their physical characteristics give them some advantage, the latter can put themselves in virtually any environment. Sure, some individuals would fare worse than others, but we wouldn't have spread to every corner of the planet without that ability.

    19. Re:On that note by tyme · · Score: 2

      Jane Q. Public wrote:

      In order for it to be true, the average "microbe" would have to be incredibly smaller than the average human cell

      Indeed: human skin cell = 30 um, red blood cell = 8 um, human X chromosome = 7 um, yeast cell = 3x4 um, mitochondria body = 4x0.8 um, E. coli bacterium = 4x0.6 um. (taken from this page found via a rudimentary Google search, zoom down to the micrometer range)

      Human cells are pretty large, on average, and microbial cells are much smaller.

      That doesn't make the cited factoid any more meaningful, but it is certainly not worthy of doubt based purely on the numbers (that is to say, there are certainly more atoms of calcium in your body than there are human cells, but does that mean that you are, in fact, a lump of chalk?).

      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
    20. Re:On that note by Lotana · · Score: 2

      And WTF is a 'USian'?

      I am surprised you haven't heard of this term or confused in its usage. It is quite recent, fairly widespread and obvious. But just in case:

      USian (Some spell it "US'ian") refers to people from the United States. Its origin is people from other North and South American countries taking offense to being grouped together with the culture/actions of the USA. Quite fascinating how politics shape spoken language!

      It should be clear when you look at the work: US + ian. US stands for "United States" and "ian" is a common post-fix on english words reffering to population groups (eg. Asian, European, etc).

    21. Re:On that note by Kittenman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you ever eaten squirrel? Stringy, gamy as hell and hardly any real meat to speak of.

      ... and the portions are so small.

      caution: may contain nuts

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    22. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 2
      Is that what you tell the natives when they try to get you to stop calling them Indians?

      Nobody wants to generate 'butthurt' and 'draw flames'. However, there are millions of Americans that do not want to be associated with the USA in any way.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    23. Re:On that note by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      salt's a preservative.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  2. blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    every year seattlites eat all the blackberries they can pick. The only thing that cut that down was when people began spraying them. But you cold not possibly get more people eating them, and that didn't dent the population in 50 years. On the otherhand no thinks of them as invasive in the sense they were not natural to live there. the pacifc northwest is berry country. Just a thorny nuisance you have to keep cut back when it encroaches walkways not unlike choking vines on trees.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  3. Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make their parts 'magical', like rhino horn and tiger penis.

  4. Ailens by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    lets hope they dont follow that rule when we branch out, after we have used up the earth's resources.

    ( yes i know, that technically in time the earth will recycle everything we dont take with us, but we wont have that sort of time to wait )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Ailens by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      we aren't using up any resource even in the short term. Helium? most of it just vented from natural gas wells, never collected. just a nat gas engineering problem. Potassium and phosphorous? 2.5% and 0.1% of lithosphere, just an chemical engineeing problem.

  5. Don't see why not. by blackicye · · Score: 2

    If they're palatable and economically harvestable, they're prime candidates for om nom nom nom.

    The Chinese have a saying that roughly translates to: "If it swims, crawls or flies and its backbone faces the Sun, it's edible."

    Lots of invertebrates and crustaceans that don't meet that criteria also still make it to the table. Heh.

    1. Re:Don't see why not. by aevan · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a Cantonese saying "Anything that walks, swims, crawls, or flies, with its back to heaven is edible.", used in South China. It backdates to the 1800s. It's been referenced in some cookbooks (e.g. "The Chinese Kitchen" by Eileen Yin-Fei Lo), and is known/used by some Chinese, and not others.

      Cue supposition based on some searching: the area traded heavily with the West during that time. Take the exotic delicacies and dishes concocted by chefs, add in a language/culture barrier,good old prejudice, and the loss of context in repetition...I can easily imagine it's a Western generalisation/mild slur that got repeated and adopted and over time became adopted as a regional motto of sorts (i.e. isn't 'known' in the Mandarin areas, just the Cantonese south).

      Could be waaay off though.

    2. Re:Don't see why not. by sexconker · · Score: 2

      But could you cite a single species that falsifies the statement?

  6. I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not in the wild but cultivated.

    The cow, the chicken, the pig... these animals have no natural habitat anymore really... yet are in no danger of dying of. Neither for that matter is the domesticated dog or the house cat or the gold fish.

    All small endangered animals can be bred as pets or food. By all means, protect their habitat in the wild but that is no guarantee that they will survive as a species. Maintain them as pets or food in our society though and they'll live as long as we continue to do that.

    As for large animals... encourage farmers to take care of a couple. Seriously, a cattle rancher could take in a few rhinos. Have a special pen for them. Make the whole thing tax deductible until there's some way to recoup the cost. These people breed BILLIONS of animals in captivity. We could do the same with rhinos, elephants, etc.

    Right now one of the things hurting these species is that its very hard to legally own them.

    An animal that belongs to no one will not be protected. We've seen this in Africa where the wild animals are prey for poachers. However, if you give the animals to the local villages and make the animal's survival the villager's responsibility they suddenly stop getting eaten or killed for their ivory.

    This is the solution.

    Anything else will likely harm these species more, waste time, waste money, and accomplish very little.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      We've already done it to great success with the buffalo. They are commercially bred, butchered, and sold around the US. We have a few herds around the country that are each individually able to sustain the species indefinitely.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As to domestication changing the species, yes but the species would survive. Furthermore, if you were so interested in maintaining a legacy strain you could literally select for known original phenotypes thus maintaining the species more exactly as it was found then nature would itself.

      No problem is insolvable.

      As to the jenga tower, there are SOME species that act in that way however most do not.

      For example, is the ferry shrimp found in muddy ditches in California essential to the california ecosystem? Obviously not. They could all go extinct tomorrow without so much as a ripple in our ecosystem.

      Species go extinct all the time and always have and frequently there are little if any ecological consequence because there is enormous redundancy in our ecosystem.

      There are exceptions but those exceptions are the exception.

      An example of just such a species would be the American wolf which did serve a vital role in maintaining the populations of native herd animals.

      The result of removing the wolf is that these herds do not maintain their scale naturally anymore.

      The fix was to allow hunting permits thus human hunters replace the wolf's role in the ecosystem. Sadly, those hunters have a different sensibility then the wolves. The wolves selected the small, the weak, the sick... and thus helped to keep the herds stronger by selecting effectively for the large, the strong, and the healthy.

      Human hunters tend to target animals that look impressive. Thus striking down many times the large, the strong, and the healthy contrary to what the wolves struck down. That is an issue and we should look into that. But it isn't insolvable.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Precisely. A book that theorized on the issue was the Phillip K Dick book "do androids dream of electronic sheep" in which most species were maintained by human beings as a kind of social obligation. It was a mark of social status to own and care for an animal. And through that they maintained many animals that otherwise would have gone extinct.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    4. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Most animals that we haven't domesticated are very difficult to domesticate. Many don't breed well in captivity, require specialized diets, etc. Even something as simple as zebras having a knack for avoiding lassos meant they were never ridden or used as beasts of burden, except in special, limited, usually ceremonial circumstances.

  7. Every species was an invasive species at one time. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

    So in that sense this is the most elegant natural solution.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  8. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a solution to this problem: goats. Turn all that thorny nuisance into yummy meat and cheese.

  9. The problem is by publiclurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can eat all of the blackberries you can get to and the plant is still there.

  10. Nutria by spudnic · · Score: 4, Informative

    They tried this a couple of decades ago in South Louisiana with the nutria. It turns out people weren't waiting in line to eat real life ROUSes. (Rodents Of Unusual Size)

    Now the state offers a $5 bounty per nutria tail turned in.

    --
    load "linux",8,1
  11. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given that 'being eaten' is the plan for plants that go to considerable metabolic expense to produce attractive fruits or berries, those probably aren't good candidates for this strategy. (Admittedly, humans probably excrete more of the seeds into the water treatment plant than birds do, so they probably aren't the ideal customer; but fruits are still the deliberately expendable seed carriers, not life-critical components.)

  12. Re:Kudzu for Energy by overshoot · · Score: 2

    Never mind energy [1] -- goats love it. They can actually snarf it down faster than it grows (which is a trick, let me tell you, in the Gulf States.)

    Kudzu-fed goat milk cheese is perfectly good stuff, or you can just let them feed their kids. Which not long afterward become cabritos. Nom!

    [1] Long-term sustainability issue here unless you return the non-fuel sludge to the area to restore minerals. Not so much of a problem with goats excreting all over place.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  13. Re:Invasive feral cats by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    I'm waiting for recipes....anyone ? :)

    A cat can be substituted for possum in any recipe. You can sample a wide variety of possum and other varmint dishes at West Virginia's annual Road Kill Cookoff. You can check Wikipedia for a summary of laws and regulations concerning collecting and consuming road kill in other states.

  14. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    50 years?

    just wait another 50 years and it's a staple of the eco habitat in seattle and you'll be fined for poisoning them.

    thats what I wonder about the lionfish population, if they eat them to almost extinct in the area.. and it takes 10 years to do so, will greenpeace tell you to quit eating them?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  15. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by IonOtter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Blackberries can be controlled, you just have to invest a little time. Basically? When you pick, tie a small ribbon on the branch you got it from. At the end of the growing season, cut out anything with a ribbon on it, because that vine will never produce fruit again, it will only become a "stringer", which spreads to produce more vines.

    This way, the plant can be controlled and kept to one area. But again, you have to invest time, which not many people have a lot of these days.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  16. Re:Invasive feral cats by IonOtter · · Score: 2

    The crows have figured out how to deal with cane toads.

    They started out by eating them alive, through the mouth, but figured out gutting them was easier.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  17. Japanese Knotweed f'rinstance... by jpellino · · Score: 2

    The typical muni approach is to mow it down - this actually promotes spread.
    Knotweed produces an amazing mono-floral honey. It compares to buckwheat honey and black sage honey.
    It gets a PR spin as "bamboo honey".
    Haven't had it as a veggie yet, but it gets some good reviews.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  18. Garlic Mustard, much beyond the east by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    That weed is at least as far west as the central plains states, and it is spreading quickly. Unless we can train some indigenous critters to start eating it our forests are in danger from what it does to the soil. Even though it is rather tasty we can't possibly eradicate it ourselves just by pulling and/or eating it.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Garlic Mustard, much beyond the east by bikeforever · · Score: 2

      Eric Boerman of Michigan State University appears to be looking for novel protein based methods for controlling the invasive species Garlic Mustard: (this is from MSU's website describing life sciences poster presentations) COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTION OF NOVEL INHIBITORS FOR MYROSINASE Eric Boerman Category: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Section 1 Poster: 33 Location: Lake Huron Room, 9:30 AM-11:30 AM Mentor(s): Leslie Kuhn (Biochemistry and Molecular Biology) Myrosinase is an enzyme found in certain plant and microbe species that is a key component of the biosynthesis pathway of isothiocyanates - allelotoxins that suppress soil microbes that mutualistically benefit many plant species. This system is found in multiple economically-damaging invasive species in North America, such as Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata), which is the focus of this study. Because the invading plants do not require symbiotic soil microbes, they gain a selectionary advantage over native species. The goal of this project is to find novel inhibitors for myrosinase which can hopefully be used to control the spread of garlic mustard and other species. This will be done by computational analysis of ligand binding in myrosinase's active site. The structure of myrosinase is well-documented, and by looking at the manner in which known ligands bind to the active site we hope to determine catalytically-active amino residues within myrosinase. Once the important features within the active site are known, a library of molecules similar in structure to known substrates and cofactors will be assessed for their ability to bind to myrosinase's active site. This will be done computationally so that the list of candidates can be quickly narrowed. Promising candidates will then be tested in vivo to determine their quality as inhibitors of myrosinase.

  19. Re:Every species was an invasive species at one ti by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    The difference being that natural selection is a slow process. What people are doing is causing a much faster change in the ecosystem by moving species around to places they did not evolve in. What we are doing is not a natural process.

  20. Re:Himalayan Blackberries by wezelboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I loathe the Himalayan Blackberry. The berries, while large and numerous, are bland. They store a lot of energy in their roots quickly, so once they get a foothold, they send out shoots everywhere- especially after you cut them back.

    Goats are the best remedy. I had a single goat clear an acre of 8-10' tall bramble in a span of a few months. For good. They eat new shoots as soon as they appear until the blackberry roots have expended all their stored energy.

    If you don't have a goat, then you must remain vigilant. I have a zero tolerance policy towards blackberries. If I see one on my property, it dies.

  21. How about evangelical Christians? by AndyKron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can we eat evangelical Christians? They're pretty invasive.

  22. Feral pig is excellent, but takes getting used to. by hey! · · Score: 2

    Here in Boston we don't have a feral pig problem, but we do have gourmet butcher shops that sell game and exotic meat. I've tried feral pig and it's good, but intense -- intense enough that I wasn't sure I liked it at first. The best way I can describe it is "extremely piggy".

    I'll explain. Imagine on one hand a cooked chicken breast. Imagine on the other hand a regular, commercial pork chop. There's a clear difference between the two, but it's ... subtle. Now imagine a place far beyond the other hand, where the difference is as subtle as being whacked in the face with a shovel. In an era where pork is marketed as "the other whtie meat" the distinctive flavor of pork has been toned down to the point where nobody will be offended, but feral pig is unabashedly swine-y. Not everyone will like it. By *I* do.

    According to the article feral pigs reproduce so successfully in many places that it would be impossible to put a dent in the populations through hunting, but I choose to call that "sustainable". Trying to eat these animals into oblivion (if you can stomach them) is an environmental "can't lose", especially if you count the environmental cost of industrial scale hog farming. I'm very happy to pay some guy from Texas to remove the problem from his ranch and send it up here so I can put it on my plate.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  23. Just wait a few hundred years by lowkster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honey bees are an invasive species. They were brought to the Americas in the 1600's. Now people are panicking about colony collapse and trying to save this invasive species. I thought that is how nature works, life seeks out new and better environments to grow in. Does it matter if a bee is blown across the ocean by a hurricane or carried over by a Spaniard? Or if a mussel makes to the great lakes on the bottom of a tanker or on a piece of drift wood?

  24. Give Me More by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Florida has a lovely python population and they can be eaten or made into boots. We have tilapia in abundance. We have the the snake head fish from the orient as well as peacock and rainbow bass and also some species of piranha. I welcome all of these invaders. We also have armadillos and iguanas both of which also are good eating. All in all i want more. I wish the jumping silver carp as well as the big head carp would invade Florida big time. Poison toads are killing a few pets but other that and one nasty, African snail that can actually eat the plaster off your exterior walls i tend to love the exotics. They are fun to catch and some get really large. And we don't even want to get into the good things that Kudzu vine can do if properly used. We have invasive bamboos which are also wonderful. Some items seen to be a curse tend to become valued. The dreaded zebra mussel in the Great Lakes has become a great food source for sturgeon and the water is cleaner for having them. Lampreys were cursed and considered an emergency and now people cook and eat lampreys. Frankly i think the fight against most invasive species simply creates jobs for public employees.

    1. Re:Give Me More by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly i think the fight against most invasive species simply creates jobs for public employees.

      That's easy to think because it's easy to forget about the species that we used to have, but don't any longer.I'm old, so I do remember the species we used to have back in the 60s. but are long gone, like the rock crab, which is way better eating than the tiny Asian shore crab that displaced it.

      Another thing to remember is that Florida is a very big state, so if you simply list all the edible invasive animals, it seems like a cornucopia. But if you look at the situation in habitat by habitat, the situation looks different.The problem these things is that they don't have native predators -- they overwhelm the resources within a habitat. That means you lose everything else in that habitat that was dependent, directly or indirectly, on resources consumed by the exotic. That includes many desirable native species.

      Take Tilapia. Of course the're edible, they're a popular aquaculture fish, but they're not *great* eating. They're like tofu: it's all about what you cook them *with*. When they take over a body of water, they displace native fish that are actually *better* eating. So instead of a nice bass, you end up catching a mediocre white fish you can buy cheaper than bait at the supermarket anyway.

      Or Asian carp. They are indeed edible, in fact good if you know how to prepare them, but they also displace many, many desirable native gamefish: bass, crappie, catfish, trout and salmon, all of which are superb eating. For a whole list of edible animals you might not be aware of, you get one in their place. That's a raw deal.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  25. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That sounds pretty complicated. I would just install a Blackberry Enterprise Server, and that would easily control all my blackberries.

  26. Re:Invasive feral cats by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    It is recommended that the dish be left to simmer for five hours before being garnished with bush plums and mistletoe berries.

    And here is the one line answer on how to eat pretty much anything: boil the crap out of it until you render it to component molecules. Sprinkle something less offensive over it.

    Ice cream for desert.

    What's not to like?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  27. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blackberries can be controlled

    Indeed! In our back yard, they are losing the battle against the ivy and bamboo! :)

  28. Not all are edible though... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 2
    The first two invasive species that I can think of, off the top of my head are kudzu and zebra mussels.

    Kudzu : AKA "the devils ivy" and "the vine that ate The South" I used to work in the landscaping business and have actually sold this stuff as an indoor decorative plant. I'm pretty sure that people taking it home and putting it in their yard instead is why we're seeing it up in Canada now. Out of curiosity, I've actually tasted kudzu leaves and it's not something I'd ever want in a salad or stewed greens. (but other people enjoy the taste of say grape leaves, so that doesn't completely rule it out.) There are apparently uses for the starch derived from the roots, but I have no experience with that. The damned stuff grows faster than goats can eat it, which is saying a lot. It grows so fast that in ideal conditions you can SEE it growing, you'd almost swear it was capable of following you. I think the best use isn't as food, but as biomass stock. The problem with using it as biomass is that it exhausts the soil pretty quickly.

    zebra mussels. As far as I know, in the areas infested by them, the mussels are not edible because of the various nasty things they filter out of the water and sequester in their tissues. I don't think ANY Great Lakes shellfish would be edible for that reason. It used to be you couldn't eat any fish caught in the Great Lakes, especially the lower lakes, because of industrial nasties like mercury and dioxin accumulation. I seem to recall that white fleshed fish species are safe now, as an occasional menu item only. Filter feeders from the Great Lakes, especially if eaten regularly like we'd have to do to keep them under control, is probably still a Bad Idea (TM Animaniacs)

    Overall; my concern is that deciding to eat the invasive species is tantamount to an admission of defeat. It's certainly a step towards learning to simply accept that they are part of the local food chain. I am not an ecology and conservation expert by any means, but I think with at least some of the invasive species we may still have a shot at eradicating them if necessary. (if Monsanto or Dupont manage to come up with a kudzu specific herbicide that degrades elegantly/cleanly they'll make a mint down in the southern US)

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:Not all are edible though... by tyme · · Score: 2

      morethanapapercert wrote:

      my concern is that deciding to eat the invasive species is tantamount to an admission of defeat.

      While I don't think that we should accept the status quo of irresponsibly introducing invasive species to our local environments, I think it's a wonderful idea to try eating our way out of the problems we've already created. For example, the Northern Snakehead is a recent and particular problem in my region (Washington D.C. Metropolitan area) and, coincidentally, is quite tasty. If we could manage to fish them to extinction it would be all for the best, and should be encouraged. Of course this may not work for many invasive species (some reproduce too rapidly to be effectively controlled by human predation, others might not be edible or palatable), so this sort of solution should be considered only as a second (or lower) tier option.

      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
  29. This is what the Everglades needs... by Tangential · · Score: 2

    We need to stimulate a big demand for wild pythons and boas in South Florida. If they became a locavore food, then dealing with their invasion in South Florida would become much easier.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  30. The most pernicious invasive species? by smhsmh · · Score: 2

    Without doubt the most significant, consequential, and pernicious invasive species on most parts of the planet -- I hear there are colonies now even on Antarctica -- is homo sapiens. But it would not be wise to start eating them.

  31. Wineberries! by Spugglefink · · Score: 2

    Wineberries (Rubus phoenicolasius) are considered an invasive, noxious species to be destroyed on sight. But why would you want to destroy something so very delicious and tasty? I have some growing on my property that drove all my fancy named cultivars to extinction, and good riddance. These berries are better tasting anyway, and the seeds were free from heaven above, or at least a bird's cloaca from above. Bird shit never tasted so good.